41
Average Days in Review
96%
Percent of Research Articles Cited within Two Years of Publication
11
Average Days to Publication from Acceptance
Annual HTML+PDF Usage

CURRENT ISSUE

Volume 65Issue 7June 2021

EDITOR IN CHIEF: Dr. Cesar A. Arias

Explore AAC

Editor in Chief

AAC EiC Arias
Cesar A. Arias

Editor in Chief (2025) | UT Health Science Center at Houston

Cesar A. Arias is Professor of Medicine, Microbiology and Molecular Genetics and holds the Margaret and Herbert Dupont Chair in Infectious Diseases at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. He is the director and founder of the Center of Antimicrobial Resistance and Microbial Genomics (CARMiG) at McGovern Medical School and the director of the Center for Infectious Diseases at the School of Public Health.

Editorial Board

  • Antimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapyArticle
    Comparison of MIC Test Strip and Sensititre YeastOne with the CLSI and EUCAST Broth Microdilution Reference Methods for In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Cryptococcus neoformans

    Comparison of MIC Test Strip and Sensititre YeastOne with the CLSI and EUCAST Broth Microdilution Reference Methods for In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Cryptococcus neoformans

    ABSTRACT

    We compared MIC test strip (MTS) and Sensititre YeastOne (SYO) methods with EUCAST and CLSI methods for amphotericin B, 5-fluocytosine, fluconazole, voriconazole, and isavuconazole against 106 Cryptococcus neoformans isolates. The overall essential agreement between the EUCAST and CLSI methods was >72% and >94% at ±1 and ±2 dilutions, respectively. The essential agreements between SYO and EUCAST/CLSI for amphotericin B, 5-flucytosine, fluconazole, and voriconazole were >89/>93% and between MTS and EUCAST/CLSI were >57/>75%. Very major error rates were low for amphotericin B and fluconazole (<3%) and a bit higher for the other drugs (<8%).

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Sloan DJ, Parris V. 2014. Cryptococcal meningitis: epidemiology and therapeutic options. Clin Epidemiol 6:169–182.
    2.
    Maziarz EK, Perfect JR. 2016. Cryptococcosis. Infect Dis Clin North Am 30:179–206.
    3.
    Rajasingham R, Smith RM, Park BJ, Jarvis JN, Govender NP, Chiller TM, Chiller TM, Denning DW, Loyse A, Boulware DR. 2017. Global burden of disease of HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis: an updated analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 17:873–881.
    4.
    Taylor-Smith LM. 2017. Cryptococcus-epithelial interactions. J Fungi (Basel) 3:53.
    5.
    Mourad A, Perfect JR. 2018. The war on cryptococcosis: a review of the antifungal arsenal. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 113:e170391.
    6.
    Perfect JR, Dismukes WE, Dromer F, Goldman DL, Graybill JR, Hamill RJ, Harrison TS, Larsen RA, Lortholary O, Nguyen MH, Pappas PG, Powderly WG, Singh N, Sobel JD, Sorrell TC. 2010. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of cryptococcal disease: 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 50:291–322.
    7.
    Espinel-Ingroff A, Aller AI, Canton E, Castañón-Olivares LR, Chowdhary A, Cordoba S, Cuenca-Estrella M, Fothergill A, Fuller J, Govender N, Hagen F, Illnait-Zaragozi MT, Johnson E, Kidd S, Lass-Flörl C, Lockhart SR, Martins MA, Meis JF, Melhem MS, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Pelaez T, Pfaller MA, Schell WA, St-Germain G, Trilles L, Turnidge J. 2012. Cryptococcus neoformans-Cryptococcus gattii species complex: an international study of wild-type susceptibility endpoint and epidemiological cutoff values for values for fluconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:5898–5906.
    8.
    Espinel-Ingroff A, Chowdhary A, Cuenca-Estrella M, Fothergill A, Fuller J, Hagen F, Govender N, Guarro J, Johnson E, Lass-Flörl C, Lockhart SR, Martins MA, Meis JF, Melhem MS, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Pelaez T, Pfaller MA, Schell WA, Trilles L, Kidd S, Turnidge J. 2012. Cryptococcus neoformans-Cryptococcus gattii species complex: an international study of wild-type susceptibility endpoint and epidemiological cutoff values for amphotericin B and flucytosine. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:3107–3113.
    9.
    Aller AI, Martín-Mazuelos E, Gutiérrez MJ, Bernal S, Chávez M, Recio FJ. 2000. Comparison of the Etest and microdilution method for antifungal susceptibility testing of Cryptococcus neoformans to four antifungal agents. J Antimicrob Chemother 46:997–1000.
    10.
    Lee CH, Chang TY, Liu JW, Chen FJ, Chien CC, Tang YF, Lu CH. 2012. Correlation of anti-fungal susceptibility with clinical outcomes in patients with cryptococcal meningitis. BMC Infect Dis 12:361.
    11.
    Vena A, Muñoz P, Guinea J, Escribano P, Peláez T, Valerio M, Bonache F, Gago S, Álvarez-Uría A, Bouza E. 2018. Fluconazole resistance is not a predictor of poor outcome in patients with cryptococcosis. Mycoses 62:441–449.
    12.
    Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). 2008. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeast; approved standard—3rd ed. CLSI document M27–3A. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
    13.
    Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of the ESCMID European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 2008. EUCAST technical note on the method for the determination of broth dilution minimum inhibitory concentrations of antifungal agents for conidia-forming moulds. Clin Microbiol Infect 14:982–984.
    14.
    Meletiadis J, Curfs-Breuker I, Meis JF, Mouton JW. 2017. In vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida isolates with the EUCAST methodology, a new method for ECOFF determination. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e02372-16.
    15.
    Maxwell MJ, Messer SA, Hollis RJ, Diekema DJ, Pfaller MA. 2003. Evaluation of MIC test strip method for determining voriconazole and amphotericin B MICs for 162 clinical isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans. J Clin Microbiol 41:97–99.
    16.
    Ochiuzzi ME, Santiso GM, Arechavala AI. 2010. Correlation of MIC test strip and neo-Sensitabs diffusion assays on Mueller-Hinton-methylene blue agar with broth microdilution reference method (CLSI-M27-A2) for testing susceptibilities of Cryptococcus neoformans to amphotericin B and fluconazole. Med Mycol 48:893–896.
    17.
    Viviani MA, Esposto MC, Cogliati M, Tortorano AM. 2003. Flucytosine and cryptococcosis: which in vitro test is the best predictor of outcome? J Chemother 15:124–128.
    18.
    Dannaoui E, Abdul M, Arpin M, Michel-Nguyen A, Piens MA, Favel A, Lortholary O, Dromer F, French Cryptococcosis Study Group. 2006. Results obtained with various antifungal susceptibility testing methods do not predict early clinical outcome in patients with cryptococcosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50:2464–2470.
    19.
    Mahabeer Y, Chang CC, Naidu D, Dorasamy A, Lewin S, Ndung'u T, Moosa M-Y, French M, Mlisana K, Coovadia Y. 2014. Comparison of Etests to broth microdilution for the susceptibility testing of Cryptococcus neoformans. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 80:294–298.
    20.
    Te Dorsthorst DT, Verweij PE, Meis JF, Mouton JW. 2005. Relationship between in vitro activities of amphotericin B and flucytosine and pH for clinical yeast and mold isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:3341–3346.
    21.
    Dias AL, Matsumoto FE, Melhem MS, da Silva EG, Auler ME, de Siqueira AM, Paula CR. 2006. Comparative analysis of MIC test strip and broth microdilution method (AFST-EUCAST) for trends in antifungal drug susceptibility testing of Brazilian Cryptococcus neoformans isolates. J Med Microbiol 55:1693–1699.
    22.
    Thompson GR, Fothergill AW, Wiederhold NP, Vallor AC, Wickes BL, Patterson TF. 2008. Evaluation of MIC test strip method for determining isavuconazole MICs against Cryptococcus gattii and Cryptococcus neoformans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52:2959–2961.
    23.
    Wiederhold NP, Kovanda L, Najvar LK, Bocanegra R, Olivo M, Kirkpatrick WR, Patterson TF. 2016. Isavuconazole is effective for the treatment of experimental cryptococcal meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:5600–5603.
    24.
    Thompson GR, 3rd, Rendon A, Ribeiro Dos Santos R, Queiroz-Telles F, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Azie N, Maher R, Lee M, Kovanda L, Engelhardt M, Vazquez JA, Cornely OA, Perfect JR. 2016. Isavuconazole treatment of cryptococcosis and dimorphic mycoses. Clin Infect Dis 63:356–362.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    Volume 64Number 424 March 2020
    eLocator: e02261-19

    History

    Received: 11 November 2019
    5 December 2019
    Accepted: 23 January 2020
    Published online: 3 February 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. CLSI
    2. Cryptococcus neoformans
    3. EUCAST
    4. Liofilchem MIC test strip
    5. Sensititre YeastOne
    6. antifungal susceptibility

    Contributors

    Authors

    Fatima Zohra Delma
    Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    Abdullah M. S. Al-Hatmi
    Foundation Atlas of Clinical Fungi, Hilversum, The Netherlands
    Centre of Expertise in Mycology of Radboudumc/CWZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    Ministry of Health, Directorate General of Health Services, Ibri, Oman
    Jochem B. Buil
    Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    Centre of Expertise in Mycology of Radboudumc/CWZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    Hein van der Lee
    Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    Centre of Expertise in Mycology of Radboudumc/CWZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    Marlou Tehupeiory-Kooreman
    Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    Centre of Expertise in Mycology of Radboudumc/CWZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    G. Sybren de Hoog
    Foundation Atlas of Clinical Fungi, Hilversum, The Netherlands
    Centre of Expertise in Mycology of Radboudumc/CWZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    Joseph Meletiadis
    Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Attikon University Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
    Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    Paul E. Verweij
    Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    Centre of Expertise in Mycology of Radboudumc/CWZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Paul E. Verweij, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Antimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapyArticle
    A Biosynthetic Platform for Antimalarial Drug Discovery

    ABSTRACT

    Advances in synthetic biology have enabled the production of a variety of compounds using bacteria as a vehicle for complex compound biosynthesis. Violacein, a naturally occurring indole pigment with antibiotic properties, can be biosynthetically engineered in Escherichia coli expressing its nonnative synthesis pathway. To explore whether this synthetic biosynthesis platform could be used for drug discovery, here we have screened bacterially derived violacein against the main causative agent of human malaria, Plasmodium falciparum. We show the antiparasitic activity of bacterially derived violacein against the P. falciparum 3D7 laboratory reference strain as well as drug-sensitive and -resistant patient isolates, confirming the potential utility of this drug as an antimalarial agent. We then screen a biosynthetic series of violacein derivatives against P. falciparum growth. The varied activity of each derivative against asexual parasite growth points to the need to further develop violacein as an antimalarial. Towards defining its mode of action, we show that biosynthetic violacein affects the parasite actin cytoskeleton, resulting in an accumulation of actin signal that is independent of actin polymerization. This activity points to a target that modulates actin behavior in the cell either in terms of its regulation or its folding. More broadly, our data show that bacterial synthetic biosynthesis could become a suitable platform for antimalarial drug discovery, with potential applications in future high-throughput drug screening with otherwise chemically intractable natural products.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    WHO. 2019. World malaria report 2018. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
    2.
    Saunders DL, Vanachayangkul P, Lon C; U.S. Army Military Malaria Research Program; National Center for Parasitology, Entomology, and Malaria Control (CNM); Royal Cambodian Armed Forces. 2014. Dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine failure in Cambodia. N Engl J Med 371:484–485.
    3.
    Kanoi BN, Takashima E, Morita M, White MT, Palacpac NMQ, Ntege EH, Balikagala B, Yeka A, Egwang TG, Horii T, Tsuboi T. 2017. Antibody profiles to wheat germ cell-free system synthesized Plasmodium falciparum proteins correlate with protection from symptomatic malaria in Uganda. Vaccine 35:873–881.
    4.
    Shaw PJ, Chaotheing S, Kaewprommal P, Piriyapongsa J, Wongsombat C, Suwannakitti N, Koonyosying P, Uthaipibull C, Yuthavong Y, Kamchonwongpaisan S. 2015. Plasmodium parasites mount an arrest response to dihydroartemisinin, as revealed by whole transcriptome shotgun sequencing (RNA-seq) and microarray study. BMC Genomics 16:830.
    5.
    Paloque L, Ramadani AP, Mercereau-Puijalon O, Augereau J-M, Benoit-Vical F. 2016. Plasmodium falciparum: multifaceted resistance to artemisinins. Malar J 15:149.
    6.
    Mbengue A, Bhattacharjee S, Pandharkar T, Liu H, Estiu G, Stahelin RV, Rizk SS, Njimoh DL, Ryan Y, Chotivanich K, Nguon C, Ghorbal M, Lopez-Rubio J-J, Pfrender M, Emrich S, Mohandas N, Dondorp AM, Wiest O, Haldar K. 2015. A molecular mechanism of artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Nature 520:683–687.
    7.
    McLaughlin EC, Norman MW, Ko Ko T, Stolt I. 2014. Three-component synthesis of disubstituted 2H-pyrrol-2-ones: preparation of the violacein scaffold. Tetrahedron Lett 55:2609–2611.
    8.
    Petersen MT, Nielsen TE. 2013. Tandem ring-closing metathesis/isomerization reactions for the total synthesis of violacein. Org Lett 15:1986–1989.
    9.
    Lopes SCP, Blanco YC, Justo GZ, Nogueira PA, Rodrigues FLS, Goelnitz U, Wunderlich G, Facchini G, Brocchi M, Duran N, Costa F. 2009. Violacein extracted from Chromobacterium violaceum inhibits Plasmodium growth in vitro and in vivo. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:2149–2152.
    10.
    Pantanella F, Berlutti F, Passariello C, Sarli S, Morea C, Schippa S. 2007. Violacein and biofilm production in Janthinobacterium lividum. J Appl Microbiol 102:992–999.
    11.
    Sneath PHA, Singh RB, Whelan JPF, Edwards D. 1953. Fatal infection by Chromobacterium Violaceum. Lancet 262:276–277.
    12.
    Rodrigues AL, Trachtmann N, Becker J, Lohanatha AF, Blotenberg J, Bolten CJ, Korneli C, de Souza Lima AO, Porto LM, Sprenger GA, Wittmann C. 2013. Systems metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for production of the antitumor drugs violacein and deoxyviolacein. Metab Eng 20:29–41.
    13.
    Bilsland E, Tavella TA, Krogh R, Stokes JE, Roberts A, Ajioka J, Spring DR, Andricopulo AD, Costa FTM, Oliver SG. 2018. Antiplasmodial and trypanocidal activity of violacein and deoxyviolacein produced from synthetic operons. BMC Biotechnol 18:22.
    14.
    Lai H-E, Obled AM, Chee SM, Morgan RM, Sharma SV, Moore SJ, Polizzi KM, Goss RJ, Freemont PS. 2019. A GenoChemetic strategy for derivatization of the violacein natural product scaffold. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/202523.
    15.
    Rodrigues AL, Göcke Y, Bolten C, Brock NL, Dickschat JS, Wittmann C. 2012. Microbial production of the drugs violacein and deoxyviolacein: analytical development and strain comparison. Biotechnol Lett 34:717–720.
    16.
    Wang H, Jiang P, Lu Y, Ruan Z, Jiang R, Xing X-H, Lou K, Wei D. 2009. Optimization of culture conditions for violacein production by a new strain of Duganella sp. B2. Biochem Eng J 44:119–124.
    17.
    Choi SY, Kim S, Lyuck S, Kim SB, Mitchell RJ. 2015. High-level production of violacein by the newly isolated Duganella violaceinigra str. NI28 and its impact on Staphylococcus aureus. Sci Rep 5:15598.
    18.
    Leal AM, de Queiroz JD, de Medeiros SR, Lima TK, Agnez-Lima LF. 2015. Violacein induces cell death by triggering mitochondrial membrane hyperpolarization in vitro. BMC Microbiol 15:115.
    19.
    Yeo AE, Rieckmann KH. 1994. The in vitro antimalarial activity of chloramphenicol against Plasmodium falciparum. Acta Trop 56:51–54.
    20.
    Ruecker A, Mathias DK, Straschil U, Churcher TS, Dinglasan RR, Leroy D, Sinden RE, Delves MJ. 2014. A male and female gametocyte functional viability assay to identify biologically relevant malaria transmission-blocking drugs. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:7292–7302.
    21.
    Malpartida-Cardenas K, Miscourides N, Rodriguez-Manzano J, Yu L-S, Moser N, Baum J, Georgiou P. 2019. Quantitative and rapid Plasmodium falciparum malaria diagnosis and artemisinin-resistance detection using a CMOS Lab-on-Chip platform. Biosens Bioelectron 145:111678.
    22.
    Baum J, Papenfuss AT, Baum B, Speed TP, Cowman AF. 2006. Regulation of apicomplexan actin-based motility. Nat Rev Microbiol 4:621–628.
    23.
    Mehta T, Vercruysse K, Johnson T, Ejiofor AO, Myles E, Quick QA. 2015. Violacein induces p44/42 mitogen-activated protein kinase-mediated solid tumor cell death and inhibits tumor cell migration. Mol Med Rep 12:1443–1448.
    24.
    Miotto O, Amato R, Ashley EA, MacInnis B, Almagro-Garcia J, Amaratunga C, Lim P, Mead D, Oyola SO, Dhorda M, Imwong M, Woodrow C, Manske M, Stalker J, Drury E, Campino S, Amenga-Etego L, Thanh T-N, Tran HT, Ringwald P, Bethell D, Nosten F, Phyo AP, Pukrittayakamee S, Chotivanich K, Chuor CM, Nguon C, Suon S, Sreng S, Newton PN, Mayxay M, Khanthavong M, Hongvanthong B, Htut Y, Han KT, Kyaw MP, Faiz MA, Fanello CI, Onyamboko M, Mokuolu OA, Jacob CG, Takala-Harrison S, Plowe CV, Day NP, Dondorp AM, Spencer CCA, McVean G, Fairhurst RM, White NJ, Kwiatkowski DP. 2015. Genetic architecture of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum. Nat Genet 47:226–234.
    25.
    Angrisano F, Riglar DT, Sturm A, Volz JC, Delves MJ, Zuccala ES, Turnbull L, Dekiwadia C, Olshina MA, Marapana DS, Wong W, Mollard V, Bradin CH, Tonkin CJ, Gunning PW, Ralph SA, Whitchurch CB, Sinden RE, Cowman AF, McFadden GI, Baum J. 2012. Spatial localisation of actin filaments across developmental stages of the malaria parasite. PLoS One 7:e32188.
    26.
    Johnson S, Rahmani R, Drew DR, Williams MJ, Wilkinson M, Tan YH, Huang JX, Tonkin CJ, Beeson JG, Baum J, Smith BJ, Baell JB. 2016. Truncated latrunculins as actin inhibitors targeting Plasmodium falciparum motility and host cell invasion. J Med Chem 59:10994–11005.
    27.
    Miguel-Blanco C, Molina I, Bardera AI, Díaz B, de las Heras L, Lozano S, González C, Rodrigues J, Delves MJ, Ruecker A, Colmenarejo G, Viera S, Martínez-Martínez MS, Fernández E, Baum J, Sinden RE, Herreros E. 2017. Hundreds of dual-stage antimalarial molecules discovered by a functional gametocyte screen. Nat Commun 8:15160.
    28.
    Das S, Lemgruber L, Tay CL, Baum J, Meissner M. 2017. Multiple essential functions of Plasmodium falciparum actin-1 during malaria blood-stage development. BMC Biol 15:70.
    29.
    Olshina MA, Baumann H, Willison KR, Baum J. 2015. Plasmodium actin is incompletely folded by heterologous protein-folding machinery and likely requires the native Plasmodium chaperonin complex to enter a mature functional state. FASEB J 30:405–416.
    30.
    Mok S, Ashley EA, Ferreira PE, Zhu L, Lin Z, Yeo T, Chotivanich K, Imwong M, Pukrittayakamee S, Dhorda M, Nguon C, Lim P, Amaratunga C, Suon S, Hien TT, Htut Y, Faiz MA, Onyamboko MA, Mayxay M, Newton PN, Tripura R, Woodrow CJ, Miotto O, Kwiatkowski DP, Nosten F, Day NPJ, Preiser PR, White NJ, Dondorp AM, Fairhurst RM, Bozdech Z. 2015. Population transcriptomics of human malaria parasites reveals the mechanism of artemisinin resistance. Science 347:431–435.
    31.
    Ashdown GW, Dimon M, Fan M, Terán F-R, Witmer K, Gaboriau DCA, Armstrong Z, Hazard J, Ando DM, Baum J. 2019. A machine learning approach to define antimalarial drug action from heterogeneous cell-based screens. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2019.12.19.882480.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    Volume 64Number 521 April 2020
    eLocator: e02129-19

    History

    Received: 21 October 2019
    26 January 2020
    Accepted: 23 February 2020
    Published online: 9 March 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. violacein
    2. drug discovery
    3. antimalarial
    4. drug resistance
    5. synthetic biology

    Contributors

    Authors

    Department of Chemistry, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Department of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Department of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    UK Dementia Research Institute Care Research and Technology Centre, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
    Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Paul S. Freemont, [email protected], or Jake Baum, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Antimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapyArticle
    Resistance Analysis of the Hepatitis C Virus NS3 Protease Inhibitor Asunaprevir

    ABSTRACT

    Asunaprevir (BMS-650032) is a potent hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3 protease inhibitor demonstrating efficacy in alfa interferon-sparing, direct-acting antiviral dual-combination regimens (together with the NS5A replication complex inhibitor daclatasvir) in patients chronically infected with HCV genotype 1b. Here, we describe a comprehensive in vitro genotypic and phenotypic analysis of asunaprevir-associated resistance against genotypes 1a and 1b using HCV replicons and patient samples obtained from clinical studies of short-term asunaprevir monotherapy. During genotype 1a resistance selection using HCV replicons, the primary NS3 protease substitutions identified were R155K, D168G, and I170T, which conferred low- to moderate-level asunaprevir resistance (5- to 21-fold) in transient-transfection susceptibility assays. For genotype 1b, a higher level of asunaprevir-associated resistance was observed at the same selection pressures, ranging from 170- to 400-fold relative to the wild-type control. The primary NS3 protease substitutions identified occurred predominantly at amino acid residue D168 (D168A/G/H/V/Y) and were associated with high-level asunaprevir resistance (16- to 280-fold) and impaired replication capacity. In asunaprevir single-ascending-dose and 3-day multiple-ascending-dose studies in HCV genotype 1a- or 1b-infected patients, the predominant pre-existing NS3 baseline polymorphism was NS3-Q80K. This substitution impacted initial virologic response rates in a single-ascending-dose study, but its effects after multiple doses were more ambiguous. Interestingly, for patient NS3 protease sequences containing Q80 and those containing K80, susceptibilities to asunaprevir were comparable when tested in an enzyme assay. No resistance-associated variants emerged in these clinical studies that significantly impacted susceptibility to asunaprevir. Importantly, asunaprevir-resistant replicons remained susceptible to an NS5A replication complex inhibitor, consistent with a role for asunaprevir in combination therapies.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Argentini C, Genovese D, Dettori S, and Rapicetta M. 2009. HCV genetic variability: from quasispecies evolution to genotype classification. Future Microbiol. 4:359–373.
    2.
    Bacon BR et al. 2011. Boceprevir for previously treated chronic HCV genotype 1 infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 364:1207–1217.
    3.
    Blight KJ, Kolykhalov AA, and Rice CM. 2000. Efficient initiation of HCV RNA replication in cell culture. Science 290:1972–1974.
    4.
    Bronowicki J et al. 2011. BMS-650032, an NS3 inhibitor (protease), in combination with peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin in treatment-naive subjects with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C infection. J. Hepatol. 54(Suppl 1):S472.
    5.
    Chayama K et al. 2012. Dual therapy with the NS5A inhibitor BMS-790052 and the NS3 protease inhibitor BMS-650032 in HCV genotype 1b infected null responders. Hepatology 55:742–748.
    6.
    Drexler D et al. 2006. Development of an on-line automated sample clean-up method and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis: application in an in vitro proteolytic assay. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 384:1145–1154.
    7.
    Food and Drug Administration. 2011. Boceprevir prescribing information. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2011/202258lbl.pdf.
    8.
    Food and Drug Administration. 2011. Telaprevir prescribing information. Accessed 1 April 2012. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2011/201917lbl.pdf.
    9.
    Fridell RA et al. 2011. Distinct functions of NS5A in hepatitis C virus RNA replication uncovered by studies with the NS5A inhibitor BMS-790052. J. Virol. 85:7312–7320.
    10.
    Fridell RA, Qiu D, Wang C, Valera L, and Gao M. 2010. Resistance analysis of the hepatitis C virus NS5A inhibitor BMS-790052 in an in vitro replicon system. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54(9):3641–3650.
    11.
    Fried MW et al. 2002. Peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 347:975–982.
    12.
    Gao M et al. 2010. Chemical genetics strategy identifies an HCV NS5A inhibitor with a potent clinical effect. Nature 465:96–100.
    13.
    Gaudieri S et al. 2009. Hepatitis C virus drug resistance and immune-driven adaptations: relevance to new antiviral therapy. Hepatology 49:1069–1082.
    14.
    Ghany MG, Strader DB, Thomas DL, and Seeff LB. 2009. Diagnosis, management, and treatment of hepatitis C: an update. Hepatology 49:1335–1374.
    15.
    Jacobson IM et al. 2011. Telaprevir for previously untreated chronic hepatitis C virus infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 364:2405–2416.
    16.
    Kadow JF et al. 2012. Discovery of BMS-791325, an allosteric NS5B replicase inhibitor for the treatment of hepatitis C, abstr. 23. In Sci. Abstr. 243rd ACS Natl. Meet. Exposition.
    17.
    Kim JL et al. 1996. Crystal structure of the hepatitis C virus NS3 protease domain complexed with a synthetic NS4A cofactor peptide. Cell 87:343–355.
    18.
    Krieger N, Lohmann V, and Bartenschlager R. 2001. Enhancement of hepatitis C virus RNA replication by cell culture-adaptive mutations. J. Virol. 75:4614–4624.
    19.
    Kuiken C, Yusim K, Boykin L, and Richardson R. 2005. The Los Alamos hepatitis C sequence database. Bioinformatics 21:379–384.
    20.
    Lagace L et al. 2012. In vitro resistance profile of the HCV NS3 protease inhibitor BI 201335. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56(1):569–572.
    21.
    Lallos L et al. 2009. Preclinical profiles of IDX136 and IDX316, two novel macrocyclic HCV protease inhibitors, poster 344. In 44th Annu. Meet. Eur. Assoc. Study Liver (EASL), Copenhagen, Denmark, 22 to 26 April 2009.
    22.
    Lemm JA et al. 2005. Replication-competent chimeric hepatitis C virus subgenomic replicons. Intervirology 48:183–191.
    23.
    Lenz O et al. 2010. In vitro resistance profile of the hepatitis C virus NS3/4A protease inhibitor TMC435. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54:1878–1887.
    24.
    Liverton NJ et al. 2010. MK-7009, a potent and selective inhibitor of hepatitis C virus NS3/4A protease. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54:305–311.
    25.
    Lohmann V, Korner F, Dobierzewska A, and Bartenschlager R. 2001. Mutations in hepatitis C virus RNAs conferring cell culture adaptation. J. Virol. 75:1437–1449.
    26.
    Lohmann V et al. 1999. Replication of subgenomic hepatitis C virus RNAs in a hepatoma cell line. Science 285:110–113.
    27.
    Lok AS et al. 2012. Preliminary study of two antiviral agents for hepatitis C genotype 1. N. Engl. J. Med. 366(3):216–224.
    28.
    McHutchison JG et al. 2009. Peginterferon alfa-2b or alfa-2a with ribavirin for treatment of hepatitis C infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 361:580–593.
    29.
    McPhee F et al. 2009. Genotypic and phenotypic analysis of samples from HCV-infected subjects treated with BMS-650032 in a single ascending dose study. Hepatology 50(4):1048A.
    30.
    McPhee F et al. 2011. No early virologic breakthrough observed with the HCV NS3 protease inhibitor BMS-650032 in multiple dose monotherapy studies and phase 2A combination studies with PEGIFN/RBV. J. Hepatol. 54(Suppl 1):A1223.
    31.
    McPhee F et al. 2009. The discovery and early development of the HCV NS3 protease inhibitor BMS-605339. Global Antiviral J. 5(Suppl 1):51.
    32.
    McPhee F et al. 2010. Identification and preclinical profile of the novel HCV NS3 protease inhibitor BMS-650032. J. Hepatol. 52(Suppl 1):S296.
    33.
    Nettles RE et al. 2011. Multiple ascending dose study of BMS-790052, an NS5A replication complex inhibitor, in patients infected with hepatitis C virus genotype 1. Hepatology 54(6):1956–1965.
    34.
    Pasquinelli C et al. 2012. Single and multiple ascending dose studies of the NS3 protease inhibitor, asunaprevir, in subjects with or without chronic hepatitis C. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56:1838–1844.
    35.
    Poordad F et al. 2011. Boceprevir for untreated chronic HCV genotype 1 infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 364:1195–1206.
    36.
    Qiu P et al. 2009. Identification of HCV protease inhibitor resistance mutations by selection pressure-based method. Nucleic Acids Res. 37:e74.
    37.
    Raney KD, Sharma SD, Moustafa IM, and Cameron CE. 2010. Hepatitis C virus non-structural protein 3 (HCV NS3): a multifunctional antiviral target. J. Biol. Chem. 285:22725–22731.
    38.
    Reesink HW et al. 2006. Rapid decline of viral RNA in hepatitis C patients treated with VX-950: a phase Ib, placebo-controlled, randomized study. Gastroenterology 131:997–1002.
    39.
    Romano KP, Ali A, Royer WE, and Schiffer CA. 2010. Drug resistance against HCV NS3/4A inhibitors is defined by the balance of substrate recognition versus inhibitor binding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107:20986–20991.
    40.
    Sarrazin C et al. 2007. Dynamic hepatitis C virus genotypic and phenotypic changes in patients treated with the protease inhibitor telaprevir. Gastroenterology 132:1767–1777.
    41.
    Scola P et al. 2010. Discovery of BMS-650032, an NS3 protease inhibitor for the treatment of hepatitis C, abstr. MEDI-38. In Sci. Abstr. 239th ACS Natl. Meet. Exposition.
    42.
    Sheaffer AK et al. 2004. Characterisation of HCV replicons resistant to inhibitors of NS3 protease activity, abstr. 290. In Proc. 7th Int. Symp. Positive Strand RNA Viruses.
    43.
    Sheaffer AK et al. 2011. Development of a chimeric replicon system for phenotypic analysis of NS3 protease sequences from HCV clinical isolates. Antivir. Ther. 16:705–718.
    44.
    Susser S et al. 2009. Characterization of resistance to the protease inhibitor boceprevir in hepatitis C virus-infected patients. Hepatology. 50:1709–1718.
    45.
    Tong X et al. 2008. Characterization of resistance mutations against HCV ketoamide protease inhibitors. Antiviral Res. 77:177–185.
    46.
    Verbinnen T et al. 2010. Tracking the evolution of multiple in vitro hepatitis C virus replicon variants under protease inhibitor selection pressure by 454 deep sequencing. J. Virol. 84:11124–11133.
    47.
    World Health Organization. 2011. Hepatitis C key facts. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs164/en/.
    48.
    Yanagi M, Purcell RH, Emerson SU, and Bukh J. 1997. Transcripts from a single full-length cDNA clone of hepatitis C virus are infectious when directly transfected into the liver of a chimpanzee. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94:8738–8743.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    Volume 56Number 7July 2012
    Pages: 3670 - 3681

    History

    Received: 8 February 2012
    27 February 2012
    Accepted: 6 April 2012
    Published online: 16 April 2012

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Contributors

    Authors

    Fiona McPhee
    Bristol-Myers Squibb, Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Jacques Friborg
    Bristol-Myers Squibb, Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Steven Levine
    Bristol-Myers Squibb, Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Chaoqun Chen
    Bristol-Myers Squibb, Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Paul Falk
    Bristol-Myers Squibb, Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Fei Yu
    Bristol-Myers Squibb, Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Dennis Hernandez
    Bristol-Myers Squibb, Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Min S. Lee
    Bristol-Myers Squibb, Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Susan Chaniewski
    Bristol-Myers Squibb, Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Amy K. Sheaffer
    Bristol-Myers Squibb, Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Claudio Pasquinelli
    Bristol-Myers Squibb, Research and Development, Hopewell, New Jersey, USA

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Fiona McPhee, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Antimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapyArticle
    Novel Insights into the Classification of Staphylococcal β-Lactamases in Relation to the Cefazolin Inoculum Effect

    Novel Insights into the Classification of Staphylococcal β-Lactamases in Relation to the Cefazolin Inoculum Effect

    ABSTRACT

    Cefazolin has become a prominent therapy for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections. However, an important concern is the cefazolin inoculum effect (CzIE), a phenomenon mediated by staphylococcal β-lactamases. Four variants of staphylococcal β-lactamases have been described based on serological methodologies and limited sequence information. Here, we sought to reassess the classification of staphylococcal β-lactamases and their correlation with the CzIE. We included a large collection of 690 contemporary bloodstream MSSA isolates recovered from Latin America, a region with a high prevalence of the CzIE. We determined cefazolin MICs at standard and high inoculums by broth microdilution. Whole-genome sequencing was performed to classify the β-lactamase in each isolate based on the predicted full sequence of BlaZ. We used the classical schemes for β-lactamase classification and compared it to BlaZ allotypes found in unique sequences using the genomic information. Phylogenetic analyses were performed based on the BlaZ and core-genome sequences. The overall prevalence of the CzIE was 40%. Among 641 genomes, type C was the most predominant β-lactamase (37%), followed by type A (33%). We found 29 allotypes and 43 different substitutions in BlaZ. A single allotype, designated BlaZ-2, showed a robust and statistically significant association with the CzIE. Two other allotypes (BlaZ-3 and BlaZ-5) were associated with a lack of the CzIE. Three amino acid substitutions (A9V, E112A, and G145E) showed statistically significant association with the CzIE (P = <0.01). CC30 was the predominant clone among isolates displaying the CzIE. Thus, we provide a novel approach to the classification of the staphylococcal β-lactamases with the potential to more accurately identify MSSA strains exhibiting the CzIE.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Boucher H, Miller LG, Razonable RR. 2010. Serious infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Infect Dis 51:S183–S197.
    2.
    Tong SY, Davis JS, Eichenberger E, Holland TL, Fowler VG, Jr. 2015. Staphylococcus aureus infections: epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev 28:603–661.
    3.
    Magill SS, O'Leary E, Janelle SJ, Thompson DL, Dumyati G, Nadle J, Wilson LE, Kainer MA, Lynfield R, Greissman S, Ray SM, Beldavs Z, Gross C, Bamberg W, Sievers M, Concannon C, Buhr N, Warnke L, Maloney M, Ocampo V, Brooks J, Oyewumi T, Sharmin S, Richards K, Rainbow J, Samper M, Hancock EB, Leaptrot D, Scalise E, Badrun F, Phelps R, Edwards JR, Emerging Infections Program Hospital Prevalence Survey Team. 2018. Changes in prevalence of health care-associated infections in U.S. hospitals. N Engl J Med 379:1732–1744.
    4.
    van Hal SJ, Jensen SO, Vaska VL, Espedido BA, Paterson DL, Gosbell IB. 2012. Predictors of mortality in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin Microbiol Rev 25:362–386.
    5.
    Koeck M, Como-Sabetti K, Boxrud D, Dobbins G, Glennen A, Anacker M, Jawahir S, See I, Lynfield R. 2019. Burdens of invasive methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus disease, Minnesota, USA. Emerg Infect Dis 25:171–174.
    6.
    Jackson KA, Gokhale RH, Nadle J, Ray SM, Dumyati G, Schaffner W, Ham DC, Magill SS, Lynfield R, See I. 2019. Public health importance of invasive methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus infections: surveillance in 8 US counties, 2016. Clin Infect Dis ciz323.
    7.
    Ericson J, Popoola VO, Smith PB, Benjamin DK, Fowler VG, Benjamin DK, Clark RH, Milstone AM. 2015. Burden of invasive Staphylococcus aureus infections in hospitalized infants. JAMA Pediatr 169:1105–1111.
    8.
    Arias CA, Reyes J, Carvajal LP, Rincon S, Diaz L, Panesso D, Ibarra G, Rios R, Munita JM, Salles MJ, Alvarez-Moreno C, Labarca J, Garcia, Luna CM, Mejia-Villatoro C, Zurita J, Guzman-Blanco M, Rodriguez-Noriega E, Narechania A, Rojas LJ, Planet PJ, Weinstock GM, Gotuzzo E, Seas C. 2017. A prospective cohort multicenter study of molecular epidemiology and phylogenomics of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in nine Latin American countries. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e00816-17.
    9.
    Liu C, Bayer A, Cosgrove SE, Daum RS, Fridkin SK, Gorwitz RJ, Kaplan SL, Karchmer AW, Levine DP, Murray BE, J Rybak M, Talan DA, Chambers HF, Infectious. 2011. Clinical practice guidelines by the infectious diseases society of America for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children. Clin Infect Dis 52:e18–e55.
    10.
    Li J, Echevarria KL, Traugott KA. 2017. β-Lactam therapy for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a comparative review of cefazolin versus antistaphylococcal penicillins. Pharmacotherapy 37:346–360.
    11.
    Loubet P, Burdet C, Vindrios W, Grall N, Wolff M, Yazdanpanah Y, Andremont A, Duval X, Lescure FX. 2018. Cefazolin versus anti-staphylococcal penicillins for treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a narrative review. Clin Microbiol Infect 24:125–132.
    12.
    Lee S, Choe PG, Song KH, Park SW, Kim HB, Kim NJ, Kim EC, Park WB, Oh MD. 2011. Is cefazolin inferior to nafcillin for treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia? Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:5122–5126.
    13.
    Li J, Echevarria KL, Hughes DW, Cadena J, Bowling JE, Lewis JS. 2nd, 2014. Comparison of cefazolin versus oxacillin for treatment of complicated bacteremia caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:5117–5124.
    14.
    McDanel JS, Roghmann M-C, Perencevich EN, Ohl ME, Goto M, Livorsi DJ, Jones M, Albertson JP, Nair R, O'Shea AMJ, Schweizer ML. 2017. Comparative effectiveness of cefazolin versus nafcillin or oxacillin for treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infections complicated by bacteremia: a nationwide cohort study. Clin Infect Dis 65:100–106.
    15.
    Brook I. 1989. Inoculum effect. Rev Infect Dis 11:361–368.
    16.
    Rincon S, Reyes J, Carvajal LP, Rojas N, Cortes F, Panesso D, Guzman M, Zurita J, Adachi JA, Murray BE, Nannini EC, Arias CA. 2013. Cefazolin high-inoculum effect in methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus from South American hospitals. J Antimicrob Chemother 68:2773–2778.
    17.
    Lenhard JR, Bulman ZP. 2019. Inoculum effect of β-lactam antibiotics. J Antimicrob Chemother 74:2825–2843.
    18.
    Quinn EL, Pohlod D, Madhavan T, Burch K, Fisher E, Cox F. 1973. Clinical experiences with cefazolin and other cephalosporins in bacterial endocarditis. J Infect Dis 128:S386–9.
    19.
    Nannini EC, Singh KV, Murray BE. 2003. Relapse of type A beta-lactamase-producing Staphylococcus aureus native valve endocarditis during cefazolin therapy: revisiting the issue. Clin Infect Dis 37:1194–1198.
    20.
    Miller WR, Seas C, Carvajal LP, Diaz L, Echeverri AM, Ferro C, Rios R, Porras P, Luna C, Gotuzzo E, Munita JM, Nannini E, Carcamo C, Reyes J, Arias CA. 2018. The cefazolin inoculum effect is associated with increased mortality in methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Open Forum Infect Dis 5:ofy123.
    21.
    Lee S, Song KH, Jung SI, Park WB, Lee SH, Kim YS, Kwak YG, Kim YK, Kiem SM, Kim HI, Kim ES, Park KH, Kim NJ, Jang HC, Kim HB, Korea INfectious Diseases (KIND) study group. 2018. Comparative outcomes of cefazolin versus nafcillin for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a prospective multicentre cohort study in Korea. Clin Microbiol Infect 24:152–158.
    22.
    Bush K, Jacoby GA. 2010. Updated functional classification of beta-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:969–976.
    23.
    Ambler RP. 1980. The structure of beta-lactamases. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 289:321–331.
    24.
    Richmond MH. 1965. Wild-type variants of exopenicillinase from Staphylococcus aureus. Biochem J 94:584–593.
    25.
    Kernodle DS, Stratton CW, McMurray LW, Chipley JR, McGraw PA. 1989. Differentiation of beta-lactamase variants of Staphylococcus aureus by substrate hydrolysis profiles. J Infect Dis 159:103–108.
    26.
    Kernodle DS, McGraw PA, Stratton CW, Kaiser AB. 1990. Use of extracts versus whole-cell bacterial suspensions in the identification of Staphylococcus aureus beta-lactamase variants. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 34:420–425.
    27.
    Zygmunt DJ, Stratton CW, Kernodle DS. 1992. Characterization of four beta-lactamases produced by Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 36:440–445.
    28.
    Voladri RK, Tummuru MK, Kernodle DS. 1996. Structure-function relationships among wild-type variants of Staphylococcus aureus beta-lactamase: importance of amino acids 128 and 216. J Bacteriol 178:7248–7253.
    29.
    Voladri RK, Kernodle DS. 1998. Characterization of a chromosomal gene encoding type B beta-lactamase in phage group II isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 42:3163–3168.
    30.
    Wang SK, Gilchrist A, Loukitcheva A, Plotkin BJ, Sigar IM, Gross AE, O'Donnell JN, Pettit N, Buros A, O'Driscoll T, Rhodes NJ, Bethel C, Segreti J, Charnot-Katsikas A, Singh K, Scheetz MH. 2018. Prevalence of a cefazolin inoculum effect associated with blaZ gene types among methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus isolates from four major medical centers in Chicago. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e00382-18.
    31.
    Song KH, Jung SI, Lee S, Park S, Kiem SM, Lee SH, Kwak YG, Kim YK, Jang HC, Kim YS, Kim HI, Kim CJ, Park KH, Kim NJ, Oh MD, Kim HB, Korea Infectious Diseases (KIND) study group. 2017. Characteristics of cefazolin inoculum effect-positive methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infection in a multicentre bacteraemia cohort. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 36:285–294.
    32.
    Saeki M, Shinagawa M, Yakuwa Y, Nirasawa S, Sato Y, Yanagihara N, Takahashi S. 2018. Inoculum effect of high concentrations of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus on the efficacy of cefazolin and other beta-lactams. J Infect Chemother 24:212–215.
    33.
    Chong YP, Park SJ, Kim ES, Bang KM, Kim MN, Kim SH, Lee SO, Choi SH, Jeong JY, Woo JH, Kim YS. 2015. Prevalence of blaZ gene types and the cefazolin inoculum effect among methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus blood isolates and their association with multilocus sequence types and clinical outcome. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 34:349–355.
    34.
    Ambler RP. 1975. The amino acid sequence of Staphylococcus aureus penicillinase. Biochem J 151:197–218.
    35.
    Chan PT. 1986. Nucleotide sequence of the Staphylococcus aureus PC1 β-lactamase gene. Nucleic Acids Res 14:5940.
    36.
    East AK, Curnock SP, Dyke KG. 1990. Change of a single amino acid in the leader peptide of a staphylococcal beta-lactamase prevents the appearance of the enzyme in the medium. FEMS Microbiol Lett 57:249–254.
    37.
    Wi YM, Park YK, Moon C, Ryu SY, Lee H, Ki HK, Cheong HS, Son JS, Lee JS, Kwon KT, Kim JM, Ha YE, Kang CI, Ko KS, Chung DR, Peck KR, Song JH. 2015. The cefazolin inoculum effect in methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus blood isolates: their association with dysfunctional accessory gene regulator (agr). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 83:286–291.
    38.
    DeLeo FR, Kennedy AD, Chen L, Bubeck Wardenburg J, Kobayashi SD, Mathema B, Braughton KR, Whitney AR, Villaruz AE, Martens CA, Porcella SF, McGavin MJ, Otto M, Musser JM, Kreiswirth BN. 2011. Molecular differentiation of historic phage-type 80/81 and contemporary epidemic Staphylococcus aureus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:18091–18096.
    39.
    Nannini EC, Stryjewski ME, Singh KV, Bourgogne A, Rude TH, Corey GR, Fowler VG, Jr, Murray BE. 2009. Inoculum effect with cefazolin among clinical isolates of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus: frequency and possible cause of cefazolin treatment failure. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:3437–3441.
    40.
    Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120.
    41.
    Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477.
    42.
    Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, Parrello B, Shukla M, Vonstein V, Wattam AR, Xia F, Stevens R. 2014. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 42:206–214.
    43.
    Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S, Holden MTG, Fookes M, Falush D, Keane JA, Parkhill J. 2015. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics 31:3691–3693.
    44.
    Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792–1797.
    45.
    Stamatakis A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30:1312–1313.
    46.
    Letunic I, Bork P. 2016. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v3: an online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees. Nucleic Acids Res 44:W242–W245.
    47.
    Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, Madden TL. 2009. BLAST plus: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10:421.
    48.
    Seabold S, Perktold J. 2010. Statsmodels: econometric and statistical modeling with Python. Proc 9th Python Sci Conf 57:61. http://conference.scipy.org/proceedings/scipy2010/pdfs/seabold.pdf.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    Volume 64Number 521 April 2020
    eLocator: e02511-19

    History

    Received: 17 December 2019
    14 January 2020
    Accepted: 10 February 2020
    Published online: 18 February 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. BlaZ allotypes
    2. MSSA
    3. cefazolin
    4. inoculum effect

    Contributors

    Authors

    Lina P. Carvajal
    Molecular Genetics and Antimicrobial Resistance Unit, International Center for Microbial Genomics, Universidad El Bosque, Bogota, Colombia
    Sandra Rincon
    Molecular Genetics and Antimicrobial Resistance Unit, International Center for Microbial Genomics, Universidad El Bosque, Bogota, Colombia
    Aura M. Echeverri
    Molecular Genetics and Antimicrobial Resistance Unit, International Center for Microbial Genomics, Universidad El Bosque, Bogota, Colombia
    Jessica Porras
    Molecular Genetics and Antimicrobial Resistance Unit, International Center for Microbial Genomics, Universidad El Bosque, Bogota, Colombia
    Rafael Rios
    Molecular Genetics and Antimicrobial Resistance Unit, International Center for Microbial Genomics, Universidad El Bosque, Bogota, Colombia
    Karen M. Ordoñez
    E.S.E. Hospital Universitario San Jorge de Pereira, Risaralda, Colombia
    Carlos Seas
    Hospital Cayetano Heredia, Instituto de Medicina Tropical Alexander von Humboldt, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
    Sara I. Gomez-Villegas
    Center for Antimicrobial Resistance and Microbial Genomics, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA
    Lorena Diaz
    Molecular Genetics and Antimicrobial Resistance Unit, International Center for Microbial Genomics, Universidad El Bosque, Bogota, Colombia
    Cesar A. Arias
    Molecular Genetics and Antimicrobial Resistance Unit, International Center for Microbial Genomics, Universidad El Bosque, Bogota, Colombia
    Center for Antimicrobial Resistance and Microbial Genomics, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA
    Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA
    Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA
    Center for Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA
    Jinnethe Reyes
    Molecular Genetics and Antimicrobial Resistance Unit, International Center for Microbial Genomics, Universidad El Bosque, Bogota, Colombia

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Jinnethe Reyes, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Antimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapyArticle
    Single Intravenous Dose of Oritavancin for Treatment of Acute Skin and Skin Structure Infections Caused by Gram-Positive Bacteria: Summary of Safety Analysis from the Phase 3 SOLO Studies

    Single Intravenous Dose of Oritavancin for Treatment of Acute Skin and Skin Structure Infections Caused by Gram-Positive Bacteria: Summary of Safety Analysis from the Phase 3 SOLO Studies

    ABSTRACT

    Oritavancin is a lipoglycopeptide with bactericidal activity against Gram-positive organisms. Its rapid concentration-dependent bactericidal activity and long elimination half-life allow single-dose treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). SOLO I and SOLO II were randomized, double-blind studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of a single 1,200-mg intravenous (i.v.) dose of oritavancin versus twice-daily i.v. vancomycin for 7 to 10 days in ABSSSI patients. Safety data from both studies were pooled for safety analysis. The database comprised pooled safety data for 976 oritavancin-treated patients and 983 vancomycin-treated patients. The incidences of adverse events, serious adverse events, and discontinuations due to adverse events were similar for oritavancin (55.3, 5.8, and 3.7%, respectively) and vancomycin (56.9, 5.9, and 4.2%, respectively). The median time to onset (3.8 days versus 3.1 days, respectively) and the duration (3.0 days for both groups) of adverse events were also similar between the two groups. The most frequently reported events were nausea, headache, and vomiting. Greater than 90% of all events were mild or moderate in severity. There were slightly more infections and infestations, abscesses or cellulitis, and hepatic and cardiac adverse events in the oritavancin group; however, more than 80% of these events were mild or moderate. Subgroup analyses did not identify clinically meaningful differences in the incidence of adverse events attributed to oritavancin. A single 1,200-mg dose of oritavancin was well tolerated and had a safety profile similar to that of twice-daily vancomycin. The long elimination half-life of oritavancin compared to that of vancomycin did not result in a clinically meaningful delay to the onset or prolongation of adverse events. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01252719 and NCT01252732.)

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Edelsberg J, Taneja C, Zervos M, Haque N, Moore C, Reyes K, Spalding J, Jiang J, Oster G. 2009. Trends in US hospital admissions for skin and soft tissue infections. Emerg Infect Dis 15:1516–1518.
    2.
    Landrum ML, Neumann C, Cook C, Chukwuma U, Ellis MW, Hospenthal DR, Murray CK. 2012. Epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus blood and skin and soft tissue infections in the US military health system, 2005-2010. JAMA 308:50–59.
    3.
    Elston DM. 2005. Optimal antibacterial treatment of uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections: applying a novel treatment algorithm. J Drugs Dermatol 4:S15–S19.
    4.
    Corey GR, Stryjewski ME. 2011. New rules for clinical trials of patients with acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections: do not let the perfect be the enemy of the good. Clin Infect Dis 52(Suppl 7):S469–S476.
    5.
    Jenkins TC, Sabel AL, Sarcone EE, Price CS, Mehler PS, Burman WJ. 2010. Skin and soft-tissue infections requiring hospitalization at an academic medical center: opportunities for antimicrobial stewardship. Clin Infect Dis 51:895–903.
    6.
    Lee BY, Singh A, David MZ, Bartsch SM, Slayton RB, Huang SS, Zimmer SM, Potter MA, Macal CM, Lauderdale DS, Miller LG, Daum RS. 2013. The economic burden of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA). Clin Microbiol Infect 19:528–536.
    7.
    Liu C, Bayer A, Cosgrove SE, Daum RS, Fridkin SK, Gorwitz RJ, Kaplan SL, Karchmer AW, Levine DP, Murray BE, Rybak JM, Talan DA, Chambers HF, Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2011. Clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children. Clin Infect Dis 52:e18–55.
    8.
    Garau J, Ostermann H, Medina J, Avila M, McBride K, Blasi F, REACH Study Group. 2013. Current management of patients hospitalized with complicated skin and soft tissue infections across Europe (2010-2011): assessment of clinical practice patterns and real-life effectiveness of antibiotics from the REACH study. Clin Microbiol Infect 19:E377–E385.
    9.
    Stevens DL, Bisno AL, Chambers HF, Dellinger EP, Goldstein EJ, Gorbach SL, Hirschmann JV, Kaplan SL, Montoya JG, Wade JC. 2014. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: 2014 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 59:147–159.
    10.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2017. Active bacterial core surveillance report, Emerging Infections Program Network, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 2015. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
    11.
    European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. 2017. Antimicrobial resistance surveillance in Europe 2015. Annual report of the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net). European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, Sweden.
    12.
    Moran GJ, Abrahamian FM, Lovecchio F, Talan DA. 2013. Acute bacterial skin infections: developments since the 2005 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines. J Emerg Med 44:e397–e412.
    13.
    Ellis MW, Schlett CD, Millar EV, Crawford KB, Cui T, Lanier JB, Tribble DR. 2014. Prevalence of nasal colonization and strain concordance in patients with community-associated Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft-tissue infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 35:1251–1256.
    14.
    Klein EY, Sun L, Smith DL, Laxminarayan R. 2013. The changing epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the United States: a national observational study. Am J Epidemiol 177:666–674.
    15.
    Wong-Beringer A, Joo J, Tse E, Beringer P. 2011. Vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity: a critical appraisal of risk with high-dose therapy. Int J Antimicrob Agents 37:95–101.
    16.
    Elyasi S, Khalili H, Hatamkhani S, Dashti-Khavidaki S. 2013. Prevention of vancomycin induced nephrotoxicity: a review of preclinical data. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 69:747–754.
    17.
    Tice A. 2012. Oritavancin: a new opportunity for outpatient therapy of serious infections. Clin Infect Dis 54(Suppl 3):S239–S243.
    18.
    Ball AT, Xu Y, Sanchez RJ, Shelbaya A, Deminski MC, Nau DP. 2010. Nonadherence to oral linezolid after hospitalization: a retrospective claims analysis of the incidence and consequence of claim reversals. Clin Ther 32:2246–2255.
    19.
    Eells SJ, Nguyen M, Jung J, Macias-Gil R, May L, Miller LG. 2016. Relationship between adherence to oral antibiotics and postdischarge clinical outcomes among patients hospitalized with Staphylococcus aureus skin infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:2941–2948.
    20.
    Kim SJ, Cegelski L, Stueber D, Singh M, Dietrich E, Tanaka KS, Parr TR, Jr, Far AR, Schaefer J. 2008. Oritavancin exhibits dual mode of action to inhibit cell-wall biosynthesis in Staphylococcus aureus. J Mol Biol 377:281–293.
    21.
    Belley A, McKay GA, Arhin FF, Sarmiento I, Beaulieu S, Fadhil I, Parr TR, Jr, Moeck G. 2010. Oritavancin disrupts membrane integrity of Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci to effect rapid bacterial killing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:5369–5371.
    22.
    Zhanel GG, Schweizer F, Karlowsky JA. 2012. Oritavancin: mechanism of action. Clin Infect Dis 54(Suppl 3):S214–S219.
    23.
    Sweeney D, Shinabarger DL, Arhin FF, Belley A, Moeck G, Pillar CM. 2017. Comparative in vitro activity of oritavancin and other agents against methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 87:121–128.
    24.
    Ambrose PG, Drusano GL, Craig WA. 2012. In vivo activity of oritavancin in animal infection models and rationale for a new dosing regimen in humans. Clin Infect Dis 54(Suppl 3):S220–S228.
    25.
    Mendes RE, Farrell DJ, Sader HS, Flamm RK, Jones RN. 2015. Activity of oritavancin against Gram-positive clinical isolates responsible for documented skin and soft-tissue infections in European and US hospitals (2010-13). J Antimicrob Chemother 70:498–504.
    26.
    Duncan LR, Sader HS, Flamm RK, Jones RN, Mendes RE. 2016. Oritavancin in vitro activity against contemporary Staphylococcus aureus isolates responsible for invasive community- and healthcare-associated infections among patients in the United States (2013-2014). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 86:303–306.
    27.
    Rubino CM, Bhavnani SM, Moeck G, Bellibas SE, Ambrose PG. 2015. Population pharmacokinetic analysis for a single 1,200-milligram dose of oritavancin using data from two pivotal phase 3 clinical trials. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:3365–3372.
    28.
    Corey GR, Kabler H, Mehra P, Gupta S, Overcash JS, Porwal A, Giordano P, Lucasti C, Perez A, Good S, Jiang H, Moeck G, O'Riordan W, SOLO I Investigators. 2014. Single-dose oritavancin in the treatment of acute bacterial skin infections. N Engl J Med 370:2180–2190.
    29.
    Corey GR, Good S, Jiang H, Moeck G, Wikler M, Green S, Manos P, Keech R, Singh R, Heller B, Bubnova N, O'Riordan W, SOLO II Investigators. 2015. Single-dose oritavancin versus 7-10 days of vancomycin in the treatment of gram-positive acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: the SOLO II noninferiority study. Clin Infect Dis 60:254–262.
    30.
    Anastasio PJ, Wolthoff P, Galli A, Fan W. 2017. Single-dose oritavancin compared to standard of care IV antibiotics for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection in the outpatient setting: a retrospective real-world study. Infect Dis Ther 6:115–128.
    31.
    Corey GR, Arhin FF, Wikler MA, Sahm DF, Kreiswirth BN, Mediavilla JR, Good S, Fiset C, Jiang H, Moeck G, Kabler H, Green S, O'Riordan W, SOLO I, SOLO II Investigators. 2016. Pooled analysis of single-dose oritavancin in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections caused by Gram-positive pathogens, including a large patient subset with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Antimicrob Agents 48:528–534.
    32.
    Corey GR, Good S, Jiang H, Moeck G, Wikler M. 2014. Efficacy and safety outcomes by subgroups in studies of a single dose of oritavancin for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI), abstr F-973. Abstr 54th Intersci Conf Antimicrob Agents Chemother. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
    33.
    Pfizer. 2010. Vancomycin hydrochloride for injection prescribing information. Pfizer, New York, NY.
    34.
    Reuben A. 2004. Hy's law. Hepatology 39:574–578.
    35.
    U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 2013. Guidance for industry. Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: developing drugs for treatment. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/Guidances/ucm071185.pdf.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    Volume 62Number 4April 2018
    eLocator: e01919-17

    History

    Received: 13 September 2017
    16 November 2017
    Accepted: 9 January 2018
    Published online: 22 January 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. single-dose treatment
    2. clinical safety
    3. 60-day safety follow-up
    4. elimination half-life
    5. single dose

    Contributors

    Authors

    G. Ralph Corey
    Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
    Jeffery Loutit
    The Medicines Company, Parsippany, New Jersey, USA
    The Medicines Company, Parsippany, New Jersey, USA
    Matthew Wikler
    The Medicines Company, Parsippany, New Jersey, USA
    Present address: Matthew Wikler, Independent Researcher, Rancho Santa Fe, California, USA.
    Michael N. Dudley
    The Medicines Company, Parsippany, New Jersey, USA
    William O'Riordan
    Sharp Chula Vista Medical Center, Chula Vista, California, USA
    on behalf of the SOLO I and SOLO II Investigators

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Greg Moeck, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Antimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapyArticle
    ARGONAUT II Study of the In Vitro Activity of Plazomicin against Carbapenemase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

    ABSTRACT

    Plazomicin was tested against 697 recently acquired carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from the Great Lakes region of the United States. Plazomicin MIC50 and MIC90 values were 0.25 and 1 mg/liter, respectively; 680 isolates (97.6%) were susceptible (MICs of ≤2 mg/liter), 9 (1.3%) intermediate (MICs of 4 mg/liter), and 8 (1.1%) resistant (MICs of >32 mg/liter). Resistance was associated with rmtF-, rmtB-, or armA-encoded 16S rRNA methyltransferases in all except 1 isolate.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    World Health Organization. 2018. Global antimicrobial resistance surveillance system (GLASS) report: early implementation 2017–2018. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/searo/amr/global-antimicrobial-resistance-surveillance-system---glass-report-early-implementation-2017-2018.pdf?sfvrsn=7e629fec_6.
    2.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2013. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2013. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/pdf/ar-threats-2013-508.pdf.
    3.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2019. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2019. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/pdf/threats-report/2019-ar-threats-report-508.pdf.
    4.
    Saravolatz LD, Stein GE. 2020. Plazomicin: a new aminoglycoside. Clin Infect Dis 70:704–709.
    5.
    Shaeer KM, Zmarlicka MT, Chahine EB, Piccicacco N, Cho JC. 2019. Plazomicin: a next-generation aminoglycoside. Pharmacotherapy 39:77–93.
    6.
    Jacobs MR, Abdelhamed AM, Good CE, Rhoads DD, Hujer KM, Hujer AM, Domitrovic TN, Rudin SD, Richter SS, van Duin D, Kreiswirth BN, Greco C, Fouts DE, Bonomo RA. 2019. ARGONAUT-I: activity of cefiderocol (S-649266), a siderophore cephalosporin, against Gram-negative bacteria, including carbapenem-resistant nonfermenters and Enterobacteriaceae with defined extended-spectrum β-lactamases and carbapenemases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63:e01801-18.
    7.
    Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2018. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, 11th ed. M07. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
    8.
    Doi Y, Wachino J-I, Arakawa Y. 2016. Aminoglycoside resistance: the emergence of acquired 16S ribosomal RNA methyltransferases. Infect Dis Clin North Am 30:523–537.
    9.
    Gamal D, Fernández-Martínez M, Salem D, El-Defrawy I, Montes LÁ, Ocampo-Sosa AA, Martínez-Martínez L. 2016. Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from Egypt containing blaNDM-1 on IncR plasmids and its association with rmtF. Int J Infect Dis 43:17–20.
    10.
    Mancini S, Poirel L, Tritten ML, Lienhard R, Bassi C, Nordmann P. 2018. Emergence of an MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae ST231 producing OXA-232 and RmtF in Switzerland. J Antimicrob Chemother 73:821–823.
    11.
    Rojas LJ, Hujer AM, Rudin SD, Wright MS, Domitrovic TN, Marshall SH, Hujer KM, Richter SS, Cober E, Perez F, Adams MD, van Duin D, Bonomo RA. 2017. NDM-5 and OXA-181 beta-lactamases, a significant threat continues to spread in the Americas. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e00454-17.
    12.
    Taylor E, Sriskandan S, Woodford N, Hopkins KL. 2018. High prevalence of 16S rRNA methyltransferases among carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in the UK and Ireland. Int J Antimicrob Agents 52:278–282.
    13.
    Castanheira M, Davis AP, Serio AW, Krause KM, Mendes RE. 2019. In vitro activity of plazomicin against Enterobacteriaceae isolates carrying genes encoding aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes most common in US Census divisions. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 94:73–77.
    14.
    Galani I, Nafplioti K, Adamou P, Karaiskos I, Giamarellou H, Souli M. 2019. Nationwide epidemiology of carbapenem resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from Greek hospitals, with regard to plazomicin and aminoglycoside resistance. BMC Infect Dis 19:167.
    15.
    Serio AW, Keepers T, Krause KM. 2019. Plazomicin is active against metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Open Forum Infect Dis 6:ofz123.
    16.
    Rodriguez-Bano J, Gutierrez-Gutierrez B, Machuca I, Pascual A. 2018. Treatment of infections caused by extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-, AmpC-, and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Clin Microbiol Rev 31:e00079-17.
    17.
    Fleischmann WA, Greenwood-Quaintance KE, Patel R. 2020. In vitro activity of plazomicin compared to amikacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin against multidrug resistant aerobic Gram-negative bacilli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 64:e01711-19.
    18.
    Castanheira M, Deshpande LM, Woosley LN, Serio AW, Krause KM, Flamm RK. 2018. Activity of plazomicin compared with other aminoglycosides against isolates from European and adjacent countries, including Enterobacteriaceae molecularly characterized for aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes and other resistance mechanisms. J Antimicrob Chemother 73:3346–3354.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    Volume 64Number 521 April 2020
    eLocator: e00012-20

    History

    Received: 7 January 2020
    3 February 2020
    Accepted: 2 March 2020
    Published online: 9 March 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. Klebsiella
    2. antibiotic resistance
    3. carbapenemase
    4. plazomicin

    Contributors

    Authors

    Michael R. Jacobs
    Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
    Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
    Caryn E. Good
    Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
    Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
    Andrea M. Hujer
    Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
    Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
    Ayman M. Abdelhamed
    Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
    Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
    Daniel D. Rhoads
    Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
    Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
    Kristine M. Hujer
    Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
    Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
    Susan D. Rudin
    Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
    Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
    T. Nicholas Domitrovic
    Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
    Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
    Lynn E. Connolly
    Achaogen, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA
    Kevin M. Krause
    Achaogen, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA
    Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
    Cesar A. Arias
    Division of Infectious Diseases, McGovern School of Medicine at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
    Center for Antimicrobial Resistance and Microbial Genomics, McGovern School of Medicine at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
    Center for Infectious Diseases, UTHealth School of Public Health, Houston, Texas, USA
    Molecular Genetics and Antimicrobial Resistance Unit, International Center for Microbial Genomics, Universidad El Bosque, Bogota, Colombia
    Barry N. Kreiswirth
    Hackensack Meridian Health Center for Discovery and Innovation, Nutley, New Jersey, USA
    Laura J. Rojas
    Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
    Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
    Roshan D’Souza
    J. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
    Richard C. White
    J. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
    Lauren M. Brinkac
    J. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
    Kevin Nguyen
    J. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
    Indresh Singh
    J. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
    J. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
    Division of Infectious Diseases, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
    Robert A. Bonomo
    Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
    Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
    Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
    Department of Pharmacology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
    Department of Biochemistry, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
    Center for Proteomics and Bioinformatics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
    CWRU-Cleveland VAMC Center for Antimicrobial Resistance and Epidemiology, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
    for the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Michael R. Jacobs, [email protected], or Robert A. Bonomo, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Antimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapyArticle
    Enhanced Efflux Pump Expression in Candida Mutants Results in Decreased Manogepix Susceptibility

    Enhanced Efflux Pump Expression in Candida Mutants Results in Decreased Manogepix Susceptibility

    ABSTRACT

    Manogepix is a broad-spectrum antifungal agent that inhibits glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor biosynthesis. Using whole-genome sequencing, we characterized two efflux-mediated mechanisms in the fungal pathogens Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis that resulted in decreased manogepix susceptibility. In C. albicans, a gain-of-function mutation in the transcription factor gene ZCF29 activated expression of ATP-binding cassette transporter genes CDR11 and SNQ2. In C. parapsilosis, a mitochondrial deletion activated expression of the major facilitator superfamily transporter gene MDR1.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Brown GD, Denning DW, Gow NAR, Levitz SM, Netea MG, White TC. 2012. Hidden killers: human fungal infections. Sci Transl Med 4:165rv13.
    2.
    Bongomin F, Gago S, Oladele RO, Denning DW. 2017. Global and multi-national prevalence of fungal diseases-estimate precision. J Fungi 3:57.
    3.
    Low C-Y, Rotstein C. 2011. Emerging fungal infections in immunocompromised patients. F1000 Med Rep 3:14.
    4.
    Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ. 2010. Epidemiology of invasive mycoses in North America. Crit Rev Microbiol 36:1–53.
    5.
    Enoch DA, Ludlam HA, Brown NM. 2006. Invasive fungal infections: a review of epidemiology and management options. J Med Microbiol 55:809–818.
    6.
    Robbins N, Wright GD, Cowen LE. 2016. Antifungal drugs: the current armamentarium and development of new agents. Microbiol Spectr 4:903–922.
    7.
    Hodges MR, Ople E, Shaw KJ. 2017. First-in-human study to assess safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of APX001 administered by intravenous infusion to healthy subjects, poster 1840. IDweek 2017, San Diego, CA.
    8.
    Hodges MR, Ople E, Shaw KJ. 2017. Phase 1 study to assess safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple oral doses of APX001 and to investigate the effect of food on APX001 bioavailability, poster 1860. IDweek 2017, San Diego, CA.
    9.
    Hata K, Horii T. 2011. In vitro and in vivo antifungal activities of E1211, a water-soluble prodrug of E1210, abstr F1-1377. Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Chicago, IL.
    10.
    Umemura M, Okamoto M, Nakayama K-I, Sagane K, Tsukahara K, Hata K, Jigami Y. 2003. GWT1 gene is required for inositol acylation of glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchors in yeast. J Biol Chem 278:23639–23647.
    11.
    Tsukahara K, Hata K, Nakamoto K, Sagane K, Watanabe N-A, Kuromitsu J, Kai J, Tsuchiya M, Ohba F, Jigami Y, Yoshimatsu K, Nagasu T. 2003. Medicinal genetics approach towards identifying the molecular target of a novel inhibitor of fungal cell wall assembly. Mol Microbiol 48:1029–1042.
    12.
    Watanabe N-A, Miyazaki M, Horii T, Sagane K, Tsukahara K, Hata K. 2012. E1210, a new broad-spectrum antifungal, suppresses Candida albicans hyphal growth through inhibition of glycosylphosphatidylinositol biosynthesis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:960–971.
    13.
    Pittet M, Conzelmann A. 2007. Biosynthesis and function of GPI proteins in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim Biophys Acta 1771:405–420.
    14.
    McLellan CA, Whitesell L, King OD, Lancaster AK, Mazitschek R, Lindquist S. 2012. Inhibiting GPI anchor biosynthesis in fungi stresses the endoplasmic reticulum and enhances immunogenicity. ACS Chem Biol 7:1520–1528.
    15.
    Zhao Y, Lee MH, Paderu P, Lee A, Jimenez-Ortigosa C, Park S, Mansbach RS, Shaw KJ, Perlin DS. 2018. Significantly improved pharmacokinetics enhances in vivo efficacy of APX001 against echinocandin- and multidrug-resistant Candida isolates in a mouse model of invasive candidiasis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e00425-18.
    16.
    Hager CL, Larkin EL, Long L, Zohra Abidi F, Shaw KJ, Ghannoum MA. 2018. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the antifungal activity of APX001A/APX001 against Candida auris. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e02319-17.
    17.
    Shaw KJ, Schell WA, Covel J, Duboc G, Giamberardino C, Kapoor M, Moloney M, Soltow QA, Tenor JL, Toffaletti DL, Trzoss M, Webb P, Perfect JR. 2018. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of APX001A/APX001 and other Gwt1 inhibitors against Cryptococcus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e00523-18.
    18.
    Gebremariam T, Alkhazraji S, Alqarihi A, Jeon HH, Gu Y, Kapoor M, Shaw KJ, Ibrahim AS. 2018. APX001 is effective in the treatment of murine invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63:e01713-18.
    19.
    Castanheira M, Duncanson FP, Diekema DJ, Guarro J, Jones RN, Pfaller MA. 2012. Activities of E1210 and comparator agents tested by CLSI and EUCAST broth microdilution methods against Fusarium and Scedosporium species identified using molecular methods. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:352–357.
    20.
    Kapoor M, Moloney M, Soltow QA, Pillar CM, Shaw KJ. 2019. Evaluation of resistance development to the Gwt1 inhibitor manogepix (APX001A) in Candida species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 64:e01387-19.
    21.
    Sagane K, Umemura M, Ogawa-Mitsuhashi K, Tsukahara K, Yoko-O T, Jigami Y. 2011. Analysis of membrane topology and identification of essential residues for the yeast endoplasmic reticulum inositol acyltransferase Gwt1p. J Biol Chem 286:14649–14658.
    22.
    Castillon GA, Aguilera-Romero A, Manzano-Lopez J, Epstein S, Kajiwara K, Funato K, Watanabe R, Riezman H, Muñiz M. 2011. The yeast p24 complex regulates GPI-anchored protein transport and quality control by monitoring anchor remodeling. Mol Biol Cell 22:2924–2936.
    23.
    Mann PA, McLellan CA, Koseoglu S, Si Q, Kuzmin E, Flattery A, Harris G, Sher X, Murgolo N, Wang H, Devito K, de Pedro N, Genilloud O, Kahn JN, Jiang B, Costanzo M, Boone C, Garlisi CG, Lindquist S, Roemer T. 2015. Chemical genomics-based antifungal drug discovery: targeting glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) precursor biosynthesis. ACS Infect Dis 1:59–72.
    24.
    Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2008. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts; approved standard, 3rd ed. CLSI document M27-A3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
    25.
    Revie NM, Iyer KR, Robbins N, Cowen LE. 2018. Antifungal drug resistance: evolution, mechanisms and impact. Curr Opin Microbiol 45:70–76.
    26.
    Ivnitski-Steele I, Holmes AR, Lamping E, Monk BC, Cannon RD, Sklar LA. 2009. Identification of Nile red as a fluorescent substrate of the Candida albicans ATP-binding cassette transporters Cdr1p and Cdr2p and the major facilitator superfamily transporter Mdr1p. Anal Biochem 394:87–91.
    27.
    Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120.
    28.
    Skrzypek MS, Binkley J, Binkley G, Miyasato SR, Simison M, Sherlock G. 2017. The Candida Genome Database (CGD): incorporation of assembly 22, systematic identifiers and visualization of high throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D592–D596.
    29.
    Weissman J, Muzzey D, Schwartz K, Weissman JS, Sherlock G. 2013. Assembly of a phased diploid Candida albicans genome facilitates allele-specific measurements and provides a simple model for repeat and indel structure. Genome Biol 14:R97.
    30.
    Guida A, Lindstädt C, Maguire SL, Ding C, Higgins DG, Corton NJ, Berriman M, Butler G. 2011. Using RNA-seq to determine the transcriptional landscape and the hypoxic response of the pathogenic yeast Candida parapsilosis. BMC Genomics 12:628.
    31.
    Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9:357–359.
    32.
    Cibulskis K, Lawrence MS, Carter SL, Sivachenko A, Jaffe D, Sougnez C, Gabriel S, Meyerson M, Lander ES, Getz G. 2013. Sensitive detection of somatic point mutations in impure and heterogeneous cancer samples. Nat Biotechnol 31:213–219.
    33.
    Cingolani P, Platts A, Wang LL, Coon M, Nguyen T, Wang L, Land SJ, Lu X, Ruden DM. 2012. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly (Austin) 6:80–92.
    34.
    Abbey DA, Funt J, Lurie-Weinberger MN, Thompson DA, Regev A, Myers CL, Berman J. 2014. YMAP: a pipeline for visualization of copy number variation and loss of heterozygosity in eukaryotic pathogens. Genome Med 6:1–16.
    35.
    Xie C, Tammi MT. 2009. CNV-seq, a new method to detect copy number variation using high-throughput sequencing. BMC Bioinformatics 10:80.
    36.
    Shekhar-Guturja T, Tebung WA, Mount H, Liu N, Köhler JR, Whiteway M, Cowen LE. 2016. Beauvericin potentiates azole activity via inhibition of multidrug efflux, blocks Candida albicans morphogenesis, and is effluxed via Yor1 and circuitry controlled by Zcf29. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:7468–7480.
    37.
    Bosworth CM, Grandhi S, Gould MP, LaFramboise T. 2017. Detection and quantification of mitochondrial DNA deletions from next-generation sequence data. BMC Bioinformatics 18:407–436.
    38.
    Nosek J, Novotna M, Hlavatovicova Z, Ussery DW, Fajkus J, Tomaska L. 2004. Complete DNA sequence of the linear mitochondrial genome of the pathogenic yeast Candida parapsilosis. Mol Genet Genomics 272:173–180.
    39.
    Shingu-Vazquez M, Traven A. 2011. Mitochondria and fungal pathogenesis: drug tolerance, virulence, and potential for antifungal therapy. Eukaryot Cell 10:1376–1383.
    40.
    Cheng S, Clancy CJ, Nguyen KT, Clapp W, Nguyen MH. 2007. A Candida albicans petite mutant strain with uncoupled oxidative phosphorylation overexpresses MDR1 and has diminished susceptibility to fluconazole and voriconazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:1855–1858.
    41.
    Cheng S, Clancy CJ, Zhang Z, Hao B, Wang W, Iczkowski KA, Pfaller MA, Nguyen MH. 2007. Uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation enables Candida albicans to resist killing by phagocytes and persist in tissue. Cell Microbiol 9:492–501.
    42.
    Moye-Rowley WS. 2005. Retrograde regulation of multidrug resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene 354:15–21.
    43.
    Gulshan K, Schmidt JA, Shahi P, Moye-Rowley WS. 2008. Evidence for the bifunctional nature of mitochondrial phosphatidylserine decarboxylase: role in Pdr3-dependent retrograde regulation of PDR5 expression. Mol Cell Biol 28:5851–5864.
    44.
    Brun S, Bergès T, Poupard P, Vauzelle-Moreau C, Renier G, Chabasse D, Bouchara J-P. 2004. Mechanisms of azole resistance in petite mutants of Candida glabrata. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:1788–1796.
    45.
    Blankenship JR, Heitman J. 2005. Calcineurin is required for Candida albicans to survive calcium stress in serum. Infect Immun 73:5767–5774.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    Volume 64Number 521 April 2020
    eLocator: e00261-20

    History

    Received: 13 February 2020
    Accepted: 4 March 2020
    Published online: 16 March 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. APX001
    2. fosmanogepix
    3. manogepix
    4. APX001A
    5. Gwt1
    6. antifungal
    7. GPI anchor
    8. glycosylphosphatidylinositol
    9. antifungal therapy
    10. efflux

    Contributors

    Authors

    Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Luke Whitesell
    Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Mili Kapoor
    Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, California, USA
    Karen Joy Shaw
    Hearts Consulting Group, San Diego, California, USA
    Leah E. Cowen
    Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Karen Joy Shaw, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Antimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapyArticle
    High Prevalence of Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae Infection in China: Geographic Distribution, Clinical Characteristics, and Antimicrobial Resistance

    High Prevalence of Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae Infection in China: Geographic Distribution, Clinical Characteristics, and Antimicrobial Resistance

    ABSTRACT

    Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae (hvKP) is traditionally defined by hypermucoviscosity, but data based on genetic background are limited. Antimicrobial-resistant hvKP has been increasingly reported but has not yet been systematically studied. K. pneumoniae isolates from bloodstream infections, hospital-acquired pneumonia, and intra-abdominal infections were collected from 10 cities in China during February to July 2013. Clinical data were collected from medical records. All K. pneumoniae isolates were investigated by antimicrobial susceptibility testing, string test, extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) gene detection, capsular serotypes, virulence gene profiles, and multilocus sequence typing. hvKP was defined by aerobactin detection. Of 230 K. pneumoniae isolates, 37.8% were hvKP. The prevalence of hvKP varied among different cities, with the highest rate in Wuhan (73.9%) and the lowest in Zhejiang (8.3%). Hypermucoviscosity and the presence of K1, K2, K20, and rmpA genes were strongly associated with hvKP (P < 0.001). A significantly higher incidence of liver abscess (P = 0.026), sepsis (P = 0.038), and invasive infections (P = 0.043) was caused by hvKP. Cancer (odds ratio [OR], 2.285) and diabetes mellitus (OR, 2.256) appeared to be independent variables associated with hvKP infections by multivariate analysis. Importantly, 12.6% of hvKP isolates produced ESBLs, and most of them carried blaCTX-M genes. Patients with neutropenia (37.5% versus 5.6%; P = 0.020), history of systemic steroid therapy (37.5% versus 5.6%; P = 0.020), and combination therapy (62.5% versus 16.7%; P = 0.009) were more likely to be infected with ESBL-producing hvKP. The prevalence of hvKP is high in China and has a varied geographic distribution. ESBL-producing hvKP is emerging, suggesting an urgent need to enhance clinical awareness, especially for immunocompromised patients receiving combination therapy.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Chang L, Bastian I, Warner M. 2013. Survey of Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia in two South Australian hospitals and detection of hypermucoviscous phenotype and magA/rmpA genotypes in K. pneumoniae isolates. Infection 41:559–563.
    2.
    Pomakova DK, Hsiao CB, Beanan JM, Olson R, MacDonald U, Keynan Y, Russo TA. 2012. Clinical and phenotypic differences between classic and hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumonia: an emerging and under-recognized pathogenic variant. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 31:981–989.
    3.
    Decré D, Verdet C, Emirian A, Le Gourrierec T, Petit JC, Offenstadt G, Maury E, Brisse S, Arlet G. 2011. Emerging severe and fatal infections due to Klebsiella pneumoniae in two university hospitals in France. J Clin Microbiol 49:3012–3014.
    4.
    Siu LK, Fung CP, Chang FY, Lee N, Yeh KM, Koh TH, Ip M. 2011. Molecular typing and virulence analysis of serotype K1 Klebsiella pneumoniae strains isolated from liver abscess patients and stool samples from noninfectious subjects in Hong Kong, Singapore, and Taiwan. J Clin Microbiol 49:3761–3765.
    5.
    Shon AS, Bajwa RP, Russo TA. 2013. Hypervirulent (hypermucoviscous) Klebsiella pneumoniae: a new and dangerous breed. Virulence 4:107–118.
    6.
    Liu YM, Li BB, Zhang YY, Zhang W, Shen H, Li H, Cao B. 2014. Clinical and molecular characteristics of emerging hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections in mainland China. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:5379–5385.
    7.
    Li W, Sun GZ, Yu YH, Li N, Chen M, Jin R, Jiao Y, Wu H. 2014. Increasing occurrence of antimicrobial-resistant hypervirulent (hypermucoviscous) Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates in China. Clin Infect Dis 58:225–232.
    8.
    Lin YC, Lu MC, Tang HL, Liu HC, Chen CH, Liu KS, Lin C, Chiou CS, Chiang MK, Chen CM, Lai YC. 2011. Assessment of hypermucoviscosity as a virulence factor for experimental Klebsiella pneumoniae infections: comparative virulence analysis with hypermucoviscosity-negative strain. BMC Microbiol 11:50.
    9.
    Zhang YW, Zeng J, Liu WE, Zhao F, Hu Z, Zhao C, Wang Q, Wang X, Chen H, Li H, Zhang F, Li S, Cao B, Wang H. 2015. Emergence of a hypervirulent carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolate from clinical infections in China. J Infect 71:553–560.
    10.
    Alcántar-Curiel MD, Girón JA. 2015. Klebsiella pneumoniae and the pyogenic liver abscess: implications and association of the presence of rmpA genes and expression of hypermucoviscosity. Virulence 6:407–409.
    11.
    Russo TA, Olson R, Macdonald U, Metzger D, Maltese LM, Drake EJ, Gulick AM. 2014. Aerobactin mediates virulence and accounts for increased siderophore production under iron-limiting conditions by hypervirulent (hypermucoviscous) Klebsiella pneumoniae. Infect Immun 82:2356–2367.
    12.
    Zhang R, Lin D, Chan EW, Gu D, Chen GX, Chen S. 2016. Emergence of carbapenem-resistant serotype K1 hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae (hvKP) strains in China. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:709–711.
    13.
    Bialek-Davenet S, Criscuolo A, Ailloud F, Passet V, Jones L, Delannoy-Vieillard AS, Garin B, Le Hello S, Arlet G, Nicolas-Chanoine MH, Decré D, Brisse S. 2014. Genomic definition of hypervirulent and multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae clonal groups. Emerg Infect Dis 20:1812–1820.
    14.
    Su SC, Siu LK, Ma L, Yeh KM, Fung CP, Lin JC, Chang FY. 2008. Community-acquired liver abscess caused by serotype K1 Klebsiella pneumoniae with CTX-M-15-type extended-spectrum beta-lactamase. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52:804–805.
    15.
    Cheng NC, Yu YC, Tai HC, Hsueh PR, Chang SC, Lai SY, Yi WC, Fang CT. 2012. Recent trend of necrotizing fasciitis in Taiwan: focus on monomicrobial Klebsiella pneumoniae necrotizing fasciitis. Clin Infect Dis 55:930–939.
    16.
    Liu Y, Li XY, Wan LG, Jiang WY, Yang JH, Li FQ. 2014. Virulence and transferability of resistance determinants in a novel Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 1137 in China. Microb Drug Resist 20:150–155.
    17.
    Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2015. M07-A10. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved standard, 10th ed. CLSI, Wayne, PA.
    18.
    Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2016. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 26th ed. Approved standard M100S. CLSI, Wayne, PA.
    19.
    Fang CT, Lai SY, Yi WC, Hsueh PR, Liu KL, Chang SC. 2007. Klebsiella pneumoniae genotype K1: an emerging pathogen that causes septic ocular or central nervous system complications from pyogenic liver abscess. Clin Infect Dis 45:284–293.
    20.
    Compain F, Babosan A, Brisse S, Genel N, Audo J, Ailloud F, Kassis-Chikhani N, Arlet G, Decré D. 2014. Multiplex PCR for the detection of seven virulence factors and K1/K2 capsular serotypes of Klebsiella pneumoniae. J Clin Microbiol 52:4377–4380.
    21.
    Lin JC, Koh TH, Lee N, Fung CP, Chang FY, Tsai YK, Ip M, Siu LK. 2014. Genotypes and virulence in serotype K2 Klebsiella pneumoniae from liver abscess and non-infectious carriers in Hong Kong, Singapore and Taiwan. Gut Pathog 6:21.
    22.
    Lewis JS, II, Herrera M, Wickes B, Patterson JE, Jorgensen JH. 2007. First report of the emergence of CTX-M-type extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) as the predominant ESBL isolated in a U.S. health care system. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:4015–4021.
    23.
    Nassif X, Sansonetti PJ. 1986. Correlation of the virulence of Klebsiella pneumoniae K1 and K2 with the presence of a plasmid encoding aerobactin. Infect Immun 54:603–608.
    24.
    Russo TA, Olson R, MacDonald U, Beanan J, Davidson BA. 2015. Aerobactin, but not yersiniabactin, salmochelin, or enterobactin, enables the growth/survival of hypervirulent (hypermucoviscous) Klebsiella pneumoniae ex vivo and in vivo. Infect Immun 83:3325–3333.
    25.
    Struve C, Roe CC, Stegger M, Stahlhut SG, Hansen DS, Engelthaler DM, Andersen PS, Driebe EM, Keim P, Krogfelt KA. 2015. Mapping the evolution of hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae. mBio 6:e00630.
    26.
    Andrade LN, Curiao T, Ferreira JC, Longo JM, Clímaco EC, Martinez R, Bellissimo-Rodrigues F, Basile-Filho A, Evaristo MA, Del Peloso PF, Ribeiro VB, Barth AL, Paula MC, Baquero F, Cantón R, Darini AL, Coque TM. 2011. Dissemination of blaKPC-2 by the spread of Klebsiella pneumoniae clonal complex 258 clones (ST258, ST11, ST437) and plasmids (IncFII, IncN, IncL/M) among Enterobacteriaceae species in Brazil. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:3579–3583.
    27.
    Yu Y, Ji S, Chen Y, Zhou W, Wei Z, Li L, Ma Y. 2007. Resistance of strains producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamases and genotype distribution in China. J Infect 54:53–57.
    28.
    Siu LK, Huang DB, Chiang T. 2014. Plasmid transferability of KPC into a virulent K2 serotype Klebsiella pneumoniae. BMC Infect Dis 14:176.
    29.
    Holt KE, Wertheim H, Zadoks RN, Baker S, Whitehouse CA, Dance D, Jenney A, Connor TR, Hsu LY, Severin J, Brisse S, Cao H, Wilksch J, Gorrie C, Schultz MB, Edwards DJ, Nguyen KV, Nguyen TV, Dao TT, Mensink M, Minh VL, Nhu NT, Schultsz C, Kuntaman K, Newton PN, Moore CE, Strugnell RA, Thomson NR. 2015. Genomic analysis of diversity, population structure, virulence, and antimicrobial resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae, an urgent threat to public health. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:E3574–E3581.
    30.
    Hennequin C, Robin F. 2016. Correlation between antimicrobial resistance and virulence in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 35:333–341.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    Volume 60Number 10October 2016
    Pages: 6115 - 6120

    History

    Received: 26 May 2016
    7 July 2016
    Accepted: 22 July 2016
    Published online: 1 August 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Contributors

    Authors

    Yawei Zhang
    Department of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
    Chunjiang Zhao
    Department of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
    Qi Wang
    Department of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
    Xiaojuan Wang
    Department of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
    Hongbin Chen
    Department of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
    Henan Li
    Department of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
    Feifei Zhang
    Department of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
    Shuguang Li
    Department of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
    Ruobing Wang
    Department of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
    Hui Wang
    Department of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Hui Wang, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Antimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapyArticle
    Preclinical Profile and Characterization of the Hepatitis C Virus NS3 Protease Inhibitor Asunaprevir (BMS-650032)

    Preclinical Profile and Characterization of the Hepatitis C Virus NS3 Protease Inhibitor Asunaprevir (BMS-650032)

    ABSTRACT

    Asunaprevir (ASV; BMS-650032) is a hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3 protease inhibitor that has demonstrated efficacy in patients chronically infected with HCV genotype 1 when combined with alfa interferon and/or the NS5A replication complex inhibitor daclatasvir. ASV competitively binds to the NS3/4A protease complex, with Ki values of 0.4 and 0.24 nM against recombinant enzymes representing genotypes 1a (H77) and 1b (J4L6S), respectively. Selectivity was demonstrated by the absence of any significant activity against the closely related GB virus-B NS3 protease and a panel of human serine or cysteine proteases. In cell culture, ASV inhibited replication of HCV replicons representing genotypes 1 and 4, with 50% effective concentrations (EC50s) ranging from 1 to 4 nM, and had weaker activity against genotypes 2 and 3 (EC50, 67 to 1,162 nM). Selectivity was again demonstrated by the absence of activity (EC50, >12 μM) against a panel of other RNA viruses. ASV exhibited additive or synergistic activity in combination studies with alfa interferon, ribavirin, and/or inhibitors specifically targeting NS5A or NS5B. Plasma and tissue exposures in vivo in several animal species indicated that ASV displayed a hepatotropic disposition (liver-to-plasma ratios ranging from 40- to 359-fold across species). Twenty-four hours postdose, liver exposures across all species tested were ≥110-fold above the inhibitor EC50s observed with HCV genotype-1 replicons. Based on these virologic and exposure properties, ASV holds promise for future utility in a combination with other anti-HCV agents in the treatment of HCV-infected patients.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Bartenschlager R. 1999. The NS3/4A proteinase of the hepatitis C virus: unravelling structure and function of an unusual enzyme and a prime target for antiviral therapy. J. Viral Hepat. 6:165–181.
    2.
    Bartenschlager R, Ahlborn-Laake L, Mous J, and Jacobsen H. 1994. Kinetic and structural analyses of hepatitis C virus polyprotein processing. J. Virol. 68:5045–5055.
    3.
    Bartenschlager R, Lohmann V, Wilkinson T, and Koch JO. 1995. Complex formation between the NS3 serine-type proteinase of the hepatitis C virus and NS4A and its importance for polyprotein maturation. J. Virol. 69:7519–7528.
    4.
    Reference deleted.
    5.
    Bronowicki J-P et al. 2012. Asunaprevir (ASV; BMS-650032), an NS3 protease inhibitor, in combination with peginterferon and ribavirin in treatment-naive patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C infection. J. Hepatol. 56(Suppl 2):S431–S432.
    6.
    Burns C et al. 2004. Benzofuran compounds, compositions and methods for treatment and prophylaxis of hepatitis C viral infections and associated diseases. PCT international patent application WO2004/041201.
    7.
    Campbell JA and Good AC. 2002. Preparation of tripeptides as hepatitis C virus inhibitors. PCT international patent application WO2002/060926.
    8.
    Chayama K et al. 2012. Dual therapy with the NS5A inhibitor BMS-790052 and the NS3 protease inhibitor BMS-650032 in HCV genotype 1b-infected null responders. Hepatology 55:742–748.
    9.
    Chen S-H et al. 2005. P1 and P1′ optimization of [3,4]-bicycloproline P2 incorporated terapeptidyl α-ketoamide based HCV protease inhibitors. Lett. Drug Design Discov. 2:118–123.
    10.
    Chou TC. 2006. Theoretical basis, experimental design, and computerized simulation of synergism and antagonism in drug combination studies. Pharmacol. Rev. 58:621–681.
    11.
    Clackson T and Winter G. 1989. ‘Sticky feet’-directed mutagenesis and its application to swapping antibody domains. Nucleic Acids Res. 17:10163–10170.
    12.
    Coelmont L et al. 2006. Ribavirin antagonizes the in vitro anti-hepatitis C virus activity of 2′-C-methylcytidine, the active component of valopicitabine. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:3444–3446.
    13.
    Don RH, Cox PT, Wainwright BJ, Baker K, and Mattick JS. 1991. ‘Touchdown’ PCR to circumvent spurious priming during gene amplification. Nucleic Acids Res. 19:4008.
    14.
    Drexler D et al. 2006. Development of an on-line automated sample clean-up method and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis: application in an in vitro proteolytic assay. Anal. Bioanal Chem. 384:1145–1154.
    15.
    Fridell RA et al. 2011. Distinct functions of NS5A in hepatitis C virus RNA replication uncovered by studies with the NS5A inhibitor BMS-790052. J. Virol. 85:7312–7320.
    16.
    Fridell RA, Qiu D, Wang C, Valera L, and Gao M. 2010. Resistance analysis of the hepatitis C virus NS5A inhibitor BMS-790052 in an in vitro replicon system. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54:3641–3650.
    17.
    Fried MW et al. 2002. Peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 347:975–982.
    18.
    Gane EJ et al. 2011. Antiviral activity, safety, and pharmacokinetics of danoprevir/ritonavir plus PEG-IFN alpha-2a/RBV in hepatitis C patients. J. Hepatol. 55:972–979.
    19.
    Gao M et al. 2010. Chemical genetics strategy identifies an HCV NS5A inhibitor with a potent clinical effect. Nature 465:96–100.
    20.
    Ghany MG, Strader DB, Thomas DL, and Seeff LB, and American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. 2009. Diagnosis, management, and treatment of hepatitis C: an update. Hepatology 49:1335–1374.
    21.
    Grobler JA et al. 2003. Identification of a key determinant of hepatitis C virus cell culture adaptation in domain II of NS3 helicase. J. Biol. Chem. 278:16741–16746.
    22.
    Jacobson IM et al. 2011. Telaprevir for previously untreated chronic hepatitis C virus infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 364:2405–2416.
    23.
    Kadow JF et al. 2012. Discovery of BMS-791325, an allosteric NS5B replicase inhibitor for the treatment of hepatitis C, abstr. MEDI-23. 243rd American Chemical Society National Meeting and Exposition.
    24.
    Kim AI and Saab S. 2005. Treatment of hepatitis C. Am. J. Med. 118:808–815.
    25.
    Kuiken C and Simmonds P. 2009. Nomenclature and numbering of the hepatitis C virus. Methods Mol. Biol. 510:33–53.
    26.
    Lamarre D et al. 2003. An NS3 protease inhibitor with antiviral effects in humans infected with hepatitis C virus. Nature 426:186–189.
    27.
    Llinas-Brunet M et al. 2004. A systematic approach to the optimization of substrate-based inhibitors of the hepatitis C virus NS3 protease: discovery of potent and specific tripeptide inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 47:6584–6594.
    28.
    Lok AS et al. 2012. Preliminary study of two antiviral agents for hepatitis C genotype 1. N. Engl. J. Med. 366:216–224.
    29.
    McHutchison JG et al. 2009. Peginterferon alfa-2b or alfa-2a with ribavirin for treatment of hepatitis C infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 361:580–593.
    30.
    McPhee F et al. 2012. Resistance analysis of the hepatitis C virus NS3 protease inhibitor asunaprevir. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56:3670–3681.
    31.
    McPhee F et al. 2009. The discovery and early development of the HCV NS3 protease inhibitor BMS-605339. Global Antiviral J. 5(Suppl 1):51.
    32.
    Merck & Co. 2011. VictrelisTM (boceprevir), package insert. Merck & Co., Whitehouse Station, NJ.
    33.
    Miller RH and Purcell RH. 1990. Hepatitis C virus shares amino acid sequence similarity with pestiviruses and flaviviruses as well as members of two plant virus supergroups. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87:2057–2061.
    34.
    Murakami E et al. 2010. Mechanism of activation of PSI-7851 and its diastereoisomer PSI-7977. J. Biol. Chem. 285:34337–34347.
    35.
    Neurath H. 1989. The diversity of proteolytic enzymes. In Beynon RJ and Bond JS (ed) Proteolytic enzymes: a practical approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
    36.
    O'Boyle DR 2nd et al. 2005. Development of a cell-based high-throughput specificity screen using a hepatitis C virus-bovine viral diarrhea virus dual replicon assay. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:1346–1353.
    37.
    Pasquinelli C et al. 2012. Single and multiple ascending dose studies of the NS3 protease inhibitor, asunaprevir, in subjects with or without chronic hepatitis C. Antivir. Agents Chemother. 56:1838–1844.
    38.
    Perni RB et al. 2006. Preclinical profile of VX-950, a potent, selective, and orally bioavailable inhibitor of hepatitis C virus NS3-4A serine protease. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:899–909.
    39.
    Poordad F et al. 2011. Boceprevir for untreated chronic HCV genotype 1 infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 364:1195–1206.
    40.
    Rajagopalan R et al. 2009. Inhibition and binding kinetics of the hepatitis C virus NS3 protease inhibitor ITMN-191 reveals tight binding and slow dissociative behavior. Biochemistry 48:2559–2568.
    41.
    Raney KD, Sharma SD, Moustafa IM, and Cameron CE. 2010. Hepatitis C virus non-structural protein 3 (HCV NS3): a multifunctional antiviral target. J. Biol. Chem. 285:22725–22731.
    42.
    Reagan-Shaw S, Nihal M, and Ahmad N. 2008. Dose translation from animal to human studies revisited. FASEB J. 22:659–661.
    43.
    Robertson B et al. 1998. Classification, nomenclature, and database development for hepatitis C virus (HCV) and related viruses: proposals for standardization. International Committee on Virus Taxonomy. Arch. Virol. 143:2493–2503.
    44.
    Sarrazin C et al. 2007. Dynamic hepatitis C virus genotypic and phenotypic changes in patients treated with the protease inhibitor telaprevir. Gastroenterology 132:1767–1777.
    45.
    Scola P et al. 2010. Discovery of BMS-650032, an NS3 protease inhibitor for the treatment of hepatitis C, abstr. MEDI-38. Scientific Abstracts for the 239th American Chemical Society National Meeting and Exposition.
    46.
    Sheaffer AK et al. 2011. Development of a chimeric replicon system for phenotypic analysis of NS3 protease sequences from HCV clinical isolates. Antivir. Ther. 16:705–718.
    47.
    Taliani M et al. 1996. A continuous assay of hepatitis C virus protease based on resonance energy transfer depsipeptide substrates. Anal. Biochem. 240:60–67.
    48.
    Tautz N, Kaiser A, and Thiel HJ. 2000. NS3 serine protease of bovine viral diarrhea virus: characterization of active site residues, NS4A cofactor domain, and protease-cofactor interactions. Virology 273:351–363.
    49.
    Thibeault D et al. 2004. Sensitivity of NS3 serine proteases from hepatitis C virus genotypes 2 and 3 to the inhibitor BILN 2061. J. Virol. 78:7352–7359.
    50.
    Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. 2011. IncivekTM (telaprevir), package insert. Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc., Cambridge, MA.
    51.
    Wakita T et al. 2005. Production of infectious hepatitis C virus in tissue culture from a cloned viral genome. Nat. Med. 11:791–796.
    52.
    World Health Organization. 2011. Hepatitis C key facts. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs164/en/. Accessed July 2012.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    Volume 56Number 10October 2012
    Pages: 5387 - 5396

    History

    Received: 8 June 2012
    29 June 2012
    Accepted: 2 August 2012
    Published online: 6 August 2012

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Contributors

    Authors

    Fiona McPhee
    Discovery Virology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Amy K. Sheaffer
    Discovery Virology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Jacques Friborg
    Discovery Virology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Dennis Hernandez
    Discovery Virology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Paul Falk
    Discovery Virology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Guangzhi Zhai
    Discovery Virology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Steven Levine
    Discovery Virology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Susan Chaniewski
    Discovery Virology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Fei Yu
    Discovery Virology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Diana Barry
    Discovery Virology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Chaoqun Chen
    Discovery Virology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Min S. Lee
    Discovery Virology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Kathy Mosure
    MAP Discovery Support, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Li-Qiang Sun
    Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Michael Sinz
    MAP Discovery Support, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Nicholas A. Meanwell
    Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Richard J. Colonno
    Discovery Virology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Present address: Richard J. Colonno, Presidio Pharmaceuticals Inc., San Francisco, California, USA.
    Jay Knipe
    MAP Discovery Support, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Paul Scola
    Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Fiona McPhee, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Antimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapyArticle
    Considerations in the Selection of Renal Dosage Adjustments for Patients with Serious Infections and Lessons Learned from the Development of Ceftazidime-Avibactam

    Considerations in the Selection of Renal Dosage Adjustments for Patients with Serious Infections and Lessons Learned from the Development of Ceftazidime-Avibactam

    ABSTRACT

    An extensive clinical development program (comprising two phase 2 and five phase 3 trials) has demonstrated the efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam in the treatment of adults with complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI), complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). During the phase 3 clinical program, updated population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling and Monte Carlo simulations using clinical PK data supported modified ceftazidime-avibactam dosage adjustments for patients with moderate or severe renal impairment (comprising a 50% increase in total daily dose compared with the original dosage adjustments) to reduce the risk of subtherapeutic drug exposures in the event of rapidly improving renal function. The modified dosage adjustments were included in the ceftazidime-avibactam labeling information at the time of initial approval and were subsequently evaluated in the final phase 3 trial (in patients with HAP, including VAP), providing supportive data for the approved U.S. and European ceftazidime-avibactam dosage regimens across renal function categories. This review describes the analyses supporting the ceftazidime-avibactam dosage adjustments for renal impairment and discusses the wider implications and benefits of using modeling and simulation to support dosage regimen optimization based on emerging clinical evidence.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Pfizer. 2020. Summary of product characteristics: Zavicefta 2 g/0.5 g powder for concentrate for solution for infusion. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/004027/WC500210234.pdf.
    2.
    Allergan. 2019. AVYCAZ (ceftazidime and avibactam) for injection, for intravenous use. https://www.allergan.com/assets/pdf/avycaz_pi.
    3.
    Vazquez JA, Gonzalez Patzan LD, Stricklin D, Duttaroy DD, Kreidly Z, Lipka J, Sable C. 2012. Efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam versus imipenem-cilastatin in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, including acute pyelonephritis, in hospitalized adults: results of a prospective, investigator-blinded, randomized study. Curr Med Res Opin 28:1921–1931.
    4.
    Lucasti C, Popescu I, Ramesh MK, Lipka J, Sable C. 2013. Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of ceftazidime/avibactam plus metronidazole versus meropenem in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in hospitalized adults: results of a randomized, double-blind, phase II trial. J Antimicrob Chemother 68:1183–1192.
    5.
    Mazuski JE, Gasink LB, Armstrong J, Broadhurst H, Stone GG, Rank D, Llorens L, Newell P, Pachl J. 2016. Efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole versus meropenem in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infection: results from a randomized, controlled, double-blind, phase 3 program. Clin Infect Dis 62:1380–1389.
    6.
    Carmeli Y, Armstrong J, Laud PJ, Newell P, Stone G, Wardman A, Gasink LB. 2016. Ceftazidime-avibactam or best available therapy in patients with ceftazidime-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa complicated urinary tract infections or complicated intra-abdominal infections (REPRISE): a randomised, pathogen-directed, phase 3 study. Lancet Infect Dis 16:661–673.
    7.
    Wagenlehner FM, Sobel JD, Newell P, Armstrong J, Huang X, Stone GG, Yates K, Gasink LB. 2016. Ceftazidime-avibactam versus doripenem for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, including acute pyelonephritis: RECAPTURE, a phase 3 randomized trial program. Clin Infect Dis 63:754–762.
    8.
    Qin X, Tran BG, Kim MJ, Wang L, Nguyen DA, Chen Q, Song J, Laud PJ, Stone GG, Chow JW. 2017. A randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of ceftazidime/avibactam plus metronidazole versus meropenem for complicated intra-abdominal infections in hospitalised adults in Asia. Int J Antimicrob Agents 49:579–588.
    9.
    Torres A, Zhong N, Pachl J, Timsit JF, Kollef M, Chen Z, Song J, Taylor D, Laud PJ, Stone GG, Chow JW. 2018. Ceftazidime-avibactam versus meropenem in nosocomial pneumonia, including ventilator-associated pneumonia (REPROVE): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet Infect Dis 18:285–295.
    10.
    Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. 1976. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 16:31–41.
    11.
    Welage LS, Schultz RW, Schentag JJ. 1984. Pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime in patients with renal insufficiency. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 25:201–204.
    12.
    Vishwanathan K, Mair S, Gupta A, Atherton J, Clarkson-Jones J, Edeki T, Das S. 2014. Assessment of the mass balance recovery and metabolite profile of avibactam in humans and in vitro drug-drug interaction potential. Drug Metab Dispos 42:932–942.
    13.
    Merdjan H, Tarral A, Das S, Li J. 2017. Phase 1 study assessing the pharmacokinetic profile and safety of avibactam in patients with renal impairment. J Clin Pharmacol 57:211–218.
    14.
    Li J, Zhou D, Nichols W, Das S. 2012. Evaluation of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) dose regimens for phase III study in patients with different renal function, abstr A-635. Abstr 52nd Intersci Conf Antimicrob Agents Chemother, San Francisco, CA.
    15.
    Li J, Knebel W, Riggs M, Zhou D, Nichols W, Das S. 2012. Population pharmacokinetic modelling of ceftazidime (CAZ) and avibactam (AVI) in healthy volunteers and patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI), abstr A-634. Abstr 52nd Intersci Conf Antimicrob Agents Chemother, San Francisco, CA.
    16.
    Li J, Zhou D, Das S, Lovern MR, Wada R, Bellanti F, Riccobene TA, Carrothers TJ, Al-Huniti N. 2015. PK/PD target attainment analyses and assessment of dose adjustments for renal insufficiency for ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI), complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) or nosocomial pneumonia (NP), abstr 2459. Am Assoc Pharm Sci Annu Meet Exposition, Orlando, FL.
    17.
    Li J, Lovern M, Green ML, Chiu J, Zhou D, Comisar C, Xiong Y, Hing J, MacPherson M, Wright JG, Riccobene T, Carrothers TJ, Das S. 2019. Ceftazidime-avibactam population pharmacokinetic modeling and pharmacodynamic target attainment across adult indications and patient subgroups. Clin Transl Sci 12:151–163.
    18.
    Berkhout J, Melchers MJ, van Mil AC, Seyedmousavi S, Lagarde CM, Schuck VJ, Nichols WW, Mouton JW. 2016. Pharmacodynamics of ceftazidime and avibactam in neutropenic mice with thigh or lung infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:368–375.
    19.
    Coleman K, Levasseur P, Girard AM, Borgonovi M, Miossec C, Merdjan H, Drusano G, Shlaes D, Nichols WW. 2014. Activities of ceftazidime and avibactam against beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in a hollow-fiber pharmacodynamic model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:3366–3372.
    20.
    Nichols WW, Newell P, Critchley IA, Riccobene T, Das S. 2018. Avibactam pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e02446-17.
    21.
    Nichols WW, Stone GG, Newell P, Broadhurst H, Wardman A, MacPherson M, Yates K, Riccobene T, Critchley IA, Das S. 2018. Ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility breakpoints against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e02590-17.
    22.
    GlaxoSmithKline. 2007. FORTAZ (ceftazidime for injection). Prescribing information. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2007/050578s053,050634s020lbl.pdf.
    23.
    GlaxoSmithKline. 2010. Summary of product characteristics: ceftazidime 1 g, 2 g, 3 g powder for solution for injection or infusion. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Referrals_document/Fortum_30/WC500098366.pdf.
    24.
    Torres A, Rank D, Melnick D, Rekeda L, Chen X, Riccobene T, Critchley IA, Lakkis HD, Taylor D, Talley AK. 2019. Randomized trial of ceftazidime-avibactam vs meropenem for treatment of hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (REPROVE): analyses per US FDA-specified end points. Open Forum Infect Dis 6:ofz149.
    25.
    Talley A, Riccobene T, Critchley I, Rekeda L, Melnick D. 2018. Outcomes among patients with hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia stratified by renal function: subgroup analysis from a phase 3 study of ceftazidime-avibactam, abstr SUNDAY 684. ASM Microbe 2018, Atlanta, GA.
    26.
    Li J, Zhou D, Das S, Lovern M, Green M, Chiu J, Riccobene T, Carrothers T, Al-Huniti N. 2015. Population PK modeling for ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) and complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), abstr 2472. Am Assoc Pharm Sci Annu Meet Exposition, Orlando, FL.
    27.
    Pfizer Inc. 2015. Data on file. CAZ MS-06 modeling and simulation analysis report.
    28.
    Tangden T, Ramos Martin V, Felton TW, Nielsen EI, Marchand S, Bruggemann RJ, Bulitta JB, Bassetti M, Theuretzbacher U, Tsuji BT, Wareham DW, Friberg LE, De Waele JJ, Tam VH, Roberts JA, Infection Section for the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Study Group of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, the International Society of Anti-Infective Pharmacology, the Critically Ill Patients Study Group of European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2017. The role of infection models and PK/PD modelling for optimising care of critically ill patients with severe infections. Intensive Care Med 43:1021–1032.
    29.
    Meng L, Mui E, Holubar MK, Deresinski SC. 2017. Comprehensive guidance for antibiotic dosing in obese adults. Pharmacotherapy 37:1415–1431.
    30.
    Asín-Prieto E, Rodríguez-Gascón A, Isla A. 2015. Applications of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analysis of antimicrobial agents. J Infect Chemother 21:319–329.
    31.
    Bidell MR, Lodise TP. 2018. Suboptimal clinical response rates with newer antibiotics among patients with moderate renal impairment: review of the literature and potential pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations for observed findings. Pharmacotherapy 38:1205–1215.
    32.
    Crass RL, Rodvold KA, Mueller BA, Pai MP. 2019. Renal dosing of antibiotics: are we jumping the gun? Clin Infect Dis 68:1596–1602.
    33.
    Kullar R, Wagenlehner FM, Popejoy MW, Long J, Yu B, Goldstein EJ. 2017. Does moderate renal impairment affect clinical outcomes in complicated intra-abdominal and complicated urinary tract infections? Analysis of two randomized controlled trials with ceftolozane/tazobactam. J Antimicrob Chemother 72:900–905.
    34.
    Xiao AJ, Caro L, Popejoy MW, Huntington JA, Kullar R. 2017. PK/PD target attainment with ceftolozane/tazobactam using Monte Carlo simulation in patients with various degrees of renal function, including augmented renal clearance and end-stage renal disease. Infect Dis Ther 6:137–148.
    35.
    Veillette JJ, Truong J, Forland SC. 2016. Pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime-avibactam in two patients with KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia and renal impairment. Pharmacotherapy 36:e172–e177.
    36.
    Pfizer Inc. 2013 Data on file. CAZ-AVI technical report, 14 October 2013 (CAZ MS-04).

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    Volume 64Number 424 March 2020
    eLocator: e02105-19

    History

    Published online: 3 February 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. HAP/VAP
    2. PK/PD modeling
    3. cIAI
    4. cUTI
    5. ceftazidime-avibactam
    6. infection
    7. renal dosage adjustment

    Contributors

    Authors

    Jianguo Li
    AstraZeneca, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA
    Present address: Jianguo Li, Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania, USA; Paul Newell, F2G Ltd., Manchester, United Kingdom; Shampa Das, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom; Angela K. Talley, Spero Therapeutics, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
    Mark Lovern
    Certara Strategic Consulting, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
    Todd Riccobene
    Allergan plc, Madison, New Jersey, USA
    Timothy J. Carrothers
    Allergan plc, Madison, New Jersey, USA
    Paul Newell
    AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom
    Present address: Jianguo Li, Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania, USA; Paul Newell, F2G Ltd., Manchester, United Kingdom; Shampa Das, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom; Angela K. Talley, Spero Therapeutics, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
    AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom
    Present address: Jianguo Li, Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania, USA; Paul Newell, F2G Ltd., Manchester, United Kingdom; Shampa Das, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom; Angela K. Talley, Spero Therapeutics, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
    Angela K. Talley
    Allergan plc, Madison, New Jersey, USA
    Present address: Jianguo Li, Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania, USA; Paul Newell, F2G Ltd., Manchester, United Kingdom; Shampa Das, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom; Angela K. Talley, Spero Therapeutics, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
    Margaret Tawadrous
    Pfizer, Groton, Connecticut, USA

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Margaret Tawadrous, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Antimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapyArticle
    Synergistic Activity of Combined NS5A Inhibitors

    ABSTRACT

    Daclatasvir (DCV) is a first-in-class hepatitis C virus (HCV) nonstructural 5A replication complex inhibitor (NS5A RCI) that is clinically effective in interferon-free combinations with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) targeting alternate HCV proteins. Recently, we reported NS5A RCI combinations that enhance HCV inhibitory potential in vitro, defining a new class of HCV inhibitors termed NS5A synergists (J. Sun, D. R. O’Boyle II, R. A. Fridell, D. R. Langley, C. Wang, S. Roberts, P. Nower, B. M. Johnson F. Moulin, M. J. Nophsker, Y. Wang, M. Liu, K. Rigat, Y. Tu, P. Hewawasam, J. Kadow, N. A. Meanwell, M. Cockett, J. A. Lemm, M. Kramer, M. Belema, and M. Gao, Nature 527:245–248, 2015, doi:10.1038/nature15711). To extend the characterization of NS5A synergists, we tested new combinations of DCV and NS5A synergists against genotype (gt) 1 to 6 replicons and gt 1a, 2a, and 3a viruses. The kinetics of inhibition in HCV-infected cells treated with DCV, an NS5A synergist (NS5A-Syn), or a combination of DCV and NS5A-Syn were distinctive. Similar to activity observed clinically, DCV caused a multilog drop in HCV, followed by rebound due to the emergence of resistance. DCV–NS5A-Syn combinations were highly efficient at clearing cells of viruses, in line with the trend seen in replicon studies. The retreatment of resistant viruses that emerged using DCV monotherapy with DCV–NS5A-Syn resulted in a multilog drop and rebound in HCV similar to the initial decline and rebound observed with DCV alone on wild-type (WT) virus. A triple combination of DCV, NS5A-Syn, and a DAA targeting the NS3 or NS5B protein cleared the cells of viruses that are highly resistant to DCV. Our data support the observation that the cooperative interaction of DCV and NS5A-Syn potentiates both the genotype coverage and resistance barrier of DCV, offering an additional DAA option for combination therapy and tools for explorations of NS5A function.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Gottwein JM, Jensen SB, Li YP, Ghanem L, Scheel TK, Serre SB, Mikkelsen L, Bukh J. 2012. Combination treatment with hepatitis C virus protease and NS5A inhibitors is effective against recombinant genotype 1a, 2a, and 3a viruses. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:1291–1303.
    2.
    Li YP, Ramirez S, Humes D, Jensen SB, Gottwein JM, Bukh J. 2014. Differential sensitivity of 5′UTR-NS5A recombinants of hepatitis C virus genotypes 1–6 to protease and NS5A inhibitors. Gastroenterology 146:812–821.
    3.
    Wang C, Jia L, O'Boyle DR, II, Sun J, Rigat K, Valera L, Nower P, Huang X, Kienzle B, Roberts S, Gao M, Fridell RA. 2014. Comparison of daclatasvir resistance barrier on NS5A from HCV genotypes 1–6: implications for cross-genotype activity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:5155–5163.
    4.
    Rice CM, Saeed M. 2014. Hepatitis C: treatment triumphs. Nature 510:43–44.
    5.
    Janardhan SV, Reau NS. 2015. Should NS5A inhibitors serve as the scaffold for all-oral anti-HCV combination therapies? Hepat Med 7:11–20.
    6.
    O'Boyle DR, II, Sun JH, Nower PT, Lemm JA, Fridell RA, Wang C, Romine JL, Belema M, Nguyen VN, Laurent DR, Serrano-Wu M, Snyder LB, Meanwell NA, Langley DR, Gao M. 2013. Characterizations of HCV NS5A replication complex inhibitors. Virology 444:343–354.
    7.
    Ascher DB, Wielens J, Nero TL, Doughty L, Morton CJ, Parker MW. 2014. Potent hepatitis C inhibitors bind directly to NS5A and reduce its affinity for RNA. Sci Rep 4:4765.
    8.
    Kwon HJ, Xing W, Chan K, Niedziela-Majka A, Brendza KM, Kirschberg T, Kato D, Link JO, Cheng G, Liu X, Sakowicz R. 2015. Direct binding of ledipasvir to HCV NS5A: mechanism of resistance to an HCV antiviral agent. PLoS One 10:e0122844.
    9.
    Targett-Adams P, Graham EJ, Middleton J, Palmer A, Shaw SM, Lavender H, Brain P, Tran TD, Jones LH, Wakenhut F, Stammen B, Pryde D, Pickford C, Westby M. 2011. Small molecules targeting hepatitis C virus-encoded NS5A cause subcellular redistribution of their target: insights into compound modes of action. J Virol 85:6353–6368.
    10.
    Lee C, Ma H, Hang JQ, Leveque V, Sklan EH, Elazar M, Klumpp K, Glenn JS. 2011. The hepatitis C virus NS5A inhibitor (BMS-790052) alters the subcellular localization of the NS5A non-structural viral protein. Virology 414:10–18.
    11.
    Berger C, Romero-Brey I, Radujkovic D, Terreux R, Zayas M, Paul D, Harak C, Hoppe S, Gao M, Penin F, Lohmann V, Bartenschlager R. 2014. Daclatasvir-like inhibitors of NS5A block early biogenesis of hepatitis C virus-induced membranous replication factories, independent of RNA replication. Gastroenterology 147:1094–1105.
    12.
    Eyre NS, Beard MR. 2014. HCV NS5A inhibitors disrupt replication factory formation: a novel mechanism of antiviral action. Gastroenterology 147:959–962.
    13.
    McGivern DR, Masaki T, Williford S, Ingravallo P, Feng Z, Lahser F, Asante-Appiah E, Neddermann P, De Francesco R, Howe AY, Lemon SM. 2014. Kinetic analyses reveal potent and early blockade of hepatitis C virus assembly by NS5A inhibitors. Gastroenterology 147:453–462.
    14.
    Lim PJ, Chatterji U, Cordek D, Sharma SD, Garcia-Rivera JA, Cameron CE, Lin K, Targett-Adams P, Gallay PA. 2012. Correlation between NS5A dimerization and hepatitis C virus replication. J Biol Chem 287:30861–30873.
    15.
    Bhattacharya D, Ansari IH, Hamatake R, Walker J, Kazmierski WM, Striker R. 2014. Pharmacological disruption of hepatitis C NS5A protein intra- and intermolecular conformations. J Gen Virol 95(Pt 2):363–372.
    16.
    Barakat KH, Anwar-Mohamed A, Tuszynski JA, Robins MJ, Tyrrell DL, Houghton M. 2015. A refined model of the HCV NS5A protein bound to daclatasvir explains drug-resistant mutations and activity against divergent genotypes. J Chem Infect Model 55:362–373.
    17.
    Tellinghuisen TL, Marcotrigiano J, Rice CM. 2005. Structure of the zinc-binding domain of an essential component of the hepatitis C virus replicase. Nature 435:374–379.
    18.
    Lambert SM, Langley DR, Garnett JA, Angell R, Hedgethorne K, Meanwell NA, Matthews SJ. 2014. The crystal structure of NS5A domain 1 from genotype 1a reveals new clues to the mechanism of action for dimeric HCV inhibitors. Protein Sci 23:723–734.
    19.
    Marcotrigiano J, Tellinghuisen T. 2009. Purification and crystallization of NS5A domain I of hepatitis C virus. Methods Mol Biol 510:85–94.
    20.
    Nettles JH, Stanton RA, Broyde J, Amblard F, Zhang H, Zhou L, Shi J, McBrayer TR, Whitaker T, Coats SJ, Kohler JJ, Schinazi RF. 2014. Asymmetric binding to NS5A by daclatasvir (BMS-790052) and analogs suggests two novel modes of HCV inhibition. J Med Chem 57:10031–10043.
    21.
    Love RA, Brodsky O, Hickey MJ, Wells PA, Cronin CN. 2009. Crystal structure of a novel dimeric form of NS5A domain I protein from hepatitis C virus. J Virol 83:4395–4403.
    22.
    Sun J, O'Boyle DR, II, Fridell RA, Langley DR, Wang C, Roberts S, Nower P, Johnson BM, Moulin F, Nophsker MJ, Wang Y, Liu M, Rigat K, Tu Y, Hewawasam P, Kadow J, Meanwell NA, Cockett M, Lemm JA, Kramer M, Belema M, Gao M. 2015. Resensitizing daclatasvir-resistant hepatitis C variants by allosteric modulation of NS5A. Nature 527:245–248.
    23.
    Fridell RA, Valera L, Qiu D, Kirk MJ, Wang C, Gao M. 2013. Intragenic complementation of hepatitis C virus NS5A RNA replication-defective alleles. J Virol 87:2320–2329.
    24.
    Fridell RA, Qiu D, Valera L, Wang C, Rose RE, Gao M. 2011. Distinct functions of NS5A in hepatitis C virus RNA replication uncovered by studies with the NS5A inhibitor BMS-790052. J Virol 85:7312–7320.
    25.
    Wang C, Huang H, Valera L, Sun J-H, O'Boyle DR, II, Nower PT, Jia L, Qiu D, Huang X, Altaf A, Gao M, Fridell RA. 2012. Hepatitis C virus RNA elimination and development of resistance in replicon cells treated with BMS-790052. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:1350–1358.
    26.
    O'Boyle DR, II, Nower PT, Sun JH, Fridell R, Wang C, Valera L, Gao M. 2013. A 96-well based analysis of replicon elimination with the HCV NS5A replication complex inhibitor daclatasvir. J Virol Methods 193:68–76.
    27.
    Hewawasam P, Kadow JF, Lopez OD, Meanwell NA, Tu Y, Wang AX, Xu N, Gupta SVSVK, Srinivasu P, Kumar IG, Kumar PS, Belema M, Fridell RA, Gao M, Lemm JA, O'Boyle DR, II, Sun J, Wang C, Wang Y. July 2013. Hepatitis C virus inhibitors. US Patent 20130183269 A1.
    28.
    Sun J, Gao M, O'Boyle DR, II, Lemm JA, Roberts SB, Belema M, Meanwell NA. June 2013. Methods to identify combinations of NS5a targeting compound that act synergistically to inhibit hepatitis C virus replication. US patent 20130157894 A1.
    29.
    Bristol-Myers Squibb. 8 November 2014. Phase 3 UNITY trials demonstrate high cure rates for investigational, all-oral daclatasvir TRIO fixed-dose combination in genotype 1 hepatitis C patients, including those with cirrhosis. Press release. http://news.bms.com/press-release/rd-news/phase-3-unity-trials-demonstrate-high-cure-rates-investigational-all-oral-dacl.
    30.
    Fridell RA, Wang C, Sun JH, O'Boyle DR, II, Nower P, Valera L, Qiu D, Roberts S, Huang X, Kienzle B, Bifano M, Nettles RE, Gao M. 2011. Genotypic and phenotypic analysis of variants resistant to hepatitis C virus nonstructural protein 5A replication complex inhibitor BMS-790052 in humans: in vitro and in vivo correlations. Hepatology 54:1924–1935.
    31.
    Fridell RA, Qiu D, Wang C, Valera L, Gao M. 2010. Resistance analysis of the hepatitis C virus NS5A inhibitor BMS-790052 in an in vitro replicon system. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:3641–3650.
    32.
    Ampuero J, Romero-Gómez M, Reddy KR. 2014. Review article: HCV genotype 3–the new treatment challenge. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 39:686–698.
    33.
    Lemm JA, Liu M, Gentles RG, Ding M, Voss S, Pelosi LA, Wang YK, Rigat KL, Mosure KW, Bender JA, Knipe JO, Colonno R, Meanwell NA, Kadow JF, Santone KS, Roberts SB, Gao M. 2014. Preclinical characterization of BMS-791325, an allosteric inhibitor of hepatitis C Virus NS5B polymerase. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:3485–3495.
    34.
    McPhee F, Sheaffer AK, Friborg J, Hernandez D, Falk P, Zhai G, Levine S, Chaniewski S, Yu F, Barry D, Chen C, Lee MS, Mosure K, Sun LQ, Sinz M, Meanwell NA, Colonno RJ, Knipe J, Scola P. 2012. Preclinical profile and characterization of the hepatitis C virus NS3 protease inhibitor asunaprevir (BMS-650032). Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:5387–5396.
    35.
    Gane E. 2014. Hepatitis C beware–the end is nigh. Lancet 384:1557–1560.
    36.
    Spaltenstein A, Andrews W, Furfine E, Hazen R, Hale M, Hanlon M, Kaldor I, Miller J, Samano V, Ray J, Xu R. 2003. Discovery and evaluation of GW0385, a third-generation HIV protease inhibitor: broad spectrum inhibition of wild-type and multi-PI-resistant viruses by femtomolar HIV protease inhibitors. Second International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment, 13 to 16 July 2003, Paris, France.
    37.
    Lee J, Currano JN, Carroll PJ, Joullié MM. 2012. Didemnins, tamandarins and related natural products. Nat Prod Rep 29:404–424.
    38.
    Wang C, Jia L, Huang H, Qiu D, Valera L, Huang X, Sun JH, Nower PT, O'Boyle DR, II, Gao M, Fridell RA. 2012. In vitro activity of BMS-790052 on hepatitis C virus genotype 4 NS5A. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:1588–1590.
    39.
    Gabizon R, Friedler A. 2014. Allosteric modulation of protein oligomerization: an emerging approach to drug design. Front Chem 2:9.
    40.
    Erickson KD, Bouchet-Marquis C, Heiser K, Szomolanyi-Tsuda E, Mishra R, Lamothe B, Hoenger A, Garcea RL. 2012. Virion assembly factories in the nucleus of polyomavirus-infected cells. PLoS Pathog 8:e1002630.
    41.
    Ou HD, Kwiatkowski W, Deerinck TJ, Noske A, Blain KY, Land HS, Soria C, Powers CJ, May AP, Shu X, Tsien RY, Fitzpatrick JAJ, Long JA, Ellisman MH, Choe S, O'Shea CC. 2012. A structural basis for the assembly and functions of a viral polymer that inactivates multiple tumor suppressors. 2012. Cell 151:304–319.
    42.
    He Y, Staschke KA, Tan SL. HCV NS5A: a multifunctional regulator of cellular pathways and virus replication, p 267–292. In Tan SL (ed), Hepatitis C viruses: genomes and molecular biology. Horizon Bioscience, Norfolk, United Kingdom.
    43.
    Tellinghuisen TL, Evans MJ, von Hahn T, You S, Rice CM. 2007. Studying hepatitis C virus: making the best of a bad virus. J Virol 81:8853–8867.
    44.
    Blair WS, Pickford C, Irving SL, Brown DG, Anderson M, Bazin R, Cao J, Ciaramella G, Isaacson J, Jackson L, Hunt R, Kjerrstrom A, Nieman JA, Patick AK, Perros M, Scott AD, Whitby K, Wu H, Butler SL. 2010. HIV capsids a tractable target for small molecule therapeutic intervention. PLoS Pathog 6:e1001220.
    45.
    Tellinghuisen TL, Marcotrigiano J, Gorbalenya AE, Rice CM. 2004. The NS5A protein of hepatitis C virus is a zinc metalloprotein. J Biol Chem 279:48576–48587.
    46.
    Qi H, Olson CA, Wu NC, Ke R, Loverdo C, Chu V, Truong S, Remenyi R, Chen Z, Du Y, Su S, Al-Mawsawi LQ, Wu T, Chen S, Lin C, Zhong W, Lloyd-Smith JO, Sun R. 2014. A quantitative high-resolution genetic profile rapidly identifies sequence determinants of hepatitis C viral fitness and drug sensitivity. PLoS Pathog 10:e1004064.
    47.
    Yang W, Sun Y, Hou X, Zhao Y, Fabrycki J, Chen D, Wang X, Agarwal A, Phadke A, Deshpande M, Huang M. 2013. ACH-806, an NS4A antagonist, inhibits hepatitis C virus replication by altering the composition of viral replication complexes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:3168–3177.
    48.
    Lam AM, Espiritu C, Bansal S, Micolochick Steuer HM, Niu C, Zennou V, Keilman M, Zhu Y, Lan S, Otto MJ, Furman PA. 2012. Genotype and subtype profiling of PSI-7977 as a nucleotide inhibitor of hepatitis C virus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:3359–3368.
    49.
    Rigat K, Wang Y, Hudyma TW, Ding M, Zheng X, Gentles RG, Beno BR, Gao M, Roberts SB. 2010. Ligand-induced changes in hepatitis C virus NS5B polymerase structure. Antiviral Res 88:197–206.
    50.
    Shotwell JB, Baskaran S, Chong P, Creech KL, Crosby RM, Dickson H, Fang J, Garrido D, Mathis A, Maung J, Parks DJ, Pouliot JJ, Price DJ, Rai R, Seal JW III, Schmitz U, Tai VWF, Thomson M, Xie M, Xiong ZZ, Peat AJ. 2012. Imidazo [1,2-a]pyridines that directly interact with hepatitis C NS4B: initial preclinical characterization. ACS Med Chem Lett 3:565–569.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    Volume 60Number 3March 2016
    Pages: 1573 - 1583

    History

    Received: 4 November 2015
    8 December 2015
    Accepted: 13 December 2015
    Published online: 28 December 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Contributors

    Authors

    Donald R. O'Boyle II
    Department of Virology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Peter T. Nower
    Department of Virology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Min Gao
    Department of Virology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Robert Fridell
    Department of Virology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Chunfu Wang
    Department of Virology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Piyasena Hewawasam
    Department of Discovery Chemistry, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Omar Lopez
    Department of Discovery Chemistry, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Yong Tu
    Department of Discovery Chemistry, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Nicholas A. Meanwell
    Department of Discovery Chemistry, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Makonen Belema
    Department of Discovery Chemistry, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Susan B. Roberts
    Department of Virology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Mark Cockett
    Department of Virology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Jin-Hua Sun
    Department of Virology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Donald R. O’Boyle II, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Antimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapyArticle
    Antibiotic Resistance in Listeriaspp

    Antibiotic Resistance in Listeriaspp

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Amyes S. G. B. and Towner K. J. Trimethoprim resistance; epidemiology and molecular aspects. J. Med. Microbiol. 31 1990 1 19
    2.
    Arpin C., Carlier C., Courvalin P., and Quentin C. Analysis of an antibiotic resistance plasmid from a clinical isolate of Listeria monocytogenes, abstr. 26/C3. 12 Réunion Interdisc. 1992 Chimiothér. Anti-Infect. Paris, France
    3.
    Biavasco F., Giovanetti E., Miele A., Vignaroli C., Facinelli B., and Varaldo P. E. In vitro conjugative transfer of VanA vancomycin resistance between enterococci and Listeriae of different species. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 15 1996 50 59
    4.
    Boisivon A., Guiomar C., and Carbon C. In vitro bactericidal activity of amoxicillin, gentamicin, rifampicin, ciprofloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole alone or in combination against Listeria monocytogenes. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 9 1990 206 209
    5.
    Charpentier E. and Courvalin P. Emergence of the trimethoprim resistance gene dfrD in Listeria monocytogenes BM4293. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41 1997 1134 1136
    6.
    Charpentier E., Gerbaud G., and Courvalin P. Characterization of a new class of tetracycline-resistance gene tet(S) in Listeria monocytogenes BM4210. Gene 131 1993 27 34
    7.
    Charpentier E., Gerbaud G., and Courvalin P. Presence of the Listeria tetracycline resistance gene tet(S) in Enterococcus faecalis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38 1994 2330 2335
    8.
    Charpentier E., Gerbaud G., and Courvalin P. Conjugative mobilization of the rolling-circle plasmid pIP823 from Listeria monocytogenes BM4293 among gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 181 1999 3368 3374
    9.
    Charpentier E., Gerbaud G., Jacquet C., Rocourt J., and Courvalin P. Incidence of antibiotic resistance in Listeria spp. J. Infect. Dis. 172 1995 277 281
    10.
    Courvalin P. Transfer of antibiotic resistance genes between gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38 1994 1447 1451
    11.
    Doucet-Populaire F., Trieu-Cuot P., Dosbaa I., Andremont A., and Courvalin P. Inducible transfer of conjugative transposon Tn1545 from Enterococcus faecalis to Listeria monocytogenes in the digestive tracts of gnotobiotic mice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 35 1991 185 187
    12.
    Espaze E. P. and Reynaud A. E. Antibiotic susceptibilities of Listeria: in vitro studies. Infection 16 1988 S160 S164
    13.
    Evans R. P. and Macrina F. L. Streptococcal R plasmid pIP501: endonuclease site map, resistance determinant location, and construction of novel derivatives. J. Bacteriol. 154 1983 1347 1355
    14.
    Facinelli B., Giovanetti E., Varaldo P. E., Casolari P., and Fabio U. Antibiotic resistance in foodborne listeria. Lancet 338 1991 1272
    15.
    Facinelli B., Roberts M. C., Giovanetti E., Casolari C., Fabio U., and Varaldo P. E. Genetic basis of tetracycline resistance in food-borne isolates of Listeria innocua. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59 1993 614 616
    16.
    Farber J. M. and Peterkin P. I. Listeria monocytogenes, a food-borne pathogen. Microbiol. Rev. 55 1991 476 511
    17.
    Flamm R. K., Hinrichs D. J., and Thomashow M. F. Introduction of pAMβ1 into Listeria monocytogenes by conjugation and homology between native L. monocytogenes plasmids. Infect. Immun. 44 1984 157 161
    18.
    Franco Abuin C. M., Quinto Fernandez E. J., Fente Sampayo C., Rodriguez Otero J. L., Dominguez Rodriguez L., and Cepeda Saez A. Susceptibilities of Listeria species isolated from food to nine antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38 1994 1655 1657
    19.
    Francois B., Charles M., and Courvalin P. Conjugative transfer of tet(S) between strains of Enterococcus faecalis is associated with the exchange of large fragments of chromosomal DNA. Microbiology 143 1997 2145 2154
    20.
    Gellin B. G. and Broome C. V. Listeriosis. JAMA 261 1989 1313 1320
    21.
    Hadorn K., Hächler H., Schaffner A., and Kayser F. H. Genetic characterization of plasmid-encoded multiple antibiotic resistance in a strain of Listeria monocytogenes causing endocarditis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 12 1993 928 937
    22.
    Hadorn K., Kayser F. H., and Hächler H. Miniplasmid derived from Listeria monocytogenes multiresistance plasmid pWDB100 upon conjugal transfer into Staphylococcus epidermidis carries chloramphenicol resistance gene identical with staphylococcal gene. System. Appl. Microbiol. 17 1994 492 500
    23.
    Hof H. Therapeutic activities of antibiotics in listeriosis. Infection 19 (Suppl. 4) 1991 229 233
    24.
    Hof H., Nichterlein T., and Kretschmar M. Management of listeriosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 10 1997 345 357
    25.
    Jacquet C., Miegeville A.-F., Catimel B., Huynh G., Courtieu A. L., and Rocourt J. La listériose humaine en France en 1991, 1992 et 1993. Bilan à partir des souches adressées aux centres nationaux de référence. Bull. Epidém. Hebdom. 28 1994 123 125
    26.
    Jones E. M. and MacGowan A. P. Antimicrobial chemotherapy of human infection due to Listeria monocytogenes. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 14 1995 165 175
    27.
    Lorber B. Listeriosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 24 1997 1 11
    28.
    Lyon B. R., Tennent J. M., May J. W., and Skurray R. A. Trimethoprim resistance encoded on a Staphylococcus aureus gentamicin resistance plasmid; cloning and transposon mutagenesis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 33 1986 189 192
    29.
    MacGowan A. P., Holt H. A., and Reeves D. S. In-vitro synergy testing of nine antimicrobial combinations against Listeria monocytogenes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 25 1990 561 566
    30.
    MacGowan A. P., Reeves D. S., and McLauchlin J. Antibiotic resistance in Listeria monocytogenes. Lancet 336 1990 513 514
    31.
    McLauchlin J., Audurier A., and Taylor A. G. Treatment failure and recurrent human listeriosis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 27 1991 851 857
    32.
    Nunez-Poulsen P., Carvajal A., Lester A., and Andreasen J. In vitro susceptibility of Listeria monocytogenes isolated from human blood and cerebrospinal fluid. APMIS 96 1988 223 228
    33.
    Pérez-Diaz J. C., Vicente M. F., and Baquero F. Plasmids in Listeria. Plasmid 8 1982 112 118
    34.
    Pinner R. W., Schuchat A., Swaminathan B., Hayes P. S., Deaver K. A., Weaver R. E., Plikaytis B. D., Reeves M., Broome C. V., Wenger J. D., and the Listeria Study Group Role of foods in sporadic listeriosis. II. Microbiologic and epidemiologic investigation. JAMA 267 1992 2046 2050
    35.
    Poyart-Salmeron C., Carlier C., Trieu-Cuot P., Courtieu A.-L., and Courvalin P. Transferable plasmid-mediated antibiotic resistance in Listeria monocytogenes. Lancet 335 1990 1422 1426
    36.
    Poyart-Salmeron C., Trieu-Cuot P., Carlier C., MacGowan A., McLauchlin J., and Courvalin P. Genetic basis of tetracycline resistance in clinical isolates of Listeria monocytogenes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 36 1992 463 466
    37.
    Poyart-Salmeron C., Trieu-Cuot P., Carlier C., and Courvalin P. Molecular characterization of two proteins involved in the excision of the pneumococcal transposon Tn1545: homologies with other site-specific recombinases. EMBO J. 8 1989 2425 2433
    38.
    Quentin C., Thibaut M. C., Horovitz J., and Bebear C. Multiresistant strain of Listeria monocytogenes in septic abortion. Lancet 336 1990 375
    39.
    Rice L. B., Eliopoulos G. M., Wennersten C., Goldmann D., Jacoby G. A., and Moellering R. C. Chromosomally mediated β-lactamase production and gentamicin resistance in Enterococcus faecalis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 35 1991 272 276
    40.
    Roberts M. C., Facinelli B., Giovanetti E., and Varaldo P. E. Transferable erythromycin resistance in Listeria spp. isolated from food. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62 1996 269 270
    41.
    Rocourt J. Listeria et listériose humaine. Ann. Inst. Pasteur 1 1990 25 30
    42.
    Rocourt J., Saint Cloment C., Brouille F., Charpentier E., Gerbaud G., and Courvalin P. Antibiotic susceptibility of Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from humans in France, abstr. 125/C10. 16 Réunion Interdisc. 1996 Chimiothér. Anti-Infect. Paris, France
    43.
    Schuchat A., Swaminathan B., and Broome C. V. Epidemiology of human listeriosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 4 1991 169 183
    44.
    Slade P. J. and Collins-Thompson D. L. Listeria, plasmids, antibiotic resistance, and food. Lancet 336 1990 1004
    45.
    Speer B. S., Shoemaker N. B., and Salyers A. A. Bacterial resistance to tetracycline: mechanisms, transfer, and clinical significance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 5 1992 387 399
    46.
    Tsakaris A., Papa A., Douboyas J., and Antoniadis A. Neonatal meningitidis due to multi-resistant Listeria monocytogenes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 39 1997 553 554
    47.
    Vicente M. F., Baquero F., and Pérez-Diaz J. C. Conjugative acquisition and expression of antibiotic resistance determinants in Listeria spp. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 21 1988 309 318

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    Volume 43Number 91 September 1999
    Pages: 2103 - 2108

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Contributors

    Authors

    Emmanuelle Charpentier
    Unité des Agents Antibactériens, Institut Pasteur, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France,1and
    Present address: Department of Infectious Diseases, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105-2794.
    Patrice Courvalin
    Department of Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 920932

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Antimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapyArticle
    In Vitro Activity of BMS-790052 on Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 4 NS5A

    ABSTRACT

    The antiviral profile of BMS-790052, a potent hepatitis C virus (HCV) replication complex inhibitor targeting nonstructural protein NS5A, is well characterized for HCV genotype-1. Here, we report that BMS-790052 inhibits hybrid replicons containing HCV genotype-4 NS5A genes with 50% effective concentrations (EC50s) ranging from 7 to 13 pM. NS5A residue 30 was an important site for BMS-790052-selected resistance in the hybrid replicons. Our results support the potential of BMS-790052 as a valuable component of combination therapy for HCV genotype-4 chronic infection.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Combet C et al. 2007. euHCVdb: the European hepatitis C virus database. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:D363–D366.
    2.
    Fridell RA et al. 2011. Distinct functions of NS5A in hepatitis C virus RNA replication uncovered by studies with the NS5A inhibitor BMS-790052. J. Virol. 85:7312–7320.
    3.
    Fridell RA, Qiu D, Wang C, Valera L, and Gao M. 2010. Resistance analysis of the hepatitis C virus NS5A inhibitor BMS-790052 in an in vitro replicon system. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54:3641–3650.
    4.
    Fridell RA et al. 2011. Genotypic and phenotypic analysis of variants resistant to hepatitis C virus nonstructural protein 5A replication complex inhibitor BMS-790052 in humans: in vitro and in vivo correlations. Hepatology 54:1924–1935.
    5.
    Gao M et al. 2010. Chemical genetics strategy identifies an HCV NS5A inhibitor with a potent clinical effect. Nature 465:96–100.
    6.
    Khattab MA et al. 2011. Management of hepatitis C virus genotype 4: recommendations of an international expert panel. J. Hepatol. 54:1250–1262.
    7.
    Lemm JA et al. 2010. Identification of hepatitis C virus NS5A inhibitors. J. Virol. 84:482–491.
    8.
    Nettles RE et al. 2011. Multiple ascending dose study of BMS-790052, a nonstructural protein 5A replication complex inhibitor, in patients infected with hepatitis C virus genotype 1. Hepatology 54:1956–1965.
    9.
    O'Boyle DR et al. 2005. Development of a cell-based high-throughput specificity screen using a hepatitis C virus-bovine viral diarrhea virus dual replicon assay. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:1346–1353.
    10.
    Simmonds P. 2004. Genetic diversity and evolution of hepatitis C virus—15 years on. J. Gen. Virol. 85:3173–3188.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    Volume 56Number 3March 2012
    Pages: 1588 - 1590

    History

    Received: 17 November 2011
    8 December 2011
    Accepted: 19 December 2011
    Published online: 27 December 2011

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Contributors

    Authors

    Chunfu Wang
    Department of Virology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Lingling Jia
    Department of Virology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Haichang Huang
    Department of Virology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Present address: D. Qiu, Discovery Biology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Hopewell, New Jersey; H. Huang, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
    Dike Qiu
    Department of Virology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Present address: D. Qiu, Discovery Biology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Hopewell, New Jersey; H. Huang, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
    Lourdes Valera
    Department of Virology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Xin Huang
    Applied Genomics, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, New Jersey, USA
    Jin-Hua Sun
    Department of Virology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Peter T. Nower
    Department of Virology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Donald R. O'Boyle II
    Department of Virology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Min Gao
    Department of Virology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA
    Robert A. Fridell
    Department of Virology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Robert A. Fridell, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Antimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapyArticle
    Investigation of Elimination Rate, Persistent Subpopulation Removal, and Relapse Rates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by Using Combinations of First-Line Drugs in a Modified Cornell Mouse Model

    Investigation of Elimination Rate, Persistent Subpopulation Removal, and Relapse Rates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by Using Combinations of First-Line Drugs in a Modified Cornell Mouse Model

    ABSTRACT

    Currently, the most effective tuberculosis control method involves case finding and 6 months of chemotherapy. There is a need to improve our understanding about drug interactions, combination activities, and the ability to remove persistent bacteria using the current regimens, particularly in relation to relapse. We aimed to investigate the therapeutic effects of three main components, rifampin (RMP), isoniazid (INH), and pyrazinamide (PZA), in current drug regimens using a modified version of the Cornell mouse model. We evaluated the posttreatment levels of persistent Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the organs of mice using culture filtrate derived from M. tuberculosis strain H37Rv. When RMP was combined with INH, PZA, or INH-PZA, significant additive activities were observed compared to each of the single-drug treatments. However, the combination of INH and PZA showed a less significant additive effect than either of the drugs used on their own. Apparent culture negativity of mouse organs was achieved at 14 weeks of treatment with RMP-INH, RMP-PZA, and RMP-INH-PZA, but not with INH-PZA, when conventional tests, namely, culture on solid agar and in liquid broth, indicated that the organs were negative for bacteria. The relapse rates for RMP-containing regimens were not significantly different from a 100% relapse rate at the numbers of mice examined in this study. In parallel, we examined the organs for the presence of culture filtrate-dependent persistent bacilli after 14 weeks of treatment. Culture filtrate treatment of the organs revealed persistent M. tuberculosis. Modeling of mycobacterial elimination rates and evaluation of culture filtrate-dependent organisms showed promise as surrogate methods for efficient factorial evaluation of drug combinations in tuberculosis in mouse models and should be further evaluated against relapse. The presence of culture filtrate-dependent persistent M. tuberculosis is the likely cause of disease relapse in this modified Cornell mouse model.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    WHO. 2010. WHO global tuberculosis control report 2010. Summary. Cent Eur J Public Health 18:237.
    2.
    Mitchison DA. 2005. Shortening the treatment of tuberculosis. Nat Biotechnol 23:187–188.
    3.
    Dhillon J, Dickinson JM, Sole K, Mitchison DA. 1996. Preventive chemotherapy of tuberculosis in Cornell model mice with combinations of rifampin, isoniazid, and pyrazinamide. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 40:552–555.
    4.
    Grosset J, Truffot-Pernot C, Lacroix C, Ji B. 1992. Antagonism between isoniazid and the combination pyrazinamide-rifampin against tuberculosis infection in mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 36:548–551.
    5.
    Almeida D, Nuermberger E, Tasneen R, Rosenthal I, Tyagi S, Williams K, Peloquin C, Grosset J. 2009. Paradoxical effect of isoniazid on the activity of rifampin-pyrazinamide combination in a mouse model of tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:4178–4184.
    6.
    Hu Y, Liu A, Ortega-Muro F, Alameda-Martin L, Mitchison D, Coates A. 2015. High-dose rifampicin kills persisters, shortens treatment duration, and reduces relapse rate in vitro and in vivo. Front Microbiol 6:641.
    7.
    Mukamolova GV, Turapov O, Malkin J, Woltmann G, Barer MR. 2010. Resuscitation-promoting factors reveal an occult population of tubercle bacilli in sputum. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 181:174–180.
    8.
    McCune RM, Jr, McDermott W, Tompsett R. 1956. The fate of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in mouse tissues as determined by the microbial enumeration technique. II. The conversion of tuberculous infection to the latent state by the administration of pyrazinamide and a companion drug. J Exp Med 104:763–802.
    9.
    McCune RM, Jr, Tompsett R. 1956. Fate of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in mouse tissues as determined by the microbial enumeration technique. I. The persistence of drug-susceptible tubercle bacilli in the tissues despite prolonged antimicrobial therapy. J Exp Med 104:737–762.
    10.
    Hu Y, Mangan JA, Dhillon J, Sole KM, Mitchison DA, Butcher PD, Coates AR. 2000. Detection of mRNA transcripts and active transcription in persistent Mycobacterium tuberculosis induced by exposure to rifampin or pyrazinamide. J Bacteriol 182:6358–6365.
    11.
    Hu Y, Liu A, Menendez MC, Garcia MJ, Oravcova K, Gillespie SH, Davies GR, Mitchison DA, Coates AR. 2015. HspX knock-out in Mycobacterium tuberculosis leads to shorter antibiotic treatment and lower relapse rate in a mouse model–a potential novel therapeutic target. Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland) 95:31–36.
    12.
    Meagher AK, Forrest A, Dalhoff A, Stass H, Schentag JJ. 2004. Novel pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for prediction of outcomes with an extended-release formulation of ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:2061–2068.
    13.
    Landaw EM, DiStefano JJ, III. 1984. Multiexponential, multicompartmental, and noncompartmental modeling. II. Data analysis and statistical considerations. Am J Physiol 246:R665–R677.
    14.
    Ette EI, Williams PJ. 2004. Population pharmacokinetics II: estimation methods. Ann Pharmacother 38:1907–1915.
    15.
    Rosenthal IM, Tasneen R, Peloquin CA, Zhang M, Almeida D, Mdluli KE, Karakousis PC, Grosset JH, Nuermberger EL. 2012. Dose-ranging comparison of rifampin and rifapentine in two pathologically distinct murine models of tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:4331–4340.
    16.
    Nuermberger EL, Spigelman MK, Yew WW. 2010. Current development and future prospects in chemotherapy of tuberculosis. Respirology 15:764–778.
    17.
    Jindani A, Aber VR, Edwards EA, Mitchison DA. 1980. The early bactericidal activity of drugs in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Am Rev Resp Dis 121:939–949.
    18.
    Mitchison DA. 2000. Role of individual drugs in the chemotherapy of tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 4:796–806.
    19.
    White RL, Burgess DS, Manduru M, Bosso JA. 1996. Comparison of three different in vitro methods of detecting synergy: time-kill, checkerboard, and E test. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 40:1914–1918.
    20.
    Grosset J. 1978. The sterilizing value of rifampicin and pyrazinamide in experimental short-course chemotherapy. Bull Int Union Tuberc 53:5–12.
    21.
    East African/British Medical Research Council. 1974. Controlled clinical trial of four short-course (6-month) regimens of chemotherapy for treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. Lancet ii:1100–1106.
    22.
    East African/British Medical Research Council. 1972. Controlled clinical trial of short-course (6-month) regimens of chemotherapy for treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. Lancet i:1079–1085.
    23.
    Hong Kong Tuberculosis Treatment Services/British Medical Research Council. 1975. Controlled trial of 6- and 9-month regimens of daily and intermittent streptomycin plus isoniazid plus pyrazinamide for pulmonary tuberculosis in Hong Kong. Tubercle 56:81–96.
    24.
    Andries K, Gevers T, Lounis N. 2010. Bactericidal potencies of new regimens are not predictive of their sterilizing potencies in a murine model of tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:4540–4544.
    25.
    North RJ. 1995. Mycobacterium tuberculosis is strikingly more virulent for mice when given via the respiratory than via the intravenous route. J Infect Dis 172:1550–1553.
    26.
    De Groote MA, Gilliland JC, Wells CL, Brooks EJ, Woolhiser LK, Gruppo V, Peloquin CA, Orme IM, Lenaerts AJ. 2011. Comparative studies evaluating mouse models used for efficacy testing of experimental drugs against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:1237–1247.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    Volume 60Number 8August 2016
    Pages: 4778 - 4785

    History

    Received: 26 October 2015
    14 November 2015
    Accepted: 20 May 2016
    Published online: 23 May 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Contributors

    Authors

    Yanmin Hu
    Institute for Infection and Immunity, St. George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom
    Henry Pertinez
    Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
    Fatima Ortega-Muro
    GlaxoSmithKline Research and Development, Diseases of Developing World, Tres Cantos, Madrid, Spain
    Laura Alameda-Martin
    GlaxoSmithKline Research and Development, Diseases of Developing World, Tres Cantos, Madrid, Spain
    Yingjun Liu
    Institute for Infection and Immunity, St. George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom
    Alessandro Schipani
    Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
    Geraint Davies
    Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
    Anthony Coates
    Institute for Infection and Immunity, St. George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Yanmin Hu, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Antimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapyArticle
    Combination Effects of Antimicrobial Peptides

    Combination Effects of Antimicrobial Peptides

    ABSTRACT

    Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are ancient and conserved across the tree of life. Their efficacy over evolutionary time has been largely attributed to their mechanisms of killing. Yet, the understanding of their pharmacodynamics both in vivo and in vitro is very limited. This is, however, crucial for applications of AMPs as drugs and also informs the understanding of the action of AMPs in natural immune systems. Here, we selected six different AMPs from different organisms to test their individual and combined effects in vitro. We analyzed their pharmacodynamics based on the Hill function and evaluated the interaction of combinations of two and three AMPs. Interactions of AMPs in our study were mostly synergistic, and three-AMP combinations displayed stronger synergism than two-AMP combinations. This suggests synergism to be a common phenomenon in AMP interaction. Additionally, AMPs displayed a sharp increase in killing within a narrow dose range, contrasting with those of antibiotics. We suggest that our results could lead a way toward better evaluation of AMP application in practice and shed some light on the evolutionary consequences of antimicrobial peptide interactions within the immune system of organisms.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Greco WR, Bravo G, Parsons JC. 1995. The search for synergy: a critical review from a response surface perspective. Pharmacol Rev 47:331–385.
    2.
    Chou TC. 2006. Theoretical basis, experimental design, and computerized simulation of synergism and antagonism in drug combination studies. Pharmacol Rev 58:621–681.
    3.
    Imamovic L, Sommer MO. 2013. Use of collateral sensitivity networks to design drug cycling protocols that avoid resistance development. Sci Transl Med 5:204ra132.
    4.
    Cokol M, Chua HN, Tasan M, Mutlu B, Weinstein ZB, Suzuki Y, Nergiz ME, Costanzo M, Baryshnikova A, Giaever G, Nislow C, Myers CL, Andrews BJ, Boone C, Roth FP. 2011. Systematic exploration of synergistic drug pairs. Mol Syst Biol 7:544.
    5.
    Tamma PD, Cosgrove SE, Maragakis LL. 2012. Combination therapy for treatment of infections with gram-negative bacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev 25:450–470.
    6.
    Worthington RJ, Melander C. 2013. Combination approaches to combat multidrug-resistant bacteria. Trends Biotechnol 31:177–184.
    7.
    Pena-Miller R, Laehnemann D, Jansen G, Fuentes-Hernandez A, Rosenstiel P, Schulenburg H, Beardmore R. 2013. When the most potent combination of antibiotics selects for the greatest bacterial load: the smile-frown transition. PLoS Biol 11:e1001540.
    8.
    Yeh PJ, Hegreness MJ, Aiden AP, Kishony R. 2009. Drug interactions and the evolution of antibiotic resistance. Nat Rev Microbiol 7:460–466.
    9.
    Chait R, Craney A, Kishony R. 2007. Antibiotic interactions that select against resistance. Nature 446:668–671.
    10.
    Loewe S. 1953. The problem of synergism and antagonism of combined drugs. Arzneimittelforschung 3:285–290.
    11.
    Ankomah P, Johnson PJ, Levin BR. 2013. The pharmaco-, population and evolutionary dynamics of multi-drug therapy: experiments with S. aureus and E. coli and computer simulations. PLoS Pathog 9:e1003300.
    12.
    Ocampo PS, Lazar V, Papp B, Arnoldini M, Abel zur Wiesch P, Busa-Fekete R, Fekete G, Pal C, Ackermann M, Bonhoeffer S. 2014. Antagonism between bacteriostatic and bactericidal antibiotics is prevalent. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:4573–4582.
    13.
    Michel JB, Yeh PJ, Chait R, Moellering RC, Jr, Kishony R. 2008. Drug interactions modulate the potential for evolution of resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:14918–14923.
    14.
    Wood K, Nishida S, Sontag ED, Cluzel P. 2012. Mechanism-independent method for predicting response to multidrug combinations in bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:12254–12259.
    15.
    Rothschild D, Dekel E, Hausser J, Bren A, Aidelberg G, Szekely P, Alon U. 2014. Linear superposition and prediction of bacterial promoter activity dynamics in complex conditions. PLoS Comput Biol 10:e1003602.
    16.
    Westerhoff HV, Zasloff M, Rosner JL, Hendler RW, De Waal A, Vaz Gomes A, Jongsma PM, Riethorst A, Juretic D. 1995. Functional synergism of the magainins PGLa and magainin-2 in Escherichia coli, tumor cells and liposomes. Eur J Biochem 228:257–264.
    17.
    Yan H, Hancock RE. 2001. Synergistic interactions between mammalian antimicrobial defense peptides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45:1558–1560.
    18.
    Johnston PR, Rolff J. 2013. Immune- and wound-dependent differential gene expression in an ancient insect. Dev Comp Immunol 40:320–324.
    19.
    Johnston PR, Makarova O, Rolff J. 2014. Inducible defenses stay up late: temporal patterns of immune gene expression in Tenebrio molitor. G3 (Bethesda, Md.) 4:947–955.
    20.
    Giuliani A, Pirri G, Nicoletto SF. 2007. Antimicrobial peptides: an overview of a promising class of therapeutics. Cent Eur J Biol 2:1–33.
    21.
    Perron GG, Zasloff M, Bell G. 2006. Experimental evolution of resistance to an antimicrobial peptide. Proc Biol Sci 273:251–256.
    22.
    Rodriguez-Rojas A, Makarova O, Rolff J. 2014. Antimicrobials, stress and mutagenesis. PLoS Pathog 10:e1004445.
    23.
    Dobson AJ, Purves J, Rolff J. 2014. Increased survival of experimentally evolved antimicrobial peptide-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an animal host. Evol Appl 7:905–912.
    24.
    Rahnamaeian M, Cytrynska M, Zdybicka-Barabas A, Dobslaff K, Wiesner J, Twyman RM, Zuchner T, Sadd BM, Regoes RR, Schmid-Hempel P, Vilcinskas A. 2015. Insect antimicrobial peptides show potentiating functional interactions against Gram-negative bacteria. Proc Biol Sci 282:20150293.
    25.
    Poppel AK, Vogel H, Wiesner J, Vilcinskas A. 2015. Antimicrobial peptides expressed in medicinal maggots of the blow fly Lucilia sericata show combinatorial activity against bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:2508–2514.
    26.
    Regoes RR, Wiuff C, Zappala RM, Garner KN, Baquero F, Levin BR. 2004. Pharmacodynamic functions: a multiparameter approach to the design of antibiotic treatment regimens. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:3670–3676.
    27.
    Zhi JG, Nightingale CH, Quintiliani R. 1986. A pharmacodynamic model for the activity of antibiotics against microorganisms under nonsaturable conditions. J Pharm Sci 75:1063–1067.
    28.
    Nolting A, Dalla Costa T, Rand KH, Derendorf H. 1996. Pharmacokinetic pharmacodynamic modeling of the antibiotic effect of piperacillin in vitro. Pharm Res 13:91–96.
    29.
    Zasloff M. 2002. Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms. Nature 415:389–395.
    30.
    Gordon YJ, Romanowski EG, McDermott AM. 2005. A review of antimicrobial peptides and their therapeutic potential as anti-infective drugs. Curr Eye Res 30:505–515.
    31.
    Do N, Weindl G, Grohmann L, Salwiczek M, Koksch B, Korting HC, Schafer-Korting M. 2014. Cationic membrane-active peptides—anticancer and antifungal activity as well as penetration into human skin. Exp Dermatol 23:326–331.
    32.
    Moore AJ, Devine DA, Bibby MC. 1994. Preliminary experimental anticancer activity of cecropins. Peptide Res 7:265–269.
    33.
    Nguyen LT, Chau JK, Perry NA, de Boer L, Zaat SA, Vogel HJ. 2010. Serum stabilities of short tryptophan- and arginine-rich antimicrobial peptide analogs. PLoS One 5:e12684.
    34.
    Nguyen LT, Chan DI, Boszhard L, Zaat SA, Vogel HJ. 2010. Structure-function studies of chemokine-derived carboxy-terminal antimicrobial peptides. Biochim Biophys Acta 1798:1062–1072.
    35.
    Wiegand I, Hilpert K, Hancock RE. 2008. Agar and broth dilution methods to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antimicrobial substances. Nat Protoc 3:163–175.
    36.
    Sochacki KA, Barns KJ, Bucki R, Weisshaar JC. 2011. Real-time attack on single Escherichia coli cells by the human antimicrobial peptide LL-37. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:E77–E81.
    37.
    Rangarajan N, Bakshi S, Weisshaar JC. 2013. Localized permeabilization of E. coli membranes by the antimicrobial peptide cecropin A. Biochemistry 52:6584–6594.
    38.
    Plummer M. 2014. rjags: Bayesian graphical models using MCMC, R package version 3-13. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rjags.
    39.
    R Core Team. 2014. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.
    40.
    Ankomah P, Levin BR. 2012. Two-drug antimicrobial chemotherapy: a mathematical model and experiments with Mycobacterium marinum. PLoS Pathog 8:e1002487.
    41.
    Matsuzaki K, Mitani Y, Akada KY, Murase O, Yoneyama S, Zasloff M, Miyajima K. 1998. Mechanism of synergism between antimicrobial peptides magainin 2 and PGLa. Biochemistry 37:15144–15153.
    42.
    Monzon M, Oteiza C, Leiva J, Amorena B. 2001. Synergy of different antibiotic combinations in biofilms of Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Antimicrob Chemother 48:793–801.
    43.
    Chongsiriwatana NP, Wetzler M, Barron AE. 2011. Functional synergy between antimicrobial peptoids and peptides against Gram-negative bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:5399–5402.
    44.
    Naghmouchi K, Le Lay C, Baah J, Drider D. 2012. Antibiotic and antimicrobial peptide combinations: synergistic inhibition of Pseudomonas fluorescens and antibiotic-resistant variants. Res Microbiol 163:101–108.
    45.
    Choi H, Lee DG. 2012. Synergistic effect of antimicrobial peptide arenicin-1 in combination with antibiotics against pathogenic bacteria. Res Microbiol 163:479–486.
    46.
    He J, Eckert R, Pharm T, Simanian MD, Hu C, Yarbrough DK, Qi F, Anderson MH, Shi W. 2007. Novel synthetic antimicrobial peptides against Streptococcus mutans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:1351–1358.
    47.
    Brogden KA. 2005. Antimicrobial peptides: pore formers or metabolic inhibitors in bacteria? Nat Rev Microbiol 3:238–250.
    48.
    Andersson DI, Hughes D. 2014. Microbiological effects of sublethal levels of antibiotics. Nat Rev Microbiol 12:465–478.
    49.
    Day T, Huijben S, Read AF. 2015. Is selection relevant in the evolutionary emergence of drug resistance? Trends Microbiol 23:126–133.
    50.
    Drlica K. 2003. The mutant selection window and antimicrobial resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother 52:11–17.
    51.
    Drlica K, Zhao X. 2007. Mutant selection window hypothesis updated. Clin Infect Dis 44:681–688.
    52.
    Berghaus LJ, Giguere S, Guldbech K. 2013. Mutant prevention concentration and mutant selection window for 10 antimicrobial agents against Rhodococcus equi. Vet Microbiol 166:670–675.
    53.
    Handel A, Margolis E, Levin BR. 2009. Exploring the role of the immune response in preventing antibiotic resistance. J Theor Biol 256:655–662.
    54.
    Dobson AJ, Purves J, Kamysz W, Rolff J. 2013. Comparing selection on S. aureus between antimicrobial peptides and common antibiotics. PLoS One 8:e76521.
    55.
    Haine ER, Moret Y, Siva-Jothy MT, Rolff J. 2008. Antimicrobial defense and persistent infection in insects. Science 322:1257–1259.
    56.
    Bevins CL, Zasloff M. 1990. Peptides from frog skin. Annu Rev Biochem 59:395–414.
    57.
    Andersson DI, Hughes D. 2010. Antibiotic resistance and its cost: is it possible to reverse resistance? Nat Rev Microbiol 8:260–271.
    58.
    Andersson DI. 2006. The biological cost of mutational antibiotic resistance: any practical conclusions? Curr Opin Microbiol 9:461–465.
    59.
    Hall AR, Angst DC, Schiessl KT, Ackermann M. 2015. Costs of antibiotic resistance—separating trait effects and selective effects. Evol Appl 8:261–272.
    60.
    Vogwill T, MacLean RC. 2015. The genetic basis of the fitness costs of antimicrobial resistance: a meta-analysis approach. Evol Appl 8:284–295.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    Volume 60Number 3March 2016
    Pages: 1717 - 1724

    History

    Received: 7 October 2015
    22 November 2015
    Accepted: 20 December 2015
    Published online: 4 January 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Contributors

    Authors

    Guozhi Yu
    Evolutionary Biology, Institut für Biologie, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Desiree Y. Baeder
    Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Roland R. Regoes
    Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Jens Rolff
    Evolutionary Biology, Institut für Biologie, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Berlin-Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research (BBIB), Berlin, Germany

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Jens Rolff, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Antimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapyArticle
    Real-World Experience with Ceftolozane-Tazobactam for Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections

    Real-World Experience with Ceftolozane-Tazobactam for Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections

    ABSTRACT

    Our objective was to describe the prescribing practices, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of patients treated with ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) for multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative infections. This was a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study at eight U.S. medical centers (2015 to 2019). Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years and receipt of C/T (≥72 hours) for suspected or confirmed MDR Gram-negative infection. The primary efficacy outcome, evaluated among patients with MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections, was composite clinical failure, namely, 30-day all-cause mortality, 30-day recurrence, and/or failure to resolve or improve infection signs or symptoms after C/T treatment. In total, 259 patients were included, and P. aeruginosa was isolated in 236 (91.1%). The MDR and extremely drug-resistant phenotypes were detected in 95.8% and 37.7% of P. aeruginosa isolates, respectively. The most common infection source was the respiratory tract (62.9%). High-dose C/T was used in 71.2% of patients with a respiratory tract infection (RTI) overall but in only 39.6% of patients with an RTI who required C/T renal dose adjustment. In the primary efficacy population (n = 226), clinical failure and 30-day mortality occurred in 85 (37.6%) and 39 (17.3%) patients, respectively. New C/T MDR P. aeruginosa resistance was detected in 3 of 31 patients (9.7%) with follow-up cultures. Hospital-acquired infection and Acute Physiological and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score were independently associated with clinical failure (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.472 and 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.322 to 4.625; and aOR, 1.068 and 95% CI, 1.031 to 1.106, respectively). Twenty-five (9.7%) patients experienced ≥1 adverse effect (9 acute kidney injury, 13 Clostridioides difficile infection, 1 hepatotoxicity, 2 encephalopathy, and 2 gastrointestinal intolerance). C/T addresses an unmet medical need in patients with MDR Gram-negative infections.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Hirsch EB, Tam VH. 2010. Impact of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection on patient outcomes. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 10:441–451.
    2.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2013. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington DC. https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/pdf/ar-threats-2013-508.pdf.
    3.
    Bonomo RA, Szabo D. 2006. Mechanisms of multidrug resistance in Acinetobacter species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clin Infect Dis 43:S49–S56.
    4.
    Benattar YD, Omar M, Zusman O, Yahav D, Zak-Doron Y, Altunin S, Elbaz M, Daitch V, Granot M, Leibovici L, Paul M. 2016. The effectiveness and safety of high-dose colistin: prospective cohort study. Clin Infect Dis 63:1605–1612.
    5.
    Mingeot-Leclercq MP, Tulkens PM. 1999. Aminoglycosides: nephrotoxicity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43:1003–1012.
    6.
    Panidis D, Markantonis SL, Boutzouka E, Karatzas S, Baltopoulos G. 2005. Penetration of gentamicin into the alveolar lining fluid of critically ill patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Chest 128:545–552.
    7.
    Doi Y, Bonomo RA, Hooper DC, Kaye KS, Johnson JR, Clancy CJ, Thaden JT, Stryjewski ME, van Duin D, Gram-Negative Committee of the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group a. 2017. Gram-negative bacterial infections: research priorities, accomplishments, and future directions of the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group. Clin Infect Dis 64:S30–S35.
    8.
    Farrell DJ, Flamm RK, Sader HS, Jones RN. 2013. Antimicrobial activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam tested against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with various resistance patterns isolated in U.S. Hospitals (2011–2012). Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:6305–6310.
    9.
    FDA. 2014. Zerbaxa (ceftolozane and tazobactam) for injection, for intravenous use. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2014/206829lbl.pdf.
    10.
    Walkty A, Karlowsky JA, Adam H, Baxter M, Lagace-Wiens P, Hoban DJ, Zhanel GG. 2013. In vitro activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates obtained from patients in Canadian hospitals in the CANWARD study, 2007 to 2012. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:5707–5709.
    11.
    Livermore DM, Mushtaq S, Meunier D, Hopkins KL, Hill R, Adkin R, Chaudhry A, Pike R, Staves P, Woodford N, BSAC Resistance Surveillance Standing Committee. 2017. Activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against surveillance and “problem” Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and non-fermenters from the British Isles. J Antimicrob Chemother 72:2278–2289.
    12.
    Solomkin J, Hershberger E, Miller B, Popejoy M, Friedland I, Steenbergen J, Yoon M, Collins S, Yuan G, Barie PS, Eckmann C. 2015. Ceftolozane/tazobactam plus metronidazole for complicated intra-abdominal infections in an era of multidrug resistance: results from a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial (ASPECT-cIAI). Clin Infect Dis 60:1462–1471.
    13.
    Wagenlehner FM, Umeh O, Steenbergen J, Yuan G, Darouiche RO. 2015. Ceftolozane-tazobactam compared with levofloxacin in the treatment of complicated urinary-tract infections, including pyelonephritis: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial (ASPECT-cUTI). Lancet 385:1949–1956.
    14.
    Aithal GP, Watkins PB, Andrade RJ, Larrey D, Molokhia M, Takikawa H, Hunt CM, Wilke RA, Avigan M, Kaplowitz N, Bjornsson E, Daly AK. 2011. Case definition and phenotype standardization in drug-induced liver injury. Clin Pharmacol Ther 89:806–815.
    15.
    Powers JH, Evans SR, Kesselheim AS. 2018. Studying new antibiotics for multidrug resistant infections: are today’s patients paying for unproven future benefits? BMJ 360:k587.
    16.
    Tam VH, Rogers CA, Chang K-T, Weston JS, Caeiro J-P, Garey KW. 2010. Impact of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia on patient outcomes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:3717–3722.
    17.
    Hook EW, Golden MR, Taylor SN, Henry E, Tseng C, Workowski KA, Swerdlow J, Nenninger A, Cammarata S. 2019. Efficacy and safety of single-dose oral delafloxacin compared with intramuscular ceftriaxone for uncomplicated gonorrhea treatment: an open-label, noninferiority, phase 3, multicenter, randomized study. Sex Transm Dis 46:279–286.
    18.
    Pertel PE, Bernardo P, Fogarty C, Matthews P, Northland R, Benvenuto M, Thorne GM, Luperchio SA, Arbeit RD, Alder J. 2008. Effects of prior effective therapy on the efficacy of daptomycin and ceftriaxone for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 46:1142–1151.
    19.
    Prasad P, Sun J, Danner RL, Natanson C. 2012. Excess deaths associated with tigecycline after approval based on noninferiority trials. Clin Infect Dis 54:1699–1709.
    20.
    Awad SS, Rodriguez AH, Chuang Y-C, Marjanek Z, Pareigis AJ, Reis G, Scheeren TW, Sanchez AS, Zhou X, Saulay M, Engelhardt M. 2014. A phase 3 randomized double-blind comparison of ceftobiprole medocaril versus ceftazidime plus linezolid for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 59:51–61.
    21.
    Castón JJ, De la Torre Á, Ruiz-Camps I, Sorlí ML, Torres V, Torre-Cisneros J. 2017. Salvage therapy with ceftolozane-tazobactam for multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e02136-16.
    22.
    Dietl B, Sánchez I, Arcenillas P, Cuchi E, Gómez L, González de Molina FJ, Boix-Palop L, Nicolás J, Calbo E. 2018. Ceftolozane/tazobactam in the treatment of osteomyelitis and skin and soft-tissue infections due to extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: clinical and microbiological outcomes. Int J Antimicrob Agents 51:498–502.
    23.
    Gallagher JC, Satlin MJ, Elabor A, Saraiya N, McCreary EK, Molnar E, El-Beyrouty C, Jones BM, Dixit D, Heil EL, Claeys KC, Hiles J, Vyas NM, Bland CM, Suh J, Biason K, McCoy D, King MA, Richards L, Harrington N, Guo Y, Chaudhry S, Lu X, Yu D. 2018. Ceftolozane-tazobactam for the treatment of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: a multicenter study. Open Forum Infect Dis 5:ofy280.
    24.
    Haidar G, Philips NJ, Shields RK, Snyder D, Cheng S, Potoski BA, Doi Y, Hao B, Press EG, Cooper VS, Clancy CJ, Nguyen MH. 2017. Ceftolozane-tazobactam for the treatment of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: clinical effectiveness and evolution of resistance. Clin Infect Dis 65:110–120.
    25.
    Hakki M, Lewis JS, II. 2018. Ceftolozane-tazobactam therapy for multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in patients with hematologic malignancies and hematopoietic-cell transplant recipients. Infection 46:431–434.
    26.
    Munita JM, Aitken SL, Miller WR, Perez F, Rosa R, Shimose LA, Lichtenberger PN, Abbo LM, Jain R, Nigo M, Wanger A, Araos R, Tran TT, Adachi J, Rakita R, Shelburne S, Bonomo RA, Arias CA. 2017. Multicenter evaluation of ceftolozane/tazobactam for serious infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clin Infect Dis 65:158–161.
    27.
    Booth CM, Karim S, Mackillop WJ. 2019. Real-world data: towards achieving the achievable in cancer care. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 16:312–325.
    28.
    Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonca A, Bruining H, Reinhart CK, Suter PM, Thijs LG. 1996. The SOFA (sepsis-related organ failure assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 22:707–710.
    29.
    Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG, Harbarth S, Hindler JF, Kahlmeter G, Olsson-Liljequist B, Paterson DL, Rice LB, Stelling J, Struelens MJ, Vatopoulos A, Weber JT, Monnet DL. 2012. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect 18:268–281.
    30.
    Xiao AJ, Miller BW, Huntington JA, Nicolau DP. 2016. Ceftolozane/tazobactam pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic-derived dose justification for phase 3 studies in patients with nosocomial pneumonia. J Clin Pharmacol 56:56–66.
    31.
    Kalil AC, Metersky ML, Klompas M, Muscedere J, Sweeney DA, Palmer LB, Napolitano LM, O'Grady NP, Bartlett JG, Carratalà J, El Solh AA, Ewig S, Fey PD, File TM, Restrepo MI, Roberts JA, Waterer GW, Cruse P, Knight SL, Brozek JL. 2016. Management of adults with hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia: 2016 clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic Society. Clin Infect Dis 63:e61–e111.
    32.
    Bodem CR, Lampton LM, Miller DP, Tarka EF, Everett ED. 1983. Endobronchial pH. Relevance of aminoglycoside activity in gram-negative bacillary pneumonia. Am Rev Respir Dis 127:39–41.
    33.
    Bonine NG, Berger A, Altincatal A, Wang R, Bhagnani T, Gillard P, Lodise T. 2019. Impact of delayed appropriate antibiotic therapy on patient outcomes by antibiotic resistance status from serious Gram-negative bacterial infections. Am J Med Sci 357:103–110.
    34.
    Seymour CW, Gesten F, Prescott HC, Friedrich ME, Iwashyna TJ, Phillips GS, Lemeshow S, Osborn T, Terry KM, Levy MM. 2017. Time to treatment and mortality during mandated emergency care for sepsis. N Engl J Med 376:2235–2244.
    35.
    Lodise TP, Jr, Patel N, Kwa A, Graves J, Furuno JP, Graffunder E, Lomaestro B, McGregor JC. 2007. Predictors of 30-day mortality among patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections: impact of delayed appropriate antibiotic selection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:3510–3515.
    36.
    Raman G, Avendano E, Berger S, Menon V. 2015. Appropriate initial antibiotic therapy in hospitalized patients with gram-negative infections: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis 15:395.
    37.
    Tamma PD, Cosgrove SE, Maragakis LL. 2012. Combination therapy for treatment of infections with gram-negative bacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev 25:450–470.
    38.
    Jorgensen SCJ, Zasowski EJ, Trinh TD, Lagnf AM, Bhatia S, Sabagha N, Abdul-Mutakabbir JC, Alosaimy S, Mynatt RP, Davis SL, Rybak MJ. 2019. Daptomycin plus beta-lactam combination therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections: a retrospective, comparative cohort study. Clin Infect Dis doi:
    39.
    Grill MF, Maganti RK. 2011. Neurotoxic effects associated with antibiotic use: management considerations. Br J Clin Pharmacol 72:381–393.
    40.
    Dinh A, Wyplosz B, Kernéis S, Lebeaux D, Bouchand F, Duran C, Béraud G, Lazaro P, Davido B, Hénard S, Canouï E, Ferry T, Wolff M. 2017. Use of ceftolozane/tazobactam as salvage therapy for infections due to extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Int J Antimicrob Agents 49:782–783.
    41.
    Frattari A, Savini V, Polilli E, Cibelli D, Talamazzi S, Bosco D, Consorte A, Fazii P, Parruti G. 2018. Ceftolozane-tazobactam and Fosfomycin for rescue treatment of otogenous meningitis caused by XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa: case report and review of the literature. IDCases 14:e00451.
    42.
    Sacks H, Chalmers TC, Smith H, Jr. 1982. Randomized versus historical controls for clinical trials. Am J Med 72:233–240.
    43.
    Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. 2009. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42:377–381.
    44.
    Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. 1987. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383.
    45.
    Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. 1985. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 13:818–829.
    46.
    Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. 1976. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 16:31–41.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    Volume 64Number 424 March 2020
    eLocator: e02291-19

    History

    Received: 16 November 2019
    14 December 2019
    Accepted: 5 January 2020
    Published online: 13 January 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. ceftolozane-tazobactam
    2. multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

    Contributors

    Authors

    Sarah C. J. Jorgensen
    Anti-Infective Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
    Present address: Sarah C. J. Jorgensen, Department of Pharmacy, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
    Trang D. Trinh
    Anti-Infective Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
    Medication Outcomes Center, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
    Evan J. Zasowski
    Anti-Infective Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
    Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Touro University California, Vallejo, California, USA
    Abdalhamid M. Lagnf
    Anti-Infective Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
    Samuel P. Simon
    Brooklyn Hospital, Brooklyn, New York, USA
    Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA
    Sahil Bhatia
    Anti-Infective Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
    Sarah M. Melvin
    Anti-Infective Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
    Molly E. Steed
    Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
    Natalie A. Finch
    Department of Pharmacy, Ben Taub Hospital, Harris Health System, Houston, Texas, USA
    Taylor Morrisette
    Anti-Infective Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
    Department of Pharmacy, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, Colorado, USA
    Sandy J. Estrada
    Department of Pharmacy, Lee Health, Fort Myers, Florida, USA
    T2 Biosystems Inc., Lexington, Massachusetts, USA
    Joshua R. Rosenberg
    Brooklyn Hospital, Brooklyn, New York, USA
    Susan L. Davis
    Anti-Infective Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
    Department of Pharmacy, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA
    Michael J. Rybak
    Anti-Infective Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
    Department of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
    Department of Pharmacy, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, USA

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Michael J. Rybak, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Antimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapyArticle
    Coinfections of Two Strains of NDM-1- and OXA-232-Coproducing Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Kidney Transplant Patient

    Coinfections of Two Strains of NDM-1- and OXA-232-Coproducing Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Kidney Transplant Patient

    ABSTRACT

    We report here a fatal case of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections in a renal transplant patient without a travel history in the prior year, from whom 2 genetically different CRKP (sequence type 14 [ST14] and ST2497) strains carrying the same plasmids and antimicrobial resistance genes, including blaNDM-1, blaOXA-232, blaCTX-M-15, armA, and tet(D), were isolated from blood and the abdominal cavity. The isolates were susceptible to colistin, tigecycline, eravacycline, and cefiderocol, which was used to treat the CRKP in combination with ceftazidime-avibactam and polymyxin B and resulted in bacterial clearance. Despite the aggressive treatment, the patient died of ischemic colitis and multiorgan failure.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Tzouvelekis LS, Markogiannakis A, Psichogiou M, Tassios PT, Daikos GL. 2012. Carbapenemases in Klebsiella pneumoniae and other Enterobacteriaceae: an evolving crisis of global dimensions. Clin Microbiol Rev 25:682–707.
    2.
    Balm MN, La MV, Krishnan P, Jureen R, Lin RT, Teo JW. 2013. Emergence of Klebsiella pneumoniae co-producing NDM-type and OXA-181 carbapenemases. Clin Microbiol Infect 19:E421–E423.
    3.
    Rojas LJ, Hujer AM, Rudin SD, Wright MS, Domitrovic TN, Marshall SH, Hujer KM, Richter SS, Cober E, Perez F, Adams MD, van Duin D, Bonomo RA. 2017. NDM-5 and OXA-181 beta-lactamases, a significant threat continues to spread in the Americas. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e00454-17.
    4.
    Avolio M, Vignaroli C, Crapis M, Camporese A. 2017. Co-production of NDM-1 and OXA-232 by ST16 Klebsiella pneumoniae, Italy, 2016. Future Microbiol 12:1119–1122.
    5.
    Lascols C, Hackel M, Marshall SH, Hujer AM, Bouchillon S, Badal R, Hoban D, Bonomo RA. 2011. Increasing prevalence and dissemination of NDM-1 metallo-beta-lactamase in India: data from the SMART study (2009). J Antimicrob Chemother 66:1992–1997.
    6.
    Al-Marzooq F, Ngeow YF, Tay ST. 2015. Emergence of Klebsiella pneumoniae producing dual carbapenemases (NDM-1 and OXA-232) and 16S rRNA methylase (armA) isolated from a Malaysian patient returning from India. Int J Antimicrob Agents 45:445–446.
    7.
    Kwon T, Yang JW, Lee S, Yun MR, Yoo WG, Kim HS, Cha JO, Kim DW. 2016. Complete genome sequence of Klebsiella pneumoniae subsp. pneumoniae KP617, coproducing OXA-232 and NDM-1 carbapenemases, isolated in South Korea. Genome Announc 4:e01550-15.
    8.
    Moubareck CA, Mouftah SF, Pal T, Ghazawi A, Halat DH, Nabi A, AlSharhan MA, AlDeesi ZO, Peters CC, Celiloglu H, Sannegowda M, Sarkis DK, Sonnevend A. 2018. Clonal emergence of Klebsiella pneumoniae ST14 co-producing OXA-48-type and NDM carbapenemases with high rate of colistin resistance in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Int J Antimicrob Agents 52:90–95.
    9.
    Doi Y, O’Hara JA, Lando JF, Querry AM, Townsend BM, Pasculle AW, Muto CA. 2014. Co-production of NDM-1 and OXA-232 by Klebsiella pneumoniae. Emerg Infect Dis 20:163–165.
    10.
    Davido B, Fellous L, Lawrence C, Maxime V, Rottman M, Dinh A. 2017. Ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam, an interesting strategy to overcome beta-lactam resistance conferred by metallo-beta-lactamases in Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e01008-17.
    11.
    Zhang Y, Kashikar A, Bush K. 2017. In vitro activity of plazomicin against beta-lactamase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). J Antimicrob Chemother 72:2792–2795.
    12.
    Stewart A, Harris P, Henderson A, Paterson D. 2018. Treatment of infections by OXA-48-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e01195-18.
    13.
    Marshall S, Hujer AM, Rojas LJ, Papp-Wallace KM, Humphries RM, Spellberg B, Hujer KM, Marshall EK, Rudin SD, Perez F, Wilson BM, Wasserman RB, Chikowski L, Paterson DL, Vila AJ, van Duin D, Kreiswirth BN, Chambers HF, Fowler VG, Jr, Jacobs MR, Pulse ME, Weiss WJ, Bonomo RA. 2017. Can ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam overcome beta-lactam resistance conferred by metallo-beta-lactamases in Enterobacteriaceae? Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e02243-16.
    14.
    Jayol A, Nordmann P, Poirel L, Dubois V. 2018. Ceftazidime/avibactam alone or in combination with aztreonam against colistin-resistant and carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. J Antimicrob Chemother 73:542–544.
    15.
    Aravind L, Anand S, Iyer LM. 2013. Novel autoproteolytic and DNA-damage sensing components in the bacterial SOS response and oxidized methylcytosine-induced eukaryotic DNA demethylation systems. Biol Direct 8:20.
    16.
    Doi Y, Hazen TH, Boitano M, Tsai Y-C, Clark TA, Korlach J, Rasko DA. 2014. Whole-genome assembly of Klebsiella pneumoniae coproducing NDM-1 and OXA-232 carbapenemases using single-molecule, real-time sequencing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:5947–5953.
    17.
    Sakamoto N, Akeda Y, Sugawara Y, Takeuchi D, Motooka D, Yamamoto N, Laolerd W, Santanirand P, Hamada S. 2018. Genomic characterization of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae with chromosomally carried blaNDM-1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e01520-18.
    18.
    Ross B, Krull M, Rath P, Kribben A, Dopadlik D, Erlemann I, Wiegard-Szramek I, Tyczynski B, Buer J, Herbstreit F. 2019. Dialysis drains as a possible source for carbapenem-resistant pathogens causing an ICU outbreak. Infection 47:233–238.
    19.
    Choi JJ, McCarthy MW. 2018. Cefiderocol: a novel siderophore cephalosporin. Expert Opin Invest Drugs 27:193–197.
    20.
    Yang S, Hemarajata P, Hindler J, Li F, Adisetiyo H, Aldrovandi G, Sebra R, Kasarskis A, MacCannell D, Didelot X, Russell D, Rubin Z, Humphries R. 2017. Evolution and transmission of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae expressing the blaOXA-232 gene during an institutional outbreak associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Clin Infect Dis 64:894–901.
    21.
    Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2019. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 29th ed. M100. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    Volume 64Number 424 March 2020
    eLocator: e00948-19

    History

    Received: 14 June 2019
    4 July 2019
    Accepted: 8 September 2019
    Published online: 16 September 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. carbapenem resistance
    2. CRKP
    3. NDM-1
    4. OXA-232
    5. ST14
    6. ST2497
    7. carbapenemase coproduction
    8. cefiderocol

    Contributors

    Authors

    Deisy A. Contreras
    Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
    Sean P. Fitzwater
    Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, UCLA Mattel Children’s Hospital, Los Angeles, California, USA
    Deepa D. Nanayakkara
    Division of Infectious Diseases, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
    Joanna Schaenman
    Division of Infectious Diseases, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
    Grace M. Aldrovandi
    Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, UCLA Mattel Children’s Hospital, Los Angeles, California, USA
    Omai B. Garner
    Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
    Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Shangxin Yang, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Antimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapyArticle
    The Future of Antifungal Drug Therapy: Novel Compounds and Targets

    ABSTRACT

    Fungal infections are a universal problem and are routinely associated with high morbidity and mortality rates in immunocompromised patients. Existing therapies comprise five different classes of antifungal agents, four of which target the synthesis of ergosterol and cell wall glucans. However, the currently available antifungals have many limitations, including poor oral bioavailability, narrow therapeutic indices, and emerging drug resistance resulting from their use, thus making it essential to investigate the development of novel drugs which can overcome these limitations and add to the antifungal armamentarium. Advances have been made in antifungal drug discovery research and development over the past few years as evidenced by the presence of several new compounds currently in various stages of development. In the following minireview, we provide a comprehensive summary of compounds aimed at one or more novel molecular targets. We also briefly describe potential pathways relevant for fungal pathogenesis that can be considered for drug development in the near future.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Denning DW, Bromley MJ. 2015. Infectious disease. How to bolster the antifungal pipeline. Science 347:1414–1416.
    2.
    Rauseo AM, Coler-Reilly A, Larson L, Spec A. 2020. Hope on the horizon: novel fungal treatments in development. Open Forum Infect Dis 7:ofaa016.
    3.
    Roemer T, Krysan DJ. 2014. Antifungal drug development: challenges, unmet clinical needs, and new approaches. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 4:a019703.
    4.
    Fernandez de Ullivarri M, Arbulu S, Garcia-Gutierrez E, Cotter PD. 2020. Antifungal peptides as therapeutic agents. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 10:105.
    5.
    Hasim S, Coleman JJ. 2019. Targeting the fungal cell wall: current therapies and implications for development of alternative antifungal agents. Future Med Chem 11:869–883.
    6.
    Houst J, Spizek J, Havlicek V. 2020. Antifungal drugs. Metabolites 10:106.
    7.
    Pianalto KM, Alspaugh JA. 2016. New horizons in antifungal therapy. J Fungi (Basel) 2:26.
    8.
    Perfect JR. 2017. The antifungal pipeline: a reality check. Nat Rev Drug Discov 16:603–616.
    9.
    Schmiedel Y, Zimmerli S. 2016. Common invasive fungal diseases: an overview of invasive candidiasis, aspergillosis, cryptococcosis, and Pneumocystis pneumonia. Swiss Med Wkly 146:w14281.
    10.
    Mazu TK, Bricker BA, Flores-Rozas H, Ablordeppey SY. 2016. The mechanistic targets of antifungal agents: an overview. Mini Rev Med Chem 16:555–578.
    11.
    Bongomin F, Gago S, Oladele RO, Denning DW. 2017. Global and multi-national prevalence of fungal diseases-estimate precision. J Fungi (Basel) 3:57.
    12.
    Rajasingham R, Smith RM, Park BJ, Jarvis JN, Govender NP, Chiller TM, Denning DW, Loyse A, Boulware DR. 2017. Global burden of disease of HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis: an updated analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 17:873–881.
    13.
    Gray KC, Palacios DS, Dailey I, Endo MM, Uno BE, Wilcock BC, Burke MD. 2012. Amphotericin primarily kills yeast by simply binding ergosterol. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:2234–2239.
    14.
    Anderson TM, Clay MC, Cioffi AG, Diaz KA, Hisao GS, Tuttle MD, Nieuwkoop AJ, Comellas G, Maryum N, Wang S, Uno BE, Wildeman EL, Gonen T, Rienstra CM, Burke MD. 2014. Amphotericin forms an extramembranous and fungicidal sterol sponge. Nat Chem Biol 10:400–406.
    15.
    Spampinato C, Leonardi D. 2013. Candida infections, causes, targets, and resistance mechanisms: traditional and alternative antifungal agents. Biomed Res Int 2013:204237.
    16.
    Van Daele R, Spriet I, Wauters J, Maertens J, Mercier T, Van Hecke S, Bruggemann R. 2019. Antifungal drugs: what brings the future? Med Mycol 57:S328–S343.
    17.
    Birnbaum JE. 1990. Pharmacology of the allylamines. J Am Acad Dermatol 23:782–785.
    18.
    Nowosielski M, Hoffmann M, Wyrwicz LS, Stepniak P, Plewczynski DM, Lazniewski M, Ginalski K, Rychlewski L. 2011. Detailed mechanism of squalene epoxidase inhibition by terbinafine. J Chem Inf Model 51:455–462.
    19.
    Bondaryk M, Kurzątkowski W, Staniszewska M. 2013. Antifungal agents commonly used in the superficial and mucosal candidiasis treatment: mode of action and resistance development. Postepy Dermatol Alergol 30:293–301.
    20.
    Parente-Rocha JA, Bailao AM, Amaral AC, Taborda CP, Paccez JD, Borges CL, Pereira M. 2017. Antifungal resistance, metabolic routes as drug targets, and new antifungal agents: an overview about endemic dimorphic fungi. Mediators Inflamm 2017:9870679.
    21.
    Miceli MH, Kauffman CA. 2015. Isavuconazole: a new broad-spectrum triazole antifungal agent. Clin Infect Dis 61:1558–1565.
    22.
    Pettit NN, Carver PL. 2015. Isavuconazole: a new option for the management of invasive fungal infections. Ann Pharmacother 49:825–842.
    23.
    Beattie SR, Krysan DJ. 2020. Antifungal drug screening: thinking outside the box to identify novel antifungal scaffolds. Curr Opin Microbiol 57:1–6.
    24.
    Calderone R, Sun N, Gay-Andrieu F, Groutas W, Weerawarna P, Prasad S, Alex D, Li D. 2014. Antifungal drug discovery: the process and outcomes. Future Microbiol 9:791–805.
    25.
    Aldholmi M, Marchand P, Ourliac-Garnier I, Le Pape P, Ganesan A. 2019. A decade of antifungal leads from natural products: 2010-2019. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 12:182.
    26.
    Katiyar C, Gupta A, Kanjilal S, Katiyar S. 2012. Drug discovery from plant sources: an integrated approach. Ayu 33:10–19.
    27.
    Shaw KJ, Schell WA, Covel J, Duboc G, Giamberardino C, Kapoor M, Moloney M, Soltow QA, Tenor JL, Toffaletti DL, Trzoss M, Webb P, Perfect JR. 2018. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of APX001A/APX001 and other Gwt1 inhibitors against cryptococcus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e00523-18.
    28.
    Tsukahara K, Hata K, Nakamoto K, Sagane K, Watanabe N-a, Kuromitsu J, Kai J, Tsuchiya M, Ohba F, Jigami Y, Yoshimatsu K, Nagasu T. 2003. Medicinal genetics approach towards identifying the molecular target of a novel inhibitor of fungal cell wall assembly. Mol Microbiol 48:1029–1042.
    29.
    Watanabe N-a, Miyazaki M, Horii T, Sagane K, Tsukahara K, Hata K. 2012. E1210, a new broad-spectrum antifungal, suppresses Candida albicans hyphal growth through inhibition of glycosylphosphatidylinositol biosynthesis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:960–971.
    30.
    Miyazaki M, Horii T, Hata K, Watanabe N-A, Nakamoto K, Tanaka K, Shirotori S, Murai N, Inoue S, Matsukura M, Abe S, Yoshimatsu K, Asada M. 2011. In vitro activity of E1210, a novel antifungal, against clinically important yeasts and molds. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:4652–4658.
    31.
    Amplyx Pharmaceuticals. 2020. Our pipeline. https://amplyx.com/our-pipeline/. Accessed 5 November 2020.
    32.
    Groll AH, Piscitelli SC, Walsh TJ. 1998. Clinical pharmacology of systemic antifungal agents: a comprehensive review of agents in clinical use, current investigational compounds, and putative targets for antifungal drug development. Adv Pharmacol 44:343–500.
    33.
    Bell AS. 2007. 7.15—Major antifungal drugs, p 445–468. In Taylor JB, Triggle DJ (ed), Comprehensive medicinal chemistry II. Elsevier, Oxford, United Kingdom.
    34.
    Van Dyke MCC, Thompson GR, Galgiani JN, Barker BM. 2019. The rise of coccidioides: forces against the dust devil unleashed. Front Immunol 10:2188–2188.
    35.
    Shubitz LF, Trinh HT, Perrill RH, Thompson CM, Hanan NJ, Galgiani JN, Nix DE. 2014. Modeling nikkomycin Z dosing and pharmacology in murine pulmonary coccidioidomycosis preparatory to phase 2 clinical trials. J Infect Dis 209:1949–1954.
    36.
    Malina C, Larsson C, Nielsen J. 2018. Yeast mitochondria: an overview of mitochondrial biology and the potential of mitochondrial systems biology. FEMS Yeast Res 18:foy040.
    37.
    Chatre L, Ricchetti M. 2014. Are mitochondria the Achilles’ heel of the Kingdom Fungi? Curr Opin Microbiol 20:49–54.
    38.
    Li D, Calderone R. 2017. Exploiting mitochondria as targets for the development of new antifungals. Virulence 8:159–168.
    39.
    Mitsuyama J, Nomura N, Hashimoto K, Yamada E, Nishikawa H, Kaeriyama M, Kimura A, Todo Y, Narita H. 2008. In vitro and in vivo antifungal activities of T-2307, a novel arylamidine. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52:1318–1324.
    40.
    Nishikawa H, Fukuda Y, Mitsuyama J, Tashiro M, Tanaka A, Takazono T, Saijo T, Yamamoto K, Nakamura S, Imamura Y, Miyazaki T, Kakeya H, Yamamoto Y, Yanagihara K, Mukae H, Kohno S, Izumikawa K. 2017. In vitro and in vivo antifungal activities of T-2307, a novel arylamidine, against Cryptococcus gattii: an emerging fungal pathogen. J Antimicrob Chemother 72:1709–1713.
    41.
    Nishikawa H, Yamada E, Shibata T, Uchihashi S, Fan H, Hayakawa H, Nomura N, Mitsuyama J. 2010. Uptake of T-2307, a novel arylamidine, in Candida albicans. J Antimicrob Chemother 65:1681–1687.
    42.
    Nishikawa H, Sakagami T, Yamada E, Fukuda Y, Hayakawa H, Nomura N, Mitsuyama J, Miyazaki T, Mukae H, Kohno S. 2016. T-2307, a novel arylamidine, is transported into Candida albicans by a high-affinity spermine and spermidine carrier regulated by Agp2. J Antimicrob Chemother 71:1845–1855.
    43.
    Yamashita K, Miyazaki T, Fukuda Y, Mitsuyama J, Saijo T, Shimamura S, Yamamoto K, Imamura Y, Izumikawa K, Yanagihara K, Kohno S, Mukae H. 2019. The novel arylamidine T-2307 selectively disrupts yeast mitochondrial function by inhibiting respiratory chain complexes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63:e00374-19.
    44.
    Shibata T, Takahashi T, Yamada E, Kimura A, Nishikawa H, Hayakawa H, Nomura N, Mitsuyama J. 2012. T-2307 causes collapse of mitochondrial membrane potential in yeast. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:5892–5897.
    45.
    Singh SB, Liu W, Li X, Chen T, Shafiee A, Card D, Abruzzo G, Flattery A, Gill C, Thompson JR, Rosenbach M, Dreikorn S, Hornak V, Meinz M, Kurtz M, Kelly R, Onishi JC. 2012. Antifungal spectrum, in vivo efficacy, and structure–activity relationship of ilicicolin H. ACS Med Chem Lett 3:814–817.
    46.
    Covian R, Trumpower BL. 2009. Ilicicolin inhibition and binding at center N of the dimeric cytochrome bc1 complex reveal electron transfer and regulatory interactions between monomers. J Biol Chem 284:8614–8620.
    47.
    Gutierrez-Cirlos EB, Merbitz-Zahradnik T, Trumpower BL. 2004. Inhibition of the yeast cytochrome bc1 complex by ilicicolin H, a novel inhibitor that acts at the Qn site of the bc1 complex. J Biol Chem 279:8708–8714.
    48.
    Singh SB, Liu W, Li X, Chen T, Shafiee A, Dreikorn S, Hornak V, Meinz M, Onishi JC. 2013. Structure–activity relationship of cytochrome bc1 reductase inhibitor broad spectrum antifungal ilicicolin H. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 23:3018–3022.
    49.
    Walsh CT, Fischbach MA. 2009. Repurposing libraries of eukaryotic protein kinase inhibitors for antibiotic discovery. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:1689–1690.
    50.
    Baxter BK, DiDone L, Ogu D, Schor S, Krysan DJ. 2011. Identification, in vitro activity and mode of action of phosphoinositide-dependent-1 kinase inhibitors as antifungal molecules. ACS Chem Biol 6:502–510.
    51.
    Koselny K, Green J, DiDone L, Halterman JP, Fothergill AW, Wiederhold NP, Patterson TF, Cushion MT, Rappelye C, Wellington M. 2016. The celecoxib derivative AR-12 has broad-spectrum antifungal activity in vitro and improves the activity of fluconazole in a murine model of cryptococcosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:7115–7127.
    52.
    Koselny K, Green J, Favazzo L, Glazier VE, DiDone L, Ransford S, Krysan DJ. 2016. Antitumor/antifungal celecoxib derivative AR-12 is a non-nucleoside inhibitor of the ANL-family adenylating enzyme acetyl CoA synthetase. ACS Infect Dis 2:268–280.
    53.
    Di Mambro T, Guerriero I, Aurisicchio L, Magnani M, Marra E. 2019. The yin and yang of current antifungal therapeutic strategies: how can we harness our natural defenses? Front Pharmacol 10:80.
    54.
    Mor V, Rella A, Farnoud AM, Singh A, Munshi M, Bryan A, Naseem S, Konopka JB, Ojima I, Bullesbach E, Ashbaugh A, Linke MJ, Cushion M, Collins M, Ananthula HK, Sallans L, Desai PB, Wiederhold NP, Fothergill AW, Kirkpatrick WR, Patterson T, Wong LH, Sinha S, Giaever G, Nislow C, Flaherty P, Pan X, Cesar GV, de Melo Tavares P, Frases S, Miranda K, Rodrigues ML, Luberto C, Nimrichter L, Del Poeta M. 2015. Identification of a new class of antifungals targeting the synthesis of fungal sphingolipids. mBio 6:e00647-15.
    55.
    Mor V, Rella A, Farnoud AM, Singh A, Munshi M, Bryan A, Naseem S, Konopka JB, Ojima I, Bullesbach E, Ashbaugh A, Linke MJ, Cushion M, Collins M, Ananthula HK, Sallans L, Desai PB, Wiederhold NP, Fothergill AW, Kirkpatrick WR, Patterson T, Wong LH, Sinha S, Giaever G, Nislow C, Flaherty P, Pan X, Cesar GV, de Melo Tavares P, Frases S, Miranda K, Rodrigues ML, Luberto C, Nimrichter L, Del Poeta M. 2018. Erratum for Mor et al., “Identification of a new class of antifungals targeting the synthesis of fungal sphingolipids”. mBio 9:e00188-18.
    56.
    Lazzarini C, Haranahalli K, Rieger R, Ananthula HK, Desai PB, Ashbaugh A, Linke MJ, Cushion MT, Ruzsicska B, Haley J, Ojima I, Del Poeta M. 2018. Acylhydrazones as antifungal agents targeting the synthesis of fungal sphingolipids. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e00156-18.
    57.
    Haranahalli K, Lazzarini C, Sun Y, Zambito J, Pathiranage S, McCarthy JB, Mallamo J, Del Poeta M, Ojima I. 2019. SAR Studies on aromatic acylhydrazone-based inhibitors of fungal sphingolipid synthesis as next-generation antifungal agents. J Med Chem 62:8249–8273.
    58.
    Lazzarini C, Haranahalli K, McCarthy JB, Mallamo J, Ojima I, Del Poeta M. 2020. Preclinical evaluation of acylhydrazone SB-AF-1002 as a novel broad-spectrum antifungal agent. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 64:e00946-20.
    59.
    Nakamura I, Yoshimura S, Masaki T, Takase S, Ohsumi K, Hashimoto M, Furukawa S, Fujie A. 2017. ASP2397: a novel antifungal agent produced by Acremonium persicinum MF-347833. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 70:45–51.
    60.
    Dietl A-M, Misslinger M, Aguiar MM, Ivashov V, Teis D, Pfister J, Decristoforo C, Hermann M, Sullivan SM, Smith LR, Haas H. 2019. The siderophore transporter Sit1 determines susceptibility to the antifungal VL-2397. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63:e00807-19.
    61.
    Nakamura I, Ohsumi K, Takeda S, Katsumata K, Matsumoto S, Akamatsu S, Mitori H, Nakai T. 2019. ASP2397 is a novel natural compound that exhibits rapid and potent fungicidal activity against Aspergillus species through a specific transporter. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63:e02689-18.
    62.
    Nakamura I, Kanasaki R, Yoshikawa K, Furukawa S, Fujie A, Hamamoto H, Sekimizu K. 2017. Discovery of a new antifungal agent ASP2397 using a silkworm model of Aspergillus fumigatus infection. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 70:41–44.
    63.
    Oliver JD, Sibley GEM, Beckmann N, Dobb KS, Slater MJ, McEntee L, Du Pré S, Livermore J, Bromley MJ, Wiederhold NP, Hope WW, Kennedy AJ, Law D, Birch M. 2016. F901318 represents a novel class of antifungal drug that inhibits dihydroorotate dehydrogenase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:12809–12814.
    64.
    Garavito MF, Narváez-Ortiz HY, Zimmermann BH. 2015. Pyrimidine metabolism: dynamic and versatile pathways in pathogens and cellular development. J Genet Genomics 42:195–205.
    65.
    D'Enfert C, Diaquin M, Delit A, Wuscher N, Debeaupuis J-P, Huerre M, Latge J-P. 1996. Attenuated virulence of uridine-uracil auxotrophs of Aspergillus fumigatus. Infect Immun 64:4401–4405.
    66.
    de Gontijo FA, Pascon RC, Fernandes L, Machado J, Jr, Alspaugh JA, Vallim MA. 2014. The role of the de novo pyrimidine biosynthetic pathway in Cryptococcus neoformans high temperature growth and virulence. Fungal Genet Biol 70:12–23.
    67.
    Buil J, Rijs A, Meis J, Birch M, Law D, Melchers W, Verweij P. 2017. In vitro activity of the novel antifungal compound F901318 against difficult-to-treat Aspergillus isolates. J Antimicrob Chemother 72:2548–2552.
    68.
    Du Pré S, Beckmann N, Almeida MC, Sibley GE, Law D, Brand AC, Birch M, Read ND, Oliver JD. 2018. Effect of the novel antifungal drug F901318 (olorofim) on growth and viability of Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e00231-18.
    69.
    Dunn M, Ramirez-Trujillo J, Hernández-Lucas I. 2009. Major roles of isocitrate lyase and malate synthase in bacterial and fungal pathogenesis. Microbiology (Reading) 155:3166–3175.
    70.
    Lorenz MC, Fink GR. 2001. The glyoxylate cycle is required for fungal virulence. Nature 412:83–86.
    71.
    Piekarska K, Hardy G, Mol E, van den Burg J, Strijbis K, van Roermund C, van den Berg M, Distel B. 2008. The activity of the glyoxylate cycle in peroxisomes of Candida albicans depends on a functional β-oxidation pathway: evidence for reduced metabolite transport across the peroxisomal membrane. Microbiology (Reading) 154:3061–3072.
    72.
    Lorenz MC, Bender JA, Fink GR. 2004. Transcriptional response of Candida albicans upon internalization by macrophages. Eukaryot Cell 3:1076–1087.
    73.
    Derengowski L, Tavares A, Silva S, Procópio L, Felipe M, Silva-Pereira I. 2008. Upregulation of glyoxylate cycle genes upon Paracoccidioides brasiliensis internalization by murine macrophages and in vitro nutritional stress condition. Med Mycol 46:125–134.
    74.
    Li X, Hou Y, Yue L, Liu S, Du J, Sun S. 2015. Potential targets for antifungal drug discovery based on growth and virulence in Candida albicans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:5885–5891.
    75.
    Bae M, Kim H, Moon K, Nam S-J, Shin J, Oh K-B, Oh D-C. 2015. Mohangamides A and B, new dilactone-tethered pseudo-dimeric peptides inhibiting Candida albicans isocitrate lyase. Org Lett 17:712–715.
    76.
    Juvvadi PR, Lamoth F, Steinbach WJ. 2014. Calcineurin as a multifunctional regulator: unraveling novel functions in fungal stress responses, hyphal growth, drug resistance, and pathogenesis. Fungal Biol Rev 28:56–69.
    77.
    Odom A, Muir S, Lim E, Toffaletti DL, Perfect J, Heitman J. 1997. Calcineurin is required for virulence of Cryptococcus neoformans. EMBO J 16:2576–2589.
    78.
    Blankenship JR, Heitman J. 2005. Calcineurin is required for Candida albicans to survive calcium stress in serum. Infect Immun 73:5767–5774.
    79.
    Steinbach WJ, Cramer RA, Perfect BZ, Asfaw YG, Sauer TC, Najvar LK, Kirkpatrick WR, Patterson TF, Benjamin DK, Heitman J, Perfect JR. 2006. Calcineurin controls growth, morphology, and pathogenicity in Aspergillus fumigatus. Eukaryot Cell 5:1091–1103.
    80.
    Nambu M, Covel JA, Kapoor M, Li X, Moloney MK, Numa MM, Soltow QA, Trzoss M, Webb P, Webb RR, Mutz M. 2017. A calcineurin antifungal strategy with analogs of FK506. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 27:2465–2471.
    81.
    Juvvadi PR, Fox D, Bobay BG, Hoy MJ, Gobeil SMC, Venters RA, Chang Z, Lin JJ, Averette AF, Cole DC, Barrington BC, Wheaton JD, Ciofani M, Trzoss M, Li X, Lee SC, Chen Y-L, Mutz M, Spicer LD, Schumacher MA, Heitman J, Steinbach WJ. 2019. Harnessing calcineurin-FK506-FKBP12 crystal structures from invasive fungal pathogens to develop antifungal agents. Nat Commun 10:4275.
    82.
    O'Meara TR, Robbins N, Cowen LE. 2017. The Hsp90 chaperone network modulates Candida virulence traits. Trends Microbiol 25:809–819.
    83.
    Shapiro RS, Uppuluri P, Zaas AK, Collins C, Senn H, Perfect JR, Heitman J, Cowen LE. 2009. Hsp90 orchestrates temperature-dependent Candida albicans morphogenesis via Ras1-PKA signaling. Curr Biol 19:621–629.
    84.
    Singh SD, Robbins N, Zaas AK, Schell WA, Perfect JR, Cowen LE. 2009. Hsp90 governs echinocandin resistance in the pathogenic yeast Candida albicans via calcineurin. PLoS Pathog 5:e1000532.
    85.
    Cowen LE, Lindquist S. 2005. Hsp90 potentiates the rapid evolution of new traits: drug resistance in diverse fungi. Science 309:2185–2189.
    86.
    Cowen LE, Singh SD, Köhler JR, Collins C, Zaas AK, Schell WA, Aziz H, Mylonakis E, Perfect JR, Whitesell L, Lindquist S. 2009. Harnessing Hsp90 function as a powerful, broadly effective therapeutic strategy for fungal infectious disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:2818–2823.
    87.
    Pachl J, Svoboda P, Jacobs F, Vandewoude K, van der Hoven B, Spronk P, Masterson G, Malbrain M, Aoun M, Garbino J, Takala J, Drgona L, Burnie J, Matthews R, Mycograb Invasive Candidiasis Study Group. 2006. A randomized, blinded, multicenter trial of lipid-associated amphotericin B alone versus in combination with an antibody-based inhibitor of heat shock protein 90 in patients with invasive candidiasis. Clin Infect Dis 42:1404–1413.
    88.
    Bugli F, Cacaci M, Martini C, Torelli R, Posteraro B, Sanguinetti M, Paroni Sterbini F. 2013. Human monoclonal antibody-based therapy in the treatment of invasive candidiasis. Clin Dev Immunol 2013:403121.
    89.
    Jhaveri K, Taldone T, Modi S, Chiosis G. 2012. Advances in the clinical development of heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) inhibitors in cancers. Biochim Biophys Acta 1823:742–755.
    90.
    Whitesell L, Robbins N, Huang DS, McLellan CA, Shekhar-Guturja T, LeBlanc EV, Nation CS, Hui R, Hutchinson A, Collins C, Chatterjee S, Trilles R, Xie JL, Krysan DJ, Lindquist S, Porco JA, Tatu U, Brown LE, Pizarro J, Cowen LE. 2019. Structural basis for species-selective targeting of Hsp90 in a pathogenic fungus. Nat Commun 10:17.
    91.
    Lillie SH, Pringle JR. 1980. Reserve carbohydrate metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: responses to nutrient limitation. J Bacteriol 143:1384–1394.
    92.
    Crowe JH, Crowe LM, Chapman D. 1984. Preservation of membranes in anhydrobiotic organisms: the role of trehalose. Science 223:701–703.
    93.
    Gadd G, Chalmers K, Reed R. 1987. The role of trehalose in dehydration resistance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Lett 48:249–254.
    94.
    Perfect JR, Tenor JL, Miao Y, Brennan RG. 2017. Trehalose pathway as an antifungal target. Virulence 8:143–149.
    95.
    Ngamskulrungroj P, Himmelreich U, Breger JA, Wilson C, Chayakulkeeree M, Krockenberger MB, Malik R, Daniel H-M, Toffaletti D, Djordjevic JT, Mylonakis E, Meyer W, Perfect JR. 2009. The trehalose synthesis pathway is an integral part of the virulence composite for Cryptococcus gattii. Infect Immun 77:4584–4596.
    96.
    Petzold EW, Himmelreich U, Mylonakis E, Rude T, Toffaletti D, Cox GM, Miller JL, Perfect JR. 2006. Characterization and regulation of the trehalose synthesis pathway and its importance in the pathogenicity of Cryptococcus neoformans. Infect Immun 74:5877–5887.
    97.
    Farnoud AM, Toledo AM, Konopka JB, Del Poeta M, London E. 2015. Raft-like membrane domains in pathogenic microorganisms. Curr Top Membr 74:233–268.
    98.
    Fernandes CM, Goldman GH, Del Poeta M. 2018. Biological roles played by sphingolipids in dimorphic and filamentous fungi. mBio 9:e00642-18.
    99.
    Spitzer M, Griffiths E, Blakely KM, Wildenhain J, Ejim L, Rossi L, De Pascale G, Curak J, Brown E, Tyers M, Wright GD. 2011. Cross‐species discovery of syncretic drug combinations that potentiate the antifungal fluconazole. Mol Syst Biol 7:499.
    100.
    Miyake Y, Kozutsumi Y, Nakamura S, Fujita T, Kawasaki T. 1995. Serine palmitoyltransferase is the primary target of a sphingosine-like immunosuppressant, ISP-1/myriocin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 211:396–403.
    101.
    Hanada K, Nishijima M, Fujita T, Kobayashi S. 2000. Specificity of inhibitors of serine palmitoyltransferase (SPT), a key enzyme in sphingolipid biosynthesis, in intact cells: a novel evaluation system using an SPT-defective mammalian cell mutant. Biochem Pharmacol 59:1211–1216.
    102.
    Munshi MA, Gardin JM, Singh A, Luberto C, Rieger R, Bouklas T, Fries BC, Del Poeta M. 2018. The role of ceramide synthases in the pathogenicity of Cryptococcus neoformans. Cell Rep 22:1392–1400.
    103.
    Delgado A, Casas J, Llebaria A, Abad JL, Fabrias G. 2006. Inhibitors of sphingolipid metabolism enzymes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1758:1957–1977.
    104.
    Voss KA, Riley RT, Norred W, Bacon CW, Meredith FI, Howard PC, Plattner RD, Collins T, Hansen DK, Porter JK. 2001. An overview of rodent toxicities: liver and kidney effects of fumonisins and Fusarium moniliforme. Environ Health Perspect 109:259–266.
    105.
    Heidler SA, Radding JA. 2000. Inositol phosphoryl transferases from human pathogenic fungi. Biochim Biophys Acta 1500:147–152.
    106.
    Aeed PA, Young CL, Nagiec MM, Elhammer ÅP. 2009. Inhibition of inositol phosphorylceramide synthase by the cyclic peptide aureobasidin A. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:496–504.
    107.
    Takesako K, Kuroda H, Inoue T, Haruna F, Yoshikawa Y, Kato I, Uchida K, Hiratani T, Yamaguchi H. 1993. Biological properties of aureobasidin A, a cyclic depsipeptide antifungal antibiotic. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 46:1414–1420.
    108.
    Nagiec MM, Nagiec EE, Baltisberger JA, Wells GB, Lester RL, Dickson RC. 1997. Sphingolipid synthesis as a target for antifungal drugs complementation of the inositol phosphorylceramide synthase defect in a mutant strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by the AUR1 gene. J Biol Chem 272:9809–9817.
    109.
    Mandala SM, Thornton RA, Rosenbach M, Milligan J, Garcia-Calvo M, Bull HG, Kurtz MB. 1997. Khafrefungin, a novel inhibitor of sphingolipid synthesis. J Biol Chem 272:32709–32714.
    110.
    Bahn Y-S. 2008. Master and commander in fungal pathogens: the two-component system and the HOG signaling pathway. Eukaryot Cell 7:2017–2036.
    111.
    Alonso-Monge R, Navarro-Garcia F, Molero G, Diez-Orejas R, Gustin M, Pla J, Sanchez M, Nombela C. 1999. Role of the mitogen-activated protein kinase Hog1p in morphogenesis and virulence of Candida albicans. J Bacteriol 181:3058–3068.
    112.
    Bahn Y-S, Kojima K, Cox GM, Heitman J. 2005. Specialization of the HOG pathway and its impact on differentiation and virulence of Cryptococcus neoformans. Mol Biol Cell 16:2285–2300.
    113.
    Bahn Y-S, Kojima K, Cox GM, Heitman J. 2006. A unique fungal two-component system regulates stress responses, drug sensitivity, sexual development, and virulence of Cryptococcus neoformans. Mol Biol Cell 17:3122–3135.
    114.
    Vetcher L, Menzella HG, Kudo T, Motoyama T, Katz L. 2007. The antifungal polyketide ambruticin targets the HOG pathway. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:3734–3736.
    115.
    Knauth P, Reichenbach H. 2000. On the mechanism of action of the myxobacterial fungicide ambruticin. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 53:1182–1190.
    116.
    Sussman A, Huss K, Chio L-C, Heidler S, Shaw M, Ma D, Zhu G, Campbell RM, Park T-S, Kulanthaivel P, Scott JE, Carpenter JW, Strege MA, Belvo MD, Swartling JR, Fischl A, Yeh W-K, Shih C, Ye XS. 2004. Discovery of cercosporamide, a known antifungal natural product, as a selective Pkc1 kinase inhibitor through high-throughput screening. Eukaryot Cell 3:932–943.
    117.
    Fuchs BB, Mylonakis E. 2009. Our paths might cross: the role of the fungal cell wall integrity pathway in stress response and cross talk with other stress response pathways. Eukaryot Cell 8:1616–1625.
    118.
    Levin DE, Bartlett-Heubusch E. 1992. Mutants in the S. cerevisiae PKC1 gene display a cell cycle-specific osmotic stability defect. J Cell Biol 116:1221–1229.
    119.
    Ashburn TT, Thor KB. 2004. Drug repositioning: identifying and developing new uses for existing drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov 3:673–683.
    120.
    Pushpakom S, Iorio F, Eyers PA, Escott KJ, Hopper S, Wells A, Doig A, Guilliams T, Latimer J, McNamee C, Norris A, Sanseau P, Cavalla D, Pirmohamed M. 2019. Drug repurposing: progress, challenges and recommendations. Nat Rev Drug Discov 18:41–58.
    121.
    Zhai B, Wu C, Wang L, Sachs MS, Lin X. 2012. The antidepressant sertraline provides a promising therapeutic option for neurotropic cryptococcal infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:3758–3766.
    122.
    Al-Janabi AAHS, Al-Mosawe HAS, Ai-Moswai K. 2019. Tamoxifen: from anti-cancer to antifungal drug. Int J Med Rev 6:88–91.
    123.
    Bekele RT, Venkatraman G, Liu R-Z, Tang X, Mi S, Benesch MGK, Mackey JR, Godbout R, Curtis JM, McMullen TPW, Brindley DN. 2016. Oxidative stress contributes to the tamoxifen-induced killing of breast cancer cells: implications for tamoxifen therapy and resistance. Sci Rep 6:21164.
    124.
    Osborne CK. 1998. Tamoxifen in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 339:1609–1618.
    125.
    Wiseman H, Cannon M, Arnstein HRV. 1989. Observation and significance of growth inhibition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (A224A) by the antioestrogen drug tamoxifen. Biochem Soc Trans 17:1038–1039.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    Volume 65Number 220 January 2021
    eLocator: e01719-20

    History

    Published online: 23 November 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. acylhydrazones
    2. antifungal agents
    3. arylamidine
    4. calcineurin
    5. drug therapy
    6. new targets
    7. nikkomycin
    8. olorofilm
    9. sphingolipids
    10. threalose

    Contributors

    Authors

    Caroline Mota Fernandes
    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
    Deveney Dasilva
    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
    Krupanandan Haranahalli
    Institute of Chemical Biology and Drug Discovery, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
    Department of Chemistry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
    J. Brian McCarthy
    MicroRid Technologies Inc., Dix Hills, New York, USA
    John Mallamo
    MicroRid Technologies Inc., Dix Hills, New York, USA
    Iwao Ojima
    Institute of Chemical Biology and Drug Discovery, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
    Department of Chemistry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
    Institute of Chemical Biology and Drug Discovery, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
    Veteran Administration Medical Center, Northport, New York, USA
    MicroRid Technologies Inc., Dix Hills, New York, USA
    Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, New York, USA

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Maurizio Del Poeta, [email protected].
    Caroline Mota Fernandes, Deveney Dasilva, and Krupanandan Haranahalli contributed equally to this article. Author order was determined alphabetically based on first names.

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Antimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapyArticle
    Staphylococcus aureus Alpha-Toxin Is Conserved among Diverse Hospital Respiratory Isolates Collected from a Global Surveillance Study and Is Neutralized by Monoclonal Antibody MEDI4893

    Staphylococcus aureus Alpha-Toxin Is Conserved among Diverse Hospital Respiratory Isolates Collected from a Global Surveillance Study and Is Neutralized by Monoclonal Antibody MEDI4893

    ABSTRACT

    Staphylococcus aureus infections lead to an array of illnesses ranging from mild skin infections to serious diseases, such endocarditis, osteomyelitis, and pneumonia. Alpha-toxin (Hla) is a pore-forming toxin, encoded by the hla gene, that is thought to play a key role in S. aureus pathogenesis. A monoclonal antibody targeting Hla, MEDI4893, is in clinical development for the prevention of S. aureus ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). The presence of the hla gene and Hla protein in 994 respiratory isolates collected from patients in 34 countries in Asia, Europe, the United States, Latin America, the Middle East, Africa, and Australia was determined. Hla levels were correlated with the geographic location, age of the subject, and length of stay in the hospital. hla gene sequence analysis was performed, and mutations were mapped to the Hla crystal structure. S. aureus supernatants containing Hla variants were tested for susceptibility or resistance to MEDI4893. The hla gene was present and Hla was expressed in 99.0% and 83.2% of the isolates, respectively, regardless of geographic region, hospital locale, or age of the subject. More methicillin-susceptible than methicillin-resistant isolates expressed Hla (86.9% versus 78.8%; P = 0.0007), and S. aureus isolates from pediatric patients expressed the largest amounts of Hla. Fifty-seven different Hla subtypes were identified, and 91% of the isolates encoded an Hla subtype that was neutralized by MED4893. This study demonstrates that Hla is conserved in diverse S. aureus isolates from around the world and is an attractive target for prophylactic monoclonal antibody (MAb) or vaccine development.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    Pujol M, Pena C, Pallares R, Ariza J, Ayats J, Dominguez MA, Gudiol F. 1996. Nosocomial Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia among nasal carriers of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible strains. Am J Med 100:509–516.
    2.
    Mest DR, Wong DH, Shimoda KJ, Mulligan ME, Wilson SE. 1994. Nasal colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on admission to the surgical intensive care unit increases the risk of infection. Anesth Analg 78:644–650.
    3.
    Perl TM, Golub JE. 1998. New approaches to reduce Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial infection rates: treating S. aureus nasal carriage. Ann Pharmacother 32:S7–S16.
    4.
    von Eiff C, Becker K, Machka K, Stammer H, Peters G. 2001. Nasal carriage as a source of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. N Engl J Med 344:11–16.
    5.
    Sievert DM, Ricks P, Edwards JR, Schneider A, Patel J, Srinivasan A, Kallen A, Limbago B, Fridkin S, National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Team, Participating NHSN Facilities. 2013. Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009-2010. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 34:1–14.
    6.
    Grgurich PE, Hudcova J, Lei Y, Sarwar A, Craven DE. 2012. Management and prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens. Expert Rev Respir Med 6:533–555.
    7.
    Otto M. 2014. Staphylococcus aureus toxins. Curr Opin Microbiol 17:32–37.
    8.
    Alonzo F III, Torres VJ. 2014. The bicomponent pore-forming leucocidins of Staphylococcus aureus. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 78:199–230.
    9.
    Rooijakkers SH, Ruyken M, van Roon J, van Kessel KP, van Strijp JA, van Wamel WJ. 2006. Early expression of SCIN and CHIPS drives instant immune evasion by Staphylococcus aureus. Cell Microbiol 8:1282–1293.
    10.
    Berube BJ, Bubeck Wardenburg J. 2013. Staphylococcus aureus alpha-toxin: nearly a century of intrigue. Toxins (Basel) 5:1140–1166.
    11.
    Bubeck Wardenburg J, Bae T, Otto M, Deleo FR, Schneewind O. 2007. Poring over pores: alpha-hemolysin and Panton-Valentine leukocidin in Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia. Nat Med 13:1405–1406.
    12.
    Craven RR, Gao X, Allen IC, Gris D, Bubeck Wardenburg J, McElvania-Tekippe E, Ting JP, Duncan JA. 2009. Staphylococcus aureus alpha-hemolysin activates the NLRP3-inflammasome in human and mouse monocytic cells. PLoS One 4:e7446.
    13.
    Powers ME, Kim HK, Wang Y, Bubeck Wardenburg J. 2012. ADAM10 mediates vascular injury induced by Staphylococcus aureus alpha-hemolysin. J Infect Dis 206:352–356.
    14.
    Tamber S, Reyes D, Donegan NP, Schwartzman JD, Cheung AL, Memmi G. 2010. The staphylococcus-specific gene rsr represses agr and virulence in Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun 78:4384–4391.
    15.
    Tamber S, Cheung AL. 2009. SarZ promotes the expression of virulence factors and represses biofilm formation by modulating SarA and agr in Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun 77:419–428.
    16.
    Montgomery CP, Boyle-Vavra S, Daum RS. 2010. Importance of the global regulators Agr and SaeRS in the pathogenesis of CA-MRSA USA300 infection. PLoS One 5:e15177.
    17.
    Jenkins A, Diep BA, Mai TT, Vo NH, Warrener P, Suzich J, Stover CK, Sellman BR. 2015. Differential expression and roles of Staphylococcus aureus virulence determinants during colonization and disease. mBio 6:e02272-14.
    18.
    Tkaczyk C, Hamilton MM, Datta V, Yang XP, Hilliard JJ, Stephens GL, Sadowska A, Hua L, O'Day T, Suzich J, Stover CK, Sellman BR. 2013. Staphylococcus aureus alpha toxin suppresses effective innate and adaptive immune responses in a murine dermonecrosis model. PLoS One 8:e75103.
    19.
    Kennedy AD, Bubeck Wardenburg J, Gardner DJ, Long D, Whitney AR, Braughton KR, Schneewind O, DeLeo FR. 2010. Targeting of alpha-hemolysin by active or passive immunization decreases severity of USA300 skin infection in a mouse model. J Infect Dis 202:1050–1058.
    20.
    Tkaczyk C, Hua L, Varkey R, Shi Y, Dettinger L, Woods R, Barnes A, MacGill RS, Wilson S, Chowdhury P, Stover CK, Sellman BR. 2012. Identification of anti-alpha toxin monoclonal antibodies that reduce the severity of Staphylococcus aureus dermonecrosis and exhibit a correlation between affinity and potency. Clin Vaccine Immunol 19:377–385.
    21.
    Ragle BE, Bubeck Wardenburg J. 2009. Anti-alpha-hemolysin monoclonal antibodies mediate protection against Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia. Infect Immun 77:2712–2718.
    22.
    Adhikari RP, Ajao AO, Aman MJ, Karauzum H, Sarwar J, Lydecker AD, Johnson JK, Nguyen C, Chen WH, Roghmann MC. 2012. Lower antibody levels to Staphylococcus aureus exotoxins are associated with sepsis in hospitalized adults with invasive S. aureus infections. J Infect Dis 206:915–923.
    23.
    Fritz SA, Tiemann KM, Hogan PG, Epplin EK, Rodriguez M, Al-Zubeidi DN, Bubeck Wardenburg J, Hunstad DA. 2013. A serologic correlate of protective immunity against community-onset Staphylococcus aureus infection. Clin Infect Dis 56:1554–1561.
    24.
    Ruotsalainen E, Karden-Lilja M, Kuusela P, Vuopio-Varkila J, Virolainen-Julkunen A, Sarna S, Valtonen V, Jarvinen A. 2008. Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia and endocarditis among injection drug users and nonaddicts: host factors, microbiological and serological characteristics. J Infect 56:249–256.
    25.
    Hua L, Hilliard JJ, Shi Y, Tkaczyk C, Cheng LI, Yu X, Datta V, Ren S, Feng H, Zinsou R, Keller A, O'Day T, Du Q, Cheng L, Damschroder M, Robbie G, Suzich J, Stover CK, Sellman BR. 2014. Assessment of an anti-alpha-toxin monoclonal antibody for prevention and treatment of Staphylococcus aureus-induced pneumonia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:1108–1117.
    26.
    Ohlsen K, Lorenz U. 2010. Immunotherapeutic strategies to combat staphylococcal infections. Int J Med Microbiol 300:402–410.
    27.
    MedImmune. 2015. Study of the efficacy and safety of MEDI4893 (SAATELLITE). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02296320.
    28.
    Cohen TS, Hilliard JJ, Jones-Nelson O, Keller AE, O'Day T, Tkaczyk C, DiGiandomenico A, Hamilton M, Pelletier M, Wang Q, Diep BA, Le VT, Cheng L, Suzich J, Stover CK, Sellman BR. 2016. Staphylococcus aureus alpha toxin potentiates opportunistic bacterial lung infections. Sci Transl Med 8:329ra331.
    29.
    Hua L, Cohen TS, Shi Y, Datta V, Hilliard JJ, Tkaczyk C, Suzich J, Stover CK, Sellman BR. 2015. MEDI4893* promotes survival and extends the antibiotic treatment window in a Staphylococcus aureus immunocompromised pneumonia model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:4526–4532.
    30.
    Sharma-Kuinkel BK, Wu Y, Tabor DE, Mok H, Sellman BR, Jenkins A, Yu L, Jafri HS, Rude TH, Ruffin F, Schell WA, Park LP, Yan Q, Thaden JT, Messina JA, Fowler VG, Jr, Esser MT. 2015. Characterization of alpha-toxin hla gene variants, alpha-toxin expression levels, and levels of antibody to alpha-toxin in hemodialysis and postsurgical patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. J Clin Microbiol 53:227–236.
    31.
    Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P. 1998. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using Phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res 8:175–185.
    32.
    Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. 2011. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739.
    33.
    Saitou N, Nei M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425.
    34.
    Diep BA, Gill SR, Chang RF, Phan TH, Chen JH, Davidson MG, Lin F, Lin J, Carleton HA, Mongodin EF, Sensabaugh GF, Perdreau-Remington F. 2006. Complete genome sequence of USA300, an epidemic clone of community-acquired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet 367:731–739.
    35.
    Oganesyan V, Peng L, Damschroder MM, Cheng L, Sadowska A, Tkaczyk C, Sellman BR, Wu H, Dall'Acqua WF. 2014. Mechanisms of neutralization of a human anti-alpha-toxin antibody. J Biol Chem 289:29874–29880.
    36.
    Song L, Hobaugh MR, Shustak C, Cheley S, Bayley H, Gouaux JE. 1996. Structure of staphylococcal alpha-hemolysin, a heptameric transmembrane pore. Science 274:1859–1866.
    37.
    Cheung GY, Duong AC, Otto M. 2012. Direct and synergistic hemolysis caused by Staphylococcus phenol-soluble modulins: implications for diagnosis and pathogenesis. Microbes Infect 14:380–386.
    38.
    Wang R, Braughton KR, Kretschmer D, Bach TH, Queck SY, Li M, Kennedy AD, Dorward DW, Klebanoff SJ, Peschel A, DeLeo FR, Otto M. 2007. Identification of novel cytolytic peptides as key virulence determinants for community-associated MRSA. Nat Med 13:1510–1514.
    39.
    Monecke S, Muller E, Buchler J, Stieber B, Ehricht R. 2014. Staphylococcus aureus in vitro secretion of alpha toxin (hla) correlates with the affiliation to clonal complexes. PLoS One 9:e100427.
    40.
    Tavares A, Nielsen JB, Boye K, Rohde S, Paulo AC, Westh H, Schonning K, de Lencastre H, Miragaia M. 2014. Insights into alpha-hemolysin (Hla) evolution and expression among Staphylococcus aureus clones with hospital and community origin. PLoS One 9:e98634.
    41.
    Stulik L, Malafa S, Hudcova J, Rouha H, Henics BZ, Craven DE, Sonnevend AM, Nagy E. 2014. alpha-hemolysin activity of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus predicts ventilator-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 190:1139–1148.
    42.
    Novick RP, Geisinger E. 2008. Quorum sensing in staphylococci. Annu Rev Genet 42:541–564.
    43.
    Thoendel M, Kavanaugh JS, Flack CE, Horswill AR. 2011. Peptide signaling in the staphylococci. Chem Rev 111:117–151.
    44.
    O'Reilly M, Kreiswirth B, Foster TJ. 1990. Cryptic alpha-toxin gene in toxic shock syndrome and septicaemia strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Microbiol 4:1947–1955.
    45.
    McGavin MJ, Arsic B, Nickerson NN. 2012. Evolutionary blueprint for host- and niche-adaptation in Staphylococcus aureus clonal complex CC30. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2:48.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    Volume 60Number 9September 2016
    Pages: 5312 - 5321

    History

    Received: 15 February 2016
    29 March 2016
    Accepted: 14 June 2016
    Published online: 20 June 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Contributors

    Authors

    David E. Tabor
    Applied Immunology and Microbiology, MedImmune LLC, Mountain View, California, USA
    Li Yu
    Statistical Sciences, MedImmune LLC, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
    Hoyin Mok
    Applied Immunology and Microbiology, MedImmune LLC, Mountain View, California, USA
    Christine Tkaczyk
    Infectious Disease-Vaccine Research, MedImmune LLC, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
    Bret R. Sellman
    Infectious Disease-Vaccine Research, MedImmune LLC, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
    Yuling Wu
    Clinical Pharmacology and DMPK, MedImmune LLC, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
    Vaheh Oganesyan
    Antibody Discovery and Protein Engineering, MedImmune LLC, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
    Tim Slidel
    Research Bioinformatics, MedImmune LLC, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Hasan Jafri
    Infectious Disease Clinical Research, MedImmune LLC, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
    Michael McCarthy
    Infectious Disease Innovative Medicines, MedImmune LLC, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
    Patricia Bradford
    Global Medicines Development, AstraZeneca, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA
    Mark T. Esser
    Infectious Disease Innovative Medicines, MedImmune LLC, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA

    Notes

    Address correspondence to David E. Tabor, [email protected].

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

  • Antimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapyArticle
    Identifying Regimens Containing TBI-166, a New Drug Candidate against Mycobacterium tuberculosis In Vitro and In Vivo

    Identifying Regimens Containing TBI-166, a New Drug Candidate against Mycobacterium tuberculosis In Vitro and In Vivo

    ABSTRACT

    TBI-166, derived from riminophenazine analogues, is under development in a phase I clinical trial in China. TBI-166 showed more potent anti-tuberculosis (anti-TB) activity than did clofazimine in in vitro and animal experiments. To identify potent regimens containing TBI-166 in TB chemotherapy, TBI-166 was assessed for pharmacological interactions in vitro and in vivo with several anti-TB drugs, including isoniazid (INH), rifampin (RFP), bedaquiline (BDQ), pretomanid (PMD), linezolid (LZD), and pyrazinamide (PZA). Using an in vitro checkerboard method, we found that TBI-166 did not show antagonism or synergy with the tested drugs. The interaction relationship between TBI-166 and each drug was indifferent. In in vivo experiments, aerosol infection models with BALB/c and C3HeB/FeJNju mice were established, testing drugs were administered either individually or combined in treatments containing TBI-166 and one, two, or three other drugs, and the bactericidal activities were determined after 4- and 8-week therapeutic treatments. In BALB/c mice, five TBI-166-containing regimens—TBI-166+BDQ, TBI-166+PZA, TBI-166+BDQ+LZD, TBI-166+BDQ+PMD, and TBI-166+BDQ+PMD+LZD—showed significantly more potent efficacy after 4 weeks of treatment compared to the control regimen, INH+RFP+PZA. At the end of an 8-week treatment, lung log CFU counts decreased to undetectable levels in mice treated with each of the five regimens. The rank order of the potency of the five regimens was as follows: TBI-166+BDQ+LZD > TBI-166+BDQ > TBI-166+PZA > TBI-166+BDQ+PMD+LZD > TBI-166+BDQ+PMD. In C3HeB/FeJNju mice, TBI-166+BDQ+LZD was also the most effective of the TBI-166-containing regimens. In conclusion, five potent chemotherapy regimens that included TBI-166 were identified. The TBI-166+BDQ+LZD regimen is recommended for further testing in a TBI-166 phase IIb clinical trial.

    REFERENCES

    1.
    World Health Organization. 2017. Global tuberculosis report 2017. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
    2.
    Ahmad Khan F, Salim MAH, Du Cros P, Casas EC, Khamraev A, Sikhondze W, Benedetti A, Bastos M, Lan Z, Jaramillo E, Falzon D, Menzies D. 2017. Effectiveness and safety of standardised shorter regimens for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: individual patient data and aggregate data meta-analyses. Eur Respir J 50:1700061. Electronic).
    3.
    World Health Organization. 2016. Global tuberculosis report 2016. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
    4.
    Dey T, Brigden G, Cox H, Shubber Z, Cooke G, Ford N. 2013. Outcomes of clofazimine for the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother 68:284–293.
    5.
    Gopal M, Padayatchi N, Metcalfe JZ, O’Donnell MR. 2013. Systematic review of clofazimine for the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 17:1001–1007.
    6.
    Padayatchi N, Gopal M, Naidoo R, Werner L, Naidoo K, Master I, O’Donnell MR. 2014. Clofazimine in the treatment of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis with HIV coinfection in South Africa: a retrospective cohort study. J Antimicrob Chemother 69:3103–3107.
    7.
    Tyagi S, Ammerman NC, Li SY, Adamson J, Converse PJ, Swanson RV, Almeida DV, Grosset JH. 2015. Clofazimine shortens the duration of the first-line treatment regimen for experimental chemotherapy of tuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:869–874.
    8.
    Grosset JH, Tyagi S, Almeida DV, Converse PJ, Li SY, Ammerman NC, Bishai WR, Enarson D, Trebucq A. 2013. Assessment of clofazimine activity in a second-line regimen for tuberculosis in mice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 188:608–612.
    9.
    Xu J, Wang B, Fu L, Zhu H, Guo S, Huang H, Yin D, Zhang Y, Lu Y. 2019. In vitro and in vivo activities of the riminophenazine TBI-166 against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63:e02155-18.
    10.
    Lu Y, Zheng M, Wang B, Fu L, Zhao W, Li P, Xu J, Zhu H, Jin H, Yin D, Huang H, Upton AM, Ma Z. 2011. Clofazimine analogs with efficacy against experimental tuberculosis and reduced potential for accumulation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:5185–5193.
    11.
    Wada M. 2001. Effectiveness and problems of PZA-containing 6-month regimen for the treatment of new pulmonary tuberculosis patients. Kekkaku 76:33–43.
    12.
    Tasneen R, Betoudji F, Tyagi S, Li SY, Williams K, Converse PJ, Dartois V, Yang T, Mendel CM, Mdluli KE, Nuermberger EL. 2016. Contribution of oxazolidinones to the efficacy of novel regimens containing bedaquiline and pretomanid in a mouse model of tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:270–277.
    13.
    Ibrahim M, Andries K, Lounis N, Chauffour A, Truffot-Pernot C, Jarlier V, Veziris N. 2007. Synergistic activity of R207910 combined with pyrazinamide against murine tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:1011–1015.
    14.
    Driver ER, Ryan GJ, Hoff DR, Irwin SM, Basaraba RJ, Kramnik I, Lenaerts AJ. 2012. Evaluation of a mouse model of necrotic granuloma formation using C3HeB/FeJ mice for testing of drugs against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:3181–3195.
    15.
    Irwin SM, Gruppo V, Brooks E, Gilliland J, Scherman M, Reichlen MJ, Leistikow R, Kramnik I, Nuermberger EL, Voskuil MI, Lenaerts AJ. 2014. Limited activity of clofazimine as a single drug in a mouse model of tuberculosis exhibiting caseous necrotic granulomas. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:4026–4034.
    16.
    Tasneen R, Li SY, Peloquin CA, Taylor D, Williams KN, Andries K, Mdluli KE, Nuermberger EL. 2011. Sterilizing activity of novel TMC207- and PA-824-containing regimens in a murine model of tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:5485–5492.
    17.
    Williams K, Minkowski A, Amoabeng O, Peloquin CA, Taylor D, Andries K, Wallis RS, Mdluli KE, Nuermberger EL. 2012. Sterilizing activities of novel combinations lacking first- and second-line drugs in a murine model of tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:3114–3120.
    18.
    Maartens G, Brill MJE, Pandie M, Svensson EM. 2018. Pharmacokinetic interaction between bedaquiline and clofazimine in patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 22:26–29.
    19.
    Zhang Z, Li T, Qu G, Pang Y, Zhao Y. 2015. In vitro synergistic activity of clofazimine and other antituberculous drugs against multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates. Int J Antimicrob Agents 45:71–75.
    20.
    Xu J, Wang B, Hu M, Huo F, Guo S, Jing W, Nuermberger E, Lu Y. 2017. Primary clofazimine and bedaquiline resistance among isolates from patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e00239-17.
    21.
    Lechartier B, Hartkoorn RC, Cole ST. 2012. In vitro combination studies of benzothiazinone lead compound BTZ043 against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:5790–5793.
    22.
    Odds FC. 2003. Synergy, antagonism, and what the chequerboard puts between them. J Antimicrob Chemother 52:1.
    23.
    Grosset J, Truffot-Pernot C, Lacroix C, Ji B. 1992. Antagonism between isoniazid and the combination pyrazinamide-rifampin against tuberculosis infection in mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 36:548–551.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    Volume 63Number 7July 2019
    eLocator: e02496-18

    History

    Received: 28 November 2018
    4 February 2019
    Accepted: 15 April 2019
    Published online: 6 May 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    KEYWORDS

    1. BALB/c mice
    2. C3HeB/FeJNju mice
    3. TBI-166
    4. murine model
    5. tuberculosis

    Contributors

    Authors

    Ye Zhang
    Beijing Key Laboratory of Drug Resistance Tuberculosis Research, Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
    Hui Zhu
    Beijing Key Laboratory of Drug Resistance Tuberculosis Research, Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
    Lei Fu
    Beijing Key Laboratory of Drug Resistance Tuberculosis Research, Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
    Bin Wang
    Beijing Key Laboratory of Drug Resistance Tuberculosis Research, Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
    Shaochen Guo
    Beijing Key Laboratory of Drug Resistance Tuberculosis Research, Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
    Xi Chen
    Beijing Key Laboratory of Drug Resistance Tuberculosis Research, Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
    Zhongquan Liu
    Beijing Key Laboratory of Drug Resistance Tuberculosis Research, Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
    Haihong Huang
    Institute of Materia Medica, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
    Tianjian Yang
    Global Alliance for TB Drug Development, New York, New York, USA
    Yu Lu
    Beijing Key Laboratory of Drug Resistance Tuberculosis Research, Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

    Notes

    Address correspondence to Yu Lu, [email protected].
    Y.Z. and H.Z. contributed equally to this work.

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

There are no results at this time

American Society for Microbiology ("ASM") is committed to maintaining your confidence and trust with respect to the information we collect from you on websites owned and operated by ASM ("ASM Web Sites") and other sources. This Privacy Policy sets forth the information we collect about you, how we use this information and the choices you have about how we use such information.
FIND OUT MORE about the privacy policy