Open access
Parasitology
Research Article
14 March 2023

Molecular Markers of Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine Resistance in Samples from Children with Uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum at Three Sites in Angola in 2019

ABSTRACT

Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) is used for prevention of malaria in pregnant women in Angola. We sequenced the Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase (pfdhfr) and dihydropteroate synthase (pfdhps) genes, implicated in SP resistance, in samples collected during a 2019 study of artemisinin-based combination therapy efficacy in Benguela, Lunda Sul, and Zaire provinces. A total of 90 day 0 and day of failure samples were individually sequenced, while 508 day 0 samples from participants without recurrent parasitemia were pooled after DNA extraction into 61 pools. The N51I, C59R, and S108N pfdhfr mutations and A437G pfdhps mutations were present at high proportions in all provinces (weighted allele frequencies, 62% to 100%). The K540E pfdhps mutation was present at lower proportions (10% to 14%). The A581G pfdhps mutation was only observed in Zaire, at a 4.6% estimated prevalence. The I431V and A613S mutations were also only observed in Zaire, at a prevalence of 2.8% to 2.9%. The most common (27% to 66%) reconstructed haplotype in all three provinces was the canonical quadruple pfdhfr pfdhps mutant. The canonical quintuple mutant was absent in Lunda Sul and Benguela and present in 7.9% of samples in Zaire. A single canonical sextuple (2.6%) mutant was observed in Zaire Province. Proportions of the pfdhps K540E and A581G mutations were well below the World Health Organization thresholds for meaningful SP resistance (prevalence of 95% for K540E and 10% for A581G). Samples from therapeutic efficacy studies represent a convenient source of samples for monitoring SP resistance markers.

INTRODUCTION

Artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) became the first-line treatment for uncomplicated malaria in 2006 in Angola, reaching full national implementation between 2007 and 2008 (1). Prior to that, the treatments used included chloroquine, amodiaquine, and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) (2). Even after the change to ACTs for therapeutic use, SP continues to be administered to pregnant women for intermittent preventive treatment (IPTp-SP) during antenatal care services (ANC). Angola follows World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines, which state that IPTp-SP can be given as early as the second trimester, with doses given at least 1 month apart during the four recommended ANC visits (3). It is recommended that women receive three or more doses of SP as IPTp, as this is associated with higher mean birth weight, fewer low birth weight infants, and a reduction in placental malaria compared to those receiving two IPTp doses or fewer (4). Despite this recommendation, the 2015–2016 Demographic and Health Survey for Angola showed that only 19% of pregnant women were receiving three or more IPTp doses (5).
Plasmodium falciparum resistance to SP occurs as the result of a combination of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at specific codons in the genes encoding dihydrofolate reductase (pfdhfr) and dihydropteroate synthase (pfdhps), two enzymes involved in the folate biosynthesis pathway. Resistance to SP can be inferred from the cumulative number of mutations at codons 16, 51, 59, 108, and 164 in pfdhfr and codons 431, 436, 437, 540, 581, and 613 in pfdhps (611). Parasite genotypes are therefore typically defined by the number of mutations present in the genes. Several genotypes have been identified as notable and have been characterized and tracked in the SP resistance surveillance literature. The canonical quintuple mutant (IRN ISGEAA) with pfdhfr mutations N51I, C59R, and S108N and pfdhps mutations A437G and K540E has been associated with clinical and parasitological SP treatment failure and has been shown to reduce the prophylactic period (6, 7). An additional mutation within pfdhps at A581G defines the sextuple mutant (IRN ISGEGA), which has been associated with decreased efficacy of IPTp-SP, resulting in low infant birth weight and increased placental inflammation (1214). Additionally, a recent large study in seven West African countries implementing seasonal malaria chemoprophylaxis with SP plus amodiaquine showed strong evidence of selection of the VAGKGS pfdhps haplotype, characterized by the rare I431V mutation, during the study period (15), although its exact effect on parasite susceptibility to SP is still unknown.
In 2013, a WHO Evidence Review Group recommended that countries consider discontinuing IPTp-SP once the population prevalence of the pfdhps 540E mutation is >95% and the prevalence of the pfdhps 581G mutation is >10%, as SP is unlikely to be effective in the presence of these mutations (4). However, current WHO guidelines do not recommend withdrawing IPTp-SP even when there is a high prevalence of mutations associated with SP resistance (16).
Although current data on SP resistance in Angola are limited, surveillance of SP resistance in Angola dates to the early 1990s (1), with the earliest molecular studies dating to the 2000s. Initial molecular studies were restricted to an investigation of a limited number of SNPs and limited scope. A seminal five-province survey conducted in 2007 in Huambo, Cabinda, Uíge, Kwanza Norte, and Malanje provinces mapped the distribution of the N51I, C59R, and S108N pfdhfr mutations and the A437G and K540E pfdhps genes using restriction fragment length polymorphism and showed high proportions (>83%) of the N51I, S108N, and A437G mutations (17). However, the proportions of C59R (49%) and K540E (13%) were lower. A Sanger sequencing study in the interior of Benguela Province in 2010 to 2011 also found low proportions of C59R (26%) and no K540E mutations (18). A more recent study in 50 patients in one hospital in the exclave province of Cabinda in 2018 confirmed continued high proportions of N51I, S108N, and A437G using Sanger sequencing but also found 94% prevalence of C59R and 31% prevalence of K540E in this hospital cohort; when considering haplotypes, 37.5% were quintuple mutants, and a single sample had six mutations, although not the six that define the canonical sextuple mutant (19).
Molecular surveillance for antimalarial resistance is a component of the national Angolan malaria control strategy. The country implements therapeutic efficacy studies (TESs) every 2 years at three fixed sentinel sites to assess ACT effectiveness. Samples from these studies present an opportunity to screen for known markers of antimalarial resistance, including those associated with resistance to ACTs (20), but also markers for other drugs, such as SP. The use of next-generation sequencing methods (NGS) allows high-throughput screening of a large number of samples, including the use of pooling to reduce time and sequencing costs (21).
Here, we used individual and pooled targeted amplicon deep sequencing screening methods to genotype samples from the 2019 Angola TES to determine their SP resistance genetic profiles.

RESULTS

Out of the initial 665 samples, 40 (6%) samples failed the initial quality control check due to a cycle threshold (CT) value of >40 or no CT (Fig. 1). Of the remaining 625 samples, 112 paired day 0 (D0) and day of failure (DoF) samples were identified for individual analysis, and 513 were directed for the pooled analysis. A total of 61 pools were constructed (Fig. 1; see also Fig. S1 in the supplemental material), representing 508 samples; the remaining 5 samples had outlier CT values that prevented them from being pooled with other samples, and these samples were analyzed individually. As a result, 117 samples were analyzed in the individual sample pipeline. Of these 117 samples, 2 failed sequencing, 1 was excluded as the patient was censored from the analysis due to a non-falciparum infection, and 24 were excluded from further analysis since they were DoF samples from recrudescences, resulting in 90 total samples for the individual analysis (Fig. 1; Table 1). All 61 pools were successfully sequenced, resulting in a total of 508 samples providing data for the pooled analysis.
FIG 1
FIG 1 Laboratory workflow for combined individual and pooled targeted amplicon sequencing analysis of dried blood spots from therapeutic efficacy monitoring in Benguela, Lunda Sul, and Zaire provinces in Angola, 2019. PET-PCR, photo-induced electron transfer PCR; MaRS, Malaria Resistance Surveillance; VAF, variant allele frequency.
TABLE 1
TABLE 1 Sample size for individual and pooled analysis of molecular markers of resistance at 3 sites in Angola in 2019
ParameterData from site in:Total
BenguelaLunda SulZaire
No. of individual samples21175290
Day 012153360
ACPR or censored2136
Treatment failure10143054
Day of failure921930
Early treatment failure0011
Reinfection921829
No. of pooled day 0 samples181163164508
No. of pools21202061
Median pool size (range)10 (3–10)10 (3–10)10 (2–10)10 (2–10)
In the combined weighted analysis, all the N51I and S108N mutations in pfdhfr were near fixation at all three sites, while the frequency of the C59R mutation in the samples from children at the three sentinel site clinics ranged from 62% to 90% (Table 2). For pfdhps, the A437G mutation was present at high levels near fixation in all three provinces, ranging from 90% in Lunda Sul to 100% in Benguela (Table 3). However, the key K540E mutation, present in the canonical quintuple mutant, was present at much lower levels, ranging from 10% to 14%. The defining mutation in the canonical sextuple mutant, A581G, was present at even lower levels, entirely absent in Benguela and Lunda Sul, and at a level of 4.6% in Zaire. The I431V mutation was only found in Zaire, at an estimated frequency of 2.9%. Similarly, the A613S mutation was also only found in Zaire at a frequency of 2.8%.
TABLE 2
TABLE 2 Frequency of mutations in pfdhfr at 3 sites in Angola in 2019
MutationData from site in:
BenguelaLunda SulZaire
n%VAFan%VAFn%VAF
A16V195018002160
N51I2019318089216100
C59R201661796221690
S108N202100180100216100
I164L201017902160
a
VAF, variant allele frequency.
TABLE 3
TABLE 3 Frequency of mutations in pfdhps at 3 sites in Angola in 2019
MutationData from site in:
BenguelaLunda SulZaire
n%VAFan%VAFn%VAF
I431V201018002152.9
S436A2019.41803.921417
A437G2011001809021499
K540E198141791321410
A581G200017902154.6
A613S201017902162.8
a
VAF, variant allele frequency.
When constructing pfdhfr pfdhps haplotypes from the 90 individual samples, a total of 60 (67%) profiles were able to be reconstructed according to the prespecified criteria for single-strain infections. The most common pfdhfr pfdhps haplotype was the canonical quadruple IRN ISGKAA mutant (Table 4), present across the three sites, with a frequency varying from 27% to 66%. Three canonical quintuple mutants (IRN ISGEAA) were identified, all in Zaire, at a frequency of 7.9%. One canonical sextuple mutant (IRN ISGEGA) and one instance of the emerging IRN VAGKGS mutant were found in Zaire, both at an estimated frequency of 2.6%.
TABLE 4
TABLE 4 Frequency of pfdhfr and pfdhps haplotypes at 3 sites in Angola in 2019
HaplotypeaNo. of mutationsNo. (%) of occurrences at site in:
BenguelaLunda SulZaire
ICN ISAKAA201 (9.1)0
IRN ISAKAA301 (9.1)0
ICN ISGKAA32 (18)2 (18)1 (2.6)
NRN ISGKAA302 (18)0
IRN IAAKAA4001 (2.6)
IRN ISGKAA47 (64)3 (27)25 (66)
ICN IAGKAA402 (18)0
ICN ISGEAA4001 (2.6)
IRN IAGKAA52 (18)05 (13)
IRN ISGEAA5003 (7.9)
IRN ISGEGA6001 (2.6)
IRN VAGKGS8001 (2.6)
Total 11 (100)11 (100)38 (100)
a
Haplotypes were defined at pfdhfr codons 51, 59, and 108 and pfdhps codons 431, 436, 437, 540, 581, and 613 (italic numbers denote the mutations used to define the canonical quintuple and sextuple mutant haplotypes). Wild type: NCS ISAKAA.

DISCUSSION

We used a mixed individual and pooled targeted amplicon deep sequencing approach to evaluate the frequency of genotypic markers of SP resistance using samples collected from children at the three sentinel site clinics during a therapeutic efficacy study. We found that across all three provinces, the N51I and S108N pfdhfr mutations were near fixation. The C59R pfdhfr mutation was also present at high levels. The K540E pfdhps mutation was present at low levels (≤14%). The A581G pfdhps mutation was absent in Benguela and Lunda Sul and present in 4.6% of samples at the Zaire site. Among the samples for which haplotypes were able to be inferred, the canonical quadruple pfdhfr pfdhps mutant was the most prevalent in all sites. The canonical quintuple mutant was absent in Lunda Sul and Benguela and present in 7.9% of samples in Zaire. One canonical sextuple mutant was reconstructed in Zaire Province.
Notably, the I431V pfdhps mutation was detected at a 2.9% frequency in Zaire Province, although it was absent in the other two provinces. This pattern of frequency almost exactly matched that of A613S, which was present at a frequency of 2.8% in Zaire Province and was absent in the other provinces. This confirms reports from West Africa that suggest that the I431V mutation often occurs together with A613S but not K540E (11, 15). Consistent with this finding, the only reconstructed pfdhps haplotype containing the I431V mutation was VAGKGS, which carries the A613S polymorphism but not K540E. This haplotype is the same one that was observed to be increasing in frequency in countries using SP plus amodiaquine for large-scale chemoprophylaxis in West Africa (15). The appearance of this haplotype in central Africa, far from the nexus of seasonal chemoprevention in the Sahel, warrants further vigilance.
These are the first reported data for SP resistance markers in Lunda Sul and Zaire provinces, precluding any analysis of trends at these sites. A single previous study in Benguela Province had been conducted in 2010 to 2011 in the interior of the province, roughly 150 km away from the TES site in the capital city of Benguela (18). Our current study found higher proportions of the C59R mutation (66% versus 26%) and also identified the presence of K540E mutations, which were absent in the 2010–2011 study. Changes in the frequency of SP resistance markers are likely affected by selection pressure by continued exposure of parasite populations to SP. There is a paucity of recent data on SP usage in Angola. The most recent household survey in 2015 to 2016 showed that only 19% of pregnant women had received three or more IPTp doses (5), a moderate increase over a very low baseline of 1.4% in 2006 to 2007 (22). The same 2015–2016 survey also showed that 8% of children treated with an antimalarial had received SP, evidence of some residual use of SP for treatment. However, a 2016 health facility survey did not uncover any prescription of SP for treatment in the public sector (23).
A recent molecular resistance mapping study of SP markers in the Democratic Republic of Congo found a nationwide east-west gradient in the frequency of the K540E mutation, with lowest proportions in the eastern half of the country (24). These findings are consistent with our observed low proportions of the K540E mutation in the three provinces studied here, two of which (Lunda Sul and Zaire) border the Democratic Republic of Congo.
The pooling strategy we employed saves time by reducing the number of PCRs and separate library preparation reactions necessary. Specifically, in the pooled arm, we were able to reduce the number of gene amplification steps and library preparation steps from 508 to 61. As such, this strategy allows for a high-throughput method of estimating allele frequencies from large data sets. It is particularly applicable when individual sample data, for example parasite phenotypes, are not important for interpretation of data. For example, we were able to pool day 0 samples from the original TES because there was no additional relevant individual sample information, as the TES did not include any SP treatment. Samples from participants with recurrent parasitemia were individually sequenced only because other markers, including ones associated with the study drugs, were also included in the targeted amplicon sequencing panel, necessitating the ability to assign genotypes to individual samples with a given phenotype. Nevertheless, this strategy of mixed individual and pooled data can still yield appropriate estimates with the weighting strategy we employed here.
There are, however, limitations to the pooling approach. First, samples can contribute different amounts of DNA to a pool, and distinct parasitic genotypes occur concurrently in each individual sample (multiclonal infections), leading to biased estimates of allele frequencies at the pool level, especially if there is differential amplification by sample or strain. We attempted to minimize the DNA quantity bias by only pooling samples with similar CT value. Second, construction of haplotypes is generally not possible with pooled data, since mutations cannot be linked across samples. Due to this, we were only able to reconstruct haplotypes for the individually sequenced samples. Notably, we had strict criteria for reconstructing haplotypes, only reporting on samples with major allele frequencies greater than 95% to avoid spurious haplotypes arising from mixed infections. This level of quality control is rare in the SP molecular surveillance literature, and comparison of our results with other haplotype prevalence estimates should account for this.
Samples collected during therapeutic efficacy trials represent a convenient source for monitoring molecular markers of resistance. Therapeutic efficacy sentinel sites are often fixed and thus allow tracking of trends in the frequency of molecular markers of resistance if multiple rounds are analyzed in turn. Moreover, the samples are from well-characterized, confirmed P. falciparum infections with sufficiently high parasite densities to ensure likely sequencing success. Typically, samples are sequenced for molecular markers of resistance associated with the antimalarial included in the trial. However, NGS approaches allow the inclusion of additional markers at low marginal cost. As such, including SP resistance markers as part of this screening is easy to justify, especially given the relatively scant data on these markers in many countries of endemicity. However, caution should be taken in generalizing the findings from sequencing samples collected during therapeutic efficacy trials. For example, in this study, children from the catchment areas of two health clinics in each of three provincial capital cities were enrolled in the trials. It is unknown if the frequency of SP resistance markers in the samples from these children is representative of the true prevalence in the overall circulating parasite population. Finally, the clinical resistance of all the pfdhfr and pfdhps mutants observed in this study has not been fully elucidated, so their true resistance phenotype is still unknown.
Our findings suggest that SP is still suitable for chemoprophylactic use at these three sites in Angola, since the K540E mutation was found at low proportions (10% to 14%), and the A581G mutation was absent from two sites and present at only a 4.6% estimated frequency in Zaire. However, future studies should continue to monitor for changes in SP resistance profiles. The use of TES samples will allow for assessment of trends at the three fixed sentinel sites.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design.

A retrospective analysis was conducted on molecular markers associated with SP resistance from samples collected from a 2019 prospective clinical outcome trial in Angola (25). Two drugs, artemether-lumefantrine and artesunate-amodiaquine, were tested at each of the three sites: M’Banza Congo, Zaire Province; Saurimo, Lunda Sul Province; and Benguela, Benguela Province.

Sample collection and pooling strategy.

Samples came from children aged 6 months to 12 years at the three sentinel site clinics with uncomplicated P. falciparum monoinfection presenting as febrile illness that met the standard WHO in vivo TES inclusion criteria (25). The children were treated with artemether-lumefantrine or artesunate-amodiaquine and followed for 28 days to assess the clinical and parasitological response. Blood spots were collected on a Whatman 903 filter on day 0 (D0) and during follow-up visits after day 2, dried, and stored in individual Ziploc bags with a desiccant. Baseline D0 samples from all participants and day of failure (DoF) samples from participants with recurrent parasitemia were included in the molecular analysis.

DNA extraction.

Six 3-mm punches from dried blood spots (DBS) were used to extract genomic DNA using a DNA extraction minikit following the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The DNA was eluted in 150 μL of elution buffer and stored at −20°C until use.

Parasitemia estimation using PET-PCR and pooling.

Following DNA extraction, photo-induced electron transfer PCR (PET-PCR) was performed on all 665 samples in duplicate (26). Any samples with a cycle threshold (CT) value of >40 or no CT value present were excluded from next-generation sequencing (NGS). A total of 61 pools were constructed from 508 D0 nonfailure samples (Fig. 1). For each province, the D0 nonfailure samples were aligned from lowest to highest CT and binned into pools of up to 10 samples maximum each, such that all samples in a pool differed by less than 1.0 CT value (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material) (21). Samples not within 1 CT value of any other samples were individually sequenced and later represented in the individual analysis. DNA (2 μL) from each sample was combined to create a pooled DNA lot for each pool.

PCR enrichment of pfdhps and pfdhfr.

PCRs were performed to amplify the full-length pfdhfr and pfdhps genes for the individual patient samples and the pools using a previously described protocol (27). The P. falciparum HB3, DD2, and 7G8 culture strains were used as positive controls. The NEB high-fidelity PCR kit (New England BioLabs, USA) was used to amplify the genes according to the manufacturer’s instructions with a 50.0 μL master mix preparation using 5× buffer.

Individual patient and pooled patient target amplicon deep sequencing.

The amplification products were sequenced using the Malaria Resistance Surveillance (MaRS) protocol (27). In brief, unique sequence indices were added to PCR amplicons for the individual samples and the pools using the Nextera XT kit (Illumina, USA). Two separate sequencing runs were performed, one for the individual samples and one for the pools.

Statistical analysis.

Sequences were analyzed at 11 loci representing the major reportable SNPs for pfdhfr (A16V, N51I, C59R, S108N, and I164L) and pfdhps (I431V, S436A, S437G, K540E, A581G, and A613S). A sample was considered a sequencing success if at each locus the percent quality (Q) was 30 or higher and more than five reads were observed. SNPs were analyzed using a combination of Python 3.0 and Geneious with a multitier workflow approach, beginning with a quality control check for naming schema. Raw sequences were then imported into Geneious, where the workflow was as follows: Trimming, Map to reference, Find Variations/SNP. The annotated file containing all the information per sample was uploaded into Jupyter Notebook, where a report was created containing the variant allele frequency (VAF) for each individual sample or pool. The VAF at each polymorphic site was calculated using the following formula:
Weighted VAF = i=1NVAFiwii=1Nwi
Here, VAFi is the variant allele frequency for DNA sample i, wi is the weight for DNA sample i, and N is the total number of individual and pooled DNA samples for each province. For the individually sequenced samples, wi=1, while for the pooled DNA samples, wi is the number of samples included in the pool. For each province, all day 0 samples and DoF samples from confirmed reinfections were included in this analysis, while the DoF samples from participants that were confirmed recrudescences were excluded from further analysis. Reinfections by definition are a new infection on the DoF, act as an independent observation of a parasite, and can be included in frequency estimates. In contrast, recrudescent infections on the DoF include the same strain present at baseline, and inclusion would be equivalent to double-counting these samples, biasing the frequency estimation. The results were not stratified by day 0 or DoF collection because SP was not expected a priori to be associated with clinical outcome in a trial of artemether-lumefantrine or artesunate-amodiaquine and because of the small overall number of treatment failures.
For individual samples, haplotypes were constructed if the major frequency allele occurred at more than 95% of reads for the pfdhfr and pfdhps loci of interest. Samples where this condition was not met were considered to have more than one strain present, precluding the inference of haplotypes.

Ethics review.

The study was reviewed by human subject review boards at the Angolan Ministry of Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Center for Global Health (protocol 2014-233c). The parents or guardians of the study participants provided written informed consent.

Data availability.

Data have been uploaded to the NCBI under SRA accession numbers SRR1530988-SRR15309198 and SRR19887632-SRR19887826 and BioProject accession number PRJNA428490.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank all study staff and participants, Venceslau Mambi Pelenda, José Bumba da Cunha, Oliveira Kiatoko, Felismina Caquece, Luzala Elisabeth Armando Garcia, Djos Kialanda, Garcia Pembele, Domingos Jandondo, and Belmira José Bondo. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the U.S. Agency for International Development.
The study was funded by the U.S. President’s Malaria Initiative and the Advanced Molecular Detection program at CDC.
P.R.D., C.M.F., B.N.A., S.L., R.H., J.F.M.M., F.F., J.F.M., and M.M.P. designed and participated in the specimen collection. P.R.D., A.L.M.C., S.R.R., and J.K. performed the laboratory analysis. P.R.D., A.L.M.C., J.K., S.R.R., J.-H.M.O., and E.T. analyzed the sequencing data. S.R.R. and M.M.P. wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Supplemental Material

File (aac.01601-22-s0001.docx)
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

1.
Fançony C, Brito M, Gil JP. 2016. Plasmodium falciparum drug resistance in Angola. Malar J 15:74.
2.
Tavares W, Morais J, Martins JF, Scalsky RJ, Stabler TC, Medeiros MM, Fortes FJ, Arez AP, Silva JC. 2022. Malaria in Angola: recent progress, challenges and future opportunities using parasite demography studies. Malar J 21:396.
3.
World Health Organization. 2013. WHO policy brief for the implementation of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy using sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP). https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-HTM-GMP-2014.4. Accessed 1 December 2021.
4.
World Health Organization. 2013. Meeting report of the Evidence Review Group on intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) of malaria in pregnancy. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/meeting-report-of-the-evidence-review-group-on-intermittent-preventive-treatment-of-malaria-in-pregnancy. Accessed 1 December 2021.
5.
The DHS Program. 2016. Angola: standard DHS, 2015-16. https://dhsprogram.com/methodology/survey/survey-display-477.cfm. Accessed 1 December 2021.
6.
Okell LC, Griffin JT, Roper C. 2017. Mapping sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria in infected humans and in parasite populations in Africa. Sci Rep 7:7389.
7.
Desai M, Gutman J, Taylor SM, Wiegand RE, Khairallah C, Kayentao K, Ouma P, Coulibaly SO, Kalilani L, Mace KE, Arinaitwe E, Mathanga DP, Doumbo O, Otieno K, Edgar D, Chaluluka E, Kamuliwo M, Ades V, Skarbinski J, Shi YP, Magnussen P, Meshnick S, Ter Kuile FO. 2016. Impact of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance on effectiveness of intermittent preventive therapy for malaria in pregnancy at clearing infections and preventing low birth weight. Clin Infect Dis 62:323–333.
8.
Wang P, Read M, Sims PFG, Hyde JE. 1997. Sulfadoxine resistance in the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum is determined by mutations in dihydropteroate synthetase and an additional factor associated with folate utilization. Mol Microbiol 23:979–986.
9.
Hastings MD, Bates SJ, Blackstone EA, Monks SM, Mutabingwa TK, Sibley CH. 2002. Highly pyrimethamine-resistant alleles of dihydrofolate reductase in isolates of Plasmodium falciparum from Tanzania. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 96:674–676.
10.
Sirawaraporn W, Sathitkul T, Sirawaraporn R, Yuthavong Y, Santi DV. 1997. Antifolate-resistant mutants of Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:1124–1129.
11.
Oguike MC, Falade CO, Shu E, Enato IG, Watila I, Baba ES, Bruce J, Webster J, Hamade P, Meek S, Chandramohan D, Sutherland CJ, Warhurst D, Roper C. 2016. Molecular determinants of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum in Nigeria and the regional emergence of dhps 431V. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 6:220–229.
12.
Minja DTR, Schmiegelow C, Mmbando B, Boström S, Oesterholt M, Magistrado P, Pehrson C, John D, Salanti A, Luty AJF, Lemnge M, Theander T, Lusingu J, Alifrangis M. 2013. Plasmodium falciparum mutant haplotype infection during pregnancy associated with reduced birthweight, Tanzania. Emerg Infect Dis 19:1446–1454.
13.
Gutman J, Kalilani L, Taylor S, Zhou Z, Wiegand RE, Thwai KL, Mwandama D, Khairallah C, Madanitsa M, Chaluluka E, Dzinjalamala F, Ali D, Mathanga DP, Skarbinski J, Shi YP, Meshnick S, ter Kuile FO. 2015. The A581G mutation in the gene encoding Plasmodium falciparum dihydropteroate synthetase reduces the effectiveness of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine preventive therapy in Malawian pregnant women. J Infect Dis 211:1997–2005.
14.
Harrington WE, Mutabingwa TK, Muehlenbachs A, Sorensen B, Bolla MC, Fried M, Duffy PE. 2009. Competitive facilitation of drug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria parasites in pregnant women who receive preventive treatment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:9027–9032.
15.
Beshir KB, Muwanguzi J, Nader J, Mansukhani R, Traore A, Gamougam K, Ceesay S, Bazie T, Kolie F, Lamine MM, Cairns M, Snell P, Scott S, Diallo A, Merle CS, NDiaye JL, Razafindralambo L, Moroso D, Ouedraogo J-B, Zongo I, Kessely H, Doumagoum D, Bojang K, Ceesay S, Loua K, Maiga H, Dicko A, Sagara I, Laminou IM, Ogboi SJ, Eloike T, Milligan P, Sutherland CJ. 2022. Prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum haplotypes associated with resistance to sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine and amodiaquine before and after upscaling of seasonal malaria chemoprevention in seven African countries: a genomic surveillance study. Lancet Infect Dis 23:361–370.
16.
World Health Organization. New and updated malaria guidance. https://www.who.int/teams/global-malaria-programme/guideline-development-process/new-and-updated-malaria-guidance. Accessed 12 October 2022.
17.
Fortes F, Dimbu R, Figueiredo P, Neto Z, do Rosário VE, Lopes D. 2011. Evaluation of prevalence’s [sic] of pfdhfr and pfdhps mutations in Angola. Malar J 10:22.
18.
Foumane Ngane V, Allico Djaman J, Culeux C, Piette N, Carnevale P, Besnard P, Fortes F, Basco LK, Tahar R. 2015. Molecular epidemiology of drug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum in Benguela Province, Angola. Malar J 14:113.
19.
Ebel ER, Reis F, Petrov DA, Beleza S. 2021. Historical trends and new surveillance of Plasmodium falciparum drug resistance markers in Angola. Malar J 20:175.
20.
Ljolje D, Dimbu PR, Kelley J, Goldman I, Nace D, Macaia A, Halsey ES, Ringwald P, Fortes F, Udhayakumar V, Talundzic E, Lucchi NW, Plucinski MM. 2018. Prevalence of molecular markers of artemisinin and lumefantrine resistance among patients with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in three provinces in Angola, 2015. Malar J 17:84.
21.
Louha S, Herman C, Gupta M, Patel D, Kelley J, Oh J-HM, Guru J, Lemoine JF, Chang MA, Venkatachalam U, Rogier E, Talundzic E. 2022. Evaluation of a parasite-density based pooled targeted amplicon deep sequencing (TADS) method for molecular surveillance of Plasmodium falciparum drug resistance genes in Haiti. PLoS One 17:e0262616.
22.
Consultoria de Serviços e Pequisas, Consultoria de Gestão e Administração em Saúde-Consaúde. 2007. Angola Malaria Indicator Survey 2006-07. https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/MIS2/MIS2.pdf. Accessed 1 November 2022.
23.
Plucinski MM, Ferreira M, Ferreira CMF, Burns J, Gaparayi P, João L, da Costa O, Gill P, Samutondo C, Quivinja J, Mbounga E, Ponce de León G, Halsey ES, Dimbu PR, Fortes F. 2017. Evaluating malaria case management at public health facilities in two provinces in Angola. Malar J 16:186.
24.
Verity R, Aydemir O, Brazeau NF, Watson OJ, Hathaway NJ, Mwandagalirwa MK, Marsh PW, Thwai K, Fulton T, Denton M, Morgan AP, Parr JB, Tumwebaze PK, Conrad M, Rosenthal PJ, Ishengoma DS, Ngondi J, Gutman J, Mulenga M, Norris DE, Moss WJ, Mensah BA, Myers-Hansen JL, Ghansah A, Tshefu AK, Ghani AC, Meshnick SR, Bailey JA, Juliano JJ. 2020. The impact of antimalarial resistance on the genetic structure of Plasmodium falciparum in the DRC. Nat Commun 11:2107.
25.
Dimbu PR, Horth R, Cândido ALM, Ferreira CM, Caquece F, Garcia LEA, André K, Pembele G, Jandondo D, Bondo BJ, Nieto AB, Labuda S, Ponce de León G, Kelley J, Patel D, Svigel SS, Talundzic E, Lucchi N, Morais JFM, Fortes F, Martins JF, Pluciński MM. 2020. Continued low efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine in Angola, 2019. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 65:e01949-20.
26.
Lucchi NW, Narayanan J, Karell MA, Xayavong M, Kariuki S, DaSilva AJ, Hill V, Udhayakumar V. 2013. Molecular diagnosis of malaria by photo-induced electron transfer fluorogenic primers: PET-PCR. PLoS One 8:e56677.
27.
Talundzic E, Ravishankar S, Kelley J, Patel D, Plucinski M, Schmedes S, Ljolje D, Clemons B, Madison-Antenucci S, Arguin PM, Lucchi NW, Vannberg F, Udhayakumar V. 2018. Next-generation sequencing and bioinformatics protocol for malaria drug resistance marker surveillance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e02474-17.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Volume 67Number 418 April 2023
eLocator: e01601-22
PubMed: 36916920

History

Received: 30 November 2022
Returned for modification: 4 January 2023
Accepted: 23 January 2023
Published online: 14 March 2023

Keywords

  1. dhfr
  2. dhps
  3. surveillance

Contributors

Authors

Stefano R. Rosillo
Malaria Branch, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Pedro Rafael Dimbu
National Malaria Control Program, Ministry of Health, Luanda, Angola
Ana Luisa M. Cândido
National Institute of Health Research, Ministry of Health, Luanda, Angola
Je-Hoon Michael Oh
Malaria Branch, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Carolina Miguel Ferreira
Population Services International Angola, Luanda, Angola
Benjamin Nieto Andrade
Population Services International Angola, Luanda, Angola
Sarah Labuda
United States President’s Malaria Initiative, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Luanda, Angola
Roberta Horth
Malaria Branch, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Julia Kelley
Malaria Branch, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Joana F. M. Morais
National Institute of Health Research, Ministry of Health, Luanda, Angola
Filomeno Fortes
Institute of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Nova University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
José Franco Martins
National Malaria Control Program, Ministry of Health, Luanda, Angola
Eldin Talundzic
Malaria Branch, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Malaria Branch, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
United States President’s Malaria Initiative, Malaria Branch, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Notes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note:

  • For recently published articles, the TOTAL download count will appear as zero until a new month starts.
  • There is a 3- to 4-day delay in article usage, so article usage will not appear immediately after publication.
  • Citation counts come from the Crossref Cited by service.

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. For an editable text file, please select Medlars format which will download as a .txt file. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share the article link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share on social media

American Society for Microbiology ("ASM") is committed to maintaining your confidence and trust with respect to the information we collect from you on websites owned and operated by ASM ("ASM Web Sites") and other sources. This Privacy Policy sets forth the information we collect about you, how we use this information and the choices you have about how we use such information.
FIND OUT MORE about the privacy policy