Generation of High Current Densities by Pure Cultures of Anode-Respiring Geoalkalibacter spp. under Alkaline and Saline Conditions in Microbial Electrochemical Cells
ABSTRACT
Anode-respiring bacteria (ARB) generate electric current in microbial electrochemical cells (MXCs) by channeling electrons from the oxidation of organic substrates to an electrode. Production of high current densities by monocultures in MXCs has resulted almost exclusively from the activity of Geobacter sulfurreducens, a neutrophilic freshwater Fe(III)-reducing bacterium and the highest-current-producing member documented for the Geobacteraceae family of the Deltaproteobacteria. Here we report high current densities generated by haloalkaliphilic Geoalkalibacter spp., thus broadening the capability for high anode respiration rates by including other genera within the Geobacteraceae. In this study, acetate-fed pure cultures of two related Geoalkalibacter spp. produced current densities of 5.0 to 8.3 and 2.4 to 3.3 A m−2 under alkaline (pH 9.3) and saline (1.7% NaCl) conditions, respectively. Chronoamperometric studies of halophilic Glk. subterraneus DSM 23483 and alkaliphilic Glk. ferrihydriticus DSM 17813 suggested that cells performed long-range electron transfer through electrode-attached biofilms and not through soluble electron shuttles. Glk. ferrihydriticus also oxidized ethanol directly to produce current, with maximum current densities of 5.7 to 7.1 A m−2 and coulombic efficiencies of 84 to 95%. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) elicited a sigmoidal response with characteristic onset, midpoint, and saturation potentials, while CV performed in the absence of an electron donor suggested the involvement of redox molecules in the biofilm that were limited by diffusion. These results matched those previously reported for actively respiring Gb. sulfurreducens biofilms producing similar current densities (~5 to 9 A m−2).
IMPORTANCE This study establishes the highest current densities ever achieved by pure cultures of anode-respiring bacteria (ARB) under alkaline and saline conditions in microbial electrochemical cells (MXCs) and provides the first electrochemical characterization of the genus Geoalkalibacter. Production of high current densities among the Geobacteraceae is no longer exclusive to Geobacter sulfurreducens, suggesting greater versatility for this family in fundamental and applied microbial electrochemical cell (MXC) research than previously considered. Additionally, this work raises the possibility that different members of the Geobacteraceae have conserved molecular mechanisms governing respiratory extracellular electron transfer to electrodes. Thus, the capacity for high current generation may exist in other uncultivated members of this family. Advancement of MXC technology for practical uses must rely on an expanded suite of ARB capable of using different electron donors and producing high current densities under various conditions. Geoalkalibacter spp. can potentially broaden the practical capabilities of MXCs to include energy generation and waste treatment under expanded ranges of salinity and pH.
Introduction
Anodes of microbial electrochemical cells (MXCs) exploit the anaerobic respiration capabilities of anode-respiring bacteria (ARB), which liberate electrons from the oxidation of organic compounds to solid electron acceptors located outside the cell. In nature, ARB perform extracellular electron transfer (EET) for respiration of insoluble Fe(III) and Mn(IV) oxides, and these bacteria are routinely enriched in current-generating anode biofilms in MXCs (1). Representatives span several phyla and are usually found in sediments and subsurface environments (2), where they harness energy available from oxidation of simple organic compounds coupled to reduction of solid electron acceptors (3). Members of the Geobacteraceae family of the Deltaproteobacteria have been well studied both for their omnipresence in high-current-producing MXCs (4, 5) and for their abundance in Fe(III)-reducing environments, which can vary greatly in temperature, salinity, and pH (6). However, Geobacteraceae members have shown poor conservation among the genes encoding outer membrane cytochromes that facilitate EET (7), in contrast to the conserved pathways for moving electrons past the outer membrane in metal-reducing Shewanella (8). This suggests that the Geobacteraceae family has evolved multiple molecular strategies for carrying out metal reduction, thereby maintaining a competitive advantage under different environmental conditions. Amperometric techniques using microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) and a potentiostat (9) can help elucidate these EET mechanisms. A poised anode facilitates real-time measurement of current generation (10), bacterial growth and respiration kinetics (11), rate-limiting processes in electron and mass transport (12, 13), gene expression profiles (14), and redox properties of electron shuttles and whole biofilms (15).
Alkaline Fe(III) reduction has been reported primarily for several low-G+C Gram-positive bacteria (16–18). Many of these microorganisms have been isolated from soda lakes (19), where they influence Fe biogeochemistry under elevated salinity and pH values sometimes exceeding pH 12. Respiratory Fe(III) reduction has been documented for the alkaliphilic isolates Bacillus infernus, Alkaliphilus metalliredigens, and Anaerobacillus arseniciselenatis (16, 17, 20) and for all genera belonging to the Geobacteraceae, with the exception of Pelobacter (21). The characterization of Geoalkalibacter ferrihydriticus DSM 17813, another soda lake isolate, expanded on the well-studied metal-reducing capabilities of the Geobacteraceae to include Fe(III) reduction up to pH 10 (22). More recently, isolation of the halophilic but neutrophilic Geoalkalibacter subterraneus strain DSM 23483 led to a broadening of the Geoalkalibacter genus description to include nonalkaliphiles (23). Geoalkalibacter spp. appear to form a distinct phylogenetic branch within the Geobacteraceae and are closely related to the halophilic Desulfuromonas clade, in agreement with Geoalkalibacter spp. having high salt tolerance (22, 23). However, the only physiological feature shared between Glk. ferrihydriticus and Glk. subterraneus is their ability to couple complete oxidation of simple organic molecules to reduction of Fe(III) and Mn(IV) oxides.
We previously identified Geoalkalibacter 16S rRNA gene sequences in enrichments from current-producing microbial electrolysis cells (5, 24). Therefore, we evaluated Glk. ferrihydriticus DSM 17813 and Glk. subterraneus DSM 23483 for current generation using poised electrodes under alkaline (pH 9.3) or saline (1.7% NaCl) conditions, respectively. Electrochemical characterizations established benchmarks for growth, anode respiration kinetics, and substrate utilization against other well-studied ARB. Production of high current densities, which we define as >1 A m−2 (25), now extends to haloalkaliphiles and provides further microbiological insight into the diversity of EET in the Geobacteraceae family. In addition, this work reinforces the potential for novel ARB in broadening the range of practical applications for MXCs.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Chronoamperometry.
Figure 1 shows Glk. subterraneus producing current using anodes poised at +0.04 V under saline conditions at pH ~7.2 within 3 days postinoculation. Cells initially grew with an estimated doubling time of 8.4 h (Fig. 1, inset), a value slightly lower than the ~6-h doubling time reported for Geobacter sulfurreducens respiring electrodes or soluble Fe(III) (11). After 6 days, the current density (based on anode surface area) reached 1.9 A m−2, and visibly thick anode biofilms appeared. To investigate whether current production resulted from attached cells, we replaced the bulk medium on day 8. Anodic current resumed immediately after medium replacement (Fig. 1), indicating that anode biofilms, not planktonic cells or redox shuttles, were responsible for current production. The coulombic efficiency (CE) for acetate-fed Glk. subterraneus biofilms ranged from 55 to 119%, with lower values occurring during growth (days 0 to 7) and higher values during stable current production (days 20 to 30). These results suggest that Glk. subterraneus may accumulate intracellular storage polymers during growth and oxidize these reserves once biofilms are established and current remains steady (Fig. 1).
FIG 1
Although high salt concentrations can improve MXC performance by increasing conductivity and lowering internal resistance, recent work has demonstrated that NaCl concentrations of >1% led to inhibition of ARB and decreased CE (26). The fact that Glk. subterraneus prefers saline conditions and uses several organic electron donors (23) makes it an appealing candidate for energy generation from saline wastewaters. Replicate experiments with Glk. subterraneus produced stable current over 30 days and maximum current densities of 2.4 to 3.3 A m−2, establishing the highest current densities reported for a pure culture of an ARB under saline conditions.
Glk. ferrihydriticus produced electricity in MECs operated under alkaline conditions (pH 9.3), emerging as the first example of an alkaliphilic ARB within the Geobacteraceae (Fig. 2). Glk. ferrihydriticus generated maximum current densities of 5.0 to 8.3 A m−2, values similar to the those reported for Gb. sulfurreducens at neutral pH (5 to 9 A m−2) (27, 28) and much higher than those observed in alkaline microbial fuel cells with mixed communities (29, 30). Glk. ferrihydriticus channeled 85 to 95% of the electrons from acetate to current, thereby achieving a CE similar to that of acetate-fed Gb. sulfurreducens biofilms under strictly anoxic conditions (31). Figure 2 (inset) shows exponential growth of Glk. ferrihydriticus at a poised potential of +0.07 V, with an estimated doubling time (7.5 h) similar to that for Glk. subterraneus, suggesting that utilization of the anode as a respiratory electron acceptor was directly coupled to cell growth. The current density decreased in response to scraping off a section of attached Glk. ferrihydriticus cells and increased when remaining cells recolonized the exposed electrode surface (Fig. 2). Medium replacement did not disrupt current production by Glk. ferrihydriticus. Thus, cell-electrode attachment and biofilm formation govern EET to anodes for Geoalkalibacter spp. in a fashion similar to that of the anode respiration scheme employed by Gb. sulfurreducens. Comparison of current: biomass ratios for the determination of biofilm development as a function of respiration rates (11) will be the subject of future investigations.
FIG 2
The fact that Glk. ferrihydriticus produced higher current densities and CE than Glk. subterraneus is perhaps not surprising given the wide range of electron acceptors used by Glk. subterraneus (23). In contrast, Glk. ferrihydriticus has been reported primarily to reduce insoluble electron acceptors, suggesting its metabolic machinery is finely tuned for obtaining energy available from coupling oxidation of simple organic molecules to reduction of extracellular Fe(III). The diversity of outer membrane cytochromes among the Geobacteraceae (7) supports the hypothesis that differences in EET machinery associated with utilization of insoluble electron acceptors may be the ultimate factors in determining anode respiration capabilities.
Current generation from ethanol.
Glk. ferrihydriticus can couple ethanol oxidation to Fe(III) reduction (22). To evaluate utilization of ethanol as an electron donor in MECs, Glk. ferrihydriticus cells were cultured twice on 10 mM ethanol and 60 mM Fe(III) oxide and inoculated into MECs poised at +0.07 V. Figure 3 shows current generation under alkaline conditions by Glk. ferrihydriticus fed 10 mM ethanol as the sole electron donor. Cells grew on electrodes with an initial doubling time slightly faster (6.9 h) than when fed acetate (7.5 h) and produced 2.6 A m−2 before acetate was detected as a by-product of ethanol oxidation (Fig. 3). We confirmed using terminal restriction length fragment polymorphism (T-RFLP) that the appearance of acetate was not a result of contamination (data not shown). Medium replacement had a positive effect on current generation, providing further evidence that accumulation of acetate was not a requirement for cells to perform anode respiration and that cells rapidly metabolized ethanol to produce current. Maximum current densities in two independent growth experiments reached 5.7 to 7.1 A m−2 when both ethanol and acetate were present, and Glk. ferrihydriticus eventually channeled 84 to 95% of electrons from ethanol to current by also consuming any acetate produced (Fig. 3; see also Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Glk. ferrihydriticus cells did not grow fermentatively in culture tubes lacking an electron acceptor when fed 10 mM ethanol, and acetate was not detected (data not shown). Other Geobacteraceae genomes (32) suggest that ethanol is oxidized to acetate via acetaldehyde, raising the possibility that a conserved pathway may exist in Glk. ferrihydriticus.
FIG 3
These results establish the highest current densities and CEs reported for an ethanol-fed pure culture of MXCs. In mixed communities, fermentation of ethanol to acetate and H2 can result in low CE (33) unless competing electron sinks, such as methanogenesis, are inhibited (34). Ethanol-fed current densities similar to those produced by Glk. ferrihydriticus have been reported for defined cocultures (35) and mixed consortia (36). However, these resulted from efficient acetate oxidation by bacteria closely related to Gb. sulfurreducens and not from direct ethanol oxidation by ARB. In addition, none of the described Gram-positive alkaliphilic respiratory Fe(III) reducers can utilize ethanol as an electron donor. Thus, Geoalkalibacter spp. could emerge as model anaerobes for understanding extracellular respiratory pathways for obtaining energy from fermentable substrates under alkaline or saline conditions.
Anode respiration kinetics.
Electrochemical measurements of living anode biofilms are indispensable in elucidating respiration kinetics of ARB (10). Low-scan-rate cyclic voltammetry (LSCV) applies gradual changes in anode potential in the presence of a substrate such that biofilms achieve steady-state current production at each potential (37). Figure 4A shows classic sigmoidal behavior for Gb. sulfurreducens biofilms scanned by LSCV under substrate turnover conditions (38), with anodic current appearing slightly above the half-reaction potential (E°′) of the electron donor (acetate, E°′ = −0.28 V), inflecting at a half-saturation potential of −0.15 V, and saturating at maximum current density around 0 V.
FIG 4
Cyclic voltammograms (CVs) of acetate-fed Glk. ferrihydriticus biofilms after 12 days of growth at pH 9.3 showed a sigmoidal curve reaching a saturation potential (~0 V) similar to that for a laboratory Geobacter isolate highly similar to Gb. sulfurreducens (Fig. 4A; see the supplemental methods in Text S1). However, the catalytic wave of Glk. ferrihydriticus had a smaller slope due to cells achieving a significantly lower open circuit potential (−0.37 V versus −0.25 V for Geobacter; E = −0.42 V for acetate at pH 9). The negative shift of ~120 mV in open circuit potential closely matches the dependence of redox potentials on pH, according to the Nernst equation; half-reaction potentials should become 59 mV more negative with each pH unit increase at room temperature. As a consequence of the lower open circuit potential, the half-saturation potential for Glk. ferrihydriticus was −0.21 V, 60 mV more negative than that of Gb. sulfurreducens (10) and the lowest half-saturation potential reported to date for any ARB. CVs generated when ethanol was the substrate showed a sigmoidal catalytic wave nearly identical to that of acetate-fed cells (Fig. 4B). However, the open circuit potential with ethanol (−0.41 V) was ~40 mV more negative than that with acetate, in agreement with ethanol being a more reduced substrate (E = −0.46 V at pH 9). These results suggest that the open circuit potential of ARB is achieved through equilibrium with the electron donor and not with intracellular redox cofactors, such as NADH. In its apparent ability to capture more energy from respiration by generating current over a wider potential window, Glk. ferrihydriticus may enjoy a competitive advantage in a natural Fe(III)-reducing environment at pH 9 in which the donor half-reaction potentials shift ~120 mV more negative but reduction potentials of insoluble Fe(III) phases could remain variable (39).
CV performed on Glk. ferrihydriticus biofilms in the absence of substrates (nonturnover CV) produced peaks whose intensity increased at higher scan rates (Fig. 5). The height of reversible peaks near −0.08 V in the forward scan showed a linear dependence on the square root of the scan rate. Such a relationship is a hallmark of films containing bound redox molecules exchanging electrons via collisions or interprotein transfer reactions, creating diffusion-like behavior (37). The fact that similar behavior has been observed for Gb. sulfurreducens biofilms (11) raises the possibility that similar mechanisms of electron transfer within biofilms exist in different members of the Geobacteraceae.
FIG 5
CVs of acetate-fed Glk. subterraneus biofilms started from more-positive open circuit potentials (−0.27 to −0.28 V) and exhibited different behavior depending on the growth stage (Fig. 6). After 7 days, forward and reverse voltammograms were asymmetrical and nonsigmoidal, and multiple redox peaks appeared across the 0.7-V potential window scanned (Fig. 6A). These peaks began to gradually disappear 4 days later, when only a single prominent peak near −0.13 V remained and biofilms sustained a more-stable saturation current above −0.1 V (Fig. 6B). After prolonged incubation (36 days), peaks were no longer visible, and mature biofilms (Fig. 6C) eventually yielded a classic sigmoidal catalytic wave with a half-saturation potential of −0.19 V, roughly ~40 mV more negative than that of Gb. sulfurreducens. Similar maturation of CVs over time was confirmed in subsequent Glk. subterraneus growth experiments (data not shown). Therefore, at least some of the molecular machinery used by halophilic Glk. subterraneus for establishing electron transfer to the anode during early stages of attachment and growth seems to be different from that employed not only by mature biofilms but also by Glk. ferrihydriticus and Gb. sulfurreducens. These results provide further evidence for the Geobacteraceae possessing a broad range of functionally redundant strategies for accomplishing extracellular respiration under diverse environmental conditions.
FIG 6
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
Both Glk. subterraneus and Glk. ferrihydriticus formed anode biofilms several micrometers thick whose ultrastructure resembled that of Gb. sulfurreducens (Fig. 7) (40). Throughout the Glk. subterraneus biofilm, cells were surrounded by web-like extracellular material, some of which appeared to condense into long filaments (see Fig. S2a and b in the supplemental material), possibly as a result of sample preparation (41). In contrast, components of the extracellular matrix, such as proteins and polysaccharides, which have been shown to assist in anchoring c-type cytochromes in Gb. sulfurreducens biofilms (42), were not abundant within Glk. ferrihydriticus biofilms but rather seemed to accumulate as an amorphous layer of densely packed globular material encapsulating the entire electrode surface (see Fig. S2c to e). Cells closest to this layer appeared to establish a physical connection with extracellular filaments resembling those observed in Gb. sulfurreducens (43). However, much more information about the physiology of Glk. ferrihydriticus is needed before specific components of the EET pathway can be identified.
FIG 7
Physiological and practical implications for Geoalkalibacter.
Geoalkalibacter spp., along with most other genera within the Geobacteraceae, share the ability to respire insoluble, extracellular electron acceptors using electrons derived from the complete oxidation of simple organic substrates. Phylogenetic clustering indicates that distinct lineages evolved to perform this metabolism across a range of salinity, since Geobacter spp. prefer freshwater environments while Desulfuromonas and Desulfuromusa exist in marine habitats (6). The discovery of Glk. ferrihydriticus suggested that other members of the Geobacteraceae also evolved to take advantage of alkaline environments, such as soda lakes, which can vary in their salinity (19). The fact that both Glk. ferrihydriticus and Glk. subterraneus can grow in saline environments agrees with their close relationship to Desulfuromonas (23). It is possible that the capacity for alkaline extracellular respiration by Glk. ferrihydriticus may have evolved as a specialized extension of a halotolerant lifestyle, but characterization of other alkaliphilic representatives of the Geobacteraceae is needed before such evolutionary patterns can be discerned.
Metal-reducing Geobacteraceae face several bioenergetic challenges in extracellular respiration given the small amounts of free energy available and the charge imbalance generated from passing electrons outside the cell (44). These hurdles are potentially magnified under alkaline and saline conditions, since cells must also invest energy in maintaining intracellular pH and osmolarity (45). CE can serve as an extracellular indicator of intracellular energy demands, since directing a high fraction of electrons to respiration maintains sufficient proton motive force to drive energy-intensive processes such as ion pumping. Differences in CE values for Glk. ferrihydriticus and Glk. subterraneus suggest that pH and salinity might manifest differently in terms of the energetic burden borne by cells performing anode respiration. More likely, however, these values arise from differences in molecular machinery for conducting electrons from cells to the anode surface. Genome sequences of Geoalkalibacter spp. are needed to further explore the genetic elements shared across the Geobacteraceae and those unique to Geoalkalibacter, such as genes for high pH and salt tolerance and utilization of higher substrates. Such a comparative genomics approach could reveal whether a set of core genes is in fact conserved in members of the Geobacteraceae capable of producing high current, since this capability is no longer exclusive to Gb. sulfurreducens.
The production of high current densities using Geoalkalibacter spp. broadens the potential applications for MXCs to include direct current generation from ethanol and from treatment of saline (26) and alkaline wastewaters, such as those produced in the textile and brewing industries (46, 47). Cathodic processes in MXCs lead to elevated pH and thus a thermodynamic decrease in cathode potential (48); a possible advantage for alkaline MXCs is that some of this potential loss can be recovered by ARB capable of current generation at lower anode potentials. While breakdown of complex wastes might best be accomplished by mixed cultures of other halophilic and alkaliphilic bacteria, Geoalkalibacter spp. already possess greater metabolic versatility than Gb. sulfurreducens. Glk. subterraneus could potentially oxidize substrates not previously studied with pure cultures in MXCs, such as propionate, butyrate, and higher fatty acids, directly to current without the need for fermentative partners. Further investigation is justified in order to affirm the potential benefits for Geoalkalibacter spp. in fundamental and applied MXC research.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Strains and culture conditions.
We obtained Geoalkalibacter ferrihydriticus DSM 17813T and Geoalkalibacter subterraneus DSM 23483T from the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSMZ). The cultures (10 ml; 1:10 inoculum) were maintained in butyl rubber-stoppered Hungate tubes containing the recommended anoxic mineral medium for each organism. We flushed the headspaces with either ultra-high-purity N2 or 80:20 N2-CO2 for Glk. ferrihydriticus and Glk. subterraneus, respectively. Glk. ferrihydriticus medium (pH 9.3) contained (per liter of deionized water) the following: 0.5 g NH4Cl, 0.2 g KCl, 0.1 g MgCl2 ⋅ 6H2O, 0.2 g KH2PO4, 1 g NaCl, 0.1 g yeast extract, 1 ml selenite-tungstate solution (49), 1 ml trace mineral solution (49), 3 g Na 2CO3, 10 g NaHCO3, and 1.36 g sodium acetate trihydrate (22). Glk. subterraneus medium (pH 7.2) contained (per liter of deionized water) the following: 17 g NaCl, 4.5 g MgCl2 ⋅ 6H2O, 0.35 g CaCl2 ⋅ 2H2O, 1 g NH4Cl, 0.08 g KH2PO4, 1 ml selenite-tungstate solution, 1 ml trace mineral solution, 3.5 g sodium bicarbonate, 1.36 g sodium acetate trihydrate, and 3 g yeast extract (23). Sterile, anoxic stock solutions of carbonates and yeast extract were added aseptically to autoclaved, cooled media. Cultures of both Geoalkalibacter spp. were amended with 50 mM Fe(III) oxide as the electron acceptor from a sterile, anoxic stock solution prepared as previously described (50). Incubation temperatures were 30 and 40°C in all experiments for Glk. ferrihydriticus and Glk. subterraneus, respectively. An isolate of Geobacter closely related to Gb. sulfurreducens was grown on electrodes as described in the supplemental methods in Text S1.
For MEC experiments, we used the same medium compositions as above with the following modifications: acetate was increased to 20 mM, all electron acceptors were omitted, and yeast extract was replaced with 5 ml/liter Wolfe’s vitamin solution (ATCC, Manassas, VA). Media had conductivities of 14.9 mS cm−1 and 38.9 mS cm−1 for Glk. ferrihydriticus and Glk. subterraneus, respectively, as measured with a digital conductivity meter (Oakton Instruments, Vernon Hills, IL). We performed two independent growth tests with Glk. ferrihydriticus using ethanol as the electron donor in medium containing 10 mM absolute ethanol in lieu of acetate.
MEC construction, inoculation, and operation.
To maintain strict control over the anode, we constructed dual-chamber H-type microbial electrolysis cells (350-ml anode volume) with two graphite rod anodes (5.3-cm2 total area) as previously described (34) and sterilized them by autoclaving. We polished anodes to a smooth surface by sanding with 600-grit followed by 1,500-grit aluminum oxide-silicon carbide sandpaper (McMaster-Carr). Pieces of anion exchange membrane (AMI 7001; Membranes International, Inc.) were autoclaved while submerged in 3 M NaCl and inserted after autoclaving. An Ag/AgCl reference electrode (BASi, West Lafayette, IN) was dipped in 70% (vol/vol) ethanol, flicked dry, and inserted into anode chambers. The cathode contained a sterile, anoxic NaOH solution (pH 12.5). We filled the reactors in a biosafety cabinet by flowing pressurized media through sterile Norprene tubing (Cole Parmer, Vernon Hills, IL). Before inoculation, we flushed the cathodes with N2 and anodes with filtered (0.22-µm-pore-size) gas appropriate for the organism as described above. For Glk. ferrihydriticus experiments, NH4Cl was added to anode chambers after gas flushing to prevent loss as NH3 gas (pKa = 9.26). Anode chambers were agitated constantly at 150 rpm by magnetic stirring.
To promote utilization of anodes as electron acceptors, we cultured Geoalkalibacter cells in medium containing a limiting concentration of 50 mM Fe(III) oxide, and 6 ml of stationary-phase cultures were used to inoculate two independent MECs (~1:60 inoculum). To inoculate two subsequent independent growth experiments, we scraped a small biofilm section (~2 mm2) using a needle into 1 ml sterile medium in an anaerobic chamber (Coy Laboratory Products, Grass Lake, MI) and used 0.1 ml of this cell suspension as the inoculum. We performed bulk medium replacement in the anaerobic chamber by transferring the anode and reference electrode to a clean MEC containing sterile medium.
Chronoamperometry and cyclic voltammetry.
Anodes were poised using a VMP3 digital potentiostat (Bio-Logic USA, Knoxville, TN) at −0.2 V versus Ag/AgCl (+0.07 V and +0.04 V versus a standard hydrogen electrode [SHE] for Glk. ferrihydriticus and Glk. subterraneus, respectively), making the conversion from Ag/AgCl to SHE based on the ionic strength of each medium as described previously (24). Cyclic voltammograms (CVs) were collected after anodes reached open circuit potential, and two consecutive forward and reverse voltage sweeps at a scan rate of 1 mV s−1 were recorded over a potential window of −0.6 to +0.1 V (for Glk. subterraneus) or −0.7 to +0.1 V versus Ag/AgCl (for Glk. ferrihydriticus) with the second sweep shown. We corrected the CVs by measuring Ohmic loss (iR drop) between the working and reference electrodes (27) by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) immediately after performing the CV. Unless noted, all potentials are reported versus SHE.
We performed CV in the absence of electron donors (nonturnover CV) (37) by transferring established Glk. ferrihydriticus biofilms grown to maximum current density (>6 A m−2) to substrate-free medium and incubating until current decayed to baseline levels. CVs for two independent experiments were recorded as described above, with biofilms scanned at successively higher rates (1, 5, 10, 50, and 100 mV s−1).
Estimation of specific growth rate.
Exponential growth of bacteria in terms of current density (i), assuming that doubling time is constant during this period (10), can be expressed as a function of specific growth rate (μ) and time (t), i = i0 exp(μt), which simplifies to ln(i/i0) = μt. By plotting the natural logarithm of current density versus time and performing linear regression for the initial growth period, we estimated the values for μ from the slope of the regression line.
Chemical and molecular analyses.
pH was measured with a microelectrode pH probe (Cole Parmer) and digital pH meter (Thermo Scientific). Concentrations of acetate and ethanol were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) as previously described (34). We calculated coulombic efficiency, defined as the percentage of electrons present in the substrate that are recovered as current (34), by comparing HPLC measurements at different time points with net charge recorded by the potentiostat over the same time interval. For ethanol-fed experiments, we calculated the coulombic efficiency based on electrons recovered over the entire time course.
We confirmed culture purity at the beginning and end of experiments by light microscopy using a 100× oil immersion objective and differential interference contrast (DIC) optics. In addition, we extracted DNA from scraped biofilm samples (see above), and 16S rRNA genes were amplified and analyzed using terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) as previously described in detail (51).
Scanning electron microscopy.
We fixed anodes at 4°C overnight in 2% glutaraldehyde, postfixed in 1% OsO4 for 1 h at room temperature, and dehydrated in a graded acetone series. Critical point-dried samples were mounted on aluminum stubs, sputter coated with Au/Pd, and imaged on an XL-30 environmental SEM (Philips) with an accelerating voltage of 10 kV and a working distance of 7 to 8 mm.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We acknowledge Oluyomi Ajulo for assistance with reactor setup and David Lowry for SEM sample preparation. We thank the anonymous second reviewer for providing exceptionally detailed and constructive contributions to the manuscript.
J.P.B. was supported in part by Science to Achieve Results (STAR) fellowship no. FP91715201-0, awarded by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). R.K.-B. was partially supported by National Science Foundation CAREER Award 1053939. C.I.T. was partially supported by Office of Naval Research grant no. N000141210344. Additional support was provided by the Swette Center for Environmental Biotechnology at Arizona State University.
Supplemental Material
REFERENCES
1.
Jung S and Regan JM. 2007. Comparison of anode bacterial communities and performance in microbial fuel cells with different electron donors. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 77:393–402.
2.
Weber KA, Achenbach LA, and Coates JD. 2006. Microorganisms pumping iron: anaerobic microbial iron oxidation and reduction. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4:752–764.
3.
Bird LJ, Bonnefoy V, and Newman DK. 2011. Bioenergetic challenges of microbial iron metabolisms. Trends Microbiol. 19:330–340.
4.
Torres CI, Krajmalnik-Brown R, Parameswaran P, Marcus AK, Wanger G, Gorby YA, and Rittmann BE. 2009. Selecting anode-respiring bacteria based on anode potential: phylogenetic, electrochemical, and microscopic characterization. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43:9519–9524.
5.
Miceli JF, Parameswaran P, Kang DW, Krajmalnik-Brown R, and Torres CI. 2012. Enrichment and analysis of anode-respiring bacteria from diverse anaerobic inocula. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46:10349–10355.
6.
Holmes D, Nevin K, and Lovley D. 2004. Comparison of 16S rRNA, nifD, recA, gyrB, rpoB and fusA genes within the family Geobacteraceae fam. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 54:1591–1599.
7.
Butler JE, Young ND, and Lovley DR. 2010. Evolution of electron transfer out of the cell: comparative genomics of six Geobacter genomes. BMC Genomics 11:40. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-40.
8.
Hartshorne RS, Reardon CL, Ross D, Nuester J, Clarke TA, Gates AJ, Mills PC, Fredrickson JK, Zachara JM, Shi L, Beliaev AS, Marshall MJ, Tien M, Brantley S, Butt JN, and Richardson DJ. 2009. Characterization of an electron conduit between bacteria and the extracellular environment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106:22169–22174.
9.
Harnisch F and Rabaey K. 2012. The diversity of techniques to study electrochemically active biofilms highlights the need for standardization. ChemSusChem 5:1027–1038.
10.
Marsili E, Rollefson JB, Baron DB, Hozalski RM, and Bond DR. 2008. Microbial biofilm voltammetry: direct electrochemical characterization of catalytic electrode-attached biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:7329–7337.
11.
Marsili E, Sun J, and Bond DR. 2010. Voltammetry and growth physiology of Geobacter sulfurreducens biofilms as a function of growth stage and imposed electrode potential. Electroanalysis 22:865–874.
12.
Torres CI, Kato Marcus A, and Rittmann BE. 2008. Proton transport inside the biofilm limits electrical current generation by anode-respiring bacteria. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 100:872–881.
13.
Bonanni PS, Schrott GD, Robuschi L, and Busalmen JP. 2012. Charge accumulation and electron transfer kinetics in Geobacter sulfurreducens biofilms. Energy Environ. Sci. 5:6188–6195.
14.
Franks AE, Glaven RH, and Lovley DR. 2012. Real-time spatial gene expression analysis within current-producing biofilms. ChemSusChem 5:1092–1098.
15.
Liu Y and Bond DR. 2012. Long-distance electron transfer by G. sulfurreducens biofilms results in accumulation of reduced c-type cytochromes. ChemSusChem 5:1047–1053.
16.
Switzer Blum J, Burns Bindi A, Buzzelli J, Stolz JF, and Oremland RS. 1998. Bacillus arsenicoselenatis sp. nov., and Bacillus selenitireducens, sp. nov.: two haloalkaliphiles from Mono Lake, California that respire oxyanions of selenium and arsenic. Arch. Microbiol. 171:19–30.
17.
Ye Q, Roh Y, Carroll SL, Blair B, Zhou J, Zhang CL, and Fields MW. 2004. Alkaline anaerobic respiration: isolation and characterization of a novel alkaliphilic and metal-reducing bacterium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:5595–5602.
18.
Gorlenko V, Tsapin A, Namsaraev Z, Teal T, Tourova T, Engler D, Mielke R, and Nealson K. 2004. Anaerobranca californiensis sp. nov., an anaerobic, alkalithermophilic, fermentative bacterium isolated from a hot spring on Mono Lake. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 54:739–743.
19.
Pollock J, Weber KA, Lack J, Achenbach LA, Mormile MR, and Coates JD. 2007. Alkaline iron(III) reduction by a novel alkaliphilic, halotolerant, Bacillus sp. isolated from salt flat sediments of Soap Lake. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 77:927–934.
20.
Boone DR, Liu Y, Zhao ZJ, Balkwill DL, Drake GR, Stevens TO, and Aldrich HC. 1995. Bacillus infernus sp. nov., an Fe(III)- and Mn(IV)-reducing anaerobe from the deep terrestrial subsurface. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 45:441–448.
21.
Butler JE, Young ND, and Lovley DR. 2009. Evolution from a respiratory ancestor to fill syntrophic and fermentative niches: comparative genomics of six Geobacteraceae species. BMC Genomics 10:103. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-103.
22.
Zavarzina DG, Kolganova TV, Boulygina ES, Kostrikina NA, Tourova TP, and Zavarzin GA. 2006. Geoalkalibacter ferrihydriticus gen. nov. sp. nov., the first alkaliphilic representative of the family Geobacteraceae, isolated from a soda lake. Microbiology 75:673–682.
23.
Greene AC, Patel BKC, and Yacob S. 2009. Geoalkalibacter subterraneus sp. nov., an anaerobic Fe(III)- and Mn(IV)-reducing bacterium from a petroleum reservoir, and emended descriptions of the family Desulfuromonadaceae and the genus Geoalkalibacter. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 59:781–785.
24.
Badalamenti JP, Torres CI, and Krajmalnik-Brown R. 2013. Light-responsive current generation by phototrophically enriched anode biofilms dominated by green sulfur bacteria. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 110:1020–1027.
25.
Torres CI, Marcus AK, Lee HS, Parameswaran P, Krajmalnik-Brown R, and Rittmann BE. 2010. A kinetic perspective on extracellular electron transfer by anode-respiring bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 34:3–17.
26.
Lefebvre O, Tan Z, Kharkwal S, and Ng HY. 2012. Effect of increasing anodic NaCl concentration on microbial fuel cell performance. Bioresour. Technol. 112:336–340.
27.
Katuri KP, Rengaraj S, Kavanagh P, O’Flaherty V, and Leech D. 2012. Charge transport through Geobacter sulfurreducens biofilms grown on graphite rods. Langmuir 28:7904–7913.
28.
Malvankar NS, Tuominen MT, and Lovley DR. 2012. Biofilm conductivity is a decisive variable for high-current-density Geobacter sulfurreducens microbial fuel cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 5:5790–5797.
29.
Zhuang L, Zhou S, Li Y, and Yuan Y. 2010. Enhanced performance of air-cathode two-chamber microbial fuel cells with high-pH anode and low-pH cathode. Bioresour. Technol. 101:3514–3519.
30.
Yuan Y, Chen Q, Zhou S, Zhuang L, and Hu P. 2011. Improved electricity production from sewage sludge under alkaline conditions in an insert-type air-cathode microbial fuel cell. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 87:80–86.
31.
Nevin KP, Richter H, Covalla SF, Johnson JP, Woodard TL, Orloff AL, Jia H, Zhang M, and Lovley DR. 2008. Power output and coulombic efficiencies from biofilms of Geobacter sulfurreducens comparable to mixed community microbial fuel cells. Environ. Microbiol. 10:2505–2514.
32.
Aklujkar M, Krushkal J, DiBartolo G, Lapidus A, Land ML, and Lovley DR. 2009. The genome sequence of Geobacter metallireducens: features of metabolism, physiology and regulation common and dissimilar to Geobacter sulfurreducens. BMC Microbiol. 9:109. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-9-109.
33.
Torres CI, Marcus AK, and Rittmann BE. 2007. Kinetics of consumption of fermentation products by anode-respiring bacteria. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 77:689–697.
34.
Parameswaran P, Torres CI, Lee HS, Krajmalnik-Brown R, and Rittmann BE. 2009. Syntrophic interactions among anode respiring bacteria (ARB) and non-ARB in a biofilm anode: electron balances. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 103:513–523.
35.
Richter H, Lanthier M, Nevin KP, and Lovley DR. 2007. Lack of electricity production by Pelobacter carbinolicus indicates that the capacity for Fe(III) oxide reduction does not necessarily confer electron transfer ability to fuel cell anodes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:5347–5353.
36.
Parameswaran P, Zhang H, Torres CI, Rittmann BE, and Krajmalnik-Brown R. 2010. Microbial community structure in a biofilm anode fed with a fermentable substrate: the significance of hydrogen scavengers. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 105:69–78.
37.
LaBelle E and Bond DR. 2009. Cyclic voltammetry for the study of microbial electron transfer at electrodes, p 137–152. In Rabaey K, Angenent L, Schröder U, and Keller J, Bioelectrochemical systems: from extracellular electron transfer to biotechnological application. IWA Publishing, London, United Kingdom.
38.
Strycharz-Glaven SM and Tender LM. 2012. Study of the mechanism of catalytic activity of G. sulfurreducens biofilm anodes during biofilm growth. ChemSusChem 5:1106–1118.
39.
Hansel CM and Lentini CJ. 2011. Mineralogical controls on microbial reduction of Fe(III) (hydr)oxides, p 93–115. In Stolz J and Oremland R, Microbial metal and metalloid metabolism: advances and applications. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
40.
Bond DR and Lovley DR. 2003. Electricity production by Geobacter sulfurreducens attached to electrodes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:1548–1555.
41.
Dohnalkova AC, Marshall MJ, Arey BW, Williams KH, Buck EC, and Fredrickson JK. 2011. Imaging hydrated microbial extracellular polymers: comparative analysis by electron microscopy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77:1254–1262.
42.
Rollefson JB, Stephen CS, Tien M, and Bond DR. 2011. Identification of an extracellular polysaccharide network essential for cytochrome anchoring and biofilm formation in Geobacter sulfurreducens. J. Bacteriol. 193:1023–1033.
43.
Malvankar NS and Lovley DR. 2012. Microbial nanowires: a new paradigm for biological electron transfer and bioelectronics. ChemSusChem 5:1039–1046.
44.
Mahadevan R, Bond DR, Butler JE, Esteve-Nuñez A, Coppi MV, Palsson BO, Schilling CH, and Lovley DR. 2006. Characterization of metabolism in the Fe(III)-reducing organism Geobacter sulfurreducens by constraint-based modeling. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:1558–1568.
45.
Padan E, Bibi E, Ito M, and Krulwich TA. 2005. Alkaline pH homeostasis in bacteria: new insights. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1717:67–88.
46.
Choe EK, Son EJ, Lee BS, Jeong SH, Shin HC, and Choi JS. 2005. NF process for the recovery of caustic soda and concentration of disodium terephthalate from alkaline wastewater from polyester fabrics. Desalination 186:29–37.
47.
Rao AG, Reddy TS, Prakash SS, Vanajakshi J, Joseph J, and Sarma PN. 2007. pH regulation of alkaline wastewater with carbon dioxide: a case study of treatment of brewery wastewater in UASB reactor coupled with absorber. Bioresour. Technol. 98:2131–2136.
48.
Popat SC, Ki D, Rittmann BE, and Torres CI. 2012. Importance of OH− transport from cathodes in microbial fuel cells. ChemSusChem 5:1071–1079.
49.
Widdel F and Bak F. 1992. Gram-negative mesophilic sulfate-reducing bacteria, p 3352–3378. In Balows A, Trüper H, Dworkin M, Harder W, and Schleifer K, The prokaryotes, 2nd ed. Springer Verlag, New York, NY.
50.
Lovley DR and Phillips EJ. 1986. Organic matter mineralization with reduction of ferric iron in anaerobic sediments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 51:683–689.
51.
Sheng J, Kim HW, Badalamenti JP, Zhou C, Sridharakrishnan S, Krajmalnik-Brown R, Rittmann BE, and Vannela R. 2011. Effects of temperature shifts on growth rate and lipid characteristics of Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 in a bench-top photobioreactor. Bioresour. Technol. 102:11218–11225.
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
mBio
Volume 4 • Number 3 • 1 July 2013
eLocator: 10.1128/mbio.00144-13
Editor: James Tiedje, Michigan State University
Copyright
© 2013 Badalamenti et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license, which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
History
Received: 22 February 2013
Accepted: 3 April 2013
Published online: 30 April 2013
Contributors
Editor
James Tiedje
Editor
Michigan State University
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Note: There is a 3- to 4-day delay in article usage, so article usage will not appear immediately after publication.
Citation counts come from the Crossref Cited by service.
Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.