INTRODUCTION
T cell function lies at the core of host resistance. However, the development of assays that reliably assess T cell immunocompetence in humans has been a challenge with few successful attempts at long-term validation efforts typical for biochemical markers of health- or disease-associated conditions (
1,
2). Exceptions include flow cytometric measurements of T cell phenotypes and subset distributions with rapid evolution of the flow cytometric procedures developed to address pressing clinical needs such as the HIV epidemic (
3). However, until now, there has been a dearth of widely applied well-understood T cell function assays, which would allow the evaluation of the intact or diseased immune system in multicenter clinical trials. Our analyses characterize T cell function assays as robust scalable procedures that compare well to the biochemical tools in clinical use.
While many T cell
in vitro assays have been described (
1,
4), invariably based on relatively small numbers of donor blood samples, they have not reached routine clinical practice even in immunological disorders. One challenge is the common necessity to ship samples to a central laboratory specialized in such assays with the need to sustain sample viability and functionality during the shipping process. Considerable efforts have been made in NIH TrialNet studies, where the single major recommendation might best be summarized as the avoidance of cryopreservation during sample shipment (
1). This sets T cell studies apart from most biochemical assays of blood samples where cryopreservation is routine and practical. For our assay development, all samples were shipped via overnight courier at room temperature, using standard heparinized collection tubes and small polystyrene shipping boxes as a simple and, in fact, the sole expedient that worked surprisingly well for as many as several days of shipping.
The T cell assay developed for the Trial to Reduce Insulin-dependent Diabetes in the Genetically at Risk (TRIGR) evolved from previous work in mouse models (
5,
6) and for smaller-scale studies, which contained five groups of test antigens or “analytes” with different roles: positive controls, negative controls, and test analytes related to cows' milk and islet and glial cells (
4,
7,
8). The present initial data analysis is focused on positive- and negative-control responses, which bracket the full proliferative response range. For the positive controls, two polyclonal activators, phytohemagglutinin (PHA) and anti-CD3, were used to assess expectedly broad proliferative responses. In addition, tetanus toxoid was included in the panel to examine a cognate postvaccination response. The negative controls, to which little or no T cell response was expected, included ovalbumin and actin and no stimulation. Our aims were to evaluate the shipping method efficacy using these control analytes and to describe the observed T cell proliferations in this substantial cohort from infancy into childhood.
DISCUSSION
We have analyzed and validated a practical, reproducible method for quantifying the T cell responses from large numbers of samples of PBMCs from shipped 3- to 10-ml fresh blood samples. Of particular interest was the surprisingly stable viability and competence for complex biological in vitro functions of shipped, fresh blood samples, with adequate responsiveness after several days of transit. The laboratory QC procedures removed a relatively small proportion (<5%) of samples from further analysis. While samples may appear to contain a sufficient number of T cells, we have found that longer shipping times, beyond a 4-day shipping period, result in losses of competent T cells. However, surprising responsiveness was observed occasionally after shipping times of as many as 9 days; we do not know what sustains viability in such samples. We recommend a 2-day shipping period, as detrimental effects appear in the samples from 3 days onward. However, a key finding of this work is that samples arriving outside the 2-day window should still be considered for investigation, with shipping time taken into account in the analyses.
We have not examined deleterious shipping effects on short-lived platelets and neutrophils. Post-blood draw separations, such as removal of platelets and neutrophils in the clinical centers, were tried in preliminary experiments and generated unacceptably large variations, delays, and contamination issues. The presented data demonstrated meaningful results in the vast majority of samples, validating the room temperature shipping protocol. This finding is concordant with a trial of shipping protocols using thermal packs by Olson et al. (
19), where the advice was to avoid extremes of temperature. We extend this by showing that T cell function can be preserved in fresh samples using only insulating packaging, across a range of climates and seasons. This was the case even for the sites with the most extreme latitude, with 91.2% of samples from Ponce, Puerto Rico (18° latitude), and 99.5% of the samples from the other extreme, Edmonton, Canada (53.53° latitude), passing laboratory QC for up to 3 days of transit.
During the more recent years of the study data, there has been a distinct tightening of the interquartile ranges for subjects at all ages (
Fig. 4). We believe this reflects systematic improvements in sample handling in the clinical centers, where fewer, but experienced, personnel carry out sample procurement and shipping. The assay personnel in the Toronto lab did not change throughout the study. Additionally, as subjects age, there is an observed reduction in the variance in response to positive controls (
Fig. 5 and
6). We believe that this is indicative of the development of immunocompetence: extremely large or small responses to the positive controls tend to disappear with age.
The use of several positive controls in the assay provided a tool to distinguish rare samples with reduced functionality from those with lost functionality. The observation of cognate, i.e., antigen-specific, T cell reactivities developing in parallel to the tetanus immunization schedules added considerable confidence that this assay methodology is suited to probe cognate immune responses and immune responsiveness in general, a relevant prerequisite for additional utility in other diseases or conditions with immunological elements. Further investigation using a new stimulation index for the response to tetanus, where log10-transformed absolute counts from anti-CD3 response cpm rather than those from unstimulated cultures were used as the reference, was conducted. This GEEs still showed the significant rising responses, corresponding to the immunization schedule, at 3 to 6 months and 6 to 9 months (P = 2 × 10−48 and 0.0001, respectively), which accounted for the effects of a developing immune system with rising responsiveness to anti-CD3 and PHA during infancy.
We expect to report an analysis of T1D disease analytes for the scheduled TRIGR interim analysis in 2014. In the interpretation of future results for test analytes, it is worth considering the control reactions too, as we did observe an age dependence for the PHA responses. Unusual results for control reactions may describe an immune system in flux, immune incompetence, or immune abnormalities related to development of a given disease.
T cell analyses, such as those presented here, can be a useful part of the routine collections in long-term prospective multicenter studies, since the validation characteristics suggest they are robust and comparable to other medical biochemical tests. We have quantified the effect of transit time on viability, which is useful for planning future studies of fresh blood T cells. The data identified a practical time window for sample shipment within one continent. Furthermore, we describe a pattern of human immune ontogeny, contrasting responsiveness to PHA, anti-CD3, and tetanus immunization. These data provide a stable and promising platform for measuring evolution of prediabetic autoimmunity and characteristics of abnormal cows' milk immunity in a large, long-term prospective pediatric trial.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by grants HD040364, HD042444, and HD051997 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation International, the Commission of the European Communities (specifically the RTD program “Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources,” contract QLK1-2002-00372, “Diabetes Prevention”), and a EFSD/JDRF/Novo Nordisk focused research grant.
The content of this article is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health, nor does it reflect the views of the Commission of the European Communities and in no way anticipates the Commission's future policy in this area.
The study formulas were provided free of charge by Mead Johnson Nutrition.
We thank the TRIGR staff at all the clinical sites, DMU, laboratories, and administrative centers for their enthusiasm and excellent work. Most importantly, we thank all TRIGR families for their willingness to participate.
The TRIGR North America investigators include T. Mandrup-Poulsen, E. Arjas, E. Läärä, Å Lernmark, B. Schmidt, and J. P. Krischer from the data safety monitoring board; H. K. Åkerblom, M. Hyytinen, M. Knip, K. Koski, M. Koski, E. Pajakkala, and M. Salonen from the international coordinating center; D. Cuthbertson, J. P. Krischer, and L. Shanker from the data management unit; B. Bradley, H.-M. Dosch, J. Dupré, W. Fraser, M. Lawson, J. L. Mahon, M. Sermer, and S. P. Taback from the Canadian Coordinating Center; D. Becker, M. Franciscus, A. Nucci, and J. P. Palmer from the USA Coordinating Center; the Canadian investigators C. L. Clarson, L. Bere, D. Thompson, D. Metzger, C. Marshall, J. Kwan, S. K. Stephure, D. Pacaud, W. Schwarz, R. Girgis, M. Thompson, S. P. Taback, D. Catte, M. L. Lawson, B. Bradley, D. Daneman, M. Sermer, M.-J. Martin, V. Morin, L. Frenette, S. Ferland, S. Sanderson, K. Heath, C. Huot, M. Gonthier, M. Thibeault, L. Legault, D. Laforte, E. A. Cummings, K. Scott, T. Bridger, C. Crummell, R. Houlden, A. Breen, G. Carson, S. Kelly, K. Sankaran, M. Penner, R. A. White, N. King, J. Popkin, and L. Robson; the U.S. investigators D. Becker, A. Daftary, M. Franciscus, C. Gilmour, J. P. Palmer, R. Taculad, M. Tanner-Blasiar, N. White, U. Devaskar, H. Horowitz, L. Rogers, R. Colon, T. Frazer, J. Torres, R. Goland, E. Greenberg, M. Nelson, H. Schachner, and B. Softness; and M. Trucco, L. Nichol, E. Savilahti, T. Härkönen, M. Knip, and H.-M. Dosch from Laboratories.