INTRODUCTION
RNA viruses are regarded by scientists as not simple, uniform organisms but genetically heterogeneous compositions in which each viral genome is likely to differ from every other virus by one or more point mutations (
1,
2). The population with great genetic diversity thus generated, called quasispecies, facilitates the survival of the populations in the presence of selective pressures under which viruses containing advantageous adaptive mutations have better fitness to survive and produce progeny (
3). The high replicative error rate of RNA viruses is caused by their error-prone RNA-dependent RNA polymerases (RdRp), with approximately one mistake made per 1,000 to 100,000 nucleotides copied (
4–6).
Ribavirin, a guanosine nucleotide analog, is a mutagenic reagent that can be wrongly incorporated into RNA viral genomes during RNA synthesis because their RdRp lack proofreading and repair mechanisms. Ribavirin has been shown to increase error frequency and result in the accumulation of deleterious mutations which debilitate and even extinguish viral populations over several rounds of replication (
6,
7). On the other hand, several RNA viruses with resistance to ribavirin have been identified and linked to an increased replication fidelity of their RdRp (
8–10). As viral quasispecies are important to the evolution and adaptation of RNA viruses, the increased replication fidelity, which restricts the amplitude of quasispecies, results in an unfit or attenuated phenotype (
9–13).
Human enterovirus 71 (EV71), like poliovirus, is a positive-strand RNA viral pathogen within the
Picornaviridae family and
Enterovirus genus. The genome of EV71 contains a single large coding region flanked by 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs). The coding region is translated to a single polypeptide, which is then processed by viral proteases to yield four structural proteins (VP1 to VP4 in P1) and nonstructural proteins, including RdRp, which is usually named 3D (
14,
15). Because of low replication fidelity, as with other RdRp, the RdRp of EV71 causes viral genetic diversity. Based on the VP1 gene sequence, EV71 is divided into three major genogroups (denoted A, B, and C) and various subgenogroups within genogroups B (B1 to B5) and C (C1 to C5) (
16). Although most EV71 infections result in mild conditions such as hand-foot-and-mouth disease (HFMD), herpangina, or aseptic meningitis in young children, some cases are associated with severe neurological complications such as acute brainstem encephalitis and poliomyelitis-like paralysis associated with high mortality during HFMD epidemics in the Asia-Pacific region (
17,
18). Currently, there is no commercial antiviral therapy or vaccine against EV71 infection. Chemically inactivated EV71 grown in Vero cells is now used to produce vaccines for humans (
19–21); however, live attenuated EV71 vaccines would be more effective to elicit both humoral and cellular immune responses at lower cost, as with control of other RNA viruses, such as influenza virus, poliovirus, measles virus, rabies virus, rubella virus, and yellow fever virus (
22–25).
As mouse is not a natural host of EV71, researchers have explored adapting EV71 in mouse brain or a mouse muscle line (
26–28), but adapted EV71 viruses may present different characteristics, particularly in tropism-related features and clinical symptoms. Alternatively, immunodeficient mice (
29,
30) and transgenic mice with a human EV71 receptor (
31,
32) were found to be vulnerable to EV71 infection. The AG129 mouse is immunodeficient and without alpha/beta and gamma interferon (IFN) receptors; it can be infected by the non-mouse-adapted EV71 strain 41 (EV71-B4 in this paper, where B4 indicates the subgenogroup) (
30). The infected mice display progressive limb paralysis prior to death and virus accumulation in the central nervous system, indicating a clear neurotropism of EV71 and making this model relevant for EV71 pathogenicity studies and for EV71 vaccines and drug testing.
Here, using a ribavirin resistance screen, we isolated a novel EV71 variant with the amino acid mutation L123F in its RdRp (RdRp-L123F) which increased viral replication fidelity without growth defects in rhabdomyosarcoma (RD) cells. EV71 variants with the L123F mutation had a lower mutation frequency in the presence or absence of ribavirin and produced fewer guanidine-resistant progeny in the presence of guanidine. RdRp-L123 locates at the entrance of the RNA template binding channel and might be involved in a hitherto unidentified fidelity checkpoint. We also generated a high-replication-fidelity variant, a subgenotype B4 virus constructed by reverse genetics ([RG] RG/B4-G64R) at another fidelity checkpoint, RdRp-G64, which has been previously described (
8,
13,
33,
34), but RdRp-G64R caused slight growth defects in RD cells. In AG129 mice, the high-fidelity variants RG/B4-G64R and RG/B4-L123F and RG/B4-G64R/L123F with a double mutation showed less virulence and pathogenicity with lower viral titers and RNA copy numbers in mouse hind limb muscle and brain than wild-type RG/B4. These results suggested that high-replication-fidelity EV71 variants could be attenuated
in vivo and offer a promising way to develop a live attenuated EV71 vaccine.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Viruses, cells, and drugs.
Wild-type EV71 strains EV71-B4 (5865/sin/000009,
AF316321; subgenogroup B4) and EV71-B5 (NUH0083/SIN/08,
FJ461781; subgenogroup B5) and reverse-genetics-generated EV71-C4 from synthesized genome (
EU703812; subgenogroup C4) were used in this study (
35). Human rhabdomyosarcoma cells (RD; ATCC number CCL-136), were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Biowest) and 1× Antibiotic-Antimycotic (Life Technologies). RD cells were maintained and infected with EV71 viruses at 37°C in a 5% CO
2 incubator. Virus purification was carried out as reported previously (
35). The following chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich: ribavirin (β-
d-ribofuranosyl-1, 2, 4-triazole-3-carboxamide, R9644-50MG), guanidine hydrochloride (G3272-500G), and
l-glutamine (G3126-100G). Ribavirin 5′-phosphate and guanidine hydrochloride were dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at a concentration of 100 mM and stored at −20°C for long-term and at 4°C for short-term usage.
Ribavirin passages.
Isolation of ribavirin-resistant variants with higher replicative fidelity was performed by serial passaging of EV71 subgenogroup B5 (EV71-B5) under gradually increasing concentrations of ribavirin. Briefly, 105 RD cells in 500 μl of DMEM were seeded into each well of a 24-well plate and incubated overnight. Next day, the RD cells were treated with ribavirin for 2 h and then infected by EV71-B5 at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of <1 for 24 h hours. For each passage, virus was harvested by two freeze-thaw cycles and used in subsequent blind passages. In total, EV71-B5 was passaged 20 times in the presence of 0.5 mM ribavirin, followed by 20 times with 1 mM and 20 times with 1.5 mM ribavirin. The viral populations from each passage were named by passage number, from B5 passage 1 (B5-P1) to B5-P60, and purified plaques were isolated from B5-P60 under the presence of 1.5 mM ribavirin in six-well plates by a standard plaque assay and designated B5-P60-C1 (where C1 indicates clone 1 isolated by plaque assay), B5-P60-C2, and so on. Briefly, six-well plates were seeded with RD cells at a density of 5 × 105 cells/well and grown overnight at 37°C. A total of 100 μl of 10-fold serial dilutions of virus was inoculated onto the RD cell monolayers. After incubation for 1 h at 37°C, the inoculum was removed, and the cells were washed with DMEM. Cells were then overlaid with 2 ml of DMEM with 5% FBS containing 0.8% agarose (A9045; Sigma) and incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator. After 6 to 7 days of incubation, plaques containing viruses were selected using a 10-μl pipette tip to draw up the medium within the plaques.
Identification of molecular determinants of the ribavirin resistance variants.
Viral RNA from EV71-B5, different virus passages, and six plaque-purified clones was purified by using an RNeasy minikit (Qiagen). The RdRp gene was amplified by using SuperScript III one-step reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) with Platinum
Taq polymerase (Life technologies) and two primers: UniEV71-RdRp-f and UniEV71-r (
Table 1). The RdRp cDNA was extracted from the gel using a QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen) and then inserted into pGEMT vector (Promega) for sequencing. The RdRp gene and corresponding protein sequences of variants were analyzed using the Lasergene software package (DNASTAR) and Chromas (Technelysium Pty., Ltd.). The positions of mutations on the EV71 RdRp protein were located on its crystal structure (
36).
Construction of infectious plasmids of EV71 and generation of virus stocks.
The genomes of EV71-B4 and EV71-B5 wild-type viruses were first amplified by RT-PCR and put under human RNA polymerase I promoter reverse genetics (RG) system as described earlier (
37), and the infectious plasmids were named pJET-B4 and pJET-B5, respectively. The infectious plasmid pJET-C4 containing synthetic cDNA of EV71-C4 has been previously described (
35). The mutations G64R and L123F in the RdRp gene were introduced into the plasmids pJET-B4, pJET-B5, and pJET-C4 by site-redirected mutagenesis with corresponding primers, listed in
Table 1. The infectious viruses RG/B4, RG/B5, RG/C4, RG/B4-G64R, RG/B4-L123F, RG/B5-L123F, RG/C4-L123F, and RG/B4-G64R/L123F were generated by direct transfection of their corresponding infectious plasmids into RD cells. All generated viruses were further propagated in RD cells for four passages, and the correctness of their RdRp genes of the fourth passage was confirmed by sequencing. All following cell and animal infection works used fourth-passage RG viruses unless indicated otherwise.
Quantification of virus by TCID50 assay and SBGR qRT-PCR.
RD cells were seeded into a 96-well plate at 104 cells in 100 μl of DMEM with 5% FBS per well. Four hours later, 100 μl of 10-fold serial dilutions of virus in DMEM with 5% FBS was transferred into each well in the plate. After 5 days, infected wells were counted for clear cytopathic effect (CPE) on cell monolayers. Values of the 50% tissue culture infective doses (TCID50) were determined by the Reed and Muensch method. Viral RNA genome in infected cells and mouse tissues was purified by using an RNeasy minikit (Qiagen), and the copy numbers were determined by SYBR green (SBGR) quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR). Briefly, primers EV-5UTR-f(445) and EV-5UTR-r(557) and a QuantiFast SYBR green RT-PCR kit (Qiagen) were used to detect EV71 RNA. The RT-PCR thermal cycling conditions were applied at an initial incubation at 50°C for 10 min (reverse transcription) and at 95°C for 5 min (initial PCR activation step), followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 10 s (denaturation), 60°C for 30 s (combined annealing and extension), and signal collection. Melting-curve data were collected from 50 to 95°C at a ramping rate of 1°C/5 s. The reaction was carried out using a Rotor-Gene Q real-time PCR cycler (Qiagen). A standard curve of copy numbers and corresponding threshold cycle (CT) values was plotted using pJET-B4 plasmid, and the relative expression levels of viral genomes were normalized to the expression value of mouse glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) mRNA.
Replication kinetics.
For replication studies of RG viruses, RD monolayers at a density of 2 × 105 cells per well in 24-well plates were either pretreated with 0.5 mM, 1 mM, 1.5 mM, or 2 mM ribavirin or mock treated and infected at an MOI of 1. For one-step growth kinetics, infected RD cells were frozen at different time points postinfection, and viruses were titrated by TCID50 assay after three freeze-thaw cycles and centrifugation at 3,000 × g for 10 min. All experiments were carried out in triplicate, and the titration was duplicated for each experiment.
Guanidine resistance assay of RG/B4 and RG/B4-L123F.
The guanidine sensitivities of plaque-purified RG/B4-L123F populations were compared to those of the plaque-purified RG/B4 populations by growth with (0.5 mM) or without guanidine for 24 h. Briefly, six plaque-purified populations of both RG/B4 and RG/B4-L123F were selected using plaque assays as described above and propagated in RD cells twice to the titers of more than 109 TCID50/ml. A total of 2 × 105 RD cells per well in 24-well plates were either untreated or treated with 0.5 mM guanidine hydrochloride for 2 h at 37°C incubator. Cells were infected at an MOI of 1 and incubated for another 24 h. Viruses were released from cells by the freeze-thaw method, and the viral titer in supernatant of the lysate was determined by TCID50 assay.
Determination of mutation frequency of RG/B4 and RG/B4-L123F.
RG/B4 and RG/B4-L123F were serially passaged in RD cells at an MOI of 1 in the presence or absence of 1 mM ribavirin as described above. Viral RNA from 12th-passage virus stocks was extracted, and cDNAs were synthesized by a RevertAid first-strand cDNA synthesis kit (Fermantas) using oligo(dT)18 primer. The P1 gene was amplified by Pfu Ultra II Hotstart PCR Master Mix (Agilent Technologies) using primers B4-P1-f and B4-P1-r, and the RdRp gene was amplified using UniEV71-RdRp-f and UniEV71-r. The PCR products were inserted into pJET1.2 vector (Fermantas) for sequencing according to the procedure of the kit. For each virus population, eight P1 and eight RdRp gene sequences were obtained and analyzed using the Lasergene software package (DNASTAR). The number of mutations per 104 nucleotides was determined using total mutations identified per population over the total number of nucleotides sequenced for that population multiplied by 104. If the same mutation recurred in the same population, it was counted only once.
Mouse infection.
AG129 mice were obtained from B&K Universal (United Kingdom) and housed in individual ventilated cages inside a biosafety level 3 (BSL3) lab for animal care and use. All animal experiments were carried out in accordance with the Guides for Animal Experiments of the National Institute of Infectious Diseases (NIID), and experimental protocols were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory, Ltd., Singapore (IACUC project approval no. TLL-13-002, Increased Fidelity Reduces Human Enterovirus 71 Fitness and Virulence in AG129 Mice).
Ten-day-old AG129 neonates were administered with 0.1 ml of PBS containing 105 to 109 TCID50 of EV71 via the intraperitoneal (i.p.) route. The clinical scores and survival rates were recorded daily until 21 days postinfection (p.i.). For viral propagation and distribution in the infected mice, hind leg muscle and brain were harvested, weighed, and stored at −80°C after euthanasia of mice with CO2. Samples were homogenized by using a TissueLyser LT homogenizer (Qiagen) in DMEM with 10% FBS, l-glutamine, and 10× Antibiotic-Antimycotic. The virus titers in the supernatants of clarified homogenates (3,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C) were determined by TCID50 assay. Each assay was carried out in triplicate. The RNAs from homogenates were extracted as described above, and viral RNA copy numbers per gram of tissue were determined by SBGR qRT-PCR.
Statistics.
All statistical analyses were performed using Student's unpaired t test. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The mean values and 1 standard deviation (mean ± SD) are shown unless specifically indicated otherwise.
DISCUSSION
In this report, we identified a novel mutation, L123F, in the RdRp of EV71 through ribavirin resistance screening and demonstrated that this mutant has higher replication fidelity than the wild type. The ribavirin resistance of EV71 could be explained by several hypothetical mechanisms. First, the L123F variants could simply replicate at a lower rate and therefore acquire fewer lethal mutations and avoid “error catastrophe” over any given time period. The fact that the RdRp-L123F mutation did not cause growth defects can exclude this hypothesis. The second probable mechanism could be that RdRp-L123F reduces the binding affinity to ribavirin and decreases the chance of misincorporation of ribavirin into EV71 genomes (
39). However, the crystal structure of EV71 RdRp reveals that the location of L123 excludes the possible interaction between L123 and ribavirin (
Fig. 4), and, more, the RdRp-L123F variants resisted another drug as well, guanidine, which directly targets 2C but not RdRp (
38). Therefore, we prefer the third mechanism, i. e., that RdRp-L123F confers a general increase in RNA replication fidelity. As RdRp-L123 locates in the entrance of the RNA template binding channel, the mutation L123F may alter the conformational structure and interaction of the RdRp and viral RNA complex, and this alteration could confer higher replication fidelity on RdRp. Moreover, the result that the mutation frequency of RG/B4-L123F was much lower than that of RG/B4 over time in the presence or absence of ribavirin substantiated that RdRp-L123F overall had higher replication fidelity (
Table 3).
High-replication-fidelity variants have been described in EV71 (
33,
34) and other RNA viruses (
8–10); however, these mutations are in different regions of the viral RdRp. Therefore, RNA viruses have different fidelity checkpoints consisting of multiple residues which may work alone or cooperatively. It is well known that the RdRp-G64 of poliovirus cooperates with G1, A239, and L241 to form a hydrogen bond network which determines the spatial positioning of D238. And the D238 interacts with the 2′ OH group of the incoming nucleotide into the catalytic site of polymerase (
40,
41). Therefore, RdRp-G64 indirectly influences viral RNA polymerization of poliovirus. A comparison of the RdRp crystal structures between poliovirus and EV71 revealed that the RdRp-G64 of EV71 might have the same function as the RdRp-G64 of poliovirus (
36), and a previous report (
33) and our results substantiated that RdRp-G64 is a fidelity checkpoint as well in EV71. It is impossible for the RdRp-L123 of EV71 to be involved in RNA polymerization catalysis during viral replication because it is very far from the catalytic site. However, L123 locates in the entrance of the RNA template binding channel, which allows viral genomic RNA template to enter and then stabilize it during viral replication (
36). The mutation L123F could cause the conformational change of RdRp before and/or during RNA synthesis to confer ribavirin resistance on EV71. Therefore, we predicted that RdRp-L123 could be involved in a hitherto unidentified fidelity checkpoint in EV71, but the structural details need further study.
Although RdRp-L123 is highly conserved in some picornaviruses (
Fig. 4), the mutation RdRp-L123F may not generate the same growth and high-replication-fidelity profiles in these picornaviruses as in EV71. Similar results have already been described in mutants at the position RdRp-G64 of poliovirus (
13), CVB3 (
42), and EV71 (
33). The same mutations which confer high fidelity on poliovirus were nonviable, growth defective, unstable, or even had decreased replication fidelity in CVB3 and EV71. The possible reason could be the subtle structural differences between their RdRp and/or changes in interactions of the RdRp mutants and their corresponding RNA genome complex during virus replication. Therefore, the best way to discover high-fidelity variants is RNA virus mutagen (such as ribavirin) resistance screening. And the direct engineering of residues in fidelity checkpoints in the viral RdRp is also promising if the structure of RdRp is well defined (
13,
42).
Mutation frequency can be very high in the presence of a low-fidelity RdRp. In a complex environment, the ability to generate a quasispecies may allow virus populations to respond and adapt fast (
43–46). Fidelity variants with wild-type-like replication kinetics are valuable tools to understand the roles of genetic diversity and mutation frequency in viral fitness and to evaluate the antiviral treatments (
47). Indeed, the RdRp of an RNA virus is a quite elaborate machine coordinating viral replication fidelity and fitness under various pressures. Higher-fidelity variants may become extinct when facing host environmental changes, immune responses, transmission bottlenecks, and so on (
10,
11,
13,
48), while much lower fidelity variants may also be restricted and extinguished soon due to higher lethal mutation frequency (
42). The correlation between replication fidelity and fitness
in vivo was first demonstrated with higher-fidelity polioviruses (
11–13) and later with higher-fidelity chikungunya virus (CHIKV) (
10) and lower-fidelity coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3) (
42). Both higher- and lower-fidelity variants have less fitness and are attenuated
in vivo.
Although the mouse-adapted EV71 strain MP-26M with high-fidelity mutations did not show dramatically lower virulence in BALB/c mice (
34), both RdRp-G64R and RdRp-L123F significantly reduced the pathogenicity of EV71-B4 in the AG129 mouse model alone or together according to the LD
50 test and amount of viral RNA in the infected tissues. The reasons for the discrepancy between the two experiments could be due to different virus strains and mouse models. For example, the virulence of MP-26M in BALB/c mice may not depend mainly on its ability to generate diverse populations for fitness due to the low fidelity of its RdRp but on specific mutations which accumulated after passages in mouse brain. Therefore, the increase in replication fidelity of MP-26M failed to reduce its virulence in mice. In contrast, the virulence of wild-type EV71-B4 and of its high-fidelity variants in mice depends on their mutant abilities, which result in replication-efficient mutations in different tissues and organs, especially in brain. The EV71-B4 high-fidelity variants exhibited low pathogenicity because they were unable to generate these replication-efficient mutations in time.
Interestingly, the double mutant RG/B4-G64R/L123F was attenuated
in vivo (
Table 4) in comparison with RG/B4-G64R or RG/B4-L123F, which coincides with the result that the fidelity of RG/B4-G64R/L123F was higher than that of RG/B4-G64R or RG/B4-L123F (
Fig. 6B and
Table 3). Therefore, it seems that a negative correlation exists between the fidelity and virulence of EV71-B4 in AG129 mice. The higher-fidelity variants exhibited lower genetic diversity, which probably reduced the viral capacity to generate mutants favoring viral growth and dissemination (
10–13). As reported in this paper, the viral titers and RNA copy numbers in hind limb muscle and brain of mice infected with RG/B4-G64R/L123F were much lower than those of mice infected with RG/B4, RG/B4-G64R, or RG/B4-L123F (
Fig. 8).
One important issue about the relationship between variants with increased fidelity and their attenuation
in vivo is whether or not these mutations in RdRp cause growth defects as growth defects also result in decreased virulence. Although RG/B4-L123F did not show growth defects while RG/B4-G64R and RG/B4-G64R/L123F did in RD cell culture, it is necessary to compare these viruses with the wild-type RG/B4 through competitive growth in mice in order to determine whether subtle growth defects happen
in vivo (
11). It also has scientific merit to evaluate which feature, the growth defects or enhanced fidelity of these variants, played a major role in their attenuation in mice in further experiments. As high-fidelity variants result in limited genomic diversity which negatively affects viral pathogenesis, expanding the diversity of these variants by chemical mutagenesis, such as through ribavirin, prior to infection may restore their pathogenicity in mice (
12), and this could be a way to determine whether increased fidelity truly contributes to the attenuation of these high-fidelity variants
in vivo.
Young suckling AG129 mice showed neurological symptoms and even died with wild-type EV71-B4 infection because AG129 mice lack a functional interferon system and support both the spread from the primary infection site and the persistence of EV71 (
30). As IFNs play an important role in the antiviral defense against EV71 infection, the LD
50 differences between the parental RG/B4 and its high-fidelity variants described in AG129 mice might even be widened in an immunocompetent host, where fewer mutations in the population of high-fidelity variants might result in a lower likelihood of mutations capable of circumventing established innate and adaptive immune responses. Because EV71 fails to cause symptoms in AG129 mice more than 3 weeks old (
30), it is hard to evaluate the efficacy of high-fidelity variants as live attenuated vaccines against EV71 in this mouse model. Actually, lacking cogent animal models for EV71 infection is hampering the research and development of EV71 vaccines although some new models seem to be promising (
32,
49).
The conventional methods to develop attenuated viral vaccines are based on the identification of viruses with an overall lower fitness via passage in cells. However, the chance of the attenuated virus being outcompeted by fitter and more pathogenic revertants makes live attenuated vaccines less acceptable, especially for human usage. However, live attenuated EV71 vaccines should outweigh the use of inactivated EV71 vaccines for their lower cost and higher efficacy to elicit both cellular and humoral responses, and they would be more effective against EV71 outbreaks in developing countries with huge populations in the Asia-Pacific region, according to the experience of a polio eradication program (
22,
23). Here, we showed that the attenuated high-fidelity EV71 variants with robust replication profiles (
Fig. 6A) would contribute to the development of both live attenuated and inactivated EV71 vaccines as high fidelity can reduce the mutation risk in the production of inactivated EV71 vaccines from wild-type strains (
19–21).