30
Average Days in Review
96%
Percent of Research Articles Cited within Two Years of Publication
21
Average Days to Publication from Acceptance
Annual HTML+PDF Usage

CURRENT ISSUE

Volume 6Issue 3June 2021

EDITOR IN CHIEF: Dr. Michael Imperiale

Explore mSphere

Editor in Chief

mSphere EiC Imperiale
Dr. Michael Imperiale

Editor in Chief (2025) | University of Michigan Medical School

Michael Imperiale is the Arthur F. Thurnau Professor and Associate Chair of the Department of Microbiology and Immunology at the University of Michigan Medical School, Associate Vice President for Research, Research Policy and Compliance at the University of Michigan, and a member of the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Board of Editors

  • mSphereArticle
    Assessment of In Vitro and In Silico Protocols for Sequence-Based Characterization of the Human Vaginal Microbiome

    ABSTRACT

    The vaginal microbiome has been connected to a wide range of health outcomes. This has led to a thriving research environment but also to the use of conflicting methodologies to study its microbial composition. Here, we systematically assessed best practices for the sequencing-based characterization of the human vaginal microbiome. As far as 16S rRNA gene sequencing is concerned, the V1-V3 region performed best in silico, but limitations of current sequencing technologies meant that the V3-V4 region performed equally well. Both approaches presented very good agreement with qPCR quantification of key taxa, provided that an appropriate bioinformatic pipeline was used. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing presents an interesting alternative to 16S rRNA gene amplification and sequencing but requires deeper sequencing and more bioinformatic expertise and infrastructure. We assessed different tools for the removal of host reads and the taxonomic annotation of metagenomic reads, including a new, easy-to-build and -use reference database of vaginal taxa. This curated database performed as well as the best-performing previously published strategies. Despite the many advantages of shotgun sequencing, none of the shotgun approaches assessed here agreed with the qPCR data as well as the 16S rRNA gene sequencing.
    IMPORTANCE The vaginal microbiome has been connected to various aspects of host health, including susceptibility to sexually transmitted infections as well as gynecological cancers and pregnancy outcomes. This has led to a thriving research environment but also to conflicting available methodologies, including many studies that do not report their molecular biological and bioinformatic methods in sufficient detail to be considered reproducible. This can lead to conflicting messages and delay progress from descriptive to intervention studies. By systematically assessing best practices for the characterization of the human vaginal microbiome, this study will enable past studies to be assessed more critically and assist future studies in the selection of appropriate methods for their specific research questions.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Godha K, Tucker KM, Biehl C, Archer DF, Mirkin S. 2018. Human vaginal pH and microbiota: an update. Gynecol Endocrinol 34:451–455.
    2.
    Linhares IM, Sisti G, Minis E, de Freitas GB, Moron AF, Witkin SS. 2019. Contribution of epithelial cells to defense mechanisms in the human vagina. Curr Infect Dis Rep 21:30.
    3.
    Amabebe E, Anumba DOC. 2018. The vaginal microenvironment: the physiologic role of lactobacilli. Front Med (Lausanne) 5:181.
    4.
    Donders GGG, Bellen G, Grinceviciene S, Ruban K, Vieira-Baptista P. 2017. Aerobic vaginitis: no longer a stranger. Res Microbiol 168:845–858.
    5.
    Norenhag J, Du J, Olovsson M, Verstraelen H, Engstrand L, Brusselaers N. 2020. The vaginal microbiota, human papillomavirus and cervical dysplasia: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis. BJOG 29:171–180.
    6.
    Cherpes TL, Meyn LA, Krohn MA, Lurie JG, Hillier SL. 2003. Association between acquisition of herpes simplex virus type 2 in women and bacterial vaginosis. Clin Infect Dis 37:319–325.
    7.
    Farcasanu M, Kwon DS. 2018. The influence of cervicovaginal microbiota on mucosal immunity and prophylaxis in the battle against HIV. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep 15:30–38.
    8.
    Eckert LO, Moore DE, Patton DL, Agnew KJ, Eschenbach DA. 2003. Relationship of vaginal bacteria and inflammation with conception and early pregnancy loss following in-vitro fertilization. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 11:11–17.
    9.
    Freitas AC, Bocking A, Hill JE, Money DM, VOGUE Research Group. 2018. Increased richness and diversity of the vaginal microbiota and spontaneous preterm birth. Microbiome 6:117.
    10.
    Łaniewski P, Ilhan ZE, Herbst-Kralovetz MM. 2020. The microbiome and gynaecological cancer development, prevention and therapy. Nat Rev Urol 17:232–250.
    11.
    Amsel R, Totten PA, Spiegel CA, Chen KC, Eschenbach D, Holmes KK. 1983. Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am J Med 74:14–22.
    12.
    Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. 1991. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol 29:297–301.
    13.
    Frank JA, Reich CI, Sharma S, Weisbaum JS, Wilson BA, Olsen GJ. 2008. Critical evaluation of two primers commonly used for amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:2461–2470.
    14.
    Ravel J, Gajer P, Abdo Z, Schneider GM, Koenig SSK, McCulle SL, Karlebach S, Gorle R, Russell J, Tacket CO, Brotman RM, Davis CC, Ault K, Peralta L, Forney LJ. 2011. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(Suppl 1):4680–4687.
    15.
    Jumpstart Consortium Human Microbiome Project Data Generation Working Group. 2012. Evaluation of 16S rDNA-based community profiling for human microbiome research. PLoS One 7:e39315.
    16.
    Brotman RM, Shardell MD, Gajer P, Tracy JK, Zenilman JM, Ravel J, Gravitt PE. 2014. Interplay between the temporal dynamics of the vaginal microbiota and human papillomavirus detection. J Infect Dis 210:1723–1733.
    17.
    Hugerth LW, Wefer HA, Lundin S, Jakobsson HE, Lindberg M, Rodin S, Engstrand L, Andersson AF. 2014. DegePrime, a program for degenerate primer design for broad-taxonomic-range PCR in microbial ecology studies. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:5116–5123.
    18.
    Mändar R, Punab M, Borovkova N, Lapp E, Kiiker R, Korrovits P, Metspalu A, Krjutškov K, Nõlvak H, Preem J-K, Oopkaup K, Salumets A, Truu J. 2015. Complementary seminovaginal microbiome in couples. Res Microbiol 166:440–447.
    19.
    Elovitz MA, Gajer P, Riis V, Brown AG, Humphrys MS, Holm JB, Ravel J. 2019. Cervicovaginal microbiota and local immune response modulate the risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. Nat Commun 10:1305.
    20.
    Chen C, Song X, Wei W, Zhong H, Dai J, Lan Z, Li F, Yu X, Feng Q, Wang Z, Xie H, Chen X, Zeng C, Wen B, Zeng L, Du H, Tang H, Xu C, Xia Y, Xia H, Yang H, Wang J, Wang J, Madsen L, Brix S, Kristiansen K, Xu X, Li J, Wu R, Jia H. 2017. The microbiota continuum along the female reproductive tract and its relation to uterine-related diseases. Nat Commun 8:875.
    21.
    Klindworth A, Pruesse E, Schweer T, Peplies J, Quast C, Horn M, Glöckner FO. 2013. Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res 41:e1.
    22.
    Escobar-Zepeda A, Godoy-Lozano EE, Raggi L, Segovia L, Merino E, Gutiérrez-Rios RM, Juarez K, Licea-Navarro AF, Pardo-Lopez L, Sanchez-Flores A. 2018. Analysis of sequencing strategies and tools for taxonomic annotation: defining standards for progressive metagenomics. Sci Rep 8:12034.
    23.
    Petricevic L, Domig KJ, Nierscher FJ, Sandhofer MJ, Fidesser M, Krondorfer I, Husslein P, Kneifel W, Kiss H. 2015. Characterisation of the vaginal Lactobacillus microbiota associated with preterm delivery. Sci Rep 4:5136.
    24.
    Ma B, France MT, Crabtree J, Holm JB, Humphrys MS, Brotman RM, Ravel J. 2020. A comprehensive non-redundant gene catalog reveals extensive within-community intraspecies diversity in the human vagina. Nat Commun 11:940.
    25.
    Ravel J, Brotman RM, Gajer P, Ma B, Nandy M, Fadrosh DW, Sakamoto J, Koenig SS, Fu L, Zhou X, Hickey RJ, Schwebke JR, Forney LJ. 2013. Daily temporal dynamics of vaginal microbiota before, during and after episodes of bacterial vaginosis. Microbiome 1:29.
    26.
    Browne PD, Nielsen TK, Kot W, Aggerholm A, Gilbert MTP, Puetz L, Rasmussen M, Zervas A, Hansen LH. 2020. GC bias affects genomic and metagenomic reconstructions, underrepresenting GC-poor organisms. Gigascience 9:giaa008.
    27.
    Peng W, Li X, Wang C, Cao H, Cui Z. 2018. Metagenome complexity and template length are the main causes of bias in PCR-based bacteria community analysis. J Basic Microbiol 58:987–997.
    28.
    Kozich JJ, Westcott SL, Baxter NT, Highlander SK, Schloss PD. 2013. Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:5112–5120.
    29.
    Prodan A, Tremaroli V, Brolin H, Zwinderman AH, Nieuwdorp M, Levin E. 2020. Comparing bioinformatic pipelines for microbial 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. PLoS One 15:e0227434.
    30.
    Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. 2016. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 13:581–583.
    31.
    Edgar RC. 2016. UNOISE2: improved error-correction for Illumina 16S and ITS amplicon sequencing. bioRxiv doi:
    32.
    Wagner AO, Malin C, Knapp BA, Illmer P. 2008. Removal of free extracellular DNA from environmental samples by ethidium monoazide and propidium monoazide. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:2537–2539.
    33.
    Hunter SJ, Easton S, Booth V, Henderson B, Wade WG, Ward JM. 2011. Selective removal of human DNA from metagenomic DNA samples extracted from dental plaque. J Basic Microbiol 51:442–446.
    34.
    Diop K, Diop A, Michelle C, Richez M, Rathored J, Bretelle F, Fournier P-E, Fenollar F. 2019. Description of three new Peptoniphilus species cultured in the vaginal fluid of a woman diagnosed with bacterial vaginosis: Peptoniphilus pacaensis sp. nov., Peptoniphilus raoultii sp. nov., and Peptoniphilus vaginalis sp. nov. Microbiologyopen 8:e00661.
    35.
    Sczyrba A, Hofmann P, Belmann P, Koslicki D, Janssen S, Dröge J, Gregor I, Majda S, Fiedler J, Dahms E, Bremges A, Fritz A, Garrido-Oter R, Jørgensen TS, Shapiro N, Blood PD, Gurevich A, Bai Y, Turaev D, DeMaere MZ, Chikhi R, Nagarajan N, Quince C, Meyer F, Balvočiūtė M, Hansen LH, Sørensen SJ, Chia BKH, Denis B, Froula JL, Wang Z, Egan R, Don Kang D, Cook JJ, Deltel C, Beckstette M, Lemaitre C, Peterlongo P, Rizk G, Lavenier D, Wu Y-W, Singer SW, Jain C, Strous M, Klingenberg H, Meinicke P, Barton MD, Lingner T, Lin H-H, Liao Y-C, et al. 2017. Critical assessment of metagenome interpretation—a benchmark of metagenomics software. Nat Methods 14:1063–1071.
    36.
    Martin KJ, Rygiewicz PT. 2005. Fungal-specific PCR primers developed for analysis of the ITS region of environmental DNA extracts. BMC Microbiol 5:28.
    37.
    Xu Y, Lin Z, Tang C, Tang Y, Cai Y, Zhong H, Wang X, Zhang W, Xu C, Wang J, Wang J, Yang H, Yang L, Gao Q. 2019. A new massively parallel nanoball sequencing platform for whole exome research. BMC Bioinformatics 20:153.
    38.
    Diop K, Dufour J-C, Levasseur A, Fenollar F. 2019. Exhaustive repertoire of human vaginal microbiota. Human Microbiome J 11:100051.
    39.
    Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O'Neal L, McLeod L, Delacqua G, Delacqua F, Kirby J, Duda SN, REDCap Consortium. 2019. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform 95:103208.
    40.
    Martin M. 2011. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J 17:10–12.
    41.
    Rognes T, Flouri T, Nichols B, Quince C, Mahé F. 2016. VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ 4:e2584.
    42.
    Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. 2013. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D590–D596.
    43.
    Cole JR, Wang Q, Fish JA, Chai B, McGarrell DM, Sun Y, Brown CT, Porras-Alfaro A, Kuske CR, Tiedje JM. 2014. Ribosomal Database Project: data and tools for high throughput rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D633–D642.
    44.
    Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Waite DW, Rinke C, Skarshewski A, Chaumeil P-A, Hugenholtz P. 2018. A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life. Nat Biotechnol 36:996–1004.
    45.
    Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9:357–359.
    46.
    Rotmistrovsky K, Agarwala R. 2012. BMTagger: Best Match Tagger for removing human reads from metagenomics datasets. http://hmpdacc.org/resources/tools_protocols.php
    47.
    Bushnell B. 2014. BBMap: a fast, accurate, splice-aware aligner. 9th Annual Genomics of Energy & Environment Meeting.
    48.
    Wood DE, Lu J, Langmead B. 2019. Improved metagenomic analysis with Kraken 2. Genome Biol 20:257.
    49.
    Truong DT, Franzosa EA, Tickle TL, Scholz M, Weingart G, Pasolli E, Tett A, Huttenhower C, Segata N. 2015. MetaPhlAn2 for enhanced metagenomic taxonomic profiling. Nat Methods 12:902–903.
    50.
    Lu J, Breitwieser FP, Thielen P, Salzberg SL. 2017. Bracken: estimating species abundance in metagenomics data. PeerJ Comput Sci 3:e104.
    51.
    LaPierre N, Alser M, Eskin E, Koslicki D, Mangul S. 2020. Metalign: efficient alignment-based metagenomic profiling via containment min hash. Genome Biol 21:242.
    52.
    Zozaya-Hinchliffe M, Lillis R, Martin DH, Ferris MJ. 2010. Quantitative PCR assessments of bacterial species in women with and without bacterial vaginosis. J Clin Microbiol 48:1812–1819.
    53.
    Akutsu T, Motani H, Watanabe K, Iwase H, Sakurada K. 2012. Detection of bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA genes for forensic identification of vaginal fluid. Leg Med (Tokyo) 14:160–162.
    54.
    Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Lozupone CA, Turnbaugh PJ, Fierer N, Knight R. 2011. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(Suppl 1):4516–1522.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSphere
    Volume 5Number 623 December 2020
    eLocator: e00448-20
    Editor: Lifeng Zhu
    Nanjing Normal University

    History

    Received: 12 May 2020
    Accepted: 21 October 2020
    Published online: 18 November 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. 16S rRNA
    2. PCR
    3. amplicon
    4. human microbiome
    5. metagenomics
    6. molecular methods
    7. quantitative methods
    8. vaginal microbiome

    Contributors

    Authors

    Centre for Translational Microbiome Research, Department of Microbiology, Tumour and Cell Biology, Science for Life Laboratory, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
    Marcela Pereira
    Centre for Translational Microbiome Research, Department of Microbiology, Tumour and Cell Biology, Science for Life Laboratory, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
    Yinghua Zha
    Centre for Translational Microbiome Research, Department of Microbiology, Tumour and Cell Biology, Science for Life Laboratory, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
    Maike Seifert
    Centre for Translational Microbiome Research, Department of Microbiology, Tumour and Cell Biology, Science for Life Laboratory, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
    Vilde Kaldhusdal
    Department of Medicine Solna, Division of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
    Fredrik Boulund
    Centre for Translational Microbiome Research, Department of Microbiology, Tumour and Cell Biology, Science for Life Laboratory, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
    Maria C. Krog
    The Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Unit, Capital Region of Denmark, Rigshospitalet and Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Department of Clinical Immunology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Zahra Bashir
    The Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Unit, Capital Region of Denmark, Rigshospitalet and Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Holbæk Hospital, Holbæk, Denmark
    Marica Hamsten
    Centre for Translational Microbiome Research, Department of Microbiology, Tumour and Cell Biology, Science for Life Laboratory, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
    Emma Fransson
    Centre for Translational Microbiome Research, Department of Microbiology, Tumour and Cell Biology, Science for Life Laboratory, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
    Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
    Henriette Svarre Nielsen
    The Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Unit, Capital Region of Denmark, Rigshospitalet and Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Ina Schuppe-Koistinen
    Centre for Translational Microbiome Research, Department of Microbiology, Tumour and Cell Biology, Science for Life Laboratory, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
    Centre for Translational Microbiome Research, Department of Microbiology, Tumour and Cell Biology, Science for Life Laboratory, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden

    Editor

    Lifeng Zhu
    Editor
    Nanjing Normal University

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Lars Engstrand, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSphereArticle
    Identification of Spacer and Protospacer Sequence Requirements in the Vibrio cholerae Type I-E CRISPR/Cas System

    Identification of Spacer and Protospacer Sequence Requirements in the Vibrio cholerae Type I-E CRISPR/Cas System

    ABSTRACT

    The prokaryotic adaptive immune system CRISPR/Cas serves as a defense against bacteriophage and invasive nucleic acids. A type I-E CRISPR/Cas system has been detected in classical biotype isolates of Vibrio cholerae, the causative agent of the disease cholera. Experimental characterization of this system revealed a functional immune system that operates using a 5′-TT-3′ protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM) for interference. However, several designed spacers against the 5′-TT-3′ PAM do not interfere as expected, indicating that further investigation of this system is necessary. In this study, we identified additional conserved sequences, including a pyrimidine in the 5′ position of the spacer and a purine in the complementary position of the protospacer using 873 unique spacers and 2,267 protospacers mined from CRISPR arrays in deposited sequences of V. cholerae. We present bioinformatic evidence that during acquisition the protospacer purine is captured in the prespacer and that a 5′-RTT-3′ PAM is necessary for spacer acquisition. Finally, we demonstrate experimentally, by designing and manipulating spacer and cognate PAMs in a plasmid conjugation assay, that a 5′-RTT-3′ PAM is necessary for CRISPR interference, and we discover functional consequences for spacer efficacy related to the identity of the 5′ spacer pyrimidine.
    IMPORTANCE Bacterial CRISPR/Cas systems provide immunity by defending against phage and other invading elements. A thorough comprehension of the molecular mechanisms employed by these diverse systems will improve our understanding of bacteriophage-bacterium interactions and bacterial adaptation to foreign DNA. The Vibrio cholerae type I-E system was previously identified in an extinct classical biotype and was partially characterized for its function. Here, using both bioinformatic and functional assays, we extend that initial study. We have found that the type I-E system still exists in modern strains of V. cholerae. Furthermore, we defined additional sequence elements both in the CRISPR array and in target DNA that are required for immunity. CRISPR/Cas systems are now commonly used as precise and powerful genetic engineering tools. Knowledge of the sequences required for CRISPR/Cas immunity is a prerequisite for the effective design and experimental use of these systems. Our results greatly facilitate the effective use of one such system. Furthermore, we provide a publicly available software program that assists in the detection and validation of CRISPR/Cas immunity requirements when such a system exists in a bacterial species.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Barrangou R, Fremaux C, Deveau H, Richards M, Boyaval P, Moineau S, Romero DA, Horvath P. 2007. CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes. Science 315:1709–1712.
    2.
    Samai P, Pyenson N, Jiang W, Goldberg GW, Hatoum-Aslan A, Marraffini LA. 2015. Co-transcriptional DNA and RNA cleavage during type III CRISPR-Cas immunity. Cell 161:1164–1174.
    3.
    Koonin EV, Makarova KS, Zhang F. 2017. Diversity, classification and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems. Curr Opin Microbiol 37:67–78.
    4.
    Jackson SA, McKenzie RE, Fagerlund RD, Kieper SN, Fineran PC, Brouns SJ. 2017. CRISPR-Cas: adapting to change. Science 356:eaal5056.
    5.
    Makarova KS, Haft DH, Barrangou R, Brouns SJ, Charpentier E, Horvath P, Moineau S, Mojica FJ, Wolf YI, Yakunin AF, van der Oost J, Koonin EV. 2011. Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Rev Microbiol 9:467–477.
    6.
    van der Oost J, Westra ER, Jackson RN, Wiedenheft B. 2014. Unravelling the structural and mechanistic basis of CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Rev Microbiol 12:479–492.
    7.
    Leenay RT, Maksimchuk KR, Slotkowski RA, Agrawal RN, Gomaa AA, Briner AE, Barrangou R, Beisel CL. 2016. Identifying and visualizing functional PAM diversity across CRISPR-Cas systems. Mol Cell 62:137–147.
    8.
    Mojica FJM, Diez-Villasenor C, Garcia-Martinez J, Almendros C. 2009. Short motif sequences determine the targets of the prokaryotic CRISPR defence system. Microbiology (Reading) 155:733–740.
    9.
    Yosef I, Goren MG, Qimron U. 2012. Proteins and DNA elements essential for the CRISPR adaptation process in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res 40:5569–5576.
    10.
    Shah SA, Erdmann S, Mojica FJ, Garrett RA. 2013. Protospacer recognition motifs: mixed identities and functional diversity. RNA Biol 10:891–899.
    11.
    Deveau H, Barrangou R, Garneau JE, Labonte J, Fremaux C, Boyaval P, Romero DA, Horvath P, Moineau S. 2008. Phage response to CRISPR-encoded resistance in Streptococcus thermophilus. J Bacteriol 190:1390–1400.
    12.
    Harris JB, LaRocque RC, Qadri F, Ryan ET, Calderwood SB. 2012. Cholera. Lancet 379:2466–2476.
    13.
    Sack DA, Sack RB, Nair GB, Siddique AK. 2004. Cholera. Lancet 363:223–233.
    14.
    Chun J, Grim CJ, Hasan NA, Lee JH, Choi SY, Haley BJ, Taviani E, Jeon YS, Kim DW, Lee JH, Brettin TS, Bruce DC, Challacombe JF, Detter JC, Han CS, Munk AC, Chertkov O, Meincke L, Saunders E, Walters RA, Huq A, Nair GB, Colwell RR. 2009. Comparative genomics reveals mechanism for short-term and long-term clonal transitions in pandemic Vibrio cholerae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:15442–15447.
    15.
    Box AM, McGuffie MJ, O'Hara BJ, Seed KD. 2016. Functional analysis of bacteriophage immunity through a type I-E CRISPR-Cas system in Vibrio cholerae and its application in bacteriophage genome engineering. J Bacteriol 198:578–590.
    16.
    Hatoum-Aslan A. 2018. Phage genetic engineering using CRISPRCas systems. Viruses 10:335.
    17.
    Chen Y, Batra H, Dong J, Chen C, Rao VB, Tao P. 2019. Genetic engineering of bacteriophages against infectious diseases. Front Microbiol 10:954.
    18.
    Kiro R, Shitrit D, Qimron U. 2014. Efficient engineering of a bacteriophage genome using the type I-E CRISPR-Cas system. RNA Biol 11:42–44.
    19.
    Martel B, Moineau S. 2014. CRISPR-Cas: an efficient tool for genome engineering of virulent bacteriophages. Nucleic Acids Res 42:9504–9513.
    20.
    Bourgeois J, Lazinski DW, Camilli A. 2020. Identification of spacer and protospacer sequence requirements in the Vibrio cholerae type I-E CRISPR/Cas system. bioRxiv doi:
    21.
    Sobecky PA, Mincer TJ, Chang MC, Toukdarian A, Helinski DR. 1998. Isolation of broad-host-range replicons from marine sediment bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:2822–2830.
    22.
    Wang J, Li J, Zhao H, Sheng G, Wang M, Yin M, Wang Y. 2015. Structural and mechanistic basis of PAM-dependent spacer acquisition in CRISPR-Cas systems. Cell 163:840–853.
    23.
    de Boer HA, Comstock LJ, Vasser M. 1983. The tac promoter: a functional hybrid derived from the trp and lac promoters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 80:21–25.
    24.
    Xue C, Seetharam AS, Musharova O, Severinov K, Brouns SJ, Severin AJ, Sashital DG. 2015. CRISPR interference and priming varies with individual spacer sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 43:10831–10847.
    25.
    Karvelis T, Gasiunas G, Young J, Bigelyte G, Silanskas A, Cigan M, Siksnys V. 2015. Rapid characterization of CRISPR-Cas9 protospacer adjacent motif sequence elements. Genome Biol 16:253.
    26.
    Doench JG, Hartenian E, Graham DB, Tothova Z, Hegde M, Smith I, Sullender M, Ebert BL, Xavier RJ, Root DE. 2014. Rational design of highly active sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9-mediated gene inactivation. Nat Biotechnol 32:1262–1267.
    27.
    Chari R, Mali P, Moosburner M, Church GM. 2015. Unraveling CRISPR-Cas9 genome engineering parameters via a library-on-library approach. Nat Methods 12:823–826.
    28.
    Chari R, Yeo NC, Chavez A, Church GM. 2017. sgRNA Scorer 2.0: a species-independent model to predict CRISPR/Cas9 activity. ACS Synth Biol 6:902–904.
    29.
    Grissa I, Vergnaud G, Pourcel C. 2007. The CRISPRdb database and tools to display CRISPRs and to generate dictionaries of spacers and repeats. BMC Bioinformatics 8:172.
    30.
    Couvin D, Bernheim A, Toffano-Nioche C, Touchon M, Michalik J, Neron B, Rocha EPC, Vergnaud G, Gautheret D, Pourcel C. 2018. CRISPRCasFinder, an update of CRISRFinder, includes a portable version, enhanced performance and integrates search for Cas proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 46:W246–W251.
    31.
    Waldor MK, Mekalanos JJ. 1996. Lysogenic conversion by a filamentous phage encoding cholera toxin. Science 272:1910–1914.
    32.
    Waldor MK, Tschape H, Mekalanos JJ. 1996. A new type of conjugative transposon encodes resistance to sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, and streptomycin in Vibrio cholerae O139. J Bacteriol 178:4157–4165.
    33.
    Bikard D, Hatoum-Aslan A, Mucida D, Marraffini LA. 2012. CRISPR interference can prevent natural transformation and virulence acquisition during in vivo bacterial infection. Cell Host Microbe 12:177–186.
    34.
    Garcia-Gutierrez E, Almendros C, Mojica FJ, Guzman NM, Garcia-Martinez J. 2015. CRISPR content correlates with the pathogenic potential of Escherichia coli. PLoS One 10:e0131935.
    35.
    Toro M, Cao G, Ju W, Allard M, Barrangou R, Zhao S, Brown E, Meng J. 2014. Association of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) elements with specific serotypes and virulence potential of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:1411–1420.
    36.
    Waldor MK, Rubin EJ, Pearson GD, Kimsey H, Mekalanos JJ. 1997. Regulation, replication, and integration functions of the Vibrio cholerae CTXΦ are encoded by region RS2. Mol Microbiol 24:917–926.
    37.
    Nelson EJ, Harris JB, Morris JG, Jr, Calderwood SB, Camilli A. 2009. Cholera transmission: the host, pathogen and bacteriophage dynamic. Nat Rev Microbiol 7:693–702.
    38.
    Faruque SM, Mekalanos JJ. 2012. Phage-bacterial interactions in the evolution of toxigenic Vibrio cholerae. Virulence 3:556–565.
    39.
    O'Hara BJ, Barth ZK, McKitterick AC, Seed KD. 2017. A highly specific phage defense system is a conserved feature of the Vibrio cholerae mobilome. PLoS Genet 13:e1006838.
    40.
    Faruque SM, Abdul Alim AR, Rahman MM, Siddique AK, Sack RB, Albert MJ. 1993. Clonal relationships among classical Vibrio cholerae O1 strains isolated between 1961 and 1992 in Bangladesh. J Clin Microbiol 31:2513–2516.
    41.
    Alam M, Islam MT, Rashed SM, Johura FT, Bhuiyan NA, Delgado G, Morales R, Mendez JL, Navarro A, Watanabe H, Hasan NA, Colwell RR, Cravioto A. 2012. Vibrio cholerae classical biotype strains reveal distinct signatures in Mexico. J Clin Microbiol 50:2212–2216.
    42.
    Musharova O, Sitnik V, Vlot M, Savitskaya E, Datsenko KA, Krivoy A, Fedorov I, Semenova E, Brouns SJJ, Severinov K. 2019. Systematic analysis of type I-E Escherichia coli CRISPR-Cas PAM sequences ability to promote interference and primed adaptation. Mol Microbiol 111:1558–1570.
    43.
    Nunez JK, Lee AS, Engelman A, Doudna JA. 2015. Integrase-mediated spacer acquisition during CRISPR-Cas adaptive immunity. Nature 519:193–198.
    44.
    Goren MG, Yosef I, Auster O, Qimron U. 2012. Experimental definition of a clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic duplicon in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol 423:14–16.
    45.
    Erdmann S, Garrett RA. 2012. Selective and hyperactive uptake of foreign DNA by adaptive immune systems of an archaeon via two distinct mechanisms. Mol Microbiol 85:1044–1056.
    46.
    Nunez JK, Harrington LB, Kranzusch PJ, Engelman AN, Doudna JA. 2015. Foreign DNA capture during CRISPR-Cas adaptive immunity. Nature 527:535–538.
    47.
    Wilkinson M, Drabavicius G, Silanskas A, Gasiunas G, Siksnys V, Wigley DB. 2019. Structure of the DNA-bound spacer capture complex of a type II CRISPR-Cas system. Mol Cell 75:90–101.e5.
    48.
    Semenova E, Jore MM, Datsenko KA, Semenova A, Westra ER, Wanner B, van der Oost J, Brouns SJ, Severinov K. 2011. Interference by clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) RNA is governed by a seed sequence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:10098–10103.
    49.
    Westra ER, Semenova E, Datsenko KA, Jackson RN, Wiedenheft B, Severinov K, Brouns SJ. 2013. Type I-E CRISPR-Cas systems discriminate target from non-target DNA through base pairing-independent PAM recognition. PLoS Genet 9:e1003742.
    50.
    Hayes RP, Xiao Y, Ding F, van Erp PB, Rajashankar K, Bailey S, Wiedenheft B, Ke A. 2016. Structural basis for promiscuous PAM recognition in type I-E Cascade from E. coli. Nature 530:499–503.
    51.
    Crooks GE, Hon G, Chandonia JM, Brenner SE. 2004. WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res 14:1188–1190.
    52.
    Levine MM, Black RE, Clements ML, Cisneros L, Saah A, Nalin DR, Gill DM, Craig JP, Young CR, Ristaino P. 1982. The pathogenicity of nonenterotoxigenic Vibrio cholerae serogroup O1 biotype El Tor isolated from sewage water in Brazil. J Infect Dis 145:296–299.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSphere
    Volume 5Number 623 December 2020
    eLocator: e00813-20
    Editor: Craig D. Ellermeier
    University of Iowa

    History

    Received: 11 August 2020
    Accepted: 1 November 2020
    Published online: 18 November 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. CRISPR/Cas
    2. Vibrio cholerae
    3. protospacer-adjacent motif

    Contributors

    Authors

    Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tufts University, School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
    David W. Lazinski
    Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tufts University, School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
    Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tufts University, School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

    Editor

    Craig D. Ellermeier
    Editor
    University of Iowa

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Andrew Camilli, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSphereArticle
    Unique Mode of Cell Division by the Mycobacterial Genetic Resister Clones Emerging De Novo from the Antibiotic-Surviving Population

    Unique Mode of Cell Division by the Mycobacterial Genetic Resister Clones Emerging De Novo from the Antibiotic-Surviving Population

    ABSTRACT

    The emergence of antibiotic genetic resisters of pathogenic bacteria poses a major public health challenge. The mechanism by which bacterial antibiotic genetic resister clones formed de novo multiply and establish a resister population remained unknown. Here, we delineated the unique mode of cell division of the antibiotic genetic resisters of Mycobacterium smegmatis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis formed de novo from the population surviving in the presence of bactericidal concentrations of rifampicin or moxifloxacin. The cells in the rifampicin/moxifloxacin-surviving population generated elevated levels of hydroxyl radical-inflicting mutations. The genetic mutants selected against rifampicin/moxifloxacin became multinucleated and multiseptated and developed multiple constrictions. These cells stochastically divided multiple times, producing sister-daughter cells phenomenally higher in number than what could be expected from their generation time. This caused an abrupt, unexpectedly high increase in the rifampicin/moxifloxacin resister colonies. This unique cell division behavior was not shown by the rifampicin resisters formed naturally in the actively growing cultures. We could detect such abrupt increases in the antibiotic resisters in others’ and our earlier data on the antibiotic-exposed laboratory/clinical M. tuberculosis strains, M. smegmatis and other bacteria in in vitro cultures, infected macrophages/animals, and tuberculosis patients. However, it went unnoticed/unreported in all those studies. This phenomenon occurring in diverse bacteria surviving against different antibiotics revealed the broad significance of the present study. We speculate that the antibiotic-resistant bacillary clones, which emerge in patients with diverse bacterial infections, might be using the same mechanism to establish an antibiotic resister population quickly in the continued presence of antibiotics.
    IMPORTANCE The bacterial pathogens that are tolerant to antibiotics and survive in the continued presence of antibiotics have the chance to acquire genetically resistant mutations against the antibiotics and emerge de novo as antibiotic resisters. Once the antibiotic resister clone has emerged, often with compromise on growth characteristics, for the protection of the species, it is important to establish an antibiotic-resistant population quickly in the continued presence of the antibiotic. In this regard, the present study has unraveled multinucleation and multiseptation followed by multiple constrictions as the cellular processes used by the bacteria for quick multiplication to establish antibiotic-resistant populations. The study also points out the same phenomenon occurring in other bacterial systems investigated in our laboratory and others’ laboratories. Identification of these specific cellular events involved in quick multiplication offers additional cellular processes that can be targeted in combination with the existing antibiotics’ targets to preempt the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Davies J, Davies D. 2010. Origins and evolution of antibiotic resistance. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 74:417–433.
    2.
    Peterson E, Kaur P. 2018. Antibiotic resistance mechanisms in bacteria: relationships between resistance determinants of antibiotic producers, environmental bacteria, and clinical pathogens. Front Microbiol 9:2928.
    3.
    Hughes D, Andersson DI. 2012. Selection of resistance at lethal and non-lethal antibiotic concentrations. Curr Opin Microbiol 15:555–560.
    4.
    Bigger JW. 1944. Treatment of Staphylococcal infections with penicillin by intermittent sterilisation. Lancet 244:497–500.
    5.
    Balaban NQ, Helaine S, Lewis K, Ackermann M, Aldridge B, Andersson DI, Brynildsen MP, Bumann D, Camilli A, Collins JJ, Dehio C, Fortune S, Ghigo J-M, Hardt W-D, Harms A, Heinemann M, Hung DT, Jenal U, Levin BR, Michiels J, Storz G, Tan M-W, Tenson T, Van Melderen L, Zinkernagel A. 2019. Definitions and guidelines for research on antibiotic persistence. Nat Rev Microbiol 17:441–448.
    6.
    Wakamoto Y, Dhar N, Chait R, Schneider K, Signorino-Gelo F, Leibler S, McKinney JD. 2013. Dynamic persistence of antibiotic-stressed mycobacteria. Science 339:91–95.
    7.
    Trastoy R, Manso T, Fernandez-Garcia L, Blasco L, Ambroa A, Perez del Molino ML, Bou G, Garcia-Contreras R, Wood TK, Tomas M. 2018. Mechanisms of bacterial tolerance and persistence in the gastrointestinal and respiratory environments. Clin Microbiol Rev 31:e00023-18.
    8.
    Woodford N, Ellington MJ. 2007. The emergence of antibiotic resistance by mutation. Clin Microbiol Infect 13:5–18.
    9.
    Sebastian J, Swaminath S, Nair RR, Jakkala K, Pradhan A, Ajitkumar P. 2017. De novo emergence of genetically resistant mutants of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the persistence phase cells formed against antituberculosis drugs in vitro. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e01343-16.
    10.
    Swaminath S, Paul A, Pradhan A, Sebastian J, Nair RR, Ajitkumar P. 2020. Mycobacterium smegmatis moxifloxacin persister cells produce high levels of hydroxyl radical, generating genetic resisters selectable not only with moxifloxacin, but also with ethambutol and isoniazid. Microbiology (Reading) 166:180–198.
    11.
    Swaminath S, Pradhan A, Nair RR, Ajitkumar P. 2020. The rifampicin-inactivating mono-ADP-ribosyl transferase of Mycobacterium smegmatis significantly influences reactive oxygen species levels in the actively growing cells. bioRxiv doi:
    12.
    Long H, Miller SF, Strauss C, Zhao C, Cheng L, Ye Z, Griffin K, Te R, Lee H, Chen C-C, Lynch M. 2016. Antibiotic treatment enhances the genome-wide mutation rate of target cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:E2498–E2505.
    13.
    Kohanski MA, DePristo MA, Collins JJ. 2010. Sublethal antibiotic treatment leads to multidrug resistance via radical-induced mutagenesis. Mol Cell 37:311–320.
    14.
    Hoeksema M, Brul S, Kuile BHT. 2018. Influence of reactive oxygen species on de novo acquisition of resistance to bactericidal antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e02354-17.
    15.
    Cohen NR, Lobritz MA, Collins JJ. 2013. Microbial persistence, and the road to drug resistance. Cell Host Microbe 13:632–642.
    16.
    Windels EM, Michiels JE, Van den Bergh B, Fauvart M, Michiels J. 2019. Antibiotics: combatting tolerance to stop resistance. mBio 10:e02095-19.
    17.
    Quan S, Venter H, Dabbs ER. 1997. Ribosylative inactivation of rifampin by Mycobacterium smegmatis is a principal contributor to its low susceptibility to this antibiotic. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 41:2456–2460.
    18.
    Nyinoh IW. 2019. Spontaneous mutations conferring antibiotic resistance to antitubercular drugs at a range of concentrations in Mycobacterium smegmatis. Drug Dev Res 80:147–154.
    19.
    Vijay S, Mukkayyan N, Ajitkumar P. 2014. Highly deviated asymmetric division in very low proportion of mycobacterial mid-log phase cells. Open Microbiol J 8:40–50.
    20.
    Cadet J, Wagner JR. 2014. Oxidatively generated base damage to cellular DNA by hydroxyl radical and one-electron oxidants: similarities and differences. Arch Biochem Biophys 557:47–54.
    21.
    Cooke MS, Evans MD, Dizdaroglu M, Lunec J. 2003. Oxidative DNA damage: mechanisms, mutation, and disease. FASEB J 17:1195–1214.
    22.
    Sakai A, Nakanishi M, Yoshiyama K, Maki H. 2006. Impact of reactive oxygen species on spontaneous mutagenesis in Escherichia coli. Genes Cells 11:767–778.
    23.
    Piccaro G, Pietraforte D, Giannoni F, Mustazzolu A, Fattorini L. 2014. Rifampin induces hydroxyl radical formation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:7527–7533.
    24.
    Kreutzer DA, Essigmann JM. 1998. Oxidized, deaminated cytosines are a source of C > T transitions in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:3578–3582.
    25.
    Allen JS, Filip CC, Gustafson RA, Allen RG, Walker JR. 1974. Regulation of bacterial cell division: genetic and phenotypic analysis of temperature-sensitive, multinucleate, filament-forming mutants of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 117:978–986.
    26.
    Dahl JL. 2004. Electron microscopy analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis cell division. FEMS Microbiol Lett 240:15–20.
    27.
    Bos J, Zhang Q, Vyawahare S, Rogers E, Rosenberg SM, Austin RH. 2015. Emergence of antibiotic resistance from multinucleated bacterial filaments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:178–183.
    28.
    Nana GYG, Ripoll C, Cabin-Flaman A, Gibouin D, Delaune A, Janniere L, Grancher G, Chagny G, Loutelier-Bourhis C, Lentzen E, Grysan P, Audinot J-N, Norris V. 2018. Division-based, growth rate diversity in bacteria. Front Microbiol 9:849.
    29.
    Eskandarian HA, Odermatt PD, Ven JXY, Hannebelle MTM, Nievergelt AP, Dhar N, McKinney JD, Fantner GE. 2017. Division site selection linked to inherited cell surface wave troughs in mycobacteria. Nat Microbiol 2:17094.
    30.
    Thanky NR, Young DB, Robertson BD. 2007. Unusual features of the cell cycle in mycobacteria: polar-restricted growth and the snapping-model of cell division. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 87:231–236.
    31.
    Martinez JL, Baquero F. 2000. Mutation frequencies and antibiotic resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44:1771–1777.
    32.
    Billington OJ, McHugh TD, Gillespie SH. 1999. Physiological cost of rifampin resistance induced in vitro in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43:1866–1869.
    33.
    Justice SS, Hunstad DA, Cegelski L, Hultgren SJ. 2008. Morphological plasticity as a bacterial survival strategy. Nat Rev Microbiol 6:162–168.
    34.
    Barrett TC, Mok WWK, Murawski AM, Brynildsen MP. 2019. Enhanced antibiotic resistance development from fluoroquinolone persisters after a single exposure to antibiotic. Nature Commun 10:1177.
    35.
    Melnyk AH, Wong A, Kassen R. 2015. The fitness costs of antibiotic resistance mutations. Evol Appl 8:273–283.
    36.
    Sandegren L. 2014. Selection of antibiotic resistance at very low antibiotic concentrations. Ups J Med Sci 119:103–107.
    37.
    Crofton J, Mitchison DA. 1948. Streptomycin resistance in pulmonary tuberculosis. Br Med J 2:1009–1015.
    38.
    Hu Y, Pertinez H, Ortega-Muro F, Alameda-Martin L, Liu Y, Schipani A, Davies G, Coates A. 2016. Investigation of elimination rate, persistent subpopulation removal, and relapse rates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by using combinations of first-line drugs in a modified Cornell mouse model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:4778–4785.
    39.
    Munoz-Elias EJ, Timm J, Botha T, Chan W-T, Gomez JE, McKinney JD. 2005. Replication dynamics of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in chronically infected mice. Infect Immun 73:546–551.
    40.
    Zhang M, Li S-Y, Rosenthal IM, Almeida DV, Ahmad Z, Converse PJ, Peloquin CA, Nuermberger EL, Grosset JH. 2011. Treatment of tuberculosis with rifamycin-containing regimens in immune-deficient mice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 183:1254–1261.
    41.
    Mor N, Simon B, Mezo N, Heifets L. 1995. Comparison of activities of rifapentine and rifampin against Mycobacterium tuberculosis residing in human macrophages. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 39:2073–2077.
    42.
    Snapper SB, Melton RE, Mustafa S, Kieser T, Jacobs WR. 1990. Isolation and characterisation of efficient plasmid transformation mutants of Mycobacterium smegmatis. Mol Microbiol 4:1911–1919.
    43.
    Dickinson JM, Aber VR, Allen BW, Ellard GA, Mitchison DA. 1974. Assay for rifampicin in serum. J Clin Pathol 27:457–462.
    44.
    Setsukinai K, Urano Y, Kakinuma K, Majima HJ, Nagano T. 2003. Development of novel fluorescence probes that can reliably detect reactive oxygen species and distinguish specific species. J Biol Chem 278:3170–3175.
    45.
    Mukherjee P, Sureka K, Datta P, Hossain T, Barik S, Das KP, Kundu M, Basu J. 2009. Novel role of Wag31 in protection of mycobacteria under oxidative stress. Mol Microbiol 73:103–119.
    46.
    Bolshakova AV, Kiselyova OI, Filonov AS, Frolova OYu, Lyubchenko YL, Yaminsky IV. 2001. Comparative studies of bacteria with an atomic force microscopy operating in different modes. Ultramicroscopy 86:121–128.
    47.
    Takade A, Takeya K, Taniguchi H, Mizuguchi Y. 1983. Electron microscopic observations of cell division in Mycobacterium vaccae V1. J Gen Microbiol 129:2315–2320.
    48.
    Vijay S, Anand D, Ajitkumar P. 2012. Unveiling unusual features of formation of septal partition and constriction in mycobacteria: an ultrastructural study. J Bacteriol 194:702–707.
    49.
    White DA, Miyada DS, Nakamura RM. 1974. Characterisation of the periodate oxidation of glycerol and related compounds, and application toward determination of serum triglyceride concentrations. Clin Chem 20:645–648.
    50.
    Nash T. 1953. The colorimetric estimation of formaldehyde by means of the Hantzsch reaction. Biochem J 55:416–421.
    51.
    Bondioli P, Bella LD. 2005. An alternative spectrophotometric method for the determination of free glycerol in biodiesel. European J Lipid Science and Technology 107:153–157.
    52.
    Joyce G, Robertson BD, Williams KJ. 2011. A modified agar pad method for mycobacterial live-cell imaging. BMC Res Notes 4:73.
    53.
    Vijay S, Nagaraja M, Sebastian J, Ajitkumar P. 2014. Asymmetric cell division in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and its unique features. Arch Microbiol 196:157–168.
    54.
    Wecker E. 1959. The extraction of infectious virus nucleic acid with hot phenol. Virology 7:241–243.
    55.
    Willems E, Leyns L, Vandesompele J. 2008. Standardization of real-time PCR gene expression data from independent biological replicates. Anal Biochem 379:127–129.
    56.
    Wang W, Chen K, Xu C. 2006. DNA quantification using EvaGreen and a real-time PCR instrument. Anal Biochem 356:303–305.
    57.
    Jakkala K, Sharan D, Nair RR, Paul A, Pradhan A, Ajitkumar P. 2019. Unveiling the physiological mechanisms that drive the emergence of antibiotic resisters from antibiotic persister population of mycobacteria. bioRxiv 846378.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSphere
    Volume 5Number 623 December 2020
    eLocator: e00994-20
    Editor: Jacqueline M. Achkar
    Albert Einstein College of Medicine

    History

    Received: 23 October 2020
    Accepted: 28 October 2020
    Published online: 18 November 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. antibiotic resisters
    2. hydroxyl radical
    3. multinucleation
    4. multiseptation
    5. multiple constriction
    6. multiple division
    7. mycobacteria

    Contributors

    Authors

    Kishor Jakkala
    Department of Microbiology and Cell Biology, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
    Avraneel Paul
    Department of Microbiology and Cell Biology, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
    Atul Pradhan
    Department of Microbiology and Cell Biology, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
    Rashmi Ravindran Nair
    Department of Microbiology and Cell Biology, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
    Deepti Sharan
    Department of Microbiology and Cell Biology, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
    Present address: Deepti Sharan, Department of Chemistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Sharmada Swaminath, Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Personalized Medicine, Nevada Institute of Personalized Medicine, UNLV School of Medicine, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
    Sharmada Swaminath
    Department of Microbiology and Cell Biology, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
    Present address: Deepti Sharan, Department of Chemistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Sharmada Swaminath, Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Personalized Medicine, Nevada Institute of Personalized Medicine, UNLV School of Medicine, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
    Department of Microbiology and Cell Biology, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

    Editor

    Jacqueline M. Achkar
    Editor
    Albert Einstein College of Medicine

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Parthasarathi Ajitkumar, [email protected].
    Avraneel Paul, Atul Pradhan, and Rashmi Ravindran Nair contributed equally to this work.

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSphereArticle
    A Novel Phage Infecting Alteromonas Represents a Distinct Group of Siphophages Infecting Diverse Aquatic Copiotrophs

    A Novel Phage Infecting Alteromonas Represents a Distinct Group of Siphophages Infecting Diverse Aquatic Copiotrophs

    ABSTRACT

    Bacteriophages play critical roles in impacting microbial community succession both ecologically and evolutionarily. Although the majority of phage genetic diversity has been increasingly unveiled, phages infecting members of the ecologically important genus Alteromonas remain poorly understood. Here, we present a comprehensive analysis of a newly isolated alterophage, vB_AcoS-R7M (R7M), to characterize its life cycle traits, genomic features, and putative evolutionary origin. R7M harbors abundant genes identified as host-like auxiliary metabolic genes facilitating viral propagation. Genomic analysis suggested that R7M is distinct from currently known alterophages. Interestingly, R7M was found to share a set of similar characteristics with a number of siphophages infecting diverse aquatic opportunistic copiotrophs. We therefore proposed the creation of one new subfamily (Queuovirinae) to group with these evolutionarily related phages. Notably, tail genes were less likely to be shared among them, and baseplate-related genes varied the most. In-depth analyses indicated that R7M has replaced its distal tail with a Rhodobacter capsulatus gene transfer agent (RcGTA)-like baseplate and further acquired a putative receptor interaction site targeting Alteromonas. These findings suggest that horizontal exchanges of viral tail adsorption apparatuses are widespread and vital for phages to hunt new hosts and to adapt to new niches.
    IMPORTANCE The evolution and ecology of phages infecting members of Alteromonas, a marine opportunistic genus that is widely distributed and of great ecological significance, remain poorly understood. The present study integrates physiological and genomic evidence to characterize the properties and putative phage-host interactions of a newly isolated Alteromonas phage, vB_AcoS-R7M (R7M). A taxonomic study reveals close evolutionary relationships among R7M and a number of siphophages infecting various aquatic copiotrophs. Their similar head morphology and overall genetic framework suggest their putative common ancestry and the grouping of a new viral subfamily. However, their major difference lies in the viral tail adsorption apparatuses and the horizontal exchanges of which possibly account for variations in host specificity. These findings outline an evolutionary scenario for the emergence of diverse viral lineages of a shared genetic pool and give insights into the genetics and ecology of viral host jumps.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Weinbauer MG. 2004. Ecology of prokaryotic viruses. FEMS Microbiol Rev 28:127–181.
    2.
    Chen X, Weinbauer MG, Jiao N, Zhang R. 2021. Revisiting marine lytic and lysogenic virus-host interactions: kill-the-winner and piggyback-the-winner. Science Bull 66:871–874.
    3.
    Suttle CA. 2007. Marine viruses—major players in the global ecosystem. Nat Rev Microbiol 5:801–812.
    4.
    López-Pérez M, Gonzaga A, Ivanova EP, Rodriguez-Valera F. 2014. Genomes of Alteromonas australica, a world apart. BMC Genomics 15:483.
    5.
    Shi Y, McCarren J, Delong EF. 2012. Transcriptional responses of surface water marine microbial assemblages to deep-sea water amendment. Environ Microbiol 14:191–206.
    6.
    Pedler BE, Aluwihare LI, Azam F. 2014. Single bacterial strain capable of significant contribution to carbon cycling in the surface ocean. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:7202–7207.
    7.
    Kazamia E, Helliwell KE, Purton S, Smith AG. 2016. How mutualisms arise in phytoplankton communities: building eco-evolutionary principles for aquatic microbes. Ecol Lett 19:810–822.
    8.
    Garcia-Heredia I, Rodriguez-Valera F, Martin-Cuadrado AB. 2013. Novel group of podovirus infecting the marine bacterium Alteromonas macleodii. Bacteriophage 3:e24766.
    9.
    Gao Y, Liu Q, Wang M, Zhao G, Jiang Y, Malin G, Gong Z, Meng X, Liu Z, Lin T, Li Y, Shao H. 2017. Characterization and genome sequence of marine Alteromonas gracilis phage PB15 isolated from the Yellow Sea, China. Curr Microbiol 74:821–826.
    10.
    Kallies R, Kiesel B, Zopfi J, Wick LY, Chatzinotas A. 2017. Complete genome sequence of Alteromonas virus vB_AspP-H4/4. Genome Announc 5:e00914.
    11.
    Wang D, Jiang Y, Xiao S, Wang M, Liu Q, Huang L, Xue C, Wang Q, Lin T, Shao H, McMinn A. 2019. Characterization and genome analysis of a novel Alteromonas phage JH01 isolated from the Qingdao Coast of China. Curr Microbiol 76:1256–1263.
    12.
    Gonzalez-Serrano R, Dunne M, Rosselli R, Martin-Cuadrado AB, Grosboillot V, Zinsli LV, Roda-Garcia JJ, Loessner MJ, Rodriguez-Valera F. 2020. Alteromonas myovirus V22 represents a new genus of marine bacteriophages requiring a tail fiber chaperone for host recognition. mSystems 5:e00217-20.
    13.
    Zhang X, Liu Y, Wang M, Wang M, Jiang T, Sun J, Gao C, Jiang Y, Guo C, Shao H, Liang Y, McMinn A. 2020. Characterization and genome analysis of a novel marine Alteromonas phage P24. Curr Microbiol 77:2813–2820.
    14.
    Park S, Kang C-H, Won S-M, Park J-M, Kim B-C, Yoon J-H. 2015. Alteromonas confluentis sp. nov., isolated from the junction between the ocean and a freshwater spring. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 65:3603–3608.
    15.
    Cornelissen A, Ceyssens P-J, T'Syen J, Van Praet H, Noben J-P, Shaburova OV, Krylov VN, Volckaert G, Lavigne R. 2011. The T7-related Pseudomonas putida phage ϕ15 displays virion-associated biofilm degradation properties. PLoS One 6:e18597.
    16.
    Conley MP, Wood WB. 1975. Bacteriophage T4 whiskers: a rudimentary environment-sensing device. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 72:3701–3705.
    17.
    Murphy J, Royer B, Mahony J, Hoyles L, Heller K, Neve H, Bonestroo M, Nauta A, Van Sinderen D. 2013. Biodiversity of lactococcal bacteriophages isolated from 3 Gouda-type cheese-producing plants. J Dairy Sci 96:4945–4957.
    18.
    Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. 2017. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 110:1281–1286.
    19.
    Kellogg CA, Paul JH. 2002. Degree of ultraviolet radiation damage and repair capabilities are related to G+C content in marine vibriophages. Aquat Microb Ecol 27:13–20.
    20.
    Miller ES, Kutter E, Mosig G, Arisaka F, Kunisawa T, Ruger W. 2003. Bacteriophage T4 genome. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 67:86–156.
    21.
    Lloyd RS, Hanawalt PC. 1981. Expression of the denV gene of bacteriophage T4 cloned in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 78:2796–2800.
    22.
    Furuta M, Schrader JO, Schrader HS, Kokjohn TA, Nyaga S, Mccullough AK, Lloyd RS, Burbank DE, Landstein D, Lane L, Van Etten JL. 1997. Chlorella virus PBCV-1 encodes a homolog of the bacteriophage T4 UV damage repair gene denV. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:1551–1556.
    23.
    Veesler D, Cambillau C. 2011. A common evolutionary origin for tailed-bacteriophage functional modules and bacterial machineries. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 75:423–433.
    24.
    Mojica KDA, Brussaard CPD. 2014. Factors affecting virus dynamics and microbial host–virus interactions in marine environments. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 89:495–515.
    25.
    Ignacio-Espinoza JC, Sullivan MB. 2012. Phylogenomics of T4 cyanophages: lateral gene transfer in the “core” and origins of host genes. Environ Microbiol 14:2113–2126.
    26.
    Chénard C, Chan AM, Vincent WF, Suttle CA. 2015. Polar freshwater cyanophage S-EIV1 represents a new widespread evolutionary lineage of phages. ISME J 9:2046–2058.
    27.
    Stern A, Mayrose I, Penn O, Shaul S, Gophna U, Pupko T. 2010. An evolutionary analysis of lateral gene transfer in thymidylate synthase enzymes. Syst Biol 59:212–225.
    28.
    Gross M, Marianovsky I, Glaser G. 2006. MazG—a regulator of programmed cell death in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 59:590–601.
    29.
    Clokie MR, Mann NH. 2006. Marine cyanophages and light. Environ Microbiol 8:2074–2082.
    30.
    Duhaime MB, Solonenko N, Roux S, Verberkmoes NC, Wichels A, Sullivan MB. 2017. Comparative omics and trait analyses of marine Pseudoalteromonas phages advance the phage OTU concept. Front Microbiol 8:1241.
    31.
    Hurwitz BL, U'Ren JM. 2016. Viral metabolic reprogramming in marine ecosystems. Curr Opin Microbiol 31:161–168.
    32.
    Rihtman B, Bowman-Grahl S, Millard A, Corrigan RM, Clokie MRJ, Scanlan DJ. 2019. Cyanophage MazG is a pyrophosphohydrolase but unable to hydrolyse magic spot nucleotides. Environ Microbiol Rep 11:448–455.
    33.
    Cruz-Plancarte I, Cazares A, Guarneros G. 2016. Genomic and transcriptional mapping of PaMx41, archetype of a new lineage of bacteriophages infecting Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:6541–6547.
    34.
    Hargreaves KR, Kropinski AM, Clokie MR. 2014. Bacteriophage behavioral ecology: how phages alter their bacterial host’s habits. Bacteriophage 4:e29866.
    35.
    Hutinet G, Kot W, Cui L, Hillebrand R, Balamkundu S, Gnanakalai S, Neelakandan R, Carstens AB, Fa Lui C, Tremblay D, Jacobs-Sera D, Sassanfar M, Lee YJ, Weigele P, Moineau S, Hatfull GF, Dedon PC, Hansen LH, de Crécy-Lagard V. 2019. 7-Deazaguanine modifications protect phage DNA from host restriction systems. Nat Commun 10:5442.
    36.
    Thiaville JJ, Kellner SM, Yuan Y, Hutinet G, Thiaville PC, Jumpathong W, Mohapatra S, Brochier-Armanet C, Letarov AV, Hillebrand R, Malik CK, Rizzo CJ, Dedon PC, de Crécy-Lagard V. 2016. Novel genomic island modifies DNA with 7-deazaguanine derivatives. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:E1452–E1459.
    37.
    Tsai R, Corrêa IR, Xu MY, Xu SY. 2017. Restriction and modification of deoxyarchaeosine (dG(+))-containing phage 9 g DNA. Sci Rep 7:8348.
    38.
    Tuorto F, Legrand C, Cirzi C, Federico G, Liebers R, Müller M, Ehrenhofer-Murray AE, Dittmar G, Gröne HJ, Lyko F. 2018. Queuosine-modified tRNAs confer nutritional control of protein translation. EMBO J 37:e99777.
    39.
    Lang AS, Zhaxybayeva O, Beatty JT. 2012. Gene transfer agents: phage-like elements of genetic exchange. Nat Rev Microbiol 10:472–482.
    40.
    Hynes AP, Shakya M, Mercer RG, Grüll MP, Bown L, Davidson F, Steffen E, Matchem H, Peach ME, Berger T, Grebe K, Zhaxybayeva O, Lang AS. 2016. Functional and evolutionary characterization of a gene transfer agent’s multilocus “genome.” Mol Biol Evol 33:2530–2543.
    41.
    Tully BJ, Graham ED, Heidelberg JF. 2018. The reconstruction of 2,631 draft metagenome-assembled genomes from the global oceans. Sci Data 5:170203.
    42.
    Bárdy P, Füzik T, Hrebík D, Pantůček R, Beatty JT, Plevka P. 2020. Structure and mechanism of DNA delivery of a gene transfer agent. Nat Commun 11:3034.
    43.
    Hildebrand A, Remmert M, Biegert A, Söding J. 2009. Fast and accurate automatic structure prediction with HHpred. Proteins 77:128–132.
    44.
    Zhang Y, Skolnick J. 2005. TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Nucleic Acids Res 33:2302–2309.
    45.
    Jang HB, Bolduc B, Zablocki O, Kuhn JH, Roux S, Adriaenssens EM, Brister JR, Kropinski AM, Krupovic M, Lavigne R, Turner D, Sullivan MB. 2019. Taxonomic assignment of uncultivated prokaryotic virus genomes is enabled by gene-sharing networks. Nat Biotechnol 37:632–639.
    46.
    Ackermann HW, Eisenstark A. 1974. The present state of phage taxonomy. Intervirology 3:201–219.
    47.
    Adriaenssens EM, Brister JR. 2017. How to name and classify your phage: an informal guide. Viruses 9:70.
    48.
    Bartual SG, Otero JM, Garcia-Doval C, Llamas-Saiz AL, Kahn R, Fox GC, van Raaij MJ. 2010. Structure of the bacteriophage T4 long tail fiber receptor-binding tip. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:20287–20292.
    49.
    Hendrix RW, Smith MC, Burns RN, Ford ME, Hatfull GF. 1999. Evolutionary relationships among diverse bacteriophages and prophages: all the world’s a phage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:2192–2197.
    50.
    Zhang Z, Chen F, Chu X, Zhang H, Luo H, Qin F, Zhai Z, Yang M, Sun J, Zhao Y. 2019. Diverse, abundant, and novel viruses infecting the marine Roseobacter RCA lineage. mSystems 4:e00494-19.
    51.
    Yurkov VV, Krieger S, Stackebrandt E, Beatty JT. 1999. Citromicrobium bathyomarinum, a novel aerobic bacterium isolated from deep-sea hydrothermal vent plume waters that contains photosynthetic pigment-protein complexes. J Bacteriol 181:4517–4525.
    52.
    Yang Y, Cai L, Ma R, Xu Y, Tong Y, Huang Y, Jiao N, Zhang R. 2017. A novel roseosiphophage isolated from the oligotrophic South China Sea. Viruses 9:109.
    53.
    Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. 2012. NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675.
    54.
    Hammerl JA, Göllner C, Dahouk SA, Nöckler K, Reetz J, Hertwig S. 2016. Analysis of the first temperate broad host range brucellaphage (BiPBO1) isolated from B. inopinata. Front Microbiol 7:24.
    55.
    Cai L, Ma R, Chen H, Yang Y, Jiao N, Zhang R. 2019. A newly isolated roseophage represents a distinct member of Siphoviridae family. Virol J 16:128.
    56.
    Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, Bemben LA, Berka J, Braverman MS, Chen Y, Chen Z, Dewell SB, Du L, Fierro JM, Gomes XV, Godwin BC, He W, Helgesen S, Ho CH, Irzyk GP, Jando SC, Alenquer MLI, Jarvie TP, Jirage KB, Kim J, Knight JR, Lanza JR, Leamon JH, Lefkowitz SM, Lei M, Li J, Lohman KL, Lu H, Makhijani VB, McDade KE, McKenna MP, Myers EW, Nickerson E, Nobile JR, Plant R, Puc BP, Ronan MT, Roth GT, Sarkis GJ, Simons JF, Simpson JW, Srinivasan M, Tartaro KR, Tomasz A, Vogt KA, Volkmer GA, et al. 2005. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437:376–380.
    57.
    Hyatt D, Chen G, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. 2010. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11:119.
    58.
    Noguchi H, Taniguchi T, Itoh T. 2008. MetaGeneAnnotator: detecting species-specific patterns of ribosomal binding site for precise gene prediction in anonymous prokaryotic and phage genomes. DNA Res 15:387–396.
    59.
    Besemer J, Lomsadze A, Borodovsky M. 2001. GeneMarkS: a self-training method for prediction of gene starts in microbial genomes. Implications for finding sequence motifs in regulatory regions. Nucleic Acids Res 29:2607–2618.
    60.
    Marchler-Bauer A, Anderson JB, Derbyshire MK, DeWeese-Scott C, Gonzales NR, Gwadz M, Hao L, He S, Hurwitz DI, Jackson JD, Ke Z, Krylov D, Lanczycki CJ, Liebert CA, Liu C, Lu F, Lu S, Marchler GH, Mullokandov M, Song JS, Thanki N, Yamashita RA, Yin JJ, Zhang D, Bryant SH. 2007. CDD: a conserved domain database for interactive domain family analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 35:D237–D240.
    61.
    Lopes A, Tavares P, Petit M-A, Guérois R, Zinn-Justin S. 2014. Automated classification of tailed bacteriophages according to their neck organization. BMC Genomics 15:1027.
    62.
    Lowe TM, Chan PP. 2016. tRNAscan-SE on-line: integrating search and context for analysis of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 44:W54–W57.
    63.
    Holtappels M, Vrancken K, Schoofs H, Deckers T, Remans T, Noben JP, Valcke R. 2015. A comparative proteome analysis reveals flagellin, chemotaxis regulated proteins and amylovoran to be involved in virulence differences between Erwinia amylovora strains. J Proteomics 123:54–69.
    64.
    Yang J, Zhang Y. 2015. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions. Nucleic Acids Res 43:W174–W181.
    65.
    DeLano WL. 2002. PyMOL: an open-source molecular graphics tool. CCP4 Newsletter on Protein Crystallography 40:82–92.
    66.
    Drozdetskiy A, Cole C, Procter J, Barton GJ. 2015. JPred4: a protein secondary structure prediction server. Nucleic Acids Res 43:W389–W394.
    67.
    Kohl M, Wiese S, Warscheid B. 2011. Cytoscape: software for visualization and analysis of biological networks. Methods Mol Biol 696:291–303.
    68.
    Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. 2016. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33:1870–1874.
    69.
    Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. 2013. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 14:60.
    70.
    Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. 2017. VICTOR: genome-based phylogeny and classification of prokaryotic viruses. Bioinformatics 33:3396–3404.
    71.
    Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD, von Haeseler A, Lanfear R. 2020. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol Biol Evol 37:1530–1534.
    72.
    Letunic I, Bork P. 2007. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL): an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Bioinformatics 23:127–128.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSphere
    Volume 6Number 330 June 2021
    eLocator: e00454-21
    Editor: Craig D. Ellermeier
    University of Iowa

    History

    Received: 17 May 2021
    Accepted: 19 May 2021
    Published online: 9 June 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. bacteriophage
    2. Alteromonas
    3. auxiliary metabolic genes
    4. comparative genomic analysis
    5. phage taxonomy
    6. receptor binding protein

    Contributors

    Authors

    Ruijie Ma
    State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, College of Ocean and Earth Sciences, Institute of Marine Microbes and Ecospheres, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
    Jiayong Lai
    College of Ocean and Earth Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
    Xiaowei Chen
    State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, College of Ocean and Earth Sciences, Institute of Marine Microbes and Ecospheres, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
    Long Wang
    State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, College of Ocean and Earth Sciences, Institute of Marine Microbes and Ecospheres, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
    Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, China
    Yahui Yang
    State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, College of Ocean and Earth Sciences, Institute of Marine Microbes and Ecospheres, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
    Shuzhen Wei
    State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, College of Ocean and Earth Sciences, Institute of Marine Microbes and Ecospheres, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
    Nianzhi Jiao
    State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, College of Ocean and Earth Sciences, Institute of Marine Microbes and Ecospheres, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
    State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, College of Ocean and Earth Sciences, Institute of Marine Microbes and Ecospheres, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
    Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, China

    Editor

    Craig D. Ellermeier
    Editor
    University of Iowa

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSphereArticle
    COVID-19: Learning from Lessons To Guide Treatment and Prevention Interventions

    COVID-19: Learning from Lessons To Guide Treatment and Prevention Interventions

    ABSTRACT

    Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by the novel coronavirus severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and first emerged in December 2019 in Wuhan, Hubei province, China. Since then, the virus has rapidly spread to many countries. While the outbreak in China appears to be in decline, the disease has spread across the world, with a daily increase in the number of confirmed cases and infection-related deaths. Here, we highlight (i) the lessons that have been learnt so far and how they will benefit reducing the impact of COVID-19 disease and (ii) an update on the status of drug treatment and vaccine development to prevent COVID-19 and potential future related pandemics. Although the mortality rate is clearly higher than for influenza, the rate does seem to vary from country to country, possibly reflecting differences in how rapidly local health authorities respond to isolate and effectively care for the affected population. Drugs are urgently needed for both prophylaxis and the treatment of severely ill patients; however, no proven effective therapies for SARS-CoV-2 currently exist. A number of drugs that have been approved for other diseases are being tested for the treatment of COVID-19 patients, but there is an absence of data from appropriately designed clinical trials showing that these drugs, either alone or in combination, will prove effective. There is also a global urgency to develop a vaccine against COVID-19, but development and appropriate testing will take at least a year before such a vaccine will be globally available. This review summarizes the lessons learnt so far from the COVID-19 pandemic, examines the evidence regarding the drugs that are being tested for the treatment of COVID19, and describes the progress made in efforts to develop an effective vaccine.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Morens DM, Daszak P, Taubenberger JK. 2020. Escaping Pandora’s box – another novel coronavirus. N Engl J Med 382:1293–1295.
    2.
    Worldometers.info. 2020. https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/. Accessed 5 May 2020.
    3.
    Johns Hopkins University of Medicine Coronavirus Research Center. 2020. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html. Accessed 5 May 2020.
    4.
    World Health Organization. 2020. WHO coronavirus disease (COVID-19) dashboard. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. https://covid19.who.int/. Accessed 5 May 2020.
    5.
    Yang W, Zhongjie Li Z, Lan Y, Wang J, Ma J, Lianmei J, Qiao S, Wei L, Shengjie L, Yilan L, Hu W. 2011. A nationwide Web-based automated system for early outbreak detection and rapid response in China. Western Pac Surveill Response J 2:10–15.
    6.
    Singhal T. 2020. A review of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Indian J Pediatr 87:281–286.
    7.
    Lauer SA, Grantz KH, Bi Q, Jones FK, Zheng Q, Meredith HR, Azman AS, Reich NG, Lessler J. 10 March 2020, posting date. The incubation period of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from publicly reported confirmed cases: estimation and application. Ann Intern Med doi:
    8.
    He X, Lau EHY, Wu P, Deng X, Wang J, Hao X, Lau YC, Wong JY, Guan Y, Tan X, Mo X, Chen Y, Liao B, Chen W, Hu F, Zhang Q, Zhong M, Wu Y, Zhao L, Zhang F, Cowling BJ, Li F, Leung GM. 15 April 2020, posting date. Temporal dynamics in viral shedding and transmissibility of COVID-19. Nat Med doi:
    9.
    World Health Organization. 2020. Report of the WHO-China Joint Mission on Coronavirus. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/who-china-joint-mission-on-covid-19-final-report.pdf. Accessed 23 March 2020.
    10.
    Yang W, Cao Q, Qin L, Wang X, Cheng Z, Pan A, Dai J, Sun Q, Zhao F, Qu J, Yan F. 2020. Clinical characteristics and imaging manifestations of the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a multi-center study in Wenzhou city, Zhejiang, China. J Infect 80:388–393.
    11.
    Gautier JF, Ravussin Y. 2020. A new symptom of COVID-19: loss of taste and smell. Obesity (Silver Spring) 28:848.
    12.
    Zheng YY, Ma YT, Zhang JY, Xie X. 2020. COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system. Nat Rev Cardiol 17:259–260.
    13.
    Mizumoto K, Chowell G. 13 March 2020, posting date. Estimating risk for death from 2019 novel coronavirus disease, China, January-February 2020. Emerg Infect Dis doi:
    14.
    Weston S, Frieman MB. 2020. COVID-19: knowns, unknowns, and questions. mSphere 5:e00203-20.
    15.
    Van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris DH, Holbrook MG, Gamble A, Williamson NM, Tamin A, Harcourt JL, Thornburg NJ, Gerber SI, Lloyd-Smith JO, de Wit E, Munster VJ. 17 March 2020, posting date. Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. N Engl J Med doi:
    16.
    Regan H, Griffiths J, Culver D, Guy J. 2020. Wuhan virus spreads as China puts cities on lockdown and scraps New Year celebrations. Cable News Network (CNN), New York, NY. https://edition.cnn.com/2020/01/23/china/wuhan-coronavirus-update-intl-hnk/index.html. Accessed 17 March 2020.
    17.
    Wang CJ, Ng CY, Brook RH. 3 March 2020, posting date. Response to COVID-19 in Taiwan: big data analytics, new technology, and proactive testing. JAMA doi:
    18.
    Knight W. 15 March 2020. Phones could track the spread of COVID-19. Is it a good idea? Wired, New York, NY. https://www.wired.com/story/phones-track-spread-covid19-good-idea/. Accessed 2 April 2020.
    19.
    Onder G, Rezza G, Brusaferro S. 23 March 2020, posting date. Case-fatality rate and characteristics of patients dying in relation to COVID-19 in Italy. JAMA doi:
    20.
    Tondo L. 18 March 2020. Scientists say mass tests in Italian town have halted Covid-19 there. Guardian News & Media Limited, London, United Kingdom. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/18/scientists-say-mass-tests-in-italian-town-have-halted-covid-19.
    21.
    Nia OT. 31 March 2020. What’s behind Germany’s low coronavirus death rate? Early mass testing, good healthcare system seen as key factors in fighting off COVID-19. Anadolu Agency, Ankara, Turkey. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/what-s-behind-germanys-low-coronavirus-death-rate/1786296#!. Accessed 1 April 2020.
    22.
    The New York Times. 2020. Coronavirus live updates. The New York Times, New York, NY. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/08/us/coronavirus-live-updates.html. Accessed 18 April 2020.
    23.
    Tang X, Wu C, Li X, Song Y, Yao X, Wu X, Duan Y, Zhang H, Wang Y, Qian Z, Cui J, Lu J. 3 March 2020, posting date. On the origin and continuing evolution of SARS-CoV-2. Nat Sci Rev doi:
    24.
    Miller A, Reandelar MJ, Fasciglione K, Roumenova V, Li Y, Otazu GH. 28 March 2020, posting date. Correlation between universal BCG vaccination policy and reduced morbidity and mortality for COVID-19: an epidemiological study. medRxiv Preprint https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.24.20042937.
    25.
    Feng S, Shen C, Xia N, Song W, Fan M, Cowling BJ. 2020. Rational use of face masks in the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Respir Med 8:434–436.
    26.
    Leung NHL, Chu DKW, Shiu EYC, Chan KH, McDevitt JJ, Hau BJP, Yen HL, Li Y, Ip DKM, Peiris JSM, Seto WH, Leung GM, Milton DK, Cowling BJ. 3 April 2020, posting date. Respiratory virus shedding in exhaled breath and efficacy of face masks. Nat Med doi:
    27.
    Xiong C, Jiang L, Chen Y, Jiang Q. 2020. Evolution and variation of 2019-novel coronavirus. bioRxiv doi:
    28.
    Chan JF, Kok KH, Zhu Z, Chu H, To KK, Yuan S, Yuen KY. 2020. Genomic characterization of the 2019 novel human-pathogenic coronavirus isolated from a patient with atypical pneumonia after visiting Wuhan. Emerg Microbes Infect 9:221–236.
    29.
    Ou X, Liu Y, Lei X, Li P, Mi D, Ren L, Guo L, Guo R, Chen T, Hu J, Xiang Z, Mu Z, Chen X, Chen J, Hu K, Jin Q, Wang J, Qian Z. 2020. Characterization of spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 on virus entry and its immune cross-reactivity with SARS-CoV. Nat Commun 11:1620.
    30.
    Thanh Le T, Andreadakis Z, Kumar A, Gomez Roman R, Tollefsen S, Saville M, Mayhew S. 9 April 2020, posting date. The COVID-19 vaccine development landscape. Nat Drug Disc doi:
    31.
    Dong L, Hu S, Gao J. 2020. Discovering drugs to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Drug Discov Ther 14:58–60.
    32.
    Arabi YM, Asseri A, Webb S, Marshall J, Al Moamary MS. 2020. Clinical trials for coronavirus disease 2019: what is being evaluated and what is not. Ann Thorac Med 15:49–51.
    33.
    Jiang S. 2020. Don’t rush to deploy COVID-19 vaccines without sufficient safety guarantees. Nature 579:321.
    34.
    Burkard C, Verheije MH, Wicht O, van Kasteren SI, van Kuppeveld FJ, Haagmans BL, Pelkmans L, Rottier PJ, Bosch BJ, de Haan CA. 2014. Coronavirus cell entry occurs through the endo-lysosomal pathway in a proteolysis-dependent manner. PLoS Pathog 10:e1004502.
    35.
    Vincent MJ, Bergeron E, Benjannet S, Erickson BR, Rollin PE, Ksiazek TG, Seidah NG, Nichol ST. 2005. Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread. Virol J 2:69.
    36.
    Savarino A, Boelaert JR, Cassone A, Majori G, Cauda R. 2003. Effects of chloroquine on viral infections: an old drug against today’s diseases? Lancet Infect Dis 3:722–727.
    37.
    Gao J, Tian Z, Yang X. 2020. Breakthrough: chloroquine phosphate has shown apparent efficacy in treatment of COVID-19 associated pneumonia in clinical studies. Biosci Trends 14:72–73.
    38.
    Gautret P, Lagier JP, Parola P, Hoang VT, Meddeb L, Mailhe M, Doudier B, Courjon J, Giordanengo V, Vieira VE, Dupont HT, Honoré S, Colson P, Chabrière E, La Scola B, Rolain JM, Brouqui P, Raoult D. 20 March 2020, posting date. Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial. Int J Antimicrob Agents doi:
    39.
    Inserm Press Office. 22 March 2020. Launch of a European clinical trial against COVID-19. Inserm, Paris, France. https://presse.inserm.fr/en/launch-of-a-european-clinical-trial-against-covid-19/38737/. Accessed 3 April 2020.
    40.
    Tang W, Cao Z, Han M, Wang Z, Chen J, Sun W, Wu Y, Xiao W, Liu S, Chen E, Chen W, Wang X, Yang J, Lin J, Zhao Q, Yan Y, Xie Z, Li D, Yang Y, Liu L, Qu J, Ning G, Shi G, Xie Q. 2020. Hydroxychloroquine in patients with COVID-19: an open-label, randomized, controlled trial. medRxiv Preprint https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.10.20060558v1.
    41.
    Sorrell FJ, Szklarz M, Azeez KRA, Elkins JM, Knapp S. 2016. Family-wide structural analysis of human Numb-associated protein kinases. Structure 24:401–411.
    42.
    Richardson P, Griffin I, Tucker C, Smith D, Oechsle O, Phelan A, Stebbing J. 2020. Baricitinib as potential treatment for 2019-nCoV acute respiratory disease. Lancet 395:e30–e31.
    43.
    Agostini ML, Andres EL, Sims AC, Graham RL, Sheahan TP, Lu X, Smith EC, Case JB, Feng JY, Jordan R, Ray AS, Cihlar T, Siegel D, Mackman RL, Clarke MO, Baric RS, Denison MR. 2018. Coronavirus susceptibility to the antiviral remedesivir (GS-5734) is mediated by the viral polymerase and the proofreading exoribonuclease. mBio 9:e00221-18.
    44.
    Grein J, Ohmagari N, Shin D, Diaz G, Asperges E, Castagna A. 10 April 2020, posting date. Compassionate use of remdesivir for patients with severe Covid-19. N Engl J Med doi:
    45.
    Sheahan TP, Sims AC, Graham RL, Menachery VD, Gralinski LE, Case JB, Leist SR, Pyrc K, Feng JY, Trantcheva I, Bannister R, Park Y, Babusis D, Clarke MO, Mackman RL, Spahn JE, Palmiotti CA, Siegel D, Ray AS, Cihlar T, Jordan R, Denison MR, Baric RS. 2017. Broad-spectrum antiviral GS-5734 inhibits both epidemic and zoonotic coronaviruses. Sci Transl Med 9:eaal3653.
    46.
    Arabi YM, Asiri AY, Assiri AM, Aziz Jokhdar HA, Alothma A, Balkhy HH, AlJohani S, Al Harbi S, Kojan S, Al Jeraisy M, Deeb AM, Memish ZA, Ghazal S, Al Faraj S, Al-Hameed F, AlSaedi A, Mandourah Y, Al Mekhlafi GA, Sherbeeni NM, Elzein FE, Almotairi A, Al Bshabshe A, Kharaba A, Jose J, Al Harthy A, Al Sulaiman M, Mady A, Fowler RA, Fowler RA, Hayden FG, Al-Dawood A, Abdelzaher M, Bajhmom W, Hussein MA, the Saudi Critical Care Trials group. 2020. Treatment of Middle East respiratory syndrome with a combination of lopinavir/ritonavir and interferon-β1b (MIRACLE trial): statistical analysis plan for a recursive two-stage group sequential randomized controlled trial. Trials 21:8.
    47.
    Yao TT, Qian JD, Zhu WY, Wang Y, Wang GQ. 2020. A systematic review of lopinavir therapy for SARS coronavirus and MERS coronavirus – a possible reference for coronavirus disease-19 treatment option. J Med Virol 92:556–563.
    48.
    Lim J, Jeon S, Shin HY, Kim MJ, Seong YM, Lee WJ, Choe KW, Kang YM, Lee B, Park SJ. 2020. Case of the index patient who caused tertiary transmission of COVID-19 infection in Korea: the application of lopinavir/ritonavir for the treatment of COVID-19 infected pneumonia monitored by quantitative RT-PCR. J Korean Med Sci 35:e79.
    49.
    Cao B, Wang Y, Wen D, Wang J, Fan G, Ruan L, Song B, Cai Y, Wei M, Li X, Xia J, Chen N, Xiang J, Yu T, Bai T, Xie X, Zhang L, Li C, Yuan Y, Chen H, Li H, Huang H, Tu S, Gong F, Liu Y, Wei Y, Dong C, Zhou F, Gu X, Xu J, Liu Z, Zhang Y, Li H, Shang L, Wang K, Li K, Zhou X, Dong X, Qu Z, Lu S, Hu X, Ruan S, Luo S, Wu J, Peng L, Cheng F, Pan L, Zou J, Jia C, Wang J, et al. 18 March 2020, posting date. A trial of lopinavir–ritonavir in adults hospitalized with severe Covid-19. N Engl J Med doi:
    50.
    Bryner J. 2020. Flu drug used in Japan shows promise in treating COVID-19. Live Science, New York, NY. https://www.livescience.com/flu-drug-could-treat-coronavirus.html.
    51.
    Momekov G, Momekova D. 2020. Ivermectin as a potential COVID-19 treatment from the pharmacokinetic point of view. medRxiv Preprint https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.11.20061804.
    52.
    Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S, Krüger N, Herrler T, Erichsen S, Schiergens TS, Herrler G, Wu N-H, Nitsche A, Müller MA, Drosten C, Pöhlmann S. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell 181:271–280.e8.
    53.
    Parsons L. 18 March 2020. UK biotech Synairgen to begin COVID-19 trial of lead candidate. https://www.pmlive.com/pharma_news/uk_biotech_synairgen_to_begin_covid-19_trial_of_lead_candidate_1329470.
    54.
    Chan KW, Wong VT, Tang S. 2020. COVID-19: an update on the epidemiological, clinical, preventive and therapeutic evidence and guidelines of integrative Chinese-Western medicine for the management of 2019 novel coronavirus disease. Am J Chin Med 13:1–26.
    55.
    Casadevall A, Pirofski L-A. 13 March 2020, posting date. The convalescent sera option for containing COVID-19. J Clin Invest doi:
    56.
    Hung IF, To KK, Lee C-K, Lee K-L, Chan K, Yan W-W, Liu R, Watt C-L, Chan W-M, Lai K-Y, Koo C-K, Buckley T, Chow F-L, Wong K-K, Chan H-S, Ching C-K, Tang BS, Lau CC, Li IW, Liu S-H, Chan K-H, Lin C-K, Yuen K-Y. 2011. Convalescent plasma treatment reduced mortality in patients with severe pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 virus infection. Clin Infect Dis 52:447–456.
    57.
    Luo P, Liu Y, Qui L, Liu X, Liu D, Li J. 6 March 2020, posting date. Tocilizumab treatment in COVID-19: a single center experience. J Med Virol doi:
    58.
    Zhang H, Penninger M, Li Y, Zhong N, Slutsky AS. 2020. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as a SARS-CoV-2 receptor: molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutic target. Intensive Care Med 46:586–590.
    59.
    Patel AB, Verma A. 24 March 2020, posting date. COVID-19 and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers: what is the evidence? JAMA doi:
    60.
    Vaduganathan M, Vardeny O, Michel T, McMurray JJV, Pfeffer MA, Solomon SD. 2020. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors in patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med 382:1653–1659.
    61.
    Liu J, Manheimer E, Shi Y, Gluud C. 2004. Chinese herbal medicine for severe acute respiratory syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Altern Complement Med 10:1041–1051.
    62.
    Yang Y, Islam MM, Wang J, Li Y, Chen X. 2020. Traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of patients infected with 2019-new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2): a review and perspective. Int J Biol Sci 16:1708–1717.
    63.
    Prajapat M, Sarma P, Shekhar N, Avti P, Sinha S, Kaur H, Kumar S, Bhattacharyya A, Kumar H, Bansal S, Medhi B. 2020. Drug targets for corona virus: a systemic review. Indian J Pharmacol 52:56–65.
    64.
    Melville NA, Nainggolan L. 2020. Are warnings against NSAIDs in COVID-19 warranted? https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/926940.
    65.
    Thomas D, Ali Z, Zachariah S, Sundararaj KGS, Van Cuyk M, Cooper JC. 2017. Coxibs refocus attention on the cardiovascular risks of non-aspirin NSAIDs. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 17:343–346.
    66.
    Thevarajan I, Nguyen THO, Koutsakos M, Druce J, Caly L, van de Sandt CE, Jia X, Nicholson S, Catton M, Cowie B, Tong SYC, Lewin SR, Kedzierska K. 2020. Breadth of concomitant immune responses prior to patient recovery: a case report of non-severe COVID-19. Nat Med 26:453–455.
    67.
    Bao L, Deng W, Gao H, Xiao C, Liu J, Xue J, Lv Q, Liu J, Yu P, Xu Y, Q F, Qu Y, Li F, Xiang Z, Yu U, Gong S, Liu M, Wang G, Wang S, Song Z, Zhao W, Han Y, Zhao L, Liu X, Wei Q, Qin C. 2020. Reinfection could not occur in SARS-CoV-2 infected rhesus macaques. bioRxiv doi:
    68.
    Walls AC, Park YJ, Tortorici MA, Wall A, McGuire AT, Veesler D. 2020. Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. Cell 181:281–282.
    69.
    Shen C, Wang Z, Zhao F, Yang Y, Li J, Yuan J, Wang F, Li D, Yang M, Xing L, Wei J, Xiao H, Yang Y, Qu J, Qing L, Chen L, Xu Z, Peng L, Li Y, Zheng H, Feng C, Huang K, Jiang Y, Liu D, Zhang Z, Liu Y, Liu L. 27 March 2020, posting date. Treatment of 5 critically ill patients with COVID19 with convalescent plasma. JAMA doi:
    70.
    Miller RW. 17 March 2020. Photos: volunteers in Seattle get first doses of trial vaccine for COVID-19. USA Today, Tysons Corner, VA. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2020/03/17/coronavirus-vaccine-trial-underway-seattle-photos-first-shots/5065909002/. Accessed 23 March 2020.
    71.
    Moderna, Inc. 16 March 2020. Moderna announces first participant dosed in NIH-led phase 1 study of mRNA vaccine (mRNA-1273) against novel coronavirus. Moderna, Inc, Cambridge, MA. https://investors.modernatx.com/news-releases/news-release-details/moderna-announces-first-participant-dosed-nih-led-phase-1-study. Accessed 23 March 2020.
    72.
    CureVac AG. 15 March 2020. CureVac focuses on the development of mRNA-based coronavirus vaccine to protect people worldwide. CureVac AG, Tübingen, Germany. https://www.curevac.com/news/curevac-focuses-on-the-development-of-mrna-based-coronavirus-vaccine-to-protect-people-worldwide. Accessed 23 March 2020.
    73.
    Sample I. 19 March 2020. Trials to begin on Covid-19 vaccine in UK next month. Guardian News & Media Limited, London, United Kingdom. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/mar/19/uk-drive-develop-coronavirus-vaccine-science. Accessed 23 March 2020.
    74.
    Mak E. 18 March 2020. China approves first homegrown COVID-19 vaccine to enter clinical trials. https://www.bioworld.com/articles/433791-china-approves-first-homegrown-covid-19-vaccine-to-enter-clinical-trials. Accessed 23 March 2020.
    75.
    Gates B. 2015. The next epidemic–lessons from Ebola. N Engl J Med 372:1381–1384.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSphere
    Volume 5Number 324 June 2020
    eLocator: e00317-20
    Editor: Helene F. Rosenberg
    National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

    History

    Published online: 13 May 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. COVID-19
    2. drugs
    3. vaccines

    Contributors

    Authors

    Chris R. Triggle
    Department of Pharmacology, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar
    Devendra Bansal
    Ministry of Public Health, Doha, Qatar
    Elmoubasher Abu Baker Abd Farag
    Ministry of Public Health, Doha, Qatar
    Hong Ding
    Department of Pharmacology, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar
    Ali A. Sultan
    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, Doha, Qatar

    Editor

    Helene F. Rosenberg
    Editor
    National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Ali A. Sultan, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSphereArticle
    Influential Parameters for the Analysis of Intracellular Parasite Metabolomics

    Influential Parameters for the Analysis of Intracellular Parasite Metabolomics

    ABSTRACT

    Metabolomics is increasingly popular for the study of pathogens. For the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum, both targeted and untargeted metabolomics have improved our understanding of pathogenesis, host-parasite interactions, and antimalarial drug treatment and resistance. However, purification and analysis procedures for performing metabolomics on intracellular pathogens have not been explored. Here, we purified in vitro-grown ring-stage intraerythrocytic P. falciparum parasites for untargeted metabolomics studies; the small size of this developmental stage amplifies the challenges associated with metabolomics studies as the ratio between host and parasite biomass is maximized. Following metabolite identification and data preprocessing, we explored multiple confounding factors that influence data interpretation, including host contamination and normalization approaches (including double-stranded DNA, total protein, and parasite numbers). We conclude that normalization parameters have large effects on differential abundance analysis and recommend the thoughtful selection of these parameters. However, normalization does not remove the contribution from the parasite’s extracellular environment (culture media and host erythrocyte). In fact, we found that extraparasite material is as influential on the metabolome as treatment with a potent antimalarial drug with known metabolic effects (artemisinin). Because of this influence, we could not detect significant changes associated with drug treatment. Instead, we identified metabolites predictive of host and medium contamination that could be used to assess sample purification. Our analysis provides the first quantitative exploration of the effects of these factors on metabolomics data analysis; these findings provide a basis for development of improved experimental and analytical methods for future metabolomics studies of intracellular organisms.
    IMPORTANCE Molecular characterization of pathogens such as the malaria parasite can lead to improved biological understanding and novel treatment strategies. However, the distinctive biology of the Plasmodium parasite, including its repetitive genome and the requirement for growth within a host cell, hinders progress toward these goals. Untargeted metabolomics is a promising approach to learn about pathogen biology. By measuring many small molecules in the parasite at once, we gain a better understanding of important pathways that contribute to the parasite’s response to perturbations such as drug treatment. Although increasingly popular, approaches for intracellular parasite metabolomics and subsequent analysis are not well explored. The findings presented in this report emphasize the critical need for improvements in these areas to limit misinterpretation due to host metabolites and to standardize biological interpretation. Such improvements will aid both basic biological investigations and clinical efforts to understand important pathogens.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    WHO. 2015. Global technical strategy for malaria. World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland.
    2.
    Carey MA, Papin JA, Guler JL. 2017. Novel Plasmodium falciparum metabolic network reconstruction identifies shifts associated with clinical antimalarial resistance. BMC Genomics 18:543.
    3.
    Allman EL, Painter HJ, Samra J, Carrasquilla M, Llinás M. 2016. Metabolomic profiling of the malaria box reveals antimalarial target pathways. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:6635–6649.
    4.
    Babbitt SE, Altenhofen L, Cobbold SA, Istvan ES, Fennell C, Doerig C, Llinás M, Goldberg DE. 2012. Plasmodium falciparum responds to amino acid starvation by entering into a hibernatory state. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:E3278–E3287. doi:
    5.
    Creek DJ, Chua HH, Cobbold SA, Nijagal B, MacRae JI, Dickerman BK, Gilson PR, Ralph SA, McConville MJ. 2016. Metabolomics-based screening of the malaria box reveals both novel and established mechanisms of action. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:6650–6663.
    6.
    Olszewski KL, Morrisey JM, Wilinski D, Burns JM, Vaidya AB, Rabinowitz JD, Llinás M. 2009. Host-parasite interactions revealed by Plasmodium falciparum metabolomics. Cell Host Microbe 5:191–199.
    7.
    Park YH, Shi YP, Liang B, Medriano CAD, Jeon YH, Torres E, Uppal K, Slutsker L, Jones DP. 2015. High-resolution metabolomics to discover potential parasite-specific biomarkers in a Plasmodium falciparum erythrocytic stage culture system. Malar J 14:122.
    8.
    Parvazi S, Sadeghi S, Azadi M, Mohammadi M, Arjmand M, Vahabi F, Sadeghzadeh S, Zamani Z. 2016. The effect of aqueous extract of cinnamon on the metabolome of Plasmodium falciparum using 1HNMR spectroscopy. J Trop Med 2016:3174841. doi:
    9.
    Sana TR, Gordon DB, Fischer SM, Tichy SE, Kitagawa N, Lai C, Gosnell WL, Chang SP. 2013. Global mass spectrometry based metabolomics profiling of erythrocytes infected with Plasmodium falciparum. PLoS One 8:e60840.
    10.
    Sengupta A, Ghosh S, Das BK, Panda A, Tripathy R, Pied S, Ravindran B, Pathak S, Sharma S, Sonawat HM. 2016. Host metabolic responses to Plasmodium falciparum infections evaluated by 1H NMR metabolomics. Mol Biosyst 12:3324–3332.
    11.
    Teng R, Lehane AM, Winterberg M, Shafik SH, Summers RL, Martin RE, van Schalkwyk DA, Junankar PR, Kirk K. 2014. 1H-NMR metabolite profiles of different strains of Plasmodium falciparum. Biosci Rep 34:e00150.
    12.
    Siddiqui G, Srivastava A, Russell AS, Creek DJ. 2017. Multi-omics based identification of specific biochemical changes associated with PfKelch13-mutant artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum. J Infect Dis 215:1435–1444.
    13.
    Paul F, Roath S, Melville D, Warhurst DC, Osisanya JOS. 1981. Separation of malaria-infected erythrocytes from whole blood: use of a selective high-gradient magnetic separation technique. Lancet ii:70–71.
    14.
    Langreth SG, Jensen JB, Reese RT, Trager W. 1978. Fine structure of human malaria in vitro. J Protozool 25:443–452.
    15.
    Canham PB, Burton AC. 1968. Distribution of size and shape in populations of normal human red cells. Circ Res 22:405–422.
    16.
    Cobbold SA, Chua HH, Nijagal B, Creek DJ, Ralph SA, McConville MJ. 2016. Metabolic dysregulation induced in Plasmodium falciparum by dihydroartemisinin and other front-line antimalarial drugs. J Infect Dis 213:276–286.
    17.
    Chen N, LaCrue AN, Teuscher F, Waters NC, Gatton ML, Kyle DE, Cheng Q. 2014. Fatty acid synthesis and pyruvate metabolism pathways remain active in dihydroartemisinin-induced dormant ring stages of Plasmodium falciparum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:4773–4781.
    18.
    Cheng Q, Kyle DE, Gatton ML. 2012. Artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum: a process linked to dormancy? Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2:249–255.
    19.
    Peatey CL, Chavchich M, Chen N, Gresty KJ, Gray K, Gatton ML, Waters NC, Cheng Q. 2015. Mitochondrial membrane potential in a small subset of artemisinin-induced dormant Plasmodium falciparum parasites in vitro. J Infect Dis 212:426–434.
    20.
    Langreth SG. 1977. Electron microscope cytochemistry of host-parasite membrane interactions in malaria. Bull World Health Organ 55:171–178.
    21.
    Ejigu BA, Valkenborg D, Baggerman G, Vanaerschot M, Witters E, Dujardin JC, Burzykowski T, Berg M. 2013. Evaluation of normalization methods to pave the way towards large-scale LC-MS-based metabolomics profiling experiments. Omics 17:473–485.
    22.
    Kohl SM, Klein MS, Hochrein J, Oefner PJ, Spang R, Gronwald W. 2012. State-of-the art data normalization methods improve NMR-based metabolomic analysis. Metabolomics 8:146–160.
    23.
    Hoffmann R, Seidl T, Dugas M. 2002. Profound effect of normalization on detection of differentially expressed genes in oligonucleotide microarray data analysis. Genome Biol 3:RESEARCH0033. doi:
    24.
    Silva AM, Cordeiro-da-Silva A, Coombs GH. 2011. Metabolic variation during development in culture of Leishmania donovani promastigotes. PLoS Neglect Trop Dis 5:e1451.
    25.
    Silva LP, Lorenzi PL, Purwaha P, Yong V, Hawke DH, Weinstein JN. 2013. Measurement of DNA concentration as a normalization strategy for metabolomic data from adherent cell lines. Anal Chem 85:9536–9542.
    26.
    Medlock GL, Carey MA, McDuffie DG, Mundy MB, Giallourou N, Swann JR, Kolling G, Papin JA. 2018. Metabolic mechanisms of interaction within a defined gut microbiota. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/250860.
    27.
    Wu Y, Li L. 2016. Sample normalization methods in quantitative metabolomics. J Chromatogr A 1430:80–95.
    28.
    Janse CJ, van der Klooster PF, van der Kaay HJ, van der Ploeg M, Overdulve JP. 1986. DNA synthesis in Plasmodium berghei during asexual and sexual development. Mol Biochem Parasitol 20:173–182.
    29.
    Wang Y, Liu H, McKenzie G, Witting PK, Stasch JP, Hahn M, Changsirivathanathamrong D, Wu BJ, Ball HJ, Thomas SR, Kapoor V, Celermajer DS, Mellor AL, Keaney JF, Hunt NH, Stocker R. 2010. Kynurenine is an endothelium-derived relaxing factor produced during inflammation. Nat Med 16:279–285.
    30.
    Hartai Z, Klivenyi P, Janaky T, Penke B, Dux L, Vecsei L. 2005. Kynurenine metabolism in plasma and in red blood cells in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Sci 239:31–35.
    31.
    Ginsburg H. 2006. Progress in in silico functional genomics: the malaria metabolic pathways database. Trends Parasitol 22:238–240.
    32.
    Olszewski KL, Mather MW, Morrisey JM, Garcia BA, Vaidya AB, Rabinowitz JD, Llinás M. 2013. Retraction: branched tricarboxylic acid metabolism in Plasmodium falciparum. Nature 497:652.
    33.
    Rojo D, Canuto GA, Castilho-Martins EA, Tavares MF, Barbas C, López-Gonzálvez Á, Rivas L. 2015. A multiplatform metabolomic approach to the basis of antimonial action and resistance in Leishmania infantum. PLoS One 10:e0130675.
    34.
    Westrop GD, Williams RA, Wang L, Zhang T, Watson DG, Silva AM, Coombs GH. 2015. Metabolomic analyses of Leishmania reveal multiple species differences and large differences in amino acid metabolism. PLoS One 10:e0136891.
    35.
    Akpunarlieva S, Weidt S, Lamasudin D, Naula C, Henderson D, Barrett M, Burgess K, Burchmore R. 2017. Integration of proteomics and metabolomics to elucidate metabolic adaptation in Leishmania. J Proteom 155:85–98.
    36.
    Trager W, Jensen JB. 1976. Human malaria parasites in continuous culture. Science 193:673–675.
    37.
    Lambros C, Vanderberg JP. 1979. Synchronization of Plasmodium falciparum erythrocytic stages in culture. J Parasitol 65:418–420.
    38.
    Doolan DL (ed). 2002. Malaria methods and protocols. Humana Press, New York, NY.
    39.
    Bei AK, Desimone TM, Badiane AS, Ahouidi AD, Dieye T, Ndiaye D, Sarr O, Ndir O, Mboup S, Duraisingh MT. 2010. A flow cytometry-based assay for measuring invasion of red blood cells by Plasmodium falciparum. Am J Hematol 85:234–237.
    40.
    Xia J, Wishart DS. 2011. Web-based inference of biological patterns, functions and pathways from metabolomic data using MetaboAnalyst. Nat Protoc 6:743–760.
    41.
    Sugimoto M, Kawakami M, Robert M, Soga T, Tomita M. 2012. Bioinformatics tools for mass spectroscopy-based metabolomic data processing and analysis. Curr Bioinform 7:96–108.
    42.
    Evans AM, DeHaven CD, Barrett T, Mitchell M, Milgram E. 2009. Integrated, nontargeted ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry platform for the identification and relative quantification of the small-molecule complement of biological systems. Anal Chem 81:6656–6667.
    43.
    Wickham H. 2016. Tidyverse: easily install and load 'tidyverse' packages (software).
    44.
    Xie Y. 2014. Knitr: a comprehensive tool for reproducible research in R, p 1–31. In Stodden V, Leisch F, Peng RD (ed), Implementing reproducible research, vol 1. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
    45.
    Wickham H. 2007. Reshaping data with the reshape package. J Stat Softw 21:1–20. https://www.jstatsoft.org/v021/i12.
    46.
    Borchers HW. 2015. Pracma: practical numerical math functions. R package version 1.8.3. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pracma/index.html.
    47.
    Augie B. 2017. gridExtra: miscellaneous functions for “grid” graphics. R package version 2.2.1.
    48.
    Chang W. 2014. extrafont: tools for using fonts. R package version 0.17. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=extrafont.
    49.
    Luciani TJ, Decorde M, Lise V. 2014. A graphics device for R that uses the w3.org xml standard for scalable vector graphics. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RSvgDevice.
    50.
    Oksanen J, Oksanen FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn PR, Minchin R, O’Hara B, Simpson GL, Peter Solymos M, Stevens HH, Szoecs E, Wagner H. 2018. Vegan: community ecology package. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.
    51.
    Team RC. 2014. Language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
    52.
    Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 57:289–300. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2346101?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
    53.
    54.
    van den Berg RA, Hoefsloot HC, Westerhuis JA, Smilde AK, van der Werf MJ. 2006. Centering, scaling, and transformations: improving the biological information content of metabolomics data. BMC Genomics 7:142.
    55.
    Le Roch KG, Johnson JR, Florens L, Zhou Y, Santrosyan A, Grainger M, Yan SF, Williamson KC, Holder AA, Carucci DJ, Yates JR, III, Winzeler EA. 2004. Global analysis of transcript and protein levels across the Plasmodium falciparum life cycle. Genome Res 14:2308–2318.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSphere
    Volume 3Number 225 April 2018
    eLocator: e00097-18
    Editor: Ira J. Blader
    University at Buffalo

    History

    Received: 22 February 2018
    Accepted: 26 March 2018
    Published online: 18 April 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. Plasmodium falciparum
    2. apicomplexan parasites
    3. intracellular pathogen
    4. metabolomics

    Contributors

    Authors

    Maureen A. Carey
    Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Cancer Biology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
    Vincent Covelli
    Division of Infectious Disease and International Health, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
    Present address: Vincent Covelli, Department of Infectious Diseases, Providence-St. Joseph Health, Victorville, California, USA; Jessica G. Cooper, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.
    Audrey Brown
    Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
    Gregory L. Medlock
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
    Mareike Haaren
    Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
    Jessica G. Cooper
    Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
    Present address: Vincent Covelli, Department of Infectious Diseases, Providence-St. Joseph Health, Victorville, California, USA; Jessica G. Cooper, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.
    Jason A. Papin
    Division of Infectious Disease and International Health, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
    Jennifer L. Guler
    Division of Infectious Disease and International Health, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
    Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA

    Editor

    Ira J. Blader
    Editor
    University at Buffalo

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Jennifer L. Guler, [email protected].
    M.A.C. and V.C. are co-first authors.

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSphereArticle
    Antibiotic Stimulation of a Bacillus subtilis Migratory Response

    Antibiotic Stimulation of a Bacillus subtilis Migratory Response

    ABSTRACT

    Competitive interactions between bacteria reveal physiological adaptations that benefit fitness. Bacillus subtilis is a Gram-positive species with several adaptive mechanisms for competition and environmental stress. Biofilm formation, sporulation, and motility are the outcomes of widespread changes in a population of B. subtilis. These changes emerge from complex, regulated pathways for adapting to external stresses, including competition from other species. To identify competition-specific functions, we cultured B. subtilis with multiple species of Streptomyces and observed altered patterns of growth for each organism. In particular, when plated on agar medium near Streptomyces venezuelae, B. subtilis initiates a robust and reproducible mobile response. To investigate the mechanistic basis for the interaction, we determined the type of motility used by B. subtilis and isolated inducing metabolites produced by S. venezuelae. Bacillus subtilis has three defined forms of motility: swimming, swarming, and sliding. Streptomyces venezuelae induced sliding motility specifically in our experiments. The inducing agents produced by S. venezuelae were identified as chloramphenicol and a brominated derivative at subinhibitory concentrations. Upon further characterization of the mobile response, our results demonstrated that subinhibitory concentrations of chloramphenicol, erythromycin, tetracycline, and spectinomycin all activate a sliding motility response by B. subtilis. Our data are consistent with sliding motility initiating under conditions of protein translation stress. This report underscores the importance of hormesis as an early warning system for potential bacterial competitors and antibiotic exposure.
    IMPORTANCE Antibiotic resistance is a major challenge for the effective treatment of infectious diseases. Identifying adaptive mechanisms that bacteria use to survive low levels of antibiotic stress is important for understanding pathways to antibiotic resistance. Furthermore, little is known about the effects of individual bacterial interactions on multispecies communities. This work demonstrates that subinhibitory amounts of some antibiotics produced by streptomycetes induce active motility in B. subtilis, which may alter species interaction dynamics among species-diverse bacterial communities in natural environments. The use of antibiotics at subinhibitory concentrations results in many changes in bacteria, including changes in biofilm formation, small-colony variants, formation of persisters, and motility. Identifying the mechanistic bases of these adaptations is crucial for understanding how bacterial communities are impacted by antibiotics.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Aoki SK, Pamma R, Hernday AD, Bickham JE, Braaten BA, Low DA. 2005. Contact-dependent inhibition of growth in Escherichia coli. Science 309:1245–1248.
    2.
    Basler M, Ho BT, Mekalanos JJ. 2013. Tit-for-tat: type VI secretion system counterattack during bacterial cell-cell interactions. Cell 152:884–894.
    3.
    Murdoch SL, Trunk K, English G, Fritsch MJ, Pourkarimi E, Coulthurst SJ. 2011. The opportunistic pathogen Serratia marcescens utilizes type VI secretion to target bacterial competitors. J Bacteriol 193:6057–6069.
    4.
    Cornforth DM, Foster KR. 2013. Competition sensing: the social side of bacterial stress responses. Nat Rev Microbiol 11:285–293.
    5.
    Brunelle BW, Bearson BL, Bearson SMD. 2015. Chloramphenicol and tetracycline decrease motility and increase invasion and attachment gene expression in specific isolates of multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Front Microbiol 5:801.
    6.
    Müller S, Strack SN, Hoefler BC, Straight PD, Kearns DB, Kirby JR. 2014. Bacillaene and sporulation protect Bacillus subtilis from predation by Myxococcus xanthus. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:5603–5610.
    7.
    Traxler MF, Kolter R. 2015. Natural products in soil microbe interactions and evolution. Nat Prod Rep 32:956–970.
    8.
    Oliveira NM, Oliveria NM, Martinez-Garcia E, Xavier J, Durham WM, Kolter R, Kim W, Foster KR. 2015. Biofilm formation as a response to ecological competition. PLoS Biol 13:e1002191.
    9.
    Hoefler BC, Gorzelnik KV, Yang JY, Hendricks N, Dorrestein PC, Straight PD. 2012. Enzymatic resistance to the lipopeptide surfactin as identified through imaging mass spectrometry of bacterial competition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:13082–13087.
    10.
    Molina L, Constantinescu F, Michel L, Reimmann C, Duffy B, Défago G. 2003. Degradation of pathogen quorum-sensing molecules by soil bacteria: a preventive and curative biological control mechanism. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 45:71–81.
    11.
    Kelsic ED, Zhao J, Vetsigian K, Kishony R. 2015. Counteraction of antibiotic production and degradation stabilizes microbial communities. Nature 521:516–519.
    12.
    Lewis K. 2010. Persister cells. Annu Rev Microbiol 64:357–372.
    13.
    Oh D-C, Kauffman CA, Jensen PR, Fenical W. 2007. Induced production of emericellamides A and B from the marine-derived fungus Emericella sp. in competing co-culture. J Nat Prod 70:515–520.
    14.
    Oh D-C, Jensen PR, Kauffman CA, Fenical W. 2005. Libertellenones A−D: induction of cytotoxic diterpenoid biosynthesis by marine microbial competition. Bioorg Med Chem 13:5267–5273.
    15.
    Traxler MF, Watrous JD, Alexandrov T, Dorrestein PC, Kolter R. 2013. Interspecies interactions stimulate diversification of the Streptomyces coelicolor secreted metabolome. mBio 4:e00459-13.
    16.
    Schroeckh V, Scherlach K, Nützmann HW, Shelest E, Schmidt-Heck W, Schuemann J, Martin K, Hertweck C, Brakhage AA. 2009. Intimate bacterial-fungal interaction triggers biosynthesis of archetypal polyketides in Aspergillus nidulans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:14558–14563.
    17.
    Flannagan RS, Valvano MA, Koval SF. 2004. Downregulation of the motA gene delays the escape of the obligate predator Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus 109J from bdelloplasts of bacterial prey cells. Microbiology 150:649–656.
    18.
    An D, Danhorn T, Fuqua C, Parsek MR. 2006. Quorum sensing and motility mediate interactions between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Agrobacterium tumefaciens in biofilm cocultures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:3828–3833.
    19.
    Stubbendieck RM, Straight PD. 2015. Escape from lethal bacterial competition through coupled activation of antibiotic resistance and a mobilized subpopulation. PLoS Genet 11:e1005722.
    20.
    Jones SE, Ho L, Rees CA, Hill JE, Nodwell JR, Elliot MA. 2017. Streptomyces exploration is triggered by fungal interactions and volatile signals. Elife 6:e21738.
    21.
    Wadhams GH, Armitage JP. 2004. Making sense of it all: bacterial chemotaxis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5:1024–1037.
    22.
    Linares JF, Gustafsson I, Baquero F, Martinez JL. 2006. Antibiotics as intermicrobial signaling agents instead of weapons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:19484–19489.
    23.
    Lai S, Tremblay J, Déziel E. 2009. Swarming motility: a multicellular behaviour conferring antimicrobial resistance. Environ Microbiol 11:126–136.
    24.
    Butler MT, Wang Q, Harshey RM. 2010. Cell density and mobility protect swarming bacteria against antibiotics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:3776–3781.
    25.
    Kearns DB. 2010. A field guide to bacterial swarming motility. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:634–644.
    26.
    Kearns DB, Losick R. 2003. Swarming motility in undomesticated Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol 49:581–590.
    27.
    Calvio C, Celandroni F, Ghelardi E, Amati G, Salvetti S, Ceciliani F, Galizzi A, Senesi S. 2005. Swarming differentiation and swimming motility in Bacillus subtilis are controlled by swrA, a newly identified dicistronic operon. J Bacteriol 187:5356–5366.
    28.
    Kinsinger RF, Kearns DB, Hale M, Fall R. 2005. Genetic requirements for potassium ion-dependent colony spreading in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 187:8462–8469.
    29.
    Kinsinger RF, Shirk MC, Fall R. 2003. Rapid surface motility in Bacillus subtilis is dependent on extracellular surfactin and potassium ion. J Bacteriol 185:5627–5631.
    30.
    van Gestel J, Vlamakis H, Kolter R. 2015. From cell differentiation to cell collectives: Bacillus subtilis uses division of labor to migrate. PLoS Biol 13:e1002141.
    31.
    Grau RR, de Oña P, Kunert M, Leñini C, Gallegos-Monterrosa R, Mhatre E, Vileta D, Donato V, Hölscher T, Boland W, Kuipers OP, Kovács ÁT. 2015. A duo of potassium-responsive histidine kinases govern the multicellular destiny of Bacillus subtilis. mBio 6:e00581.
    32.
    Yim G, Wang HH, Davies J. 2007. Antibiotics as signalling molecules. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 362:1195–1200.
    33.
    Davies J, Spiegelman GB, Yim G. 2006. The world of subinhibitory antibiotic concentrations. Curr Opin Microbiol 9:445–453.
    34.
    Hoffman LR, D’Argenio DA, MacCoss MJ, Zhang Z, Jones RA, Miller SI. 2005. Aminoglycoside antibiotics induce bacterial biofilm formation. Nature 436:1171–1175.
    35.
    Lin JT, Connelly MB, Amolo C, Otani S, Yaver DS. 2005. Global transcriptional response of Bacillus subtilis to treatment with subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics that inhibit protein synthesis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:1915–1926.
    36.
    Jones C, Allsopp L, Horlick J, Kulasekara H, Filloux A. 2013. Subinhibitory concentration of kanamycin induces the Pseudomonas aeruginosa type VI secretion system. PLoS One 8:e81132.
    37.
    Bleich R, Watrous JD, Dorrestein PC, Bowers AA, Shank EA. 2015. Thiopeptide antibiotics stimulate biofilm formation in Bacillus subtilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:3086–3091.
    38.
    Vargas-Bautista C, Rahlwes K, Straight P. 2014. Bacterial competition reveals differential regulation of the pks genes by Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 196:717–728.
    39.
    Branda SS, González-Pastor JE, Ben-Yehuda S, Losick R, Kolter R. 2001. Fruiting body formation by Bacillus subtilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:11621–11626.
    40.
    Fall R, Kearns DB, Nguyen T. 2006. A defined medium to investigate sliding motility in a Bacillus subtilis flagella-less mutant. BMC Microbiol 6:31.
    41.
    Joys TM, Frankel RW. 1967. Genetic control of flagellation in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 94:32–37.
    42.
    Iino T. 1977. Genetics of structure and function of bacterial flagella. Annu Rev Genet 11:161–182.
    43.
    Roux D, Cywes-Bentley C, Zhang YF, Pons S, Konkol M, Kearns DB, Little DJ, Howell PL, Skurnik D, Pier GB. 2015. Identification of poly-N-acetylglucosamine as a major polysaccharide component of the Bacillus subtilis biofilm matrix. J Biol Chem 290:19261–19272.
    44.
    Bald R, Erdmann VA, Pongs O. 1972. Irreversible binding of chloramphenicol analogues to E. coli ribosomes. FEBS Lett 28:149–152.
    45.
    Ehrlich J, Bartz QR, Smith RM, Joslyn DA, Burkholder PR. 1947. Chloromycetin, a new antibiotic from a soil actinomycete. Science 106:417.
    46.
    Ehrlich J, Gottlieb D, Burkholder PR, Anderson LE, Pridham TG. 1948. Streptomyces venezuelae, n. sp., the source of chloromycetin. J Bacteriol 56:467–477.
    47.
    Smith CG. 1958. Effect of halogens on the chloramphenicol fermentation. J Bacteriol 75:577–583.
    48.
    Wilson DN. 2014. Ribosome-targeting antibiotics and mechanisms of bacterial resistance. Nat Rev Microbiol 12:35–48.
    49.
    Weisblum B. 1995. Erythromycin resistance by ribosome modification. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 39:577–585.
    50.
    Carter AP, Clemons WM, Brodersen DE, Morgan-Warren RJ, Wimberly BT, Ramakrishnan V. 2000. Functional insights from the structure of the 30S ribosomal subunit and its interactions with antibiotics. Nature 407:340–348.
    51.
    Pioletti M, Schlünzen F, Harms J, Zarivach R, Glühmann M, Avila H, Bashan A, Bartels H, Auerbach T, Jacobi C, Hartsch T, Yonath A, Franceschi F. 2001. Crystal structures of complexes of the small ribosomal subunit with tetracycline, edeine and IF3. EMBO J 20:1829–1839.
    52.
    Shaw WV, Brodsky RF. 1968. Characterization of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase from chloramphenicol-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 95:28–36.
    53.
    Leslie AG, Moody PC, Shaw WV. 1988. Structure of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase at 1.75-A resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 85:4133–4137.
    54.
    Bulkley D, Innis CA, Blaha G, Steitz TA. 2010. Revisiting the structures of several antibiotics bound to the bacterial ribosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:17158–17163.
    55.
    Zhong P, Pratt SD, Edalji RP, Walter KA, Holzman TF, Shivakumar AG, Katz L. 1995. Substrate requirements for ErmC’ methyltransferase activity. J Bacteriol 177:4327–4332.
    56.
    Skinner R, Cundliffe E, Schmidt FJ. 1983. Site of action of a ribosomal RNA methylase responsible for resistance to erythromycin and other antibiotics. J Biol Chem 258:12702–12706.
    57.
    Reilman E, Mars RAT, van Dijl JM, Denham EL. 2014. The multidrug ABC transporter BmrC/BmrD of Bacillus subtilis is regulated via a ribosome-mediated transcriptional attenuation mechanism. Nucleic Acids Res 42:11393–11407.
    58.
    Dar D, Shamir M, Mellin JR, Koutero M, Stern-Ginossar N, Cossart P, Sorek R. 2016. Term-seq reveals abundant ribo-regulation of antibiotics resistance in bacteria. Science 352:aad9822.
    59.
    Bui LMG, Conlon BP, Kidd SP. 2017. Antibiotic tolerance and the alternative lifestyles of Staphylococcus aureus. Essays Biochem 61:71–79.
    60.
    Kaplan JB. 2011. Antibiotic-induced biofilm formation. Int J Artif Organs 34:737–751.
    61.
    Dunkle JA, Xiong L, Mankin AS, Cate JHD. 2010. Structures of the Escherichia coli ribosome with antibiotics bound near the peptidyl transferase center explain spectra of drug action. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:17152–17157.
    62.
    Davies J, Gorini L, Davis BD. 1965. Misreading of RNA codewords induced by aminoglycoside antibiotics. Mol Pharmacol 1:93–106.
    63.
    Davis BD, Chen LL, Tai PC. 1986. Misread protein creates membrane channels: an essential step in the bactericidal action of aminoglycosides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 83:6164–6168.
    64.
    Kohanski MA, Dwyer DJ, Collins JJ. 2010. How antibiotics kill bacteria: from targets to networks. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:423–435.
    65.
    Hol FJH, Hubert B, Dekker C, Keymer JE. 2016. Density-dependent adaptive resistance allows swimming bacteria to colonize an antibiotic gradient. ISME J 10:30–38.
    66.
    Levin-Reisman I, Ronin I, Gefen O, Braniss I, Shoresh N, Balaban NQ. 2017. Antibiotic tolerance facilitates the evolution of resistance. Science 355:826–830.
    67.
    Yasbin RE, Young FE. 1974. Transduction in Bacillus subtilis by bacteriophage SPP1. J Virol 14:1343–1348.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSphere
    Volume 3Number 128 February 2018
    eLocator: e00586-17
    Editor: Craig D. Ellermeier
    University of Iowa

    History

    Received: 8 December 2017
    Accepted: 31 January 2018
    Published online: 21 February 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. Bacillus subtilis
    2. Streptomyces venezuelae
    3. antibiotics
    4. chloramphenicol
    5. competition
    6. hormesis
    7. ribosome
    8. sliding motility

    Contributors

    Authors

    Yongjin Liu
    Biochemistry and Biophysics Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA
    Steven Kyle
    Biochemistry and Biophysics Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA
    Biochemistry and Biophysics Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA
    Interdisciplinary Program in Genetics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA

    Editor

    Craig D. Ellermeier
    Editor
    University of Iowa

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Paul D. Straight, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSphereArticle
    Comprehensive Bioinformatic Assessments of the Variability of Neisseria gonorrhoeae Vaccine Candidates

    Comprehensive Bioinformatic Assessments of the Variability of Neisseria gonorrhoeae Vaccine Candidates

    ABSTRACT

    A protective vaccine is the only viable way to stop the spread of gonorrhea in the face of rising antibiotic resistance. However, the notorious phase and antigenic variation of Neisseria gonorrhoeae surface proteins remains one of the challenges in vaccine development. To facilitate vaccine advancement efforts, we carried out comprehensive bioinformatic analyses of sequence variation by comparing 34 gonorrhea antigen candidates among >5,000 clinical N. gonorrhoeae isolates deposited in the Neisseria PubMLST database. Eight protein antigens showed exceptional conservation by having a single allele variant distributed in >80% of isolates. An additional 18 vaccine candidates were represented by ≤3 alleles in >50% of N. gonorrhoeae isolates globally. Phylogenetic analyses highlighted closely related antigen variants and additionally showed that AniA and FetB were the closest between N. gonorrhoeae and N. meningitidis. Up to 44% of N. meningitidis alleles for both antigens have premature stop codons, suggesting differential expression. Mapping polymorphisms to the available three-dimensional structures of 12 antigens revealed low-frequency surface polymorphisms. PorB and TbpB possessed numerous high-prevalence polymorphic sites. While TbpA was also highly variable, conserved loops were nonetheless identified. A high degree of sequence conservation, the distribution of a single antigen variant among N. gonorrhoeae strains globally, or low-frequency sequence polymorphisms in surface loops make ACP, AniA, BamA, BamE, MtrE, NspA, NGO0778, NGO1251, NGO1985, OpcA, PldA, Slam2, and ZnuD promising candidates for a gonorrhea vaccine. Finally, the commonly used N. gonorrhoeae FA1090 strain emerges as a vaccine prototype, as it carries antigen sequence types identical to the most broadly distributed antigen variants.
    IMPORTANCE Neisseria gonorrhoeae, the Gram-negative bacterium responsible for the sexually transmitted infection gonorrhea, is categorized as a high-priority pathogen for research and development efforts. N. gonorrhoeae’s “superbug” status, its high morbidity, and the serious health impact associated with gonorrhea highlight the importance of vaccine development. One of the longstanding barriers to developing an effective vaccine against N. gonorrhoeae is the remarkable variability of surface-exposed antigens. In this report, we addressed this roadblock by applying extensive bioinformatic analyses to 34 gonorrhea antigen candidates among >5,000 clinical N. gonorrhoeae isolates. Our studies are important, as they reveal promising, conserved gonorrhea vaccine candidates and aid structural vaccinology. Moreover, these approaches are broadly applicable to other infectious diseases where surface antigen variability impedes successful vaccine design.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Servin-Blanco R, Zamora-Alvarado R, Gevorkian G, Manoutcharian K. 2016. Antigenic variability: obstacles on the road to vaccines against traditionally difficult targets. Hum Vaccin Immunother 12:2640–2648.
    2.
    Palmer GH, Bankhead T, Seifert HS. 2016. Antigenic variation in bacterial pathogens. Microbiol Spectr 4:10.1128/microbiolspec.VMBF-0005-2015.
    3.
    Deitsch KW, Lukehart SA, Stringer JR. 2009. Common strategies for antigenic variation by bacterial, fungal and protozoan pathogens. Nat Rev Microbiol 7:493–503.
    4.
    Zhang G, Meredith TC, Kahne D. 2013. On the essentiality of lipopolysaccharide to Gram-negative bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol 16:779–785.
    5.
    Stern A, Brown M, Nickel P, Meyer TF. 1986. Opacity genes in Neisseria gonorrhoeae: control of phase and antigenic variation. Cell 47:61–71.
    6.
    Swanson J, Kraus SJ, Gotschlich EC. 1971. Studies on gonococcus infection. I. Pili and zones of adhesion: their relation to gonococcal growth patterns. J Exp Med 134:886–906.
    7.
    Snyder LA, Saunders NJ, Shafer WM. 2001. A putatively phase variable gene (dca) required for natural competence in Neisseria gonorrhoeae but not Neisseria meningitidis is located within the division cell wall (dcw) gene cluster. J Bacteriol 183:1233–1241.
    8.
    EBioMedicine. 2017. Gonococcal vaccine development: lessons from group B meningococcal vaccines. EBioMedicine 22:1.
    9.
    Giuliani MM, Adu-Bobie J, Comanducci M, Arico B, Savino S, Santini L, Brunelli B, Bambini S, Biolchi A, Capecchi B, Cartocci E, Ciucchi L, Di Marcello F, Ferlicca F, Galli B, Luzzi E, Masignani V, Serruto D, Veggi D, Contorni M, Morandi M, Bartalesi A, Cinotti V, Mannucci D, Titta F, Ovidi E, Welsch JA, Granoff D, Rappuoli R, Pizza M. 2006. A universal vaccine for serogroup B meningococcus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:10834–10839.
    10.
    Shirley M, Dhillon S. 2015. Bivalent rLP2086 vaccine (Trumenba(®)): a review in active immunization against invasive meningococcal group B disease in individuals aged 10-25 years. BioDrugs 29:353–361.
    11.
    Fletcher LD, Bernfield L, Barniak V, Farley JE, Howell A, Knauf M, Ooi P, Smith RP, Weise P, Wetherell M, Xie X, Zagursky R, Zhang Y, Zlotnick GW. 2004. Vaccine potential of the Neisseria meningitidis 2086 lipoprotein. Infect Immun 72:2088–2100.
    12.
    Jiang HQ, Hoiseth SK, Harris SL, McNeil LK, Zhu D, Tan C, Scott AA, Alexander K, Mason K, Miller L, DaSilva I, Mack M, Zhao XJ, Pride MW, Andrew L, Murphy E, Hagen M, French R, Arora A, Jones TR, Jansen KU, Zlotnick GW, Anderson AS. 2010. Broad vaccine coverage predicted for a bivalent recombinant factor H binding protein based vaccine to prevent serogroup B meningococcal disease. Vaccine 28:6086–6093.
    13.
    Rice PA, Shafer WM, Ram S, Jerse AE. 2017. Neisseria gonorrhoeae: drug resistance, mouse models, and vaccine development. Annu Rev Microbiol 71:665–686.
    14.
    CDC. 2019. Sexually transmitted diseases surveillance 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/std/stats18/default.htm.
    15.
    CDC. 2015. Gonococcal infections: 2015 STD treatment guidelines. https://www.cdc.gov/std/tg2015/default.htm.
    16.
    Workowski KA. 2015. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines. Clin Infect Dis 61(Suppl 8):S759–S762.
    17.
    Thorpe P, Cyr SS, Barbee L, Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Pham C, Schlanger K, Torrone E, Weinstock H, Kersh EN. 2020. Update to CDC’s treatment guidelines for gonococcal infection. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 69:1911–1916.
    18.
    Unemo M, Shafer WM. 2014. Antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the 21st century: past, evolution, and future. Clin Microbiol Rev 27:587–613.
    19.
    Marjuki H, Topaz N, Joseph SJ, Gernert KM, Kersh EN, Antimicrobial-Resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae Working Group, Wang X. 2019. Genetic similarity of gonococcal homologs to meningococcal outer membrane proteins of serogroup B vaccine. mBio 10:e01668-19.
    20.
    WHO. 2012. Global action plan to control the spread and impact of antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
    21.
    Dolange V, Churchward CP, Christodoulides M, Snyder LAS. 2018. The growing threat of gonococcal blindness. Antibiotics (Basel) 7:59.
    22.
    Harrison WO, Hooper RR, Wiesner PJ, Campbell AF, Karney WW, Reynolds GH, Jones OG, Holmes KK. 1979. A trial of minocycline given after exposure to prevent gonorrhea. N Engl J Med 300:1074–1078.
    23.
    McCormack WM, Stumacher RJ, Johnson K, Donner A. 1977. Clinical spectrum of gonococcal infection in women. Lancet 1:1182–1185.
    24.
    Handsfield HH, Lipman TO, Harnisch JP, Tronca E, Holmes KK. 1974. Asymptomatic gonorrhea in men. Diagnosis, natural course, prevalence and significance. N Engl J Med 290:117–123.
    25.
    Platt R, Rice PA, McCormack WM. 1983. Risk of acquiring gonorrhea and prevalence of abnormal adnexal findings among women recently exposed to gonorrhea. JAMA 250:3205–3209.
    26.
    Gottlieb SL, Ndowa F, Hook EW, III, Deal C, Bachmann L, Abu-Raddad L, Chen XS, Jerse A, Low N, MacLennan CA, Petousis-Harris H, Seib KL, Unemo M, Vincent L, Giersing BK, Gonococcal Vaccine PPC Expert Advisory Group. 2020. Gonococcal vaccines: public health value and preferred product characteristics; report of a WHO global stakeholder consultation, January 2019. Vaccine 38:4362–4373.
    27.
    WHO. 2018. Antibiotic-resistant gonorrhoea on the rise, new drugs needed. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
    28.
    Rendtorff RC, Curran JW, Chandler RW, Wiser WL, Robinson H. 1974. Economic consequences of gonorrhea in women: experience from an urban hospital. Sexually Transmitted Diseases 1:40–47.
    29.
    Kirkcaldy RD, Weston E, Segurado AC, Hughes G. 2019. Epidemiology of gonorrhoea: a global perspective. Sex Health 16:401–411.
    30.
    ECDC. 2012. Response plan to control and manage the threat of multidrug-resistant gonorrhoea in Europe. ECDC, Solna, Sweden.
    31.
    El-Rami FE, Zielke RA, Wi T, Sikora AE, Unemo M. 2019. Quantitative proteomics of the 2016 WHO Neisseria gonorrhoeae reference strains surveys vaccine candidates and antimicrobial resistance determinants. Mol Cell Proteomics 18:127–150.
    32.
    Zielke RA, Wierzbicki IH, Weber JV, Gafken PR, Sikora AE. 2014. Quantitative proteomics of the Neisseria gonorrhoeae cell envelope and membrane vesicles for the discovery of potential therapeutic targets. Mol Cell Proteomics 13:1299–1317.
    33.
    Zielke RA, Wierzbicki IH, Baarda BI, Gafken PR, Soge OO, Holmes KK, Jerse AE, Unemo M, Sikora AE. 2016. Proteomics-driven antigen discovery for development of vaccines against gonorrhea. Mol Cell Proteomics 15:2338–2355.
    34.
    Phillips NJ, Steichen CT, Schilling B, Post DM, Niles RK, Bair TB, Falsetta ML, Apicella MA, Gibson BW. 2012. Proteomic analysis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae biofilms shows shift to anaerobic respiration and changes in nutrient transport and outermembrane proteins. PLoS One 7:e38303.
    35.
    McClure R, Nudel K, Massari P, Tjaden B, Su X, Rice PA, Genco CA. 2015. The gonococcal transcriptome during infection of the lower genital tract in women. PLoS One 10:e0133982.
    36.
    Baarda BI, Martinez FG, Sikora AE. 2018. Proteomics, bioinformatics and structure-function antigen mining for gonorrhea vaccines. Front Immunol 9:2793.
    37.
    Vincent LR, Jerse AE. 2019. Biological feasibility and importance of a gonorrhea vaccine for global public health. Vaccine 37:7419–7426.
    38.
    Sikora AE, Gomez C, Le Van A, Baarda BI, Darnell S, Martinez FG, Zielke RA, Bonventre JA, Jerse AE. 2020. A novel gonorrhea vaccine composed of MetQ lipoprotein formulated with CpG shortens experimental murine infection. Vaccine 38:8175–8184.
    39.
    Leduc I, Connolly KL, Begum A, Underwood K, Darnell S, Shafer WM, Balthazar JT, Macintyre AN, Sempowski GD, Duncan JA, Little MB, Rahman N, Garges EC, Jerse AE. 2020. The serogroup B meningococcal outer membrane vesicle-based vaccine 4CMenB induces cross-species protection against Neisseria gonorrhoeae. PLoS Pathog 16:e1008602.
    40.
    Jolley KA, Bray JE, Maiden MCJ. 2018. Open-access bacterial population genomics: BIGSdb software, the PubMLST.org website and their applications. Wellcome Open Res 3:124.
    41.
    Baarda BI, Zielke RA, Nicholas RA, Sikora AE. 2018. PubMLST for antigen allele mining to inform development of gonorrhea protein-based vaccines. Front Microbiol 9:2971.
    42.
    Baarda BI, Zielke RA, Le Van A, Jerse AE, Sikora AE. 2019. Neisseria gonorrhoeae MlaA influences gonococcal virulence and membrane vesicle production. PLoS Pathog 15:e1007385.
    43.
    Baarda BI, Sikora AE. 2019. Phenotypic microarray screening of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in chemically defined liquid medium. Methods Mol Biol 1997:207–216.
    44.
    van der Woude MW, Baumler AJ. 2004. Phase and antigenic variation in bacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev 17:581–611.
    45.
    Unemo M, Golparian D, Sanchez-Buso L, Grad Y, Jacobsson S, Ohnishi M, Lahra MM, Limnios A, Sikora AE, Wi T, Harris SR. 2016. The novel 2016 WHO Neisseria gonorrhoeae reference strains for global quality assurance of laboratory investigations: phenotypic, genetic and reference genome characterization. J Antimicrob Chemother 71:3096–3108.
    46.
    Baarda BI, Emerson S, Proteau PJ, Sikora AE. 2017. Deciphering the function of new gonococcal vaccine antigens using phenotypic microarrays. J Bacteriol 199:e00037-17.
    47.
    Mulks MH, Knapp JS. 1987. Immunoglobulin A1 protease types of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and their relationship to auxotype and serovar. Infect Immun 55:931–936.
    48.
    Plaut AG, Gilbert JV, Artenstein MS, Capra JD. 1975. Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Neisseria meningitidis: extracellular enzyme cleaves human immunoglobulin A. Science 190:1103–1105.
    49.
    Pohlner J, Halter R, Meyer TF. 1987. Neisseria gonorrhoeae IgA protease. Secretion and implications for pathogenesis. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 53:479–484.
    50.
    Pohlner J, Halter R, Beyreuther K, Meyer TF. 1987. Gene structure and extracellular secretion of Neisseria gonorrhoeae IgA protease. Nature 325:458–462.
    51.
    Halter R, Pohlner J, Meyer TF. 1984. IgA protease of Neisseria gonorrhoeae: isolation and characterization of the gene and its extracellular product. EMBO J 3:1595–1601.
    52.
    Plaut AG, Gilbert JV, Wistar R. Jr, 1977. Loss of antibody activity in human immunoglobulin A exposed extracellular immunoglobulin A proteases of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Streptococcus sanguis. Infect Immun 17:130–135.
    53.
    Senior BW, Stewart WW, Galloway C, Kerr MA. 2001. Cleavage of the hormone human chorionic gonadotropin, by the type 1 IgA1 protease of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and its implications. J Infect Dis 184:922–925.
    54.
    Lin L, Ayala P, Larson J, Mulks M, Fukuda M, Carlsson SR, Enns C, So M. 1997. The Neisseria type 2 IgA1 protease cleaves LAMP1 and promotes survival of bacteria within epithelial cells. Mol Microbiol 24:1083–1094.
    55.
    Shoberg RJ, Mulks MH. 1991. Proteolysis of bacterial membrane proteins by Neisseria gonorrhoeae type 2 immunoglobulin A1 protease. Infect Immun 59:2535–2541.
    56.
    Simpson DA, Hausinger RP, Mulks MH. 1988. Purification, characterization, and comparison of the immunoglobulin A1 proteases of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Bacteriol 170:1866–1873.
    57.
    Paruchuri DK, Seifert HS, Ajioka RS, Karlsson KA, So M. 1990. Identification and characterization of a Neisseria gonorrhoeae gene encoding a glycolipid-binding adhesin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87:333–337.
    58.
    Jamet A, Jousset AB, Euphrasie D, Mukorako P, Boucharlat A, Ducousso A, Charbit A, Nassif X. 2015. A new family of secreted toxins in pathogenic Neisseria species. PLoS Pathog 11:e1004592.
    59.
    Haines KA, Yeh L, Blake MS, Cristello P, Korchak H, Weissmann G. 1988. Protein I, a translocatable ion channel from Neisseria gonorrhoeae, selectively inhibits exocytosis from human neutrophils without inhibiting O2 generation. J Biol Chem 263:945–951.
    60.
    Unemo M, Olcen P, Berglund T, Albert J, Fredlund H. 2002. Molecular epidemiology of Neisseria gonorrhoeae: sequence analysis of the porB gene confirms presence of two circulating strains. J Clin Microbiol 40:3741–3749.
    61.
    Brunham RC, Plummer F, Slaney L, Rand F, DeWitt W. 1985. Correlation of auxotype and protein I type with expression of disease due to Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Infect Dis 152:339–343.
    62.
    Cannon JG, Buchanan TM, Sparling PF. 1983. Confirmation of association of protein I serotype of Neisseria gonorrhoeae with ability to cause disseminated infection. Infect Immun 40:816–819.
    63.
    Ram S, Sharma AK, Simpson SD, Gulati S, McQuillen DP, Pangburn MK, Rice PA. 1998. A novel sialic acid binding site on factor H mediates serum resistance of sialylated Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Exp Med 187:743–752.
    64.
    Ram S, McQuillen DP, Gulati S, Elkins C, Pangburn MK, Rice PA. 1998. Binding of complement factor H to loop 5 of porin protein 1A: a molecular mechanism of serum resistance of nonsialylated Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Exp Med 188:671–680.
    65.
    Ram S, Cullinane M, Blom AM, Gulati S, McQuillen DP, Monks BG, O'Connell C, Boden R, Elkins C, Pangburn MK, Dahlback B, Rice PA. 2001. Binding of C4b-binding protein to porin: a molecular mechanism of serum resistance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Exp Med 193:281–295.
    66.
    Chen A, Seifert HS. 2013. Structure-function studies of the Neisseria gonorrhoeae major outer membrane porin. Infect Immun 81:4383–4391.
    67.
    Pajón R, Chinea G, Marrero E, Gonzalez D, Guillén G. 1997. Sequence analysis of the structural tbpA gene: protein topology and variable regions within neisserial receptors for transferrin iron acquisition. Microb Pathog 23:71–84.
    68.
    Cornelissen CN, Biswas GD, Tsai J, Paruchuri DK, Thompson SA, Sparling PF. 1992. Gonococcal transferrin-binding protein 1 is required for transferrin utilization and is homologous to TonB-dependent outer membrane receptors. J Bacteriol 174:5788–5797.
    69.
    Anderson JE, Sparling PF, Cornelissen CN. 1994. Gonococcal transferrin-binding protein 2 facilitates but is not essential for transferrin utilization. J Bacteriol 176:3162–3170.
    70.
    Rokbi B, Renauld-Mongenie G, Mignon M, Danve B, Poncet D, Chabanel C, Caugant DA, Quentin-Millet MJ. 2000. Allelic diversity of the two transferrin binding protein B gene isotypes among a collection of Neisseria meningitidis strains representative of serogroup B disease: implication for the composition of a recombinant TbpB-based vaccine. Infect Immun 68:4938–4947.
    71.
    Harrison OB, Maiden MC, Rokbi B. 2008. Distribution of transferrin binding protein B gene (tbpB) variants among Neisseria species. BMC Microbiol 8:66.
    72.
    Kuroda Y, Tsuyuguchi T, Sakai Y, K CS, Ishihara T, Yamaguchi T, Saisho H, Yokosuka O. 2010. Long-term follow-up evaluation for more than 10 years after endoscopic treatment for postoperative bile duct strictures. Surg Endosc 24:834–840.
    73.
    Zhu P, Morelli G, Achtman M. 1999. The opcA and (psi)opcB regions in Neisseria: genes, pseudogenes, deletions, insertion elements and DNA islands. Mol Microbiol 33:635–650.
    74.
    Jerse AE, Sharma ND, Simms AN, Crow ET, Snyder LA, Shafer WM. 2003. A gonococcal efflux pump system enhances bacterial survival in a female mouse model of genital tract infection. Infect Immun 71:5576–5582.
    75.
    Lee EH, Shafer WM. 1999. The farAB-encoded efflux pump mediates resistance of gonococci to long-chained antibacterial fatty acids. Mol Microbiol 33:839–845.
    76.
    Lewis LA, Rice PA, Ram S. 2019. Role of gonococcal neisserial surface protein A (NspA) in serum resistance and comparison of its factor H binding properties with those of its meningococcal counterpart. Infect Immun 87:e00658-18.
    77.
    Helm RA, Barnhart MM, Seifert HS. 2007. pilQ Missense mutations have diverse effects on PilQ multimer formation, piliation, and pilus function in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Bacteriol 189:3198–3207.
    78.
    Berry JL, Phelan MM, Collins RF, Adomavicius T, Tonjum T, Frye SA, Bird L, Owens R, Ford RC, Lian LY, Derrick JP. 2012. Structure and assembly of a trans-periplasmic channel for type IV pili in Neisseria meningitidis. PLoS Pathog 8:e1002923.
    79.
    Noinaj N, Buchanan SK, Cornelissen CN. 2012. The transferrin-iron import system from pathogenic Neisseria species. Mol Microbiol 86:246–257.
    80.
    Noinaj N, Easley NC, Oke M, Mizuno N, Gumbart J, Boura E, Steere AN, Zak O, Aisen P, Tajkhorshid E, Evans RW, Gorringe AR, Mason AB, Steven AC, Buchanan SK. 2012. Structural basis for iron piracy by pathogenic Neisseria. Nature 483:53–58.
    81.
    Almonacid-Mendoza HL, Humbert MV, Dijokaite A, Cleary DW, Soo Y, Hung MC, Orr CM, Machelett MM, Tews I, Christodoulides M. 2018. Structure of the recombinant Neisseria gonorrhoeae adhesin complex protein (rNg-ACP) and generation of murine antibodies with bactericidal activity against gonococci. mSphere 3:e00331-18.
    82.
    Hollingshead S, Jongerius I, Exley RM, Johnson S, Lea SM, Tang CM. 2018. Structure-based design of chimeric antigens for multivalent protein vaccines. Nat Commun 9:1051.
    83.
    Gu H, Liao Y, Zhang J, Wang Y, Liu Z, Cheng P, Wang X, Zou Q, Gu J. 2018. Rational design and evaluation of an artificial Escherichia coli K1 protein vaccine candidate based on the structure of OmpA. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 8:172.
    84.
    Xu L, He D, Yang L, Li Z, Ye X, Yu H, Zhao H, Li S, Yuan L, Qian H, Que Y, Kuo Shih JW, Zhu H, Li Y, Cheng T, Xia N. 2015. A broadly cross-protective vaccine presenting the neighboring epitopes within the VP1 GH loop and VP2 EF loop of enterovirus 71. Sci Rep 5:12973.
    85.
    Cardozo T, Wang S, Jiang X, Kong XP, Hioe C, Krachmarov C. 2014. Vaccine focusing to cross-subtype HIV-1 gp120 variable loop epitopes. Vaccine 32:4916–4924.
    86.
    Rollenhagen C, Sörensen M, Rizos K, Hurvitz R, Bumann D. 2004. Antigen selection based on expression levels during infection facilitates vaccine development for an intracellular pathogen. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:8739–8744.
    87.
    Zimmermann P, Curtis N. 2019. Factors that influence the immune response to vaccination. Clin Microbiol Rev 32:e00084-18.
    88.
    Jukes TH, Cantor CR. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules, p 21–131. In Munro HN (ed), Mammalian protein metabolism. Academic Press, New York, NY.
    89.
    Sikora AE, Mills RH, Weber JV, Hamza A, Passow BW, Romaine A, Williamson ZA, Reed RW, Zielke RA, Korotkov KV. 2017. Peptide inhibitors targeting the Neisseria gonorrhoeae pivotal anaerobic respiration factor AniA. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e00186-17.
    90.
    Noinaj N, Kuszak AJ, Gumbart JC, Lukacik P, Chang H, Easley NC, Lithgow T, Buchanan SK. 2013. Structural insight into the biogenesis of beta-barrel membrane proteins. Nature 501:385–390.
    91.
    Sikora AE, Wierzbicki IH, Zielke RA, Ryner RF, Korotkov KV, Buchanan SK, Noinaj N. 2018. Structural and functional insights into the role of BamD and BamE within the beta-barrel assembly machinery in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Biol Chem 293:1106–1119.
    92.
    Lei HT, Chou TH, Su CC, Bolla JR, Kumar N, Radhakrishnan A, Long F, Delmar JA, Do SV, Rajashankar KR, Shafer WM, Yu EW. 2014. Crystal structure of the open state of the Neisseria gonorrhoeae MtrE outer membrane channel. PLoS One 9:e97475.
    93.
    Vandeputte-Rutten L, Bos MP, Tommassen J, Gros P. 2003. Crystal structure of Neisserial surface protein A (NspA), a conserved outer membrane protein with vaccine potential. J Biol Chem 278:24825–24830.
    94.
    Prince SM, Achtman M, Derrick JP. 2002. Crystal structure of the OpcA integral membrane adhesin from Neisseria meningitidis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:3417–3421.
    95.
    Zeth K, Kozjak-Pavlovic V, Faulstich M, Fraunholz M, Hurwitz R, Kepp O, Rudel T. 2013. Structure and function of the PorB porin from disseminating Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Biochem J 449:631–642.
    96.
    Calmettes C, Ing C, Buckwalter CM, El Bakkouri M, Chieh-Lin Lai C, Pogoutse A, Gray-Owen SD, Pomes R, Moraes TF. 2015. The molecular mechanism of Zinc acquisition by the neisserial outer-membrane transporter ZnuD. Nat Commun 6:7996.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSphere
    Volume 6Number 124 February 2021
    eLocator: e00977-20
    Editor: Drusilla L. Burns
    U.S. Food and Drug Administration

    History

    Received: 23 September 2020
    Accepted: 8 January 2021
    Published online: 3 February 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. gonorrhea
    2. protein subunit vaccine
    3. antigen variability
    4. PubMLST
    5. bioinformatics
    6. crystal structure
    7. phylogenetics
    8. Neisseria gonorrhoeae
    9. antigenic variation
    10. phylogenetic analysis
    11. subunit
    12. vaccine

    Contributors

    Authors

    Benjamin I. Baarda
    Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
    Ryszard A. Zielke
    Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
    Alaina K. Holm
    Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
    Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
    Vaccine and Gene Therapy Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Beaverton, Oregon, USA

    Editor

    Drusilla L. Burns
    Editor
    U.S. Food and Drug Administration

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Aleksandra E. Sikora, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSphereArticle
    PprA Protein Is Involved in Chromosome Segregation via Its Physical and Functional Interaction with DNA Gyrase in Irradiated Deinococcus radiodurans Bacteria

    PprA Protein Is Involved in Chromosome Segregation via Its Physical and Functional Interaction with DNA Gyrase in Irradiated Deinococcus radiodurans Bacteria

    ABSTRACT

    PprA, a radiation-induced Deinococcus-specific protein, was previously shown to be required for cell survival and accurate chromosome segregation after exposure to ionizing radiation. Here, we used an in vivo approach to determine, by shotgun proteomics, putative PprA partners coimmunoprecipitating with PprA when cells were exposed to gamma rays. Among them, we found the two subunits of DNA gyrase and, thus, chose to focus our work on characterizing the activities of the deinococcal DNA gyrase in the presence or absence of PprA. Loss of PprA rendered cells hypersensitive to novobiocin, an inhibitor of the B subunit of DNA gyrase. We showed that treatment of bacteria with novobiocin resulted in induction of the radiation desiccation response (RDR) regulon and in defects in chromosome segregation that were aggravated by the absence of PprA. In vitro, the deinococcal DNA gyrase, like other bacterial DNA gyrases, possesses DNA negative supercoiling and decatenation activities. These two activities are inhibited in vitro by novobiocin and nalidixic acid, whereas PprA specifically stimulates the decatenation activity of DNA gyrase. Together, these results suggest that PprA plays a major role in chromosome decatenation via its interaction with the deinococcal DNA gyrase when D. radiodurans cells are recovering from exposure to ionizing radiation.
    IMPORTANCED. radiodurans is one of the most radiation-resistant organisms known. This bacterium is able to cope with high levels of DNA lesions generated by exposure to extreme doses of ionizing radiation and to reconstruct a functional genome from hundreds of radiation-induced chromosomal fragments. Here, we identified partners of PprA, a radiation-induced Deinococcus-specific protein, previously shown to be required for radioresistance. Our study leads to three main findings: (i) PprA interacts with DNA gyrase after irradiation, (ii) treatment of cells with novobiocin results in defects in chromosome segregation that are aggravated by the absence of PprA, and (iii) PprA stimulates the decatenation activity of DNA gyrase. Our results extend the knowledge of how D. radiodurans cells survive exposure to extreme doses of gamma irradiation and point out the link between DNA repair, chromosome segregation, and DNA gyrase activities in the radioresistant D. radiodurans bacterium.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Cox MM and Battista JR. 2005. Deinococcus radiodurans—the consummate survivor. Nat Rev Microbiol3:882–892.
    2.
    Slade D and Radman M. 2011. Oxidative stress resistance in Deinococcus radiodurans. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev75:133–191.
    3.
    Krisko A and Radman M. 2013. Biology of extreme radiation resistance: the way of Deinococcus radiodurans. Cold Spring Harb Perspect J Biol5:a012765.
    4.
    Daly MJ. 2012. Death by protein damage in irradiated cells. DNA Repair (Amst)11:12–21.
    5.
    Confalonieri F and Sommer S. 2011. Bacterial and archaeal resistance to ionizing radiation. J Phys Conf Ser261:012005 doi:
    6.
    Ishino Y and Narumi I. 2015. DNA repair in hyperthermophilic and hyperradioresistant microorganisms. Curr Opin Microbiol25:103–112.
    7.
    Zahradka K, Slade D, Bailone A, Sommer S, Averbeck D, Petranovic M, Lindner AB, and Radman M. 2006. Reassembly of shattered chromosomes in Deinococcus radiodurans. Nature443:569–573.
    8.
    Daly MJ and Minton KW. 1995. Interchromosomal recombination in the extremely radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans. J Bacteriol177:5495–5505.
    9.
    Slade D, Lindner AB, Paul G, and Radman M. 2009. Recombination and replication in DNA repair of heavily irradiated Deinococcus radiodurans. Cell136:1044–1055.
    10.
    Bentchikou E, Servant P, Coste G, and Sommer S. 2010. A major role of the RecFOR pathway in DNA double-strand-break repair through ESDSA in Deinococcus radiodurans. PLoS Genet6:e1000774.
    11.
    Daly MJ and Minton KW. 1996. An alternative pathway of recombination of chromosomal fragments precedes recA-dependent recombination in the radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans. J Bacteriol178:4461–4471.
    12.
    Xu G, Lu H, Wang L, Chen H, Xu Z, Hu Y, Tian B, and Hua Y. 2010. DdrB stimulates single-stranded DNA annealing and facilitates RecA-independent DNA repair in Deinococcus radiodurans. DNA Repair (Amst)9:805–812.
    13.
    Bouthier de la Tour C, Boisnard S, Norais C, Toueille M, Bentchikou E, Vannier F, Cox MM, Sommer S, and Servant P. 2011. The deinococcal DdrB protein is involved in an early step of DNA double strand break repair and in plasmid transformation through its single-strand annealing activity. DNA Repair (Amst)10:1223–1231.
    14.
    Narumi I, Satoh K, Cui S, Funayama T, Kitayama S, and Watanabe H. 2004. PprA: a novel protein from Deinococcus radiodurans that stimulates DNA ligation. Mol Microbiol54:278–285.
    15.
    Kota S, Kamble VA, Rajpurohit YS, and Misra HS. 2010. ATP-type DNA ligase requires other proteins for its activity in vitro and its operon components for radiation resistance in Deinococcus radioduransin vivo. Biochem Cell Biol88:783–790.
    16.
    Makarova KS, Omelchenko MV, Gaidamakova EK, Matrosova VY, Vasilenko A, Zhai M, Lapidus A, Copeland A, Kim E, Land M, Mavrommatis K, Pitluck S, Richardson PM, Detter C, Brettin T, Saunders E, Lai B, Ravel B, Kemner KM, Wolf YI, Sorokin A, Gerasimova AV, Gelfand MS, Fredrickson JK, Koonin EV, and Daly MJ. 2007. Deinococcus geothermalis: the pool of extreme radiation resistance genes shrinks. PLoS One2:e955.
    17.
    Tanaka M, Earl AM, Howell HA, Park MJ, Eisen JA, Peterson SN, and Battista JR. 2004. Analysis of Deinococcus radiodurans’s transcriptional response to ionizing radiation and desiccation reveals novel proteins that contribute to extreme radioresistance. Genetics168:21–33.
    18.
    Ludanyi M, Blanchard L, Dulermo R, Brandelet G, Bellanger L, Pignol D, Lemaire D, and de Groot A. 2014. Radiation response in Deinococcus deserti: IrrE is a metalloprotease that cleaves repressor protein DdrO. Mol Microbiol94:434–449.
    19.
    Devigne A, Ithurbide S, Bouthier de la Tour C, Passot F, Mathieu M, Sommer S, and Servant P. 2015. DdrO is an essential protein that regulates the radiation desiccation response and the apoptotic-like cell death in the radioresistant Deinococcus radiodurans bacterium. Mol Microbiol96:1069–1084.
    20.
    Wang Y, Xu Q, Lu H, Lin L, Wang L, Xu H, Cui X, Zhang H, Li T, and Hua Y. 2015. Protease activity of PprI facilitates DNA damage response: Mn2+-dependence and substrate sequence-specificity of the proteolytic reaction. PLoS One10:e0122071.
    21.
    Devigne A, Mersaoui S, Bouthier-de-la-Tour C, Sommer S, and Servant P. 2013. The PprA protein is required for accurate cell division of gamma-irradiated Deinococcus radiodurans bacteria. DNA Repair (Amst)12:265–272.
    22.
    Selvam K, Duncan JR, Tanaka M, and Battista JR. 2013. DdrA, DdrD, and PprA: components of UV and mitomycin C resistance in Deinococcus radiodurans R1. PLoS One8:e69007.
    23.
    Adachi M, Hirayama H, Shimizu R, Satoh K, Narumi I, and Kuroki R. 2014. Interaction of double-stranded DNA with polymerized PprA protein from Deinococcus radiodurans. Protein Sci23:1349–1358.
    24.
    Kota S and Misra HS. 2008. Identification of a DNA processing complex from Deinococcus radiodurans. Biochem Cell Biol86:448–458.
    25.
    Champoux JJ. 2001. DNA topoisomerases: structure, function, and mechanism. Annu Rev Biochem70:369–413.
    26.
    DiNardo S, Voelkel KA, Sternglanz R, Reynolds AE, and Wright A. 1982. Escherichia coli DNA topoisomerase I mutants have compensatory mutations in DNA gyrase genes. Cell31:43–51.
    27.
    Drlica K and Zhao X. 1997. DNA gyrase, topoisomerase IV, and the 4-quinolones. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev61:377–392.
    28.
    Lecointe F, Coste G, Sommer S, and Bailone A. 2004. Vectors for regulated gene expression in the radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans. Gene336:25–35.
    29.
    Nguyen HH, de la Tour CB, Toueille M, Vannier F, Sommer S, and Servant P. 2009. The essential histone-like protein HU plays a major role in Deinococcus radiodurans nucleoid compaction. Mol Microbiol73:240–252.
    30.
    Adams DE, Shekhtman EM, Zechiedrich EL, Schmid MB, and Cozzarelli NR. 1992. The role of topoisomerase IV in partitioning bacterial replicons and the structure of catenated intermediates in DNA replication. Cell71:277–288.
    31.
    Zechiedrich EL and Cozzarelli NR. 1995. Roles of topoisomerase IV and DNA gyrase in DNA unlinking during replication in Escherichia coli. Genes Dev9:2859–2869.
    32.
    Forterre P, Gribaldo S, Gadelle D, and Serre MC. 2007. Origin and evolution of DNA topoisomerases. Biochimie89:427–446.
    33.
    Khodursky AB, Peter BJ, Schmid MB, DeRisi J, Botstein D, Brown PO, and Cozzarelli NR. 2000. Analysis of topoisomerase function in bacterial replication fork movement: use of DNA microarrays. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A97:9419–9424.
    34.
    Hiasa H and Marians KJ. 1994. Topoisomerase III, but not topoisomerase I, can support nascent chain elongation during theta-type DNA replication. J Biol Chem269:32655–32659.
    35.
    Krogh BO and Shuman S. 2002. A poxvirus-like type IB topoisomerase family in bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A99:1853–1858.
    36.
    Toueille M, Mirabella B, Guérin P, Bouthier de la Tour C, Boisnard S, Nguyen HH, Blanchard L, Servant P, de Groot A, Sommer S, and Armengaud J. 2012. A comparative proteomic approach to better define Deinococcus nucleoid specificities. J Proteomics75:2588–2600.
    37.
    Kota S, Charaka VK, Ringgaard S, Waldor MK, and Misra HS. 2014. PprA contributes to Deinococcus radiodurans resistance to nalidixic acid, genome maintenance after DNA damage and interacts with deinococcal topoisomerases. PLoS One9:e85288.
    38.
    Osburne MS, Zavodny SM, and Peterson GA. 1988. Drug-induced relaxation of supercoiled plasmid DNA in Bacillus subtilis and induction of the SOS response. J Bacteriol170:442–445.
    39.
    Collin F, Karkare S, and Maxwell A. 2011. Exploiting bacterial DNA gyrase as a drug target: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol92:479–497.
    40.
    Kato J, Nishimura Y, Imamura R, Niki H, Hiraga S, and Suzuki H. 1990. New topoisomerase essential for chromosome segregation in E. coli. Cell63:393–404.
    41.
    Peng H and Marians KJ. 1993. Decatenation activity of topoisomerase IV during oriC and pBR322 DNA replication in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A90:8571–8575.
    42.
    Manjunatha UH, Dalal M, Chatterji M, Radha DR, Visweswariah SS, and Nagaraja V. 2002. Functional characterisation of mycobacterial DNA gyrase: an efficient decatenase. Nucleic Acids Res30:2144–2153.
    43.
    Smith CL. 1983. recF-dependent induction of recA synthesis by coumermycin, a specific inhibitor of the B subunit of DNA gyrase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A80:2510–2513.
    44.
    Drlica K and Snyder M. 1978. Superhelical Escherichia coli DNA: relaxation by coumermycin. J Mol Biol120:145–154.
    45.
    Gao G, Le D, Huang L, Lu H, Narumi I, and Hua Y. 2006. Internal promoter characterization and expression of the Deinococcus radioduranspprI-folP gene cluster. FEMS Microbiol Lett257:195–201.
    46.
    Kohanski MA, Dwyer DJ, Hayete B, Lawrence CA, and Collins JJ. 2007. A common mechanism of cellular death induced by bactericidal antibiotics. Cell130:797–810.
    47.
    Li Y, Sergueev K, and Austin S. 2002. The segregation of the Escherichia coli origin and terminus of replication. Mol Microbiol46:985–996.
    48.
    Passot FM, Nguyen HH, Dard-Dascot C, Thermes C, Servant P, Espéli O, and Sommer S. 2015. Nucleoid organization in the radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans. Mol Microbiol97:759–774 doi:
    49.
    de la Tour CB, Passot FM, Toueille M, Mirabella B, Guérin P, Blanchard L, Servant P, de Groot A, Sommer S, and Armengaud J. 2013. Comparative proteomics reveals key proteins recruited at the nucleoid of Deinococcus after irradiation-induced DNA damage. Proteomics13:3457–3469.
    50.
    Kota S, Charaka VK, and Misra HS. 2014. PprA, a pleiotropic protein for radioresistance, works through DNA gyrase and shows cellular dynamics during postirradiation recovery in Deinococcus radiodurans. J Genet93:349–354.
    51.
    Espeli O, Lee C, and Marians KJ. 2003. A physical and functional interaction between Escherichia coli FtsK and topoisomerase IV. J Biol Chem278:44639–44644.
    52.
    Madabhushi R and Marians KJ. 2009. Actin homolog MreB affects chromosome segregation by regulating topoisomerase IV in Escherichia coli. Mol Cell33:171–180.
    53.
    Hayama R and Marians KJ. 2010. Physical and functional interaction between the condensin MukB and the decatenase topoisomerase IV in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A107:18826–18831.
    54.
    Bouthier de la Tour C, Toueille M, Jolivet E, Nguyen HH, Servant P, Vannier F, and Sommer S. 2009. The Deinococcus radiodurans SMC protein is dispensable for cell viability yet plays a role in DNA folding. Extremophiles13:827–837.
    55.
    Mennecier S, Coste G, Servant P, Bailone A, and Sommer S. 2004. Mismatch repair ensures fidelity of replication and recombination in the radioresistant organism Deinococcus radiodurans. Mol Genet Genomics272:460–469.
    56.
    Norais C, Servant P, Bouthier-de-la-Tour C, Coureux PD, Ithurbide S, Vannier F, Guerin PP, Dulberger CL, Satyshur KA, Keck JL, Armengaud J, Cox MM, and Sommer S. 2013. The Deinococcus radiodurans DR1245 protein, a DdrB partner homologous to YbjN proteins and reminiscent of type III secretion system chaperones. PLoS One8:e56558.
    57.
    de Groot A, Dulermo R, Ortet P, Blanchard L, Guérin P, Fernandez B, Vacherie B, Dossat C, Jolivet E, Siguier P, Chandler M, Barakat M, Dedieu A, Barbe V, Heulin T, Sommer S, Achouak W, and Armengaud J. 2009. Alliance of proteomics and genomics to unravel the specificities of Sahara bacterium Deinococcus deserti. PLoS Genet5:e1000434.
    58.
    Hartmann EM, Allain F, Gaillard JC, Pible O, and Armengaud J. 2014. Taking the shortcut for high-throughput shotgun proteomic analysis of bacteria. Methods Mol Biol1197:275–285.
    59.
    Clair G, Armengaud J, and Duport C. 2012. Restricting fermentative potential by proteome remodeling: an adaptive strategy evidenced in Bacillus cereus. Mol Cell Proteomics11:M111.013102.
    60.
    Yang YS, Fernandez B, Lagorce A, Aloin V, De Guillen KM, Boyer JB, Dedieu A, Confalonieri F, Armengaud J, and Roumestand C. 2015. Prioritizing targets for structural biology through the lens of proteomics: the archaeal protein TGAM_1934 from Thermococcus gammatolerans. Proteomics15:114–123.
    61.
    Liu H, Sadygov RG, and Yates JR III. 2004. A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics. Anal Chem76:4193–4201.
    62.
    Carvalho PC, Hewel J, Barbosa VC, and Yates JR III. 2008. Identifying differences in protein expression levels by spectral counting and feature selection. Genet Mol Res7:342–356.
    63.
    Huang YY, Deng JY, Gu J, Zhang ZP, Maxwell A, Bi LJ, Chen YY, Zhou YF, Yu ZN, and Zhang XE. 2006. The key DNA-binding residues in the C-terminal domain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA gyrase A subunit (GyrA). Nucleic Acids Res34:5650–5659.
    64.
    Pan XS and Fisher LM. 1999. Streptococcus pneumoniae DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV: overexpression, purification, and differential inhibition by fluoroquinolones. Antimicrob Agents Chemother43:1129–1136.
    65.
    Chen J, Rauch CA, White JH, Englund PT, and Cozzarelli NR. 1995. The topology of the kinetoplast DNA network. Cell80:61–69.
    66.
    Audic S and Claverie JM. 1997. The significance of digital gene expression profiles. Genome Res7:986–995.
    67.
    Earl AM, Rankin SK, Kim KP, Lamendola ON, and Battista JR. 2002. Genetic evidence that the uvsE gene product of Deinococcus radiodurans R1 is a UV damage endonuclease. J Bacteriol184:1003–1009.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSphere
    Volume 1Number 125 February 2016
    eLocator: e00036-15
    Editor: Grant R. Bowman
    University of Wyoming

    History

    Received: 23 October 2015
    Accepted: 9 December 2015
    Published online: 13 January 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS:

    1. Deinococcus radiodurans
    2. PprA
    3. DNA gyrase
    4. DNA decatenation

    Contributors

    Authors

    Alice Devigne
    Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CEA, CNRS, Univ Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette cedex, France
    Philippe Guérin
    CEA, DSV, IBiTec-S, SPI, Li2D, Laboratory Innovative Technologies for Detection and Diagnostics, Bagnols-sur-Cèze, France
    Johnny Lisboa
    Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CEA, CNRS, Univ Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette cedex, France
    Present address: Johnny Lisboa, Institute for Molecular and Cell Biology (IBMC), Porto, Portugal.
    Sophie Quevillon-Cheruel
    Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CEA, CNRS, Univ Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette cedex, France
    Jean Armengaud
    CEA, DSV, IBiTec-S, SPI, Li2D, Laboratory Innovative Technologies for Detection and Diagnostics, Bagnols-sur-Cèze, France
    Suzanne Sommer
    Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CEA, CNRS, Univ Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette cedex, France
    Claire Bouthier de la Tour
    Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CEA, CNRS, Univ Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette cedex, France
    Pascale Servant
    Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CEA, CNRS, Univ Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette cedex, France

    Editor

    Grant R. Bowman
    Editor
    University of Wyoming

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Pascale Servant, [email protected].
    C.B.D.L.T. and P.S. contributed equally to this work as senior authors and should be considered co-last authors.

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSphereArticle
    First Detection of Bat White-Nose Syndrome in Western North America

    ABSTRACT

    White-nose syndrome (WNS) is an emerging fungal disease of bats caused by Pseudogymnoascus destructans. Since it was first detected near Albany, NY, in 2006, the fungus has spread across eastern North America, killing unprecedented numbers of hibernating bats. The devastating impacts of WNS on Nearctic bat species are attributed to the likely introduction of P. destructans from Eurasia to naive host populations in eastern North America. Since 2006, the disease has spread in a gradual wavelike pattern consistent with introduction of the pathogen at a single location. Here, we describe the first detection of P. destructans in western North America in a little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus) from near Seattle, WA, far from the previously recognized geographic distribution of the fungus. Whole-genome sequencing and phylogenetic analyses indicated that the isolate of P. destructans from Washington grouped with other isolates of a presumed clonal lineage from the eastern United States. Thus, the occurrence of P. destructans in Washington does not likely represent a novel introduction of the fungus from Eurasia, and the lack of intensive surveillance in the western United States makes it difficult to interpret whether the occurrence of P. destructans in the Pacific Northwest is disjunct from that in eastern North America. Although there is uncertainty surrounding the impacts of WNS in the Pacific Northwest, the presence of the pathogen in western North America could have major consequences for bat conservation.
    IMPORTANCE White-nose syndrome (WNS) represents one of the most consequential wildlife diseases of modern times. Since it was first documented in New York in 2006, the disease has killed millions of bats and threatens several formerly abundant species with extirpation or extinction. The spread of WNS in eastern North America has been relatively gradual, inducing optimism that disease mitigation strategies could be established in time to conserve bats susceptible to WNS in western North America. The recent detection of the fungus that causes WNS in the Pacific Northwest, far from its previous known distribution, increases the urgency for understanding the long-term impacts of this disease and for developing strategies to conserve imperiled bat species.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Gargas A, Trest MT, Christensen M, Volk TJ, and Blehert DS. 2009. Geomyces destructans sp. nov. associated with bat white-nose syndrome. Mycotaxon108:147–154.
    2.
    Lorch JM, Meteyer CU, Behr MJ, Boyles JG, Cryan PM, Hicks AC, Ballmann AE, Coleman JT, Redell DN, Reeder DM, and Blehert DS. 2011. Experimental infection of bats with Geomyces destructans causes white-nose syndrome. Nature480:376–378.
    3.
    Blehert DS, Hicks AC, Behr M, Meteyer CU, Berlowski-Zier BM, Buckles EL, Coleman JT, Darling SR, Gargas A, Niver R, Okoniewski JC, Rudd RJ, and Stone WB. 2009. Bat white-nose syndrome: an emerging fungal pathogen?Science323:227.
    4.
    Turner GG, Reeder DM, and Coleman JTH. 2011. A five-year assessment of mortality and geographic spread of white-nose syndrome in North American bats and a look to the future. Bat Res News52:13–27.
    5.
    Puechmaille SJ, Wibbelt G, Korn V, Fuller H, Forget F, Mühldorfer K, Kurth A, Bogdanowicz W, Borel C, Bosch T, Cherezy T, Drebet M, Görföl T, Haarsma AJ, Herhaus F, Hallart G, Hammer M, Jungmann C, Le Bris Y, Lutsar L, Masing M, Mulkens B, Passior K, Starrach M, Wojtaszewski A, Zöphel U, and Teeling EC. 2011. Pan-European distribution of white-nose syndrome fungus (Geomyces destructans) not associated with mass mortality. PLoS One6:e19167.
    6.
    Hoyt JR, Langwig KE, Sun K, Lu G, Parise KL, Jiang T, Frick WF, Foster JT, Feng J, and Kilpatrick AM. 2016. Host persistence or extinction from emerging infectious disease: insights from white-nose syndrome in endemic and invading regions. Proc R Soc B283:20152861.
    7.
    Zukal J, Bandouchova H, Brichta J, Cmokova A, Jaron KS, Kolarik M, Kovacova V, Kubátová A, Nováková A, Orlov O, Pikula J, Presetnik P, Šuba J, Zahradníková A Jr, and Martínková N. 2016. White-nose syndrome without borders: Pseudogymnoascus destructans infection tolerated in Europe and Palearctic Asia but not in North America. Sci Rep6:19829.
    8.
    Muller LK, Lorch JM, Lindner DL, O’Connor M, Gargas A, and Blehert DS. 2013. Bat white-nose syndrome: a real-time TaqMan polymerase chain reaction test targeting the intergenic spacer region of Geomyces destructans. Mycologia105:253–259.
    9.
    Meteyer CU, Buckles EL, Blehert DS, Hicks AC, Green DE, Shearn-Bochsler V, Thomas NJ, Gargas A, and Behr MJ. 2009. Histopathologic criteria to confirm white-nose syndrome in bats. J Vet Diagn Invest21:411–414.
    10.
    Ren P, Haman KH, Last LA, Rajkumar SS, Keel MK, and Chaturvedi V. 2012. Clonal spread of Geomyces destructans among bats, midwestern and southern United States. Emerg Infect Dis18:883–885.
    11.
    Leopardi S, Blake D, and Puechmaille SJ. 2015. White-nose syndrome fungus introduced from Europe to North America. Curr Biol25:R217–R219.
    12.
    Seemann T. 2015. Snippy: fast bacterial variant calling from NGS reads. https://github.com/tseemann/snippy.
    13.
    Drees KP, Palmer JM, Sebra R, Lorch JM, Chen C, Wu CC, Bok JW, Keller NP, Blehert DS, Cuomo CA, Lindner DL, and Foster JT. 2016. Use of multiple sequencing technologies to produce a high quality genome of the fungus Pseudogymnoascus destructans, the causative agent of bat white-nose syndrome. Genome Announc4:e00445-16.
    14.
    Li H. 2013. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arXivarXiv:1303.3997 [q-bio.GN]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.3997.
    15.
    Garrison E and Marth G. 2012. Haplotype-based variant detection from short-read sequencing. arXivarXiv:1207.3907 [q-bio.GN]. https://arXiv.org/abs/1207.3907.
    16.
    Palmer JM, Kubatova A, Novakova A, Minnis AM, Kolarik M, and Lindner DL. 2014. Molecular characterization of a heterothallic mating system in Pseudogymnoascus destructans, the fungus causing white-nose syndrome of bats. G3 (Bethesda)4:1755–1763.
    17.
    Maher SP, Kramer AM, Pulliam JT, Zokan MA, Bowden SE, Barton HD, Magori K, and Drake JM. 2012. Spread of white-nose syndrome on a network regulated by geography and climate. Nat Commun3:1306.
    18.
    Ruedi M and Mayer F. 2001. Molecular systematics of bats of the genus Myotis (Vespertilionidae) suggests deterministic ecomorphological convergences. Mol Phylogenet Evol21:436–448.
    19.
    Vonhof MJ, Russell AL, and Miller-Butterworth CM. 2015. Range-wide genetic analysis of little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus) populations: estimating the risk of spread of white-nose syndrome. PLoS One10:e0128713.
    20.
    Perkins JM, Barss JM, and Peterson J. 1990. Winter records of bats in Oregon and Washington. Northwest Nat71:59–62.
    21.
    Bogan MA, Cryan PM, Valdez EW, Ellison LE, and O’Shea TJ. 2003. Western crevice and cavity-roosting bats, p 69–77. InO’Shea TJBogan MA (ed), Monitoring trends in bat populations of the United States and territories: problems and prospects. Information and technology report 2003-0003. U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins, CO.
    22.
    Falxa G. 2007. Winter foraging of silver-haired and California myotis bats in western Washington. Northwest Nat88:98–100.
    23.
    Stamatakis A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics30:1312–1313.
    24.
    Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, and Schwartz T. 2010. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees, p 1–8. InProceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), 14 November 2010, New Orleans, LA.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSphere
    Volume 1Number 431 August 2016
    eLocator: e00148-16
    Editor: Katherine McMahon
    University of Wisconsin

    History

    Received: 27 May 2016
    Accepted: 12 July 2016
    Published online: 3 August 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS:

    1. Pseudogymnoascus destructans
    2. Washington
    3. bat
    4. white-nose syndrome

    Contributors

    Authors

    Jeffrey M. Lorch
    U.S. Geological Survey, National Wildlife Health Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
    Jonathan M. Palmer
    U.S. Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Center for Forest Mycology Research, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
    Daniel L. Lindner
    U.S. Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Center for Forest Mycology Research, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
    Anne E. Ballmann
    U.S. Geological Survey, National Wildlife Health Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
    Kyle G. George
    U.S. Geological Survey, National Wildlife Health Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
    Kathryn Griffin
    U.S. Geological Survey, National Wildlife Health Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
    Susan Knowles
    U.S. Geological Survey, National Wildlife Health Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
    John R. Huckabee
    PAWS Wildlife Center, Lynnwood, Washington, USA
    Katherine H. Haman
    Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, Washington, USA
    Christopher D. Anderson
    Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, Washington, USA
    Penny A. Becker
    Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, Washington, USA
    Joseph B. Buchanan
    Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, Washington, USA
    Jeffrey T. Foster
    University of New Hampshire, Department of Molecular, Cellular and Biomedical Sciences, Durham, New Hampshire, USA
    David S. Blehert
    U.S. Geological Survey, National Wildlife Health Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA

    Editor

    Katherine McMahon
    Editor
    University of Wisconsin

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Jeffrey M. Lorch, [email protected].
    J.M.L. and J.M.P. contributed equally to this article.

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSphereArticle
    Human Immunoglobulin G Cannot Inhibit Fibrinogen Binding by the Genetically Diverse A Domain of Staphylococcus aureus Fibronectin-Binding Protein A

    Human Immunoglobulin G Cannot Inhibit Fibrinogen Binding by the Genetically Diverse A Domain of Staphylococcus aureus Fibronectin-Binding Protein A

    ABSTRACT

    The fibronectin-binding protein A (FnBPA) is a cell surface-associated protein of Staphylococcus aureus which mediates adherence to the host extracellular matrix and is important for bacterial virulence. Previously, substantial sequence diversity was found among strains in the fibrinogen-binding A domain of this protein, and 7 different isotypes were described. The effect of this sequence diversity on the human antibody response, in terms of both antibody production and antibody function, remains unclear. In this study, we identify five different FnBPA A domain isotypes based on the sequence results of 22 clinical S. aureus isolates, obtained from the same number of patients suffering from bacteremia. Using a bead-based Luminex technique, we measure the patients’ total immunoglobulin G (IgG) against the 7 FnBPA isotypes at the onset and during the time course of bacteremia (median of 10 serum samples per patient over a median of 35 days). A significant increase in IgG against the FnBPA A domain, including the isotype carried by the infecting strain, is observed in only three out of 22 patients (14%) after the onset of bacteremia. Using a Luminex-based FnBPA–fibrinogen-binding assay, we find that preincubation of recombinant FnBPA isotypes with IgG from diverse patients does not interfere with binding to fibrinogen. This observation is confirmed using an alternative Luminex-based assay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
    IMPORTANCE Despite the many in vitro and murine in vivo studies involving FnBPA, the actual presence of this virulence factor during human infection is less well established. Furthermore, it is currently unknown to what extent sequence variation in such a virulence factor affects the human antibody response and the ability of antibodies to interfere with FnBPA function. This study sheds new light on these issues. First, the uniform presence of a patient’s IgG against FnBPA indicates the presence and importance of this virulence factor during S. aureus pathogenesis. Second, the absence of an increase in antibody production in most patients following bacteremia indicates the complexity of S. aureus-host interactions, possibly involving immune evasion or lack of expression of FnBPA during invasive infection. Finally, we provide new insights into the inability of human antibodies to interfere with FnBPA-fibrinogen binding. These observations should be taken into account during the development of novel vaccination approaches.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Wertheim HF, Melles DC, Vos MC, van Leeuwen W, van Belkum A, Verbrugh HA, Nouwen JL. 2005. The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus aureus infections. Lancet Infect Dis 5:751–762.
    2.
    Williams RE. 1963. Healthy carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: its prevalence and importance. Bacteriol Rev 27:56–71.
    3.
    Chang FY, MacDonald BB, Peacock JE, Jr, Musher DM, Triplett P, Mylotte JM, O’Donnell A, Wagener MM, Yu VL. 2003. A prospective multicenter study of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: incidence of endocarditis, risk factors for mortality, and clinical impact of methicillin resistance. Medicine 82:322–332.
    4.
    Laupland KB, Ross T, Gregson DB. 2008. Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections: risk factors, outcomes, and the influence of methicillin resistance in Calgary, Canada, 2000–2006. J Infect Dis 198:336–343.
    5.
    Lautenschlager S, Herzog C, Zimmerli W. 1993. Course and outcome of bacteremia due to Staphylococcus aureus: evaluation of different clinical case definitions. Clin Infect Dis 16:567–573.
    6.
    Foster TJ, Höök M. 1998. Surface protein adhesins of Staphylococcus aureus. Trends Microbiol 6:484–488.
    7.
    Jönsson K, Signäs C, Müller HP, Lindberg M. 1991. Two different genes encode fibronectin binding proteins in Staphylococcus aureus. The complete nucleotide sequence and characterization of the second gene. Eur J Biochem 202:1041–1048.
    8.
    Signäs C, Raucci G, Jönsson K, Lindgren PE, Anantharamaiah GM, Höök M, Lindberg M. 1989. Nucleotide sequence of the gene for a fibronectin-binding protein from Staphylococcus aureus: use of this peptide sequence in the synthesis of biologically active peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 86:699–703.
    9.
    Peacock SJ, Day NP, Thomas MG, Berendt AR, Foster TJ. 2000. Clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus exhibit diversity in fnb genes and adhesion to human fibronectin. J Infect 41:23–31.
    10.
    Edwards AM, Potts JR, Josefsson E, Massey RC. 2010. Staphylococcus aureus host cell invasion and virulence in sepsis is facilitated by the multiple repeats within FnBPA. PLoS Pathog 6:e1000964.
    11.
    Que YA, Haefliger JA, Piroth L, François P, Widmer E, Entenza JM, Sinha B, Herrmann M, Francioli P, Vaudaux P, Moreillon P. 2005. Fibrinogen and fibronectin binding cooperate for valve infection and invasion in Staphylococcus aureus experimental endocarditis. J Exp Med 201:1627–1635.
    12.
    Shinji H, Yosizawa Y, Tajima A, Iwase T, Sugimoto S, Seki K, Mizunoe Y. 2011. Role of fibronectin-binding proteins A and B in in vitro cellular infections and in vivo septic infections by Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun 79:2215–2223.
    13.
    Massey RC, Kantzanou MN, Fowler T, Day NP, Schofield K, Wann ER, Berendt AR, Höök M, Peacock SJ. 2001. Fibronectin-binding protein A of Staphylococcus aureus has multiple, substituting, binding regions that mediate adherence to fibronectin and invasion of endothelial cells. Cell Microbiol 3:839–851.
    14.
    Roche FM, Downer R, Keane F, Speziale P, Park PW, Foster TJ. 2004. The N-terminal A domain of fibronectin-binding proteins A and B promotes adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus to elastin. J Biol Chem 279:38433–38440.
    15.
    Wann ER, Gurusiddappa S, Hook M. 2000. The fibronectin-binding MSCRAMM FnbpA of Staphylococcus aureus is a bifunctional protein that also binds to fibrinogen. J Biol Chem 275:13863–13871.
    16.
    Mosesson MW. 2005. Fibrinogen and fibrin structure and functions. J Thromb Haemost 3:1894–1904.
    17.
    Mosher DF. 2006. Plasma fibronectin concentration: a risk factor for arterial thrombosis? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 26:1193–1195.
    18.
    Foster TJ, Geoghegan JA, Ganesh VK, Höök M. 2014. Adhesion, invasion and evasion: the many functions of the surface proteins of Staphylococcus aureus. Nat Rev Microbiol 12:49–62.
    19.
    Menzies BE. 2003. The role of fibronectin binding proteins in the pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus infections. Curr Opin Infect Dis 16:225–229.
    20.
    Geoghegan JA, Monk IR, O’Gara JP, Foster TJ. 2013. Subdomains N2N3 of fibronectin binding protein A mediate Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation and adherence to fibrinogen using distinct mechanisms. J Bacteriol 195:2675–2683.
    21.
    O’Neill E, Pozzi C, Houston P, Humphreys H, Robinson DA, Loughman A, Foster TJ, O’Gara JP. 2008. A novel Staphylococcus aureus biofilm phenotype mediated by the fibronectin-binding proteins, FnBPA and FnBPB. J Bacteriol 190:3835–3850.
    22.
    Hanke ML, Kielian T. 2012. Deciphering mechanisms of staphylococcal biofilm evasion of host immunity. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2:62.
    23.
    Keane FM, Loughman A, Valtulina V, Brennan M, Speziale P, Foster TJ. 2007. Fibrinogen and elastin bind to the same region within the A domain of fibronectin binding protein A, an MSCRAMM of Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Microbiol 63:711–723.
    24.
    Deivanayagam CC, Wann ER, Chen W, Carson M, Rajashankar KR, Höök M, Narayana SV. 2002. A novel variant of the immunoglobulin fold in surface adhesins of Staphylococcus aureus: crystal structure of the fibrinogen-binding MSCRAMM, clumping factor A. EMBO J 21:6660–6672.
    25.
    Ponnuraj K, Bowden MG, Davis S, Gurusiddappa S, Moore D, Choe D, Xu Y, Hook M, Narayana SV. 2003. A “dock, lock, and latch” structural model for a staphylococcal adhesin binding to fibrinogen. Cell 115:217–228.
    26.
    Mamo W, Bodén M, Flock JI. 1994. Vaccination with Staphylococcus aureus fibrinogen binding proteins (FgBPs) reduces colonisation of S. aureus in a mouse mastitis model. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 10:47–53.
    27.
    Mamo W, Jonsson P, Flock JI, Lindberg M, Müller HP, Wadström T, Nelson L. 1994. Vaccination against Staphylococcus aureus mastitis: immunological response of mice vaccinated with fibronectin-binding protein (FnBP-A) to challenge with S. aureus. Vaccine 12:988–992.
    28.
    DeJonge M, Burchfield D, Bloom B, Duenas M, Walker W, Polak M, Jung E, Millard D, Schelonka R, Eyal F, Morris A, Kapik B, Roberson D, Kesler K, Patti J, Hetherington S. 2007. Clinical trial of safety and efficacy of INH-A21 for the prevention of nosocomial staphylococcal bloodstream infection in premature infants. J Pediatr 151:260–265.
    29.
    Patti JM. 2004. A humanized monoclonal antibody targeting Staphylococcus aureus. Vaccine 22(Suppl 1):S39–S43.
    30.
    Weems JJ, Jr, Steinberg JP, Filler S, Baddley JW, Corey GR, Sampathkumar P, Winston L, John JF, Kubin CJ, Talwani R, Moore T, Patti JM, Hetherington S, Texter M, Wenzel E, Kelley VA, Fowler VG, Jr. 2006. Phase II, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study comparing the safety and pharmacokinetics of tefibazumab to placebo for treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50:2751–2755.
    31.
    Pier GB. 2013. Will there ever be a universal Staphylococcus aureus vaccine? Hum Vaccin Immunother 9:1865–1876.
    32.
    Loughman A, Sweeney T, Keane FM, Pietrocola G, Speziale P, Foster TJ. 2008. Sequence diversity in the A domain of Staphylococcus aureus fibronectin-binding protein A. BMC Microbiol 8:74.
    33.
    den Reijer PM, Lemmens-den Toom N, Kant S, Snijders SV, Boelens H, Tavakol M, Verkaik NJ, van Belkum A, Verbrugh HA, van Wamel WJ. 2013. Characterization of the humoral immune response during Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and global gene expression by Staphylococcus aureus in human blood. PLoS One 8:e53391.
    34.
    den Reijer PM, Sandker M, Snijders SV, Tavakol M, Hendrickx AP, van Wamel WJ. 2017. Combining in vitro protein detection and in vivo antibody detection identifies potential vaccine targets against Staphylococcus aureus during osteomyelitis. Med Microbiol Immunol 206:11–22.
    35.
    Junge S, Görlich D, den Reijer M, Wiedemann B, Tümmler B, Ellemunter H, Dübbers A, Küster P, Ballmann M, Koerner-Rettberg C, Große-Onnebrink J, Heuer E, Sextro W, Mainz JG, Hammermann J, Riethmüller J, Graepler-Mainka U, Staab D, Wollschläger B, Szczepanski R, Schuster A, Tegtmeyer FK, Sutharsan S, Wald A, Nofer JR, van Wamel W, Becker K, Peters G, Kahl BC. 2016. Factors associated with worse lung function in cystic fibrosis patients with persistent Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS One 11:e0166220.
    36.
    Casolini F, Visai L, Joh D, Conaldi PG, Toniolo A, Höök M, Speziale P. 1998. Antibody response to fibronectin-binding adhesin FnbpA in patients with Staphylococcus aureus infections. Infect Immun 66:5433–5442.
    37.
    Sun Q, Smith GM, Zahradka C, McGavin MJ. 1997. Identification of D motif epitopes in Staphylococcus aureus fibronectin-binding protein for the production of antibody inhibitors of fibronectin binding. Infect Immun 65:537–543.
    38.
    Ní Eidhin D, Perkins S, Francois P, Vaudaux P, Höök M, Foster TJ. 1998. Clumping factor B (ClfB), a new surface-located fibrinogen-binding adhesin of Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Microbiol 30:245–257.
    39.
    Jacobsson G, Colque-Navarro P, Gustafsson E, Andersson R, Möllby R. 2010. Antibody responses in patients with invasive Staphylococcus aureus infections. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 29:715–725.
    40.
    Vytvytska O, Nagy E, Blüggel M, Meyer HE, Kurzbauer R, Huber LA, Klade CS. 2002. Identification of vaccine candidate antigens of Staphylococcus aureus by serological proteome analysis. Proteomics 2:580–590.
    41.
    Veloso TR, Chaouch A, Roger T, Giddey M, Vouillamoz J, Majcherczyk P, Que YA, Rousson V, Moreillon P, Entenza JM. 2013. Use of a human-like low-grade bacteremia model of experimental endocarditis to study the role of Staphylococcus aureus adhesins and platelet aggregation in early endocarditis. Infect Immun 81:697–703.
    42.
    Bröker BM, Holtfreter S, Bekeredjian-Ding I. 2014. Immune control of Staphylococcus aureus—regulation and counter-regulation of the adaptive immune response. Int J Med Microbiol 304:204–214.
    43.
    Thammavongsa V, Kim HK, Missiakas D, Schneewind O. 2015. Staphylococcal manipulation of host immune responses. Nat Rev Microbiol 13:529–543.
    44.
    Foster TJ. 2016. The remarkably multifunctional fibronectin binding proteins of Staphylococcus aureus. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 35:1923–1931.
    45.
    Hall AE, Domanski PJ, Patel PR, Vernachio JH, Syribeys PJ, Gorovits EL, Johnson MA, Ross JM, Hutchins JT, Patti JM. 2003. Characterization of a protective monoclonal antibody recognizing Staphylococcus aureus MSCRAMM protein clumping factor A. Infect Immun 71:6864–6870.
    46.
    Speziale P, Joh D, Visai L, Bozzini S, House-Pompeo K, Lindberg M, Höök M. 1996. A monoclonal antibody enhances ligand binding of fibronectin MSCRAMM (adhesin) from Streptococcus dysgalactiae. J Biol Chem 271:1371–1378.
    47.
    Meenan NA, Visai L, Valtulina V, Schwarz-Linek U, Norris NC, Gurusiddappa S, Höök M, Speziale P, Potts JR. 2007. The tandem beta-zipper model defines high affinity fibronectin-binding repeats within Staphylococcus aureus FnBPA. J Biol Chem 282:25893–25902.
    48.
    Maira-Litrán T, Kropec A, Goldmann DA, Pier GB. 2005. Comparative opsonic and protective activities of Staphylococcus aureus conjugate vaccines containing native or deacetylated Staphylococcal poly-N-acetyl-beta-(1-6)-glucosamine. Infect Immun 73:6752–6762.
    49.
    Lorenz U, Lorenz B, Schmitter T, Streker K, Erck C, Wehland J, Nickel J, Zimmermann B, Ohlsen K. 2011. Functional antibodies targeting IsaA of Staphylococcus aureus augment host immune response and open new perspectives for antibacterial therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:165–173.
    50.
    Hall CE, Slayter HS. 1959. The fibrinogen molecule: its size, shape, and mode of polymerization. J Biophys Biochem Cytol 5:11–16.
    51.
    Kolata J, Bode LG, Holtfreter S, Steil L, Kusch H, Holtfreter B, Albrecht D, Hecker M, Engelmann S, van Belkum A, Völker U, Bröker BM. 2011. Distinctive patterns in the human antibody response to Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in carriers and non-carriers. Proteomics 11:3914–3927.
    52.
    Verkaik NJ, Boelens HA, de Vogel CP, Tavakol M, Bode LG, Verbrugh HA, van Belkum A, van Wamel WJ. 2010. Heterogeneity of the humoral immune response following Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 29:509–518.
    53.
    Hawkins J, Kodali S, Matsuka YV, McNeil LK, Mininni T, Scully IL, Vernachio JH, Severina E, Girgenti D, Jansen KU, Anderson AS, Donald RG. 2012. A recombinant clumping factor A-containing vaccine induces functional antibodies to Staphylococcus aureus that are not observed after natural exposure. Clin Vaccine Immunol 19:1641–1650.
    54.
    Scully IL, Timofeyeva Y, Keeney D, Matsuka YV, Severina E, McNeil LK, Nanra J, Hu G, Liberator PA, Jansen KU, Anderson AS. 2015. Demonstration of the preclinical correlate of protection for Staphylococcus aureus clumping factor A in a murine model of infection. Vaccine 33:5452–5457.
    55.
    Verkaik N, Brouwer E, Hooijkaas H, van Belkum A, van Wamel W. 2008. Comparison of carboxylated and penta-His microspheres for semi-quantitative measurement of antibody responses to His-tagged proteins. J Immunol Methods 335:121–125.
    56.
    Ko YP, Liang X, Smith CW, Degen JL, Höök M. 2011. Binding of Efb from Staphylococcus aureus to fibrinogen blocks neutrophil adherence. J Biol Chem 286:9865–9874.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSphere
    Volume 3Number 225 April 2018
    eLocator: e00590-17
    Editor: Paul D. Fey
    University of Nebraska Medical Center

    History

    Received: 12 December 2017
    Accepted: 14 February 2018
    Published online: 7 March 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. Staphylococcus aureus
    2. antibody function
    3. antibody repertoire
    4. bacteremia
    5. fibrinogen
    6. fibronectin-binding protein A
    7. Luminex

    Contributors

    Authors

    P. Martijn den Reijer
    Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    Mehri Tavakol
    Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    Nicole Lemmens-den Toom
    Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    Dikra Allouch
    Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    Sheila Thomas
    Center for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases, Institute of Bioscience and Technology, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA
    Vannakambadi K. Ganesh
    Center for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases, Institute of Bioscience and Technology, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA
    Ya-Ping Ko
    Center for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases, Institute of Bioscience and Technology, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA
    Henri A. Verbrugh
    Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    Willem J. B. van Wamel
    Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    Editor

    Paul D. Fey
    Editor
    University of Nebraska Medical Center

    Notes

    Address correspondence to P. Martijn den Reijer, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSphereArticle
    l-Alanine and Its Distinct Roles in the Bioenergetics of Trypanosoma cruzi" class="teaser__item__title">Uptake of l-Alanine and Its Distinct Roles in the Bioenergetics of Trypanosoma cruzi

    Uptake of l-Alanine and Its Distinct Roles in the Bioenergetics of Trypanosoma cruzi

    ABSTRACT

    Amino acids participate in several critical processes in the biology of trypanosomatids, such as osmoregulation, cell differentiation, and host cell invasion. Some of them provide reducing power for mitochondrial ATP synthesis. It was previously shown that alanine, which is formed mainly by the amination of pyruvate, is a metabolic end product formed when parasites are replicating in a medium rich in glucose and amino acids. It was shown as well that this amino acid can also be used for the regulation of cell volume and resistance to osmotic stress. In this work, we demonstrate that, despite it being an end product of its metabolism, Trypanosoma cruzi can take up and metabolize l-Ala through a low-specificity nonstereoselective active transport system. The uptake was dependent on the temperature in the range between 10 and 40°C, which allowed us to calculate an activation energy of 66.4 kJ/mol and estimate the number of transporters per cell at ~436,000. We show as well that, once taken up by the cells, l-Ala can be completely oxidized to CO2, supplying electrons to the electron transport chain, maintaining the electrochemical proton gradient across the mitochondrial inner membrane, and supporting ATP synthesis in T. cruzi epimastigotes. Our data demonstrate a dual role for Ala in the parasite’s bioenergetics, by being a secreted end product of glucose catabolism and taken up as nutrient for oxidative mitochondrial metabolism.
    IMPORTANCE It is well known that trypanosomatids such as the etiological agent of Chagas’ disease, Trypanosoma cruzi, produce alanine as a main end product of their energy metabolism when they grow in a medium containing glucose and amino acids. In this work, we investigated if under starvation conditions (which happen during the parasite life cycle) the secreted alanine could be recovered from the extracellular medium and used as an energy source. Herein we show that indeed, in parasites submitted to metabolic stress, this metabolite can be taken up and used as an energy source for ATP synthesis, allowing the parasite to extend its survival under starvation conditions. The obtained results point to a dual role for Ala in the parasite’s bioenergetics, by being a secreted end product of glucose catabolism and taken up as nutrient for oxidative mitochondrial metabolism.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Lisvane Silva P, Mantilla BS, Barisón MJ, Wrenger C, Silber AM. 2011. The uniqueness of the Trypanosoma cruzi mitochondrion: opportunities to identify new drug target for the treatment of Chagas disease. Curr Pharm Des 17:2074–2099.
    2.
    Marchese L, Nascimento JF, Damasceno FS, Bringaud F, Michels PAM, Silber AM. 2018. The uptake and metabolism of amino acids, and their unique role in the biology of pathogenic trypanosomatids. Pathogens 7:36.
    3.
    Fernandes MC, Andrews NW. 2012. Host cell invasion by Trypanosoma cruzi: a unique strategy that promotes persistence. FEMS Microbiol Rev 36:734–747.
    4.
    Kollien AH, Schaub GA. 1998. Development of Trypanosoma cruzi after starvation and feeding of the vector—a review. Tokai J Exp Clin Med 23:335–340.
    5.
    Moreira CJ, Spata MC. 2002. Dynamics of evolution and resistance to starvation of Triatoma vitticeps (Reduviidae: Triatominae), submitted to two different regimens of food deprivation. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 97:1049–1055.
    6.
    Silber AM, Colli W, Ulrich H, Alves MJ, Pereira CA. 2005. Amino acid metabolic routes in Trypanosoma cruzi: possible therapeutic targets against Chagas’ disease. Curr Drug Targets Infect Disord 5:53–64.
    7.
    Barisón MJ, Damasceno FS, Mantilla BS, Silber AM. 2016. The active transport of histidine and its role in ATP production in Trypanosoma cruzi. J Bioenerg Biomembr 48:437–449.
    8.
    Mantilla BS, Paes LS, Pral EM, Martil DE, Thiemann OH, Fernández-Silva P, Bastos EL, Silber AM. 2015. Role of delta1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate-dehydrogenase supports mitochondrial metabolism and host-cell invasion of Trypanosoma cruzi. J Biol Chem 290:7767–7790.
    9.
    Paes LS, Suárez Mantilla BS, Zimbres FM, Pral EM, Diogo de Melo P, Tahara EB, Kowaltowski AJ, Elias MC, Silber AM. 2013. Proline dehydrogenase regulates redox state and respiratory metabolism in Trypanosoma cruzi. PLoS One 8:e69419.
    10.
    Zeledon R. 1960. Comparative physiological studies on four species of hemoflagellates in culture. II. Effect of carbohydrates and related substances and some amino compounds on the respiration. J Parasitol 46:541–551.
    11.
    Martins RM, Covarrubias C, Rojas RG, Silber AM, Yoshida N. 2009. Use of l-proline and ATP production by Trypanosoma cruzi metacyclic forms as requirements for host cell invasion. Infect Immun 77:3023–3032.
    12.
    Magdaleno A, Suárez Mantilla B, Rocha SC, Pral EM, Silber AM. 2011. The involvement of glutamate metabolism in the resistance to thermal, nutritional, and oxidative stress in Trypanosoma cruzi. Enzyme Res 2011:486928.
    13.
    Barisón MJ, Rapado LN, Merino EF, Furusho Pral EM, Mantilla BS, Marchese L, Nowicki C, Silber AM, Cassera MB. 2017. Metabolomic profiling reveals a finely tuned, starvation-induced metabolic switch in Trypanosoma cruzi epimastigotes. J Biol Chem 292:8964–8977.
    14.
    Manchola NC, Silber AM, Nowicki C. 2018. The non-canonical substrates of Trypanosoma cruzi tyrosine and aspartate aminotransferases: branched-chain amino acids. J Eukaryot Microbiol 65:70–76.
    15.
    Magdaleno A, Ahn IY, Paes LS, Silber AM. 2009. Actions of a proline analogue, l-thiazolidine-4-carboxylic acid (T4C), on Trypanosoma cruzi. PLoS One 4:e4534.
    16.
    Contreras VT, Salles JM, Thomas N, Morel CM, Goldenberg S. 1985. In vitro differentiation of Trypanosoma cruzi under chemically defined conditions. Mol Biochem Parasitol 16:315–327.
    17.
    Cazzulo JJ. 1994. Intermediate metabolism in Trypanosoma cruzi. J Bioenerg Biomembr 26:157–165.
    18.
    Frydman B, de los Santos C, Cannata JJ, Cazzulo JJ. 1990. Carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance analysis of [1-13C]glucose metabolism in Trypanosoma cruzi. Evidence of the presence of two alanine pools and of two CO2 fixation reactions. Eur J Biochem 192:363–368.
    19.
    Urbina JA, Ysern X, Mildvan AS. 1990. Involvement of a divalent cation in the binding of fructose 6-phosphate to Trypanosoma cruzi phosphofructokinase: kinetic and magnetic resonance studies. Arch Biochem Biophys 278:187–194.
    20.
    Cazzulo JJ, Arauzo S, Franke de Cazzulo BM, Cannata JJB. 1988. On the production of glycerol and l-alanine during the aerobic fermentation of glucose by trypanosomatids. FEMS Microbiol Lett 51:187–191.
    21.
    Zelada C, Montemartini M, Cazzulo JJ, Nowicki C. 1996. Purification and partial structural and kinetic characterization of an alanine aminotransferase from epimastigotes of Trypanosoma cruzi. Mol Biochem Parasitol 79:225–228.
    22.
    Montemartini M, Búa J, Bontempi E, Zelada C, Ruiz AM, Santomé JA, Cazzulo JJ, Nowicki C. 1995. A recombinant tyrosine aminotransferase from Trypanosoma cruzi has both tyrosine aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase activities. FEMS Microbiol Lett 133:17–20.
    23.
    de Barros EG, Caldas RdA. 1983. Partial purification and characterization of glutamic-pyruvic transaminase from Trypanosoma cruzi. Comp Biochem Physiol 74:449–452.
    24.
    Duschak VG, Cazzulo JJ. 1991. Subcellular localization of glutamate dehydrogenases and alanine aminotransferase in epimastigotes of Trypanosoma cruzi. FEMS Microbiol Lett 67:131–135.
    25.
    Acosta H, Dubourdieu M, Quiñones W, Cáceres A, Bringaud F, Concepción JL. 2004. Pyruvate phosphate dikinase and pyrophosphate metabolism in the glycosome of Trypanosoma cruzi epimastigotes. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 138:347–356.
    26.
    Rohloff P, Rodrigues CO, Docampo R. 2003. Regulatory volume decrease in Trypanosoma cruzi involves amino acid efflux and changes in intracellular calcium. Mol Biochem Parasitol 126:219–230.
    27.
    Rohloff P, Montalvetti A, Docampo R. 2004. Acidocalcisomes and the contractile vacuole complex are involved in osmoregulation in Trypanosoma cruzi. J Biol Chem 279:52270–52281.
    28.
    Rohloff P, Docampo R. 2008. A contractile vacuole complex is involved in osmoregulation in Trypanosoma cruzi. Exp Parasitol 118:17–24.
    29.
    Silber AM, Rojas RL, Urias U, Colli W, Alves MJ. 2006. Biochemical characterization of the glutamate transport in Trypanosoma cruzi. Int J Parasitol 36:157–163.
    30.
    Manchola NC, Rapado LN, Barisón MJ, Silber AM. 2016. Biochemical characterization of branched chain amino acids uptake in Trypanosoma cruzi. J Eukaryot Microbiol 63:299–308.
    31.
    Vanderheyden N, Benaim G, Docampo R. 1996. The role of a H(+)-ATPase in the regulation of cytoplasmic pH in Trypanosoma cruzi epimastigotes. Biochem J 318:103–109.
    32.
    Schnaufer A, Clark-Walker GD, Steinberg AG, Stuart K. 2005. The F1-ATP synthase complex in bloodstream stage trypanosomes has an unusual and essential function. EMBO J 24:4029–4040.
    33.
    Maugeri DA, Cannata JJ, Cazzulo JJ. 2011. Glucose metabolism in Trypanosoma cruzi. Essays Biochem 51:15–30.
    34.
    Raw I. 1959. Some aspects of carbohydrate metabolism of cultural forms of Trypanosoma cruzi. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 1:192–194.
    35.
    Cannata JJ, Frasch AC, Cataldi de Flombaum MA, Segura EL, Cazzulo JJ. 1979. Two forms of “malic” enzyme with different regulatory properties in Trypanosoma cruzi. Biochem J 184:409–419.
    36.
    Cazzulo JJ, Juan SM, Segura EL. 1977. The malic enzyme from Trypanosoma cruzi. J Gen Microbiol 99:237–241.
    37.
    Avilán L, García P. 1994. Hysteresis of cytosolic NADP-malic enzyme II from Trypanosoma cruzi. Mol Biochem Parasitol 65:225–232.
    38.
    Haanstra JR, González-Marcano EB, Gualdrón-López M, Michels PA. 2016. Biogenesis, maintenance and dynamics of glycosomes in trypanosomatid parasites. Biochim Biophys Acta 1863:1038–1048.
    39.
    de Boiso JF, Stoppani AO. 1973. The mechanism of acetate and pyruvate oxidation by Trypanosoma cruzi. J Protozool 20:673–678.
    40.
    Silber AM, Tonelli RR, Martinelli M, Colli W, Alves MJ. 2002. Active transport of l-proline in Trypanosoma cruzi. J Eukaryot Microbiol 49:441–446.
    41.
    Harington JS. 1961. Studies of the amino acids of Rhodnius prolixus. I. Analysis of the haemolymph. Parasitology 51:309–318.
    42.
    Harington JS. 1961. Studies of the amino acids of Rhodnius prolixus. II. Analysis of the excretory material. Parasitology 51:319–326.
    43.
    Antunes LC, Han J, Pan J, Moreira CJ, Azambuja P, Borchers CH, Carels N. 2013. Metabolic signatures of triatomine vectors of Trypanosoma cruzi unveiled by metabolomics. PLoS One 8:e77283.
    44.
    Baydoun AR, Emery PW, Pearson JD, Mann GE. 1990. Substrate-dependent regulation of intracellular amino acid concentrations in cultured bovine aortic endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 173:940–948.
    45.
    Bouvier LA, Silber AM, Galvão Lopes C, Canepa GE, Miranda MR, Tonelli RR, Colli W, Alves MJ, Pereira CA. 2004. Post genomic analysis of permeases from the amino acid/auxin family in protozoan parasites. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 321:547–556.
    46.
    Inbar E, Schlisselberg D, Suter Grotemeyer M, Rentsch D, Zilberstein D. 2013. A versatile proline/alanine transporter in the unicellular pathogen Leishmania donovani regulates amino acid homoeostasis and osmotic stress responses. Biochem J 449:555–566.
    47.
    Darling TN, Blum JJ. 1990. Changes in the shape of Leishmania major promastigotes in response to hexoses, proline, and hypo-osmotic stress. J Protozool 37:267–272.
    48.
    Burrows C, Blum JJ. 1991. Effect of hyper-osmotic stress on alanine content of Leishmania major promastigotes. J Protozool 38:47–52.
    49.
    Elliot SL, Rodrigues Jde O, Lorenzo MG, Martins-Filho OA, Guarneri AA. 2015. Trypanosoma cruzi, etiological agent of Chagas disease, is virulent to its triatomine vector Rhodnius prolixus in a temperature-dependent manner. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 9:e0003646.
    50.
    Cazzulo JJ, Franke de Cazzulo BM, Engel JC, Cannata JJ. 1985. End products and enzyme levels of aerobic glucose fermentation in trypanosomatids. Mol Biochem Parasitol 16:329–343.
    51.
    Ryley JF. 1956. Studies on the metabolism of the Protozoa. 7. Comparative carbohydrate metabolism of eleven species of trypanosome. Biochem J 62:215–222.
    52.
    Chang SL. 1948. Studies on hemoflagellates; observations concerning some biochemical activities in culture, and respiration of three species of leishmanias and Trypanosoma cruzi. J Infect Dis 82:109–118.
    53.
    Urbina JA, Azavache V. 1984. Regulation of energy metabolism in Trypanosoma (Schizotrypanum) cruzi epimastigotes. II. NAD+-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase. Mol Biochem Parasitol 11:241–255.
    54.
    Wynne de Martini GJ, Abramo Orrego L, de Rissio AM, Alvarez M, Mujica LP. 1980. Culture of Trypanosoma cruzi in a monophasic medium. Application to large-scale cultures in fermentation processes. Medicina (B Aires) 40(Suppl 1):109–114.
    55.
    Sylvester D, Krassner SM. 1976. Proline metabolism in Trypanosoma cruzi epimastigotes. Comp Biochem Physiol 55:443–447.
    56.
    Crispim M, Damasceno FS, Hernández A, Barisón MJ, Pretto Sauter I, Souza Pavani R, Santos Moura A, Pral EMF, Cortez M, Elias MC, Silber AM. 2018. The glutamine synthetase of Trypanosoma cruzi is required for its resistance to ammonium accumulation and evasion of the parasitophorous vacuole during host-cell infection. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 12:e0006170.
    57.
    Cruz-Bustos T, Potapenko E, Storey M, Docampo R. 2018. An intracellular ammonium transporter is necessary for replication, differentiation, and resistance to starvation and osmotic stress in Trypanosoma cruzi. mSphere 3:e00377-17.
    58.
    González-Marcano E, Acosta H, Mijares A, Concepción JL. 2016. Kinetic and molecular characterization of the pyruvate phosphate dikinase from Trypanosoma cruzi. Exp Parasitol 165:81–87.
    59.
    Marciano D, Maugeri DA, Cazzulo JJ, Nowicki C. 2009. Functional characterization of stage-specific aminotransferases from trypanosomatids. Mol Biochem Parasitol 166:172–182.
    60.
    Montemartini M, Santomé JA, Cazzulo JJ, Nowicki C. 1993. Purification and partial structural and kinetic characterization of tyrosine aminotransferase from epimastigotes of Trypanosoma cruzi. Biochem J 292:901–906.
    61.
    Nowicki C, Montemartini M, Duschak V, Santomé JA, Cazzulo JJ. 1992. Presence and subcellular localization of tyrosine aminotransferase and p-hydroxyphenyllactate dehydrogenase in epimastigotes of Trypanosoma cruzi. FEMS Microbiol Lett 71:119–124.
    62.
    Cannata JJ, Cazzulo JJ. 1984. Glycosomal and mitochondrial malate dehydrogenases in epimastigotes of Trypanosoma cruzi. Mol Biochem Parasitol 11:37–49.
    63.
    Boveris A, Hertig CM, Turrens JF. 1986. Fumarate reductase and other mitochondrial activities in Trypanosoma cruzi. Mol Biochem Parasitol 19:163–169.
    64.
    Takashima E, Inaoka DK, Osanai A, Nara T, Odaka M, Aoki T, Inaka K, Harada S, Kita K. 2002. Characterization of the dihydroorotate dehydrogenase as a soluble fumarate reductase in Trypanosoma cruzi. Mol Biochem Parasitol 122:189–200.
    65.
    Blum JJ. 1996. Oxidation of alanine, acetate, glutamate, and succinate by digitonin-permeabilized Leishmania major promastigotes. J Eukaryot Microbiol 43:144–150.
    66.
    Keegan FP, Sansone L, Blum JJ. 1987. Oxidation of glucose, ribose, alanine, and glutamate by Leishmania braziliensis panamensis. J Protozool 34:174–179.
    67.
    Blum JJ. 1994. Energy metabolism in Leishmania. J Bioenerg Biomembr 26:147–155.
    68.
    Brener Z, Chiari E. 1965. Aspects of early growth of different Trypanosoma cruzi strains in culture medium. J Parasitol 51:922–926.
    69.
    Stein WD. 1989. Kinetics of transport: analyzing, testing, and characterizing models using kinetic approaches. Methods Enzymol 171:23–62.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSphere
    Volume 3Number 429 August 2018
    eLocator: e00338-18
    Editor: Ira J. Blader
    University at Buffalo

    History

    Received: 21 June 2018
    Accepted: 22 June 2018
    Published online: 18 July 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. Chagas disease
    2. l-alanine metabolism
    3. l-alanine uptake
    4. Trypanosoma cruzi
    5. bioenergetics

    Contributors

    Authors

    Richard M. B. M. Girard
    Department of Parasitology, Laboratory of Biochemistry of Tryps - LaBTryps, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, Cidade Universitária, Butantã, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
    Marcell Crispim
    Department of Parasitology, Laboratory of Biochemistry of Tryps - LaBTryps, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, Cidade Universitária, Butantã, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
    Mayke Bezerra Alencar
    Department of Parasitology, Laboratory of Biochemistry of Tryps - LaBTryps, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, Cidade Universitária, Butantã, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
    Ariel Mariano Silber
    Department of Parasitology, Laboratory of Biochemistry of Tryps - LaBTryps, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, Cidade Universitária, Butantã, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

    Editor

    Ira J. Blader
    Editor
    University at Buffalo

    Reviewers

    Richard Burchmore
    Solicited external reviewer
    University of Glasgow
    Achim Schnaufer
    Solicited external reviewer
    University of Edinburgh
    Roberto Docampo
    Solicited external reviewer
    University of Georgia

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Ariel Mariano Silber, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSphereArticle
    Latent Membrane Protein 1 Is a Novel Determinant of Epstein-Barr Virus Genome Persistence and Reactivation

    Latent Membrane Protein 1 Is a Novel Determinant of Epstein-Barr Virus Genome Persistence and Reactivation

    ABSTRACT

    Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a ubiquitous gammaherpesvirus that persistently infects humans, with nearly 95% seropositivity in adults. Infection in differentiating epithelia is permissive, but EBV-associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) tumors harbor a clonal and nonproductive latent infection. However, in explanted NPC cultures and epithelial cell lines, episomal EBV genomes are frequently lost. The resulting unstable infection has hampered efforts to study the determinants of EBV persistence and latency in epithelial oncogenesis. The EBV nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1) protein is required for tethering EBV episomes to cellular DNA and for mitotic segregation to daughter cells. Expression of EBNA1 does not ensure faithful partitioning of EBV episomes or replicons, suggesting that additional regulatory mechanisms have yet to be elucidated. The EBV latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) is an oncogenic signaling protein expressed in latent and lytic cycles. This study identified that LMP1 contributes to the loss of EBV genomes in latently infected cells and promotes differentiation-induced lytic replication in a polarized air-liquid interface (ALI) culture model. Deletion of LMP1 in recombinantly infected 293 cells promoted the retention of EBV genomes in passaged cells, which was in part localized to a conserved PXQXT motif in the C-terminal signaling domain (CTAR1). Additionally, knockdown of LMP1 in the recombinantly infected NPC cell line HK1 resulted in decreased induction of lytic proteins and infectious EBV titers. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that in epithelial infections, regulation of LMP1 mechanisms may be a determinant of infection outcome and a potential risk factor for EBV persistence in preneoplastic cells.
    IMPORTANCE Latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) is a constitutively active oncogenic signaling protein encoded by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). Despite monoclonal infection in cases of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), it has been difficult to reconcile the heterogeneous LMP1 protein levels detected in tumor cells. The LMP1 protein is a pleiotropic signaling protein with oncogenic potential. Findings from this study are consistent with the hypothesis that LMP1 has a role distinct from that of oncogenesis that facilitates the viral life cycle by promoting an unstable but productive infection in differentiating epithelia.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Young LS and Rickinson AB. 2004. Epstein-Barr virus: 40 years on. Nat Rev Cancer4:757–768.
    2.
    Raab-Traub N and Flynn K. 1986. The structure of the termini of the Epstein-Barr virus as a marker of clonal cellular proliferation. Cell47:883–889.
    3.
    Tsao SW, Tsang CM, Pang PS, Zhang G, Chen H, and Lo KW. 2012. The biology of EBV infection in human epithelial cells. Semin Cancer Biol22:137–143.
    4.
    Dittmer DP, Hilscher CJ, Gulley ML, Yang EV, Chen M, and Glaser R. 2008. Multiple pathways for Epstein-Barr virus episome loss from nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Cancer123:2105–2112.
    5.
    Tsang CM, Zhang G, Seto E, Takada K, Deng W, Yip YL, Man C, Hau PM, Chen H, Cao Y, Lo KW, Middeldorp JM, Cheung AL, and Tsao SW. 2010. Epstein-Barr virus infection in immortalized nasopharyngeal epithelial cells: regulation of infection and phenotypic characterization. Int J Cancer127:1570–1583.
    6.
    Shannon-Lowe C, Adland E, Bell AI, Delecluse HJ, Rickinson AB, and Rowe M. 2009. Features distinguishing Epstein-Barr virus infections of epithelial cells and B cells: viral genome expression, genome maintenance, and genome amplification. J Virol83:7749–7760.
    7.
    Leight ER and Sugden B. 2001. Establishment of an oriP replicon is dependent upon an infrequent, epigenetic event. Mol Cell Biol21:4149–4161.
    8.
    Nanbo A, Sugden A, and Sugden B. 2007. The coupling of synthesis and partitioning of EBV’s plasmid replicon is revealed in live cells. EMBO J26:4252–4262.
    9.
    Sivachandran N, Thawe NN, and Frappier L. 2011. Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 1 replication and segregation functions in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell lines. J Virol85:10425–10430.
    10.
    Raab-Traub N. 2002. Epstein-Barr virus in the pathogenesis of NPC. Semin Cancer Biol12:431–441.
    11.
    Nawandar DM, Ohashi M, Djavadian R, Barlow E, Makielski K, Ali A, Lee D, Lambert PF, Johannsen E, and Kenney SC. 2017. Differentiation-dependent LMP1 expression is required for efficient lytic Epstein-Barr virus reactivation in epithelial cells. J Virol91:e02438-16.
    12.
    Tsao SW, Tsang CM, To KF, and Lo KW. 2015. The role of Epstein-Barr virus in epithelial malignancies. J Pathol235:323–333.
    13.
    Dawson CW, Port RJ, and Young LS. 2012. The role of the EBV-encoded latent membrane proteins LMP1 and LMP2 in the pathogenesis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Semin Cancer Biol22:144–153.
    14.
    Palser AL, Grayson NE, White RE, Corton C, Correia S, Ba Abdullah MM, Watson SJ, Cotten M, Arrand JR, Murray PG, Allday MJ, Rickinson AB, Young LS, Farrell PJ, and Kellam P. 2015. Genome diversity of Epstein-Barr virus from multiple tumor types and normal infection. J Virol89:5222–5237.
    15.
    Edwards RH, Seillier-Moiseiwitsch F, and Raab-Traub N. 1999. Signature amino acid changes in latent membrane protein 1 distinguish Epstein-Barr virus strains. Virology261:79–95.
    16.
    Sitki-Green D, Covington M, and Raab-Traub N. 2003. Compartmentalization and transmission of multiple Epstein-Barr virus strains in asymptomatic carriers. J Virol77:1840–1847.
    17.
    Sung NS, Edwards RH, Seillier-Moiseiwitsch F, Perkins AG, Zeng Y, and Raab-Traub N. 1998. Epstein-Barr virus strain variation in nasopharyngeal carcinoma from the endemic and non-endemic regions of China. Int J Cancer76:207–215.
    18.
    Edwards RH, Sitki-Green D, Moore DT, and Raab-Traub N. 2004. Potential selection of LMP1 variants in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Virol78:868–881.
    19.
    Pathmanathan R, Prasad U, Sadler R, Flynn K, and Raab-Traub N. 1995. Clonal proliferations of cells infected with Epstein-Barr virus in preinvasive lesions related to nasopharyngeal carcinoma. N Engl J Med333:693–698.
    20.
    Temple RM, Zhu J, Budgeon L, Christensen ND, Meyers C, and Sample CE. 2014. Efficient replication of Epstein-Barr virus in stratified epithelium in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A111:16544–16549.
    21.
    Müller L, Brighton LE, Carson JL, Fischer WA II, and Jaspers I. 2013. Culturing of human nasal epithelial cells at the air liquid interface. J Vis Exp doi:
    22.
    Feederle R, Bartlett EJ, and Delecluse HJ. 2010. Epstein-Barr virus genetics: talking about the BAC generation. Herpesviridae1:6.
    23.
    Delecluse HJ, Hilsendegen T, Pich D, Zeidler R, and Hammerschmidt W. 1998. Propagation and recovery of intact, infectious Epstein-Barr virus from prokaryotic to human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A95:8245–8250.
    24.
    Raab-Traub N. 2012. Novel mechanisms of EBV-induced oncogenesis. Curr Opin Virol2:453–458.
    25.
    Tsang CM, Yip YL, Lo KW, Deng W, To KF, Hau PM, Lau VM, Takada K, Lui VW, Lung ML, Chen H, Zeng M, Middeldorp JM, Cheung AL, and Tsao SW. 2012. Cyclin D1 overexpression supports stable EBV infection in nasopharyngeal epithelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:E3473–E3482. doi:
    26.
    Shimizu N, Yoshiyama H, and Takada K. 1996. Clonal propagation of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) recombinants in EBV-negative Akata cells. J Virol70:7260–7263.
    27.
    Knox PG, Li QX, Rickinson AB, and Young LS. 1996. In vitro production of stable Epstein-Barr virus-positive epithelial cell clones which resemble the virus:cell interaction observed in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Virology215:40–50.
    28.
    Lo AK, Lo KW, Tsao SW, Wong HL, Hui JW, To KF, Hayward DS, Chui YL, Lau YL, Takada K, and Huang DP. 2006. Epstein-Barr virus infection alters cellular signal cascades in human nasopharyngeal epithelial cells. Neoplasia8:173–180.
    29.
    Nawandar DM, Wang A, Makielski K, Lee D, Ma S, Barlow E, Reusch J, Jiang R, Wille CK, Greenspan D, Greenspan JS, Mertz JE, Hutt-Fletcher L, Johannsen EC, Lambert PF, and Kenney SC. 2015. Differentiation-dependent KLF4 expression promotes lytic Epstein-Barr virus infection in epithelial cells. PLoS Pathog11:e1005195.
    30.
    Whitcutt MJ, Adler KB, and Wu R. 1988. A biphasic chamber system for maintaining polarity of differentiation of cultured respiratory tract epithelial cells. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol24:420–428.
    31.
    Shair KH, Schnegg CI, and Raab-Traub N. 2008. EBV latent membrane protein 1 effects on plakoglobin, cell growth, and migration. Cancer Res68:6997–7005.
    32.
    Grundhoff A and Ganem D. 2004. Inefficient establishment of KSHV latency suggests an additional role for continued lytic replication in Kaposi sarcoma pathogenesis. J Clin Invest113:124–136.
    33.
    Lam N, Sandberg ML, and Sugden B. 2004. High physiological levels of LMP1 result in phosphorylation of eIF2 alpha in Epstein-Barr virus-infected cells. J Virol78:1657–1664.
    34.
    Huang DP, Ho JH, Poon YF, Chew EC, Saw D, Lui M, Li CL, Mak LS, Lai SH, and Lau WH. 1980. Establishment of a cell line (NPC/HK1) from a differentiated squamous carcinoma of the nasopharynx. Int J Cancer26:127–132.
    35.
    Mainou BA and Raab-Traub N. 2006. LMP1 strain variants: biological and molecular properties. J Virol80:6458–6468.
    36.
    Wasil LR, Wei L, Chang C, Lan L, and Shair KH. 2015. Regulation of DNA damage signaling and cell death responses by Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane proteins (LMP) 1 and LMP2A in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. J Virol89:7612–7624.
    37.
    Geiser V, Cahir-McFarland E, and Kieff E. 2011. Latent membrane protein 1 is dispensable for Epstein-Barr virus replication in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. PLoS One6:e22929.
    38.
    Chang Y, Cheng SD, and Tsai CH. 2002. Chromosomal integration of Epstein-Barr virus genomes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Head Neck24:143–150.
    39.
    Gulley ML, Raphael M, Lutz CT, Ross DW, and Raab-Traub N. 1992. Epstein-Barr virus integration in human lymphomas and lymphoid cell lines. Cancer70:185–191.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSphere
    Volume 2Number 627 December 2017
    eLocator: e00453-17
    Editor: Michael J. Imperiale
    University of Michigan—Ann Arbor

    History

    Received: 2 October 2017
    Accepted: 8 October 2017
    Published online: 8 November 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. Epstein-Barr virus
    2. gammaherpesvirus
    3. pathogenesis

    Contributors

    Authors

    Elizabeth A. Caves
    Cancer Virology Program, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
    Rachel M. Butch
    Cancer Virology Program, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
    Sarah A. Cook
    Cancer Virology Program, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
    Laura R. Wasil
    Cancer Virology Program, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
    Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
    Present address: Laura R. Wasil, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
    Chen Chen
    Cancer Virology Program, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
    Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
    Yuanpu Peter Di
    Cancer Virology Program, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
    Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
    Nara Lee
    Cancer Virology Program, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
    Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
    Kathy H. Y. Shair
    Cancer Virology Program, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
    Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

    Editor

    Michael J. Imperiale
    Editor
    University of Michigan—Ann Arbor

    Reviewers

    Clare E. Sample
    Solicited external reviewer
    Penn State University College of Medicine
    Shannon Kenney
    Solicited external reviewer
    University of Wisconsin–Madison

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Kathy H. Y. Shair, [email protected].
    E.A.C., R.M.B., and S.A.C. contributed equally to this work.

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSphereArticle
    Ehrlichia chaffeensis TRP75 Interacts with Host Cell Targets Involved in Homeostasis, Cytoskeleton Organization, and Apoptosis Regulation To Promote Infection

    Ehrlichia chaffeensis TRP75 Interacts with Host Cell Targets Involved in Homeostasis, Cytoskeleton Organization, and Apoptosis Regulation To Promote Infection

    ABSTRACT

    Ehrlichia chaffeensis is an obligately intracellular bacterium that exhibits tropism for mononuclear phagocytes. The mechanisms involved in E. chaffeensis infection of the host cell and evasion of host defenses are not fully defined, but a subset of type 1 secreted tandem repeat protein (TRP) effectors play important roles. Recently, we determined molecular interactions of TRP120, TRP47, and TRP32 with the eukaryotic host cell. In this investigation, we used yeast two-hybrid analysis to reveal that another E. chaffeensis tandem repeat protein, TRP75, interacts with a diverse group of human proteins associated with organismal and tissue homeostasis, multiple metabolic processes and regulation, response to reactive oxygen species, signal transduction, and protein modifications. Thirteen identified host target proteins associated with actin cytoskeleton reorganization or apoptosis were examined in detail and confirmed to interact with TRP75 at different levels as determined by coimmunoprecipitation assays. These protein interactions were visualized by immunofluorescence confocal microscopy during infection and colocalized with Ehrlichia morulae with different intensities. Moreover, small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) (n = 86) were used to knock down identified TRP75-interacting host proteins separately, and their influence on ehrlichial infection was investigated by real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR). Knockdown of 74/86 (86%) TRP75 target proteins had a significant negative effect on ehrlichial infection. The results of this study further support the idea of a role of Ehrlichia TRPs as effectors that interact with a complex array of host proteins to promote ehrlichial infection.
    IMPORTANCE Human monocytic ehrlichiosis (HME) is caused by an obligatory intracellular bacterium, E. chaffeensis, and is one of the most prevalent, life-threatening emerging infectious zoonoses in the United States. The mechanisms through which E. chaffeensis invades and establishes an intracellular niche are not well understood but are dependent on secreted ehrlichial effector proteins. The significance of this study is in addressing how intracellular pathogens, particularly those with small genomes such as Ehrlichia, exploit a limited number of secreted effector proteins such as tandem repeat proteins (TRPs) to manipulate complex eukaryotes and to regulate host cell processes through molecular pathogen-host interplay. The results of our studies highlight the broader role of ehrlichial TRPs in promoting infection and help define the mechanisms through which obligately intracellular bacteria modulate host cell function for survival.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Paddock CD, Childs JE. 2003. Ehrlichia chaffeensis: a prototypical emerging pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev 16:37–64.
    2.
    Dunning Hotopp JC, Lin M, Madupu R, Crabtree J, Angiuoli SV, Eisen JA, Seshadri R, Ren Q, Wu M, Utterback TR, Smith S, Lewis M, Khouri H, Zhang C, Niu H, Lin Q, Ohashi N, Zhi N, Nelson W, Brinkac LM, Dodson RJ, Rosovitz MJ, Sundaram J, Daugherty SC, Davidsen T, Durkin AS, Gwinn M, Haft DH, Selengut JD, Sullivan SA, Zafar N, Zhou L, Benahmed F, Forberger H, Halpin R, Mulligan S, Robinson J, White O, Rikihisa Y, Tettelin H. 2006. Comparative genomics of emerging human ehrlichiosis agents. PLoS Genet 2:e21.
    3.
    Rikihisa Y. 2015. Molecular pathogenesis of Ehrlichia chaffeensis infection. Annu Rev Microbiol 69:283–304.
    4.
    Lina TT, Farris T, Luo T, Mitra S, Zhu B, McBride JW. 2016. Hacker within! Ehrlichia chaffeensis effector driven phagocyte reprogramming strategy. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 6:58.
    5.
    Doyle CK, Nethery KA, Popov VL, McBride JW. 2006. Differentially expressed and secreted major immunoreactive protein orthologs of Ehrlichia canis and E. chaffeensis elicit early antibody responses to epitopes on glycosylated tandem repeats. Infect Immun 74:711–720.
    6.
    Luo T, Zhang X, McBride JW. 2009. Major species-specific antibody epitopes of the Ehrlichia chaffeensis p120 and E. canis p140 orthologs in surface-exposed tandem repeat regions. Clin Vaccine Immunol 16:982–990.
    7.
    Luo T, Zhang X, Wakeel A, Popov VL, McBride JW. 2008. A variable-length PCR target protein of Ehrlichia chaffeensis contains major species-specific antibody epitopes in acidic serine-rich tandem repeats. Infect Immun 76:1572–1580.
    8.
    Kuriakose JA, Zhang X, Luo T, McBride JW. 2012. Molecular basis of antibody mediated immunity against Ehrlichia chaffeensis involves species-specific linear epitopes in tandem repeat proteins. Microbes Infect 14:1054–1063.
    9.
    McBride JW, Zhang X, Wakeel A, Kuriakose JA. 2011. Tyrosine-phosphorylated Ehrlichia chaffeensis and Ehrlichia canis tandem repeat orthologs contain a major continuous cross-reactive antibody epitope in lysine-rich repeats. Infect Immun 79:3178–3187.
    10.
    Popov VL, Yu Xj, Walker DH. 2000. The 120 kDa outer membrane protein of Ehrlichia chaffeensis: preferential expression on dense-core cells and gene expression in Escherichia coli associated with attachment and entry. Microb Pathog 28:71–80.
    11.
    Huang H, Lin M, Wang X, Kikuchi T, Mottaz H, Norbeck A, Rikihisa Y. 2008. Proteomic analysis of and immune responses to Ehrlichia chaffeensis lipoproteins. Infect Immun 76:3405–3414.
    12.
    Luo T, Kuriakose JA, Zhu B, Wakeel A, McBride JW. 2011. Ehrlichia chaffeensis TRP120 interacts with a diverse array of eukaryotic proteins involved in transcription, signaling, and cytoskeleton organization. Infect Immun 79:4382–4391.
    13.
    Luo T, McBride JW. 2012. Ehrlichia chaffeensis TRP32 interacts with host cell targets that influence intracellular survival. Infect Immun 80:2297–2306.
    14.
    Wakeel A, den Dulk-Ras A, Hooykaas PJ, McBride JW. 2011. Ehrlichia chaffeensis tandem repeat proteins and Ank200 are type 1 secretion system substrates related to the repeats-in-toxin exoprotein family. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 1:22.
    15.
    Wakeel A, Kuriakose JA, McBride JW. 2009. An Ehrlichia chaffeensis tandem repeat protein interacts with multiple host targets involved in cell signaling, transcriptional regulation, and vesicle trafficking. Infect Immun 77:1734–1745.
    16.
    Farris TR, Dunphy PS, Zhu B, Kibler CE, McBride JW. 2016. Ehrlichia chaffeensis TRP32 is a nucleomodulin that directly regulates expression of host genes governing differentiation and proliferation. Infect Immun doi:
    17.
    Zhu B, Kuriakose JA, Luo T, Ballesteros E, Gupta S, Fofanov Y, McBride JW. 2011. Ehrlichia chaffeensis TRP120 binds a G+C-rich motif in host cell DNA and exhibits eukaryotic transcriptional activator function. Infect Immun 79:4370–4381.
    18.
    Alonso R, Salavert F, Garcia-Garcia F, Carbonell-Caballero J, Bleda M, Garcia-Alonso L, Sanchis-Juan A, Perez-Gil D, Marin-Garcia P, Sanchez R, Cubuk C, Hidalgo MR, Amadoz A, Hernansaiz-Ballesteros RD, Alemán A, Tarraga J, Montaner D, Medina I, Dopazo J. 2015. Babelomics 5.0: functional interpretation for new generations of genomic data. Nucleic Acids Res 43:W117–W121.
    19.
    Al-Shahrour F, Díaz-Uriarte R, Dopazo J. 2004. FatiGO: a Web tool for finding significant associations of Gene Ontology terms with groups of genes. Bioinformatics 20:578–580.
    20.
    Marieb EN, Hoehn K, Hutchinson M. 2013. Human anatomy and physiology, 9th ed. Pearson Education/Benjamin-Cummings, San Francisco, CA.
    21.
    Condeelis J. 1995. Elongation factor 1 alpha, translation and the cytoskeleton. Trends Biochem Sci 20:169–170.
    22.
    Ejiri S. 2002. Moonlighting functions of polypeptide elongation factor 1: from actin bundling to zinc finger protein R1-associated nuclear localization. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 66:1–21.
    23.
    Luo T, Dunphy PS, McBride JW. 2017. Ehrlichia chaffeensis tandem repeat effector targets differentially influence infection. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 7:178.
    24.
    Perland E, Fredriksson R. 2017. Classification systems of secondary active transporters. Trends Pharmacol Sci 38:305–315.
    25.
    Hediger MA, Romero MF, Peng JB, Rolfs A, Takanaga H, Bruford EA. 2004. The ABCs of solute carriers: physiological, pathological and therapeutic implications of human membrane transport proteins. Pflugers Arch 447:465–468.
    26.
    Uldry M, Thorens B. 2004. The SLC2 family of facilitated hexose and polyol transporters. Pflugers Arch 447:480–489.
    27.
    Palmieri F. 2004. The mitochondrial transporter family (SLC25): physiological and pathological implications. Pflugers Arch 447:689–709.
    28.
    Hamblett KJ, Jacob AP, Gurgel JL, Tometsko ME, Rock BM, Patel SK, Milburn RR, Siu S, Ragan SP, Rock DA, Borths CJ, O’Neill JW, Chang WS, Weidner MF, Bio MM, Quon KC, Fanslow WC. 2015. SLC46A3 is required to transport catabolites of noncleavable antibody maytansine conjugates from the lysosome to the cytoplasm. Cancer Res 75:5329–5340.
    29.
    Furukawa J, Inoue K, Maeda J, Yasujima T, Ohta K, Kanai Y, Takada T, Matsuo H, Yuasa H. 2015. Functional identification of SLC43A3 as an equilibrative nucleobase transporter involved in purine salvage in mammals. Sci Rep 5:15057.
    30.
    Lee SH, Dominguez R. 2010. Regulation of actin cytoskeleton dynamics in cells. Mol Cells 29:311–325.
    31.
    Thomas S, Popov VL, Walker DH. 2010. Exit mechanisms of the intracellular bacterium Ehrlichia. PLoS One 5:e15775.
    32.
    Mohan Kumar D, Yamaguchi M, Miura K, Lin M, Los M, Coy JF, Rikihisa Y. 2013. Ehrlichia chaffeensis uses its surface protein EtpE to bind GPI-anchored protein DNase X and trigger entry into mammalian cells. PLoS Pathog 9:e1003666.
    33.
    Bruneel A, Labas V, Mailloux A, Sharma S, Royer N, Vinh J, Pernet P, Vaubourdolle M, Baudin B. 2005. Proteomics of human umbilical vein endothelial cells applied to etoposide-induced apoptosis. Proteomics 5:3876–3884.
    34.
    Gournier H, Goley ED, Niederstrasser H, Trinh T, Welch MD. 2001. Reconstitution of human Arp2/3 complex reveals critical roles of individual subunits in complex structure and activity. Mol Cell 8:1041–1052.
    35.
    Janji B, Giganti A, De Corte V, Catillon M, Bruyneel E, Lentz D, Plastino J, Gettemans J, Friederich E. 2006. Phosphorylation on Ser5 increases the F-actin-binding activity of l-plastin and promotes its targeting to sites of actin assembly in cells. J Cell Sci 119:1947–1960.
    36.
    Ma AD, Abrams CS. 1999. Pleckstrin induces cytoskeletal reorganization via a Rac-dependent pathway. J Biol Chem 274:28730–28735.
    37.
    Angeles DC, Gan BH, Onstead L, Zhao Y, Lim KL, Dachsel J, Melrose H, Farrer M, Wszolek ZK, Dickson DW, Tan EK. 2011. Mutations in LRRK2 increase phosphorylation of peroxiredoxin 3 exacerbating oxidative stress-induced neuronal death. Hum Mutat 32:1390–1397.
    38.
    Hawkes WC, Alkan Z. 2012. Delayed cell cycle progression in selenoprotein W-depleted cells is regulated by a mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 4-p38/c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase-p53 pathway. J Biol Chem 287:27371–27379.
    39.
    Bixel K, Saini U, Kumar Bid H, Fowler J, Riley M, Wanner R, Deepa Priya Dorayappan K, Rajendran S, Konishi I, Matsumura N, Cohn DE, Selvendiran K. 2017. Targeting STAT3 by HO3867 induces apoptosis in ovarian clear cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer 141:1856–1866.
    40.
    Wu Y, Liu XM, Wang XJ, Zhang Y, Liang XQ, Cao EH. 2009. PIG11 is involved in hepatocellular carcinogenesis and its over-expression promotes Hepg2 cell apoptosis. Pathol Oncol Res 15:411–416.
    41.
    Ahn KC, Choi JY, Kim JS, Hwang SG, Kim WJ, Park JK, Um HD. 2013. ICAM-3 endows anticancer drug resistance against microtubule-damaging agents via activation of the ICAM-3-AKT/ERK-CREB-2 pathway and blockage of apoptosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 441:507–513.
    42.
    Su Z, Xin S, Xu L, Cheng J, Guo J, Li L, Wei Q. 2012. The calcineurin B subunit induces TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) expression via CD11b-NF-kappaB pathway in RAW264.7 macrophages. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 417:777–783.
    43.
    Yang SB, Chen X, Wu BY, Wang MW, Cai CH, Cho DB, Chong J, Li P, Tang SG, Yang PC. 2009. Immunoglobulin kappa and immunoglobulin lambda are required for expression of the anti-apoptotic molecule Bcl-xL in human colorectal cancer tissue. Scand J Gastroenterol 44:1443–1451.
    44.
    Donati G, Thomas G. 2012. Apoptosis in pluripotent stem cells: RPL11 strikes again. Cell Cycle 11:840.
    45.
    Dunphy PS, Luo T, McBride JW. 2014. Ehrlichia chaffeensis exploits host SUMOylation pathways to mediate effector-host interactions and promote intracellular survival. Infect Immun 82:4154–4168.
    46.
    Zhu B, Farris TR, Milligan SL, Chen HS, Zhu RJ, Hong A, Zhou XC, Gao XL, McBride JW. 2016. Rapid identification of ubiquitination and SUMOylation target sites by microfluidic peptide array. Biochem Biophys Rep 5:430–438.
    47.
    Zhu B, Das S, Mitra S, Farris TR, McBride JW. 2017. Ehrlichia chaffeensis TRP120 moonlights as a HECT E3 ligase involved in self- and host ubiquitination to influence protein interactions and stability for intracellular survival. Infect Immun 85:e00290-17.
    48.
    Ribet D, Cossart P. 2010. Post-translational modifications in host cells during bacterial infection. FEBS Lett 584:2748–2758.
    49.
    Jorgensen I, Bednar MM, Amin V, Davis BK, Ting JP, McCafferty DG, Valdivia RH. 2011. The Chlamydia protease CPAF regulates host and bacterial proteins to maintain pathogen vacuole integrity and promote virulence. Cell Host Microbe 10:21–32.
    50.
    Zhong G. 2011. Chlamydia trachomatis secretion of proteases for manipulating host signaling pathways. Front Microbiol 2:14.
    51.
    Kuriakose JA, Miyashiro S, Luo T, Zhu B, McBride JW. 2011. Ehrlichia chaffeensis transcriptome in mammalian and arthropod hosts reveals differential gene expression and post transcriptional regulation. PLoS One 6:e24136.
    52.
    Bartel P, Chien CT, Sternglanz R, Fields S. 1993. Elimination of false positives that arise in using the two-hybrid system. Biotechniques 14:920–924.
    53.
    Vojtek AB, Hollenberg SM. 1995. Ras-Raf interaction: two-hybrid analysis. Methods Enzymol 255:331–342.
    54.
    Fromont-Racine M, Rain JC, Legrain P. 1997. Toward a functional analysis of the yeast genome through exhaustive two-hybrid screens. Nat Genet 16:277–282.
    55.
    Formstecher E, Aresta S, Collura V, Hamburger A, Meil A, Trehin A, Reverdy C, Betin V, Maire S, Brun C, Jacq B, Arpin M, Bellaiche Y, Bellusci S, Benaroch P, Bornens M, Chanet R, Chavrier P, Delattre O, Doye V, Fehon R, Faye G, Galli T, Girault JA, Goud B, de Gunzburg J, Johannes L, Junier MP, Mirouse V, Mukherjee A, Papadopoulo D, Perez F, Plessis A, Rossé C, Saule S, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Vincent A, White M, Legrain P, Wojcik J, Camonis J, Daviet L. 2005. Protein interaction mapping: a Drosophila case study. Genome Res 15:376–384.
    56.
    Lina TT, Dunphy PS, Luo T, McBride JW. 2016. Ehrlichia chaffeensis TRP120 activates canonical Notch signaling to downregulate TLR2/4 expression and promote intracellular survival. MBio 7:e00672-16.
    57.
    Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, Tinevez JY, White DJ, Hartenstein V, Eliceiri K, Tomancak P, Cardona A. 2012. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9:676–682.
    58.
    Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. 2012. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSphere
    Volume 3Number 225 April 2018
    eLocator: e00147-18
    Editor: Sarah E. F. D'Orazio
    University of Kentucky

    History

    Received: 16 March 2018
    Accepted: 24 March 2018
    Published online: 11 April 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. Ehrlichia chaffeensis
    2. apoptosis
    3. cytoskeleton organization
    4. effector-host interaction
    5. homeostasis
    6. tandem repeat protein

    Contributors

    Authors

    Tian Luo
    Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA
    Shubhajit Mitra
    Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA
    Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA
    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA
    Center for Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Diseases, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA
    Sealy Center for Vaccine Development, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA
    Institute for Human Infections and Immunity, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA

    Editor

    Sarah E. F. D'Orazio
    Editor
    University of Kentucky

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Jere W. McBride, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSphereArticle
    Manipulation of the Gut Microbiota Reveals Role in Colon Tumorigenesis

    ABSTRACT

    There is growing evidence that individuals with colonic adenomas and carcinomas harbor a distinct microbiota. Alterations to the gut microbiota may allow the outgrowth of bacterial populations that induce genomic mutations or exacerbate tumor-promoting inflammation. In addition, it is likely that the loss of key bacterial populations may result in the loss of protective functions that are normally provided by the microbiota. We explored the role of the gut microbiota in colon tumorigenesis by using an inflammation-based murine model. We observed that perturbing the microbiota with different combinations of antibiotics reduced the number of tumors at the end of the model. Using the random forest machine learning algorithm, we successfully modeled the number of tumors that developed over the course of the model on the basis of the initial composition of the microbiota. The timing of antibiotic treatment was an important determinant of tumor outcome, as colon tumorigenesis was arrested by the use of antibiotics during the early inflammation period of the murine model. Together, these results indicate that it is possible to predict colon tumorigenesis on the basis of the composition of the microbiota and that altering the gut microbiota can alter the course of tumorigenesis.
    IMPORTANCE Mounting evidence indicates that alterations to the gut microbiota, the complex community of bacteria that inhabits the gastrointestinal tract, are strongly associated with the development of colorectal cancer. We used antibiotic perturbations to a murine model of inflammation-driven colon cancer to generate eight starting communities that resulted in various severities of tumorigenesis. Furthermore, we were able to quantitatively predict the final number of tumors on the basis of the initial composition of the gut microbiota. These results further bolster the evidence that the gut microbiota is involved in mediating the development of colorectal cancer. As a final proof of principle, we showed that perturbing the gut microbiota in the midst of tumorigenesis could halt the formation of additional tumors. Together, alteration of the gut microbiota may be a useful therapeutic approach to preventing and altering the trajectory of colorectal cancer.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Bäckhed F, Ley RE, Sonnenburg JL, Peterson DA, and Gordon JI. 2005. Host-bacterial mutualism in the human intestine. Science307:1915–1920.
    2.
    Levy R and Borenstein E. 2013. Metabolic modeling of species interaction in the human microbiome elucidates community-level assembly rules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A110:12804–12809.
    3.
    Marino S, Baxter NT, Huffnagle GB, Petrosino JF, and Schloss PD. 2014. Mathematical modeling of primary succession of murine intestinal microbiota. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A111:439–444.
    4.
    Lepp PW, Brinig MM, Ouverney CC, Palm K, Armitage GC, and Relman DA. 2004. Methanogenic Archaea and human periodontal disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A101:6176–6181.
    5.
    Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Mahowald MA, Magrini V, Mardis ER, and Gordon JI. 2006. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature444:1027–1031.
    6.
    Tamboli CP, Neut C, Desreumaux P, and Colombel JF. 2004. Dysbiosis in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut53:1–4.
    7.
    Saulnier DM, Riehle K, Mistretta T, Diaz M, Mandal D, Raza S, Weidler EM, Qin X, Coarfa C, Milosavljevic A, Petrosino JF, Highlander S, Gibbs R, Lynch SV, Shulman RJ, and Versalovic J. 2011. Gastrointestinal microbiome signatures of pediatric patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology141:1782–1791.
    8.
    Chen HM, Yu YN, Wang JL, Lin YW, Kong X, Yang CQ, Yang L, Liu ZJ, Yuan YZ, Liu F, Wu JX, Zhong L, Fang DC, Zou W, and Fang JY. 2013. Decreased dietary fiber intake and structural alteration of gut microbiota in patients with advanced colorectal adenoma. Am J Clin Nutr97:1044–1052.
    9.
    Chen W, Liu F, Ling Z, Tong X, and Xiang C. 2012. Human intestinal lumen and mucosa-associated microbiota in patients with colorectal cancer. PLoS One7:e39743.
    10.
    Kostic AD, Gevers D, Pedamallu CS, Michaud M, Duke F, Earl AM, Ojesina AI, Jung J, Bass AJ, Tabernero J, Baselga J, Liu C, Shivdasani RA, Ogino S, Birren BW, Huttenhower C, Garrett WS, and Meyerson M. 2012. Genomic analysis identifies association of Fusobacterium with colorectal carcinoma. Genome Res22:292–298.
    11.
    Geng J, Fan H, Tang X, Zhai H, and Zhang Z. 2013. Diversified pattern of the human colorectal cancer microbiome. Gut Pathog5:2.
    12.
    Shen XJ, Rawls JF, Randall TA, Burcall L, Mpande C, Jenkins N, Jovov B, Abdo Z, Sandler RS, and Keku TO. 2010. Molecular characterization of mucosal adherent bacteria and associations with colorectal adenomas. Gut Microbes1:138–147.
    13.
    Sobhani I, Tap J, Roudot-Thoraval F, Roperch JP, Letulle S, Langella P, Corthier G, Van Nhieu JT, and Furet JP. 2011. Microbial dysbiosis in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. PLoS One6:e16393.
    14.
    Wang T, Cai G, Qiu Y, Fei N, Zhang M, Pang X, Jia W, Cai S, and Zhao L. 2012. Structural segregation of gut microbiota between colorectal cancer patients and healthy volunteers. ISME J6:320–329.
    15.
    Ahn J, Sinha R, Pei Z, Dominianni C, Wu J, Shi J, Goedert JJ, Hayes RB, and Yang L. 2013. Human gut microbiome and risk for colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst105:1907–1911.
    16.
    Zackular JP, Baxter NT, Iverson KD, Sadler WD, Petrosino JF, Chen GY, and Schloss PD. 2013. The gut microbiome modulates colon tumorigenesis. mBio4:e00692-13.
    17.
    Baxter NT, Zackular JP, Chen GY, and Schloss PD. 2014. Structure of the gut microbiome following colonization with human feces determines colonic tumor burden. Microbiome2:20.
    18.
    Arthur JC, Perez-Chanona E, Muhlbauer M, Tomkovich S, Uronis JM, Fan TJ, Campbell BJ, Abujamel T, Dogan B, Rogers AB, Rhodes JM, Stintzi A, Simpson KW, Hansen JJ, Keku TO, Fodor AA, and Jobin C. 2012. Intestinal inflammation targets cancer-inducing activity of the microbiota. Science338:120–123.
    19.
    Sears C, Islam S, Saha A, Arjumand M, Alam N, Faruque A, Salam M, Shin J, Hecht D, Weintraub A, Sack R, and Qadri F. 2008. Association of enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis infection with inflammatory diarrhea. Clin Infect Dis47:797–803.
    20.
    Kostic A, Chun E, Robertson L, Glickman J, Gallini C, Michaud M, Clancy T, Chung D, Lochhead P, Hold G, El-Omar E, Brenner D, Fuchs C, Meyerson M, and Garrett W. 2013. Fusobacterium nucleatum potentiates intestinal tumorigenesis and modulates the tumor-immune microenvironment. Cell Host Microbe14:207–215.
    21.
    Rubinstein M, Wang X, Liu W, Hao Y, Cai G, and Han Y. 2013. Fusobacterium nucleatum promotes colorectal carcinogenesis by modulating E-cadherin/beta-catenin signaling via its FadA adhesin. Cell Host Microbe14:195–206.
    22.
    Zackular JP, Rogers MAM, Ruffin MT, and Schloss PD. 2014. The human gut microbiome as a screening tool for colorectal cancer. Cancer Prev Res7:1112–1121.
    23.
    Lepage P, Leclerc MC, Joossens M, Mondot S, Blottiere HM, Raes J, Ehrlich D, and Dore J. 2013. A metagenomic insight into our gut’s microbiome. Gut62:146–158.
    24.
    Turnbaugh PJ, Ridaura VK, Faith JJ, Rey FE, Knight R, and Gordon JI. 2009. The effect of diet on the human gut microbiome: a metagenomic analysis in humanized gnotobiotic mice. Sci Transl Med1:6ra14.
    25.
    Qin J, Li R, Raes J, Arumugam M, Burgdorf KS, Manichanh C, Nielsen T, Pons N, Levenez F, Yamada T, Mende DR, Li J, Xu J, Li S, Li D, Cao J, Wang B, Liang H, Zheng H, Xie Y, Tap J, Lepage P, Bertalan M, Batto JM, Hansen T, Le Paslier D, Linneberg A, Nielsen HB, Pelletier E, Renault P, Sicheritz-Ponten T, Turner K, Zhu H, Yu C, Jian M, Zhou Y, Li Y, Zhang X, Qin N, Yang H, Wang J, Brunak S, Dore J, Guarner F, Kristiansen K, Pedersen O, Parkhill J, Weissenbach J, Bork P, and Ehrlich SD. 2010. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature464:59–65.
    26.
    Louis P and Flint HJ. 2009. Diversity, metabolism and microbial ecology of butyrate-producing bacteria from the human large intestine. FEMS Microbiol Lett294:1–8.
    27.
    Appleyard CB, Cruz ML, Isidro AA, Arthur JC, Jobin C, and De Simone C. 2011. Pretreatment with the probiotic VSLno.3 delays transition from inflammation to dysplasia in a rat model of colitis-associated cancer. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol301:G1004–G1013.
    28.
    Zhu Y, Michele Luo T, Jobin C, and Young HA. 2011. Gut microbiota and probiotics in colon tumorigenesis. Cancer Lett309:119–127.
    29.
    De Robertis M, Massi E, Poeta ML, Carotti S, Morini S, Cecchetelli L, Signori E, and Fazio VM. 2011. The AOM/DSS murine model for the study of colon carcinogenesis: from pathways to diagnosis and therapy studies. J Carcinog10:9.
    30.
    Sekirov I, Tam NM, Jogova M, Robertson ML, Li Y, Lupp C, and Finlay BB. 2008. Antibiotic-induced perturbations of the intestinal microbiota alter host susceptibility to enteric infection. Infect Immun76:4726–4736.
    31.
    Garrett WS, Lord GM, Punit S, Lugo-Villarino G, Mazmanian S, Ito S, Glickman JN, and Glimcher LH. 2007. Communicable ulcerative colitis induced by T-bet deficiency in the innate immune system. Cell131:33–45.
    32.
    Ubeda C, Taur Y, Jenq RR, Equinda MJ, Son T, Samstein M, Viale A, Socci ND, van den Brink MRM, Kamboj M, and Pamer EG. 2010. Vancomycin-resistant enterococcus domination of intestinal microbiota is enabled by antibiotic treatment in mice and precedes bloodstream invasion in humans. J Clin Invest120:4332–4341.
    33.
    Housseau F and Sears CL. 2010. Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis (ETBF)-mediated colitis in Min (Apc+/−) mice: a human commensal-based murine model of colon carcinogenesis. Cell Cycle9:3–5.
    34.
    Schubert AM, Sinani H, and Schloss PD. 2015. Antibiotic induced alterations of the murine gut microbiota and subsequent effects on colonization resistance against Clostridium difficile. mBio6:e00974-15.
    35.
    Chen L, Zou YY, Lu FG, Li FJ, and Lian GH. 2013. Efficacy profiles for different concentrations of Lactobacillus acidophilus in experimental colitis. World J Gastroenterol19:5347–5356.
    36.
    Liu Y, Tran DQ, Fatheree NY, and Marc Rhoads J. 2014. Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 differentially modulates effector memory T cells and Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in a mouse model of necrotizing enterocolitis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol307:G177–G186.
    37.
    Jenq RR, Ubeda C, Taur Y, Menezes CC, Khanin R, Dudakov JA, Liu C, West ML, Singer NV, Equinda MJ, Gobourne A, Lipuma L, Young LF, Smith OM, Ghosh A, Hanash AM, Goldberg JD, Aoyama K, Blazar BR, Pamer EG, and van den Brink MR. 2012. Regulation of intestinal inflammation by microbiota following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. J Exp Med209:903–911.
    38.
    Mack DR, Ahrne S, Hyde L, Wei S, and Hollingsworth MA. 2003. Extracellular MUC3 mucin secretion follows adherence of Lactobacillus strains to intestinal epithelial cells in vitro. Gut52:827–833.
    39.
    Liu Z, Zhang P, Ma Y, Chen H, Zhou Y, Zhang M, Chu Z, and Qin H. 2011. Lactobacillus plantarum prevents the development of colitis in IL-10-deficient mouse by reducing the intestinal permeability. Mol Biol Rep38:1353–1361.
    40.
    Chen L, Zou Y, Peng J, Lu F, Yin Y, Li F, and Yang J. 2015. Lactobacillus acidophilus suppresses colitis-associated activation of the IL-23/Th17 axis. J Immunol Res2015:909514.
    41.
    Human Microbiome Consortium. 2012. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature486:207–214.
    42.
    Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Mach Learn45:5–32.
    43.
    Subramanian S, Huq S, Yatsunenko T, Haque R, Mahfuz M, Alam MA, Benezra A, DeStefano J, Meier MF, Muegge BD, Barratt MJ, VanArendonk LG, Zhang Q, Province MA, Petri WA Jr., Ahmed T, and Gordon JI. 2014. Persistent gut microbiota immaturity in malnourished Bangladeshi children. Nature510:417–421.
    44.
    Kozich JJ, Westcott SL, Baxter NT, Highlander SK, and Schloss PD. 2013. Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform. Appl Environ Microbiol79:5112–5120.
    45.
    Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley BB, Parks DH, Robinson CJ, Sahl JW, Stres B, Thallinger GG, Van Horn DJ, and Weber CF. 2009. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol75:7537–7541.
    46.
    Pruesse E, Quast C, Knittel K, Fuchs BM, Ludwig W, Peplies J, and Glockner FO. 2007. Silva: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Res35:7188–7196.
    47.
    Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, and Knight R. 2011. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics27:2194–2200.
    48.
    Schloss PD and Westcott SL. 2011. Assessing and improving methods used in operational taxonomic unit-based approaches for 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol77:3219–3226.
    49.
    Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, and Cole JR. 2007. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol73:5261–5267.
    50.
    Cole JR, Wang Q, Fish JA, Chai B, McGarrell DM, Sun Y, Brown CT, Porras-Alfaro A, Kuske CR, and Tiedje JM. 2014. Ribosomal Database Project: data and tools for high throughput rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res42:D633–D642.
    51.
    Yue JC and Clayton MK. 2005. A similarity measure based on species proportions. Commun Stat Theory Methods34:2123–2131.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSphere
    Volume 1Number 125 February 2016
    eLocator: e00001-15
    Editor: Susannah Green Tringe
    Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

    History

    Received: 14 September 2015
    Accepted: 22 September 2015
    Published online: 4 November 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS:

    1. 16S rRNA gene sequencing
    2. azoxymethane
    3. colorectal cancer
    4. dextran sodium sulfate
    5. microbial ecology
    6. microbiome
    7. murine models

    Contributors

    Authors

    Joseph P. Zackular
    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
    Nielson T. Baxter
    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
    Grace Y. Chen
    Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

    Editor

    Susannah Green Tringe
    Editor
    Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Patrick D. Schloss, [email protected], or Grace Y. Chen, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSphereArticle
    Engineering Recombinant Reoviruses To Display gp41 Membrane-Proximal External-Region Epitopes from HIV-1

    Engineering Recombinant Reoviruses To Display gp41 Membrane-Proximal External-Region Epitopes from HIV-1

    ABSTRACT

    The gp41 membrane-proximal external region (MPER) is a target for broadly neutralizing antibody responses against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). However, replication-defective virus vaccines currently under evaluation in clinical trials do not efficiently elicit MPER-specific antibodies. Structural modeling suggests that the MPER forms an α-helical coiled coil that is required for function and immunogenicity. To maintain the native MPER conformation, we used reverse genetics to engineer replication-competent reovirus vectors that displayed MPER sequences in the α-helical coiled-coil tail domain of viral attachment protein σ1. Sequences in reovirus strain type 1 Lang (T1L) σ1 were exchanged with sequences encoding HIV-1 strain Ba-L MPER epitope 2F5 or the entire MPER. Individual 2F5 or MPER substitutions were introduced at virion-proximal or virion-distal sites in the σ1 tail. Recombinant reoviruses containing heterologous HIV-1 sequences were viable and produced progeny yields comparable to those with wild-type virus. HIV-1 sequences were retained following 10 serial passages in cell culture, indicating that the substitutions were genetically stable. Recombinant viruses engineered to display the 2F5 epitope or full-length MPER in σ1 were recognized by purified 2F5 antibody. Inoculation of mice with 2F5-containing vectors or rabbits with 2F5- or MPER-containing vectors elicited anti-reovirus antibodies, but HIV-1-specific antibodies were not detected. Together, these findings indicate that heterologous sequences that form α-helices can functionally replace native sequences in the α-helical tail domain of reovirus attachment protein σ1. However, although these vectors retain native antigenicity, they were not immunogenic, illustrating the difficulty of experimentally inducing immune responses to this essential region of HIV-1.
    IMPORTANCE Vaccines to protect against HIV-1, the causative agent of AIDS, are not approved for use. Antibodies that neutralize genetically diverse strains of HIV-1 bind to discrete regions of the envelope glycoproteins, including the gp41 MPER. We engineered recombinant reoviruses that displayed MPER epitopes in attachment protein σ1 (REO-MPER vectors). The REO-MPER vectors replicated with wild-type efficiency, were genetically stable, and retained native antigenicity. However, we did not detect HIV-1-specific immune responses following inoculation of the REO-MPER vectors into small animals. This work provides proof of principle for engineering reovirus to express antigenic epitopes and illustrates the difficulty in eliciting MPER-specific immune responses.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Mehandru S, Wrin T, Galovich J, Stiegler G, Vcelar B, Hurley A, Hogan C, Vasan S, Katinger H, Petropoulos CJ, and Markowitz M. 2004. Neutralization profiles of newly transmitted human immunodeficiency virus type 1 by monoclonal antibodies 2G12, 2F5, and 4E10. J Virol78:14039–14042.
    2.
    Binley JM, Wrin T, Korber B, Zwick MB, Wang M, Chappey C, Stiegler G, Kunert R, Zolla-Pazner S, Katinger H, Petropoulos CJ, and Burton DR. 2004. Comprehensive cross-clade neutralization analysis of a panel of anti-human immunodeficiency virus type 1 monoclonal antibodies. J Virol78:13232–13252.
    3.
    Hager-Braun C, Katinger H, and Tomer KB. 2006. The HIV-neutralizing monoclonal antibody 4E10 recognizes N-terminal sequences on the native antigen. J Immunol176:7471–7481.
    4.
    Scheid JF, Mouquet H, Feldhahn N, Seaman MS, Velinzon K, Pietzsch J, Ott RG, Anthony RM, Zebroski H, Hurley A, Phogat A, Chakrabarti B, Li Y, Connors M, Pereyra F, Walker BD, Wardemann H, Ho D, Wyatt RT, Mascola JR, Ravetch JV, and Nussenzweig MC. 2009. Broad diversity of neutralizing antibodies isolated from memory B cells in HIV-infected individuals. Nature458:636–640.
    5.
    Walker LMPhogat SKChan-Hui PYWagner DPhung PGoss JLWrin TSimek MDFling SMitcham JLLehrman JKPriddy FHOlsen OAFrey SMHammond PWProtocol G Principal Investigators, Kaminsky SZamb TMoyle MKoff WCPoignard PBurton DR. 2009. Broad and potent neutralizing antibodies from an African donor reveal a new HIV-1 vaccine target. Science326:285–289.
    6.
    Huang J, Ofek G, Laub L, Louder MK, Doria-Rose NA, Longo NS, Imamichi H, Bailer RT, Chakrabarti B, Sharma SK, Alam SM, Wang T, Yang Y, Zhang B, Migueles SA, Wyatt R, Haynes BF, Kwong PD, Mascola JR, and Connors M. 2012. Broad and potent neutralization of HIV-1 by a gp41-specific human antibody. Nature491:406–412.
    7.
    Zwick MB, Jensen R, Church S, Wang M, Stiegler G, Kunert R, Katinger H, and Burton DR. 2005. Anti-human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) antibodies 2F5 and 4E10 require surprisingly few crucial residues in the membrane-proximal external region of glycoprotein gp41 to neutralize HIV-1. J Virol79:1252–1261.
    8.
    Montero M, van Houten NE, Wang X, and Scott JK. 2008. The membrane-proximal external region of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope: dominant site of antibody neutralization and target for vaccine design. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev72:54–84.
    9.
    Landais E, Huang X, Havenar-Daughton C, Murrell B, Price MA, Wickramasinghe L, Ramos A, Bian CB, Simek M, Allen S, Karita E, Kilembe W, Lakhi S, Inambao M, Kamali A, Sanders EJ, Anzala O, Edward V, Bekker LG, Tang J, Gilmour J, Kosakovsky-Pond SL, Phung P, Wrin T, Crotty S, Godzik A, and Poignard P. 2016. Broadly neutralizing antibody responses in a large longitudinal sub-Saharan HIV primary infection cohort. PLoS Pathog12:e1005369.
    10.
    Frey G, Peng H, Rits-Volloch S, Morelli M, Cheng Y, and Chen B. 2008. A fusion-intermediate state of HIV-1 gp41 targeted by broadly neutralizing antibodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A105:3739–3744.
    11.
    Devash Y, Calvelli TA, Wood DG, Reagan KJ, and Rubinstein A. 1990. Vertical transmission of human immunodeficiency virus is correlated with the absence of high-affinity/avidity maternal antibodies to the gp120 principal neutralizing domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A87:3445–3449.
    12.
    Robertson CA, Mok JYQ, Froebel KS, Simmonds P, Burns SM, Marsden HS, and Graham S. 1992. Maternal antibodies to gp120 V3 sequence do not correlate with protection against vertical transmission of human immunodeficiency virus. J Infect Dis166:704–709.
    13.
    Ugen KE, Goedert JJ, Boyer J, Refaeli Y, Frank I, Williams WV, Willoughby A, Landesman S, Mendez H, and Rubinstein A. 1992. Vertical transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Reactivity of maternal sera with glycoprotein 120 and 41 peptides from HIV type 1. J Clin Invest89:1923–1930.
    14.
    Alfsen A, Iniguez P, Bouguyon E, and Bomsel M. 2001. Secretory IgA specific for a conserved epitope on gp41 envelope glycoprotein inhibits epithelial transcytosis of HIV-1. J Immunol166:6257–6265.
    15.
    Conley AJ, Kessler JA II, Boots LJ, McKenna PM, Schleif WA, Emini EA, Mark GE III, Katinger H, Cobb EK, Lunceford SM, Rouse SR, and Murthy KK. 1996. The consequence of passive administration of an anti-human immunodeficiency virus type 1 neutralizing monoclonal antibody before challenge of chimpanzees with a primary virus isolate. J Virol70:6751–6758.
    16.
    Hessell AJ, Rakasz EG, Tehrani DM, Huber M, Weisgrau KL, Landucci G, Forthal DN, Koff WC, Poignard P, Watkins DI, and Burton DR. 2010. Broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies 2F5 and 4E10, directed against the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp41 membrane proximal external region protect against mucosal challenge by simian-human immunodeficiency virus SHIVBa-L. J Virol84:1302–1313.
    17.
    Moog C, Dereuddre-Bosquet N, Teillaud J, Biedma ME, Holl V, Van Ham G, Heyndrickx L, Van Dorsselaer A, Katinger D, Vcelar B, Zolla-Pazner S, Mangeot I, Kelly C, Shattock RJ, and Le Grand R. 2014. Protective effect of vaginal application of neutralizing and nonneutralizing inhibitory antibodies against vaginal SHIV challenge in macaques. Mucosal Immunol7:46–56.
    18.
    Dryden KA, Wang G, Yeager M, Nibert ML, Coombs KM, Furlong DB, Fields BN, and Baker TS. 1993. Early steps in reovirus infection are associated with dramatic changes in supramolecular structure and protein conformation: analysis of virions and subviral particles by cryoelectron microscopy and image reconstruction. J Cell Biol122:1023–1041.
    19.
    Gomatos PJ and Tamm I. 1963. The secondary structure of reovirus RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A49:707–714.
    20.
    Lee PWK, Hayes EC, and Joklik WK. 1981. Protein σ1 is the reovirus cell attachment protein. Virology108:156–163.
    21.
    Weiner HL, Powers ML, and Fields BN. 1980. Absolute linkage of virulence and central nervous system cell tropism of reoviruses to viral hemagglutinin. J Infect Dis141:609–616.
    22.
    Dermody TS, Parker JS, and Sherry B. 2013. Orthoreoviruses, p 1304–1346. In Knipe DMHowley PM (ed), Fields virology, 6th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA.
    23.
    Tai JH, Williams JV, Edwards KM, Wright PF, Crowe JE, and Dermody TS. 2005. Prevalence of reovirus-specific antibodies in young children in Nashville, Tennessee. J Infect Dis191:1221–1224.
    24.
    White CL, Twigger KR, Vidal L, De Bono JS, Coffey M, Heinemann L, Morgan R, Merrick A, Errington F, Vile RG, Melcher AA, Pandha HS, and Harrington KJ. 2008. Characterization of the adaptive and innate immune response to intravenous oncolytic reovirus (Dearing type 3) during a phase I clinical trial. Gene Ther15:911–920.
    25.
    Galanis E, Markovic SN, Suman VJ, Nuovo GJ, Vile RG, Kottke TJ, Nevala WK, Thompson MA, Lewis JE, Rumilla KM, Roulstone V, Harrington K, Linette GP, Maples WJ, Coffey M, Zwiebel J, and Kendra K. 2012. Phase II trial of intravenous administration of Reolysin (reovirus serotype-3-Dearing strain) in patients with metastatic melanoma. Mol Ther20:1998–2003.
    26.
    Furlong DB, Nibert ML, and Fields BN. 1988. Sigma 1 protein of mammalian reoviruses extends from the surfaces of viral particles. J Virol62:246–256.
    27.
    Fraser RD, Furlong DB, Trus BL, Nibert ML, Fields BN, and Steven AC. 1990. Molecular structure of the cell-attachment protein of reovirus: correlation of computer-processed electron micrographs with sequence-based predictions. J Virol64:2990–3000.
    28.
    Chappell JD, Prota AE, Dermody TS, and Stehle T. 2002. Crystal structure of reovirus attachment protein sigma 1 reveals evolutionary relationship to adenovirus fiber. EMBO J21:1–11.
    29.
    Nibert ML, Dermody TS, and Fields BN. 1990. Structure of the reovirus cell-attachment protein: a model for the domain organization of σ1. J Virol64:2976–2989.
    30.
    Reiter DM, Frierson JM, Halvorson EE, Kobayashi T, Dermody TS, and Stehle T. 2011. Crystal structure of reovirus attachment protein σ1 in complex with sialylated oligosaccharides. PLoS Pathog7:e1002166.
    31.
    Dutch RE, Jardetzky TS, and Lamb RA. 2000. Virus membrane fusion proteins: biological machines that undergo a metamorphosis. Biosci Rep20:597–612.
    32.
    Kobayashi T, Antar AA, Boehme KW, Danthi P, Eby EA, Guglielmi KM, Holm GH, Johnson EM, Maginnis MS, Naik S, Skelton WB, Wetzel JD, Wilson GJ, Chappell JD, and Dermody TS. 2007. A plasmid-based reverse genetics system for animal double-stranded RNA viruses. Cell Host Microbe1:147–157.
    33.
    Kobayashi T, Ooms LS, Ikizler M, Chappell JD, and Dermody TS. 2010. An improved reverse genetics system for mammalian orthoreoviruses. Virology398:194–200.
    34.
    Kirchner E, Guglielmi KM, Strauss HM, Dermody TS, and Stehle T. 2008. Structure of reovirus sigma 1 in complex with its receptor junctional adhesion molecule-A. PLoS Pathog4:e1000235.
    35.
    Reiss K, Stencel JE, Liu Y, Blaum BS, Reiter DM, Feizi T, Dermody TS, and Stehle T. 2012. The GM2 glycan serves as a functional coreceptor for serotype 1 reovirus. PLoS Pathog8:e1003078.
    36.
    Bokiej M, Ogden KM, Ikizler M, Reiter DM, Stehle T, and Dermody TS. 2012. Optimum length and flexibility of reovirus attachment protein σ1 are required for efficient viral infection. J Virol86:10270–10280.
    37.
    Doyle JD, Danthi P, Kendall EA, Ooms LS, Wetzel JD, and Dermody TS. 2012. Molecular determinants of proteolytic disassembly of the reovirus outer capsid. J Biol Chem287:8029–8038.
    38.
    Doyle JD, Stencel-Baerenwald JE, Copeland CA, Rhoads JP, Brown JJ, Boyd KL, Atkinson JB, and Dermody TS. 2015. Diminished reovirus capsid stability alters disease pathogenesis and littermate transmission. PLoS Pathog11:e1004693.
    39.
    Danthi P, Coffey CM, Parker JS, Abel TW, and Dermody TS. 2008. Independent regulation of reovirus membrane penetration and apoptosis by the μ1 φ domain. PLoS Pathog4:e1000248.
    40.
    Danthi P, Kobayashi T, Holm GH, Hansberger MW, Abel TW, and Dermody TS. 2008. Reovirus apoptosis and virulence are regulated by host cell membrane penetration efficiency. J Virol82:161–172.
    41.
    Zurney J, Kobayashi T, Holm GH, Dermody TS, and Sherry B. 2009. The reovirus μ2 protein inhibits interferon signaling through a novel mechanism involving nuclear accumulation of interferon regulatory factor 9. J Virol83:2178–2187.
    42.
    Irvin SC, Zurney J, Ooms LS, Chappell JD, Dermody TS, and Sherry B. 2012. A single amino acid polymorphism in reovirus protein μ2 determines repression of interferon signaling and modulates myocarditis. J Virol86:2302–2311.
    43.
    Stebbing RE, Irvin SC, Rivera-Serrano EE, Boehme KW, Ikizler M, Yoder JA, Dermody TS, and Sherry B. 2014. An ITAM in a nonenveloped virus regulates activation of NF-κB, induction of beta interferon, and viral spread. J Virol88:2572–2583.
    44.
    Kobayashi T, Ooms LS, Chappell JD, and Dermody TS. 2009. Identification of functional domains in reovirus replication proteins μNS and μ2. J Virol83:2892–2906.
    45.
    Ooms LS, Kobayashi T, Dermody TS, and Chappell JD. 2010. A post-entry step in the mammalian orthoreovirus replication cycle is a determinant of cell tropism. J Biol Chem285:41604–41613.
    46.
    Ooms LS, Jerome WG, Dermody TS, and Chappell JD. 2012. Reovirus replication protein 2 influences cell tropism by promoting particle assembly within viral inclusions. J Virol86:10979–10987.
    47.
    Boehme KW, Guglielmi KM, and Dermody TS. 2009. Reovirus nonstructural protein sigma1s is required for establishment of viremia and systemic dissemination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A106:19986–19991.
    48.
    Frierson JM, Pruijssers AJ, Konopka JL, Reiter DM, Abel TW, Stehle T, and Dermody TS. 2012. Utilization of sialylated glycans as coreceptors enhances the neurovirulence of serotype 3 reovirus. J Virol86:13164–13173.
    49.
    Nygaard RM, Lahti L, Boehme KW, Ikizler M, Doyle JD, Dermody TS, and Schiff LA. 2013. Genetic determinants of reovirus pathogenesis in a murine model of respiratory infection. J Virol87:9279–9289.
    50.
    Stencel-Baerenwald J, Reiss K, Blaum BS, Colvin D, Li X, Abel T, Boyd K, Stehle T, and Dermody TS. 2015. Glycan engagement dictates hydrocephalus induction by serotype 1 reovirus. mBio6(2):e02356.
    51.
    Pruijssers AJ, Hengel H, Abel TW, and Dermody TS. 2013. Apoptosis induction influences reovirus replication and virulence in newborn mice. J Virol87:12980–12989.
    52.
    Zwick MB, Labrijn AF, Wang M, Spenlehauer C, Saphire EO, Binley JM, Moore JP, Stiegler G, Katinger H, Burton DR, and Parren PW. 2001. Broadly neutralizing antibodies targeted to the membrane-proximal external region of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 glycoprotein gp41. J Virol75:10892–10905.
    53.
    Parker CE, Deterding LJ, Hager-Braun C, Binley JM, Schulke N, Katinger H, Moore JP, and Tomer KB. 2001. Fine definition of the epitope on the gp41 glycoprotein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 for the neutralizing monoclonal antibody 2F5. J Virol75:10906–10911.
    54.
    Shen X, Parks RJ, Montefiori DC, Kirchherr JL, Keele BF, Decker JM, Blattner WA, Gao F, Weinhold KJ, Hicks CB, Greenberg ML, Hahn BH, Shaw GM, Haynes BF, and Tomaras GD. 2009. In vivo gp41 antibodies targeting the 2F5 monoclonal antibody epitope mediate human immunodeficiency virus type 1 neutralization breadth. J Virol83:3617–3625.
    55.
    Haigwood NL. 2009. Update on animal models for HIV research. Eur J Immunol39:1994–1999.
    56.
    Montefiori DC. 2009. Measuring HIV neutralization in a luciferase reporter gene assay. Methods Mol Biol485:395–405.
    57.
    Sarzotti-Kelsoe M, Daniell X, Todd CA, Bilska M, Martelli A, LaBranche C, Perez LG, Ochsenbauer C, Kappes JC, Rountree W, Denny TN, and Montefiori DC. 2014. Optimization and validation of a neutralizing antibody assay for HIV-1 in A3R5 cells. J Immunol Methods409:147–160.
    58.
    Silvey KJ, Hutchings AB, Vajdy M, Petzke MM, and Neutra MR. 2001. Role of immunoglobulin A in protection against reovirus entry into murine Peyer’s patches. J Virol75:10870–10879.
    59.
    Hutchings AB, Helander A, Silvey KJ, Chandran K, Lucas WT, Nibert ML, and Neutra MR. 2004. Secretory immunoglobulin A antibodies against the sigma1 outer capsid protein of reovirus type 1 Lang prevent infection of mouse Peyer’s patches. J Virol78:947–957.
    60.
    Kasel JA, Rosen L, and Evans HE. 1963. Infection of human volunteers with a reovirus of bovine origin. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med112:979–981.
    61.
    Vidal L, Pandha HS, Yap TA, White CL, Twigger K, Vile RG, Melcher A, Coffey M, Harrington KJ, and DeBono JS. 2008. A phase I study of intravenous oncolytic reovirus type 3 Dearing in patients with advanced cancer. Clin Cancer Res14:7127–7137.
    62.
    Wolf J, Rubin D, Finberg R, Kauffman R, Sharpe A, Trier J, and Fields B. 1981. Intestinal M cells: a pathway for entry of reovirus into the host. Science212:471–472.
    63.
    Gonzalez-Hernandez MB, Liu T, Payne HC, Stencel-Baerenwald JE, Ikizler M, Yagita H, Dermody TS, Williams IR, and Wobus CE. 2014. Efficient norovirus and reovirus replication in the mouse intestine requires microfold (M) cells. J Virol88:6934–6943.
    64.
    Fleeton MN, Fleeton MN, Contractor N, Leon F, Wetzel JD, Dermody TS, and Kelsall BL. 2004. Peyer’s patch dendritic cells process viral antigen from apoptotic epithelial cells in the intestine of reovirus-infected mice. J Exp Med200:235–245.
    65.
    Johansson C, Wetzel JD, He JP, Mikacenic C, Dermody TS, and Kelsall BL. 2007. Type I interferons produced by hematopoietic cells protect mice against lethal infection by mammalian reovirus. J Exp Med204:1349–1358.
    66.
    Antar AAR, Konopka JL, Campbell JA, Henry RA, Perdigoto AL, Carter BD, Pozzi A, Abel TW, and Dermody TS. 2009. Junctional adhesion molecule-A is required for hematogenous dissemination of reovirus. Cell Host Microbe5:59–71.
    67.
    London SD, Rubin DH, and Cebra JJ. 1987. Gut mucosal immunization with reovirus serotype 1-L stimulates virus-specific cytotoxic T cell precursors as well as IgA memory cells in Peyer’s patches. J Exp Med165:830–847.
    68.
    Major AS and Cuff CF. 1996. Effects of the route of infection on immunoglobulin G subclasses and specificity of the reovirus-specific humoral immune response. J Virol70:5968–5974.
    69.
    Virgin HW IV, Mann MA, Fields BN, and Tyler KL. 1991. Monoclonal antibodies to reovirus reveal structure/function relationships between capsid proteins and genetics of susceptibility to antibody action. J Virol65:6772–6781.
    70.
    Tyler KL, Mann MA, Fields BN, and Virgin HW IV. 1993. Protective anti-reovirus monoclonal antibodies and their effects on viral pathogenesis. J Virol67:3446–3453.
    71.
    Giordano MO, Martínez LC, Isa MB, Ferreyra LJ, Canna F, Paván JV, Paez M, Notario R, Nates SV, and Nates SV. 2002. Twenty year study of the occurrence of reovirus infection in hospitalized children with acute gastroenteritis in Argentina. Pediatr Infect Dis J21:880–882.
    72.
    Hermann L, Embree J, Hazelton P, Wells B, and Coombs RTK. 2004. Reovirus type 2 isolated from cerebrospinal fluid. Pediatr Infect Dis J23:373–375.
    73.
    Tyler K, Barton E, Ibach M, Robinson C, Valyi-Nagy T, Campbell JA, Clarke P, O’Donnell SM, Wetzel J, and Dermody T. 2004. Isolation and molecular characterization of a novel type 3 reovirus from a child with meningitis. J Infect Dis189:1664–1675.
    74.
    Ura T, Yoshida A, Xin K, Yoshizaki S, Yashima S, Abe S, Mizuguchi H, and Okuda K. 2009. Designed recombinant adenovirus type 5 vector induced envelope-specific CD8(+) cytotoxic T lymphocytes and cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies against human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Gene Med11:139–149.
    75.
    Beneduce F, Kusov Y, Klinger M, Gauss-Müller V, and Morace G. 2002. Chimeric hepatitis A virus particles presenting a foreign epitope (HIV gp41) at their surface. Antiviral Res55:369–377.
    76.
    Eckhart L, Raffelsberger W, Ferko B, Klima A, Purtscher M, Katinger H, and Rüker F. 1996. Immunogenic presentation of a conserved gp41 epitope of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 on recombinant surface antigen of hepatitis B virus. J Gen Virol77:2001–2008.
    77.
    Muster T, Ferko B, Klima A, Purtscher M, Trkola A, Schulz P, Grassauer A, Engelhardt OG, García-Sástre A, Palese P, and Katinger H. 1995. Mucosal model of immunization against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 with a chimeric influenza virus. J Virol69:6678–6686.
    78.
    Zhang H, Huang Y, Fayad R, Spear GT, and Qiao L. 2004. Induction of mucosal and systemic neutralizing antibodies against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) by oral immunization with bovine papillomavirus-HIV-1 gp41 chimeric virus-like particles. J Virol78:8342–8348.
    79.
    Marusic C, Rizza P, Lattanzi L, Mancini C, Spada M, Belardelli F, Benvenuto E, and Capone I. 2001. Chimeric plant virus particles as immunogens for inducing murine and human immune responses against human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Virol75:8434–8439.
    80.
    Arnold GF, Velasco PK, Holmes AK, Wrin T, Geisler SC, Phung P, Tian Y, Resnick DA, Ma X, Mariano TM, Petropoulos CJ, Taylor JW, Katinger H, and Arnold E. 2009. Broad neutralization of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) elicited from human rhinoviruses that display the HIV-1 gp41 ELDKWA epitope. J Virol83:5087–5100.
    81.
    Tran EEH, Borgnia MJ, Kuybeda O, Schauder DM, Bartesaghi A, Frank GA, Sapiro G, Milne JLS, and Subramaniam S. 2012. Structural mechanism of trimeric HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein activation. PLoS Pathog8:e1002797.
    82.
    Alam SM, McAdams M, Boren D, Rak M, Scearce RM, Gao F, Camacho ZT, Gewirth D, Kelsoe G, Chen P, and Haynes BF. 2007. The role of antibody polyspecificity and lipid reactivity in binding of broadly neutralizing anti-HIV-1 envelope human monoclonal antibodies 2F5 and 4E10 to glycoprotein 41 membrane proximal envelope epitopes. J Immunol178:4424–4435.
    83.
    Matyas GR, Wieczorek L, Beck Z, Ochsenbauer-Jambor C, Kappes JC, Michael NL, Polonis VR, and Alving CR. 2009. Neutralizing antibodies induced by liposomal HIV-1 glycoprotein 41 peptide simultaneously bind to both the 2F5 or 4E10 epitope and lipid epitopes. AIDS23:2069–2077.
    84.
    Klein F, Diskin R, Scheid J, Gaebler C, Mouquet H, Georgiev IS, Pancera M, Zhou T, Incesu R, Fu B, Gnanapragasam PP, Oliveira T, Seaman M, Kwong P, Bjorkman P, and Nussenzweig M. 2013. Somatic mutations of the immunoglobulin framework are generally required for broad and potent HIV-1 neutralization. Cell153:126–138.
    85.
    Gray ES, Madiga MC, Hermanus T, Moore PL, Wibmer CK, Tumba NL, Werner L, Mlisana K, Sibeko S, Williamson C, Abdool Karim SS, Morris L, and CAPRISA002 Study Team. 2011. The neutralization breadth of HIV-1 develops incrementally over four years and is associated with CD4+ T cell decline and high viral load during acute infection. J Virol85:4828–4840.
    86.
    Mikell I, Sather DN, Kalams SA, Altfeld M, Alter G, and Stamatatos L. 2011. Characteristics of the earliest cross-neutralizing antibody response to HIV-1. PLoS Pathog7:e1001251.
    87.
    Cardoso RMF, Zwick MB, Stanfield RL, Kunert R, Binley JM, Katinger H, Burton DR, and Wilson IA. 2005. Broadly neutralizing anti-HIV antibody 4E10 recognizes a helical conformation of a highly conserved fusion-associated motif in gp41. Immunity22:163–173.
    88.
    Flyak A, Ilinykh P, Murin C, Garron T, Shen X, Fusco M, Hashiguchi T, Bornholdt Z, Slaughter J, Sapparapu G, Klages C, Ksiazek T, Ward A, Saphire E, Bukreyev A, and Crowe J Jr.2015. Mechanism of human antibody-mediated neutralization of Marburg virus. Cell160:893–903.
    89.
    Throsby M, van den Brink E, Jongeneelen M, Poon LLM, Alard P, Cornelissen L, Bakker A, Cox F, van Deventer E, Guan Y, Cinatl J, ter Meulen JT, Lasters I, Carsetti R, Peiris M, de Kruif J, and Goudsmit J. 2008. Heterosubtypic neutralizing monoclonal antibodies cross-protective against H5N1 and H1N1 recovered from human IgM+ memory B cells. PLoS One3:e3942.
    90.
    Virgin HW IV, Bassel-Duby R, Fields BN, and Tyler KL. 1988. Antibody protects against lethal infection with the neurally spreading reovirus type 3 (Dearing). J Virol62:4594–4604.
    91.
    Smith RE, Zweerink HJ, and Joklik WK. 1969. Polypeptide components of virions, top component and cores of reovirus type 3. Virology39:791–810.
    92.
    Purtscher M, Trkola A, Gruber G, Buchacher A, Predl R, Steindl F, Tauer C, Berger R, Barrett N, Jungbauer A, and Katinger H. 1994. A broadly neutralizing human monoclonal antibody against gp41 of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses10:1651–1658.
    93.
    Boyce TG, Gruber WC, Coleman-Dockery SD, Sannella EC, Reed GW, Wolff M, and Wright PF. 1999. Mucosal immune response to trivalent live attenuated intranasal influenza vaccine in children. Vaccine18:82–88.
    94.
    Seaman MS, Janes H, Hawkins N, Grandpre LE, Devoy C, Giri A, Coffey RT, Harris L, Wood B, Daniels MG, Bhattacharya T, Lapedes A, Polonis VR, McCutchan FE, Gilbert PB, Self SG, Korber BT, Montefiori DC, and Mascola JR. 2010. Tiered categorization of a diverse panel of HIV-1 Env pseudoviruses for assessment of neutralizing antibodies. J Virol84:1439–1452.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSphere
    Volume 1Number 322 June 2016
    eLocator: e00086-16
    Editor: Carolyn B. Coyne
    University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine

    History

    Received: 31 March 2016
    Accepted: 25 April 2016
    Published online: 18 May 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS:

    1. human immunodeficiency virus
    2. immunization
    3. live vector vaccines
    4. neutralizing antibodies
    5. reovirus

    Contributors

    Authors

    Karl W. Boehme
    Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
    Elizabeth B. Lamb Center for Pediatric Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
    Present address: Karl W. Boehme, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
    Mine' Ikizler
    Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
    Elizabeth B. Lamb Center for Pediatric Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
    Jason A. Iskarpatyoti
    Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
    Elizabeth B. Lamb Center for Pediatric Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
    J. Denise Wetzel
    Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
    Elizabeth B. Lamb Center for Pediatric Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
    Jordan Willis
    Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
    Vanderbilt Vaccine Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
    James E. Crowe Jr.
    Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
    Vanderbilt Vaccine Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
    Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
    Celia C. LaBranche
    Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
    Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
    Laboratory for AIDS Vaccine Research and Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
    David C. Montefiori
    Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
    Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
    Laboratory for AIDS Vaccine Research and Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
    Gregory J. Wilson
    Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
    Elizabeth B. Lamb Center for Pediatric Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
    Terence S. Dermody
    Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
    Elizabeth B. Lamb Center for Pediatric Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
    Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA

    Editor

    Carolyn B. Coyne
    Editor
    University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Gregory J. Wilson, [email protected], or Terence S. Dermody, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSphereArticle
    Maternal Humoral Immune Responses Do Not Predict Postnatal HIV-1 Transmission Risk in Antiretroviral-Treated Mothers from the IMPAACT PROMISE Study

    Maternal Humoral Immune Responses Do Not Predict Postnatal HIV-1 Transmission Risk in Antiretroviral-Treated Mothers from the IMPAACT PROMISE Study

    ABSTRACT

    To design immune interventions that can synergize with antiretroviral therapy (ART) to reduce the rate of HIV mother-to-child transmission (MTCT), it is essential to characterize maternal immune responses in the setting of ART during pregnancy and breastfeeding and define their effect on MTCT. Prior studies reported an association between breast milk envelope (Env)-specific antibodies and antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity (ADCC) activity with reduced postnatal transmission. In this study, we investigated whether these immune correlates were similarly associated with protection in a matched case-control study of mother-infant pairs receiving maternal ART or infant nevirapine prophylaxis during breastfeeding in the International Maternal-Pediatric-Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Network Promoting Maternal-Infant Survival Everywhere (PROMISE) trial, assessing postnatal transmission risk in 19 transmitting and 57 nontransmitting mothers using conditional logistic regression models adjusted for maternal plasma viral load. The odds ratios of postnatal MTCT for a 1-unit increase in an immune correlate were 3.61 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56, 23.14) for breast milk Env-specific secretory IgA (sIgA), 2.32 (95% CI, 0.43, 12.56) for breast milk and 2.16 (95% CI, 0.51, 9.14) for plasma Env-specific IgA, and 4.57 (95% CI, 0.68, 30.48) for breast milk and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.25, 3.67) for plasma ADCC activity, with all CIs spanning 1.0. Interestingly, although mucosal IgA responses are poor in untreated HIV-infected women, there was a strong correlation between the magnitudes of breast milk and plasma Env-specific IgA in this cohort. In this analysis of the small number of postnatal virus transmissions in the landmark PROMISE study, no single antibody response was associated with breast milk transmission risk.
    IMPORTANCE Each year, >150,000 infants become newly infected with HIV-1 through MTCT despite ART, with up to 42% of infections occurring during breastfeeding. Several factors contribute to continued pediatric infections, including ART nonadherence, the emergence of drug-resistant HIV strains, acute infection during breastfeeding, and poor access to ART in resource-limited areas. A better understanding of the maternal humoral immune responses that provide protection against postnatal transmission in the setting of ART is critical to guide the design of maternal vaccine strategies to further eliminate postnatal HIV transmission. In this study, we found that in women treated with antiretrovirals during pregnancy, there was a positive correlation between plasma viral load and breast milk and plasma IgA responses; however, conclusions regarding odds of MTCT risk were limited by the small sample size. These findings will inform future studies to investigate maternal immune interventions that can synergize with ART to eliminate MTCT during breastfeeding.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Thomas TK, Masaba R, Borkowf CB, Ndivo R, Zeh C, Misore A, Otieno J, Jamieson D, Thigpen MC, Bulterys M, Slutsker L, De Cock KM, Amornkul PN, Greenberg AE, Fowler MG, KiBS Study Team. 2011. Triple-antiretroviral prophylaxis to prevent mother-to-child HIV transmission through breastfeeding—the Kisumu Breastfeeding Study. PLoS Med 8:e1001015.
    2.
    Kilewo C, Karlsson K, Massawe A, Lyamuya E, Swai A, Mhalu F, Biberfeld G, Mitra Study Team. 2008. Prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 through breast-feeding by treating infants prophylactically with lamivudine in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: the Mitra study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 48:315–323.
    3.
    Palombi L, Marazzi MC, Voetberg A, Magid NA, the DREAM Program Prevention of Mother-To-Child Transmission Team. 2007. Treatment acceleration program and the experience of the DREAM program in prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV. AIDS 21:S65–S71.
    4.
    Chasela CS, Hudgens MG, Jamieson DJ, Kayira D, Hosseinipour MC, Kourtis AP, Martinson F, Tegha G, Knight RJ, Ahmed YI, Kamwendo DD, Hoffman IF, Ellington SR, Kacheche Z, Soko A, Wiener JB, Fiscus SA, Kazembe P, Mofolo IA, Chigwenembe M, Sichali DS, van der Horst CM. 2010. Maternal or infant antiretroviral drugs to reduce HIV-1 transmission. N Engl J Med 362:2271–2281.
    5.
    Flynn PM, Taha TE, Cababasay M, Fowler MG, Mofenson LM, Owor M, Fiscus S, Stranix-Chibanda L, Coutsoudis A, Gnanashanmugam D, Chakhtoura N, McCarthy K, Mukuzunga C, Makanani B, Moodley D, Nematadzira T, Kusakara B, Patil S, Vhembo T, Bobat R, Mmbaga BT, Masenya M, Nyati M, Theron G, Mulenga H, Butler K, Shapiro DE, PROMISE Study Team. 2018. Prevention of HIV-1 transmission through breastfeeding: efficacy and safety of maternal antiretroviral therapy versus infant nevirapine prophylaxis for duration of breastfeeding in HIV-1-infected women with high CD4 cell count (IMPAACT PROMISE): a randomized, open-label, clinical trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 77:383–392.
    6.
    UNAIDS. 2016. On the fast-track to an AIDS-free generation: the incredible journey of the global plan towards the elimination of new HIV infections among children by 2015 and keeping their mothers alive. UNAIDS, Geneva, Switzerland.
    7.
    Coutsoudis A, Dabis F, Fawzi W, Gaillard P, Haverkamp G, Harris DR, Jackson JB, Leroy V, Meda N, Msellati P, Newell M-L, Nsuati R, Read JS, Wiktor S. 2004. Late postnatal transmission of HIV-1 in breast-fed children: an individual patient data meta-analysis. J Infect Dis 189:2154–2166.
    8.
    John-Stewart G, Mbori-Ngacha D, Ekpini R, Janoff EN, Nkengasong J, Read JS, Van de Perre P, Newell M-L. 2004. Breast-feeding and transmission of HIV-1. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 35:196–202.
    9.
    Semba RD, Kumwenda N, Hoover DR, Taha TE, Quinn TC, Mtimavalye L, Biggar RJ, Broadhead R, Miotti PG, Sokoll LJ, van der Hoeven L, Chiphangwi JD. 1999. Human immunodeficiency virus load in breast milk, mastitis, and mother-to-child transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Infect Dis 180:93–98.
    10.
    John GC, Nduati RW, Mbori-Ngacha DA, Richardson BA, Panteleeff D, Mwatha A, Overbaugh J, Bwayo J, Ndinya-Achola JO, Kreiss JK. 2001. Correlates of mother-to-child human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) transmission: association with maternal plasma HIV-1 RNA load, genital HIV-1 DNA shedding, and breast infections. J Infect Dis 183:206–212.
    11.
    Creek TL, Kim A, Lu L, Bowen A, Masunge J, Arvelo W, Smit M, Mach O, Legwaila K, Motswere C, Zaks L, Finkbeiner T, Povinelli L, Maruping M, Ngwaru G, Tebele G, Bopp C, Puhr N, Johnston SP, Dasilva AJ, Bern C, Beard RS, Davis MK. 2010. Hospitalization and mortality among primarily nonbreastfed children during a large outbreak of diarrhea and malnutrition in Botswana, 2006. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 53:14–19.
    12.
    Shapiro RL, Lockman S, Kim S, Smeaton L, Rahkola JT, Thior I, Wester C, Moffat C, Arimi P, Ndase P, Asmelash A, Stevens L, Montano M, Makhema J, Essex M, Janoff EN. 2007. Infant morbidity, mortality, and breast milk immunologic profiles among breast-feeding HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected women in Botswana. J Infect Dis 196:562–569.
    13.
    Kuhn L, Aldrovandi GM, Sinkala M, Kankasa C, Semrau K, Mwiya M, Kasonde P, Scott N, Vwalika C, Walter J, Bulterys M, Tsai WY, Thea DM, Zambia Exclusive Breastfeeding Study. 2008. Effects of early, abrupt weaning on HIV-free survival of children in Zambia. N Engl J Med 359:130–141.
    14.
    Iliff PJ, Piwoz EG, Tavengwa NV, Zunguza CD, Marinda ET, Nathoo KJ, Moulton LH, Ward BJ, Humphrey JH, ZVITAMBO study group. 2005. Early exclusive breastfeeding reduces the risk of postnatal HIV-1 transmission and increases HIV-free survival. AIDS 19:699–708.
    15.
    Coovadia HM, Rollins NC, Bland RM, Little K, Coutsoudis A, Bennish ML, Newell ML. 2007. Mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 infection during exclusive breastfeeding in the first 6 months of life: an intervention cohort study. Lancet 369:1107–1116.
    16.
    World Health Organization. 2016. Guideline: updates on HIV and infant feeding: the duration of breastfeeding, and support from health services to improve feeding practices among mothers living with HIV. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
    17.
    Nduati R, John G, Mbori-Ngacha D, Richardson B, Overbaugh J, Mwatha A, Ndinya-Achola J, Bwayo J, Onyango FE, Hughes J, Kreiss J. 2000. Effect of breastfeeding and formula feeding on transmission of HIV-1: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 283:1167–1174.
    18.
    De Cock KM, Fowler M, Mercier E, de Vincenzi I, Saba J, Hoff E, Alnwick DJ, Rogers M, Shaffer N. 2000. Prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission in resource-poor countries: translating research into policy and practice. JAMA 283:1175–1182.
    19.
    Duprat C, Mohammed Z, Datta P, Stackiw W, Ndinya-Achola JO, Kreiss JK, Holmes KK, Plummer FA, Embree JE. 1994. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 IgA antibody in breast milk and serum. Pediatr Infect Dis J 13:603–608.
    20.
    Becquart P, Chomont N, Roques P, Ayouba A, Kazatchkine MD, Belec L, Hocini H. 2002. Compartmentalization of HIV-1 between breast milk and blood of HIV-infected mothers. Virology 300:109–117.
    21.
    Kuhn L, Trabattoni D, Kankasa C, Sinkala M, Lissoni F, Ghosh M, Aldrovandi G, Thea D, Clerici M. 2006. HIV-specific secretory IgA in breast milk of HIV-positive mothers is not associated with protection against HIV transmission among breast-fed infants. J Pediatr 149:611–616.
    22.
    Mabuka J, Nduati R, Odem-Davis K, Peterson D, Overbaugh J. 2012. HIV-specific antibodies capable of ADCC are common in breastmilk and are associated with reduced risk of transmission in women with high viral loads. PLoS Pathog 8:e1002739.
    23.
    Pollara J, McGuire E, Fouda GG, Rountree W, Eudailey J, Overman RG, Seaton KE, Deal A, Edwards RW, Tegha G, Kamwendo D, Kumwenda J, Nelson JAE, Liao H-X, Brinkley C, Denny TN, Ochsenbauer C, Ellington S, King CC, Jamieson DJ, van der Horst C, Kourtis AP, Tomaras GD, Ferrari G, Permar SR. 2015. Association of HIV-1 envelope-specific breast milk IgA responses with reduced risk of postnatal mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1. J Virol 89:9952–9961.
    24.
    Fowler MG, Qin M, Fiscus SA, Currier JS, Flynn PM, Chipato T, McIntyre J, Gnanashanmugam D, Siberry GK, Coletti AS, Taha TE, Klingman KL, Martinson FE, Owor M, Violari A, Moodley D, Theron GB, Bhosale R, Bobat R, Chi BH, Strehlau R, Mlay P, Loftis AJ, Browning R, Fenton T, Purdue L, Basar M, Shapiro DE, Mofenson LM. 2016. Benefits and risks of antiretroviral therapy for perinatal HIV prevention. N Engl J Med 375:1726–1737.
    25.
    Fouda GG, Yates NL, Pollara J, Shen X, Overman GR, Mahlokozera T, Wilks AB, Kang HH, Salazar-Gonzalez JF, Salazar MG, Kalilani L, Meshnick SR, Hahn BH, Shaw GM, Lovingood RV, Denny TN, Haynes B, Letvin NL, Ferrari G, Montefiori DC, Tomaras GD, Permar SR, Center for HIV/AIDS Vaccine Immunology. 2011. HIV-specific functional antibody responses in breast milk mirror those in plasma and are primarily mediated by IgG antibodies. J Virol 85:9555–9567.
    26.
    Rychert J, Amedee AM. 2005. The antibody response to SIV in lactating rhesus macaques. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 38:135–141.
    27.
    Becquart P, Hocini H, Levy M, Sepou A, Kazatchkine MD, Belec L. 2000. Secretory anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibodies in colostrum and breast milk are not a major determinant of the protection of early postnatal transmission of HIV. J Infect Dis 181:532–539.
    28.
    Permar SR, Wilks AB, Ehlinger EP, Kang HH, Mahlokozera T, Coffey RT, Carville A, Letvin NL, Seaman MS. 2010. Limited contribution of mucosal IgA to simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)-specific neutralizing antibody response and virus envelope evolution in breast milk of SIV-infected, lactating rhesus monkeys. J Virol 84:8209–8218.
    29.
    Banks ND, Kinsey N, Clements J, Hildreth JE. 2002. Sustained antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) in SIV-infected macaques correlates with delayed progression to AIDS. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 18:1197–1205.
    30.
    Sun Y, Asmal M, Lane S, Permar SR, Schmidt SD, Mascola JR, Letvin NL. 2011. Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity in simian immunodeficiency virus-infected rhesus monkeys. J Virol 85:6906–6912.
    31.
    Barouch DH, Liu J, Li H, Maxfield LF, Abbink P, Lynch DM, Iampietro MJ, SanMiguel A, Seaman MS, Ferrari G, Forthal DN, Ourmanov I, Hirsch VM, Carville A, Mansfield KG, Stablein D, Pau MG, Schuitemaker H, Sadoff JC, Billings EA, Rao M, Robb ML, Kim JH, Marovich MA, Goudsmit J, Michael NL. 2012. Vaccine protection against acquisition of neutralization-resistant SIV challenges in rhesus monkeys. Nature 482:89–93.
    32.
    Milligan C, Richardson BA, John-Stewart G, Nduati R, Overbaugh J. 2015. Passively acquired antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) activity in HIV-infected infants is associated with reduced mortality. Cell Host Microbe 17:500–506.
    33.
    Eudailey JA, Dennis ML, Parker ME, Phillips BL, Huffman TN, Bay CP, Hudgens MG, Wiseman RW, Pollara JJ, Fouda GG, Ferrari G, Pickup DJ, Kozlowski PA, Van Rompay KKA, De Paris K, Permar SR. 2018. Maternal HIV-1 Env vaccination for systemic and breast milk immunity to prevent oral SHIV acquisition in infant macaques. mSphere 3:e00505-17.
    34.
    Pollara J, Orlandi C, Beck C, Edwards RW, Hu Y, Liu S, Wang S, Koup RA, Denny TN, Lu S, Tomaras GD, DeVico A, Lewis GK, Ferrari G. 2018. Application of area scaling analysis to identify natural killer cell and monocyte involvement in the GranToxiLux antibody dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity assay. Cytometry A 93:436–447.
    35.
    Trkola A, Matthews J, Gordon C, Ketas T, Moore JP. 1999. A cell line-based neutralization assay for primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates that use either the CCR5 or the CXCR4 coreceptor. J Virol 73:8966–8974.
    36.
    Fouda GG, Mahlokozera T, Salazar-Gonzalez JF, Salazar MG, Learn G, Kumar SB, Dennison SM, Russell E, Rizzolo K, Jaeger F, Cai F, Vandergrift NA, Gao F, Hahn B, Shaw GM, Ochsenbauer C, Swanstrom R, Meshnick S, Mwapasa V, Kalilani L, Fiscus S, Montefiori D, Haynes B, Kwiek J, Alam SM, Permar SR. 2013. Postnatally-transmitted HIV-1 Envelope variants have similar neutralization-sensitivity and function to that of nontransmitted breast milk variants. Retrovirology 10:3.
    37.
    Edmonds TG, Ding H, Yuan X, Wei Q, Smith KS, Conway JA, Wieczorek L, Brown B, Polonis V, West JT, Montefiori DC, Kappes JC, Ochsenbauer C. 2010. Replication competent molecular clones of HIV-1 expressing Renilla luciferase facilitate the analysis of antibody inhibition in PBMC. Virology 408:1–13.
    38.
    Koene HR, Kleijer M, Algra J, Roos D, von Dem Borne AE, de Haas M. 1997. Fc gammaRIIIa-158V/F polymorphism influences the binding of IgG by natural killer cell Fc gammaRIIIa, independently of the Fc gammaRIIIa-48L/R/H phenotype. Blood 90:1109–1114.
    39.
    Bruhns P, Iannascoli B, England P, Mancardi DA, Fernandez N, Jorieux S, Daeron M. 2009. Specificity and affinity of human Fcgamma receptors and their polymorphic variants for human IgG subclasses. Blood 113:3716–3725.
    40.
    Tomaras GD, Yates NL, Liu P, Qin L, Fouda GG, Chavez LL, Decamp AC, Parks RJ, Ashley VC, Lucas JT, Cohen M, Eron J, Hicks CB, Liao H-X, Self SG, Landucci G, Forthal DN, Weinhold KJ, Keele BF, Hahn BH, Greenberg ML, Morris L, Karim SSA, Blattner WA, Montefiori DC, Shaw GM, Perelson AS, Haynes BF. 2008. Initial B-cell responses to transmitted human immunodeficiency virus type 1: virion-binding immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG antibodies followed by plasma anti-gp41 antibodies with ineffective control of initial viremia. J Virol 82:12449–12463.
    41.
    Nelson CS, Pollara J, Kunz EL, Jeffries TL, Jr, Duffy R, Beck C, Stamper L, Wang M, Shen X, Pickup DJ, Staats HF, Hudgens MG, Kepler TB, Montefiori DC, Moody MA, Tomaras GD, Liao HX, Haynes BF, Ferrari G, Fouda GGA, Permar SR. 2016. Combined HIV-1 envelope systemic and mucosal immunization of lactating rhesus monkeys induces a robust immunoglobulin A isotype B cell response in breast milk. J Virol 90:4951–4965.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSphere
    Volume 4Number 530 October 2019
    eLocator: e00716-19
    Editor: Marcela F. Pasetti
    University of Maryland School of Medicine

    History

    Received: 7 October 2019
    Accepted: 9 October 2019
    Published online: 23 October 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. ADCC
    2. HIV-1
    3. antibodies
    4. antiretroviral therapy
    5. breast milk
    6. postnatal transmission

    Contributors

    Authors

    Eliza D. Hompe
    Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
    Denise L. Jacobson
    Center for Biostatistics in AIDS Research, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
    Joshua A. Eudailey
    Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
    Kevin Butler
    Center for Biostatistics in AIDS Research, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
    Whitney Edwards
    Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
    Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
    Justin Pollara
    Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
    Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
    Sean S. Brummel
    Center for Biostatistics in AIDS Research, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
    Genevieve G. Fouda
    Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
    Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
    Lameck Chinula
    University of North Carolina Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi
    Melvin Kamanga
    Johns Hopkins University Research Project, Blantyre, Malawi
    Aarti Kinikar
    Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India
    Dhayendre Moodley
    Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa and School of Clinical Medicine, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa
    Maxensia Owor
    Johns Hopkins University Research Collaboration, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
    Mary Glenn Fowler
    Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
    Sallie R. Permar
    Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
    Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA

    Editor

    Marcela F. Pasetti
    Editor
    University of Maryland School of Medicine

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Sallie R. Permar, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSphereArticle
    Pseudomonas aeruginosa gshA Mutant Is Defective in Biofilm Formation, Swarming, and Pyocyanin Production

    Pseudomonas aeruginosa gshA Mutant Is Defective in Biofilm Formation, Swarming, and Pyocyanin Production

    ABSTRACT

    Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a ubiquitous Gram-negative bacterium that can cause severe opportunistic infections. The principal redox buffer employed by this organism is glutathione (GSH). To assess the role of GSH in the virulence of P. aeruginosa, a number of analyses were performed using a mutant strain deficient in gshA, which does not produce GSH. The mutant strain exhibited a growth delay in minimal medium compared to the wild-type strain. Furthermore, the gshA mutant was defective in biofilm and persister cell formation and in swimming and swarming motility and produced reduced levels of pyocyanin, a key virulence factor. Finally, the gshA mutant strain demonstrated increased sensitivity to methyl viologen (a redox cycling agent) as well as the thiol-reactive antibiotics fosfomycin and rifampin. Taken together, these data suggest a key role for GSH in the virulence of P. aeruginosa.
    IMPORTANCE Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a ubiquitous bacterium that can cause severe opportunistic infections, including many hospital-acquired infections. It is also a major cause of infections in patients with cystic fibrosis. P. aeruginosa is intrinsically resistant to a number of drugs and is capable of forming biofilms that are difficult to eradicate with antibiotics. The number of drug-resistant strains is also increasing, making treatment of P. aeruginosa infections very difficult. Thus, there is an urgent need to understand how P. aeruginosa causes disease in order to find novel ways to treat infections. We show that the principal redox buffer, glutathione (GSH), is involved in intrinsic resistance to the fosfomycin and rifampin antibiotics. We further demonstrate that GSH plays a role in P. aeruginosa disease and infection, since a mutant lacking GSH has less biofilm formation, is less able to swarm, and produces less pyocyanin, a pigment associated with infection.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Hardalo C, Edberg SC. 1997. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: assessment of risk from drinking water. Crit Rev Microbiol 23:47–75.
    2.
    Poole K, Srikumar R. 2001. Multidrug efflux in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: components, mechanisms and clinical significance. Curr Top Med Chem 1:59–71.
    3.
    Tian ZX, Yi XX, Cho A, O’Gara F, Wang YP. 2016. CpxR activates MexAB-OprM efflux pump expression and enhances antibiotic resistance in both laboratory and clinical nalB-type isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS Pathog 12:e1005932.
    4.
    Bodey GP, Bolivar R, Fainstein V, Jadeja L. 1983. Infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Rev Infect Dis 5:279–313.
    5.
    Vital-Lopez FG, Reifman J, Wallqvist A. 2015. Biofilm formation mechanisms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa predicted via genome-scale kinetic models of bacterial metabolism. PLoS Comput Biol 11:e1004452.
    6.
    Yeung ATY, Parayno A, Hancock REW. 2012. Mucin promotes rapid surface motility in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. mBio 3:e00073-12.
    7.
    Yeung ATY, Torfs ECW, Jamshidi F, Bains M, Wiegand I, Hancock REW, Overhage J. 2009. Swarming of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is controlled by a broad spectrum of transcriptional regulators, including MetR. J Bacteriol 191:5592–5602.
    8.
    Wilson R, Sykes DA, Watson D, Rutman A, Taylor GW, Cole PJ. 1988. Measurement of Pseudomonas aeruginosa phenazine pigments in sputum and assessment of their contribution to sputum sol toxicity for respiratory epithelium. Infect Immun 56:2515–2517.
    9.
    Jimenez PN, Koch G, Thompson JA, Xavier KB, Cool RH, Quax WJ. 2012. The multiple signaling systems regulating virulence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 76:46–65.
    10.
    Masip L, Veeravalli K, Georgiou G. 2006. The many faces of glutathione in bacteria. Antioxid Redox Signal 8:753–762.
    11.
    Lu SC. 2013. Glutathione synthesis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1830:3143–3153.
    12.
    Song M, Husain M, Jones-Carson J, Liu L, Henard CA, Vázquez-Torres A. 2013. Low-molecular-weight thiol-dependent antioxidant and antinitrosative defences in Salmonella pathogenesis. Mol Microbiol 87:609–622.
    13.
    Reniere ML, Whiteley AT, Portnoy DA. 2016. An in vivo selection identifies Listeria monocytogenes genes required to sense the intracellular environment and activate virulence factor expression. PLoS Pathog 12:e1005741.
    14.
    Reniere ML, Whiteley AT, Hamilton KL, John SM, Lauer P, Brennan RG, Portnoy DA. 2015. Glutathione activates virulence gene expression of an intracellular pathogen. Nature 517:170–173.
    15.
    Feinbaum RL, Urbach JM, Liberati NT, Djonovic S, Adonizio A, Carvunis A-R, Ausubel FM. 2012. Genome-wide identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence-related genes using a Caenorhabditis elegans infection model. PLoS Pathog 8:e1002813.
    16.
    Skurnik D, Roux D, Aschard H, Cattoir V, Yoder-Himes D, Lory S, Pier GB. 2013. A comprehensive analysis of in vitro and in vivo genetic fitness of Pseudomonas aeruginosa using high-throughput sequencing of transposon libraries. PLoS Pathog 9:e1003582.
    17.
    Turner KH, Everett J, Trivedi U, Rumbaugh KP, Whiteley M. 2014. Requirements for Pseudomonas aeruginosa acute burn and chronic surgical wound infection. PLoS Genet 10:e1004518.
    18.
    Zhang W, McLamore ES, Wu R, Stensberg M, Porterfield DM, Banks MK. 2014. Glutathione-gated potassium efflux as a mechanism of active biofilm detachment. Water Environ Res 86:462–469.
    19.
    Murillo LA, Newport G, Lan CY, Habelitz S, Dungan J, Agabian NM. 2005. Genome-wide transcription profiling of the early phase of biofilm formation by Candida albicans. Eukaryot Cell 4:1562–1573.
    20.
    Reimmann C, Ginet N, Michel L, Keel C, Michaux P, Krishnapillai V, Zala M, Heurlier K, Triandafillu K, Harms H, Défago G, Haas D. 2002. Genetically programmed autoinducer destruction reduces virulence gene expression and swarming motility in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Microbiology 148:923–932.
    21.
    Toutain CM, Zegans ME, O’Toole GA. 2005. Evidence for two flagellar stators and their role in the motility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 187:771–777.
    22.
    Reimmann C, Beyeler M, Latifi A, Winteler H, Foglino M, Lazdunski A, Haas D. 1997. The global activator GacA of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO positively controls the production of the autoinducer N-butyryl-homoserine lactone and the formation of the virulence factors pyocyanin, cyanide, and lipase. Mol Microbiol 24:309–319.
    23.
    Nguyen D, Joshi-Datar A, Lepine F, Bauerle E, Olakanmi O, Beer K, McKay G, Siehnel R, Schafhauser J, Wang Y, Britigan BE, Singh PK. 2011. Active starvation responses mediate antibiotic tolerance in biofilms and nutrient-limited bacteria. Science 334:982–986.
    24.
    Kint CI, Verstraeten N, Fauvart M, Michiels J. 2012. New-found fundamentals of bacterial persistence. Trends Microbiol 20:577–585.
    25.
    Kohanski MA, Dwyer DJ, Collins JJ. 2010. How antibiotics kill bacteria: from targets to networks. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:423–435.
    26.
    Rawat M, Johnson C, Cadiz V, Av-Gay Y. 2007. Comparative analysis of mutants in the mycothiol biosynthesis pathway in Mycobacterium smegmatis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 363:71–76.
    27.
    Zhang Y, Wei Y. 2009. Impact of glutathione on the gene expression of exoY and exoS in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao 49:603–608.
    28.
    Rawat M, Newton GL, Ko M, Martinez GJ, Fahey RC, Av-Gay Y. 2002. Mycothiol-deficient Mycobacterium smegmatis mutants are hypersensitive to alkylating agents, free radicals, and antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46:3348–3355.
    29.
    Newton GL, Fahey RC, Rawat M. 2012. Detoxification of toxins by bacillithiol in Staphylococcus aureus. Microbiology 158:1117–1126.
    30.
    Roberts AA, Sharma SV, Strankman AW, Duran SR, Rawat M, Hamilton CJ. 2013. Mechanistic studies of FosB: a divalent-metal-dependent bacillithiol-S-transferase that mediates fosfomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Biochem J 451:69–79.
    31.
    Beharry Z, Palzkill T. 2005. Functional analysis of active site residues of the fosfomycin resistance enzyme FosA from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Biol Chem 280:17786–17791.
    32.
    Rigsby RE, Rife CL, Fillgrove KL, Newcomer ME, Armstrong RN. 2004. Phosphonoformate: a minimal transition state analogue inhibitor of the fosfomycin resistance protein, FosA. Biochemistry 43:13666–13673.
    33.
    Childers BM, Van Laar TA, You T, Clegg S, Leung KP. 2013. MrkD1P from Klebsiella pneumoniae strain IA565 allows for coexistence with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and protection from protease-mediated biofilm detachment. Infect Immun 81:4112–4120.
    34.
    Zhang Y, Duan K. 2009. Glutathione exhibits antibacterial activity and increases tetracycline efficacy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Sci China C Life Sci 52:501–505.
    35.
    Fuchs JA, Warner HR. 1975. Isolation of an Escherichia coli mutant deficient in glutathione synthesis. J Bacteriol 124:140–148.
    36.
    Thorgersen MP, Downs DM. 2008. Analysis of yggX and gshA mutants provides insights into the labile iron pool in Salmonella enterica. J Bacteriol 190:7608–7613.
    37.
    Rajkarnikar A, Strankman A, Duran S, Vargas D, Roberts AA, Barretto K, Upton H, Hamilton CJ, Rawat M. 2013. Analysis of mutants disrupted in bacillithiol metabolism in Staphylococcus aureus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 436:128–133.
    38.
    Deponte M. 2013. Glutathione catalysis and the reaction mechanisms of glutathione-dependent enzymes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1830:3217–3266.
    39.
    Lan L, Murray TS, Kazmierczak BI, He C. 2010. Pseudomonas aeruginosa OspR is an oxidative stress sensing regulator that affects pigment production, antibiotic resistance and dissemination during infection. Mol Microbiol 75:76–91.
    40.
    Sao Emani C, Williams MJ, Wiid IJ, Hiten NF, Viljoen AJ, Pietersen R-DD, van Helden PD, Baker B. 2013. Ergothioneine is a secreted antioxidant in Mycobacterium smegmatis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:3202–3207.
    41.
    Singh AR, Strankman A, Orkusyan R, Purwantini E, Rawat M. 2016. Lack of mycothiol and ergothioneine induces different protective mechanisms in Mycobacterium smegmatis. Biochem Biophys Rep 8:100–106.
    42.
    Ta P, Buchmeier N, Newton GL, Rawat M, Fahey RC. 2011. Organic hydroperoxide resistance protein and ergothioneine compensate for loss of mycothiol in Mycobacterium smegmatis mutants. J Bacteriol 193:1981–1990.
    43.
    Rawat M, Uppal M, Newton G, Steffek M, Fahey RC, Av-Gay Y. 2004. Targeted mutagenesis of the Mycobacterium smegmatis mca gene, encoding a mycothiol-dependent detoxification protein. J Bacteriol 186:6050–6058.
    44.
    Viducic D, Ono T, Murakami K, Susilowati H, Kayama S, Hirota K, Miyake Y. 2006. Functional analysis of spoT, relA and dksA genes on quinolone tolerance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa under nongrowing condition. Microbiol Immunol 50:349–357.
    45.
    Muller M, Merrett ND. 2015. Mechanism for glutathione-mediated protection against the Pseudomonas aeruginosa redox toxin, pyocyanin. Chem Biol Interact 232:30–37.
    46.
    Glasser NR, Kern SE, Newman DK. 2014. Phenazine redox cycling enhances anaerobic survival in Pseudomonas aeruginosa by facilitating generation of ATP and a proton motive force. Mol Microbiol 92:399–412.
    47.
    Trivedi A, Mavi PS, Bhatt D, Kumar A. 2016. Thiol reductive stress induces cellulose-anchored biofilm formation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Commun 7:11392.
    48.
    Vargas D, Hageman S, Gulati M, Nobile CJ, Rawat M. 2016. S-nitrosomycothiol reductase and mycothiol are required for survival under aldehyde stress and biofilm formation in Mycobacterium smegmatis. IUBMB Life 68:621–628.
    49.
    Pittman MS, Robinson HC, Poole RK. 2005. A bacterial glutathione transporter (Escherichia coli CydDC) exports reductant to the periplasm. J Biol Chem 280:32254–32261.
    50.
    Turnbull AL, Surette MG. 2010. Cysteine biosynthesis, oxidative stress and antibiotic resistance in Salmonella typhimurium. Res Microbiol 161:643–650.
    51.
    Ghezzi P. 2005. Regulation of protein function by glutathionylation. Free Radic Res 39:573–580.
    52.
    Ghezzi P. 2013. Protein glutathionylation in health and disease. Biochim Biophys Acta 1830:3165–3172.
    53.
    Imlay JA. 2015. Transcription factors that defend bacteria against reactive oxygen species. Annu Rev Microbiol 69:93–108.
    54.
    Fuangthong M, Helmann JD. 2002. The OhrR repressor senses organic hydroperoxides by reversible formation of a cysteine-sulfenic acid derivative. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:6690–6695.
    55.
    Vinckx T, Wei Q, Matthijs S, Cornelis P. 2010. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa oxidative stress regulator OxyR influences production of pyocyanin and rhamnolipids: protective role of pyocyanin. Microbiology 156:678–686.
    56.
    Jacobs MA, Alwood A, Thaipisuttikul I, Spencer D, Haugen E, Ernst S, Will O, Kaul R, Raymond C, Levy R, Chun-Rong L, Guenthner D, Bovee D, Olson MV, Manoil C. 2003. Comprehensive transposon mutant library of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:14339–14344.
    57.
    Choi KH, Kumar A, Schweizer HP. 2006. A 10-min method for preparation of highly electrocompetent Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells: application for DNA fragment transfer between chromosomes and plasmid transformation. J Microbiol Methods 64:391–397.
    58.
    Essar DW, Eberly L, Hadero A, Crawford IP. 1990. Identification and characterization of genes for a second anthranilate synthase in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: interchangeability of the two anthranilate synthases and evolutionary implications. J Bacteriol 172:884–900.
    59.
    Kumar R, Chhibber S, Gupta V, Harjai K. 2011. Screening and profiling of quorum sensing signal molecules in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from catheterized urinary tract infection patients. Indian J Med Res 134:208–213.
    60.
    Van Laar TA, Chen T, You T, Leung KP. 2015. Sublethal concentrations of carbapenems alter cell morphology and genomic expression of Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:1707–1717.
    61.
    Coffey BM, Anderson GG. 2014. Biofilm formation in the 96-well microtiter plate. Methods Mol Biol 1149:631–641.
    62.
    Möker N, Dean CR, Tao J. 2010. Pseudomonas aeruginosa increases formation of multidrug-tolerant persister cells in response to quorum-sensing signaling molecules. J Bacteriol 192:1946–1955.
    63.
    Somprasong N, Jittawuttipoka T, Duang-Nkern J, Romsang A, Chaiyen P, Schweizer HP, Vattanaviboon P, Mongkolsuk S. 2012. Pseudomonas aeruginosa thiol peroxidase protects against hydrogen peroxide toxicity and displays atypical patterns of gene regulation. J Bacteriol 194:3904–3912.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSphere
    Volume 3Number 225 April 2018
    eLocator: e00155-18
    Editor: Sarah E. F. D'Orazio
    University of Kentucky

    History

    Received: 23 March 2018
    Accepted: 24 March 2018
    Published online: 18 April 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    2. biofilms
    3. glutathione
    4. pyocyanin
    5. thiols
    6. virulence

    Contributors

    Authors

    Tricia A. Van Laar
    Department of Biology, California State University—Fresno, Fresno, California, USA
    Saika Esani
    Department of Biology, California State University—Fresno, Fresno, California, USA
    Tyler J. Birges
    Department of Biology, California State University—Fresno, Fresno, California, USA
    Bethany Hazen
    Department of Biology, California State University—Fresno, Fresno, California, USA
    Jason M. Thomas
    Department of Biology, California State University—Fresno, Fresno, California, USA
    Mamta Rawat
    Department of Biology, California State University—Fresno, Fresno, California, USA

    Editor

    Sarah E. F. D'Orazio
    Editor
    University of Kentucky

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Mamta Rawat, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSphereArticle
    Cyanophage Diversity and Community Structure in Dead Zone Sediments

    ABSTRACT

    Up to 20% of prokaryotic organisms in the oceans are estimated to die every day due to viral infection and lysis. Viruses can therefore alter microbial diversity, community structure, and biogeochemical processes driven by these organisms. Cyanophages are viruses that infect and lyse cyanobacterial cells, adding bioavailable carbon and nutrients into the environment. Cyanobacteria are photosynthesizing bacteria, with some species capable of N2 fixation, which are known to form large blooms as well as resistant resting cells known as akinetes. Here, we investigated cyanophage diversity and community structure plus cyanobacteria in dead zone sediments. We sampled surface sediments and sequenced DNA and RNA, along an oxygen gradient—representing oxic, hypoxic, and anoxic conditions—in one of the world’s largest dead zones located in the Baltic Sea. Cyanophages were detected at all stations and, based on partial genome contigs, had a higher alpha diversity and different beta diversity in the hypoxic-anoxic sediments, suggesting that cyanobacteria in dead zone sediments and/or environmental conditions select for specific cyanophages. Some of these cyanophages can infect cyanobacteria with potential consequences for gene expression related to their photosystem and phosphate regulation. Top cyanobacterial genera detected in the anoxic sediment included Dolichospermum/Anabaena, Synechococcus, and Cyanobium. RNA transcripts classified to cyanobacteria were associated with numerous pathways, including anaerobic carbon metabolism and N2 fixation. Cyanobacterial blooms are known to fuel oxygen-depleted ecosystems with phosphorus (so-called internal loading), and our cyanophage data indicate the potential for viral lysis of cyanobacteria which might explain the high nutrient turnover in these environments.
    IMPORTANCE Cyanophages are viruses that target cyanobacteria and directly control their abundance via viral lysis. Cyanobacteria are known to cause large blooms in water bodies, substantially contributing to oxygen depletion in bottom waters resulting in areas called dead zones. Our knowledge of cyanophages in dead zones is very scarce, and so far, no studies have assembled partial cyanophage genomes and investigated their associated cyanobacteria in these dark and anoxic sediments. Here, we present the first study using DNA and RNA sequencing to investigate in situ diversity of cyanophages and cyanobacteria in dead zones. Our study shows that dead zone sediments contain different cyanophages compared to oxic sediments and suggest that these viruses are able to affect cyanobacterial photosystem and phosphate regulation. Furthermore, cyanophage-controlled lysis of cyanobacteria might also increase the turnover of carbon, phosphorus, and nitrogen in these oxygen-free environments at the bottom of the sea.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Suttle CA. 2007. Marine viruses—major players in the global ecosystem. Nat Rev Microbiol 5:801–812.
    2.
    Waterbury JB, Valois FW. 1993. Resistance to co-occurring phages enables marine synechococcus communities to coexist with cyanophages abundant in seawater. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:3393–3399.
    3.
    Suttle CA, Chan AM. 1993. Marine cyanophages infecting oceanic and coastal strains of Synechococcus: abundance, morphology, cross-infectivity and growth characteristics. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 92:99–99.
    4.
    Sullivan MB, Waterbury JB, Chisholm SW. 2003. Cyanophages infecting the oceanic cyanobacterium Prochlorococcus. Nature 424:1047–1051.
    5.
    Cairns J, Coloma S, Sivonen K, Hiltunen T. 2016. Evolving interactions between diazotrophic cyanobacterium and phage mediate nitrogen release and host competitive ability. R Soc Open Sci 3:160839.
    6.
    Holmfeldt K, Titelman J, Riemann L. 2010. Virus production and lysate recycling in different sub-basins of the northern Baltic Sea. Microb Ecol 60:572–580.
    7.
    Castenholz RW. 2015. General characteristics of the cyanobacteria. In Trujillo ME, Dedysh S, DeVos P, Hedlund B, Kämpfer P, Rainey FA, Whitman WB (ed), Bergey’s manual of systematics of archaea and bacteria. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken, NJ.
    8.
    Karlson AML, Duberg J, Motwani NH, Hogfors H, Klawonn I, Ploug H, Barthel Svedén J, Garbaras A, Sundelin B, Hajdu S, Larsson U, Elmgren R, Gorokhova E. 2015. Nitrogen fixation by cyanobacteria stimulates production in Baltic food webs. Ambio 44:413–426.
    9.
    Karlson AML, Nascimento FJA, Elmgren R. 2008. Incorporation and burial of carbon from settling cyanobacterial blooms by deposit-feeding macrofauna. Limnol Oceanogr 53:2754–2758.
    10.
    Brocke HJ, Wenzhoefer F, de Beer D, Mueller B, van Duyl FC, Nugues MM. 2015. High dissolved organic carbon release by benthic cyanobacterial mats in a Caribbean reef ecosystem. Sci Rep 5:8852.
    11.
    O’Neil JM, Roman MR. 1994. Ingestion of the cyanobacterium Trichodesmium spp. by pelagic harpacticoid copepods Macrosetella, Miracia and Oculosetella. Hydrobiologia 292:235–240.
    12.
    Nascimento FJA, Karlson AM, Elmgren R. 2008. Settling blooms of filamentous cyanobacteria as food for meiofauna assemblages. Limnol Oceanogr 53:2636–2643.
    13.
    Scanlan DJ, West NJ. 2002. Molecular ecology of the marine cyanobacterial genera Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 40:1–12.
    14.
    Li X, Dreher TW, Li R. 2016. An overview of diversity, occurrence, genetics and toxin production of bloom-forming Dolichospermum (Anabaena) species. Harmful Algae 54:54–68.
    15.
    Emeis KC, Struck U, Leipe T, Pollehne F, Kunzendorf H, Christiansen C. 2000. Changes in the C, N, P burial rates in some Baltic Sea sediments over the last 150 years - relevance to P regeneration rates and the phosphorus cycle. Mar Geol 167:43–59.
    16.
    Stal LJ, Albertano P, Bergman B, Bröckel K, Gallon JR, Hayes PK, Sivonen K, Walsby AE. 2003. BASIC: Baltic Sea cyanobacteria. An investigation of the structure and dynamics of water blooms of cyanobacteria in the Baltic Sea—responses to a changing environment. Cont Shelf Res 23:1695–1714.
    17.
    Conley DJ. 2012. Ecology: save the Baltic Sea. Nature 486:463–464.
    18.
    Peinert R, Saure A, Stegmann P, Stienen C, Haardt H, Smetacek V. 1982. Dynamics of primary production and sedimentation in a coastal ecosystem. Netherlands J Sea Res 16:276–289.
    19.
    Fuchsman CA, Palevsky HI, Widner B, Duffy M, Carlson MCG, Neibauer JA, Mulholland MR, Keil RG, Devol AH, Rocap G. 2019. Cyanobacteria and cyanophage contributions to carbon and nitrogen cycling in an oligotrophic oxygen-deficient zone. ISME J 13:2714–2726.
    20.
    Vahtera E, Conley DJ, Gustafsson BG, Kuosa H, Pitkänen H, Savchuk OP, Tamminen T, Viitasalo M, Voss M, Wasmund N, Wulff F. 2007. Internal ecosystem feedbacks enhance nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria blooms and complicate management in the Baltic Sea. Ambio 36:186–195.2.0.CO;2]. doi:
    21.
    Nascimento FJA, Karlson AML, Näslund J, Gorokhova E. 2009. Settling cyanobacterial blooms do not improve growth conditions for soft bottom meiofauna. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 368:138–146.
    22.
    Middelburg JJ, Meysman FJR. 2007. Burial at sea. Science 316:1294–1295.
    23.
    Diaz RJ, Rosenberg R. 2008. Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems. Science 321:926–929.
    24.
    Kaplan-Levy RN, Hadas O, Summers ML, Rücker J, Sukenik A. 2010. Akinetes: dormant cells of cyanobacteria, p 5–27. In Lubzens E, Cerda J, Clark M (ed), Dormancy and resistance in harsh environments. Springer, New York, NY.
    25.
    Mannan RM, Pakrasi HB. 1993. Dark heterotrophic growth conditions result in an increase in the content of photosystem ii units in the filamentous cyanobacterium Anabaena variabilis ATCC 29413. Plant Physiol 103:971–977.
    26.
    Pelroy RA, Bassham JA. 1972. Photosynthetic and dark carbon metabolism in unicellular blue-green algae. Arch Mikrobiol 86:25–38.
    27.
    Richardson LL, Castenholz RW. 1987. Enhanced survival of the cyanobacterium Oscillatoria terebriformis in darkness under anaerobic conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 53:2151–2158.
    28.
    Voss M, Dippner JW, Humborg C, Hürdler J, Korth F, Neumann T, Schernewski G, Venohr M. 2011. History and scenarios of future development of Baltic Sea eutrophication. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 92:307–322.
    29.
    Bonaglia S, Klawonn I, De Brabandere L, Deutsch B, Thamdrup B, Brüchert V. 2016. Denitrification and DNRA at the Baltic Sea oxic–anoxic interface: substrate spectrum and kinetics. Limnol Oceanogr 61:1900–1915.
    30.
    Hargreaves KR, Anderson NJ, Clokie MRJ. 2013. Recovery of viable cyanophages from the sediments of a eutrophic lake at decadal timescales. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 83:450–456.
    31.
    Cai L, Jørgensen BB, Suttle CA, He M, Cragg BA, Jiao N, Zhang R. 2019. Active and diverse viruses persist in the deep sub-seafloor sediments over thousands of years. ISME J 13:1857–1864.
    32.
    Bianchi TS, Engelhaupt E, Westman P, Andrén T, Rolff C, Elmgren R. 2000. Cyanobacterial blooms in the Baltic Sea: natural or human-induced? Limnol Oceanogr 45:716–726.
    33.
    Broman E, Bonaglia S, Holovachov O, Marzocchi U, Hall POJ, Nascimento FJA. 2020. Uncovering diversity and metabolic spectrum of animals in dead zone sediments. Commun Biol 3:106.
    34.
    Bolduc B, Jang HB, Doulcier G, You Z-Q, Roux S, Sullivan MB. 2017. vConTACT: an iVirus tool to classify double-stranded DNA viruses that infect Archaea and Bacteria. PeerJ 5:e3243.
    35.
    Vandieken V, Sabelhaus L, Engelhardt T. 2017. Virus dynamics are influenced by season, tides and advective transport in intertidal, permeable sediments. Front Microbiol 8:2526.
    36.
    Weinbauer MG, Brettar I, Höfle MG. 2003. Lysogeny and virus-induced mortality of bacterioplankton in surface, deep, and anoxic marine waters. Limnol Oceanogr 48:1457–1465.
    37.
    Taylor GT, Iabichella M, Ho T-Y, Scranton MI, Thunell RC, Muller-Karger F, Varela R. 2001. Chemoautotrophy in the redox transition zone of the Cariaco Basin: a significant midwater source of organic carbon production. Limnol Oceanogr 46:148–163.
    38.
    Barrangou R. 2015. The roles of CRISPR–Cas systems in adaptive immunity and beyond. Curr Opin Immunol 32:36–41.
    39.
    Riemann L, Holmfeldt K, Titelman J. 2009. Importance of viral lysis and dissolved dna for bacterioplankton activity in a P-limited estuary, northern Baltic Sea. Microb Ecol 57:286–294.
    40.
    Gao EB, Huang Y, Ning D. 2016. Metabolic genes within cyanophage genomes: implications for diversity and evolution. Genes 7:80.
    41.
    Kim SK, Makino K, Amemura M, Shinagawa H, Nakata A. 1993. Molecular analysis of the phoH gene, belonging to the phosphate regulon in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 175:1316–1324.
    42.
    Ivanciuc T, Sbrana E, Ansar M, Bazhanov N, Szabo C, Casola A, Garofalo RP. 2016. Hydrogen sulfide is an antiviral and antiinflammatory endogenous gasotransmitter in the airways. Role in respiratory syncytial virus infection. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 55:684–696.
    43.
    Stal LJ, Moezelaar R. 1997. Fermentation in cyanobacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 21:179–211.
    44.
    Thureborn P, Franzetti A, Lundin D, Sjöling S. 2016. Reconstructing ecosystem functions of the active microbial community of the Baltic Sea oxygen depleted sediments. PeerJ 4:e1593.
    45.
    Jessen GL, Lichtschlag A, Ramette A, Pantoja S, Rossel PE, Schubert CJ, Struck U, Boetius A. 2017. Hypoxia causes preservation of labile organic matter and changes seafloor microbial community composition (Black Sea). Sci Adv 3:e1601897.
    46.
    Hulthe G, Hulth S, Hall POJ. 1998. Effect of oxygen on degradation rate of refractory and labile organic matter in continental margin sediments. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 62:1319–1328.
    47.
    Hallenbeck PC, Kochian LV, Benemann JR. 1981. Hydrogen evolution catalyzed by hydrogenase in cultures of cyanobacteria. Z Naturforsch C 36:87–92.
    48.
    Sukenik A, Rücker J, Maldener I. 2019. Dormant cells (akinetes) of filamentous cyanobacteria demonstrate a great variability in morphology, physiology, and ecological function, p 65–77. In Mishra AK, Tiwari DN, Rai AN (ed), Cyanobacteria. Academic Press, New York, NY.
    49.
    Callieri C, Slabakova V, Dzhembekova N, Slabakova N, Peneva E, Cabello-Yeves PJ, Di Cesare A, Eckert EM, Bertoni R, Corno G, Salcher MM, Kamburska L, Bertoni F, Moncheva S. 2019. The mesopelagic anoxic Black Sea as an unexpected habitat for Synechococcus challenges our understanding of global “deep red fluorescence.” ISME J 13:1676–1687.
    50.
    Hall POJ, Almroth Rosell E, Bonaglia S, Dale AW, Hylén A, Kononets M, Nilsson M, Sommer S, van de Velde S, Viktorsson L. 2017. Influence of natural oxygenation of Baltic proper deep water on benthic recycling and removal of phosphorus, nitrogen, silicon and carbon. Front Mar Sci 4:27.
    51.
    Bergman B, Gallon JR, Rai AN, Stal LJ. 1997. N2 fixation by non-heterocystous cyanobacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 19:139–185.
    52.
    Domingues RB, Barbosa AB, Sommer U, Galvão HM. 2011. Ammonium, nitrate and phytoplankton interactions in a freshwater tidal estuarine zone: potential effects of cultural eutrophication. Aquat Sci 73:331–343.
    53.
    Smart LB, McIntosh L. 1991. Expression of photosynthesis genes in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803: psaA-psaB and psbA transcripts accumulate in dark-grown cells. Plant Mol Biol 17:959–971.
    54.
    Blomqvist S, Ekeroth N, Elmgren R, Hall PO. 2015. Long overdue improvement of box corer sampling. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 538:13–21.
    55.
    Marzocchi U, Bonaglia S, van de Velde S, Hall POJ, Schramm A, Risgaard-Petersen N, Meysman FJR. 2018. Transient bottom water oxygenation creates a niche for cable bacteria in long-term anoxic sediments of the Eastern Gotland Basin. Environ Microbiol 20:3031–3041.
    57.
    Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9:357–359.
    58.
    Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120.
    59.
    Wood DE, Salzberg S. 2014. Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol 15:R46.
    60.
    Robertson CE, Harris JK, Wagner BD, Granger D, Browne K, Tatem B, Feazel LM, Park K, Pace NR, Frank DN. 2013. Explicet: graphical user interface software for metadata-driven management, analysis and visualization of microbiome data. Bioinformatics 29:3100–3101.
    61.
    Li D, Luo R, Liu CM, Leung CM, Ting HF, Sadakane K, Yamashita H, Lam TW. 2016. MEGAHIT v1.0: a fast and scalable metagenome assembler driven by advanced methodologies and community practices. Methods 102:3–11.
    62.
    Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069.
    63.
    Hyatt D, Chen GL, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. 2010. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11:119.
    64.
    Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410.
    65.
    The UniProt Consortium. 2019. UniProt: a worldwide hub of protein knowledge. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D506–D515.
    66.
    Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup. 2009. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078–2079.
    67.
    Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W. 2015. HTSeq–a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31:166–169.
    68.
    Smid M, Coebergh van den Braak RRJ, van de Werken HJG, van Riet J, van Galen A, de Weerd V, van der Vlugt-Daane M, Bril SI, Lalmahomed ZS, Kloosterman WP, Wilting SM, Foekens JA, IJzermans JNM, the MATCH Study Group, Martens JWM, Sieuwerts AM. 2018. Gene length corrected trimmed mean of M-values (GeTMM) processing of RNA-seq data performs similarly in intersample analyses while improving intrasample comparisons. BMC Bioinformatics 19:236.
    69.
    Kanehisa M, Goto S. 2000. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 28:27–30.
    70.
    Roux S, Enault F, Hurwitz BL, Sullivan MB. 2015. VirSorter: mining viral signal from microbial genomic data. PeerJ 3:e985.
    71.
    Quinlan AR, Hall IM. 2010. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26:841–842.
    72.
    Brum JR, Ignacio-Espinoza JC, Roux S, Doulcier G, Acinas SG, Alberti A, Chaffron S, Cruaud C, de Vargas C, Gasol JM, Gorsky G, Gregory AC, Guidi L, Hingamp P, Iudicone D, Not F, Ogata H, Pesant S, Poulos BT, Schwenck SM, Speich S, Dimier C, Kandels-Lewis S, Picheral M, Searson S, Bork P, Bowler C, Sunagawa S, Wincker P, Karsenti E, Sullivan MB, Tara Oceans Coordinators. 2015. Patterns and ecological drivers of ocean viral communities. Science 348:1261498.
    73.
    Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. 2001. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4:9.
    74.
    Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, O’Hara R, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner H. 2018. vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.5-2.
    75.
    Clarke K, Warwick R. 1998. Quantifying structural redundancy in ecological communities. Oecologia 113:278–289.
    76.
    R Core Team. 2013. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.
    77.
    Taylor M. 2017. sinkr: collection of functions with emphasis in multivariate data analysis. R package version 0.6.
    78.
    Harrell FE, Jr, Dupont C. 2008. Hmisc: Harrell miscellaneous. R package version 3.
    79.
    Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. 2010. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26:139–140.
    80.
    Haas BJ, Papanicolaou A, Yassour M, Grabherr M, Blood PD, Bowden J, Couger MB, Eccles D, Li B, Lieber M, Macmanes MD, Ott M, Orvis J, Pochet N, Strozzi F, Weeks N, Westerman R, William T, Dewey CN, Henschel R, Leduc RD, Friedman N, Regev A. 2013. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nat Protoc 8:1494–1512.
    81.
    Broman E, Holmfeldt K, Bonaglia S, Hall POJ, Nascimento FJA. 2020. Eastern Gotland Basin sediment DNA and RNA data. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA531756.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSphere
    Volume 6Number 228 April 2021
    eLocator: e00208-21
    Editor: Yonghua Li-Beisson
    Aix-Marseille University

    History

    Received: 8 March 2021
    Accepted: 1 April 2021
    Published online: 28 April 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. DNA
    2. anoxic
    3. cyanobacteria
    4. cyanophages
    5. sediment
    6. virus

    Contributors

    Authors

    Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
    Baltic Sea Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
    Karin Holmfeldt
    Centre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems (EEMiS), Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden
    Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
    Department of Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Nordcee and HADAL, Odense, Denmark
    Department of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
    Per O. J. Hall
    Department of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
    Francisco J. A. Nascimento
    Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
    Baltic Sea Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden

    Editor

    Yonghua Li-Beisson
    Editor
    Aix-Marseille University

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • mSphereArticle
    A Novel Glycolipid Biosurfactant Confers Grazing Resistance upon Pantoea ananatis BRT175 against the Social Amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum

    A Novel Glycolipid Biosurfactant Confers Grazing Resistance upon Pantoea ananatis BRT175 against the Social Amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum

    ABSTRACT

    Pantoea is a versatile genus of bacteria with both plant- and animal-pathogenic strains, some of which have been suggested to cause human infections. There is, however, limited knowledge on the potential determinants used for host association and pathogenesis in animal systems. In this study, we used the model host Dictyostelium discoideum to show that isolates of Pantoea ananatis exhibit differential grazing susceptibility, with some being resistant to grazing by the amoebae. We carried out a high-throughput genetic screen of one grazing-resistant isolate, P. ananatis BRT175, using the D. discoideum pathosystem to identify genes responsible for the resistance phenotype. Among the 26 candidate genes involved in grazing resistance, we identified rhlA and rhlB, which we show are involved in the biosynthesis of a biosurfactant that enables swarming motility in P. ananatis BRT175. Using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), the biosurfactant was shown to be a glycolipid with monohexose-C10-C10 as the primary congener. We show that this novel glycolipid biosurfactant is cytotoxic to the amoebae and is capable of compromising cellular integrity, leading to cell lysis. The production of this biosurfactant may be important for bacterial survival in the environment and could contribute to the establishment of opportunistic infections.
    IMPORTANCE The genetic factors used for host interaction by the opportunistic human pathogen Pantoea ananatis are largely unknown. We identified two genes that are important for the production of a biosurfactant that confers grazing resistance against the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. We show that the biosurfactant, which exhibits cytotoxicity toward the amoebae, is a glycolipid that incorporates a hexose rather than rhamnose. The production of this biosurfactant may confer a competitive advantage in the environment and could potentially contribute to the establishment of opportunistic infections.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Bergman KA, Arends JP, and Schölvinck EH. 2007. Pantoea agglomerans septicemia in three newborn infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J26:453–454.
    2.
    Shubov A, Jagannathan P, and Chin-Hong PV. 2011. Pantoea agglomerans pneumonia in a heart-lung transplant recipient: case report and a review of an emerging pathogen in immunocompromised hosts. Transpl Infect Dis13:536–539.
    3.
    De Baere T, Verhelst R, Labit C, Verschraegen G, Wauters G, Claeys G, and Vaneechoutte M. 2004. Bacteremic infection with Pantoea ananatis. J Clin Microbiol42:4393–4395.
    4.
    Lalas KM and Erichsen D. 2010. Sporadic Pantoea agglomerans bacteremia in a near-term female: case report and review of literature. Jpn J Infect Dis63:290–291.
    5.
    Cheng A, Liu C, Tsai H, Hsu M, Yang C, Huang Y, Liao C, and Hsueh P. 2013. Bacteremia caused by Pantoea agglomerans at a medical center in Taiwan, 2000–2010. J Microbiol Immunol Infect46:187–194.
    6.
    Cruz AT, Cazacu AC, and Allen CH. 2007. Pantoea agglomerans, a plant pathogen causing human disease. J Clin Microbiol45:1989–1992.
    7.
    De Champs C, Le Seaux S, Dubost JJ, Boisgard S, Sauvezie B, and Sirot J. 2000. Isolation of Pantoea agglomerans in two cases of septic monoarthritis after plant thorn and wood sliver injuries. J Clin Microbiol38:460–461.
    8.
    Habsah H, Zeehaida M, Van Rostenberghe H, Noraida R, Wan Pauzi WI, Fatimah I, Rosliza AR, Nik Sharimah NY, and Maimunah H. 2005. An outbreak of Pantoea spp. in a neonatal intensive care unit secondary to contaminated parenteral nutrition. J Hosp Infect61:213–218.
    9.
    Coutinho TA and Venter SN. 2009. Pantoea ananatis: an unconventional plant pathogen. Mol Plant Pathol10:325–335.
    10.
    Walterson AM and Stavrinides J. 2015. Pantoea: insights into a highly versatile and diverse genus within the Enterobacteriaceae. FEMS Microbiol Rev39:968–984.
    11.
    Serrano F. 1928. Bacterial fruitlet brown rot on pineapple in the Philippines. Philipp J Sci36:271–305.
    12.
    Völksch B, Thon S, Jacobsen ID, and Gube M. 2009. Polyphasic study of plant- and clinic-associated Pantoea agglomerans strains reveals indistinguishable virulence potential. Infect Genet Evol9:1381–1391.
    13.
    Nadarasah G and Stavrinides J. 2014. Quantitative evaluation of the host-colonizing capabilities of the enteric bacterium Pantoea using plant and insect hosts. Microbiology160:602–615.
    14.
    Kirzinger MWB, Nadarasah G, and Stavrinides J. 2011. Insights into cross-kingdom plant pathogenic bacteria. Genes (Basel)2:980–997.
    15.
    Nadarasah G and Stavrinides J. 2011. Insects as alternative hosts for phytopathogenic bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev35:555–575.
    16.
    Stavrinides J, No A, and Ochman H. 2010. A single genetic locus in the phytopathogen Pantoea stewartii enables gut colonization and pathogenicity in an insect host. Environ Microbiol12:147–155.
    17.
    De Maayer P, Chan WY, Rubagotti E, Venter SN, Toth IK, Birch PR, and Coutinho TA. 2014. Analysis of the Pantoea ananatis pan-genome reveals factors underlying its ability to colonize and interact with plant, insect and vertebrate hosts. BMC Genomics15:404.
    18.
    Shyntum D, Venter S, Moleleki L, Toth I, and Coutinho T. 2014. Comparative genomics of type VI secretion systems in strains of Pantoea ananatis from different environments. BMC Genomics15:163.
    19.
    Kirzinger MWB and Stavrinides J. 2012. Host specificity determinants as a genetic continuum. Trends Microbiol20:88–93.
    20.
    Kirzinger MWB, Butz CJ, and Stavrinides J. 2015. Inheritance of Pantoea type III secretion systems through both vertical and horizontal transfer. Mol Genet Genomics290:2075–2088.
    21.
    Cosson P and Soldati T. 2008. Eat, kill or die: when amoeba meets bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol11:271–276.
    22.
    Hasselbring BM, Patel MK, and Schell MA. 2011. Dictyostelium discoideum as a model system for identification of Burkholderia pseudomallei virulence factors. Infect Immun79:2079–2088.
    23.
    Pan Y, Lin T, Hsu C, and Wang J. 2011. Use of a Dictyostelium model for isolation of genetic loci associated with phagocytosis and virulence in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Infect Immun79:997–1006.
    24.
    Lelong E, Marchetti A, Simon M, Burns JL, van Delden C, Köhler T, and Cosson P. 2011. Evolution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence in infected patients revealed in a Dictyostelium discoideum host model. Clin Microbiol Infect17:1415–1420.
    25.
    Alibaud L, Köhler T, Coudray A, Prigent-Combaret C, Bergeret E, Perrin J, Benghezal M, Reimmann C, Gauthier Y, Van Delden C, Attree I, Fauvarque M, and Cosson P. 2008. Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence genes identified in a Dictyostelium host model. Cell Microbiol10:729–740.
    26.
    Froquet R, Lelong E, Marchetti A, and Cosson P. 2008. Dictyostelium discoideum: a model host to measure bacterial virulence. Nat Protoc4:25–30.
    27.
    Pukatzki S, Kessin RH, and Mekalanos JJ. 2002. The human pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa utilizes conserved virulence pathways to infect the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A99:3159–3164.
    28.
    MacIntyre DL, Miyata ST, Kitaoka M, and Pukatzki S. 2010. The Vibrio cholerae type VI secretion system displays antimicrobial properties. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A107:19520–19524.
    29.
    Sperandio D, Decoin V, Latour X, Mijouin L, Hillion M, Feuilloley MGJ, Orange N, and Merieau A. 2012. Virulence of the Pseudomonas fluorescens clinical strain MFN1032 towards Dictyostelium discoideum and macrophages in relation with type III secretion system. BMC Microbiol12:223.
    30.
    Cosson P, Zulianello L, Join-Lambert O, Faurisson F, Gebbie L, Benghezal M, Van Delden C, Curty LK, and Köhler T. 2002. Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence analyzed in a Dictyostelium discoideum host system. J Bacteriol184:3027–3033.
    31.
    Totsika M, Heras B, Wurpel DJ, and Schembri MA. 2009. Characterization of two homologous disulfide bond systems involved in virulence factor biogenesis in uropathogenic Escherichia coli CFT073. J Bacteriol191:3901–3908.
    32.
    Qin A, Scott DW, and Mann BJ. 2008. Francisella tularensis subsp. tularensis Schu S4 disulfide bond formation protein B, but not an RND-type efflux pump, is required for virulence. Infect Immun76:3086–3092.
    33.
    Denoncin K and Collet J. 2013. Disulfide bond formation in the bacterial periplasm: major achievements and challenges ahead. Antioxid Redox Signal19:63–71.
    34.
    Bjur E, Eriksson-Ygberg S, Åslund F, and Rhen M. 2006. Thioredoxin 1 promotes intracellular replication and virulence of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Infect Immun74:5140–5151.
    35.
    Abdel-Mawgoud AM, Hausmann R, Lépine F, Müller MM, and Déziel E. 2011. Rhamnolipids: detection, analysis, biosynthesis, genetic regulation, and bioengineering of production, p 13–55. InSoberón-Chávez G (ed), Biosurfactants: from genes to applications. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
    36.
    Alexeyev MF, Shokolenko IN, and Croughan TP. 1995. Improved antibiotic-resistance gene cassettes and omega elements for Escherichia coli vector construction and in vitro deletion/insertion mutagenesis. Gene160:63–67.
    37.
    Alexeyev MF, Shokolenko IN, and Croughan TP. 1995. New mini-Tn5 derivatives for insertion mutagenesis and genetic engineering in gram-negative bacteria. Can J Microbiol41:1053–1055.
    38.
    Abdel-Mawgoud AM, Lépine F, and Déziel E. 2010. Rhamnolipids: diversity of structures, microbial origins and roles. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol86:1323–1336.
    39.
    Caiazza NC, Shanks RMQ, and O’Toole GA. 2005. Rhamnolipids modulate swarming motility patterns of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol187:7351–7361.
    40.
    Déziel E, Lépine F, Milot S, and Villemur R. 2003. rhlA is required for the production of a novel biosurfactant promoting swarming motility in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: 3-(3-hydroxyalkanoyloxy)alkanoic acids (HAAs), the precursors of rhamnolipids. Microbiology149:2005–2013.
    41.
    Nickzad A, Lépine F, and Déziel E. 2015. Quorum sensing controls swarming motility of Burkholderia glumae through regulation of rhamnolipids. PLoS One10:e0128509.
    42.
    Kearns DB. 2010. A field guide to bacterial swarming motility. Nat Rev Microbiol8:634–644.
    43.
    De Maayer P, Chan WY, Venter SN, Toth IK, Birch PRJ, Joubert F, and Coutinho TA. 2010. Genome sequence of Pantoea ananatis LMG20103, the causative agent of eucalyptus blight and dieback. J Bacteriol192:2936–2937.
    44.
    De Maayer P, Chan WY, Rezzonico F, Bühlmann A, Venter SN, Blom J, Goesmann A, Frey JE, Smits THM, Duffy B, and Coutinho TA. 2012. Complete genome sequence of clinical isolate Pantoea ananatis LMG 5342. J Bacteriol194:1615–1616.
    45.
    Sillo A, Matthias J, Konertz R, Bozzaro S, and Eichinger L. 2011. Salmonella typhimurium is pathogenic for Dictyostelium cells and subverts the starvation response. Cell Microbiol13:1793–1811.
    46.
    Smith DDN, Kirzinger MWB, and Stavrinides J. 2013. Draft genome sequence of the antibiotic-producing epiphytic isolate Pantoea ananatis BRT175. Genome Announc1:e00902-13.
    47.
    Pukatzki S, Ma AT, Sturtevant D, Krastins B, Sarracino D, Nelson WC, Heidelberg JF, and Mekalanos JJ. 2006. Identification of a conserved bacterial protein secretion system in Vibrio cholerae using the Dictyostelium host model system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A103:1528–1533.
    48.
    Pradel E, Zhang Y, Pujol N, Matsuyama T, Bargmann CI, and Ewbank JJ. 2007. Detection and avoidance of a natural product from the pathogenic bacterium Serratia marcescens by Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A104:2295–2300.
    49.
    Antunes LCM, Ferreira RBR, Buckner MMC, and Finlay BB. 2010. Quorum sensing in bacterial virulence. Microbiology156:2271–2282.
    50.
    Pearson JP, Pesci EC, and Iglewski BH. 1997. Roles of Pseudomonas aeruginosalas and rhl quorum-sensing systems in control of elastase and rhamnolipid biosynthesis genes. J Bacteriol179:5756–5767.
    51.
    Deep A, Chaudhary U, and Gupta V. 2011. Quorum sensing and bacterial pathogenicity: from molecules to disease. J Lab Physicians3:4–11.
    52.
    Zulianello L, Canard C, Köhler T, Caille D, Lacroix J, and Meda P. 2006. Rhamnolipids are virulence factors that promote early infiltration of primary human airway epithelia by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect Immun74:3134–3147.
    53.
    Jensen PO, Bjarnsholt T, Phipps R, Rasmussen TB, Calum H, Christoffersen L, Moser C, Williams P, Pressler T, Givskov M, and Høiby N. 2007. Rapid necrotic killing of polymorphonuclear leukocytes is caused by quorum-sensing-controlled production of rhamnolipid by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiology153:1329–1338.
    54.
    Häussler S, Rohde M, von Neuhoff N, Nimtz M, and Steinmetz I. 2003. Structural and functional cellular changes induced by Burkholderia pseudomallei rhamnolipid. Infect Immun71:2970–2975.
    55.
    Ochsner UA, Fiechter A, and Reiser J. 1994. Isolation, characterization, and expression in Escherichia coli of the Pseudomonas aeruginosarhlAB genes encoding a rhamnosyltransferase involved in rhamnolipid biosurfactant synthesis. J Biol Chem269:19787–19795.
    56.
    Dubeau D, Déziel E, Woods DE, and Lépine F. 2009. Burkholderia thailandensis harbors two identical rhl gene clusters responsible for the biosynthesis of rhamnolipids. BMC Microbiol9:263.
    57.
    Rahim R, Ochsner UA, Olvera C, Graninger M, Messner P, Lam JS, and Soberón-Chávez G. 2001. Cloning and functional characterization of the Pseudomonas aeruginosarhlC gene that encodes rhamnosyltransferase 2, an enzyme responsible for di-rhamnolipid biosynthesis. Mol Microbiol40:708–718.
    58.
    Déziel E, Lépine F, Milot S, and Villemur R. 2000. Mass spectrometry monitoring of rhamnolipids from a growing culture of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain 57rp. Biochim Biophys Acta1485:145–152.
    59.
    Tremblay J, Richardson A, Lépine F, and Déziel E. 2007. Self-produced extracellular stimuli modulate the Pseudomonas aeruginosa swarming motility behaviour. Environ Microbiol9:2622–2630.
    60.
    Brüssow H. 2007. Bacteria between protists and phages: from antipredation strategies to the evolution of pathogenicity. Mol Microbiol65:583–589.
    61.
    Matz C and Kjelleberg S. 2005. Off the hook—how bacteria survive protozoan grazing. Trends Microbiol13:302–307.
    62.
    Brown SP, Cornforth DM, and Mideo N. 2012. Evolution of virulence in opportunistic pathogens: generalism, plasticity, and control. Trends Microbiol20:336–342.
    63.
    Adiba S, Nizak C, van Baalen M, Denamur E, and Depaulis F. 2010. From grazing resistance to pathogenesis: the coincidental evolution of virulence factors. PLoS One5:e11882.
    64.
    Fey P, Kowal AS, Gaudet P, Pilcher KE, and Chisholm RL. 2007. Protocols for growth and development of Dictyostelium discoideum. Nat Protoc2:1307–1316.
    65.
    Sussman M. 1966. Biochemical and genetic methods in the study of cellular slime mold development, p 397–410. InPrescott D (ed), Methods in cell physiology, vol 2. Academic Press, New York, NY.
    66.
    Ochman H, Gerber AS, and Hartl DL. 1988. Genetic applications of an inverse polymerase chain reaction. Genetics120:621–623.
    67.
    Guerra-Santos L, Kappeli O, and Fiechter A. 1984. Pseudomonas aeruginosa biosurfactant production in continuous culture with glucose as carbon source. Appl Environ Microbiol48:301–305.
    68.
    Dinno A. 2015. Dunn.Test: Dunn’s test of multiple comparisons using rank sums. R package version 1.2.4. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
    69.
    Abdel-Mawgoud AM, Lépine F, and Déziel E. 2014. Liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry for the identification and quantification of rhamnolipids. Methods Mol Biol1149:359–373.
    70.
    Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, and Kumar S. 2013. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol30:2725–2729.
    71.
    Hall BG, Acar H, Nandipati A, and Barlow M. 2014. Growth rates made easy. Mol Biol Evol31:232–238.
    72.
    R Core Team. 2014. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
    73.
    Wickham H. 2009. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer, New York, NY.
    74.
    Kessler B, De Lorenzo V, and Timmis KN. 1992. A general system to integrate lacZ fusions into the chromosomes of gram-negative eubacteria: regulation of the Pm promoter of the TOL plasmid studied with all controlling elements in monocopy. Mol Gen Genet233:293–301.
    75.
    Fey P, Dodson RJ, Basu S, and Chisholm RL. 2013. One stop shop for everything Dictyostelium: DictyBase and the Dicty Stock Center in 2012. Methods Mol Biol983:59–92.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    mSphere
    Volume 1Number 125 February 2016
    eLocator: e00075-15
    Editor: Katherine McMahon
    University of Wisconsin

    History

    Received: 26 November 2015
    Accepted: 1 December 2015
    Published online: 20 January 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS:

    1. biosurfactants
    2. Pantoea
    3. Dictyostelium
    4. opportunistic infections

    Contributors

    Authors

    Derek D. N. Smith
    Department of Biology, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
    Arvin Nickzad
    INRS-Institut Armand-Frappier, Laval, Québec, Canada
    INRS-Institut Armand-Frappier, Laval, Québec, Canada
    John Stavrinides
    Department of Biology, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada

    Editor

    Katherine McMahon
    Editor
    University of Wisconsin

    Notes

    Address correspondence to John Stavrinides, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

There are no results at this time

American Society for Microbiology ("ASM") is committed to maintaining your confidence and trust with respect to the information we collect from you on websites owned and operated by ASM ("ASM Web Sites") and other sources. This Privacy Policy sets forth the information we collect about you, how we use this information and the choices you have about how we use such information.
FIND OUT MORE about the privacy policy