INTRODUCTION
Helicobacter pylori infection has a worldwide overall prevalence of 44%. This rate ranged from 50.8% in developing countries compared with 34.7% in developed countries (
1).
H. pylori is a microaerophilic Gram-negative bacterium that can survive in highly acidic environments and is generally acquired in the first 5 years of life by oral-oral or fecal-oral transmission, linked to of low socioeconomic status, poor hygiene, and overcrowding (
2,
3).
H. pylori causes persistent inflammation in the gastric mucosa (
4) that increases the risk of clinical symptoms associated with peptic ulcers or chronic gastritis that may later progress to chronic forms leading to intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia, and ultimately, gastric adenocarcinoma (
5,
6).
H. pylori infection is consistently recognized as the most important risk factor for gastric cancer (
7). Since 1994,
H. pylori has been identified as a class-1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) (
8).
H. pylori eradication may rapidly decrease active inflammation in the gastric mucosa, prevent progression toward precancerous lesions and reverse gastric atrophy before the development of intestinal metaplasia. Undoubtedly, the earliest possible eradication of
H. pylori is highly beneficial (
9).
H. pylori gastritis as an infectious disease is now included as a nosological entity in the new International Classification of Disease 11th Revision (ICD 11), which implies treatment of all
H. pylori-infected patients. Eradication of
H. pylori is recommended even in the absence of symptoms. Empirical
H. pylori eradication included triple standard therapy. It consists of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) in standard doses accompanied by two antibiotics such as clarithromycin plus amoxicillin for 14 days (
10). Resistance of
H. pylori to antibiotics has reached alarming levels worldwide, which has been identified as one of the main causes of therapeutic failure (
11,
12). Amoxicillin, metronidazole, clarithromycin, tetracycline, and levofloxacin are the most frequent antibiotics used in different combinations in eradication regimens (
13).
The current study first aimed to isolate H. pylori in cultures from gastric biopsy samples from patients coming of the western central region of Colombia and test their susceptibility to amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, tetracycline, rifampicin, and levofloxacin. We also aimed to assess the efficacy of the standard triple therapy in the population from two specialized Health Centers located in the cities Pereira and Manizales. In this part of the country, like different regions, positive infected patients are treated in an empirical way, without previous analysis of antimicrobial drug resistance, which could increase the risk of emergence of multidrug resistant strains.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patient population
Consecutive adult patients with gastroduodenal disease who underwent gastroduodenoscopy and biopsy sampling at two specialized centers in the west-central region of Colombia (cities of Pereira and Manizales) between February and October 2018 and gave written informed consent to participate in the study were included. Patients with comorbidities, immunosuppression due to risk of infection, previous gastric surgery, and those who had used PPIs, anti-H2 inhibitors, or antibiotics 4 weeks before the study were excluded. Histological and culture studies were performed to diagnose H. pylori.
The study was approved by the Bioethics Committee (BC) of the Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira (Pereira-Colombia), and the BC approved the informed consent before the start of the project.
H. pylori culture
H. pylori was cultured from gastric biopsy samples of the antrum, body, and fundus. Samples were stored in Brain Hearth Infusion (BHI) broth with 20% glycerol, supplemented with antibiotics (vancomycin 10 mg/L, polymyxin B 0.33 mg/L, bacitracin 1.07 mg/L, and amphotericin B 5 mg/L).
The biopsy specimens were mixed with sterile saline solution and macerated with a homogenizer (Deltaware Pellet Pestle). We kept the maceration tissues at −80°C in BHI broth with glycerol. Then 100 µL of each mash solution was plated onto culture media Tryptic soy agar (TSA) (Oxoid or Merck), supplemented with sheep blood (7%), isovitalex (0.5%), and the same antibiotics/concentrations used for the BHI broth media during transportation and were incubated under microaerophilic conditions (5% O2, 10% CO2 and 85% N2) at 37°C for 5–7 days. Colonies were confirmed with Gram staining and biochemical tests (positive urease, catalase and oxidase test).
E-test and definition of susceptibility testing
H. pylori isolates obtained by the primary culture were subcultured on non-selective TSA (Oxoid or Merck) with 7% sheep blood, 0.5% isovitalex (BBL). The isolates were subcultured to discover the profile of antimicrobial resistance by E-test (AB BIODISK North American Inc., Piscataway, NJ, USA) for metronidazole, clarithromycin, amoxicillin, levofloxacin, rifampicin, and tetracycline. Suspensions from pure 48 h subcultures were prepared in Brucella broth supplemented with 0.5% Isovitalex, and inoculum turbidity was adjusted to McFarland 3.0 standard. Thereafter, they were inoculated onto TSA plates supplemented with sheep blood (7%), isovitalex (0.5%), and without antibiotics. E-test strips were placed and incubated under microaerophilic conditions at 37°C for 72 h.
Antimicrobial activity was detected as a minimum inhibitory concentration (MICs).
H. pylori strain ATCC 43504™ was used as a control. Clarithromycin MICs were interpreted based on CLSI breakpoints (≥1.0 mg/L resistant) (CLSI, 2016) (
14); we also used EUCAST breakpoints (
15) for amoxicillin ≥ 0.125 mg/L, levofloxacin ≥ 1 mg/L, tetracycline ≥ 1 mg/L, rifampin ≥ 1 mg/L, and metronidazole ≥ 8 mg/L antibiotics.
Treatment and follow-up by 13C-urea breath test
H. pylori positive patients received triple therapy with PPI (omeprazole 40 mg b.i.d.), clarithromycin (500 mg b.i.d.), and amoxicillin (1 g b.i.d.) for 14 days. Forty-five days after the end of therapy, 13C urea breath test (13C UBT) (TAU-KIT, Isomed S.L., Madrid, Spain) was performed with citric acid and 100 mg of 13C-urea. Patients who were positive after completion of the first treatment were re-treated with the second-line regimen with PPI (40 mg b.i.d.), amoxicillin (1 g b.i.d.), tetracycline (500 mg t.i.d.), and bismuth subsalicylate (524 mg b.i.d.) for 14 and 45 days after the end of treatment, a 13C UBT was performed as a follow-up.
Statistical analysis
For the analysis of eradication, the population included all H. pylori positive patients who received full doses of treatment and had 13C UBT for follow-up, while for the reporting of antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST), the population included H. pylori positive patients who did or did not receive pharmacological treatment. Data that did not meet the conditions were not considered. Correlational statistics were performed in the IBM SPSS Statistics v.25 program. Eradication rates between groups were compared by Chi 2 test or Fisher’s exact test, and odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. P values < 0.05 were considered significant.
DISCUSSION
In this study, triple standard therapy for 14 days was effective for the eradication of
H. pylori in 81.2% of the patients with a positive histology or culture, which is similar to the results in other studies in Colombia that reported the eradication success in about 80% of the cases (
18). The goal of eradication therapy is to reliably cure
H. pylori infection in the majority (≥90%) of patients (
10).
It is important to highlight that, of the positives, 83.6% of the patients were detected by culture and 71.6% of them by histological study, finding that the culture detection rate was the same that was reported by others (50%–95%) (
19). There were 16.4% false negative cultures, which could be associated with incubation <10 days, some studies recommend prolonged incubation for some strains, especially those enduring hostile environment or a period of antibiotic force (
20,
21).
H. pylori could transform from the normal spiral-shaped bacillary form into the coccoid form, it allows the microorganism to survive in hostile environments and enter a viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state, minimizing its detectability by conventional culture techniques (
22,
23). Transformation to coccoid form due to adverse conditions (pH, pO2, aging, aerobiosis, temperature increase, or antibiotic exposure) (
24) may explain why the susceptibility profile was obtained in 75% and not 100% of
H. pylori positive patients.
Agar dilution method is the gold standard to antibiotic resistance of
H. pylori. However, using this method is laborious Miftahussurur et al
. (
25), concluded that E-test has an acceptable agreement for levofloxacin, metronidazole, tetracycline, and clarithromycin but further confirmation may be necessary for amoxicillin.
Multiple studies worldwide have confirmed the increase in therapeutic failures in patients with strains resistant to clarithromycin, finding eradication rates of only 22.2% compared to 90.2% in sensitive strains (
26). Clarithromycin resistance is known to be a primary factor for treatment failure in
H. pylori infections; hence, there have been numerous studies about tailored therapies according to a clarithromycin resistance test (
27). It is recommended separating the regions, considering the prevalence of resistance to this antimicrobial and using intent-to-treat (ITT) as the first line only in those with a low prevalence of resistance (<15%) (
10,
28).
The increasing H. pylori resistance to previously effective antibiotic treatments has become of great concern and requires careful choice of therapies and revision of therapeutic strategies.
Maastricht VI, a new focus is set on molecular testing for
H. pylori detection and antibiotic susceptibility with support for the role of antibiotic stewardship. The most effective empirical regimens are revised if individual antibiotic resistance is not available (
10).
In this study, the clarithromycin resistance rate was 19%, being 10.8% higher than that reported in the 2020 study (
16), without statistically significant variation. However, this is the first report of clarithromycin resistance exceeding 15% in the west central region of Colombia after more than 10 years of resistance surveillance. It is important to avoid the use of clarithromycin-based triple regimens in countries/regions with high (>15%) primary clarithromycin resistance in
H. pylori without susceptibility testing (
10,
28). This is similar to results reported in Tumaco (20.5%) (
29), Medellín (18.8%) (
30), and some studies in Bogotá (13.6%–17.7%) (
31). However, it is important to mention that although clarithromycin is the antibiotic associated with the most resistance studies in Colombia, the differences between the reports have been variable (
31,
32). In Latin America, resistance to clarithromycin were seen in Mexico, Colombia, Argentina, and Brazil (
33) and Peru (
34). According to Megraud et al
. (
35), overall resistance to clarithromycin is above the threshold of 15% except in Indonesia where reporting is close to 9%.
According to previously published studies on
H. pylori resistance in Colombia, the antibiotic with the highest percentage of resistance is metronidazole, which reached 72%–93% in Bogotá and around 88% in the Western Central Region of Colombia (
31); however, this has been considered of not the greatest therapeutic importance (
36) because it does not significantly influence eradication rates (
37,
38). Resistance rate to metronidazole (81%) remained similar to the results previously published by the group (
16,
17). This is like the rates reported in developing countries due to the frequent use of the drug for the treatment of common infections, mainly dental, gastrointestinal, or genital origin. According to Megraud et al. (
35), overall resistance to metronidazole in adults is between 45% and 55% except in China which is 78%.
Amoxicillin resistance in Colombia has been evaluated, showing rates in the city of Bogotá in the years 2008 and 2010 of 7% and 3.8%, respectively, while in the case of Tumaco, the percentage in 2012 was 20.5% (
31). In this study, the existence of resistant strains in the Western Central Region of Colombia, resistance to amoxicillin was 9.5%, which is like the values reported in the city of Bogotá, the difference found in the evaluation of the results obtained from the previous study being statistically significant (
P = 0.02). However, Martínez et al
. (
33) reported that no resistant strains have been found in nine studies in Latin America, making it difficult to figure out a possible increase in resistance to amoxicillin in the region.
Levofloxacin resistance in this study was 26.2%, which is like the values reported in Colombia in the studies in the city of Bogotá (27.3%) in 2014 (
37) while, as reported by Megraud et al
. (
35), primary overall resistance to this antibiotic in adults ranges between 14.0% and 20.0% with a trend of increase over time and variability in regions. In contrast, no isolates with tetracycline resistant, which is similar to previous results (2009 and 2020) (
16,
17) in the Western Central Region of Colombia, or Europe (
35), or in other areas of Colombia del 1.7% (
39). However, there are exceptional cases where resistances of 50% have been reported (
40). It should be noted that 15 of the 30 patients studied with 13C UBT follow-up and antimicrobial susceptibility presented combined resistance to two or more antibiotics, the main combination being metronidazole and clarithromycin (13.3%), which is consistent with what was stated by Megraud et al
. (
35).
Because of an increase in
H. pylori antibiotic resistance, the eradication rate of the infection with empirical therapy has been decreasing. Tailored therapy, based on the antibiotic selection according to susceptibility testing results, was found to be superior to empiric treatment (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.53–2.79) in the study of Rokkas et al
. (
41).
In Colombia, only two studies have reported multidrug-resistant strains that, and in the study by Arévalo et al
. (
38) they were found in patients with three or more failed treatments. While many factors are associated with the failure of
H. pylori eradication, the main contributors are patient noncompliance and increased antimicrobial resistance, especially to quinolones and macrolides (
42). In this study, we observed that in patients with clarithromycin resistance, the eradication rate decreased to <50% (
Table 4), corroborating what Roberts et al
. reported (
42). Therefore, optimizing the first-line regimen based on local antibiotic resistance patterns is critical to prevent repeated courses of treatment and the spread of secondary antibiotic resistance (
10,
43). The increasing
H. pylori resistance to previously effective antibiotic treatments has become of great concern and requires careful choice of therapies and revision of therapeutic strategies (
10). Growing antibiotic resistance and previous unsuccessful treatment attempts impede eradication success and ease emergence and spread of multidrug (MDR “resistance to ≥3 antibiotics of different class”) resistant strains (
44), and this is the first report about MDR in the region.
Conclusions
The high rate of resistance to metronidazole, clarithromycin, and levofloxacin found in this study proves the risk of therapeutic failure when using these antimicrobials in the treatment of H. pylori in the population from Western Central Region of Colombia. The ideal success rate in eradicating H. pylori infection (≥90%) was not achieved in this study. H. pylori MDR is the biggest challenge in the management, and this is the first time that MDR is reported in the region. Moreover, the updated percentages of resistance to clarithromycin in this geographical area have increased.
The main results of this study emphasize that patients should be treated according to local rates of antimicrobial resistance, encouraging H. pylori susceptibility testing not only in these cities but throughout the country. Future studies with a larger number of patients are desirable to confirm these results. The results imply that inadequate eradication therapy not only increases healthcare costs due to the need for more studies or treatments but also has a negative impact on the quantity and quality of life of affected patients.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was funded by Universidad Libre (Convocatoria interna 07) and Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira (Cod: CIE 5-17-4).
Conceptualization, A.A. and J.M.; methodology, A.A., Y.G., J.M., J.S., L.C., T.M, P.F., L.L., R.P. and B.A; software, P.F and R.P.; validation, A.A., T.M., B.A. and J.M.; formal analysis, A.A and P.F; investigation, A.A., J.M., B.A., and J.S.; data curation, A.A., T.M. and P.F.; resources, A.A., T.M. and P.F.; writing—original draft preparation, A.A and P.F.; writing—review and editing, A.A., Y.G., J.M., J.S., L.C., T.M, P.F., L.L., R.P. and B.A.; visualization, A.A., L.L.,T.M., B.A. and J.M.; supervision, A.A., T.M., Y.G. and Y.G.; project administration, A.A. and J.M; funding acquisition, A.A., J.S and J.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient[s] to publish this paper.