INTRODUCTION
Larix spp. have strong adaptability, cold resistance, light preference, and fast growth rate. Larix spp. wood has tough material, detailed structure, weak causticity, and high economic value. Due to these characteristics, Larix spp. are frequently used as the preferred tree species for fast-growing and high-yield artificial timber forests.
Larch shoot blight is considered one of the most serious forest diseases worldwide, posing a severe threat to larch plantations (
1). It was first discovered in Hokkaido, Japan, in 1938 (
2,
3). In 1950, the pathogen was identified as
Physalospora laricina Sawada (
4). Subsequently, in 1961, Yamamoto and Kazuo recombined it into
Guignardia laricina (Sawada) W. Yamam. & Kaz. Itô (
2,
5). Shang suggested that it should be taken from the genus
Guignardia and recombined into
Botryosphaeria laricina (Sawada) Y.Z. Shang, which basically established its taxonomic status (
6). This proposal was corroborated by Japanese forest pathologist Kobayashi, whose publication in 1990 confirmed the validity of the name (
7,
8), subsequently adopted by contemporary researchers. Recent advancements in classification systems, particularly the establishment of Dothideomycetes, Botryosphaeriales, have provided further insights into its taxonomic positioning. Notably, in 2021, Hattori and Nakashima suggested the strain be re-classified as
Neofusicoccum laricinum (Sawada) Y. Hattori & C. Nakash, signaling a noteworthy development in the taxonomic understanding of this pathogen (
1).
The distribution of this disease encompasses regions in China, Japan, North Korea, South Korea, Russia, and other geographical locations. Larch shoot blight represents a very important fungal disease prevalent in northern Chinese larch plantations, characterized by its highly destructive nature and rapid dissemination. It has been designated as an official quarantine object in 2013 (
9) and a key invasive alien species for management in 2023 (
10) by China, which underscores its substantial impact. Moreover, the pathogen has also received classification as a quarantine pest from the European Food Safety Authority and the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization (
11,
12).
Larch shoot blight mainly affects the tops of the current year’s new growth of 1- to 35-year-old larch plantations but also causes serious damage to young larch forests of 6–15 years old. The disease typically initiates from the main shoots of larch and progresses downward from the upper crown. Upon disease onset, the tender stems of new shoots exhibit fading; leaves wither and fall off; and new shoots bend and droop, leaving only a limited number of needles at the apex (
13–15).
In recent years, the prevalence of larch shoot blight has been increasing significantly, causing severe damage to larch trees. Currently, the primary methods for preventing and treating the disease involve chemical control and implementing appropriate forest management measures. However, these methods are not particularly effective in preventing the disease. Moreover, chemical control can only control the spread of the disease in a short period of time. However, there is a growing emphasis on biological control. It utilizes organisms that are harmless or beneficial to plants to resist pathogens, and affect or inhibit the survival and spread of pathogens (
16). The diverse modes of action of biopesticides can effectively mitigate the rapid emergence of resistance in harmful organisms (
17,
18), reduce environmental pollution, and sustain ecosystem integrity. In 2009, Liu et al. screened and obtained three fungi with significant antagonistic effects on larch shoot blight pathogens, demonstrating substantial control efficacy when applied through forest spraying (
19). Subsequently, there has been a limited amount of research on biological control of larch shoot blight. Notably, no studies have investigated the biocontrol of plant endophytic bacteria for larch shoot blight.
Endophytic bacteria in plants primarily play key roles in diseases resistance, promoting plant growth, and facilitating symbiotic nitrogen fixation. This concept was initially introduced by Kloepper et al. in 1922, who highlighted that plant endophytic bacteria not only coexist with the plant for extended periods but also do not cause substantial damage to their host plants (
20). Endophytic bacteria have the capacity to enhance the microbial environment while suppressing pathogen proliferation in
Pinus sylvestris, thus significantly contributing to sustainable disease management (
21). Throughout their coexistence with host plants, endophytes and their metabolites can stimulate host plants growth and bolster the hosts’ resistance and resilience to diseases.
In both field and greenhouse experiments, researchers demonstrated that the endophytic bacteria
Bacillus subtilis, isolated from wheat, exhibited a potent control effect of 41.34% on
Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici through root inoculation test, with the field control efficacy reaching 34.78% (
22). Additionally, in 2000, Yi et al. discovered that an endophytic bacterium isolated from rice not only inhibited the mycelium of rice blight but also effectively suppressed the sclerotia of the pathogen (
23). Furthermore, in 2003, Wang and Xiao identified an endophytic bacterium in tobacco that not only hindered the growth of
Phytophthora nicotianae but also impeded the germination and movement of zoospores (
24). Subsequently, in 2021, Ma et al. isolated and screened strains from
Saposhnikovia divaricata (Turcz.) Schischk, which exhibited enhanced antagonistic effects against six pathogenic bacteria of ginseng, including
Rhizoctonia solani,
Botrytis cinerea, and
Phytophthora capsica (
25). Finally, in 2022, Wang et al. isolated endophytic bacteria from healthy pepper tissues for controlling
Fusarium oxysporum in chili peppers (
26).
Studying and utilizing endophytic bacteria with biocontrol effect against larch shoot blight can inhibit the occurrence of the disease and suppress pathogen proliferation. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to isolate and screen endophytic bacteria exhibiting potent antagonistic effects and high safety profiles, with the objective of demonstrating strong resistance to larch shoot blight. These efforts are intended to establish a foundation for future prevention and control measures against larch shoot blight.
DISCUSSION
For a long time, chemical control has been the main method in the prevention and control of plant diseases. The chemical germicides used in chemical control will cause serious pollution in the environment and at the same time will make the pathogens develop drug resistance. In recent years, biological control has been increasingly emphasized because of its environmentally friendly characteristics. Most of the isolation of biocontrol bacteria comes from the soil, but the research application of endophytic bacteria in plants is relatively few.
Larch shoot blight is a very important quarantine fungal disease in larch plantations in many countries around the world. It is extremely harmful and spreads rapidly. The control of larch shoot blight is still based on chemical control and forest management measures, and there is a lack of research on biological control of larch shoot blight. Liu et al. screened three fungi,
Sordaria filicola,
Trichoderma atroviride, and
Chaetomium globosum, which are antagonistic to
Neofusicoccum laricinum (
19). Spraying 50% concentration of these three fungi suspension, the control effect was higher than 42.38%. In this experiment, an endophytic bacterium,
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens JL 54, was isolated from larch. Moreover, the control effect of this bacterium on larch shoot blight in potted seedlings could reach 50%, which showed that this bacterium has a good prospect for biocontrol application.
Bacillus sp., with germicidal stability and compatibility with chemical germicides characteristics, is the main source of biological germicides and has been recognized as a very important microbial resource for biological control (
27,
28). In the application of biocontrol,
Bacillus spp. as a germicide showed better control effect. For example, the control effect of
Bacillus sp. Bs-916 against rice sheath blight in the rice field was 73.9%–81.9% (
29). In the application of endophytic bacteria in plant disease prevention and control,
Bacillus spp. have also received more attention. In 2004, He et al. showed that the endophytic
Bacillus subtilis BS-2 of chili peppers not only could colonize in cabbage but also had good growth-promoting and disease-prevention effects (
30). In 2008, Chen et al. isolated a strain of
Bacillus subtilis CQBS03 from citrus leaves, which had a good inhibitory effect on the growth and spores of
Xanthomonas axonopodis pv.
Citri (
31). In 2019, Hu et al. isolated and screened an endophytic antagonistic bacterium from
Pinus tabulaeformis,
Bacillus subtilis (
32). Li et al. isolated endophytic bacteria
Bacillus cereus NJSZ-13 and
Bacillus pumilus LYMC-3 with nematicidal activity on
Bursaphelenchus xylophilus from pine stems (
33,
34). The endophytic bacteria (
Bacillus altitudinis) isolated from sugarcane by Nittaya et al. had a growth-promoting effect on sugarcane and an antagonistic activity against
Fusarium (
35). Dai et al. found that the secondary metabolites secreted by endophytic
Bacillus pumilus HR 10 inhibited the growth and deformed the mycelium of
Sphaeropsis sapinea and had a preventive effect on
Sphaeropsis shoot blight of pine (
36). In this experiment,
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens was screened from 391 strains of larch endophytic bacteria as a significant antagonistic strain.
Studies have shown that
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens can produce antimicrobial lipopeptide IturinA to inhibit the growth of
Rhizoctonia solani, and can produce seven antimicrobial lipopeptides to inhibit the growth of
C. dematium,
Xanthomonas campestris pv.
campestris,
Agrobacterium bumefaciens, and
Pyricularia oryzae (
37,
38). Whether the antimicrobial substance of
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens JL 54 obtained in this experiment against
Neofusicoccum laricinum is an antimicrobial lipopeptide needs further study.
Combined with the results of prevention and safety test, strain NMG 23 was highly pathogenic to alfalfa and hemolytic, and was unsuitable for use as a biocontrol strain. Strains JL 6 and JL 54 had no pathogenicity to alfalfa and tobacco. Simultaneously, the two strains had no hemolysis. They were sensitive to 8 of the 10 antibiotics tested. Moreover, the control effect of JL 54 on larch shoot blight was significant in the experiment. Therefore, strain JL 6 is a safe strain, and strain JL 54 is a safe strain with great potential for biocontrol. The strain YN 2 showed incomplete hemolysis in the hemolysis test. Before the biocontrol strain will be put into field application, a large number of pathogenicity tests are needed to fully clarify its safety.
In this study, only the control effect of potted seedlings in a greenhouse was carried out for endophytic antagonistic bacteria. In the future, it is necessary to further study the control effect of those endophytic antagonistic bacteria in forests.
Conclusion
In this study, 391 strains of endophytic bacteria were isolated from healthy larch branches and leaves from 13 sampling sites in 8 provinces of China. After preliminary and re-screening, 10 strains of endophytic bacteria were obtained; their inhibition rates against Neofusicoccum laricinum were all above 57%. Among them, strains YN 2, JL 6, NMG 23, and JL 54 exhibited the highest inhibition rates of 63.16%–65.08%. Therefore, these four strains were used as the research objects in the subsequent prevention and safety test.
In the greenhouse control effect experiment, it was found that strains YN 2 and JL 54 exhibited higher control effects on larch shoot blight after 14 days of inoculation with pathogenic fungi. The control effects of strains YN 2 and JL 54 were 57.7% and 50.0%, respectively. Combined with the results of control effect and safety test, strain JL 54 was considered to be a biologically safe bacterium and a promising strain for biocontrol. However, the virulence gene was detected in strain YN 2. A large number of pathogenicity tests are required to fully clarify the safety of this biocontrol strain before being put into the field application.
Because strain JL 54 is a potential and safe strain for biocontrol, it was selected for species identification in this experiment. Combined with the colony characteristics of the strain and the results of 16S rDNA sequence and gyrB gene sequence analysis, it was identified as Bacillus amyloliquefaciens.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Biological materials
The tested larch seedlings were 3-year-old Larix kaempferi (Lamb.) Carrière, acquired in October 2022 from Longnan City, Gansu Province, China, and subsequently transplanted on into greenhouse pots on 15 October 2022. The non-flowering tobacco (Nicotiana benthniciana) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa) seeds were procured from Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
The endophytic bacteria were isolated from branches and leaves of healthy larches collected from 13 sampling sites in 8 provinces of China (Yunnan, Hunan, Hebei, Jilin, Liaoning, Heilongjiang, Nei Mongol, and Shandong).
The pathogen of larch shoot blight is Neofusicoccum laricinum (Sawada) Y. Hattori & C. Nakash, with strain number DHKS 6-3. This strain was sourced from the Jilin Provincial Academy of Forestry Science and isolated from Larix olgensis Henry in Mudangang Forest Farm, Dunhua City, Jilin Province, China.
Medium
1.
Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) medium: peeled potato 200 g, glucose 20 g, agar 20 g, distilled water 1 L.
2.
NA medium: peptone 10 g, sodium chloride 5 g, beef extract 3 g, agar 20 g, pH 7.3, distilled water 1 L, pH 7.2–7.4.
3.
LB medium: tryptone 10 g, yeast extract 5 g, sodium chloride 4 g, distilled water 1 L, pH 7.2–7.4.
4.
Mueller-Hinton (MH) medium: beef powder 2 g, soluble starch 1.5 g, acid hydrolyzed casein 17.5 g, agar 20 g, distilled water 1 L, pH 7.2–7.4.
5.
Blood agar medium: peptone 10 g, sodium chloride 5 g, beef extract 3 g, defibered sheep blood 50 mL, agar 20 g, distilled water 1 L, pH 7.2–7.4.
The growth and antagonism test of
Neofusicoccum laricinum (Sawada) Y. Hattori & C. Nakash were conducted using PDA medium. The isolation and growth of endophytic bacteria were achieved using NA medium and LB medium, while the hemolysis test utilized blood agar medium. Additionally, MH medium was employed for drug sensitivity test (
39).
Isolation and purification of endophytic bacteria from larch
Endophytic bacteria were isolated by tissue separation method (
40). The method started with selection of healthy larch branches and needles, then rinsing the surface of the larch plant tissue under running water to remove surface dirt. Subsequently, the leaves and branches were sterilized separately, peeling the outer skin of the branches for proper sterilization. Following this, the leaves and branches were washed sequentially with sterile water, disinfected with 75% ethanol for 60 s and 3% sodium hypochlorite for 30 s, and finally rinsed three times with sterile water. The sterile water obtained after the last washing should be used as a control and coated on NA medium. Next, the sterilized branches, cut into approximately 2-cm lengths, should be placed in NA medium, with a total of five branches positioned in the center and around each dish. Similarly, the leaves should be placed directly, homogenized, and coated. The disinfected leaves, also cut into approximately 2-cm lengths, should be placed on NA medium, with five leaves arranged in the center and around each dish. For homogenization, the leaf pulp was first ground with a sterilized mortar and pestle, and then 200 µL of leaf pulp was pipetted into the NA medium and spread uniformly with a spreader.
The treated NA medium was sealed and placed in a constant temperature incubator at 28℃ for incubation. After 2–3 days, the bacterial colonies that have grown in the medium were picked and incubated. Subsequently, after 1–2 days, the growth of the colonies was observed. A single colony was selected and inoculated on NA solid medium for purification. This purification process was repeated twice. Each endophytic bacterial solution was stored in an Eppendorf tube with 50% sterile glycerol and temporarily stored in a refrigerator at −20°C.
Screening of antagonistic bacteria
The obtained strains underwent screening and re-screening using the plate confrontation method (
41).
Neofusicoccum laricinum (Sawada) Y. Hattori & C. Nakash was inoculated on PDA medium and cultured at 28°C for 5 days. Fungus cakes were prepared by punching the edge of the pathogenic fungal colony, the sterile puncher with a diameter of 6 mm.
To initiate the preliminary screening, the two-sided streaking confrontation culture method was employed. This involved inoculating the vigorously growing pathogen cake of larch shoot blight in the center of the PDA plate, while a single colony of endophytic bacteria was selected and streaked on both sides of the PDA plate. Additionally, a control plate without the streaking of endophytic bacteria strain, only inoculated with pathogenic fungi, was established. Each of the these procedures was repeated three times. Subsequently, the plates were incubated in a constant temperature incubator at 28℃. Upon reaching a 90-mm diameter in the control group’s petri dishes, we observed the formation of the inhibition zone in the treatment group and measured the diameter of the pathogenic fungal colonies in both the treatment and control groups to calculate the inhibition rate.
The rescreening process employed the four-point standoff culture method. In the center of a 90-mm diameter PDA plate containing 25 mL, the pathogen cake of Neofusicoccum laricinum was placed, and single colonies of endophytic bacteria were selected. The endophytic bacteria were then inoculated at four diagonals, positioned 3 cm away from the pathogen cake, with each treatment being repeated three times. Simultaneously, a plate with only pathogenic fungi cake placed in the center and no endophytic bacteria inoculation served as the control. Subsequently, the plates were incubated at 28℃ in a constant temperature incubator. The diameter of the pathogenic fungi colonies in both the treatment and control groups was measured, and the inhibition rate was calculated when the control group had reached a full petri dish length of 90 mm.
The colony diameters of the control and treated groups were measured using the cross method, and the inhibition rate was calculated using the following formula (
42):
The inhibition rate of each endophytic bacteria was recorded. Subsequently, four strains of endophytic bacteria exhibiting the highest resistance to Neofusicoccum laricinum were selected for subsequent pot seedling control experiments.
Pot experiment
The experiment was conducted in the greenhouse at Nanjing Forestry University from April to May 2023. Healthy larch seedlings with similar growth status were selected for pot and inoculation experiments. The experiment comprised four treatment groups and two control groups (one negative control group and one blank control group), each consisting of six plants.
Upon preservation at 4°C, the four strains of endophytic bacteria with the most potent antagonistic effect, as identified above in “Screening of antagonistic bacteria,” were inoculated on NA plates and placed in a constant temperature incubator at 28℃ to activate cultivation for 36 h. Following this, a ring of single colonies was selected and inoculated into conical flasks containing LB culture medium. The bacteria solution of the four endophytic bacteria strains was obtained by shaking the culture for 1 day at 28°C and 200 r/min. Subsequently, the bacteria solution of the four endophytic bacteria strains was withdrawn using a pipette gun and inoculated into sterilized and cooled LB culture medium at 1% inoculation amount. It was then placed on the shaker at 200 r/min and 28℃ under dark condition for 3 days, resulting in the fermentation broths of the four endophyte strains being obtained.
The antagonistic endophytic bacteria were applied using the root irrigation method, with the fermentation broth of antagonistic bacteria being pipetted into the root soil of pine seedlings five times. Conversely, the pathogenic fungus was inoculated using the wounding method (
43). A tangential section was excised from the lower part of the branch using a sterile blade, and the pathogenic fungus cake was then affixed to the section, ensuring contact between the pathogenic fungus and the tangential section of the branch (
Table 7). Subsequently, an inverted cone-shaped wrapping cake was fashioned using a sealing film, with distilled water added to facilitate moisturization and maintain the activity of the pathogenic fugus. The treated larch seedlings were then incubated at room temperature (28℃), while a humidifier was employed in the greenhouse to establish a high-temperature and high-humidity environment. Incidence was observed daily, and distilled water was added to the sealing film. After 14 days, the incidence rate, disease index, and control effect were calculated.
Larch shoot blight grading standard is as follows: Grade 0: whole plant disease-free; Grade 1 : less than 5% of the needles; Grade 2: 6%−25% needles; Grade 3: 26%−50% needles; Grade 4: 51%−75% of needles; Grade 5: more than 76% of the needles were infected.
The calculation formulas of incidence, disease index, and control effect are as follows (
44):
Safety detection of antagonistic bacteria
Tobacco inoculation
The activated antagonistic bacteria were inoculated into LB medium and cultured at 28°C with a rotation speed of 200 r/min for 24 h. Subsequently, the fermentation broth was centrifuged at 10,000 r/min for 10 min at 4°C to obtain a cell pellet. The concentration of cells was adjusted to 1 × 108 CFU/mL using sterile water. Then, using a sterilized 1-mL syringe, 100-µL bacterial suspension was injected into the mesophyll cells from the lower epidermis of tobacco leaves. As a control, tobacco leaves inoculated with sterile water (CK) were utilized. The inoculated tobacco plants were incubated in an artificial climatic chamber set at 25° and 85% relative humidity and were subjected to a 16-h photoperiod. Three days following the inoculation, the tobacco leaves were inspected for the presence of spots.
Alfalfa inoculation
The selected alfalfa seeds underwent a 20-min soaking in 98% concentrated sulfuric acid. Subsequently, the seeds were thoroughly rinsed with a large volume of sterile water. The rinsed seeds were then placed in an appropriate amount of sterile water and subjected to incubation at 30°C with a rotation speed of 200 r/min for 8 h. Following this, the seeds were rinsed twice with sterile water and carefully transferred onto 1% water agar plates using sterile tweezers (
45). Once the seeds sprouted, a small incision was made on the cotyledon using an inoculation needle. Then, 10 µL of prepared fermentation broths of YN 2, JL 6, NMG 23, JL 54, and LMG 1222, each with a concentration of 1 × 10
8 CFU/mL, was applied to the wound. Each treatment group consisted of three replicates, with five seeds per replicate. The negative control comprised LB liquid medium, while the positive control used the fermentation broth of the control strain with pathogenic activity on alfalfa LMG 1222 (
Burkholderia cepacia).
After the inoculation treatment, the alfalfa seeds were placed in an artificial climate incubator set at a temperature of 30°C and relative humidity of 90% and were subjected to timed light conditions (12 h of light and 12 h of darkness) for a duration of 10 days to monitor the growth of alfalfa.
Drug sensitivity test
The fermentation broth of YN 2, JL 6, NMG 23, and JL 54 strains, each at a concentration of 1 × 10
8 CFU/mL, was evenly spread on the surface of MH agar plates using sterile cotton swabs. The plates were then placed on a sterile operating table and allowed to dry for 5 min. Antimicrobial drug sheets (Hangzhou Microbiology Reagent Co., Ltd.) were carefully retrieved using sterile tweezers and affixed onto the surface of the MH agar plates coated with the tested strains. After pasting, gently pressure was applied with tweezers to ensure the antimicrobial paper adhered securely. Each plate was equipped with five antimicrobial sheets, arranged in a uniform manner. The plates were subsequently incubated at 28°C. After 24 h, the presence or absence of bacteriostatic rings around the antimicrobial drug paper was observed, and the diameter of the bacteriostatic ring (including the diameter of the paper) was measured using a vernier caliper (
46). Each treatment group consisted of three replicates, and the average diameter of the bacteriostatic ring was determined. The susceptibility of the strains to different antimicrobial drugs was assessed following the technical requirements outlined in the antimicrobial drug susceptibility test (
Table 8).
Hemolysis test
The strains YN 2, JL 6, NMG 23, and JL 54 were inoculated onto blood agar plates and incubated in a constant temperature incubator at 28°C for 24 h. Subsequently, the plates were observed for the presence of hemolytic rings (
47).
The hemolysis rate was determined by supernatant hemoglobin spectrophotometry (
48).
Two milliliters of fresh blood was taken from sheep, anticoagulated with anticoagulant citrate dextrose solution (ACD), diluted with 2.5 mL of physiological saline, and refrigerated at 4℃. In the negative control group, 10 mL of normal saline (0.9% NaCl solution) was added to the test tube. In the positive control group, 10 mL of distilled water was added to the test tube. In the treatment group, 1 mL of the tested bacterial solution and 10 mL of normal saline were added to the test tube. All test tubes were placed in a constant temperature water bath at 37°C ± 1°C for 30 min. Diluted blood (0.2 mL) was added to each test tube, gently mixed, and placed in a water bath at 37.2°C ± 1°C for 1 h.
The liquid was poured out from the tube and centrifuged at 800 × g for 5 min. The supernatant was aspirated, and the absorbance at 545 nm was measured on a UV-Vis spectrophotometer, zeroed with physiological saline. The absorbance of the control group was taken as the average of three test tubes. The absorbance of the negative control should not exceed 0.03, and the absorbance of the positive control should be 0.8 ± 0.3; otherwise the experiment should be repeated.
The average absorbance of the negative control group is Dnc; the average absorbance of the positive control group is Dpc, and the absorbance of the sample is Dt. The formula for calculating the hemolysis rate (Z) is as follows:
The hemolysis rate of the test sample should be less than 5%. A hemolysis rate of more than 5% indicates that the bacteria have hemolysis.
Detection of virulence gene
The presence of hemolytic enterotoxin genes (
hblA,
hblB,
hblC, and
hblD), non-hemolytic enterotoxin genes (
nheA,
nheB, and
nheC), emetic toxin gene (
ces), enterotoxin gene (
entFM), and cytotoxin gene (
cytK) was determined using PCR-specific amplification. The primer sequences used for PCR amplification of toxin genes are listed in
Table 9. The amplified products were then analyzed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis to confirm the presence of toxin genes in the antagonistic strains.
Morphological identification of superior antagonistic bacteria
The endophytic strains exhibiting effective control and high safety, as identified in section 2.6, were inoculated onto NA medium and incubated at 28°C for 48 h. The morphological characteristics of the colonies were observed and described, including size, shape, edge morphology, color, transparency, and surface properties. Gram staining was performed on the bacterial culture. Smears of single colony grown on NA plates for 24 h were fixed and subjected to staining procedures. A drop of crystal violet dye was applied for 1 min. Decolorization was achieved using 95% ethanol decolorization for 20–30 s, followed by washing with water. Subsequently, safranine re-dyeing agent was applied for 3 min, followed by washing, air-drying, and observation under oil immersion microscope.
Molecular biology identification
Extraction of genomic DNA from endophytic bacterium
Genomic DNA of endophytic bacterium was extracted using Ezup Column Bacteria Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Sangon Biotech). The specific steps refer to the operation instructions.
The 16 S rDNA fragment was amplified and the bacterial universal primers 27 F (5′-
AGAGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1492 R (5′-
GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′) were selected. PCR amplification of the
gyrB gene sequence was performed using primers UP-1 (5′ -
GAAGTCATCATGACCGTTCTGCAYGCNGGNGGNAARTTYGA-3′) and UP-2r (5′-
AGCAGGATACGGATGTGCGAGCCRTCNACRTCNGCRTCNGTCNGTCNGTCAT-3′) (
54).
PCR reaction system (20 µL): Green Taq Mix 10 µL, upstream and downstream primers 1 µL, template DNA 2 µL, dd H2O 6 µL.
PCR reaction procedure of 16 S rDNA: pre-denaturation at 95°C for 5 min, denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 48°C for 30 s, extension at 72°C for 90 s, 30 cycles, final extension at 72°C for 10 min.
PCR reaction procedure of gyrB gene sequence: pre-denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 60°C for 30 s, extension at 72°C for 90 s, 30 cycles, final extension at 72°C for 5 min.
Sequencing and phylogenetic analysis
The PCR-amplified fragments were sent to Sangon Biotech for sequencing. The 16S rDNA and
gyrB gene sequences obtained by sequencing were subjected to BLAST alignment on NCBI. The 16S rDNA and
gyrB gene sequences of representative strains were selected for multi-sequence homology comparison. The 16S rDNA and
gyrB gene sequences obtained above were connected to form a 16S rDNA-
gyrB tandem feature sequence (
55). The phylogenetic tree was constructed using software MEGA, version 7, and the identification results of different phylogenetic evolutionary trees were compared (
56).
Data analysis
The results of the statistics were summarized and calculated using Excel software, version 2016, and one-way analysis of variance was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (version 26; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). The data were presented as the mean average of three replicates ± standard deviations. Data with the same letters mean the differences are not significant in the 5% level (Duncan multiple range test).