Open access
Microbial Ecology
Research Article
31 January 2023

Week-Old Chicks with High Bacteroides Abundance Have Increased Short-Chain Fatty Acids and Reduced Markers of Gut Inflammation

ABSTRACT

As important commensals in the chicken intestine, Bacteroides are essential complex carbohydrate degraders, and short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) producers that are highly adapted to the distal gut. Previous studies have shown large variation in Bacteroides abundance in young chickens. However, limited information is available regarding how this variation affects the gut microbiome and host immunity. To investigate how elevated or depleted Bacteroides levels affect gut microbial functional capacity and impact host response, we sampled 7-day-old broiler chickens from 14 commercial production flocks. Week-old broiler chickens were screened and birds with low Bacteroides (LB) and high Bacteroides (HB) abundance were identified via 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays. Cecal microbial functionality and SCFA concentration of chickens with distinct cecal Bacteroides abundance were profiled by shotgun metagenomic sequencing and gas chromatography, respectively. The intestinal immune responses of LB and HB chickens were assessed via reverse transcription qPCR. Results showed that the gut microbiota of the LB group had increased abundance of lactic acid bacteria pyruvate fermentation pathway, whereas complex polysaccharide degradation and SCFA production pathways were enriched in the HB group (P < 0.05), which was supported by increased SCFA concentrations in the ceca of HB chickens (P < 0.05). HB chickens also showed decreased expression of interleukin-1β and increased expression of interleukin-10 and tight-junction protein claudin-1 (P < 0.05). Overall, the results indicated that elevated Bacteroides may benefit the 7-day broiler gut and that further work should be done to confirm the causal role of Bacteroides in the observed positive outcomes.
IMPORTANCE To date, limited information is available comparing distinct Bacteroides compositions in the chicken gut microbial communities, particularly in the context of microbial functional capacities and host responses. This study showed that possessing a microbiome with elevated Bacteroides in early life may confer beneficial effects to the chicken host, particularly in improving SCFA production and gut health. This study is among the first metagenomic studies focusing on the early life chicken gut microbiota structure, microbial functionality, and host immune responses. We believe that it will offer insights to future studies on broiler gut microbial population and their effects on host health.

INTRODUCTION

In the ceca of matured chickens, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes are reported to be the most dominant phyla, where together these 2 phyla represent more than 90% of total cecal microbiota (13). It has been shown that Bacteroides have relatively low abundance in the ceca of newly hatched chicks (4), and become the predominant taxa at day 7, reaching the peak (40 to 45%) at 3 weeks of age (5). Great variation of Bacteroides abundance was reported in the ceca of young chickens ranging from 2% to 40% (6, 7). Members belonging to the genus Bacteroides are Gram-negative, rod-shaped bacteria, which are highly adapted to the gut environment, especially the lower gastrointestinal tract. Encoding a high number of genes for polysaccharide and monosaccharide metabolism, Bacteroides are important complex carbohydrates degraders in the host gut (8). However, limited information is available regarding how differential abundance of this taxa affects gut immune state or functional capacity of the gut microbiota in broiler chickens.
In microbiome research, studying variations in microbial structure and composition can offer insight into complex host-microbe-metabolite interactions. Arumugam et al. (2011) first described 3 robust clusters in the human gut microbiota, indicating the importance of the population-level analysis of the gut microbiome variation (9). In chicken research, studies have also suggested the existence of distinct gut microbiomes among individuals (10, 11). Kaakoush et al. (2014) reported that chicken fecal microbiomes could be separated into 4 enterotypes, including elevated Bacteroides, and that microbial composition could be associated with pathogen carriage; however, the authors did not explore changes in metabolite profile or host responses (10). A more recent study identified high Bacteroides in the duodenum of mature chickens with less fat deposition, and lower serum triglyceride levels (11).
The aim of this study was to understand how high and low Bacteroides abundances are associated with early life chicken gut microbial functional capacity, and immune response. This was achieved by sampling and characterizing week-old broiler chickens from commercial production flocks with distinct cecal Bacteroides abundance.

RESULTS

Bacterial composition of early life chicken cecal microbiome.

On average, 24,647.56 ± 7632.78 reads per sample were generated, and processed by the QIIME2 pipeline, resulting in 1,798 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs). Filtered reads were taxonomically classified to represent 4 major phyla (Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria) and 106 genera. The 3 most abundant phyla made up over 98% of the population, and included Firmicutes (76.16 ± 15.72%), Bacteroidetes (17.54 ± 16.59%), and Proteobacteria (5.07 ± 6.83%).

Bacteroides over-/under- representing sample identification.

On the genus level, various levels of Bacteroides relative abundance were observed (16.3 ± 15.6%; range, 0 to 52.2%). Low Bacteroides samples were defined as samples with Bacteroides relative abundance lower than 0.7% (mean − SD); whereas high Bacteroides samples were defined as samples with Bacteroides relative abundance higher than 31.9% (mean + SD). As a result, chickens from 11 different flocks were assigned to either the LB or HB group. Specifically, 18 birds with low Bacteroides levels from 6 flocks and 15 birds with high Bacteroides from 6 flocks were identified. Chickens that were not assigned to either group were marked as not assigned (n/a) (Table 1). Bodyweights were not collected at day 7 terminations; however, the average 32-day flock bodyweight (P = 0.91) and mortality rate (P = 0.93) were similar between flocks that had the majority of birds identified as LB, HB, or n/a (Table 1).
TABLE 1
TABLE 1 Distribution of chickens assigned to high Bacteroides group, low Bacteroides group, or unassigneda
Chicken distributionFlock mean bodyweight (gram)Flock mean mortality rate (%)
HBb (1) + n/a (4)1,7934.8
LBc (5)1,7464.7
LB (4) + n/a (1)1,8103.3
LB (4) + HB (1)1,8365.7
LB (2) + n/a (3)1,7906.5
LB (1) + n/a (4)1,8503.1
HB (1) + n/a (4)1,7984.8
n/ad (5)1,7445.2
HB (1) + n/a (4)1,7505.1
HB (3) + n/a (2)1,7627.0
n/a (5)1,8506.1
HB (3) + n/a (2)1,8863.7
HB (3) + n/a (2)1,7903.5
n/a (5)1,7445.2
a
Each box represents a single production flock. In each production flock, 5 young broiler chickens were randomly sampled. Numbers in the brackets refer to the number of broiler chickens assigned to each specific group.
b
HB, high Bacteroides group.
c
LB, low Bacteroides group.
d
n/a, unassigned.
Beta diversity analyses revealed that LB, HB, and n/a groups were significantly separated based on Bray-Curtis distance metric (P < 0.05 for HB versus LB, HB versus n/a, and LB versus n/a) (Fig. 1). Observed ASV index revealed that the richness of observed taxa between the HB, LB, and n/a groups was comparable. However, the Shannon index showed that the HB had decreased evenness due to the high relative abundance of Bacteroides in the cecal microbiota. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay using primers targeting the Bacteroides-Prevotella group showed that the LB group had a lower absolute abundance of Bacteroides-Prevotella group (5.96 and 9.04 log10 copies/g cecal contents of Bacteroides-Prevotella 16S rRNA gene for LB and HB group, respectively; P < 0.01).
FIG 1
FIG 1 (a) Principal coordinate analysis plot based on Bray-Curtis distance metric. Distinct pattern of Bacteroides populations resulted in significantly different clusters between LB, HB, and chickens not assigned to either HB or LB groups (n/a) (adonis P < 0.05). (b) The HB group had decreased bacterial species evenness compared with the LB group and the n/a group (Shannon index, P < 0.01). (c) Comparable bacterial species richness was observed between groups (observed ASV, P > 0.05). LB, low Bacteroides, n = 18; HB, high Bacteroides, n = 15; n/a, not assigned, n = 37. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.
The generated cecal microbiome network (Fig. 2) included taxa that were involved either in coabundance (positive associations represented by green line) or coexclusion (negative associations represented by pink line) based on a threshold of P < 0.05, and an absolute pairwise correlation of >0.30. Nodes were categorized as hubs or non-hubs based on the within-module degree and eigenvector centrality. Eigenvector considers both the importance of the node and the degree of connectivity of its neighbors. The hub nodes were further classified as network hubs (modularity > 0.63) and module hubs (modularity between 0.60 and 0.63) based on the degree of connectivity. Based on both eigenvector centrality and modularity, 5 centered genera (Lactobacillus, [Clostridium]_methylpentosum_group, Acinetobacter, Phascolarctobacterium, and an uncultured member from the family Erysipelatoclostridiaceae) were identified as hubs. This rendered the potential of identified hubs in diverse species interactions. Possible competition interactions were identified in Fig. 2, where Bacteroides relative abundance was negatively correlated with Lactobacillus, the [Clostridium] methylpentosum group, and an uncultured member of the Erysipelatoclostridiaceae family. In addition, genera Alistipes showed a positive correlation to Bacteroides, indicating mutualism between these genera.
FIG 2
FIG 2 Cecal microbiome co-occurrence network based on SparCC correlation on the genus level. Only significantly correlated (P < 0.05) taxa in the cecal microbiome with coefficient greater than 0.3 are shown. Estimated correlations were transformed to dissimilarities via the “signed” distance metric, and corresponding similarities were used as edge weights. Node sizes were scaled based on eigenvector centrality. Hubs were defined using eigenvector centrality with a centrality value above the empirical 90% quantile. To increase visibility, hubs were highlighted by bold text and borders, and marked as ①, ②, ③, ④, and ⑤. Node colors represent phyla. ①, Lactobacillus; ②, [Clostridium]_methylpentosum_group; ③, Acinetobacter; ④, Phascolarctobacterium; ⑤, an uncultured member from the family Erysipelatoclostridiacea.
Spearman correlation between cecal microbial taxa also revealed positive association between Bacteroides and the genera Faecalibacterium, Anaerofilum, Anaeroplasma, Alistipes, and an undetermined genus from the order Oscillospirales; whereas negative correlations between Bacteroides and the genera Lactobacillus, Escherichia-Shigella, Blautia, Subdoligranulum, Anaerostipes, Negativibacillus, the [Ruminococcus]-torques group, and an uncultured genus belonging to the family Ruminococcaceaea were also suggested (Fig. S1).

HB individuals have higher short-chain fatty acid concentrations in cecal contents.

Gas chromatography was used to measure short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentrations in broiler cecal contents. The HB group had increased concentrations of total SCFAs (P < 0.01), acetate (P < 0.01), propionate (P < 0.05), butyrate (P < 0.05), and valerate (P < 0.05) compared with the LB group (Fig. 3). Spearman correlation between SCFA concentrations and bacterial relative abundance suggested a series of microbes that were correlated with the altered SCFA profile between HB and LB (Fig. 4). Notably, an uncultured member belonging to the family Lachnospiraceae and Faecalibacterium were found positively associated with most of the detected SCFAs. In addition, acetate concentration was positively correlated with Clostridia vadinBB60 group, and negatively correlated with Tyzzerella. Butyrate was positively correlated with Bacteroides, and negatively correlated with Blautia. Anaeroplasma, a member from the order Oscillospirales, and an undetermined genus from the family Ruminococcaceae were associated with propionate concentration, whereas [Ruminococcus] torques group showed a negatively correlation with propionate levels. Branched-chain fatty acid, isobutyrate, and isovalerate, were associated with Merdibacter, and an undetermined member of Ruminococcaeae.
FIG 3
FIG 3 Cecal short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentrations in LB and HB groups. Results were shown as (a) total SCFA concentrations, (b) acetate, (c) propionate, (d) butyrate, and (e) valerate (mean ± standard deviation; LB, n = 18; HB, n =15; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01). LB, low Bacteroides; HB, high Bacteroides; Conc., Concentration.
FIG 4
FIG 4 Heatmap showing Spearman correlations between cecal bacterial abundance and short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentrations in broiler chickens. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; Conc., Concentration.

Shotgun metagenomic sequencing suggested differentiated microbial functional capacities between the HB and LB group.

To investigate functional capacities of the HB and LB gut microbiome, we performed shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Briefly, a total of 1,860 genes were annotated based on the Metacyc database (12). Gene networks were constructed based on the annotated genes from shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Genes that represented characteristics of the HB group and the LB group were predicted based on eigenvector centrality (Fig. 5). The properties of the networks can be found in Table 2, 3, and 4, and Table S1. The Jaccard index was significantly close to 0 for betweenness centrality, closeness centrality, and eigenvector centrality (Table 4), suggesting that the sets of most central were considerably different between the HB and LB group (Jaccard index ranging from 0 to 1, where 0 being 2 completely different sets, and 1 being exactly equal sets). Different hub nodes were identified between HB and LB group based on eigenvector centrality (Fig. 5) that indicated nodes not only important by itself, but also sharing high connectivity with important neighbors. Specifically, in the HB network the acetylxylan esterase (EC3.1.1.72), the type I arylsulfatase (EC3.1.6.1), the non-reducing end beta-L-arabinofuranosidase (EC3.2.1.185), and the licheninase (EC3.2.1.73) were identified as hubs, whereas only the histidine kinase (EC2.7.13.3) was identified as a hub in the LB group.
FIG 5
FIG 5 The comparison of the functional network harbored by cecal microbial communities. Green edges corresponded to positive associations, and red edges to negative associations. Colors of nodes represented clusters determined by the fast greedy modularity optimization. Node sizes were scaled according to eigenvector centrality. Nodes with bold text were identified hubs in the networks. Hubs were nodes with eigenvector centrality greater than 90% quantile of the empirical centrality distribution (LB, low Bacteroides; HB, high Bacteroides; LB, n = 18; HB, n = 15).
TABLE 2
TABLE 2 Properties of networks constructed for the HB group and LB group, Jaccard indexa
Network propertiesJaccP (≤Jacc)P (≥Jacc)
Degree0.0480.002**1.000
Betweenness centrality0.000< 0.001***1.000
Closeness centrality0.0910.009**0.998
Eigenvector centrality0.0500.003**1.000
Hub taxa0.0000.2961.000
Adjusted rand index = 0.109 (ARI, measuring similarity between clusterings ranging from 0–1. ARI = 1, perfect agreement between clusterings; ARI = 0, two random clusterings; P <0.001)
a
Jaccard index measured the similarity between sets of most central nodes. Jaccard index ranged from 0 (completely different) to 1 (sets equal), **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.
TABLE 3
TABLE 3 Properties of networks constructed for the HB group and LB group, Hub nodes
HBLB
3.1.1.72: Acetylxylan esterase2.7.13.3: Histidine kinase
3.1.6.1: Arylsulfatase (type I) 
3.2.1.185: Non-reducing end beta-L-arabinofuranosidase 
3.2.1.73: Licheninase 
TABLE 4
TABLE 4 Eigenvector centrality
GeneHBLB
Highest values in the HB group
 3.2.1.185: Non-reducing end beta-L-arabinofuranosidase1.0000.267
 3.2.1.73: Licheninase0.9490
 3.1.1.72: Acetylxylan esterase0.8660.558
 3.1.6.1: Arylsulfatase (type I)0.8390
 3.2.1.52: Beta-N-acetylhexosaminidase0.6650.132
Highest values in the LB group
 2.7.13.3 histidine kinase01.000
 2.7.7.7: DNA-directed DNA polymerase00.912
 6.3.5.5: Carbamoyl-phosphate synthase (glutamine-hydrolyzing)00.752
 2.7.7.6: DNA-directed RNA polymerase00.737

Shotgun metagenomic sequencing suggested enriched microbial pathways related to complex carbohydrate degradation and SCFA production in the HB group.

Shotgun metagenomic sequencing and functional genomics analyses identified 12 pathways that were different between the HB group and the LB group (LefSe LDA score > 2) (Fig. 6). The gut microbiota of the HB group harbored more abundant pathways, including the Stickland reaction pathways (PWY-8190), the superpathway of UDP-N-acetylglucosamine-derived O-antigen building blocks biosynthesis (PWY-7332), the dTDP-β-L-rhamnose biosynthesis (DTDPRHAMSYN-PWY), the 1,5-anhydrofructose degradation pathway (PWY-6992), the β-(1, 4)-mannan degradation pathway (PWY-7456), and the γ-aminobutyric acid degradation pathway (PWY-5022). The LB microbiota were more abundant in the l-carnitine respiration pathway (CARNMET-PWY), the superpathway of glycerol degradation to 1,3-propanediol (GOLPDLCAT-PWY), the heterolactic fermentation pathway (P122-PWY), the oleate β-oxidation pathway (PWY0-1337), the d-erythronate degradation II pathway (PWY-7873), and the superpathway of pyrimidine ribonucleosides degradation pathway (PWY-7209), which exerts reductive pyrimidine degradation in bacteria.
FIG 6
FIG 6 Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) showing differentially abundant pathways of the cecal microbiota (LDA score ≥ 2.0; P < 0.05; LB, low Bacteroides; HB, high Bacteroides; LB, n = 18; HB, n = 15).

The cecal tonsil of HB and LB chickens exhibited different expression levels of genes involved in immune tolerance and gut integrity.

To investigate how different levels of Bacteroides population affected host responses, cecal tonsil RNA was extracted from the HB and LB group, and subjected to reverse transcription qPCR (RT-qPCR) assay to examine immune-related genes, including Interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6 and IL-10, as well as tight-junction protein gene claudin-1 (CLDN1), and the sodium coupled monocarboxylate transporter (SMCT) (Fig. 7). The cecal tonsils of the HB group showed a decreased IL-1β with an increased IL-10, compared with the LB group. In addition, CLDN1, which has previously been associated with improved barrier function (13), was also higher in the cecal tonsil tissues of the HB group (P < 0.05). SMCT expression was not different between groups (P = 0.103).
FIG 7
FIG 7 Gene expression in chicken cecal tonsil. (a) Pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1β showed lower expression levels in the HB group compared to LB broiler chickens. (b) IL-6 expression was not differed between groups. (c) Increased anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 was observed in the HB group. (d) The expression of the tight-junction protein CLDN1 was slightly increased in the HB group. (e) Compared to the LB group, a trend of increased expression of short-chain fatty acid transporter SMCT was seen in the ceca of HB chickens (LB, n = 18; HB, n = 15; mean ± standard deviation; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; n.s., not significant; LB, low Bacteroides; HB, high Bacteroides).

DISCUSSION

While several studies have shown significant variations in Bacteroides populations in the chicken gut microbiome in early life (6, 7), this is the first study to investigate how distinct Bacteroides compositions associate with cecal SCFA profiles, host responses, as well as microbial functional capacity. Bodyweight of day-7 chickens were not collected, limiting a connection to growth performance. However, 32-day bodyweight and flock mortality rate were similar between flocks, where the majority of birds were identified as LB, n/a, or HB. With regard to the cecal microbial composition of chickens close to the end of production, the variability of Bacteroides was much less pronounced (data not shown); therefore, the LB/HB phenotype was only explored in day-7 chickens. Moreover, in this study, only 5 young broilers per flock were sampled. Previously, microbiome studies showed that individuals housed together, particularly coprophagic animals like mice and chicken, exhibited high similarity in the intestinal microbiota (14, 15). Therefore, to better explore the variability of the cecal microbiome among commercial broiler chickens, instead of sampling more broilers from each flock, we chose to increase the number of flocks sampled.
What caused the distinct Bacteroides levels was not investigated in thisstudy. Previous studies showed that cecal Bacteroides abundance in young broiler chickens could be increased by exposure to cecal contents from 40-week-old healthy chickens via oral gavage (16), the use of recycled litter (17), or hen contact at hatching (4). The absence of contact with the parent flock in modern broiler production likely limits the transmission of mature chicken-derived commensals (2, 18). In this sense, the alternate initial exposures (e.g., parent flock, hatching environments, or handling crew) may play an important role in shaping the early-life broiler microbiota. It has been reported that the relative abundance of Bacteroides was positively correlated with chicken cecal SCFA profiles (19). In accordance with previous findings, our results showed that the over-representation of Bacteroides in ceca was associated with increased concentrations of SCFAs, particularly acetate, propionate, butyrate, and valerate. In the chicken intestine, SCFAs are products of the gut microbiota fermentation from partially- or non-digestible polysaccharides, mainly derived from plant biomass. Functional gene network analyses showed that the microbial functional capacity of the HB group was centered by a series of complex carbohydrate degradation enzymes. Specifically, acetylxylan esterase (EC3.1.1.72) contributes to xylan utilization (20), and β-L-arabinofuranosidase (EC3.2.1.185) helps digest glycoproteins that are widely found in plant cell wall fractions (21). The licheninase (EC3.2.1.73) can degrade β-glucans, which have been used as chicken feed additives (22), and were found to modulate the host gut microbiota, decreasing intestinal inflammation (23, 24). In this study, Spearman correlation analyses showed that the abundance of the microbe-encoded acetylxylan esterase, β-L-arabinofuranosidase, and licheninase were significantly associated with cecal total SCFA, acetate, propionate, butyrate, and valerate concentrations (Fig. S2). Therefore, by harboring microbial functional capacity centered by these key enzymes, the microbiota of the HB group showed potential for increased utilization of plant-derived biomass to promote SCFA production, and thereby improve gut health.
Van der Hee and Wells (2021) recently reviewed the complex interactions between SCFAs, gut microbes, and the host immune system (25). Briefly, enterocytes can absorb SCFAs via passive diffusion or protein-mediated transport, and elevated levels of lumen SCFAs enhance associated transporter and receptor expression (25). Nastasi et al. (2015) reported that butyrate can confer anti-inflammatory properties in colonic dendritic cells via the G-protein coupled receptors pathway, which inhibits the expression of cytokine and chemokine genes (26). In this study, the elevated butyrate in HB birds coincided with lower IL-1β, and higher IL-10 expression in the cecal tonsil. In addition, tight-junction protein levels are important indicators of gut integrity, as they contribute to epithelial cell adhesions and act as a barrier. Generally, decreased expression of tight-junction proteins may lead to diffusion of antigens or bacterial macromolecules (e.g., endotoxin) from the intestinal lumen into circulation (27). Decreased level of tight-junction protein claudin 1 was reported in chronically stressed, and repeatedly corticosterone-injected rats (28). In addition, gut inflammation caused by Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium challenge was also found to decrease the expression of chicken intestinal claudin 1 (13). Therefore, in this study, the decreased expression of CLDN1 mRNA level found in the LB group may indicate decreased gut integrity, and may have contributed to the increased expression of IL-1β.
Microbial co-occurrence networks provided an opportunity to explore the impact of elevated Bacteroides on cecal microbial communities and types of interactions with other connected microorganisms. The analysis included both positive and negative links, considering the possibility that both types of associations could influence network stability. To circumvent the limitations of sparsity and high dimensionality of microbial data, the correlation principle was utilized to understand the pairwise associations among microbes and interactions. Further, network features were computed to identify biologically significant patterns and community keystone taxa. In this study, the SparCC correlation method evaluated the variance of the log-ratio for modified data to infer pairwise relations. Lactobacillus was negatively associated with Bacteroides in the cecal microbial community. Similarly, previous human studies have demonstrated that Lactobacillus can competitively exclude commensals, including Bacteroides (29). Competition is often observed between taxa sharing similar nutrient sources (e.g., nitrogen and carbon source). It might partially explain the negative correlations between Bacteroides and Lactobacillus in this study, since members from these 2 genera are efficient and important complex carbohydrate degraders. Particularly, our results of functional genetic analyses indicated that the 1,5-anhydrofructose degradation pathway (PWY-6992), and the β-(1, 4)-mannan degradation pathway (PWY-7456) were more abundant in the HB cecal microbiota. The 1,5-anhydrofructose degradation pathway catalyzes the degradation of glycogen (30), whereas the β-(1, 4)-mannan degradation pathway is involved in the hydrolysis of mannans, a major group of hemicellulose (31). The enriched pathway PWY-7456 in the HB cecal microbiota indicated that the microbial members harbored greater genetic potential in utilizing complex carbohydrates derived from plant cell wall, which were contained in chicken feed. In the LB group, the heterolactic fermentation pathway (P122-PWY) was more abundant in the gut microbiome. Possessed mainly by lactic acid bacteria, the heterolactic fermentation pathway ferments starch to lactates. The difference in the predominant carbohydrate utilization pathways between LB and HB groups further identified nutrient competition between Bacteroides and Lactobacillus, particularly regarding complex carbohydrate fermentation. Currently, a good number of studies have considered Lactobacillus as probiotics in poultry, and reported potential beneficial effects. However, many of these studies also found that the abundance of Lactobacillus in the chicken ceca was not affected by Lactobacillus supplementation, suggesting that the potential beneficial effects conferred by Lactobacillus may not be a consequence of cecal colonization (32, 33). In fact, Chen et al. (2016) studied the effect of the supplementation of Lactobacillus spp. and/or yeast with bacteriocin on broiler performance, and reported that supplementation with Lactobacillus culture alone (without bacteriocin) was the only treatment group that increased cecal Lactobacillus colonization (34). Consistent with our study, the increase in Lactobacillus coincided with decreased SCFA production, with no improvement on performance compared to the control (34). Thus, although supplementing Lactobacillus had been shown to exert beneficial effects on poultry, the effects of Lactobacillus colonization in the chicken ceca needs to be carefully assessed in the future.
In addition, results from this study indicated that Alistipes may share a mutualistic relationship with Bacteroides. To date, little is known about the genus Alistipes, which is a sub-branch genus of the phylum Bacteroidetes (35). Alistipes are bile-resistant microorganisms with an ability to produce acetic acid by digesting gelatin and fermenting carbohydrates (36). Correlations between health outcomes and Alistipes indicated that Alistipes may exert protective effects against diseases, such as liver fibrosis and colitis (37, 38). However, the causal effect of the microbial taxa in diseases and its prevalence remains unclear. Studies have shown that Alistipes are more abundant in host gut with an anti-inflammatory background (39, 40). In this study, the lower IL-1β expression in the ceca of HB broilers may have favored Alistipes growth.
The higher Bacteroides abundance in ceca may reflect a further progression of microbial succession, with the transition from facultative anaerobes, such as Lactobacilli, to strict anaerobes, such as Bacteroides, Ruminococcaceae, and Lachnospiraceae. An anaerobic gut environment and undigested carbohydrates entering ceca are essential for the production of SCFAs (41), in turn, increased SCFAs help make the gut more anaerobic (42). In congruence, our results showed that obligate anaerobes from the families Ruminococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae were positively correlated with SCFA production. On the other hand, more inflammation could provide reactive oxygen species that could delay colonization of strict anaerobes (43). Although previously both in vitro (44) and in vivo (45) studies have shown the immunomodulatory effects of Bacteroides strains, the direction of causality between high Bacteroides/SCFA levels and inflammation has yet to be determined. Therefore, future studies assessing how the host intestine responds to increased SCFA (e.g., via histone deacetylation) is warranted. Further, while this study points to a beneficial impact of high Bacteroides colonization, future research with the introduction of Bacteroides strains to chickens in microbially controlled conditions will be needed to demonstrate causal contributions of Bacteroides in improving health outcomes, and to support their development as potential probiotics.
To conclude, this study identified distinct Bacteroides populations in the ceca of commercial broiler chickens in early life. Our results revealed that elevated level of cecal Bacteroides in young chickens had led to altered microbial functional capacity of the gut microbiome, which promoted the production of SCFA. Coinciding with that, compared to the LB group, chickens from the HB group had lower expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, coupled with higher expressions of anti-inflammatory cytokine and tight-junction protein gene. Consequently, it indicated that elevated cecal Bacteroides may be beneficial to commercial broiler chickens in suppressing gut inflammation through the increment of short-chain fatty acid production.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chicken management and sample collection.

Following the Canadian Council on Animal Care guidelines (46), the animal usage of this experiment was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee administered by the University of Alberta (AUP00002377). A commercial broiler farm in AB, Canada provided facilities and all the chickens for this study. A total of 14 broiler flocks reared under the same feed and water, light exposure, and immunization condition in similarly engineered broiler production houses were sampled. Animal management and sample collection procedure were performed as descried previously (47). Briefly, for each flock, 14,000 Ross 308 broiler chicks were placed at 1 day of age, and fed ad libitum until the end of the production cycle. At day 7, five broiler chickens from each flock, randomly selected from different areas in the barn, were euthanized by cervical dislocation for sampling. Approximately 300 mg of cecal contents and cecal tonsil tissue were collected, snap-frozen, and stored at –80°C for further analyses.

Bacteroides over-/under- representing sample identification.

Total DNA was extracted from cecal contents using the QIAamp Fast DNA Stool minikit (Qiagen), with an additional bead-beading step with ~200 mg of garnet rock at 6.0 m/s for 60 s (FastPrep-24 5G instrument, MP Biomedicals). Amplicon libraries were constructed according to the manufacturing protocol from Illumina (16S Metagenomic Sequencing Library Preparation), targeting the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene (primers: Forward: 5′-TCGTCGG CAGCGTCAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAGCCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3′; Reverse: 5′-GTCTCGTGGGCTCGGAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAGGACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3′). An Illumina MiSeq Platform (2 × 300 cycles; Illumina Inc.) was used for a paired-end sequencing run.
The quality of the reads was assessed using FastQC. Quantitative Insight into Microbial Ecology (QIIME2)-2020.6 was used to process the sequenced reads (48). DADA2 was used to de-noise and generate paired-end representative reads (49), and samples with reads less than 14,000 reads were removed. An ASV feature table was subsequently created. To assign taxonomy, the q2-feature-classifier in QIIME2 was used with a pretrained classifier “SILVA 132 99%” (50). The command “qiime feature-table relative-frequency” on taxa collapse level 6 was used to calculate genus relative abundance in QIIME2. The mean value and standard deviation of Bacteroides relative abundance was calculated. Based on the data distribution, to screen for distinct cecal Bacteroides samples, cecal content with Bacteroides relative abundance falling inside one standard deviation were considered as non-assigned (n/a) samples, whereas the ones falling outside of a standard deviation was considered as LB or HB samples.
The 'diversity core-metrics-phylogenetic' command was used for diversity analyses on the screened samples. The Chao1 and Shannon diversity indices were computed using “diversity alpha-phylogenetic”, and the significance was determined using “diversity alpha-group-significance”. The beta diversity was analyzed in QIIME2 using the Bray-Curtis distance metric, and a principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) was plotted in R utilizing phyloseq package. Pairwise Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance Using Distance Matrices (pairwise Adonis) based on the Bray-Curtis distance matrices was used to identify significant differences in community structures between treatments.
A microbial co-occurrence network was calculated using the NetCoMi package (version 1.0.2) in R, with the Sparse Correlations for Compositional data (SparCC) as the sparsification method. The algorithm estimated pairwise association after 20 iterations, assuming an absence of a large number of co-occurring taxa with strong correlations. The taxa count data was resampled 100 times before being used to generate randomized correlation tables. For each pairwise correlation, the randomized correlation matrix was used to calculate bootstrapped P values. The resulting correlation matrix was utilized in network models to define links between taxa. If the absolute pairwise correlation between 2 taxa was greater than 0.25, and there was strong evidence for the association (P < 0.001), correlations between the 2 taxa were considered during network construction. Network features, including degree, betweenness, closeness centrality, and modularity computation, enabled identification of hubs (quantile set at 0.9). The community structure was constructed based on the fast, greedy algorithm (51).
The extracted genomic DNA was also used to measure the abundance of the Bacteroides-Prevotella group in the cecal content using qPCR, targeting the 16s rRNA gene (Table 5). PerfeCTa SYBR green Supermix (Quantabio) was used for qPCR assays, which were conducted on an ABI StepOne real-time system (Applied Biosystems), following the setup of 95°C for 3 min, 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 s, and 68°C for 30 s. A 10-log-fold standard curve for quantification of the target gene was created using PCR amplicon, where the concentration was determined by a Quant-iT PicoGreen dsDNA assay kit (Invitrogen). Bacteroides-Prevotella 16S rRNA gene copy numbers were determined using the relative standard curve method, and normalized to the weight of cecal content used for DNA extraction.
Table 5
Table 5 Primers used in this study
PrimerSequenceProduct size (bp)Reference
Bacteroides-Prevotella ForwardGGTGTCGGCTTAAGTGCCAT14056
Bacteroides-Prevotella ReverseCGGACGTAAGGGCCGTGC
ILa-1b ForwardGGGCATCAAGGGCTACAA8857
IL-1b ReverseCTGTCCAGGCGGTAGAAGAT
IL-6 ForwardGAGGGCCGTTCGCTATTTG6758
IL-6 ReverseATTGTGCCCGAACTAAAACATTC
IL-10 ForwardGCTGAGGGTGAAGTTTGAGG12159
IL-10 ReverseAGACTGGCAGCCAAAGGTC
SMCTb ForwardGGCTTCAGCGTTTGGGACTA23560
SMCT ReverseTGCAGAAGATGGCACCGTAG
CLDNc1 ForwardCCAGGTGAAGAAGATGCGGA129
CLDN1 ReverseGGTGTGAAAGGGTCATAGAAGGC
GAPDHd ForwardCTACACACGGACACTTCAAG24427
GAPDH ReverseACAAACATGGGGGCATCAG
a
IL, interleukin.
b
SMCT, sodium coupled monocarboxylate transporter.
c
CLDN, claudin.
d
GAPDH, Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

Shotgun metagenomic sequencing and functional genomics analyses.

Total genomic DNA extracted from the cecal contents, as described above, were used for Shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Library preparation and shotgun sequencing were performed at the Genome Quebec Innovation Centre (Montreal, Canada). Libraries were generated using NEBNext Ultra II DNA Library Prep Kit (New England Biolabs). Shotgun metagenomic sequencing was performed using the NovaSeq 6000 S4 PE150 system (Illumina Inc.).
FastP v0.23.2. was used for quality control. Low quality reads, adaptors, polyG, and duplicated sequences were removed (52). To remove host DNA contamination, a chicken host reference database was built using bowtie2 v2.4.1 with genome Gallus_gallus 105 release from Ensembl (53). Kneaddata v0.10.0 were used to remove host contaminants with the built reference database (https://github.com/biobakery/kneaddata). Gene abundance and pathway analyses were conducted using HuMAnN3, with default settings (54). Gene and pathway abundance were annotated by the Metacyc database, and normalized to copy numbers per million reads using the HuMAnN3 utility scripts. Differentiate gene and pathway abundance were identified using LDA effect size (LEfSe) implemented in the Galaxy online tool (LDA score > 2). Differentiate gene network was constructed using the NetCoMi v1.0.2 package in R (51). Briefly, filter parameters were set to the 50 most frequent genes. Gene network was clustered based on the fast, greedy algorithm. Gene association was determined by the SPRING method (55). The corresponding similarities were used as edge weights. Eigenvector centrality was used to define hubs and scale node sizes. Properties of the constructed network were calculated based on the highest degree, and betweenness and closeness centrality at the same time, with hub quantile set at 0.9. The Jaccard index was used to assess the differences of the most central nodes between groups. Similarity between networks were assessed based on the adjusted Rand index.

RT-qPCR assay.

To examine host response to different Bacteroides relative abundance, cecal tonsils were subjected to RNA extraction, followed by cDNA synthesis and qPCR assay. Approximately 30 to 50 mg of snap-frozen cecal tonsil tissue was cut and weighed. Tissue was ground by pre-chilled RNase-free mortar and pestle in liquid nitrogen. RNA was extracted using the GeneJET RNA purification kit (Thermo Scientific) with modifications. Specifically, ground tissues were homogenized in 600 μL of lysis buffer followed by bead beating in nuclease-free tubes with 3 metal beads at 4 m/s for 20 s (MP Biomedicals). Prior to elution, DNase I (Qiagen) was used to treat samples for 15 min to remove DNA. RNA concentration was determined by a NanoDrop 2000c spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific), and were normalized to 1 μg of RNA for reverse transcription. QScript Flex cDNA Synthesis Kit (Quanta Biosciences) was used for RNA reverse transcription, following the random primer and oligo (dt) protocol. Then, qPCR was performed using PercfeCTa SYBR green Supermix (Quantabio) with primers listed in Table 5, and conducted on an ABI StepOne real-time system following the cycles: 95°C for 3 min, 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 s, and 60°C for 30 s. Glyceraldhyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as the housekeeping gene for calculating the fold change of gene expression relative to LB birds using the 2-ΔΔCt method.

SCFAs analysis.

Cecal contents used for 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, and shotgun metagenomic sequencing were also used for SCFA analysis. Approximately 30 mg per sample of snap-frozen cecal content was weighed, followed by homogenization with 25% phosphoric acid. Samples were centrifuged at 21,130 × g for 10 min, and supernatant was collected and filtered using a 0.45 μm filter. Isocaproic acid (23 μmol/mL) was added at a 1:4 ratio to samples as an internal standard. Samples were analyzed on a Scion 456-GC instrument. Final concentrations of SCFAs were normalized to sample weights.

Statistical analyses.

If not otherwise stated, statistical analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software), and mean values were presented as mean ± the standard deviation. Statistically significant differences were determined (P < 0.05) by an unpaired Student's t test for parametric data (i.e., gene expression and SCFA concentrations). The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to determine the significance of non-parametric data (i.e., microbiome alpha-diversity indices). The Spearman’s correlation was used to correlate SCFA concentration and bacterial relative abundance, as well as to determine correlations between cecal microbial taxa. Correlation significance was determined by psych package, and visualized using the corrplot package in R (version 3.6.1).

Data availability.

The 16S rRNA sequences and shotgun metagenomic sequences in this study were submitted to NCBI Sequence Read Archive under BioProject IDs: PRJNA876288 and PRJNA902117, respectively.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by the Alberta Livestock and Meat Agency, the Alberta Chicken Producers, the Canadian Poultry Research Council, and the Results Driven Agriculture Research. B.P.W. is supported by the Canada Research Chair Program.
Funders did not participate in study design, data collection, and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Supplemental Material

File (spectrum.03616-22-s0001.pdf)
File (spectrum.03616-22-s0002.xlsx)
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

1.
Rychlik I. 2020. Composition and function of chicken gut microbiota. Animals 10:103.
2.
Oakley BB, Lillehoj HS, Kogut MH, Kim WK, Maurer JJ, Pedroso A, Lee MD, Collett SR, Johnson TJ, Cox NA. 2014. The chicken gastrointestinal microbiome. FEMS Microbiol Lett 360:100–112.
3.
Tillman GE, Haas GJ, Wise MG, Oakley B, Smith MA, Siragusa GR. 2011. Chicken intestine microbiota following the administration of lupulone, a hop-based antimicrobial. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 77:395–403.
4.
Kubasova T, Kollarcikova M, Crhanova M, Karasova D, Cejkova D, Sebkova A, Matiasovicova J, Faldynova M, Pokorna A, Cizek A, Rychlik I. 2019. Contact with adult hen affects development of caecal microbiota in newly hatched chicks. PLoS One 14:e0212446.
5.
Thomas M, Wongkuna S, Ghimire S, Kumar R, Antony L, Doerner KC, Singery A, Nelson E, Woyengo T, Chankhamhaengdecha S, Janvilisri T, Scaria J. 2019. Gut microbial dynamics during conventionalization of germfree chicken. mSphere 4:e00035-19.
6.
Wei S, Morrison M, Yu Z. 2013. Bacterial census of poultry intestinal microbiome. Poult Sci 92:671–683.
7.
Oakley BB, Kogut MH. 2016. Spatial and temporal changes in the broiler chicken cecal and fecal microbiomes and correlations of bacterial taxa with cytokine gene expression. Front Vet Sci 3:11.
8.
Medvecky M, Cejkova D, Polansky O, Karasova D, Kubasova T, Cizek A, Rychlik I. 2018. Whole genome sequencing and function prediction of 133 gut anaerobes isolated from chicken caecum in pure cultures. BMC Genomics 19:561.
9.
Arumugam M, Raes J, Pelletier E, Le Paslier D, Yamada T, Mende DR, Fernandes GR, Tap J, Bruls T, Batto J-M, Bertalan M, Borruel N, Casellas F, Fernandez L, Gautier L, Hansen T, Hattori M, Hayashi T, Kleerebezem M, Kurokawa K, Leclerc M, Levenez F, Manichanh C, Nielsen HB, Nielsen T, Pons N, Poulain J, Qin J, Sicheritz-Ponten T, Tims S, Torrents D, Ugarte E, Zoetendal EG, Wang J, Guarner F, Pedersen O, de Vos WM, Brunak S, Doré J, Antolín M, Artiguenave F, Blottiere HM, Almeida M, Brechot C, Cara C, Chervaux C, Cultrone A, Delorme C, Denariaz G, Dervyn R, MetaHIT Consortium, et al. 2011. Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome. Nature 473:174–180.
10.
Kaakoush NO, Sodhi N, Chenu JW, Cox JM, Riordan SM, Mitchell HM. 2014. The interplay between Campylobacter and Helicobacter species and other gastrointestinal microbiota of commercial broiler chickens. Gut Pathog 6:18.
11.
Yuan Z, Yan W, Wen C, Zheng J, Yang N, Sun C. 2020. Enterotype identification and its influence on regulating the duodenum metabolism in chickens. Poult Sci 99:1515–1527.
12.
Caspi R, Billington R, Ferrer L, Foerster H, Fulcher CA, Keseler IM, Kothari A, Krummenacker M, Latendresse M, Mueller LA, Ong Q, Paley S, Subhraveti P, Weaver DS, Karp PD. 2016. The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of pathway/genome databases. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D471–D480. Accessed 11 March 2022.
13.
Shao Y, Guo Y, Wang Z. 2013. beta-1,3/1,6-Glucan alleviated intestinal mucosal barrier impairment of broiler chickens challenged with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Poult Sci 92:1764–1773.
14.
McCafferty J, Mühlbauer M, Gharaibeh RZ, Arthur JC, Perez-Chanona E, Sha W, Jobin C, Fodor AA. 2013. Stochastic changes over time and not founder effects drive cage effects in microbial community assembly in a mouse model. ISME J 7:2116–2125.
15.
Laukens D, Brinkman BM, Raes J, De Vos M, Vandenabeele P. 2016. Heterogeneity of the gut microbiome in mice: guidelines for optimizing experimental design. FEMS Microbiol Rev 40:117–132.
16.
Glendinning L, Chintoan-Uta C, Stevens MP, Watson M. 2022. Effect of cecal microbiota transplantation between different broiler breeds on the chick flora in the first week of life. Poult Sci 101:101624.
17.
Wang L, Lilburn M, Yu Z. 2016. Intestinal microbiota of broiler chickens as affected by litter management regimens. Front Microbiol 7:593.
18.
Maki JJ, Bobeck EA, Sylte MJ, Looft T. 2020. Eggshell and environmental bacteria contribute to the intestinal microbiota of growing chickens. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 11.
19.
Liao X, Shao Y, Sun G, Yang Y, Zhang L, Guo Y, Luo X, Lu L. 2020. The relationship among gut microbiota, short-chain fatty acids, and intestinal morphology of growing and healthy broilers. Poult Sci 99:5883–5895.
20.
Sista Kameshwar AK, Qin W. 2018. Understanding the structural and functional properties of carbohydrate esterases with a special focus on hemicellulose deacetylating acetyl xylan esterases. Mycology 9:273–295.
21.
Fujita K, Takashi Y, Obuchi E, Kitahara K, Suganuma T. 2014. Characterization of a novel β-l-Arabinofuranosidase in Bifidobacterium longum. J Biol Chem 289:5240–5249.
22.
Schwartz B, Vetvicka V. 2021. Review: β-glucans as effective antibiotic alternatives in poultry. Molecules 26:3560.
23.
Karumuthil-Melethil S, Gudi R, Johnson BM, Perez N, Vasu C. 2014. Fungal β-glucan, a Dectin-1 ligand, promotes protection from type 1 diabetes by inducing regulatory innate immune response. J Immunol 193:3308–3321.
24.
Goldenkova-Pavlova IV, Tyurin AА, Mustafaev ON. 2018. The features that distinguish lichenases from other polysaccharide-hydrolyzing enzymes and the relevance of lichenases for biotechnological applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:3951–3965.
25.
van der HB, Wells JM. 2021. Microbial regulation of host physiology by short-chain fatty acids. Trends Microbiol 29:700–712.
26.
Nastasi C, Candela M, Bonefeld CM, Geisler C, Hansen M, Krejsgaard T, Biagi E, Andersen MH, Brigidi P, Ødum N, Litman T, Woetmann A. 2015. The effect of short-chain fatty acids on human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Sci Rep 5:16148.
27.
Tsukita S, Yamazaki Y, Katsuno T, Tamura A, Tsukita S. 2008. Tight junction-based epithelial microenvironment and cell proliferation. Oncogene 27:6930–6938.
28.
Zheng G, Wu SP, Hu Y, Smith DE, Wiley JW, Hong S. 2013. Corticosterone mediates stress-related increased intestinal permeability in a region-specific manner. Neurogastroenterol Motil 25:e127–e139.
29.
Argentini C, Fontana F, Alessandri G, Lugli GA, Mancabelli L, Ossiprandi MC, van Sinderen D, Ventura M, Milani C, Turroni F. 2022. Evaluation of modulatory activities of Lactobacillus crispatus strains in the context of the vaginal microbiota. Microbiol Spectr 10:e0273321.
30.
Yu S. 2005. Enzymatic description of the anhydrofructose pathway of glycogen degradation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1723:63–73.
31.
Gilbert HJ, Knox JP, Boraston AB. 2013. Advances in understanding the molecular basis of plant cell wall polysaccharide recognition by carbohydrate-binding modules. Curr Opin Struct Biol 23:669–677.
32.
Gérard P, Brézillon C, Quéré F, Salmon A, Rabot S. 2008. Characterization of cecal microbiota and response to an orally administered Lactobacillus probiotic strain in the broiler chicken. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 14:115–122.
33.
De Cesare A, Sirri F, Manfreda G, Moniaci P, Giardini A, Zampiga M, Meluzzi A. 2017. Effect of dietary supplementation with Lactobacillus acidophilus D2/CSL (CECT 4529) on caecum microbioma and productive performance in broiler chickens. PLoS One 12:e0176309.
34.
Chen CY, Chen SW, Wang HT. 2017. Effect of supplementation of yeast with bacteriocin and Lactobacillus culture on growth performance, cecal fermentation, microbiota composition, and blood characteristics in broiler chickens. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 30:211–220.
35.
Parker BJ, Wearsch PA, Veloo ACM, Rodriguez-Palacios A. 2020. The genus Alistipes: gut bacteria with emerging implications to inflammation, cancer, and mental health. Front Immunol 11:906.
36.
Rautio M, Eerola E, Vaisanen-Tunkelrott ML, Molitoris D, Lawson P, Collins MD, Jousimies-Somer H. 2003. Reclassification of Bacteroides putredinis (Weinberg et al., 1937) in a New Genus Alistipes gen. nov., as Alistipes putredinis comb. nov., and description of Alistipes finegoldii sp nov., from human sources. Syst Appl Microbiol 26:182–188.
37.
Sung CM, Lin Y-F, Chen K-F, Ke H-M, Huang H-Y, Gong Y-N, Tsai W-S, You J-F, Lu MJ, Cheng H-T, Lin C-Y, Kuo C-J, Tsai IJ, Hsieh S-Y. 2019. Predicting clinical outcomes of cirrhosis patients with hepatic encephalopathy from the fecal microbiome. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol 8:301–318.
38.
Dziarski R, Park SY, Kashyap DR, Dowd SE, Gupta D. 2016. Pglyrp-regulated gut microflora Prevotella falsenii, Parabacteroides distasonis and Bacteroides eggerthii enhance and Alistipes finegoldii attenuates colitis in mice. PLoS One 11:e0146162.
39.
Shen L, Liu L, Ji H-F. 2017. Regulative effects of curcumin spice administration on gut microbiota and its pharmacological implications. Food Nutr Res 61:1361780.
40.
Frank DN, Amand ALS, Feldman RA, Boedeker EC, Harpaz N, Pace NR. 2007. Molecular-phylogenetic characterization of microbial community imbalances in human inflammatory bowel diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:13780–13785.
41.
van Der Wielen PW, Biesterveld S, Notermans S, Hofstra H, Urlings BA, van Knapen F. 2000. Role of volatile fatty acids in development of the cecal microflora in broiler chickens during growth. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:2536–2540.
42.
Yang F, Chen H, Gao Y, An N, Li X, Pan X, Yang X, Tian L, Sun J, Xiong X, Xing Y. 2020. Gut microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids and hypertension: mechanism and treatment. Biomed Pharmacother 130:110503.
43.
Yardeni T, Tanes CE, Bittinger K, Mattei LM, Schaefer PM, Singh LN, Wu GD, Murdock DG, Wallace DC. 2019. Host mitochondria influence gut microbiome diversity: a role for ROS. Sci Signal 12:eaaw3159.
44.
Hiippala K, Kainulainen V, Suutarinen M, Heini T, Bowers JR, Jasso-Selles D, Lemmer D, Valentine M, Barnes R, Engelthaler DM, Satokari R. 2020. Isolation of anti-inflammatory and epithelium reinforcing Bacteroides and Parabacteroides Spp. from a healthy fecal donor. Nutrients 12:935.
45.
Tan H, Zhao J, Zhang H, Zhai Q, Chen W. 2019. Novel strains of Bacteroides fragilis and Bacteroides ovatus alleviate the LPS-induced inflammation in mice. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 103:2353–2365.
46.
Canadian Council on Animal Care. 2009. Guide to the care and use of farm animals in research, teaching and testing. www.ccac.ca. Accessed 1 September 2018.
47.
Fan Y, Forgie AJ, Ju T, Marcolla C, Inglis T, McMullen LM, Willing BP, Korver DR. 2022. The use of disinfectant in barn cleaning alters microbial composition and increases carriage of campylobacter jejuni in broiler chickens. Appl Environ Microbiol 88:e0029522.
48.
Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, Alexander H, Alm EJ, Arumugam M, Asnicar F, Bai Y, Bisanz JE, Bittinger K, Brejnrod A, Brislawn CJ, Brown CT, Callahan BJ, Caraballo-Rodríguez AM, Chase J, Cope EK, Da Silva R, Diener C, Dorrestein PC, Douglas GM, Durall DM, Duvallet C, Edwardson CF, Ernst M, Estaki M, Fouquier J, Gauglitz JM, Gibbons SM, Gibson DL, Gonzalez A, Gorlick K, Guo J, Hillmann B, Holmes S, Holste H, Huttenhower C, Huttley GA, Janssen S, Jarmusch AK, Jiang L, Kaehler BD, Kang KB, Keefe CR, Keim P, Kelley ST, Knights D, et al. 2019. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol 37:852–857.
49.
Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. 2016. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 13:581–583.
50.
Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. 2013. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D590–D596.
51.
Peschel S, Müller CL, Von Mutius E, Boulesteix A-L, Depner M. 2021. NetCoMi: network construction and comparison for microbiome data in R. Briefings in Bioinformatics 22.
52.
Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. 2018. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34:i884–i890.
53.
Cunningham F, Allen JE, Allen J, Alvarez-Jarreta J, Amode MR, Armean IM, Austine-Orimoloye O, Azov AG, Barnes I, Bennett R, Berry A, Bhai J, Bignell A, Billis K, Boddu S, Brooks L, Charkhchi M, Cummins C, Da Rin Fioretto L, Davidson C, Dodiya K, Donaldson S, El Houdaigui B, El Naboulsi T, Fatima R, Giron CG, Genez T, Martinez JG, Guijarro-Clarke C, Gymer A, Hardy M, Hollis Z, Hourlier T, Hunt T, Juettemann T, Kaikala V, Kay M, Lavidas I, Le T, Lemos D, Marugan JC, Mohanan S, Mushtaq A, Naven M, Ogeh DN, Parker A, Parton A, Perry M, Pilizota I, Prosovetskaia I, et al. 2022. Ensembl 2022. Nucleic Acids Res 50:D988–D995.
54.
Beghini F, McIver LJ, Blanco-Míguez A, Dubois L, Asnicar F, Maharjan S, Mailyan A, Manghi P, Scholz M, Thomas AM, Valles-Colomer M, Weingart G, Zhang Y, Zolfo M, Huttenhower C, Franzosa EA, Segata N. 2021. Integrating taxonomic, functional, and strain-level profiling of diverse microbial communities with bioBakery 3. Elife 10:e65088.
55.
Yoon G, Gaynanova I, Müller CL. 2019. Microbial networks in SPRING - Semi-parametric rank-based correlation and partial correlation estimation for quantitative microbiome data. Front Genet 10.
56.
Rinttila T, Kassinen A, Malinen E, Krogius L, Palva A. 2004. Development of an extensive set of 16S rDNA-targeted primers for quantification of pathogenic and indigenous bacteria in faecal samples by real-time PCR. J Appl Microbiol 97:1166–1177.
57.
Abdel-Mageed AM, Nii T, Isobe N, Yoshimura Y. 2017. Modulatory roles of proinflammatory cytokines on the expression of cathelicidins in the lower regions of the oviduct of laying hens. Cytokine 99:66–72.
58.
Yang J, Wang J, Huang K, Zhu M, Liu Q, Liu G, Chen F, Zhang H, Qin S. 2021. Selenium enriched Bacillus subtilis yb-1114246 activated the TLR2–NF-κB1 signaling pathway to regulate chicken intestinal β-defensin 1 expression. Food Funct 12:5913–5926.
59.
Grenier B, Schwartz-Zimmermann HE, Caha S, Moll WD, Schatzmayr G, Applegate TJ. 2015. Dose-dependent effects on sphingoid bases and cytokines in chickens fed diets prepared with fusarium verticillioides culture material containing fumonisins. Toxins (Basel) 7:1253–1272.
60.
Metzler-Zebeli BU, Siegerstetter S-C, Magowan E, Lawlor PG, Petri RM, ÓConnell NE, Zebeli Q. 2019. Feed restriction modifies intestinal microbiota-host mucosal networking in chickens divergent in residual feed intake. mSystems 4:e00261-18.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Microbiology Spectrum
Microbiology Spectrum
Volume 11Number 213 April 2023
eLocator: e03616-22
Editor: Diyan Li, Chengdu University
PubMed: 36719194

History

Received: 13 September 2022
Accepted: 8 January 2023
Published online: 31 January 2023

Keywords

  1. broiler chickens
  2. Bacteroides
  3. gut microbiota
  4. microbial functionality
  5. inflammation

Contributors

Authors

Yi Fan
Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Tingting Ju
Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Tulika Bhardwaj
Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Douglas R. Korver
Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Editor

Diyan Li
Editor
Chengdu University

Notes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note:

  • For recently published articles, the TOTAL download count will appear as zero until a new month starts.
  • There is a 3- to 4-day delay in article usage, so article usage will not appear immediately after publication.
  • Citation counts come from the Crossref Cited by service.

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. For an editable text file, please select Medlars format which will download as a .txt file. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share the article link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share on social media

American Society for Microbiology ("ASM") is committed to maintaining your confidence and trust with respect to the information we collect from you on websites owned and operated by ASM ("ASM Web Sites") and other sources. This Privacy Policy sets forth the information we collect about you, how we use this information and the choices you have about how we use such information.
FIND OUT MORE about the privacy policy