INTRODUCTION
A complex set of carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) devoted to the plant biomass degradation are produced by saprotrophic fungi (
1) including many
Aspergillus species, and this set includes a diversity of redox-active auxiliary activity enzymes (AAs) such as lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases (LPMOs) and cellobiose dehydrogenases (CDHs) (
2–10).
LPMOs are copper-dependent enzymes that utilize an oxidative mechanism to cleave the glycosidic bonds of polysaccharides in the presence of an external electron donor and O
2 (
11). LPMOs can also utilize H
2O
2 as the oxidizing cosubstrate (
12,
13). LPMOs from family AA9 (LPMO9s) are numerous in some fungal genomes (
14), with members exhibiting activity on cellulose, glucans, and xylans (
15,
16). Electrons to reduce LPMOs can be provided by various sources such as small chemical compounds (e.g., ascorbate and monophenols) or enzymes, including the AA3_1 CDHs (
17). Fungal CDHs have been shown to provide electrons for the redox-mediated oxidative cleavage of cellulose (
18,
19), while also being involved in lignin degradation (
20,
21).
Many studies have reported the functional characterization of LPMOs (
22–27) and CDHs (
28–30) and their functional partnership has been demonstrated
in vitro (
31–35). The importance of fungal CDHs in biomass degradation has been investigated in
Trametes versicolor (
36),
Neurospora crassa (
33,
37), and
Podospora anserina (
38). Different aspects of LPMOs’ biological role have been investigated in fungi (
39–43), however, to the best of our knowledge, the implication of these enzymes for fungal growth on lignocellulose has not been demonstrated.
Aspergillus nidulans is a model organism for genetic and experimental studies (
44,
45) harboring nine LPMO9s and two CDH encoding genes in its genome (
46). The diversity of putative LPMO9s in this fungus (
AnLPMO9s) along with the CDH (
AnCDH1) has been verified by different approaches (
2,
5,
25), and partially characterized (
25,
47). However, it has not been characterized
in vivo.
In this work, the time-resolved expression of CAZymes by A. nidulans was assessed in response to crystalline cellulose and lignocellulosic substrates derived from sugarcane crops. Among several CAZymes, six LPMO9s were secreted overtime along with a cosecreted CDH. Based on the secretion profile, three candidates were obtained by homologous expression in A. nidulans and biochemically characterized. The biological role of these enzymes in the model organism A. nidulans was investigated by constructing mutants carrying single, double, and triple deletions for LPMO9s and CDH, and by overexpression of LPMO9s.
DISCUSSION
Among several CAZymes differentially secreted, six
AnLPMO9s had their secretion influenced by the inducing substrate and period of cultivation. The profile of LPMO9s induced in the presence of Avicel or SCS were quite similar, but two additional members were identified in the SCS secretome at small amounts, probably induced by lignocellulosic components other than cellulose or cellooligosaccharides. In turn, SCB induces a more diverse set of LPMO9s, which can be associated with the distinct compositional contents of SCB and SCS (
49) as well as hemicellulose (
50) and lignin (
51) structures, both of which parameters can be affected by the plant biomass pretreatment (
52). The secretion levels of these enzymes are remarkably high at the early period of cultivation, especially on SCB, decreasing overtime in all cultivation conditions. Likewise, when a different lignocellulosic feedstock such as sorghum stover is used for
A. nidulans cultivation a similar profile is obtained, considering both the
AnLPMO9s variety and time response (
2). In addition to the induction by complex lignocellulosic substrates, it is notable that some
AnLPMO9s can also be induced by noncellulosic substrates such as starch (
48), commercial xylan and glucose (
2). Despite the limited number of studies involving the regulation of LPMO9s expression in fungi, several binding sites for common CAZymes regulators such as CreA, CeRE, and XlnR can be found in promoter regions of the
AnLPMO9s encoding genes (
25) and the expression of
AnLPMO9C, -F and -G showed to be strongly dependent on CLR-B, another transcription factor involved in the regulation of cellulases (
53,
54).
The abundant secretion of
AnCDH1, highly induced on Avicel, is an indication that this enzyme plays an important role in the
A. nidulans oxidative system. In turn, the lower secretion levels on SCS and SCB suggest the presence of alternative electron donors such as residual lignin or its derived compounds found in plant biomass (
18,
55–58) as well as other enzymes (discussed below). In addition to a strong induction by crystalline cellulose (
25,
53,
54), other studies detected
AnCDH1 expression/secretion also occurring on different lignocelluloses, but not on xylan (
5,
25), evidencing it is specifically induced by cellulose or cellulose-derivatives.
Recombinant
AnLPMO9C, -F and -G were abundantly secreted in their active forms using a cloning strategy widely used for CAZyme expression in filamentous fungi (
59). As predicted by phylogeny (
25), our functional analysis demonstrated that these LPMO9s are cellulose-active enzymes with different regioselectivities.
AnLPMO9F and -G found in the secretomes induced on Avicel, SCB and SCS oxidize C1 and C4 in glycosidic linkages, whereas
AnLPMO9C, detected only in the secretomes induced on lignocellulosic feedstocks, oxidizes C1. These newly characterized enzymes thereby expand the current knowledge on the
AnLPMO9s arsenal in addition to the previously characterized
AnLPMO9D (AN3046), which oxidizes at C1 of cellulose and xyloglucan (
25) and
AnLPMO9B (AN1602, appended to CBM1), which oxidizes at C4 of cellulose and cello-oligosaccharides (
47).
A. nidulans takes place along with other fungi such as
N. crassa,
Gloeophyllum trabeum,
Malbranchea cinnamomea, and
P. anserina, which have the LPMO9 arsenal extensively characterized (
15).
While the three enzymes were active on cellulose, a comparison between
AnLPMO9F and -G demonstrated that, ultimately, the latter showed higher performance on celluloses that have crystalline regions such as Avicel and FP which presents 30–50% of amorphous regions (
60–62). Additionally, only
AnLPMO9G was active on the
Valonia cellulose which corresponds to one of the most crystalline native cellulose materials (
63–66).
Based on the secretion profiles on Avicel and SCS, single, double, or triple mutants carrying deletions of AnLPMO9F, AnLPMO9G and AnCDH1 were designed to verify their contribution to the A. nidulans cellulolytic system. Deletion of the most secreted AnLPMO9F (single, double, or triple mutants) had a striking impact, reducing by a half the activity toward amorphous cellulose or β-glucan. In contrast, these activities were not affected by the AnLPMO9G deletion. In turn, when FP was used as the substrate, single deletions of both AnLPMO9s had a negative effect on the enzymatic activity. Considering these data, as well as the minor and steady secretion of AnLPMO9G, it is likely that this enzyme oxidizes crystalline portions of the substrate, while the abundantly secreted AnLPMO9F appears more efficient on cellulose with a lower degree of crystallinity or a higher extent of amorphous regions. Moreover, the overexpression of AnLPMO9F and -G improves the secretome activity on PASC and FP, respectively.
The CDHs and LPMOs interplay in the fungal breakdown of crystalline cellulose has been demonstrated
in vitro (
31–35). Here, our
in vivo study shows that despite the high secretion levels of
AnCDH1 under induction by cellulose, the performance of the Δ
AnCDH1 strain secretome is not changed using amorphous cellulose as the substrate. Only a subtle decrease can be verified in the FPase, indicating that
AnCDH1 may also contribute to the degradation of crystalline cellulose. Additionally, its deletion causes no impairment of fungal growth on crystalline cellulose and a subtle decrease on lignocellulose. While there are no such studies involving LPMO9s, some functional studies dealing with CDH deletion have been published in the last few years reporting variable results obtained with different fungal species. In
T.
versicolor, CDH deficient mutants grew poorly in minimal medium supplemented with crystalline cellulose, but not on noncrystalline carbohydrates. In addition, these mutants are deficient in colonizing and degrading wood (
36). In
N. crassa, deletion of the major CDH substantially reduced the secretome activity on crystalline cellulose (
33). In
P.
anserina, single and multiple mutants lacking CDHs can grow normally on cellulose, but some mutants present reduced conidia formation, possibly due to a reduced ability to obtain nutrients from crystalline cellulose. Besides, external LPMO9s supplementation can improve the performance to degrade cellulose using the parental or the CDH deficient secretomes, suggesting that other redox partners are providing electrons to the
P. anserina LPMO9s (
38). Indeed,
in vitro analysis have been revealing other enzymes, such as AA3_2 flavoenzymes (
67), AA12 pyranose dehydrogenase (
68), and AA7 oligosaccharide dehydrogenase (
69), acting as electron donors to the LPMO9s. Here,
A. nidulans AA7 or AA3 oxidoreductases were exclusively secreted on lignocellulose and Avicel, representing potential alternative redox partners for the
AnLPMO9s.
Other changes in the secretomes such as the reduction in the xylanolytic activity could not be easily explained since the target
AnLPMO9s showed no oxidative activity on isolated xylan or cellulose/xylan mixtures, and the MS analysis of the single-deleted mutants showed increased secretion of xylanolytic enzymes. Additionally, only a few LPMO9s are known to display activity on hemicelluloses and oligosaccharides, which usually occurs in addition to the activity on cellulose (
70), or, more rarely, only on substrate mixtures (
71).
MS analysis of secretomes from the single deletion mutants also revealed an overall reduction in cellulase secretion, particularly of a β-glucosidase, corroborating the enzymatic assays (except for the Δ
AnLPMO9F strain). Furthermore, the strains lacking
AnLPMO9s increased the secretion of a cellobiohydrolase, suggesting an adaptive mechanism adopted to compensate LPMO9s absence during cellulose degradation. A compensatory mechanism is also observed in
P. anserina mutants lacking CDHs, which secretes an increased number of β-glucosidases probably alleviating CBH inhibition by cellobiose, which is originally performed by CDH through product oxidation (
38). However, this compensation mechanism by increasing β-glucosidase secretion was not observed in the
A. nidulans mutant strains lacking LPMO9s or CDH. In addition, the increased secretion of proteins associated with fungal cell wall verified in the Δ
AnCDH1 strain suggests more intense cell-wall remodeling.
In summary, we identified several AA9 LPMOs as well as a CDH being differentially produced by A. nidulans upon growth on crystalline cellulose and lignocelluloses. One C1/C4-oxidizing LPMO9 (AnLPMO9F) is predominant in the secretome induced on cellulose and sugarcane straw, while another C1/C4-oxidizing LPMO9 (AnLPMO9G) is steadily secreted at small amounts in all inducing conditions. In turn, a more diversified set including several LPMO9s with distinct regioselectivities is induced on sugarcane bagasse. The phenotyping of A. nidulans mutant strains allowed measuring the importance of those oxidative components for the extracellular cellulolytic system, demonstrating that the lack of LPMO9s partially reduces fungal growth on lignocellulose. In turn, the impact of CDH absence was less evident, despite the high secretion levels under inducing conditions. Furthermore, the overexpression of specific LPMO9s also contributed to revealing the importance of each component in plant biomass degradation and gave rise to an enriched fungal secretome that boosts lignocellulose conversion when added to commercial enzymes.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to CAPES, CNPq, and FAPESP for financial support; Brazilian Biosciences National Laboratory (LNBio/CNPEM) for the use of the MS facility; Fernando Rodrigo Frederico (LEBBPOR/FEQ/UNICAMP) for technical support with HPLC analysis; Paulo A. Baldasso for technical assistance; Lívia Brenelli from LNBR/CNPEM for kindly providing the pretreated SCS used in the saccharification assays; LGE/UNICAMP for kindly providing steam-exploded lignocellulose and Laboratory of Neuroproteomics (LNP/IB/UNICAMP) for MS analysis.
C.R.F.T. and A.D. conceptualized and acquired funds for the project. C.R.F.T., M.V.R., J.A.G., F.L.F., and J.P.F.C. designed and performed main experiments, analyzed data, and drafted the manuscript. F.J.C. and M.P.Z. contributed to the experiments involving gene deletion. J.P.F.C. and F.L.V. contributed to experiments involving enzyme expression and characterization. T.L.R.C. and M.T.M. collected and analyzed data on IC and HPLC analysis. T.T.F. provided funds. P.H.W. and G.J.D. provided funding and contributed to experiments design. A.D. and P.H.W. supervised the project and wrote and revised the final version of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version.
C.R.F.T. was supported by FAPESP (São Paulo Research Foundation) and CNPq (Brazilian Council for Scientific and Technological Development), fellowships no. 16/16306-0 and 19/08263-1, and grant no. 420392/2018-1, respectively. M.V.R., J.A.G., F.L.F., F.J.C., M.P.Z., and J.P.F.C. were supported by FAPESP fellowships. A.D. was supported by FAPESP (grants number 15/50612-8, 17/22669-0, and 15/50590-4) and CNPq (grants number 404654/2018-5 and 304816/2017-5).
We declare that we have no competing interests.