INTRODUCTION
Due to demographic shifts, including increased economic prosperity and particularly during the ongoing epidemic, the global prevalence of companion animals has experienced rapid growth. Presently, it is estimated that roughly one-third of households worldwide own a pet. With the escalating number of individuals sharing their living spaces with pets, the relationship between humans and their animal companions has evolved beyond mere ownership. As implied by the term “companion” animals, contemporary society perceives pets as more than possessions—they are regarded as friends or family members. In response to this evolving perspective, the pet industry has adapted, reflecting the heightened desire of individuals to invest more quality time with their cherished animal companions (
1,
2).
In contrast to wild animals contending with threats from other species and unpredictable environmental conditions, the mortality of domesticated animals is predominantly attributed to physical factors. Among young animals, mortality is most commonly attributed to trauma and infectious diseases, while elderly animals often succumb to chronic ailments like cancer, diabetes, and obesity. Much like the recognition of metabolic disorders as a primary factor in various chronic human diseases, pet obesity has been identified as a contributor to health disparities. Recent studies focusing on canines reveal alarming statistics, with 29%–34% of dogs classified as overweight and 5%–8% diagnosed as obese. These findings underscore the prevalence of pet obesity and its potential impact on the health and well-being of companion animals, mirroring the concerns associated with metabolic disorders in human health (
3–5).
While the complete etiology of obesity remains not fully elucidated, its fundamental cause lies in the accumulation of lipids. Domesticated animals typically become obese due to factors such as restricted physical activity and excessive energy intake, often stemming from the consumption of high-calorie foods, particularly indulgent treats. In the United States, where pet ownership is prevalent, food ranks among the most substantial expenses for pet owners. Both feline and canine owners invest significantly in standard pet food, with additional expenditures on treats. Concurrently, expenses on toys, accessories, and other pet-related items contribute to the continuous rise in overall pet-related costs. Projections indicate a gradual increase in spending on pet food and treats in the United States. In response to the rising awareness of pet obesity and the associated dietary restrictions imposed by owners, manufacturers of pet probiotics have discerned the evolving needs of pet owners. This recognition has prompted a focus on developing products that align with the dietary requirements of obese pets, reflecting a growing market demand for specialized pet nutrition (
6–8).
The choice of
Caenorhabditis elegans as the model organism in this study was motivated by its numerous practical advantages for screening potential probiotics. In comparison to other animal models,
C. elegans boasts a relatively short lifespan, lasting approximately 3–4 weeks, and is easy to maintain, undergoing quick reproductive cycles within a matter of days. Notably,
C. elegans shares 65% of genes associated with human diseases and possesses intestinal cells that exhibit structural similarities to those found in the human intestine (
9,
10). The transparency of
C. elegans’ body provides a distinct advantage, allowing for easy observation of lipid droplets and other potentially hazardous accumulations. This characteristic makes
C. elegans a preferred model for investigating various aspects of health, including obesity, feeding behaviors, satiety, and metabolic disorders (
11,
12). The combination of these attributes positions
C. elegans as a practical and informative model for the initial screening of potential probiotics.
A complex microbial community resides in the gastrointestinal tract of animals, and healthy canines and felines have been demonstrated to exhibit an abundance of
Bifidobacterium,
Lactobacillus,
Enterococcus,
Mogibactera,
Clostridium, and more (
13–15); clinical trials of those canine- and feline-origin probiotics were successful in improving the digestibility and overall health of senior dogs (
16,
17), relieving diarrhea (
18), lowering serum glucose and cholesterol levels, and decreasing systemic inflammation (
19,
20).
Given the substantial impact of gut microbiota on host systemic health, recent investigations have unveiled a correlation between gut microbiota composition and obesity. Typically, obese individuals exhibit an elevated presence of gram-positive bacteria, such as
Firmicutes, coupled with a reduction in gram-negative bacteria, particularly
Bacteroidetes (
21,
22). Additionally, it has been observed that obese individuals tend to possess a less diverse gut microbiota compared to their non-obese counterparts. Supplementation of obese individuals with
Lactobacillus-fermented dairy products has demonstrated a reduction in serum cholesterol and systemic cytokines associated with diabetes (
23–25).
This reduction in harmful factors suggests a modulation of gut microbiota through probiotic administration. Antibiotics have also been explored as an adjunct in obesity treatment, highlighting the intricate interplay between gut microbiota and metabolic health. Probiotics exert their beneficial effects by generating microbial byproducts, such as vitamin B and short-chain fatty acids, through the fermentation of indigestible carbohydrates in the gastrointestinal tract. These byproducts serve as an energy source for adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production via the citric acid cycle (
26,
27).
While the positive impact of probiotics on host health, including their role in obesity prevention, is acknowledged, a comprehensive understanding of their mechanisms is still evolving. Studies on probiotic effects in obese individuals remain primarily confined to human research, and the precise mechanisms underlying probiotic-induced modulation of host health in both humans and animals are not fully elucidated. Consequently, this study seeks to explore how probiotics, specifically Enterococcus faecium IDCC 2102 and Bifidobacterium lactis IDCC 4301, regulate gut microbiota to mitigate obesity in obese beagles and the hyperlipidemic C. elegans strain VS29.
DISCUSSION
The gut microbiota, residing in the gastrointestinal tract, plays a crucial role in influencing the overall health of the host. Probiotics, which are live beneficial bacteria, have been utilized to preserve homeostasis, contributing to the rapid growth of the pet probiotics industry. However, there has been a relatively limited number of metagenomic and metabolomic studies conducted in animals compared to those in humans (
36,
37). Consequently, the objective of this investigation was to ascertain how the administration of probiotics might regulate the obesity-induced disruption of the microbiota, stemming from an imbalance in energy intake and expenditure.
Initially, the probiotics Enterococcus faecium IDCC 2102 (IDCC 2102) and Bifidobacterium lactis IDCC 4301 (IDCC 4301) demonstrated a significant increase in the lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) when compared to the control Escherichia coli OP50 (OP50). Additionally, they effectively prevented lipid accumulation in C. elegans. This observed trend was further corroborated in canine models, where both IDCC 2102 and IDCC 4301 significantly curtailed weight gain in high-fat diet-treated canine subjects. Moreover, these probiotics restored lipase activity by reducing lipid-storing lipoproteins in the canine models, highlighting their potential in mitigating the effects of a high-fat diet.
Lipid accumulation due to obesity has been proven to burden blood flow and contribute to cardiovascular diseases, systemic inflammation, and hormonal disruption. As obesity develops, adipose tissue composed of adipocytes differentiates and transforms into highly active endocrine organs. They secrete pro-inflammatory adipokines and hunger hormones (
35,
38) and induce insulin resistance (
39). Both IDCC 2102 and IDCC 4301 significantly retained inflammatory cytokines and restored hormonal homeostasis compared to the high-fat diet-induced obese canine group (HFD).
Subsequently, we investigated the microbial changes induced by the treatment with IDCC 2102 and IDCC 4301. α-Diversity, which assesses microbial diversity within groups, and β-diversity, measuring microbial composition distances between groups (
40), were employed for analysis. Notably, treatments with IDCC 2102 and IDCC 4301 led to significant alterations in the microbial community structure. An advantageous aspect of probiotics is their capacity to modulate gut microbial ecosystems by inhibiting pathogens and fostering the growth of beneficial commensal bacteria (
41). The induction of obesity substantially increased the
Firmicutes/
Bacteroidetes ratio, a well-recognized characteristic of obesity.
Firmicutes are known for their efficiency in extracting energy from food, suggesting their role in facilitating calorie absorption and subsequent weight gain (
42,
43). Additionally, the HFD group exhibited an elevated abundance of
Erysipelotrichaceae, associated with high-fat diet consumption (
44);
Coriobacteriaceae, which tends to increase in tandem with the development of type 2 diabetes (
45); and an active pathogen,
Fusobacteriaceae (
46). Conversely, treatments with IDCC 2102 and IDCC 4301 led to an enrichment in the proportion of
Enterococcus and
Bifidobacterium, respectively, indicating effective colonization. Furthermore, both treatments augmented the abundance of
S24-7,
Lactobacillaceae, and
Ruminococcaceae, which are commensal bacteria prevalent in healthy canine microbiota (
47,
48). These findings underscore the potential of IDCC 2102 and IDCC 4301 in positively shaping the gut microbiota composition.
Given the significant role of the gut microbiota in influencing host physiology through the production of bacterial metabolites, we conducted an analysis of bacterial metabolites and functional pathways to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the impact of IDCC 2102 and IDCC 4301 on the hyperlipidemic C. elegans and canine models. The C. elegans control group, under hyperlipidemic conditions, exhibited heightened levels of glycine-related components, indicating a connection to lipid accumulation. Remarkably, treatments with E. faecium IDCC 2102 and B. lactis IDCC 4301 were found to influence glycine synthesis, potentially contributing to an extended lifespan in C. elegans. The hyperlipidemic C. elegans strain displayed notable alterations in metabolites linked to fatty acid metabolism, alongside an accumulation of glycine. Importantly, the administration of probiotics reversed this metabolic profile. This reversal was marked by elevated levels of beneficial bacterial short-chain acids like 5-aminovaleric acid and acetic acid, along with an increase in the serotonin precursor L-tryptophan. Simultaneously, there was a decrease in the levels of glycine and its precursor molecules. These findings strongly suggest that probiotic treatment effectively regulates lipid accumulation and mitigates neurotoxicity in the hyperlipidemic C. elegans model.
In our canine models, we observed that IDCC 2102 and IDCC 4301 actively participated in energy-producing mechanisms, specifically involving canine pyruvate and glucose metabolism. Under conditions of obesity, marked by an excessive intake of energy from a high-fat diet, the incapacity to burn this surplus energy leads to its storage as triglycerides. Notably, treatments with IDCC 2102 and IDCC 4301 prompted the activation of the pyruvate mechanism, thereby promoting homeostasis in glucose metabolism and facilitating ATP production. Moreover, both IDCC 2102 and IDCC 4301 prompted the synthesis of substantial quantities of short-chain fatty acids, such as acetic acid and butyric acid, while decreasing choleric acid and adipic acid levels (
49–51). Notably, IDCC 4301 exhibited a specialization in utilizing glucose metabolism, generating carboxylic acids like valeric acid and glutaric acid (
52). Furthermore, our investigation revealed that
Enterococcus faecium IDCC 2102 produced a noteworthy quantity of dopamine. Dopamine, a key catecholamine molecule, serves as a neurotransmitter regulating various animal behaviors, as established by prior research. In individuals with obesity, dopamine signaling indirectly influences pathological eating, leading to weight gain and glucose intolerance (
53–55). Additionally, pyruvate has been identified as a protective factor for dopaminergic neurons (
56).
In summary, our investigation provides valuable insights into the intricate mechanisms through which
E. faecium IDCC 2102 and
B. lactis IDCC 4301 exert their influence on the host, with a particular emphasis on the context of obesity. These noble probiotics demonstrate the ability to activate energy-producing pathways, regulate the synthesis of short-chain fatty acids, and impact neurotransmitter production. This multifaceted approach holds promising potential for attenuating the effects of obesity and enhancing metabolic health in both canines and the
C. elegans model. This sophisticated comprehension highlights the therapeutic capabilities of noble probiotics in addressing the intricate interplay of metabolic and neurobiological factors (
Fig. 9).
Furthermore, this unveils potential applications for interventions aimed at enhancing metabolic health in various mammals, extending to humans, as evidenced by the C. elegans study, which serves as a human homolog model. However, the intricate nature of these interactions in metabolic diseases emphasizes the necessity for additional research to fully comprehend the broader implications and potential therapeutic applications of these findings in conditions related to obesity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Probiotic preparation
Ildong Bioscience Co., Ltd. (Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea) provided the probiotics for this experiment, Enterococcus faecium IDCC 2102 (IDCC 2102) and Bifidobacterium lactis IDCC 4301 (IDCC 4301), and they were cultured in de Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe (MRS; BD Difco, New Jersey, USA) at 37°C for 48 h under aerobic conditions. Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) was cultured in MRS at 37°C for 24 h under aerobic conditions. The bacterial cultures were freeze-dried and kept at −80°C before use.
C. elegans culture conditions
C. elegans fer15(b26)II;fem-1(hc17)IV and
C. elegans strain VS29 (vha-6p::GFP::dgat-2) were purchased from the Caenorhabditis Genetic Center (Minnesota, USA) and maintained on nematode growth medium (NGM) plates at 15°C.
E. coli strain OP50 (OP50), the standard feed for
C. elegans, was cultured in the Luria–Bertani medium (LB Broth, Miller; BD Difco) at 37°C for 24 h with 225 rpm shaking. The live bacterial lawn was prepared for
C. elegans feeding by centrifuging the bacterial pellet at 13,000 rpm for 1 minute, washing it twice with sterile M9 buffer (3 g KH
2PO
4, 6 g Na
2HPO
4, and 5 g NaCl mixed in 1 L distilled water, autoclaved), and then adding 1 mL of 1 M MgSO
4 (Sigma‒Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The bacterial pellet was then concentrated to a final concentration of 2.5 mg/L (wet weight) in M9 buffer and suspended on NGM plates [3.5 g Bacto Peptone (BD Difco), 3 g NaCl (Sigma‒Aldrich), and 20 g agar (BD Difco)] (
11).
Lifespan analysis
For the lifespan analysis, egg-bearing worms were bleached using a sodium hypochlorite‒sodium hydroxide solution (Sigma‒Aldrich), and the newborn worms were synchronized to L1 stage worms on NGM plates at 25°C (
57). After 3 days, young adult L4 stage worms were plated on 35-mm-diameter NGM plates seeded with OP50, IDCC 2102, IDCC 4301, and LGG. The experiment was carried out in triplicate, and all worms were transplanted to new bacterial lawns on a daily basis until all worms died.
Lipid staining for fat accumulation
To quantify the lipid accumulation of
C. elegans, featured staining methods were applied to oil red O and Nile red O (
58,
59). First,
C. elegans strain VS29 was synchronized to the young adult L4 stage as described above and exposed to
E. coli OP50, IDCC 2102, and IDCC 4301 for 48 h. The staining method followed bioprotocols using oil red O and Nile red solutions (Sigma‒Aldrich). The result was observed using an Olympus IX53 (Olympus Life Science, Tokyo, Japan), and the intensity was analyzed using i-Solution (IMT i-Solution Inc, New York, USA).
Animal care and treatment
Beagles aged 2–4 years and weighing 9.0 ± 2.14 kg were purchased from Orient Bio (Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea) for the experiment (8 males and 12 females). They were given 2 weeks to acclimate to the breeding room atmosphere before the experiment began ad libitum. After acclimation, all subjects were randomly separated into four groups of five individuals based on body weight (9.24 ± 2.17 kg; n = 3 per group). The control group (cont) received a standard diet consisting of medium adult dry dog food (Royal Canin, Gard, France; ME (metabolizable energy) = 357.0 kcal/100 g), while the other groups were induced to develop obesity with a 22% high-fat diet (HFD; Jeilfeed, Seoul, Republic of Korea; ME (metabolizable energy) = 483.0 kcal/100 g). The probiotic groups were administered with 1010 CFU/day of IDCC 2102 and 1010 CFU/day of IDCC 4301 for 9 weeks, mixed with the high-fat diet. The nutritional compositions of normal chow and HFD are stated in Table S1. Each experimental animal was bred in a separate cage with an identity card during the experiment, including the acclimation period. The breeding room was maintained at a constant temperature (21°C ± 2°C), humidity (50% ± 20%), and photoperiod of 12 h (08:00–20:00). This animal experiment was conducted with the approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Chungnam National University (202109A-CNU-149).
Physiological analysis
The body weight was obtained once a week following the commencement of the test at a specific time to observe the change in body weight during the experiment. To assess feed intake, the provided quantity of feed was measured daily at a specific time, and the residual amount was gauged 24 h later consistently throughout the experiment.
To monitor changes in the body shape of the beagle animal model as a result of a high-fat diet and probiotic feeding, the width of the abdomen and hips was measured once a week to score the body condition score, which is an index for determining the body shape of companion animals, and the score during the test period. Table S2 provides the body condition score index. The higher the degree of obesity, the higher the score, and the requirements for each score component are stated in Table S2 (
60). The average value between the groups was calculated.
At the end of the 9-week experiment, all animals were fasted for 14 h, blood was collected and centrifuged (4°C, 3,000 rpm, 20 minutes), and serum was separated to analyze various physiological changes. The separated serum was kept at −70°C, and the experiment was carried out using ELISA. TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 (R&D Systems, Minnesota, USA), and C-reactive protein (Cusabio Technology LLC, Texas, USA) concentrations in the blood were analyzed to assess changes in inflammation-related cytokines. For the examination of energy metabolism regulators, the concentrations of leptin (Millipore, USA), adiponectin (ABclonal Technology, Massachusetts, USA), and malondialdehyde (Biocompare, California, USA) in the blood were measured according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Serum ALT, AST, HDL-C, TG, and TCHO were analyzed using a DRI-CHEM Analyzer (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan).
Fecal metagenome analysis
After 9 weeks of experimentation, fecal samples were obtained from each subject, frozen at −70°C, and then used for the experiment to examine the intestinal microbial community’s response to feed. The first step was to extract the gDNA from each sample in accordance with the DNeasy PowerSoil Pro Kit’s manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Next, the V4 segment of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene was amplified using the extracted DNA sample, and Illumina iSeq 100 (Illumina, Inc., California, USA) was used for next-generation sequencing (
61). The following is the primer sequence for the synthesis of the V4 region: 515F,
TCGTCGGCAGCGTCAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAGGTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA; 806R,
GTCTCGTGGGCTCGGAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAGGGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT.
Metabolite analysis
The pooled fecal samples of canines and
C. elegans VS29 strains exposed to probiotics were weighed and diluted in methanol to a final concentration of 20 mg/mL on ice. To ensure significance, the metabolite analysis was repeated three times. The supernatant was filtered using a 0.2-µm pore size polyvinylidene fluoride syringe filter after centrifugation at 15,000 ×
g for 5 minutes at 4°C. Two hundred-microliter aliquots of the filtered supernatant were concentrated in a vacuum concentrator and kept at −81°C prior to derivatization and gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis. The extract was derivatized at 30°C for 90 minutes with 30 µL of 20 mg/mL methoxyamine hydrochloride in pyridine (Sigma‒Aldrich), followed by 50 µL of N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide (Sigma‒Aldrich). As an internal standard, fluoranthene was added to the extract. A Thermo Trace 1310 GC (Waltham, MA, USA) linked to a Thermo ISQ LT single quadrupole mass spectrometer was used for the GC-MS analysis (Waltham, MA, USA). A 60-µm long DB-5MS column with an inner diameter of 0.2 mm was used. The derivatives were separated using a 0.25 m film thickness (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The sample was injected at 300°C with a split ratio of 1:60, and the helium split flow was 90 mL/min for analysis. The metabolites were separated using 1.5 mL of continuous flow helium and an oven ramp of 50°C (2 minute hold) to 180°C (8 minute hold) at 5°C/min, 210°C at 2.5°C/min, and 325°C (10 minute hold) at 5°C/min. The mass spectra peaked at a rate of 5 spectra/s throughout the scan in the range of 35–650 m/z. The ionization mode was exposed to electron impact with the ion source temperature adjusted to 270°C. Thermo Xcalibur software was used to analyze the spectral peaks, and the metabolites were identified by matching the mass spectra and retention indices of the NIST Mass spectral search tool (version 2.0, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) (
62,
63).
Correlation analysis for the metagenome and metabolome
The Shannon and Chao indices of bacterial alpha diversity were analyzed using a non-parametric one-way analysis of variance (Kruskal–Wallis test) and Tukey’s
post hoc analysis if a significant difference (
P < 0.05) was found. Welch’s
t-test was used to compare the differences in the relative abundance of bacterial composition (
64,
65). The correlation between the microbiota and metabolites was conducted using the M
2IA (
66). Microbiome–metadata correlation analyses and analyses of the different levels of microbial communities by genus were performed. A network was used to examine the relationship between the functional metabolites and the bacteria. The pink nodes are the functional metabolites, and the other nodes of bacteria were grouped by color (functional false discovery rate <0.05). To discover functional pathways in the fecal microbiome, PICRUSt and KEGG (level 2) were utilized to predict the existence of functional genes in the sample. PICRUSt was completed via an online application (
67,
68). Using STAMP v0.2.1.3 and an extended error bar plot, the difference in the relative abundance of bacteria and significantly different KEGG pathways within groups was calculated.
A volcano plot and principal component analysis (PCA) of metabolomics data were processed using GraphPad Prism 7.0.4 (GraphPad Software, California, USA), and heatmap analysis was processed using MetaboAnalyst 5.0 (
69).
Statistics
All data points used for this study were analyzed in triplicate, and the data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Significant differences were determined according to Student’s t-test and one-way ANOVA using GraphPad Prism 7.0.4 (GraphPad Software) and SigmaPlot 13 (Systat Software, California, USA) followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. C. elegans survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method, and the significance of differences between survival curves was determined using the log-rank test (STATA6; STATA, College Station, TX, USA).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We acknowledge Ildong Bioscience Co., Ltd. (Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea) for the provision of Enterococcus faecium IDCC 2102 (IDCC 2102) and Bifidobacterium lactis IDCC 4301 (IDCC 4301).
A.N.K., M.J.K., D.L., J.J.L., M.K.K., M.S., M.L., J.Y., S.O., and Y.K. conceived and designed the research. A.N.K., M.J.K., D.L., J.J.L., M.K.K., M.S., S.O., and Y.K. conducted the experiments. A.N.K., M.J.K., D.L., J.J.L., M.K.K., M.S., S.O., and Y.K. conducted the bioinformatics. A.N.K., M.J.K., D.L., J.J.L., M.K.K., M.S., S.O., and Y.K. analyzed the data. A.N.K., M.J.K., D.L., J.J.L., M.K.K., M.S., S.O., and Y.K. prepared the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This research was supported by Ildong Bioscience Co., Ltd. (2022), the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant, funded by the Korean government (MEST) (NRF-2021R1A2C3011051), and by High Value-Added Food Technology Development Program of the Korean Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries (IPET), the Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries of the Korea (321037-05-4-HD040).