Thigh infection model.
The activity of two carbapenems, three cephalosporins, and a monobactam alone or in combination with QPX7728 were evaluated against both strains of carbapenem-resistant
K. pneumoniae. As shown in
Fig. 1 and
2, treatment with ceftazidime, ceftolozane, or cefepime was ineffective at reducing bacterial counts for either strain compared with untreated control groups at the start of treatment. When the same exposures of these cephalosporins were combined with 12.5, 25, or 50 mg/kg of body weight of QPX7728, they produced about 2 log CFU reductions in bacterial counts for both strains compared with untreated controls at the start of treatment and all combinations with beta lactams alone (
P < 0.05).
The activity of aztreonam alone and in combination with 12.5, 25, or 50 mg/kg of QPX7728 against both strains of carbapenem-resistant
K. pneumoniae are shown in
Fig. 3. The exposure of aztreonam allowed between 1 and 2 logs of bacterial growth in both
K. pneumoniae strains. For
K. pneumoniae KP1096, the combination of aztreonam with 12.5, 25, or 50 mg/kg of QPX7728 produced 1.47, 1.62, and 1.54 log CFU reductions in bacterial counts in the thigh, respectively. The reduction in bacterial counts with the combination therapy for all three dose regimens of QPX7728 was significantly greater than that observed for aztreonam alone (
P < 0.05). For
K. pneumoniae KP1223, the combination of aztreonam with 12.5, 25, or 50 mg/kg of QPX7728 produced 0.14, 0.70, and 0.67 log CFU reductions in bacterial counts in the thigh, respectively. The reduction in bacterial counts with aztreonam plus 12.5 mg/kg of QPX7728 was not significant compared with untreated controls at the start of treatment (
P > 0.05). However, the bacterial counts with aztreonam in combination with 25 or 50 mg/kg of QPX7728 were significantly lower than that observed with aztreonam alone or untreated controls at the start of treatment (
P < 0.05).
The activity of biapenem and meropenem alone and in combination with QPX7728 against
K. pneumoniae strain KP1096 is shown in
Fig. 4. Treatment with biapenem and meropenem allowed 0.73 and 0.49 log CFU, respectively, of bacterial growth compared with untreated controls at the start of treatment. The administration of biapenem in combination with 12.5, 25, or 50 mg/kg of QPX7728 produced 0.91, 1.21, and 1.37 log CFU reductions, respectively, in bacterial counts in the thigh compared with untreated controls at the start of treatment. Treatment with meropenem in combination with 12.5, 25, or 50 mg/kg of QPX7728 produced 0.94, 1.21, and 1.19 log CFU reductions, respectively, in bacterial counts in the thigh compared with untreated controls at the start of treatment, respectively. The reductions in bacterial counts observed with combination therapy for both carbapenems at all doses of QPX7728 were significantly greater than those observed with either biapenem or meropenem alone (
P < 0.05).
The activity of biapenem and meropenem alone and in combination with QPX7728 against
K. pneumoniae strain KP1223 is shown in
Fig. 5. Treatment with biapenem or meropenem allowed for, roughly, 2 log CFU of bacterial growth compared with untreated controls at the start of treatment. The administration of biapenem in combination with 12.5 mg/kg of QPX7728 did not produce a reduction in bacterial counts compared with untreated controls at the start of treatment (
P > 0.05), but the bacterial counts were significantly lower with 12.5 mg/kg of QPX7728 than treatment with biapenem alone (
P < 0.05). The administration of biapenem in combination of 25 or 50 mg/kg of QPX7728 produced 1.56 and 1.62 log CFU reductions, respectively, in bacterial counts in the thigh. These reductions in bacterial counts were significantly lower than that observed with biapenem alone and untreated controls at the start of treatment (
P < 0.05). The administration of meropenem in combination with 12.5, 25, or 50 mg/kg of QPX7728 produced between 1.02, 1.45, or 1.82 log CFU reductions, respectively, in bacterial counts in the thigh. These reductions in bacterial counts were significantly lower than that observed with meropenem alone and untreated controls at the start of treatment (
P < 0.05).
QPX7728 alone did not have any antibacterial activity against K. pneumoniae KP1096. Treatment with QPX7728 at 50 mg/kg every 2 hours allowed for 1.14 log CFU/thigh of bacterial growth.
For all experiments, untreated control groups for both K. pneumoniae strains were sacrificed after 12 hours due to signs of distress. Over the 12-hour period, K. pneumoniae KP1096 grew by 0.7 log CFU/thigh and K. pneumoniae KP1223 grew by 2.0 log CFU/thigh.