31
Average Days in Review
97%
Percent of Research Articles Cited within Two Years of Publication
11
Average Days to Publication from Acceptance
Annual HTML+PDF Usage

CURRENT ISSUE

Volume 95Issue 16July 2021

EDITOR IN CHIEF: Dr. Rozanne M. Sandri-Goldin

Explore JVI

Editor in Chief

JVI EiC Sandri-Goldin
Dr. Rozanne M. Sandri-Goldin

Editor in Chief (2021) | University of California, Irvine

Rozanne M. Sandri-Goldin is Chancellor’s Professor and Chair of the Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics in the School of Medicine at the University of California, Irvine (UC Irvine).

Editorial Board

  • Journal of VirologyArticle
    Isolation and Full-Length Genome Characterization of SARS-CoV-2 from COVID-19 Cases in Northern Italy

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Zhou P, Yang XL, Wang XG, Hu B, Zhang L, Zhang W, Si HR, Zhu Y, Li B, Huang CL, Chen HD, Chen J, Luo Y, Guo H, Jiang RD, Liu MQ, Chen Y, Shen XR, Wang X, Zheng XS, Zhao K, Chen QJ, Deng F, Liu LL, Yan B, Zhan FX, Wang YY, Xiao GF, Shi ZL. 2020. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 579:270–273.
    2.
    Wu F, Zhao S, Yu B, Chen YM, Wang W, Song ZG, Hu Y, Tao ZW, Tian JH, Pei YY, Yuan ML, Zhang YL, Dai FH, Liu Y, Wang QM, Zheng JJ, Xu L, Holmes EC, Zhang YZ. 2020. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature 579:265–269.
    3.
    World Health Organization. 2020. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Situation report 61. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports.
    4.
    . 2020. Dipartimento della Protezione Civile—Emergenza Coronavirus: la risposta nazionale. http://www.protezionecivile.gov.it/attivita-rischi/rischio-sanitario/emergenze/coronavirus.
    5.
    Corman VM, Landt O, Kaiser M, Molenkamp R, Meijer A, Chu DKW, Bleicker T, Brunink S, Schneider J, Schmidt ML, Mulders D, Haagmans BL, van der Veer B, van den Brink S, Wijsman L, Goderski G, Romette JL, Ellis J, Zambon M, Peiris M, Goossens H, Reusken C, Koopmans MPG, Drosten C. 2020. Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Euro Surveill 25(3):2000045.
    6.
    Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. 2018. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 35:1547–1549.
    7.
    Giovanetti M, Benvenuto D, Angeletti S, Ciccozzi M. 2020. The first two cases of 2019-nCoV in Italy: where they come from? J Med Virol 92:518–521.
    8.
    Su YCF, Anderson DE, Young BE, Zhu F, Linster M, Kalimuddin S, Low JGH, Yan Z, Jayakumar J, Sun L, Yan GZ, Mendenhall IH, Leo Y-S, Lye DC, Wang L-F, Smith G. 2020. Discovery of a 382-nt deletion during the early evolution of SARS-CoV-2. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.11.987222v1.
    9.
    Shu Y, McCauley J. 2017. GISAID: global initiative on sharing all influenza data—from vision to reality. Euro Surveill 22(13):30494.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Journal of Virology
    Volume 94Number 1118 May 2020
    eLocator: e00543-20
    Editor: Rozanne M. Sandri-Goldin
    University of California, Irvine

    History

    Published online: 1 April 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. COVID-19
    2. Italy
    3. SARS-CoV-2

    Contributors

    Authors

    Danilo Licastro
    ARGO Open Lab Platform for Genome Sequencing, Trieste, Italy
    Sreejith Rajasekharan
    Laboratory of Molecular Virology, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), Trieste, Italy
    Simeone Dal Monego
    ARGO Open Lab Platform for Genome Sequencing, Trieste, Italy
    Ludovica Segat
    Laboratorio di riferimento per SARS-CoV-2, Regione Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata Giuliano Isontina (ASUGI), UCO Igiene e Sanità Pubblica, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche Chirurgiche e della Salute, Università di Trieste, Trieste, Italy
    Pierlanfranco D’Agaro
    Laboratorio di riferimento per SARS-CoV-2, Regione Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata Giuliano Isontina (ASUGI), UCO Igiene e Sanità Pubblica, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche Chirurgiche e della Salute, Università di Trieste, Trieste, Italy
    Laboratory of Molecular Virology, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), Trieste, Italy
    The Regione FVG Laboratory Group on COVID-19

    Editor

    Rozanne M. Sandri-Goldin
    Editor
    University of California, Irvine

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Pierlanfranco D’Agaro, [email protected], or Alessandro Marcello, [email protected].
    Danilo Licastro and Sreejith Rajasekharan contributed equally to this work and are named in alphabetical order.

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Journal of VirologyArticle
    Antiviral Activity of the Zinc Ionophores Pyrithione and Hinokitiol against Picornavirus Infections

    Antiviral Activity of the Zinc Ionophores Pyrithione and Hinokitiol against Picornavirus Infections

    ABSTRACT

    We have discovered two metal ion binding compounds, pyrithione (PT) and hinokitiol (HK), that efficiently inhibit human rhinovirus, coxsackievirus, and mengovirus multiplication. Early stages of virus infection are unaffected by these compounds. However, the cleavage of the cellular eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4GI by the rhinoviral 2A protease was abolished in the presence of PT and HK. We further show that these compounds inhibit picornavirus replication by interfering with proper processing of the viral polyprotein. In addition, we provide evidence that these structurally unrelated compounds lead to a rapid import of extracellular zinc ions into cells. Imported Zn2+ was found to be localized in punctate structures, as well as in mitochondria. The observed elevated level of zinc ions was reversible when the compounds were removed. As the antiviral activity of these compounds requires the continuous presence of the zinc ionophore PT, HK, or pyrrolidine-dithiocarbamate, the requirement for zinc ions for the antiviral activity is further substantiated. Therefore, an increase in intracellular zinc levels provides the basis for a new antipicornavirus mechanism.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Beyersmann, D., and H. Haase.2001. Functions of zinc in signaling, proliferation and differentiation of mammalian cells. Biometals14:331-341.
    2.
    Bryant, F., and B. T. Overell.1953. Quantitative chromatographic analysis of organic acids in plant tissue extracts. Biochim. Biophys. Acta10:471-476.
    3.
    Butterworth, B. E., and B. D. Korant.1974. Characterization of the large picornaviral polypeptides produced in the presence of zinc ion. J. Virol.14:282-291.
    4.
    Crutchfield, C. E., III, E. J. Lewis, and B. D. Zelickson.1997. The highly effective use of topical zinc pyrithione in the treatment of psoriasis: a case report. Dermatol. Online J.3:3.
    5.
    Duke, G. M., and A. C. Palmenberg.1989. Cloning and synthesis of infectious cardiovirus RNAs containing short, discrete poly(C) tracts. J. Virol.63:1822-1826.
    6.
    Erl, W., C. Weber, and G. K. Hansson.2000. Pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate-induced apoptosis depends on cell type, density, and the presence of Cu(2+) and Zn(2+). Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.278:C1116-C1125.
    7.
    Etchison, D., and S. Fout.1985. Human rhinovirus 14 infection of HeLa cells results in the proteolytic cleavage of the p220 cap-binding complex subunit and inactivates globin mRNA translation in vitro. J. Virol.54:634-638.
    8.
    Etchison, D., S. C. Milburn, I. Edery, N. Sonenberg, and J. W. Hershey.1982. Inhibition of HeLa cell protein synthesis following poliovirus infection correlates with the proteolysis of a 220,000-dalton polypeptide associated with eucaryotic initiation factor 3 and a cap binding protein complex. J. Biol. Chem.257:14806-14810.
    9.
    Gaudernak, E., J. Seipelt, A. Triendl, A. Grassauer, and E. Kuechler.2002. Antiviral effects of pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate on human rhinoviruses. J. Virol.76:6004-6015.
    10.
    Geller, R., M. Vignuzzi, R. Andino, and J. Frydman.2007. Evolutionary constraints on chaperone-mediated folding provide an antiviral approach refractory to development of drug resistance. Genes Dev.21:195-205.
    11.
    Gradi, A., H. Imataka, Y. V. Svitkin, E. Rom, B. Raught, S. Morino, and N. Sonenberg.1998. A novel functional human eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4G. Mol. Cell. Biol.18:334-342.
    12.
    Guthery, E., L. A. Seal, and E. L. Anderson.2005. Zinc pyrithione in alcohol-based products for skin antisepsis: persistence of antimicrobial effects. Am. J. Infect. Control33:15-22.
    13.
    Haase, H., and D. Beyersmann.2002. Intracellular zinc distribution and transport in C6 rat glioma cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.296:923-928.
    14.
    Haase, H., and W. Maret.2003. Intracellular zinc fluctuations modulate protein tyrosine phosphatase activity in insulin/insulin-like growth factor-1 signaling. Exp. Cell Res.291:289-298.
    15.
    Inamori, Y., H. Tsujibo, H. Ohishi, F. Ishii, M. Mizugaki, H. Aso, and N. Ishida.1993. Cytotoxic effect of hinokitiol and tropolone on the growth of mammalian cells and on blastogenesis of mouse splenic T cells. Biol. Pharm. Bull.16:521-523.
    16.
    Kim, C. H., J. H. Kim, C. Y. Hsu, and Y. S. Ahn.1999. Zinc is required in pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate inhibition of NF-kappaB activation. FEBS Lett.449:28-32.
    17.
    Kim, C. H., J. H. Kim, S. J. Moon, K. C. Chung, C. Y. Hsu, J. T. Seo, and Y. S. Ahn.1999. Pyrithione, a zinc ionophore, inhibits NF-kappaB activation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.259:505-509.
    18.
    Kim, C. H., J. H. Kim, J. Xu, C. Y. Hsu, and Y. S. Ahn.1999. Pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate induces bovine cerebral endothelial cell death by increasing the intracellular zinc level. J. Neurochem.72:1586-1592.
    19.
    Kondoh, M., E. Tasaki, S. Araragi, M. Takiguchi, M. Higashimoto, Y. Watanabe, and M. Sato.2002. Requirement of caspase and p38MAPK activation in zinc-induced apoptosis in human leukemia HL-60 cells. Eur. J. Biochem.269:6204-6211.
    20.
    Kondoh, M., E. Tasaki, M. Takiguchi, M. Higashimoto, Y. Watanabe, and M. Sato.2005. Activation of caspase-3 in HL-60 cells treated with pyrithione and zinc. Biol. Pharm. Bull.28:757-759.
    21.
    Krenn, B. M., B. Holzer, E. Gaudernak, A. Triendl, F. J. van Kuppeveld, and J. Seipelt.2005. Inhibition of polyprotein processing and RNA replication of human rhinovirus by pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate involves metal ions. J. Virol.79:13892-13899.
    22.
    Lanke, K., B. M. Krenn, W. J. Melchers, J. Seipelt, and F. J. van Kuppeveld.2007. PDTC inhibits picornavirus polyprotein processing and RNA replication by transporting zinc ions into cells. J. Gen. Virol.88:1206-1217.
    23.
    Miyamoto, D., Y. Kusagaya, N. Endo, A. Sometani, S. Takeo, T. Suzuki, Y. Arima, K. Nakajima, and Y. Suzuki.1998. Thujaplicin-copper chelates inhibit replication of human influenza viruses. Antiviral Res.39:89-100.
    24.
    Muylle, F. A., D. Adriaensen, W. De Coen, J. P. Timmermans, and R. Blust.2006. Tracing of labile zinc in live fish hepatocytes using FluoZin-3. Biometals19:437-450.
    25.
    Perrin, D. D.1979. Stability constants of metal-ion complexes: organic ligands. Pergamon, Oxford, United Kingdom.
    26.
    Reed, L. J., and H. Muench.1938. A simple method of estimating fifty per cent endpoints. Am. J. Hyg.27:493-497.
    27.
    Sensi, S. L., L. M. Canzoniero, S. P. Yu, H. S. Ying, J. Y. Koh, G. A. Kerchner, and D. W. Choi.1997. Measurement of intracellular free zinc in living cortical neurons: routes of entry. J. Neurosci.17:9554-9564.
    28.
    Sensi, S. L., D. Ton-That, J. H. Weiss, A. Rothe, and K. R. Gee.2003. A new mitochondrial fluorescent zinc sensor. Cell Calcium34:281-284.
    29.
    Si, X., B. M. McManus, J. Zhang, J. Yuan, C. Cheung, M. Esfandiarei, A. Suarez, A. Morgan, and H. Luo.2005. Pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate reduces coxsackievirus B3 replication through inhibition of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. J. Virol.79:8014-8023.
    30.
    Skern, T., C. Neubauer, L. Frasel, P. Grundler, W. Sommergruber, M. Zorn, E. Kuechler, and D. Blaas.1987. A neutralizing epitope on human rhinovirus type 2 includes amino acid residues between 153 and 164 of virus capsid protein VP2. J. Gen. Virol.68:315-323.
    31.
    Skern, T., W. Sommergruber, D. Blaas, C. Pieler, and E. Kuechler.1984. Relationship of human rhinovirus strain 2 and poliovirus as indicated by comparison of the polymerase gene regions. Virology136:125-132.
    32.
    Trust, T. J., and R. W. Coombs.1973. Antibacterial activity of beta-thujaplicin. Can. J. Microbiol.19:1341-1346.
    33.
    Uchide, N., and K. Ohyama.2003. Antiviral function of pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate against influenza virus: the inhibition of viral gene replication and transcription. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.52:8-10.
    34.
    Uchide, N., K. Ohyama, T. Bessho, B. Yuan, and T. Yamakawa.2002. Effect of antioxidants on apoptosis induced by influenza virus infection: inhibition of viral gene replication and transcription with pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate. Antiviral Res.56:207-217.
    35.
    Warner, R. R., J. R. Schwartz, Y. Boissy, and T. L. Dawson, Jr.2001. Dandruff has an altered stratum corneum ultrastructure that is improved with zinc pyrithione shampoo. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.45:897-903.
    36.
    Wessels, E., D. Duijsings, R. A. Notebaart, W. J. Melchers, and F. J. van Kuppeveld.2005. A proline-rich region in the coxsackievirus 3A protein is required for the protein to inhibit endoplasmic reticulum-to-Golgi transport. J. Virol.79:5163-5173.
    37.
    Yan, R., W. Rychlik, D. Etchison, and R. E. Rhoads.1992. Amino acid sequence of the human protein synthesis initiation factor eIF-4 gamma. J. Biol. Chem.267:23226-23231.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Journal of Virology
    Volume 83Number 11 January 2009
    Pages: 58 - 64

    History

    Received: 22 July 2008
    Accepted: 6 October 2008
    Published online: 15 October 2008

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Contributors

    Authors

    B. M. Krenn
    Max F. Perutz Laboratories, Medical University of Vienna, Dr. Bohr-Gasse 9/3, 1030 Vienna, Austria
    E. Gaudernak
    Max F. Perutz Laboratories, Medical University of Vienna, Dr. Bohr-Gasse 9/3, 1030 Vienna, Austria
    B. Holzer
    Max F. Perutz Laboratories, Medical University of Vienna, Dr. Bohr-Gasse 9/3, 1030 Vienna, Austria
    K. Lanke
    Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen Centre for Molecular Life Sciences, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    F. J. M. Van Kuppeveld
    Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen Centre for Molecular Life Sciences, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    Max F. Perutz Laboratories, Medical University of Vienna, Dr. Bohr-Gasse 9/3, 1030 Vienna, Austria

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Journal of VirologyArticle
    Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Dampen the Cytokine and Antibody Response to SARS-CoV-2 Infection

    ABSTRACT

    Identifying drugs that regulate severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and its symptoms has been a pressing area of investigation during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which are frequently used for the relief of pain and inflammation, could modulate both SARS-CoV-2 infection and the host response to the virus. NSAIDs inhibit the enzymes cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), which mediate the production of prostaglandins (PGs). Since PGs play diverse biological roles in homeostasis and inflammatory responses, inhibiting PG production with NSAIDs could affect COVID-19 pathogenesis in multiple ways, including (i) altering susceptibility to infection by modifying expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), the cell entry receptor for SARS-CoV-2; (ii) regulating replication of SARS-CoV-2 in host cells; and (iii) modulating the immune response to SARS-CoV-2. Here, we investigate these potential roles. We demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 infection upregulates COX-2 in diverse human cell culture and mouse systems. However, suppression of COX-2 by two commonly used NSAIDs, ibuprofen and meloxicam, had no effect on ACE2 expression, viral entry, or viral replication. In contrast, in a mouse model of SARS-CoV-2 infection, NSAID treatment reduced production of proinflammatory cytokines and impaired the humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2, as demonstrated by reduced neutralizing antibody titers. Our findings indicate that NSAID treatment may influence COVID-19 outcomes by dampening the inflammatory response and production of protective antibodies rather than modifying susceptibility to infection or viral replication.
    IMPORTANCE Public health officials have raised concerns about the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for treating symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). NSAIDs inhibit the enzymes cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), which are critical for the generation of prostaglandins—lipid molecules with diverse roles in homeostasis and inflammation. Inhibition of prostaglandin production by NSAIDs could therefore have multiple effects on COVID-19 pathogenesis. Here, we demonstrate that NSAID treatment reduced both the antibody and proinflammatory cytokine response to SARS-CoV-2 infection. The ability of NSAIDs to modulate the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection has important implications for COVID-19 pathogenesis in patients. Whether this occurs in humans and whether it is beneficial or detrimental to the host remains an important area of future investigation. This also raises the possibility that NSAIDs may alter the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Day M. 2020. Covid-19: ibuprofen should not be used for managing symptoms, say doctors and scientists. BMJ 368:m1086.
    2.
    Powis S. 2020. Novel coronavirus: anti-inflammatory medications. Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London, United Kingdom.
    3.
    Ricciotti E, FitzGerald GA. 2011. Prostaglandins and inflammation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 31:986–1000.
    4.
    Zhou P, Yang X-L, Wang X-G, Hu B, Zhang L, Zhang W, Si H-R, Zhu Y, Li B, Huang C-L, Chen H-D, Chen J, Luo Y, Guo H, Jiang R-D, Liu M-Q, Chen Y, Shen X-R, Wang X, Zheng X-S, Zhao K, Chen Q-J, Deng F, Liu L-L, Yan B, Zhan F-X, Wang Y-Y, Xiao G-F, Shi Z-L. 2020. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 579:270–273.
    5.
    Fang L, Karakiulakis G, Roth M. 2020. Are patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus at increased risk for COVID-19 infection? Lancet Respir Med 8:e21.
    6.
    Raaben M, Einerhand AW, Taminiau LJ, van Houdt M, Bouma J, Raatgeep RH, Büller HA, de Haan CA, Rossen JW. 2007. Cyclooxygenase activity is important for efficient replication of mouse hepatitis virus at an early stage of infection. Virol J 4:55.
    7.
    Qiao W, Wang C, Chen B, Zhang F, Liu Y, Lu Q, Guo H, Yan C, Sun H, Hu G, Yin X. 2015. Ibuprofen attenuates cardiac fibrosis in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Cardiology 131:97–106.
    8.
    Miyoshi H, VanDussen KL, Malvin NP, Ryu SH, Wang Y, Sonnek NM, Lai C-W, Stappenbeck TS. 2017. Prostaglandin E2 promotes intestinal repair through an adaptive cellular response of the epithelium. EMBO J 36:5–24.
    9.
    Alfajaro MM, Choi J-S, Kim D-S, Seo J-Y, Kim J-Y, Park J-G, Soliman M, Baek Y-B, Cho E-H, Kwon J, Kwon H-J, Park S-J, Lee WS, Kang M-I, Hosmillo M, Goodfellow I, Cho K-O. 2017. Activation of COX-2/PGE2 promotes sapovirus replication via the inhibition of nitric oxide production. J Virol 91:e01656-16.
    10.
    Alfajaro MM, Cho E-H, Park J-G, Kim J-Y, Soliman M, Baek Y-B, Kang M-I, Park S-I, Cho K-O. 2018. Feline calicivirus- and murine norovirus-induced COX-2/PGE2 signaling pathway has proviral effects. PLoS One 13:e0200726.
    11.
    Lu R, Zhao X, Li J, Niu P, Yang B, Wu H, Wang W, Song H, Huang B, Zhu N, Bi Y, Ma X, Zhan F, Wang L, Hu T, Zhou H, Hu Z, Zhou W, Zhao L, Chen J, Meng Y, Wang J, Lin Y, Yuan J, Xie Z, Ma J, Liu WJ, Wang D, Xu W, Holmes EC, Gao GF, Wu G, Chen W, Shi W, Tan W. 2020. Genomic characterization and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet 395:565–574.
    12.
    Yan X, Hao Q, Mu Y, Timani KA, Ye L, Zhu Y, Wu J. 2006. Nucleocapsid protein of SARS-CoV activates the expression of cyclooxygenase-2 by binding directly to regulatory elements for nuclear factor-κB and CCAAT/enhancer binding protein. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 38:1417–1428.
    13.
    Liu M, Yang Y, Gu C, Yue Y, Wu KK, Wu J, Zhu Y. 2007. Spike protein of SARS-CoV stimulates cyclooxygenase-2 expression via both calcium-dependent and calcium-independent protein kinase C pathways. FASEB J 21:1586–1596.
    14.
    Fajgenbaum DC, June CH. 2020. Cytokine storm. N Engl J Med 383:2255–2273.
    15.
    Horby P, Lim WS, Emberson JR, Mafham M, Bell JL, Linsell L, Staplin N, Brightling C, Ustianowski A, Elmahi E, Prudon B, Green C, Felton T, Chadwick D, Rege K, Fegan C, Chappell LC, Faust SN, Jaki T, Jeffery K, Montgomery A, Rowan K, Juszczak E, Baillie JK, Haynes R, Landray MJ, RECOVERY Collaborative Group. 2020. Dexamethasone in hospitalized patients with Covid-19: preliminary report. N Engl J Med doi:
    16.
    Lucas C, Wong P, Klein J, Castro TBR, Silva J, Sundaram M, Ellingson MK, Mao T, Oh JE, Israelow B, Takahashi T, Tokuyama M, Lu P, Venkataraman A, Park A, Mohanty S, Wang H, Wyllie AL, Vogels CBF, Earnest R, Lapidus S, Ott IM, Moore AJ, Muenker MC, Fournier JB, Campbell M, Odio CD, Casanovas-Massana A, Herbst R, Shaw AC, Medzhitov R, Schulz WL, Grubaugh ND, Cruz CD, Farhadian S, Ko AI, Omer SB, Iwasaki A, Yale IMPACT Team. 2020. Longitudinal analyses reveal immunological misfiring in severe COVID-19. 7821. Nature 584:463–469.
    17.
    Mann ER, Menon M, Knight SB, Konkel JE, Jagger C, Shaw TN, Krishnan S, Rattray M, Ustianowski A, Bakerly ND, Dark P, Lord GM, Simpson A, Felton T, Ho L-P, Trc NR, Feldmann M, CIRCO, Grainger JR, Hussell T. 2020. Longitudinal immune profiling reveals key myeloid signatures associated with COVID-19. Sci Immunol 5:eabd6197.
    18.
    Robb CT, Goepp M, Rossi AG, Yao C. 2020. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, prostaglandins, and COVID-19. Br J Pharmacol 177:4899–4920.
    19.
    Yao C, Narumiya S. 2019. Prostaglandin-cytokine crosstalk in chronic inflammation. Br J Pharmacol 176:337–354.
    20.
    Zhao J, Zhao J, Legge K, Perlman S. 2011. Age-related increases in PGD2 expression impair respiratory DC migration, resulting in diminished T cell responses upon respiratory virus infection in mice. J Clin Invest 121:4921–4930.
    21.
    Coulombe F, Jaworska J, Verway M, Tzelepis F, Massoud A, Gillard J, Wong G, Kobinger G, Xing Z, Couture C, Joubert P, Fritz JH, Powell WS, Divangahi M. 2014. Targeted prostaglandin E2 inhibition enhances antiviral immunity through induction of type I interferon and apoptosis in macrophages. Immunity 40:554–568.
    22.
    Vijay R, Fehr AR, Janowski AM, Athmer J, Wheeler DL, Grunewald M, Sompallae R, Kurup SP, Meyerholz DK, Sutterwala FS, Narumiya S, Perlman S. 2017. Virus-induced inflammasome activation is suppressed by prostaglandin D2/DP1 signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:E5444–E5453.
    23.
    Hashimoto K, Graham BS, Geraci MW, FitzGerald GA, Egan K, Zhou W, Goleniewska K, O’Neal JF, Morrow JD, Durbin RK, Wright PF, Collins RD, Suzutani T, Peebles RS. 2004. Signaling through the prostaglandin I2 receptor IP protects against respiratory syncytial virus-induced illness. J Virol 78:10303–10309.
    24.
    Bernard MP, Bancos S, Chapman TJ, Ryan EP, Treanor JJ, Rose RC, Topham DJ, Phipps RP. 2010. Chronic inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 attenuates antibody responses against vaccinia infection. Vaccine 28:1363–1372.
    25.
    Arvin AM, Fink K, Schmid MA, Cathcart A, Spreafico R, Havenar-Daughton C, Lanzavecchia A, Corti D, Virgin HW. 2020. A perspective on potential antibody-dependent enhancement of SARS-CoV-2. 7821. Nature 584:353–363.
    26.
    Blanco-Melo D, Nilsson-Payant BE, Liu W-C, Uhl S, Hoagland D, Møller R, Jordan TX, Oishi K, Panis M, Sachs D, Wang TT, Schwartz RE, Lim JK, Albrecht RA, tenOever BR. 2020. Imbalanced host response to SARS-CoV-2 drives development of COVID-19. Cell 181:1036–1045.
    27.
    Leung C, Wadsworth SJ, Yang SJ, Dorscheid DR. 2020. Structural and functional variations in human bronchial epithelial cells cultured in air-liquid interface using different growth media. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 318:L1063–L1073.
    28.
    Ravindra NG, Alfajaro MM, Gasque V, Habet V, Wei J, Filler RB, Huston NC, Wan H, Szigeti-Buck K, Wang B, Wang G, Montgomery RR, Eisenbarth SC, Williams A, Pyle AM, Iwasaki A, Horvath TL, Foxman EF, Pierce RW, van Dijk D, Wilen CB. 2020. Single-cell longitudinal analysis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in human airway epithelium. bioRxiv doi:
    29.
    McCray PB, Pewe L, Wohlford-Lenane C, Hickey M, Manzel L, Shi L, Netland J, Jia HP, Halabi C, Sigmund CD, Meyerholz DK, Kirby P, Look DC, Perlman S. 2007. Lethal infection of K18-hACE2 mice infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J Virol 81:813–821.
    30.
    Bao L, Deng W, Huang B, Gao H, Liu J, Ren L, Wei Q, Yu P, Xu Y, Qi F, Qu Y, Li F, Lv Q, Wang W, Xue J, Gong S, Liu M, Wang G, Wang S, Song Z, Zhao L, Liu P, Zhao L, Ye F, Wang H, Zhou W, Zhu N, Zhen W, Yu H, Zhang X, Guo L, Chen L, Wang C, Wang Y, Wang X, Xiao Y, Sun Q, Liu H, Zhu F, Ma C, Yan L, Yang M, Han J, Xu W, Tan W, Peng X, Jin Q, Wu G, Qin C. 2020. The pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 in hACE2 transgenic mice. Nature 583:830–833.
    31.
    Jiang R-D, Liu M-Q, Chen Y, Shan C, Zhou Y-W, Shen X-R, Li Q, Zhang L, Zhu Y, Si H-R, Wang Q, Min J, Wang X, Zhang W, Li B, Zhang H-J, Baric RS, Zhou P, Yang X-L, Shi Z-L. 2020. Pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 in transgenic mice expressing human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. Cell 182:50–58.
    32.
    Hassan AO, Case JB, Winkler ES, Thackray LB, Kafai NM, Bailey AL, McCune BT, Fox JM, Chen RE, Alsoussi WB, Turner JS, Schmitz AJ, Lei T, Shrihari S, Keeler SP, Fremont DH, Greco S, McCray PB, Perlman S, Holtzman MJ, Ellebedy AH, Diamond MS. 2020. A SARS-CoV-2 infection model in mice demonstrates protection by neutralizing antibodies. Cell 182:744–753.
    33.
    Sun J, Zhuang Z, Zheng J, Li K, Wong RL-Y, Liu D, Huang J, He J, Zhu A, Zhao J, Li X, Xi Y, Chen R, Alshukairi AN, Chen Z, Zhang Z, Chen C, Huang X, Li F, Lai X, Chen D, Wen L, Zhuo J, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Huang S, Dai J, Shi Y, Zheng K, Leidinger MR, Chen J, Li Y, Zhong N, Meyerholz DK, McCray PB, Perlman S, Zhao J. 2020. Generation of a broadly useful model for COVID-19 pathogenesis, vaccination, and treatment. Cell 182:734–743.
    34.
    Israelow B, Song E, Mao T, Lu P, Meir A, Liu F, Alfajaro MM, Wei J, Dong H, Homer RJ, Ring A, Wilen CB, Iwasaki A. 2020. Mouse model of SARS-CoV-2 reveals inflammatory role of type I interferon signaling. J Exp Med 217:e20201241.
    35.
    Sun S-H, Chen Q, Gu H-J, Yang G, Wang Y-X, Huang X-Y, Liu S-S, Zhang N-N, Li X-F, Xiong R, Guo Y, Deng Y-Q, Huang W-J, Liu Q, Liu Q-M, Shen Y-L, Zhou Y, Yang X, Zhao T-Y, Fan C-F, Zhou Y-S, Qin C-F, Wang Y-C. 2020. A mouse model of SARS-CoV-2 infection and pathogenesis. Cell Host Microbe 28:124–133.
    36.
    Winkler ES, Bailey AL, Kafai NM, Nair S, McCune BT, Yu J, Fox JM, Chen RE, Earnest JT, Keeler SP, Ritter JH, Kang L-I, Dort S, Robichaud A, Head R, Holtzman MJ, Diamond MS. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 infection of human ACE2-transgenic mice causes severe lung inflammation and impaired function. Nat Immunol 21:1470–1479.
    37.
    Park MK, Kang SH, Son JY, Lee MK, Ju JS, Bae YC, Ahn DK. 2019. Co-administered low doses of ibuprofen and dexamethasone produce synergistic antinociceptive effects on neuropathic mechanical allodynia in rats. J Pain Res 12:2959–2968.
    38.
    Tubbs JT, Kissling GE, Travlos GS, Goulding DR, Clark JA, King-Herbert AP, Blankenship-Paris TL. 2011. Effects of buprenorphine, meloxicam, and flunixin meglumine as postoperative analgesia in mice. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 50:185–191.
    39.
    Santos ARS, Vedana EMA, De Freitas GAG. 1998. Antinociceptive effect of meloxicam, in neurogenic and inflammatory nociceptive models in mice. Inflammation Res 47:302–307.
    40.
    Laird JMA, Herrero JF, Garcia de la Rubia P, Cervero F. 1997. Analgesic activity of the novel COX-2 preferring NSAID, meloxicam in mono-arthritic rats: central and peripheral components. Inflamm Res 46:203–210.
    41.
    Avanzato VA, Oguntuyo KY, Escalera-Zamudio M, Gutierrez B, Golden M, Pond SLK, Pryce R, Walter TS, Seow J, Doores KJ, Pybus OG, Munster VJ, Lee B, Bowden TA. 2019. A structural basis for antibody-mediated neutralization of Nipah virus reveals a site of vulnerability at the fusion glycoprotein apex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116:25057–25067.
    42.
    Wei J, Alfajaro MM, DeWeirdt PC, Hanna RE, Lu-Culligan WJ, Cai WL, Strine MS, Zhang S-M, Graziano VR, Schmitz CO, Chen JS, Mankowski MC, Filler RB, Ravindra NG, Gasque V, de Miguel FJ, Patil A, Chen H, Oguntuyo KY, Abriola L, Surovtseva YV, Orchard RC, Lee B, Lindenbach BD, Politi K, van Dijk D, Kadoch C, Simon MD, Yan Q, Doench JG, Wilen CB. 2021. Genome-wide CRISPR screens reveal host factors critical for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Cell 184:76–91.
    43.
    Sander WJ, O’Neill HG, Pohl CH. 2017. Prostaglandin E2 as a modulator of viral infections. Front Physiol 8:89.
    44.
    Luczak M, Gumulka W, Szmigielski S, Korbecki M. 1975. Inhibition of multiplication of parainfluenza 3 virus in prostaglandin-treated WISH cells. Arch Virol 49:377–380.
    45.
    Xie X, Muruato A, Lokugamage KG, Narayanan K, Zhang X, Zou J, Liu J, Schindewolf C, Bopp NE, Aguilar PV, Plante KS, Weaver SC, Makino S, LeDuc JW, Menachery VD, Shi P-Y. 2020. An infectious cDNA clone of SARS-CoV-2. Cell Host Microbe 27:841–848.
    46.
    Kindler E, Thiel V, Weber F. 2016. Interaction of SARS and MERS coronaviruses with the antiviral interferon response. Adv Virus Res 96:219–243.
    47.
    Dudek SE, Nitzsche K, Ludwig S, Ehrhardt C. 2016. Influenza A viruses suppress cyclooxygenase-2 expression by affecting its mRNA stability. 1. Sci Rep 6:27275.
    48.
    Sumpter R, Loo Y-M, Foy E, Li K, Yoneyama M, Fujita T, Lemon SM, Gale M. 2005. Regulating intracellular antiviral defense and permissiveness to hepatitis C virus RNA replication through a cellular RNA helicase, RIG-I. J Virol 79:2689–2699.
    49.
    Fink K. 2012. Origin and function of circulating plasmablasts during acute viral infections. Front Immunol 3:78.
    50.
    Ryan EP, Pollock SJ, Pollack SJ, Murant TI, Bernstein SH, Felgar RE, Phipps RP. 2005. Activated human B lymphocytes express cyclooxygenase-2 and cyclooxygenase inhibitors attenuate antibody production. J Immunol 174:2619–2626.
    51.
    Bernard MP, Phipps RP. 2007. CpG oligodeoxynucleotides induce cyclooxygenase-2 in human B lymphocytes: implications for adjuvant activity and antibody production. Clin Immunol 125:138–148.
    52.
    Bancos S, Bernard MP, Topham DJ, Phipps RP. 2009. Ibuprofen and other widely used non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs inhibit antibody production in human cells. Cell Immunol 258:18–28.
    53.
    Bernard MP, Phipps RP. 2010. Inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 impairs the expression of essential plasma cell transcription factors and human B-lymphocyte differentiation. Immunology 129:87–96.
    54.
    Zheng J, Wong L-YR, Li K, Verma AK, Ortiz M, Wohlford-Lenane C, Leidinger MR, Knudson CM, Meyerholz DK, McCray PB, Perlman S. 2020. COVID-19 treatments and pathogenesis including anosmia in K18-hACE2 mice. Nature doi:
    55.
    Tipton DA, Flynn JC, Stein SH, Dabbous MK. 2003. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors decrease interleukin-1β-stimulated prostaglandin E2 and IL-6 production by human gingival fibroblasts. J Periodontol 74:1754–1763.
    56.
    Cheng Q, Li N, Chen M, Zheng J, Qian Z, Wang X, Huang C, Xu S, Shi G. 2013. Cyclooxygenase-2 promotes hepatocellular apoptosis by interacting with TNF-α and IL-6 in the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in rats. Dig Dis Sci 58:2895–2902.
    57.
    Kaur J, Sanyal SN. 2011. Diclofenac, a selective COX-2 inhibitor, inhibits DMH-induced colon tumorigenesis through suppression of MCP-1, MIP-1α, and VEGF. Mol Carcinog 50:707–718.
    58.
    Lisboa FA, Bradley MJ, Hueman MT, Schobel SA, Gaucher BJ, Styrmisdottir EL, Potter BK, Forsberg JA, Elster EA. 2017. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs may affect cytokine response and benefit healing of combat-related extremity wounds. Surgery 161:1164–1173.
    59.
    Anderson GD, Hauser SD, McGarity KL, Bremer ME, Isakson PC, Gregory SA. 1996. Selective inhibition of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 reverses inflammation and expression of COX-2 and interleukin 6 in rat adjuvant arthritis. J Clin Invest 97:2672–2679.
    60.
    Aoki T, Frȍsen J, Fukuda M, Bando K, Shioi G, Tsuji K, Ollikainen E, Nozaki K, Laakkonen J, Narumiya S. 2017. Prostaglandin E2–EP2–NF-κB signaling in macrophages as a potential therapeutic target for intracranial aneurysms. Sci Signal 10:eaah6037.
    61.
    Zhou Y, Fu B, Zheng X, Wang D, Zhao C, Qi Y, Sun R, Tian Z, Xu X, Wei H. 2020. Pathogenic T cells and inflammatory monocytes incite inflammatory storms in severe COVID-19 patients. Natl Sci Rev 7:998–1002.
    62.
    Lam JKP, Hui KF, Ning RJ, Xu XQ, Chan KH, Chiang AKS. 2018. Emergence of CD4+ and CD8+ polyfunctional T cell responses against immunodominant lytic and latent EBV antigens in children with primary EBV infection. Front Microbiol 9:416.
    63.
    Seo SH, Webster RG. 2002. Tumor necrosis factor alpha exerts powerful anti-influenza virus effects in lung epithelial cells. J Virol 76:1071–1076.
    64.
    Karki R, Sharma BR, Tuladhar S, Williams EP, Zalduondo L, Samir P, Zheng M, Sundaram B, Banoth B, Malireddi RKS, Schreiner P, Neale G, Vogel P, Webby R, Jonsson CB, Kanneganti T-D. 2021. Synergism of TNF-α and IFN-γ triggers inflammatory cell death, tissue damage, and mortality in SARS-CoV-2 infection and cytokine shock syndromes. Cell 184:149–168.
    65.
    Huang E, Jordan SC. 2020. Tocilizumab for Covid-19: the ongoing search for effective therapies. N Engl J Med 383:2387–2388.
    66.
    Imam Z, Odish F, Gill I, O’Connor D, Armstrong J, Vanood A, Ibironke O, Hanna A, Ranski A, Halalau A. 2020. Older age and comorbidity are independent mortality predictors in a large cohort of 1305 COVID-19 patients in Michigan, United States. J Intern Med 288:469–476.
    67.
    Rinott E, Kozer E, Shapira Y, Bar-Haim A, Youngster I. 2020. Ibuprofen use and clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients. Clin Microbiol Infect 26:1259.e5–1259-e7.
    68.
    Wong AY, MacKenna B, Morton C, Schultze A, Walker AJ, Bhaskaran K, Brown J, Rentsch CT, Williamson E, Drysdale H, Croker R, Bacon S, Hulme W, Bates C, Curtis HJ, Mehrkar A, Evans D, Inglesby P, Cockburn J, McDonald H, Tomlinson L, Mathur R, Wing K, Forbes H, Parry J, Hester F, Harper S, Evans S, Smeeth L, Douglas I, Goldacre B. 2020. OpenSAFELY: do adults prescribed Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have an increased risk of death from COVID-19? medRxiv doi:
    69.
    Abu Esba LC, Alqahtani RA, Thomas A, Shamas N, Alswaidan L, Mardawi G. 2020. Ibuprofen and NSAID use in COVID-19 infected patients is not associated with worse outcomes: a prospective cohort study. Infect Dis Ther doi:
    70.
    Bruce E, Barlow-Pay F, Short R, Vilches-Moraga A, Price A, McGovern A, Braude P, Stechman MJ, Moug S, McCarthy K, Hewitt J, Carter B, Myint PK. 2020. Prior routine use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and important outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. J Clin Med 9:2586.
    71.
    Lund LC, Kristensen KB, Reilev M, Christensen S, Thomsen RW, Christiansen CF, Støvring H, Johansen NB, Brun NC, Hallas J, Pottegård A. 2020. Adverse outcomes and mortality in users of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2: a Danish nationwide cohort study. PLoS Med 17:e1003308.
    72.
    Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. 2014. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15:550.
    73.
    Decker JM, Bibollet-Ruche F, Wei X, Wang S, Levy DN, Wang W, Delaporte E, Peeters M, Derdeyn CA, Allen S, Hunter E, Saag MS, Hoxie JA, Hahn BH, Kwong PD, Robinson JE, Shaw GM. 2005. Antigenic conservation and immunogenicity of the HIV coreceptor binding site. J Exp Med 201:1407–1419.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Journal of Virology
    Volume 95Number 710 March 2021
    eLocator: e00014-21
    Editor: Tom Gallagher
    Loyola University Chicago

    History

    Received: 5 January 2021
    Accepted: 11 January 2021
    Published online: 13 January 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. SARS-CoV-2
    2. COVID-19
    3. NSAIDs
    4. antibody response

    Contributors

    Authors

    Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
    Department of Immunobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
    Mia Madel Alfajaro
    Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
    Department of Immunobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
    Ryan D. Chow
    Department of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
    Jin Wei
    Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
    Department of Immunobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
    Renata B. Filler
    Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
    Department of Immunobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
    Stephanie C. Eisenbarth
    Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
    Department of Immunobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
    Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
    Department of Immunobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA

    Editor

    Tom Gallagher
    Editor
    Loyola University Chicago

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Journal of VirologyArticle
    RNA Recombination In Vivo in the Absence of Viral Replication

    RNA Recombination In Vivo in the Absence of Viral Replication

    ABSTRACT

    To study fundamental aspects of RNA recombination, an in vivo RNA recombination system was established. This system allowed the efficient generation of recombinant cytopathogenic pestiviruses after transfection of synthetic, nonreplicatable, subgenomic transcripts in cells infected with a replicating noncytopathogenic virus. Studies addressing the interplay between RNA recombination and replication revealed that cotransfection of noninfected cells with various pairs of nonreplicatable RNA derivatives also led to the emergence of recombinant viral genomes. Remarkably, homologous and nonhomologous recombination occurred between two overlapping transcripts, each lacking different essential parts of the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) gene. Apart from the generally accepted viral replicative copy choice recombination, our results prove the existence of a viral RdRp-independent mechanism of RNA recombination that occurs in vivo. It appears likely that such a mechanism not only contributes to the evolution of RNA viruses but also leads to the generation of recombinant cellular RNAs.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Abelson, J., C. R. Trotta, and H. Li.1998. tRNA splicing. J. Biol. Chem.273:12685-12688.
    2.
    Agol, V. I.1997. Recombination and other genomic rearrangements in picornaviruses. Semin. Virol.8:77-84.
    3.
    Ahlquist, P.2002. RNA-dependent RNA polymerases, viruses, and RNA silencing. Science296:1270-1273.
    4.
    Arnold, J. J., and C. E. Cameron.1999. Poliovirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (3Dpol) is sufficient for template switching in vitro. J. Biol. Chem.274:2706-2716.
    5.
    Baroth, M., M. Orlich, H.-J. Thiel, and P. Becher.2000. Insertion of cellular NEDD8 coding sequences in a pestivirus. Virology278:456-466.
    6.
    Becher, P., M. Orlich, M. König, and H.-J. Thiel.1999. Nonhomologous RNA recombination in bovine viral diarrhea virus: molecular characterization of a variety of subgenomic RNAs isolated during an outbreak of fatal mucosal disease. J. Virol.73:5646-5653.
    7.
    Becher, P., M. Orlich, and H.-J. Thiel.2000. Mutations in the 5′ nontranslated region of bovine viral diarrhea virus result in altered growth characteristics. J. Virol.74:7884-7894.
    8.
    Becher, P., M. Orlich, and H.-J. Thiel.2001. RNA recombination between persisting pestivirus and a vaccine strain: generation of cytopathogenic virus and induction of lethal disease. J. Virol.75:6256-6264.
    9.
    Becher, P., H.-J. Thiel, M. Collins, J. Brownlie, and M. Orlich.2002. Cellular sequences in pestivirus genomes encoding gamma-aminobutyric acid (A) receptor-associated protein and Golgi-associated ATPase enhancer of 16 kilodaltons. J. Virol.76:13069-13076.
    10.
    Bruzik, J. P., and T. Maniatis.1992. Spliced leader RNAs from lower eukaryotes are trans-spliced in mammalian cells. Nature360:692-695.
    11.
    Bujarski, J. J., and P. Kaesberg.1986. Genetic recombination between RNA components of a multipartite plant virus. Nature321:528-531.
    12.
    Chang, J., and J. Taylor.2002. In vivo RNA-directed transcription, with template switching, by a mammalian RNA polymerase. EMBO J.21:157-164.
    13.
    Charini, W. A., S. Todd, G. A. Gutman, and B. L. Semler.1994. Transduction of a human RNA sequence by poliovirus. J. Virol.68:6547-6552.
    14.
    Chetverin, A. B., H. V. Chetverina, A. A. Demidenko, and V. I. Ugarov.1997. Nonhomologous RNA recombination in a cell-free system: evidence for a transesterification mechanism guided by secondary structure. Cell88:503-513.
    15.
    Chetverina, H. V., A. A. Demidenko, V. I. Ugarov, and A. B. Chetverin.1999. Spontaneous rearrangements in RNA sequences. FEBS Lett.450:89-94.
    16.
    Cooper, P. D.1977. Genetics of picornaviruses. Comp. Virol.9:133-207.
    17.
    Corapi, W. V., R. O. Donis, and E. J. Dubovi.1988. Monoclonal antibody analyses of cytopathic and noncytopathic viruses from fatal bovine viral diarrhea infections. J. Virol.62:2823-2827.
    18.
    Diener, T. O.1991. Subviral pathogens of plants: viroids and viroidlike satellite RNAs. FASEB J.5:2808-2813.
    19.
    Dolja, R., and J. C. Carrington.1992. Evolution of positive-strand RNA viruses. Semin. Virol.3:315-326.
    20.
    Doudna, J. S., and T. R. Cech.2002. The chemical repertoire of natural ribozymes. Nature418:222-228.
    21.
    Eul, J., M. Graessmann, and A. Graessmann.1995. Experimental evidence for RNA trans-splicing in mammalian cells. EMBO J.14:3226-3235.
    22.
    Figlerowicz, M.2000. Role of RNA structure in non-homologous recombination between genomic molecules of brome mosaic virus. Nucleic Acids Res.28:1714-1723.
    23.
    Figlerowicz, M., P. D. Nagy, N. Tang, C. C. Kao, and J. J. Bujarski.1998. Mutations in the N terminus of the brome mosaic virus polymerase affect genetic RNA-RNA recombination. J. Virol.72:9192-9200.
    24.
    Fu, T. B., and J. Taylor.1993. The RNAs of hepatitis delta virus are copied by RNA polymerase II in nuclear homogenates. J. Virol.67:6965-6972.
    25.
    Gmyl, A. P., E. V. Belousov, S. V. Maslova, E. V. Khitrina, A. B. Chetverin, and V. I. Agol.1999. Nonreplicative RNA recombination in poliovirus. J. Virol.73:8958-8965.
    26.
    Gmyl, A. P., S. A. Korshenko, E. V. Belousov, E. V. Khitrina, and V. I. Agol.2003. Nonreplicative homologous RNA recombination: promiscuous joining of RNA pieces? RNA9:1221-1223.
    27.
    Heinz, F. X., M. S. Collett, R. H. Purcell, E. A. Gould, C. R. Howard, M. Houghton, R. J. M. Moormann, C. M. Rice, and H.-J. Thiel.2000. Family Flaviviridae, p. 859-878. In C. M. Fauquet, M. H. V. van Regenmortel, D. H. L. Bishop, E. B. Carstens, M. K. Estes, S. M. Lemon, J. Maniloff, M. A. Mayo, D. J. McGeoch, C. R. Pringle, and R. B. Wickner (ed.), Virus taxonomy: seventh report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, Calif.
    28.
    Hwang, C. K., E. S. Svarovskaia, and V. K. Pathak.2001. Dynamic copy choice: steady state between murine leukemia virus polymerase and polymerase-dependent RNase H activity determines frequency of in vivo template switching. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA98:12209-12214.
    29.
    Jarvis, T. C., and K. Kirkegaard.1992. Poliovirus RNA recombination: mechanistic studies in the absence of selection. EMBO J.11:3135-3145.
    30.
    Khatchikian, D., M. Orlich, and R. Rott.1989. Increased viral pathogenicity after insertion of a 28S rRNA sequence into the haemagglutinin gene of an influenza virus. Nature340:156-157.
    31.
    Kim, M. J., and C. Kao.2001. Factors regulating template switch in vitro by viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerases: implications for RNA-RNA recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA98:4972-4977.
    32.
    Kirkegaard, K., and D. Baltimore.1986. The mechanism of RNA recombination in poliovirus. Cell47:433-443.
    33.
    Kulpa, D., R. Topping, and A. Telesnitsky.1997. Determination of the site of first strand transfer during Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcription and identification of strand transfer-associated reverse transcriptase errors. EMBO J.16:856-865.
    34.
    Lai, M. M. C.1992. RNA recombination in animal and plant viruses. Microbiol. Rev.56:61-79.
    35.
    Lai, V. C., C. C. Kao, E. Ferrari, J. Park, A. S. Uss, J. Wright-Minogue, Z. Hong, and J. Y. Lau.1999. Mutational analysis of bovine viral diarrhea virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. J. Virol.73:10129-10136.
    36.
    Lindenbach, B. D., and C. M. Rice.2001. Flaviviridae: the viruses and their replication, p. 991-1041. In D. M. Knipe and P. M. Howley (ed.), Fields virology, 4th ed. Lippincott/The Williams & Wilkins Co., Philadelphia, Pa.
    37.
    Meyers, G., T. Rümenapf, and H.-J. Thiel.1989. Ubiquitin in a togavirus. Nature341:491.
    38.
    Meyers, G., N. Tautz, P. Becher, H.-J. Thiel, and B. Kümmerer.1996. Recovery of cytopathogenic and noncytopathogenic bovine viral diarrhea viruses from cDNA constructs. J. Virol.70:8606-8613.
    39.
    Monroe, S. S., and S. Schlesinger.1983. RNAs from two independently isolated defective interfering particles of Sindbis virus contain a cellular tRNA sequence at their 5′ ends. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA80:3279-3283.
    40.
    Munishkin, A. V., L. A. Voronin, and A. B. Chetverin.1988. An in vivo recombinant RNA capable of autocatalytic synthesis by Q beta replicase. Nature333:473-475.
    41.
    Nagy, P. D., and J. J. Bujarski.1993. Targeting the site of RNA-RNA recombination in brome mosaic virus with antisense sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA90:6390-6394.
    42.
    Nagy, P. D., and A. E. Simon.1997. New insights into the mechanisms of RNA recombination. Virology235:1-9.
    43.
    Nagy, P. D., C. Zhang, and A. E. Simon.1998. Dissecting RNA recombination in vitro: role of RNA sequences and the viral replicase. EMBO J.17:2392-2403.
    44.
    Nishikura, K.2001. A short primer on RNAi: RNA-directed RNA polymerase acts as a key catalyst. Cell107:415-418.
    45.
    Pilipenko, E. V., A. P. Gmyl, and V. I. Agol.1995. A model for rearrangements in RNA genomes. Nucleic Acids Res.23:1870-1875.
    46.
    Rackwitz, H. R., W. Rohde, and H. L. Sanger.1981. DNA-dependent RNA polymerase II of plant origin transcribes viroid RNA into full-length copies. Nature291:297-301.
    47.
    Reed, R.2000. Mechanisms of fidelity in pre-mRNA splicing. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.12:340-345.
    48.
    Romanova, L. I., V. M. Blinov, E. A. Tolskaya, E. G. Viktorova, M. S. Kolesnikova, E. A. Guseva, and V. I. Agol.1986. The primary structure of crossover regions of intertypic poliovirus recombinants: a model of recombination between RNA genomes. Virology155:202-213.
    49.
    Schiebel, W., T. Pelissier, L. Riedel, S. Thalmeir, R. Schiebel, D. Kempe, F. Lottspeich, H. L. Sanger, and M. Wassenegger.1998. Isolation of an RNA-directed RNA polymerase-specific cDNA clone from tomato. Plant Cell10:2087-2101.
    50.
    Sijen, T., J. Fleenor, F. Simmer, K. L. Thijssen, S. Parrish, L. Timmons, R. H. Plasterk, and A. Fire.2001. On the role of RNA amplification in dsRNA-triggered gene silencing. Cell107:465-476.
    51.
    Singh, R.2002. RNA-protein interactions that regulate pre-mRNA splicing. Gene Expr.10:79-92.
    52.
    Strauss, J. H., and E. G. Strauss.1988. Evolution of RNA viruses. Annu. Rev. Microbiol.42:657-683.
    53.
    Tautz, N., G. Meyers, and H.-J. Thiel.1993. Processing of poly-ubiquitin in the polyprotein of an RNA virus. Virology197:74-85.
    54.
    Tsiang, M., S. S. Monroe, and S. Schlesinger.1985. Studies of defective interfering RNAs of Sindbis virus with and without tRNA-ASP sequences at their 5′ termini. J. Virol.54:38-44.
    55.
    White, K. A., and T. J. Morris.1994. Nonhomologous RNA recombination in tombusvirus: generation and evolution of defective interfering RNAs by stepwise deletions. J. Virol.68:14-24.
    56.
    Worobey, M., and E. C. Holmes.1999. Evolutionary aspects of recombination in RNA viruses. J. Gen. Virol.80:2535-2543.
    57.
    Zaphiropoulos, P. G.1998. Non-homologous recombination mediated by Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase. I. Evidence supporting a copy choice mechanism. Nucleic Acids Res.26:787-792.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Journal of Virology
    Volume 78Number 1215 June 2004
    Pages: 6271 - 6281

    History

    Received: 21 November 2003
    Accepted: 10 February 2004

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Contributors

    Authors

    Andreas Gallei
    Institut für Virologie (FB Veterinärmedizin), Justus-Liebig-Universität, D-35392 Giessen, Germany
    Alexander Pankraz
    Institut für Virologie (FB Veterinärmedizin), Justus-Liebig-Universität, D-35392 Giessen, Germany
    Heinz-Jürgen Thiel
    Institut für Virologie (FB Veterinärmedizin), Justus-Liebig-Universität, D-35392 Giessen, Germany
    Paul Becher [email protected]
    Institut für Virologie (FB Veterinärmedizin), Justus-Liebig-Universität, D-35392 Giessen, Germany

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Journal of VirologyArticle
    Susceptibility of White-Tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus) to SARS-CoV-2

    ABSTRACT

    The origin of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus causing the global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, remains a mystery. Current evidence suggests a likely spillover into humans from an animal reservoir. Understanding the host range and identifying animal species that are susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection may help to elucidate the origin of the virus and the mechanisms underlying cross-species transmission to humans. Here, we demonstrated that white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), an animal species in which the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2)—the SARS-CoV-2 receptor—shares a high degree of similarity to that of humans, are highly susceptible to infection. Intranasal inoculation of deer fawns with SARS-CoV-2 resulted in established subclinical viral infection and shedding of infectious virus in nasal secretions. Notably, infected animals transmitted the virus to noninoculated contact deer. Viral RNA was detected in multiple tissues 21 days postinoculation (p.i.). All inoculated and indirect contact animals seroconverted and developed neutralizing antibodies as early as day 7 p.i. The work provides important insights into the animal host range of SARS-CoV-2 and identifies white-tailed deer as a wild animal species susceptible to the virus.
    IMPORTANCE Given the presumed zoonotic origin of SARS-CoV-2, the human-animal-environment interface of the COVID-19 pandemic is an area of great scientific and public and animal health interest. Identification of animal species that are susceptible to infection by SARS-CoV-2 may help to elucidate the potential origin of the virus, identify potential reservoirs or intermediate hosts, and define the mechanisms underlying cross-species transmission to humans. Additionally, it may also provide information and help to prevent potential reverse zoonosis that could lead to the establishment of new wildlife hosts. Our data shows that upon intranasal inoculation, white-tailed deer became subclinically infected and shed infectious SARS-CoV-2 in nasal secretions and feces. Importantly, indirect contact animals were infected and shed infectious virus, indicating efficient SARS-CoV-2 transmission from inoculated animals. These findings support the inclusion of wild cervid species in investigations conducted to assess potential reservoirs or sources of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Gorbalenya AE, Baker SC, Baric RS, de Groot RJ, Drosten C, Gulyaeva AA, Haagmans BL, Lauber C, Leontovich AM, Neuman BW, Penzar D, Perlman S, Poon LLM, Samborskiy DV, Sidorov IA, Sola I, Ziebuhr J. 2020. The species severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2. Nat Microbiol Nature Res 5:536–544.
    2.
    Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, Zhao X, Huang B, Shi W, Lu R, Niu P, Zhan F, Ma X, Wang D, Xu W, Wu G, Gao GF, Tan W, China Novel Coronavirus Investigating and Research Team. 2020. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med 382:727–733.
    3.
    Zhou P, Yang XL, Wang XG, Hu B, Zhang L, Zhang W, Si HR, Zhu Y, Li B, Huang CL, Chen HD, Chen J, Luo Y, Guo H, Jiang RD, Liu MQ, Chen Y, Shen XR, Wang X, Zheng XS, Zhao K, Chen QJ, Deng F, Liu LL, Yan B, Zhan FX, Wang YY, Xiao GF, Shi ZL. 2020. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 579:270–273.
    4.
    Wu F, Zhao S, Yu B, Chen YM, Wang W, Song ZG, Hu Y, Tao ZW, Tian JH, Pei YY, Yuan ML, Zhang YL, Dai FH, Liu Y, Wang QM, Zheng JJ, Xu L, Holmes EC, Zhang YZ. 2020. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature 579:265–269.
    5.
    Andersen KG, Rambaut A, Lipkin WI, Holmes EC, Garry RF. 2020. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. Nat Med 26:450–454.
    6.
    Latinne A, Hu B, Olival KJ, Zhu G, Zhang L, Li H, Chmura AA, Field HE, Zambrana-Torrelio C, Epstein JH, Li B, Zhang W, Wang LF, Shi ZL, Daszak P. 2020. Origin and cross-species transmission of bat coronaviruses in China. Nat Commun 11:4235.
    7.
    Murakami S, Kitamura T, Suzuki J, Sato R, Aoi T, Fujii M, Matsugo H, Kamiki H, Ishida H, Takenaka-Uema A, Shimojima M, Horimoto T. 2020. Detection and characterization of bat sarbecovirus phylogenetically related to SARS-CoV-2, Japan. Emerg Infect Dis 26:3025–3029.
    8.
    Lau SKP, Luk HKH, Wong ACP, Li KSM, Zhu L, He Z, Fung J, Chan TTY, Fung KSC, Woo PCY. 2020. Possible bat origin of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Emerg Infect Dis 26:1542–1547.
    9.
    Chu DKW, Poon LLM, Gomaa MM, Shehata MM, Perera RAPM, Zeid DA, El Rifay AS, Siu LY, Guan Y, Webby RJ, Ali MA, Peiris M, Kayali G. 2014. MERS coronaviruses in dromedary camels, Egypt. Emerg Infect Dis 20:1049–1053.
    10.
    Alagaili AN, Briese T, Mishra N, Kapoor V, Sameroff SC, Burbelo PD, de Wit E, Munster VJ, Hensley LE, Zalmout IS, Kapoor A, Epstein JH, Karesh WB, Daszak P, Mohammed OB, Lipkin WI. 2014. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection in dromedary camels in Saudi Arabia. mBio 5:e00884-14.
    11.
    Childs JE, Mackenzie JS, Richt JA. 2007. Current topics in microbiology and immunology. The biology, circumstances and consequences of cross-species transmission. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany.
    12.
    Lu R, Zhao X, Li J, Niu P, Yang B, Wu H, Wang W, Song H, Huang B, Zhu N, Bi Y, Ma X, Zhan F, Wang L, Hu T, Zhou H, Hu Z, Zhou W, Zhao L, Chen J, Meng Y, Wang J, Lin Y, Yuan J, Xie Z, Ma J, Liu WJ, Wang D, Xu W, Holmes EC, Gao GF, Wu G, Chen W, Shi W, Tan W. 2020. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet 395:565–574.
    13.
    Paraskevis D, Kostaki EG, Magiorkinis G, Panayiotakopoulos G, Sourvinos G, Tsiodras S. 2020. Full-genome evolutionary analysis of the novel corona virus (2019-nCoV) rejects the hypothesis of emergence as a result of a recent recombination event. Infect Genet Evol 79:104212.
    14.
    Lam TTY, Jia N, Zhang YW, Shum MHH, Jiang JF, Zhu HC, Tong YG, Shi YX, Ni XB, Liao YS, Li WJ, Jiang BG, Wei W, Yuan TT, Zheng K, Cui XM, Li J, Pei GQ, Qiang X, Cheung WYM, Li LF, Sun FF, Qin S, Huang JC, Leung GM, Holmes EC, Hu YL, Guan Y, Cao WC. 2020. Identifying SARS-CoV-2-related coronaviruses in Malayan pangolins. Nature 583:282–285.
    15.
    Liu P, Jiang J-Z, Wan X-F, Hua Y, Li L, Zhou J, Wang X, Hou F, Chen J, Zou J, Chen J. 2020. Are pangolins the intermediate host of the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2)? PLoS Pathog 16:e1008421.
    16.
    Letko M, Marzi A, Munster V. 2020. Functional assessment of cell entry and receptor usage for SARS-CoV-2 and other lineage B betacoronaviruses. Nat Microbiol 5:562–569.
    17.
    Wan Y, Shang J, Graham R, Baric RS, Li F. 2020. Receptor recognition by the novel coronavirus from Wuhan: an analysis based on decade-long structural studies of SARS coronavirus. J Virol 94:1–9.
    18.
    Damas J, Hughes GM, Keough KC, Painter CA, Persky NS, Corbo M, Hiller M, Koepfli KP, Pfenning AR, Zhao H, Genereux DP, Swofford R, Pollard KS, Ryder OA, Nweeia MT, Lindblad-Toh K, Teeling EC, Karlsson EK, Lewin HA. 2020. Broad host range of SARS-CoV-2 predicted by comparative and structural analysis of ACE2 in vertebrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117:22311–22322.
    19.
    Sit THC, Brackman CJ, Ip SM, Tam KWS, Law PYT, To EMW, Yu VYT, Sims LD, Tsang DNC, Chu DKW, Perera RAPM, Poon LLM, Peiris M. 2020. Infection of dogs with SARS-CoV-2. Nature 586:776–778.
    20.
    Oreshkova N, Molenaar RJ, Vreman S, Harders F, Oude MBB, Van Der Honing RWH, Gerhards N, Tolsma P, Bouwstra R, Sikkema RS, Tacken MGJ, De RM, Weesendorp E, Engelsma MY, Bruschke CJM, Smit LAM, Koopmans M, Van Der Poel WHM, Stegeman A. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 infection in farmed minks, the Netherlands, April and May 2020. Eurosurveillance 25:2001005.
    21.
    Rockx B, Kuiken T, Herfst S, Bestebroer T, Lamers MM, Munnink BBO, De Meulder D, Van Amerongen G, Van Den Brand J, Okba NMA, Schipper D, Van Run P, Leijten L, Sikkema R, Verschoor E, Verstrepen B, Bogers W, Langermans J, Langermans J, Drosten C, Van Vlissingen MF, Fouchier R, De Swart R, Koopmans M, Haagmans BL. 2020. Comparative pathogenesis of COVID-19, MERS, and SARS in a nonhuman primate model. Science 368:1012–1015.
    22.
    McAloose D, Laverack M, Wang L, Killian ML, Caserta LC, Yuan F, Mitchell PK, Queen K, Mauldin MR, Cronk BD, Bartlett SL, Sykes JM, Zec S, Stokol T, Ingerman K, Delaney MA, Fredrickson R, Ivančić M, Jenkins-Moore M, Mozingo K, Franzen K, Bergeson NH, Goodman L, Wang H, Fang Y, Olmstead C, McCann C, Thomas P, Goodrich E, Elvinger F, Smith DC, Tong S, Slavinski S, Calle PP, Terio K, Torchetti MK, Diel DG. 2020. From people to Panthera: natural SARS-CoV-2 infection in tigers and lions at the Bronx Zoo. mBio 11:e02220-20.
    23.
    Shi J, Wen Z, Zhong G, Yang H, Wang C, Huang B, Liu R, He X, Shuai L, Sun Z, Zhao Y, Liu P, Liang L, Cui P, Wang J, Zhang X, Guan Y, Tan W, Wu G, Chen H, Bu Z. 2020. Susceptibility of ferrets, cats, dogs, and other domesticated animals to SARS-coronavirus 2. Science 368:1016–1020.
    24.
    Chandrashekar A, Liu J, Martino AJ, McMahan K, Mercad NB, Peter L, Tostanosk LH, Yu J, Maliga Z, Nekorchuk M, Busman-Sahay K, Terry M, Wriji LM, Ducat S, Martine DR, Atyeo C, Fischinger S, Burk JS, Slei MD, Pessaint L, Van Ry A, Greenhouse J, Taylor T, Blade K, Cook A, Finneyfrock B, Brown R, Teow E, Velasco J, Zahn R, Wegmann F, Abbink P, Bondzi EA, Dagotto G, Gebr MS, He X, Jacob-Dolan C, Kordana N, Li Z, Lifto MA, Mahrokhia SH, Maxfiel LF, Nityanandam R, Nkolol JP, Schmid AG, Mille AD, Bari RS, Alter G, Sorge PK, Este JD, Andersen H, Lewi MG, Barou DH. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 infection protects against rechallenge in rhesus macaques. Science 369:812–817.
    25.
    Munster VJ, Feldmann F, Williamson BN, van Doremalen N, Pérez-Pérez L, Schulz J, Meade-White K, Okumura A, Callison J, Brumbaugh B, Avanzato VA, Rosenke R, Hanley PW, Saturday G, Scott D, Fischer ER, de Wit E. 2020. Respiratory disease in rhesus macaques inoculated with SARS-CoV-2. Nature 585:268–272.
    26.
    Hartman AL, Nambulli S, McMillen CM, White AG, Tilston-Lunel NL, Albe JR, Cottle E, Dunn MD, Frye LJ, Gilliland TH, Olsen EL, O'Malley KJ, Schwarz MM, Tomko JA, Walker RC, Xia M, Hartman MS, Klein E, Scanga CA, Flynn JL, Klimstra WB, McElroy AK, Reed DS, Duprex WP. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 infection of African green monkeys results in mild respiratory disease discernible by PET/CT imaging and shedding of infectious virus from both respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts. PLoS Pathog 16:e1008903.
    27.
    Zhang Z, Wang L, Liu W, Yan Z, Zhu Y, Zhou S, Guan S. 2020. Replication, pathogenicity, and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in minks. Natl Sci Rev
    28.
    Freuling CM, Breithaupt A, Müller T, Sehl J, Balkema-Buschmann A, Rissmann M, Klein A, Wylezich C, Höper D, Wernike K, Aebischer A, Hoffmann D, Friedrichs V, Dorhoi A, Groschup MH, Beer M, Mettenleiter TC. 2020. Susceptibility of raccoon dogs for experimental SARS-CoV-2 infection. Emerg Infect Dis 26:2982–2985.
    29.
    Meekins DA, Morozov I, Trujillo JD, Gaudreault NN, Bold D, Carossino M, Artiaga BL, Indran SV, Kwon T, Balaraman V, Madden DW, Feldmann H, Henningson J, Ma W, Balasuriya UBR, Richt JA. 2020. Susceptibility of swine cells and domestic pigs to SARS-CoV-2. Emerg Microbes Infect 9:2278–2288.
    30.
    Ulrich L, Wernike K, Hoffmann D, Mettenleiter TC, Beer M. 2020. Experimental infection of cattle with SARS-CoV-2. Emerg Infect Dis 26:2979–2981.
    31.
    Schlottau K, Rissmann M, Graaf A, Schön J, Sehl J, Wylezich C, Höper D, Mettenleiter TC, Balkema-Buschmann A, Harder T, Grund C, Hoffmann D, Breithaupt A, Beer M. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 in fruit bats, ferrets, pigs, and chickens: an experimental transmission study. Lancet Microbe 1:e218–e225.
    32.
    Matsuyama S, Nao N, Shirato K, Kawase M, Saito S, Takayama I, Nagata N, Sekizuka T, Katoh H, Kato F, Sakata M, Tahara M, Kutsuna S, Ohmagari N, Kuroda M, Suzuki T, Kageyama T, Takeda M. 2020. Enhanced isolation of SARS-CoV-2 by TMPRSS2-expressing cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117:7001–7003.
    33.
    Harcourt J, Tamin A, Lu X, Kamili S, Sakthivel SK, Murray J, Queen K, Tao Y, Paden CR, Zhang J, Li Y, Uehara A, Wang H, Goldsmith C, Bullock HA, Wang L, Whitaker B, Lynch B, Gautam R, Schindewolf C, Lokugamage KG, Scharton D, Plante JA, Mirchandani D, Widen SG, Narayanan K, Makino S, Ksiazek TG, Plante KS, Weaver SC, Lindstrom S, Tong S, Menachery VD, Thornburg NJ. 2020. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 from patient with 2019 novel coronavirus disease, United States. Emerg Infect Dis 26:1266–1273.
    34.
    Korber B, Fischer WM, Gnanakaran S, Yoon H, Theiler J, Abfalterer W, Hengartner N, Giorgi EE, Bhattacharya T, Foley B, Hastie KM, Parker MD, Partridge DG, Evans CM, Freeman TM, de Silva TI, Angyal A, Brown RL, Carrilero L, Green LR, Groves DC, Johnson KJ, Keeley AJ, Lindsey BB, Parsons PJ, Raza M, Rowland-Jones S, Smith N, Tucker RM, Wang D, Wyles MD, McDanal C, Perez LG, Tang H, Moon-Walker A, Whelan SP, LaBranche CC, Saphire EO, Montefiori DC. 2020. Tracking changes in SARS-CoV-2 spike: evidence that D614G increases infectivity of the COVID-19 virus. Cell 182:812–827.e19.
    35.
    Arons MM, Hatfield KM, Reddy SC, Kimball A, James A, Jacobs JR, Taylor J, Spicer K, Bardossy AC, Oakley LP, Tanwar S, Dyal JW, Harney J, Chisty Z, Bell JM, Methner M, Paul P, Carlson CM, McLaughlin HP, Thornburg N, Tong S, Tamin A, Tao Y, Uehara A, Harcourt J, Clark S, Brostrom-Smith C, Page LC, Kay M, Lewis J, Montgomery P, Stone ND, Clark TA, Honein MA, Duchin JS, Jernigan JA. 2020. Presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections and transmission in a skilled nursing facility. N Engl J Med 382:2081–2090.
    36.
    Kim YI, Kim SG, Kim SM, Kim EH, Park SJ, Yu KM, Chang JH, Kim EJ, Lee S, Casel MAB, Um J, Song MS, Jeong HW, Lai VD, Kim Y, Chin BS, Park JS, Chung KH, Foo SS, Poo H, Mo IP, Lee OJ, Webby RJ, Jung JU, Choi YK. 2020. Infection and rapid transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in ferrets. Cell Host Microbe 27:704–709.e2.
    37.
    Richard M, Kok A, de Meulder D, Bestebroer TM, Lamers MM, Okba NMA, Fentener van Vlissingen M, Rockx B, Haagmans BL, Koopmans MPG, Fouchier RAM, Herfst S. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 is transmitted via contact and via the air between ferrets. Nat Commun 11:3496.
    38.
    Sia SF, Yan LM, Chin AWH, Fung K, Choy KT, Wong AYL, Kaewpreedee P, Perera RAPM, Poon LLM, Nicholls JM, Peiris M, Yen HL. 2020. Pathogenesis and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in golden hamsters. Nature 583:834–838.
    39.
    Fagre A, Lewis J, Eckley M, Zhan S, Rocha SM, Sexton NR, Burke B, Geiss B, Peersen O, Kading R, Rovnak J, Ebel GD, Tjalkens RB, Aboellail T, Schountz T. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 infection, neuropathogenesis and transmission among deer mice: implications for reverse zoonosis to New World rodents. BioRxiv
    40.
    Bosco-Lauth AM, Hartwig AE, Porter SM, Gordy PW, Nehring M, Byas AD, VandeWoude S, Ragan IK, Maison RM, Bowen RA. 2020. Experimental infection of domestic dogs and cats with SARS-CoV-2: pathogenesis, transmission, and response to reexposure in cats. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117:26382–26388.
    41.
    Halfmann PJ, Hatta M, Chiba S, Maemura T, Fan S, Takeda M, Kinoshita N, Hattori S, Sakai-Tagawa Y, Iwatsuki-Horimoto K, Imai M, Kawaoka Y. 2020. Transmission of SARS-VoV-2 in domestic cats. N Engl J Med 383:592–594.
    42.
    Honein MA, Christie A, Rose DA, Brooks JT, Meaney-Delman D, Cohn A, Sauber-Schatz EK, Walker A, McDonald LC, Liburd LC, Hall JE, Fry AM, Hall AJ, Gupta N, Kuhnert WL, Yoon PW, Gundlapalli AV, Beach MJ, Walke HT, CDC COVID-19 Response Team. 2020. Summary of guidance for public health strategies to address high levels of community transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and related deaths, December 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 69:1860–1867.
    43.
    Bialek S, Boundy E, Bowen V, Chow N, Cohn A, Dowling N, Ellington S, Gierke R, Hall A, MacNeil J, Patel P, Peacock G, Pilishvili T, Razzaghi H, Reed N, Ritchey M, Sauber-Schatz E. 2020. Severe outcomes among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) — United States, February 12–March 16, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 69:343–346.
    44.
    Nachtigall I, Lenga P, Jóźwiak K, Thürmann P, Meier-Hellmann A, Kuhlen R, Brederlau J, Bauer T, Tebbenjohanns J, Schwegmann K, Hauptmann M, Dengler J. 2020. Clinical course and factors associated with outcomes among 1904 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in Germany: an observational study. Clin Microbiol Infect 26:1663–1669.
    45.
    Wu Z, McGoogan JM. 2020. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China. JAMA 323:1239.
    46.
    Gaudreault NN, Trujillo JD, Carossino M, Meekins DA, Morozov I, Madden DW, Indran SV, Bold D, Balaraman V, Kwon T, Artiaga BL, Cool K, García-Sastre A, Ma W, Wilson WC, Henningson J, Balasuriya UBR, Richt JA. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 infection, disease and transmission in domestic cats. Emerg Microbes Infect 9:2322–2332.
    47.
    Oude Munnink BB, Sikkema RS, Nieuwenhuijse DF, Molenaar RJ, Munger E, Molenkamp R, van der Spek A, Tolsma P, Rietveld A, Brouwer M, Bouwmeester-Vincken N, Harders F, Hakze-van der Honing R, Wegdam-Blans MCA, Bouwstra RJ, GeurtsvanKessel C, van der Eijk AA, Velkers FC, Smit LAM, Stegeman A, van der Poel WHM, Koopmans MPG. 2021. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 on mink farms between humans and mink and back to humans. Science 371:172–177.
    48.
    Widders A, Broom A, Broom J. 2020. SARS-CoV-2: the viral shedding vs infectivity dilemma. Infect Dis Health 25:210–215.
    49.
    Perera RAPM, Tso E, Tsang OTY, Tsang DNC, Fung K, Leung YWY, Chin AWH, Chu DKW, Cheng SMS, Poon LLM, Chuang VWM, Peiris M. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 virus culture and subgenomic RNA for respiratory specimens from patients with mild coronavirus disease. Emerg Infect Dis 26:2701–2704.
    50.
    Suess C, Hausmann R. 2020. Gross and histopathological pulmonary findings in a COVID-19 associated death during self-isolation. Int J Legal Med 134:1285–1290.
    51.
    Arrossi AV, Farver C. 2020. The pulmonary pathology of COVID-19. Cleve Clin J Med
    52.
    Yu P, Qi F, Xu Y, Li F, Liu P, Liu J, Bao L, Deng W, Gao H, Xiang Z, Xiao C, Lv Q, Gong S, Liu J, Song Z, Qu Y, Xue J, Wei Q, Liu M, Wang G, Wang S, Yu H, Liu X, Huang B, Wang W, Zhao L, Wang H, Ye F, Zhou W, Zhen W, Han J, Wu G, Jin Q, Wang J, Tan W, Qin C. 2020. Age‐related rhesus macaque models of COVID‐19. Anim Model Exp Med 3:93–97.
    53.
    Rockx B, Feldmann F, Brining D, Gardner D, LaCasse R, Kercher L, Long D, Rosenke R, Virtaneva K, Sturdevant DE, Porcella SF, Mattoon J, Parnell M, Baric RS, Feldmann H. 2011. Comparative pathogenesis of three human and zoonotic SARS-CoV strains in cynomolgus macaques. PLoS One 6:e18558.
    54.
    Sun SH, Chen Q, Gu HJ, Yang G, Wang YX, Huang XY, Liu SS, Zhang NN, Li XF, Xiong R, Guo Y, Deng YQ, Huang WJ, Liu Q, Liu QM, Shen YL, Zhou Y, Yang X, Zhao TY, Fan CF, Zhou YS, Qin CF, Wang YC. 2020. A mouse model of SARS-CoV-2 infection and pathogenesis. Cell Host Microbe 28:124–133.e4.
    55.
    Bao L, Deng W, Huang B, Gao H, Liu J, Ren L, Wei Q, Yu P, Xu Y, Qi F, Qu Y, Li F, Lv Q, Wang W, Xue J, Gong S, Liu M, Wang G, Wang S, Song Z, Zhao L, Liu P, Zhao L, Ye F, Wang H, Zhou W, Zhu N, Zhen W, Yu H, Zhang X, Guo L, Chen L, Wang C, Wang Y, Wang X, Xiao Y, Sun Q, Liu H, Zhu F, Ma C, Yan L, Yang M, Han J, Xu W, Tan W, Peng X, Jin Q, Wu G, Qin C. 2020. The pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 in hACE2 transgenic mice. Nature 583:830–833.
    56.
    Hammer AS, Quaade ML, Rasmussen TB, Fonager J, Rasmussen M, Mundbjerg K, Lohse L, Strandbygaard B, Jørgensen CS, Alfaro-Núñez A, Rosenstierne MW, Boklund A, Halasa T, Fomsgaard A, Belsham GJ, Bøtner A. 2021. SARS-CoV-2 transmission between mink (Neovison vison) and humans, Denmark. Emerg Infect Dis 27:547–551.
    57.
    Palmer MV, Cox RJ, Waters WR, Thacker TC, Whipple DL. 2017. Using white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in infectious disease research. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 56:350–360.
    58.
    Palmer MV, Wiarda J, Kanipe C, Thacker TC. 2019. Early pulmonary lesions in cattle infected via aerosolized Mycobacterium bovis. Vet Pathol 56:544–554.
    59.
    Wagner B, Hillegas JM, Babasyan S. 2012. Monoclonal antibodies to equine CD23 identify the low-affinity receptor for IgE on subpopulations of IgM + and IgG1 + B-cells in horses. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 146:125–134.
    60.
    Wimer CL, Schnabel CL, Perkins G, Babasyan S, Freer H, Stout AE, Rollins A, Osterrieder N, Goodman LB, Glaser A, Wagner B. 2018. The deletion of the ORF1 and ORF71 genes reduces virulence of the neuropathogenic EHV-1 strain Ab4 without compromising host immunity in horses. PLoS One 13:e0206679.
    61.
    Wagner B, Freer H, Rollins A, Erb HN. 2011. A fluorescent bead-based multiplex assay for the simultaneous detection of antibodies to B. burgdorferi outer surface proteins in canine serum. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 140:190–198.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Journal of Virology
    Volume 95Number 1110 May 2021
    eLocator: e00083-21
    Editor: Tom Gallagher
    Loyola University Chicago

    History

    Received: 20 January 2021
    Accepted: 2 March 2021
    Published online: 10 March 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. ACE2
    2. SARS-CoV-2
    3. cervids
    4. deer
    5. host species
    6. pathogenesis
    7. host range

    Contributors

    Authors

    Infectious Bacterial Diseases Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Ames, Iowa, USA
    Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Animal Health Diagnostic Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
    Shollie Falkenberg
    Ruminant Disease and Immunology Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Ames, Iowa, USA
    Alexandra Buckley
    Virus and Prion Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, USDA, Agricultural Research, Ames, Iowa, USA
    Leonardo C. Caserta
    Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Animal Health Diagnostic Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
    Patrick K. Mitchell
    Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Animal Health Diagnostic Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
    Virus and Prion Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, USDA, Agricultural Research, Ames, Iowa, USA
    Alicia Rollins
    Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Animal Health Diagnostic Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
    Nancy C. Zylich
    Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Animal Health Diagnostic Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
    Randall W. Renshaw
    Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Animal Health Diagnostic Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
    Cassandra Guarino
    Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Animal Health Diagnostic Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
    Bettina Wagner
    Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Animal Health Diagnostic Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
    Kelly Lager
    Virus and Prion Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, USDA, Agricultural Research, Ames, Iowa, USA
    Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Animal Health Diagnostic Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA

    Editor

    Tom Gallagher
    Editor
    Loyola University Chicago

    Notes

    Mitchell V. Palmer and Mathias Martins contributed equally to this work. Author order was determined based on the institution where the animal studies were conducted and in order of increasing seniority.

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Journal of VirologyArticle
    Molecular Mechanism for Antibody-Dependent Enhancement of Coronavirus Entry

    Molecular Mechanism for Antibody-Dependent Enhancement of Coronavirus Entry

    ABSTRACT

    Antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of viral entry has been a major concern for epidemiology, vaccine development, and antibody-based drug therapy. However, the molecular mechanism behind ADE is still elusive. Coronavirus spike protein mediates viral entry into cells by first binding to a receptor on the host cell surface and then fusing viral and host membranes. In this study, we investigated how a neutralizing monoclonal antibody (MAb), which targets the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) coronavirus spike, mediates viral entry using pseudovirus entry and biochemical assays. Our results showed that MAb binds to the virus surface spike, allowing it to undergo conformational changes and become prone to proteolytic activation. Meanwhile, MAb binds to cell surface IgG Fc receptor, guiding viral entry through canonical viral-receptor-dependent pathways. Our data suggest that the antibody/Fc-receptor complex functionally mimics viral receptor in mediating viral entry. Moreover, we characterized MAb dosages in viral-receptor-dependent, Fc-receptor-dependent, and both-receptors-dependent viral entry pathways, delineating guidelines on MAb usages in treating viral infections. Our study reveals a novel molecular mechanism for antibody-enhanced viral entry and can guide future vaccination and antiviral strategies.
    IMPORTANCE Antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of viral entry has been observed for many viruses. It was shown that antibodies target one serotype of viruses but only subneutralize another, leading to ADE of the latter viruses. Here we identify a novel mechanism for ADE: a neutralizing antibody binds to the surface spike protein of coronaviruses like a viral receptor, triggers a conformational change of the spike, and mediates viral entry into IgG Fc receptor-expressing cells through canonical viral-receptor-dependent pathways. We further evaluated how antibody dosages impacted viral entry into cells expressing viral receptor, Fc receptor, or both receptors. This study reveals complex roles of antibodies in viral entry and can guide future vaccine design and antibody-based drug therapy.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Tirado SM, Yoon KJ. 2003. Antibody-dependent enhancement of virus infection and disease. Viral Immunol 16:69–86.
    2.
    Takada A, Kawaoka Y. 2003. Antibody-dependent enhancement of viral infection: molecular mechanisms and in vivo implications. Rev Med Virol 13:387–398.
    3.
    Guzman MG, Alvarez M, Rodriguez-Roche R, Bernardo L, Montes T, Vazquez S, Morier L, Alvarez A, Gould EA, Kouri G, Halstead SB. 2007. Neutralizing antibodies after infection with dengue 1 virus. Emerg Infect Dis 13:282–286.
    4.
    Dejnirattisai W, Jumnainsong A, Onsirisakul N, Fitton P, Vasanawathana S, Limpitikul W, Puttikhunt C, Edwards C, Duangchinda T, Supasa S, Chawansuntati K, Malasit P, Mongkolsapaya J, Screaton G. 2010. Cross-reacting antibodies enhance dengue virus infection in humans. Science 328:745–748.
    5.
    Katzelnick LC, Gresh L, Halloran ME, Mercado JC, Kuan G, Gordon A, Balmaseda A, Harris E. 2017. Antibody-dependent enhancement of severe dengue disease in humans. Science 358:929–932.
    6.
    Whitehead SS, Blaney JE, Durbin AP, Murphy BR. 2007. Prospects for a dengue virus vaccine. Nat Rev Microbiol 5:518–528.
    7.
    Willey S, Aasa-Chapman MMI, O’Farrell S, Pellegrino P, Williams I, Weiss RA, Neil SJD. 2011. Extensive complement-dependent enhancement of HIV-1 by autologous non-neutralising antibodies at early stages of infection. Retrovirology 8:16.
    8.
    Beck Z, Prohaszka Z, Fust G. 2008. Traitors of the immune system-enhancing antibodies in HIV infection: their possible implication in HIV vaccine development. Vaccine 26:3078–3085.
    9.
    Takada A, Watanabe S, Okazaki K, Kida H, Kawaoka Y. 2001. Infectivity-enhancing antibodies to Ebola virus glycoprotein. J Virol 75:2324–2330.
    10.
    Takada A, Feldmann H, Ksiazek TG, Kawaoka Y. 2003. Antibody-dependent enhancement of Ebola virus infection. J Virol 77:7539–7544.
    11.
    Perlman S, Netland J. 2009. Coronaviruses post-SARS: update on replication and pathogenesis. Nat Rev Microbiol 7:439–450.
    12.
    Enjuanes L, Almazan F, Sola I, Zuniga S. 2006. Biochemical aspects of coronavirus replication and virus-host interaction. Annu Rev Microbiol 60:211–230.
    13.
    Zaki AM, van Boheemen S, Bestebroer TM, Osterhaus A, Fouchier R. 2012. Isolation of a novel coronavirus from a man with pneumonia in Saudi Arabia. N Engl J Med 367:1814–1820.
    14.
    Ksiazek TG, Erdman D, Goldsmith CS, Zaki SR, Peret T, Emery S, Tong SX, Urbani C, Comer JA, Lim W, Rollin PE, Dowell SF, Ling AE, Humphrey CD, Shieh WJ, Guarner J, Paddock CD, Rota P, Fields B, DeRisi J, Yang JY, Cox N, Hughes JM, LeDuc JW, Bellini WJ, Anderson LJ. 2003. A novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N Engl J Med 348:1953–1966.
    15.
    Peiris JSM, Lai ST, Poon LLM, Guan Y, Yam LYC, Lim W, Nicholls J, Yee WKS, Yan WW, Cheung MT, Cheng VCC, Chan KH, Tsang DNC, Yung RWH, Ng TK, Yuen KY. 2003. Coronavirus as a possible cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Lancet 361:1319–1325.
    16.
    de Groot RJ, Baker SC, Baric RS, Brown CS, Drosten C, Enjuanes L, Fouchier RA, Galiano M, Gorbalenya AE, Memish ZA, Perlman S, Poon LL, Snijder EJ, Stephens GM, Woo PC, Zaki AM, Zambon M, Ziebuhr J. 2013. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV): announcement of the Coronavirus Study Group. J Virol 87:7790–7792.
    17.
    Li F. 2016. Structure, function, and evolution of coronavirus spike proteins. Annu Rev Virol 3:237–261.
    18.
    Yuan Y, Cao D, Zhang Y, Ma J, Qi J, Wang Q, Lu G, Wu Y, Yan J, Shi Y, Zhang X, Gao GF. 2017. Cryo-EM structures of MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV spike glycoproteins reveal the dynamic receptor binding domains. Nat Commun 8:15092.
    19.
    Shang J, Zheng Y, Yang Y, Liu C, Geng Q, Luo C, Zhang W, Li F. 2018. Cryo-EM structure of infectious bronchitis coronavirus spike protein reveals structural and functional evolution of coronavirus spike proteins. PLoS Pathog 14:e1007009.
    20.
    Song W, Gui M, Wang X, Xiang Y. 2018. Cryo-EM structure of the SARS coronavirus spike glycoprotein in complex with its host cell receptor ACE2. PLoS Pathog 14:e1007236.
    21.
    Pallesen J, Wang N, Corbett KS, Wrapp D, Kirchdoerfer RN, Turner HL, Cottrell CA, Becker MM, Wang L, Shi W, Kong WP, Andres EL, Kettenbach AN, Denison MR, Chappell JD, Graham BS, Ward AB, McLellan JS. 2017. Immunogenicity and structures of a rationally designed prefusion MERS-CoV spike antigen. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:E7348–E7357.
    22.
    Shang J, Zheng Y, Yang Y, Liu C, Geng Q, Tai W, Du L, Zhou Y, Zhang W, Li F. 2018. Cryo-electron microscopy structure of porcine deltacoronavirus spike protein in the prefusion state. J Virol 92:e01556-17.
    23.
    Walls AC, Tortorici MA, Bosch BJ, Frenz B, Rottier PJ, DiMaio F, Rey FA, Veesler D. 2016. Cryo-electron microscopy structure of a coronavirus spike glycoprotein trimer. Nature 531:114–117.
    24.
    Walls AC, Tortorici MA, Frenz B, Snijder J, Li W, Rey FA, DiMaio F, Bosch BJ, Veesler D. 2016. Glycan shield and epitope masking of a coronavirus spike protein observed by cryo-electron microscopy. Nat Struct Mol Biol 23:899–905.
    25.
    Kirchdoerfer RN, Cottrell CA, Wang N, Pallesen J, Yassine HM, Turner HL, Corbett KS, Graham BS, McLellan JS, Ward AB. 2016. Pre-fusion structure of a human coronavirus spike protein. Nature 531:118–121.
    26.
    Li F. 2015. Receptor recognition mechanisms of coronaviruses: a decade of structural studies. J Virol 89:1954–1964.
    27.
    Li WH, Moore MJ, Vasilieva N, Sui JH, Wong SK, Berne MA, Somasundaran M, Sullivan JL, Luzuriaga K, Greenough TC, Choe H, Farzan M. 2003. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is a functional receptor for the SARS coronavirus. Nature 426:450–454.
    28.
    Raj VS, Mou HH, Smits SL, Dekkers DHW, Muller MA, Dijkman R, Muth D, Demmers JAA, Zaki A, Fouchier RAM, Thiel V, Drosten C, Rottier PJM, Osterhaus A, Bosch BJ, Haagmans BL. 2013. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 is a functional receptor for the emerging human coronavirus-EMC. Nature 495:251–254.
    29.
    Li F, Li WH, Farzan M, Harrison SC. 2005. Structure of SARS coronavirus spike receptor-binding domain complexed with receptor. Science 309:1864–1868.
    30.
    Lu G, Hu Y, Wang Q, Qi J, Gao F, Li Y, Zhang Y, Zhang W, Yuan Y, Bao J, Zhang B, Shi Y, Yan J, Gao GF. 2013. Molecular basis of binding between novel human coronavirus MERS-CoV and its receptor CD26. Nature 500:227–231.
    31.
    Belouzard S, Millet JK, Licitra BN, Whittaker GR. 2012. Mechanisms of coronavirus cell entry mediated by the viral spike protein. Viruses 4:1011–1033.
    32.
    Heald-Sargent T, Gallagher T. 2012. Ready, set, fuse! The coronavirus spike protein and acquisition of fusion competence. Viruses 4:557–580.
    33.
    Bertram S, Glowacka I, Muller MA, Lavender H, Gnirss K, Nehlmeier I, Niemeyer D, He Y, Simmons G, Drosten C, Soilleux EJ, Jahn O, Steffen I, Pohlmann S. 2011. Cleavage and activation of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein by human airway trypsin-like protease. J Virol 85:13363–13372.
    34.
    Matsuyama S, Ujike M, Morikawa S, Tashiro M, Taguchi F. 2005. Protease-mediated enhancement of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:12543–12547.
    35.
    Kam YW, Okumura Y, Kido H, Ng LF, Bruzzone R, Altmeyer R. 2009. Cleavage of the SARS coronavirus spike glycoprotein by airway proteases enhances virus entry into human bronchial epithelial cells in vitro. PLoS One 4:e7870.
    36.
    Shirato K, Kawase M, Matsuyama S. 2013. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection mediated by the transmembrane serine protease TMPRSS2. J Virol 87:12552–12561.
    37.
    Gierer S, Müller MA, Heurich A, Ritz D, Springstein BL, Karsten CB, Schendzielorz A, Gnirß K, Drosten C, Pöhlmann S. 2015. Inhibition of proprotein convertases abrogates processing of the Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein in infected cells but does not reduce viral infectivity. J Infect Dis 211:889–897.
    38.
    Gierer S, Bertram S, Kaup F, Wrensch F, Heurich A, Krämer-Kühl A, Welsch K, Winkler M, Meyer B, Drosten C, Dittmer U, von Hahn T, Simmons G, Hofmann H, Pöhlmann S. 2013. The spike protein of the emerging betacoronavirus EMC uses a novel coronavirus receptor for entry, can be activated by TMPRSS2, and is targeted by neutralizing antibodies. J Virol 87:5502–5511.
    39.
    Zheng Y, Shang J, Yang Y, Liu C, Wan Y, Geng Q, Wang M, Baric R, Li F. 2018. Lysosomal proteases are a determinant of coronavirus tropism. J Virol 92:e01504-18.
    40.
    Walls AC, Tortorici MA, Snijder J, Xiong X, Bosch BJ, Rey FA, Veesler D. 2017. Tectonic conformational changes of a coronavirus spike glycoprotein promote membrane fusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:11157–11162.
    41.
    Li F, Berardi M, Li WH, Farzan M, Dormitzer PR, Harrison SC. 2006. Conformational states of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein ectodomain. J Virol 80:6794–6800.
    42.
    Wang SF, Tseng SP, Yen CH, Yang JY, Tsao CH, Shen CW, Chen KH, Liu FT, Liu WT, Chen YM, Huang JC. 2014. Antibody-dependent SARS coronavirus infection is mediated by antibodies against spike proteins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 451:208–214.
    43.
    Kam YW, Kien F, Roberts A, Cheung YC, Lamirande EW, Vogel L, Chu SL, Tse J, Guarner J, Zaki SR, Subbarao K, Peiris M, Nal B, Altmeyer R. 2007. Antibodies against trimeric S glycoprotein protect hamsters against SARS-CoV challenge despite their capacity to mediate FcγRII-dependent entry into B cells in vitro. Vaccine 25:729–740.
    44.
    Jaume M, Yip MS, Cheung CY, Leung HL, Li PH, Kien F, Dutry I, Callendret B, Escriou N, Altmeyer R, Nal B, Daeron M, Bruzzone R, Peiris JS. 2011. Anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike antibodies trigger infection of human immune cells via a pH- and cysteine protease-independent FcγR pathway. J Virol 85:10582–10597.
    45.
    Corapi WV, Olsen CW, Scott FW. 1992. Monoclonal antibody analysis of neutralization and antibody-dependent enhancement of feline infectious peritonitis virus. J Virol 66:6695–6705.
    46.
    Hohdatsu T, Yamada M, Tominaga R, Makino K, Kida K, Koyama H. 1998. Antibody-dependent enhancement of feline infectious peritonitis virus infection in feline alveolar macrophages and human monocyte cell line U937 by serum of cats experimentally or naturally infected with feline coronavirus. J Vet Med Sci 60:49–55.
    47.
    Vennema H, de Groot RJ, Harbour DA, Dalderup M, Gruffydd-Jones T, Horzinek MC, Spaan WJ. 1990. Early death after feline infectious peritonitis virus challenge due to recombinant vaccinia virus immunization. J Virol 64:1407–1409.
    48.
    Du L, Zhao G, Yang Y, Qiu H, Wang L, Kou Z, Tao X, Yu H, Sun S, Tseng CT, Jiang S, Li F, Zhou Y. 2014. A conformation-dependent neutralizing monoclonal antibody specifically targeting receptor-binding domain in Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein. J Virol 88:7045–7053.
    49.
    Du L, Zhao G, Li L, He Y, Zhou Y, Zheng BJ, Jiang S. 2009. Antigenicity and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV S protein receptor-binding domain stably expressed in CHO cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 384:486–490.
    50.
    He YX, Lu H, Siddiqui P, Zhou YS, Jiang SB. 2005. Receptor-binding domain of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein contains multiple conformation-dependent epitopes that induce highly potent neutralizing antibodies. J Immunol 174:4908–4915.
    51.
    Millet JK, Whittaker GR. 2014. Host cell entry of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus after two-step, furin-mediated activation of the spike protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:15214–15219.
    52.
    Walls AC, Xiong X, Park YJ, Tortorici MA, Snijder J, Quispe J, Cameroni E, Gopal R, Dai M, Lanzavecchia A, Zambon M, Rey FA, Corti D, Veesler D. 2019. Unexpected receptor functional mimicry elucidates activation of coronavirus fusion. Cell 176:1026–1039.e1015.
    53.
    Uhlén M, Fagerberg L, Hallström BM, Lindskog C, Oksvold P, Mardinoglu A, Sivertsson Å, Kampf C, Sjöstedt E, Asplund A, Olsson I, Edlund K, Lundberg E, Navani S, Szigyarto CA-K, Odeberg J, Djureinovic D, Takanen JO, Hober S, Alm T, Edqvist P-H, Berling H, Tegel H, Mulder J, Rockberg J, Nilsson P, Schwenk JM, Hamsten M, von Feilitzen K, Forsberg M, Persson L, Johansson F, Zwahlen M, von Heijne G, Nielsen J, Pontén F. 2015. Proteomics. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science 347:1260419.
    54.
    Uhlén M, Björling E, Agaton C, Szigyarto CA-K, Amini B, Andersen E, Andersson A-C, Angelidou P, Asplund A, Asplund C, Berglund L, Bergström K, Brumer H, Cerjan D, Ekström M, Elobeid A, Eriksson C, Fagerberg L, Falk R, Fall J, Forsberg M, Björklund MG, Gumbel K, Halimi A, Hallin I, Hamsten C, Hansson M, Hedhammar M, Hercules G, Kampf C, Larsson K, Lindskog M, Lodewyckx W, Lund J, Lundeberg J, Magnusson K, Malm E, Nilsson P, Odling J, Oksvold P, Olsson I, Oster E, Ottosson J, Paavilainen L, Persson A, Rimini R, Rockberg J, Runeson M, Sivertsson A, Sköllermo A, Steen J, Stenvall M, Sterky F, Strömberg S, Sundberg M, Tegel H, Tourle S, Wahlund E, Waldén A, Wan J, Wernérus H, Westberg J, Wester K, Wrethagen U, Xu LL, Hober S, Pontén F. 2005. A human protein atlas for normal and cancer tissues based on antibody proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 4:1920–1932.
    55.
    Qiu H, Sun S, Xiao H, Feng J, Guo Y, Tai W, Wang Y, Du L, Zhao G, Zhou Y. 2016. Single-dose treatment with a humanized neutralizing antibody affords full protection of a human transgenic mouse model from lethal Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)-coronavirus infection. Antiviral Res 132:141–148.
    56.
    Jing Y, Ni Z, Wu J, Higgins L, Markowski TW, Kaufman DS, Walcheck B. 2015. Identification of an ADAM17 cleavage region in human CD16 (FcgammaRIII) and the engineering of a non-cleavable version of the receptor in NK cells. PLoS One 10:e0121788.
    57.
    Genin M, Clement F, Fattaccioli A, Raes M, Michiels C. 2015. M1 and M2 macrophages derived from THP-1 cells differentially modulate the response of cancer cells to etoposide. BMC Cancer 15:577.
    58.
    Snyder KM, Hullsiek R, Mishra HK, Mendez DC, Li Y, Rogich A, Kaufman DS, Wu J, Walcheck B. 2018. Expression of a recombinant high affinity IgG Fc receptor by engineered NK cells as a docking platform for therapeutic mAbs to target cancer cells. Front Immunol 9:2873.
    59.
    Su K, Li X, Edberg JC, Wu J, Ferguson P, Kimberly RP. 2004. A promoter haplotype of the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif-bearing FcgammaRIIb alters receptor expression and associates with autoimmunity. II. Differential binding of GATA4 and Yin-Yang1 transcription factors and correlated receptor expression and function. J Immunol 172:7192–7199.
    60.
    Du L, Tai W, Yang Y, Zhao G, Zhu Q, Sun S, Liu C, Tao X, Tseng CK, Perlman S, Jiang S, Zhou Y, Li F. 2016. Introduction of neutralizing immunogenicity index to the rational design of MERS coronavirus subunit vaccines. Nat Commun 7:13473.
    61.
    Liu C, Tang J, Ma Y, Liang X, Yang Y, Peng G, Qi Q, Jiang S, Li J, Du L, Li F. 2015. Receptor usage and cell entry of porcine epidemic diarrhea coronavirus. J Virol 89:6121–6125.
    62.
    Yang Y, Du L, Liu C, Wang L, Ma C, Tang J, Baric RS, Jiang S, Li F. 2014. Receptor usage and cell entry of bat coronavirus HKU4 provide insight into bat-to-human transmission of MERS coronavirus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:12516–12521.
    63.
    Liu C, Ma Y, Yang Y, Zheng Y, Shang J, Zhou Y, Jiang S, Du L, Li J, Li F. 2016. Cell entry of porcine epidemic diarrhea coronavirus is activated by lysosomal proteases. J Biol Chem 291:24779–24786.
    64.
    Chen Y, Rajashankar KR, Yang Y, Agnihothram SS, Liu C, Lin YL, Baric RS, Li F. 2013. Crystal structure of the receptor-binding domain from newly emerged Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J Virol 87:10777–10783.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Journal of Virology
    Volume 94Number 514 February 2020
    eLocator: e02015-19
    Editor: Tom Gallagher
    Loyola University Chicago

    History

    Received: 27 November 2019
    Accepted: 4 December 2019
    Published online: 11 December 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. antibody-dependent enhancement of viral entry
    2. MERS coronavirus
    3. SARS coronavirus
    4. spike protein
    5. neutralizing antibody
    6. viral receptor
    7. IgG Fc receptor
    8. antibody-dependent enhancement of viral entry

    Contributors

    Authors

    Yushun Wan
    Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA
    Jian Shang
    Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA
    Shihui Sun
    Laboratory of Infection and Immunity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Beijing, China
    Wanbo Tai
    Lindsley F. Kimball Research Institute, New York Blood Center, New York, New York, USA
    Jing Chen
    Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
    Qibin Geng
    Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA
    Lei He
    Laboratory of Infection and Immunity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Beijing, China
    Yuehong Chen
    Laboratory of Infection and Immunity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Beijing, China
    Jianming Wu
    Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA
    Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
    Yusen Zhou
    Laboratory of Infection and Immunity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Beijing, China
    Lanying Du
    Lindsley F. Kimball Research Institute, New York Blood Center, New York, New York, USA
    Fang Li
    Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA

    Editor

    Tom Gallagher
    Editor
    Loyola University Chicago

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Lanying Du, [email protected], or Fang Li, [email protected].
    Yushun Wan and Jian Shang contributed equally to this work. Author order was determined by the time of joining the project.

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Journal of VirologyArticle
    Viral Mutation Rates

    ABSTRACT

    Accurate estimates of virus mutation rates are important to understand the evolution of the viruses and to combat them. However, methods of estimation are varied and often complex. Here, we critically review over 40 original studies and establish criteria to facilitate comparative analyses. The mutation rates of 23 viruses are presented as substitutions per nucleotide per cell infection (s/n/c) and corrected for selection bias where necessary, using a new statistical method. The resulting rates range from 10−8 to10−6 s/n/c for DNA viruses and from 10−6 to 10−4 s/n/c for RNA viruses. Similar to what has been shown previously for DNA viruses, there appears to be a negative correlation between mutation rate and genome size among RNA viruses, but this result requires further experimental testing. Contrary to some suggestions, the mutation rate of retroviruses is not lower than that of other RNA viruses. We also show that nucleotide substitutions are on average four times more common than insertions/deletions (indels). Finally, we provide estimates of the mutation rate per nucleotide per strand copying, which tends to be lower than that per cell infection because some viruses undergo several rounds of copying per cell, particularly double-stranded DNA viruses. A regularly updated virus mutation rate data set will be available at www.uv.es/rsanjuan/virmut.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Anderson, J. P., R. Daifuku, and L. A. Loeb.2004. Viral error catastrophe by mutagenic nucleosides. Annu. Rev. Microbiol.58:183-205.
    2.
    Batschelet, E., E. Domingo, and C. Weissmann.1976. The proportion of revertant and mutant phage in a growing population, as a function of mutation and growth rate. Gene1:27-32.
    3.
    Bebenek, K., J. Abbotts, J. D. Roberts, S. H. Wilson, and T. A. Kunkel.1989. Specificity and mechanism of error-prone replication by human immunodeficiency virus-1 reverse transcriptase. J. Biol. Chem.264:16948-16956.
    4.
    Belshaw, R., A. Gardner, A. Rambaut, and O. G. Pybus.2008. Pacing a small cage: mutation and RNA viruses. Trends Ecol. Evol.23:188-193.
    5.
    Bull, J. J., R. Sanjuán, and C. O. Wilke.2007. Theory of lethal mutagenesis for viruses. J. Virol.81:2930-2939.
    6.
    Carrasco, P., F. de la Iglesia, and S. F. Elena.2007. Distribution of fitness and virulence effects caused by single-nucleotide substitutions in tobacco etch virus. J. Virol.81:12979-12984.
    7.
    Carter, J., and V. Saunders.2007. Virology: principles and applications. Wiley, New York, NY.
    8.
    Challberg, M. D., and T. J. Kelly.1989. Animal virus DNA replication. Annu. Rev. Biochem.58:671-717.
    9.
    Chao, L., C. U. Rang, and L. E. Wong.2002. Distribution of spontaneous mutants and inferences about the replication mode of the RNA bacteriophage φ6. J. Virol.76:3276-3281.
    10.
    Chung, D. H., Y. Sun, W. B. Parker, J. B. Arterburn, A. Bartolucci, and C. B. Jonsson.2007. Ribavirin reveals a lethal threshold of allowable mutation frequency for Hantaan virus. J. Virol.81:11722-11729.
    11.
    Crotty, S., C. E. Cameron, and R. Andino.2001. RNA virus error catastrophe: direct molecular test by using ribavirin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.98:6895-6900.
    12.
    Cuevas, J. M., S. Duffy, and R. Sanjuán.2009. Point mutation rate of bacteriophage ΦX174. Genetics183:747-749.
    13.
    Cuevas, J. M., F. González-Candelas, A. Moya, and R. Sanjuán.2009. The effect of ribavirin on the mutation rate and spectrum of hepatitis C virus in vivo. J. Virol.83:5760-5764.
    14.
    Cuevas, J. M., A. Moya, and R. Sanjuán.2005. Following the very initial growth of biological RNA viral clones. J. Gen. Virol.86:435-443.
    15.
    Dapp, M. J., C. L. Clouser, S. Patterson, and L. M. Mansky.2009. 5-Azacytidine can induce lethal mutagenesis in human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J. Virol.83:11950-11958.
    16.
    Davenport, M. P., L. Loh, J. Petravic, and S. J. Kent.2008. Rates of HIV immune escape and reversion: implications for vaccination. Trends Microbiol.16:561-566.
    17.
    de la Torre, J. C., C. Giachetti, B. L. Semler, and J. J. Holland.1992. High frequency of single-base transitions and extreme frequency of precise multiple-base reversion mutations in poliovirus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.89:2531-2535.
    18.
    de la Torre, J. C., E. Wimmer, and J. J. Holland.1990. Very high frequency of reversion to guanidine resistance in clonal pools of guanidine-dependent type 1 poliovirus. J. Virol.64:664-671.
    19.
    Denhardt, D. T., and R. B. Silver.1966. An analysis of the clone size distribution of ΦX174 mutants and recombinants. Virology30:10-19.
    20.
    De Paepe, M., and F. Taddei.2006. Viruses' life history: towards a mechanistic basis of a trade-off between survival and reproduction among phages. PLoS Biol.4:e193.
    21.
    Domingo, E.2006. Quasispecies: concept and implications for virology. Springer, New York, NY.
    22.
    Domingo, E., R. A. Flavell, and C. Weissmann.1976. In vitro site-directed mutagenesis: generation and properties of an infectious extracistronic mutant of bacteriophage Qβ. Gene1:3-25.
    23.
    Domingo-Calap, P., J. M. Cuevas, and R. Sanjuán.2009. The fitness effects of random mutations in single-stranded DNA and RNA bacteriophages. PLoS Genet.5:e1000742.
    24.
    Dougherty, J. P., and H. M. Temin.1988. Determination of the rate of base-pair substitution and insertion mutations in retrovirus replication. J. Virol.62:2817-2822.
    25.
    Dove, W. F.1968. The genetics of the lambdoid phages. Annu. Rev. Genet.2:305-340.
    26.
    Drake, J. W.1991. A constant rate of spontaneous mutation in DNA-based microbes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.88:7160-7164.
    27.
    Drake, J. W.1993. Rates of spontaneous mutation among RNA viruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.90:4171-4175.
    28.
    Drake, J. W.2009. Avoiding dangerous missense: thermophiles display especially low mutation rates. PLoS Genet.5:e1000520.
    29.
    Drake, J. W., B. Charlesworth, D. Charlesworth, and J. F. Crow.1998. Rates of spontaneous mutation. Genetics148:1667-1686.
    30.
    Drake, J. W., and J. J. Holland.1999. Mutation rates among RNA viruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.96:13910-13913.
    31.
    Drake, J. W., and C. B. Hwang.2005. On the mutation rate of herpes simplex virus type 1. Genetics170:969-970.
    32.
    Duffy, S., L. A. Shackelton, and E. C. Holmes.2008. Rates of evolutionary change in viruses: patterns and determinants. Nat. Rev. Genet.9:267-276.
    33.
    Durán-Vila, R., S. F. Elena, J. A. Daròs, and R. Flores.2008. Structure and evolution of viroids, p. 43-64. In E. Domingo, C. R. Parrish, and J. J. Holland (ed.), Origin and evolution of viruses. Elsevier, New York, NY.
    34.
    Eckerle, L. D., X. Lu, S. M. Sperry, L. Choi, and M. R. Denison.2007. High fidelity of murine hepatitis virus replication is decreased in nsp14 exoribonuclease mutants. J. Virol.81:12135-12144.
    35.
    Flores, R., C. Hernández, A. E. Martínez de Alba, J. A. Daròs, and F. Di Serio.2005. Viroids and viroid-host interactions. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.43:117-139.
    36.
    Furió, V., A. Moya, and R. Sanjuán.2005. The cost of replication fidelity in an RNA virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.102:10233-10237.
    37.
    Gago, S., S. F. Elena, R. Flores, and R. Sanjuán.2009. Extremely high mutation rate of a hammerhead viroid. Science323:1308.
    38.
    Gao, F., Y. Chen, D. N. Levy, J. A. Conway, T. B. Kepler, and H. Hui.2004. Unselected mutations in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genome are mostly nonsynonymous and often deleterious. J. Virol.78:2426-2433.
    39.
    Graci, J. D., D. A. Harki, V. S. Korneeva, J. P. Edathil, K. Too, D. Franco, E. D. Smidansky, A. V. Paul, B. R. Peterson, D. M. Brown, D. Loakes, and C. E. Cameron.2007. Lethal mutagenesis of poliovirus mediated by a mutagenic pyrimidine analogue. J. Virol.81:11256-11266.
    40.
    Grande-Pérez, A., E. Lázaro, P. Lowenstein, E. Domingo, and S. C. Manrubia.2005. Suppression of viral infectivity through lethal defection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.102:4448-4452.
    41.
    Heinz, B. A., R. R. Rueckert, D. A. Shepard, F. J. Dutko, M. A. McKinlay, M. Fancher, M. G. Rossmann, J. Badger, and T. J. Smith.1989. Genetic and molecular analyses of spontaneous mutants of human rhinovirus 14 that are resistant to an antiviral compound. J. Virol.63:2476-2485.
    42.
    Hirano, N., K. Fujiwara, and M. Matumoto.1976. Mouse hepatitis virus (MHV-2). Plaque assay and propagation in mouse cell line DBT cells. Jpn. J. Microbiol.20:219-225.
    43.
    Holland, J. J., J. C. de la Torre, D. A. Steinhauer, D. K. Clarke, E. A. Duarte, and E. Domingo.1989. Virus mutation frequencies can be greatly underestimated by monoclonal antibody neutralization of virions. J. Virol.63:5030-5036.
    44.
    Holland, J. J., E. Domingo, J. C. de la Torre, and D. A. Steinhauer.1990. Mutation frequencies at defined single codon sites in vesicular stomatitis virus and poliovirus can be increased only slightly by chemical mutagenesis. J. Virol.64:3960-3962.
    45.
    Holland, J. J., K. Spindler, F. Horodyski, E. Grabau, S. Nichol, and S. VandePol.1982. Rapid evolution of RNA genomes. Science215:1577-1585.
    46.
    Holmes, E. C.2009. The evolution and emergence of RNA viruses. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
    47.
    Huang, K. J., and D. P. Wooley.2005. A new cell-based assay for measuring the forward mutation rate of HIV-1. J. Virol. Methods124:95-104.
    48.
    Jenkins, G. M., A. Rambaut, O. G. Pybus, and E. C. Holmes.2002. Rates of molecular evolution in RNA viruses: a quantitative phylogenetic analysis. J. Mol. Evol.54:156-165.
    49.
    Kunkel, T. A.1985. The mutational specificity of DNA polymerase-beta during in vitro DNA synthesis. Production of frameshift, base substitution, and deletion mutations. J. Biol. Chem.260:5787-5796.
    50.
    Kunkel, T. A.2004. DNA replication fidelity. J. Biol. Chem.279:16895-16898.
    51.
    Laakso, M. M., and R. E. Sutton.2006. Replicative fidelity of lentiviral vectors produced by transient transfection. Virology348:406-417.
    52.
    Leider, J. M., P. Palese, and F. I. Smith.1988. Determination of the mutation rate of a retrovirus. J. Virol.62:3084-3091.
    53.
    Loeb, L. A., J. M. Essigmann, F. Kazazi, J. Zhang, K. D. Rose, and J. I. Mullins.1999. Lethal mutagenesis of HIV with mutagenic nucleoside analogs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.96:1492-1497.
    54.
    Lu, Q., Y. T. Hwang, and C. B. Hwang.2002. Mutation spectra of herpes simplex virus type 1 thymidine kinase mutants. J. Virol.76:5822-5828.
    55.
    Luria, S. E.1951. The frequency distribution of spontaneous bacteriophage mutants as evidence for the exponential rate of phage reproduction. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.16:463-470.
    56.
    Luria, S. E., and M. Delbrück.1943. Mutations of bacteria from virus sensitivity to virus resistance. Genetics28:491-511.
    57.
    Lynch, M.2006. The origins of eukaryotic gene structure. Mol. Biol. Evol.23:450-468.
    58.
    Malpica, J. M., A. Fraile, I. Moreno, C. I. Obies, J. W. Drake, and F. García-Arenal.2002. The rate and character of spontaneous mutation in an RNA virus. Genetics162:1505-1511.
    59.
    Mansky, L. M.1998. Retrovirus mutation rates and their role in genetic variation. J. Gen. Virol.79:1337-1345.
    60.
    Mansky, L. M.2000. In vivo analysis of human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 reverse transcription accuracy. J. Virol.74:9525-9531.
    61.
    Mansky, L. M., and L. C. Bernard.2000. 3′-Azido-3′-deoxythymidine (AZT) and AZT-resistant reverse transcriptase can increase the in vivo mutation rate of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J. Virol.74:9532-9539.
    62.
    Mansky, L. M., S. Preveral, L. Selig, R. Benarous, and S. Benichou.2000. The interaction of vpr with uracil DNA glycosylase modulates the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in vivo mutation rate. J. Virol.74:7039-7047.
    63.
    Mansky, L. M., and H. M. Temin.1994. Lower mutation rate of bovine leukemia virus relative to that of spleen necrosis virus. J. Virol.68:494-499.
    64.
    Mansky, L. M., and H. M. Temin.1995. Lower in vivo mutation rate of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 than that predicted from the fidelity of purified reverse transcriptase. J. Virol.69:5087-5094.
    65.
    Minskaia, E., T. Hertzig, A. E. Gorbalenya, V. Campanacci, C. Cambillau, B. Canard, and J. Ziebuhr.2006. Discovery of an RNA virus 3′→5′ exoribonuclease that is critically involved in coronavirus RNA synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.103:5108-5113.
    66.
    Monk, R. J., F. G. Malik, D. Stokesberry, and L. H. Evans.1992. Direct determination of the point mutation rate of a murine retrovirus. J. Virol.66:3683-3689.
    67.
    Niwa, O., A. Decleve, M. Liberman, and H. S. Kaplan.1973. Adaptation of plaque assay methods to the in vitro quantitation of the radiation leukemia virus. J. Virol.12:68-73.
    68.
    Nobusawa, E., and K. Sato.2006. Comparison of the mutation rates of human influenza A and B viruses. J. Virol.80:3675-3678.
    69.
    Parthasarathi, S., A. Varela-Echavarría, Y. Ron, B. D. Preston, and J. P. Dougherty.1995. Genetic rearrangements occurring during a single cycle of murine leukemia virus vector replication: characterization and implications. J. Virol.69:7991-8000.
    70.
    Parvin, J. D., A. Moscona, W. T. Pan, J. M. Leider, and P. Palese.1986. Measurement of the mutation rates of animal viruses: influenza A virus and poliovirus type 1. J. Virol.59:377-383.
    71.
    Pathak, V. K., and H. M. Temin.1990. Broad spectrum of in vivo forward mutations, hypermutations, and mutational hotspots in a retroviral shuttle vector after a single replication cycle: substitutions, frameshifts, and hypermutations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.87:6019-6023.
    72.
    Perelson, A. S.2002. Modelling viral and immune system dynamics. Nat. Rev. Immunol.2:28-36.
    73.
    Peris, J. B., P. Davis, J. M. Cuevas, M. R. Nebot, and R. Sanjuán.2010. Distribution of fitness effects caused by single-nucleotide substitutions in bacteriophage f1. Genetics185:603-609.
    74.
    Pfeiffer, J. K., and K. Kirkegaard.2003. A single mutation in poliovirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase confers resistance to mutagenic nucleotide analogs via increased fidelity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.100:7289-7294.
    75.
    Pfeiffer, J. K., and K. Kirkegaard.2005. Increased fidelity reduces poliovirus fitness and virulence under selective pressure in mice. PLoS Pathog.1:e11.
    76.
    Pult, I., N. Abbott, Y. Y. Zhang, and J. Summers.2001. Frequency of spontaneous mutations in an avian hepadnavirus infection. J. Virol.75:9623-9632.
    77.
    Raney, J. L., R. R. Delongchamp, and C. R. Valentine.2004. Spontaneous mutant frequency and mutation spectrum for gene A of ΦX174 grown in E. coli. Environ. Mol. Mutagen.44:119-127.
    78.
    Sanjuán, R.2010. Mutational fitness effects in RNA and ssDNA viruses: common patterns revealed by site-directed mutagenesis studies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond.365:1975-1982.
    79.
    Sanjuán, R., P. Agudelo-Romero, and S. F. Elena.2009. Upper-limit mutation rate estimation for a plant RNA virus. Biol. Lett.5:394-396.
    80.
    Sanjuán, R., A. Moya, and S. F. Elena.2004. The distribution of fitness effects caused by single-nucleotide substitutions in an RNA virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.101:8396-8401.
    81.
    Schrag, S. J., P. A. Rota, and W. J. Bellini.1999. Spontaneous mutation rate of measles virus: direct estimation based on mutations conferring monoclonal antibody resistance. J. Virol.73:51-54.
    82.
    Sedivy, J. M., J. P. Capone, U. L. RajBhandary, and P. A. Sharp.1987. An inducible mammalian amber suppressor: propagation of a poliovirus mutant. Cell50:379-389.
    83.
    Sierra, S., M. Dávila, P. R. Lowenstein, and E. Domingo.2000. Response of foot-and-mouth disease virus to increased mutagenesis: influence of viral load and fitness in loss of infectivity. J. Virol.74:8316-8323.
    84.
    Stech, J., X. Xiong, C. Scholtissek, and R. G. Webster.1999. Independence of evolutionary and mutational rates after transmission of avian influenza viruses to swine. J. Virol.73:1878-1884.
    85.
    Suárez, P., J. Valcárcel, and J. Ortín.1992. Heterogeneity of the mutation rates of influenza A viruses: isolation of mutator mutants. J. Virol.66:2491-2494.
    86.
    Suárez-López, P., and J. Ortín.1994. An estimation of the nucleotide substitution rate at defined positions in the influenza virus haemagglutinin gene. J. Gen. Virol.75:389-393.
    87.
    Thomas, M. J., A. A. Platas, and D. K. Hawley.1998. Transcriptional fidelity and proofreading by RNA polymerase II. Cell93:627-637.
    88.
    Tromas, N., and S. F. Elena.2010. The rate and spectrum of spontaneous mutations in a plant RNA virus. Genetics185:983-989.
    89.
    Varela-Echavarría, A., N. Garvey, B. D. Preston, and J. P. Dougherty.1992. Comparison of Moloney murine leukemia virus mutation rate with the fidelity of its reverse transcriptase in vitro. J. Biol. Chem.267:24681-24688.
    90.
    Vignuzzi, M., J. K. Stone, J. J. Arnold, C. E. Cameron, and R. Andino.2006. Quasispecies diversity determines pathogenesis through cooperative interactions in a viral population. Nature439:344-348.
    91.
    Vignuzzi, M., E. Wendt, and R. Andino.2008. Engineering attenuated virus vaccines by controlling replication fidelity. Nat. Med.14:154-161.
    92.
    Wain-Hobson, S.1993. The fastest genome evolution ever described: HIV variation in situ. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.3:878-883.
    93.
    Wang, W., W. M. Lee, A. G. Mosser, and R. R. Rueckert.1998. WIN 52035-dependent human rhinovirus 16: assembly deficiency caused by mutations near the canyon surface. J. Virol.72:1210-1218.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Journal of Virology
    Volume 84Number 191 October 2010
    Pages: 9733 - 9748

    History

    Received: 31 March 2010
    Accepted: 12 July 2010
    Published online: 21 July 2010

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Contributors

    Authors

    Rafael Sanjuán [email protected]
    Institut Cavanilles de Biodiversitat i Biologia Evolutiva, Departament de Genetica, and Unidad Mixta de Investigación en Genómica y Salud, Universitat de València, C/Catedrático Agustín Escardino 9, Paterna 46980, València, Spain
    Miguel R. Nebot
    Instituto de Física Corpuscular, Universitat de València and CSIC, C/Catedrático Agustín Escardino 9, Paterna 46980, València, Spain
    Nicola Chirico
    Department of Structural and Functional Biology, Via JH Dunant 3, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy
    Louis M. Mansky
    Institute for Molecular Virology, Academic Health Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
    Robert Belshaw
    Department of Zoology, South Parks Road, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, United Kingdom

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Journal of VirologyArticle
    COVID-19 Vaccine Candidates Based on Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara Expressing the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Induce Robust T- and B-Cell Immune Responses and Full Efficacy in Mice

    COVID-19 Vaccine Candidates Based on Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara Expressing the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Induce Robust T- and B-Cell Immune Responses and Full Efficacy in Mice

    ABSTRACT

    Vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, are urgently needed. We developed two COVID-19 vaccines based on modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) vectors expressing the entire SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein (MVA-CoV2-S); their immunogenicity was evaluated in mice using DNA/MVA or MVA/MVA prime/boost immunizations. Both vaccines induced robust, broad, and polyfunctional S-specific CD4+ (mainly Th1) and CD8+ T-cell responses, with a T effector memory phenotype. DNA/MVA immunizations elicited higher T-cell responses. All vaccine regimens triggered high titers of IgG antibodies specific for the S, as well as for the receptor-binding domain; the predominance of the IgG2c isotype was indicative of Th1 immunity. Notably, serum samples from vaccinated mice neutralized SARS-CoV-2 in cell cultures, and those from MVA/MVA immunizations showed a higher neutralizing capacity. Remarkably, one or two doses of MVA-CoV2-S protect humanized K18-hACE2 mice from a lethal dose of SARS-CoV-2. In addition, two doses of MVA-CoV2-S confer full inhibition of virus replication in the lungs. These results demonstrate the robust immunogenicity and full efficacy of MVA-based COVID-19 vaccines in animal models and support its translation to the clinic.
    IMPORTANCE The continuous dissemination of the novel emerging SARS-CoV-2 virus, with more than 78 million infected cases worldwide and higher than 1,700,000 deaths as of 23 December 2020, highlights the urgent need for the development of novel vaccines against COVID-19. With this aim, we have developed novel vaccine candidates based on the poxvirus modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) strain expressing the full-length SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein, and we have evaluated their immunogenicity in mice using DNA/MVA or MVA/MVA prime/boost immunization protocols. The results showed the induction of a potent S-specific T-cell response and high titers of neutralizing antibodies. Remarkably, humanized K18-hACE2 mice immunized with one or two doses of the MVA-based vaccine were 100% protected from SARS-CoV-2 lethality. Moreover, two doses of the vaccine prevented virus replication in lungs. Our findings prove the robust immunogenicity and efficacy of MVA-based COVID-19 vaccines in animal models and support its translation to the clinic.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Lu R, Zhao X, Li J, Niu P, Yang B, Wu H, Wang W, Song H, Huang B, Zhu N, Bi Y, Ma X, Zhan F, Wang L, Hu T, Zhou H, Hu Z, Zhou W, Zhao L, Chen J, Meng Y, Wang J, Lin Y, Yuan J, Xie Z, Ma J, Liu WJ, Wang D, Xu W, Holmes EC, Gao GF, Wu G, Chen W, Shi W, Tan W. 2020. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet 395:565–574.
    2.
    Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, Zhao X, Huang B, Shi W, Lu R, Niu P, Zhan F, Ma X, Wang D, Xu W, Wu G, Gao GF, Tan W, China Novel Coronavirus Investigating and Research Team. 2020. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med 382:727–733.
    3.
    de Wit E, van Doremalen N, Falzarano D, Munster VJ. 2016. SARS and MERS: recent insights into emerging coronaviruses. Nat Rev Microbiol 14:523–534.
    4.
    Chakraborty I, Maity P. 2020. COVID-19 outbreak: migration, effects on society, global environment and prevention. Sci Total Environ 728:138882.
    5.
    Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, Zhang L, Fan G, Xu J, Gu X, Cheng Z, Yu T, Xia J, Wei Y, Wu W, Xie X, Yin W, Li H, Liu M, Xiao Y, Gao H, Guo L, Xie J, Wang G, Jiang R, Gao Z, Jin Q, Wang J, Cao B. 2020. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 395:497–506.
    6.
    Wu F, Zhao S, Yu B, Chen YM, Wang W, Song ZG, Hu Y, Tao ZW, Tian JH, Pei YY, Yuan ML, Zhang YL, Dai FH, Liu Y, Wang QM, Zheng JJ, Xu L, Holmes EC, Zhang YZ. 2020. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature 579:265–269.
    7.
    Amanat F, Krammer F. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: status report. Immunity 52:583–589.
    8.
    Funk CD, Laferriere C, Ardakani A. 2020. A snapshot of the global race for vaccines targeting SARS-CoV-2 and the COVID-19 pandemic. Front Pharmacol 11:937.
    9.
    Wrapp D, Wang N, Corbett KS, Goldsmith JA, Hsieh CL, Abiona O, Graham BS, McLellan JS. 2020. Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science 367:1260–1263.
    10.
    Addetia A, Crawford KHD, Dingens A, Zhu H, Roychoudhury P, Huang ML, Jerome KR, Bloom JD, Greninger AL. 2020. Neutralizing antibodies correlate with protection from SARS-CoV-2 in humans during a fishery vessel outbreak with high attack rate. J Clin Microbiol 58:e02107-20.
    11.
    Liu L, To KK, Chan KH, Wong YC, Zhou R, Kwan KY, Fong CH, Chen LL, Choi CY, Lu L, Tsang OT, Leung WS, To WK, Hung IF, Yuen KY, Chen Z. 2020. High neutralizing antibody titer in intensive care unit patients with COVID-19. Emerg Microbes Infect 9:1664–1670.
    12.
    Salazar E, Kuchipudi SV, Christensen PA, Eagar TN, Yi X, Zhao P, Jin Z, Long SW, Olsen RJ, Chen J, Castillo B, Leveque C, Towers DM, Lavinder J, Gollihar JD, Cardona J, Ippolito GC, Nissly RH, Bird IM, Greenawalt D, Rossi RM, Gontu A, Srinivasan S, Poojary IB, Cattadori IM, Hudson PJ, Joselyn N, Prugar L, Huie K, Herbert A, Bernard DW, Dye J, Kapur V, Musser JM. 2020. Relationship between anti-spike protein antibody titers and SARS-CoV-2 in vitro virus neutralization in convalescent plasma. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.08.138990.
    13.
    Chiuppesi F, Salazar MD, Contreras H, Nguyen VH, Martinez J, Park S, Nguyen J, Kha M, Iniguez A, Zhou Q, Kaltcheva T, Levytskyy R, Ebelt ND, Kang TH, Wu X, Rogers T, Manuel ER, Shostak Y, Diamond DJ, Wussow F. 2020. Development of a synthetic poxvirus-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.01.183236.
    14.
    Corbett KS, Edwards D, Leist SR, Abiona OM, Boyoglu-Barnum S, Gillespie RA, Himansu S, Schafer A, Ziwawo CT, DiPiazza AT, Dinnon KH, Elbashir SM, Shaw CA, Woods A, Fritch EJ, Martinez DR, Bock KW, Minai M, Nagata BM, Hutchinson GB, Bahl K, Garcia-Dominguez D, Ma L, Renzi I, Kong WP, Schmidt SD, Wang L, Zhang Y, Stevens LJ, Phung E, Chang LA, Loomis RJ, Altaras NE, Narayanan E, Metkar M, Presnyak V, Liu C, Louder MK, Shi W, Leung K, Yang ES, West A, Gully KL, Wang N, Wrapp D, Doria-Rose NA, Stewart-Jones G, Bennett H, Nason MC, Ruckwardt TJ, et al. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine development enabled by prototype pathogen preparedness. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.11.145920.
    15.
    Gao Q, Bao L, Mao H, Wang L, Xu K, Yang M, Li Y, Zhu L, Wang N, Lv Z, Gao H, Ge X, Kan B, Hu Y, Liu J, Cai F, Jiang D, Yin Y, Qin C, Li J, Gong X, Lou X, Shi W, Wu D, Zhang H, Zhu L, Deng W, Li Y, Lu J, Li C, Wang X, Yin W, Zhang Y, Qin C. 2020. Development of an inactivated vaccine candidate for SARS-CoV-2. Science 369:77–81.
    16.
    Laczko D, Hogan MJ, Toulmin SA, Hicks P, Lederer K, Gaudette BT, Castano D, Amanat F, Muramatsu H, Oguin TH, III, Ojha A, Zhang L, Mu Z, Parks R, Manzoni TB, Roper B, Strohmeier S, Tombacz I, Arwood L, Nachbagauer R, Kariko K, Greenhouse J, Pessaint L, Porto M, Putman-Taylor T, Strasbaugh A, Campbell TA, Lin PJC, Tam YK, Sempowski GD, Farzan M, Choe H, Saunders KO, Haynes BF, Andersen H, Eisenlohr LC, Weissman D, Krammer F, Bates P, Allman D, Locci M, Pardi N. 2020. A single immunization with nucleoside-modified mRNA vaccines elicits strong cellular and humoral immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 in mice. Immunity 53:724–732.e7.
    17.
    McKay PF, Hu K, Blakney AK, Samnuan K, Brown JC, Penn R, Zhou J, Bouton CR, Rogers P, Polra K, Lin PJC, Barbosa C, Tam YK, Barclay WS, Shattock RJ. 2020. Self-amplifying RNA SARS-CoV-2 lipid nanoparticle vaccine candidate induces high neutralizing antibody titers in mice. Nat Commun 11:3523.
    18.
    Smith TRF, Patel A, Ramos S, Elwood D, Zhu X, Yan J, Gary EN, Walker SN, Schultheis K, Purwar M, Xu Z, Walters J, Bhojnagarwala P, Yang M, Chokkalingam N, Pezzoli P, Parzych E, Reuschel EL, Doan A, Tursi N, Vasquez M, Choi J, Tello-Ruiz E, Maricic I, Bah MA, Wu Y, Amante D, Park DH, Dia Y, Ali AR, Zaidi FI, Generotti A, Kim KY, Herring TA, Reeder S, Andrade VM, Buttigieg K, Zhao G, Wu JM, Li D, Bao L, Liu J, Deng W, Qin C, Brown AS, Khoshnejad M, Wang N, Chu J, Wrapp D, McLellan JS, et al. 2020. Immunogenicity of a DNA vaccine candidate for COVID-19. Nat Commun 11:2601.
    19.
    Mercado NB, Zahn R, Wegmann F, Loos C, Chandrashekar A, Yu J, Liu J, Peter L, McMahan K, Tostanoski LH, He X, Martinez DR, Rutten L, Bos R, van Manen D, Vellinga J, Custers J, Langedijk JP, Kwaks T, Bakkers MJG, Zuijdgeest D, Huber SKR, Atyeo C, Fischinger S, Burke JS, Feldman J, Hauser BM, Caradonna TM, Bondzie EA, Dagotto G, Gebre MS, Hoffman E, Jacob-Dolan C, Kirilova M, Li Z, Lin Z, Mahrokhian SH, Maxfield LF, Nampanya F, Nityanandam R, Nkolola JP, Patel S, Ventura JD, Verrington K, Wan H, Pessaint L, Ry AV, Blade K, Strasbaugh A, Cabus M, et al. 2020. Single-shot Ad26 vaccine protects against SARS-CoV-2 in rhesus macaques. Nature 586:583–588.
    20.
    Ren W, Sun H, Gao GF, Chen J, Sun S, Zhao R, Gao G, Hu Y, Zhao G, Chen Y, Jin X, Fang F, Chen J, Wang Q, Gong S, Gao W, Sun Y, Su J, He A, Cheng X, Li M, Xia C, Li M, Sun L. 2020. Recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike S1-Fc fusion protein induced high levels of neutralizing responses in nonhuman primates. Vaccine 38:5653–5658.
    21.
    van Doremalen N, Lambe T, Spencer A, Belij-Rammerstorfer S, Purushotham JN, Port JR, Avanzato V, Bushmaker T, Flaxman A, Ulaszewska M, Feldmann F, Allen ER, Sharpe H, Schulz J, Holbrook M, Okumura A, Meade-White K, Perez-Perez L, Bissett C, Gilbride C, Williamson BN, Rosenke R, Long D, Ishwarbhai A, Kailath R, Rose L, Morris S, Powers C, Lovaglio J, Hanley PW, Scott D, Saturday G, de Wit E, Gilbert SC, Munster VJ. 2020. ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination prevents SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in rhesus macaques. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.13.093195.
    22.
    Yu J, Tostanoski LH, Peter L, Mercado NB, McMahan K, Mahrokhian SH, Nkolola JP, Liu J, Li Z, Chandrashekar A, Martinez DR, Loos C, Atyeo C, Fischinger S, Burke JS, Slein MD, Chen Y, Zuiani A, Lelis FJN, Travers M, Habibi S, Pessaint L, Van Ry A, Blade K, Brown R, Cook A, Finneyfrock B, Dodson A, Teow E, Velasco J, Zahn R, Wegmann F, Bondzie EA, Dagotto G, Gebre MS, He X, Jacob-Dolan C, Kirilova M, Kordana N, Lin Z, Maxfield LF, Nampanya F, Nityanandam R, Ventura JD, Wan H, Cai Y, Chen B, Schmidt AG, Wesemann DR, Baric RS, et al. 2020. DNA vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 in rhesus macaques. Science 369:806–811.
    23.
    Jackson LA, Anderson EJ, Rouphael NG, Roberts PC, Makhene M, Coler RN, McCullough MP, Chappell JD, Denison MR, Stevens LJ, Pruijssers AJ, McDermott A, Flach B, Doria-Rose NA, Corbett KS, Morabito KM, O’Dell S, Schmidt SD, Swanson PA, Padilla M, Mascola JR, Neuzil KM, Bennett H, Sun W, Peters E, Makowski M, Albert J, Cross K, Buchanan W, Pikaart-Tautges R, Ledgerwood JE, Graham BS, Beigel JH, mRNA Study Group. 2020. An mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 - preliminary report. N Engl J Med 383:1920–1931.
    24.
    Zhu FC, Li YH, Guan XH, Hou LH, Wang WJ, Li JX, Wu SP, Wang BS, Wang Z, Wang L, Jia SY, Jiang HD, Wang L, Jiang T, Hu Y, Gou JB, Xu SB, Xu JJ, Wang XW, Wang W, Chen W. 2020. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a recombinant adenovirus type-5 vectored COVID-19 vaccine: a dose-escalation, open-label, non-randomised, first-in-human trial. Lancet 395:1845–1854.
    25.
    Voysey M, Clemens SAC, Madhi SA, Weckx LY, Folegatti PM, Aley PK, Angus B, Baillie VL, Barnabas SL, Bhorat QE, Bibi S, Briner C, Cicconi P, Collins AM, Colin-Jones R, Cutland CL, Darton TC, Dheda K, Duncan CJA, Emary KRW, Ewer KJ, Fairlie L, Faust SN, Feng S, Ferreira DM, Finn A, Goodman AL, Green CM, Green CA, Heath PT, Hill C, Hill H, Hirsch I, Hodgson SHC, Izu A, Jackson S, Jenkin D, Joe CCD, Kerridge S, Koen A, Kwatra G, Lazarus R, Lawrie AM, Lelliott A, Libri V, Lillie PJ, Mallory R, Mendes AVA, Milan EP, Minassian AM, et al. 2020. Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: an interim analysis of four randomised controlled trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK. Lancet 397:99−111.
    26.
    Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, Absalon J, Gurtman A, Lockhart S, Perez JL, Pérez Marc G, Moreira ED, Zerbini C, Bailey R, Swanson KA, Roychoudhury S, Koury K, Li P, Kalina WV, Cooper D, Frenck RW, Hammitt LL, Türeci Ö, Nell H, Schaefer A, Ünal S, Tresnan DB, Mather S, Dormitzer PR, Şahin U, Jansen KU, Gruber WC, C4591001 Clinical Trial Group. 2020. Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine. N Engl J Med 383:2603–2615.
    27.
    Mayr A. 2003. Smallpox vaccination and bioterrorism with pox viruses. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 26:423–430.
    28.
    Gomez CE, Najera JL, Krupa M, Perdiguero B, Esteban M. 2011. MVA and NYVAC as vaccines against emergent infectious diseases and cancer. Curr Gene Ther 11:189–217.
    29.
    Gomez CE, Perdiguero B, Garcia-Arriaza J, Esteban M. 2013. Clinical applications of attenuated MVA poxvirus strain. Expert Rev Vaccines 12:1395–1416.
    30.
    Volz A, Sutter G. 2013. Protective efficacy of modified vaccinia virus Ankara in preclinical studies. Vaccine 31:4235–4240.
    31.
    Volz A, Sutter G. 2017. Modified vaccinia virus Ankara: history, value in basic research, and current perspectives for vaccine development. Adv Virus Res 97:187–243.
    32.
    Garcia-Arriaza J, Esteban M. 2014. Enhancing poxvirus vectors vaccine immunogenicity. Hum Vaccin Immunother 10:2235–2244.
    33.
    Garcia-Arriaza J, Cepeda V, Hallengard D, Sorzano CO, Kummerer BM, Liljestrom P, Esteban M. 2014. A novel poxvirus-based vaccine, MVA-CHIKV, is highly immunogenic and protects mice against chikungunya infection. J Virol 88:3527–3547.
    34.
    Pérez P, Marín MQ, Lázaro-Frías A, Jiménez de Oya N, Blázquez A-B, Escribano-Romero E, S Sorzano CÓ, Ortego J, Saiz J-C, Esteban M, Martín-Acebes MA, García-Arriaza J. 2018. A vaccine based on a modified vaccinia virus Ankara vector expressing Zika virus structural proteins controls Zika virus replication in mice. Sci Rep 8:17385.
    35.
    Lazaro-Frias A, Gomez-Medina S, Sanchez-Sampedro L, Ljungberg K, Ustav M, Liljestrom P, Munoz-Fontela C, Esteban M, Garcia-Arriaza J. 2018. Distinct immunogenicity and efficacy of poxvirus-based vaccine candidates against Ebola virus expressing GP and VP40 proteins. J Virol 92:e00363-18.
    36.
    Hallengard D, Lum FM, Kummerer BM, Lulla A, Lulla V, Garcia-Arriaza J, Fazakerley JK, Roques P, Le Grand R, Merits A, Ng LF, Esteban M, Liljestrom P. 2014. Prime-boost immunization strategies against Chikungunya virus. J Virol 88:13333–13343.
    37.
    Ohlund P, Garcia-Arriaza J, Zusinaite E, Szurgot I, Mannik A, Kraus A, Ustav M, Merits A, Esteban M, Liljestrom P, Ljungberg K. 2018. DNA-launched RNA replicon vaccines induce potent anti-Ebolavirus immune responses that can be further improved by a recombinant MVA boost. Sci Rep 8:12459.
    38.
    Roques P, Ljungberg K, Kummerer BM, Gosse L, Dereuddre-Bosquet N, Tchitchek N, Hallengard D, Garcia-Arriaza J, Meinke A, Esteban M, Merits A, Le Grand R, Liljestrom P. 2017. Attenuated and vectored vaccines protect nonhuman primates against Chikungunya virus. JCI Insight 2:e83527.
    39.
    Pittman PR, Hahn M, Lee HS, Koca C, Samy N, Schmidt D, Hornung J, Weidenthaler H, Heery CR, Meyer TPH, Silbernagl G, Maclennan J, Chaplin P. 2019. Phase 3 efficacy trial of modified vaccinia Ankara as a vaccine against smallpox. N Engl J Med 381:1897–1908.
    40.
    Garcia-Arriaza J, Arnaez P, Gomez CE, Sorzano CO, Esteban M. 2013. Improving adaptive and memory immune responses of an HIV/AIDS vaccine candidate MVA-B by deletion of vaccinia virus genes (C6L and K7R) blocking interferon signaling pathways. PLoS One 8:e66894.
    41.
    Grifoni A, Weiskopf D, Ramirez SI, Mateus J, Dan JM, Moderbacher CR, Rawlings SA, Sutherland A, Premkumar L, Jadi RS, Marrama D, de Silva AM, Frazier A, Carlin AF, Greenbaum JA, Peters B, Krammer F, Smith DM, Crotty S, Sette A. 2020. Targets of T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus in humans with COVID-19 disease and unexposed individuals. Cell 181:1489–1501.e1415.
    42.
    Le Bert N, Tan AT, Kunasegaran K, Tham CYL, Hafezi M, Chia A, Chng MHY, Lin M, Tan N, Linster M, Chia WN, Chen MI, Wang LF, Ooi EE, Kalimuddin S, Tambyah PA, Low JG, Tan YJ, Bertoletti A. 2020. SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell immunity in cases of COVID-19 and SARS, and uninfected controls. Nature 584:457–462.
    43.
    Bachmann MF, Wolint P, Schwarz K, Jager P, Oxenius A. 2005. Functional properties and lineage relationship of CD8+ T cell subsets identified by expression of IL-7 receptor alpha and CD62L. J Immunol 175:4686–4696.
    44.
    Winkler ES, Bailey AL, Kafai NM, Nair S, McCune BT, Yu J, Fox JM, Chen RE, Earnest JT, Keeler SP, Ritter JH, Kang LI, Dort S, Robichaud A, Head R, Holtzman MJ, Diamond MS. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 infection of human ACE2-transgenic mice causes severe lung inflammation and impaired function. Nat Immunol 21:1327–1335.
    45.
    Zheng J, Wong LR, Li K, Verma AK, Ortiz M, Wohlford-Lenane C, Leidinger MR, Knudson CM, Meyerholz DK, McCray PB, Jr, Perlman S. 2020. COVID-19 treatments and pathogenesis including anosmia in K18-hACE2 mice. Nature doi:
    46.
    Panagioti E, Klenerman P, Lee LN, van der Burg SH, Arens R. 2018. Features of effective T cell-inducing vaccines against chronic viral infections. Front Immunol 9:276.
    47.
    Graham BS. 2020. Rapid COVID-19 vaccine development. Science 368:945–946.
    48.
    Asbach B, Kibler KV, Kostler J, Perdiguero B, Yates NL, Stanfield-Oakley S, Tomaras GD, Kao SF, Foulds KE, Roederer M, Seaman MS, Montefiori DC, Parks R, Ferrari G, Forthal DN, Phogat S, Tartaglia J, Barnett SW, Self SG, Gottardo R, Cristillo AD, Weiss DE, Galmin L, Ding S, Heeney JL, Esteban M, Jacobs BL, Pantaleo G, Wagner R. 2018. Priming with a potent HIV-1 DNA vaccine frames the quality of immune responses prior to a poxvirus and protein boost. J Virol 93:e01529-18.
    49.
    Amanat F, Stadlbauer D, Strohmeier S, Nguyen THO, Chromikova V, McMahon M, Jiang K, Arunkumar GA, Jurczyszak D, Polanco J, Bermudez-Gonzalez M, Kleiner G, Aydillo T, Miorin L, Fierer DS, Lugo LA, Kojic EM, Stoever J, Liu STH, Cunningham-Rundles C, Felgner PL, Moran T, Garcia-Sastre A, Caplivski D, Cheng AC, Kedzierska K, Vapalahti O, Hepojoki JM, Simon V, Krammer F. 2020. A serological assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion in humans. Nat Med 26:1033–1036.
    50.
    Xiang F, Wang X, He X, Peng Z, Yang B, Zhang J, Zhou Q, Ye H, Ma Y, Li H, Wei X, Cai P, Ma WL. 2020. Antibody detection and dynamic characteristics in patients with COVID-19. Clin Infect Dis doi:
    51.
    Manners C, Larios Bautista E, Sidoti H, Lopez OJ. 2020. Protective adaptive immunity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronaviruses 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and implications for vaccines. Cureus 12:e8399.
    52.
    Mayr A, Stickl H, Muller HK, Danner K, Singer H. 1978. The smallpox vaccination strain MVA: marker, genetic structure, experience gained with the parenteral vaccination and behavior in organisms with a debilitated defence mechanism (author's transl). Zentralbl Bakteriol B 167:375–390.
    53.
    Ramirez JC, Gherardi MM, Esteban M. 2000. Biology of attenuated modified vaccinia virus Ankara recombinant vector in mice: virus fate and activation of B- and T-cell immune responses in comparison with the Western Reserve strain and advantages as a vaccine. J Virol 74:923–933.
    54.
    Gomez CE, Perdiguero B, Cepeda MV, Mingorance L, Garcia-Arriaza J, Vandermeeren A, Sorzano CO, Esteban M. 2013. High, broad, polyfunctional, and durable T cell immune responses induced in mice by a novel hepatitis C virus (HCV) vaccine candidate (MVA-HCV) based on modified vaccinia virus Ankara expressing the nearly full-length HCV genome. J Virol 87:7282–7300.
    55.
    Gomez CE, Najera JL, Jimenez EP, Jimenez V, Wagner R, Graf M, Frachette MJ, Liljestrom P, Pantaleo G, Esteban M. 2007. Head-to-head comparison on the immunogenicity of two HIV/AIDS vaccine candidates based on the attenuated poxvirus strains MVA and NYVAC co-expressing in a single locus the HIV-1BX08 gp120 and HIV-1(IIIB) Gag-Pol-Nef proteins of clade B. Vaccine 25:2863–2885.
    56.
    Marin MQ, Perez P, Ljungberg K, Sorzano COS, Gomez CE, Liljestrom P, Esteban M, Garcia-Arriaza J. 2019. Potent anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) T cell immune responses induced in mice vaccinated with DNA-launched RNA replicons and modified vaccinia virus Ankara-HCV. J Virol 93:e00055-19.
    57.
    Garcia-Arriaza J, Gomez CE, Sorzano CO, Esteban M. 2014. Deletion of the vaccinia virus N2L gene encoding an inhibitor of IRF3 improves the immunogenicity of modified vaccinia virus Ankara expressing HIV-1 antigens. J Virol 88:3392–3410.
    58.
    Garcia-Arriaza J, Najera JL, Gomez CE, Sorzano CO, Esteban M. 2010. Immunogenic profiling in mice of a HIV/AIDS vaccine candidate (MVA-B) expressing four HIV-1 antigens and potentiation by specific gene deletions. PLoS One 5:e12395.
    59.
    Garcia-Arriaza J, Najera JL, Gomez CE, Tewabe N, Sorzano CO, Calandra T, Roger T, Esteban M. 2011. A candidate HIV/AIDS vaccine (MVA-B) lacking vaccinia virus gene C6L enhances memory HIV-1-specific T-cell responses. PLoS One 6:e24244.
    60.
    Perdiguero B, Gomez CE, Garcia-Arriaza J, Sanchez-Corzo C, Sorzano COS, Wilmschen S, von Laer D, Asbach B, Schmalzl C, Peterhoff D, Ding S, Wagner R, Kimpel J, Levy Y, Pantaleo G, Esteban M. 2019. Heterologous combination of VSV-GP and NYVAC vectors expressing HIV-1 trimeric gp145 Env as vaccination strategy to induce balanced B and T cell immune responses. Front Immunol 10:2941.
    61.
    Bartosch B, Dubuisson J, Cosset FL. 2003. Infectious hepatitis C virus pseudo-particles containing functional E1-E2 envelope protein complexes. J Exp Med 197:633–642.
    62.
    Corman VM, Landt O, Kaiser M, Molenkamp R, Meijer A, Chu DK, Bleicker T, Brunink S, Schneider J, Schmidt ML, Mulders DG, Haagmans BL, van der Veer B, van den Brink S, Wijsman L, Goderski G, Romette JL, Ellis J, Zambon M, Peiris M, Goossens H, Reusken C, Koopmans MP, Drosten C. 2020. Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Euro Surveill 25(3):2000045. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045.
    63.
    Gong EY, Smets A, Verheyen N, Clynhens M, Gustin E, Lory P, Kraus G. 2013. A duplex real-time RT-PCR assay for profiling inhibitors of four dengue serotypes. Methods Mol Biol 1030:195–203.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Journal of Virology
    Volume 95Number 710 March 2021
    eLocator: e02260-20
    Editor: Mark T. Heise
    University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

    History

    Received: 24 November 2020
    Accepted: 4 January 2021
    Published online: 7 January 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. SARS-CoV-2
    2. COVID-19
    3. MVA
    4. poxvirus
    5. vaccines
    6. S protein
    7. T cell responses
    8. neutralizing antibodies
    9. K18-hACE2 mice
    10. SARS-CoV-2 vaccine efficacy

    Contributors

    Authors

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain
    Urtzi Garaigorta
    Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain
    Patricia Pérez
    Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain
    Adrián Lázaro-Frías
    Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain
    Carmen Zamora
    Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain
    Pablo Gastaminza
    Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain
    Carlos del Fresno
    Laboratory of Immunobiology, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain
    José M. Casasnovas
    Department of Macromolecular Structures, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain
    Carlos Óscar S. Sorzano
    Biocomputing Unit, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain
    David Sancho
    Laboratory of Immunobiology, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain
    Mariano Esteban [email protected]
    Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain

    Editor

    Mark T. Heise
    Editor
    University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Journal of VirologyArticle
    CG dinucleotide removal in bioluminescent and fluorescent reporters improves HIV-1 replication and reporter gene expression for dual imaging in humanized mice

    CG dinucleotide removal in bioluminescent and fluorescent reporters improves HIV-1 replication and reporter gene expression for dual imaging in humanized mice

    Abstract

    Visualizing the transmission and dissemination of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) in real time in humanized mouse models is a robust tool to investigate viral replication during treatments and in tissue reservoirs. However, the stability and expression of HIV-1 reporter genes are obstacles for long-term serial imaging in vivo. Two replication-competent CCR5-tropic HIV-1 reporter constructs were created that encode either nanoluciferase (nLuc) or a near-infrared fluorescent protein (iRFP) upstream of nef. HIV-1 reporter virus replication and reporter gene expression was measured in cell culture and in humanized mice. While reporter gene expression in vivo correlated initially with plasma viremia, expression decreased after 4-5 weeks despite high plasma viremia. The reporter genes were codon-optimized to remove cytosine/guanine (CG) dinucleotides and new CO-nLuc and CO-iRFP viruses were reconstructed. Removal of CG dinucleotides in HIV-1 reporter viruses improved replication in vitro and reporter expression in vivo and ex vivo. Both codon optimized reporter viruses could be visualized during co-infection and in vivo reporter gene expression during treatment failure preceded detection of plasma viremia. While the dynamic range of CO-iRFP HIV-1 was lower than that of CO-nLuc HIV-1, both viruses could have utility in studying and visualizing HIV-1 infection in humanized mice.
    Importance
    Animal models are important for studying HIV-1 pathogenesis and treatments. We developed two viruses each encoding a reporter gene that can be expressed in cells after infection. This study shows that HIV-1 infection can be visualized by noninvasive, whole body imaging in mice with human immune cells over time by reporter expression. We improved reporter expression to reflect HIV-1 replication and showed that two viral variants can be tracked over time in the same animal and can predict failure of antiretroviral therapy to suppress virus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Journal of Virology
    Preprint7 July 2021
    eLocator: JVI.00449-21

    History

    Published online: 7 July 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Contributors

    Authors

    Chandra N. Roy
    Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
    Mariana A. Benitez Moreno
    Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
    Chris Kline
    Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
    Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
    Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Journal of VirologyArticle
    Receptor Recognition by the Novel Coronavirus from Wuhan: an Analysis Based on Decade-Long Structural Studies of SARS Coronavirus

    Receptor Recognition by the Novel Coronavirus from Wuhan: an Analysis Based on Decade-Long Structural Studies of SARS Coronavirus

    ABSTRACT

    Recently, a novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) has emerged from Wuhan, China, causing symptoms in humans similar to those caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV). Since the SARS-CoV outbreak in 2002, extensive structural analyses have revealed key atomic-level interactions between the SARS-CoV spike protein receptor-binding domain (RBD) and its host receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), which regulate both the cross-species and human-to-human transmissions of SARS-CoV. Here, we analyzed the potential receptor usage by 2019-nCoV, based on the rich knowledge about SARS-CoV and the newly released sequence of 2019-nCoV. First, the sequence of 2019-nCoV RBD, including its receptor-binding motif (RBM) that directly contacts ACE2, is similar to that of SARS-CoV, strongly suggesting that 2019-nCoV uses ACE2 as its receptor. Second, several critical residues in 2019-nCoV RBM (particularly Gln493) provide favorable interactions with human ACE2, consistent with 2019-nCoV’s capacity for human cell infection. Third, several other critical residues in 2019-nCoV RBM (particularly Asn501) are compatible with, but not ideal for, binding human ACE2, suggesting that 2019-nCoV has acquired some capacity for human-to-human transmission. Last, while phylogenetic analysis indicates a bat origin of 2019-nCoV, 2019-nCoV also potentially recognizes ACE2 from a diversity of animal species (except mice and rats), implicating these animal species as possible intermediate hosts or animal models for 2019-nCoV infections. These analyses provide insights into the receptor usage, cell entry, host cell infectivity and animal origin of 2019-nCoV and may help epidemic surveillance and preventive measures against 2019-nCoV.
    IMPORTANCE The recent emergence of Wuhan coronavirus (2019-nCoV) puts the world on alert. 2019-nCoV is reminiscent of the SARS-CoV outbreak in 2002 to 2003. Our decade-long structural studies on the receptor recognition by SARS-CoV have identified key interactions between SARS-CoV spike protein and its host receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), which regulate both the cross-species and human-to-human transmissions of SARS-CoV. One of the goals of SARS-CoV research was to build an atomic-level iterative framework of virus-receptor interactions to facilitate epidemic surveillance, predict species-specific receptor usage, and identify potential animal hosts and animal models of viruses. Based on the sequence of 2019-nCoV spike protein, we apply this predictive framework to provide novel insights into the receptor usage and likely host range of 2019-nCoV. This study provides a robust test of this reiterative framework, providing the basic, translational, and public health research communities with predictive insights that may help study and battle this novel 2019-nCoV.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Lee N, Hui D, Wu A, Chan P, Cameron P, Joynt GM, Ahuja A, Yung MY, Leung CB, To KF, Lui SF, Szeto CC, Chung S, Sung J. 2003. A major outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. N Engl J Med 348:1986–1994.
    2.
    Yu ITS, Li YG, Wong TW, Tam W, Chan AT, Lee JHW, Leung DYC, Ho T. 2004. Evidence of airborne transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome virus. N Engl J Med 350:1731–1739.
    3.
    Marra MA, Jones SJM, Astell CR, Holt RA, Brooks-Wilson A, Butterfield YSN, Khattra J, Asano JK, Barber SA, Chan SY, Cloutier A, Coughlin SM, Freeman D, Girn N, Griffith OL, Leach SR, Mayo M, McDonald H, Montgomery SB, Pandoh PK, Petrescu AS, Robertson AG, Schein JE, Siddiqui A, Smailus DE, Stott JM, Yang GS, Plummer F, Andonov A, Artsob H, Bastien N, Bernard K, Booth TF, Bowness D, Czub M, Drebot M, Fernando L, Flick R, Garbutt M, Gray M, Grolla A, Jones S, Feldmann H, Meyers A, Kabani A, Li Y, Normand S, Stroher U, Tipples GA, Tyler S, Vogrig R, Ward D, Watson B, Brunham RC, Krajden M, Petric M, Skowronski DM, Upton C, Roper RL. 2003. The genome sequence of the SARS-associated coronavirus. Science 300:1399–1404.
    4.
    Peiris JSM, SARS Study Group, Lai ST, Poon LLM, Guan Y, Yam LYC, Lim W, Nicholls J, Yee WKS, Yan WW, Cheung MT, Cheng VCC, Chan KH, Tsang DNC, Yung RWH, Ng TK, Yuen KY. 2003. Coronavirus as a possible cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Lancet 361:1319–1325.
    5.
    Guan Y, Zheng BJ, He YQ, Liu XL, Zhuang ZX, Cheung CL, Luo SW, Li PH, Zhang LJ, Guan YJ, Butt KM, Wong KL, Chan KW, Lim W, Shortridge KF, Yuen KY, Peiris JSM, Poon L. 2003. Isolation and characterization of viruses related to the SARS coronavirus from animals in Southern China. Science 302:276–278.
    6.
    Liang GD, SARS Diagnosis Working Group, Chen QX, Xu JG, Liu YF, Lim W, Peiris JSM, Anderson LJ, Ruan L, Li H, Kan B, Di B, Cheng P, Chan KH, Erdman DD, Gu SY, Yan XG, Liang WL, Zhou DH, Haynes L, Duan SM, Zhang X, Zheng H, Gao Y, Tong SX, Li DX, Fang L, Qin PZ, Xu WB. 2004. Laboratory diagnosis of four recent sporadic cases of community-acquired SARS, Guangdong Province, China. Emerg Infect Dis 10:1774–1781.
    7.
    Song H-D, Tu C-C, Zhang G-W, Wang S-Y, Zheng K, Lei L-C, Chen Q-X, Gao Y-W, Zhou H-Q, Xiang H, Zheng H-J, Chern S-WW, Cheng F, Pan C-M, Xuan H, Chen S-J, Luo H-M, Zhou D-H, Liu Y-F, He J-F, Qin P-Z, Li L-H, Ren Y-Q, Liang W-J, Yu Y-D, Anderson L, Wang M, Xu R-H, Wu X-W, Zheng H-Y, Chen J-D, Liang G, Gao Y, Liao M, Fang L, Jiang L-Y, Li H, Chen F, Di B, He L-J, Lin J-Y, Tong S, Kong X, Du L, Hao P, Tang H, Bernini A, Yu X-J, Spiga O, Guo Z-M, Pan H-Y, He W-Z, Manuguerra J-C, Fontanet A, Danchin A, Niccolai N, Li Y-X, Wu C-I, Zhao G-P. 2005. Cross-host evolution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus in palm civet and human. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:2430–2435.
    8.
    Sheahan T, Rockx B, Donaldson E, Sims A, Pickles R, Corti D, Baric R. 2008. Mechanisms of zoonotic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus host range expansion in human airway epithelium. J Virol 82:2274–2285.
    9.
    Liu L, Fang Q, Deng F, Wang HZ, Yi CE, Ba L, Yu WJ, Lin RD, Li TS, Hu ZH, Ho DD, Zhang LQ, Chen ZW. 2007. Natural mutations in the receptor binding domain of spike glycoprotein determine the reactivity of cross-neutralization between palm civet coronavirus and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J Virol 81:4694–4700.
    10.
    Hu B, Zeng LP, Yang XL, Ge XY, Zhang W, Li B, Xie JZ, Shen XR, Zhang YZ, Wang N, Luo DS, Zheng XS, Wang MN, Daszak P, Wang LF, Cui J, Shi ZL. 2017. Discovery of a rich gene pool of bat SARS-related coronaviruses provides new insights into the origin of SARS coronavirus. PLoS Pathog 13:e1006698.
    11.
    Ge XY, Li JL, Yang XL, Chmura AA, Zhu G, Epstein JH, Mazet JK, Hu B, Zhang W, Peng C, Zhang YJ, Luo CM, Tan B, Wang N, Zhu Y, Crameri G, Zhang SY, Wang LF, Daszak P, Shi ZL. 2013. Isolation and characterization of a bat SARS-like coronavirus that uses the ACE2 receptor. Nature 503:535–538.
    12.
    Cui J, Li F, Shi ZL. 2019. Origin and evolution of pathogenic coronaviruses. Nat Rev Microbiol 17:181–192.
    13.
    Li F. 2013. Receptor recognition and cross-species infections of SARS coronavirus. Antiviral Res 100:246–254.
    14.
    Li WH, Wong SK, Li F, Kuhn JH, Huang IC, Choe H, Farzan M. 2006. Animal origins of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus: insight from ACE2-S-protein interactions. J Virol 80:4211–4219.
    15.
    Perlman S, Netland J. 2009. Coronaviruses post-SARS: update on replication and pathogenesis. Nat Rev Microbiol 7:439–450.
    16.
    Li F. 2016. Structure, function, and evolution of coronavirus spike proteins. Annu Rev Virol 3:237–261.
    17.
    Li WH, Moore MJ, Vasilieva N, Sui JH, Wong SK, Berne MA, Somasundaran M, Sullivan JL, Luzuriaga K, Greenough TC, Choe H, Farzan M. 2003. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is a functional receptor for the SARS coronavirus. Nature 426:450–454.
    18.
    Li F. 2015. Receptor recognition mechanisms of coronaviruses: a decade of structural studies. J Virol 89:1954–1964.
    19.
    Li WH, Greenough TC, Moore MJ, Vasilieva N, Somasundaran M, Sullivan JL, Farzan M, Choe H. 2004. Efficient replication of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus in mouse cells is limited by murine angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. J Virol 78:11429–11433.
    20.
    Li WH, Zhang CS, Sui JH, Kuhn JH, Moore MJ, Luo SW, Wong SK, Huang IC, Xu KM, Vasilieva N, Murakami A, He YQ, Marasco WA, Guan Y, Choe HY, Farzan M. 2005. Receptor and viral determinants of SARS-coronavirus adaptation to human ACE2. EMBO J 24:1634–1643.
    21.
    McCray PB, Pewe L, Wohlford-Lenane C, Hickey M, Manzel L, Shi L, Netland J, Jia HP, Halabi C, Sigmund CD, Meyerholz DK, Kirby P, Look DC, Perlman S. 2007. Lethal infection of K18-hACE2 mice infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J Virol 81:813–821.
    22.
    Moore MJ, Dorfman T, Li WH, Wong SK, Li YH, Kuhn JH, Coderre J, Vasilieva N, Han ZC, Greenough TC, Farzan M, Choe H. 2004. Retroviruses pseudotyped with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein efficiently infect cells expressing angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. J Virol 78:10628–10635.
    23.
    Qu XX, Hao P, Song XJ, Jiang SM, Liu YX, Wang PG, Rao X, Song HD, Wang SY, Zuo Y, Zheng AH, Luo M, Wang HL, Deng F, Wang HZ, Hu ZH, Ding MX, Zhao GP, Deng HK. 2005. Identification of two critical amino acid residues of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein for its variation in zoonotic tropism transition via a double substitution strategy. J Biol Chem 280:29588–29595.
    24.
    Li F. 2008. Structural analysis of major species barriers between humans and palm civets for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infections. J Virol 82:6984–6991.
    25.
    Li F, Li WH, Farzan M, Harrison SC. 2005. Structure of SARS coronavirus spike receptor-binding domain complexed with receptor. Science 309:1864–1868.
    26.
    Wu KL, Peng GQ, Wilken M, Geraghty RJ, Li F. 2012. Mechanisms of host receptor adaptation by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J Biol Chem 287:8904–8911.
    27.
    Yang Y, Du L, Liu C, Wang L, Ma C, Tang J, Baric RS, Jiang S, Li F. 2014. Receptor usage and cell entry of bat coronavirus HKU4 provide insight into bat-to-human transmission of MERS coronavirus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:12516–12521.
    28.
    Raj VS, Mou HH, Smits SL, Dekkers DHW, Muller MA, Dijkman R, Muth D, Demmers JAA, Zaki A, Fouchier RAM, Thiel V, Drosten C, Rottier PJM, Osterhaus A, Bosch BJ, Haagmans BL. 2013. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 is a functional receptor for the emerging human coronavirus-EMC. Nature 495:251–254.
    29.
    Hou YX, Peng C, Yu M, Li Y, Han ZG, Li F, Wang LF, Shi ZL. 2010. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) proteins of different bat species confer variable susceptibility to SARS-CoV entry. Arch Virol 155:1563–1569.
    30.
    Letko M, Munster V. 2020. Functional assessment of cell entry and receptor usage for lineage B β-coronaviruses, including 2019-nCoV. bioRxiv.
    31.
    Zhou P, Yang X-L, Wang X-G, Hu B, Zhang L, Zhang W, Si H-R, Zhu Y, Li B, Huang C-L, Chen H-D, Chen J, Luo Y, Guo H, Jiang R-D, Liu M-Q, Chen Y, Shen X-R, Wang X, Zheng X-S, Zhao K, Chen Q-J, Deng F, Liu L-L, Yan B, Zhan F-X, Wang Y-Y, Xiao G-F, Shi Z-L. 3 February 2020. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature doi:
    32.
    Emsley P, Cowtan K. 2004. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 60:2126–2132.
    33.
    Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, Li W, Lopez R, McWilliam H, Remmert M, Soding J, Thompson JD, Higgins DG. 2011. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol 7:539.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Journal of Virology
    Volume 94Number 717 March 2020
    eLocator: e00127-20
    Editor: Tom Gallagher
    Loyola University Chicago

    History

    Received: 22 January 2020
    Accepted: 28 January 2020
    Published online: 29 January 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. 2019-nCoV
    2. SARS coronavirus
    3. angiotensin-converting enzyme 2
    4. animal reservoir
    5. cross-species transmission
    6. human-to-human transmission

    Contributors

    Authors

    Yushun Wan
    Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA
    Jian Shang
    Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA
    Rachel Graham
    Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
    Ralph S. Baric
    Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
    Fang Li
    Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA

    Editor

    Tom Gallagher
    Editor
    Loyola University Chicago

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Fang Li, [email protected].
    Yushun Wan and Jian Shang contributed equally to this work. Author order was determined by the time to join the project.

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Journal of VirologyArticle
    Immunization with Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara-Based Recombinant Vaccine against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Is Associated with Enhanced Hepatitis in Ferrets

    Immunization with Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara-Based Recombinant Vaccine against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Is Associated with Enhanced Hepatitis in Ferrets

    ABSTRACT

    Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) caused by a newly identified coronavirus (SARS-CoV) is a serious emerging human infectious disease. In this report, we immunized ferrets (Mustela putorius furo) with recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara (rMVA) expressing the SARS-CoV spike (S) protein. Immunized ferrets developed a more rapid and vigorous neutralizing antibody response than control animals after challenge with SARS-CoV; however, they also exhibited strong inflammatory responses in liver tissue. Inflammation in control animals exposed to SARS-CoV was relatively mild. Thus, our data suggest that vaccination with rMVA expressing SARS-CoV S protein is associated with enhanced hepatitis.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Berry, J. D., S. Jones, M. A. Drebot, A. Andonov, M. Sabara, X. Y. Yuan, H. Weingartl, L. Fernando, P. Marszal, J. Gren, B. Nicolas, M. Andonova, F. Ranada, M. J. Gubbins, T. B. Ball, P. Kitching, Y. Li, A. Kabani, and F. Plummer.2004. Development and characterisation of neutralising monoclonal antibody to the SARS-coronavirus. J. Virol. Methods120:87-96.
    1a.
    Bisht, H., A. Roberts, L. Vogel, A. Bukreyev, P. L. Collins, B. R. Murphy, K. Subbarao, and B. Moss.2004. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein expressed by attenuated vaccinia virus protectively immunizes mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA101:6641-6646.
    2.
    Chakrabarti, S., J. R. Sisler, and B. Moss.1997. Compact, synthetic, vaccinia virus early/late promoter for protein expression. BioTechniques23:1094-1097.
    3.
    Chau, T. N., K. C. Lee, H. Yao, T. Y. Tsang, T. C. Chow, Y. C. Yeung, K. W. Choi, Y. K. Tso, T. Lau, S. T. Lai, and C. L. Lai.2004. SARS-associated viral hepatitis caused by a novel coronavirus: report of three cases. Hepatology39:302-310.
    4.
    Collins, A. R., R. L. Knobler, H. Powell, and M. J. Buchmeier.1982. Monoclonal antibodies to murine hepatitis virus-4 (strain JHM) define the viral glycoprotein responsible for attachment and cell-cell fusion. Virology119:358-371.
    5.
    Falkner, F. G., and B. Moss.1988. Escherichia coli gpt gene provides dominant selection for vaccinia virus open reading frame expression vectors. J. Virol.62:1849-1854.
    6.
    Fleming, J. O., S. A. Stohlman, R. C. Harmon, M. M. Lai, J. A. Frelinger, and L. P. Weiner.1983. Antigenic relationships of murine coronaviruses: analysis using monoclonal antibodies to JHM (MHV-4) virus. Virology131:296-307.
    7.
    Gao, W., A. Tamin, A. Soloff, L. D'Aiuto, E. Nwanegbo, P. D. Robbins, W. J. Bellini, S. Barratt-Boyes, and A. Gambotto.2003. Effects of a SARS-associated coronavirus vaccine in monkeys. Lancet362:1895-1896.
    8.
    Marra, M. A., S. J. Jones, C. R. Astell, R. A. Holt, A. Brooks-Wilson, Y. S. Butterfield, J. Khattra, J. K. Asano, S. A. Barber, S. Y. Chan, A. Cloutier, S. M. Coughlin, D. Freeman, N. Girn, O. L. Griffith, S. R. Leach, M. Mayo, H. McDonald, S. B. Montgomery, P. K. Pandoh, A. S. Petrescu, A. G. Robertson, J. E. Schein, A. Siddiqui, D. E. Smailus, J. M. Stott, G. S. Yang, F. Plummer, A. Andonov, H. Artsob, N. Bastien, K. Bernard, T. F. Booth, D. Bowness, M. Czub, M. Drebot, L. Fernando, R. Flick, M. Garbutt, M. Gray, A. Grolla, S. Jones, H. Feldmann, A. Meyers, A. Kabani, Y. Li, S. Normand, U. Stroher, G. A. Tipples, S. Tyler, R. Vogrig, D. Ward, B. Watson, R. C. Brunham, M. Krajden, M. Petric, D. M. Skowronski, C. Upton, and R. L. Roper.2003. The genome sequence of the SARS-associated coronavirus. Science300:1399-1404.
    9.
    Marshall, E., and M. Enserink.2004. Medicine. Caution urged on SARS vaccines. Science303:944-946.
    10.
    Martina, B. E., B. L. Haagmans, T. Kuiken, R. A. Fouchier, G. F. Rimmelzwaan, G. Van Amerongen, J. S. Peiris, W. Lim, and A. D. Osterhaus.2003. Virology: SARS virus infection of cats and ferrets. Nature425:915.
    11.
    Moss, B.1996. Genetically engineered poxviruses for recombinant gene expression, vaccination, and safety. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA93:11341-11348.
    12.
    Olsen, C. W.1993. A review of feline infectious peritonitis virus: molecular biology, immunopathogenesis, clinical aspects, and vaccination. Vet. Microbiol.36:1-37.
    13.
    Pedersen, N. C., and J. W. Black.1983. Attempted immunization of cats against feline infectious peritonitis, using avirulent live virus or sublethal amounts of virulent virus. Am. J. Vet. Res.44:229-234.
    14.
    Rota, P. A., M. S. Oberste, S. S. Monroe, W. A. Nix, R. Campagnoli, J. P. Icenogle, S. Penaranda, B. Bankamp, K. Maher, M. H. Chen, S. Tong, A. Tamin, L. Lowe, M. Frace, J. L. DeRisi, Q. Chen, D. Wang, D. D. Erdman, T. C. Peret, C. Burns, T. G. Ksiazek, P. E. Rollin, A. Sanchez, S. Liffick, B. Holloway, J. Limor, K. McCaustland, M. Olsen-Rasmussen, R. Fouchier, S. Gunther, A. D. Osterhaus, C. Drosten, M. A. Pallansch, L. J. Anderson, and W. J. Bellini.2003. Characterization of a novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. Science300:1394-1399.
    15.
    Subbarao, K., J. McAuliffe, L. Vogel, G. Fahle, S. Fischer, K. Tatti, M. Packard, W. J. Shieh, S. Zaki, and B. Murphy.2004. Prior infection and passive transfer of neutralizing antibody prevent replication of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus in the respiratory tract of mice. J. Virol.78:3572-3577.
    16.
    Vennema, H., R. J. de Groot, D. A. Harbour, M. Dalderup, T. Gruffydd-Jones, M. C. Horzinek, and W. J. Spaan.1990. Early death after feline infectious peritonitis virus challenge due to recombinant vaccinia virus immunization. J. Virol.64:1407-1409.
    17.
    Weingartl, H. M., J. Copps, M. A. Drebot, P. Marszal, G. Smith, J. Gren, M. Andova, J. Pasick, P. Kitching, and M. Czub.2004. Susceptibility of pigs and chickens to SARS coronavirus. Emerg. Infect. Dis.10:179-184.
    18.
    Weiss, R. C., and F. W. Scott.1981. Antibody-mediated enhancement of disease in feline infectious peritonitis: comparisons with dengue hemorrhagic fever. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.4:175-189.
    19.
    Yang, Z. Y., W. P. Kong, Y. Huang, A. Roberts, B. R. Murphy, K. Subbarao, and G. J. Nabel.2004. A DNA vaccine induces SARS coronavirus neutralization and protective immunity in mice. Nature428:561-564.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Journal of Virology
    Volume 78Number 2215 November 2004
    Pages: 12672 - 12676

    History

    Received: 29 April 2004
    Accepted: 29 July 2004

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Contributors

    Authors

    Hana Weingartl
    National Centre for Foreign Animal Diseases
    Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2
    Markus Czub
    National Microbiology Laboratory, Canadian Science Centre for Human and Animal Health, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3E 3R2
    Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2
    Stefanie Czub
    National Centre for Foreign Animal Diseases
    Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2
    James Neufeld
    National Centre for Foreign Animal Diseases
    Peter Marszal
    National Centre for Foreign Animal Diseases
    Jason Gren
    National Centre for Foreign Animal Diseases
    Greg Smith
    National Centre for Foreign Animal Diseases
    Shane Jones
    National Microbiology Laboratory, Canadian Science Centre for Human and Animal Health, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3E 3R2
    Roxanne Proulx
    National Microbiology Laboratory, Canadian Science Centre for Human and Animal Health, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3E 3R2
    Yvonne Deschambault
    National Microbiology Laboratory, Canadian Science Centre for Human and Animal Health, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3E 3R2
    Elsie Grudeski
    National Microbiology Laboratory, Canadian Science Centre for Human and Animal Health, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3E 3R2
    Anton Andonov
    National Microbiology Laboratory, Canadian Science Centre for Human and Animal Health, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3E 3R2
    Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2
    Runtao He
    National Microbiology Laboratory, Canadian Science Centre for Human and Animal Health, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3E 3R2
    Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2
    Yan Li
    National Microbiology Laboratory, Canadian Science Centre for Human and Animal Health, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3E 3R2
    Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2
    John Copps
    National Centre for Foreign Animal Diseases
    Allen Grolla
    National Microbiology Laboratory, Canadian Science Centre for Human and Animal Health, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3E 3R2
    Daryl Dick
    National Microbiology Laboratory, Canadian Science Centre for Human and Animal Health, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3E 3R2
    Jody Berry
    National Centre for Foreign Animal Diseases
    Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2
    Shelley Ganske
    National Centre for Foreign Animal Diseases
    Lisa Manning
    National Centre for Foreign Animal Diseases
    Jingxin Cao [email protected]
    National Microbiology Laboratory, Canadian Science Centre for Human and Animal Health, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3E 3R2
    Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Journal of VirologyArticle
    Complexities of Viral Mutation Rates

    ABSTRACT

    Many viruses evolve rapidly. This is due, in part, to their high mutation rates. Mutation rate estimates for over 25 viruses are currently available. Here, we review the population genetics of virus mutation rates. We specifically cover the topics of mutation rate estimation, the forces that drive the evolution of mutation rates, and how the optimal mutation rate can be context-dependent.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Orr HA. 2000. The rate of adaptation in asexuals. Genetics 155:961–968.
    2.
    Duffy S, Shackelton LA, Holmes EC. 2008. Rates of evolutionary change in viruses: patterns and determinants. Nat Rev Genet 9:267–276.
    3.
    Sanjuan R. 2012. From molecular genetics to phylodynamics: evolutionary relevance of mutation rates across viruses. PLoS Pathog 8:e1002685.
    4.
    Peck KM, Chan CH, Tanaka MM. 2015. Connecting within-host dynamics to the rate of viral molecular evolution. Virus Evol 1:vev013.
    5.
    Sanjuan R, Domingo-Calap P. 2016. Mechanisms of viral mutation. Cell Mol Life Sci 73:4433–4448.
    6.
    Lynch M, Ackerman MS, Gout JF, Long H, Sung W, Thomas WK, Foster PL. 2016. Genetic drift, selection and the evolution of the mutation rate. Nat Rev Genet 17:704–714.
    7.
    Gorbalenya AE, Enjuanes L, Ziebuhr J, Snijder EJ. 2006. Nidovirales: evolving the largest RNA virus genome. Virus Res 117:17–37.
    8.
    Hicks AL, Duffy S. 2014. Cell tropism predicts long-term nucleotide substitution rates of mammalian RNA viruses. PLoS Pathog 10:e1003838.
    9.
    Perales C, Martin V, Domingo E. 2011. Lethal mutagenesis of viruses. Curr Opin Virol 1:419–422.
    10.
    Ferrer-Orta C, Arias A, Escarmis C, Verdaguer N. 2006. A comparison of viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerases. Curr Opin Struct Biol 16:27–34.
    11.
    Campagnola G, McDonald S, Beaucourt S, Vignuzzi M, Peersen OB. 2015. Structure-function relationships underlying the replication fidelity of viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerases. J Virol 89:275–286.
    12.
    Venkataraman S, Prasad B, Selvarajan R. 2018. RNA dependent RNA polymerases: insights from structure, function and evolution. Viruses 10:E76.
    13.
    Domingo-Calap P, Cuevas JM, Sanjuan R. 2009. The fitness effects of random mutations in single-stranded DNA and RNA bacteriophages. PLoS Genet 5:e1000742.
    14.
    Sanjuan R. 2010. Mutational fitness effects in RNA and single-stranded DNA viruses: common patterns revealed by site-directed mutagenesis studies. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 365:1975–1982.
    15.
    Cuevas JM, Domingo-Calap P, Sanjuan R. 2012. The fitness effects of synonymous mutations in DNA and RNA viruses. Mol Biol Evol 29:17–20.
    16.
    Visher E, Whitefield SE, McCrone JT, Fitzsimmons W, Lauring AS. 2016. The mutational robustness of influenza A virus. PLoS Pathog 12:e1005856.
    17.
    Jenkins GM, Rambaut A, Pybus OG, Holmes EC. 2002. Rates of molecular evolution in RNA viruses: a quantitative phylogenetic analysis. J Mol Evol 54:156–165.
    18.
    Belshaw R, Gardner A, Rambaut A, Pybus OG. 2008. Pacing a small cage: mutation and RNA viruses. Trends Ecol Evol 23:188–193.
    19.
    Sanjuan R, Nebot MR, Chirico N, Mansky LM, Belshaw R. 2010. Viral mutation rates. J Virol 84:9733–9748.
    20.
    Pauly MD, Procario MC, Lauring AS. 2017. A novel twelve class fluctuation test reveals higher than expected mutation rates for influenza A viruses. Elife 6:e26437.
    21.
    Acevedo A, Andino R. 2014. Library preparation for highly accurate population sequencing of RNA viruses. Nat Protoc 9:1760–1769.
    22.
    Luria SE, Delbruck M. 1943. Mutations of bacteria from virus sensitivity to virus resistance. Genetics 28:491–511.
    23.
    Dulin D, Arnold JJ, van Laar T, Oh H, Lee C, Perkins AL, Harki DA, Depken M, Cameron CE, Dekker NH. 2017. Signatures of nucleotide analog incorporation by an RNA-depenent RNA polymerase revealed using high-throughput magnetic tweezers. Cell Rep 21:1063–1076.
    24.
    Mansky LM, Cunningham KS. 2000. Virus mutators and antimutators: roles in evolution, pathogenesis and emergence. Trends Genet 16:512–517.
    25.
    Pfeiffer JK, Kirkegaard K. 2005. Increased fidelity reduces poliovirus fitness and virulence under selective pressure in mice. PLoS Pathog 1:e11.
    26.
    Graham RL, Becker MM, Eckerle LD, Bolles M, Denison MR, Baric RS. 2012. A live, impaired-fidelity coronavirus vaccine protects in an aged, immunocompromised mouse model of lethal disease. Nat Med 18:1820–1826.
    27.
    Li C, Wang H, Yuan T, Woodman A, Yang D, Zhou G, Cameron CE, Yu L. 2018. Foot-and-mouth disease virus type O specific mutations determine RNA-dependent RNA polymerase fidelity and virus attenuation. Virology 518:87–94.
    28.
    Taddei F, Radman M, Maynard-Smith J, Toupance B, Gouyon PH, Godelle B. 1997. Role of mutator alleles in adaptive evolution. Nature 387:700–702.
    29.
    Travis JM, Travis ER. 2002. Mutator dynamics in fluctuating environments. Proc Biol Sci 269:591–597.
    30.
    Sniegowski PD, Gerrish PJ, Lenski RE. 1997. Evolution of high mutation rates in experimental populations of E. coli. Nature 387:703–705.
    31.
    Bedford T, Cobey S, Pascual M. 2011. Strength and tempo of selection revealed in viral gene genealogies. BMC Evol Biol 11:220.
    32.
    Kimura M. 1967. On the evolutionary adjustment of spontaneous mutation rates. Genet Res 9:23–34.
    33.
    Kamp C, Wilke CO, Adami C, Bornholdt S. 2002. Viral evolution under the pressure of an adaptive immune system: optimal mutation rates for viral escape. Complexity 8:28–33.
    34.
    Sniegowski PD, Gerrish PJ, Johnson T, Shaver A. 2000. The evolution of mutation rates: separating causes from consequences. Bioessays 22:1057–1066.
    35.
    Tanaka MM, Bergstrom CT, Levin BR. 2003. The evolution of mutator genes in bacterial populations: the roles of environmental change and timing. Genetics 164:843–854.
    36.
    Elena SF, Sanjuan R. 2005. Adaptive value of high mutation rates of RNA viruses: separating causes from consequences. J Virol 79:11555–11558.
    37.
    Furio V, Moya A, Sanjuan R. 2005. The cost of replication fidelity in an RNA virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:10233–10237.
    38.
    Regoes RR, Hamblin S, Tanaka MM. 2013. Viral mutation rates: modelling the roles of within-host viral dynamics and the trade-off between replication fidelity and speed. Proc Biol Sci 280:20122047.
    39.
    Hopfield JJ. 1974. Kinetic proofreading: a new mechanism for reducing errors in biosynthetic processes requiring high specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 71:4135–4139.
    40.
    Gerrish PJ, Colato A, Perelson AS, Sniegowski PD. 2007. Complete genetic linkage can subvert natural selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:6266–6271.
    41.
    Tenaillon O, Toupance B, Le Nagard H, Taddei F, Godelle B. 1999. Mutators, population size, adaptive landscape and the adaptation of asexual populations of bacteria. Genetics 152:485–493.
    42.
    Risso-Ballester J, Cuevas JM, Sanjuan R. 2016. Genome-wide estimation of the spontaneous mutation rate of human adenovirus 5 by high-fidelity deep sequencing. PLoS Pathog 12:e1006013.
    43.
    Geller R, Domingo-Calap P, Cuevas JM, Rossolillo P, Negroni M, Sanjuan R. 2015. The external domains of the HIV-1 envelope are a mutational cold spot. Nat Commun 6:8571.
    44.
    Loh E, Salk JJ, Loeb LA. 2010. Optimization of DNA polymerase mutation rates during bacterial evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:1154–1159.
    45.
    Clune J, Misevic D, Ofria C, Lenski RE, Elena SF, Sanjuan R. 2008. Natural selection fails to optimize mutation rates for long-term adaptation on rugged fitness landscapes. PLoS Comput Biol 4:e1000187.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Journal of Virology
    Volume 92Number 1415 July 2018
    eLocator: e01031-17
    Editor: Christopher S. Sullivan
    University of Texas at Austin

    History

    Published online: 2 May 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. virus evolution
    2. viral mutation rates
    3. mutation rate evolution
    4. polymerase fidelity
    5. polymerase

    Contributors

    Authors

    Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
    Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

    Editor

    Christopher S. Sullivan
    Editor
    University of Texas at Austin

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Adam S. Lauring, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Journal of VirologyArticle
    Host-Virus Chimeric Events in SARS-CoV-2-Infected Cells Are Infrequent and Artifactual

    ABSTRACT

    The pathogenic mechanisms underlying severe SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) infection remain largely unelucidated. High-throughput sequencing technologies that capture genome and transcriptome information are key approaches to gain detailed mechanistic insights from infected cells. These techniques readily detect both pathogen- and host-derived sequences, providing a means of studying host-pathogen interactions. Recent studies have reported the presence of host-virus chimeric (HVC) RNA in transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) data from SARS-CoV-2-infected cells and interpreted these findings as evidence of viral integration in the human genome as a potential pathogenic mechanism. Since SARS-CoV-2 is a positive-sense RNA virus that replicates in the cytoplasm, it does not have a nuclear phase in its life cycle. Thus, it is biologically unlikely to be in a location where splicing events could result in genome integration. Therefore, we investigated the biological authenticity of HVC events. In contrast to true biological events like mRNA splicing and genome rearrangement events, which generate reproducible chimeric sequencing fragments across different biological isolates, we found that HVC events across >100 RNA-seq libraries from patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and infected cell lines were highly irreproducible. RNA-seq library preparation is inherently error prone due to random template switching during reverse transcription of RNA to cDNA. By counting chimeric events observed when constructing an RNA-seq library from human RNA and spiked-in RNA from an unrelated species, such as the fruit fly, we estimated that ∼1% of RNA-seq reads are artifactually chimeric. In SARS-CoV-2 RNA-seq, we found that the frequency of HVC events was, in fact, not greater than this background “noise.” Finally, we developed a novel experimental approach to enrich SARS-CoV-2 sequences from bulk RNA of infected cells. This method enriched viral sequences but did not enrich HVC events, suggesting that the majority of HVC events are, in all likelihood, artifacts of library construction. In conclusion, our findings indicate that HVC events observed in RNA-sequencing libraries from SARS-CoV-2-infected cells are extremely rare and are likely artifacts arising from random template switching of reverse transcriptase and/or sequence alignment errors. Therefore, the observed HVC events do not support SARS-CoV-2 fusion to cellular genes and/or integration into human genomes.
    IMPORTANCE The pathogenic mechanisms underlying SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19, are not fully understood. In particular, relatively little is known about the reasons some individuals develop life-threatening or persistent COVID-19. Recent studies identified host-virus chimeric (HVC) reads in RNA-sequencing data from SARS-CoV-2-infected cells and suggested that HVC events support potential “human genome invasion” and “integration” by SARS-CoV-2. This suggestion has fueled concerns about the long-term effects of current mRNA vaccines that incorporate elements of the viral genome. SARS-CoV-2 is a positive-sense, single-stranded RNA virus that does not encode a reverse transcriptase and does not include a nuclear phase in its life cycle, so some doubts have rightfully been expressed regarding the authenticity of HVCs and the role played by endogenous retrotransposons in this phenomenon. Thus, it is important to independently authenticate these HVC events. Here, we provide several lines of evidence suggesting that the observed HVC events are likely artifactual.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Kazemian M, Ren M, Lin JX, Liao W, Spolski R, Leonard WJ. 2015. Possible human papillomavirus 38 contamination of endometrial cancer RNA sequencing samples in the Cancer Genome Atlas Database. J Virol 89:8967–8973.
    2.
    Kazemian M, Ren M, Lin JX, Liao W, Spolski R, Leonard WJ. 2015. Comprehensive assembly of novel transcripts from unmapped human RNA-Seq data and their association with cancer. Mol Syst Biol 11:826.
    3.
    McBride AA, Warburton A. 2017. The role of integration in oncogenic progression of HPV-associated cancers. PLoS Pathog 13:e1006211.
    4.
    Mani SKK, Yan B, Cui Z, Sun J, Utturkar S, Foca A, Fares N, Durantel D, Lanman N, Merle P, Kazemian M, Andrisani O. 2020. Restoration of RNA helicase DDX5 suppresses hepatitis B virus (HBV) biosynthesis and Wnt signaling in HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Theranostics 10:10957–10972.
    5.
    Wang L, Laing J, Yan B, Zhou H, Ke L, Wang C, Narita Y, Zhang Z, Olson M, Afzali B, Zhao B, Kazemian M. 2020. Epstein-Barr virus episome physically interacts with active regions of the host genome in lymphoblastoid cells. J Virol 94:e01390-20.
    6.
    Chakravorty S, Yan B, Wang C, Wang L, Quaid JT, Lin CF, Briggs SD, Majumder J, Canaria DA, Chauss D, Chopra G, Olson MR, Zhao B, Afzali B, Kazemian M. 2019. Integrated pan-cancer map of EBV-associated neoplasms reveals functional host-virus interactions. Cancer Res 79:6010–6023.
    7.
    Nellore A, Jaffe AE, Fortin JP, Alquicira-Hernandez J, Collado-Torres L, Wang S, Phillips RA, III, Karbhari N, Hansen KD, Langmead B, Leek JT. 2016. Human splicing diversity and the extent of unannotated splice junctions across human RNA-seq samples on the Sequence Read Archive. Genome Biol 17:266.
    8.
    Zhang XO, Dong R, Zhang Y, Zhang JL, Luo Z, Zhang J, Chen LL, Yang L. 2016. Diverse alternative back-splicing and alternative splicing landscape of circular RNAs. Genome Res 26:1277–1287.
    9.
    Brant AC, Menezes AN, Felix SP, de Almeida LM, Sammeth M, Moreira MAM. 2019. Characterization of HPV integration, viral gene expression and E6E7 alternative transcripts by RNA-Seq: a descriptive study in invasive cervical cancer. Genomics 111:1853–1861.
    10.
    Sung WK, Zheng H, Li S, Chen R, Liu X, Li Y, Lee NP, Lee WH, Ariyaratne PN, Tennakoon C, Mulawadi FH, Wong KF, Liu AM, Poon RT, Fan ST, Chan KL, Gong Z, Hu Y, Lin Z, Wang G, Zhang Q, Barber TD, Chou WC, Aggarwal A, Hao K, Zhou W, Zhang C, Hardwick J, Buser C, Xu J, Kan Z, Dai H, Mao M, Reinhard C, Wang J, Luk JM. 2012. Genome-wide survey of recurrent HBV integration in hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Genet 44:765–769.
    11.
    Zhao LH, Liu X, Yan HX, Li WY, Zeng X, Yang Y, Zhao J, Liu SP, Zhuang XH, Lin C, Qin CJ, Zhao Y, Pan ZY, Huang G, Liu H, Zhang J, Wang RY, Yang Y, Wen W, Lv GS, Zhang HL, Wu H, Huang S, Wang MD, Tang L, Cao HZ, Wang L, Lee TL, Jiang H, Tan YX, Yuan SX, Hou GJ, Tao QF, Xu QG, Zhang XQ, Wu MC, Xu X, Wang J, Yang HM, Zhou WP, Wang HY. 2016. Genomic and oncogenic preference of HBV integration in hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Commun 7:12992.
    12.
    Palacios-Flores K, Castillo A, Uribe C, Garcia Sotelo J, Boege M, Davila G, Flores M, Palacios R, Morales L. 2019. Prediction and identification of recurrent genomic rearrangements that generate chimeric chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116:8445–8450.
    13.
    Kannan K, Wang L, Wang J, Ittmann MM, Li W, Yen L. 2011. Recurrent chimeric RNAs enriched in human prostate cancer identified by deep sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:9172–9177.
    14.
    McGregor R, Chauss D, Freiwald T, Yan B, Wang L, Nova-Lamperti E, Zhang Z, Teague H, West EE, Bibby J, Kelly A, Malik A, Freeman AF, Schwartz D, Portilla D, John S, Lavender P, Lionakis MS, Mehta NN, Kemper C, Cooper N, Lombardi G, Laurence A, Kazemian M, Afzali B. 2020. An autocrine vitamin D-driven Th1 shutdown program can be exploited for COVID-19. bioRxiv
    15.
    Xu Z, Shi L, Wang Y, Zhang J, Huang L, Zhang C, Liu S, Zhao P, Liu H, Zhu L, Tai Y, Bai C, Gao T, Song J, Xia P, Dong J, Zhao J, Wang FS. 2020. Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Respir Med 8:420–422.
    16.
    Fung TS, Liu DX. 2019. Human coronavirus: host-pathogen interaction. Annu Rev Microbiol 73:529–557.
    17.
    Yan B, Freiwald T, Chauss D, Wang L, West E, Mirabelli C, Zhang CJ, Nichols EM, Malik N, Gregory R, Bantscheff M, Ghidelli-Disse S, Kolev M, Frum T, Spence JR, Sexton JZ, Alysandratos KD, Kotton DN, Pittaluga S, Bibby J, Niyonzima N, Olson MR, Kordasti S, Portilla D, Wobus CE, Laurence A, Lionakis MS, Kemper C, Afzali B, Kazemian M. 2021. SARS-CoV-2 drives JAK1/2-dependent local complement hyperactivation. Sci Immunol 6:eabg0833.
    18.
    Zhang L, Richards A, Khalil A, Wogram E, Ma H, Young RA, Jaenisch R. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome. bioRxiv
    19.
    Yin Y, Liu X-Z, He X, Zhou L-Q. 2021. Exogenous coronavirus interacts with endogenous retrotransposon in human cells. Front Cell Infect Microbiol
    20.
    Cohen J. 2020. The coronavirus may sometimes slip its genetic material into human chromosomes. Science
    21.
    Cocquet J, Chong A, Zhang G, Veitia RA. 2006. Reverse transcriptase template switching and false alternative transcripts. Genomics 88:127–131.
    22.
    Kim D, Lee JY, Yang JS, Kim JW, Kim VN, Chang H. 2020. The architecture of SARS-CoV-2 transcriptome. Cell 181:914–921.e10.
    23.
    Sikora D, Rocheleau L, Brown EG, Pelchat M. 2017. Influenza A virus cap-snatches host RNAs based on their abundance early after infection. Virology 509:167–177.
    24.
    Ho JSY, Angel M, Ma Y, Sloan E, Wang G, Martinez-Romero C, Alenquer M, Roudko V, Chung L, Zheng S, Chang M, Fstkchyan Y, Clohisey S, Dinan AM, Gibbs J, Gifford R, Shen R, Gu Q, Irigoyen N, Campisi L, Huang C, Zhao N, Jones JD, van Knippenberg I, Zhu Z, Moshkina N, Meyer L, Noel J, Peralta Z, Rezelj V, Kaake R, Rosenberg B, Wang B, Wei J, Paessler S, Wise HM, Johnson J, Vannini A, Amorim MJ, Baillie JK, Miraldi ER, Benner C, Brierley I, Digard P, Luksza M, Firth AE, Krogan N, Greenbaum BD, MacLeod MK, van Bakel H, et al. 2020. Hybrid gene origination creates human-virus chimeric proteins during infection. Cell 181:1502–1517.e23.
    25.
    Blanco-Melo D, Nilsson-Payant BE, Liu WC, Uhl S, et al. 2020. Imbalanced host response to SARS-CoV-2 drives development of COVID-19. Cell 181(5):1036–1045.e9.
    26.
    Hoagland DA, Clarke DJB, Møller R, Han Y, Yang L, Wojciechowicz ML, Lachmann A, Oguntuyo KY, Stevens C, Lee B, Chen S, Ma'ayan A, tenOever BR. 2020. bioRxiv
    27.
    Weingarten-Gabbay S, Klaeger S, Sarkizova S, Pearlman LR, Chen D-Y, Bauer MR, Taylor HB, Conway HL, Tomkins-Tinch CH, Finkel Y, Nachshon A, Gentili M, Rivera KD, Keskin DB, Rice CM, Clauser KR, Hacohen N, Carr SA, Abelin JG, Saeed M, Sabeti PC. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 infected cells present HLA-I peptides from canonical and out-of-frame ORFs. bioRxiv
    28.
    Banerjee AK, Blanco MR, Bruce EA, Honson DD, Chen LM, Chow A, Bhat P, Ollikainen N, Quinodoz SA, Loney C, Thai J, Miller ZD, Lin AE, Schmidt MM, Stewart DG, Goldfarb D, De Lorenzo G, Rihn SJ, Voorhees RM, Botten JW, Majumdar D, Guttman M. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 disrupts splicing, translation, and protein trafficking to suppress host defenses. Cell 183(5):1325–1339.e21.
    29.
    Wyler E, Mösbauer K, Franke V, Diag A, Gottula LT, Arsie R, Klironomos F, Koppstein D, Ayoub S, Buccitelli C, Richter A, Legnini I, Ivanov A, Mari T, Del Giudice S, Papies JP, Praktiknjo S, Müller MA, Niemeyer D, Selbach M, Akalin A, Rajewsky N, Drosten C, Landthaler M. 2021. Transcriptomic profiling of SARS-CoV-2 infected human cell lines identifies HSP90 as target for COVID-19 therapy. iScience 24(3):102151.
    30.
    Han Y, Duan X, Yang L, Nilsson-Payant BE, Wang P, Duan F, Tang X, Yaron TM, Zhang T, Uhl S, Bram Y, Richardson C, Zhu J, Zhao Z, Redmond D, Houghton S, Nguyen DT, Xu D, Wang X, Jessurun J, Borczuk A, Huang Y, Johnson JL, Liu Y, Xiang J, Wang H, Cantley LC, tenOever BR, Ho DD, Pan FC, Evans T, Chen HJ, Schwartz RE, Chen S. 2021. Identification of SARS-CoV-2 inhibitors using lung and colonic organoids. Nature 589(7841):270–275.
    31.
    Desai N, Neyaz A, Szabolcs A, Shih AR, et al. 2020. Temporal and spatial heterogeneity of host response to SARS-CoV-2 pulmonary infection. Nat Commun 11:6319.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Journal of Virology
    Volume 95Number 1512 July 2021
    eLocator: e00294-21
    Editor: Colin R. Parrish
    Cornell University

    History

    Received: 17 February 2021
    Accepted: 10 May 2021
    Published online: 12 May 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. COVID-19
    2. SARS-CoV-2
    3. RNA sequencing
    4. sequencing reads
    5. chimeric reads
    6. host-virus fusion

    Contributors

    Authors

    Department of Biochemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
    Srishti Chakravorty
    Department of Biochemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
    Carmen Mirabelli
    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
    Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
    Jorge L. Trujillo-Ochoa
    Immunoregulation Section, Kidney Diseases Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
    Immunoregulation Section, Kidney Diseases Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
    Dhaneshwar Kumar
    Department of Biochemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
    Immunoregulation Section, Kidney Diseases Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
    Fungal Pathogenesis Section, Laboratory of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
    Matthew R. Olson
    Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
    Immunoregulation Section, Kidney Diseases Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
    Department of Biochemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
    Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA

    Editor

    Colin R. Parrish
    Editor
    Cornell University

    Notes

    Bingyu Yan, Srishti Chakravorty, and Carmen Mirabelli are joint first authors. They are listed in the order in which they joined the project. Christiane E. Wobus, Behdad Afzali, and Majid Kazemian are joint last authors.

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Journal of VirologyArticle
    A Double-Inactivated Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Vaccine Provides Incomplete Protection in Mice and Induces Increased Eosinophilic Proinflammatory Pulmonary Response upon Challenge

    A Double-Inactivated Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Vaccine Provides Incomplete Protection in Mice and Induces Increased Eosinophilic Proinflammatory Pulmonary Response upon Challenge

    ABSTRACT

    Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) is an important emerging virus that is highly pathogenic in aged populations and is maintained with great diversity in zoonotic reservoirs. While a variety of vaccine platforms have shown efficacy in young-animal models and against homologous viral strains, vaccine efficacy has not been thoroughly evaluated using highly pathogenic variants that replicate the acute end stage lung disease phenotypes seen during the human epidemic. Using an adjuvanted and an unadjuvanted double-inactivated SARS-CoV (DIV) vaccine, we demonstrate an eosinophilic immunopathology in aged mice comparable to that seen in mice immunized with the SARS nucleocapsid protein, and poor protection against a nonlethal heterologous challenge. In young and 1-year-old animals, we demonstrate that adjuvanted DIV vaccine provides protection against lethal disease in young animals following homologous and heterologous challenge, although enhanced immune pathology and eosinophilia are evident following heterologous challenge. In the absence of alum, DIV vaccine performed poorly in young animals challenged with lethal homologous or heterologous strains. In contrast, DIV vaccines (both adjuvanted and unadjuvanted) performed poorly in aged-animal models. Importantly, aged animals displayed increased eosinophilic immune pathology in the lungs and were not protected against significant virus replication. These data raise significant concerns regarding DIV vaccine safety and highlight the need for additional studies of the molecular mechanisms governing DIV-induced eosinophilia and vaccine failure, especially in the more vulnerable aged-animal models of human disease.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Becker M. M. et al. 2008. Synthetic recombinant bat SARS-like coronavirus is infectious in cultured cells and in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105:19944–19949.
    2.
    Bisht H. et al. 2004. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein expressed by attenuated vaccinia virus protectively immunizes mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101:6641–6646.
    3.
    Booth C. et al. 2003. Clinical features and short-term outcomes of 144 patients with SARS in the greater Toronto area. JAMA 289:2801–2809.
    4.
    Bossart K. N. et al. 2009. A neutralizing human monoclonal antibody protects against lethal disease in a new ferret model of acute nipah virus infection. PLoS Pathog. 5:e1000642.
    5.
    Cameron M. et al. 2007. Interferon-mediated immunopathological events are associated with atypical innate and adaptive immune responses in severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) patients. J. Virol. 81:8692–8706.
    6.
    Castilow E. M., Legge K. L., and Varga S. M.. 2008. Cutting edge: eosinophils do not contribute to respiratory syncytial virus vaccine-enhanced disease. J. Immunol. 181:6692–6696.
    7.
    Chen Z. et al. 2004. Antigenicity analysis of different regions of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus nucleocapsid protein. Clin. Chem. 50:988–995.
    8.
    Chinese SARS Molecular Epidemiology Consortium. 2004. Molecular evolution of the SARS coronavirus during the course of the SARS epidemic in China. Science 303:1666–1669.
    9.
    Chow S. C. S. et al. 2006. Specific epitopes of the structural and hypothetical proteins elicit variable humoral responses in SARS patients. J. Clin. Pathol. 59:468–476.
    10.
    Delgado M. F. et al. 2009. Lack of antibody affinity maturation due to poor Toll-like receptor stimulation leads to enhanced respiratory syncytial virus disease. Nat. Med. 15:34–41.
    11.
    Deming D. et al. 2006. Vaccine efficacy in senescent mice challenged with recombinant SARS-CoV bearing epidemic and zoonotic spike variants. PLoS Med. 3:e525.
    12.
    Donnelly C. A. et al. 2003. Epidemiological determinants of spread of causal agent of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. Lancet 361:1761–1766.
    13.
    Enjuanes L. et al. 2008. Vaccines to prevent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-induced disease. Virus Res. 133:45–62.
    14.
    Goodwin K., Viboud C., and Simonsen L.. 2006. Antibody response to influenza vaccination in the elderly: a quantitative review. Vaccine 24:1159–1169.
    15.
    Greenough T. C. et al. 2005. Development and characterization of a severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus-neutralizing human monoclonal antibody that provides effective immunoprophylaxis in mice. J. Infect. Dis. 191:507–514.
    16.
    Gruver A. L., Hudson L. L., and Sempowski G. D.. 2007. Immunosenescence of ageing. J. Pathol. 211:144–156.
    17.
    He Y., Zhou Y., Siddiqui P., and Jiang S.. 2004. Inactivated SARS-CoV vaccine elicits high titers of spike protein-specific antibodies that block receptor binding and virus entry. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 325:445–452.
    18.
    HogenEsch H. 2002. Mechanisms of stimulation of the immune response by aluminum adjuvants. Vaccine 20:S34–S39.
    19.
    Hou Y.-X. et al. 2010. Immunogenicity of the spike glycoprotein of Bat SARS-like coronavirus. Virol. Sin. 25:36–44.
    20.
    Ishioka T. et al. 2011. Effects of respiratory syncytial virus infection and major basic protein derived from eosinophils in pulmonary alveolar epithelial cells (A549). Cell Biol. Int. 35:467–474.
    21.
    Kopecky-Bromberg S. A., Martínez-Sobrido L., Frieman M., Baric R. A., and Palese P.. 2007. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus open reading frame (ORF) 3b, ORF 6, and nucleocapsid proteins function as interferon antagonists. J. Virol. 81:548–557.
    22.
    Lau S. K. P. et al. 2005. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-like virus in Chinese horseshoe bats. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102:14040–14045.
    23.
    Li W. et al. 2005. Bats are natural reservoirs of SARS-like coronaviruses. Science 310:676–679.
    24.
    Lin J.-T. et al. 2007. Safety and immunogenicity from a phase I trial of inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus vaccine. Antivir. Ther. 12:1107–1113.
    25.
    LoBue A. D., Thompson J. M., Lindesmith L., Johnston R. E., and Baric R. S.. 2009. Alphavirus-adjuvanted norovirus-like particle vaccines: heterologous, humoral, and mucosal immune responses protect against murine norovirus challenge. J. Virol. 83:3212–3227.
    26.
    Malcolm K. C. et al. 2011. Bacteria-specific neutrophil dysfunction associated with interferon-stimulated gene expression in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. PLoS One 6:e21958.
    27.
    Marshall E. and Enserink M.. 2004. Medicine. Caution urged on SARS vaccines. Science 303:944–946.
    28.
    Martin J. E. et al. 2008. A SARS DNA vaccine induces neutralizing antibody and cellular immune responses in healthy adults in a phase I clinical trial. Vaccine 26:6338–6343.
    29.
    McElhaney J. E., Hooton J. W., Hooton N., and Bleackley R. C.. 2005. Comparison of single versus booster dose of influenza vaccination on humoral and cellular immune responses in older adults. Vaccine 23:3294–3300.
    30.
    Meyerholz D. K., Griffin M. A., Castilow E. M., and Varga S. M.. 2009. Comparison of histochemical methods for murine eosinophil detection in an RSV vaccine-enhanced inflammation model. Toxicol. Pathol. 37:249–255.
    31.
    Moghaddam A. et al. 2006. A potential molecular mechanism for hypersensitivity caused by formalin-inactivated vaccines. Nat. Med. 12:905–907.
    32.
    Narasaraju T. et al. 2011. Excessive neutrophils and neutrophil extracellular traps contribute to acute lung injury of influenza pneumonitis. Am. J. Pathol. 179:199–210.
    33.
    Netland J. et al. 2010. Immunization with an attenuated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus deleted in E protein protects against lethal respiratory disease. Virology 399:120–128.
    34.
    Neuman B. W. et al. 2006. Supramolecular architecture of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus revealed by electron cryomicroscopy. J. Virol. 80:7918–7928.
    35.
    Normile D. 2005. Virology researchers tie deadly SARS virus to bats. Science 309:2154–2155.
    36.
    Peiris J. S. M. et al. 2003. Clinical progression and viral load in a community outbreak of coronavirus-associated SARS pneumonia: a prospective study. Lancet 361:1767–1772.
    37.
    Peng H., Yang L.-T., Wang L.-Y., Li J., Huang J., Lu Z.-Q., Koup R. A., Bailer R. T., and Wu C.-Y. 2006. Long-lived memory T lymphocyte responses against SARS coronavirus nucleocapsid protein in SARS-recovered patients. Virology 351:466–475.
    38.
    Polack F. 2007. Atypical measles and enhanced respiratory syncytial virus disease (ERD) made simple. Pediatr. Res. 62:111.
    39.
    Roberts A. et al. 2007. A mouse-adapted SARS-coronavirus causes disease and mortality in BALB/c mice. PLoS Pathog. 3:e5.
    40.
    Roberts A. et al. 2010. Immunogenicity and protective efficacy in mice and hamsters of a β-propiolactone inactivated whole virus SARS-CoV vaccine. Viral Immunol. 23:509–519.
    41.
    Roberts A. et al. 2008. Animal models and vaccines for SARS-CoV infection. Virus Res. 133:20–32.
    42.
    Roberts A. et al. 2005. Aged BALB/c mice as a model for increased severity of severe acute respiratory syndrome in elderly humans. J. Virol. 79:5833–5838.
    43.
    Rockx B. et al. 2009. Early upregulation of acute respiratory distress syndrome-associated cytokines promotes lethal disease in an aged-mouse model of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. J. Virol. 83:7062–7074.
    44.
    Rockx B. et al. 2008. Structural basis for potent cross-neutralizing human monoclonal antibody protection against lethal human and zoonotic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus challenge. J. Virol. 82:3220–3235.
    45.
    Rockx B. et al. 2007. Synthetic reconstruction of zoonotic and early human severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus isolates that produce fatal disease in aged mice. J. Virol. 81:7410–7423.
    46.
    See R. H. et al. 2008. Severe acute respiratory syndrome vaccine efficacy in ferrets: whole killed virus and adenovirus-vectored vaccines. J. Gen. Virol. 89:2136–2146.
    47.
    Sheahan T., Deming D., Donaldson E., Pickles R., and Baric R.. 2006. Resurrection of an “extinct” SARS-CoV isolate GD03 from late 2003. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 581:547–550.
    48.
    Sheahan T. et al. 2011. Successful vaccination strategies that protect aged mice from lethal influenza and lethal heterologous SARS-CoV challenge. J. Virol. 85:217–230.
    49.
    Song H. et al. 2005. Cross-host evolution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus in palm civet and human. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102:2430–2435.
    50.
    Spruth M. et al. 2006. A double-inactivated whole virus candidate SARS coronavirus vaccine stimulates neutralising and protective antibody responses. Vaccine 24:652–661.
    51.
    Stockman L. J., Bellamy R., and Garner P.. 2006. SARS: systematic review of treatment effects. PLoS Med. 3:e343.
    52.
    Subbarao K. et al. 2004. Prior infection and passive transfer of neutralizing antibody prevent replication of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus in the respiratory tract of mice. J. Virol. 78:3572–3577.
    53.
    Takasuka N. et al. 2004. A subcutaneously injected UV-inactivated SARS coronavirus vaccine elicits systemic humoral immunity in mice. Int. Immunol. 16:1423–1430.
    54.
    Thompson J. M. et al. 2006. Mucosal and systemic adjuvant activity of alphavirus replicon particles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103:3722–3727.
    55.
    Thompson J. M., Whitmore A. C., Staats H. F., and Johnston R.. 2008. The contribution of type I interferon signaling to immunity induced by alphavirus replicon vaccines. Vaccine 26:4998–5003.
    56.
    Thompson J. M., Whitmore A. C., Staats H. F., and Johnston R. E.. 2008. Alphavirus replicon particles acting as adjuvants promote CD8+ T cell responses to co-delivered antigen. Vaccine 26:4267–4275.
    57.
    Tsunetsugu-Yokota Y., Ato M., Takahashi Y., Hashimoto S.-I., Kaji T., Kuraoka M., Yamamoto K.-I., Mitsuki Y.-Y., Yamamoto T., Oshima M., Ohnishi K., and Takemori T.. 2007. Formalin-treated UV-inactivated SARS coronavirus vaccine retains its immunogenicity and promotes Th2-type immune responses. Jpn. J. Infect. Dis. 60:106–112.
    58.
    Ubol S. and Halstead S. B.. 2010. How innate immune mechanisms contribute to antibody-enhanced viral infections. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 17:1829–1835.
    59.
    Vogel L. N. et al. 2007. Utility of the aged BALB/c mouse model to demonstrate prevention and control strategies for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV). Vaccine 25:2173–2179.
    60.
    Yang Z.-Y. et al. 2004. A DNA vaccine induces SARS coronavirus neutralization and protective immunity in mice. Nature 428:561–564.
    61.
    Yasui F. et al. 2008. Prior immunization with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) nucleocapsid protein causes severe pneumonia in mice infected with SARS-CoV. J. Immunol. 181:6337–6348.
    62.
    Yip C. W. et al. 2009. Phylogenetic perspectives on the epidemiology and origins of SARS and SARS-like coronaviruses. Infect. Genet. Evol. 9:1185–1196.
    63.
    Yount B. et al. 2003. Reverse genetics with a full-length infectious cDNA of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100:12995–13000.
    64.
    Zhang J.-S. et al. 2005. A serological survey on neutralizing antibody titer of SARS convalescent sera. J. Med. Virol. 77:147–150.
    65.
    Zhong X. et al. 2005. B-cell responses in patients who have recovered from severe acute respiratory syndrome target a dominant site in the S2 domain of the surface spike glycoprotein. J. Virol. 79:3401–3408.
    66.
    Zhu Y. G. and Qu J. M.. 2009. Differential characteristics of the early stage of lung inflammation induced by SARS-CoV nucleocapsid protein related to age in the mouse. Inflamm. Res. 58:312–320.
    67.
    Zhu Z. et al. 2007. Potent cross-reactive neutralization of SARS coronavirus isolates by human monoclonal antibodies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:12123–12128.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Journal of Virology
    Volume 85Number 231 December 2011
    Pages: 12201 - 12215

    History

    Received: 22 August 2011
    Accepted: 8 September 2011
    Published online: 3 November 2011

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Contributors

    Authors

    Meagan Bolles
    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
    Damon Deming
    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
    Kristin Long
    Carolina Vaccine Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
    Sudhakar Agnihothram
    Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
    Alan Whitmore
    Carolina Vaccine Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
    Martin Ferris
    Carolina Vaccine Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
    William Funkhouser
    Department of Pathology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
    Lisa Gralinski
    Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
    Allison Totura
    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
    Mark Heise
    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
    Carolina Vaccine Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
    Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
    Ralph S. Baric [email protected]
    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
    Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Journal of VirologyArticle
    Universal Dengue Vaccine Elicits Neutralizing Antibodies against Strains from All Four Dengue Virus Serotypes

    Universal Dengue Vaccine Elicits Neutralizing Antibodies against Strains from All Four Dengue Virus Serotypes

    ABSTRACT

    Any potential dengue virus (DENV) vaccine needs to elicit protective immunity against strains from all four serotypes to avoid potential antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). In this study, four independent DENV envelope (E) glycoproteins were generated using wild-type E sequences from viruses isolated between 1943 and 2006 using computationally optimized broadly reactive antigen (COBRA) methodology. COBRA and wild-type E antigens were expressed on the surface of subvirion viral particles (SVPs). Four separate wild-type E antigens were used for each serotype. Mice vaccinated with wild-type DENV SVPs had anti-E IgG antibodies that neutralized serotype-specific viruses. COBRA DENV SVPs elicited a broader breadth of antibodies that neutralized strains across all four serotypes. Two COBRA DENV vaccine candidates that elicited the broadest breadth of neutralizing antibodies in mice were used to vaccinate rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) that either were immunologically naive to any DENV serotype or had preexisting antibodies to DENV. Antibodies elicited by COBRA DENV E immunogens neutralized all 12 strains of DENV in vitro, which was comparable to antibodies elicited by a tetravalent wild-type E SVP vaccination mixture. Therefore, using a single DENV COBRA E protein can elicit neutralizing antibodies against strains representing all four serotypes of DENV in both naive and dengue virus-preimmune populations.
    IMPORTANCE Dengue virus infects millions of people living in tropical areas of the world. Dengue virus-induced diseases can range from mild to severe with death. An effective vaccine will need to neutralize viruses from all four serotypes of dengue virus without inducing enhanced disease. A dengue virus E vaccine candidate generated by computationally optimized broadly reactive antigen algorithms elicits broadly neutralizing protection for currently circulating strains from all four serotypes regardless of immune status. Most dengue vaccines in development formulate four separate components based on prM-E from a wild-type strain representing each serotype. Designing a monovalent vaccine that elicits protective immunity against all four serotypes is an effective and economical strategy.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Brady OJ, Gething PW, Bhatt S, Messina JP, Brownstein JS, Hoen AG, Moyes CL, Farlow AW, Scott TW, Hay SI. 2012. Refining the global spatial limits of dengue virus transmission by evidence-based consensus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 6:e1760.
    2.
    Guzman MG, Harris E. 2015. Dengue. Lancet 385:453–465.
    3.
    Bhatt S, Gething PW, Brady OJ, Messina JP, Farlow AW, Moyes CL, Drake JM, Brownstein JS, Hoen AG, Sankoh O, Myers MF, George DB, Jaenisch T, Wint GRW, Simmons CP, Scott TW, Farrar JJ, Hay SI. 2013. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature 496:504–507.
    4.
    Thomas SJ, Endy TP, Rothman AL. 2014. Flaviviruses: dengue, p 351–381. In Kaslow R, Stanberry LR, Le Duc JW (ed), Viral infections of humans: epidemiology and control, 5th ed. Springer, New York, NY.
    5.
    Bennett SN. 2010. Evolutionary dynamics of dengue virus, p 157–172. In Hanley KA, Weaver SC (ed), Frontiers in dengue virus research. Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, United Kingdom.
    6.
    Messina JP, Brady OJ, Scott TW, Zou C, Pigott DM, Duda KA, Bhatt S, Katzelnick L, Howes RE, Battle KE, Simmons CP, Hay SI. 2014. Global spread of dengue virus types: mapping the 70 year history. Trends Microbiol 22:138–146.
    7.
    Reich NG, Shrestha S, King AA, Rohani P, Lessler J, Kalayanarooj S, Yoon I-K, Gibbons RV, Burke DS, Cummings DA. 2013. Interactions between serotypes of dengue highlight epidemiological impact of cross-immunity. J R Soc Interface 10:20130414.
    8.
    Libraty DH, Endy TP, Houng H-SH, Green S, Kalayanarooj S, Suntayakorn S, Chansiriwongs W, Vaughn DW, Nisalak A, Ennis FA, Rothman AL. 2002. Differing influences of virus burden and immune activation on disease severity in secondary dengue-3 virus infections. J Infect Dis 185:1213–1221.
    9.
    Chambers TJ, Hahn CS, Galler R, Rice CM. 1990. Flavivirus genome organization, expression, and replication. Annu Rev Microbiol 44:649–688.
    10.
    Halstead S. 2008. Dengue. Tropical medicine: science and practice, vol 5. Imperial College Press, London, United Kingdom.
    11.
    Courageot M-P, Frenkiel M-P, Dos Santos CD, Deubel V, Desprès P. 2000. α-Glucosidase inhibitors reduce dengue virus production by affecting the initial steps of virion morphogenesis in the endoplasmic reticulum. J Virol 74:564–572.
    12.
    Modis Y, Ogata S, Clements D, Harrison SC. 2004. Structure of the dengue virus envelope protein after membrane fusion. Nature 427:313–319.
    13.
    Yu I-M, Zhang W, Holdaway HA, Li L, Kostyuchenko VA, Chipman PR, Kuhn RJ, Rossmann MG, Chen J. 2008. Structure of the immature dengue virus at low pH primes proteolytic maturation. Science 319:1834–1837.
    14.
    Heinz F, Auer G, Stiasny K, Holzmann H, Mandl C, Guirakhoo F, Kunz C. 1994. The interactions of the flavivirus envelope proteins: implications for virus entry and release. Arch Virol Suppl 9:339–348.
    15.
    van der Schaar HM, Rust MJ, Waarts B-L, van der Ende-Metselaar H, Kuhn RJ, Wilschut J, Zhuang X, Smit JM. 2007. Characterization of the early events in dengue virus cell entry by biochemical assays and single-virus tracking. J Virol 81:12019–12028.
    16.
    Russell P, Brandt W, Dalrymple J. 1980. Chemical and antigenic structure of flaviviruses, p 503–529. In Schlesinger RW (ed), The togaviruses: biology, structure, replication. Academic Press, New York, NY.
    17.
    Ferlenghi I, Clarke M, Ruttan T, Allison SL, Schalich J, Heinz FX, Harrison SC, Rey FA, Fuller SD. 2001. Molecular organization of a recombinant subviral particle from tick-borne encephalitis virus. Mol Cell 7:593–602.
    18.
    Guy B, Briand O, Lang J, Saville M, Jackson N. 2015. Development of the Sanofi Pasteur tetravalent dengue vaccine: one more step forward. Vaccine 33:7100–7111.
    19.
    Torresi J, Ebert G, Pellegrini M. 2017. Vaccines licensed and in clinical trials for the prevention of dengue. Hum Vaccin Immunother 13:1059–1072.
    20.
    Halstead SB. 2016. Licensed dengue vaccine: public health conundrum and scientific challenge. Am J Trop Med Hyg 95:741–745.
    21.
    Halstead SB. 2016. Critique of World Health Organization recommendation of a dengue vaccine. J Infect Dis 214:1793–1795.
    22.
    Aguiar M, Stollenwerk N, Halstead SB. 2016. The risks behind Dengvaxia recommendation. Lancet Infect Dis 16:882–883.
    23.
    Sabchareon A, Wallace D, Sirivichayakul C, Limkittikul K, Chanthavanich P, Suvannadabba S, Jiwariyavej V, Dulyachai W, Pengsaa K, Wartel TA, Moureau A, Saville M, Bouckenooghe A, Viviani S, Tornieporth NG, Lang J. 2012. Protective efficacy of the recombinant, live-attenuated, CYD tetravalent dengue vaccine in Thai schoolchildren: a randomised, controlled phase 2b trial. Lancet 380:1559–1567.
    24.
    de Silva AM, Harris E. 2018. Which dengue vaccine approach is the most promising, and should we be concerned about enhanced disease after vaccination? The path to a dengue vaccine: learning from human natural dengue infection studies and vaccine trials. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 10:a029371.
    25.
    Ross T, Tang X, Lu H, Olagnier D, Kirchenbaum G, Evans J. 2014. COBRA-based dengue tetravalent vaccine elicits neutralizing antibodies against all four dengue serotypes. J Vaccine Immunotechnol 1:7.
    26.
    Roldao A, Mellado MC, Castilho LR, Carrondo MJ, Alves PM. 2010. Virus-like particles in vaccine development. Expert Rev Vaccines 9:1149–1176.
    27.
    Giles BM, Ross TM. 2011. A computationally optimized broadly reactive antigen (COBRA) based H5N1 VLP vaccine elicits broadly reactive antibodies in mice and ferrets. Vaccine 29:3043–3054.
    28.
    Dejnirattisai W, Wongwiwat W, Supasa S, Zhang X, Dai X, Rouvinski A, Jumnainsong A, Edwards C, Quyen NTH, Duangchinda T, Grimes JM, Tsai W-Y, Lai C-Y, Wang W-K, Malasit P, Farrar J, Simmons CP, Zhou ZH, Rey FA, Mongkolsapaya J, Screaton GR. 2015. A new class of highly potent, broadly neutralizing antibodies isolated from viremic patients infected with dengue virus. Nat Immunol 16:170–177.
    29.
    Mir D, Romero H, de Carvalho LMF, Bello G. 2014. Spatiotemporal dynamics of DENV-2 Asian-American genotype lineages in the Americas. PLoS One 9:e98519.
    30.
    Holmes EC, Twiddy SS. 2003. The origin, emergence and evolutionary genetics of dengue virus. Infect Genet Evol 3:19–28.
    31.
    Carter DM, Darby CA, Lefoley BC, Crevar CJ, Alefantis T, Oomen R, Anderson SF, Strugnell T, Cortés-Garcia G, Vogel TU, Parrington M, Kleanthous H, Ross TM. 2016. Design and characterization of a computationally optimized broadly reactive hemagglutinin vaccine for H1N1 influenza viruses. J Virol 90:4720–4734.
    32.
    Rico-Hesse R. 2010. Dengue virus virulence and transmission determinants. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 338:45–55.
    33.
    Cologna R, Armstrong PM, Rico-Hesse R. 2005. Selection for virulent dengue viruses occurs in humans and mosquitoes. J Virol 79:853–859.
    34.
    Noad R, Roy P. 2003. Virus-like particles as immunogens. Trends Microbiol 11:438–444.
    35.
    Cedillo-Barrón L, García-Cordero J, Bustos-Arriaga J, León-Juárez M, Gutiérrez-Castañeda B. 2014. Antibody response to dengue virus. Microbes Infect 16:711–720.
    36.
    de Alwis R, Smith SA, Olivarez NP, Messer WB, Huynh JP, Wahala WMPB, White LJ, Diamond MS, Baric RS, Crowe JE, Jr, de Silva AM. 2012. Identification of human neutralizing antibodies that bind to complex epitopes on dengue virions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:7439–7444.
    37.
    Rouvinski A, Guardado-Calvo P, Barba-Spaeth G, Duquerroy S, Vaney M-C, Kikuti CM, Navarro Sanchez ME, Dejnirattisai W, Wongwiwat W, Haouz A, Girard-Blanc C, Petres S, Shepard WE, Desprès P, Arenzana-Seisdedos F, Dussart P, Mongkolsapaya J, Screaton GR, Rey FA. 2015. Recognition determinants of broadly neutralizing human antibodies against dengue viruses. Nature 520:109–113.
    38.
    Hadinegoro SR, Arredondo-Garcia JL, Capeding MR, Deseda C, Chotpitayasunondh T, Dietze R, Muhammad Ismail HI, Reynales H, Limkittikul K, Rivera-Medina DM, Tran HN, Bouckenooghe A, Chansinghakul D, Cortes M, Fanouillere K, Forrat R, Frago C, Gailhardou S, Jackson N, Noriega F, Plennevaux E, Wartel TA, Zambrano B, Saville M, CYD-TDV Dengue Vaccine Working Group. 2015. Efficacy and long-term safety of a dengue vaccine in regions of endemic disease. N Engl J Med 373:1195–1206.
    39.
    Sahin U, Karikó K, Türeci Ö. 2014. mRNA-based therapeutics—developing a new class of drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov 13:759–780.
    40.
    Halstead S, O’Rourke E. 1977. Dengue viruses and mononuclear phagocytes. I. Infection enhancement by non-neutralizing antibody. J Exp Med 146:201–217.
    41.
    Halstead SB. 2007. Dengue. Lancet 370:1644–1652.
    42.
    Katzelnick LC, Gresh L, Halloran ME, Mercado JC, Kuan G, Gordon A, Balmaseda A, Harris E. 2017. Antibody-dependent enhancement of severe dengue disease in humans. Science 358:929–932.
    43.
    Montoya M, Gresh L, Mercado JC, Williams KL, Vargas MJ, Gutierrez G, Kuan G, Gordon A, Balmaseda A, Harris E. 2013. Symptomatic versus inapparent outcome in repeat dengue virus infections is influenced by the time interval between infections and study year. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 7:e2357.
    44.
    Tsang TK, Ghebremariam SL, Gresh L, Gordon A, Halloran ME, Katzelnick LC, Rojas DP, Kuan G, Balmaseda A, Sugimoto J, Harris E, Longini IM, Jr, Yang Y. 2019. Effects of infection history on dengue virus infection and pathogenicity. Nat Commun 10:1246.
    45.
    Dans AL, Dans LF, Lansang MAD, Silvestre MAA, Guyatt GH. 2018. Controversy and debate on dengue vaccine series—paper 1. Review of a licensed dengue vaccine: inappropriate subgroup analyses and selective reporting may cause harm in mass vaccination programs. J Clin Epidemiol 95:137–139.
    46.
    Osorio JE, Velez ID, Thomson C, Lopez L, Jimenez A, Haller AA, Silengo S, Scott J, Boroughs KL, Stovall JL, Luy BE, Arguello J, Beatty ME, Santangelo J, Gordon GS, Huang CYH, Stinchcomb DT. 2014. Safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant live attenuated tetravalent dengue vaccine (DENVax) in flavivirus-naive healthy adults in Colombia: a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 1 study. Lancet Infect Dis 14:830–838.
    47.
    Precioso AR, Palacios R, Thomé B, Mondini G, Braga P, Kalil J. 2015. Clinical evaluation strategies for a live attenuated tetravalent dengue vaccine. Vaccine 33:7121–7125.
    48.
    Hombach J, Cardosa MJ, Sabchareon A, Vaughn DW, Barrett AD. 2007. Scientific consultation on immunological correlates of protection induced by dengue vaccines: report from a meeting held at the World Health Organization 17–18 November 2005. Vaccine 25:4130–4139.
    49.
    Salje H, Cummings DAT, Rodriguez-Barraquer I, Katzelnick LC, Lessler J, Klungthong C, Thaisomboonsuk B, Nisalak A, Weg A, Ellison D, Macareo L, Yoon I-K, Jarman R, Thomas S, Rothman AL, Endy T, Cauchemez S. 2018. Reconstruction of antibody dynamics and infection histories to evaluate dengue risk. Nature 557:719–723.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Journal of Virology
    Volume 95Number 428 January 2021
    eLocator: e00658-20
    Editor: Jae U. Jung
    Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic

    History

    Received: 9 April 2020
    Accepted: 2 November 2020
    Published online: 18 November 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies
    2. dengue
    3. vaccine

    Contributors

    Authors

    Naoko Uno
    Center for Vaccines and Immunology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA
    Center for Vaccines and Immunology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA
    Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA

    Editor

    Jae U. Jung
    Editor
    Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Ted M. Ross, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Journal of VirologyArticle
    The Nucleocapsid Protein of SARS–CoV-2: a Target for Vaccine Development

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Zhou P, Yang XL, Wang XG, Hu B, Zhang L, Zhang W, Si HR, Zhu Y, Li B, Huang CL, Chen HD, Chen J, Luo Y, Guo H, Jiang RD, Liu MQ, Chen Y, Shen XR, Wang X, Zheng XS, Zhao K, Chen QJ, Deng F, Liu LL, Yan B, Zhan FX, Wang YY, Xiao GF, Shi ZL. 2020. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 579:270–273.
    2.
    Marra MA, Jones SJM, Astell CR, Holt RA, Brooks-Wilson A, Butterfield YSN, Khattra J, Asano JK, Barber SA, Chan SY, Cloutier A, Coughlin SM, Freeman D, Girn N, Griffith OL, Leach SR, Mayo M, McDonald H, Montgomery SB, Pandoh PK, Petrescu AS, Robertson AG, Schein JE, Siddiqui A, Smailus DE, Stott JM, Yang GS, Plummer F, Andonov A, Artsob H, Bastien N, Bernard K, Booth TF, Bowness D, Czub M, Drebot M, Fernando L, Flick R, Garbutt M, Gray M, Grolla A, Jones S, Feldmann H, Meyers A, Kabani A, Li Y, Normand S, Stroher U, Tipples GA, Tyler S, Vogrig R, Ward D, Watson B, Brunham RC, Krajden M, Petric M, Skowronski DM, Upton C, Roper RL. 2003. The genome sequence of the SARS-associated coronavirus. Science 300:1399–1404.
    3.
    Drosten C, Gunther S, Preiser W, van der Werf S, Brodt HR, Becker S, Rabenau H, Panning M, Kolesnikova L, Fouchier RA, Berger A, Burguiere AM, Cinatl J, Eickmann M, Escriou N, Grywna K, Kramme S, Manuguerra JC, Muller S, Rickerts V, Sturmer M, Vieth S, Klenk HD, Osterhaus AD, Schmitz H, Doerr HW. 2003. Identification of a novel coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N Engl J Med 348:1967–1976.
    4.
    Wrapp D, Wang N, Corbett KS, Goldsmith JA, Hsieh CL, Abiona O, Graham BS, McLellan JS. 2020. Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science 367:1260–1263.
    5.
    Walls AC, Park Y-J, Tortorici MA, Wall A, McGuire AT, Veesler D. 2020. Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. Cell 181:281–292.
    6.
    Jaimes JA, André NM, Millet JK, Whittaker GR. 2020. Structural modeling of 2019-novel coronavirus (nCoV) spike protein reveals a proteolytically-sensitive activation loop as a distinguishing feature compared to SARS-CoV and related SARS-like coronaviruses. bioRxiv doi:
    7.
    Kang S, Yang M, Hong Z, Zhang L, Huang Z, Chen X, He S, Zhou Z, Zhou Z, Chen Q, Yan Y, Zhang C, Shan H, Chen S. 2020. Crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein RNA binding domain reveals potential unique drug targeting sites. bioRxiv doi:
    8.
    Pang J, Wang MX, Ang IYH, Tan SHX, Lewis RF, Chen JI, Gutierrez RA, Gwee SXW, Chua PEY, Yang Q, Ng XY, Yap RK, Tan HY, Teo YY, Tan CC, Cook AR, Yap JC, Hsu LY. 2020. Potential rapid diagnostics, vaccine and therapeutics for 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV): a systematic review. J Clin Med 9:E623.
    9.
    Chen WH, Strych U, Hotez PJ, Bottazzi ME. 3 March 2020. The SARS-CoV-2 vaccine pipeline: an overview. Curr Trop Med Rep doi:
    10.
    Kwong PD, Doyle ML, Casper DJ, Cicala C, Leavitt SA, Majeed S, Steenbeke TD, Venturi M, Chaiken I, Fung M, Katinger H, Parren PW, Robinson J, Van Ryk D, Wang L, Burton DR, Freire E, Wyatt R, Sodroski J, Hendrickson WA, Arthos J. 2002. HIV-1 evades antibody-mediated neutralization through conformational masking of receptor-binding sites. Nature 420:678–682.
    11.
    Grifoni A, Sidney J, Zhang Y, Scheuermann RH, Peters B, Sette A. 8 April 2020. A sequence homology and bioinformatic approach can predict candidate targets for immune responses to SARS-CoV-2. Cell Host Microbe doi:
    12.
    Ruan YJ, Wei CL, Ee AL, Vega VB, Thoreau H, Su ST, Chia JM, Ng P, Chiu KP, Lim L, Zhang T, Peng CK, Lin EO, Lee NM, Yee SL, Ng LF, Chee RE, Stanton LW, Long PM, Liu ET. 2003. Comparative full-length genome sequence analysis of 14 SARS coronavirus isolates and common mutations associated with putative origins of infection. Lancet 361:1779–1785.
    13.
    Yang ZY, Werner HC, Kong WP, Leung K, Traggiai E, Lanzavecchia A, Nabel GJ. 2005. Evasion of antibody neutralization in emerging severe acute respiratory syndrome coronaviruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:797–801.
    14.
    Holmes KV, Enjuanes L. 2003. Virology. The SARS coronavirus: a postgenomic era. Science 300:1377–1378.
    15.
    Rota PA, Oberste MS, Monroe SS, Nix WA, Campagnoli R, Icenogle JP, Penaranda S, Bankamp B, Maher K, Chen MH, Tong S, Tamin A, Lowe L, Frace M, DeRisi JL, Chen Q, Wang D, Erdman DD, Peret TC, Burns C, Ksiazek TG, Rollin PE, Sanchez A, Liffick S, Holloway B, Limor J, McCaustland K, Olsen-Rasmussen M, Fouchier R, Gunther S, Osterhaus AD, Drosten C, Pallansch MA, Anderson LJ, Bellini WJ. 2003. Characterization of a novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. Science 300:1394–1399.
    16.
    Zhu Y, Liu M, Zhao W, Zhang J, Zhang X, Wang K, Gu C, Wu K, Li Y, Zheng C, Xiao G, Yan H, Zhang J, Guo D, Tien P, Wu J. 2005. Isolation of virus from a SARS patient and genome-wide analysis of genetic mutations related to pathogenesis and epidemiology from 47 SARS-CoV isolates. Virus Genes 30:93–102.
    17.
    Cong Y, Ulasli M, Schepers H, Mauthe M, V’Kovski P, Kriegenburg F, Thiel V, de Haan CAM, Reggiori F. 2020. Nucleocapsid protein recruitment to replication-transcription complexes plays a crucial role in coronaviral life cycle. J Virol 94:e01925-19.
    18.
    Leung DT, Tam FC, Ma CH, Chan PK, Cheung JL, Niu H, Tam JS, Lim PL. 2004. Antibody response of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) targets the viral nucleocapsid. J Infect Dis 190:379–386.
    19.
    Gao W, Tamin A, Soloff A, D'Aiuto L, Nwanegbo E, Robbins PD, Bellini WJ, Barratt-Boyes S, Gambotto A. 2003. Effects of a SARS-associated coronavirus vaccine in monkeys. Lancet 362:1895–1896.
    20.
    Okada M, Takemoto Y, Okuno Y, Hashimoto S, Yoshida S, Fukunaga Y, Tanaka T, Kita Y, Kuwayama S, Muraki Y, Kanamaru N, Takai H, Okada C, Sakaguchi Y, Furukawa I, Yamada K, Matsumoto M, Kase T, Demello DE, Peiris JS, Chen PJ, Yamamoto N, Yoshinaka Y, Nomura T, Ishida I, Morikawa S, Tashiro M, Sakatani M. 2005. The development of vaccines against SARS corona virus in mice and SCID-PBL/hu mice. Vaccine 23:2269–2272.
    21.
    Lee HK, Lee BH, Dutta NK, Seok SH, Baek MW, Lee HY, Kim DJ, Na YR, Noh KJ, Park SH, Kariwa H, Nakauchi M, Mai Le Q, Heo SJ, Park JH. 2008. Detection of antibodies against SARS-coronavirus using recombinant truncated nucleocapsid proteins by ELISA. J Microbiol Biotechnol 18:1717–1721.
    22.
    Dutta NK, Mazumdar K, Lee BH, Baek MW, Kim DJ, Na YR, Park SH, Lee HK, Kariwa H, Mai Le Q, Park JH. 2008. Search for potential target site of nucleocapsid gene for the design of an epitope-based SARS DNA vaccine. Immunol Lett 118:65–71.
    23.
    Lee HK, Lee BH, Seok SH, Baek MW, Lee HY, Kim DJ, Na YR, Noh KJ, Park SH, Kumar DN, Kariwa H, Nakauchi M, Heo SJ, Park JH. 2010. Production of specific antibodies against SARS-coronavirus nucleocapsid protein without cross reactivity with human coronaviruses 229E and OC43. J Vet Sci 11:165–167.
    24.
    Sheikh A, Al-Taher A, Al-Nazawi M, Al-Mubarak AI, Kandeel M. 2020. Analysis of preferred codon usage in the coronavirus N genes and their implications for genome evolution and vaccine design. J Virol Methods 277:113806.
    25.
    Chang CK, Hou MH, Chang CF, Hsiao CD, Huang TH. 2014. The SARS coronavirus nucleocapsid protein—forms and functions. Antiviral Res 103:39–50.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Journal of Virology
    Volume 94Number 1316 June 2020
    eLocator: e00647-20
    Editor: Rebecca Ellis Dutch
    University of Kentucky College of Medicine

    History

    Published online: 16 June 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
    2. severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS–CoV-2)
    3. nucleocapsid protein
    4. vaccine

    Contributors

    Authors

    Center for Tuberculosis Research, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
    Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
    The W. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

    Editor

    Rebecca Ellis Dutch
    Editor
    University of Kentucky College of Medicine

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Noton K. Dutta, [email protected]

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Journal of VirologyArticle
    Intranasal Adenovirus-Vectored Vaccine for Induction of Long-Lasting Humoral Immunity-Mediated Broad Protection against Influenza in Mice

    Intranasal Adenovirus-Vectored Vaccine for Induction of Long-Lasting Humoral Immunity-Mediated Broad Protection against Influenza in Mice

    ABSTRACT

    Influenza vaccines aimed at inducing antibody (Ab) responses against viral surface hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) provide sterile immunity to infection with the same subtypes. Vaccines targeting viral conserved determinants shared by the influenza A viruses (IAV) offer heterosubtypic immunity (HSI), a broad protection against different subtypes. We proposed that vaccines targeting both HA and the conserved ectodomain of matrix protein 2 (M2e) would provide protection against infection with the same subtype and also HSI against other subtypes. We report here that single intranasal immunization with a recombinant adenovirus (rAd) vector encoding both HA of H5 virus and M2e (rAdH5/M2e) induced significant HA- and M2e-specific Ab responses, along with protection against heterosubtypic challenge in mice. The protection is superior compared to that induced by rAd vector encoding either HA (rAdH5), or M2e (rAdM2e). While protection against homotypic H5 virus is primarily mediated by virus-neutralizing Abs, the cross-protection is associated with Abs directed to conserved stalk HA and M2e that seem to have an additive effect. Consistently, adoptive transfer of antisera induced by rAdH5/M2e provided the best protection against heterosubtypic challenge compared to that provided by antisera derived from mice immunized with rAdH5 or rAdM2e. These results support the development of rAd-vectored vaccines encoding both H5 and M2e as universal vaccines against different IAV subtypes.
    IMPORTANCE Current licensed influenza vaccines provide protection limited to the infection with same virus strains; therefore, the composition of influenza vaccines has to be revised every year. We have developed a new universal influenza vaccine that is highly efficient in induction of long-lasting cross-protection against different influenza virus strains. The cross-protection is associated with a high level of vaccine-induced antibodies against the conserved stalk domain of influenza virus hemagglutinin and the ectodomain of matrix protein. The vaccine could be used to stimulate cross-protective antibodies for the prevention and treatment of influenza with immediate effect for individuals who fail to respond to or receive the vaccine in due time. The vaccine offers a new tool to control influenza outbreaks, including pandemics.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Aballéa S, Martin CJM, Wutzler P, Carrat F, Gasparini R, Toniolo-Neto J, Drummond M, and Weinstein M. 2007. The cost-effectiveness of influenza vaccination for people aged 50 to 64 years: an international model. Value Health 10:98–116.
    2.
    Clements ML, Betts RF, Tierney EL, and Murphy BR. 1986. Serum and nasal wash antibodies associated with resistance to experimental challenge with influenza A wild-type virus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 24:157–160.
    3.
    Couch RB. 1975. Assessment of immunity to influenza using artificial challenge of normal volunteers with influenza virus. Dev. Biol. Stand. 28:295–306.
    4.
    Hobson D, Curry RL, Beare AS, and Ward-Gardner A. 1972. The role of serum haemagglutination-inhibiting antibody in protection against challenge infection with influenza A2 and B viruses. J. Hyg. (Lond.) 70:767–777.
    5.
    Fan J, Liang X, Horton MS, Perry HC, Citron MP, Heidecker GJ, Fu TM, Joyce J, Przysiecki CT, Keller PM, Garsky VM, Ionescu R, Rippeon Y, Shi L, Chastain MA, Condra JH, Davies ME, Liao J, Emini EA, and Shiver JW. 2004. Preclinical study of influenza virus A M2 peptide conjugate vaccines in mice, ferrets, and rhesus monkeys. Vaccine 22:2993–3003.
    6.
    Liu W, Zou P, and Chen Y-H. 2004. Monoclonal antibodies recognizing EVETPIRN epitope of influenza A virus M2 protein could protect mice from lethal influenza A virus challenge. Immunol. Lett. 93:131–136.
    7.
    Mozdzanowska K, Maiese K, Furchner M, and Gerhard W. 1999. Treatment of influenza virus-infected SCID mice with nonneutralizing antibodies specific for the transmembrane proteins matrix 2 and neuraminidase reduces the pulmonary virus titer but fails to clear the infection. Virology 254:138–146.
    8.
    Neirynck S, Deroo T, Saelens X, Vanlandschoot P, Jou WM, and Fiers W. 1999. A universal influenza A vaccine based on the extracellular domain of the M2 protein. Nat. Med. 5:1157–1163.
    9.
    Treanor JJ, Tierney EL, Zebedee SL, Lamb RA, and Murphy BR. 1990. Passively transferred monoclonal antibody to the M2 protein inhibits influenza A virus replication in mice. J. Virol. 64:1375–1377.
    10.
    Frace AM, Klimov AI, Rowe T, Black RA, and Katz JM. 1999. Modified M2 proteins produce heterotypic immunity against influenza A virus. Vaccine 17:2237–2244.
    11.
    Mozdzanowska K, Feng J, Eid M, Kragol G, Cudic M, Otvos L Jr, and Gerhard W. 2003. Induction of influenza type A virus-specific resistance by immunization of mice with a synthetic multiple antigenic peptide vaccine that contains ectodomains of matrix protein 2. Vaccine 21:2616–2626.
    12.
    Okuda K, Ihata A, Watabe S, Okada E, Yamakawa T, Hamajima K, Yang J, Ishii N, Nakazawa M, Okuda K, Ohnari K, Nakajima K, and Xin KQ. 2001. Protective immunity against influenza A virus induced by immunization with DNA plasmid containing influenza M gene. Vaccine 19:3681–3691.
    13.
    Slepushkin VA, Katz JM, Black RA, Gamble WC, Rota PA, and Cox NJ. 1995. Protection of mice against influenza A virus challenge by vaccination with baculovirus-expressed M2 protein. Vaccine 13:1399–1402.
    14.
    Neirynck S, Deroo T, Saelens X, Vanlandschoot P, Jou WM, and Fiers W. 1999. A universal influenza A vaccine based on the extracellular domain of the M2 protein. Nat. Med. 5:1157–1163.
    15.
    Fan J, Liang X, Horton MS, Perry HC, Citron MP, Heidecker GJ, Fu T-M, Joyce J, Przysiecki CT, and Keller PM. 2004. Preclinical study of influenza virus A M2 peptide conjugate vaccines in mice, ferrets, and rhesus monkeys. Vaccine 22:2993–3003.
    16.
    Tompkins SM, Zhao ZS, Lo CY, Misplon JA, Liu T, Ye Z, Hogan RJ, Wu Z, Benton KA, Tumpey TM, and Epstein SL. 2007. Matrix protein 2 vaccination and protection against influenza viruses, including subtype H5N1. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 13:426–435.
    17.
    Shim BS, Choi YK, Yun CH, Lee EG, Jeon YS, Park SM, Cheon IS, Joo DH, Cho CH, Song MS, Seo SU, Byun YH, Park HJ, Poo H, Seong BL, Kim JO, Nguyen HH, Stadler K, Kim DW, Hong KJ, Czerkinsky C, and Song MK. 2011. Sublingual immunization with M2-based vaccine induces broad protective immunity against influenza. PLoS One 6:e27953.
    18.
    Song JM, Wang BZ, Park KM, Van Rooijen N, Quan FS, Kim MC, Jin HT, Pekosz A, Compans RW, and Kang SM. 2011. Influenza virus-like particles containing M2 induce broadly cross protective immunity. PLoS One 6:e14538.
    19.
    Krystal M, Elliott RM, Benz EW Jr, Young JF, and Palese P. 1982. Evolution of influenza A and B viruses: conservation of structural features in the hemagglutinin genes. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 79:4800–4804.
    20.
    Okuno Y, Isegawa Y, Sasao F, and Ueda S. 1993. A common neutralizing epitope conserved between the hemagglutinins of influenza A virus H1 and H2 strains. J. Virol. 67:2552–2558.
    21.
    Bommakanti G, Citron MP, Hepler RW, Callahan C, Heidecker GJ, Najar TA, Lu X, Joyce JG, Shiver JW, Casimiro DR, ter Meulen J, Liang X, and Varadarajan R. 2010. Design of an HA2-based Escherichia coli expressed influenza immunogen that protects mice from pathogenic challenge. P Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107:13701–13706.
    22.
    Steel J, Lowen AC, Wang TT, Yondola M, Gao Q, Haye K, Garcia-Sastre A, and Palese P. 2010. Influenza virus vaccine based on the conserved hemagglutinin stalk domain. mBio 1:e00018–10.
    23.
    Pica N, Hai R, Krammer F, Wang TT, Maamary J, Eggink D, Tan GS, Krause JC, Moran T, Stein CR, Banach D, Wrammert J, Belshe RB, Garcia-Sastre A, and Palese P. 2012. Hemagglutinin stalk antibodies elicited by the 2009 pandemic influenza virus as a mechanism for the extinction of seasonal H1N1 viruses. P Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109:2573–2578.
    24.
    Wei CJ, Boyington JC, McTamney PM, Kong WP, Pearce MB, Xu L, Andersen H, Rao S, Tumpey TM, Yang ZY, and Nabel GJ. 2010. Induction of broadly neutralizing H1N1 influenza antibodies by vaccination. Science 329:1060–1064.
    25.
    Krammer F, Pica N, Hai R, Margine I, and Palese P. 2013. Chimeric hemagglutinin influenza virus vaccine constructs elicit broadly protective stalk-specific antibodies. J. Virol. 87:6542–6550.
    26.
    Schepp-Berglind J, Luo M, Wang D, Wicker JA, Raja NU, Hoel BD, Holman DH, Barrett AD, and Dong JY. 2007. Complex adenovirus-mediated expression of West Nile virus C, PreM, E, and NS1 proteins induces both humoral and cellular immune responses. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 14:1117–1126.
    27.
    Sullivan NJ, Geisbert TW, Geisbert JB, Xu L, Yang ZY, Roederer M, Koup RA, Jahrling PB, and Nabel GJ. 2003. Accelerated vaccination for Ebola virus haemorrhagic fever in non-human primates. Nature 424:681–684.
    28.
    Sullivan NJ, Sanchez A, Rollin PE, Yang ZY, and Nabel GJ. 2000. Development of a preventive vaccine for Ebola virus infection in primates. Nature 408:605–609.
    29.
    Tatsis N and Ertl HC. 2004. Adenoviruses as vaccine vectors. Mol. Ther. 10:616–629.
    30.
    Timofeev AV, Ozherelkov SV, Pronin AV, Deeva AV, Karganova GG, Elbert LB, and Stephenson JR. 1998. Immunological basis for protection in a murine model of tick-borne encephalitis by a recombinant adenovirus carrying the gene encoding the NS1 nonstructural protein. J. Gen. Virol. 79(Pt 4):689–695.
    31.
    Epstein SL, Kong WP, Misplon JA, Lo CY, Tumpey TM, Xu L, and Nabel GJ. 2005. Protection against multiple influenza A subtypes by vaccination with highly conserved nucleoprotein. Vaccine 23:5404–5410.
    32.
    Kim SH, Kim JY, Choi Y, Nguyen HH, Song MK, and Chang J. 2013. Mucosal vaccination with recombinant adenovirus encoding nucleoprotein provides potent protection against influenza virus infection. PLoS One 8:e75460.
    33.
    Gao W, Soloff AC, Lu X, Montecalvo A, Nguyen DC, Matsuoka Y, Robbins PD, Swayne DE, Donis RO, Katz JM, Barratt-Boyes SM, and Gambotto A. 2006. Protection of mice and poultry from lethal H5N1 avian influenza virus through adenovirus-based immunization. J. Virol. 80:1959–1964.
    34.
    Hoelscher MA, Singh N, Garg S, Jayashankar L, Veguilla V, Pandey A, Matsuoka Y, Katz JM, Donis R, Mittal SK, and Sambhara S. 2008. A broadly protective vaccine against globally dispersed clade 1 and clade 2 H5N1 influenza viruses. J. Infect. Dis. 197:1185–1188.
    35.
    Rao SS, Kong WP, Wei CJ, Van Hoeven N, Gorres JP, Nason M, Andersen H, Tumpey TM, and Nabel GJ. 2010. Comparative efficacy of hemagglutinin, nucleoprotein, and matrix 2 protein gene-based vaccination against H5N1 influenza in mouse and ferret. PLoS One 5:e9812.
    36.
    Wang YQ, Qi LW, Aa J, Wang GJ, Gao W, Cheng SJ, Wang ZZ, Xiao W, and Li P. 2012. Comprehensive chemical profiling of guizhi fuling capsule by the combined use of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry with a deconvolution software and rapid-resolution liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry. Biomed. Chromatogr. 26:1286–1296.
    37.
    Shmarov MM, Sedova ES, Verkhovskaya LV, Rudneva IA, Bogacheva EA, Barykova YA, Shcherbinin DN, Lysenko AA, Tutykhina IL, Logunov DY, Smirnov YA, Naroditsky BS, and Gintsburg AL. 2010. Induction of a protective heterosubtypic immune response against the influenza virus by using recombinant adenoviral vectors expressing hemagglutinin of the influenza H5 virus. Acta Naturae 2:111–118.
    38.
    Van Kampen KR, Shi Z, Gao P, Zhang J, Foster KW, Chen DT, Marks D, Elmets CA, and Tang DC. 2005. Safety and immunogenicity of adenovirus-vectored nasal and epicutaneous influenza vaccines in humans. Vaccine 23:1029–1036.
    39.
    Brandtzaeg P. 2003. Role of mucosal immunity in influenza. Dev. Biol. (Basel) 115:39–48.
    40.
    Gallichan WS and Rosenthal KL. 1996. Long-lived cytotoxic T lymphocyte memory in mucosal tissues after mucosal but not systemic immunization. J. Exp. Med. 184:1879–1890.
    41.
    Nguyen HH, Moldoveanu Z, Novak MJ, van Ginkel FW, Ban E, Kiyono H, McGhee JR, and Mestecky J. 1999. Heterosubtypic immunity to lethal influenza A virus infection is associated with virus-specific CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses induced in mucosa-associated tissues. Virology 254:50–60.
    42.
    Nguyen HH, Tumpey TM, Park HJ, Byun YH, Tran LD, Nguyen VD, Kilgore PE, Czerkinsky C, Katz JM, Seong BL, Song JM, Kim YB, Do HT, Nguyen T, and Nguyen CV. 2010. Prophylactic and therapeutic efficacy of avian antibodies against influenza virus H5N1 and H1N1 in mice. PLoS One 5:e10152.
    43.
    Nguyen HH, van Ginkel FW, Vu HL, McGhee JR, and Mestecky J. 2001. Heterosubtypic immunity to influenza A virus infection requires B cells but not CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J. Infect. Dis. 183:368–376.
    44.
    Hai R, Krammer F, Tan GS, Pica N, Eggink D, Maamary J, Margine I, Albrecht RA, and Palese P. 2012. Influenza viruses expressing chimeric hemagglutinins: globular head and stalk domains derived from different subtypes. J. Virol. 86:5774–5781.
    45.
    Maines TR, Lu XH, Erb SM, Edwards L, Guarner J, Greer PW, Nguyen DC, Szretter KJ, Chen LM, Thawatsupha P, Chittaganpitch M, Waicharoen S, Nguyen DT, Nguyen T, Nguyen HH, Kim JH, Hoang LT, Kang C, Phuong LS, Lim W, Zaki S, Donis RO, Cox NJ, Katz JM, and Tumpey TM. 2005. Avian influenza (H5N1) viruses isolated from humans in Asia in 2004 exhibit increased virulence in mammals. J. Virol. 79:11788–11800.
    46.
    Park HJ, Ferko B, Byun YH, Song JH, Han GY, Roethl E, Egorov A, Muster T, Seong B, Kweon MN, Song M, Czerkinsky C, and Nguyen HH. 2012. Sublingual immunization with a live attenuated influenza a virus lacking the nonstructural protein 1 induces broad protective immunity in mice. PLoS One 7:e39921.
    47.
    Ekiert DC, Friesen RH, Bhabha G, Kwaks T, Jongeneelen M, Yu W, Ophorst C, Cox F, Korse HJ, Brandenburg B, Vogels R, Brakenhoff JP, Kompier R, Koldijk MH, Cornelissen LA, Poon LL, Peiris M, Koudstaal W, Wilson IA, and Goudsmit J. 2011. A highly conserved neutralizing epitope on group 2 influenza A viruses. Science 333:843–850.
    48.
    Price GE, Soboleski MR, Lo CY, Misplon JA, Pappas C, Houser KV, Tumpey TM, and Epstein SL. 2009. Vaccination focusing immunity on conserved antigens protects mice and ferrets against virulent H1N1 and H5N1 influenza A viruses. Vaccine 27:6512–6521.
    49.
    Soboleski MR, Gabbard JD, Price GE, Misplon JA, Lo CY, Perez DR, Ye J, Tompkins SM, and Epstein SL. 2011. Cold-adapted influenza and recombinant adenovirus vaccines induce cross-protective immunity against pH1N1 challenge in mice. PLoS One 6:e21937.
    50.
    Braucher DR, Henningson JN, Loving CL, Vincent AL, Kim E, Steitz J, Gambotto AA, and Kehrli ME Jr. 2012. Intranasal vaccination with replication-defective adenovirus type 5 encoding influenza virus hemagglutinin elicits protective immunity to homologous challenge and partial protection to heterologous challenge in pigs. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 19:1722–1729.
    51.
    Wei CJ, Yassine HM, McTamney PM, Gall JG, Whittle JR, Boyington JC, and Nabel GJ. 2012. Elicitation of broadly neutralizing influenza antibodies in animals with previous influenza exposure. Sci. Transl. Med. 4:147ra114.
    52.
    Rogers GN, Paulson JC, Daniels RS, Skehel JJ, Wilson IA, and Wiley DC. 1983. Single amino acid substitutions in influenza haemagglutinin change receptor binding specificity. Nature 304:76–78.
    53.
    El Bakkouri K, Descamps F, De Filette M, Smet A, Festjens E, Birkett A, Van Rooijen N, Verbeek S, Fiers W, and Saelens X. 2011. Universal vaccine based on ectodomain of matrix protein 2 of influenza A: Fc receptors and alveolar macrophages mediate protection. J. Immunol. 186:1022–1031.
    54.
    Fiers W, De Filette M, El Bakkouri K, Schepens B, Roose K, Schotsaert M, Birkett A, and Saelens X. 2009. M2e-based universal influenza A vaccine. Vaccine 27:6280–6283.
    55.
    Hillaire ML, van Trierum SE, Kreijtz JH, Bodewes R, Geelhoed-Mieras MM, Nieuwkoop NJ, Fouchier RA, Kuiken T, Osterhaus AD, and Rimmelzwaan GF. 2011. Cross-protective immunity against influenza pH1N1 2009 viruses induced by seasonal influenza A (H3N2) virus is mediated by virus-specific T cells. J. Gen. Virol. 92:2339–2349.
    56.
    Weinfurter JT, Brunner K, Capuano SV III, Li C, Broman KW, Kawaoka Y, and Friedrich TC. 2011. Cross-reactive T cells are involved in rapid clearance of 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus in nonhuman primates. PLoS Pathog. 7:e1002381.
    57.
    Epstein SL, Lo CY, Misplon JA, Lawson CM, Hendrickson BA, Max EE, and Subbarao K. 1997. Mechanisms of heterosubtypic immunity to lethal influenza A virus infection in fully immunocompetent, T cell-depleted, β2-microglobulin-deficient, and J-chain-deficient mice. J. Immunol. 158:1222–1230.
    58.
    Krammer F and Palese P. 2013. Influenza virus hemagglutinin stalk-based antibodies and vaccines. Curr. Opin. Virol. 3:521–530.
    59.
    Croyle MA, Patel A, Tran KN, Gray M, Zhang Y, Strong JE, Feldmann H, and Kobinger GP. 2008. Nasal delivery of an adenovirus-based vaccine bypasses preexisting immunity to the vaccine carrier and improves the immune response in mice. PLoS One 3:e3548.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Journal of Virology
    Volume 88Number 171 September 2014
    Pages: 9693 - 9703
    Editor: S. Perlman

    History

    Received: 20 March 2014
    Accepted: 4 June 2014
    Published online: 4 August 2014

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Contributors

    Authors

    Eun Hye Kim
    Viral Immunology Laboratory, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, South Korea
    Hae-Jung Park
    Viral Immunology Laboratory, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, South Korea
    Gye-Yeong Han
    Viral Immunology Laboratory, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, South Korea
    Man-Ki Song
    Viral Immunology Laboratory, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, South Korea
    Alexander Pereboev
    Gene Therapy Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
    Jeong S. Hong
    Department of Cell Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
    Jun Chang
    Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea
    Young-Ho Byun
    Department of Biotechnology and Vaccine Translational Research Center, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea
    Baik Lin Seong
    Department of Biotechnology and Vaccine Translational Research Center, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea
    Huan H. Nguyen
    Viral Immunology Laboratory, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, South Korea

    Editor

    S. Perlman
    Editor

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Huan H. Nguyen, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Journal of VirologyArticle
    Difference in Receptor Usage between Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Coronavirus and SARS-Like Coronavirus of Bat Origin

    Difference in Receptor Usage between Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Coronavirus and SARS-Like Coronavirus of Bat Origin

    ABSTRACT

    Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is caused by the SARS-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV), which uses angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as its receptor for cell entry. A group of SARS-like CoVs (SL-CoVs) has been identified in horseshoe bats. SL-CoVs and SARS-CoVs share identical genome organizations and high sequence identities, with the main exception of the N terminus of the spike protein (S), known to be responsible for receptor binding in CoVs. In this study, we investigated the receptor usage of the SL-CoV S by combining a human immunodeficiency virus-based pseudovirus system with cell lines expressing the ACE2 molecules of human, civet, or horseshoe bat. In addition to full-length S of SL-CoV and SARS-CoV, a series of S chimeras was constructed by inserting different sequences of the SARS-CoV S into the SL-CoV S backbone. Several important observations were made from this study. First, the SL-CoV S was unable to use any of the three ACE2 molecules as its receptor. Second, the SARS-CoV S failed to enter cells expressing the bat ACE2. Third, the chimeric S covering the previously defined receptor-binding domain gained its ability to enter cells via human ACE2, albeit with different efficiencies for different constructs. Fourth, a minimal insert region (amino acids 310 to 518) was found to be sufficient to convert the SL-CoV S from non-ACE2 binding to human ACE2 binding, indicating that the SL-CoV S is largely compatible with SARS-CoV S protein both in structure and in function. The significance of these findings in relation to virus origin, virus recombination, and host switching is discussed.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Babcock, G. J., D. J. Esshaki, W. D. Thomas, Jr., and D. M. Ambrosino.2004. Amino acids 270 to 510 of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein are required for interaction with receptor. J. Virol.78:4552-4560.
    2.
    Baric, R. S., K. Fu, M. C. Schaad, and S. A. Stohlman.1990. Establishing a genetic recombination map for murine coronavirus strain A59 complementation groups. Virology177:646-656.
    3.
    Berry, J. D., S. Jones, M. A. Drebot, A. Andonov, M. Sabara, X. Y. Yuan, H. Weingartl, L. Fernando, P. Marszal, J. Gren, B. Nicolas, M. Andonova, F. Ranada, M. J. Gubbins, T. B. Ball, P. Kitching, Y. Li, A. Kabani, and F. Plummer.2004. Development and characterisation of neutralising monoclonal antibody to the SARS-coronavirus. J. Virol. Methods120:87-96.
    4.
    Bosch, B. J., R. van der Zee, C. A. de Haan, and P. J. Rottier.2003. The coronavirus spike protein is a class I virus fusion protein: structural and functional characterization of the fusion core complex. J. Virol.77:8801-8811.
    5.
    Reference deleted.
    6.
    Calisher, C. H., J. E. Childs, H. E. Field, K. V. Holmes, and T. Schountz.2006. Bats: important reservoir hosts of emerging viruses. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.19:531-545.
    7.
    Casais, R., B. Dove, D. Cavanagh, and P. Britton.2003. Recombinant avian infectious bronchitis virus expressing a heterologous spike gene demonstrates that the spike protein is a determinant of cell tropism. J. Virol.77:9084-9089.
    8.
    Reference deleted.
    9.
    de Haan, C. A., L. Kuo, P. S. Masters, H. Vennema, and P. J. Rottier.1998. Coronavirus particle assembly: primary structure requirements of the membrane protein. J. Virol.72:6838-6850.
    10.
    Dimitrov, D. S.2004. Virus entry: molecular mechanisms and biomedical applications. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.2:109-122.
    11.
    Douglas, G. C., M. K. O'Bryan, M. P. Hedger, D. K. Lee, M. A. Yarski, A. I. Smith, and R. A. Lew.2004. The novel angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) homolog, ACE2, is selectively expressed by adult Leydig cells of the testis. Endocrinology145:4703-4711.
    12.
    Drosten, C., S. Gunther, W. Preiser, S. van der Werf, H. R. Brodt, S. Becker, H. Rabenau, M. Panning, L. Kolesnikova, R. A. Fouchier, A. Berger, A. M. Burguiere, J. Cinatl, M. Eickmann, N. Escriou, K. Grywna, S. Kramme, J. C. Manuguerra, S. Muller, V. Rickerts, M. Sturmer, S. Vieth, H. D. Klenk, A. D. Osterhaus, H. Schmitz, and H. W. Doerr.2003. Identification of a novel coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med.348:1967-1976.
    13.
    Eaton, B. T., C. C. Broder, D. Middleton, and L. F. Wang.2006. Hendra and Nipah viruses: different and dangerous. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.4:23-35.
    14.
    Fu, K., and R. S. Baric.1992. Evidence for variable rates of recombination in the MHV genome. Virology189:88-102.
    15.
    Fu, K., and R. S. Baric.1994. Map locations of mouse hepatitis virus temperature-sensitive mutants: confirmation of variable rates of recombination. J. Virol.68:7458-7466.
    16.
    Fukushi, S., T. Mizutani, M. Saijo, S. Matsuyama, N. Miyajima, F. Taguchi, S. Itamura, I. Kurane, and S. Morikawa.2005. Vesicular stomatitis virus pseudotyped with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein. J. Gen. Virol.86:2269-2274.
    17.
    Gorbalenya, A. E., E. J. Snijder, and W. J. Spaan.2004. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus phylogeny: toward consensus. J. Virol.78:7863-7866.
    18.
    Guan, Y., B. J. Zheng, Y. Q. He, X. L. Liu, Z. X. Zhuang, C. L. Cheung, S. W. Luo, P. H. Li, L. J. Zhang, Y. J. Guan, K. M. Butt, K. L. Wong, K. W. Chan, W. Lim, K. F. Shortridge, K. Y. Yuen, J. S. Peiris, and L. L. Poon.2003. Isolation and characterization of viruses related to the SARS coronavirus from animals in southern China. Science302:276-278.
    19.
    Haijema, B. J., H. Volders, and P. J. Rottier.2003. Switching species tropism: an effective way to manipulate the feline coronavirus genome. J. Virol.77:4528-4538.
    20.
    Han, D. P., A. Penn-Nicholson, and M. W. Cho.2006. Identification of critical determinants on ACE2 for SARS-CoV entry and development of a potent entry inhibitor. Virology350:15-25.
    21.
    Reference deleted.
    22.
    Jia, W., K. Karaca, C. R. Parrish, and S. A. Naqi.1995. A novel variant of avian infectious bronchitis virus resulting from recombination among three different strains. Arch. Virol.140:259-271.
    23.
    Kan, B., M. Wang, H. Jing, H. Xu, X. Jiang, M. Yan, W. Liang, H. Zheng, K. Wan, Q. Liu, B. Cui, Y. Xu, E. Zhang, H. Wang, J. Ye, G. Li, M. Li, Z. Cui, X. Qi, K. Chen, L. Du, K. Gao, Y. T. Zhao, X.-Z. Zou, Y.-J. Feng, Y.-F. Gao, R. Hai, D. Yu, Y. Guan, and J. Xu.2005. Molecular evolution analysis and geographic investigation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-like virus in palm civets at an animal market and on farms. J. Virol.79:11892-11900.
    24.
    Krueger, D. K., S. M. Kelly, D. N. Lewicki, R. Ruffolo, and T. M. Gallagher.2001. Variations in disparate regions of the murine coronavirus spike protein impact the initiation of membrane fusion. J. Virol.75:2792-2802.
    25.
    Ksiazek, T. G., D. Erdman, C. S. Goldsmith, S. R. Zaki, T. Peret, S. Emery, S. Tong, C. Urbani, J. A. Comer, W. Lim, P. E. Rollin, S. F. Dowell, A. E. Ling, C. D. Humphrey, W. J. Shieh, J. Guarner, C. D. Paddock, P. Rota, B. Fields, J. DeRisi, J. Y. Yang, N. Cox, J. M. Hughes, J. W. LeDuc, W. J. Bellini, and L. J. Anderson.2003. A novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med.348:1953-1966.
    25a.
    Kuo, L., G. J. Godeke, M. J. Raamsman, P. S. Masters, and P. J. Rottier.2000. Retargeting of coronavirus by substitution of the spike glycoprotein ectodomain: crossing the host cell species barrier. J. Virol.74:1393-1406.
    26.
    Lau, S. K., P. C. Woo, K. S. Li, Y. Huang, H. W. Tsoi, B. H. Wong, S. S. Wong, S. Y. Leung, K. H. Chan, and K. Y. Yuen.2005. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-like virus in Chinese horseshoe bats. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA102:14040-14045.
    27.
    Li, F., W. Li, M. Farzan, and S. C. Harrison.2005. Structure of SARS coronavirus spike receptor-binding domain complexed with receptor. Science309:1864-1868.
    28.
    Li, W., M. J. Moore, N. Vasilieva, J. Sui, S. K. Wong, M. A. Berne, M. Somasundaran, J. L. Sullivan, K. Luzuriaga, T. C. Greenough, H. Choe, and M. Farzan.2003. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is a functional receptor for the SARS coronavirus. Nature426:450-454.
    29.
    Li, W., Z. Shi, M. Yu, W. Ren, C. Smith, J. H. Epstein, H. Wang, G. Crameri, Z. Hu, H. Zhang, J. Zhang, J. McEachern, H. Field, P. Daszak, B. T. Eaton, S. Zhang, and L. F. Wang.2005. Bats are natural reservoirs of SARS-like coronaviruses. Science310:676-679.
    30.
    Li, W., S. K. Wong, F. Li, J. H. Kuhn, I. C. Huang, H. Choe, and M. Farzan.2006. Animal origins of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus: insight from ACE2-S-protein interactions. J. Virol.80:4211-4219.
    31.
    Li, W., C. Zhang, J. Sui, J. H. Kuhn, M. J. Moore, S. Luo, S. K. Wong, I. C. Huang, K. Xu, N. Vasilieva, A. Murakami, Y. He, W. A. Marasco, Y. Guan, H. Choe, and M. Farzan.2005. Receptor and viral determinants of SARS-coronavirus adaptation to human ACE2. EMBO J.24:1634-1643.
    32.
    Lissenberg, A., M. M. Vrolijk, A. L. van Vliet, M. A. Langereis, J. D. de Groot-Mijnes, P. J. Rottier, and R. J. de Groot.2005. Luxury at a cost? Recombinant mouse hepatitis viruses expressing the accessory hemagglutinin esterase protein display reduced fitness in vitro. J. Virol.79:15054-15063.
    33.
    Martina, B. E., B. L. Haagmans, T. Kuiken, R. A. Fouchier, G. F. Rimmelzwaan, G. Van Amerongen, J. S. Peiris, W. Lim, and A. D. Osterhaus.2003. Virology: SARS virus infection of cats and ferrets. Nature425:915.
    34.
    Nie, Y., G. Wang, X. Shi, H. Zhang, Y. Qiu, Z. He, W. Wang, G. Lian, X. Yin, L. Du, L. Ren, J. Wang, X. He, T. Li, H. Deng, and M. Ding.2004. Neutralizing antibodies in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus infection. J. Infect. Dis.190:1119-1126.
    35.
    Poon, L. L., D. K. Chu, K. H. Chan, O. K. Wong, T. M. Ellis, Y. H. Leung, S. K. Lau, P. C. Woo, K. Y. Suen, K. Y. Yuen, Y. Guan, and J. S. Peiris.2005. Identification of a novel coronavirus in bats. J. Virol.79:2001-2009.
    36.
    Poutanen, S. M., D. E. Low, B. Henry, S. Finkelstein, D. Rose, K. Green, R. Tellier, R. Draker, D. Adachi, M. Ayers, A. K. Chan, D. M. Skowronski, I. Salit, A. E. Simor, A. S. Slutsky, P. W. Doyle, M. Krajden, M. Petric, R. C. Brunham, and A. J. McGeer.2003. Identification of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Canada. N. Engl. J. Med.348:1995-2005.
    37.
    Qu, X. X., P. Hao, X. J. Song, S. M. Jiang, Y. X. Liu, P. G. Wang, X. Rao, H. D. Song, S. Y. Wang, Y. Zuo, A. H. Zheng, M. Luo, H. L. Wang, F. Deng, H. Z. Wang, Z. H. Hu, M. X. Ding, G. P. Zhao, and H. K. Deng.2005. Identification of two critical amino acid residues of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein for its variation in zoonotic tropism transition via a double substitution strategy. J. Biol. Chem.280:29588-29595.
    38.
    Ren, W., W. Li, M. Yu, P. Hao, Y. Zhang, P. Zhou, S. Zhang, G. Zhao, Y. Zhong, S. Wang, L. F. Wang, and Z. Shi.2006. Full-length genome sequences of two SARS-like coronaviruses in horseshoe bats and genetic variation analysis. J. Gen. Virol.87:3355-3359.
    39.
    Tang, X. C., J. X. Zhang, S. Y. Zhang, P. Wang, X. H. Fan, L. F. Li, G. Li, B. Q. Dong, W. Liu, C. L. Cheung, K. M. Xu, W. J. Song, D. Vijaykrishna, L. L. Poon, J. S. Peiris, G. J. Smith, H. Chen, and Y. Guan.2006. Prevalence and genetic diversity of coronaviruses in bats from China. J. Virol.80:7481-7490.
    39a.
    Thompson, J. D., D. G. Higgins, and T. J. Gibson.1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res.22:4673-4680.
    40.
    Tu, C., G. Crameri, X. Kong, J. Chen, Y. Sun, M. Yu, H. Xiang, X. Xia, S. Liu, T. Ren, Y. Yu, B. T. Eaton, H. Xuan, and L. F. Wang.2004. Antibodies to SARS coronavirus in civets. Emerg. Infect. Dis.10:2244-2248.
    41.
    Wang, L., D. Junker, and E. W. Collisson.1993. Evidence of natural recombination within the S1 gene of infectious bronchitis virus. Virology192:710-716.
    42.
    Wang, P., J. Chen, A. Zheng, Y. Nie, X. Shi, W. Wang, G. Wang, M. Luo, H. Liu, L. Tan, X. Song, Z. Wang, X. Yin, X. Qu, X. Wang, T. Qing, M. Ding, and H. Deng.2004. Expression cloning of functional receptor used by SARS coronavirus. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.315:439-444.
    42a.
    Wong, S. K., W. H. Li, M. J. Moore, H. Choe, and M. Farzan.2004. A 193-amino acid fragment of the SARS coronavirus S protein efficiently binds angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. J. Biol. Chem.279:3197-3201.
    43.
    Woo, P. C., S. K. Lau, K. S. Li, R. W. Poon, B. H. Wong, H. W. Tsoi, B. C. Yip, Y. Huang, K. H. Chan, and K. Y. Yuen.2006. Molecular diversity of coronaviruses in bats. Virology351:180-187.
    44.
    Woo, P. C., S. K. Lau, C. C. Yip, Y. Huang, H. W. Tsoi, K. H. Chan, and K. Y. Yuen.2006. Comparative analysis of 22 coronavirus HKU1 genomes reveals a novel genotype and evidence of natural recombination in coronavirus HKU1. J. Virol.80:7136-7145.
    44a.
    P. C. Y. Woo, M. Wang, S. K. P. Lau, H. Xu, R. W. S. Poon, R. Guo, B. H. L. Wong, K. Gao, H.-W. Tsoi, Y. Huang, K. S. M. Li, C. S. F. Lam, K.-H. Chan, B.-J. Zheng, and K.-Y. Yuen.2007. Comparative analysis of twelve genomes of three novel group 2c and group 2d coronaviruses reveals unique group and subgroup features. J. Virol.81:1574-1585.
    45.
    Xiao, X., S. Chakraborti, A. S. Dimitrov, K. Gramatikoff, and D. S. Dimitrov.2003. The SARS-CoV S glycoprotein: expression and functional characterization. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.312:1159-1164.
    46.
    Zhang, H., G. Wang, J. Li, Y. Nie, X. Shi, G. Lian, W. Wang, X. Yin, Y. Zhao, X. Qu, M. Ding, and H. Deng.2004. Identification of an antigenic determinant on the S2 domain of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike glycoprotein capable of inducing neutralizing antibodies. J. Virol.78:6938-6945.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Journal of Virology
    Volume 82Number 415 February 2008
    Pages: 1899 - 1907

    History

    Received: 20 May 2007
    Accepted: 15 November 2007
    Published online: 12 December 2007

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Contributors

    Authors

    Wuze Ren
    State Key Laboratory of Virology, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China
    Xiuxia Qu
    Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation of the Ministry of Education, College of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
    Wendong Li
    State Key Laboratory of Virology, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China
    Present address: School of Life Science, Heilongjiang University, Harbin, 150080, China.
    Zhenggang Han
    State Key Laboratory of Virology, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China
    Meng Yu
    CSIRO Livestock Industries, Australian Animal Health Laboratory and Australian Biosecurity Cooperative Research Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Geelong, Australia
    Peng Zhou
    State Key Laboratory of Virology, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China
    Shu-Yi Zhang
    School of Life Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China
    Lin-Fa Wang [email protected]
    CSIRO Livestock Industries, Australian Animal Health Laboratory and Australian Biosecurity Cooperative Research Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Geelong, Australia
    Hongkui Deng
    Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation of the Ministry of Education, College of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
    Zhengli Shi [email protected]
    State Key Laboratory of Virology, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Journal of VirologyArticle
    A Comparative Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Antivirals Characterizes 3CLpro Inhibitor PF-00835231 as a Potential New Treatment for COVID-19

    ABSTRACT

    Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the etiological agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). There is a dire need for novel effective antivirals to treat COVID-19, as the only approved direct-acting antiviral to date is remdesivir, targeting the viral polymerase complex. A potential alternate target in the viral life cycle is the main SARS-CoV-2 protease 3CLpro (Mpro). The drug candidate PF-00835231 is the active compound of the first anti-3CLpro regimen in clinical trials. Here, we perform a comparative analysis of PF-00835231, the preclinical 3CLpro inhibitor GC-376, and the polymerase inhibitor remdesivir, in alveolar basal epithelial cells modified to express ACE2 (A549+ACE2 cells). We find PF-00835231 with at least similar or higher potency than remdesivir or GC-376. A time-of-drug-addition approach delineates the timing of early SARS-CoV-2 life cycle steps in A549+ACE2 cells and validates PF-00835231’s early time of action. In a model of the human polarized airway epithelium, both PF-00835231 and remdesivir potently inhibit SARS-CoV-2 at low micromolar concentrations. Finally, we show that the efflux transporter P-glycoprotein, which was previously suggested to diminish PF-00835231’s efficacy based on experiments in monkey kidney Vero E6 cells, does not negatively impact PF-00835231 efficacy in either A549+ACE2 cells or human polarized airway epithelial cultures. Thus, our study provides in vitro evidence for the potential of PF-00835231 as an effective SARS-CoV-2 antiviral and addresses concerns that emerged based on prior studies in nonhuman in vitro models.
    IMPORTANCE The arsenal of SARS-CoV-2 specific antiviral drugs is extremely limited. Only one direct-acting antiviral drug is currently approved, the viral polymerase inhibitor remdesivir, and it has limited efficacy. Thus, there is a substantial need to develop additional antiviral compounds with minimal side effects and alternate viral targets. One such alternate target is its main protease, 3CLpro (Mpro), an essential component of the SARS-CoV-2 life cycle processing the viral polyprotein into the components of the viral polymerase complex. In this study, we characterize a novel antiviral drug, PF-00835231, which is the active component of the first-in-class 3CLpro-targeting regimen in clinical trials. Using 3D in vitro models of the human airway epithelium, we demonstrate the antiviral potential of PF-00835231 for inhibition of SARS-CoV-2.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, Zhao X, Huang B, Shi W, Lu R, Niu P, Zhan F, Ma X, Wang D, Xu W, Wu G, Gao GF, Tan W, China Novel Coronavirus Investigating and Research Team. 2020. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med 382:727–733.
    2.
    Gorbalenya AE, Baker SC, Baric RS, de Groot RJ, Drosten C, Gulyaeva AA, Haagmans BL, Lauber C, Leontovich AM, Neuman BW, Penzar D, Perlman S, Poon LLM, Samborskiy DV, Sidorov IA, Sola I, Ziebuhr J. 2020. The species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2. Nat Microbiol 5:536–544.
    3.
    Pruijssers AJ, George AS, Schäfer A, Leist SR, Gralinksi LE, Dinnon KH, Yount BL, Agostini ML, Stevens LJ, Chappell JD, Lu X, Hughes TM, Gully K, Martinez DR, Brown AJ, Graham RL, Perry JK, Du Pont V, Pitts J, Ma B, Babusis D, Murakami E, Feng JY, Bilello JP, Porter DP, Cihlar T, Baric RS, Denison MR, Sheahan TP. 2020. Remdesivir inhibits SARS-CoV-2 in human lung cells and chimeric SARS-CoV expressing the SARS-CoV-2 RNA polymerase in mice. Cell Rep 32:107940.
    4.
    Ziebuhr J, Siddell SG. 1999. Processing of the human coronavirus 229E replicase polyproteins by the virus-encoded 3C-like proteinase: identification of proteolytic products and cleavage sites common to pp1a and pp1ab. J Virol 73:177–185.
    5.
    Gadlage MJ, Denison MR. 2010. Exchange of the coronavirus replicase polyprotein cleavage sites alters protease specificity and processing. J Virol 84:6894–6898.
    6.
    Dai W, Zhang B, Jiang X-M, Su H, Li J, Zhao Y, Xie X, Jin Z, Peng J, Liu F, Li C, Li Y, Bai F, Wang H, Cheng X, Cen X, Hu S, Yang X, Wang J, Liu X, Xiao G, Jiang H, Rao Z, Zhang L-K, Xu Y, Yang H, Liu H. 2020. Structure-based design of antiviral drug candidates targeting the SARS-CoV-2 main protease. Science 368:1331–1335.
    7.
    Zhang L, Lin D, Sun X, Curth U, Drosten C, Sauerhering L, Becker S, Rox K, Hilgenfeld R. 2020. Crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2 main protease provides a basis for design of improved α-ketoamide inhibitors. Science 368:409–412.
    8.
    Gordon DE, Jang GM, Bouhaddou M, Xu J, Obernier K, White KM, O’Meara MJ, Rezelj VV, Guo JZ, Swaney DL, Tummino TA, Hüttenhain R, Kaake RM, Richards AL, Tutuncuoglu B, Foussard H, Batra J, Haas K, Modak M, Kim M, Haas P, Polacco BJ, Braberg H, Fabius JM, Eckhardt M, Soucheray M, Bennett MJ, Cakir M, McGregor MJ, Li Q, Meyer B, Roesch F, Vallet T, Mac Kain A, Miorin L, Moreno E, Naing ZZC, Zhou Y, Peng S, Shi Y, Zhang Z, Shen W, Kirby IT, Melnyk JE, Chorba JS, Lou K, Dai SA, Barrio-Hernandez I, Memon D, Hernandez-Armenta C, et al. 2020. A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing. Nature 583:459–468.
    9.
    Hoffman RL, Kania RS, Brothers MA, Davies JF, Ferre RA, Gajiwala KS, He M, Hogan RJ, Kozminski K, Li LY, Lockner JW, Lou J, Marra MT, Mitchell LJ, Murray BW, Nieman JA, Noell S, Planken SP, Rowe T, Ryan K, Smith GJ, Solowiej JE, Steppan CM, Taggart B. 2020. Discovery of ketone-based covalent inhibitors of coronavirus 3CL proteases for the potential therapeutic treatment of COVID-19. J Med Chem 63:12725–12747.
    10.
    Yoshino R, Yasuo N, Sekijima M. 2020. Identification of key interactions between SARS-CoV-2 main protease and inhibitor drug candidates. Sci Rep 10:12493.
    11.
    Ma C, Sacco MD, Hurst B, Townsend JA, Hu Y, Szeto T, Zhang X, Tarbet B, Marty MT, Chen Y, Wang J. 2020. Boceprevir, GC-376, and calpain inhibitors II, XII inhibit SARS-CoV-2 viral replication by targeting the viral main protease. Cell Res 30:678–692.
    12.
    Jin Z, Zhao Y, Sun Y, Zhang B, Wang H, Wu Y, Zhu Y, Zhu C, Hu T, Du X, Duan Y, Yu J, Yang X, Yang X, Yang K, Liu X, Guddat LW, Xiao G, Zhang L, Yang H, Rao Z. 2020. Structural basis for the inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 main protease by antineoplastic drug carmofur. Nat Struct Mol Biol 27:529–532.
    13.
    Jin Z, Du X, Xu Y, Deng Y, Liu M, Zhao Y, Zhang B, Li X, Zhang L, Peng C, Duan Y, Yu J, Wang L, Yang K, Liu F, Jiang R, Yang X, You T, Liu X, Yang X, Bai F, Liu H, Liu X, Guddat LW, Xu W, Xiao G, Qin C, Shi Z, Jiang H, Rao Z, Yang H. 2020. Structure of Mpro from SARS-CoV-2 and discovery of its inhibitors. Nature 582:289–293.
    14.
    Boras B, Jones RM, Anson BJ, Arenson D, Aschenbrenner L, Bakowski MA, Beutler N, Binder J, Chen E, Eng H, Hammond J, Hoffman R, Kadar EP, Kania R, Kimoto E, Kirkpatrick MG, Lanyon L, Lendy EK, Lillis JR, Luthra SA, Ma C, Noell S, Obach RS, O’Brien MN, O’Connor R, Ogilvie K, Owen D, Pettersson M, Reese MR, Rogers T, Rossulek MI, Sathish JG, Steppan C, Ticehurst M, Updyke LW, Zhu Y, Wang J, Chatterjee AK, Mesecar AD, Anderson AS, Allerton C. 2020. Discovery of a novel inhibitor of coronavirus 3CL protease as a clinical candidate for the potential treatment of COVID-19. bioRxiv
    15.
    Bossennec M, Di Roio A, Caux C, Ménétrier-Caux C. 2018. MDR1 in immunity: friend or foe? Oncoimmunology 7:e1499388-11.
    16.
    Sankatsing SUC, Beijnen JH, Schinkel AH, Lange JMA, Prins JM. 2004. P glycoprotein in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection and therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:1073–1081.
    17.
    Puelles VG, Lütgehetmann M, Lindenmeyer MT, Sperhake JP, Wong MN, Allweiss L, Chilla S, Heinemann A, Wanner N, Liu S, Braun F, Lu S, Pfefferle S, Schröder AS, Edler C, Gross O, Glatzel M, Wichmann D, Wiech T, Kluge S, Pueschel K, Aepfelbacher M, Huber TB. 2020. Multiorgan and renal tropism of SARS-CoV-2. N Engl J Med 383:590–592.
    18.
    Zou L, Ruan F, Huang M, Liang L, Huang H, Hong Z, Yu J, Kang M, Song Y, Xia J, Guo Q, Song T, He J, Yen H-L, Peiris M, Wu J. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 viral load in upper respiratory specimens of infected patients. N Engl J Med 382:1177–1179.
    19.
    Blanco-Melo D, Nilsson-Payant BE, Liu W-C, Uhl Hoagland SD, Møller R, Jordan TX, Oishi K, Panis Sachs MD, Wang TT, Schwartz RE, Lim JK, Albrecht RA, TenOever R. 2020. Imbalanced host response to SARS-CoV-2 drives development of COVID-19. Cell 181:1036–1045.e9.
    20.
    Shannon A, Le NT-T, Selisko B, Eydoux C, Alvarez K, Guillemot J-C, Decroly E, Peersen O, Ferron F, Canard B. 2020. Remdesivir and SARS-CoV-2: structural requirements at both nsp12 RdRp and nsp14 exonuclease active-sites. Antiviral Res 178:104793.
    21.
    Rambaut A, Holmes EC, O’Toole Á, Hill V, McCrone JT, Ruis C, Du Plessis L, Pybus OG. 2020. A dynamic nomenclature proposal for SARS-CoV-2 lineages to assist genomic epidemiology. Nat Microbiol 5:1403–1407.
    22.
    Gonzalez-Reiche AS, Hernandez MM, Sullivan MJ, Ciferri B, Alshammary H, Obla A, Fabre S, Kleiner G, Polanco J, Khan Z, Alburquerque B, van de Guchte A, Dutta J, Francoeur N, Melo BS, Oussenko I, Deikus G, Soto J, Sridhar SH, Wang Y-C, Twyman K, Kasarskis A, Altman Dr Smith M, Sebra R, Aberg J, Krammer F, García-Sastre A, Luksza M, Patel G, Paniz-Mondolfi A, Gitman M, Sordillo EM, Simon V, van Bakel H. 2020. Introductions and early spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the New York City area. Science 369:297–301.
    23.
    Plante JA, Liu Y, Liu J, Xia H, Johnson BA, Lokugamage KG, Zhang X, Muruato AE, Zou J, Fontes-Garfias CR, Mirchandani D, Scharton D, Bilello JP, Ku Z, An Z, Kalveram B, Freiberg AN, Menachery VD, Xie X, Plante KS, Weaver SC, Shi PY. 2020. Spike mutation D614G alters SARS-CoV-2 fitness. Nature
    24.
    Hou YJ, Chiba S, Halfmann P, Ehre C, Kuroda M, Dinnon KH, Leist SR, Schäfer A, Nakajima N, Takahashi K, Lee RE, Mascenik TM, Graham R, Edwards CE, Tse LV, Okuda K, Markmann AJ, Bartelt L, de Silva A, Margolis DM, Boucher RC, Randell SH, Suzuki T, Gralinski LE, Kawaoka Y, Baric RS. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 D614G variant exhibits efficient replication ex vivo and transmission in vivo. Science 370:1464–1468.
    25.
    Thornburg N, Bradford R, Rashid S, Flores B, Parker M, Tallon L, Sadzewicz L, Ott S, Vavikolanu K, Nadendla S, Sichtig H. 2020. Data from “FDA Database for Regulatory Grade Microbial Sequences (FDA-ARGOS): supporting development and validation of infectious disease Dx tests.”
    26.
    Roder A, Banakis S, Johnson K, Khalfan M, Borenstein E, Samanovic M, Cornelius A, Herati R, Ulrich R, Fleming A, Kottkamp A, Raabe V, Mulligan MJ, Gresham D, Ghedin E. 2020. Data from “SARS-CoV-2 sequences from COVID19 patients in New York.” GenBank https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MT703677.1 (accession no. MT703677.1).
    27.
    Lavi E, Wang Q, Weiss SR, Gonatas NK. 1996. Syncytia formation induced by coronavirus infection is associated with fragmentation and rearrangement of the Golgi apparatus. Virology 221:325–334.
    28.
    Corver J, Broer R, Van Kasteren P, Spaan W. 2009. Mutagenesis of the transmembrane domain of the SARS coronavirus spike glycoprotein: refinement of the requirements for SARS coronavirus cell entry. Virol J 6:230–213.
    29.
    Kim Y, Lovell S, Tiew K-C, Mandadapu SR, Alliston KR, Battaile KP, Groutas WC, Chang K-O. 2012. Broad-spectrum antivirals against 3C or 3C-like proteases of picornaviruses, noroviruses, and coronaviruses. J Virol 86:11754–11762.
    30.
    Vuong W, Khan MB, Fischer C, Arutyunova E, Lamer T, Shields J, Saffran HA, McKay RT, van Belkum MJ, Joyce MA, Young HS, Tyrrell DL, Vederas JC, Lemieux MJ. 2020. Feline coronavirus drug inhibits the main protease of SARS-CoV-2 and blocks virus replication. Nat Commun 11:4282.
    31.
    Gordon CJ, Tchesnokov EP, Woolner E, Perry JK, Feng JY, Porter DP, Götte M. 2020. Remdesivir is a direct-acting antiviral that inhibits RNA-dependent RNA polymerase from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 with high potency. J Biol Chem 295:6785–6797.
    32.
    Krichel B, Falke S, Hilgenfeld R, Redecke L, Uetrecht C. 2020. Processing of the SARS-CoV pp1a/ab nsp7–10 region. Biochem J 477:1009–1019.
    33.
    Agostini ML, Andres EL, Sims AC, Graham RL, Sheahan TP, Lu X, Smith EC, Case JB, Feng JY, Jordan R, Ray AS, Cihlar T, Siegel D, Mackman RL, Clarke MO, Baric RS, Denison MR. 2018. Coronavirus susceptibility to the antiviral remdesivir (GS-5734) is mediated by the viral polymerase and the proofreading exoribonuclease. mBio 9:e00221-18.
    34.
    Daelemans D, Pauwels R, De Clercq E, Pannecouque C. 2011. A time-of-drug addition approach to target identification of antiviral compounds. Nat Protoc 6:925–933.
    35.
    Reid AT, Sutanto EN, Chander-Veerati P, Looi K, Li NF, Iosifidis T, Loo SL, Garratt LW, Kicic A. 2019. Ground zero—the airway epithelium. In Bartlett N, Wark P, Knight D (ed), Rhinovirus infections: rethinking the impact on human health and disease. Academic Press, London, UK.
    36.
    Dittmann M, Koralov SB, Ruggles K. 2020. Data from “Analysis of 3D human airway epithelial cultures by single-cell RNA-seq.” Gene Expression Omnibus https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE166601 (GEO series GSE166601).
    37.
    Garcıá SR, Deprez M, Lebrigand K, Cavard A, Paquet A, Arguel MJ, Magnone V, Truchi M, Caballero I, Leroy S, Marquette CH, Marcet B, Barbry P, Zaragosi LE. 2019. Novel dynamics of human mucociliary differentiation revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing of nasal epithelial cultures. Development 146:dev177428.
    38.
    Ravindra N, Alfajaro MM, Gasque V, Habet V, Wei J, Filler R, Huston N, Wan H, Szigeti-Buck K, Wang B, Wang G, Montgomery R, Eisenbarth S, Williams A, Pyle AM, Iwasaki A, Horvath T, Foxman E, Pierce R, van Dijk D, Wilen C. 2020. Single-cell longitudinal analysis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in human airway epithelium. bioRxiv
    39.
    Greaney AM, Adams TS, Brickman Raredon MS, Gubbins E, Schupp JC, Engler AJ, Ghaedi M, Yuan Y, Kaminski N, Niklason LE. 2020. Platform effects on regeneration by pulmonary basal cells as evaluated by single-cell RNA sequencing. Cell Rep 30:4250–4265.e6.
    40.
    Suzuyama N, Katoh M, Takeuchi T, Yoshitomi S, Higuchi T, Asashi S, Yokoi T. 2007. Species differences of inhibitory effects on P-glycoprotein-mediated drug transport. J Pharm Sci 96:1609–1618.
    41.
    Walters MS, Gomi K, Ashbridge B, Moore MA, Arbelaez V, Heldrich J, Ding BS, Rafii S, Staudt MR, Crystal RG. 2013. Generation of a human airway epithelium derived basal cell line with multipotent differentiation capacity. Respir Res 14:135.
    42.
    Liao M, Liu Y, Yuan J, Wen Y, Xu G, Zhao J, Cheng L, Li J, Wang X, Wang F, Liu L, Amit I, Zhang S, Zhang Z. 2020. Single-cell landscape of bronchoalveolar immune cells in patients with COVID-19. Nat Med 26:842–844.
    43.
    Liao M, Liu Y, Yuan J, Wen Y, Xu G, Zhao J, Cheng L, Li J, Wang X, Wang F, Liu L, Amit I, Zhang S, Zhang Z. 2020. Data from “Single-cell landscape of bronchoalveolar immune cells in COVID-19 patients.” Gene Expression Omnibus https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE145926 (series GSE145926).
    44.
    Hui KPY, Cheung MC, Perera RAPM, Ng KC, Bui CHT, Ho JCW, Ng MMT, Kuok DIT, Shih KC, Tsao SW, Poon LLM, Peiris M, Nicholls JM, Chan MCW. 2020. Tropism, replication competence, and innate immune responses of the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 in human respiratory tract and conjunctiva: an analysis in ex-vivo and in-vitro cultures. Lancet Respir Med 8:687–695.
    45.
    Chu H, Chan JF-W, Yuen TT-T, Shuai H, Yuan S, Wang Y, Hu B, Yip CC-Y, Tsang JO-L, Huang X, Chai Y, Yang D, Hou Y, Chik KK-H, Zhang X, Fung AY-F, Tsoi H-W, Cai J-P, Chan W-M, Ip JD, Chu AW-H, Zhou J, Lung DC, Kok K-H, To KK-W, Tsang OT-Y, Chan K-H, Yuen K-Y. 2020. Comparative tropism, replication kinetics, and cell damage profiling of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV with implications for clinical manifestations, transmissibility, and laboratory studies of COVID-19: an observational study. Lancet Microbe 1:e14–e23.
    46.
    Sheahan TP, Sims AC, Zhou S, Graham RL, Pruijssers AJ, Agostini ML, Leist SR, Schäfer A, Dinnon KH, Stevens LJ, Chappell JD, Lu X, Hughes TM, George AS, Hill CS, Montgomery SA, Brown AJ, Bluemling GR, Natchus MG, Saindane M, Kolykhalov AA, Painter G, Harcourt J, Tamin A, Thornburg NJ, Swanstrom R, Denison MR, Baric RS. 2020. An orally bioavailable broad-spectrum antiviral inhibits SARS-CoV-2 in human airway epithelial cell cultures and multiple coronaviruses in mice. Sci Transl Med 12:eabb5883.
    47.
    Cao B, Wang Y, Wen D, Liu W, Wang J, Fan G, Ruan L, Song B, Cai Y, Wei M, Li X, Xia J, Chen N, Xiang J, Yu T, Bai T, Xie X, Zhang L, Li C, Yuan Y, Chen H, Li H, Huang H, Tu S, Gong F, Liu Y, Wei Y, Dong C, Zhou F, Gu X, Xu J, Liu Z, Zhang Y, Li H, Shang L, Wang K, Li K, Zhou X, Dong X, Qu Z, Lu S, Hu X, Ruan S, Luo S, Wu J, Peng L, Cheng F, Pan L, Zou J, Jia C, et al. 2020. A trial of lopinavir-ritonavir in adults hospitalized with severe Covid-19. N Engl J Med 382:1787–1799.
    48.
    Deng X, StJohn SE, Osswald HL, O’Brien A, Banach BS, Sleeman K, Ghosh AK, Mesecar AD, Baker SC. 2014. Coronaviruses resistant to a 3C-like protease inhibitor are attenuated for replication and pathogenesis, revealing a low genetic barrier but high fitness cost of resistance. J Virol 88:11886–11898.
    49.
    Günthard HF, Calvez V, Paredes R, Pillay D, Shafer RW, Wensing AM, Jacobsen DM, Richman DD. 2019. Human immunodeficiency virus drug resistance: 2018 recommendations of the International Antiviral Society–USA panel. Clin Infect Dis 320:379–396.
    50.
    Su TH, Liu CJ. 2017. Combination therapy for chronic hepatitis B: current updates and perspectives. Gut Liver 11:590–603.
    51.
    Whitley RJ, Monto AS. 2019. Resistance of influenza virus to antiviral medications. Clin Infect Dis 71:1092–1094.
    52.
    Kumar A. 2011. Early versus late oseltamivir treatment in severely ill patients with 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1): speed is life. J Antimicrob Chemother 66:959–963.
    53.
    Wölfel R, Corman VM, Guggemos W, Seilmaier M, Zange S, Müller MA, Niemeyer D, Jones TC, Vollmar P, Rothe C, Hoelscher M, Bleicker T, Brünink S, Schneider J, Ehmann R, Zwirglmaier K, Drosten C, Wendtner C. 2020. Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019. Nature 581:465–469.
    54.
    Jonathan G, Norio O, Daniel S, George D, Erika A, Antonella C, Torsten F, Gary G, Green ML, François-Xavier L, Emanuele N, Rentaro O. 2020. Compassionate use of remdesivir for patients with severe Covid-19. N Engl J Med 382:2327–2336.
    55.
    Chaudhary PM, Mechetner EB, Roninson IB. 1992. Expression and activity of the multidrug resistance P-glycoprotein in human peripheral blood lymphocytes. Blood 80:2735–2739.
    56.
    Egashira M, Kawamata N, Sugimoto K, Kaneko T, Oshimi K. 1999. P-glycoprotein expression on normal and abnormally expanded natural killer cells and inhibition of P-glycoprotein function by cyclosporin A and its analogue, PSC833. Blood 93:599–606.
    57.
    Chen ML, Sun A, Cao W, Eliason A, Mendez KM, Getzler AJ, Tsuda S, Diao H, Mukori C, Bruno NE, Kim SY, Pipkin ME, Koralov SB, Sundrud MS. 2020. Physiological expression and function of the MDR1 transporter in cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J Exp Med 217:e20191388.
    58.
    Cao W, Kayama H, Chen ML, Delmas A, Sun A, Kim SY, Rangarajan ES, McKevitt K, Beck AP, Jackson CB, Crynen G, Oikonomopoulos A, Lacey PN, Martinez GJ, Izard T, Lorenz RG, Rodriguez-Palacios A, Cominelli F, Abreu MT, Hommes DW, Koralov SB, Takeda K, Sundrud MS. 2017. The xenobiotic transporter Mdr1 enforces T cell homeostasis in the presence of intestinal bile acids. Immunity 47:1182–1196.e10.
    59.
    Fung KL, Pan J, Ohnuma S, Lund PE, Pixley JN, Kimchi-Sarfaty C, Ambudkar SV, Gottesman MM. 2014. MDR1 synonymous polymorphisms alter transporter specificity and protein stability in a stable epithelial monolayer. Cancer Res 74:598–608.
    60.
    Gralinski LE, Menachery VD. 2020. Return of the coronavirus: 2019-nCoV. Viruses 12:135–138.
    61.
    Volz E, Mishra S, Chand M, Barrett JC, Johnson R, Hopkins S, Gandy A, Rambaut A, Ferguson NM. 2021. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Lineage B.1.1.7 in England: insights from linking epidemiological and genetic data. medRxiv
    62.
    Tegally H, Wilkinson E, Lessells RR, Giandhari J, Pillay S, Msomi N, Mlisana K, Bhiman J, Allam M, Ismail A, Engelbrecht S, van Zyl G, Preiser W, Williamson C, Pettruccione F, Sigal A, Gazy I, Hardie D, Hsiao M, Martin D, York D, Goedhals D, San EJ, Giovanetti M, Lourenco J, Alcantara LC, de Oliveira T. 2020. Major new lineages of SARS-CoV-2 emerge and spread in South Africa during lockdown. medRxiv
    63.
    Faria N, Claro IM, Candido D, Franco LAM, Andrade PS, Coletti TM, Silva CAM, Sales FC, Manuli ER, Aguiar RS, Gaburo N, Camilo CDC, Fraiji NA, Crispim MAE, Carvalho MDPSS, Rambaut A, Loman N, Pybus OG, Sabino EC, the CADDE Genomic Network. 12 Jan 2021. Genomic characterisation of an emergent SARS-CoV-2 lineage in Manaus: preliminary findings. Virological.org.
    64.
    Seifert LL, Si C, Saha D, Sadic M, De Vries M, Ballentine S, Briley A, Wang G, Valero-Jimenez AM, Mohamed A, Schaefer U, Moulton HM, García-Sastre A, Tripathi S, Rosenberg BR, Dittmann M. 2019. The ETS transcription factor ELF1 regulates a broadly antiviral program distinct from the type i interferon response. PLoS Pathog 15:e1007634.
    65.
    Johnson BA, Xie X, Bailey AL, Kalveram B, Lokugamage KG, Muruato A, Zou J, Zhang X, Juelich T, Smith JK, Zhang L, Bopp N, Schindewolf C, Vu M, Vanderheiden A, Winkler ES, Swetnam D, Plante JA, Aguilar P, Plante KS, Popov V, Lee B, Weaver SC, Suthar MS, Routh AL, Ren P, Ku Z, An Z, Debbink K, Diamond MS, Shi PY, Freiberg AN, Menachery VD. 2021. Loss of furin cleavage site attenuates SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis. Nature
    66.
    Mimitou EP, Cheng A, Montalbano A, Hao S, Stoeckius M, Legut M, Roush T, Herrera A, Papalexi E, Ouyang Z, Satija R, Sanjana NE, Koralov SB, Smibert P. 2019. Multiplexed detection of proteins, transcriptomes, clonotypes and CRISPR perturbations in single cells. Nat Methods 16:409–412.
    67.
    Stoeckius M, Zheng S, Houck-Loomis B, Hao S, Yeung BZ, Mauck WM, Smibert P, Satija R. 2018. Cell hashing with barcoded antibodies enables multiplexing and doublet detection for single cell genomics. Genome Biol 19:224.
    68.
    Stuart T, Butler A, Hoffman P, Hafemeister C, Papalexi E, Mauck WM, Hao Y, Stoeckius M, Smibert P, Satija R. 2019. Comprehensive integration of single-cell data. Cell 177:1888–1902.e21.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Journal of Virology
    Volume 95Number 1026 April 2021
    eLocator: e01819-20
    Editor: Julie K. Pfeiffer
    University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

    History

    Received: 16 September 2020
    Accepted: 17 February 2021
    Published online: 23 February 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. COVID-19
    2. GC-376
    3. antiviral
    4. clades
    5. human airway epithelium cultures
    6. remdesivir
    7. time-of-addition experiments

    Contributors

    Authors

    Maren de Vries
    Department of Microbiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
    Adil S. Mohamed
    Department of Microbiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
    Rachel A. Prescott
    Department of Microbiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
    Vilcek Institute of Graduate Biomedical Sciences, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
    Ana M. Valero-Jimenez
    Department of Microbiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
    Ludovic Desvignes
    Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
    Office of Science and Research, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
    Rebecca O’Connor
    Pfizer Discovery Sciences, Groton, Connecticut, USA
    Claire Steppan
    Pfizer Discovery Sciences, Groton, Connecticut, USA
    Joseph C. Devlin
    Vilcek Institute of Graduate Biomedical Sciences, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
    Institute of Systems Genetics, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
    Ellie Ivanova
    Department of Pathology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
    Alberto Herrera
    Department of Pathology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
    Austin Schinlever
    Department of Microbiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
    Vilcek Institute of Graduate Biomedical Sciences, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
    Paige Loose
    Department of Microbiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
    Kelly Ruggles
    Institute of Systems Genetics, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
    Sergei B. Koralov
    Department of Pathology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
    Annaliesa S. Anderson
    Pfizer Vaccine Research and Development, Pearl River, New York, USA
    Joseph Binder
    Pfizer Oncology Research and Development, San Diego, California, USA
    Department of Microbiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA

    Editor

    Julie K. Pfeiffer
    Editor
    University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Journal of VirologyArticle
    Early Transcriptional Changes within Liver, Adrenal Gland, and Lymphoid Tissues Significantly Contribute to Ebola Virus Pathogenesis in Cynomolgus Macaques

    Early Transcriptional Changes within Liver, Adrenal Gland, and Lymphoid Tissues Significantly Contribute to Ebola Virus Pathogenesis in Cynomolgus Macaques

    ABSTRACT

    Ebola virus (EBOV) continues to pose a significant threat to human health, as evidenced by the 2013–2016 epidemic in West Africa and the ongoing outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. EBOV causes hemorrhagic fever, organ damage, and shock culminating in death, with case fatality rates as high as 90%. This high lethality combined with the paucity of licensed medical countermeasures makes EBOV a critical human pathogen. Although EBOV infection results in significant damage to the liver and the adrenal glands, little is known about the molecular signatures of injury in these organs. Moreover, while changes in peripheral blood cells are becoming increasingly understood, the host responses within organs and lymphoid tissues remain poorly characterized. To address this knowledge gap, we tracked longitudinal transcriptional changes in tissues collected from EBOV-Makona-infected cynomolgus macaques. Following infection, both liver and adrenal glands exhibited significant and early downregulation of genes involved in metabolism, coagulation, hormone synthesis, and angiogenesis; upregulated genes were associated with inflammation. Analysis of lymphoid tissues showed early upregulation of genes that play a role in innate immunity and inflammation and downregulation of genes associated with cell cycle and adaptive immunity. Moreover, transient activation of innate immune responses and downregulation of humoral immune responses in lymphoid tissues were confirmed with flow cytometry. Together, these data suggest that the liver, adrenal gland, and lymphatic organs are important sites of EBOV infection and that dysregulating the function of these vital organs contributes to the development of Ebola virus disease.
    IMPORTANCE Ebola virus (EBOV) remains a high-priority pathogen since it continues to cause outbreaks with high case fatality rates. Although it is well established that EBOV results in severe organ damage, our understanding of tissue injury in the liver, adrenal glands, and lymphoid tissues remains limited. We begin to address this knowledge gap by conducting longitudinal gene expression studies in these tissues, which were collected from EBOV-infected cynomolgus macaques. We report robust and early gene expression changes within these tissues, indicating they are primary sites of EBOV infection. Furthermore, genes involved in metabolism, coagulation, and adaptive immunity were downregulated, while inflammation-related genes were upregulated. These results indicate significant tissue damage consistent with the development of hemorrhagic fever and lymphopenia. Our study provides novel insight into EBOV-host interactions and elucidates how host responses within the liver, adrenal glands, and lymphoid tissues contribute to EBOV pathogenesis.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Larsen T, Stevens EL, Davis KJ, Geisbert JB, Daddario-DiCaprio KM, Jahrling PB, Hensley LE, Geisbert TW. 2007. Pathologic findings associated with delayed death in nonhuman primates experimentally infected with Zaire Ebola virus. J Infect Dis 196:S323–S328.
    2.
    Wauquier N, Becquart P, Padilla C, Baize S, Leroy EM. 2010. Human fatal Zaire Ebola virus infection is associated with an aberrant innate immunity and with massive lymphocyte apoptosis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 4:e837.
    3.
    Messaoudi I, Amarasinghe GK, Basler CF. 2015. Filovirus pathogenesis and immune evasion: insights from Ebola virus and Marburg virus. Nat Rev Microbiol 13:663–676.
    4.
    Feldmann H, Geisbert TW. 2011. Ebola haemorrhagic fever. Lancet 377:849–862.
    6.
    WHO. 2020. Ebola virus disease, Democratic Republic of the Congo, external situation report 78. https://www.who.int/publications-detail/ebola-virus-disease-democratic-republic-of-congo-external-situation-report-78-2019.
    7.
    Geisbert TW, Hensley LE, Larsen T, Young HA, Reed DS, Geisbert JB, Scott DP, Kagan E, Jahrling PB, Davis KJ. 2003. Pathogenesis of Ebola hemorrhagic fever in cynomolgus macaques: evidence that dendritic cells are early and sustained targets of infection. Am J Pathol 163:2347–2370.
    8.
    Menicucci AR, Versteeg K, Woolsey C, Mire CE, Geisbert JB, Cross RW, Agans KN, Jankeel A, Geisbert TW, Messaoudi I. 2017. Transcriptome analysis of circulating immune cell subsets highlight the role of monocytes in Zaire Ebola virus Makona pathogenesis. Front Immunol 8:1372–1372.
    9.
    Twenhafel NA, Mattix ME, Johnson JC, Robinson CG, Pratt WD, Cashman KA, Wahl-Jensen V, Terry C, Olinger GG, Hensley LE, Honko AN. 2013. Pathology of experimental aerosol Zaire ebolavirus infection in rhesus macaques. Vet Pathol 50:514–529.
    10.
    Geisbert TW, Young HA, Jahrling PB, Davis KJ, Larsen T, Kagan E, Hensley LE. 2003. Pathogenesis of Ebola hemorrhagic fever in primate models: evidence that hemorrhage is not a direct effect of virus-induced cytolysis of endothelial cells. Am J Pathol 163:2371–2382.
    11.
    Jaax NK, Davis KJ, Geisbert TJ, Vogel P, Jaax GP, Topper M, Jahrling PB. 1996. Lethal experimental infection of rhesus monkeys with Ebola-Zaire (Mayinga) virus by the oral and conjunctival route of exposure. Arch Pathol Lab Med 120:140–155.
    12.
    Zaki SR, Shieh W-J, Greer PW, Goldsmith CS, Ferebee T, Katshitshi J, Tshioko FK, Bwaka MA, Swanepoel R, Calain P, Khan AS, Lloyd E, Rollin PE, Ksiazek TG, Peters CJ, for the Commission de Lutte contre les Epidémies à K. 1999. A novel immunohistochemical assay for the detection of Ebola virus in skin: implications for diagnosis, spread, and surveillance of Ebola hemorrhagic fever. J Infect Dis 179:S36–S47.
    13.
    Marzi A, Feldmann F, Hanley PW, Scott DP, Günther S, Feldmann H. 2015. Delayed disease progression in cynomolgus macaques infected with Ebola virus Makona strain. Emerg Infect Dis 21:1777–1783.
    14.
    Spengler JR, Saturday G, Lavender KJ, Martellaro C, Keck JG, Nichol ST, Spiropoulou CF, Feldmann H, Prescott J. 2017. Severity of disease in humanized mice infected with Ebola virus or Reston virus is associated with magnitude of early viral replication in liver. J Infect Dis 217:58–63.
    15.
    Bird BH, Spengler JR, Chakrabarti AK, Khristova ML, Sealy TK, Coleman-McCray JD, Martin BE, Dodd KA, Goldsmith CS, Sanders J, Zaki SR, Nichol ST, Spiropoulou CF. 2016. Humanized mouse model of Ebola virus disease mimics the immune responses in human disease. J Infect Dis 213:703–711.
    16.
    Reed C, Alves DA, Fritz EA, Geisbert JB, Hensley LE, Geisbert TW, Larsen T. 2011. Pathogenesis of Marburg hemorrhagic fever in cynomolgus macaques. J Infect Dis 204:S1021–S1031.
    17.
    Sanchez AG, Feldmann H. 2006. Filoviridae: Marburg and Ebola viruses, p 1409–1448. In Knipe DM, Howley PM (ed), Fields virology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA.
    18.
    Liu X, Speranza E, Muñoz-Fontela C, Haldenby S, Rickett NY, Garcia-Dorival I, Fang Y, Hall Y, Zekeng E-G, Lüdtke A, Xia D, Kerber R, Krumkamp R, Duraffour S, Sissoko D, Kenny J, Rockliffe N, Williamson ED, Laws TR, N’Faly M, Matthews DA, Günther S, Cossins AR, Sprecher A, Connor JH, Carroll MW, Hiscox JA. 2017. Transcriptomic signatures differentiate survival from fatal outcomes in humans infected with Ebola virus. Genome Biol 18:4.
    19.
    Caballero IS, Honko AN, Gire SK, Winnicki SM, Mele M, Gerhardinger C, Lin AE, Rinn JL, Sabeti PC, Hensley LE, Connor JH. 2016. In vivo Ebola virus infection leads to a strong innate response in circulating immune cells. BMC Genomics 17:707.
    20.
    Versteeg K, Menicucci AR, Woolsey C, Mire CE, Geisbert JB, Cross RW, Agans KN, Jeske D, Messaoudi I, Geisbert TW. 2017. Infection with the Makona variant results in a delayed and distinct host immune response compared to previous Ebola virus variants. Sci Rep 7:9730.
    21.
    Chen EY, Tan CM, Kou Y, Duan Q, Wang Z, Meirelles GV, Clark NR, Ma’ayan A. 2013. Enrichr: interactive and collaborative HTML5 gene list enrichment analysis tool. BMC Bioinformatics 14:128–128.
    22.
    Kuleshov MV, Jones MR, Rouillard AD, Fernandez NF, Duan Q, Wang Z, Koplev S, Jenkins SL, Jagodnik KM, Lachmann A, McDermott MG, Monteiro CD, Gundersen GW, Ma’ayan A. 2016. Enrichr: a comprehensive gene set enrichment analysis Web server 2016 update. Nucleic Acids Res 44:W90–W97.
    23.
    Tripathi S, Pohl MO, Zhou Y, Rodriguez-Frandsen A, Wang G, Stein DA, Moulton HM, DeJesus P, Che J, Mulder LCF, Yángüez E, Andenmatten D, Pache L, Manicassamy B, Albrecht RA, Gonzalez MG, Nguyen Q, Brass A, Elledge S, White M, Shapira S, Hacohen N, Karlas A, Meyer TF, Shales M, Gatorano A, Johnson JR, Jang G, Johnson T, Verschueren E, Sanders D, Krogan N, Shaw M, König R, Stertz S, García-Sastre A, Chanda SK. 2015. Meta- and orthogonal integration of influenza “OMICs” data defines a role for UBR4 in virus budding. Cell Host Microbe 18:723–735.
    24.
    Ernst J, Bar-Joseph Z. 2006. STEM: a tool for the analysis of short time series gene expression data. BMC Bioinformatics 7:191.
    25.
    Odom DT, Zizlsperger N, Gordon DB, Bell GW, Rinaldi NJ, Murray HL, Volkert TL, Schreiber J, Rolfe PA, Gifford DK, Fraenkel E, Bell GI, Young RA. 2004. Control of pancreas and liver gene expression by HNF transcription factors. Science 303:1378–1381.
    26.
    Waxman DJ, Holloway MG. 2009. Sex differences in the expression of hepatic drug metabolizing enzymes. Mol Pharmacol 76:215–228.
    27.
    Ohkawa H, Miura H, Suzuki M, Nakanishi M, Tomaru Y, Kimura Y, Hayashizaki Y, Ohta Y. 2009. Identification of an inter-transcription factor regulatory network in human hepatoma cells by matrix RNAi. Nucleic Acids Res 37:1049–1060.
    28.
    Gonzalez FJ. 2008. Regulation of hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha-mediated transcription. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 23:2–7.
    29.
    Burdin DV, Kolobov AA, Brocker C, Soshnev AA, Samusik N, Demyanov AV, Brilloff S, Jarzebska N, Martens-Lobenhoffer J, Mieth M, Maas R, Bornstein SR, Bode-Böger SM, Gonzalez F, Weiss N, Rodionov RN. 2016. Diabetes-linked transcription factor HNF4α regulates metabolism of endogenous methylarginines and β-aminoisobutyric acid by controlling expression of alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase 2. Sci Rep 6:35503.
    30.
    Reijnen MJ, Sladek FM, Bertina RM, Reitsma PH. 1992. Disruption of a binding site for hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 results in hemophilia B Leyden. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89:6300–6303.
    31.
    Guzman-Lepe J, Cervantes-Alvarez E, Collin de l’Hortet A, Wang Y, Mars WM, Oda Y, Bekki Y, Shimokawa M, Wang H, Yoshizumi T, Maehara Y, Bell A, Fox IJ, Takeishi K, Soto-Gutierrez A. 2018. Liver-enriched transcription factor expression relates to chronic hepatic failure in humans. Hepatol Commun 2:582–594.
    32.
    Frishberg A, Brodt A, Steuerman Y, Gat-Viks I. 2016. ImmQuant: a user-friendly tool for inferring immune cell-type composition from gene-expression data. Bioinformatics 32:3842–3843.
    33.
    Novershtern N, Subramanian A, Lawton LN, Mak RH, Haining WN, McConkey ME, Habib N, Yosef N, Chang CY, Shay T, Frampton GM, Drake ACB, Leskov I, Nilsson B, Preffer F, Dombkowski D, Evans JW, Liefeld T, Smutko JS, Chen J, Friedman N, Young RA, Golub TR, Regev A, Ebert BL. 2011. Densely interconnected transcriptional circuits control cell states in human hematopoiesis. Cell 144:296–309.
    34.
    Abbas AR, Baldwin D, Ma Y, Ouyang W, Gurney A, Martin F, Fong S, van Lookeren Campagne M, Godowski P, Williams PM, Chan AC, Clark HF. 2005. Immune response in silico (IRIS): immune-specific genes identified from a compendium of microarray expression data. Genes Immun 6:319–331.
    35.
    Fallon JR, McNally EM. 2018. Non-glycanated biglycan and LTBP4: leveraging the extracellular matrix for Duchenne muscular dystrophy therapeutics. Matrix Biol 68–69:616–627.
    36.
    Kash JC, Muhlberger E, Carter V, Grosch M, Perwitasari O, Proll SC, Thomas MJ, Weber F, Klenk HD, Katze MG. 2006. Global suppression of the host antiviral response by Ebola- and Marburgviruses: increased antagonism of the type I interferon response is associated with enhanced virulence. J Virol 80:3009–3020.
    37.
    Kuzmin IV, Schwarz TM, Ilinykh PA, Jordan I, Ksiazek TG, Sachidanandam R, Basler CF, Bukreyev A. 2017. Innate immune responses of bat and human cells to filoviruses: commonalities and distinctions. J Virol 91:e02471-16.
    38.
    Bosworth A, Dowall DS, Armstrong S, Liu X, Dong X, Bruce BC, Ng LFP, Carroll WM, Hewson R, Hiscox AJ. 2019. Investigating the cellular transcriptomic response induced by the Makona variant of Ebola virus in differentiated THP-1 cells. Viruses 11:1023.
    39.
    Ilinykh PA, Lubaki NM, Widen SG, Renn LA, Theisen TC, Rabin RL, Wood TG, Bukreyev A. 2015. Different temporal effects of Ebola virus VP35 and VP24 proteins on global gene expression in human dendritic cells. J Virol 89:7567–7583.
    40.
    Rasmussen AL, Okumura A, Ferris MT, Green R, Feldmann F, Kelly SM, Scott DP, Safronetz D, Haddock E, LaCasse R, Thomas MJ, Sova P, Carter VS, Weiss JM, Miller DR, Shaw GD, Korth MJ, Heise MT, Baric RS, Pardo-Manuel de Villena F, Feldmann H, Katze MG. 2014. Host genetic diversity enables Ebola hemorrhagic fever pathogenesis and resistance. Science 346:987–991.
    41.
    Baize S, Leroy EM, Mavoungou E, Fisher-Hoch SP. 2000. Apoptosis in fatal Ebola infection. Does the virus toll the bell for immune system? Apoptosis 5:5–7.
    42.
    Wong G, Richardson JS, Pillet S, Patel A, Qiu X, Alimonti J, Hogan J, Zhang Y, Takada A, Feldmann H, Kobinger GP. 2012. Immune parameters correlate with protection against Ebola virus infection in rodents and nonhuman primates. Sci Transl Med 4:158ra146.
    43.
    Saphire EO, Schendel SL, Fusco ML, Gangavarapu K, Gunn BM, Wec AZ, Halfmann PJ, Brannan JM, Herbert AS, Qiu X, Wagh K, He S, Giorgi EE, Theiler J, Pommert KBJ, Krause TB, Turner HL, Murin CD, Pallesen J, Davidson E, Ahmed R, Aman MJ, Bukreyev A, Burton DR, Crowe JE, Jr, Davis CW, Georgiou G, Krammer F, Kyratsous CA, Lai JR, Nykiforuk C, Pauly MH, Rijal P, Takada A, Townsend AR, Volchkov V, Walker LM, Wang C-I, Zeitlin L, Doranz BJ, Ward AB, Korber B, Kobinger GP, Andersen KG, Kawaoka Y, Alter G, Chandran K, Dye JM, Viral Hemorrhagic Fever Immunotherapeutic C. 2018. Systematic analysis of monoclonal antibodies against Ebola virus GP defines features that contribute to protection. Cell 174:938–952.e13.
    44.
    Rubins KH, Hensley LE, Wahl-Jensen V, Daddario DiCaprio KM, Young HA, Reed DS, Jahrling PB, Brown PO, Relman DA, Geisbert TW. 2007. The temporal program of peripheral blood gene expression in the response of nonhuman primates to Ebola hemorrhagic fever. Genome Biol 8:R174.
    45.
    Cross RW, Fenton KA, Geisbert JB, Mire CE, Geisbert TW. 2015. Modeling the disease course of Zaire ebolavirus infection in the outbred guinea pig. J Infect Dis 212:S305–S315.
    46.
    Cross RW, Mire CE, Borisevich V, Geisbert JB, Fenton KA, Geisbert TW. 2016. The domestic ferret (Mustela putorius furo) as a lethal infection model for 3 species of Ebolavirus. J Infect Dis 214:565–569.
    47.
    Sanchez A, Lukwiya M, Bausch D, Mahanty S, Sanchez AJ, Wagoner KD, Rollin PE. 2004. Analysis of human peripheral blood samples from fatal and nonfatal cases of Ebola (Sudan) hemorrhagic fever: cellular responses, virus load, and nitric oxide levels. J Virol 78:10370–10377.
    48.
    Guo FH, De Raeve HR, Rice TW, Stuehr DJ, Thunnissen FB, Erzurum SC. 1995. Continuous nitric oxide synthesis by inducible nitric oxide synthase in normal human airway epithelium in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92:7809–7813.
    49.
    Snyder CM, Shroff EH, Liu J, Chandel NS. 2009. Nitric oxide induces cell death by regulating anti-apoptotic BCL-2 family members. PLoS One 4:e7059.
    50.
    McElroy AK, Shrivastava-Ranjan P, Harmon JR, Martines RB, Silva-Flannery L, Flietstra TD, Kraft CS, Mehta AK, Lyon GM, Varkey JB, Ribner BS, Nichol ST, Zaki SR, Spiropoulou CF. 2019. Macrophage activation marker soluble CD163 associated with fatal and severe Ebola virus disease in humans. Emerg Infect Dis 25:290–298.
    51.
    Thi EP, Mire CE, Lee ACH, Geisbert JB, Zhou JZ, Agans KN, Snead NM, Deer DJ, Barnard TR, Fenton KA, MacLachlan I, Geisbert TW. 2015. Lipid nanoparticle siRNA treatment of Ebola-virus-Makona-infected nonhuman primates. Nature 521:362–365.
    52.
    Backman TWH, Girke T. 2016. systemPipeR: NGS workflow and report generation environment. BMC Bioinformatics 17:388.
    53.
    Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. 2010. edgeR: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26:139–140.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Journal of Virology
    Volume 94Number 1118 May 2020
    eLocator: e00250-20
    Editor: Mark T. Heise
    University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

    History

    Received: 17 February 2020
    Accepted: 11 March 2020
    Published online: 25 March 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. Ebola virus
    2. NHP
    3. adrenal
    4. hemorrhagic fever
    5. liver
    6. lymph nodes
    7. pathogenesis
    8. spleen
    9. tissues
    10. transcriptomics

    Contributors

    Authors

    Allen Jankeel
    Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, School of Biological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
    Andrea R. Menicucci
    Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, School of Biological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
    Courtney Woolsey
    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA
    Galveston National Laboratory, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA
    Karla A. Fenton
    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA
    Galveston National Laboratory, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA
    Norma Mendoza
    Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, School of Biological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
    Krista Versteeg
    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA
    Galveston National Laboratory, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA
    Robert W. Cross
    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA
    Galveston National Laboratory, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA
    Thomas W. Geisbert
    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA
    Galveston National Laboratory, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA
    Ilhem Messaoudi
    Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, School of Biological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA

    Editor

    Mark T. Heise
    Editor
    University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Thomas W. Geisbert, [email protected], or Ilhem Messaoudi, [email protected].
    Allen Jankeel, Andrea R. Menicucci, and Courtney Woolsey contributed equally. Author order was determined alphabetically.

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

There are no results at this time

American Society for Microbiology ("ASM") is committed to maintaining your confidence and trust with respect to the information we collect from you on websites owned and operated by ASM ("ASM Web Sites") and other sources. This Privacy Policy sets forth the information we collect about you, how we use this information and the choices you have about how we use such information.
FIND OUT MORE about the privacy policy