INTRODUCTION
Antiretroviral treatment (ART) has substantially decreased the progression to AIDS in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected individuals. However, despite the ability to suppress viremia, HIV-infected individuals in whom the infection is suppressed by ART have increased rates of morbidity and mortality compared to those of uninfected individuals (
1). One mechanism underlying the increased mortality is dysfunction of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, which is associated with inflammation during HIV infection. Several lines of evidence support the role of GI dysfunction in HIV-related disease, including (i) a consistent association between mortality in HIV-infected individuals and markers of microbial translocation and gut epithelial dysfunction (
2β4), (ii) the association of microbial products that translocate during HIV or simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infection and inflammation (
5β7), and (iii) dysbiosis of the gut microbiome during HIV infection, which results in inflammation (
8β10).
The recent awareness of the importance of the gut microbiome in human health has greatly improved our understanding of the interactions between GI bacteria and the immune system, as well as the importance of maintaining healthy microbial communities at mucosal surfaces. During HIV infection, the delicate balance of commensal bacterial communities is perturbed, resulting in microbial dysbiosis. This is typically characterized by an overall loss of diversity, with alterations to the phyla
Bacteroidetes,
Firmicutes, and
Proteobacteria (
11). Specifically, the loss of beneficial bacterial genera, such as
Bacteroides,
Lactobacillus, and
Bifidobacterium, has been observed and associated with pathogenesis (
9,
10,
12,
13). Furthermore, the levels of several pathogenic
Proteobacteria have been observed to increase during HIV infection, including those within the genera
Campylobacter,
Escherichia,
Acinetobacter,
Desulfovibrio, and
Pseudomonas, as have those of
Prevotella species (
9β11). Indeed, these bacteria have been found to be more adherent to the epithelium, to be more prone to translocate, and to be drivers of inflammation in the context of HIV and SIV infections (
8β10,
14). In an effort to reverse the deleterious effects of gut dysbiosis, studies have been performed using probiotic microbes to improve health in HIV-infected individuals and using the SIV-infected macaque model. In pathogenic SIV infection, animals in which SIV infection is suppressed by ART have enhanced immunity and CD4
+ T cell restoration in the GI tract after probiotic therapy or therapy with probiotics supplemented with interleukin-21 (IL-21) (
15,
16). In HIV-infected individuals, probiotics have been shown to decrease inflammation and microbial translocation (
17,
18). Thus, replenishing the gut microbiome with beneficial commensals may improve immunity, decrease inflammation, and improve health in individuals with HIV infection.
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), wherein donor fecal material is transplanted into the intestine of a recipient, has been demonstrated to robustly alter microbial communities (
19). FMT has been used to treat bacterial diseases, such as
Clostridium difficile and vancomycin-resistant
Enterococcus (VRE) infections, which occur when there is dysbiosis (typically after antibiotic use) and these pathogenic bacteria overtake the microbiome and cause diarrheal disease; such infections are typically resistant to treatment (
20β22). Unlike antibiotic therapy, FMT has a rate of efficacy of restoring a diverse microbiota and decreasing GI symptoms of nearly 90% (
20,
23,
24). Clinical trials evaluating the benefits of FMT in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and other gastrointestinal diseases are under way (
19,
25).
Given that microbial dysbiosis occurs during HIV infection and is associated with pathogenesis, we sought to determine whether FMT would be a safe and efficacious method of modifying the bacterial community and improving health in HIV-infected individuals. Due to the immunodeficiency and chronic inflammation that occurs in HIV infection, determining the safety of FMT is crucial to prevent deleterious consequences if it is to be used as a treatment in the future. Here we used the macaque model of HIV infection and performed FMT on six chronically SIV-infected rhesus macaques on ART.
(Preliminary data from this study were previously presented at the Human Immunity and the Microbiome in Health and Disease meeting in Montreal, Canada, September 2015.)
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study animals.
The animals were housed and cared for in Association for the Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care international (AAALACi)-accredited facilities, and all animal procedures were performed according to protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the University of Washington. Six male rhesus macaques (
Macaca mulatta) were infected intrarectally with SIV
MAC239x and started on ART at 130 days after infection. ART consisted of subcutaneous tenofovir (9-
R-2-phosphonomethoxypropyl adenine; 20 mg/kg of body weight) and emtricitabine (FTC; 30 mg/kg) and oral raltegravir (50 mg twice a day [b.i.d.]). For longitudinal assessment of the effects of FMT, procedures and sampling were performed in two groups, with the study schedule varying by 1 day between groups. The times at which samples were obtained from the two groups are referred to collectively as the number of weeks post-FMT (an overview is presented in
Fig. 1). Specifically, blood and biopsy specimens of the colon, rectum, and jejunum were taken before antibiotic treatment (pre-ABX; 3 weeks prior to FMT) and after 2 weeks on antibiotic treatment, which was 1 week prior to FMT. Post-FMT samples were taken at 2 and 6 weeks after transplantation. In addition, prior to FMT, we collected plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) before SIV infection (β47 weeks) and pre-ART (β33 weeks).
Antibiotic treatment and fecal microbial transplantation.
First, animals were placed on an ABX regimen for 19 total days. This regimen consisted of oral vancomycin (15 mg/kg orally b.i.d.) for 7 days, followed by a combination of vancomycin and enrofloxacin (10 mg/kg orally b.i.d.) for 12 additional days. This ABX regimen was chosen to target both Gram-positive and Gram-negative intestinal bacteria. Stool samples from healthy (SIV-negative) rhesus macaque donors also housed at the Washington National Primate Research Center (WaNPRC) were processed for transplantation as previously described in protocols for humans (
26). In brief, stool was homogenized in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and fibrous material was filtered out using a 70-ΞΌm-pore-size filter. The solution was centrifuged, and the pellet was resuspended in PBS with 10% glycerol and frozen at β80Β°C until use. For transplantation, stool sample mixtures containing 50 g of fecal donor material were thawed for each recipient animal. The mixtures were centrifuged, the pellet was resuspended in 80 ml PBS, and 40 ml of the suspension was gavaged into the duodenum and 40 ml was gavaged into the upper colon via an endoscope. The transplant procedure was performed 3 or 4 days after the end of ABX, depending on the sampling group (see
Fig. 1).
Blood and tissue processing.
Plasma and PBMCs were separated by density gradient centrifugation and cryopreserved for later analyses. Gut biopsy specimens were immediately processed as follows: 1 to 2 biopsy specimens per tissue were frozen in RNAlater solution (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) for subsequent DNA extraction and 16S rRNA sequencing. The remaining biopsy specimens were enzymatically digested with RPMI-1640 medium (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Logan, UT) supplemented with Liberase (40 ΞΌg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and DNase (4 ΞΌg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) for 1 h at 37Β°C with vigorous stirring, ground through a 70-ΞΌm-pore-size cell strainer into a single-cell suspension, and then analyzed by flow cytometry. Complete blood counts with differential were measured on a Beckman Coulter AC*T 5diff CP hematology analyzer. Viral loads were determined by real-time reverse transcription (RT)-PCR using primers specific for SIV
gag as previously detailed (
27).
Genomic DNA extraction and sequencing.
Genomic DNA was extracted from colon tissue biopsy specimens using an Omni Bead Ruptor with 2.8-mm ceramic beads and homogenized in Buffer RLT (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Genomic DNA was extracted by use of an RNA/DNA All-Prep kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA), and 5 ng of genomic DNA per biopsy specimen was used to generate a 460-bp amplicon by targeting the V3 and V4 variable regions of the 16S rRNA gene. All genomic DNA underwent 20 cycles of PCR, and 16S rRNA amplicons were cleaned using 0.8Γ AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA). Nextera XT dual index adaptors (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA) were incorporated by performing 12 PCR cycles using a FailSafe PCR system (Epicentre, Madison, WI), cleaned using 1.1Γ AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA), quantified using a Qubit DNA high-sensitivity assay kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA), and multiplexed using an equal molar ratio of DNA for each sample. Final 16S rRNA libraries were loaded on a 600-cycle MiSeq kit at 2 pM with 5% phiX phage as a control and sequenced using Nextera sequencing read and index primers (all from Illumina, San Diego, CA).
Analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequencing data.
We first combined paired-end reads using the PANDAseq assembler (
28) and then analyzed 16S rRNA gene sequence data using the QIIME software package (
29). We initially clustered sequences into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at 97% similarity and assigned a taxonomy to each OTU using the Greengenes database (release 13.5) (
30). We performed principal-coordinate analysis (PCoA) using the tools within QIIME software.
Antibodies and flow cytometry. (i) Surface staining.
Single cells isolated from biopsy specimens were stained immediately after isolation using the following surface antigen antibodies (clones are denoted in parentheses), all of which were from BD Biosciences, unless stated otherwise: CD45 peridinin chlorophyll protein (PerCP; clone D058-1283), CD3 phycoerythrin (PE) CF594 (clone SP34-2), CD4 Brilliant Violet 605 (clone OKT4; BioLegend), CD8 Brilliant Violet 570 (clone RPA-T8; BioLegend), CD14 Brilliant Violet 786 (clone M5E2; BioLegend), and HLA-DR Brilliant Violet 711 (clone G46-6).
(ii) Intracellular cytokine staining.
Cryopreserved PBMCs were thawed using R10 medium with 5 ΞΌg/ml DNase. Thawed PBMCs were rested for 4 h and then stimulated for 14 h at 37Β°C with 10 ng/ml phorbol myristate acetate (PMA; Sigma-Aldrich) and 1 ΞΌg/ml ionomycin (Life Technologies) in R10 medium with 1 mg/ml of brefeldin A (Sigma-Aldrich). The stimulated cells were then stained with the following surface antigen antibodies, all of which were from BD Biosciences, unless otherwise stated: CD45 PerCP (clone D058-1283), CD3 PE CF594 (clone SP34-2), CD4 Brilliant Violet 605 (clone OKT4; BioLegend), CD8 allophycocyanin-H7 (clone SK1), and CD14 Brilliant Violet 786 (clone M5E2; BioLegend). Following surface staining, stimulated cells were permeabilized using Cytofix/Cytoperm (BD Biosciences) and stained using the following intracellular antigen antibodies from eBioscience: IL-17 PE (catalog number ebio64CAP17) and IL-22 PerCP-eFluor710 (catalog number IL022JOP). Stained samples were fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde and collected on an LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, La Jolla, CA). Analysis was performed with FlowJo software (version 9.7.6; TreeStar Inc., Ashland, OR).
Assessment of plasma cytokines and soluble factors.
Cytokine and chemokine levels in plasma were analyzed using a Milliplex MAP (multianalyte profiling) nonhuman primate cytokine magnetic bead panel premixed 23-plex kit (Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). The levels of the analytes were assessed on a Bio-Plex 200 system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Other soluble factors were assessed via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using the following preprepared kits: for soluble CD14 (sCD14), a Quantikine ELISA human sCD14 immunoassay (R&D Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN); for lipopolysaccharide (LPS) binding protein (LBP), an ELISA kit from Biometic (Brixen, Italy); for monkey C-reactive protein (CRP), an ELISA kit from Life Diagnostics (West Chester, PA); and for rhesus macaque soluble IL-6R, an ELISA from RayBiotech, Inc. (Norcross, GA). ELISA results were read using an iMark microplate reader (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA).
Statistical analyses.
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism statistical software (version 6; GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). The results obtained at the post-ABX time point (week β1) and the post-FMT time points (weeks 2 and 6) were compared to those obtained at the pre-ABX time point (week β3), which was used as the baseline, and significance was evaluated using a paired t test. The statistical significance of the difference in the results between the pre-SIV infection and all post-SIV infection time points was also evaluated using a paired t test when cryopreserved samples obtained before SIV infection were available for comparison. We generated correlation matrices using the R statistical software package.
DISCUSSION
In chronic HIV infection, an altered gut microbiome is associated with mucosal dysfunction, systemic inflammation, and disease progression (
9,
10,
12,
39). FMT is emerging as an effective treatment option for antibiotic-refractory intestinal infections, such as
C. difficile infections, as well as for chronic inflammatory conditions of the gut that are known to be associated with dysbiosis (
24,
25,
40). ABX is often used prior to transplantation, although the overall impact of this strategy on the efficacy of therapy is largely unknown (
41). Here we have reported on the effects of ABX and FMT on the microbiome, health, inflammation, and immunity of 6 SIV-infected rhesus macaques. Overall, we found that FMT is safe and well tolerated and may have beneficial effects on immunity.
Interestingly, after FMT, the microbiome community structure reverted to a state that was strikingly similar to that pre-FMT. This likely indicates that the transplant donors had a microbiota similar to that of the SIV-infected animals, even though the donors were healthy, SIV-uninfected animals. This may be because all animals were housed at WaNPRC and fed the same diet, which may outweigh the effects of SIV infection in these colonies. Another alternative is that the bacteria in the FMT did not colonize and the microbiota rapidly reverted to pre-FMT communities. However, given the extensive selection for a diverse community of anaerobic Gram-negative bacteria induced by antibiotics, this is unlikely, and furthermore, previous studies have demonstrated that the recipient microbiome resembles the donor microbiome post-FMT (
42).
Despite the reversion to a microbiome similar to that pre-FMT, we observed enhanced Th17 and Th22 frequencies post-FMT treatment. Induction of Th17 and Th22 cells is important, given that these cells are essential in responding to bacterial and fungal pathogens and critical in maintaining the homeostasis of epithelial barriers (
43β45). Additionally, during HIV and SIV infection, IL-17- and IL-22-producing cells are lost, and this is associated with damage to epithelial barrier integrity, inflammation, and pathogenic effects (
32β34,
46). Although we observed no correlations between Th17 and Th22 frequencies and any specific bacterial population, the alterations observed may have been induced by minor populations or combinations of populations not represented in the overall microbiome composition detected. Additionally, we observed decreased intestinal CD4
+ T cell activation post-FMT treatment. Importantly, HLA-DR expression on CD4
+ T cells of the gut correlated strongly with several lower-abundance bacterial genera. The associations between bacterial genera and activated CD4
+ T cells were similar between cells isolated from different GI tissues, suggesting either that FMT altered the microbiome at other intestinal sites in a manner similar to that in which it did in the colon or that changes in colonic microbial communities have widespread effects on gastrointestinal immunity. Further studies on microbiome alterations at different gastrointestinal sites after FMT should be performed to address this; however, the data suggest that FMT may provide a novel therapeutic intervention to enhance gastrointestinal integrity through enhanced T cell immunity.
Of interest, while FMT tended to improve health in the animals, antibiotic treatment appeared to have an inflammatory effect. The increase in that amounts of proinflammatory adaptive immune-related cytokines indicates a potential T or NK cell response to the altered microbiota induced by antibiotics (
47,
48). In addition, the level of sCD14, a marker of microbial translocation, increased in 5 of the 6 animals post-ABX in our study and remained elevated through 6 weeks post-FMT. Although we cannot conclude that these changes were solely induced by ABX due to the lack of an ABX-only control group, a recently published study with chronically infected pigtail macaques similarly observed an increase in sCD14 levels in 2 of the 3 animals after treatment with the antibiotic rifaximin and the anti-inflammatory agent sulfasalazine (
49). To our knowledge, no other studies have assessed inflammatory cytokines after ABX in infected macaques. The drastic shift in the microbiota from an aerobic to an anaerobic dominant community observed in the gut post-ABX could potentially influence the systemic inflammatory response. The overall change to an anaerobic environment in the intestine would directly impact oxygen levels, the gut pH, the microbial biofilm structure, and the microbial by-products produced, stimulating an immune response. Importantly, ABX differentially affected the animals in our study, with only minor microbiome changes being observed in 2 of the animals, while the other 4 animals had dramatic microbiome shifts. This demonstrates that different individuals can respond differently to microbiome-altering therapies. Further studies to assess how commonly used antibiotics may affect inflammation and immunity and the long-term consequences on the microbiome are warranted.
Finally, our study provides evidence that alterations to the gastrointestinal microbiome are associated with changes in immunological parameters. Microbial diversity has previously been demonstrated to be an important factor in protection from intestinal pathogens and inflammatory disorders. Additionally, previous studies of dysbiosis in IBD have shown associations between some low-abundance genera, such as
Roseburia and
Faecalibacterium, and intestinal inflammation (
50,
51). Indeed, in our study, physiological and immune parameters altered by ABX and/or FMT treatment correlated most strongly across all sampling time points with lower-abundance taxonomic groups in the colon. Interestingly, we also observed a negative correlation between
Roseburia and CD4
+ T cell activation in the gut, further suggesting that this bacterial community may have beneficial anti-inflammatory properties. While this was a small study with few animals, these data warrant further investigation into how overall changes in the microbiome, particularly in terms of diversity and changes in minor populations, affect immunity.
Overall, this pilot study provides evidence that FMT would be a safe treatment for microbial dysbiosis in individuals with HIV infection and might potentially have beneficial effects on the immune dysfunction associated with chronic infection. One caveat of this small pilot study was our inability to include ABX-only, FMT-only, and no-treatment control groups. Without results for these control groups, we are unable to assess the relative contribution of ABX and FMT treatment to the reported observations. Although the changes observed after ABX but before FMT are logically attributable to ABX, a larger follow-up study that includes these control groups should be performed to confirm these findings. This will be particularly important to further understand how ABX and FMT treatment may have differentially contributed to the transient weight loss and increase in sCD14 levels observed in this study. Future FMT studies with macaques could also consider the use of prescreening of potential macaque donors to identify donor feces with a high microbial diversity or enriched for beneficial bacterial communities, the use of a combination of probiotics and fecal material, or the use of fecal material from healthy humans to better represent the human microbiota. Additionally, a recent report demonstrated that altering the microbiome with antibiotic treatment with a luminal antibiotic (rifaximin) together with an anti-inflammatory drug (sulfasalazine) during acute SIV infection resulted in beneficial reductions in immune activation and microbial translocation, while treatment during chronic infection had no discernible effect (
49). This suggests that future studies assessing the benefits of FMT in lentiviral infection may result in increased benefits if it is administered during the acute phase of infection. Finally, while future preclinical studies are of interest to determine the mechanisms underlying the decreased inflammation and enhanced cellular effects of FMT, ultimately, clinical trials with HIV-infected individuals would be most informative as to the beneficial effects of FMT for the treatment of HIV-associated microbial dysbiosis. Importantly, the pilot studies described here provide evidence that FMT in immunodeficient primates infected with lentivirus did not have negative side effects but had overall positive effects, suggesting that clinical trials may be safe and efficacious.