44
Average Days in Review
97%
Percent of Research Articles Cited within Two Years of Publication
24
Average Days to Publication from Acceptance
Annual HTML+PDF Usage

CURRENT ISSUE

Volume 6Issue 3June 2021

EDITOR IN CHIEF: Dr. Jack A. Gilbert

Explore mSystems

Editor in Chief

mSystems EiC Gilbert
Dr. Jack A. Gilbert

Editor in Chief (2025) | University of California San Diego

Jack A. Gilbert is a Professor in Pediatrics and the Scripps Institution of Oceanography. Dr. Gilbert uses molecular tools to test fundamental hypotheses in microbial ecology. He cofounded the Earth Microbiome Project and has authored more than 350 peer-reviewed publications and book chapters on microbial ecology.

Board of Editors

Explore mSystems

Editor in Chief

JB EiC Silhavy
Dr. Thomas J. Silhavy

Editor in Chief (2021) | Princeton University

Thomas J. Silhavy is the Warner-Lambert Parke-Davis Professor of Molecular Biology at Princeton University. He is a bacterial geneticist who has made fundamental contributions to several different research fields.

Editorial Board

  • mSystemsArticle
    Comparative Genomic Analysis of Rapidly Evolving SARS-CoV-2 Reveals Mosaic Pattern of Phylogeographical Distribution

    Comparative Genomic Analysis of Rapidly Evolving SARS-CoV-2 Reveals Mosaic Pattern of Phylogeographical Distribution

    ABSTRACT

    The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) that started in Wuhan, China, in December 2019 has spread worldwide, emerging as a global pandemic. The severe respiratory pneumonia caused by novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has so far claimed more than 0.38 million lives and has impacted human lives worldwide. However, as the novel SARS-CoV-2 virus displays high transmission rates, the underlying genomic severity is required to be fully understood. We studied the complete genomes of 95 SARS-CoV-2 strains from different geographical regions worldwide to uncover the pattern of the spread of the virus. We show that there is no direct transmission pattern of the virus among neighboring countries, suggesting that its spread is a result of travel of infected humans to different countries. We revealed unique single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in nonstructural protein 13 (nsp13), nsp14, nsp15, and nsp16 (ORF1b polyproteins) and in the S-protein within 10 viral isolates from the United States. These viral proteins are involved in RNA replication and binding with the human receptors, indicating that the viral variants that are circulating in the population of the United States are different from those circulating in the populations of other countries. In addition, we found an amino acid addition in nsp16 (mRNA cap-1 methyltransferase) of a U.S. isolate (GenBank accession no. MT188341.1) leading to a shift in the amino acid frame from position 2540 onward. Through comparative structural analysis of the wild-type and mutant proteins, we showed that this addition of a phenylalanine residue renders the protein in the mutant less stable, which might affect mRNA cap-1 methyltransferase function. We further analyzed the SARS-CoV-2–human interactome, which revealed that the interferon signaling pathway is targeted by orf1ab during infection and that it also interacts with NF-κB-repressing factor (NKRF), which is a potential regulator of interleukin-8 (IL-8). We propose that targeting this interaction may subsequently improve the health condition of COVID-19 patients. Our analysis also emphasized that SARS-CoV-2 manipulates spliceosome machinery during infection; hence, targeting splicing might affect viral replication. In conclusion, the replicative machinery of SARS-CoV-2 is targeting interferon and the notch signaling pathway along with spliceosome machinery to evade host challenges.
    IMPORTANCE The COVID-19 pandemic continues to storm the world, with over 6.5 million cases worldwide. The severity of the disease varies with the territories and is mainly influenced by population density and age factor. In this study, we analyzed the transmission pattern of 95 SARS-CoV-2 genomes isolated from 11 different countries. Our study also revealed several nonsynonymous mutations in ORF1b and S-proteins and the impact on their structural stability. Our analysis showed the manipulation of host system by viral proteins through SARS-CoV-2–human protein interactome, which can be useful to understand the impact of virus on human health.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Wang Q, Zhang Y, Wu L, Niu S, Song C, Zhang Z, Lu G, Qiao C, Hu Y, Yuen KY, Wang Q, Zhou H, Yan J, Qi J. 2020. Structural and functional basis of SARS-CoV-2 entry by using human ACE2. Cell 181:894–904.e9.
    2.
    Walls AC, Park YJ, Tortorici MA, Wall A, McGuire AT, Veesler D. 2020. Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. Cell 181:281–292.e6.
    3.
    Wu A, Peng Y, Huang B, Ding X, Wang X, Niu P, Meng J, Zhu Z, Zhang Z, Wang J, Sheng J, Quan L, Xia Z, Tan W, Cheng G, Jiang T. 2020. Genome composition and divergence of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) originating in China. Cell Host Microbe 27:325–328.
    4.
    Tyrrell DA, Bynoe ML. 1966. Cultivation of viruses from a high proportion of patients with colds. Lancet i:76–77.
    5.
    Woo PC, Lau SK, Lam CS, Lau CC, Tsang AK, Lau JH, Bai R, Teng JL, Tsang CC, Wang M, Zheng BJ, Chan KH, Yuen KY. 2012. Discovery of seven novel mammalian and avian coronaviruses in the genus deltacoronavirus supports bat coronaviruses as the gene source of alphacoronavirus and betacoronavirus and avian coronaviruses as the gene source of gammacoronavirus and deltacoronavirus. J Virol 86:3995–4008.
    6.
    Li F. 2016. Structure, function, and evolution of coronavirus spike proteins. Annu Rev Virol 3:237–261.
    7.
    Tang Q, Song Y, Shi M, Cheng Y, Zhang W, Xia XQ. 2015. Inferring the hosts of coronavirus using dual statistical models based on nucleotide composition. Sci Rep 5:17155.
    8.
    Fehr AR, Perlman S. 2015. Coronaviruses: an overview of their replication and pathogenesis. Methods Mol Biol 1282:1–23.
    9.
    Lv L, Li G, Chen J, Liang X, Li Y. 2020. Comparative genomic analysis revealed specific mutation pattern between human coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 and Bat-SARSr-CoV RaTG13. bioXiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.27.969006.
    10.
    Lau SK, Woo PC, Li KS, Huang Y, Tsoi HW, Wong BH, Wong SS, Leung SY, Chan KH, Yuen KY. 2005. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-like virus in Chinese horseshoe bats. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:14040–14045.
    11.
    Meyer B, Muller MA, Corman VM, Reusken CB, Ritz D, Godeke GJ, Lattwein E, Kallies S, Siemens A, van Beek J, Drexler JF, Muth D, Bosch BJ, Wernery U, Koopmans MP, Wernery R, Drosten C. 2014. Antibodies against MERS coronavirus in dromedary camels, United Arab Emirates, 2003 and 2013. Emerg Infect Dis 20:552–559.
    12.
    Zhang C, Zheng W, Huang X, Bell EW, Zhou X, Zhang Y. 2020. Protein structure and sequence reanalysis of 2019-nCoV genome refutes snakes as its intermediate host and the unique similarity between its spike protein insertions and HIV-1. J Proteome Res 19:1351–1360.
    13.
    Bajaj A, Purohit HJ. 2020. Understanding SARS-CoV-2: genetic diversity, transmission and cure in human. Indian J Microbiol 60:398–401.
    14.
    Neuman BW, Adair BD, Yoshioka C, Quispe JD, Orca G, Kuhn P, Milligan RA, Yeager M, Buchmeier MJ. 2006. Supramolecular architecture of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus revealed by electron cryomicroscopy. J Virol 80:7918–7928.
    15.
    Barcena M, Oostergetel GT, Bartelink W, Faas FG, Verkleij A, Rottier PJ, Koster AJ, Bosch BJ. 2009. Cryo-electron tomography of mouse hepatitis virus: insights into the structure of the coronavirion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:582–587.
    16.
    Chen Y, Liu Q, Guo D. 2020. Emerging coronaviruses: genome structure, replication, and pathogenesis. J Med Virol 92:418–423.
    17.
    Collins AR, Knobler RL, Powell H, Buchmeier MJ. 1982. Monoclonal antibodies to murine hepatitis virus-4 (strain JHM) define the viral glycoprotein responsible for attachment and cell–cell fusion. Virology 119:358–371.
    18.
    Neuman BW, Kiss G, Kunding AH, Bhella D, Baksh MF, Connelly S, Droese B, Klaus JP, Makino S, Sawicki SG, Siddell SG, Stamou DG, Wilson IA, Kuhn P, Buchmeier MJ. 2011. A structural analysis of M protein in coronavirus assembly and morphology. J Struct Biol 174:11–22.
    19.
    Ruch TR, Machamer CE. 2012. The coronavirus E protein: assembly and beyond. Viruses 4:363–382.
    20.
    McBride R, van Zyl M, Fielding BC. 2014. The coronavirus nucleocapsid is a multifunctional protein. Viruses 6:2991–3018.
    21.
    Yu X, Yang R. 2020. COVID-19 transmission through asymptomatic carriers is a challenge to containment. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 14:474–475.
    22.
    Lu R, Zhao X, Li J, Niu P, Yang B, Wu H, Wang W, Song H, Huang B, Zhu N, Bi Y, Ma X, Zhan F, Wang L, Hu T, Zhou H, Hu Z, Zhou W, Zhao L, Chen J, Meng Y, Wang J, Lin Y, Yuan J, Xie Z, Ma J, Liu WJ, Wang D, Xu W, Holmes EC, Gao GF, Wu G, Chen W, Shi W, Tan W. 2020. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet 395:565–574.
    23.
    Sah R, Rodriguez-Morales AJ, Jha R, Chu DKW, Gu H, Peiris M, Bastola A, Lal BK, Ojha HC, Rabaan AA, Zambrano LI, Costello A, Morita K, Pandey BD, Poon L. 2020. Complete genome sequence of a 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) strain isolated in Nepal. Microbiol Resour Announc 9:e00169-20.
    24.
    Ren LL, Wang YM, Wu ZQ, Xiang ZC, Guo L, Xu T, Jiang YZ, Xiong Y, Li YJ, Li XW, Li H, Fan GH, Gu XY, Xiao Y, Gao H, Xu JY, Yang F, Wang XM, Wu C, Chen L, Liu YW, Liu B, Yang J, Wang XR, Dong J, Li L, Huang CL, Zhao JP, Hu Y, Cheng ZS, Liu LL, Qian ZH, Qin C, Jin Q, Cao B, Wang JW. 2020. Identification of a novel coronavirus causing severe pneumonia in human: a descriptive study. Chin Med J (Engl) 133:1015–1024.
    25.
    Coronaviridae Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. 2020. The species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2. Nat Microbiol 5:536–544.
    26.
    Yadav PD, Potdar VA, Choudhary ML, Nyayanit DA, Agrawal M, Jadhav SM, Majumdar TD, Shete-Aich A, Basu A, Abraham P, Cherian SS. 2020. Full-genome sequences of the first two SARS-CoV-2 viruses from India. Indian J Med Res 151:200–209.
    27.
    Tilocca B, Soggiu A, Sanguinetti M, Musella V, Britti D, Bonizzi L, Urbani A, Roncada P. 2020. Comparative computational analysis of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein epitopes in taxonomically related coronaviruses. Microbes Infect 22:188–194.
    28.
    Tilocca B, Soggiu A, Musella V, Britti D, Sanguinetti M, Urbani A, Roncada P. 2020. Molecular basis of COVID-19 relationships in different species: a one health perspective. Microbes Infect 22:218–220.
    29.
    Snijder EJ, Decroly E, Ziebuhr J. 2016. The nonstructural proteins directing coronavirus RNA synthesis and processing. Adv Virus Res 96:59–126.
    30.
    Jang KJ, Jeong S, Kang DY, Sp N, Yang YM, Kim DE. 2020. A high ATP concentration enhances the cooperative translocation of the SARS coronavirus helicase nsP13 in the unwinding of duplex RNA. Sci Rep 10:4481.
    31.
    Becares M, Pascual-Iglesias A, Nogales A, Sola I, Enjuanes L, Zuñiga S. 2016. Mutagenesis of coronavirus nsp14 reveals its potential role in modulation of the innate immune response. J Virol 90:5399–5414.
    32.
    Athmer J, Fehr AR, Grunewald M, Smith EC, Denison MR, Perlman S. 2017. In situ tagged nsp15 reveals interactions with coronavirus replication/Transcription complex-associated proteins. mBio 8:e02320-16.
    33.
    von Grotthuss M, Wyrwicz LS, Rychlewski L. 2003. mRNA cap-1 methyltransferase in the SARS genome. Cell 113:701–702.
    34.
    Hermjakob H, Montecchi-Palazzi L, Lewington C, Mudali S, Kerrien S, Orchard S, Vingron M, Roechert B, Roepstorff P, Valencia A, Margalit H, Armstrong J, Bairoch A, Cesareni G, Sherman D, Apweiler R. 2004. IntAct: an open source molecular interaction database. Nucleic Acids Res 32:D452–D455.
    35.
    Gao Y, Yan L, Huang Y, Liu F, Zhao Y, Cao L, Wang T, Sun Q, Ming Z, Zhang L, Ge J, Zheng L, Zhang Y, Wang H, Zhu Y, Zhu C, Hu T, Hua T, Zhang B, Yang X, Li J, Yang H, Liu Z, Xu W, Guddat LW, Wang Q, Lou Z, Rao Z. 2020. Structure of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase from COVID-19 virus. Science 368:779–782.
    36.
    Xia S, Liu M, Wang C, Xu W, Lan Q, Feng S, Qi F, Bao L, Du L, Liu S, Qin C, Sun F, Shi Z, Zhu Y, Jiang S, Lu L. 2020. Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 (previously 2019-nCoV) infection by a highly potent pan-coronavirus fusion inhibitor targeting its spike protein that harbors a high capacity to mediate membrane fusion. Cell Res 30:343–355.
    37.
    Khailany RA, Safdar M, Ozaslan M. 2020. Genomic characterization of a novel SARS-CoV-2. Gene Rep 113:100682.
    38.
    Goncalves A, Burckstummer T, Dixit E, Scheicher R, Gorna MW, Karayel E, Sugar C, Stukalov A, Berg T, Kralovics R, Planyavsky M, Bennett KL, Colinge J, Superti-Furga G. 2011. Functional dissection of the TBK1 molecular network. PLoS One 6:e23971.
    39.
    Wang C, Chen T, Zhang J, Yang M, Li N, Xu X, Cao X. 2009. The E3 ubiquitin ligase Nrdp1 'preferentially' promotes TLR-mediated production of type I interferon. Nat Immunol 10:744–752.
    40.
    Tetsuka T, Uranishi H, Imai H, Ono T, Sonta S, Takahashi N, Asamitsu K, Okamoto T. 2000. Inhibition of nuclear factor-kappaB-mediated transcription by association with the amino-terminal enhancer of split, a Groucho-related protein lacking WD40 repeats. J Biol Chem 275:4383–4390.
    41.
    Schett G, Sticherling M, Neurath MF. 2020. COVID-19: risk for cytokine targeting in chronic inflammatory diseases? Nat Rev Immunol 20:271–272.
    42.
    Darzacq X, Jady BE, Verheggen C, Kiss AM, Bertrand E, Kiss T. 2002. Cajal body-specific small nuclear RNAs: a novel class of 2'-O-methylation and pseudouridylation guide RNAs. EMBO J 21:2746–2756.
    43.
    Neuman BW, Joseph JS, Saikatendu KS, Serrano P, Chatterjee A, Johnson MA, Liao L, Klaus JP, Yates JR, III, Wuthrich K, Stevens RC, Buchmeier MJ, Kuhn P. 2008. Proteomics analysis unravels the functional repertoire of coronavirus nonstructural protein 3. J Virol 82:5279–5294.
    44.
    Jourdan SS, Osorio F, Hiscox JA. 2012. An interactome map of the nucleocapsid protein from a highly pathogenic North American porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus strain generated using SILAC-based quantitative proteomics. Proteomics 12:1015–1023.
    45.
    Ghosh G, Adams JA. 2011. Phosphorylation mechanism and structure of serine-arginine protein kinases. FEBS J 278:587–597.
    46.
    Page-McCaw PS, Amonlirdviman K, Sharp PA. 1999. PUF60: a novel U2AF65-related splicing activity. RNA 5:1548–1560.
    47.
    Agafonov DE, Kastner B, Dybkov O, Hofele RV, Liu WT, Urlaub H, Lührmann R, Stark H. 2016. Molecular architecture of the human U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP. Science 351:1416–1420.
    48.
    Bojkova D, Klann K, Koch B, Widera M, Krause D, Cinatl C, Sandra C, Cinatl J, Münch C. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 infected host cell proteomics reveal potential therapy targets. Preprint doi:
    49.
    Rizzo P, Vieceli Dalla Sega F, Fortini F, Marracino L, Rapezzi C, Ferrari R. 2020. COVID-19 in the heart and the lungs: could we “Notch” the inflammatory storm? Basic Res Cardiol 115:31.
    50.
    Takeuchi H, Schneider M, Williamson DB, Ito A, Takeuchi M, Handford PA, Haltiwanger RS. 2018. Two novel protein O-glucosyltransferases that modify sites distinct from POGLUT1 and affect Notch trafficking and signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:E8395–E8402.
    51.
    McMillan BJ, Zimmerman B, Egan ED, Lofgren M, Xu X, Hesser A, Blacklow SC. 2017. Structure of human POFUT1, its requirement in ligand-independent oncogenic Notch signaling, and functional effects of Dowling-Degos mutations. Glycobiology 27:777–786.
    52.
    Gordon DE, Jang GM, Bouhaddou M, Xu J, Obernier K, White KM, O’Meara MJ, Rezelj VV, Guo JZ, Swaney DL, Tummino TA, Hüttenhain R, Kaake RM, Richards AL, Tutuncuoglu B, Foussard H, Batra J, Haas K, Modak M, Kim M, Haas P, Polacco BJ, Braberg H, Fabius JM, Eckhardt M, Soucheray M, Bennett MJ, Cakir M, McGregor MJ, Li Q, Meyer B, Roesch F, Vallet T, Mac Kain A, Miorin L, Moreno E, Naing ZZC, Zhou Y, Peng S, Shi Y, Zhang Z, Shen W, Kirby IT, Melnyk JE, Chorba JS, Lou K, Dai SA, Barrio-Hernandez I, Memon D, Hernandez-Armenta C, et al. 2020. A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing. Nature 583:459–468.
    53.
    Shi CS, Qi HY, Boularan C, Huang NN, Abu-Asab M, Shelhamer JH, Kehrl JH. 2014. SARS-coronavirus open reading frame-9b suppresses innate immunity by targeting mitochondria and the MAVS/TRAF3/TRAF6 signalosome. J Immunol 193:3080–3089.
    54.
    Singh K, Chen Y-C, Judy JT, Seifuddin F, Tunc I, Pirooznia M. 2020. Network analysis and transcriptome profiling identify autophagic and mitochondrial dysfunctions in SARS-CoV-2 infection. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.13.092536.
    55.
    Mason RJ. 2020. Pathogenesis of COVID-19 from a cell biology perspective. Eur Respir J 55:2000607.
    56.
    Ronco C, Reis T, Husain-Syed F. 2020. Management of acute kidney injury in patients with COVID-19. Lancet Respir Med 8:738–742.
    57.
    Holdt B, Peters E, Nagel HR, Steiner M. 2008. An automated assay of urinary alanine aminopeptidase activity. Clin Chem Lab Med 46:537–540.
    58.
    Li J, Guo M, Tian X, Liu C, Wang X, Yang X, Wu P, Xiao Z, Qu Y, Yin Y, Fu J, Zhu Z, Liu Z, Peng C, Zhu T, Liang Q. 2020. Virus-host interactome and proteomic survey of PMBCs from COVID-19 patients reveal potential virulence factors influencing SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.31.019216.
    59.
    Zhong J, Tang J, Ye C, Dong L. 2020. The immunology of COVID-19: is immune modulation an option for treatment? Lancet Rheumatol 2:e428–e436.
    60.
    Coperchini F, Chiovato L, Croce L, Magri F, Rotondi M. 2020. The cytokine storm in COVID-19: an overview of the involvement of the chemokine/chemokine-receptor system. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 53:25–32.
    61.
    Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S, Krüger N, Herrler T, Erichsen S, Schiergens TS, Herrler G, Wu N-H, Nitsche A, Müller MA, Drosten C, Pöhlmann S. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell 181:271–280.e8.
    62.
    Yan R, Zhang Y, Li Y, Xia L, Guo Y, Zhou Q. 2020. Structural basis for the recognition of SARS-CoV-2 by full-length human ACE2. Science 367:1444–1448.
    63.
    Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, Xiang J, Wang Y, Song B, Gu X, Guan L, Wei Y, Li H, Wu X, Xu J, Tu S, Zhang Y, Chen H, Cao B. 2020. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 395:1054–1062.
    64.
    Huang X, Wei F, Yang Z, Li M, Liu L, Chen K. 2020. Lactose dehydrogenase in patients with severe COVID-19: a meta-analysis of retrospective study. Prehosp Disaster Med doi:
    65.
    Cheng MP, Papenburg J, Desjardins M, Kanjilal S, Quach C, Libman M, Dittrich S, Yansouni CP. 2020. Diagnostic testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus-2: a narrative review. Ann Intern Med doi:
    66.
    Kryazhimskiy S, Plotkin JB. 2008. The population genetics of dN/dS. PLoS Genet 4:e1000304.
    67.
    Kosakovsky Pond SL, Frost SD. 2005. Not so different after all: a comparison of methods for detecting amino acid sites under selection. Mol Biol Evol 22:1208–1222.
    68.
    Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069.
    69.
    Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075.
    70.
    Nakamura T, Yamada KD, Tomii K, Katoh K. 2018. Parallelization of MAFFT for large-scale multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 34:2490–2492.
    71.
    Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S, Holden MT, Fookes M, Falush D, Keane JA, Parkhill J. 2015. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics 31:3691–3693.
    72.
    Tamura K, Nei M. 1993. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol 10:512–526.
    73.
    Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. 2016. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33:1870–1874.
    74.
    Letunic I, Bork P. 2016. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v3: an online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees. Nucleic Acids Res 44:W242–W245.
    75.
    Zhou Z, Alikhan NF, Sergeant MJ, Luhmann N, Vaz C, Francisco AP, Carrico JA, Achtman M. 2018. GrapeTree: visualization of core genomic relationships among 100,000 bacterial pathogens. Genome Res 28:1395–1404.
    76.
    Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792–1797.
    77.
    Treangen TJ, Ondov BD, Koren S, Phillippy AM. 2014. The Harvest suite for rapid core-genome alignment and visualization of thousands of intraspecific microbial genomes. Genome Biol 15:524.
    78.
    Waterhouse A, Bertoni M, Bienert S, Studer G, Tauriello G, Gumienny R, Heer FT, de Beer TAP, Rempfer C, Bordoli L, Lepore R, Schwede T. 2018. SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res 46:W296–W303.
    79.
    Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE. 2004. UCSF Chimera–a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 25:1605–1612.
    80.
    Venselaar H, Te Beek TA, Kuipers RK, Hekkelman ML, Vriend G. 2010. Protein structure analysis of mutations causing inheritable diseases. An e-Science approach with life scientist friendly interfaces. BMC Bioinformatics 11:548.
    81.
    Gelly JC, Joseph AP, Srinivasan N, de Brevern AG. 2011. iPBA: a tool for protein structure comparison using sequence alignment strategies. Nucleic Acids Res 39:W18–W23.
    82.
    Capriotti E, Fariselli P, Casadio R. 2005. I-Mutant2.0: predicting stability changes upon mutation from the protein sequence or structure. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W306–W310.
    83.
    Laskowski RA. 2001. PDBsum: summaries and analyses of PDB structures. Nucleic Acids Res 29:221–222.
    84.
    Laskowski RA, Jabłońska J, Pravda L, Vařeková RS, Thornton JM. 2018. PDBsum: structural summaries of PDB entries. Protein Sci 27:129–134.
    85.
    Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B, Ideker T. 2003. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res 13:2498–2504.
    86.
    Bindea G, Mlecnik B, Hackl H, Charoentong P, Tosolini M, Kirilovsky A, Fridman WH, Pages F, Trajanoski Z, Galon J. 2009. ClueGO: a Cytoscape plug-in to decipher functionally grouped gene ontology and pathway annotation networks. Bioinformatics 25:1091–1093.
    87.
    Kanehisa M, Goto S. 2000. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 28:27–30.
    88.
    Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Kawashima M, Furumichi M, Tanabe M. 2016. KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D457–D462.
    89.
    Fabregat A, Jupe S, Matthews L, Sidiropoulos K, Gillespie M, Garapati P, Haw R, Jassal B, Korninger F, May B, Milacic M, Roca CD, Rothfels K, Sevilla C, Shamovsky V, Shorser S, Varusai T, Viteri G, Weiser J, Wu G, Stein L, Hermjakob H, D'Eustachio P. 2018. The Reactome Pathway Knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res 46:D649–D655.
    90.
    Pond SL, Frost SD, Muse SV. 2005. HyPhy: hypothesis testing using phylogenies. Bioinformatics 21:676–679.
    91.
    Weaver S, Shank SD, Spielman SJ, Li M, Muse SV, Kosakovsky Pond SL. 2018. Datamonkey 2.0: a modern Web application for characterizing selective and other evolutionary processes. Mol Biol Evol 35:773–777.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSystems
    Volume 5Number 425 August 2020
    eLocator: e00505-20
    Editor: Ileana M. Cristea
    Princeton University

    History

    Received: 5 June 2020
    Accepted: 14 July 2020
    Published online: 28 July 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. COVID-2019
    2. SARS-CoV-2
    3. viruses

    Contributors

    Authors

    Roshan Kumar
    P.G. Department of Zoology, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Bihar, India
    Helianthous Verma
    Department of Zoology, Ramjas College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
    Nirjara Singhvi
    Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
    Utkarsh Sood
    The Energy and Resources Institute, New Delhi, India
    Vipin Gupta
    PhiXGen Private Limited, Gurugram, Haryana, India
    Mona Singh
    PhiXGen Private Limited, Gurugram, Haryana, India
    Rashmi Kumari
    Department of Zoology, College of Commerce, Arts & Science, Patliputra University, Patna, Bihar, India
    Princy Hira
    Department of Zoology, Maitreyi College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India
    Shekhar Nagar
    Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
    Chandni Talwar
    Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
    Namita Nayyar
    Department of Zoology, Sri Venkateswara College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India
    Shailly Anand
    Department of Zoology, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India
    Charu Dogra Rawat
    Department of Zoology, Ramjas College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
    Mansi Verma
    Department of Zoology, Sri Venkateswara College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India
    Ram Krishan Negi
    Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
    Yogendra Singh
    Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
    The Energy and Resources Institute, New Delhi, India

    Editor

    Ileana M. Cristea
    Editor
    Princeton University

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Rup Lal, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSystemsArticle
    Evaluation of CRISPR Diversity in the Human Skin Microbiome for Personal Identification

    Evaluation of CRISPR Diversity in the Human Skin Microbiome for Personal Identification

    ABSTRACT

    The highly personalized human skin microbiome may serve as a viable marker in personal identification. Amplicon sequencing resolution using 16S rRNA cannot identify bacterial communities sufficiently to discriminate between individuals. Thus, novel higher-resolution genetic markers are required for forensic purposes. The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs) are prokaryotic genetic elements that can provide a history of infections encountered by the bacteria. The sequencing of CRISPR spacers may provide phylogenetic information with higher resolution than other markers. However, using spacer sequencing for discrimination of personal skin microbiome is difficult due to limited information on CRISPRs in human skin microbiomes. It remains unclear whether personal microbiome discrimination can be achieved using spacer diversity or which CRISPRs will be forensically relevant. We identified common CRISPRs in the human skin microbiome via metagenomic reconstruction and used amplicon sequencing for deep sequencing of spacers. We successfully reconstructed 24 putative CRISPR arrays using metagenomic data sets. A total of 1,223,462 reads from three CRISPR arrays revealed that spacers in the skin microbiome were highly personalized, and conserved repeats were commonly shared between individuals. These individual specificities observed using CRISPR typing were confirmed by comparing the CRISPR diversity to microbiome diversity assessed using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. CRISPR typing achieved 95.2% accuracy in personal classification, whereas 16S rRNA sequencing only achieved 52.6%. These results suggest that sequencing CRISPRs in the skin microbiome may be a more powerful approach for personal identification and ecological studies compared to conventional 16S rRNA sequencing.
    IMPORTANCE Microbial community diversity analysis can be utilized to characterize the personal microbiome that varies between individuals. CRISPR sequences, which reflect virome structure, in the human skin environment may be highly personalized similar to the structures of individual viromes. In this study, we identified 24 putative CRISPR arrays using a shotgun metagenome data set of the human skin microbiome. The findings of this study expand our understanding of the nature of CRISPRs by identifying novel CRISPR candidates. We developed a method to efficiently determine the diversity of three CRISPR arrays. Our analysis revealed that the CRISPR spacer diversity in the human skin microbiome is highly personalized compared with the microbiome diversity assessed by 16S rRNA sequencing, providing a new perspective on the study of the skin microbiome.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Fierer N, Lauber CL, Zhou N, McDonald D, Costello EK, Knight R. 2010. Forensic identification using skin bacterial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:6477–6481.
    2.
    Oh J, Byrd AL, Deming C, Conlan S, Program NCS, Kong HH, Segre J, NISC Comparative Sequencing Program. 2014. Biogeography and individuality shape function in the human skin metagenome. Nature 514:59–64.
    3.
    Oh J, Byrd AL, Park M, Program NCS, Kong HH, Segre JA, NISC Comparative Sequencing Program. 2016. Temporal stability of the human skin microbiome. Cell 165:854–866.
    4.
    Fierer N, Hamady M, Lauber CL, Knight R. 2008. The influence of sex, handedness, and washing on the diversity of hand surface bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:17994–17999.
    5.
    Schmedes SE, Woerner AE, Budowle B. 2017. Forensic human identification using skin microbiomes. Appl Environ Microbiol 83:e01672-17.
    6.
    Lax S, Hampton-Marcell JT, Gibbons SM, Colares GB, Smith D, Eisen JA, Gilbert JA. 2015. Forensic analysis of the microbiome of phones and shoes. Microbiome 3:21.
    7.
    Daly DJ, Murphy C, McDermott SD. 2012. The transfer of touch DNA from hands to glass, fabric and wood. Forensic Sci Int Genet 6:41–46.
    8.
    Costello EEK, Lauber CCL, Hamady M, Fierer N, Gordon JI, Knight R. 2009. Bacterial community variation in human body habitats across space and time. Science 326:1694–1697.
    9.
    Quaak FCA, van Duijn T, Hoogenboom J, Kloosterman AD, Kuiper I. 2018. Human-associated microbial populations as evidence in forensic casework. Forensic Sci Int Genet 36:176–185.
    10.
    Benschop CCG, Quaak FCA, Boon ME, Sijen T, Kuiper I. 2012. Vaginal microbial flora analysis by next generation sequencing and microarrays; can microbes indicate vaginal origin in a forensic context? Int J Legal Med 126:303–310.
    11.
    Nishi E, Tashiro Y, Sakai K. 2015. Discrimination among individuals using terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism profiling of bacteria derived from forensic evidence. Int J Legal Med 129:425–433.
    12.
    Wilkins D, Leung MHY, Lee PKH. 2017. Microbiota fingerprints lose individually identifying features over time. Microbiome 5:1.
    13.
    Franzosa EA, Huang K, Meadow JF, Gevers D, Lemon KP, Bohannan BJM, Huttenhower C. 2015. Identifying personal microbiomes using metagenomic codes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:E2930–E2938.
    14.
    Ghebremedhin B, Layer F, König W, König B. 2008. Genetic classification and distinguishing of Staphylococcus species based on different partial gap, 16S rRNA, hsp60, rpoB, sodA, and tuf gene sequences. J Clin Microbiol 46:1019–1025.
    15.
    Yang J, Tsukimi T, Yoshikawa M, Suzuki K, Takeda T, Tomita M, Fukuda S. 2019. Cutibacterium acnes (Propionibacterium acnes) 16S rRNA genotyping of microbial samples from possessions contributes to owner identification. mSystems 4:e00594-19.
    16.
    Bhaya D, Davison M, Barrangou R. 2011. CRISPR-Cas systems in Bacteria and Archaea: versatile small RNAs for adaptive defense and regulation. Annu Rev Genet 45:273–297.
    17.
    Barrangou R, Marraffini LA. 2014. CRISPR-Cas systems: prokaryotes upgrade to adaptive immunity. Mol Cell 54:234–244.
    18.
    Barrangou R, Fremaux C, Deveau H, Richards M, Boyaval P, Moineau S, Romero D, Horvath P. 2007. CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes. Science 315:1709–1712.
    19.
    Abeles SR, Robles-Sikisaka R, Ly M, Lum AG, Salzman J, Boehm TK, Pride DT. 2014. Human oral viruses are personal, persistent and gender-consistent. ISME J 8:1753–1767.
    20.
    Naidu M, Robles-Sikisaka R, Abeles SR, Boehm TK, Pride DT. 2014. Characterization of bacteriophage communities and CRISPR profiles from dental plaque. BMC Microbiol 14:175–175.
    21.
    Kamerbeek J, Schouls L, Kolk A, van Agterveld M, van Soolingen D, Kuijper S, Bunschoten A, Molhuizen H, Shaw R, Goyal M, van Embden J. 1997. Simultaneous detection and strain differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for diagnosis and epidemiology. J Clin Microbiol 35:907–914.
    22.
    Hoe N, Nakashima K, Grigsby D, Pan X, Dou SJ, Naidich S, Garcia M, Kahn E, Bergmire-Sweat D, Musser JM. 1999. Rapid molecular genetic subtyping of serotype M1 group A Streptococcus strains. Emerg Infect Dis 5:254–263.
    23.
    Schouls LM, Reulen S, Duim B, Wagenaar JA, Willems RJ, Dingle KE, Colles FM, Van Embden JD. 2003. Comparative genotyping of Campylobacter jejuni by amplified fragment length polymorphism, multilocus sequence typing, and short repeat sequencing: strain diversity, host range, and recombination. J Clin Microbiol 41:15–26.
    24.
    Pourcel C, Salvignol G, Vergnaud G. 2005. CRISPR elements in Yersinia pestis acquire new repeats by preferential uptake of bacteriophage DNA, and provide additional tools for evolutionary studies. Microbiology (Reading) 151:653–663.
    25.
    Mokrousov I, Narvskaya O, Limeschenko E, Vyazovaya A. 2005. Efficient discrimination within a Corynebacterium diphtheriae epidemic clonal group by a novel macroarray-based method. J Clin Microbiol 43:1662–1668.
    26.
    Horvath P, Romero DA, Coute-Monvoisin AC, Richards M, Deveau H, Moineau S, Boyaval P, Fremaux C, Barrangou R. 2008. Diversity, activity, and evolution of CRISPR loci in Streptococcus thermophilus. J Bacteriol 190:1401–1412.
    27.
    Fabre L, Zhang J, Guigon G, Le Hello S, Guibert V, Accou-Demartin M, de Romans S, Lim C, Roux C, Passet V, Diancourt L, Guibourdenche M, Issenhuth-Jeanjean S, Achtman M, Brisse S, Sola C, Weill FX. 2012. CRISPR typing and subtyping for improved laboratory surveillance of Salmonella infections. PLoS One 7:e36995.
    28.
    Lier C, Baticle E, Horvath P, Haguenoer E, Valentin AS, Glaser P, Mereghetti L, Lanotte P. 2015. Analysis of the type II-A CRISPR-Cas system of Streptococcus agalactiae reveals distinctive features according to genetic lineages. Front Genet 6:214.
    29.
    Beauruelle C, Pastuszka A, Horvath P, Perrotin F, Mereghetti L, Lanotte P. 2017. CRISPR: a useful genetic feature to follow vaginal carriage of group B Streptococcus. Front Microbiol 8:1981.
    30.
    Hu T, Cui Y, Qu X. 2020. Characterization and comparison of CRISPR loci in Streptococcus thermophilus. Arch Microbiol 202:695–710.
    31.
    Shariat N, Dudley EG. 2014. CRISPRs: molecular signatures used for pathogen subtyping. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:430–439.
    32.
    Sun CL, Thomas BC, Barrangou R, Banfield JF. 2016. Metagenomic reconstructions of bacterial CRISPR loci constrain population histories. ISME J 10:858–870.
    33.
    Rho M, Wu Y-W, Tang H, Doak TG, Ye Y. 2012. Diverse CRISPRs evolving in human microbiomes. PLoS Genet 8:e1002441.
    34.
    Gogleva AA, Gelfand MS, Artamonova II. 2014. Comparative analysis of CRISPR cassettes from the human gut metagenomic contigs. BMC Genomics 15:202–202.
    35.
    Paez-Espino D, Eloe-Fadrosh EA, Pavlopoulos GA, Thomas AD, Huntemann M, Mikhailova N, Rubin E, Ivanova NN, Kyrpides NC. 2016. Uncovering Earth’s virome. Nature 536:425–430.
    36.
    Pride DT, Sun CL, Salzman J, Rao N, Loomer P, Armitage GC, Banfield JF, Relman DA. 2011. Analysis of streptococcal CRISPRs from human saliva reveals substantial sequence diversity within and between subjects over time. Genome Res 21:126–136.
    37.
    Robles-Sikisaka R, Ly M, Boehm T, Naidu M, Salzman J, Pride DT. 2013. Association between living environment and human oral viral ecology. ISME J 7:1710–1724.
    38.
    Robles-Sikisaka R, Naidu M, Ly M, Salzman J, Abeles SR, Boehm TK, Pride DT. 2014. Conservation of streptococcal CRISPRs on human skin and saliva. BMC Microbiol 14:146–146.
    39.
    Li D, Liu C-M, Luo R, Sadakane K, Lam T-W. 2015. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 31:1674–1676.
    40.
    Edgar RC. 2007. PILER-CR: fast and accurate identification of CRISPR repeats. BMC Bioinformatics 8:18.
    41.
    Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Iranzo J, Shmakov SA, Alkhnbashi OS, Brouns SJJ, Charpentier E, Cheng D, Haft DH, Horvath P, Moineau S, Mojica FJM, Scott D, Shah SA, Siksnys V, Terns MP, Venclovas C, White MF, Yakunin AF, Yan W, Zhang F, Garrett RA, Backofen R, van der Oost J, Barrangou R, Koonin EV. 2020. Evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems: a burst of class 2 and derived variants. Nat Rev Microbiol 18:67–83.
    42.
    Couvin D, Bernheim A, Toffano-Nioche C, Touchon M, Michalik J, Neron B, Rocha EPC, Vergnaud G, Gautheret D, Pourcel C. 2018. CRISPRCasFinder, an update of CRISRFinder, includes a portable version, enhanced performance and integrates search for Cas proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 46:W246–W251.
    43.
    Hao M, Cui Y, Qu X. 2018. Analysis of CRISPR-Cas system in Streptococcus thermophilus and its application. Front Microbiol 9:257.
    44.
    Pourcel C, Touchon M, Villeriot N, Vernadet JP, Couvin D, Toffano-Nioche C, Vergnaud G. 2020. CRISPRCasdb a successor of CRISPRdb containing CRISPR arrays and cas genes from complete genome sequences, and tools to download and query lists of repeats and spacers. Nucleic Acids Res 48:D535–D544.
    45.
    Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, Alexander H, Alm EJ, Arumugam M, Asnicar F, Bai Y, Bisanz JE, Bittinger K, Brejnrod A, Brislawn CJ, Brown CT, Callahan BJ, Caraballo-Rodriguez AM, Chase J, Cope EK, Da Silva R, Diener C, Dorrestein PC, Douglas GM, Durall DM, Duvallet C, Edwardson CF, Ernst M, Estaki M, Fouquier J, Gauglitz JM, Gibbons SM, Gibson DL, Gonzalez A, Gorlick K, Guo J, Hillmann B, Holmes S, Holste H, Huttenhower C, Huttley GA, Janssen S, Jarmusch AK, Jiang L, Kaehler BD, Kang KB, Keefe CR, Keim P, Kelley ST, Knights D, et al. 2019. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol 37:852–857.
    46.
    Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Holmes SP. 2017. Exact sequence variants should replace operational taxonomic units in marker-gene data analysis. ISME J 11:2639–2643.
    47.
    Gotelli N, Chao A. 2013. Measuring and estimating species richness, species diversity, and biotic similarity from sampling data, p 195–211. In Levin S (ed), Encyclopedia of biodiversity, vol 5. Academic Press, Cambridge, MA.
    48.
    Cottier F, Srinivasan KG, Yurieva M, Liao W, Poidinger M, Zolezzi F, Pavelka N. 2018. Advantages of meta-total RNA sequencing (MeTRS) over shotgun metagenomics and amplicon-based sequencing in the profiling of complex microbial communities. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 4:2.
    49.
    McGinn J, Marraffini LA. 2019. Molecular mechanisms of CRISPR–Cas spacer acquisition. Nat Rev Microbiol 17:7–12.
    50.
    Rascovan N, Duraisamy R, Desnues C. 2016. Metagenomics and the human virome in asymptomatic individuals. Annu Rev Microbiol 70:125–141.
    51.
    Knights D, Costello EK, Knight R. 2011. Supervised classification of human microbiota. FEMS Microbiol Rev 35:343–359.
    52.
    Statnikov A, Henaff M, Narendra V, Konganti K, Li Z, Yang L, Pei Z, Blaser MJ, Aliferis CF, Alekseyenko AV. 2013. A comprehensive evaluation of multicategory classification methods for microbiomic data. Microbiome 1:11.
    53.
    Watanabe H, Nakamura I, Mizutani S, Kurokawa Y, Mori H, Kurokawa K, Yamada T. 2018. Minor taxa in human skin microbiome contribute to the personal identification. PLoS One 13:e0199947.
    54.
    Liu J, Yan R, Zhong Q, Ngo S, Bangayan NJ, Nguyen L, Lui T, Liu M, Erfe MC, Craft N, Tomida S, Li H. 2015. The diversity and host interactions of Propionibacterium acnes bacteriophages on human skin. ISME J 9:2078–2093.
    55.
    Fitz-Gibbon S, Tomida S, Chiu B-H, Nguyen L, Du C, Liu M, Elashoff D, Erfe MC, Loncaric A, Kim J, Modlin RL, Miller JF, Sodergren E, Craft N, Weinstock GM, Li H. 2013. Propionibacterium acnes strain populations in the human skin microbiome associated with acne. J Invest Dermatol 133:2152–2160.
    56.
    Brüggemann H, Lomholt HB, Tettelin H, Kilian M. 2012. CRISPR/cas loci of type II Propionibacterium acnes confer immunity against acquisition of mobile elements present in type I P acnes. PLoS One 7:e34171.
    57.
    Paez-Espino D, Sharon I, Morovic W, Stahl B, Thomas BC, Barrangou R, Banfield JF. 2015. CRISPR immunity drives rapid phage genome evolution in Streptococcus thermophilus. mBio 6:e00262-15.
    58.
    Kutmutia SK, Drautz-Moses DI, Uchida A, Purbojati RW, Wong A, Kushwaha KK, Putra A, Premkrishnan BNV, Heinle CE, Vettath VK, Junqueira ACM, Schuster SC. 2019. Complete genome sequence of Micrococcus luteus strain SGAir0127, isolated from indoor air samples from Singapore. Microbiol Resour Announc 8:e00656-19.
    59.
    Tomida S, Nguyen L, Chiu BH, Liu J, Sodergren E, Weinstock GM, Li H. 2013. Pan-genome and comparative genome analyses of Propionibacterium acnes reveal its genomic diversity in the healthy and diseased human skin microbiome. mBio 4:e00003-13.
    60.
    Maiden MCJ, Bygraves JA, Feil E, Morelli G, Russell JE, Urwin R, Zhang Q, Zhou J, Zurth K, Caugant DA, Feavers IM, Achtman M, Spratt BG. 1998. Multilocus sequence typing: a portable approach to the identification of clones within populations of pathogenic microorganisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:3140–3145.
    61.
    Supply P, Allix C, Lesjean S, Cardoso-Oelemann M, Rüsch-Gerdes S, Willery E, Savine E, de Haas P, van Deutekom H, Roring S, Bifani P, Kurepina N, Kreiswirth B, Sola C, Rastogi N, Vatin V, Gutierrez MC, Fauville M, Niemann S, Skuce R, Kremer K, Locht C, van Soolingen D. 2006. Proposal for standardization of optimized mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit-variable-number tandem repeat typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 44:4498–4510.
    62.
    Zolfo M, Tett A, Jousson O, Donati C, Segata N. 2017. MetaMLST: multi-locus strain-level bacterial typing from metagenomic samples. Nucleic Acids Res 45:e7.
    63.
    Shevchenko SG, Radey M, Tchesnokova V, Kisiela D, Sokurenko EV. 2019. Escherichia coli clonobiome: assessing the strain diversity in feces and urine by deep amplicon sequencing. Appl Environ Microbiol 85:e01866-19.
    64.
    Meadow JF, Altrichter AE, Green JL. 2014. Mobile phones carry the personal microbiome of their owners. PeerJ 2:e447.
    65.
    Hidalgo-Cantabrana C, Sanozky-Dawes R, Barrangou R. 2018. Insights into the human virome using CRISPR spacers from microbiomes. Viruses 10:479.
    66.
    Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120.
    67.
    Rognes T, Flouri T, Nichols B, Quince C, Mahé F. 2016. VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ 4:e2584.
    68.
    Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402.
    69.
    Godde JS, Bickerton A. 2006. The repetitive DNA elements called CRISPRs and their associated genes: evidence of horizontal transfer among prokaryotes. J Mol Evol 62:718–729.
    70.
    Hunter JD. 2007. Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment. Comput Sci Eng 9:90–95.
    71.
    Nethery MA, Barrangou R. 2019. CRISPR Visualizer: rapid identification and visualization of CRISPR loci via an automated high-throughput processing pipeline. RNA Biol 16:577–584.
    72.
    Castelino M, Eyre S, Moat J, Fox G, Martin P, Ho P, Upton M, Barton A. 2017. Optimisation of methods for bacterial skin microbiome investigation: primer selection and comparison of the 454 versus MiSeq platform. BMC Microbiol 17:23.
    73.
    Zheng W, Tsompana M, Ruscitto A, Sharma A, Genco R, Sun Y, Buck MJ. 2015. An accurate and efficient experimental approach for characterization of the complex oral microbiota. Microbiome 3:48.
    74.
    Kong HH, Andersson B, Clavel T, Common JE, Jackson SA, Olson ND, Segre JA, Traidl-Hoffmann C. 2017. Performing skin microbiome research: a method to the madness. J Invest Dermatol 137:561–568.
    75.
    Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. 2016. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 13:581–583.
    76.
    Weiss S, Xu ZZ, Peddada S, Amir A, Bittinger K, Gonzalez A, Lozupone C, Zaneveld JR, Vázquez-Baeza Y, Birmingham A, Hyde ER, Knight R. 2017. Normalization and microbial differential abundance strategies depend upon data characteristics. Microbiome 5:27.
    77.
    Kruskal WH, Wallis WA. 1952. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 47:583–621.
    78.
    Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O′Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MH, Szoecs E, Wagner H. 2019. Vegan: Community Ecology Package, version 2.5-4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.
    79.
    Guyon I, Weston J, Barnhill S, Vapnik V. 2002. Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines. Mach Learn 46:389–422.
    80.
    Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, Blondel M, Prettenhofer P, Weiss R, Dubourg V, Vanderplas J, Passos A, Cournapeau D, Brucher M, Perrot M, Duchesnay É. 2011. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res 12:2825–2830.
    81.
    Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glockner FO. 2013. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D590–D596.
    82.
    Salter SJ, Cox MJ, Turek EM, Calus ST, Cookson WO, Moffatt MF, Turner P, Parkhill J, Loman NJ, Walker AW. 2014. Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses. BMC Biol 12:87–87.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSystems
    Volume 6Number 123 February 2021
    eLocator: e01255-20
    Editor: Nicola Segata
    University of Trento

    History

    Received: 1 December 2020
    Accepted: 8 January 2021
    Published online: 2 February 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. human skin microbiome
    2. CRISPR
    3. metagenomics
    4. forensic science
    5. next-generation sequencing

    Contributors

    Authors

    National Research Institute of Police Science, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
    Ryo Yokota
    National Research Institute of Police Science, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
    Ken Watanabe
    National Research Institute of Police Science, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
    Tomoko Akutsu
    National Research Institute of Police Science, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
    Ai Asahi
    National Research Institute of Police Science, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
    Satoshi Kubota
    National Research Institute of Police Science, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan

    Editor

    Nicola Segata
    Editor
    University of Trento

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Kochi Toyomane, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSystemsArticle
    Repurposing Didanosine as a Potential Treatment for COVID-19 Using Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data

    Repurposing Didanosine as a Potential Treatment for COVID-19 Using Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data

    ABSTRACT

    As of today (7 April 2020), more than 81,000 people around the world have died from the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic. There is no approved drug or vaccine for COVID-19, although more than 10 clinical trials have been launched to test potential drugs. In an urgent response to this pandemic, I developed a bioinformatics pipeline to identify compounds and drug candidates to potentially treat COVID-19. This pipeline is based on publicly available single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data and the drug perturbation database “Library of Integrated Network-Based Cellular Signatures” (LINCS). I developed a ranking score system that prioritizes these drugs or small molecules. The four drugs with the highest total score are didanosine, benzyl-quinazolin-4-yl-amine, camptothecin, and RO-90-7501. In conclusion, I have demonstrated the utility of bioinformatics for identifying drugs than can be repurposed for potentially treating COVID-19 patients.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Zheng Y-Y, Ma Y-T, Zhang J-Y, Xie X. 5 March 2020. COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system. Nat Rev Cardiol doi:
    2.
    Reyfman PA, Walter JM, Joshi N, Anekalla KR, McQuattie-Pimentel AC, Chiu S, Fernandez R, Akbarpour M, Chen C-I, Ren Z, Verma R, Abdala-Valencia H, Nam K, Chi M, Han S, Gonzalez-Gonzalez FJ, Soberanes S, Watanabe S, Williams KJN, Flozak AS, Nicholson TT, Morgan VK, Winter DR, Hinchcliff M, Hrusch CL, Guzy RD, Bonham CA, Sperling AI, Bag R, Hamanaka RB, Mutlu GM, Yeldandi AV, Marshall SA, Shilatifard A, Amaral LAN, Perlman H, Sznajder JI, Argento AC, Gillespie CT, Dematte J, Jain M, Singer BD, Ridge KM, Lam AP, Bharat A, Bhorade SM, Gottardi CJ, Budinger G, Misharin AV. 2019. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of human lung provides insights into the pathobiology of pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 199:1517–1536.
    3.
    Subramanian A, Narayan R, Corsello SM, Peck DD, Natoli TE, Lu X, Gould J, Davis JF, Tubelli AA, Asiedu JK, Lahr DL, Hirschman JE, Liu Z, Donahue M, Julian B, Khan M, Wadden D, Smith IC, Lam D, Liberzon A, Toder C, Bagul M, Orzechowski M, Enache OM, Piccioni F, Johnson SA, Lyons NJ, Berger AH, Shamji AF, Brooks AN, Vrcic A, Flynn C, Rosains J, Takeda DY, Hu R, Davison D, Lamb J, Ardlie K, Hogstrom L, Greenside P, Gray NS, Clemons PA, Silver S, Wu X, Zhao W-N, Read-Button W, Wu X, Haggarty SJ, Ronco LV, Boehm JS, Schreiber SL, Doench JG, Bittker JA, Root DE, Wong B, Golub TR. 2017. A next generation connectivity map: L1000 platform and the first 1,000,000 profiles. Cell 171:1437–1452.e17.
    4.
    Mourad J-J, Levy BI. 30 March 2020. Interaction between RAAS inhibitors and ACE2 in the context of COVID-19. Nat Rev Cardiol doi:
    5.
    Perry CM, Balfour JA. 1996. Didanosine. Drugs 52:928–962.
    6.
    Tamari K, Sano K, Li Z, Seo Y, Otani K, Tatekawa S, Toratani M, Takaoka Y, Takahashi Y, Minami K, Isohashi F, Koizumi M, Ogawa K. 2019. Ro 90-7501 is a novel radiosensitizer for cervical cancer cells that inhibits ATM phosphorylation. Anticancer Res 39:4805–4810.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSystems
    Volume 5Number 228 April 2020
    eLocator: e00297-20
    Editor: Jack A. Gilbert
    University of California San Diego

    History

    Published online: 14 April 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. COVID-19
    2. drug
    3. repurposing

    Contributors

    Author

    Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

    Editor

    Jack A. Gilbert
    Editor
    University of California San Diego

    Notes

    Address correspondence to [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSystemsArticle
    Ribosome Profiling of Synechocystis Reveals Altered Ribosome Allocation at Carbon Starvation

    ABSTRACT

    Cyanobacteria experience both rapid and periodic fluctuations in light and inorganic carbon (Ci) and have evolved regulatory mechanisms to respond to these, including extensive posttranscriptional gene regulation. We report the first genome-wide ribosome profiling data set for cyanobacteria, where ribosome occupancy on mRNA is quantified with codon-level precision. We measured the transcriptome and translatome of Synechocystis during autotrophic growth before (high carbon [HC] condition) and 24 h after removing CO2 from the feedgas (low carbon [LC] condition). Ribosome occupancy patterns in the 5′ untranslated region suggest that ribosomes can assemble there and slide to the Shine-Dalgarno site, where they pause. At LC, total translation was reduced by 80% and ribosome pausing was increased at stop and start codons and in untranslated regions, which may be a sequestration mechanism to inactivate ribosomes in response to rapid Ci depletion. Several stress response genes, such as thioredoxin M (sll1057), a putative endonuclease (slr0915), protease HtrA (slr1204), and heat shock protein HspA (sll1514) showed marked increases in translational efficiency at LC, indicating translational control in response to Ci depletion. Ribosome pause scores within open reading frames were mostly constant, though several ribosomal proteins had significantly altered pause score distributions at LC, which might indicate translational regulation of ribosome biosynthesis in response to Ci depletion. We show that ribosome profiling is a powerful tool to decipher dynamic gene regulation strategies in cyanobacteria.
    IMPORTANCE Ribosome profiling accesses the translational step of gene expression via deep sequencing of ribosome-protected mRNA footprints. Pairing of ribosome profiling and transcriptomics data provides a translational efficiency for each gene. Here, the translatome and transcriptome of the model cyanobacterium Synechocystis were compared under carbon-replete and carbon starvation conditions. The latter may be experienced when cyanobacteria are cultivated in poorly mixed bioreactors or engineered to be product-secreting cell factories. A small fraction of genes (<200), including stress response genes, showed changes in translational efficiency during carbon starvation, indicating condition-dependent translation-level regulation. We observed ribosome occupancy in untranslated regions, possibly due to an alternative translation initiation mechanism in Synechocystis. The higher proportion of ribosomes residing in untranslated regions during carbon starvation may be a mechanism to quickly inactivate superfluous ribosomes. This work provides the first ribosome profiling data for cyanobacteria and reveals new regulation strategies for coping with nutrient limitation.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Morales-Pineda M, Cózar A, Laiz I, Úbeda B, Gálvez JÁ. 2014. Daily, biweekly, and seasonal temporal scales of pCO2 variability in two stratified Mediterranean reservoirs. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 119:509–520.
    2.
    Burnap R, Hagemann M, Kaplan A. 2015. Regulation of CO2 concentrating mechanism in cyanobacteria. Life (Basel) 5:348–371.
    3.
    Silva TL, Reis A. 2015. Scale-up problems for the large scale production of algae, p 125–149. In Das D (ed), Algal biorefinery: an integrated approach. Springer International Publishing, Basel, Switzerland.
    4.
    Tamburic B, Evenhuis CR, Suggett DJ, Larkum AWD, Raven JA, Ralph PJ. 2015. Gas transfer controls carbon limitation during biomass production by marine microalgae. ChemSusChem 8:2727–2736.
    5.
    Kopka J, Schmidt S, Dethloff F, Pade N, Berendt S, Schottkowski M, Martin N, Dühring U, Kuchmina E, Enke H, Kramer D, Wilde A, Hagemann M, Friedrich A. 2017. Systems analysis of ethanol production in the genetically engineered cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002. Biotechnol Biofuels 10:56.
    6.
    Wang HL, Postier BL, Burnap RL. 2004. Alterations in global patterns of gene expression in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 in response to inorganic carbon limitation and the inactivation of ndhR, a LysR family regulator. J Biol Chem 279:5739–5751.
    7.
    Eisenhut M, von Wobeser EA, Jonas L, Schubert H, Ibelings BW, Bauwe H, Matthijs HCP, Hagemann M. 2007. Long-term response toward inorganic carbon limitation in wild type and glycolate turnover mutants of the Cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803. Plant Physiol 144:1946–1959.
    8.
    Orf I, Schwarz D, Kaplan A, Kopka J, Hess WR, Hagemann M, Klähn S. 2016. CyAbrB2 contributes to the transcriptional regulation of low CO2 acclimation in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Plant Cell Physiol 57:2232–2243.
    9.
    Kopf M, Hess WR. 2015. Regulatory RNAs in photosynthetic cyanobacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 39:301–315.
    10.
    Guerreiro ACL, Benevento M, Lehmann R, van Breukelen B, Post H, Giansanti P, Maarten Altelaar AF, Axmann IM, Heck AJR. 2014. Daily rhythms in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus probed by high-resolution mass spectrometry-based proteomics reveals a small defined set of cyclic proteins. Mol Cell Proteomics 13:2042–2055.
    11.
    Waldbauer JR, Rodrigue S, Coleman ML, Chisholm SW. 2012. Transcriptome and proteome dynamics of a light-dark synchronized bacterial cell cycle. PLoS One 7:e43432.
    12.
    Ingolia NT, Ghaemmaghami S, Newman JRS, Weissman JS. 2009. Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling. Science 324:218–223.
    13.
    Brar GA, Weissman JS. 2015. Ribosome profiling reveals the what, when, where and how of protein synthesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 16:651–664.
    14.
    Jeong Y, Kim JN, Kim MW, Bucca G, Cho S, Yoon YJ, Kim BG, Roe JH, Kim SC, Smith CP, Cho BK. 2016. The dynamic transcriptional and translational landscape of the model antibiotic producer Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). Nat Commun 7:11605.
    15.
    Bucca G, Pothi R, Hesketh A, Moller-Levet C, Hodgson DA, Laing EE, Stewart GR, Smith CP. 2018. Translational control plays an important role in the adaptive heat-shock response of Streptomyces coelicolor. bioRxiv 46:5692.
    16.
    Li GW, Burkhardt D, Gross C, Weissman JS. 2014. Quantifying absolute protein synthesis rates reveals principles underlying allocation of cellular resources. Cell 157:624–635.
    17.
    Singh AK, Sherman LA. 2002. Characterization of a stress-responsive operon in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803. Gene 297:11–19.
    18.
    Jiang HB, Song WY, Cheng HM, Qiu BS. 2015. The hypothetical protein Ycf46 is involved in regulation of CO2 utilization in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Planta 241:145–155.
    19.
    Battchikova N, Vainonen JP, Vorontsova N, Kera¨Nen M, Carmel D, Aro E-M. 2010. Dynamic changes in the proteome of synechocystis 6803 in response to CO2 limitation revealed by quantitative proteomics. J Proteome Res 9:5896–5912.
    20.
    Dai X, Zhu M, Warren M, Balakrishnan R, Patsalo V, Okano H, Williamson JR, Fredrick K, Wang YP, Hwa T. 2017. Reduction of translating ribosomes enables Escherichia coli to maintain elongation rates during slow growth. Nat Microbiol 2:1–9.
    21.
    Duval M, Simonetti A, Caldelari I, Marzi S. 2015. Multiple ways to regulate translation initiation in bacteria: mechanisms, regulatory circuits, dynamics. Biochimie 114:18–29.
    22.
    Kortmann J, Sczodrok S, Rinnenthal J, Schwalbe H, Narberhaus F. 2011. Translation on demand by a simple RNA-based thermosensor. Nucleic Acids Res 39:2855–2868.
    23.
    Woolstenhulme CJ, Guydosh NR, Green R, Buskirk AR. 2015. High-precision analysis of translational pausing by ribosome profiling in bacteria lacking EFP. Cell Rep 11:13–21.
    24.
    Shah P, Ding Y, Niemczyk M, Kudla G, Plotkin JB. 2013. XRate-limiting steps in yeast protein translation. Cell 153:1589–1601.
    25.
    Yamamoto H, Wittek D, Gupta R, Qin B, Ueda T, Krause R, Yamamoto K, Albrecht R, Pech M, Nierhaus KH. 2016. 70S-scanning initiation is a novel and frequent initiation mode of ribosomal translation in bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:E1180–E1189.
    26.
    Subramaniam AR, Zid BM, O’Shea EK. 2014. An integrated approach reveals regulatory controls on bacterial translation elongation. Cell 159:1200–1211.
    27.
    Fu Y, Deiorio-Haggar K, Anthony J, Meyer MM. 2013. Most RNAs regulating ribosomal protein biosynthesis in Escherichia coli are narrowly distributed to Gammaproteobacteria. Nucleic Acids Res 41:3491–3503.
    28.
    Tyystjärvi T, Herranen M, Aro EM. 2001. Regulation of translation elongation in cyanobacteria: membrane targeting of the ribosome nascent-chain complexes controls the synthesis of D1 protein. Mol Microbiol 40:476–484.
    29.
    Burkhardt DH, Rouskin S, Zhang Y, Li GW, Weissman JS, Gross CA. 2017. Operon mRNAs are organized into ORF-centric structures that predict translation efficiency. Elife 6:1–23.
    30.
    Gawroński P, Jensen PE, Karpiński S, Leister D, Scharff LB. 2018. Plastid ribosome pausing is induced by multiple features and is linked to protein complex assembly. Plant Physiol 176:2557.
    31.
    Georg J, Dienst D, Schurgers N, Wallner T, Kopp D, Stazic D, Kuchmina E, Klahn S, Lokstein H, Hess WR, Wilde A. 2014. The small regulatory RNA SyR1/PsrR1 controls photosynthetic functions in cyanobacteria. Plant Cell 26:3661–3679.
    32.
    García-Domínguez M, Reyes JC, Florencio FJ. 2000. NtcA represses transcription of gifA and gifB, genes that encode inhibitors of glutamine synthetase type I from Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Mol Microbiol 35:1192–1201.
    33.
    Klähn S, Schaal C, Georg J, Baumgartner D, Knippen G, Hagemann M, Muro-Pastor AM, Hess WR. 2015. The sRNA NsiR4 is involved in nitrogen assimilation control in cyanobacteria by targeting glutamine synthetase inactivating factor IF7. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:E6243–E6252.
    34.
    Klähn S, Orf I, Schwarz D, Matthiessen JKF, Kopka J, Hess WR, Hagemann M. 2015. Integrated transcriptomic and metabolomic characterization of the low-carbon response using an ndhR mutant of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Plant Physiol 169:114.254045.
    35.
    Mutsuda M, Sugiura M. 2006. Translation initiation of cyanobacterial rbcS mRNAs requires the 38-kDa ribosomal protein S1 but not the Shine-Dalgarno sequence: development of a cyanobacterial in vitro translation system. J Biol Chem 281:38314–38321.
    36.
    Nakagawa S, Niimura Y, Miura KI, Gojobori T. 2010. Dynamic evolution of translation initiation mechanisms in prokaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:6382–6387.
    37.
    Polikanov YS, Blaha GM, Steitz TA. 2012. How hibernation factors RMF, HPF, and YfiA turn off protein synthesis. Science 336:915–918.
    38.
    Galmozzi CV, Florencio FJ, Muro-Pastor MI. 2016. The cyanobacterial ribosomal-associated protein LrtA is involved in post-stress survival in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. PLoS One 11:e0159346–e0159324.
    39.
    Tange O. 2011. GNU Parallel: the command-line power tool. Login USENIX Mag 36:42–47.
    40.
    Becker AH, Oh E, Weissman JS, Kramer G, Bukau B. 2013. Selective ribosome profiling as a tool for studying the interaction of chaperones and targeting factors with nascent polypeptide chains and ribosomes. Nat Protoc 8:2212–2239.
    41.
    Martin M. 2011. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J 17:10.
    42.
    Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL. 2009. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol 10:R25.
    43.
    Hartz D, McPheeters DS, Traut R, Gold L. 1988. Extension inhibition analysis of translation initiation complexes. Methods Enzymol 164:419–425.
    44.
    Beyer D, Skripkin E, Wadzack J, Nierhaus KH. 1994. How the ribosome moves along the mRNA during protein synthesis. J Biol Chem 269:30713–30717.
    45.
    Jahn M, Vialas V, Karlsen J, Maddalo G, Edfors F, Forsström B, Uhlen M, Käll L, Hudson EP. 2018. Growth of cyanobacteria is constrained by the abundance of light and carbon assimilation proteins. Cell Reports 25:1–9.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSystems
    Volume 3Number 530 October 2018
    eLocator: e00126-18
    Editor: David F. Savage
    University of California, Berkeley

    History

    Received: 13 July 2018
    Accepted: 11 September 2018
    Published online: 16 October 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. cyanobacteria
    2. gene regulation
    3. light stress
    4. translational control

    Contributors

    Authors

    School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, Science for Life Laboratory, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Solna, Sweden
    Johannes Asplund-Samuelsson https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8077-5305
    School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, Science for Life Laboratory, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Solna, Sweden
    School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, Science for Life Laboratory, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Solna, Sweden
    Present address: Quentin Thomas, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Copenhagen Plant Science Centre, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
    School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, Science for Life Laboratory, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Solna, Sweden
    School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, Science for Life Laboratory, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Solna, Sweden

    Editor

    David F. Savage
    Editor
    University of California, Berkeley

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Elton P. Hudson, [email protected].
    J.K. and J.A.-S. contributed equally to this work.

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSystemsArticle
    OsdR of Streptomyces coelicolor and the Dormancy Regulator DevR of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Control Overlapping Regulons

    ABSTRACT

    Two-component regulatory systems allow bacteria to respond adequately to changes in their environment. In response to a given stimulus, a sensory kinase activates its cognate response regulator via reversible phosphorylation. The response regulator DevR activates a state of dormancy under hypoxia in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, allowing this pathogen to escape the host defense system. Here, we show that OsdR (SCO0204) of the soil bacterium Streptomyces coelicolor is a functional orthologue of DevR. OsdR, when activated by the sensory kinase OsdK (SCO0203), binds upstream of the DevR-controlled dormancy genes devR, hspX, and Rv3134c of M. tuberculosis. In silico analysis of the S. coelicolor genome combined with in vitro DNA binding studies identified many binding sites in the genomic region around osdR itself and upstream of stress-related genes. This binding correlated well with transcriptomic responses, with deregulation of developmental genes and genes related to stress and hypoxia in the osdR mutant. A peak in osdR transcription in the wild-type strain at the onset of aerial growth correlated with major changes in global gene expression. Taken together, our data reveal the existence of a dormancy-related regulon in streptomycetes which plays an important role in the transcriptional control of stress- and development-related genes.
    IMPORTANCE Dormancy is a state of growth cessation that allows bacteria to escape the host defense system and antibiotic challenge. Understanding the mechanisms that control dormancy is of key importance for the treatment of latent infections, such as those from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In mycobacteria, dormancy is controlled by the response regulator DevR, which responds to conditions of hypoxia. Here, we show that OsdR of Streptomyces coelicolor recognizes the same regulatory element and controls a regulon that consists of genes involved in the control of stress and development. Only the core regulon in the direct vicinity of dosR and osdR is conserved between M. tuberculosis and S. coelicolor, respectively. Thus, we show how the system has diverged from allowing escape from the host defense system by mycobacteria to the control of sporulation by complex multicellular streptomycetes. This provides novel insights into how bacterial growth and development are coordinated with the environmental conditions.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Stock AM, Robinson VL, and Goudreau PN. 2000. Two-component signal transduction. Annu Rev Biochem69:183–215.
    2.
    Whitworth DE. 2012. Classification and organization of two-component systems, p 1–20. In Gross R and Beier D (ed), Two-component systems in bacteria. Caister Academic Press, Poole, United Kingdom.
    3.
    Barka EA, Vatsa P, Sanchez L, Gaveau-Vaillant N, Jacquard C, Klenk HP, Clément C, Ouhdouch Y, and van Wezel GP. 2016. Taxonomy, physiology, and natural products of the Actinobacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev80:1–43.
    4.
    Hopwood DA. 2007. Streptomyces in nature and medicine: the antibiotic makers. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
    5.
    Claessen D, Rozen DE, Kuipers OP, Søgaard-Andersen L, and van Wezel GP. 2014. Bacterial solutions to multicellularity: a tale of biofilms, filaments and fruiting bodies. Nat Rev Microbiol12:115–124.
    6.
    Flärdh K and Buttner MJ. 2009. Streptomyces morphogenetics: dissecting differentiation in a filamentous bacterium. Nat Rev Microbiol7:36–49.
    7.
    Van Keulen G, Alderson J, White J, and Sawers RG. 2007. The obligate aerobic actinomycete Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) survives extended periods of anaerobic stress. Environ Microbiol9:3143–3149.
    8.
    Hutchings MI, Hoskisson PA, Chandra G, and Buttner MJ. 2004. Sensing and responding to diverse extracellular signals? Analysis of the sensor kinases and response regulators of Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). Microbiology150:2795–2806.
    9.
    Wang W, Shu D, Chen L, Jiang W, and Lu Y. 2009. Cross-talk between an orphan response regulator and a noncognate histidine kinase in Streptomyces coelicolor. FEMS Microbiol Lett294:150–156.
    10.
    Daigle F, Lerat S, Bucca G, Sanssouci É, Smith CP, Malouin F, and Beaulieu C. 2015. A terD domain-encoding gene (SCO2368) is involved in calcium homeostasis and participates in calcium regulation of a DosR-like regulon in Streptomyces coelicolor. J Bacteriol197:913–923.
    11.
    Gerasimova A, Kazakov AE, Arkin AP, Dubchak I, and Gelfand MS. 2011. Comparative genomics of the dormancy regulons in mycobacteria. J Bacteriol193:3446–3452.
    12.
    Chao MC and Rubin EJ. 2010. Letting sleeping dos lie: does dormancy play a role in tuberculosis?Annu Rev Microbiol64:293–311.
    13.
    Martínez JL and Rojo F. 2011. Metabolic regulation of antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol Rev35:768–789.
    14.
    Selvaraj S, Sambandam V, Sardar D, and Anishetty S. 2012. In silico analysis of DosR regulon proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Gene506:233–241.
    15.
    Cho HY, Cho HJ, Kim YM, Oh JI, and Kang BS. 2009. Structural insight into the heme-based redox sensing by DosS from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Biol Chem284:13057–13067.
    16.
    Podust LM, Ioanoviciu A, and Ortiz de Montellano PR. 2008. 2.3 Å X-ray structure of the heme-bound GAF domain of sensory histidine kinase DosT of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Biochemistry47:12523-125531.
    17.
    Wisedchaisri G, Wu M, Rice AE, Roberts DM, Sherman DR, and Hol WG. 2005. Structures of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DosR and DosR-DNA complex involved in gene activation during adaptation to hypoxic latency. J Mol Biol354:630–641.
    18.
    Chauhan S and Tyagi JS. 2008. Cooperative binding of phosphorylated DevR to upstream sites is necessary and sufficient for activation of the Rv3134c-devRS operon in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: implication in the induction of DevR target genes. J Bacteriol190:4301–4312.
    19.
    Bailey TL, Boden M, Buske FA, Frith M, Grant CE, Clementi L, Ren J, Li WW, and Noble WS. 2009. MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res37:W202–W208.
    20.
    Hiard S, Marée R, Colson S, Hoskisson PA, Titgemeyer F, van Wezel GP, Joris B, Wehenkel L, and Rigali S. 2007. PREDetector: a new tool to identify regulatory elements in bacterial genomes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun357:861–864.
    21.
    Rigali S, Nivelle R, and Tocquin P. 2015. On the necessity and biological significance of threshold-free regulon prediction outputs. Mol Biosyst11:333–337.
    22.
    Fillenberg SB, Grau FC, Seidel G, and Muller YA. 2015. Structural insight into operator dre-sites recognition and effector binding in the GntR/HutC transcription regulator NagR. Nucleic Acids Res43:1283–1296.
    23.
    Tenconi E, Urem M, Świątek-Połatyńska MA, Titgemeyer F, Muller YA, van Wezel GP, and Rigali S. 2015. Multiple allosteric effectors control the affinity of DasR for its target sites. Biochem Biophys Res Commun464:324–329.
    24.
    Świątek MA, Gubbens J, Bucca G, Song E, Yang YH, Laing E, Kim BG, Smith CP, and van Wezel GP. 2013. The ROK family regulator Rok7B7 pleiotropically affects xylose utilization, carbon catabolite repression, and antibiotic production in Streptomyces coelicolor. J Bacteriol195:1236–1248.
    25.
    Fischer M, Alderson J, van Keulen G, White J, and Sawers RG. 2010. The obligate aerobe Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) synthesizes three active respiratory nitrate reductases. Microbiology156:3166–3179.
    26.
    Fischer M, Falke D, Pawlik T, and Sawers RG. 2014. Oxygen-dependent control of respiratory nitrate reduction in mycelium of Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). J Bacteriol196:4152–4162.
    27.
    Facey PD, Sevcikova B, Novakova R, Hitchings MD, Crack JC, Kormanec J, Dyson PJ, and Del Sol R. 2011. The dpsA gene of Streptomyces coelicolor: induction of expression from a single promoter in response to environmental stress or during development. PLoS One6:e25593.
    28.
    Kim JN, Jeong Y, Yoo JS, Roe JH, Cho BK, and Kim BG. 2015. Genome-scale analysis reveals a role for NdgR in the thiol oxidative stress response in Streptomyces coelicolor. BMC Genomics16:116.
    29.
    Pagels M, Fuchs S, Pané-Farré J, Kohler C, Menschner L, Hecker M, McNamarra PJ, Bauer MC, von Wachenfeldt C, Liebeke M, Lalk M, Sander G, von Eiff C, Proctor RA, and Engelmann S. 2010. Redox sensing by a Rex-family repressor is involved in the regulation of anaerobic gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Microbiol76:1142–1161.
    30.
    Bueno E, Mesa S, Bedmar EJ, Richardson DJ, and Delgado MJ. 2012. Bacterial adaptation of respiration from oxic to microoxic and anoxic conditions: redox control. Antioxid Redox Signal16:819–852.
    31.
    Shin JH, Singh AK, Cheon DJ, and Roe JH. 2011. Activation of the SoxR regulon in Streptomyces coelicolor by the extracellular form of the pigmented antibiotic actinorhodin. J Bacteriol193:75–81.
    32.
    Lee EJ, Karoonuthaisiri N, Kim HS, Park JH, Cha CJ, Kao CM, and Roe JH. 2005. A master regulator sigmaB governs osmotic and oxidative response as well as differentiation via a network of sigma factors in Streptomyces coelicolor. Mol Microbiol57:1252–1264.
    33.
    Zuber P. 2009. Management of oxidative stress in Bacillus. Annu Rev Microbiol63:575–597.
    34.
    Jung Y-G, Cho Y-B, Kim M-S, Yoo J-S, Hong S-H, and Roe J-H. 2011. Determinants of redox sensitivity in RsrA, a zinc-containing anti-sigma factor for regulating thiol oxidative stress response. Nucleic Acids Res39:7586–7597.
    35.
    Kang JG, Paget MS, Seok YJ, Hahn MY, Bae JB, Hahn JS, Kleanthous C, Buttner MJ, and Roe JH. 1999. RsrA, an anti-sigma factor regulated by redox change. EMBO J18:4292–4298.
    36.
    Kim MS, Dufour YS, Yoo JS, Cho YB, Park JH, Nam GB, Kim HM, Lee KL, Donohue TJ, and Roe JH. 2012. Conservation of thiol-oxidative stress responses regulated by SigR orthologues in actinomycetes. Mol Microbiol85:326–344.
    37.
    Kallifidas D, Pascoe B, Owen GA, Strain-Damerell CM, Hong HJ, and Paget MS. 2010. The zinc-responsive regulator zur controls expression of the coelibactin gene cluster in Streptomyces coelicolor. J Bacteriol192:608–611.
    38.
    Li W, Bottrill AR, Bibb MJ, Buttner MJ, Paget MS, and Kleanthous C. 2003. The role of zinc in the disulphide stress-regulated anti-sigma factor RsrA from Streptomyces coelicolor. J Mol Biol333:461–472.
    39.
    Shin JH, Jung HJ, An YJ, Cho YB, Cha SS, and Roe JH. 2011. Graded expression of zinc-responsive genes through two regulatory zinc-binding sites in Zur. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A108:5045–5050.
    40.
    Dai Y and Outten FW. 2012. The E. coli SufS-SufE sulfur transfer system is more resistant to oxidative stress than IscS-IscU. FEBS Lett586:4016–4022.
    41.
    Paget MS, Molle V, Cohen G, Aharonowitz Y, and Buttner MJ. 2001. Defining the disulphide stress response in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2): identification of the sigmaR regulon. Mol Microbiol42:1007–1020.
    42.
    Jakimowicz D and van Wezel GP. 2012. Cell division and DNA segregation in Streptomyces: how to build a septum in the middle of nowhere?Mol Microbiol85:393–404.
    43.
    Keijser BJ, Noens EE, Kraal B, Koerten HK, and van Wezel GP. 2003. The Streptomyces coelicolorssgB gene is required for early stages of sporulation. FEMS Microbiol Lett225:59–67.
    44.
    Willemse J, Borst JW, de Waal E, Bisseling T, and van Wezel GP. 2011. Positive control of cell division: FtsZ is recruited by SsgB during sporulation of Streptomyces. Genes Dev25:89–99.
    45.
    Ausmees N, Wahlstedt H, Bagchi S, Elliot MA, Buttner MJ, and Flärdh K. 2007. SmeA, a small membrane protein with multiple functions in Streptomyces sporulation including targeting of a SpoIIIE/FtsK-like protein to cell division septa. Mol Microbiol65:1458–1473.
    46.
    Claessen D, Rink R, de Jong W, Siebring J, de Vreugd P, Boersma FG, Dijkhuizen L, and Wösten HA. 2003. A novel class of secreted hydrophobic proteins is involved in aerial hyphae formation in Streptomyces coelicolor by forming amyloid-like fibrils. Genes Dev17:1714–1726.
    47.
    Claessen D, Wösten HA, van Keulen G, Faber OG, Alves AM, Meijer WG, and Dijkhuizen L. 2002. Two novel homologous proteins of Streptomyces coelicolor and Streptomyces lividans are involved in the formation of the rodlet layer and mediate attachment to a hydrophobic surface. Mol Microbiol44:1483–1492.
    48.
    Elliot MA, Karoonuthaisiri N, Huang J, Bibb MJ, Cohen SN, Kao CM, and Buttner MJ. 2003. The chaplins: a family of hydrophobic cell-surface proteins involved in aerial mycelium formation in Streptomyces coelicolor. Genes Dev17:1727–1740.
    49.
    Kodani S, Hudson ME, Durrant MC, Buttner MJ, Nodwell JR, and Willey JM. 2004. The SapB morphogen is a lantibiotic-like peptide derived from the product of the developmental gene ramS in Streptomyces coelicolor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A101:11448–11453.
    50.
    Willey J, Santamaria R, Guijarro J, Geistlich M, and Losick R. 1991. Extracellular complementation of a developmental mutation implicates a small sporulation protein in aerial mycelium formation by S. coelicolor. Cell65:641–650.
    51.
    Kelemen GH, Brian P, Flärdh K, Chamberlin L, Chater KF, and Buttner MJ. 1998. Developmental regulation of transcription of whiE, a locus specifying the polyketide spore pigment in Streptomyces coelicolor A3 (2). J Bacteriol180:2515–2521.
    52.
    Salerno P, Persson J, Bucca G, Laing E, Ausmees N, Smith CP, and Flärdh K. 2013. Identification of new developmentally regulated genes involved in Streptomyces coelicolor sporulation. BMC Microbiol13:281.
    53.
    Piette A, Derouaux A, Gerkens P, Noens EE, Mazzucchelli G, Vion S, Koerten HK, Titgemeyer F, De Pauw E, Leprince P, van Wezel GP, Galleni M, and Rigali S. 2005. From dormant to germinating spores of Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2): new perspectives from the crp null mutant. J Proteome Res4:1699–1708.
    54.
    Derouaux A, Halici S, Nothaft H, Neutelings T, Moutzourelis G, Dusart J, Titgemeyer F, and Rigali S. 2004. Deletion of a cyclic AMP receptor protein homologue diminishes germination and affects morphological development of Streptomyces coelicolor. J Bacteriol186:1893–1897.
    55.
    Al-Bassam MM, Bibb MJ, Bush MJ, Chandra G, and Buttner MJ. 2014. Response regulator heterodimer formation controls a key stage in Streptomyces development. PLoS Genet10:e1004554.
    56.
    Bibb MJ, Domonkos A, Chandra G, and Buttner MJ. 2012. Expression of the chaplin and rodlin hydrophobic sheath proteins in Streptomyces venezuelae is controlled by sigma(BldN) and a cognate anti-sigma factor, RsbN. Mol Microbiol84:1033–1049.
    57.
    Bibb MJ, Molle V, and Buttner MJ. 2000. sigma(BldN), an extracytoplasmic function RNA polymerase sigma factor required for aerial mycelium formation in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). J Bacteriol182:4606–4616.
    58.
    Di Berardo C, Capstick DS, Bibb MJ, Findlay KC, Buttner MJ, and Elliot MA. 2008. Function and redundancy of the chaplin cell surface proteins in aerial hypha formation, rodlet assembly, and viability in Streptomyces coelicolor. J Bacteriol190:5879–5889.
    59.
    Huang J, Lih CJ, Pan KH, and Cohen SN. 2001. Global analysis of growth phase responsive gene expression and regulation of antibiotic biosynthetic pathways in Streptomyces coelicolor using DNA microarrays. Genes Dev15:3183–3192.
    60.
    Nieselt K, Battke F, Herbig A, Bruheim P, Wentzel A, Jakobsen ØM, Sletta H, Alam MT, Merlo ME, Moore J, Omara WA, Morrissey ER, Juarez-Hermosillo MA, Rodríguez-García A, Nentwich M, Thomas L, Iqbal M, Legaie R, Gaze WH, Challis GL, Jansen RC, Dijkhuizen L, Rand DA, Wild DL, Bonin M, Reuther J, Wohlleben W, Smith MC, Burroughs NJ, Martin JF, Hodgson DA, Takano E, Breitling R, Ellingsen TE, and Wellington EM. 2010. The dynamic architecture of the metabolic switch in Streptomyces coelicolor. BMC Genomics11:10.
    61.
    Strakova E, Bobek J, Zikova A, and Vohradsky J. 2013. Global features of gene expression on the proteome and transcriptome levels in S. coelicolor during germination. PLoS One8:e72842.
    62.
    Wade JT, Reppas NB, Church GM, and Struhl K. 2005. Genomic analysis of LexA binding reveals the permissive nature of the Escherichia coli genome and identifies unconventional target sites. Genes Dev19:2619–2630.
    63.
    Gao Z, Li F, Wu G, Zhu Y, Yu T, and Yu S. 2012. Roles of hinge region, loops 3 and 4 in the activation of Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein. Int J Biol Macromol50:1–6.
    64.
    Molle V, Fujita M, Jensen ST, Eichenberger P, González-Pastor JE, Liu JS, and Losick R. 2003. The Spo0A regulon of Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol50:1683–1701.
    65.
    Laub MT, Chen SL, Shapiro L, and McAdams HH. 2002. Genes directly controlled by CtrA, a master regulator of the Caulobacter cell cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A99:4632–4637.
    66.
    Gao C, Hindra, Mulder D, Yin C, and Elliot MA. 2012. Crp is a global regulator of antibiotic production in Streptomyces. mBio3:00407-12.
    67.
    Pullan ST, Chandra G, Bibb MJ, and Merrick M. 2011. Genome-wide analysis of the role of GlnR in Streptomyces venezuelae provides new insights into global nitrogen regulation in actinomycetes. BMC Genomics12:175.
    68.
    Allenby NE, Laing E, Bucca G, Kierzek AM, and Smith CP. 2012. Diverse control of metabolism and other cellular processes in Streptomyces coelicolor by the PhoP transcription factor: genome-wide identification of in vivo targets. Nucleic Acids Res40:9543–9556.
    69.
    Świątek-Połatyńska MA, Bucca G, Laing E, Gubbens J, Titgemeyer F, Smith CP, Rigali S, and van Wezel GP. 2015. Genome-wide analysis of in vivo binding of the master regulator DasR in Streptomyces coelicolor identifies novel non-canonical targets. PLoS One10:e0122479.
    70.
    Taneja NK, Dhingra S, Mittal A, Naresh M, and Tyagi JS. 2010. Mycobacterium tuberculosis transcriptional adaptation, growth arrest and dormancy phenotype development is triggered by vitamin C. PLoS One5:e10860.
    71.
    Sousa EH, Tuckerman JR, Gonzalez G, and Gilles-Gonzalez MA. 2007. DosT and DevS are oxygen-switched kinases in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Protein Sci16:1708–1719.
    72.
    Honaker RW, Dhiman RK, Narayanasamy P, Crick DC, and Voskuil MI. 2010. DosS responds to a reduced electron transport system to induce the Mycobacterium tuberculosis DosR regulon. J Bacteriol192:6447–6455.
    73.
    Van Veluw GJ, Petrus ML, Gubbens J, de Graaf R, de Jong IP, van Wezel GP, Wösten HA, and Claessen D. 2012. Analysis of two distinct mycelial populations in liquid-grown Streptomyces cultures using a flow cytometry-based proteomics approach. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol96:1301–1312.
    74.
    Van Dissel D, Claessen D, and Van Wezel GP. 2014. Morphogenesis of Streptomyces in submerged cultures. Adv Appl Microbiol89:1–45.
    75.
    Borodina I, Krabben P, and Nielsen J. 2005. Genome-scale analysis of Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) metabolism. Genome Res15:820–829.
    76.
    Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, and Maniatis T. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
    77.
    Floriano B and Bibb M. 1996. afsR is a pleiotropic but conditionally required regulatory gene for antibiotic production in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). Mol Microbiol21:385–396.
    78.
    Van Wezel GP, White J, Hoogvliet G, and Bibb MJ. 2000. Application of redD, the transcriptional activator gene of the undecylprodigiosin biosynthetic pathway, as a reporter for transcriptional activity in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) and Streptomyces lividans. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol2:551–556.
    79.
    Kieser T, Bibb MJ, Buttner MJ, Chater KF, and Hopwood DA. 2000. Practical Streptomyces genetics. The John Innes Foundation, Norwich, United Kingdom.
    80.
    Świątek MA, Tenconi E, Rigali S, and van Wezel GP. 2012. Functional analysis of the N-acetylglucosamine metabolic genes of Streptomyces coelicolor and role in the control of development and antibiotic production. J Bacteriol194:1136–1144.
    81.
    Vara J, Lewandowska-Skarbek M, Wang YG, Donadio S, and Hutchinson CR. 1989. Cloning of genes governing the deoxysugar portion of the erythromycin biosynthesis pathway in Saccharopolyspora erythraea (Streptomyces erythreus). J Bacteriol171:5872–5881.
    82.
    Blondelet-Rouault MH, Weiser J, Lebrihi A, Branny P, and Pernodet JL. 1997. Antibiotic resistance gene cassettes derived from the Omega interposon for use in E. coli and Streptomyces. Gene190:315–317.
    83.
    Colson S, Stephan J, Hertrich T, Saito A, van Wezel GP, Titgemeyer F, and Rigali S. 2007. Conserved cis-acting elements upstream of genes composing the chitinolytic system of streptomycetes are DasR-responsive elements. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol12:60–66.
    84.
    Mahr K, van Wezel GP, Svensson C, Krengel U, Bibb MJ, and Titgemeyer F. 2000. Glucose kinase of Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2): large-scale purification and biochemical analysis. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek78:253–261.
    85.
    Rigali S, Nothaft H, Noens EE, Schlicht M, Colson S, Müller M, Joris B, Koerten HK, Hopwood DA, Titgemeyer F, and van Wezel GP. 2006. The sugar phosphotransferase system of Streptomyces coelicolor is regulated by the GntR-family regulator DasR and links N-acetylglucosamine metabolism to the control of development. Mol Microbiol61:1237–1251.
    86.
    Bucca G, Laing E, Mersinias V, Allenby N, Hurd D, Holdstock J, Brenner V, Harrison M, and Smith CP. 2009. Development and application of versatile high density microarrays for genome-wide analysis of Streptomyces coelicolor: characterization of the HspR regulon. Genome Biol10:R5.
    87.
    Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM, Bolstad B, Dettling M, Dudoit S, Ellis B, Gautier L, Ge Y, Gentry J, Hornik K, Hothorn T, Huber W, Iacus S, Irizarry R, Leisch F, Li C, Maechler M, Rossini AJ, Sawitzki G, Smith C, Smyth G, Tierney L, Yang JY, and Zhang J. 2004. Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol5:R80.
    88.
    Smyth GK and Speed T. 2003. Normalization of cDNA microarray data. Methods31:265–273.
    89.
    Hong F, Breitling R, McEntee CW, Wittner BS, Nemhauser JL, and Chory J. 2006. RankProd: a bioconductor package for detecting differentially expressed genes in meta-analysis. Bioinformatics22:2825–2827.
    90.
    Laing E and Smith CP. 2010. RankProdIt: a web-interactive rank products analysis tool. BMC Res Notes3:221.
    91.
    Colson S, van Wezel GP, Craig M, Noens EE, Nothaft H, Mommaas AM, Titgemeyer F, Joris B, and Rigali S. 2008. The chitobiose-binding protein, DasA, acts as a link between chitin utilization and morphogenesis in Streptomyces coelicolor. Microbiology154:373–382.
    92.
    Tenconi E, Jourdan S, Motte P, Virolle MJ, and Rigali S. 2012. Extracellular sugar phosphates are assimilated by Streptomyces in a PhoP-dependent manner. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek102:425–433.
    93.
    Zdobnov EM and Apweiler R. 2001. InterProScan—an integration platform for the signature-recognition methods in InterPro. Bioinformatics17:847–848.
    94.
    Finn RD, Tate J, Mistry J, Coggill PC, Sammut SJ, Hotz HR, Ceric G, Forslund K, Eddy SR, Sonnhammer EL, and Bateman A. 2008. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res36:D281–D288.
    95.
    Altschul SF, Wootton JC, Gertz EM, Agarwala R, Morgulis A, Schäffer AA, and Yu YK. 2005. Protein database searches using compositionally adjusted substitution matrices. FEBS J272:5101–5109.
    96.
    Crooks GE, Hon G, Chandonia JM, and Brenner SE. 2004. WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res14:1188–1190.
    97.
    Chauhan S, Sharma D, Singh A, Surolia A, and Tyagi JS. 2011. Comprehensive insights into Mycobacterium tuberculosis DevR (DosR) regulon activation switch. Nucleic Acids Res39:7400–7414.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSystems
    Volume 1Number 328 June 2016
    eLocator: e00014-16
    Editor: Matt Traxler
    University of California, Berkeley

    History

    Received: 17 February 2016
    Accepted: 29 March 2016
    Published online: 3 May 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS:

    1. Developmental control
    2. Streptomyces
    3. dormancy
    4. stress response

    Contributors

    Authors

    Mia Urem
    Molecular Biotechnology, Institute of Biology Leiden, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
    Teunke van Rossum
    Molecular Biotechnology, Institute of Biology Leiden, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
    Giselda Bucca
    Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom
    Present address: Giselda Bucca and Colin P. Smith, School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Brighton, Huxley Building, Moulsecoomb, Brighton, United Kingdom.
    Geri F. Moolenaar
    Molecular Genetics, Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
    Emma Laing
    Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom
    Magda A. Świątek-Połatyńska
    Molecular Biotechnology, Institute of Biology Leiden, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
    Joost Willemse
    Molecular Biotechnology, Institute of Biology Leiden, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
    Elodie Tenconi
    InBioS - Centre for Protein Engineering, Université de Liège, Institut de Chimie B6a, Liège, Belgium
    Sébastien Rigali
    InBioS - Centre for Protein Engineering, Université de Liège, Institut de Chimie B6a, Liège, Belgium
    Nora Goosen
    Molecular Genetics, Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
    Colin P. Smith
    Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom
    Present address: Giselda Bucca and Colin P. Smith, School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Brighton, Huxley Building, Moulsecoomb, Brighton, United Kingdom.
    Molecular Biotechnology, Institute of Biology Leiden, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands

    Editor

    Matt Traxler
    Editor
    University of California, Berkeley

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Gilles P. van Wezel, [email protected].
    M.U. and T.V.R. contributed equally to this work.

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSystemsArticle
    2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic: Built Environment Considerations To Reduce Transmission

    ABSTRACT

    With the rapid spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that results in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), corporate entities, federal, state, county, and city governments, universities, school districts, places of worship, prisons, health care facilities, assisted living organizations, daycares, homeowners, and other building owners and occupants have an opportunity to reduce the potential for transmission through built environment (BE)-mediated pathways. Over the last decade, substantial research into the presence, abundance, diversity, function, and transmission of microbes in the BE has taken place and revealed common pathogen exchange pathways and mechanisms. In this paper, we synthesize this microbiology of the BE research and the known information about SARS-CoV-2 to provide actionable and achievable guidance to BE decision makers, building operators, and all indoor occupants attempting to minimize infectious disease transmission through environmentally mediated pathways. We believe this information is useful to corporate and public administrators and individuals responsible for building operations and environmental services in their decision-making process about the degree and duration of social-distancing measures during viral epidemics and pandemics.
    Author Video: An author video summary of this article is available.

    Note Added after Publication

    After original publication of this paper, several changes were required and have been made in this version of the article.
    The text on page 5, first paragraph, line 18, originally read as follows: “HEPA filters are rated to remove at least 99.97% of particles down to 0.3 µm (51). Most residential and commercial buildings utilize MERV-5 to MERV-11, and in critical health care settings, MERV-12 or higher and HEPA filters are used. MERV-13 filters have the potential to remove microbes and other particles ranging from 0.3 to 10.0 µm. Most viruses, including CoVs, range from 0.004 to 1.0 µm, limiting the effectiveness of these filtration techniques against pathogens such as SARS-CoV-2 (52). Furthermore, no filter system is perfect. Recently,….”
    The text on page 6, third full paragraph, second sentence, originally read as follows: “Even though viral particles are too small to be contained by even the best HEPA and MERV filters, ventilation precautions can be taken to ensure the minimization of SARS-CoV-2 spread.”
    The first sentence of Acknowledgments originally said: “We thank Jason Stenson and Cassandra Moseley for comments on the manuscript.”
    Reference 96 has been added to this version.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Parrish CR, Holmes EC, Morens DM, Park E-C, Burke DS, Calisher CH, Laughlin CA, Saif LJ, Daszak P. 2008. Cross-species virus transmission and the emergence of new epidemic diseases. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 72:457–470.
    2.
    de Groot RJ, Baker SC, Baric RS, Brown CS, Drosten C, Enjuanes L, Fouchier RAM, Galiano M, Gorbalenya AE, Memish ZA, Perlman S, Poon LLM, Snijder EJ, Stephens GM, Woo PCY, Zaki AM, Zambon M, Ziebuhr J. 2013. Commentary: Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV): announcement of the Coronavirus Study Group. J Virol 87:7790–7792.
    3.
    Peiris JSM, Lai ST, Poon LLM, Guan Y, Yam LYC, Lim W, Nicholls J, Yee WKS, Yan WW, Cheung MT, Cheng VCC, Chan KH, Tsang DNC, Yung RWH, Ng TK, Yuen KY, SARS Study Group. 2003. Coronavirus as a possible cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Lancet 361:1319–1325.
    4.
    Hui DSC, Chan MCH, Wu AK, Ng PC. 2004. Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS): epidemiology and clinical features. Postgrad Med J 80:373–381.
    5.
    World Health Organization. 5 January 2020. Pneumonia of unknown cause – China. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
    6.
    Peeri NC, Shrestha N, Rahman MS, Zaki R, Tan Z, Bibi S, Baghbanzadeh M, Aghamohammadi N, Zhang W, Haque U. 22 February 2020. The SARS, MERS and novel coronavirus (COVID-19) epidemics, the newest and biggest global health threats: what lessons have we learned? Int J Epidemiol doi:
    7.
    Ramadan N, Shaib H. 2019. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV): a review. Germs 9:35–42.
    8.
    Wu P, Hao X, Lau EHY, Wong JY, Leung KSM, Wu JT, Cowling BJ, Leung GM. 2020. Real-time tentative assessment of the epidemiological characteristics of novel coronavirus infections in Wuhan, China, as at 22 January 2020. Euro Surveill 25:2000044. https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000044.
    9.
    Li Q, Guan X, Wu P, Wang X, Zhou L, Tong Y, Ren R, Leung KSM, Lau EHY, Wong JY, Xing X, Xiang N, Wu Y, Li C, Chen Q, Li D, Liu T, Zhao J, Li M, Tu W, Chen C, Jin L, Yang R, Wang Q, Zhou S, Wang R, Liu H, Luo Y, Liu Y, Shao G, Li H, Tao Z, Yang Y, Deng Z, Liu B, Ma Z, Zhang Y, Shi G, Lam TTY, Wu JTK, Gao GF, Cowling BJ, Yang G, Leung GM, Feng Z. 29 January 2020. Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus–infected pneumonia. N Engl J Med doi:
    10.
    Rothan HA, Byrareddy SN. 26 February 2020. The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. J Autoimmun doi:
    11.
    Sizun J, Yu MW, Talbot PJ. 2000. Survival of human coronaviruses 229E and OC43 in suspension and after drying on surfaces: a possible source of hospital-acquired infections. J Hosp Infect 46:55–60.
    12.
    Chen Y, Liu Q, Guo D. 2020. Emerging coronaviruses: genome structure, replication, and pathogenesis. J Med Virol 92:418–423.
    13.
    Chan J-W, Yuan S, Kok K-H, To KK-W, Chu H, Yang J, Xing F, Liu J, Yip CC-Y, Poon R-S, Tsoi H-W, Lo S-F, Chan K-H, Poon V-M, Chan W-M, Ip JD, Cai J-P, Cheng V-C, Chen H, Hui C-M, Yuen K-Y. 2020. A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: a study of a family cluster. Lancet 395:514–523.
    14.
    Fehr AR, Perlman S. 2015. Coronaviruses: an overview of their replication and pathogenesis. Methods Mol Biol 1282:1–23.
    15.
    Walls AC, Park Y-J, Tortorici MA, Wall A, McGuire AT, Veesler D. 2020. Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. Cell 180:1–12.
    16.
    South China Agricultural University. 2020. Pangolin is found as a potential intermediate host of new coronavirus in South China Agricultural University. https://scau.edu.cn/2020/0207/c1300a219015/page.htm.
    17.
    Cui J, Li F, Shi Z-L. 2019. Origin and evolution of pathogenic coronaviruses. Nat Rev Microbiol 17:181–192.
    18.
    Perlman S. 2020. Another decade, another coronavirus. N Engl J Med 382:760–762.
    19.
    Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, Zhao X, Huang B, Shi W, Lu R, Niu P, Zhan F, Ma X, Wang D, Xu W, Wu G, Gao GF, Tan W, China Novel Coronavirus Investigating and Research Team. 2020. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med 382:727–733.
    20.
    CDC. 2020. 2019-nCoV real-time RT-PCR diagnostic panel (CDC) - fact sheet for healthcare providers. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
    21.
    Millán-Oñate J, Rodriguez-Morales AJ, Camacho-Moreno G, Mendoza-Ramírez H, Rodríguez-Sabogal IA, Álvarez-Moreno C. A new emerging zoonotic virus of concern: the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19). Infectio, in press.
    22.
    Horve PF, Lloyd S, Mhuireach GA, Dietz L, Fretz M, MacCrone G, Van Den Wymelenberg K, Ishaq SL. 2020. Building upon current knowledge and techniques of indoor microbiology to construct the next era of theory into microorganisms, health, and the built environment. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 30:219–217.
    23.
    Adams RI, Bhangar S, Dannemiller KC, Eisen JA, Fierer N, Gilbert JA, Green JL, Marr LC, Miller SL, Siegel JA, Stephens B, Waring MS, Bibby K. 2016. Ten questions concerning the microbiomes of buildings. Build Environ 109:224–234.
    24.
    Tellier R, Li Y, Cowling BJ, Tang JW. 2019. Recognition of aerosol transmission of infectious agents: a commentary. BMC Infect Dis 19:101.
    25.
    Andrews JR, Morrow C, Walensky RP, Wood R. 2014. Integrating social contact and environmental data in evaluating tuberculosis transmission in a South African township. J Infect Dis 210:597–603.
    26.
    Mizumoto K, Chowell G. 2020. Transmission potential of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) onboard the Diamond Princess Cruises Ship, 2020. Infect Dis Model 5:264–270.
    27.
    Wu JT, Leung K, Leung GM. 2020. Nowcasting and forecasting the potential domestic and international spread of the 2019-nCoV outbreak originating in Wuhan, China: a modelling study. Lancet 395:689–697.
    28.
    Zhang S, Diao M, Yu W, Pei L, Lin Z, Chen D. 2020. Estimation of the reproductive number of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) and the probable outbreak size on the Diamond Princess cruise ship: a data-driven analysis. Int J Infect Dis 93:201–204.
    29.
    Poon LLM, Peiris M. 2020. Emergence of a novel human coronavirus threatening human health. Nat Med 26:317–319.
    30.
    Guerra FM, Bolotin S, Lim G, Heffernan J, Deeks SL, Li Y, Crowcroft NS. 2017. The basic reproduction number (R0) of measles: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis 17:e420–e428.
    31.
    Biggerstaff M, Cauchemez S, Reed C, Gambhir M, Finelli L. 2014. Estimates of the reproduction number for seasonal, pandemic, and zoonotic influenza: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Infect Dis 14:480.
    32.
    Zhao S, Cao P, Gao D, Zhuang Z, Chong MKC, Cai Y, Ran J, Wang K, Yang L, He D, Wang MH. 20 February 2020. Epidemic growth and reproduction number for the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak on the Diamond Princess Cruise Ship from January 20 to February 19, 2020: a preliminary data-driven analysis. SSRN doi:
    33.
    Mizumoto K, Kagaya K, Zarebski A, Chowell G. 2020. Estimating the asymptomatic proportion of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases on board the Diamond Princess cruise ship, Yokohama, Japan, 2020. Euro Surveill 25(10):pii=2000180. https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.10.2000180.
    34.
    Ong SWX, Tan YK, Chia PY, Lee TH, Ng OT, Wong MSY, Marimuthu K. 2020. Air, surface environmental, and personal protective equipment contamination by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) from a symptomatic patient. JAMA doi:
    35.
    Stephens B, Azimi P, Thoemmes MS, Heidarinejad M, Allen JG, Gilbert JA. 2019. Microbial exchange via fomites and implications for human health. Curr Pollution Rep 5:214.
    36.
    Vandegrift R, Fahimipour AK, Muscarella M, Bateman AC, Van Den Wymelenberg K, Bohannan B. 26 March 2019. Moving microbes: the dynamics of transient microbial residence on human skin. bioRxiv doi:
    37.
    Rothe C, Schunk M, Sothmann P, Bretzel G, Froeschl G, Wallrauch C, Zimmer T, Thiel V, Janke C, Guggemos W, Seilmaier M, Drosten C, Vollmar P, Zwirglmaier K, Zange S, Wölfel R, Hoelscher M. 2020. Transmission of 2019-nCoV infection from an asymptomatic contact in Germany. N Engl J Med 382:970–971.
    38.
    Yaqian M, Lin W, Wen J, Chen G. 2020. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV: a system review. Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS). medRxiv doi:
    39.
    CDC. 2020. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
    40.
    Doultree JC, Druce JD, Birch CJ, Bowden DS, Marshall JA. 1999. Inactivation of feline calicivirus, a Norwalk virus surrogate. J Hosp Infect 41:51–57.
    41.
    Bin SY, Heo JY, Song M-S, Lee J, Kim E-H, Park S-J, Kwon H-I, Kim SM, Kim Y-I, Si Y-J, Lee I-W, Baek YH, Choi W-S, Min J, Jeong HW, Choi YK. 2016. Environmental contamination and viral shedding in MERS patients during MERS-CoV outbreak in South Korea. Clin Infect Dis 62:755–760.
    42.
    Kampf G, Todt D, Pfaender S, Steinmann E. 2020. Persistence of coronaviruses on inanimate surfaces and its inactivation with biocidal agents. J Hosp Infect 104:246–251.
    43.
    van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris DH, Holbrook MG, Gamble A, Williamson BN, Tamin A, Harcourt JL, Thornburg NJ, Gerber SI, Lloyd-Smith JO, de Wit E, Munster VJ. 2020. Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. N Engl J Med doi:
    44.
    Xiao F, Tang M, Zheng X, Liu Y, Li X, Shan H. 2020. Evidence for gastrointestinal infection of SARS-CoV-2. Gastroenterology doi:
    45.
    Lipsitch M, Allen J. 16 March 2020. Coronavirus reality check: 7 myths about social distancing, busted. USA Today, McLean, VA. https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/03/16/coronavirus-social-distancing-myths-realities-column/5053696002/.
    46.
    Bell DM, World Health Organization Working Group on International and Community Transmission of SARS. 2004. Public health interventions and SARS spread, 2003. Emerg Infect Dis 10:1900–1906.
    47.
    Coronaviridae Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. 2020. The species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2. Nat Microbiol doi:
    48.
    Chang D, Xu H, Rebaza A, Sharma L, Dela Cruz CS. 2020. Protecting health-care workers from subclinical coronavirus infection. Lancet Respir Med 8:e13.
    49.
    Booth TF, Kournikakis B, Bastien N, Ho J, Kobasa D, Stadnyk L, Li Y, Spence M, Paton S, Henry B, Mederski B, White D, Low DE, McGeer A, Simor A, Vearncombe M, Downey J, Jamieson FB, Tang P, Plummer F. 2005. Detection of airborne severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus and environmental contamination in SARS outbreak units. J Infect Dis 191:1472–1477.
    50.
    American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Condition Engineers, Inc. (ASHRAE). 2017. Ventilation of health care facilities (ANSI/ASHRAE/ASHE standard 170-2017). American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Condition Engineers, Inc., Atlanta, GA.
    51.
    Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology. 2016. HEPA and ULPA Filters (IEST-RP-CC001.6). Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology, Schaumburg, IL.
    52.
    Goldsmith CS, Tatti KM, Ksiazek TG, Rollin PE, Comer JA, Lee WW, Rota PA, Bankamp B, Bellini WJ, Zaki SR. 2004. Ultrastructural characterization of SARS coronavirus. Emerg Infect Dis 10:320–326.
    53.
    Knowles H. 3 July 2019. Mold infections leave one dead and force closure of operating rooms at children’s hospital. Washington Post, Washington, DC.
    54.
    So RCH, Ko J, Yuan YWY, Lam JJ, Louie L. 2004. Severe acute respiratory syndrome and sport: facts and fallacies. Sports Med 34:1023–1033.
    55.
    Goldberg JL. 2017. Guideline implementation: hand hygiene. AORN J 105:203–212.
    56.
    Chaovavanich A, Wongsawat J, Dowell SF, Inthong Y, Sangsajja C, Sanguanwongse N, Martin MT, Limpakarnjanarat K, Sirirat L, Waicharoen S, Chittaganpitch M, Thawatsupha P, Auwanit W, Sawanpanyalert P, Melgaard B. 2004. Early containment of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS); experience from Bamrasnaradura Institute, Thailand. J Med Assoc Thai 87:1182–1187.
    57.
    Center for Devices, Radiological Health. 2020. N95 respirators and surgical masks (face masks). US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD.
    58.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2020. Interim guidance for the use of masks to control seasonal influenza virus transmission. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
    59.
    Ryu S, Gao H, Wong JY, Shiu EYC, Xiao J, Fong MW, Cowling BJ. 2020. Nonpharmaceutical measures for pandemic influenza in nonhealthcare settings-international travel-related measures. Emerg Infect Dis doi:
    60.
    Fong MW, Gao H, Wong JY, Xiao J, Shiu EYC, Ryu S, Cowling BJ. 2020. Nonpharmaceutical measures for pandemic influenza in nonhealthcare settings-social distancing measures. Emerg Infect Dis doi:
    61.
    Vandegrift R, Bateman AC, Siemens KN, Nguyen M, Wilson HE, Green JL, Van Den Wymelenberg KG, Hickey RJ. 2017. Cleanliness in context: reconciling hygiene with a modern microbial perspective. Microbiome 5:76.
    62.
    Qian H, Zheng X. 2018. Ventilation control for airborne transmission of human exhaled bio-aerosols in buildings. J Thorac Dis 10:S2295–S2304.
    63.
    Kim SW, Ramakrishnan MA, Raynor PC, Goyal SM. 2007. Effects of humidity and other factors on the generation and sampling of a coronavirus aerosol. Aerobiologia 23:239–248.
    64.
    Casanova LM, Jeon S, Rutala WA, Weber DJ, Sobsey MD. 2010. Effects of air temperature and relative humidity on coronavirus survival on surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:2712–2717.
    65.
    Chan KH, Malik Peiris JS, Lam SY, Poon LLM, Yuen KY, Seto WH. 2011. The effects of temperature and relative humidity on the viability of the SARS coronavirus. Adv Virol 2011:734690.
    66.
    BioSpace. 11 February 2020. Condair study shows indoor humidification can reduce the transmission and risk of infection from coronavirus. BioSpace, Urbandale, IA.
    67.
    Noti JD, Blachere FM, McMillen CM, Lindsley WG, Kashon ML, Slaughter DR, Beezhold DH. 2013. High humidity leads to loss of infectious influenza virus from simulated coughs. PLoS One 8:e57485.
    68.
    Marr LC, Tang JW, Van Mullekom J, Lakdawala SS. 2019. Mechanistic insights into the effect of humidity on airborne influenza virus survival, transmission and incidence. J R Soc Interface 16:20180298.
    69.
    Xie X, Li Y, Chwang ATY, Ho PL, Seto WH. 2007. How far droplets can move in indoor environments–revisiting the Wells evaporation-falling curve. Indoor Air 17:211–225.
    70.
    Yang W, Marr LC. 2012. Mechanisms by which ambient humidity may affect viruses in aerosols. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:6781–6788.
    71.
    Memarzadeh F, Olmsted RN, Bartley JM. 2010. Applications of ultraviolet germicidal irradiation disinfection in health care facilities: effective adjunct, but not stand-alone technology. Am J Infect Control 38:S13–S24.
    72.
    Kudo E, Song E, Yockey LJ, Rakib T, Wong PW, Homer RJ, Iwasaki A. 2019. Low ambient humidity impairs barrier function and innate resistance against influenza infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116:10905–10910.
    73.
    Eccles R. 2002. An explanation for the seasonality of acute upper respiratory tract viral infections. Acta Otolaryngol 122:183–191.
    74.
    Salah B, Dinh Xuan AT, Fouilladieu JL, Lockhart A, Regnard J. 1988. Nasal mucociliary transport in healthy subjects is slower when breathing dry air. Eur Respir J 1:852–855.
    75.
    Block SS. 1953. Humidity requirements for mold growth. Appl Microbiol 1:287–293.
    76.
    Kembel SW, Jones E, Kline J, Northcutt D, Stenson J, Womack AM, Bohannan BJ, Brown GZ, Green JL. 2012. Architectural design influences the diversity and structure of the built environment microbiome. ISME J 6:1469–1479.
    77.
    Mhuireach GÁ, Brown GZ, Kline J, Manandhar D, Moriyama M, Northcutt D, Rivera I, Van Den Wymelenberg K. 2020. Lessons learned from implementing night ventilation of mass in a next-generation smart building. Energy Build 207:109547.
    78.
    Meadow JF, Altrichter AE, Kembel SW, Kline J, Mhuireach G, Moriyama M, Northcutt D, O’Connor TK, Womack AM, Brown GZ, Green JL, Bohannan BJM. 2014. Indoor airborne bacterial communities are influenced by ventilation, occupancy, and outdoor air source. Indoor Air 24:41–48.
    79.
    Howard-Reed C, Wallace LA, Ott WR. 2002. The effect of opening windows on air change rates in two homes. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 52:147–159.
    80.
    Fahimipour AK, Hartmann EM, Siemens A, Kline J, Levin DA, Wilson H, Betancourt-Román CM, Brown GZ, Fretz M, Northcutt D, Siemens KN, Huttenhower C, Green JL, Van Den Wymelenberg K. 2018. Daylight exposure modulates bacterial communities associated with household dust. Microbiome 6:175.
    81.
    Schuit M, Gardner S, Wood S, Bower K, Williams G, Freeburger D, Dabisch P. 2020. The influence of simulated sunlight on the inactivation of influenza virus in aerosols. J Infect Dis 221:372–378.
    82.
    Dijk D-J, Duffy JF, Silva EJ, Shanahan TL, Boivin DB, Czeisler CA. 2012. Amplitude reduction and phase shifts of melatonin, cortisol and other circadian rhythms after a gradual advance of sleep and light exposure in humans. PLoS One 7:e30037.
    83.
    Issa MH, Rankin JH, Attalla M, Christian AJ. 2011. Absenteeism, performance and occupant satisfaction with the indoor environment of green Toronto schools. Indoor Built Environ 20:511–523.
    84.
    Rutala WA, Weber DJ, Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HIPAC). 2017. Guideline for disinfection and sterilization in healthcare facilities, 2017. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
    85.
    Tseng C-C, Li C-S. 2007. Inactivation of viruses on surfaces by ultraviolet germicidal irradiation. J Occup Environ Hyg 4:400–405.
    86.
    Lytle CD, Sagripanti J-L. 2005. Predicted inactivation of viruses of relevance to biodefense by solar radiation. J Virol 79:14244–14252.
    87.
    Bedell K, Buchaklian AH, Perlman S. 2016. Efficacy of an automated multiple emitter whole-room ultraviolet-C disinfection system against coronaviruses MHV and MERS-CoV. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 37:598–599.
    88.
    Nardell EA, Bucher SJ, Brickner PW, Wang C, Vincent RL, Becan-McBride K, James MA, Michael M, Wright JD. 2008. Safety of upper-room ultraviolet germicidal air disinfection for room occupants: results from the Tuberculosis Ultraviolet Shelter Study. Public Health Rep 123:52–60.
    89.
    Miller SL, Linnes J, Luongo J. 2013. Ultraviolet germicidal irradiation: future directions for air disinfection and building applications. Photochem Photobiol 89:777–781.
    90.
    Welch D, Buonanno M, Grilj V, Shuryak I, Crickmore C, Bigelow AW, Randers-Pehrson G, Johnson GW, Brenner DJ. 2018. Far-UVC light: a new tool to control the spread of airborne-mediated microbial diseases. Sci Rep 8:2752.
    91.
    Buonanno M, Stanislauskas M, Ponnaiya B, Bigelow AW, Randers-Pehrson G, Xu Y, Shuryak I, Smilenov L, Owens DM, Brenner DJ. 2016. 207-nm UV light-a promising tool for safe low-cost reduction of surgical site infections. II: In-vivo safety studies. PLoS One 11:e0138418.
    92.
    Kembel SW, Meadow JF, O’Connor TK, Mhuireach G, Northcutt D, Kline J, Moriyama M, Brown GZ, Bohannan BJM, Green JL. 2014. Architectural design drives the biogeography of indoor bacterial communities. PLoS One 9:e87093.
    93.
    NIAID. 2020. Novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Flickr.
    94.
    Yu IT, Li Y, Wong TW, Tam W, Chan AT, Lee JH, Leung DY, Ho T. 2004. Evidence of airborne transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome virus. N Engl J Med 350:1731–1739.
    95.
    Li Y, Duan S, Yu ITS, Wong TW. 2004. Multi-zone modeling of probable SARS virus transmission by airflow between flats in Block E, Amoy Gardens. Indoor Air 15:96–111.
    96.
    Liu Y, Ning Z, Chen Y, Guo M, Liu Y, Gali NK, Sun L, Duan Y, Cai J, Westerdahl D, Liu X, Ho K-F, Kan H, Fu Q, Lan K. 2020. Aerodynamic characteristics and RNA concentration of SARS-CoV-2 aerosol in Wuhan hospitals during COVID-19 outbreak. bioRxiv doi:

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSystems
    Volume 5Number 228 April 2020
    eLocator: e00245-20
    Editor: Jack A. Gilbert
    University of California San Diego

    History

    Published online: 7 April 2020

    Peer Review History

    Download review history as PDF.

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. COVID-19
    2. SARS-CoV-2
    3. building operations
    4. built environment
    5. novel coronavirus

    Contributors

    Authors

    Biology and the Built Environment Center, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA
    Biology and the Built Environment Center, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA
    Genome Center, University of California—Davis, Davis, California, USA
    Mark Fretz
    Biology and the Built Environment Center, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA
    Institute for Health and the Built Environment, University of Oregon, Portland, Oregon, USA
    Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California—Davis, Davis, California, USA
    Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of California—Davis, Davis, California, USA
    Genome Center, University of California—Davis, Davis, California, USA
    Kevin Van Den Wymelenberg https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0336-5537
    Biology and the Built Environment Center, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA
    Institute for Health and the Built Environment, University of Oregon, Portland, Oregon, USA

    Editor

    Jack A. Gilbert
    Editor
    University of California San Diego

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Patrick F. Horve, [email protected].
    Leslie Dietz and Patrick F. Horve contributed equally to this work. Their order in the byline was determined alphabetically by their last name.

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSystemsArticle
    Cellular and Structural Basis of Synthesis of the Unique Intermediate Dehydro-F420-0 in Mycobacteria

    ABSTRACT

    F420 is a low-potential redox cofactor used by diverse bacteria and archaea. In mycobacteria, this cofactor has multiple roles, including adaptation to redox stress, cell wall biosynthesis, and activation of the clinical antitubercular prodrugs pretomanid and delamanid. A recent biochemical study proposed a revised biosynthesis pathway for F420 in mycobacteria; it was suggested that phosphoenolpyruvate served as a metabolic precursor for this pathway, rather than 2-phospholactate as long proposed, but these findings were subsequently challenged. In this work, we combined metabolomic, genetic, and structural analyses to resolve these discrepancies and determine the basis of F420 biosynthesis in mycobacterial cells. We show that, in whole cells of Mycobacterium smegmatis, phosphoenolpyruvate rather than 2-phospholactate stimulates F420 biosynthesis. Analysis of F420 biosynthesis intermediates present in M. smegmatis cells harboring genetic deletions at each step of the biosynthetic pathway confirmed that phosphoenolpyruvate is then used to produce the novel precursor compound dehydro-F420-0. To determine the structural basis of dehydro-F420-0 production, we solved high-resolution crystal structures of the enzyme responsible (FbiA) in apo-, substrate-, and product-bound forms. These data show the essential role of a single divalent cation in coordinating the catalytic precomplex of this enzyme and demonstrate that dehydro-F420-0 synthesis occurs through a direct substrate transfer mechanism. Together, these findings resolve the biosynthetic pathway of F420 in mycobacteria and have significant implications for understanding the emergence of antitubercular prodrug resistance.
    IMPORTANCE Mycobacteria are major environmental microorganisms and cause many significant diseases, including tuberculosis. Mycobacteria make an unusual vitamin-like compound, F420, and use it to both persist during stress and resist antibiotic treatment. Understanding how mycobacteria make F420 is important, as this process can be targeted to create new drugs to combat infections like tuberculosis. In this study, we show that mycobacteria make F420 in a way that is different from other bacteria. We studied the molecular machinery that mycobacteria use to make F420, determining the chemical mechanism for this process and identifying a novel chemical intermediate. These findings also have clinical relevance, given that two new prodrugs for tuberculosis treatment are activated by F420.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Greening C, Ahmed FH, Mohamed AE, Lee BM, Pandey G, Warden AC, Scott C, Oakeshott JG, Taylor MC, Jackson CJ. 2016. Physiology, biochemistry, and applications of F420-and Fo-dependent redox reactions. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 80:451–493.
    2.
    Eirich LD, Vogels GD, Wolfe RS. 1978. Proposed structure for coenzyme F420 from Methanobacterium. Biochemistry 17:4583–4593.
    3.
    Jacobson F, Walsh C. 1984. Properties of 7,8-didemethyl-8-hydroxy-5-deazaflavins relevant to redox coenzyme function in methanogen metabolism. Biochemistry 23:979–988.
    4.
    Edmondson DE, Barman B, Tollin G. 1972. Importance of the N-5 position in flavine coenzymes. Properties of free and protein-bound 5-deaza analogs. Biochemistry 11:1133–1138.
    5.
    Taylor MC, Jackson CJ, Tattersall DB, French N, Peat TS, Newman J, Briggs LJ, Lapalikar GV, Campbell PM, Scott C, Russell RJ, Oakeshott JG. 2010. Identification and characterization of two families of F420H2-dependent reductases from mycobacteria that catalyse aflatoxin degradation. Mol Microbiol 78:561–575.
    6.
    Li W, Khullar A, Chou S, Sacramo A, Gerratana B. 2009. Biosynthesis of sibiromycin, a potent antitumor antibiotic. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:2869–2878.
    7.
    Greening C, Jirapanjawat T, Afroze S, Ney B, Scott C, Pandey G, Lee BM, Russell RJ, Jackson CJ, Oakeshott JG, Taylor MC, Warden AC. 2017. Mycobacterial F420H2-dependent reductases promiscuously reduce diverse compounds through a common mechanism. Front Microbiol 8:1000.
    8.
    Ney B, Ahmed FH, Carere CR, Biswas A, Warden AC, Morales SE, Pandey G, Watt SJ, Oakeshott JG, Taylor MC, Stott MB, Jackson CJ, Greening C. 2017. The methanogenic redox cofactor F420 is widely synthesized by aerobic soil bacteria. ISME J 11:125–137.
    9.
    Rinke C, Schwientek P, Sczyrba A, Ivanova NN, Anderson IJ, Cheng J-F, Darling A, Malfatti S, Swan BK, Gies EA, Dodsworth JA, Hedlund BP, Tsiamis G, Sievert SM, Liu W-T, Eisen JA, Hallam SJ, Kyrpides NC, Stepanauskas R, Rubin EM, Hugenholtz P, Woyke T. 2013. Insights into the phylogeny and coding potential of microbial dark matter. Nature 499:431–437.
    10.
    Wu D, Hugenholtz P, Mavromatis K, Pukall R, Dalin E, Ivanova NN, Kunin V, Goodwin L, Wu M, Tindall BJ, Hooper SD, Pati A, Lykidis A, Spring S, Anderson IJ, D’haeseleer P, Zemla A, Singer M, Lapidus A, Nolan M, Copeland A, Han C, Chen F, Cheng J-F, Lucas S, Kerfeld C, Lang E, Gronow S, Chain P, Bruce D, Rubin EM, Kyrpides NC, Klenk H-P, Eisen JA. 2009. A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea. Nature 462:1056–1060.
    11.
    Spang A, Poehlein A, Offre P, Zumbrägel S, Haider S, Rychlik N, Nowka B, Schmeisser C, Lebedeva EV, Rattei T, Böhm C, Schmid M, Galushko A, Hatzenpichler R, Weinmaier T, Daniel R, Schleper C, Spieck E, Streit W, Wagner M. 2012. The genome of the ammonia-oxidizing Candidatus Nitrososphaera gargensis: insights into metabolic versatility and environmental adaptations. Environ Microbiol 14:3122–3145.
    12.
    Gurumurthy M, Rao M, Mukherjee T, Rao SPS, Boshoff HI, Dick T, Barry CE, Manjunatha UH. 2013. A novel F420-dependent anti-oxidant mechanism protects M ycobacterium tuberculosis against oxidative stress and bactericidal agents. Mol Microbiol 87:744–755.
    13.
    Jirapanjawat T, Ney B, Taylor MC, Warden AC, Afroze S, Russell RJ, Lee BM, Jackson CJ, Oakeshott JG, Pandey G, Greening C. 2016. The redox cofactor F420 protects mycobacteria from diverse antimicrobial compounds and mediates a reductive detoxification system. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:6810–6818.
    14.
    Purwantini E, Mukhopadhyay B. 2013. Rv0132c of Mycobacterium tuberculosis encodes a coenzyme F420-dependent hydroxymycolic acid dehydrogenase. PLoS One 8:e81985.
    15.
    Cellitti SE, Shaffer J, Jones DH, Mukherjee T, Gurumurthy M, Bursulaya B, Boshoff HI, Choi I, Nayyar A, Lee YS, Cherian J, Niyomrattanakit P, Dick T, Manjunatha UH, Barry CE, Spraggon G, Geierstanger BH. 2012. Structure of Ddn, the deazaflavin-dependent nitroreductase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis involved in bioreductive activation of PA-824. Structure 20:101–112.
    16.
    Mohamed A, Ahmed F, Arulmozhiraja S, Lin C, Taylor M, Krausz E, Jackson C, Coote M. 2016. Protonation state of F420H2 in the prodrug-activating deazaflavin dependent nitroreductase (Ddn) from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mol Biosyst 12:1110–1113.
    17.
    Lee BM, Almeida DV, Afriat-Jurnou L, Aung HL, Forde BM, Hards K, Pidot SJ, Ahmed FH, Mohamed AE, Taylor MC. 2019. The evolution of nitroimidazole antibiotic resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. bioRxiv doi:
    18.
    Graham DE, Xu H, White RH. 2003. Identification of the 7,8-didemethyl-8-hydroxy-5-deazariboflavin synthase required for coenzyme F420 biosynthesis. Arch Microbiol 180:455–464.
    19.
    Graupner M, White RH. 2001. Biosynthesis of the phosphodiester bond in coenzyme F420 in the methanoarchaea. Biochemistry 40:10859–10872.
    20.
    Grochowski LL, Xu H, White RH. 2008. Identification and characterization of the 2-phospho-L-lactate guanylyltransferase involved in coenzyme F420 biosynthesis. Biochemistry 47:3033–3037.
    21.
    Graupner M, Xu H, White RH. 2002. Characterization of the 2-phospho-L-lactate transferase enzyme involved in coenzyme F420 biosynthesis in Methanococcus jannaschii. Biochemistry 41:3754–3761.
    22.
    Li H, Graupner M, Xu H, White RH. 2003. CofE catalyzes the addition of two glutamates to F420-0 in F420 coenzyme biosynthesis in Methanococcus jannaschii. Biochemistry 42:9771–9778.
    23.
    Nocek B, Evdokimova E, Proudfoot M, Kudritska M, Grochowski L, White R, Savchenko A, Yakunin A, Edwards A, Joachimiak A. 2007. Structure of an amide bond forming F420: γγ-glutamyl ligase from Archaeoglobus fulgidus−a member of a new family of non-ribosomal peptide synthases. J Mol Biol 372:456–469.
    24.
    Bashiri G, Antoney J, Jirgis ENM, Shah MV, Ney B, Copp J, Stuteley SM, Sreebhavan S, Palmer B, Middleditch M, Tokuriki N, Greening C, Scott C, Baker EN, Jackson CJ. 2019. A revised biosynthetic pathway for the cofactor F420 in prokaryotes. Nat Commun 10:1558.
    25.
    Forouhar F, Abashidze M, Xu H, Grochowski LL, Seetharaman J, Hussain M, Kuzin A, Chen Y, Zhou W, Xiao R, Acton TB, Montelione GT, Galinier A, White RH, Tong L. 2008. Molecular insights into the biosynthesis of the F420 coenzyme. J Biol Chem 283:11832–11840.
    26.
    Braga D, Last D, Hasan M, Guo H, Leichnitz D, Uzum Z, Richter I, Schalk F, Beemelmanns C, Hertweck C, Lackner G. 2019. Metabolic pathway rerouting in Paraburkholderia rhizoxinica evolved long-overlooked derivatives of coenzyme F420. ACS Chem Biol 14:2088–2094.
    27.
    Bair TB, Isabelle DW, Daniels L. 2001. Structures of coenzyme F420 in Mycobacterium species. Arch Microbiol 176:37–43.
    28.
    Bashiri G, Rehan AM, Sreebhavan S, Baker HM, Baker EN, Squire CJ. 2016. Elongation of the poly-γ-glutamate tail of F420 requires both domains of the F420: γ-glutamyl ligase (FbiB) of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Biol Chem 291:6882–6894.
    29.
    Krissinel E, Henrick K. 2007. Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. J Mol Biol 372:774–797.
    30.
    Grinter R, Roszak AW, Cogdell RJ, Milner JJ, Walker D. 2012. The crystal structure of the lipid II-degrading bacteriocin syringacin M suggests unexpected evolutionary relationships between colicin M-like bacteriocins. J Biol Chem 287:38876–38888.
    31.
    Knape MJ, Ahuja LG, Bertinetti D, Burghardt NC, Zimmermann B, Taylor SS, Herberg FW. 2015. Divalent metal ions Mg2+ and Ca2+ have distinct effects on protein kinase A activity and regulation. ACS Chem Biol 10:2303–2315.
    32.
    Fothergill-Gilmore LA, Michels PA. 1993. Evolution of glycolysis. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 59:105–235.
    33.
    Shi K, Bohl TE, Park J, Zasada A, Malik S, Banerjee S, Tran V, Li N, Yin Z, Kurniawan F, Orellana K, Aihara H. 2018. T4 DNA ligase structure reveals a prototypical ATP-dependent ligase with a unique mode of sliding clamp interaction. Nucleic Acids Res 46:10474–10488.
    34.
    Haver HL, Chua A, Ghode P, Lakshminarayana SB, Singhal A, Mathema B, Wintjens R, Bifani P. 2015. Mutations in genes for the F420 biosynthetic pathway and a nitroreductase enzyme are the primary resistance determinants in spontaneous in vitro-selected PA-824-resistant mutants of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:5316–5323.
    35.
    Cashmore TJ, Klatt S, Yamaryo-Botte Y, Brammananth R, Rainczuk AK, McConville MJ, Crellin PK, Coppel RL. 2017. Identification of a membrane protein required for lipomannan maturation and lipoarabinomannan synthesis in Corynebacterineae. J Biol Chem 292:4976–4986.
    36.
    Bashiri G, Rehan AM, Greenwood DR, Dickson JM, Baker EN. 2010. Metabolic engineering of cofactor F420 production in Mycobacterium smegmatis. PLoS One 5:e15803.
    37.
    Tropea JE, Cherry S, Waugh DS. 2009. Expression and purification of soluble His 6-tagged TEV protease, p 297–307. In Doyle SA (ed), High throughput protein expression and purification: methods and protocols. Humana Press, Springer, Totowa, NJ.
    38.
    Kabsch W. 2010. XDS. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66:125–132.
    39.
    Winn MD, Ballard CC, Cowtan KD, Dodson EJ, Emsley P, Evans PR, Keegan RM, Krissinel EB, Leslie AGW, McCoy A, McNicholas SJ, Murshudov GN, Pannu NS, Potterton EA, Powell HR, Read RJ, Vagin A, Wilson KS. 2011. Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 67:235–242.
    40.
    Adams PD, Afonine PV, Bunkoczi G, Chen VB, Davis IW, Echols N, Headd JJ, Hung L-W, Kapral GJ, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, McCoy AJ, Moriarty NW, Oeffner R, Read RJ, Richardson DC, Richardson JS, Terwilliger TC, Zwart PH. 2010. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66:213–221.
    41.
    Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott WG, Cowtan K. 2010. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66:486–501.
    42.
    Long F, Nicholls RA, Emsley P, Graǽulis S, Merkys A, Vaitkus A, Murshudov GN. 2017. AceDRG: a stereochemical description generator for ligands. Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol 73:112–122.
    43.
    Stoessel D, Nowell CJ, Jones AJ, Ferrins L, Ellis KM, Riley J, Rahmani R, Read KD, McConville MJ, Avery VM, Baell JB, Creek DJ. 2016. Metabolomics and lipidomics reveal perturbation of sphingolipid metabolism by a novel anti-trypanosomal 3-(oxazolo [4,5-b] pyridine-2-yl) anilide. Metabolomics 12:126.
    44.
    Shchepin RV, Coffey AM, Waddell KW, Chekmenev EY. 2012. PASADENA hyperpolarized 13C phospholactate. J Am Chem Soc 134:3957–3960.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSystems
    Volume 5Number 330 June 2020
    eLocator: e00389-20
    Editor: Jack A. Gilbert
    University of California San Diego

    History

    Received: 30 April 2020
    Accepted: 4 May 2020
    Published online: 19 May 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. cofactor biosynthesis
    2. deazaflavin
    3. F420
    4. Mycobacterium
    5. Mycobacterium smegmatis
    6. structural biology

    Contributors

    Authors

    School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
    Department of Microbiology, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
    Blair Ney
    School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
    CSIRO Land & Water, Canberra, ACT, Australia
    Research School of Chemistry, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
    Rajini Brammananth
    School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
    Department of Microbiology, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
    Christopher K. Barlow
    Department of Biochemistry, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
    Monash Proteomics & Metabolomics Facility, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
    Paul R. F. Cordero
    School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
    Department of Microbiology, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
    David L. Gillett
    School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
    Department of Microbiology, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
    Thierry Izoré
    Department of Biochemistry, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
    Department of Biochemistry, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
    Liam K. Harold
    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
    Gregory M. Cook
    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
    George Taiaroa
    Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
    Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
    Andrew C. Warden
    CSIRO Land & Water, Canberra, ACT, Australia
    John G. Oakeshott
    CSIRO Land & Water, Canberra, ACT, Australia
    Matthew C. Taylor
    CSIRO Land & Water, Canberra, ACT, Australia
    Paul K. Crellin
    School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
    Department of Microbiology, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
    Colin J. Jackson
    Research School of Chemistry, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
    Ralf B. Schittenhelm
    Department of Biochemistry, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
    Monash Proteomics & Metabolomics Facility, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
    Ross L. Coppel
    Department of Microbiology, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
    School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
    Department of Microbiology, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia

    Editor

    Jack A. Gilbert
    Editor
    University of California San Diego

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Rhys Grinter, [email protected], or Chris Greening, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSystemsArticle
    Combined RNAseq and ChIPseq Analyses of the BvgA Virulence Regulator of Bordetella pertussis

    ABSTRACT

    Bordetella pertussis regulates the production of its virulence factors by the two-component system BvgAS. In the virulence phase, BvgS phosphorylates BvgA, which then activates the transcription of virulence-activated genes (vags). In the avirulence phase, such as during growth in the presence of MgSO4, BvgA is not phosphorylated and the vags are not expressed. Instead, a set of virulence-repressed genes (vrgs) is expressed. Here, we performed transcriptome sequencing (RNAseq) analyses on B. pertussis cultivated with or without MgSO4 and on a BvgA-deficient Tohama I derivative. We observed that 146 genes were less expressed under modulating conditions or in the BvgA-deficient strain than under the nonmodulating condition, while 130 genes were more expressed. Some of the genes code for proteins with regulatory functions, suggesting a BvgA/S regulation cascade. To determine which genes are directly regulated by BvgA, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIPseq) analyses. We identified 148 BvgA-binding sites, 91 within putative promoter regions, 52 within open reading frames, and 5 in noncoding regions. Among the former, 32 are in BvgA-regulated putative promoter regions. Some vags, such as dnt and fhaL, contain no BvgA-binding site, suggesting indirect BvgA regulation. Unexpectedly, BvgA also bound to some vrg putative promoter regions. Together, these observations indicate an unrecognized complexity of BvgA/S biology.
    IMPORTANCE Bordetella pertussis, the etiological agent of whooping cough, remains a major global health problem. Despite the global usage of whole-cell vaccines since the 1950s and of acellular vaccines in the 1990s, it still is one of the most prevalent vaccine-preventable diseases in industrialized countries. Virulence of B. pertussis is controlled by BvgA/S, a two-component system responsible for upregulation of virulence-activated genes (vags) and downregulation of virulence-repressed genes (vrgs). By transcriptome sequencing (RNAseq) analyses, we identified more than 270 vags or vrgs, and chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIPseq) analyses revealed 148 BvgA-binding sites, 91 within putative promoter regions, 52 within open reading frames, and 5 in noncoding regions. Some vags, such as dnt and fhaL, do not contain a BvgA-binding site, suggesting indirect regulation. In contrast, several vrgs and some genes not identified by RNAseq analyses under laboratory conditions contain strong BvgA-binding sites, indicating previously unappreciated complexities of BvgA/S biology.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Melvin JA, Scheller EV, Miller JF, Cotter PA. 2014. Bordetella pertussis pathogenesis: current and future challenges. Nat Rev Microbiol 12:274–288.
    2.
    Decker KB, James TD, Stibitz S, Hinton DM. 2012. The Bordetella pertussis model of exquisite gene control by the global transcription factor BvgA. Microbiology 158:1665–1676.
    3.
    Coutte L, Huot L, Antoine R, Slupek S, Merkel TJ, Chen Q, Stibitz S, Hot D, Locht C. 2016. The multifaceted RisA regulon of Bordetella pertussis. Sci Rep 6:32774.
    4.
    Cummings CA, Bootsma HJ, Relman DA, Miller JF. 2006. Species- and strain-specific control of a complex, flexible regulon by Bordetella BvgAS. J Bacteriol 188:1775–1785.
    5.
    Gestal MC, Rivera I, Howard LK, Dewan KK, Soumana IH, Dedloff M, Nicholson TL, Linz B, Harvill ET. 2018. Blood or serum exposure induce global transcriptional changes, altered antigenic profile, and increased cytotoxicity by classical bordetellae. Front Microbiol 9:1969.
    6.
    van Beek LF, de Gouw D, Eleveld MJ, Bootsma HJ, de Jonge MI, Mooi FR, Zomer A, Diavatopoulos DA. 2018. Adaptation of Bordetella pertussis to the respiratory tract. J Infect Dis 217:1987–1996.
    7.
    Moon K, Bonocora RP, Kim DD, Chen Q, Wade JT, Stibitz S, Hinton DM. 2017. The BvgAS regulon of Bordetella pertussis. mBio 8:e01526-17.
    8.
    Ahuja U, Shokeen B, Cheng N, Cho Y, Blum C, Coppola G, Miller JF. 2016. Differential regulation of type III secretion and virulence genes in Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella bronchiseptica by a secreted anti-sigma factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:2341–2348.
    9.
    Menozzi FD, Mutombo R, Renauld G, Gantiez C, Hannah JH, Leininger E, Brennan MJ, Locht C. 1994. Heparin-inhibitable lectin activity of the filamentous hemagglutinin adhesin of Bordetella pertussis. Infect Immun 62:769–778.
    10.
    Boulanger A, Chen Q, Hinton DM, Stibitz S. 2013. In vivo phosphorylation dynamics of the Bordetella pertussis virulence-controlling response regulator BvgA. Mol Microbiol 88:156–172.
    11.
    Amman F, D'Halluin A, Antoine R, Huot L, Bibova I, Keidel K, Slupek S, Bouquet P, Coutte L, Caboche S, Locht C, Vecerek B, Hot D. 2018. Primary transcriptome analysis reveals importance of IS elements for the shaping of the transcriptional landscape of Bordetella pertussis. RNA Biol 15:967–975.
    12.
    Keidel K, Amman F, Bibova I, Drzmisek J, Benes V, Hot D, Vecerek B. 2018. Signal transduction-dependent small regulatory RNA is involved in glutamate metabolism of the human pathogen Bordetella pertussis. RNA 24:1530–1541.
    13.
    Chen Q, Lee G, Craig C, Ng V, Carlson PE, Jr, Hinton DM, Stibitz S. 2018. A novel Bvg-repressed promoter causes vrg-like transcription of fim3 but does not result in the production of serotype 3 fimbriae in Bvg mode Bordetella pertussis. J Bacteriol 200:e00175-18.
    14.
    Scarlato V, Prugnola A, Arico B, Rappuoli R. 1990. Positive transcriptional feedback at the bvg locus controls expression of virulence factors in Bordetella pertussis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87:6753–6757.
    15.
    Chen Q, Decker KB, Boucher PE, Hinton D, Stibitz S. 2010. Novel architectural features of Bordetella pertussis fimbrial subunit promoters and their activation by the global virulence regulator BvgA. Mol Microbiol 77:1326–1340.
    16.
    Bonocora RP, Fitzgerald DM, Stringer AM, Wade JT. 2013. Non-canonical protein-DNA interactions identified by ChIP are not artifacts. BMC Genomics 14:254.
    17.
    Shimada T, Ishihama A, Busby SJ, Grainger DC. 2008. The Escherichia coli RutR transcription factor binds at targets within genes as well as intergenic regions. Nucleic Acids Res 36:3950–3955.
    18.
    Wade JT, Struhl K, Busby SJ, Grainger DC. 2007. Genomic analysis of protein-DNA interactions in bacteria: insights into transcription and chromosome organization. Mol Microbiol 65:21–26.
    19.
    Galagan J, Lyubetskaya A, Gomes A. 2013. ChIP-Seq and the complexity of bacterial transcriptional regulation. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 363:43–68.
    20.
    Rivera-Millot A, Lesne E, Solans L, Coutte L, Bertrand-Michel J, Froguel P, Dhennin V, Hot D, Locht C, Antoine R, Jacob-Dubuisson F. 2017. Characterization of a Bvg-regulated fatty acid methyl-transferase in Bordetella pertussis. PLoS One 12:e0176396.
    21.
    Boucher PE, Yang MS, Stibitz S. 2001. Mutational analysis of the high-affinity BvgA binding site in the fha promoter of Bordetella pertussis. Mol Microbiol 40:991–999.
    22.
    Boucher PE, Menozzi FD, Locht C. 1994. The modular architecture of bacterial response regulator. Insights into the activation mechanism of the BvgA transactivator of Bordetella pertussis. J Mol Biol 241:363–367.
    23.
    Williams CL, Boucher PE, Stibitz S, Cotter PA. 2005. BvgA functions as both an activator and a repressor to control Bvg phase expression of bipA in Bordetella pertussis. Mol Microbiol 56:175–188.
    24.
    Wong TY, Hall JM, Nowak ES, Boehm DT, Gonyar LA, Hewlett EL, Eby JC, Barbier M, Damron FH. 2019. Analysis of the in vivo transcriptome of Bordetella pertussis during infection of mice. mSphere 4:e00154-19.
    25.
    Stibitz S, Black W, Falkow S. 1986. The construction of a cloning vector designed for gene replacement in Bordetella pertussis. Gene 50:133–140.
    26.
    Simon R, Priefer U, Pühler A. 1983. A broad host range mobilization system for in vivo genetic engineering: transposon mutagenesis in Gram negative bacteria. Nat Biotechnol 1:784–791.
    27.
    McClure R, Balasubramanian D, Sun Y, Bobrovskyy M, Sumby P, Genco CA, Vanderpool CK, Tjaden B. 2013. Computational analysis of bacterial RNA-Seq data. Nucleic Acids Res 41:e140.
    28.
    Solans L, Gonzalo-Asensio J, Sala C, Benjak A, Uplekar S, Rougemont J, Guilhot C, Malaga W, Martín C, Cole ST. 2014. The PhoP-dependent ncRNA Mcr7 modulates the TAT secretion system in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLoS Pathog 10:e1004183.
    29.
    Dupre E, Lesne E, Guerin J, Lensink MF, Verger A, de Ruyck J, Brysbaert G, Vezin H, Locht C, Antoine R, Jacob-Dubuisson F. 2015. Signal transduction by BvgS sensor kinase. Binding of modulator nicotinate affects the conformation and dynamics of the entire periplasmic moiety. J Biol Chem 290:26473.
    30.
    Zhang Y, Liu T, Meyer CA, Eeckhoute J, Johnson DS, Bernstein BE, Nusbaum C, Myers RM, Brown M, Li W, Liu XS. 2008. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol 9:R137.
    31.
    Li H. 2011. A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data. Bioinformatics 27:2987–2993.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSystems
    Volume 5Number 330 June 2020
    eLocator: e00208-20
    Editor: Mark J. Mandel
    University of Wisconsin—Madison

    History

    Received: 10 March 2020
    Accepted: 24 April 2020
    Published online: 19 May 2020

    Peer Review History

    Download review history as PDF.

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. Bordetella pertussis
    2. RNAseq
    3. ChIPseq
    4. BvgA
    5. response regulator

    Contributors

    Authors

    Université de Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019, UMR9017, CIIL, Center for Infection and Immunity of Lille, Lille, France
    Université de Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019, UMR9017, CIIL, Center for Infection and Immunity of Lille, Lille, France
    Stephanie Slupek
    Université de Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019, UMR9017, CIIL, Center for Infection and Immunity of Lille, Lille, France
    Université de Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019, UMR9017, CIIL, Center for Infection and Immunity of Lille, Lille, France
    Present address: Luis Solans, Exopol, Poligono Rio Gallego, San Mateo de Gallego, Spain.
    Julien Derop
    Université de Lille, CNRS, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, UMR 8199, European Genomic Institute for Diabetes, Lille, France
    Université de Lille, CNRS, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, UMR 8199, European Genomic Institute for Diabetes, Lille, France
    Université de Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019, UMR9017, CIIL, Center for Infection and Immunity of Lille, Lille, France
    Université de Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019, UMR9017, CIIL, Center for Infection and Immunity of Lille, Lille, France

    Editor

    Mark J. Mandel
    Editor
    University of Wisconsin—Madison

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Loïc Coutte, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSystemsArticle
    DNA Extraction and Host Depletion Methods Significantly Impact and Potentially Bias Bacterial Detection in a Biological Fluid

    ABSTRACT

    Untargeted sequencing of nucleic acids present in food can inform the detection of food safety and origin, as well as product tampering and mislabeling issues. The application of such technologies to food analysis may reveal valuable insights that are simply unobtainable by targeted testing, leading to the efforts of applying such technologies in the food industry. However, before these approaches can be applied, it is imperative to verify that the most appropriate methods are used at every step of the process: gathering of primary material, laboratory methods, data analysis, and interpretation. The focus of this study is on gathering the primary material, in this case, DNA. We used bovine milk as a model to (i) evaluate commercially available kits for their ability to extract nucleic acids from inoculated bovine milk, (ii) evaluate host DNA depletion methods for use with milk, and (iii) develop and evaluate a selective lysis-propidium monoazide (PMA)-based protocol for host DNA depletion in milk. Our results suggest that magnetically based nucleic acid extraction methods are best for nucleic acid isolation of bovine milk. Removal of host DNA remains a challenge for untargeted sequencing of milk, highlighting the finding that the individual matrix characteristics should always be considered in food testing. Some reported methods introduce bias against specific types of microbes, which may be particularly problematic in food safety, where the detection of Gram-negative pathogens and hygiene indicators is essential. Continuous efforts are needed to develop and validate new approaches for untargeted metagenomics in samples with large amounts of DNA from a single host.
    IMPORTANCE Tracking the bacterial communities present in our food has the potential to inform food safety and product origin. To do so, the entire genetic material present in a sample is extracted using chemical methods or commercially available kits and sequenced using next-generation platforms to provide a snapshot of the microbial composition. Because the genetic material of higher organisms present in food (e.g., cow in milk or beef, wheat in flour) is around 1,000 times larger than the bacterial content, challenges exist in gathering the information of interest. Additionally, specific bacterial characteristics can make them easier or harder to detect, adding another layer of complexity to this issue. In this study, we demonstrate the impact of using different methods for the ability to detect specific bacteria and highlight the need to ensure that the most appropriate methods are being used for each particular sample.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Tan X, Chung T, Chen Y, Macarisin D, Laborde L, Kovac J. 2019. The occurrence of Listeria monocytogenes is associated with built environment microbiota in three tree fruit processing facilities. Microbiome 7:115.
    2.
    Guidone A, Zotta T, Matera A, Ricciardi A, De Filippis F, Ercolini D, Parente E. 2016. The microbiota of high-moisture mozzarella cheese produced with different acidification methods. Int J Food Microbiol 216:9–17.
    3.
    Haiminen N, Edlund S, Chambliss D, Kunitomi M, Weimer BC, Ganesan B, Baker R, Markwell P, Davis M, Carol Huang B, Kong N, Prill RJ, Marlowe CH, Quintanar A, Pierre S, Dubois G, Kaufman JH, Parida L, Beck KL. 2019. Food authentication from shotgun sequencing reads with an application on high protein powders. NPJ Sci Food 3:24.
    4.
    Beck KL, Haiminen N, Chambliss D, Edlund S, Kunitomi M, Carol Huang B, Kong N, Ganesan B, Baker R, Kawas B, Davis M, Prill RJ, Krishnareddy H, Marlowe CH, Pierre S, Quintanar A, Parida L, Kaufman J, Weimer BC. 2020. Monitoring the microbiome for food safety, and quality using deep 1 shotgun sequencing. bioRxiv 2020.05.18.102574.
    5.
    Jagadeesan B, Gerner-Smidt P, Allard MW, Leuillet S, Winkler A, Xiao Y, Chaffron S, Van Der Vossen J, Tang S, Katase M, McClure P, Kimura B, Ching Chai L, Chapman J, Grant K. 2019. The use of next generation sequencing for improving food safety: translation into practice. Food Microbiol 79:96–115.
    6.
    Foroutan A, Guo AC, Vazquez-Fresno R, Lipfert M, Zhang L, Zheng J, Badran H, Budinski Z, Mandal R, Ametaj BN, Wishart DS. 2019. Chemical composition of commercial cow’s milk. J Agric Food Chem 67:4897–4914.
    7.
    Demeke T, Jenkins GR. 2010. Influence of DNA extraction methods, PCR inhibitors and quantification methods on real-time PCR assay of biotechnology-derived traits. Anal Bioanal Chem 396:1977–1990.
    8.
    Schrader C, Schielke A, Ellerbroek L, Johne R. 2012. PCR inhibitors—occurrence, properties and removal. J Appl Microbiol 113:1014–1026.
    9.
    Bickley J, Short JK, McDowell DG, Parkes HC. 1996. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of Listeria monocytogenes in diluted milk and reversal of PCR inhibition caused by calcium ions. Lett Appl Microbiol 22:153–158.
    10.
    Soboleva SE, Zakharova OD, Sedykh SE, Ivanisenko NV, Buneva VN, Nevinsky GA. 2019. DNase and RNase activities of fresh cow milk lactoferrin. J Mol Recognit 32:e2777.
    11.
    DiCenzo GC, Finan TM. 2017. The divided bacterial genome. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 81:e00019-17.
    12.
    Zhou S, Goldstein S, Place M, Bechner M, Patino D, Potamousis K, Ravindran P, Pape L, Rincon G, Hernandez-Ortiz J, Medrano JF, Schwartz DC. 2015. A clone-free, single molecule map of the domestic cow (Bos taurus) genome. BMC Genomics 16:644.
    13.
    Murphy SC, Martin NH, Barbano DM, Wiedmann M. 2016. Influence of raw milk quality on processed dairy products: how do raw milk quality test results relate to product quality and yield? J Dairy Science 99:10128–10149.
    14.
    Bhatt VD, Ahir VB, Koringa PG, Jakhesara SJ, Rank DN, Nauriyal DS, Kunjadia AP, Joshi CG. 2012. Milk microbiome signatures of subclinical mastitis-affected cattle analysed by shotgun sequencing. J Appl Microbiol 112:639–650.
    15.
    Kuehn JS, Gorden PJ, Munro D, Rong R, Dong Q, Plummer PJ, Wang C, Phillips GJ. 2013. Bacterial community profiling of milk samples as a means to understand culture-negative bovine clinical mastitis. PLoS One 8:e61959.
    16.
    Ganda EK, Gaeta N, Sipka A, Pomeroy B, Oikonomou G, Schukken YH, Bicalho RC. 2017. Normal milk microbiome is reestablished following experimental infection with Escherichia coli independent of intramammary antibiotic treatment with a third-generation cephalosporin in bovines. Microbiome 5:74.
    17.
    Walsh AM, Crispie F, Daari K, O'Sullivan O, Martin JC, Arthur CT, Claesson MJ, Scott KP, Cotter PD. 2017. Strain-level metagenomic analysis of the fermented dairy beverage nunu highlights potential food safety risks. Appl Environ Microbiol 83:e01144-17.
    18.
    Addis MF, Tanca A, Uzzau S, Oikonomou G, Bicalho RC, Moroni P. 2016. The bovine milk microbiota: insights and perspectives from -omics studies. Mol Biosyst 12:2359–2372.
    19.
    Richards VP, Choi SC, Pavinski Bitar PD, Gurjar AA, Stanhope MJ. 2013. Transcriptomic and genomic evidence for Streptococcus agalactiae adaptation to the bovine environment. BMC Genomics 14:920.
    20.
    Wolfe BE, Button JE, Santarelli M, Dutton RJ. 2014. Cheese rind communities provide tractable systems for in situ and in vitro studies of microbial diversity. Cell 158:422–433.
    21.
    De Filippis F, Genovese A, Ferranti P, Gilbert JA, Ercolini D. 2016. Metatranscriptomics reveals temperature-driven functional changes in microbiome impacting cheese maturation rate. Sci Rep 6:21871.
    22.
    Geer SR, Barbano DM. 2014. The effect of immunoglobulins and somatic cells on the gravity separation of fat, bacteria, and spores in pasteurized whole milk. J Dairy Sci 97:2027–2038.
    23.
    Caplan Z, Melilli C, Barbano DM. 2013. Gravity separation of fat, somatic cells, and bacteria in raw and pasteurized milks. J Dairy Sci 96:2011–2019.
    24.
    Kirchner B, Pfaffl MW, Dumpler J, Von Mutius E, Ege MJ. 2016. MicroRNA in native and processed cow’s milk and its implication for the farm milk effect on asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 137:1893–1895.e13.
    25.
    Volk H, Piskernik S, Kurinčič M, Klančnik A, Toplak N, Jeršek B. 2014. Evaluation of different methods for DNA extraction from milk. J Food Nutr Res 53:97–104.
    26.
    Quigley L, O'Sullivan O, Beresford TP, Paul Ross R, Fitzgerald GF, Cotter PD. 2012. A comparison of methods used to extract bacterial DNA from raw milk and raw milk cheese. J Appl Microbiol 113:96–105.
    27.
    Lima SF, Bicalho MLS, Bicalho RC. 2018. Evaluation of milk sample fractions for characterization of milk microbiota from healthy and clinical mastitis cows. PLoS One 13:e0193671.
    28.
    Marotz CA, Sanders JG, Zuniga C, Zaramela LS, Knight R, Zengler K. 2018. Improving saliva shotgun metagenomics by chemical host DNA depletion. Microbiome 6:42.
    29.
    Thoendel M, Jeraldo PR, Greenwood-Quaintance KE, Yao JZ, Chia N, Hanssen AD, Abdel MP, Patel R. 2016. Comparison of microbial DNA enrichment tools for metagenomic whole genome sequencing. J Microbiol Methods 127:141–145.
    30.
    Hasan MR, Rawat A, Tang P, Jithesh PV, Thomas E, Tan R, Tilley P. 2016. Depletion of human DNA in spiked clinical specimens for improvement of sensitivity of pathogen detection by next-generation sequencing. J Clin Microbiol 54:919–927.
    31.
    Oechslin CP, Lenz N, Liechti N, Ryter S, Agyeman P, Bruggmann R, Leib SL, Beuret CM. 2018. Limited correlation of shotgun metagenomics following host depletion and routine diagnostics for viruses and bacteria in low concentrated surrogate and clinical samples. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 8:375.
    32.
    Nelson MT, Pope CE, Marsh RL, Wolter DJ, Weiss EJ, Hager KR, Vo AT, Brittnacher MJ, Radey MC, Hayden HS, Eng A, Miller SI, Borenstein E, Hoffman LR. 2019. Human and extracellular DNA depletion for metagenomic analysis of complex clinical infection samples yields optimized viable microbiome profiles. Cell Rep 26:2227–2240.e5.
    33.
    Chiu CY, Miller SA. 2019. Clinical metagenomics. Nat Rev Genet 20:341–355.
    34.
    Quigley L, O'Sullivan O, Stanton C, Beresford TP, Ross RP, Fitzgerald GF, Cotter PD. 2013. The complex microbiota of raw milk. FEMS Microbiol Rev 37:664–698.
    35.
    Kable ME, Srisengfa Y, Laird M, Zaragoza J, McLeod J, Heidenreich J, Marco ML. 2016. The core and seasonal microbiota of raw bovine milk in tanker trucks and the impact of transfer to a milk processing facility. mBio 7:e00836-16.
    36.
    Doyle CJ, Gleeson D, O'Toole PW, Cotter PD. 2017. Impacts of seasonal housing and teat preparation on raw milk microbiota: a high-throughput sequencing study. Appl Environ Microbiol 83:e02694-16.
    37.
    Skeie SB, Haland M, Thorsen IM, Narvhus J, Porcellato D. 2019. Bulk tank raw milk microbiota differs within and between farms: a moving goalpost challenging quality control. J Dairy Sci 102:1959–1971.
    38.
    Porcellato D, Aspholm M, Skeie SB, Monshaugen M, Brendehaug J, Mellegård H. 2018. Microbial diversity of consumption milk during processing and storage. Int J Food Microbiol 266:21–30.
    39.
    De Filippis F, Parente E, Ercolini D. 2018. Recent past, present, and future of the food microbiome. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol 9:589–608.
    40.
    Sun L, Dicksved J, Priyashantha H, Lundh Å, Johansson M. 2019. Distribution of bacteria between different milk fractions, investigated using culture-dependent methods and molecular-based and fluorescent microscopy approaches. J Appl Microbiol 127:1028–1037.
    41.
    Ali N, De Cássia R, Rampazzo P, Dias Tavares Costa A, Krieger MA. 2017. Current nucleic acid extraction methods and their implications to point-of-care diagnostics. 2017:1–13.
    42.
    Lim MY, Song EJ, Kim SH, Lee J, Nam YD. 2018. Comparison of DNA extraction methods for human gut microbial community profiling. Syst Appl Microbiol 41:151–157.
    43.
    Pan S, Gu B, Wang H, Yan Z, Wang P, Pei H, Xie W, Chen D, Liu G. 2013. Comparison of four DNA extraction methods for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis by real-time PCR and its clinical application in pulmonary tuberculosis. J Thorac Dis 5:251–257.
    44.
    Fort A, Guiry MD, Sulpice R. 2018. Magnetic beads, a particularly effective novel method for extraction of NGS-ready DNA from macroalgae. Algal Res 32:308–313.
    45.
    García-Nogales P, Serrano A, Secchi S, Gutiérrez S, Arís A. 2010. Comparison of commercially-available RNA extraction methods for effective bacterial RNA isolation from milk spiked samples. Electron J Biotechnol 13:10.
    46.
    Metzger SA, Hernandez LL, Skarlupka JH, Suen G, Walker TM, Ruegg PL. 2018. Influence of sampling technique and bedding type on the milk microbiota: results of a pilot study. J Dairy Sci 101:6346–6356.
    47.
    Feehery GR, Yigit E, Oyola SO, Langhorst BW, Schmidt VT, Stewart FJ, Dimalanta ET, Amaral-Zettler LA, Davis T, Quail MA, Pradhan S. 2013. A method for selectively enriching microbial DNA from contaminating vertebrate host DNA. PLoS One 8:e76096.
    48.
    Heravi FS, Zakrzewski M, Vickery K, Hu H. 2020. Host DNA depletion efficiency of microbiome DNA enrichment methods in infected tissue samples. J Microbiol Methods 170:105856.
    49.
    Fittipaldi M, Nocker A, Codony F. 2012. Progress in understanding preferential detection of live cells using viability dyes in combination with DNA amplification. J Microbiol Methods 91:276–289.
    50.
    Nocker A, Camper AK. 2009. Novel approaches toward preferential detection of viable cells using nucleic acid amplification techniques. FEMS Microbiol Lett 291:137–142.
    51.
    Sinha R, Abu-Ali G, Vogtmann E, Fodor AA, Ren B, Amir A, Schwager E, Crabtree J, Ma S, Abnet CC, Knight R, White O, Huttenhower C, The Microbiome Quality Control Project Consortium. 2017. Assessment of variation in microbial community amplicon sequencing by the Microbiome Quality Control (MBQC) Project Consortium. Nat Biotechnol 35:1077–1086.
    52.
    Minich JJ, Sanders JG, Amir A, Humphrey G, Gilbert JA, Knight R. 2019. Quantifying and understanding well-to-well contamination in microbiome research. mSystems 4:e00186-19.
    53.
    Eisenhofer R, Minich JJ, Marotz C, Cooper A, Knight R, Weyrich LS. 2019. Contamination in low microbial biomass microbiome studies: issues and recommendations. Trends Microbiol 27:105–117.
    54.
    FDA. 2017. Grade “A” pasteurized milk ordinance. FDA, Silver Spring, MD. https://www.fda.gov/media/114169/download.
    55.
    Buehler AJ, Martin NH, Boor KJ, Wiedmann M. 2018. Psychrotolerant spore-former growth characterization for the development of a dairy spoilage predictive model. J Dairy Sci 101:6964–6981.
    56.
    Gaillard S, Leguerinel I, Mafart P. 1998. Model for combined effects of temperature, pH and water activity on thermal inactivation of Bacillus cereus spores. J Food Sci 63:887–889.
    57.
    Brankatschk R, Bodenhausen N, Zeyer J, Burgmann H. 2012. Simple absolute quantification method correcting for quantitative PCR efficiency variations for microbial community samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:4481–4489.
    58.
    Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P. 2008. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom J 50:346–363.
    59.
    Bonferroni CE. 1936. Teoria statistica delle classi e calcolo delle probabilità. Pubblicazioni del R Istituto Superiore di Scienze Economiche e Commerciali di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
    60.
    61.
    Wood DE, Salzberg SL. 2014. Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol 15:R46.
    62.
    Liu Y, Orsi RH, Boor KJ, Wiedmann M, Guariglia-Oropeza V. 2017. Home alone: elimination of all but one alternative sigma factor in Listeria monocytogenes allows prediction of new roles for σB. Front Microbiol 8:1910.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSystems
    Volume 6Number 329 June 2021
    eLocator: e00619-21
    Editor: Sean M. Gibbons
    Institute for Systems Biology

    History

    Received: 20 May 2021
    Accepted: 21 May 2021
    Published online: 15 June 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. host depletion
    2. shotgun metagenomics
    3. milk
    4. DNA
    5. RNA
    6. biases
    7. propidium monoazide
    8. dairy
    9. low biomass
    10. food microbiome

    Contributors

    Authors

    Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
    Consortium for Sequencing the Food Supply Chain, San Jose, California, USA
    Present address: Erika Ganda, Department of Animal Science, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania, USA.
    Consortium for Sequencing the Food Supply Chain, San Jose, California, USA
    IBM Almaden Research Center, San Jose, California, USA
    Consortium for Sequencing the Food Supply Chain, San Jose, California, USA
    IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York, USA
    College of Information Sciences and Technology, Penn State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
    Department of Statistics, Penn State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
    Department of Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
    Ban Kawas
    Consortium for Sequencing the Food Supply Chain, San Jose, California, USA
    IBM Almaden Research Center, San Jose, California, USA
    Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
    Renee R. Anderson
    Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
    Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
    Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
    Consortium for Sequencing the Food Supply Chain, San Jose, California, USA

    Editor

    Sean M. Gibbons
    Editor
    Institute for Systems Biology

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSystemsArticle
    Heterotrophic Thaumarchaea with Small Genomes Are Widespread in the Dark Ocean

    Heterotrophic Thaumarchaea with Small Genomes Are Widespread in the Dark Ocean

    ABSTRACT

    The Thaumarchaeota is a diverse archaeal phylum comprising numerous lineages that play key roles in global biogeochemical cycling, particularly in the ocean. To date, all genomically characterized marine thaumarchaea are reported to be chemolithoautotrophic ammonia oxidizers. In this study, we report a group of putatively heterotrophic marine thaumarchaea (HMT) with small genome sizes that is globally abundant in the mesopelagic, apparently lacking the ability to oxidize ammonia. We assembled five HMT genomes from metagenomic data and show that they form a deeply branching sister lineage to the ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA). We identify this group in metagenomes from mesopelagic waters in all major ocean basins, with abundances reaching up to 6% of that of AOA. Surprisingly, we predict the HMT have small genomes of ∼1 Mbp, and our ancestral state reconstruction indicates this lineage has undergone substantial genome reduction compared to other related archaea. The genomic repertoire of HMT indicates a versatile metabolism for aerobic chemoorganoheterotrophy that includes a divergent form III-a RuBisCO, a 2M respiratory complex I that has been hypothesized to increase energetic efficiency, and a three-subunit heme-copper oxidase complex IV that is absent from AOA. We also identify 21 pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ)-dependent dehydrogenases that are predicted to supply reducing equivalents to the electron transport chain and are among the most highly expressed HMT genes, suggesting these enzymes play an important role in the physiology of this group. Our results suggest that heterotrophic members of the Thaumarchaeota are widespread in the ocean and potentially play key roles in global chemical transformations.
    IMPORTANCE It has been known for many years that marine Thaumarchaeota are abundant constituents of dark ocean microbial communities, where their ability to couple ammonia oxidation and carbon fixation plays a critical role in nutrient dynamics. In this study, we describe an abundant group of putatively heterotrophic marine Thaumarchaeota (HMT) in the ocean with physiology distinct from those of their ammonia-oxidizing relatives. HMT lack the ability to oxidize ammonia and fix carbon via the 3-hydroxypropionate/4-hydroxybutyrate pathway but instead encode a form III-a RuBisCO and diverse PQQ-dependent dehydrogenases that are likely used to conserve energy in the dark ocean. Our work expands the scope of known diversity of Thaumarchaeota in the ocean and provides important insight into a widespread marine lineage.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Bar-On YM, Phillips R, Milo R. 2018. The biomass distribution on Earth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:6506–6511.
    2.
    Falkowski PG, Fenchel T, Delong EF. 2008. The microbial engines that drive Earth’s biogeochemical cycles. Science 320:1034–1039.
    3.
    Spang A, Caceres EF, Ettema T. 2017. Genomic exploration of the diversity, ecology, and evolution of the archaeal domain of life. Science 357:eaaf3883.
    4.
    Adam PS, Borrel G, Brochier-Armanet C, Gribaldo S. 2017. The growing tree of Archaea: new perspectives on their diversity, evolution and ecology. ISME J 11:2407–2425.
    5.
    Brochier-Armanet C, Boussau B, Gribaldo S, Forterre P. 2008. Mesophilic crenarchaeota: proposal for a third archaeal phylum, the Thaumarchaeota. Nat Rev Microbiol 6:245–252.
    6.
    Guy L, Ettema T. 2011. The archaeal “TACK” superphylum and the origin of eukaryotes. Trends Microbiol 19:580–587.
    7.
    Lloyd KG, Schreiber L, Petersen DG, Kjeldsen KU, Lever MA, Steen AD, Stepanauskas R, Richter M, Kleindienst S, Lenk S, Schramm A, Jørgensen BB. 2013. Predominant archaea in marine sediments degrade detrital proteins. Nature 496:215–218.
    8.
    Spang A, Saw JH, Jørgensen SL, Zaremba-Niedzwiedzka K, Martijn J, Lind AE, van Eijk R, Schleper C, Guy L, Ettema T. 2015. Complex archaea that bridge the gap between prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Nature 521:173–179.
    9.
    Castelle CJ, Brown CT, Anantharaman K, Probst AJ, Huang RH, Banfield JF. 2018. Biosynthetic capacity, metabolic variety and unusual biology in the CPR and DPANN radiations. Nat Rev Microbiol 16:629–645.
    10.
    Castelle CJ, Wrighton KC, Thomas BC, Hug LA, Brown CT, Wilkins MJ, Frischkorn KR, Tringe SG, Singh A, Markillie LM, Taylor RC, Williams KH, Banfield JF. 2015. Genomic expansion of domain Archaea highlights roles for organisms from new phyla in anaerobic carbon cycling. Curr Biol 25:690–701.
    11.
    Raymann K, Brochier-Armanet C, Gribaldo S. 2015. The two-domain tree of life is linked to a new root for the Archaea. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:6670–6675.
    12.
    Williams TA, Szöllősi GJ, Spang A, Foster PG, Heaps SE, Boussau B, Ettema TJG, Embley TM. 2017. Integrative modeling of gene and genome evolution roots the archaeal tree of life. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:E4602–E4611.
    13.
    Pester M, Schleper C, Wagner M. 2011. The Thaumarchaeota: an emerging view of their phylogeny and ecophysiology. Curr Opin Microbiol 14:300–306.
    14.
    Orcutt BN, Sylvan JB, Knab NJ, Edwards KJ. 2011. Microbial ecology of the dark ocean above, at, and below the seafloor. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 75:361–422.
    15.
    Karner MB, DeLong EF, Karl DM. 2001. Archaeal dominance in the mesopelagic zone of the Pacific Ocean. Nature 409:507–510.
    16.
    Herndl GJ, Reinthaler T, Teira E, van Aken H, Veth C, Pernthaler A, Pernthaler J. 2005. Contribution of Archaea to total prokaryotic production in the deep Atlantic Ocean. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:2303–2309.
    17.
    Beam JP, Jay ZJ, Kozubal MA, Inskeep WP. 2014. Niche specialization of novel Thaumarchaeota to oxic and hypoxic acidic geothermal springs of Yellowstone National Park. ISME J 8:938–951.
    18.
    Hua Z-S, Qu Y-N, Zhu Q, Zhou E-M, Qi Y-L, Yin Y-R, Rao Y-Z, Tian Y, Li Y-X, Liu L, Castelle CJ, Hedlund BP, Shu W-S, Knight R, Li W-J. 2018. Genomic inference of the metabolism and evolution of the archaeal phylum Aigarchaeota. Nat Commun 9:2832.
    19.
    Kato S, Itoh T, Yuki M, Nagamori M, Ohnishi M, Uematsu K, Suzuki K, Takashina T, Ohkuma M. 2019. Isolation and characterization of a thermophilic sulfur- and iron-reducing thaumarchaeote from a terrestrial acidic hot spring. ISME J 13:2465–2474.
    20.
    Lin X, Handley KM, Gilbert JA, Kostka JE. 2015. Metabolic potential of fatty acid oxidation and anaerobic respiration by abundant members of Thaumarchaeota and Thermoplasmata in deep anoxic peat. ISME J 9:2740–2744.
    21.
    Chaumeil P-A, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. 15 November 2019. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics doi:
    22.
    Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Waite DW, Rinke C, Skarshewski A, Chaumeil P-A, Hugenholtz P. 2018. A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life. Nat Biotechnol 36:996–1004.
    23.
    Parks DH, Rinke C, Chuvochina M, Chaumeil P-A, Woodcroft BJ, Evans PN, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2017. Recovery of nearly 8,000 metagenome-assembled genomes substantially expands the tree of life. Nat Microbiol 2:1533–1542.
    24.
    Reji L, Francis CA. 2020. Aerobic heterotrophy and RuBisCO-mediated CO2 metabolism in marine Thaumarchaeota. bioRxiv doi:
    25.
    Eloe EA, Shulse CN, Fadrosh DW, Williamson SJ, Allen EE, Bartlett DH. 2011. Compositional differences in particle-associated and free-living microbial assemblages from an extreme deep-ocean environment. Environ Microbiol Rep 3:449–458.
    26.
    Bano N, Ruffin S, Ransom B, Hollibaugh JT. 2004. Phylogenetic composition of Arctic Ocean archaeal assemblages and comparison with antarctic assemblages. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:781–789.
    27.
    Tolar BB, Reji L, Smith JM, Blum M, Timothy Pennington J, Chavez FP, Francis CA. 5 March 2020. Time series assessment of Thaumarchaeota ecotypes in Monterey Bay reveals the importance of water column position in predicting distribution–environment relationships. Limnol Oceanogr doi:
    28.
    Mincer TJ, Church MJ, Taylor LT, Preston C, Karl DM, DeLong EF. 2007. Quantitative distribution of presumptive archaeal and bacterial nitrifiers in Monterey Bay and the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre. Environ Microbiol 9:1162–1175.
    29.
    Naganuma T, Miyoshi T, Kimura H. 2007. Phylotype diversity of deep-sea hydrothermal vent prokaryotes trapped by 0.2- and 0.1-μm-pore-size filters. Extremophiles 11:637–646.
    30.
    Martin-Cuadrado A-B, Rodriguez-Valera F, Moreira D, Alba JC, Ivars-Martínez E, Henn MR, Talla E, López-García P. 2008. Hindsight in the relative abundance, metabolic potential and genome dynamics of uncultivated marine archaea from comparative metagenomic analyses of bathypelagic plankton of different oceanic regions. ISME J 2:865–886.
    31.
    Jungbluth SP, Lin H-T, Cowen JP, Glazer BT, Rappé MS. 2014. Phylogenetic diversity of microorganisms in subseafloor crustal fluids from Holes 1025C and 1026B along the Juan de Fuca Ridge flank. Front Microbiol 5:119.
    32.
    DeLong EF, Preston CM, Mincer T, Rich V, Hallam SJ, Frigaard N-U, Martinez A, Sullivan MB, Edwards R, Brito BR, Chisholm SW, Karl DM. 2006. Community genomics among stratified microbial assemblages in the ocean’s interior. Science 311:496–503.
    33.
    Zaballos M, López-López A, Ovreas L, Bartual SG, D'Auria G, Alba JC, Legault B, Pushker R, Daae FL, Rodríguez-Valera F. 2006. Comparison of prokaryotic diversity at offshore oceanic locations reveals a different microbiota in the Mediterranean Sea. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 56:389–405.
    34.
    Agogué H, Brink M, Dinasquet J, Herndl GJ. 2008. Major gradients in putatively nitrifying and non-nitrifying Archaea in the deep North Atlantic. Nature 456:788–791.
    35.
    Church MJ, Wai B, Karl DM, DeLong EF. 2010. Abundances of crenarchaeal amoA genes and transcripts in the Pacific Ocean. Environ Microbiol 12:679–688.
    36.
    Kiełbasa SM, Wan R, Sato K, Horton P, Frith MC. 2011. Adaptive seeds tame genomic sequence comparison. Genome Res 21:487–493.
    37.
    Mende DR, Bryant JA, Aylward FO, Eppley JM, Nielsen T, Karl DM, DeLong EF. 2017. Environmental drivers of a microbial genomic transition zone in the ocean’s interior. Nat Microbiol 2:1367–1373.
    38.
    Rinke C, Schwientek P, Sczyrba A, Ivanova NN, Anderson IJ, Cheng J-F, Darling A, Malfatti S, Swan BK, Gies EA, Dodsworth JA, Hedlund BP, Tsiamis G, Sievert SM, Liu W-T, Eisen JA, Hallam SJ, Kyrpides NC, Stepanauskas R, Rubin EM, Hugenholtz P, Woyke T. 2013. Insights into the phylogeny and coding potential of microbial dark matter. Nature 499:431–437.
    39.
    Dombrowski N, Lee J-H, Williams TA, Offre P, Spang A. 2019. Genomic diversity, lifestyles and evolutionary origins of DPANN archaea. FEMS Microbiol Lett 366:fnz008.
    40.
    Giovannoni SJ, Cameron Thrash J, Temperton B. 2014. Implications of streamlining theory for microbial ecology. ISME J 8:1553–1565.
    41.
    Doxey AC, Kurtz DA, Lynch MDJ, Sauder LA, Neufeld JD. 2015. Aquatic metagenomes implicate Thaumarchaeota in global cobalamin production. ISME J 9:461–471.
    42.
    Heal KR, Qin W, Ribalet F, Bertagnolli AD, Coyote-Maestas W, Hmelo LR, Moffett JW, Devol AH, Armbrust EV, Stahl DA, Ingalls AE. 2017. Two distinct pools of B12 analogs reveal community interdependencies in the ocean. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:364–369.
    43.
    Pelve EA, Lindås A-C, Martens-Habbena W, de la Torre JR, Stahl DA, Bernander R. 2011. Cdv-based cell division and cell cycle organization in the thaumarchaeon Nitrosopumilus maritimus. Mol Microbiol 82:555–566.
    44.
    Santoro AE, Dupont CL, Alex Richter R, Craig MT, Carini P, McIlvin MR, Yang Y, Orsi WD, Moran DM, Saito MA. 2015. Genomic and proteomic characterization of “Candidatus Nitrosopelagicus brevis”: an ammonia-oxidizing archaeon from the open ocean. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:1173–1178.
    45.
    Liu Y, White RH, Whitman WB. 2010. Methanococci use the diaminopimelate aminotransferase (DapL) pathway for lysine biosynthesis. J Bacteriol 192:3304–3310.
    46.
    Kerou M, Offre P, Valledor L, Abby SS, Melcher M, Nagler M, Weckwerth W, Schleper C. 2016. Proteomics and comparative genomics of Nitrososphaera viennensis reveal the core genome and adaptations of archaeal ammonia oxidizers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:E7937–E7946.
    47.
    Zeng Z, Liu X-L, Farley KR, Wei JH, Metcalf WW, Summons RE, Welander PV. 2019. GDGT cyclization proteins identify the dominant archaeal sources of tetraether lipids in the ocean. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116:22505–22511.
    48.
    Bräsen C, Esser D, Rauch B, Siebers B. 2014. Carbohydrate metabolism in Archaea: current insights into unusual enzymes and pathways and their regulation. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 78:89–175.
    49.
    Zhang J, Frerman FE, Kim J-J. 2006. Structure of electron transfer flavoprotein-ubiquinone oxidoreductase and electron transfer to the mitochondrial ubiquinone pool. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:16212–16217.
    50.
    Spang A, Poehlein A, Offre P, Zumbrägel S, Haider S, Rychlik N, Nowka B, Schmeisser C, Lebedeva EV, Rattei T, Böhm C, Schmid M, Galushko A, Hatzenpichler R, Weinmaier T, Daniel R, Schleper C, Spieck E, Streit W, Wagner M. 2012. The genome of the ammonia-oxidizing Candidatus Nitrososphaera gargensis: insights into metabolic versatility and environmental adaptations. Environ Microbiol 14:3122–3145.
    51.
    Chadwick GL, Hemp J, Fischer WW, Orphan VJ. 2018. Convergent evolution of unusual complex I homologs with increased proton pumping capacity: energetic and ecological implications. ISME J 12:2668–2680.
    52.
    Lücker S, Wagner M, Maixner F, Pelletier E, Koch H, Vacherie B, Rattei T, Damsté JSS, Spieck E, Le Paslier D, Daims H. 2010. A Nitrospira metagenome illuminates the physiology and evolution of globally important nitrite-oxidizing bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:13479–13484.
    53.
    Walker CB, de la Torre JR, Klotz MG, Urakawa H, Pinel N, Arp DJ, Brochier-Armanet C, Chain PSG, Chan PP, Gollabgir A, Hemp J, Hügler M, Karr EA, Könneke M, Shin M, Lawton TJ, Lowe T, Martens-Habbena W, Sayavedra-Soto LA, Lang D, Sievert SM, Rosenzweig AC, Manning G, Stahl DA. 2010. Nitrosopumilus maritimus genome reveals unique mechanisms for nitrification and autotrophy in globally distributed marine crenarchaea. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:8818–8823.
    54.
    Stahl DA, de la Torre JR. 2012. Physiology and diversity of ammonia-oxidizing archaea. Annu Rev Microbiol 66:83–101.
    55.
    Hemp J, Gennis RB. 2008. Diversity of the heme-copper superfamily in archaea: insights from genomics and structural modeling. Results Probl Cell Differ 45:1–31.
    56.
    Pereira MM, Santana M, Teixeira M. 2001. A novel scenario for the evolution of haem–copper oxygen reductases. Biochim Biophys Acta 1505:185–208.
    57.
    Pereira MM, Sousa FL, Veríssimo AF, Teixeira M. 2008. Looking for the minimum common denominator in haem–copper oxygen reductases: towards a unified catalytic mechanism. Biochim Biophys Acta 1777:929–934.
    58.
    Wang B, Qin W, Ren Y, Zhou X, Jung M-Y, Han P, Eloe-Fadrosh EA, Li M, Zheng Y, Lu L, Yan X, Ji J, Liu Y, Liu L, Heiner C, Hall R, Martens-Habbena W, Herbold CW, Rhee S-K, Bartlett DH, Huang L, Ingalls AE, Wagner M, Stahl DA, Jia Z. 2019. Expansion of Thaumarchaeota habitat range is correlated with horizontal transfer of ATPase operons. ISME J 13:3067–3079.
    59.
    Matsutani M, Yakushi T. 2018. Pyrroloquinoline quinone-dependent dehydrogenases of acetic acid bacteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:9531–9540.
    60.
    Anthony C. 2004. The quinoprotein dehydrogenases for methanol and glucose. Arch Biochem Biophys 428:2–9.
    61.
    Keltjens JT, Pol A, Reimann J, Op den Camp H. 2014. PQQ-dependent methanol dehydrogenases: rare-earth elements make a difference. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:6163–6183.
    62.
    Yamada M, Elias MD, Matsushita K, Migita CT, Adachi O. 2003. Escherichia coli PQQ-containing quinoprotein glucose dehydrogenase: its structure comparison with other quinoproteins. Biochim Biophys Acta 1647:185–192.
    63.
    Sun J, Steindler L, Thrash JC, Halsey KH, Smith DP, Carter AE, Landry ZC, Giovannoni SJ. 2011. One carbon metabolism in SAR11 pelagic marine bacteria. PLoS One 6:e23973.
    64.
    Cozier GE, Salleh RA, Anthony C. 1999. Characterization of the membrane quinoprotein glucose dehydrogenase from Escherichia coli and characterization of a site-directed mutant in which histidine-262 has been changed to tyrosine. Biochem J 340:639–647.
    65.
    Rozeboom HJ, Yu S, Mikkelsen R, Nikolaev I, Mulder HJ, Dijkstra BW. 2015. Crystal structure of quinone-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase from Pseudogluconobacter saccharoketogenes. A versatile dehydrogenase oxidizing alcohols and carbohydrates. Protein Sci 24:2044–2054.
    66.
    Anthony C. 1996. Quinoprotein-catalysed reactions. Biochemical J 320:697–711.
    67.
    Deschamps P, Zivanovic Y, Moreira D, Rodriguez-Valera F, López-García P. 2014. Pangenome evidence for extensive interdomain horizontal transfer affecting lineage core and shell genes in uncultured planktonic thaumarchaeota and euryarchaeota. Genome Biol Evol 6:1549–1563.
    68.
    Tabita FR, Satagopan S, Hanson TE, Kreel NE, Scott SS. 2008. Distinct form I, II, III, and IV Rubisco proteins from the three kingdoms of life provide clues about Rubisco evolution and structure/function relationships. J Exp Bot 59:1515–1524.
    69.
    Saito Y, Ashida H, Sakiyama T, de Marsac NT, Danchin A, Sekowska A, Yokota A. 2009. Structural and functional similarities between a ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCO)-like protein from Bacillus subtilis and photosynthetic RuBisCO. J Biol Chem 284:13256–13264.
    70.
    Jaffe AL, Castelle CJ, Dupont CL, Banfield JF. 2019. Lateral gene transfer shapes the distribution of RuBisCO among candidate phyla radiation bacteria and DPANN Archaea. Mol Biol Evol 36:435–446.
    71.
    Wrighton KC, Castelle CJ, Varaljay VA, Satagopan S, Brown CT, Wilkins MJ, Thomas BC, Sharon I, Williams KH, Tabita FR, Banfield JF. 2016. RubisCO of a nucleoside pathway known from Archaea is found in diverse uncultivated phyla in bacteria. ISME J 10:2702–2714.
    72.
    Pearson A, Hurley SJ, Shah Walter SR, Kusch S, Lichtin S, Zhang YG. 2016. Stable carbon isotope ratios of intact GDGTs indicate heterogeneous sources to marine sediments. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 181:18–35.
    73.
    Ingalls AE, Shah SR, Hansman RL, Aluwihare LI, Santos GM, Druffel ERM, Pearson A. 2006. Quantifying archaeal community autotrophy in the mesopelagic ocean using natural radiocarbon. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:6442–6447.
    74.
    Hurley SJ, Close HG, Elling FJ, Jasper CE, Gospodinova K, McNichol AP, Pearson A. 2019. CO2-dependent carbon isotope fractionation in Archaea. Part II: the marine water column. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 261:383–395.
    75.
    Arístegui J, Duarte CM, Agustí S, Doval M, Alvarez-Salgado XA, Hansell DA. 2002. Dissolved organic carbon support of respiration in the dark ocean. Science 298:1967.
    76.
    Carlson CA, Hansell DA. 2015. DOM sources, sinks, reactivity, and budgets. In Hansell DA, Carlson CA (ed), Biogeochemistry of marine dissolved organic matter. Academic Press, New York, NY.
    77.
    Durkin CA, Van Mooy BAS, Dyhrman ST, Buesseler KO. 2016. Sinking phytoplankton associated with carbon flux in the Atlantic Ocean. Limnol Oceanogr 61:1172–1187.
    78.
    Johnson WM, Longnecker K, Kido Soule MC, Arnold WA, Bhatia MP, Hallam SJ, Van Mooy BAS, Kujawinski EB. 2020. Metabolite composition of sinking particles differs from surface suspended particles across a latitudinal transect in the South Atlantic. Limnol Oceanogr 65:111–127.
    79.
    Biller SJ, Berube PM, Dooley K, Williams M, Satinsky BM, Hackl T, Hogle SL, Coe A, Bergauer K, Bouman HA, Browning TJ, De Corte D, Hassler C, Hulston D, Jacquot JE, Maas EW, Reinthaler T, Sintes E, Yokokawa T, Chisholm SW. 2018. Marine microbial metagenomes sampled across space and time. Sci Data 5:180176.
    80.
    Hawley AK, Torres-Beltrán M, Zaikova E, Walsh DA, Mueller A, Scofield M, Kheirandish S, Payne C, Pakhomova L, Bhatia M, Shevchuk O, Gies EA, Fairley D, Malfatti SA, Norbeck AD, Brewer HM, Pasa-Tolic L, Del Rio TG, Suttle CA, Tringe S, Hallam SJ. 2017. A compendium of multi-omic sequence information from the Saanich Inlet water column. Sci Data 4:170160.
    81.
    Chen I-M, Chu K, Palaniappan K, Pillay M, Ratner A, Huang J, Huntemann M, Varghese N, White JR, Seshadri R, Smirnova T, Kirton E, Jungbluth SP, Woyke T, Eloe-Fadrosh EA, Ivanova NN, Kyrpides NC. 2019. IMG/M v.5.0: an integrated data management and comparative analysis system for microbial genomes and microbiomes. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D666–D677.
    82.
    Kang DD, Li F, Kirton E, Thomas A, Egan R, An H, Wang Z. 2019. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ 7:e7359.
    83.
    Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055.
    84.
    Olm MR, Brown CT, Brooks B, Banfield JF. 2017. dRep: a tool for fast and accurate genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-replication. ISME J 11:2864–2868.
    85.
    Treangen TJ, Sommer DD, Angly FE, Koren S, Pop M. 2011. Next generation sequence assembly with AMOS. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics Chapter 11:Unit 11.8.
    86.
    Tully BJ, Graham ED, Heidelberg JF. 2018. The reconstruction of 2,631 draft metagenome-assembled genomes from the global oceans. Sci Data 5:170203.
    87.
    Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9:357–359.
    88.
    Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477.
    89.
    Varghese NJ, Mukherjee S, Ivanova N, Konstantinidis KT, Mavrommatis K, Kyrpides NC, Pati A. 2015. Microbial species delineation using whole genome sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 43:6761–6771.
    90.
    Hyatt D, Chen G-L, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. 2010. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11:119.
    91.
    Huerta-Cepas J, Szklarczyk D, Forslund K, Cook H, Heller D, Walter MC, Rattei T, Mende DR, Sunagawa S, Kuhn M, Jensen LJ, von Mering C, Bork P. 2016. eggNOG 4.5: a hierarchical orthology framework with improved functional annotations for eukaryotic, prokaryotic and viral sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D286–D293.
    92.
    Finn RD, Coggill P, Eberhardt RY, Eddy SR, Mistry J, Mitchell AL, Potter SC, Punta M, Qureshi M, Sangrador-Vegas A, Salazar GA, Tate J, Bateman A. 2016. The Pfam protein families database: towards a more sustainable future. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D279–D285.
    93.
    Eddy SR. 2011. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput Biol 7:e1002195.
    94.
    Moriya Y, Itoh M, Okuda S, Yoshizawa AC, Kanehisa M. 2007. KAAS: an automatic genome annotation and pathway reconstruction server. Nucleic Acids Res 35:W182–W185.
    95.
    Armenteros JJA, Tsirigos KD, Sønderby CK, Petersen TN, Winther O, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H. 2019. SignalP 5.0 improves signal peptide predictions using deep neural networks. Nat Biotechnol 37:420–423.
    96.
    Käll L, Krogh A, Sonnhammer E. 2007. Advantages of combined transmembrane topology and signal peptide prediction–the Phobius web server. Nucleic Acids Res 35:W429–W432.
    97.
    Elbourne LDH, Tetu SG, Hassan KA, Paulsen IT. 2017. TransportDB 2.0: a database for exploring membrane transporters in sequenced genomes from all domains of life. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D320–D324.
    98.
    Vallenet D. 2006. MaGe: a microbial genome annotation system supported by synteny results. Nucleic Acids Res 34:53–65.
    99.
    Vallenet D, Calteau A, Dubois M, Amours P, Bazin A, Beuvin M, Burlot L, Bussell X, Fouteau S, Gautreau G, Lajus A, Langlois J, Planel R, Roche D, Rollin J, Rouy Z, Sabatet V, Médigue C. 2020. MicroScope: an integrated platform for the annotation and exploration of microbial gene functions through genomic, pangenomic and metabolic comparative analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 48:D579–D589.
    100.
    Wang S, Li W, Liu S, Xu J. 2016. RaptorX-Property: a web server for protein structure property prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 44:W430–W435.
    101.
    Getz EW, Tithi SS, Zhang L, Aylward FO. 2018. Parallel evolution of genome streamlining and cellular bioenergetics across the marine radiation of a bacterial phylum. mBio 9:e01089-18.
    102.
    Jungbluth SP, Amend JP, Rappé MS. 2017. Metagenome sequencing and 98 microbial genomes from Juan de Fuca Ridge flank subsurface fluids. Sci Data 4:1–11.
    103.
    Sunagawa S, Mende DR, Zeller G, Izquierdo-Carrasco F, Berger SA, Kultima JR, Coelho LP, Arumugam M, Tap J, Nielsen HB, Rasmussen S, Brunak S, Pedersen O, Guarner F, de Vos WM, Wang J, Li J, Doré J, Ehrlich SD, Stamatakis A, Bork P. 2013. Metagenomic species profiling using universal phylogenetic marker genes. Nat Methods 10:1196–1199.
    104.
    Mende DR, Sunagawa S, Zeller G, Bork P. 2013. Accurate and universal delineation of prokaryotic species. Nat Methods 10:881–884.
    105.
    Huerta-Cepas J, Serra F, Bork P. 2016. ETE 3: reconstruction, analysis, and visualization of phylogenomic data. Mol Biol Evol 33:1635–1638.
    106.
    Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, Li W, Lopez R, McWilliam H, Remmert M, Söding J, Thompson JD, Higgins DG. 2011. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol 7:539.
    107.
    Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldón T. 2009. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25:1972–1973.
    108.
    Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. 2010. FastTree 2–approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One 5:e9490.
    109.
    Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. 2015. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 32:268–274.
    110.
    Hoang DT, Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS. 2018. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol Biol Evol 35:518–522.
    111.
    Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. 2017. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat Methods 14:587–589.
    112.
    Quang LS, Gascuel O, Lartillot N. 2008. Empirical profile mixture models for phylogenetic reconstruction. Bioinformatics 24:2317–2323.
    113.
    Clark K, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Sayers EW. 2016. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D67–D72.
    114.
    Cole JR, Wang Q, Fish JA, Chai B, McGarrell DM, Sun Y, Brown CT, Porras-Alfaro A, Kuske CR, Tiedje JM. 2014. Ribosomal Database Project: data and tools for high throughput rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D633–D642.
    115.
    Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR. 2007. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:5261–5267.
    116.
    Nakamura T, Yamada KD, Tomii K, Katoh K. 2018. Parallelization of MAFFT for large-scale multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 34:2490–2492.
    117.
    O'Leary NA, Wright MW, Brister JR, Ciufo S, Haddad D, McVeigh R, Rajput B, Robbertse B, Smith-White B, Ako-Adjei D, Astashyn A, Badretdin A, Bao Y, Blinkova O, Brover V, Chetvernin V, Choi J, Cox E, Ermolaeva O, Farrell CM, Goldfarb T, Gupta T, Haft D, Hatcher E, Hlavina W, Joardar VS, Kodali VK, Li W, Maglott D, Masterson P, McGarvey KM, Murphy MR, O'Neill K, Pujar S, Rangwala SH, Rausch D, Riddick LD, Schoch C, Shkeda A, Storz SS, Sun H, Thibaud-Nissen F, Tolstoy I, Tully RE, Vatsan AR, Wallin C, Webb D, Wu W, Landrum MJ, Kimchi A, Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Kitts P, Murphy TD, Pruitt KD. 2016. Reference sequence (RefSeq) database at NCBI: current status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D733–D745.
    118.
    NCBI Resource Coordinators. 2018. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res 46:D8–D13.
    119.
    Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, Madden TL. 2009. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10:421.
    120.
    Oubrie A, Rozeboom HJ, Kalk KH, Huizinga EG, Dijkstra BW. 2002. Crystal structure of quinohemoprotein alcohol dehydrogenase from Comamonas testosteroni: structural basis for substrate oxidation and electron transfer. J Biol Chem 277:3727–3732.
    121.
    Lechner M, Findeiss S, Steiner L, Marz M, Stadler PF, Prohaska SJ. 2011. Proteinortho: detection of (co-)orthologs in large-scale analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 12:124.
    122.
    Aylward FO, Eppley JM, Smith JM, Chavez FP, Scholin CA, DeLong EF. 2015. Microbial community transcriptional networks are conserved in three domains at ocean basin scales. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:5443–5448.
    123.
    Wilson ST, Aylward FO, Ribalet F, Barone B, Casey JR, Connell PE, Eppley JM, Ferrón S, Fitzsimmons JN, Hayes CT, Romano AE, Turk-Kubo KA, Vislova A, Armbrust EV, Caron DA, Church MJ, Zehr JP, Karl DM, DeLong EF. 2017. Coordinated regulation of growth, activity and transcription in natural populations of the unicellular nitrogen-fixing cyanobacterium Crocosphaera. Nat Microbiol 2:17118.
    124.
    Frith MC. 2011. A new repeat-masking method enables specific detection of homologous sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 39:e23.
    125.
    Mortazavi A, Williams BA, McCue K, Schaeffer L, Wold B. 2008. Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat Methods 5:621–628.
    126.
    Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K. 2004. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289–290.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSystems
    Volume 5Number 330 June 2020
    eLocator: e00415-20
    Editor: Nick Bouskill
    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

    History

    Received: 11 May 2020
    Accepted: 28 May 2020
    Published online: 16 June 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. Thaumarchaeota
    2. marine archaea
    3. TACK
    4. PQQ-dehydrogenase
    5. RuBisCO

    Contributors

    Authors

    Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
    Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, USA

    Editor

    Nick Bouskill
    Editor
    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Frank O. Aylward, [email protected], or Alyson E. Santoro, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSystemsArticle
    Chemogenomic Screen for Imipenem Resistance in Gram-Negative Bacteria

    Chemogenomic Screen for Imipenem Resistance in Gram-Negative Bacteria

    ABSTRACT

    Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria are considered a major threat to global health. Imipenem (IMP) is used as a last line of treatment against these pathogens, but its efficacy is diminished by the emergence of resistance. We applied a whole-genome screen in Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates that were submitted to chemical mutagenesis, selected for IMP resistance, and characterized by next-generation sequencing. A comparative analysis of IMP-resistant clones showed that most of the highly mutated genes shared by the three species encoded proteins involved in transcription or signal transduction. Of these, the rpoD gene was one of the most prevalent and an E. coli strain disrupted for rpoD displayed a 4-fold increase in resistance to IMP. E. coli and K. pneumoniae also specifically shared several mutated genes, most involved in membrane/cell envelope biogenesis, and the contribution in IMP susceptibility was experimentally proven for amidases, transferases, and transglycosidases. P. aeruginosa differed from the two Enterobacteriaceae isolates with two different resistance mechanisms, with one involving mutations in the oprD porin or, alternatively, in two-component systems. Our chemogenomic screen performed with the three species has highlighted shared and species-specific responses to IMP.
    IMPORTANCE Gram-negative carbapenem-resistant bacteria are a major threat to global health. The use of genome-wide screening approaches to probe for genes or mutations enabling resistance can lead to identification of molecular markers for diagnostics applications. We describe an approach called Mut-Seq that couples chemical mutagenesis and next-generation sequencing for studying resistance to imipenem in the Gram-negative bacteria Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The use of this approach highlighted shared and species-specific responses, and the role in resistance of a number of genes involved in membrane biogenesis, transcription, and signal transduction was functionally validated. Interestingly, some of the genes identified were previously considered promising therapeutic targets. Our genome-wide screen has the potential to be extended outside drug resistance studies and expanded to other organisms.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Tacconelli E, Carrara E, Savoldi A, Harbarth S, Mendelson M, Monnet DL, Pulcini C, Kahlmeter G, Kluytmans J, Carmeli Y, Ouellette M, Outterson K, Patel J, Cavaleri M, Cox EM, Houchens CR, Grayson ML, Hansen P, Singh N, Theuretzbacher U, Magrini N. 2018. Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: the WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis. Lancet Infect Dis 18:318–327.
    2.
    Nordmann P, Dortet L, Poirel L. 2012. Carbapenem resistance in Enterobacteriaceae: here is the storm! Trends Mol Med 18:263–272.
    3.
    Navon-Venezia S, Kondratyeva K, Carattoli A. 2017. Klebsiella pneumoniae: a major worldwide source and shuttle for antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol Rev 41:252–275.
    4.
    López-Causapé C, Cabot G, Del Barrio-Tofiño E, Oliver A. 2018. The versatile mutational resistome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front Microbiol 9:685.
    5.
    Peleg AY, Hooper DC. 2010. Hospital-acquired infections due to gram-negative bacteria. N Engl J Med 362:1804–1813.
    6.
    Papp-Wallace KM, Endimiani A, Taracila MA, Bonomo RA. 2011. Carbapenems: past, present, and future. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:4943–4960.
    7.
    Lob SH, Hackel MA, Kazmierczak KM, Young K, Motyl MR, Karlowsky JA, Sahm DF. 24 May 2017, posting date. In vitro activity of imipenem-relebactam against Gram-negative ESKAPE pathogens isolated by clinical laboratories in the United States in 2015 (results from the SMART Global Surveillance Program). Antimicrob Agents Chemother doi:
    8.
    Diene SM, Rolain JM. 2014. Carbapenemase genes and genetic platforms in Gram-negative bacilli: Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas, and Acinetobacter species. Clin Microbiol Infect 20:831–838.
    9.
    Bidet P, Burghoffer B, Gautier V, Brahimi N, Mariani-Kurkdjian P, El-Ghoneimi A, Bingen E, Arlet G. 2005. In vivo transfer of plasmid-encoded ACC-1 AmpC from Klebsiella pneumoniae to Escherichia coli in an infant and selection of impermeability to imipenem in K. pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:3562–3565.
    10.
    Queenan AM, Bush K. 2007. Carbapenemases: the versatile beta-lactamases. Clin Microbiol Rev 20:440–458.
    11.
    Chia JH, Siu LK, Su LH, Lin HS, Kuo AJ, Lee MH, Wu TL. 2009. Emergence of carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli in Taiwan: resistance due to combined CMY-2 production and porin deficiency. J Chemother 21:621–626.
    12.
    Shin SY, Bae IK, Kim J, Jeong SH, Yong D, Kim JM, Lee K. 2012. Resistance to carbapenems in sequence type 11 Klebsiella pneumoniae is related to DHA-1 and loss of OmpK35 and/or OmpK36. J Med Microbiol 61:239–245.
    13.
    Rodriguez-Martinez JM, Poirel L, Nordmann P. 2009. Molecular epidemiology and mechanisms of carbapenem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:4783–4788.
    14.
    Fang ZL, Zhang LY, Huang YM, Qing Y, Cao KY, Tian GB, Huang X. 2014. OprD mutations and inactivation in imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from China. Infect Genet Evol 21:124–128.
    15.
    Hong DJ, Bae IK, Jang IH, Jeong SH, Kang HK, Lee K. 2015. Epidemiology and characteristics of metallo-beta-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect Chemother 47:81–97.
    16.
    Pang Z, Raudonis R, Glick BR, Lin TJ, Cheng Z. 2019. Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: mechanisms and alternative therapeutic strategies. Biotechnol Adv 37:177–192.
    17.
    Zhanel GG, Lawrence CK, Adam H, Schweizer F, Zelenitsky S, Zhanel M, Lagace-Wiens PRS, Walkty A, Denisuik A, Golden A, Gin AS, Hoban DJ, Lynch JP, III, Karlowsky JA. 2018. Imipenem-relebactam and meropenem-vaborbactam: two novel carbapenem-beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations. Drugs 78:65–98.
    18.
    Schmidt-Malan SM, Mishra AJ, Mushtaq A, Brinkman CL, Patel R. 27 July 2018, posting date. In vitro activity of imipenem-relebactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam against resistant Gram-negative bacilli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother doi:
    19.
    Livermore DM, Yang YJ. 1989. Comparative activity of meropenem against Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains with well-characterized resistance mechanisms. J Antimicrob Chemother 24(Suppl A):149–159.
    20.
    Voutsinas D, Mavroudis T, Avlamis A, Giamarellou H. 1989. In-vitro activity of meropenem, a new carbapenem, against multiresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa compared with that of other antipseudomonal antimicrobials. J Antimicrob Chemother 24(Suppl A):143–147.
    21.
    Feng J, Lupien A, Gingras H, Wasserscheid J, Dewar K, Legare D, Ouellette M. 2009. Genome sequencing of linezolid-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae mutants reveals novel mechanisms of resistance. Genome Res 19:1214–1223.
    22.
    Fani F, Leprohon P, Legare D, Ouellette M. 2011. Whole genome sequencing of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae reveals mutations in penicillin-binding proteins and in a putative iron permease. Genome Biol 12:R115.
    23.
    Koser CU, Ellington MJ, Peacock SJ. 2014. Whole-genome sequencing to control antimicrobial resistance. Trends Genet 30:401–407.
    24.
    Rimoldi SG, Gentile B, Pagani C, Di Gregorio A, Anselmo A, Palozzi AM, Fortunato A, Pittiglio V, Ridolfo AL, Gismondo MR, Rizzardini G, Lista F. 2017. Whole genome sequencing for the molecular characterization of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strains isolated at the Italian ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco Hospital, 2012–2014. BMC Infect Dis 17:666.
    25.
    Robins WP, Faruque SM, Mekalanos JJ. 2013. Coupling mutagenesis and parallel deep sequencing to probe essential residues in a genome or gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:E848–E857.
    26.
    Gingras H, Patron K, Bhattacharya A, Leprohon P, Ouellette M. 25 April 2019, posting date. Gain and loss of function screens coupled to next generation sequencing for antibiotic mode of action and resistance studies in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother doi:
    27.
    Brammeld JS, Petljak M, Martincorena I, Williams SP, Alonso LG, Dalmases A, Bellosillo B, Robles-Espinoza CD, Price S, Barthorpe S, Tarpey P, Alifrangis C, Bignell G, Vidal J, Young J, Stebbings L, Beal K, Stratton MR, Saez-Rodriguez J, Garnett M, Montagut C, Iorio F, McDermott U. 2017. Genome-wide chemical mutagenesis screens allow unbiased saturation of the cancer genome and identification of drug resistance mutations. Genome Res 27:613–625.
    28.
    Wayne P. 2019. CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 29th ed. CLSI supplement M100. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
    29.
    Du H, Pan B, Chen T. 2017. Evaluation of chemical mutagenicity using next generation sequencing: a review. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev 35:140–158.
    30.
    Galperin MY, Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Koonin EV. 2015. Expanded microbial genome coverage and improved protein family annotation in the COG database. Nucleic Acids Res 43:D261–D269.
    31.
    Peters NT, Dinh T, Bernhardt TG. 2011. A fail-safe mechanism in the septal ring assembly pathway generated by the sequential recruitment of cell separation amidases and their activators. J Bacteriol 193:4973–4983.
    32.
    Lehrbach NJ, Ji F, Sadreyev R. 2017. Next-generation sequencing for identification of EMS-induced mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr Protoc Mol Biol 117:7.29.1–7 29.12.
    33.
    Borukhov S, Nudler E. 2008. RNA polymerase: the vehicle of transcription. Trends Microbiol 16:126–134.
    34.
    Campbell EA, Muzzin O, Chlenov M, Sun JL, Olson CA, Weinman O, Trester-Zedlitz ML, Darst SA. 2002. Structure of the bacterial RNA polymerase promoter specificity sigma subunit. Mol Cell 9:527–539.
    35.
    Paget MS. 2015. Bacterial sigma factors and anti-sigma factors: structure, function and distribution. Biomolecules 5:1245–1265.
    36.
    Sauvage E, Terrak M. 17 February 2016, posting date. Glycosyltransferases and transpeptidases/penicillin-binding proteins: valuable targets for new antibacterials. Antibiotics (Basel) doi:
    37.
    Dik DA, Fisher JF, Mobashery S. 2018. Cell-wall recycling of the Gram-negative bacteria and the nexus to antibiotic resistance. Chem Rev 118:5952–5984.
    38.
    Rodloff AC, Goldstein EJ, Torres A. 2006. Two decades of imipenem therapy. J Antimicrob Chemother 58:916–929.
    39.
    Edwards JR, Turner PJ. 1995. Laboratory data which differentiate meropenem and imipenem. Scand J Infect Dis Suppl 96:5–10.
    40.
    Adler M, Anjum M, Andersson DI, Sandegren L. 2016. Combinations of mutations in envZ, ftsI, mrdA, acrB and acrR can cause high-level carbapenem resistance in Escherichia coli. J Antimicrob Chemother 71:1188–1198.
    41.
    Tsang MJ, Yakhnina AA, Bernhardt TG. 2017. NlpD links cell wall remodeling and outer membrane invagination during cytokinesis in Escherichia coli. PLoS Genet 13:e1006888.
    42.
    Gray AN, Egan AJ, van't Veer IL, Verheul J, Colavin A, Koumoutsi A, Biboy J, Altelaar AFM, Damen MJ, Huang KC, Simorre J-P, Breukink E, den Blaauwen T, Typas A, Gross CA, Vollmer W. 7 May 2015, posting date. Coordination of peptidoglycan synthesis and outer membrane constriction during Escherichia coli cell division. Elife doi:
    43.
    Heidrich C, Ursinus A, Berger J, Schwarz H, Holtje JV. 2002. Effects of multiple deletions of murein hydrolases on viability, septum cleavage, and sensitivity to large toxic molecules in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 184:6093–6099.
    44.
    Uehara T, Dinh T, Bernhardt TG. 2009. LytM-domain factors are required for daughter cell separation and rapid ampicillin-induced lysis in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 191:5094–5107.
    45.
    Yunck R, Cho H, Bernhardt TG. 2016. Identification of MltG as a potential terminase for peptidoglycan polymerization in bacteria. Mol Microbiol 99:700–718.
    46.
    Cho H, Uehara T, Bernhardt TG. 2014. Beta-lactam antibiotics induce a lethal malfunctioning of the bacterial cell wall synthesis machinery. Cell 159:1300–1311.
    47.
    Templin MF, Edwards DH, Holtje JV. 1992. A murein hydrolase is the specific target of bulgecin in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 267:20039–20043.
    48.
    Costa CS, Anton DN. 2006. High-level resistance to mecillinam produced by inactivation of soluble lytic transglycosylase in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. FEMS Microbiol Lett 256:311–317.
    49.
    Hancock RE. 1998. Resistance mechanisms in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other nonfermentative gram-negative bacteria. Clin Infect Dis 27(Suppl 1):S93–S99.
    50.
    Hancock RE, Brinkman FS. 2002. Function of pseudomonas porins in uptake and efflux. Annu Rev Microbiol 56:17–38.
    51.
    Trias J, Nikaido H. 1990. Outer membrane protein D2 catalyzes facilitated diffusion of carbapenems and penems through the outer membrane of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 34:52–57.
    52.
    Shu JC, Kuo AJ, Su LH, Liu TP, Lee MH, Su IN, Wu TL. 2017. Development of carbapenem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is associated with OprD polymorphisms, particularly the amino acid substitution at codon 170. J Antimicrob Chemother 72:2489–2495.
    53.
    Pirnay JP, De Vos D, Mossialos D, Vanderkelen A, Cornelis P, Zizi M. 2002. Analysis of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa oprD gene from clinical and environmental isolates. Environ Microbiol 4:872–882.
    54.
    Gutierrez O, Juan C, Cercenado E, Navarro F, Bouza E, Coll P, Perez JL, Oliver A. 2007. Molecular epidemiology and mechanisms of carbapenem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Spanish hospitals. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:4329–4335.
    55.
    Kao CY, Chen SS, Hung KH, Wu HM, Hsueh PR, Yan JJ, Wu JJ. 2016. Overproduction of active efflux pump and variations of OprD dominate in imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from patients with bloodstream infections in Taiwan. BMC Microbiol 16:107.
    56.
    Courtois N, Caspar Y, Maurin M. 2018. Phenotypic and genetic resistance traits of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains infecting cystic fibrosis patients: a French cohort study. Int J Antimicrob Agents 52:358–364.
    57.
    Perron K, Caille O, Rossier C, Van Delden C, Dumas J-L, Köhler T. 2004. CzcR-CzcS, a two-component system involved in heavy metal and carbapenem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Biol Chem 279:8761–8768.
    58.
    Caille O, Rossier C, Perron K. 2007. A copper-activated two-component system interacts with zinc and imipenem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 189:4561–4568.
    59.
    Chen YT, Chang HY, Lu CL, Peng HL. 2004. Evolutionary analysis of the two-component systems in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. J Mol Evol 59:725–737.
    60.
    Macfarlane EL, Kwasnicka A, Ochs MM, Hancock RE. 1999. PhoP-PhoQ homologues in Pseudomonas aeruginosa regulate expression of the outer-membrane protein OprH and polymyxin B resistance. Mol Microbiol 34:305–316.
    61.
    Macfarlane EL, Kwasnicka A, Hancock RE. 2000. Role of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PhoP-phoQ in resistance to antimicrobial cationic peptides and aminoglycosides. Microbiology 146:2543–2554.
    62.
    Gooderham WJ, Hancock RE. 2009. Regulation of virulence and antibiotic resistance by two-component regulatory systems in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. FEMS Microbiol Rev 33:279–294.
    63.
    Barrow K, Kwon DH. 2009. Alterations in two-component regulatory systems of phoPQ and pmrAB are associated with polymyxin B resistance in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:5150–5154.
    64.
    Miller AK, Brannon MK, Stevens L, Johansen HK, Selgrade SE, Miller SI, Hoiby N, Moskowitz SM. 2011. PhoQ mutations promote lipid A modification and polymyxin resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa found in colistin-treated cystic fibrosis patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:5761–5769.
    65.
    Li H, Durbin R. 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25:1754–1760.
    66.
    McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, Garimella K, Altshuler D, Gabriel S, Daly M, DePristo MA. 2010. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res 20:1297–1303.
    67.
    Pyne ME, Moo-Young M, Chung DA, Chou CP. 2015. Coupling the CRISPR/Cas9 system with lambda red recombineering enables simplified chromosomal gene replacement in Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:5103–5114.
    68.
    Sukhija K, Pyne M, Ali S, Orr V, Abedi D, Moo-Young M, Chou CP. 2012. Developing an extended genomic engineering approach based on recombineering to knock-in heterologous genes to Escherichia coli genome. Mol Biotechnol 51:109–118.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSystems
    Volume 4Number 617 December 2019
    eLocator: e00465-19
    Editor: Zackery Bulman
    University of Illinois at Chicago

    History

    Received: 31 July 2019
    Accepted: 6 November 2019
    Published online: 19 November 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. chemical mutagenesis
    2. carbapenem resistance
    3. Escherichia coli
    4. Klebsiella pneumoniae
    5. Pseudomonas aeruginosa

    Contributors

    Authors

    Jessica Y. El Khoury
    Axe des Maladies Infectieuses et Immunitaires du Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec and Département de Microbiologie, Infectiologie et Immunologie, Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
    Alexandra Maure
    Axe des Maladies Infectieuses et Immunitaires du Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec and Département de Microbiologie, Infectiologie et Immunologie, Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
    Hélène Gingras
    Axe des Maladies Infectieuses et Immunitaires du Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec and Département de Microbiologie, Infectiologie et Immunologie, Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
    Philippe Leprohon
    Axe des Maladies Infectieuses et Immunitaires du Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec and Département de Microbiologie, Infectiologie et Immunologie, Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
    Marc Ouellette
    Axe des Maladies Infectieuses et Immunitaires du Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec and Département de Microbiologie, Infectiologie et Immunologie, Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada

    Editor

    Zackery Bulman
    Editor
    University of Illinois at Chicago

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Marc Ouellette, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSystemsArticle
    Identification of Primary Antimicrobial Resistance Drivers in Agricultural Nontyphoidal Salmonella enterica Serovars by Using Machine Learning

    ABSTRACT

    Nontyphoidal Salmonella (NTS) is a leading global cause of bacterial foodborne morbidity and mortality. Our ability to treat severe NTS infections has been impaired by increasing antimicrobial resistance (AMR). To understand and mitigate the global health crisis AMR represents, we need to link the observed resistance phenotypes with their underlying genomic mechanisms. Broiler chickens represent a key reservoir and vector for NTS infections, but isolates from this setting have been characterized in only very low numbers relative to clinical isolates. In this study, we sequenced and assembled 97 genomes encompassing 7 serotypes isolated from broiler chicken in farms in British Columbia between 2005 and 2008. Through application of machine learning (ML) models to predict the observed AMR phenotype from this genomic data, we were able to generate highly (0.92 to 0.99) precise logistic regression models using known AMR gene annotations as features for 7 antibiotics (amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ampicillin, cefoxitin, ceftiofur, ceftriaxone, streptomycin, and tetracycline). Similarly, we also trained “reference-free” k-mer-based set-covering machine phenotypic prediction models (0.91 to 1.0 precision) for these antibiotics. By combining the inferred k-mers and logistic regression weights, we identified the primary drivers of AMR for the 7 studied antibiotics in these isolates. With our research representing one of the largest studies of a diverse set of NTS isolates from broiler chicken, we can thus confirm that the AmpC-like CMY-2 β-lactamase is a primary driver of β-lactam resistance and that the phosphotransferases APH(6)-Id and APH(3″-Ib) are the principal drivers of streptomycin resistance in this important ecosystem.
    IMPORTANCE Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) represents an existential threat to the function of modern medicine. Genomics and machine learning methods are being increasingly used to analyze and predict AMR. This type of surveillance is very important to try to reduce the impact of AMR. Machine learning models are typically trained using genomic data, but the aspects of the genomes that they use to make predictions are rarely analyzed. In this work, we showed how, by using different types of machine learning models and performing this analysis, it is possible to identify the key genes underlying AMR in nontyphoidal Salmonella (NTS). NTS is among the leading cause of foodborne illness globally; however, AMR in NTS has not been heavily studied within the food chain itself. Therefore, in this work we performed a broad-scale analysis of the AMR in NTS isolates from commercial chicken farms and identified some priority AMR genes for surveillance.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Gardy JL, Loman NJ. 2018. Towards a genomics-informed, real-time, global pathogen surveillance system. Nat Rev Genet 19:9.
    2.
    Robinson T, Bu D, Carrique-Mas J, Fèvre E, Gilbert M, Grace D, Hay S, Jiwakanon J, Kakkar M, Kariuki S, Laxminarayan R, Lubroth J, Magnusson U, Thi Ngoc P, van Boeckel TP, Woolhouse M. 2016. Antibiotic resistance is the quintessential One Health issue. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 110:377–380.
    3.
    World Health Organization. 2015. Global action plan on antimicrobial resistance. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
    4.
    Brown ED, Wright GD. 2016. Antibacterial drug discovery in the resistance era. Nature 529:336.
    5.
    Bradley P, Gordon NC, Walker TM, Dunn L, Heys S, Huang B, Earle S, Pankhurst LJ, Anson L, De Cesare M, Piazza P, Votintseva A, Golubchik T, Wilson D, Wyllie D, Diel R, Niemann S, Feuerriegel S, Kohl T, Ismail N, Omar S, Smith E, Buck D, McVean G, Walker A, Peto T, Crook D, Iqbal Z. 2015. Rapid antibiotic-resistance predictions from genome sequence data for Staphylococcus aureus and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Commun 6:10063.
    6.
    Jia B, Raphenya AR, Alcock B, Waglechner N, Guo P, Tsang KK, Lago BA, Dave BM, Pereira S, Sharma AN, Doshi S, Courtot M, Lo R, Williams LE, Frye JG, Elsayegh T, Sardar D, Westman EL, Pawlowski AC, Johnson TA, Brinkman FSL, Wright GD, McArthur AG. 28 October 2016, posting date. CARD 2017: expansion and model-centric curation of the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res doi:
    7.
    Neuert S, Nair S, Day MR, Doumith M, Ashton PM, Mellor KC, Jenkins C, Hopkins KL, Woodford N, de Pinna E, Godbole G, Dallman TJ. 2018. Prediction of phenotypic antimicrobial resistance profiles from whole genome sequences of non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica. Front Microbiol 9:592.
    8.
    Anderson DJ, Miller B, Marfatia R, Drew R. 2012. Ability of an antibiogram to predict Pseudomonas aeruginosa susceptibility to targeted antimicrobials based on hospital day of isolation. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 33:589–593.
    9.
    McDermott PF, Tyson GH, Kabera C, Chen Y, Li C, Folster JP, Ayers SL, Lam C, Tate HP, Zhao S. 22 August 2016, posting date. The use of whole genome sequencing for detecting antimicrobial resistance in nontyphoidal Salmonella. Antimicrob Agents Chemother doi:
    10.
    Pesesky MW, Hussain T, Wallace M, Patel S, Andleeb S, Burnham CAD, Dantas G. 2016. Evaluation of machine learning and rules-based approaches for predicting antimicrobial resistance profiles in Gram-negative Bacilli from whole genome sequence data. Front Microbiol 7:1887.
    11.
    Nguyen M, Long SW, McDermott PF, Olsen RJ, Olson R, Stevens RL, Tyson GH, Zhao S, Davis JJ. 2018. Using machine learning to predict antimicrobial minimum inhibitory concentrations and associated genomic features for nontyphoidal Salmonella. bioRxiv https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/380782v2.
    12.
    Davis JJ, Boisvert S, Brettin T, Kenyon RW, Mao C, Olson R, Overbeek R, Santerre J, Shukla M, Wattam AR, Will R, Xia F, Stevens R. 2016. Antimicrobial resistance prediction in PATRIC and RAST. Sci Rep 6:27930.
    13.
    Drouin A, Giguère S, Déraspe M, Marchand M, Tyers M, Loo VG, Bourgault AM, Laviolette F, Corbeil J. 2016. Predictive computational phenotyping and biomarker discovery using reference-free genome comparisons. BMC Genomics 17:754.
    14.
    World Health Organization. 2018. Salmonella (non-typhoidal) fact sheet. http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/salmonella-(non-typhoidal).
    15.
    World Health Organization. 2015. WHO estimates of the global burden of foodborne diseases: foodborne disease burden epidemiology reference group 2007-2015. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
    16.
    Ao TT, Feasey NA, Gordon MA, Keddy KH, Angulo FJ, Crump JA. 2015. Global burden of invasive nontyphoidal Salmonella disease, 2010. Emerg Infect Dis 21:941.
    17.
    Angulo FJ, Mølbak K. 2005. Human health consequences of antimicrobial drug–resistant Salmonella and other foodborne pathogens. Clin Infect Dis 41:1613–1620.
    18.
    Krueger AL, Greene SA, Barzilay EJ, Henao O, Vugia D, Hanna S, Meyer S, Smith K, Pecic G, Hoefer D, Griffin P. 2014. Clinical outcomes of nalidixic acid, ceftriaxone, and multidrug-resistant nontyphoidal Salmonella infections compared with pansusceptible infections in FoodNet sites, 2006–2008. Foodborne Pathog Dis 11:335–341.
    19.
    Tyson GH, Zhao S, Li C, Ayers S, Sabo JL, Lam C, Miller RA, McDermott PF. 2017. Establishing genotypic cutoff values to measure antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e02140-16.
    20.
    Dhanani AS, Block G, Dewar K, Forgetta V, Topp E, Beiko RG, Diarra MS. 2015. Genomic comparison of non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica serovars Typhimurium, Enteritidis, Heidelberg, Hadar and Kentucky isolates from broiler chickens. PLoS One 10:e0128773.
    21.
    Takahata S, Ida T, Hiraishi T, Sakakibara S, Maebashi K, Terada S, Muratani T, Matsumoto T, Nakahama C, Tomono K. 2010. Molecular mechanisms of fosfomycin resistance in clinical isolates of Escherichia coli. Int J Antimicrob Agents 35:333–337.
    22.
    Gunn JS, Lim KB, Krueger J, Kim K, Guo L, Hackett M, Miller SI. 1998. PmrA–PmrB-regulated genes necessary for 4-aminoarabinose lipid A modification and polymyxin resistance. Mol Microbiol 27:1171–1182.
    23.
    Misawa K, Tarumoto N, Tamura S, Osa M, Hamamoto T, Yuki A, Kouzaki Y, Imai K, Ronald RL, Yamaguchi T, Murakami T, Maesaki S, Suzuki Y, Kawana A, Maeda T. 2018. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in genes encoding penicillin-binding proteins in β-lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae in Japan. BMC Res Notes 11:53.
    24.
    Shaaly A, Kalamorz F, Gebhard S, Cook GM. 2013. Undecaprenyl pyrophosphate phosphatase confers low-level resistance to bacitracin in Enterococcus faecalis. J Antimicrob Chemother 68:1583–1593.
    25.
    Nishino K, Yamaguchi A. 2004. Role of histone-like protein H-NS in multidrug resistance of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 186:1423–1429.
    26.
    Srinivasan VB, Vaidyanathan V, Mondal A, Rajamohan G. 2012. Role of the two component signal transduction system CpxAR in conferring cefepime and chloramphenicol resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae NTUH-K2044. PLoS One 7:e33777.
    27.
    Rahmati S, Yang S, Davidson AL, Zechiedrich EL. 2002. Control of the AcrAB multidrug efflux pump by quorum-sensing regulator SdiA. Mol Microbiol 43:677–685.
    28.
    Alekshun MN, Levy SB. 1997. Regulation of chromosomally mediated multiple antibiotic resistance: the mar regulon. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 41:2067–2075.
    29.
    O’Regan E, Quinn T, Pagès JM, McCusker M, Piddock L, Fanning S. 2009. Multiple regulatory pathways associated with high-level ciprofloxacin and multidrug resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis: involvement of RamA and other global regulators. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:1080–1087.
    30.
    Pontel LB, Audero MEP, Espariz M, Checa SK, Soncini FC. 2007. GolS controls the response to gold by the hierarchical induction of Salmonella-specific genes that include a CBA efflux-coding operon. Mol Microbiol 66:814–825.
    31.
    Nishino K, Senda Y, Yamaguchi A. 2008. CRP regulator modulates multidrug resistance of Escherichia coli by repressing the mdtEF multidrug efflux genes. J Antibiot 61:120.
    32.
    Nagakubo S, Nishino K, Hirata T, Yamaguchi A. 2002. The putative response regulator BaeR stimulates multidrug resistance of Escherichia coli via a novel multidrug exporter system, MdtABC. J Bacteriol 184:4161–4167.
    33.
    Nishino K, Latifi T, Groisman EA. 2006. Virulence and drug resistance roles of multidrug efflux systems of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Mol Microbiol 59:126–141.
    34.
    Lomovskaya O, Lewis K. 1992. emr, an Escherichia coli locus for multidrug resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89:8938–8942.
    35.
    Lomovskaya O, Lewis K, Matin A. 1995. emrR is a negative regulator of the Escherichia coli multidrug resistance pump emrAB. J Bacteriol 177:2328–2334.
    36.
    Garvey MI, Baylay AJ, Wong RL, Piddock LJ. 2011. Overexpression of patA and patB, which encode ABC transporters, is associated with fluoroquinolone resistance in clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:190–196.
    37.
    Hirakawa H, Nishino K, Hirata T, Yamaguchi A. 2003. Comprehensive studies of drug resistance mediated by overexpression of response regulators of two-component signal transduction systems in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 185:1851–1856.
    38.
    Bohn C, Bouloc P. 1998. The Escherichia coli cmlA gene encodes the multidrug efflux pump Cmr/MdfA and is responsible for isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside exclusion and spectinomycin sensitivity. J Bacteriol 180:6072–6075.
    39.
    Magnet S, Courvalin P, Lambert T. 1999. Activation of the cryptic AAC(6’)-Iy aminoglycoside resistance gene of Salmonella by a chromosomal deletion generating a transcriptional fusion. J Bacteriol 181:6650–6655.
    40.
    Coyne S, Rosenfeld N, Lambert T, Courvalin P, Périchon B. 2010. Overexpression of resistance-nodulation-cell division pump AdeFGH confers multidrug resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:4389–4393.
    41.
    Bauernfeind A, Stemplinger I, Jungwirth R, Giamarellou H. 1996. Characterization of the plasmidic beta-lactamase CMY-2, which is responsible for cephamycin resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 40:221–224.
    42.
    Novotna G, Janata J. 2006. A new evolutionary variant of the streptogramin A resistance protein, Vga(A) LC, from Staphylococcus haemolyticus with shifted substrate specificity towards lincosamides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50:4070–4076.
    43.
    Roberts MC. 2005. Update on acquired tetracycline resistance genes. FEMS Microbiol Lett 245:195–203.
    44.
    Arcangioli MA, Leroy-Sétrin S, Martel JL, Chaslus-Dancla E. 1999. A new chloramphenicol and florfenicol resistance gene flanked by two integron structures in Salmonella typhimurium DT104. FEMS Microbiol Lett 174:327–332.
    45.
    Daly M, Villa L, Pezzella C, Fanning S, Carattoli A. 2005. Comparison of multidrug resistance gene regions between two geographically unrelated Salmonella serotypes. J Antimicrob Chemother 55:558–561.
    46.
    Abouzeed YM, Baucheron S, Cloeckaert A. 2008. ramR mutations involved in efflux-mediated multidrug resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52:2428–2434.
    47.
    Salverda ML, De Visser JAG, Barlow M. 2010. Natural evolution of TEM-1 β-lactamase: experimental reconstruction and clinical relevance. FEMS Microbiol Rev 34:1015–1036.
    48.
    McArthur AG, Waglechner N, Nizam F, Yan A, Azad MA, Baylay AJ, Bhullar K, Canova MJ, De Pascale G, Ejim L, Kalan L, King A, Koteva K, Morar M, Mulvey M, O’Brien J, Pawlowski A, Piddock L, Spanogiannopoulos P, Sutherland A, Tang I, Taylor P, Thaker M, Wang W, Yan M, T Y, Wright G. 6 May 2013, posting date. The comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Antimicrob Agents Chemother doi:
    49.
    Drouin A, Giguère S, Sagatovich V, Déraspe M, Laviolette F, Marchand M, Corbeil J. 2014. Learning interpretable models of phenotypes from whole genome sequences with the Set Covering Machine. arXiv 1412.1074 [q-bio.GN]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.1074.
    50.
    Marchand M, Shawe-Taylor J. 2002. The set covering machine. J Mach Learn Res 3:723–746. http://www.jmlr.org/papers/volume3/marchand02a/marchand02a.pdf.
    51.
    Public Health Agency of Canada. 2018. FoodNet Canada annual report 2017. Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
    52.
    Timme RE, Pettengill JB, Allard MW, Strain E, Barrangou R, Wehnes C, Van Kessel JS, Karns JS, Musser SM, Brown EW. 2013. Phylogenetic diversity of the enteric pathogen Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica inferred from genome-wide reference-free SNP characters. Genome Biol Evol 5:2109–2123.
    53.
    Drouin A, Hocking T, Laviolette F. 2017. Maximum margin interval trees, p 4947–4956. In Guyon I, Luxburg UV, Bengio S, Wallach H, Fergus R, Vishwanathan S, Garnett R (ed), Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (NIPS 2017). Neural Information Processing Systems, San Diego, CA.
    54.
    Chung YJ, Saier MH. 2002. Overexpression of the Escherichia coli sugE gene confers resistance to a narrow range of quaternary ammonium compounds. J Bacteriol 184:2543–2545.
    55.
    Giles W, Benson AK, Olson M, Hutkins RW, Whichard J, Winokur P, Fey PD. 2004. DNA sequence analysis of regions surrounding blaCMY-2 from multiple Salmonella plasmid backbones. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:2845–2852.
    56.
    El-Halfawy OM, Klett J, Ingram RJ, Loutet SA, Murphy ME, Martín-Santamaría S, Valvano MA. 2017. Antibiotic capture by bacterial lipocalins uncovers an extracellular mechanism of intrinsic antibiotic resistance. mBio 8:e00225-17.
    57.
    Naguib MM, Valvano MA. 2018. Vitamin E increases antimicrobial sensitivity by inhibiting bacterial lipocalin antibiotic binding. mSphere 3:e00564-18.
    58.
    Dame-Korevaar A, Fischer EA, Stegeman A, Mevius D, van Essen-Zandbergen A, Velkers F, van der Goot J. 2017. Dynamics of CMY-2 producing E. coli in a broiler parent flock. Vet Microbiol 203:211–214.
    59.
    Martin LC, Weir EK, Poppe C, Reid-Smith RJ, Boerlin P. 2012. Characterization of bla CMY-2 plasmids in Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from food animals in Canada. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:1285–1287.
    60.
    Campos J, Mourão J, Silveira L, Saraiva M, Belo Correia C, Maçãs AP, Peixe L, Antunes P. 2017. P-262-extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant CMY-2-producing Salmonella Heidelberg and S. Minnesota in poultry meat imported into the European Union. In Congress of Microbiology and Biotechnology (MICROBIOTEC 2017), Escola Superior de Biotecnologia da Universidade Católica do Porto, 7–9 December 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.18/4894.
    61.
    Campos J, Mourão J, Silveira L, Saraiva M, Correia CB, Maçãs AP, Peixe L, Antunes P. 2018. Imported poultry meat as a source of extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant CMY-2-producing Salmonella Heidelberg and Salmonella Minnesota in the European Union, 2014–2015. Int J Antimicrob Agents 51:151–154.
    62.
    Tiba-Casas MR, Camargo CH, Soares FB, Doi Y, Fernandes SA. 25 September 2018, posting date. Emergence of CMY-2-producing Salmonella Heidelberg associated with IncI1 plasmids isolated from poultry in Brazil. Microb Drug Resist doi:
    63.
    Madec JY, Haenni M, Nordmann P, Poirel L. 2017. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase/AmpC-and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in animals: a threat for humans? Clin Microbiol Infect 23:826–833.
    64.
    Espinosa RF, Rumi V, Marchisio M, Cejas D, Radice M, Vay C, Barrios R, Gutkind G, Di Conza J. 2018. Fast and easy detection of CMY-2 in Escherichia coli by direct MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. J Microbiol Methods 148:22–28.
    65.
    Radford D, Strange P, Lepp D, Hernandez M, Rehman MA, Diarra MS, Balamurugan S. 2018. Genomic and proteomic analyses of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis identifying mechanisms of induced de novo tolerance to ceftiofur. Front Microbiol 9:2123.
    66.
    Michael G, Schwarz S. 2016. Antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic nontyphoidal Salmonella: an alarming trend? Clin Microbiol Infect 22:968–974.
    67.
    Pezzella C, Ricci A, DiGiannatale E, Luzzi I, Carattoli A. 2004. Tetracycline and streptomycin resistance genes, transposons, and plasmids in Salmonella enterica isolates from animals in Italy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:903–908.
    68.
    Silverman M, Zieg J, Hilmen M, Simon M. 1979. Phase variation in Salmonella: genetic analysis of a recombinational switch. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 76:391–395.
    69.
    Lucarelli C, Dionisi AM, Filetici E, Owczarek S, Luzzi I, Villa L. 2012. Nucleotide sequence of the chromosomal region conferring multidrug resistance (R-type ASSuT) in Salmonella Typhimurium and monophasic Salmonella Typhimurium strains. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:111–114.
    70.
    Maamar E, Alonso CA, Hamzaoui Z, Dakhli N, Abbassi MS, Ferjani S, Saidani M, Boubaker IBB, Torres C. 2018. Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin-resistance in CMY-2-producing Escherichia coli of lineage ST2197 in a Tunisian poultry farm. Int J Food Microbiol 269:60–63.
    71.
    Diarra MS, Delaquis P, Rempel H, Bach S, Harlton C, Aslam M, Pritchard J, Topp E. 2014. Antibiotic resistance and diversity of Salmonella enterica serovars associated with broiler chickens. J Food Protect 77:40–49.
    72.
    Matthews TC, Bristow FR, Griffiths EJ, Petkau A, Adam J, Dooley D, Kruczkiewicz P, Curatcha J, Cabral J, Fornika D, Winsor G, Courtot M, Bertelli C, Roudgar A, Feijao P, Mabon P, Enns E, Thiessen J, Keddy A, Isaac-Renton J, Gardy JL, Tang P, Consortium I, Carriço JA, Chindelevitch L, Chauve C, Graham MR, McArthur AG, Taboada EN, Beiko RG, Brinkman FS, Hsiao WW, Van Domselaar G. 2018. The Integrated Rapid Infectious Disease Analysis (IRIDA) platform. bioRxiv https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/381830v1.
    73.
    Magoč T, Salzberg SL. 2011. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 27:2957–2963.
    74.
    Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477.
    75.
    Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075.
    76.
    Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069.
    77.
    Seemann T. 2017. ABRicate. Mass screening of contigs for antimicrobial resistance or virulence genes. https://github.com/tseemann/abricate.
    78.
    Carattoli A, Zankari E, García-Fernández A, Larsen MV, Lund O, Villa L, Aarestrup FM, Hasman H. 2014. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:3895–3903.
    79.
    McKinney W. 2011. pandas: a foundational Python library for data analysis and statistics. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265194455_pandas_a_Foundational_Python_Library_for_Data_Analysis_and_Statistics.
    80.
    Waskom M, Botvinnik O, O’Kane D, Hobson P, Lukauskas S, Gemperline DC, Augspurger T, Halchenko Y, Cole JB, Warmenhoven J, de Ruiter J, Pye C, Hoyer S, Vanderplas J, Villalba S, Kunter G, Quintero E, Bachant P, Martin M, Meyer K, Miles A, Ram Y, Yarkoni T, Williams ML, Evans C, Fitzgerald C, Brian Fonnesbeck C, Lee A, Qalieh A. 2017. mwaskom/seaborn: v0.8.1 (September 2017).
    81.
    Yoshida CE, Kruczkiewicz P, Laing CR, Lingohr EJ, Gannon VP, Nash JH, Taboada EN. 2016. The Salmonella in silico typing resource (SISTR): an open Web-accessible tool for rapidly typing and subtyping draft Salmonella genome assemblies. PLoS One 11:e0147101.
    82.
    Kluyver T, Ragan-Kelley B, Pérez F, Granger BE, Bussonnier M, Frederic J, Kelley K, Hamrick JB, Grout J, Corlay S, Ivanov P, Avila D, Abdalla S, Willing C, Jupyter development team. 2016. Jupyter Notebooks—a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/403913/.
    83.
    Torvalds L, Hamano J. 2010. Git: Fast version control system. http://git-scm.com.
    84.
    Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S, Holden MT, Fookes M, Falush D, Keane JA, Parkhill J. 2015. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics 31:3691–3693.
    85.
    Page AJ, Taylor B, Delaney AJ, Soares J, Seemann T, Keane JA, Harris SR. 29 April 2016, posting date. SNP-sites: rapid efficient extraction of SNPs from multi-FASTA alignments. Microb Genom doi:
    86.
    Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. 2015. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 32:268–274.
    87.
    Trifinopoulos J, Nguyen LT, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. 2016. W-IQ-TREE: a fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 44:W232–W235.
    88.
    Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TK, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. 2017. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat Methods 14:587.
    89.
    Huerta-Cepas J, Serra F, Bork P. 2016. ETE 3: reconstruction, analysis, and visualization of phylogenomic data. Mol Biol Evol 33:1635–1638.
    90.
    Hyatt D, Chen GL, LoCascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. 2010. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11:119.
    91.
    Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. 2015. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods 12:59.
    92.
    Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, Blondel M, Prettenhofer P, Weiss R, Dubourg V, Vanderplas J, Passos A, Cournapeau D, Brucher M, Perrot M, Duchesnay É. 2011. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res 12:2825–2830.
    93.
    Lemaître G, Nogueira F, Aridas CK. 2017. Imbalanced-learn: a Python toolbox to tackle the curse of imbalanced datasets in machine learning. J Mach Learn Res 18:559–563.
    94.
    Li H. 2013. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arXiv 1303.3997 [q-bio.GN]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.3997.
    95.
    Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen G, Olson R, Osterman A, Overbeek R, McNeil L, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch G, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9:75.
    96.
    Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, Parrello B, Shukla M, Vonstein V, Wattam A, Xia F, Stevens R. 2014. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 42:D206–D214.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSystems
    Volume 4Number 427 August 2019
    eLocator: e00211-19
    Editor: Jack A. Gilbert
    University of California San Diego

    History

    Received: 22 March 2019
    Accepted: 11 July 2019
    Published online: 6 August 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. AMR prediction
    2. Salmonella
    3. antimicrobial resistance
    4. food chain
    5. genomics
    6. machine learning

    Contributors

    Authors

    Faculty of Computer Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
    Guelph Research and Development Center, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), Guelph, Ontario, Canada
    Catherine Carrillo
    Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Guelph Research and Development Center, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), Guelph, Ontario, Canada
    Faculty of Computer Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

    Editor

    Jack A. Gilbert
    Editor
    University of California San Diego

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Moussa S. Diarra, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSystemsArticle
    Role of VapBC12 Toxin-Antitoxin Locus in Cholesterol-Induced Mycobacterial Persistence

    ABSTRACT

    The worldwide increase in the frequency of multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant cases of tuberculosis is mainly due to therapeutic noncompliance associated with a lengthy treatment regimen. Depending on the drug susceptibility profile, the treatment duration can extend from 6 months to 2 years. This protracted regimen is attributed to a supposedly nonreplicating and metabolically inert subset of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis population, called “persisters.” The mechanism underlying stochastic generation and enrichment of persisters is not fully known. We have previously reported that the utilization of host cholesterol is essential for mycobacterial persistence. In this study, we have demonstrated that cholesterol-induced activation of a RNase toxin (VapC12) inhibits translation by targeting proT tRNA in M. tuberculosis. This results in cholesterol-specific growth modulation that increases the frequency of generation of the persisters in a heterogeneous M. tuberculosis population. Also, a null mutant strain of this toxin (ΔvapC12) demonstrated an enhanced growth phenotype in a guinea pig model of M. tuberculosis infection, depicting its role in disease persistence. Thus, we have identified a novel strategy through which cholesterol-specific activation of a toxin-antitoxin module in M. tuberculosis enhances persister formation during infection. The current findings provide an opportunity to target persisters, a new paradigm facilitating tuberculosis drug development.
    IMPORTANCE The current TB treatment regimen involves a combination of drugs administered for an extended duration that could last for 6 months to 2 years. This could lead to noncompliance and the emergence of newer drug resistance strains. It is widely perceived that the major culprits are the so-called nonreplicating and metabolically inactive “persister” bacteria. The importance of cholesterol utilization during the persistence stage of M. tuberculosis infection and its potential role in the generation of persisters is very intriguing. We explored the mechanism involved in the cholesterol-mediated generation of persisters in mycobacteria. In this study, we have identified a toxin-antitoxin (TA) system essential for the generation of persisters during M. tuberculosis infection. This study verified that M. tuberculosis strain devoid of the VapBC12 TA system failed to persist and showed a hypervirulent phenotype in a guinea pig infection model. Our studies indicate that the M. tuberculosis VapBC12 TA system acts as a molecular switch regulating persister generation during infection. VapBC12 TA system as a drug target offers opportunities to develop shorter and more effective treatment regimens against tuberculosis.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Pai M, Behr MA, Dowdy D, Dheda K, Divangahi M, Boehme CC, Ginsberg A, Swaminathan S, Spigelman M, Getahun H, Menzies D, Raviglione M. 2016. Tuberculosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2:16076.
    2.
    Smith NH, Hewinson RG, Kremer K, Brosch R, Gordon SV. 2009. Myths and misconceptions: the origin and evolution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Rev Microbiol 7:537–544.
    3.
    Wolfe ND, Dunavan CP, Diamond J. 2007. Origins of major human infectious diseases. Nature 447:279–283.
    4.
    Dhar N, McKinney J, Manina G. 2016. Phenotypic heterogeneity in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microbiol Spectr 4.
    5.
    Zhang Y, Yew WW, Barer MR. 2012. Targeting persisters for tuberculosis control. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:2223–2230.
    6.
    Chao MC, Rubin EJ. 2010. Letting sleeping dos lie: does dormancy play a role in tuberculosis? Annu Rev Microbiol 64:293–311.
    7.
    Fisher RA, Gollan B, Helaine S. 2017. Persistent bacterial infections and persister cells. Nat Rev Microbiol 15:453–464.
    8.
    McDermott W. 1958. Microbial persistence. Yale J Biol Med 30:257.
    9.
    McDermott W, McCune RM, Jr, Tompsett R. 1956. Dynamics of antituberculous chemotherapy. Am Rev Tuberc 74:100–108.
    10.
    Balaban NQ, Gerdes K, Lewis K, McKinney JD. 2013. A problem of persistence: still more questions than answers? Nat Rev Microbiol 11:587–591.
    11.
    Wu Y, Vulić M, Keren I, Lewis K. 2012. Role of oxidative stress in persister tolerance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:4922–4926.
    12.
    Brauner A, Fridman O, Gefen O, Balaban NQ. 2016. Distinguishing between resistance, tolerance and persistence to antibiotic treatment. Nat Rev Microbiol 14:320–330.
    13.
    Helaine S, Kugelberg E. 2014. Bacterial persisters: formation, eradication, and experimental systems. Trends Microbiol 22:417–424.
    14.
    Pandey AK, Sassetti CM. 2008. Mycobacterial persistence requires the utilization of host cholesterol. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:4376–4380.
    15.
    de Carvalho LP, Fischer SM, Marrero J, Nathan C, Ehrt S, Rhee KY. 2010. Metabolomics of Mycobacterium tuberculosis reveals compartmentalized co-catabolism of carbon substrates. Chem Biol 17:1122–1131.
    16.
    Russell DG. 2011. Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the intimate discourse of a chronic infection. Immunol Rev 240:252–268.
    17.
    Miner MD, Chang JC, Pandey AK, Sassetti CM, Sherman DR. 2009. Role of cholesterol in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Indian J Exp Biol 47:407–411.
    18.
    Singh V, Jamwal S, Jain R, Verma P, Gokhale R, Rao KV. 2012. Mycobacterium tuberculosis-driven targeted recalibration of macrophage lipid homeostasis promotes the foamy phenotype. Cell Host Microbe 12:669–681.
    19.
    zu Bentrup KH, Russell DG. 2001. Mycobacterial persistence: adaptation to a changing environment. Trends Microbiol 9:597–605.
    20.
    Russell DG, VanderVen BC, Lee W, Abramovitch RB, Kim M-J, Homolka S, Niemann S, Rohde KH. 2010. Mycobacterium tuberculosis wears what it eats. Cell Host Microbe 8:68–76.
    21.
    Cheng HY, Soo VW, Islam S, McAnulty MJ, Benedik MJ, Wood TK. 2014. Toxin GhoT of the GhoT/GhoS toxin/antitoxin system damages the cell membrane to reduce adenosine triphosphate and to reduce growth under stress. Environ Microbiol 16:1741–1754.
    22.
    Harms A, Brodersen DE, Mitarai N, Gerdes K. 2018. Toxins, targets, and triggers: an overview of toxin-antitoxin biology. Mol Cell 70:768–784.
    23.
    Balaban NQ, Merrin J, Chait R, Kowalik L, Leibler S. 2004. Bacterial persistence as a phenotypic switch. Science 305:1622–1625.
    24.
    Coray DS, Wheeler NE, Heinemann JA, Gardner PP. 2017. Why so narrow: distribution of anti-sense regulated, type I toxin-antitoxin systems compared with type II and type III systems. RNA Biol 14:275–280.
    25.
    Goeders N, Chai R, Chen B, Day A, Salmond GP. 2016. Structure, evolution, and functions of bacterial type III toxin-antitoxin systems. Toxins 8:282.
    26.
    Leplae R, Geeraerts D, Hallez R, Guglielmini J, Drèze P, Van Melderen L. 2011. Diversity of bacterial type II toxin–antitoxin systems: a comprehensive search and functional analysis of novel families. Nucleic Acids Res 39:5513–5525.
    27.
    Ramage HR, Connolly LE, Cox JS. 2009. Comprehensive functional analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis toxin-antitoxin systems: implications for pathogenesis, stress responses, and evolution. PLoS Genet 5:e1000767.
    28.
    Winther K, Tree JJ, Tollervey D, Gerdes K. 2016. VapCs of Mycobacterium tuberculosis cleave RNAs essential for translation. Nucleic Acids Res 44:9860–9871.
    29.
    Ahidjo BA, Kuhnert D, McKenzie JL, Machowski EE, Gordhan BG, Arcus V, Abrahams GL, Mizrahi V. 2011. VapC toxins from Mycobacterium tuberculosis are ribonucleases that differentially inhibit growth and are neutralized by cognate VapB antitoxins. PLoS One 6:e21738.
    30.
    Page R, Peti W. 2016. Toxin-antitoxin systems in bacterial growth arrest and persistence. Nat Chem Biol 12:208–214.
    31.
    Hayes F. 2003. Toxins-antitoxins: plasmid maintenance, programmed cell death, and cell cycle arrest. Science 301:1496–1499.
    32.
    Yamaguchi Y, Inouye M. 2011. Regulation of growth and death in Escherichia coli by toxin-antitoxin systems. Nat Rev Microbiol 9:779–790.
    33.
    Griffin JE, Gawronski JD, DeJesus MA, Ioerger TR, Akerley BJ, Sassetti CM. 2011. High-resolution phenotypic profiling defines genes essential for mycobacterial growth and cholesterol catabolism. PLoS Pathog 7:e1002251.
    34.
    McKinney JD, Honer zu Bentrup K, Munoz-Elias EJ, Miczak A, Chen B, Chan WT, Swenson D, Sacchettini JC, Jacobs WR, Jr, Russell DG. 2000. Persistence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in macrophages and mice requires the glyoxylate shunt enzyme isocitrate lyase. Nature 406:735–738.
    35.
    Munoz-Elias EJ, Upton AM, Cherian J, McKinney JD. 2006. Role of the methylcitrate cycle in Mycobacterium tuberculosis metabolism, intracellular growth, and virulence. Mol Microbiol 60:1109–1122.
    36.
    Siegrist MS, Unnikrishnan M, McConnell MJ, Borowsky M, Cheng TY, Siddiqi N, Fortune SM, Moody DB, Rubin EJ. 2009. Mycobacterial Esx-3 is required for mycobactin-mediated iron acquisition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:18792–18797.
    37.
    Tufariello JM, Chapman JR, Kerantzas CA, Wong K-W, Vilchèze C, Jones CM, Cole LE, Tinaztepe E, Thompson V, Fenyö D, Niederweis M, Ueberheide B, Philips JA, Jacobs WR. 2016. Separable roles for Mycobacterium tuberculosis ESX-3 effectors in iron acquisition and virulence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:E348–E357.
    38.
    Shan Y, Gandt AB, Rowe SE, Deisinger JP, Conlon BP, Lewis K. 2017. ATP-dependent persister formation in Escherichia coli. mBio 8:e02267-16.
    39.
    Conlon BP, Rowe SE, Gandt AB, Nuxoll AS, Donegan NP, Zalis EA, Clair G, Adkins JN, Cheung AL, Lewis K. 2016. Persister formation in Staphylococcus aureus is associated with ATP depletion. Nat Microbiol 1:16051.
    40.
    Arcus VL, McKenzie JL, Robson J, Cook GM. 2011. The PIN-domain ribonucleases and the prokaryotic VapBC toxin-antitoxin array. Protein Eng Des Sel 24:33–40.
    41.
    Robson J, McKenzie JL, Cursons R, Cook GM, Arcus VL. 2009. The vapBC operon from Mycobacterium smegmatis is an autoregulated toxin-antitoxin module that controls growth via inhibition of translation. J Mol Biol 390:353–367.
    42.
    Winther KS, Gerdes K. 2011. Enteric virulence associated protein VapC inhibits translation by cleavage of initiator tRNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:7403–7407.
    43.
    Agarwal S, Tiwari P, Deep A, Kidwai S, Gupta S, Thakur KG, Singh R. 2018. System wide analysis unravels differential regulation and in vivo essentiality of VapBC TA systems from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Infect Dis 217:1809–1820.
    44.
    Ehrt S, Guo XV, Hickey CM, Ryou M, Monteleone M, Riley LW, Schnappinger D. 2005. Controlling gene expression in mycobacteria with anhydrotetracycline and Tet repressor. Nucleic Acids Res 33:e21.
    45.
    Arcus VL, Bäckbro K, Roos A, Daniel EL, Baker EN. 2004. Distant structural homology leads to the functional characterization of an archaeal PIN domain as an exonuclease. J Biol Chem 279:16471–16478.
    46.
    Kolodkin-Gal I, Engelberg-Kulka H. 2008. The extracellular death factor: physiological and genetic factors influencing its production and response in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 190:3169–3175.
    47.
    Nigam A, Kumar S, Engelberg-Kulka H. 2018. Quorum-sensing extracellular death peptides enhance the endoribonucleolytic activities of Mycobacterium tuberculosis MazF toxins. mBio 9:e00685-18.
    48.
    Kana BD, Gordhan BG, Downing KJ, Sung N, Vostroktunova G, Machowski EE, Tsenova L, Young M, Kaprelyants A, Kaplan G, Mizrahi V. 2008. The resuscitation-promoting factors of Mycobacterium tuberculosis are required for virulence and resuscitation from dormancy but are collectively dispensable for growth in vitro. Mol Microbiol 67:672–684.
    49.
    Uhía I, Krishnan N, Robertson BD. 2018. Characterising resuscitation promoting factor fluorescent-fusions in mycobacteria. BMC Microbiol 18:30.
    50.
    ten Bokum AM, Movahedzadeh F, Frita R, Bancroft GJ, Stoker NG. 2008. The case for hypervirulence through gene deletion in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Trends Microbiol 16:436–441.
    51.
    Balaban NQ, Helaine S, Lewis K, Ackermann M, Aldridge B, Andersson DI, Brynildsen MP, Bumann D, Camilli A, Collins JJ, Dehio C, Fortune S, Ghigo J-M, Hardt W-D, Harms A, Heinemann M, Hung DT, Jenal U, Levin BR, Michiels J, Storz G, Tan M-W, Tenson T, Van Melderen L, Zinkernagel A. 2019. Definitions and guidelines for research on antibiotic persistence. Nat Rev Microbiol 17:460–460.
    52.
    VanderVen BC, Fahey RJ, Lee W, Liu Y, Abramovitch RB, Memmott C, Crowe AM, Eltis LD, Perola E, Deininger DD, Wang T, Locher CP, Russell DG. 2015. Novel inhibitors of cholesterol degradation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis reveal how the bacterium’s metabolism is constrained by the intracellular environment. PLoS Pathog 11:e1004679.
    53.
    Sassetti CM, Rubin EJ. 2003. Genetic requirements for mycobacterial survival during infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:12989–12994.
    54.
    Potrykus K, Cashel M. 2008. (p)ppGpp: still magical? Annu Rev Microbiol 62:35–51.
    55.
    Iyer S, Le D, Park BR, Kim M. 2018. Distinct mechanisms coordinate transcription and translation under carbon and nitrogen starvation in Escherichia coli. Nat Microbiol 3:741–748.
    56.
    Rao SP, Alonso S, Rand L, Dick T, Pethe K. 2008. The protonmotive force is required for maintaining ATP homeostasis and viability of hypoxic, nonreplicating Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:11945–11950.
    57.
    Black PA, Warren RM, Louw GE, van Helden PD, Victor TC, Kana BD. 2014. Energy metabolism and drug efflux in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:2491–2503.
    58.
    Cruz JW, Sharp JD, Hoffer ED, Maehigashi T, Vvedenskaya IO, Konkimalla A, Husson RN, Nickels BE, Dunham CM, Woychik NA. 2015. Growth-regulating Mycobacterium tuberculosis VapC-mt4 toxin is an isoacceptor-specific tRNase. Nat Commun 6:7480.
    59.
    Walling LR, Butler JS. 2017. Homologous VapC toxins inhibit translation and cell growth by sequence-specific cleavage of tRNAfMet. J Bacteriol 200:e00582-17.
    60.
    Sakatos A, Babunovic GH, Chase MR, Dills A, Leszyk J, Rosebrock T, Bryson B, Fortune SM. 2018. Posttranslational modification of a histone-like protein regulates phenotypic resistance to isoniazid in mycobacteria. Sci Adv 4:eaao1478.
    61.
    Caron C, Boyault C, Khochbin S. 2005. Regulatory cross-talk between lysine acetylation and ubiquitination: role in the control of protein stability. Bioessays 27:408–415.
    62.
    Lovewell RR, Baer CE, Mishra BB, Smith CM, Sassetti CM. 2020. Granulocytes act as a niche for Mycobacterium tuberculosis growth. Mucosal Immunol doi:
    63.
    Ene IV, Brunke S, Brown AJ, Hube B. 2014. Metabolism in fungal pathogenesis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 4:a019695.
    64.
    Eisenreich W, Rudel T, Heesemann J, Goebel W. 2019. How viral and intracellular bacterial pathogens reprogram the metabolism of host cells to allow their intracellular replication. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 9.
    65.
    Chai Q, Wang X, Qiang L, Zhang Y, Ge P, Lu Z, Zhong Y, Li B, Wang J, Zhang L, Zhou D, Li W, Dong W, Pang Y, Gao GF, Liu CH. 2019. A Mycobacterium tuberculosis surface protein recruits ubiquitin to trigger host xenophagy. Nat Commun 10:1973.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSystems
    Volume 5Number 622 December 2020
    eLocator: e00855-20
    Editor: Theodore M. Flynn
    Delta Stewardship Council

    History

    Received: 29 August 2020
    Accepted: 5 November 2020
    Published online: 15 December 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. cholesterol
    2. host-pathogen interactions
    3. mycobacteria
    4. toxin-antitoxin

    Contributors

    Authors

    Sakshi Talwar
    Mycobacterial Pathogenesis Laboratory, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, Haryana, India
    Manitosh Pandey
    Mycobacterial Pathogenesis Laboratory, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, Haryana, India
    Department of Life Science, ITM University, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India
    Chandresh Sharma
    Mycobacterial Pathogenesis Laboratory, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, Haryana, India
    Rintu Kutum
    CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
    Josephine Lum
    Singapore Immunology Network, Singapore
    Daniel Carbajo
    Singapore Immunology Network, Singapore
    Renu Goel
    Drug Discovery Research Center, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, Haryana, India
    Michael Poidinger
    Singapore Immunology Network, Singapore
    Debasis Dash
    CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
    Amit Singhal
    Mycobacterial Pathogenesis Laboratory, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, Haryana, India
    Singapore Immunology Network, Singapore
    Mycobacterial Pathogenesis Laboratory, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, Haryana, India

    Editor

    Theodore M. Flynn
    Editor
    Delta Stewardship Council

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Amit Kumar Pandey, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSystemsArticle
    MICOM: Metagenome-Scale Modeling To Infer Metabolic Interactions in the Gut Microbiota

    ABSTRACT

    Compositional changes in the gut microbiota have been associated with a variety of medical conditions such as obesity, Crohn’s disease, and diabetes. However, connecting microbial community composition to ecosystem function remains a challenge. Here, we introduce MICOM, a customizable metabolic model of the human gut microbiome. By using a heuristic optimization approach based on L2 regularization, we were able to obtain a unique set of realistic growth rates that corresponded well with observed replication rates. We integrated adjustable dietary and taxon abundance constraints to generate personalized metabolic models for individual metagenomic samples. We applied MICOM to a balanced cohort of metagenomes from 186 people, including a metabolically healthy population and individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Model results showed that individual bacterial genera maintained conserved niche structures across humans, while the community-level production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) was heterogeneous and highly individual specific. Model output revealed complex cross-feeding interactions that would be difficult to measure in vivo. Metabolic interaction networks differed somewhat consistently between healthy and diabetic subjects. In particular, MICOM predicted reduced butyrate and propionate production in a diabetic cohort, with restoration of SCFA production profiles found in healthy subjects following metformin treatment. Overall, we found that changes in diet or taxon abundances have highly personalized effects. We believe MICOM can serve as a useful tool for generating mechanistic hypotheses for how diet and microbiome composition influence community function. All methods are implemented in an open-source Python package, which is available at https://github.com/micom-dev/micom.
    IMPORTANCE The bacterial communities that live within the human gut have been linked to health and disease. However, we are still just beginning to understand how those bacteria interact and what potential interventions to our gut microbiome can make us healthier. Here, we present a mathematical modeling framework (named MICOM) that can recapitulate the growth rates of diverse bacterial species in the gut and can simulate metabolic interactions within microbial communities. We show that MICOM can unravel the ecological rules that shape the microbial landscape in our gut and that a given dietary or probiotic intervention can have widely different effects in different people.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Zeevi D, Korem T, Zmora N, Israeli D, Rothschild D, Weinberger A, Ben-Yacov O, Lador D, Avnit-Sagi T, Lotan-Pompan M, Suez J, Mahdi JA, Matot E, Malka G, Kosower N, Rein M, Zilberman-Schapira G, Dohnalová L, Pevsner-Fischer M, Bikovsky R, Halpern Z, Elinav E, Segal E. 2015. Personalized nutrition by prediction of glycemic responses. Cell 163:1079–1094.
    2.
    Cho I, Blaser MJ. 2012. The human microbiome: at the interface of health and disease. Nat Rev Genet 13:260–270.
    3.
    Lewis JD, Chen EZ, Baldassano RN, Otley AR, Griffiths AM, Lee D, Bittinger K, Bailey A, Friedman ES, Hoffmann C, Albenberg L, Sinha R, Compher C, Gilroy E, Nessel L, Grant A, Chehoud C, Li H, Wu GD, Bushman FD. 2015. Inflammation, antibiotics, and diet as environmental stressors of the gut microbiome in pediatric Crohn’s disease. Cell Host Microbe 18:489–500.
    4.
    Qin J, Li Y, Cai Z, Li S, Zhu J, Zhang F, Liang S, Zhang W, Guan Y, Shen D, Peng Y, Zhang D, Jie Z, Wu W, Qin Y, Xue W, Li J, Han L, Lu D, Wu P, Dai Y, Sun X, Li Z, Tang A, Zhong S, Li X, Chen W, Xu R, Wang M, Feng Q, Gong M, Yu J, Zhang Y, Zhang M, Hansen T, Sanchez G, Raes J, Falony G, Okuda S, Almeida M, LeChatelier E, Renault P, Pons N, Batto J-M, Zhang Z, Chen H, Yang R, Zheng W, Li S, Yang H, Wang J, Ehrlich SD, Nielsen R, Pedersen O, Kristiansen K, Wang J. 2012. A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes. Nature 490:55–60.
    5.
    Livanos AE, Greiner TU, Vangay P, Pathmasiri W, Stewart D, McRitchie S, Li H, Chung J, Sohn J, Kim S, Gao Z, Barber C, Kim J, Ng S, Rogers AB, Sumner S, Zhang X-S, Cadwell K, Knights D, Alekseyenko A, Bäckhed F, Blaser MJ. 2016. Antibiotic-mediated gut microbiome perturbation accelerates development of type 1 diabetes in mice. Nat Microbiol 1:16140.
    6.
    Duvallet C, Gibbons SM, Gurry T, Irizarry RA, Alm EJ. 2017. Meta-analysis of gut microbiome studies identifies disease-specific and shared responses. Nat Commun 8:1784.
    7.
    Xu Z, Malmer D, Langille MGI, Way SF, Knight R. 2014. Which is more important for classifying microbial communities: who’s there or what they can do? ISME J 8:2357–2359.
    8.
    Langille MGI, Zaneveld J, Caporaso JG, McDonald D, Knights D, Reyes JA, Clemente JC, Burkepile DE, Vega Thurber RL, Knight R, Beiko RG, Huttenhower C. 2013. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat Biotechnol 31:814–821.
    9.
    Aßhauer KP, Wemheuer B, Daniel R, Meinicke P. 2015. Tax4Fun: predicting functional profiles from metagenomic 16S rRNA data. Bioinformatics 31:2882–2884.
    10.
    Bauer E, Thiele I. 2018. From network analysis to functional metabolic modeling of the human gut microbiota. mSystems 3:e00209-17.
    11.
    Heinken A, Sahoo S, Fleming RMT, Thiele I. 2013. Systems-level characterization of a host-microbe metabolic symbiosis in the mammalian gut. Gut Microbes 4:28–40.
    12.
    Resendis-Antonio O, Reed JL, Encarnación S, Collado-Vides J, Palsson BØ. 2007. Metabolic reconstruction and modeling of nitrogen fixation in Rhizobium etli. PLoS Comput Biol 3:1887–1895.
    13.
    Orth JD, Thiele I, Palsson BØ. 2010. What is flux balance analysis? Nat Biotechnol 28:245–248.
    14.
    Lewis NE, Hixson KK, Conrad TM, Lerman JA, Charusanti P, Polpitiya AD, Adkins JN, Schramm G, Purvine SO, Lopez-Ferrer D, Weitz KK, Eils R, König R, Smith RD, Palsson BØ. 2010. Omic data from evolved E. coli are consistent with computed optimal growth from genome-scale models. Mol Syst Biol 6:390.
    15.
    Medlock GL, Carey MA, McDuffie DG, Mundy MB, Giallourou N, Swann JR, Kolling GL, Papin JA. 2018. Inferring metabolic mechanisms of interaction within a defined gut microbiota. Cell Syst 7:245–257.e7.
    16.
    Long MR, Ong WK, Reed JL. 2015. Computational methods in metabolic engineering for strain design. Curr Opin Biotechnol 34:135–141.
    17.
    Zomorrodi AR, Maranas CD. 2012. OptCom: a multi-level optimization framework for the metabolic modeling and analysis of microbial communities. PLoS Comput Biol 8:e1002363.
    18.
    Thompson LR, Sanders JG, McDonald D, Amir A, Ladau J, Locey KJ, Prill RJ, Tripathi A, Gibbons SM, Ackermann G, Navas-Molina JA, Janssen S, Kopylova E, Vázquez-Baeza Y, González A, Morton JT, Mirarab S, Zech Xu Z, Jiang L, Haroon MF, Kanbar J, Zhu Q, Jin Song S, Kosciolek T, Bokulich NA, Lefler J, Brislawn CJ, Humphrey G, Owens SM, Hampton-Marcell J, Berg-Lyons D, McKenzie V, Fierer N, Fuhrman JA, Clauset A, Stevens RL, Shade A, Pollard KS, Goodwin KD, Jansson JK, Gilbert JA, Knight R, Earth Microbiome Project Consortium. 2017. A communal catalogue reveals Earth’s multiscale microbial diversity. Nature 551:457–463.
    19.
    Gibbons SM, Kearney SM, Smillie CS, Alm EJ. 2017. Two dynamic regimes in the human gut microbiome. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005364.
    20.
    Johnson AJ, Vangay P, Al-Ghalith GA, Hillmann BM, Ward TL, Shields-Cutler RR, Kim AD, Shmagel AK, Syed AN, Personalized Microbiome Class Students, Walter J, Menon R, Koecher K, Knights D. 2019. Daily sampling reveals personalized diet-microbiome associations in humans. Cell Host Microbe 25:789–802.e5.
    21.
    Poyet M, Groussin M, Gibbons SM, Avila-Pacheco J, Jiang X, Kearney SM, Perrotta AR, Berdy B, Zhao S, Lieberman TD, Swanson PK, Smith M, Roesemann S, Alexander JE, Rich SA, Livny J, Vlamakis H, Clish C, Bullock K, Deik A, Scott J, Pierce KA, Xavier RJ, Alm EJ. 2019. A library of human gut bacterial isolates paired with longitudinal multiomics data enables mechanistic microbiome research. Nat Med 25:1442–1452.
    22.
    Chan SHJ, Simons MN, Maranas CD. 2017. SteadyCom: predicting microbial abundances while ensuring community stability. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005539.
    23.
    Human Microbiome Project Consortium. 2012. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486:207–214.
    24.
    Engl HW, Hanke M, Neubauer A. 2000. Regularization of inverse problems. Springer Science & Business Media, New York, NY.
    25.
    Hoerl AE, Kennard RW. 1970. Ridge regression: biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics 12:55–67.
    26.
    Potra FA, Wright SJ. 2000. Interior-point methods. J Comput Appl Math 124:281–302.
    27.
    Forslund K, Hildebrand F, Nielsen T, Falony G, Le Chatelier E, Sunagawa S, Prifti E, Vieira-Silva S, Gudmundsdottir V, Pedersen HK, Arumugam M, Kristiansen K, Voigt AY, Vestergaard H, Hercog R, Costea PI, Kultima JR, Li J, Jørgensen T, Levenez F, Dore J, MetaHIT consortium, Nielsen HB, Brunak S, Raes J, Hansen T, Wang J, Ehrlich SD, Bork P, Pedersen O. 2015. Disentangling type 2 diabetes and metformin treatment signatures in the human gut microbiota. Nature 528:262–266.
    28.
    Wu H, Esteve E, Tremaroli V, Khan MT, Caesar R, Mannerås-Holm L, Ståhlman M, Olsson LM, Serino M, Planas-Fèlix M, Xifra G, Mercader JM, Torrents D, Burcelin R, Ricart W, Perkins R, Fernàndez-Real JM, Bäckhed F. 2017. Metformin alters the gut microbiome of individuals with treatment-naive type 2 diabetes, contributing to the therapeutic effects of the drug. Nat Med 23:850–858.
    29.
    Dadi TH, Renard BY, Wieler LH, Semmler T, Reinert K. 2017. SLIMM: species level identification of microorganisms from metagenomes. PeerJ 5:e3138.
    30.
    Korem T, Zeevi D, Suez J, Weinberger A, Avnit-Sagi T, Pompan-Lotan M, Matot E, Jona G, Harmelin A, Cohen N, Sirota-Madi A, Thaiss CA, Pevsner-Fischer M, Sorek R, Xavier R, Elinav E, Segal E. 2015. Growth dynamics of gut microbiota in health and disease inferred from single metagenomic samples. Science 349:1101–1106.
    31.
    Magnúsdóttir S, Heinken A, Kutt L, Ravcheev DA, Bauer E, Noronha A, Greenhalgh K, Jäger C, Baginska J, Wilmes P, Fleming RMT, Thiele I. 2017. Generation of genome-scale metabolic reconstructions for 773 members of the human gut microbiota. Nat Biotechnol 35:81–89.
    32.
    Noronha A, Modamio J, Jarosz Y, Guerard E, Sompairac N, Preciat G, Daníelsdóttir AD, Krecke M, Merten D, Haraldsdóttir HS, Heinken A, Heirendt L, Magnúsdóttir S, Ravcheev DA, Sahoo S, Gawron P, Friscioni L, Garcia B, Prendergast M, Puente A, Rodrigues M, Roy A, Rouquaya M, Wiltgen L, Žagare A, John E, Krueger M, Kuperstein I, Zinovyev A, Schneider R, Fleming RMT, Thiele I. 2019. The Virtual Metabolic Human database: integrating human and gut microbiome metabolism with nutrition and disease. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D614–D624.
    33.
    Magnúsdóttir S, Heinken A, Fleming RMT, Thiele I. 2018. Reply to “Challenges in modeling the human gut microbiome.” Nat Biotechnol 36:686–691.
    34.
    Kiela PR, Ghishan FK. 2016. Physiology of intestinal absorption and secretion. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 30:145–159.
    35.
    Lagier J-C, Million M, Hugon P, Armougom F, Raoult D. 2012. Human gut microbiota: repertoire and variations. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2:136.
    36.
    Koren O, Goodrich JK, Cullender TC, Spor A, Laitinen K, Bäckhed HK, Gonzalez A, Werner JJ, Angenent LT, Knight R, Bäckhed F, Isolauri E, Salminen S, Ley RE. 2012. Host remodeling of the gut microbiome and metabolic changes during pregnancy. Cell 150:470–480.
    37.
    Morgan XC, Tickle TL, Sokol H, Gevers D, Devaney KL, Ward DV, Reyes JA, Shah SA, LeLeiko N, Snapper SB, Bousvaros A, Korzenik J, Sands BE, Xavier RJ, Huttenhower C. 2012. Dysfunction of the intestinal microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease and treatment. Genome Biol 13:R79.
    38.
    Brown K, DeCoffe D, Molcan E, Gibson DL. 2012. Diet-induced dysbiosis of the intestinal microbiota and the effects on immunity and disease. Nutrients 4:1095–1119.
    39.
    Bajaj JS, Hylemon PB, Ridlon JM, Heuman DM, Daita K, White MB, Monteith P, Noble NA, Sikaroodi M, Gillevet PM. 2012. Colonic mucosal microbiome differs from stool microbiome in cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy and is linked to cognition and inflammation. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 303:G675–G685.
    40.
    Chen W, Liu F, Ling Z, Tong X, Xiang C. 2012. Human intestinal lumen and mucosa-associated microbiota in patients with colorectal cancer. PLoS One 7:e39743.
    41.
    Murri M, Leiva I, Gomez-Zumaquero JM, Tinahones FJ, Cardona F, Soriguer F, Queipo-Ortuño MI. 2013. Gut microbiota in children with type 1 diabetes differs from that in healthy children: a case-control study. BMC Med 11:46.
    42.
    McCann KS. 2000. The diversity–stability debate. Nature 405:228–233.
    43.
    Coyte KZ, Schluter J, Foster KR. 2015. The ecology of the microbiome: networks, competition, and stability. Science 350:663–666.
    44.
    Mahfouz A, van de Giessen M, van der Maaten L, Huisman S, Reinders M, Hawrylycz MJ, Lelieveldt B. 2015. Visualizing the spatial gene expression organization in the brain through non-linear similarity embeddings. Methods 73:79–89.
    45.
    Arumugam M, Raes J, Pelletier E, Le Paslier D, Yamada T, Mende DR, Fernandes GR, Tap J, Bruls T, Batto J-M, Bertalan M, Borruel N, Casellas F, Fernandez L, Gautier L, Hansen T, Hattori M, Hayashi T, Kleerebezem M, Kurokawa K, Leclerc M, Levenez F, Manichanh C, Nielsen HB, Nielsen T, Pons N, Poulain J, Qin J, Sicheritz-Ponten T, Tims S, Torrents D, Ugarte E, Zoetendal EG, Wang J, Guarner F, Pedersen O, de Vos WM, Brunak S, Doré J, MetaHIT Consortium, Antolín M, Artiguenave F, Blottiere HM, Almeida M, Brechot C, Cara C, Chervaux C, Cultrone A, Delorme C, Denariaz G, Dervyn R, et al. 2011. Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome. Nature 473:174–180.
    46.
    Kinross JM, Darzi AW, Nicholson JK. 2011. Gut microbiome-host interactions in health and disease. Genome Med 3:14.
    47.
    Tan J, McKenzie C, Potamitis M, Thorburn AN, Mackay CR, Macia L. 2014. The role of short-chain fatty acids in health and disease. Adv Immunol 121:91–119.
    48.
    Tremaroli V, Bäckhed F. 2012. Functional interactions between the gut microbiota and host metabolism. Nature 489:242–249.
    49.
    Vital M, Karch A, Pieper DH. 2017. Colonic butyrate-producing communities in humans: an overview using omics data. mSystems 2:e00130-17.
    50.
    Baxter NT, Schmidt AW, Venkataraman A, Kim KS, Waldron C, Schmidt TM. 2019. Dynamics of human gut microbiota and short-chain fatty acids in response to dietary interventions with three fermentable fibers. mBio 10:e02566-18.
    51.
    Savageau MA. 2010. Biochemical systems analysis: a study of function and design in molecular biology. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, Scotts Valley, CA.
    52.
    Heinrich R, Rapoport TA. 1974. A linear steady-state treatment of enzymatic chains. General properties, control and effector strength. Eur J Biochem 42:89–95.
    53.
    Hillmann B, Al-Ghalith GA, Shields-Cutler R, Zhu Q, Gohl D, Beckman KB, Knight R, Knights D. 2018. Evaluating the information content of shallow shotgun metagenomics. mSystems 3:e00069-18.
    54.
    Gilbert JA, Blaser MJ, Caporaso JG, Jansson JK, Lynch SV, Knight R. 2018. Current understanding of the human microbiome. Nat Med 24:392–400.
    55.
    Babaei P, Shoaie S, Ji B, Nielsen J. 2018. Challenges in modeling the human gut microbiome. Nat Biotechnol 36:682–686.
    56.
    Reese AT, Pereira FC, Schintlmeister A, Berry D, Wagner M, Hale LP, Wu A, Jiang S, Durand HK, Zhou X, Premont RT, Diehl AM, O’Connell TM, Alberts SC, Kartzinel TR, Pringle RM, Dunn RR, Wright JP, David LA. 2018. Microbial nitrogen limitation in the mammalian large intestine. Nat Microbiol 3:1441–1450.
    57.
    Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. 2016. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 13:581–583.
    58.
    Brown CT, Olm MR, Thomas BC, Banfield JF. 2016. Measurement of bacterial replication rates in microbial communities. Nat Biotechnol 34:1256–1263.
    59.
    Ebrahim A, Lerman JA, Palsson BO, Hyduke DR. 2013. COBRApy: COnstraints-Based Reconstruction and Analysis for Python. BMC Syst Biol 7:74.
    60.
    Sender R, Fuchs S, Milo R. 2016. Revised estimates for the number of human and bacteria cells in the body. PLoS Biol 14:e1002533.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSystems
    Volume 5Number 125 February 2020
    eLocator: e00606-19
    Editor: Nicholas Chia
    Mayo Clinic

    History

    Received: 20 September 2019
    Accepted: 19 December 2019
    Published online: 21 January 2020

    Peer Review History

    Download review history as PDF.

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. flux balance analysis
    2. gut microbiome
    3. metagenome
    4. systems biology

    Contributors

    Authors

    Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica (INMEGEN), Mexico City, México
    Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, Washington, USA
    Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, Washington, USA
    eScience Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
    Osbaldo Resendis-Antonio https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5220-541X
    Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica (INMEGEN), Mexico City, México
    Human Systems Biology Laboratory, Coordinación de la Investigación Científica - Red de Apoyo a la Investigación, Universidad Nacional Autonóma de México (UNAM), Mexico City, México

    Editor

    Nicholas Chia
    Editor
    Mayo Clinic

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Sean M. Gibbons, [email protected], or Osbaldo Resendis-Antonio, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSystemsArticle
    Clonal yet Different: Understanding the Causes of Genomic Heterogeneity in Microbial Species and Impacts on Public Health

    Clonal yet Different: Understanding the Causes of Genomic Heterogeneity in Microbial Species and Impacts on Public Health

    ABSTRACT

    Why are members of a microbial species not the same? They may be clonal, but microbial populations are often composed of multiple cocirculating lineages distinguished by large phenotypic and genetic differences. Species and the mechanisms of speciation have been notoriously challenging to study in microbes owing to pervasive horizontal gene flow, widespread geographical distribution, and cryptic ecological niches that structure microbial populations. Understanding the origins of genomic variation in microbial species and populations is fundamental to questions critical to society and public health, such as “Are emerging diseases new species or variants of existing ones?,” “What makes a resistant strain successful?,” and “How will a pathogen respond to selective pressures?” To explore these questions, I use whole-genome sequencing of closely related strains to understand the evolutionary, ecological, and epidemiological dynamics of bacterial pathogens to inform effective, more precisely targeted public health interventions.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Croucher NJ, Coupland PG, Stevenson AE, Callendrello A, Bentley SD, Hanage WP. 2014. Diversification of bacterial genome content through distinct mechanisms over different timescales. Nat Commun 5:5471.
    2.
    Krause DJ, Whitaker RJ. 2015. Inferring speciation processes from patterns of natural variation in microbial genomes. Syst Biol 64:926–935.
    3.
    Andam CP, Mitchell PK, Callendrello A, Chang Q, Corander J, Chaguza C, McGee L, Beall BW, Hanage WP. 2017. Genomic epidemiology of penicillin-nonsusceptible pneumococci with nonvaccine serotypes causing invasive disease in the United States. J Clin Microbiol 55:1104–1115.
    4.
    Andam CP, Worby CJ, Gierke R, McGee L, Pilishvili T, Hanage WP. 2017. Penicillin resistance of nonvaccine type pneumococcus before and after PCV13 introduction, United States. Emerg Infect Dis 23:1012–1015.
    5.
    Chaguza C, Cornick JE, Andam CP, Gladstone RA, Alaerts M, Musicha P, Peno C, Bar-Zeev N, Kamng'ona AW, Kiran AM, Msefula CL, McGee L, Breiman RF, Kadioglu A, French N, Heyderman RS, Hanage WP, Bentley SD, Everett DB. 2017. Population genetic structure, antibiotic resistance, capsule switching and evolution of invasive pneumococci before conjugate vaccination in Malawi. Vaccine 35:4594–4602.
    6.
    Destoumieux-Garzón D, Mavingui P, Boetsch G, Boissier J, Darriet F, Duboz P, Fritsch C, Giraudoux P, Le Roux F, Morand S, Paillard C, Pontier D, Sueur C, Voituron Y. 2018. The One Health concept: 10 years old and a long road ahead. Front Vet Sci 5:14.
    7.
    Hanage WP. 2016. Not so simple after all: bacteria, their population genetics, and recombination. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 8:a018069.
    8.
    Vos M, Didelot X. 2009. A comparison of homologous recombination rates in bacteria and archaea. ISME J 3:199–208.
    9.
    Beiko RG, Harlow TJ, Ragan MA. 2005. Highways of gene sharing in prokaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:14332–14337.
    10.
    Chewapreecha C, Harris SR, Croucher NJ, Turner C, Marttinen P, Cheng L, Pessia A, Aanensen DM, Mather AE, Page AJ, Salter SJ, Harris D, Nosten F, Goldblatt D, Corander J, Parkhill J, Turner P, Bentley SD. 2014. Dense genomic sampling identifies highways of pneumococcal recombination. Nat Genet 46:305–309.
    11.
    Soucy SM, Huang J, Gogarten JP. 2015. Horizontal gene transfer: building the web of life. Nat Rev Genet 16:472–482.
    12.
    McInerney JO, McNally A, O'Connell MJ. 2017. Why prokaryotes have pangenomes. Nat Microbiol 2:17040.
    13.
    Sheppard SK, Cheng L, Méric G, de Haan CPA, Llarena A-K, Marttinen P, Vidal A, Ridley A, Clifton-Hadley F, Connor TR, Strachan NJC, Forbes K, Colles FM, Jolley KA, Bentley SD, Maiden MCJ, Hänninen M-L, Parkhill J, Hanage WP, Corander J. 2014. Cryptic ecology among host generalist Campylobacter jejuni in domestic animals. Mol Ecol 23:2442–2451.
    14.
    Fondi M, Karkman A, Tamminen MV, Bosi E, Virta M, Fani R, Alm E, McInerney JO. 2016. Every gene is everywhere but the environment selects”: global geolocalization of gene sharing in environmental samples through network analysis. Genome Biol Evol 8:1388–1400.
    15.
    Wilson DJ. 2012. Insights from genomics into bacterial pathogen populations. PLoS Pathog 8:e1002874.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSystems
    Volume 4Number 325 June 2019
    eLocator: e00097-19

    History

    Received: 12 February 2019
    Accepted: 11 March 2019
    Published online: 7 May 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. bacterial pathogens
    2. microbial evolution
    3. microbial population genomics

    Contributors

    Author

    Department of Molecular, Cellular and Biomedical Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, USA

    Notes

    Address correspondence to [email protected].
    Conflict of Interest Disclosures: C.P.A. has nothing to disclose.

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSystemsArticle
    The Vibrio-Squid Symbiosis as a Model for Studying Interbacterial Competition

    The Vibrio-Squid Symbiosis as a Model for Studying Interbacterial Competition

    ABSTRACT

    The symbiosis between Euprymna scolopes squid and its bioluminescent bacterial symbiont, Vibrio fischeri, is a valuable model system to study a natural, coevolved host-microbe association. Over the past 30 years, researchers have developed and optimized many experimental methods to study both partners in isolation and during symbiosis. These powerful tools, along with a strong foundational knowledge about the system, position the Vibrio-squid symbiosis at the forefront of host-microbe interactions because this system is uniquely suited to investigation of symbiosis from both host and bacterial perspectives. Moreover, the ability to isolate and characterize different strains of V. fischeri has revealed exciting new insights about how different genotypes evolve to compete for a host niche, including deploying interbacterial weapons early during host colonization. This Perspective explores how interbacterial warfare influences the diversity and spatial structure of the symbiotic population, as well as the possible effects that intraspecific competition might have on the host.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Hardin G. 1960. The competitive exclusion principle. Science 131:1292–1297.
    2.
    Bauer MA, Kainz K, Carmona-Gutierrez D, Madeo F. 2018. Microbial wars: competition in ecological niches and within the microbiome. Microb Cell 5:215–219.
    3.
    Mandel MJ, Dunn AK. 15 December 2016, posting date. Impact and influence of the natural Vibrio-squid symbiosis in understanding bacterial-animal interactions. Front Microbiol doi:
    4.
    Bongrand C, Ruby EG. 2019. Achieving a multi-strain symbiosis: strain behavior and infection dynamics. ISME J 13:698–706.
    5.
    Speare L, Cecere AG, Guckes KR, Smith S, Wollenberg MS, Mandel MJ, Miyashiro T, Septer AN. 2018. Bacterial symbionts use a type VI secretion system to eliminate competitors in their natural host. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:E8528–E8537.
    6.
    Coulthurst S. 20 March 2019, posting date. The type VI secretion system: a versatile bacterial weapon. Microbiology doi:
    7.
    Nikolakakis K, Lehnert E, McFall-Ngai MJ, Ruby EG. 2015. Use of hybridization chain reaction-fluorescent in situ hybridization to track gene expression by both partners during initiation of symbiosis. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:4728–4735.
    8.
    Sun Y, LaSota ED, Cecere AG, LaPenna KB, Larios-Valencia J, Wollenberg MS, Miyashiro T. 2016. Intraspecific competition impacts Vibrio fischeri strain diversity during initial colonization of the squid light organ. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:3082–3091.
    9.
    Wollenberg MS, Ruby EG. 2009. Population structure of Vibrio fischeri within the light organs of Euprymna scolopes squid from two Oahu (Hawaii) populations. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:193–202.
    10.
    Visick KL, Hodge-Hanson KM, Tischler AH, Bennett AK, Mastrodomenico V. 2018. Tools for rapid genetic engineering of Vibrio fischeri. Appl Environ Microbiol 84:e00850-18.
    11.
    Belcaid M, Casaburi G, McAnulty SJ, Schmidbaur H, Suria AM, Moriano-Gutierrez S, Pankey MS, Oakley TH, Kremer N, Koch EJ, Collins AJ, Nguyen H, Lek S, Goncharenko-Foster I, Minx P, Sodergren E, Weinstock G, Rokhsar DS, McFall-Ngai M, Simakov O, Foster JS, Nyholm SV. 2019. Symbiotic organs shaped by distinct modes of genome evolution in cephalopods. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116:3030–3035.
    12.
    Nyholm SV, Stewart JJ, Ruby EG, McFall-Ngai MJ. 2009. Recognition between symbiotic Vibrio fischeri and the haemocytes of Euprymna scolopes. Environ Microbiol 11:483–493.
    13.
    Chun CK, Scheetz TE, de Fatima Bonaldo M, Brown B, Clemens A, Crookes-Goodson WJ, Crouch K, DeMartini T, Eyestone M, Goodson MS, Janssens B, Kimbell JL, Koropatnick TA, Kucaba T, Smith C, Stewart JJ, Tong D, Troll JV, Webster S, Winhall-Rice J, Yap C, Casavant TL, McFall-Ngai MJ, Bento Soares M. 16 June 2006, posting date. An annotated cDNA library of juvenile Euprymna scolopes with and without colonization by the symbiont Vibrio fischeri. BMC Genomics doi:
    14.
    Koch EJ, Miyashiro T, McFall-Ngai MJ, Ruby EG. 2014. Features governing symbiont persistence in the squid-vibrio association. Mol Ecol 23:1624–1634.
    15.
    Levisohn R, Moreland J, Nealson KH. 1987. Isolation and characterization of a generalized transducing phage for the marine luminous bacterium Vibrio fischeri MJ-1. Microbiology 133:1577–1582.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSystems
    Volume 4Number 325 June 2019
    eLocator: e00108-19

    History

    Received: 15 February 2019
    Accepted: 24 April 2019
    Published online: 11 June 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. Aliivibrio
    2. Vibrio fischeri
    3. competition
    4. symbiosis
    5. type VI secretion system

    Contributors

    Author

    Alecia N. Septer
    Department of Marine Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA

    Notes

    Address correspondence to [email protected].
    Conflict of Interest Disclosures: A.N.S. has nothing to disclose.

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSystemsArticle
    Rapid Increase of SARS-CoV-2 Variant B.1.1.7 Detected in Sewage Samples from England between October 2020 and January 2021

    Rapid Increase of SARS-CoV-2 Variant B.1.1.7 Detected in Sewage Samples from England between October 2020 and January 2021

    ABSTRACT

    SARS-CoV-2 variants with multiple amino acid mutations in the spike protein are emerging in different parts of the world, raising concerns regarding their possible impact on human immune response and vaccine efficacy against the virus. Recently, a variant named lineage B.1.1.7 was detected and shown to be rapidly spreading across the UK since November 2020. As surveillance for these SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) becomes critical, we have investigated the use of environmental surveillance (ES) for the rapid detection and quantification of B.1.1.7 viruses in sewage as a way of monitoring its expansion that is independent on the investigation of identified clinical cases. Next-generation sequencing analysis of amplicons synthesized from sewage concentrates revealed the presence of B.1.1.7 mutations in viral sequences, first identified in a sample collected in London on 10 November 2020 and shown to rapidly increase in frequency to >95% in January 2021, in agreement with clinical data over the same period. We show that ES can provide an early warning of VOCs becoming prevalent in the population and that, as well as B.1.1.7, our method can detect VOCs B.1.351 and P.1, first identified in South Africa and Brazil, respectively, and other viruses carrying critical spike mutation E484K, known to have an effect on virus antigenicity. Although we did not detect such mutation in viral RNAs from sewage, we did detect mutations at amino acids 478, 490, and 494, located close to amino acid 484 in the spike protein structure and known to also have an effect on antigenicity.
    IMPORTANCE The recent appearance and growth of new SARS-CoV-2 variants represent a major challenge for the control of the COVID-19 pandemic. These variants of concern contain mutations affecting antigenicity, which raises concerns on their possible impact on human immune response to the virus and vaccine efficacy against them. Here, we show how environmental surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 can be used to help us understand virus transmission patterns and provide an early warning of variants becoming prevalent in the population. We describe the detection and quantification of variant B.1.1.7, first identified in southeast England in sewage samples from London (UK) before widespread transmission of this variant was obvious from clinical cases. Variant B.1.1.7 was first detected in a sample from early November 2020, with the frequency of B.1.1.7 mutations detected in sewage rapidly increasing to >95% in January 2021, in agreement with increasing SARS-CoV-2 infections associated with B.1.1.7 viruses.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Chand M, Hopkins S, Dabrera G, Achison C, Christina B, Barclay W, Ferguson N, Volz E, Loman N, Rambaut A, Barrett J. 2020. Investigation of novel SARS-CoV-2 variant: variant of concern 202012/01. Public Health England, London, United Kingdom. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/959438/Technical_Briefing_VOC_SH_NJL2_SH2.pdf. Accessed 9 February 2021.
    2.
    Volz E, Mishra S, Chand M, Barrett JC, Johnson R, Geidelberg L, Hinsley WR, Laydon DJ, Dabrera G, O’Toole Á, Amato R, Ragonnet-Cronin M, Harrison I, Jackson B, Ariani CV, Boyd O, Loman NJ, McCrone JT, Gonçalves S, Jorgensen D, Myers R, Hill V, Jackson DK, Gaythorpe K, Groves N, Sillitoe J, Kwiatkowski DP, Flaxman S, Ratmann O, Bhatt S, Hopkins S, Gandy A, Rambaut A, Ferguson NM, The COVID-19 Genomics UK (COG-UK) Consortium. 2021. Assessing transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7 in England. Nature 593:266–269.
    3.
    Rambaut A, Loman N, Pybus O, Barclay W, Barretr J, Carabelli A, Connor T, Peacock T, Robertson DL, Volz E. 2020. Preliminary genomic characterisation of an emergent SARS-CoV-2 lineage in the UK defined by a novel set of spike mutations. https://virological.org/t/preliminary-genomic-characterisation-of-an-emergent-sars-cov-2-lineage-in-the-uk-defined-by-a-novel-set-of-spike-mutations/563. Accessed 9 February 2021.
    4.
    Chan KK, Tan TJC, Narayanan KK, Procko E. 2021. An engineered decoy receptor for SARS-CoV-2 broadly binds protein S sequence variants. Sci Adv 17:eabf1738.
    5.
    Starr TN, Greaney AJ, Hilton SK, Ellis D, Crawford KHD, Dingens AS, Navarro MJ, Bowen JE, Tortorici MA, Walls AC, King NP, Veesler D, Bloom JD. 2020. Deep mutational scanning of SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain reveals constraints on folding and ACE2 binding. Cell 182:1295–1310.
    6.
    Gu H, Chen Q, Yang G, He L, Fan H, Deng YQ, Wang Y, Teng Y, Zhao Z, Cui Y, Li Y, Li XF, Li J, Zhang NN, Yang X, Chen S, Guo Y, Zhao G, Wang X, Luo DY, Wang H, Yang X, Li Y, Han G, He Y, Zhou X, Geng S, Sheng X, Jiang S, Sun S, Qin CF, Zhou Y. 2020. Adaptation of SARS-CoV-2 in BALB/c mice for testing vaccine efficacy. Science 369:1603–1607.
    7.
    Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Pohlmann S. 2020. A multibasic cleavage site in the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 is essential for infection of human lung cells. Mol Cell 78:779–784.
    8.
    Johnson BA, Xie X, Bailey AL, Kalveram B, Lokugamage KG, Muruato A, Zou J, Zhang X, Juelich T, Smith JK, Zhang L, Bopp N, Schindewolf C, Vu M, Vanderheiden A, Winkler ES, Swetnam D, Plante JA, Aguilar P, Plante KS, Popov V, Lee B, Weaver SC, Suthar MS, Routh AL, Ren P, Ku Z, An Z, Debbink K, Diamond MS, Shi PY, Freiberg AN, Menachery VD. 2021. Loss of furin cleavage site attenuates SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis. Nature 591:293–299.
    9.
    Kemp S, Harvey W, Lytras S, Carabelli A, Robertson D, Gupta R. 2021. Recurrent emergence and transmission of a SARS-CoV-2 spike deletion H69/V70. bioRxiv https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.12.14.422555v6.
    10.
    Elbe S, Buckland-Merrett G. 2017. Data, disease, and diplomacy: GISAID’s innovative contribution to global health. Glob Chall 1:33–46.
    11.
    Tegally H, Wilkinson E, Giovanetti M, Iranzadeh A, Fonseca V, Giandhari J, Doolabh D, Pillay S, San EJ, Msomi N, Mlisana K, von Gottberg A, Walaza S, Allam M, Ismail A, Mohale T, Glass AJ, Engelbrecht S, Van Zyl G, Preiser W, Petruccione F, Sigal A, Hardie D, Marais G, Hsiao NY, Korsman S, Davies MA, Tyers L, Mudau I, York D, Maslo C, Goedhals D, Abrahams S, Laguda-Akingba O, Alisoltani-Dehkordi A, Godzik A, Wibmer CK, Sewell BT, Lourenco J, Alcantara LCJ, Kosakovsky Pond SL, Weaver S, Martin D, Lessells RJ, Bhiman JN, Williamson C, de Oliveira T. 2021. Detection of a SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern in South Africa. Nature 592:438–443.
    12.
    Faria NR, Claro IM, Candido D, Franco LAM, Andrade PS, Coletti TM, Silva CAM, Sales FC, Manuli ER, Aguiar RS, Gaburo N, Camilo CC, Fraiji NA, Crispim MAE, Carvalho MPSS, Rambaut A, Loman N, Pybus OG, Sabino EC. 2021. Genomic characterization of an emergent SARS-CoV-2 lineage in Manaus: preliminary findings. https://virological.org/t/genomic-characterization-of-an-emergent-sars-cov-2-lineage-in-manaus-preliminary-findings/586. Accessed 9 February 2021.
    13.
    Greaney AJ, Loes AN, Crawford KHD, Starr TN, Malone KD, Chu HY, Bloom JD. 2021. Comprehensive mapping of mutations in the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain that affect recognition by polyclonal human plasma antibodies. Cell Host Microbe 29:463–476 e6.
    14.
    Cheng MH, Krieger JM, Kaynak B, Arditi M, Bahar I. 2021. Impact of South African 501.V2 variant on SARS-CoV-2 spike infectivity and neutralization: a structure-based computational assessment. bioRxiv https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.01.10.426143v1.
    15.
    Public Health England. 2021. Investigation of novel SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern 202012/01: technical briefing 5. Public Health England, London, United Kingdom. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/959426/Variant_of_Concern_VOC_202012_01_Technical_Briefing_5.pdf. Accessed 9 February 2021.
    16.
    Wu K, Werner AP, Moliva JI, Koch M, Choi A, Stewart-Jones GBE, Bennett H, Boyoglu-Barnum S, Shi W, Graham BS, Carfi A, Corbett KS, Seder RA, Edwards DK. 2021. mRNA-1273 vaccine induces neutralizing antibodies against spike mutants from global SARS-CoV-2 variants. bioRxiv https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.01.25.427948v1.
    17.
    Wang Z, Schmidt F, Weisblum Y, Muecksch F, Barnes CO, Finkin S, Schaefer-Babajew D, Cipolla M, Gaebler C, Lieberman JA, Oliveira TY, Yang Z, Abernathy ME, Huey-Tubman KE, Hurley A, Turroja M, West KA, Gordon K, Millard KG, Ramos V, Da Silva J, Xu J, Colbert RA, Patel R, Dizon J, Unson-O’Brien C, Shimeliovich I, Gazumyan A, Caskey M, Bjorkman PJ, Casellas R, Hatziioannou T, Bieniasz PD, Nussenzweig MC. 2021. mRNA vaccine-elicited antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and circulating variants. Nature 592:616–622.
    18.
    Ho D, Wang P, Liu L, Iketani S, Luo Y, Guo Y, Wang M, Yu J, Zhang B, Kwong P, Graham B, Mascola J, Chang J, Yin M, Sobieszczyk M, Kyratsous C, Shapiro L, Sheng Z, Nair M, Huang Y. 2021. Increased resistance of SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1.351 and B.1.1.7 to antibody neutralization. bioRxiv https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.01.25.428137v2.
    19.
    Xie X, Liu Y, Liu J, Zhang X, Zou J, Fontes-Garfias CR, Xia H, Swanson KA, Cutler M, Cooper D, Menachery VD, Weaver SC, Dormitzer PR, Shi PY. 2021. Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 spike 69/70 deletion, E484K and N501Y variants by BNT162b2 vaccine-elicited sera. Nat Med 27:620–621.
    20.
    Muik A, Wallisch A-K, Sänger B, Swanson KA, Mühl J, Chen W, Cai H, Maurus D, Sarkar R, Türeci Ö, Dormitzer PR, Şahin U. 2021. Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7 pseudovirus by BNT162b2 vaccine-elicited human sera. Science 371:1152–1153.
    21.
    Foladori P, Cutrupi F, Segata N, Manara S, Pinto F, Malpei F, Bruni L, La Rosa G. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 from faeces to wastewater treatment: what do we know? A review. Sci Total Environ 743:140444.
    22.
    Martin J, Klapsa D, Wilton T, Zambon M, Bentley E, Bujaki E, Fritzsche M, Mate R, Majumdar M. 2020. Tracking SARS-CoV-2 in sewage: evidence of changes in virus variant predominance during COVID-19 pandemic. Viruses 12:1144.
    23.
    Korber B, Fischer WM, Gnanakaran S, Yoon H, Theiler J, Abfalterer W, Hengartner N, Giorgi EE, Bhattacharya T, Foley B, Hastie KM, Parker MD, Partridge DG, Evans CM, Freeman TM, de Silva TI, McDanal C, Perez LG, Tang H, Moon-Walker A, Whelan SP, LaBranche CC, Saphire EO, Montefiori DC, Angyal A, Brown RL, Carrilero L, Green LR, Groves DC, Johnson KJ, Keeley AJ, Lindsey BB, Parsons PJ, Raza M, Rowland-Jones S, Smith N, Tucker RM, Wang D, Wyles MD. 2020. Tracking changes in SARS-CoV-2 spike: evidence that D614G increases infectivity of the COVID-19 virus. Cell 182:812–827.
    24.
    Fontenele RS, Kraberger S, Hadfield J, Driver EM, Bowes D, Holland LA, Faleye TOC, Adhikari S, Kumar R, Inchausti R, Holmes WK, Deitrick S, Brown P, Duty D, Smith T, Bhatnagar A, Yeager RA, Holm RH, Hoogesteijn von Reitzenstein N, Wheeler E, Dixon K, Constantine T, Wilson MA, Lim ES, Jiang X, Halden RU, Scotch M, Varsani A. 2021. High-throughput sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater provides insights into circulating variants. medRxiv https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.01.22.21250320v1.
    25.
    Nemudryi A, Nemudraia A, Wiegand T, Surya K, Buyukyoruk M, Cicha C, Vanderwood KK, Wilkinson R, Wiedenheft B. 2020. Temporal detection and phylogenetic assessment of SARS-CoV-2 in municipal wastewater. Cell Rep Med 1:100098.
    26.
    Crits-Christoph A, Kantor RS, Olm MR, Whitney ON, Al-Shayeb B, Lou YC, Flamholz A, Kennedy LC, Greenwald H, Hinkle A, Hetzel J, Spitzer S, Koble J, Tan A, Hyde F, Schroth G, Kuersten S, Banfield JF, Nelson KL. 2021. Genome sequencing of sewage detects regionally prevalent SARS-CoV-2 variants. mBio 12:e02703-20.
    27.
    Jahn K, Dreifuss D, Topolsky I, Kull A, Ganesanandamoorthy P, Fernandez-Cassi X, Bänziger C, Stachler E, Fuhrmann L, Jablonski KP, Chen C, Aquino C, Stadler T, Ort C, Kohn T, Julian TR, Beerenwinkel N. 2021. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants in Switzerland by genomic analysis of wastewater samples. medRxiv https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.01.08.21249379v1.
    28.
    Izquierdo-Lara R, Elsinga G, Heijnen L, Oude Munnink BB, Schapendonk CME, Nieuwenhuijse D, Kon M, Lu L, Aarestrup FM, Lycett S, Medema G, Koopmans MPG, de Graaf M. 2020. Monitoring SARS-CoV-2 circulation and diversity through community wastewater sequencing. medRxiv https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.09.21.20198838v1.
    29.
    Office for National Statistics. 2021. Coronavirus (COVID-19) Infection Survey, UK: 8 January 2021. Office for National Statistics, London, United Kingdom. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/conditionsanddiseases/bulletins/coronaviruscovid19infectionsurveypilot/8january2021. Accessed 9 February 2021.
    30.
    Baum A, Fulton BO, Wloga E, Copin R, Pascal KE, Russo V, Giordano S, Lanza K, Negron N, Ni M, Wei Y, Atwal GS, Murphy AJ, Stahl N, Yancopoulos GD, Kyratsous CA. 2020. Antibody cocktail to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein prevents rapid mutational escape seen with individual antibodies. Science 369:1014–1018.
    31.
    Li Q, Wu J, Nie J, Zhang L, Hao H, Liu S, Zhao C, Zhang Q, Liu H, Nie L, Qin H, Wang M, Lu Q, Li X, Sun Q, Liu J, Zhang L, Li X, Huang W, Wang Y. 2020. The impact of mutations in SARS-CoV-2 spike on viral infectivity and antigenicity. Cell 182:1284–1294 e9.
    32.
    Weisblum Y, Schmidt F, Zhang F, DaSilva J, Poston D, Lorenzi JC, Muecksch F, Rutkowska M, Hoffmann HH, Michailidis E, Gaebler C, Agudelo M, Cho A, Wang Z, Gazumyan A, Cipolla M, Luchsinger L, Hillyer CD, Caskey M, Robbiani DF, Rice CM, Nussenzweig MC, Hatziioannou T, Bieniasz PD. 2020. Escape from neutralizing antibodies by SARS-CoV-2 spike protein variants. Elife 9:e61312.
    33.
    Rappazzo CG, Tse LV, Kaku CI, Wrapp D, Sakharkar M, Huang D, Deveau LM, Yockachonis TJ, Herbert AS, Battles MB, O’Brien CM, Brown ME, Geoghegan JC, Belk J, Peng L, Yang L, Scobey TD, Burton DR, Nemazee D, Dye JM, Voss JE, Gunn BM, McLellan JS, Baric RS, Gralinski LE, Walker LM. 2020. An engineered antibody with broad protective efficacy in murine models of SARS and COVID-19. bioRxiv https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.11.17.385500v1.
    34.
    Liu Z, VanBlargan LA, Bloyet LM, Rothlauf PW, Chen RE, Stumpf S, Zhao H, Errico JM, Theel ES, Liebeskind MJ, Alford B, Buchser WJ, Ellebedy AH, Fremont DH, Diamond MS, Whelan SPJ. 2020. Landscape analysis of escape variants identifies SARS-CoV-2 spike mutations that attenuate monoclonal and serum antibody neutralization. bioRxiv https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.11.06.372037v2.
    35.
    Didion JP, Martin M, Collins FS. 2017. Atropos: specific, sensitive, and speedy trimming of sequencing reads. PeerJ 5:e3720.
    36.
    Xu C, Wang Y, Liu C, Zhang C, Han W, Hong X, Wang Y, Hong Q, Wang S, Zhao Q, Wang Y, Yang Y, Chen K, Zheng W, Kong L, Wang F, Zuo Q, Huang Z, Cong Y. 2021. Conformational dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 trimeric spike glycoprotein in complex with receptor ACE2 revealed by cryo-EM. Sci Adv 7:eabe5575.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSystems
    Volume 6Number 329 June 2021
    eLocator: e00353-21
    Editor: Charles R. Langelier
    University of California—San Francisco

    History

    Received: 24 March 2021
    Accepted: 19 May 2021
    Published online: 15 June 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. SARS-CoV-2
    2. environmental surveillance
    3. variant B.1.1.7
    4. variant of concern
    5. COVID-19
    6. sewage
    7. vaccine
    8. wastewater
    9. next-generation sequencing
    10. direct detection
    11. B.1.1.7
    12. surveillance

    Contributors

    Authors

    Thomas Wilton
    Division of Virology, National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, South Mimms, Potters Bar, Hertfordshire, UK
    Erika Bujaki
    Division of Virology, National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, South Mimms, Potters Bar, Hertfordshire, UK
    Dimitra Klapsa
    Division of Virology, National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, South Mimms, Potters Bar, Hertfordshire, UK
    Manasi Majumdar
    Division of Virology, National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, South Mimms, Potters Bar, Hertfordshire, UK
    Maria Zambon
    Respiratory Virology and Polio Reference Service, Public Health England, London, UK
    Martin Fritzsche
    Division of Analytical and Biological Sciences, National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, South Mimms, Potters Bar, Hertfordshire, UK
    Ryan Mate
    Division of Analytical and Biological Sciences, National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, South Mimms, Potters Bar, Hertfordshire, UK
    Division of Virology, National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, South Mimms, Potters Bar, Hertfordshire, UK

    Editor

    Charles R. Langelier
    Editor
    University of California—San Francisco

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSystemsArticle
    Species Designations Belie Phenotypic and Genotypic Heterogeneity in Oral Streptococci

    ABSTRACT

    Health-associated oral Streptococcus species are promising probiotic candidates to protect against dental caries. Ammonia production through the arginine deiminase system (ADS), which can increase the pH of oral biofilms, and direct antagonism of caries-associated bacterial species are desirable properties for oral probiotic strains. ADS and antagonistic activities can vary dramatically among individuals, but the genetic basis for these differences is unknown. We sequenced whole genomes of a diverse set of clinical oral Streptococcus isolates and examined the genetic basis of variability in ADS and antagonistic activities. A total of 113 isolates were included and represented 10 species: Streptococcus australis, A12-like, S. cristatus, S. gordonii, S. intermedius, S. mitis, S. oralis including S. oralis subsp. dentisani, S. parasanguinis, S. salivarius, and S. sanguinis. Mean ADS activity and antagonism on Streptococcus mutans UA159 were measured for each isolate, and each isolate was whole genome shotgun sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq. Phylogenies were built of genes known to be involved in ADS activity and antagonism. Several approaches to correlate the pan-genome with phenotypes were performed. Phylogenies of genes previously identified in ADS activity and antagonism grouped isolates by species, but not by phenotype. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) identified additional genes potentially involved in ADS activity or antagonism across all the isolates we sequenced as well as within several species. Phenotypic heterogeneity in oral streptococci is not necessarily reflected by genotype and is not species specific. Probiotic strains must be carefully selected based on characterization of each strain and not based on inclusion within a certain species.
    IMPORTANCE Representative type strains are commonly used to characterize bacterial species, yet species are phenotypically and genotypically heterogeneous. Conclusions about strain physiology and activity based on a single strain therefore may be inappropriate and misleading. When selecting strains for probiotic use, the assumption that all strains within a species share the same desired probiotic characteristics may result in selection of a strain that lacks the desired traits, and therefore makes a minimally effective or ineffective probiotic. Health-associated oral streptococci are promising candidates for anticaries probiotics, but strains need to be carefully selected based on observed phenotypes. We characterized the genotypes and anticaries phenotypes of strains from 10 species of oral streptococci and demonstrate poor correlation between genotype and phenotype across all species.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Hasslöf P, West CE, Karlsson Videhult F, Brandelius C, Stecksén-Blicks C. 2013. Early intervention with probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei F19 has no long-term effect on caries experience. Caries Res 47:559–565.
    2.
    Lin X, Chen X, Chen Y, Jiang W, Chen H. 2015. The effect of five probiotic lactobacilli strains on the growth and biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans. Oral Dis 21:e128–e134.
    3.
    Teanpaisan R, Piwat S, Dahlén G. 2011. Inhibitory effect of oral Lactobacillus against oral pathogens. Lett Appl Microbiol 53:452–459.
    4.
    Pham LC, van Spanning RJM, Röling WFM, Prosperi AC, Terefework Z, ten Cate JM, Crielaard W, Zaura E. 2009. Effects of probiotic Lactobacillus salivarius W24 on the compositional stability of oral microbial communities. Arch Oral Biol 54:132–137.
    5.
    Madhwani T, McBain AJ. 2011. Bacteriological effects of a Lactobacillus reuteri probiotic on in vitro oral biofilms. Arch Oral Biol 56:1264–1273.
    6.
    Comelli EM, Guggenheim B, Stingele F, Neeser J-R. 2002. Selection of dairy bacterial strains as probiotics for oral health. Eur J Oral Sci 110:218–224.
    7.
    Jiang Q, Stamatova I, Kainulainen V, Korpela R, Meurman JH. 2016. Interactions between Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and oral micro-organisms in an in vitro biofilm model. BMC Microbiol 16:149.
    8.
    Lee S-H, Kim Y-J. 2014. A comparative study of the effect of probiotics on cariogenic biofilm model for preventing dental caries. Arch Microbiol 196:601–609.
    9.
    Ravn I, Dige I, Meyer RL, Nyvad B. 2012. Colonization of the oral cavity by probiotic bacteria. Caries Res 46:107–112.
    10.
    Liu Y-L, Nascimento M, Burne RA. 2012. Progress toward understanding the contribution of alkali generation in dental biofilms to inhibition of dental caries. Int J Oral Sci 4:135–140.
    11.
    Richards VP, Alvarez AJ, Luce AR, Bedenbaugh M, Mitchell M, Burne RA, Nascimento MM. 2017. The microbiome of site-specific dental plaque of children with different caries status. Infect Immun 85:e00106-17.
    12.
    Gross EL, Beall CJ, Kutsch SR, Firestone ND, Leys EJ, Griffen AL. 2012. Beyond Streptococcus mutans: dental caries onset linked to multiple species by 16S rRNA community analysis. PLoS One 7:e47722.
    13.
    Di Pierro F, Adami T, Rapacioli G, Giardini N, Streitberger C. 2013. Clinical evaluation of the oral probiotic Streptococcus salivarius K12 in the prevention of recurrent pharyngitis and/or tonsillitis caused by Streptococcus pyogenesin adults. Expert Opin Biol Ther 13:339–343.
    14.
    Burton JP, Chilcott CN, Moore CJ, Speiser G, Tagg JR. 2006. A preliminary study of the effect of probiotic Streptococcus salivarius K12 on oral malodour parameters. J Appl Microbiol 100:754–764.
    15.
    Di Pierro F, Di Pasquale D, Di Cicco M. 2015. Oral use of Streptococcus salivarius K12 in children with secretory otitis media: preliminary results of a pilot, uncontrolled study. Int J Gen Med 8:303–306.
    16.
    Dong Y, Chen YYM, Snyder JA, Burne RA. 2002. Isolation and molecular analysis of the gene cluster for the arginine deiminase system from Streptococcus gordonii DL1. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:5549–5553.
    17.
    Dong Y, Chen Y-YM, Burne RA. 2004. Control of expression of the arginine deiminase operon of Streptococcus gordonii by CcpA and Flp. J Bacteriol 186:2511–2514.
    18.
    Zeng L, Dong Y, Burne RA. 2006. Characterization of cis-acting sites controlling arginine deiminase gene expression in Streptococcus gordonii. J Bacteriol 188:941–949.
    19.
    Liu Y, Burne RA. 2009. Multiple two-component systems modulate alkali generation in Streptococcus gordonii in response to environmental stresses. J Bacteriol 191:7353–7362.
    20.
    Liu Y, Dong Y, Chen Y-YM, Burne RA. 2008. Environmental and growth phase regulation of the Streptococcus gordonii arginine deiminase genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:5023–5030.
    21.
    Acevedo AM, Machado C, Rivera LE, Wolff M, Kleinberg I. 2005. The inhibitory effect of an arginine bicarbonate/calcium carbonate CaviStat-containing dentifrice on the development of dental caries in Venezuelan school children. J Clin Dent 16:63–70.
    22.
    Acevedo AM, Montero M, Rojas-Sanchez F, Machado C, Rivera LE, Wolff M, Kleinberg I. 2008. Clinical evaluation of the ability of CaviStat in a mint confection to inhibit the development of dental caries in children. J Clin Dent 19:1–8.
    23.
    Kraivaphan P, Amornchat C, Triratana T, Mateo LR, Ellwood R, Cummins D, Devizio W, Zhang YP. 2013. Two-year caries clinical study of the efficacy of novel dentifrices containing 1.5% arginine, an insoluble calcium compound and 1,450 ppm fluoride. Caries Res 47:582–590.
    24.
    Nascimento MM, Browngardt C, Xiaohui X, Klepac-Ceraj V, Paster BJ, Burne RA. 2014. The effect of arginine on oral biofilm communities. Mol Oral Microbiol 29:45–54.
    25.
    Chakraborty B, Burne RA. 2017. Effects of arginine on Streptococcus mutans growth, virulence gene expression, and stress tolerance. Appl Environ Microbiol 83:e00496-17.
    26.
    Huang X, Browngardt CM, Jiang M, Ahn S-J, Burne RA, Nascimento MM. 2018. Diversity in antagonistic interactions between commensal oral streptococci and Streptococcus mutans. Caries Res 52:88–101.
    27.
    Nascimento MM, Gordan VV, Garvan CW, Browngardt CM, Burne RA. 2009. Correlations of oral bacterial arginine and urea catabolism with caries experience. Oral Microbiol Immunol 24:89–95.
    28.
    Nascimento MM, Liu Y, Kalra R, Perry S, Adewumi A, Xu X, Primosch RE, Burne RA. 2013. Oral arginine metabolism may decrease the risk for dental caries in children. J Dent Res 92:604–608.
    29.
    Huang X, Schulte RM, Burne RA, Nascimento MM. 2015. Characterization of the arginolytic microflora provides insights into pH homeostasis in human oral biofilms. Caries Res 49:165–176.
    30.
    Jensen A, Scholz CFP, Kilian M. 2016. Re-evaluation of the taxonomy of the Mitis group of the genus Streptococcus based on whole genome phylogenetic analyses, and proposed reclassification of Streptococcus dentisani as Streptococcus oralis subsp. dentisani comb. nov., Streptococcus tigurinus as Streptococcus oralis subsp. tigurinus comb. nov., and Streptococcus oligofermentans as a later synonym of Streptococcus cristatus. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66:4803–4820.
    31.
    Huang X, Palmer SR, Ahn S-J, Richards VP, Williams ML, Nascimento MM, Burne RA. 2016. A highly arginolytic Streptococcus species that potently antagonizes Streptococcus mutans. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:2187–2201.
    32.
    Richards VP, Palmer SR, Bitar PDP, Qin X, Weinstock GM, Highlander SK, Town CD, Burne RA, Stanhope MJ. 2014. Phylogenomics and the dynamic genome evolution of the genus Streptococcus. Genome Biol Evol 6:741–753.
    33.
    Collins C, Didelot X. 2018. A phylogenetic method to perform genome-wide association studies in microbes that accounts for population structure and recombination. PLoS Comput Biol 14:e1005958.
    34.
    Brynildsrud O, Bohlin J, Scheffer L, Eldholm V. 2016. Rapid scoring of genes in microbial pan-genome-wide association studies with Scoary. Genome Biol 17:238.
    35.
    Chen YY, Weaver CA, Mendelsohn DR, Burne RA. 1998. Transcriptional regulation of the Streptococcus salivarius 57.I urease operon. J Bacteriol 180:5769–5775.
    36.
    Burne RA, Chen YY. 2000. Bacterial ureases in infectious diseases. Microbes Infect 2:533–542.
    37.
    Aas JA, Paster BJ, Stokes LN, Olsen I, Dewhirst FE. 2005. Defining the normal bacterial flora of the oral cavity. J Clin Microbiol 43:5721–5732.
    38.
    Tritt A, Eisen JA, Facciotti MT, Darling AE. 2012. An integrated pipeline for de novo assembly of microbial genomes. PLoS One 7:e42304.
    39.
    Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075.
    40.
    Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069.
    41.
    Brohée S, van Helden J. 2006. Evaluation of clustering algorithms for protein-protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinformatics 7:488.
    42.
    Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. 2015. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods 12:59–60.
    43.
    van Dongen S. 2000. Graph clustering by flow simulation. PhD dissertation. University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
    44.
    Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792–1797.
    45.
    Bruen TC, Philippe H, Bryant D. 2006. A simple and robust statistical test for detecting the presence of recombination. Genetics 172:2665–2681.
    46.
    Guindon S, Gascuel O, Rannala B. 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol 52:696–704.
    47.
    Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K-I, Miyata T. 2002. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res 30:3059–3066.
    48.
    Ewing GB, Ebersberger I, Schmidt HA, Haeseler von A. 2008. Rooted triple consensus and anomalous gene trees. BMC Evol Biol 8:118.
    49.
    Degnan JH, Rosenberg NA. 2006. Discordance of species trees with their most likely gene trees. PLoS Genet 2:e68.
    50.
    Strimmer K, Haeseler von A. 1996. Quartet puzzling: a quartet maximum-likelihood method for reconstructing tree topologies. Mol Biol Evol 13:964.
    51.
    Degnan PH, Yu Y, Sisneros N, Wing RA, Moran NA. 2009. Hamiltonella defensa, genome evolution of protective bacterial endosymbiont from pathogenic ancestors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:9063–9068.
    52.
    Yu G, Smith DK, Zhu H, Guan Y, Lam TT-Y. 2017. ggtree: an rpackage for visualization and annotation of phylogenetic trees with their covariates and other associated data. Methods Ecol Evol 8:28–36.
    53.
    Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S, Holden MTG, Fookes M, Falush D, Keane JA, Parkhill J. 2015. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics 31:3691–3693.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSystems
    Volume 3Number 626 December 2018
    eLocator: e00158-18
    Editor: Peter J. Turnbaugh
    University of California, San Francisco

    History

    Received: 3 August 2018
    Accepted: 29 November 2018
    Published online: 18 December 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. Streptococcus
    2. genomics
    3. oral microbiology
    4. phylogenetic analysis
    5. variable phenotypes

    Contributors

    Authors

    Department of Biological Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA
    Brinta Chakraborty
    Department of Oral Biology, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
    Marcelle M. Nascimento
    Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, Division of Operative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
    Department of Oral Biology, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
    Vincent P. Richards
    Department of Biological Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA

    Editor

    Peter J. Turnbaugh
    Editor
    University of California, San Francisco

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Vincent P. Richards, [email protected].
    I.M.V. and B.C. contributed equally to this article.

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSystemsArticle
    Genome-Wide Analysis of Transcriptional Changes and Genes That Contribute to Fitness during Degradation of the Anthropogenic Pollutant Pentachlorophenol by Sphingobium chlorophenolicum

    Genome-Wide Analysis of Transcriptional Changes and Genes That Contribute to Fitness during Degradation of the Anthropogenic Pollutant Pentachlorophenol by Sphingobium chlorophenolicum

    ABSTRACT

    Pentachlorophenol (PCP) is a highly toxic pesticide that was first introduced in the 1930s. The alphaproteobacterium Sphingobium chlorophenolicum, which was isolated from PCP-contaminated sediment, has assembled a metabolic pathway capable of completely degrading PCP. This pathway produces four toxic intermediates, including a chlorinated benzoquinone that is a potent alkylating agent and three chlorinated hydroquinones that react with O2 to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS). RNA-seq analysis revealed that PCP causes a global stress response that resembles responses to proton motive force uncoupling and membrane disruption, while surprisingly, little of the response resembles the responses expected to be produced by the PCP degradation intermediates. Tn-seq was used to identify genes important for fitness in the presence of PCP. By comparing the genes that are important for fitness in wild-type S. chlorophenolicum and a non-PCP-degrading mutant, we identified genes that are important only when the PCP degradation intermediates are produced. These include genes encoding two enzymes that are likely to be involved in protection against ROS. In addition to these enzymes, the endogenous levels of other enzymes that protect cells from oxidative stress appear to mitigate the toxic effects of the chlorinated benzoquinone and hydroquinone metabolites of PCP. The combination of RNA-seq and Tn-seq results identify important mechanisms for defense against the toxicity of PCP.
    IMPORTANCE Phenolic compounds such as pentachlorophenol (PCP), triclosan, and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) represent a common class of anthropogenic biocides. Despite the novelty of these compounds, many can be degraded by microbes isolated from contaminated sites. However, degradation of this class of chemicals often generates toxic intermediates, which may contribute to their recalcitrance to biodegradation. We have addressed the stresses associated with degradation of PCP by Sphingobium chlorophenolicum by examining the transcriptional response after PCP exposure and identifying genes necessary for growth during both exposure to and degradation of PCP. This work identifies some of the mechanisms that protect cells from this toxic compound and facilitate its degradation. This information could be used to engineer strains capable of improved biodegradation of PCP or similar phenolic pollutants.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Zheng W, Yu H, Wang X, Qu W. 2012. Systematic review of pentachlorophenol occurrence in the environment and in humans in China: not a negligible health risk due to the re-emergence of schistosomiasis. Environ Int 42:105–116.
    2.
    Cheng P, Zhang Q, Shan X, Shen D, Wang B, Tang Z, Jin Y, Zhang C, Huang F. 2015. Cancer risks and long-term community-level exposure to pentachlorophenol in contaminated areas, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 22:1309–1317.
    3.
    Cooper GS, Jones S. 2008. Pentachlorophenol and cancer risk: focusing the lens on specific chlorophenols and contaminants. Environ Health Perspect 116:1001–1008.
    4.
    Shah S, Thakur IS. 2002. Enrichment and characterization of a microbial community from tannery effluent for degradation of pentachlorophenol. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 18:693–698.
    5.
    Thakur IS, Verma PK, Upadhaya KC. 2001. Involvement of plasmid in degradation of pentachlorophenol by Pseudomonas sp. from a chemostat. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 286:109–113.
    6.
    Hoferkamp L, Hermanson MH, Muir DCG. 2010. Current use pesticides in Arctic media; 2000-2007. Sci Total Environ 408:2985–2994.
    7.
    Sinkkonen S, Paasivirta J. 2000. Polychlorinated organic compounds in the Arctic cod liver: trends and profiles. Chemosphere 40:619–626.
    8.
    Orton F, Lutz I, Kloas W, Routledge EJ. 2009. Endocrine disrupting effects of herbicides and pentachlorophenol: in vitro and in vivo evidence. Environ Sci Technol 43:2144–2150.
    9.
    Cui Y, Liang L, Zhong Q, He Q, Shan X, Chen K, Huang F. 2017. The association of cancer risks with pentachlorophenol exposure: focusing on community population in the areas along certain section of Yangtze River in China. Environ Pollut 224:729–738.
    10.
    Morgan M, Jones P, Sobus J. 2015. Short-term variability and predictors of urinary pentachlorophenol levels in Ohio preschool children. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12:800–815.
    11.
    Piskorska-Pliszczynska J, Strucinski P, Mikolajczyk S, Maszewski S, Rachubik J, Pajurek M. 2016. Pentachlorophenol from an old henhouse as a dioxin source in eggs and related human exposure. Environ Pollut 208:404–412.
    12.
    Bosso L, Cristinzio G. 2014. A comprehensive overview of bacteria and fungi used for pentachlorophenol biodegradation. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 13:387–427.
    13.
    Brown EJ, Pignatello JJ, Martinson MM, Crawford RL. 1986. Pentachlorophenol degradation: a pure bacterial culture and an epilithic microbial consortium. Appl Environ Microbiol 52:92–97.
    14.
    Copley SD. 2000. Evolution of a metabolic pathway for degradation of a toxic xenobiotic: the patchwork approach. Trends Biochem Sci 25:261–265.
    15.
    Dai MH, Rogers JB, Warner JR, Copley SD. 2003. A previously unrecognized step in pentachlorophenol degradation in Sphingobium chlorophenolicum is catalyzed by tetrachlorobenzoquinone reductase (PcpD). J Bacteriol 185:302–310.
    16.
    Yan DZ, Mao LQ, Li CZ, Liu J. 2015. Biodegradation of hexachlorobenzene by a constructed microbial consortium. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 31:371–377.
    17.
    Song M, Bielefeldt AR. 2012. Toxicity and inhibition of bacterial growth by series of alkylphenol polyethoxylate nonionic surfactants. J Hazard Mater 219-220:127–132.
    18.
    Kim HJ, Du W, Ismagilov RF. 2012. Complex function by design using spatially pre-structured synthetic microbial communities: degradation of pentachlorophenol in the presence of Hg(II). Integr Biol 3:126–133.
    19.
    Lin Z, Zhen Z, Wu Z, Yang J, Zhong L, Hu H, Luo C, Bai J, Li Y, Zhang D. 2016. The impact on the soil microbial community and enzyme activity of two earthworm species during the bioremediation of pentachlorophenol-contaminated soils. J Hazard Mater 301:35–45.
    20.
    Crosby DG. 1981. Environmental chemistry of pentachlorophenol. Pure Appl Chem 53:1052–1080.
    21.
    Kim J, Copley SD. 2012. Inhibitory cross-talk upon introduction of a new metabolic pathway into an existing metabolic network. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:E2856–E2864.
    22.
    Bornscheuer UT, Huisman GW, Kazlauskas RJ, Lutz S, Moore JC, Robins K. 2012. Engineering the third wave of biocatalysis. Nature 485:185–194.
    23.
    Damborsky J, Brezovsky J. 2014. Computational tools for designing and engineering enzymes. Curr Opin Chem Biol 19:8–16.
    24.
    Boyle PM, Silver PA. 2012. Parts plus pipes: synthetic biology approaches to metabolic engineering. Metab Eng 14:223–232.
    25.
    Martínez I, Mohamed MES, Rozas D, García JL, Díaz E. 2016. Engineering synthetic bacterial consortia for enhanced desulfurization and revalorization of oil sulfur compounds. Metab Eng 35:46–54.
    26.
    Dvořák P, Nikel PI, Damborský J, de Lorenzo V. 2017. Bioremediation 3.0: engineering pollutant-removing bacteria in the times of systemic biology. Biotechnol Adv 35:845–866.
    27.
    Trevors JT. 1983. Effect of pentachlorophenol on the membrane fluidity of Pseudomonas fluorescens. Biol Environ 16:331–334.
    28.
    Duxbury CL, Thompson JE. 1987. Pentachlorophenol alters the molecular organization of membranes in mammalian cells. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 16:367–373.
    29.
    Suwalsky M, Espinoza MA, Bagnara M, Sotomayor CP. 1990. X-ray and fluorescence studies on phospholipid bilayers: IX. Interactions with pentachlorophenol. Z Naturforsch C 45:265–272.
    30.
    Dercová K, Čertík M, Mal’ová A, Sejáková Z. 2004. Effect of chlorophenols on the membrane lipids of bacterial cells. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 54:251–254.
    31.
    Mukhopadhyay P, Vogel HJ, Tieleman DP. 2004. Distribution of pentachlorophenol in phospholipid bilayers: a molecular dynamics study. Biophys J 86:337–345.
    32.
    Wmnuacii EC. 1954. The effect of pentachlorophenol on oxidative phosphorylation. J Biol Chem 210:545–550.
    33.
    Steiert JG, Thoma WJ, Ugurbil K, Crawford RL. 1988. 31P nuclear magnetic resonance studies of effects of some chlorophenols on Escherichia coli and a pentachlorophenol-degrading bacterium. J Bacteriol 170:4954–4957.
    34.
    Weinbach EC. 1957. Biochemical basis for the toxicity of pentachlorophenol. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 43:393–397.
    35.
    McCarthy DL, Claude AA, Copley SD. 1997. In vivo levels of chlorinated hydroquinones in a pentachlorophenol-degrading bacterium. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:1883–1888.
    36.
    van Ommen B, den Besten C, Rutten ALM, Ploemen JHTM, Vos RME, Muller F, van Bladerensll PJ. 1988. Active site-directed irreversible inhibition of glutathione S-transferases by the glutathione conjugate of tetrachloro-1,4-benzoquinone. J Biol Chem 263:12939–12942.
    37.
    Vaidyanathan VG, Villalta PW, Sturla SJ. 2007. Nucleobase-dependent reactivity of a quinone metabolite of pentachlorophenol. Chem Res Toxicol 20:913–919.
    38.
    Hlouchova K, Rudolph J, Pietari JMH, Behlen LS, Copley SD. 2012. Pentachlorophenol hydroxylase, a poorly functioning enzyme required for degradation of pentachlorophenol by Sphingobium chlorophenolicum. Biochemistry 51:3848–3860.
    39.
    Rudolph J, Erbse AH, Behlen LS, Copley SD. 2014. A radical intermediate in the conversion of pentachlorophenol to tetrachlorohydroquinone by Sphingobium chlorophenolicum. Biochemistry 53:6539–6549.
    40.
    Xun L, Topp E, Orser CS. 1992. Purification and characterization of a tetrachloro-p-hydroquinone reductive dehalogenase from a Flavobacterium sp. J Bacteriol 174:8003–8007.
    41.
    Orser CS, Dutton J, Lange C, Jablonski P, Xun LY, Hargis M. 1993. Characterization of a Flavobacterium glutathione-S-transferase gene involved in reductive dechlorination. J Bacteriol 175:2640–2644.
    42.
    Webb BN, Ballinger JW, Kim E, Belchik SM, Lam KS, Youn B, Nissen MS, Xun L, Kang C. 2010. Characterization of chlorophenol 4-monooxygenase (TftD) and NADH:FAD oxidoreductase (TftC) of Burkholderia cepacia AC1100. J Biol Chem 285:2014–2027.
    43.
    Ledger T, Pieper DH, González B. 2006. Chlorophenol hydroxylases encoded by plasmid pJP4 differentially contribute to chlorophenoxyacetic acid degradation. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:2783–2792.
    44.
    Pakala SB, Gorla P, Pinjari AB, Krovidi RK, Baru R, Yanamandra M, Merrick M, Siddavattam D. 2007. Biodegradation of methyl parathion and p-nitrophenol: evidence for the presence of a p-nitrophenol 2-hydroxylase in a Gram-negative Serratia sp. strain DS001. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 73:1452–1462.
    45.
    Alvarenga N, Birolli WG, Seleghim MHR, Porto ALM. 2014. Biodegradation of methyl parathion by whole cells of marine-derived fungi Aspergillus sydowii and Penicillium decaturense. Chemosphere 117:47–52.
    46.
    Schroeder I, van Tonder J, Steenkamp V. 2012. Comparative toxicity of pentachlorophenol with its metabolites tetrachloro-1,2-hydroquinone and tetrachloro-1,4-benzoquinone in HepG2 cells. Open Toxicol J 5:11–20.
    47.
    Chen HM, Zhu BZ, Chen RJ, Wang BJ, Wang YJ. 2014. The pentachlorophenol metabolite tetrachlorohydroquinone induces massive ROS and prolonged p-ERK expression in splenocytes, leading to inhibition of apoptosis and necrotic cell death. PLoS One 9:e89483.
    48.
    Dahlhaus M, Almstadt E, Henschke P, Lüttgert S, Appel KE. 1995. Induction of 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine and single-strand breaks in DNA of V79 cells by tetrachloro-p-hydroquinone. Mutat Res 329:29–36.
    49.
    Hayes RP, Moural TW, Lewis KM, Onofrei D, Xun L, Kang C. 2014. Structures of the inducer-binding domain of pentachlorophenol-degrading gene regulator PcpR from Sphingobium chlorophenolicum. Int J Mol Sci 15:20736–20752.
    50.
    Cai M, Xun L. 2002. Organization and regulation of pentachlorophenol-degrading genes in Sphingobium chlorophenolicum ATCC 39723. J Bacteriol 184:4672–4680.
    51.
    Smirnova GV, Oktyabrsky ON. 2005. Glutathione in bacteria. Biochemistry (Mosc) 70:1199–1211.
    52.
    Lomovskaya O, Lewis K. 1992. Emr, an Escherichia coli locus for multidrug resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89:8938–8942.
    53.
    Van Horn WD, Sanders CR. 2012. Prokaryotic diacylglycerol kinase and undecaprenol kinase. Annu Rev Biophys 41:81–101.
    54.
    Price MN, Deutschbauer AM, Skerker JM, Wetmore KM, Ruths T, Mar JS, Kuehl JV, Shao W, Arkin AP. 2013. Indirect and suboptimal control of gene expression is widespread in bacteria. Mol Syst Biol 9:660.
    55.
    van Opijnen T, Bodi KL, Camilli A. 2009. Tn-seq: high-throughput parallel sequencing for fitness and genetic interaction studies in microorganisms. Nat Methods 6:767–772.
    56.
    Lampe DJ, Akerley BJ, Rubin EJ, Mekalanos JJ, Robertson HM. 1999. Hyperactive transposase mutants of the Himar 1 mariner transposon. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 96:11428–11433.
    57.
    Lomovskaya O, Lewis K, Matin A. 1995. EmrR is a negative regulator of the Escherichia coli multidrug resistance pump EmrAB. J Bacteriol 177:2328–2334.
    58.
    Turner KH, Everett J, Trivedi U, Rumbaugh KP, Whiteley M. 2014. Requirements for Pseudomonas aeruginosa acute burn and chronic surgical wound infection. PLoS Genet 10:e1004518.
    59.
    Deutschbauer A, Price MN, Wetmore KM, Shao W, Baumohl JK, Xu Z, Nguyen M, Tamse R, Davis RW, Arkin AP. 2011. Evidence-based annotation of gene function in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 using genome-wide fitness profiling across 121 conditions. PLoS Genet 7:e1002385.
    60.
    Jensen PA, Zhu Z, van Opijnen T. 2017. Antibiotics disrupt coordination between transcriptional and phenotypic stress responses in pathogenic bacteria. Cell Rep 20:1705–1716.
    61.
    Molina-Santiago C, Udaondo Z, Gómez-Lozano M, Molin S, Ramos J-L. 2017. Global transcriptional response of solvent-sensitive and solvent-tolerant Pseudomonas putida strains exposed to toluene. Environ Microbiol 19:645–658.
    62.
    Anes J, McCusker MP, Fanning S, Martins M. 2015. The ins and outs of RND efflux pumps in Escherichia coli. Front Microbiol 6:587.
    63.
    Hassan HM, Fridovich I. 1978. Superoxide radical and the oxygen enhancement of the toxicity of paraquat in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 25:8143–8148.
    64.
    Ferguson GP, Tötemeyer S, MacLean MJ, Booth IR. 1998. Methylglyoxal production in bacteria: suicide or survival? Arch Microbiol 170:209–219.
    65.
    Winterbourn CC, Metodiewa D. 1994. The reaction of superoxide with reduced glutathione. Arch Biochem Biophys 314:284–290.
    66.
    Van Ommen B, Adang A, Muller F, Van Bladeren P. 1986. The microsomal metabolism of pentachlorophenol and its covalent binding to protein and DNA. Chem Biol Interact 60:1–11.
    67.
    Cserjesi AJ, Johnson EL. 1972. Methylation of pentachlorophenol by Trichoderma virgatum. Can J Microbiol 18:45–49.
    68.
    Denyer SP, Maillard J-Y. 2002. Cellular impermeability and uptake of biocides and antibiotics in Gram-negative bacteria. J Appl Microbiol 92:35S–45S.
    69.
    Murinova S, Dercova K. 2014. Response mechanisms of bacterial degraders to environmental contaminants on the level of cell walls and cytoplasmic membrane. Int J Microbiol 2014:873081.
    70.
    Yadid I, Rudolph J, Hlouchova K, Copley SD. 2013. Sequestration of a highly reactive intermediate in an evolving pathway for degradation of pentachlorophenol. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:E2182–E2190.
    71.
    Baudouin-Cornu P, Lagniel G, Kumar C, Huang M-E, Labarre J. 2012. Glutathione degradation is a key determinant of glutathione homeostasis. J Biol Chem 287:4552–4561.
    72.
    Wang X, Yomano LP, Lee JY, York SW, Zheng H, Mullinnix MT, Shanmugam KT, Ingram LO. 2013. Engineering furfural tolerance in Escherichia coli improves the fermentation of lignocellulosic sugars into renewable chemicals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:4021–4026.
    73.
    Dueber JE, Wu GC, Malmirchegini GR, Moon TS, Petzold CJ, Ullal AV, Prather KLJ, Keasling JD. 2009. Synthetic protein scaffolds provide modular control over metabolic flux. Nat Biotechnol 27:753–759.
    74.
    Lee MJ, Mantell J, Hodgson L, Alibhai D, Fletcher JM, Brown IR, Frank S, Xue WF, Verkade P, Woolfson DN, Warren MJ. 2018. Engineered synthetic scaffolds for organizing proteins within the bacterial cytoplasm. Nat Chem Biol 14:142–147.
    75.
    Pfennig N. 1967. Photosynthetic bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 21:285–324.
    76.
    Neidhardt FC, Bloch PL, Smith DF. 1974. Culture medium for enterobacteria. J Bacteriol 119:736–747.
    77.
    Shishkin AA, Giannoukos G, Kucukural A, Ciulla D, Busby M, Surka C, Chen J, Bhattacharyya RP, Rudy RF, Patel M, Novod N, Hung DT, Gnirke A, Garber M, Guttman M, Livny J. 2015. Simultaneous generation of many RNA-seq libraries in a single reaction. Nat Methods 12:323–325.
    78.
    Wiles TJ, Norton JP, Russell CW, Dalley BK, Fischer KF, Mulvey MA. 2013. Combining quantitative genetic footprinting and trait enrichment analysis to identify fitness determinants of a bacterial pathogen. PLoS Genet 9:e1003716.
    79.
    McCoy KM, Antonio ML, van Opijnen T. 2017. MAGenTA - Microbial Assessment by Genome-Wide Tn-Seq Analysis - Manual. Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA.
    80.
    Cochrane SA, Findlay B, Bakhtiary A, Acedo JZ, Rodriguez-Lopez EM, Mercier P, Vederas JC. 2016. Antimicrobial lipopeptide tridecaptin A 1 selectively binds to Gram-negative lipid II. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:11561–11566.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSystems
    Volume 3Number 626 December 2018
    eLocator: e00275-18
    Editor: Gilles P. van Wezel
    Leiden University

    History

    Received: 30 October 2018
    Accepted: 1 November 2018
    Published online: 20 November 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. RNA-seq
    2. Sphingobium chlorophenolicum
    3. Tn-seq
    4. benzoquinone
    5. biodegradation
    6. hydroquinone
    7. pentachlorophenol

    Contributors

    Authors

    Jake J. Flood
    Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA
    Cooperative Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA
    Shelley D. Copley
    Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA
    Cooperative Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA

    Editor

    Gilles P. van Wezel
    Editor
    Leiden University

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Shelley D. Copley, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSystemsArticle
    Administration of Exogenous Melatonin Improves the Diurnal Rhythms of the Gut Microbiota in Mice Fed a High-Fat Diet

    Administration of Exogenous Melatonin Improves the Diurnal Rhythms of the Gut Microbiota in Mice Fed a High-Fat Diet

    ABSTRACT

    Melatonin, a circadian hormone, has been reported to improve host lipid metabolism by reprogramming the gut microbiota, which also exhibits rhythmicity in a light/dark cycle. However, the effect of the administration of exogenous melatonin on the diurnal variation in the gut microbiota in mice fed a high-fat diet (HFD) is unclear. Here, we further confirmed the antiobesogenic effect of melatonin on mice fed an HFD for 2 weeks. Samples were collected every 4 h within a 24-h period, and diurnal rhythms of clock gene expression (Clock, Cry1, Cry2, Per1, and Per2) and serum lipid indexes varied with diurnal time. Notably, Clock and triglycerides (TG) showed a marked rhythm in the control in melatonin-treated mice but not in the HFD-fed mice. The rhythmicity of these parameters was similar between the control and melatonin-treated HFD-fed mice compared with that in the HFD group, indicating an improvement caused by melatonin in the diurnal clock of host metabolism in HFD-fed mice. Moreover, 16S rRNA gene sequencing showed that most microbes exhibited daily rhythmicity, and the trends were different for different groups and at different time points. We also identified several specific microbes that correlated with the circadian clock genes and serum lipid indexes, which might indicate the potential mechanism of action of melatonin in HFD-fed mice. In addition, effects of melatonin exposure during daytime or nighttime were compared, but a nonsignificant difference was noticed in response to HFD-induced lipid dysmetabolism. Interestingly, the responses of microbiota-transplanted mice to HFD feeding also varied at different transplantation times (8:00 and 16:00) and with different microbiota donors. In summary, the daily oscillations in the expression of circadian clock genes, serum lipid indexes, and the gut microbiota appeared to be driven by short-term feeding of an HFD, while administration of exogenous melatonin improved the composition and diurnal rhythmicity of some specific gut microbiota in HFD-fed mice.
    IMPORTANCE The gut microbiota is strongly shaped by a high-fat diet, and obese humans and animals are characterized by low gut microbial diversity and impaired gut microbiota compositions. Comprehensive data on mammalian gut metagenomes shows gut microbiota exhibit circadian rhythms, which is disturbed by a high-fat diet. On the other hand, melatonin is a natural and ubiquitous molecule showing multiple mechanisms of regulating the circadian clock and lipid metabolism, while the role of melatonin in the regulation of the diurnal patterns of gut microbial structure and function in obese animals is not yet known. This study delineates an intricate picture of melatonin-gut microbiota circadian rhythms and may provide insight for obesity intervention.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Tordjman S, Chokron S, Delorme R, Charrier A, Bellissant E, Jaafari N, Fougerou C. 2017. Melatonin: pharmacology, functions and therapeutic benefits. Curr Neuropharmacol 15:434–443.
    2.
    Claustrat B, Leston J. 2015. Melatonin: physiological effects in humans. Neurochirurgie 61:77–84.
    3.
    Keijzer H, Smits MG, Duffy JF, Curfs L. 2014. Why the dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) should be measured before treatment of patients with circadian rhythm sleep disorders. Sleep Med Rev 18:333–339.
    4.
    Reiter RJ, Tamura H, Tan DX, Xu XY. 2014. Melatonin and the circadian system: contributions to successful female reproduction. Fertil Steril 102:321–328.
    5.
    Slats D, Claassen J, Verbeek MM, Overeem S. 2013. Reciprocal interactions between sleep, circadian rhythms and Alzheimer’s disease: focus on the role of hypocretin and melatonin. Ageing Res Rev 12:188–200.
    6.
    Zisapel N. 2018. New perspectives on the role of melatonin in human sleep, circadian rhythms and their regulation. Br J Pharmacol 175:3190–3199.
    7.
    Jilg A, Bechstein P, Saade A, Dick M, Li TX, Tosini G, Rami A, Zemmar A, Stehle JH. 2019. Melatonin modulates daytime-dependent synaptic plasticity and learning efficiency. J Pineal Res 66:e12553.
    8.
    Najafi M, Salehi E, Farhood B, Nashtaei MS, Goradel NH, Khanlarkhani N, Namjoo Z, Mortezaee K. 2019. Adjuvant chemotherapy with melatonin for targeting human cancers: a review. J Cell Physiol 234:2356–2372.
    9.
    do Amaral FG, Cipolla-Neto J. 2018. A brief review about melatonin, a pineal hormone. Arch Endocrinol Metab 62:472–479.
    10.
    Meng JF, Shi TC, Song S, Zhang ZW, Fang YL. 2017. Melatonin in grapes and grape-related foodstuffs: a review. Food Chem 231:185–191.
    11.
    Buonfiglio D, Tchio C, Furigo I, Donato J, Baba K, Cipolla‐Neto J, Tosini G. 2019. Removing melatonin receptor type 1 signaling leads to selective leptin resistance in the arcuate nucleus. J Pineal Res 67:e12580.
    12.
    Owino S, Sanchez-Bretano A, Tchio C, Cecon E, Karamitri A, Dam J, Jockers R, Piccione G, Noh HL, Kim T, Kim JK, Baba K, Tosini G. 2018. Nocturnal activation of melatonin receptor type 1 signaling modulates diurnal insulin sensitivity via regulation of PI3K activity. J Pineal Res 64:e12462.
    13.
    Ozkok E, Yorulmaz H, Ates G, Aksu A, Balkis N, Sahin O, Tamer S. 2016. Amelioration of energy metabolism by melatonin in skeletal muscle of rats with LPS induced endotoxemia. Physiol Res 65:833–842.
    14.
    McMullan CJ, Schernhammer ES, Rimm EB, Hu FB, Forman JP. 2013. Melatonin secretion and the incidence of type 2 diabetes. JAMA 309:1388–1396.
    15.
    Patel R, Rathwa N, Palit SP, Ramachandran AV, Begum R. 2018. Association of melatonin and MTNR1B variants with type 2 diabetes in Gujarat population. Biomed Pharmacother 103:429–434.
    16.
    Xu PF, Wang JL, Hong F, Wang S, Jin X, Xue TT, Jia L, Zhai YG. 2017. Melatonin prevents obesity through modulation of gut microbiota in mice. J Pineal Res 62:e12399.
    17.
    Yin J, Li Y, Han H, Chen S, Gao J, Liu G, Wu X, Deng J, Yu Q, Huang X, Fang R, Li T, Reiter RJ, Zhang D, Zhu C, Zhu G, Ren W, Yin Y. 2018. Melatonin reprogramming of gut microbiota improves lipid dysmetabolism in high-fat diet-fed mice. J Pineal Res 65:e12524.
    18.
    Moossavi S, Azad MB. 2019. Quantifying and interpreting the association between early-life gut microbiota composition and childhood obesity. mBio 10:e02787-18.
    19.
    Gomes AC, Hoffmann C, Mota JF. 2018. The human gut microbiota: metabolism and perspective in obesity. Gut Microbes 9:308–325.
    20.
    Yildirimer CC, Brown KH. 2018. Intestinal microbiota lipid metabolism varies across rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) phylogeographic divide. J Appl Microbiol 125:1614–1625.
    21.
    Lacroix S, Pechereau F, Leblanc N, Boubertakh B, Houde A, Martin C, Flamand N, Silvestri C, Raymond F, Di Marzo V, Veilleux A. 2019. Rapid and concomitant gut microbiota and endocannabinoidome response to diet-induced obesity in mice. mSystems 4:e00407-19.
    22.
    Shan K, Qu H, Zhou K, Wang L, Zhu C, Chen H, Gu Z, Cui J, Fu G, Li J, Chen H, Wang R, Qi Y, Chen W, Chen YQ. 2019. Distinct gut microbiota induced by different fat-to-sugar-ratio high-energy diets share similar pro-obesity genetic and metabolite profiles in prediabetic mice. mSystems 4:e00219-19.
    23.
    Song B, Zhong YZ, Zheng CB, Li FN, Duan YH, Deng JP. 2019. Propionate alleviates high-fat diet-induced lipid dysmetabolism by modulating gut microbiota in mice. J Appl Microbiol 127:1546–1555.
    24.
    Cao GT, Dai B, Wang KL, Yan Y, Xu YL, Wang YX, Yang CM. 2019. Bacillus licheniformis, a potential probiotic, inhibits obesity by modulating colonic microflora in C57BL/6J mice model. J Appl Microbiol 127:880–888.
    25.
    de Mendoza D, Pilon M. 2019. Control of membrane lipid homeostasis by lipid-bilayer associated sensors: a mechanism conserved from bacteria to humans. Prog Lipid Res 76:100996.
    26.
    Zarrinpar A, Chaix A, Yooseph S, Panda S. 2014. Diet and feeding pattern affect the diurnal dynamics of the gut microbiome. Cell Metab 20:1006–1017.
    27.
    Leone V, Gibbons SM, Martinez K, Hutchison AL, Huang EY, Cham CM, Pierre JF, Heneghan AF, Nadimpalli A, Hubert N, Zale E, Wang YW, Huang Y, Theriault B, Dinner AR, Musch MW, Kudsk KA, Prendergast BJ, Gilbert JA, Chang EB. 2015. Effects of diurnal variation of gut microbes and high-fat feeding on host circadian clock function and metabolism. Cell Host Microbe 17:681–689.
    28.
    Wang YH, Kuang Z, Yu XF, Ruhn KA, Kubo M, Hooper LV. 2017. The intestinal microbiota regulates body composition through NFIL3 and the circadian clock. Science 357:912–916.
    29.
    Marcinkevicius EV, Shirasu-Hiza MM. 2015. Message in a biota: gut microbes signal to the circadian clock. Cell Host Microbe 17:541–543.
    30.
    Giles C, Takechi R, Lam V, Dhaliwal SS, Mamo J. 2018. Contemporary lipidomic analytics: opportunities and pitfalls. Prog Lipid Res 71:86–100.
    31.
    Paulose JK, Wright JM, Patel AG, Cassone VM. 2016. Human gut bacteria are sensitive to melatonin and express endogenous circadian rhythmicity. PLoS One 11:e0146643.
    32.
    Gachon F, Yeung J, Naef F. 2018. Cross-regulatory circuits linking inflammation, high-fat diet, and the circadian clock. Genes Dev 32:1359–1360.
    33.
    Murakami M, Tognini P, Liu Y, Eckel-Mahan KL, Baldi P, Sassone-Corsi P. 2016. Gut microbiota directs PPAR-driven reprogramming of the liver circadian clock by nutritional challenge. EMBO Rep 17:1292–1303.
    34.
    Richards AL, Muehlbauer AL, Alazizi A, Burns MB, Findley A, Messina F, Gould TJ, Cascardo C, Pique-Regi R, Blekhman R, Luca F. 2019. Gut microbiota has a widespread and modifiable effect on host gene regulation. mSystems 4:e00323-18.
    35.
    Eckel-Mahan KL, Patel VR, de Mateo S, Orozco-Solis R, Ceglia NJ, Sahar S, Dilag-Penilla SA, Dyar KA, Baldi P, Sassone-Corsi P. 2013. Reprogramming of the circadian clock by nutritional challenge. Cell 155:1464–1478.
    36.
    Eckel-Mahan KL, Patel VR, Mohney RP, Vignola KS, Baldi P, Sassone-Corsi P. 2012. Coordination of the transcriptome and metabolome by the circadian clock. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:5541–5546.
    37.
    Hatori M, Vollmers C, Zarrinpar A, DiTacchio L, Bushong EA, Gill S, Leblanc M, Chaix A, Joens M, Fitzpatrick JAJ, Ellisman MH, Panda S. 2012. Time-restricted feeding without reducing caloric intake prevents metabolic diseases in mice fed a high-fat diet. Cell Metab 15:848–860.
    38.
    Ye C, Wang R, Tai Y, Zhang LH, Tang SH, Tang CW. 2018. Obesity damages intestinal mucosal barrier and microbiota composition in rat model of severe acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 154:S-948.
    39.
    Paolella G, Vajro P. 2018. Maternal microbiota, prepregnancy weight, and mode of delivery intergenerational transmission of risk for childhood overweight and obesity. JAMA Pediatr 172:320–322.
    40.
    Foley KP, Zlitni S, Denou E, Duggan BM, Chan RW, Stearns JC, Schertzer JD. 2018. Long term but not short term exposure to obesity related microbiota promotes host insulin resistance. Nat Commun 9:4681.
    41.
    Joyce SA, MacSharry J, Casey PG, Kinsella M, Murphy EF, Shanahan F, Hill C, Gahan C. 2014. Regulation of host weight gain and lipid metabolism by bacterial bile acid modification in the gut. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:7421–7426.
    42.
    Torres-González LA, Rodríguez-León O, Alvarado-Carrillo V, Escogido LR. 2013. Network modeling of gene expression microarray in patients with obesity and relationship with lactobacillus probiotic intake. Proc Nutr Soc 72:E80.
    43.
    Naito E, Yoshida Y, Makino K, Kounoshi Y, Kunihiro S, Takahashi R, Matsuzaki T, Miyazaki K, Ishikawa F. 2011. Beneficial effect of oral administration of Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota on insulin resistance in diet-induced obesity mice. J Appl Microbiol 110:650–657.
    44.
    Thaiss CA, Levy M, Korem T, Dohnalova L, Shapiro H, Jaitin DA, David E, Winter DR, Gury-BenAri M, Tatirovsky E, Tuganbaev T, Federici S, Zmora N, Zeevi D, Dori-Bachash M, Pevsner-Fischer M, Kartvelishvily E, Brandis A, Harmelin A, Shibolet O, Halpern Z, Honda K, Amit I, Segal E, Elinav E. 2016. Microbiota diurnal rhythmicity programs host transcriptome oscillations. Cell 167:1495.e12–1510.e12.
    45.
    Karasek M, Winczyk K. 2006. Melatonin in humans. J Physiol Pharmacol 57(Suppl 5):19–39.
    46.
    Jung MJ, Lee J, Shin NR, Kim MS, Hyun DW, Yun JH, Kim PS, Whon TW, Bae JW. 2016. Chronic repression of mTOR complex 2 induces changes in the gut microbiota of diet-induced obese mice. Sci Rep 6:30887.
    47.
    Galley JD, Bailey M, Dush CK, Schoppe-Sullivan S, Christian LM. 2014. Maternal obesity is associated with alterations in the gut microbiome in toddlers. PLoS One 9:e113026.
    48.
    Gunn PJ, Middleton B, Davies SK, Revell VL, Skene DJ. 2016. Sex differences in the circadian profiles of melatonin and cortisol in plasma and urine matrices under constant routine conditions. Chronobiol Int 33:39–50.
    49.
    Yin J, Li YY, Zhu XT, Han H, Ren WK, Chen S, Bin P, Liu G, Huang XG, Fang RJ, Wang B, Wang K, Sun LP, Li TJ, Yin YL. 2017. Effects of long-term protein restriction on meat quality, muscle amino acids, and amino acid transporters in pigs. J Agric Food Chem 65:9297–9304.
    50.
    Talbot CPJ, Plat J, Ritsch A, Mensink RP. 2018. Determinants of cholesterol efflux capacity in humans. Prog Lipid Res 69:21–32.
    51.
    Pirro M, Ricciuti B, Rader DJ, Catapano AL, Sahebkar A, Banach M. 2018. High density lipoprotein cholesterol and cancer: marker or causative? Prog Lipid Res 71:54–69.
    52.
    Maraschin FDS, Kulcheski FR, Segatto ALA, Trenz TS, Barrientos-Diaz O, Margis-Pinheiro M, Margis R, Turchetto-Zolet AC. 2019. Enzymes of glycerol-3-phosphate pathway in triacylglycerol synthesis in plants: function, biotechnological application and evolution. Prog Lipid Res 73:46–64.
    53.
    Yu XH, Zhang DW, Zheng XL, Tang CK. 2019. Cholesterol transport system: an integrated cholesterol transport model involved in atherosclerosis. Prog Lipid Res 73:65–91.
    54.
    Yin J, Han H, Li Y, Liu Z, Zhao Y, Fang R, Huang X, Zheng J, Ren W, Wu F, Liu G, Wu X, Wang K, Sun L, Li C, Li T, Yin Y. 2017. Lysine restriction affects feed intake and amino acid metabolism via gut microbiome in piglets. Cell Physiol Biochem 44:1749–1761.
    55.
    Yook JS, Kim KA, Kim M, Cha YS. 2017. Black adzuki bean (Vigna angularis) Attenuates high-fat diet-induced colon inflammation in mice. J Med Food 20:367–375.
    56.
    Yin J, Ren W, Duan J, Wu L, Chen S, Li T, Yin Y, Wu G. 2014. Dietary arginine supplementation enhances intestinal expression of SLC7A7 and SLC7A1 and ameliorates growth depression in mycotoxin-challenged pigs. Amino Acids 46:883–892.
    57.
    Yin J, Ren W, Liu G, Duan J, Yang G, Wu L, Li T, Yin Y. 2013. Birth oxidative stress and the development of an antioxidant system in newborn piglets. Free Radic Res 47:1027–1035.
    58.
    Yin J, Wu MM, Xiao H, Ren WK, Duan JL, Yang G, Li TJ, Yin YL. 2014. Development of an antioxidant system after early weaning in piglets. J Anim Sci 92:612–619.
    59.
    Yin J, Liu M, Ren W, Duan J, Yang G, Zhao Y, Fang R, Chen L, Li T, Yin Y. 2015. Effects of dietary supplementation with glutamate and aspartate on diquat-induced oxidative stress in piglets. PLoS One 10:e0122893.
    60.
    Yin J, Li Y, Han H, Zheng J, Wang L, Ren W, Chen S, Wu F, Fang R, Huang X, Li C, Tan B, Xiong X, Zhang Y, Liu G, Yao J, Li T, Yin Y. 2017. Effects of lysine deficiency and Lys-Lys dipeptide on cellular apoptosis and amino acids metabolism. Mol Nutr Food Res 61:1600754.
    61.
    Yin J, Wu M, Duan J, Liu G, Cui Z, Zheng J, Chen S, Ren W, Deng J, Tan X, Al-Dhabi NA, Duraipandiyan V, Liao P, Li T, Yulong Y. 2015. Pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate inhibits NF-kappaB activation and upregulates the expression of Gpx1, Gpx4, occludin, and ZO-1 in DSS-induced colitis. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 177:1716–1728.
    62.
    Kashinskaya EN, Simonov EP, Kabilov MR, Izvekova GI, Andree KB, Solovyev MM. 2018. Diet and other environmental factors shape the bacterial communities of fish gut in an eutrophic lake. J Appl Microbiol 125:1626–1641.
    63.
    Castillo-Lopez E, Moats J, Aluthge ND, Ramirez HAR, Christensen DA, Mutsvangwa T, Penner GB, Fernando SC. 2018. Effect of partially replacing a barley-based concentrate with flaxseed-based products on the rumen bacterial population of lactating Holstein dairy cows. J Appl Microbiol 124:42–57.
    64.
    Aßhauer KP, Wemheuer B, Daniel R, Meinicke P. 2015. Tax4Fun: predicting functional profiles from metagenomic 16S rRNA data. Bioinformatics 31:2882–2884.
    65.
    Hiragaki S, Baba K, Coulson E, Kunst S, Spessert R, Tosini G. 2014. Melatonin signaling modulates clock genes expression in the mouse retina. PLoS One 9:e106819.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSystems
    Volume 5Number 330 June 2020
    eLocator: e00002-20
    Editor: Paul Wilmes
    Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine

    History

    Received: 11 January 2020
    Accepted: 23 April 2020
    Published online: 19 May 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. melatonin
    2. circadian clock
    3. gut microbiota
    4. lipid dysmetabolism

    Contributors

    Authors

    Jie Yin
    College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Co-Innovation Center of Animal Production Safety, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China
    Yuying Li
    Key Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutritional Physiology and Metabolic Process, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, Hunan, China
    Hui Han
    Key Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutritional Physiology and Metabolic Process, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, Hunan, China
    Jie Ma
    College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Co-Innovation Center of Animal Production Safety, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China
    Gang Liu
    College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Co-Innovation Center of Animal Production Safety, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China
    Xin Wu
    Key Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutritional Physiology and Metabolic Process, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, Hunan, China
    Xingguo Huang
    College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Co-Innovation Center of Animal Production Safety, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China
    Rejun Fang
    College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Co-Innovation Center of Animal Production Safety, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China
    Kenkichi Baba
    Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Neuroscience Institute, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
    Peng Bin
    College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
    Guoqiang Zhu
    College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
    Wenkai Ren
    Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, Institute of Subtropical Animal Nutrition and Feed, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
    Bie Tan
    College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Co-Innovation Center of Animal Production Safety, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China
    Gianluca Tosini
    Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Neuroscience Institute, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
    Xi He
    College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Co-Innovation Center of Animal Production Safety, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China
    Tiejun Li
    Key Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutritional Physiology and Metabolic Process, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, Hunan, China
    Yulong Yin
    College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Co-Innovation Center of Animal Production Safety, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China
    Key Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutritional Physiology and Metabolic Process, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, Hunan, China

    Editor

    Paul Wilmes
    Editor
    Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Gianluca Tosini, [email protected], or Tiejun Li, [email protected]

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

There are no results at this time

American Society for Microbiology ("ASM") is committed to maintaining your confidence and trust with respect to the information we collect from you on websites owned and operated by ASM ("ASM Web Sites") and other sources. This Privacy Policy sets forth the information we collect about you, how we use this information and the choices you have about how we use such information.
FIND OUT MORE about the privacy policy