ABSTRACT

Using live microbes as therapeutic candidates is a strategy that has gained traction across multiple therapeutic areas. In the skin, commensal microorganisms play a crucial role in maintaining skin barrier function, homeostasis, and cutaneous immunity. Alterations of the homeostatic skin microbiome are associated with a number of skin diseases. Here, we present the design of an engineered commensal organism, Staphylococcus epidermidis, for use as a live biotherapeutic product (LBP) candidate for skin diseases. The development of novel bacterial strains whose growth can be controlled without the use of antibiotics or genetic elements conferring antibiotic resistance enables modulation of therapeutic exposure and improves safety. We therefore constructed an auxotrophic strain of S. epidermidis that requires exogenously supplied d-alanine. The S. epidermidis NRRL B-4268 Δalr1 Δalr2 Δdat strain (SEΔΔΔ) contains deletions of three biosynthetic genes: two alanine racemase genes, alr1 and alr2 (SE1674 and SE1079), and the d-alanine aminotransferase gene, dat (SE1423). These three deletions restricted growth in d-alanine-deficient medium, pooled human blood, and skin. In the presence of d-alanine, SEΔΔΔ colonized and increased expression of human β-defensin 2 in cultured human skin models in vitro. SEΔΔΔ showed a low propensity to revert to d-alanine prototrophy and did not form biofilms on plastic in vitro. These studies support the potential safety and utility of SEΔΔΔ as a live biotherapeutic strain whose growth can be controlled by d-alanine.
IMPORTANCE The skin microbiome is rich in opportunities for novel therapeutics for skin diseases, and synthetic biology offers the advantage of providing novel functionality or therapeutic benefit to live biotherapeutic products. The development of novel bacterial strains whose growth can be controlled without the use of antibiotics or genetic elements conferring antibiotic resistance enables modulation of therapeutic exposure and improves safety. This study presents the design and in vitro evidence of a skin commensal whose growth can be controlled through d-alanine. The basis of this strain will support future clinical studies of this strain in humans.

INTRODUCTION

Commensal microorganisms play a crucial role in maintaining human health across a number of organ systems, particularly in the skin (17). Diverse communities of microorganisms populate the skin, and a square centimeter can contain up to a billion microorganisms (8). These diverse communities of bacteria, fungi, mites, and viruses can provide protection against disease and form dynamic, yet distinct, niches on the skin (9). Increasing evidence has associated altered microbial communities or dysbiosis in the skin with cutaneous diseases (8, 10), especially atopic dermatitis (1113). New strategies have emerged using microbes as therapy for treating a range of diseases (14). While this approach has gained particular attention in developing biotherapeutics for gastrointestinal diseases (15, 16), few studies have reported on using live microbes to treat skin diseases.
Staphylococcus epidermidis, recently dubbed the “microbial guardian of skin health” (17), is a strong candidate for use as a live biotherapeutic product (LBP) for skin conditions. S. epidermidis is a Gram-positive bacterium that is ubiquitous in the human skin and mucosal flora. As one of the earliest colonizers of the skin after birth, S. epidermidis plays an important role in cutaneous immunity and maintaining microbial community homeostasis (18, 19). In the clinical setting, S. epidermidis has demonstrated activity as a potential therapeutic (2022). In Japan, in a double-blind, randomized clinical trial, topical application of autologous S. epidermidis in healthy volunteers increased lipid content of the skin, suppressed water evaporation, and improved skin moisture retention without signs of erythema (20). Other investigators have shown that S. epidermidis is capable of producing antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) that selectively target Staphylococcus aureus (23, 24). S. epidermidis has also shown other potent, therapeutic effects in preclinical settings. For example, a recent report described antineoplastic properties of certain strains of S. epidermidis (21). Naik et al. found that S. epidermidis (from the A20 clade) applied to the skin of germfree mice resulted in the development of protection against specific cutaneous pathogens (25). Other studies have shown that S. epidermidis may enhance innate skin immunity and limit pathogen invasion (19). In addition, S. epidermidis produces lipoteichoic acid, which can suppress Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3)-mediated inflammation and protect mice from S. aureus infection (26, 27). Moreover, recent evidence suggests that topical S. epidermidis application is able to induce a nonclassical major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I)-restricted immune response to not only promote protection against pathogens but also accelerate wound repair in skin (18). The introduction of S. epidermidis could also aid in reestablishing skin homeostasis by targeting pathogen-driven dysbiosis.
Translational use of S. epidermidis in humans ideally requires controlling the viability and growth of the microbe, particularly in the manipulation, formulation, and life span of the therapeutic strain. While genetic manipulation of the strain using classical antibiotic selection markers could achieve this control, this method is discouraged by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in the final design of an LBP (14). Here, we propose an elegant solution for controlling an S. epidermidis strain for therapeutic use by introducing d-alanine auxotrophy. d-Alanine is required for the synthesis of peptidoglycans, which are essential components of the bacterial cell wall. d-Alanine is not normally present at significant levels in human tissue; so bacteria must produce it biosynthetically, or it must be supplied exogenously. In bacteria, biosynthesis is accomplished through the action of alanine racemase, which interconverts l-alanine and d-alanine, and by d-alanine aminotransferase, which interconverts d-glutamic acid and d-alanine. The metabolic pathway requirement for d-alanine auxotrophy varies in different genetic backgrounds. It was reported that the presence of glutamate racemase (interconverting d-glutamate and l-glutamate) with d-alanine aminotransferase (interconverting d-alanine and d-glutamate) provides a bypass for alanine racemase in S. aureus and Listeria monocytogenes (28, 29). In the present study, we found that, in S. epidermidis, it was necessary to knock out the d-alanine aminotransferase gene (SE1423) in addition to the two alanine racemase enzymes, alr1 (SE1674) and alr2 (SE1079), to fully confer the auxotrophic phenotype.
Here, we describe a strategy for generating a d-alanine-auxotrophic strain of S. epidermidis. This approach permitted tunable and precise control of growth of the organism. We further characterized its growth in culture and human blood and its colonization and activity in cultured skin models in vitro.

RESULTS

Knocking out both alanine racemase genes, alr1 and alr2, in S. epidermidis NRRL B-4268 (Δalr1 Δalr2) did not produce an auxotrophic phenotype for d-alanine, in contrast to similar genetic knockouts in other bacteria such as Bacillus subtilis (30). This suggested that there was another metabolic pathway that could result in the production of d-alanine. The dat gene, encoding d-alanine aminotransferase, was identified as a candidate gene to knock out in order to eliminate potential interconversion of d-glutamate to d-alanine (Fig. 1A). The resulting triple-knockout strain, S. epidermidis Δalr1 Δalr2 Δdat (SEΔΔΔ), was successfully generated and displayed the desired d-alanine auxotrophy. All candidate clones (numbers 7, 12, and 18) showed some growth in an initial screen on tryptic soy agar (TSA) medium supplemented with 40 μg/ml d-alanine and failed to grow in the absence of supplementation (Fig. 1B). All three chromosomal deletions were similarly confirmed by PCR in each of the three candidate clones, numbers 7, 12, and 18, as illustrated in the example for SE1423 shown in Fig. 1C and D.
FIG 1
FIG 1 Strategy for d-alanine auxotrophy. (A) Alanine metabolism in staphylococcal species and the strategy for constructing a S. epidermidis d-alanine auxotroph. (B) The construction of S. epidermidis Δalr1 Δalr2 Δdat is described in Materials and Methods. Twenty-five candidate clones were patched onto two different plates, and the plates were incubated at 30°C overnight. Left, TSA plate; right, TSA plus anhydrotetracycline (2 μg/ml) and d-alanine (40 μg/ml). Three clones (7, 12, and 18, highlighted in yellow circles) could only grow on TSA supplemented with d-alanine. (C and D) Example of PCR confirmation of gene knockout for S. epidermidis 1423 in SEΔΔΔ candidates. The DNA from cells patched onto a plate containing TSA plus anhydrotetracycline (2 μg/ml) and d-alanine (40 μg/ml) was used as the template in PCRs. Gel lanes are shown for the indicated knockout clones (7, 12, and 18), wild-type (WT) S. epidermidis, and SE1423KO plasmid DNA (Vector; as a control). For the experiment shown in panel C, PCR was performed using primers 1423-5F and 1423-3R to distinguish the wild-type SE1423 locus (PCR product of 2.3 kb) and the SE1423 knockout (PCR product of 1.5 kb). For the experiment shown in panel D, PCR was performed using primers 1423-F and 1423-R to detect a PCR product of 0.7 kb, specific for the wild-type SE1423 locus. As expected, the PCR products were not generated from the SE1423 knockout plasmid and putative SE1423 knockout S. epidermidis clones. Results confirmed successful SE1423 deletion in clones 7, 12, and 18, and similar PCR analysis was done to confirm deletions of SE1674 and SE1079.
During strain construction, it was also noted that a Δdat mutation alone in the absence of the Δalr1 Δalr2 mutations had no effect on the growth of the mutated strain in the absence of d-alanine (data not shown). Further, attempts to engineer a mutation in the glutamate racemase gene, murI, were unsuccessful, possibly due to the multifunctional nature of this protein, which has been observed in other bacteria (data not shown) (31, 32). The entire genomes of the S. epidermidis Δalr1 Δalr2 Δdat mutant and parental strain NRRL B-4268, as well as the genome of the ATCC 12228 strain, were sequenced using a long-read methodology (PacBio, Menlo Park, CA) and assembled; no significant differences from the published sequences were observed except intended deletions in the alr1, alr2, and dat genes in the mutant (data not shown) (ATCC 12228; GenBank accession numbers AE015929 and CP043845). Further, complementation of the d-alanine auxotrophy by a plasmid containing the B. subtilis alanine racemase gene (alrA) confirmed that the auxotrophy was due to disruption of the d-alanine biosynthetic pathway, as expected from the three engineered deletions (data not shown).
In order to determine the frequency of reversion from d-alanine auxotrophy to prototrophy of SEΔΔΔ, concentrated cell suspensions were plated on Vegitone agar without d-alanine supplementation and compared to cells on plates with d-alanine. The result indicates that no phenotypic revertants developed in the absence of d-alanine, with an estimated frequency of reversion of less than 4.8 × 10−11 revertants/CFU plated. In the same strain, the frequency of spontaneous rifampin resistance emergence was 6 × 10−8 mutants/CFU plated, demonstrating that the conditions of this experiment were able to select for mutations in strain SEΔΔΔ (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material).

Characteristics of SEΔΔΔ growth in broth cultures.

The kinetics of SEΔΔΔ growth in Vegitone broth were evaluated at 37°C with increasing concentrations of d-alanine (Fig. 2A). After ∼7 h, growth approached stationary phase, independently of the d-alanine concentration, such that generation times could be estimated using a standard logistic equation. From this, the estimated generation time was ∼31 to 45 min. No growth of the SEΔΔΔ strain was measured in the absence of d-alanine after 7 h, in agreement with the auxotrophic nature of the bacteria. There was no correlation between generation time and d-alanine concentration. The growth of SEΔΔΔ was very sensitive to the d-alanine concentration, as indicated by a steep Hill slope (∼11) of the concentration-growth curve (data not shown). The d-alanine concentration needed for the half-maximal response (50% effective concentration [EC50]) was 54 μg/ml (0.005%) (Fig. 2B). As there was no difference in the growth curves between conditions using 80 and 200 μg/ml of d-alanine, the standard concentration of d-alanine for routine growth of the auxotroph was set at 100 μg/ml. The growth of the auxotroph SEΔΔΔ strain in the presence of 100 μg/ml of d-alanine was similar to that of the wild-type parent, NRRL B-4268, at 37°C, further supporting that the only phenotype conferred by the triple deletion is d-alanine auxotrophy (Fig. S2).
FIG 2
FIG 2 Characterization of SEΔΔΔ growth in vitro. (A) Graph showing the effect of d-alanine concentration (from 0 to 20 μg/ml) on the change in the OD at 600 nm over the time of incubation at 37°C for SEΔΔΔ. Each data point is the mean ± standard deviation of three independent replicates. Dashed lines are the results from the logistic fit. As described in Materials and Methods, cultures were inoculated to a starting OD600 of 0.1, which corresponded to approximately 1 × 107 CFU/ml. (B) EC50 curve of d-alanine concentration on the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). (C) Graph showing the effect of temperature on the growth kinetics of SEΔΔΔ. Growth curves were generated at room temperature and at 37°C using a d-alanine concentration of 100 μg/ml. One culture was placed into the incubator shaker (37°C; 250 rpm), and the second culture was placed at room temperature in a shaker (250 rpm). (D) Graph showing the effect of pH on the growth kinetics of SEΔΔΔ. Growth curves, at 37°C, were generated from Vegitone medium that had been adjusted to pH 5 or 6 or the standard pH 7.0. d-Alanine was then added to obtain a final concentration of 100 μg/ml.
At room temperature, SEΔΔΔ showed little to no growth, as monitored by the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) (Fig. 2C) though the culture density increased by ∼2 log10 CFU over a 30-h time period (data not shown). The comparator culture grown at 37°C had a log10 CFU increase of ∼6 (data not shown) and reached stationary phase within ∼4 h from the end of lag phase (Fig. 2C).
Skin surface pH ranges from ∼4 to 6, compared to below the skin surface, which has a pH around 7 (34); therefore growth at lower pH in broth cultures was evaluated. SEΔΔΔ cultures grown at 37°C in standard Vegitone broth pH (7.0) and in broth adjusted to pH 6.0 each increased by ∼6 log10 CFU (data not shown) and reached stationary phase within 4 h from the end of the lag phase, showing generation times of 45.5 min and 35.5 min, respectively (Fig. 2D). The growth rate at pH 5.0 was somewhat lower (generation time of 65 min) and showed a more pronounced lag phase, yet cultures grew to about the same final cell densities as with medium at pH 6 and 7 (Fig. 2D). SEΔΔΔ showed no growth at pH 4 (data not shown).

Characteristics of SEΔΔΔ safety.

We looked at three characteristics of SEΔΔΔ related to safety: (i) the ability of SEΔΔΔ to grow in human blood, (ii) its antibiotic resistance/susceptibility, and (iii) its potential to grow a biofilm. To test the ability of SEΔΔΔ to grow should it unintentionally enter the bloodstream, growth was assessed for 24 h in defibrinated human blood. SEΔΔΔ inoculated in human blood without d-alanine showed no growth after an overnight incubation with inocula of less than 1.4 × 108 CFU/ml, but human blood supplemented with d-alanine was capable of supporting growth at all levels of inocula tested (except the lowest inoculum concentration of 1 × 100) (Table S3). The CFU counts of blood cultures inoculated with 1.4 × 108 CFU/ml remained constant, with no further growth or loss of viability under the conditions of this assay.
The antibiotic susceptibility profiles of NRRL B-4268 and SEΔΔΔ were determined using CLSI methodology. Table 1 shows that the SEΔΔΔ strain has antibiotic susceptibility similar to that of the parent wild-type S. epidermidis NRRL B-4268, and results were consistent with a prior literature report (35).
TABLE 1
TABLE 1 Antibiotic susceptibility of SEΔΔΔ versus the parent S. epidermidis strain
AntibioticMIC (μg/ml)Susceptibilitya
SEΔΔΔNRRL B-4268
Ampicillin44NA
Bacitracin1616NA
Cefalexin22NA
Ceftaroline0.120.12S
Chloramphenicol22S
Clindamycin0.060.06S
Daptomycin0.50.5S
Doxycycline44S
Erythromycin≤0.12≤0.12S
Fosfomycin44NA
Fusidic acid≤0.03≤0.03NA
Gentamicin≤0.06≤0.06S
Levofloxacin0.120.12S
Linezolid≤0.5≤0.5S
Mupirocin0.120.12NA
Oritavancin0.030.06S
Oxacillin0.120.12S
Quinupristin/dalfopristin≤0.12≤0.12S
Rifampin≤0.002≤0.002S
Tetracycline>32>32R
Tigecycline0.250.12 - 0.25S
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole≤0.5/9.5≤0.5/9.5S
Vancomycin11S
a
According to CLSI breakpoints: S, sensitive; R, resistant. NA, not available.
Finally, we looked at the ability of SEΔΔΔ to form biofilm. This experiment was performed on polystyrene plastic, and growth was evaluated in a standard crystal violet assay in a 96-well format. Cultures were grown in tryptic soy broth (TSB)–0.5% d-glucose, with and without d-alanine, and biofilm formation was detected and quantified using crystal violet. The data in Fig. 3 show that the crystal violet staining for SEΔΔΔ, with or without d-alanine present, was indistinguishable from that of the blank and TSB controls, indicating that no biofilms formed on the plastic under the conditions of this assay. Wells containing the positive-control strain, SE1457, showed strong crystal violet staining, consistent with this strain’s known ica-positive genotype and biofilm-forming phenotype.
FIG 3
FIG 3 The production of biofilm from S. epidermidis in vitro. The bottom panel shows the accumulation of biofilm on plastic wells within 24 h at 37°C, visualized by crystal violet staining. Biofilm formation was further quantified by dissolving the crystal violet in acetic acid and reading absorbance at 570 nm. S. epidermidis strain 1457 was the positive control, and the blank and TSB medium-only wells served as negative controls for background staining. All data shown are means ± standard deviations of 16 replicate microtiter wells.

SEΔΔΔ colonization of a human skin model in vitro.

To determine if d-alanine supplementation is necessary for SEΔΔΔ colonization and survival on reconstructed human epidermis (RHE), 105 CFU of SEΔΔΔ was inoculated onto the RHE surface either with or without d-alanine supplementation. No colonization occurred without d-alanine present, indicating that d-alanine must be supplied for growth on skin (Fig. 4). Furthermore, these data show that SEΔΔΔ colonized the RHE within 4 h and persisted for up to 72 h following a single application with d-alanine supplementation. Interestingly, as early as 4 h postinoculation, in the absence of d-alanine, no bacteria were recovered from the RHE when homogenates were plated on SaSelect plates supplemented with d-alanine.
FIG 4
FIG 4 SEΔΔΔ growth in RHE. RHE inserts were colonized with SEΔΔΔ at 37°C in 5% CO2. d-Alanine at 100 μg/ml (+ d-Ala) was added to the medium feeding the RHE insert, as indicated. Colonized models were harvested at each time point by uniform skin punches. Skin punch samples were rinsed in DPBS to remove nonadherent cells, vortexed, and assayed for cell density by serial dilution and plating on SaSelect plates supplemented with 100 μg/ml of d-alanine. Each condition was tested in triplicate.
SEΔΔΔ was also evaluated for its ability to trigger host-commensal communication. SEΔΔΔ was seeded on RHE inserts, and mRNA levels for specific host-commensal signals were measured by quantitative PCR (qPCR). In Fig. 5, data show a trend in the change in expression levels of two epithelial AMPs, S100 calcium-binding protein A7 (S100A7) and human β-defensin 2 (hβD-2). In this sample (n = 3), the average expression levels of both AMPs were heightened in the presence of SEΔΔΔ. No deleterious effects of the SEΔΔΔ colonization on the structure of the RHE were observed histologically.
FIG 5
FIG 5 Expression of human AMPs following SEΔΔΔ treatment of RHE. (A and B) Plots of the changes in mRNA levels for two epithelial AMPs (S100A7 and hβD-2). hβD-2 was elevated in the presence of SEΔΔΔ. (C) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of transverse sections of RHE inserts with or without treatment with SEΔΔΔ. The vehicle control was PBS containing 100 μg/ml d-alanine. ns, not significant. *, P < 0.05. Horizontal lines indicate medians.

DISCUSSION

A strategy is presented for the construction of an S. epidermidis strain, SEΔΔΔ, with a non-antibiotic-associated conditional growth phenotype. SEΔΔΔ, exhibits key features that support its potential as a skin LBP: its growth is tunable with d-alanine, its d-alanine auxotrophy has a low propensity to phenotypically revert, it colonizes human skin equivalents, it does not grow in pooled human blood, it does not form biofilms on plastic, and it increases expression of an important host AMP, hβD-2. Our strategy involved deleting the ability to synthesize d-alanine, which is required for the synthesis of bacterial cell peptidoglycan. Here, we show that, as expected, disruption of peptidoglycan through d-alanine starvation is bactericidal in culture and on skin in vitro. In contrast to reports for B. subtilis, in order to develop d-alanine auxotrophy in S. epidermidis, not only the two alanine racemase genes (alr1 and alr2) but also the d-alanine aminotransferase gene, dat, had to be knocked out. Evidently, the combination of glutamate racemase and d-alanine aminotransferase provides a viable bypass to alanine racemase, as reported in MRSA132 (28) and Listeria monocytogenes (29). Other investigators have reported on other auxotrophy strategies for attenuating growth in S. aureus, including proline (36), menadione (37), and NK41 (38).
Several findings from these studies support the idea that attenuation by d-alanine auxotrophy may promote the safety of SEΔΔΔ for use as a skin LBP. The very low spontaneous reversion rate of d-alanine auxotrophy suggests that very large doses of SEΔΔΔ may be applied to skin without selecting for a prototrophic revertant. Further, results also support that the d-alanine auxotrophy of SEΔΔΔ may mitigate the risk of bacterial dissemination into the bloodstream. Biofilm-forming S. epidermidis is often associated with opportunistic nosocomial infections due to the ability to colonize biomaterials of indwelling medical devices (39, 40). Therefore, biofilm formation is an undesirable property of an LBP. No biofilm formation was seen with SEΔΔΔ, with and without d-alanine, suggesting that this strain may have a lower propensity to form biofilm in a clinical setting. Another important observation is that the inability to form biofilm in vitro did not affect the ability of SEΔΔΔ to robustly colonize and grow on RHE.
S. epidermidis belongs to the group of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), which is distinguished from coagulase-positive staphylococci such as S. aureus by lacking the enzyme coagulase. A large arsenal of tools is available to S. epidermidis to control the colonization of other pathogenic microorganisms, including proteases that degrade proteins in S. aureus biofilm, stimulation of AMP secretion from keratinocytes, or secretion of lantibiotics targeting S. aureus (4147). In addition, S. epidermidis produces lipoteichoic acid, which can suppress TLR3-mediated inflammation and protect mice from S. aureus infection (48). Specific novel lantibiotics secreted by S. epidermidis and Staphylococcus hominis were recently shown to control S. aureus infection by synergizing with the human keratinocyte-secreting cathelicidin-related AMP LL-37 (49). This is a further demonstration of the important and beneficial interplay between commensals and the host. Interestingly, these lantibiotic-secreting strains were significantly underrepresented in the microbiome of atopic dermatitis patients, and exogenous application of these lantibiotic-secreting commensals resulted in a reduction in S. aureus infection in a small group of atopic dermatitis patients (49). Introduction of d-alanine auxotrophy into other S. epidermidis strain backgrounds may be a way of broadly controlling isolates selected for their novel therapeutic properties.
Skin innate immunity is the first line of defense after the physical skin barrier. Keratinocytes are the main skin cell population involved (5052); they express a variety of TLRs, which are primary sensors of innate immunity (53, 54). The innate immune system can recognize pathogens and trigger the host response to eliminate them via the release of cytokines (e.g., interleukin-1α [IL-1α] and IL-1β) and AMPs (51, 5557). AMPs are secreted by keratinocytes, sebocytes, T cells, and mast cells and can directly attack pathogens (e.g., bacteria, enveloped viruses, and fungi) (5861). AMPs can be grouped into five separate classes: defensins, dermcidin, cathelicidins, S100 proteins, and ribonucleases (6163). Some are constitutively expressed while others can be induced following a skin insult. AMPs are highly cationic and thus interact with negatively charged membrane components (e.g., lipopolysaccharide [LPS], peptidoglycans, outer membrane protein I [OprI]) of skin pathogens, essentially forming holes in the cell membrane (58). AMPs have also been shown to exert immunomodulatory effects, interacting directly with receptors on immune cells to promote chemotaxis, differentiation, and cytokine production (39). The most abundant AMPs in human skin are human defensins, the cathelicidin LL-37, and RNase 7. Several studies have shown that commensal organisms such as S. epidermidis can directly induce expression of hβD-2 (hDEFB4A gene) while presenting a relative tolerance to it, enabling such organisms to survive on the skin surface and to modulate defensin expression when the stratum corneum barrier is disrupted (64). Therefore, commensal bacteria such as S. epidermidis are able to amplify the innate immune response of human keratinocytes to pathogens by induction of AMP expression (62). Our SEΔΔΔ auxotroph promoted the expression hβD-2, a key AMP in the skin that has been shown to inhibit S. aureus, thus demonstrating its ability to favorably modulate host innate immunity (65).
This study had several limitations, including the restriction of using reconstructed human epidermis instead of in vivo studies. However, given evidence that S. epidermidis does not natively colonize mice and the poor translation of microbiome studies in mice to humans (66), in vivo studies themselves carry limitations. Three-dimensional in vitro skin models like the RHE we developed in this study have been established to study human microbiota on the skin as an alternative to in vivo studies (67). Future clinical testing of SEΔΔΔ in humans will provide key information in vivo such as growth on live skin, competition with other microbes, and safety.
In this study, we describe the engineering of a live skin commensal, S. epidermidis, and characterize its favorable properties which support its potential use as an LBP for skin diseases. Properties conferred by the d-alanine auxotrophy and the strain background itself support the potential of SEΔΔΔ to serve either as an LBP itself or as a recombinant host for expressing novel skin therapeutics. Future studies will evaluate the effect of this LBP candidate on human skin in the clinical setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Generation and confirmation of auxotrophy.

The commensal, nonpathogenic strain S. epidermidis, NRRL B-4268 was obtained from the USDA (Agricultural Research Service, NRRL culture collection, Peoria, IL, USA). This strain is also known as ATCC 12228 (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA) and PCI 1200 (U.S. FDA). This strain was selected for its low virulence potential because it lacks the ica operon implicated in S. epidermidis-associated catheter bloodstream infections (68).
The reference genome has been published as the ATCC 12228 genome (35, 69). The genome encodes two annotated alanine racemase genes, SE1674 (alr1) and SE1079 (alr2); both genes were targeted for deletion. The strategy for conferring d-alanine auxotrophy to NRRL B-4268 is presented in Fig. 1A Briefly, chromosomal DNA from S. epidermidis NRRL B-4268 was isolated and used as a template for PCR. The 5′ flanking region (1.0 kb) of SE1674 was amplified using forward primer 1674-5F (SalI) and reverse primer 1674-5R. Similarly, the 3′ flanking region (1.0 kb) of SE1674 was amplified using forward primer 1674-3F and reverse primer 1674-3R (EcoRI). Overlapping PCR was performed using a mixture of the 5′ PCR and 3′ PCR products as templates, and primers 1674-5F (SalI) and 1674-3R (EcoRI) to generate a PCR product, termed 5′-1674-3′ (2.0 kb).
The overlapping PCR product 5′-1674-3′ was digested with SalI and EcoRI, cloned into the temperature-sensitive plasmid pJB38 at the EcoRI-SalI sites (70), and transformed into TOP10 Escherichia coli (Life Technologies, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA) using ampicillin selection (100 μg/ml) to develop knockout (KO) plasmid pJB-1674KO that contains a chloramphenicol (Cm) resistance selection marker. Plasmid pJB-1674KO was purified and transformed into E. coli GM2163 (a dam dcm mutant) using ampicillin selection (100 μg/ml) and then purified and transformed into NRRL B-4268 by electroporation. Transformants were grown at the permissive temperature (30°C) on tryptic soy agar plates (TSA) containing 10 μg/ml Cm. (see Tables S1 and S2 in the supplemental material for more information on the strains, plasmids, and primers used.)
For each of the gene knockouts created in this study, the presence of each pJB38 KO plasmid in initial S. epidermidis transformants was confirmed by PCR amplification of the flanking region of each gene. Colonies of confirmed pJB38 KO plasmid transformants were restreaked onto fresh TSA with Cm (10 μg/ml) and d-alanine (40 μg/ml), and plates were incubated at 43°C for 24 h to select for plasmid integration into the chromosome via single-crossover homologous recombination. Isolated colonies were streaked again for purification at 43°C and then inoculated into 50 ml of tryptic soy broth (TSB) plus d-alanine (40 μg/ml), without Cm, in a 250-ml baffled shake flask and grown at 30°C for 24 h to permit the excision of plasmid sequences from the chromosome by homologous recombination. The culture was passaged six times by transferring an aliquot of 0.5 ml to a flask containing 50 ml of fresh medium and growing the culture at 30°C for 24 h. The final culture was plated on TSA with 2 μg/ml anhydrotetracycline (to induce plasmid counterselection) and d-alanine (40 μg/ml). After 2 days of incubation at 30°C, approximately 100 to 200 colonies were formed on plates inoculated with 100 μl of culture at a 10−5 dilution. Following integration of the KO plasmid and removal of the plasmid backbone containing the antibiotic selection marker, an SE1674 knockout strain (S. epidermidis Δalr1) was isolated and confirmed by PCR amplification using primers flanking the gene. Using the same gene knockout method described above, we proceeded to knock out SE1079 in this strain, leading to successful generation of double-knockout strains (S. epidermidis Δalr1 Δalr2). More information about the plasmids and PCR primers used in this study can be found in Tables S1 and S2, respectively.

Measurement of effect of d-alanine levels on SEΔΔΔ growth.

The effect of d-alanine concentrations ranging from 0 μg/ml to 200 μg/ml (0% to 0.02%) on the short-term growth curves of SEΔΔΔ was investigated. Five milliliters of Vegitone medium (catalogue no. 41960; Sigma-Aldrich) containing 0.004% (40 μg/ml) d-alanine (99+%; Acros Organics) was inoculated with an isolated SEΔΔΔ colony. Cultures were incubated overnight at 37°C with shaking at 250 rpm on an orbital shaker.
Growth rates were measured at 37°C for up to 7 h. Fifty milliliters of Vegitone containing the prescribed amount of d-alanine was inoculated with 1 ml of the overnight culture to give a final optical density (OD) at 600 nm of 0.1 relative units (RU). Flasks were incubated on an orbital shaker at 250 rpm. Every ∼60 min, a sample was taken, and the OD600 was recorded. Growth curves were conducted for 7 h and were fitted using a standard logistic growth equation (71).

Measurement of effect of temperature and pH on SEΔΔΔ growth.

The effect of temperature and medium pH on SEΔΔΔ growth were examined using 100 μg/ml d-alanine in all groups. Growth curves were measured at room temperature (∼25°C) and at 37°C for up to 40 h. Fifty milliliters of Vegitone containing d-alanine was inoculated with 1.0 ml of the overnight culture. Growth curves were also evaluated at three different pH values (pHs 4, 5, 6, and 7) at 37°C for 40 h.

Antibiotic susceptibility testing of S. epidermidis NRRL B-4268 and SEΔΔΔ.

Antibiotic susceptibility testing was conducted at IHMA Europe Sàrl, Monthey, Switzerland, using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) methodology, with the exception that 100 mg/liter d-alanine was added to testing with SEΔΔΔ (72).

Determination of the frequency of spontaneous phenotypic reversion of auxotrophy of SEΔΔΔ.

The d-alanine-deficient medium used to isolate revertants was Vegitone agar plates, prepared in 150-mm petri dishes. Rifampin stocks were prepared in methanol at a final concentration of 4 μg/ml. As appropriate, Vegitone agar plates were prepared with either 100 μg/ml of d-alanine or 8 ng/ml of rifampin and 100 μg/ml of d-alanine. Eight milliliters of the overnight culture was spun down at 10,000 rpm for 10 min. The pellets were resuspended in 1,200 μl of Vegitone broth, and 150 μl of the suspension was spread onto 150-mm petri dishes. All plates were incubated at 37°C for ∼24 h. The experiment was carried out in quadruplicate. The remaining inoculum suspension was serially diluted 1:10 in Vegitone broth and plated onto Vegitone agar plates supplemented with 100 μg/ml d-alanine and incubated at 37°C for 24 h to quantify CFU in the inoculum. The spontaneous resistance frequency was determined by dividing the number of colonies grown in in the absence of d-alanine by the total number of CFU plated.

Determination of growth of SEΔΔΔ in blood.

TSB supplemented with 100 μg/ml of d-alanine was inoculated with SEΔΔΔ and incubated overnight at 37°C. The overnight culture was further diluted in fresh TSB plus d-alanine and allowed to grow until it reached mid-log phase, which corresponded to an absorbance of ∼0.7, as measured by the OD600. Virus-free, defibrinated pooled whole human blood from three healthy donors was purchased from BioIVT (Westbury, NY). The SEΔΔΔ culture was concentrated to 1 × 109 CFU/ml. Serial 10-fold dilutions ranging from 1 × 109 to 1 × 101 were made in TSB with or without d-alanine and then diluted again 10-fold into a volume of 100 μl of blood in a 96-well microtiter plate. All blood cultures were incubated in a tissue culture incubator at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 24 h. The following day, cultures were serially diluted and plated on TSA with 100 μg/ml of d-alanine, grown overnight, and scored for the number of colonies. The experiment was carried out in duplicate. The remaining inoculum suspension was serially diluted in TSB and plated onto TSA supplemented with 100 μg/ml of d-alanine to quantify CFU in the inoculum. All plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h.

Growth of SEΔΔΔ on reconstructed human epidermis.

Fully differentiated antibiotic-free reconstructed human epidermis (RHE) culture inserts from Mattek (EpiDerm, Ashland, MA, USA) were used to evaluate bacterial colonization. RHE models were reactivated by placing cell inserts into six-well plates containing 1 ml of EpiDerm maintenance medium from Mattek. The inserts were then incubated for 18 h at 37°C in 5% CO2. Following incubation, the inserts were transferred to 12-well hanging culture inserts with 5 ml of Epiderm maintenance medium in each well, and the tissues were incubated for an additional 30 min at 37°C in 5% CO2. When applicable, 100 μg/ml of d-alanine was also added to the RHE medium. SEΔΔΔ was inoculated into 25 ml of TSB containing 100 μg/ml of d-alanine. The culture was grown at 37°C overnight with shaking. After 18 h, fresh TSB supplemented with 100 μg/ml of d-alanine was inoculated with the overnight culture of SEΔΔΔ at a starting OD600 of 0.1. Cultures were grown at 37°C to log phase (OD600 of 0.5 to 0.7), pelleted by centrifugation at 15,000 rpm for 2 min, and then resuspended in Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS) to a final OD600 of 1.0. The bacterial pellet was suspended in 1 ml of DPBS and pelleted at 15,000 rpm for 2 min. This process was repeated two more times to ensure that residual d-alanine was removed from the bacterial suspension. The bacterial cells were next diluted down to 0.01 OD600 in DPBS. For cells receiving d-alanine, 100 μg/ml of d-alanine was added to the bacterial suspension prior to RHE inoculation. To inoculate the RHE inserts, 10 μl of the prepared bacterial suspension was applied to the center of the dry surface-air interface of the RHE, ensuring that the liquid droplet remained centered when possible. The RHE inserts were then incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 4 h, 24 h, 48 h, or 72 h. At each time point, bacterial colonization was assessed by taking a 4-mm punch biopsy specimen from the center of the RHE. Biopsy specimens were washed by submerging the tissue in 1 ml of DPBS to remove unadhered cells. In order to release the colonized bacterial cells from the RHE, the biopsy specimens were transferred to 1 ml of DPBS, followed by vortexing for 2 min at full speed. Colonization of SEΔΔΔ was quantified by dilution plating and counting CFU on SaSelect plates supplemented with 100 μg/ml d-alanine (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). All experiments were done in triplicate.

Biofilm formation assay with SEΔΔΔ.

The biofilm assay was adapted from Mack et al. and Neopane et al. (73, 74). TSB was inoculated with S. epidermidis strain SEΔΔΔ and the biofilm-forming strain S. epidermidis 1457 (75) and incubated overnight at 37°C. The culture was then diluted 1:200 in fresh TSB–0.5% glucose, and 200 μl was dispensed into a flat-bottom, 96-well tissue culture plate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). The plate was incubated at 37°C for 24 h. After incubation, the microtiter plate was washed twice with 1× DPBS to remove loosely attached bacterial and planktonic cells. The biofilms were fixed by incubation in 200 μl of 99% methanol for 10 min. The methanol was decanted, and wells were allowed to air dry for 10 min. Once dry, wells were stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 5 min. Excess crystal violet was washed twice with deionized water. Wells were air dried, and then stained biofilms were removed by dissolving them in 200 μl of 30% glacial acetic acid. The amount of biofilm was quantified by measuring absorbance of the plate at 570 nm.

Effect of SEΔΔΔ on AMP production in cultured human skin.

The effect of SEΔΔΔ on antimicrobial peptide (AMP) production in cultured human skin was determined at StratiCELL (Les Isnes, Belgium) using RHE inserts. RHE inserts were cultured in triplicates at the air-liquid interface for 14 days in gentamicin-free culture medium containing d-alanine (100 μg/ml) in 95% humidity at 37°C with 5% CO2 to fully differentiate the RHE. A single topical treatment with SEΔΔΔ (10 μl at a cell density of 1 × 107 CFU/ml in phosphate-buffered saline [PBS] plus 100 μg/ml d-alanine) was allowed to colonize for 48 h on fully differentiated epidermis. Control samples were treated with 10 μl of the vehicle solution (PBS plus d-alanine 100 μg/ml). During the treatment, the tissue culture medium feeding the RHE was also supplemented with 100 μg/ml d-alanine. RHE inserts were kept at the air-liquid interface in a humid atmosphere at 37°C with 5% CO2.

Histological analysis of RHE.

At the end of the treatment, three tissue samples per condition were fixed in 4% formaldehyde, dehydrated, and paraffin embedded. Sections of 6 μm of epidermis were stained with eosin and hematoxylin. Slides were mounted with specific medium and examined with a Leica DM2000 photomicroscope coupled to a digital camera (Zeiss).

Analysis of AMP expression in RHE.

To quantify gene expression of human AMPs, total mRNA was extracted using a Qiagen RNeasy kit (Hilden, Germany). Tissues were washed in PBS, removed from their inserts, and immersed directly in the lysis buffer. Extraction of mRNA was performed according to the supplier’s recommendations. The collected mRNA was stored at –80°C. Reverse transcription was performed with a high-capacity mRNA-to-cDNA kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) from 1 μg of total mRNA, according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
The target sequences of the genes of interest, S100 calcium-binding protein A7 (S100A7) and human β-defensin 2 (DEFB4A), were amplified by using TaqMan gene expression assays (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). TaqMan probes were grafted with a fluorophore (6-carboxyfluorescein [FAM]) at their 5′ ends and with a fluorescence quencher in the 3′ ends. PCRs were performed with a QuantStudio 7 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). In order to normalize the results, a housekeeping gene (β2-microglobulin [B2M]) was used. The thermal cycles were programmed with first one denaturation step at 95°C for 20 s. The amplification protocol followed with 40 cycles (1s at 95°C and 20 s at 60°C). Threshold cycle (CT) values were obtained for each gene. Data were analyzed by using the relative quantification (RQ) application available on the Applied Biosystems website (and designed to perform relative quantification of gene expression using the comparative CT [ΔΔCT] method) (76, 77).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

D.D., A.P.T., K.K., G.R.D., R.L., A.M., T.H.G., S.M.-B., A.K., M.P., and T.W. are employed by Azitra, Inc. J.O. and A.M. have received funding from Azitra, Inc.

Supplemental Material

File (msphere.00360-20-sf001.pdf)
File (msphere.00360-20-sf002.pdf)
File (msphere.00360-20-st001.docx)
File (msphere.00360-20-st002.docx)
File (msphere.00360-20-st003.docx)
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

1.
Mulcahy ME, Geoghegan JA, Monk IR, O'Keeffe KM, Walsh EJ, Foster TJ, McLoughlin RM. 2012. Nasal colonisation by Staphylococcus aureus depends upon clumping factor B binding to the squamous epithelial cell envelope protein loricrin. PLoS Pathog 8:e1003092.
2.
Wikoff WR, Anfora AT, Liu J, Schultz PG, Lesley SA, Peters EC, Siuzdak G. 2009. Metabolomics analysis reveals large effects of gut microflora on mammalian blood metabolites. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:3698–3703.
3.
Salzman NH, Hung K, Haribhai D, Chu H, Karlsson-Sjoberg J, Amir E, Teggatz P, Barman M, Hayward M, Eastwood D, Stoel M, Zhou Y, Sodergren E, Weinstock GM, Bevins CL, Williams CB, Bos NA. 2010. Enteric defensins are essential regulators of intestinal microbial ecology. Nat Immunol 11:76–82.
4.
Kau AL, Ahern PP, Griffin NW, Goodman AL, Gordon JI. 2011. Human nutrition, the gut microbiome and the immune system. Nature 474:327–336.
5.
Ravel J, Gajer P, Abdo Z, Schneider GM, Koenig SS, McCulle SL, Karlebach S, Gorle R, Russell J, Tacket CO, Brotman RM, Davis CC, Ault K, Peralta L, Forney LJ. 2011. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(Suppl 1):4680–4687.
6.
Grice EA, Segre JA. 2011. The skin microbiome. Nat Rev Microbiol 9:244–253.
7.
Diaz Heijtz R, Wang S, Anuar F, Qian Y, Bjorkholm B, Samuelsson A, Hibberd ML, Forssberg H, Pettersson S. 2011. Normal gut microbiota modulates brain development and behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:3047–3052.
8.
Weyrich LS, Dixit S, Farrer AG, Cooper AJ, Cooper AJ. 2015. The skin microbiome: associations between altered microbial communities and disease. Australas J Dermatol 56:268–274.
9.
Oh J, Byrd AL, Deming C, Conlan S, NISC Comparative Sequencing Program, Kong HH, Segre JA. 2014. Biogeography and individuality shape function in the human skin metagenome. Nature 514:59–64.
10.
Oh J, Freeman AF, NISC Comparative Sequencing Program, Park M, Sokolic R, Candotti F, Holland SM, Segre JA, Kong HH. 2013. The altered landscape of the human skin microbiome in patients with primary immunodeficiencies. Genome Res 23:2103–2114.
11.
Grice EA. 2014. The skin microbiome: potential for novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to cutaneous disease. Semin Cutan Med Surg 33:98–103.
12.
Powers CE, McShane DB, Gilligan PH, Burkhart CN, Morrell DS. 2015. Microbiome and pediatric atopic dermatitis. J Dermatol 42:1137–1142. https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.13072.
13.
Wan P, Chen J. 2020. A calm, dispassionate look at skin microbiota in atopic dermatitis: an integrative literature review. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 10:53–61.
14.
Dreher-Lesnick SM, Stibitz S, Carlson PE. Jr., 2017. U.S. regulatory considerations for development of live biotherapeutic products as drugs. Microbiol Spectr 5(5):BAD-0017-2017.
15.
Dore J, Multon MC, Behier JM, participants of Giens XXXII, Round Table No. 2. 2017. The human gut microbiome as source of innovation for health: which physiological and therapeutic outcomes could we expect? Therapie 72:21–38.
16.
Vemuri RC, Gundamaraju R, Shinde T, Eri R. 2017. Therapeutic interventions for gut dysbiosis and related disorders in the elderly: antibiotics, probiotics or faecal microbiota transplantation? Benef Microbes 8:179–192.
17.
Stacy A, Belkaid Y. 2019. Microbial guardians of skin health. Science 363:227–228.
18.
Linehan JL, Harrison OJ, Han S-J, Byrd AL, Vujkovic-Cvijin I, Villarino AV, Sen SK, Shaik J, Smelkinson M, Tamoutounour S, Collins N, Bouladoux N, Dzutsev A, Rosshart SP, Arbuckle JH, Wang C-R, Kristie TM, Rehermann B, Trinchieri G, Brenchley JM, O'Shea JJ, Belkaid Y. 2018. Non-classical immunity controls microbiota impact on skin immunity and tissue repair. Cell 172:784–796.e18.
19.
Naik S, Bouladoux N, Linehan JL, Han SJ, Harrison OJ, Wilhelm C, Conlan S, Himmelfarb S, Byrd AL, Deming C, Quinones M, Brenchley JM, Kong HH, Tussiwand R, Murphy KM, Merad M, Segre JA, Belkaid Y. 2015. Commensal-dendritic-cell interaction specifies a unique protective skin immune signature. Nature 520:104–108.
20.
Nodake Y, Matsumoto S, Miura R, Honda H, Ishibashi G, Matsumoto S, Dekio I, Sakakibara R. 2015. Pilot study on novel skin care method by augmentation with Staphylococcus epidermidis, an autologous skin microbe—a blinded randomized clinical trial. J Dermatol Sci 79:119–126.
21.
Nakatsuji T, Chen TH, Butcher AM, Trzoss LL, Nam S-J, Shirakawa KT, Zhou W, Oh J, Otto M, Fenical W, Gallo RL. 2018. A commensal strain of Staphylococcus epidermidis protects against skin neoplasia. Sci Adv 4:eaao4502.
22.
Iwase T, Uehara Y, Shinji H, Tajima A, Seo H, Takada K, Agata T, Mizunoe Y. 2010. Staphylococcus epidermidis Esp inhibits Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation and nasal colonization. Nature 465:346–349.
23.
Cogen AL, Yamasaki K, Sanchez KM, Dorschner RA, Lai Y, MacLeod DT, Torpey JW, Otto M, Nizet V, Kim JE, Gallo RL. 2010. Selective antimicrobial action is provided by phenol-soluble modulins derived from Staphylococcus epidermidis, a normal resident of the skin. J Invest Dermatol 130:192–200.
24.
Cogen AL, Yamasaki K, Muto J, Sanchez KM, Crotty Alexander L, Tanios J, Lai Y, Kim JE, Nizet V, Gallo RL. 2010. Staphylococcus epidermidis antimicrobial delta-toxin (phenol-soluble modulin-gamma) cooperates with host antimicrobial peptides to kill group A Streptococcus. PLoS One 5:e8557.
25.
Naik S, Bouladoux N, Wilhelm C, Molloy MJ, Salcedo R, Kastenmuller W, Deming C, Quinones M, Koo L, Conlan S, Spencer S, Hall JA, Dzutsev A, Kong H, Campbell DJ, Trinchieri G, Segre JA, Belkaid Y. 2012. Compartmentalized control of skin immunity by resident commensals. Science 337:1115–1119.
26.
Li D, Lei H, Li Z, Li H, Wang Y, Lai Y. 2013. A novel lipopeptide from skin commensal activates TLR2/CD36-p38 MAPK signaling to increase antibacterial defense against bacterial infection. PLoS One 8:e58288.
27.
Lai Y, Cogen AL, Radek KA, Park HJ, Macleod DT, Leichtle A, Ryan AF, Di Nardo A, Gallo RL. 2010. Activation of TLR2 by a small molecule produced by Staphylococcus epidermidis increases antimicrobial defense against bacterial skin infections. J Invest Dermatol 130:2211–2221.
28.
Moscoso M, Garcia P, Cabral MP, Rumbo C, Bou G. 2018. A d-alanine auxotrophic live vaccine is effective against lethal infection caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Virulence 9:604–620.
29.
Thompson RJ, Bouwer HG, Portnoy DA, Frankel FR. 1998. Pathogenicity and immunogenicity of a Listeria monocytogenes strain that requires d-alanine for growth. Infect Immun 66:3552–3561.
30.
Dul MJ, Young FE. 1973. Genetic mapping of a mutant defective in d,l-alanine racemase in Bacillus subtilis 168. J Bacteriol 115:1212–1214.
31.
Ashiuchi M, Kuwana E, Komatsu K, Soda K, Misono H. 2003. Differences in effects on DNA gyrase activity between two glutamate racemases of Bacillus subtilis, the poly-γ-glutamate synthesis-linking Glr enzyme and the YrpC (MurI) isozyme. FEMS Microbiol Lett 223:221–225.
32.
Sengupta S, Ghosh S, Nagaraja V. 2008. Moonlighting function of glutamate racemase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis: racemization and DNA gyrase inhibition are two independent activities of the enzyme. Microbiology 154:2796–2803.
33.
Reference deleted.
34.
Ali SM, Yosipovitch G. 2013. Skin pH: from basic science to basic skin care. Acta Derm Venereol 93:261–267.
35.
Zhang YQ, Ren SX, Li HL, Wang YX, Fu G, Yang J, Qin ZQ, Miao YG, Wang WY, Chen RS, Shen Y, Chen Z, Yuan ZH, Zhao GP, Qu D, Danchin A, Wen YM. 2003. Genome-based analysis of virulence genes in a non-biofilm-forming Staphylococcus epidermidis strain (ATCC 12228). Mol Microbiol 49:1577–1593.
36.
Li C, Sun F, Cho H, Yelavarthi V, Sohn C, He C, Schneewind O, Bae T. 2010. CcpA mediates proline auxotrophy and is required for Staphylococcus aureus pathogenesis. J Bacteriol 192:3883–3892.
37.
Lannergård J, von Eiff C, Sander G, Cordes T, Seggewiss J, Peters G, Proctor RA, Becker K, Hughes D. 2008. Identification of the genetic basis for clinical menadione-auxotrophic small-colony variant isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52:4017–4022.
38.
Barbagelata MS, Alvarez L, Gordiola M, Tuchscherr L, von Eiff C, Becker K, Sordelli D, Buzzola F. 2011. Auxotrophic mutant of Staphylococcus aureus interferes with nasal colonization by the wild type. Microbes Infect 13:1081–1090.
39.
Conlan S, NISC Comparative Sequencing Program, Mijares LA, Becker J, Blakesley RW, Bouffard GG, Brooks S, Coleman H, Gupta J, Gurson N, Park M, Schmidt B, Thomas PJ, Otto M, Kong HH, Murray PR, Segre JA. 2012. Staphylococcus epidermidis pan-genome sequence analysis reveals diversity of skin commensal and hospital infection-associated isolates. Genome Biol 13:R64.
40.
Kord M, Ardebili A, Jamalan M, Jahanbakhsh R, Behnampour N, Ghaemi EA. 2018. Evaluation of biofilm formation and presence of ica genes in Staphylococcus epidermidis clinical isolates. Osong Public Health Res Perspect 9:160–166.
41.
Bastos MCF, Ceotto H, Coelho MLV, Nascimento JS. 2009. Staphylococcal antimicrobial peptides: relevant properties and potential biotechnological applications. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 10:38–61.
42.
Sahl HG, Bierbaum G. 1998. Lantibiotics: biosynthesis and biological activities of uniquely modified peptides from gram-positive bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 52:41–79.
43.
Vandecandelaere I, Depuydt P, Nelis HJ, Coenye T. 2014. Protease production by Staphylococcus epidermidis and its effect on Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Pathog Dis 70:321–331.
44.
Chen C, Krishnan V, Macon K, Manne K, Narayana SV, Schneewind O. 2013. Secreted proteases control autolysin-mediated biofilm growth of Staphylococcus aureus. J Biol Chem 288:29440–29452.
45.
Dubin G, Chmiel D, Mak P, Rakwalska M, Rzychon M, Dubin A. 2001. Molecular cloning and biochemical characterisation of proteases from Staphylococcus epidermidis. Biol Chem 382:1575–1582.
46.
Moon J, Banbula AL, Oleksy A, Mayo JA, Travis J. 2001 Isolation and characterization of a highly specific serine endopeptidase from an oral strain of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Biol Chem 382:1095–1099.
47.
Sugimoto S, Iwamoto T, Takada K, Okuda K, Tajima A, Iwase T, Mizunoe Y. 2013. Staphylococcus epidermidis Esp degrades specific proteins associated with Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation and host-pathogen interaction. J Bacteriol 195:1645–1655.
48.
Lai Y, Di Nardo A, Nakatsuji T, Leichtle A, Yang Y, Cogen AL, Wu ZR, Hooper LV, Schmidt RR, von Aulock S, Radek KA, Huang CM, Ryan AF, Gallo RL. 2009. Commensal bacteria regulate Toll-like receptor 3-dependent inflammation after skin injury. Nat Med 15:1377–1382.
49.
Nakatsuji T, Chen TH, Narala S, Chun KA, Two AM, Yun T, Shafiq F, Kotol PF, Bouslimani A, Melnik AV, Latif H, Kim J-N, Lockhart A, Artis K, David G, Taylor P, Streib J, Dorrestein PC, Grier A, Gill SR, Zengler K, Hata TR, Leung DYM, Gallo RL. 2017. Antimicrobials from human skin commensal bacteria protect against Staphylococcus aureus and are deficient in atopic dermatitis. Sci Transl Med 9:eaah4680.
50.
Bitschar K, Wolz C, Krismer B, Peschel A, Schittek B. 2017. Keratinocytes as sensors and central players in the immune defense against Staphylococcus aureus in the skin. J Dermatol Sci 87:215–220.
51.
Pasparakis M, Haase I, Nestle FO. 2014. Mechanisms regulating skin immunity and inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol 14:289–301.
52.
Pivarcsi A, Kemény L, Dobozy A. 2004. Innate immune functions of the keratinocytes. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung 51:303–310.
53.
Lee J, Blaber M. 2010. Increased functional half-life of fibroblast growth factor-1 by recovering a vestigial disulfide bond. J Proteins Proteomics 1:37–42.
54.
Lee J, Blaber S, Dubey V, Blaber M. 2011. A polypeptide “building block” for the β-trefoil fold identified by top-down symmetric deconstruction. J Mol Biol 407:744–763.
55.
Wei W, Wiggins J, Hu D, Vrbanac V, Bowder D, Mellon M, Tager A, Sodroski J, Xiang SH. 2019. Blocking HIV-1 infection by chromosomal integrative expression of human CD4 on the surface of Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356. J Virol 93:e01830-18.
56.
Wang D, Tai PWL, Gao G. 2019. Adeno-associated virus vector as a platform for gene therapy delivery. Nat Rev Drug Discov 18:358–378.
57.
Simanski M, Glaser R, Harder J. 2014. Human skin engages different epidermal layers to provide distinct innate defense mechanisms. Exp Dermatol 23:230–231.
58.
Brogden KA. 2005. Antimicrobial peptides: pore formers or metabolic inhibitors in bacteria? Nat Rev Microbiol 3:238–250.
59.
Clausen ML, Agner T. 2016. Antimicrobial peptides, infections and the skin barrier. Curr Probl Dermatol 49:38–46.
60.
Schittek B, Paulmann M, Senyurek I, Steffen H. 2008. The role of antimicrobial peptides in human skin and in skin infectious diseases. Infect Disord Drug Targets 8:135–143.
61.
Yamasaki K, Gallo RL. 2008. Antimicrobial peptides in human skin disease. Eur J Dermatol 18:11–21.
62.
Wanke I, Steffen H, Christ C, Krismer B, Gotz F, Peschel A, Schaller M, Schittek B. 2011. Skin commensals amplify the innate immune response to pathogens by activation of distinct signaling pathways. J Invest Dermatol 131:382–390.
63.
Niyonsaba F, Kiatsurayanon C, Chieosilapatham P, Ogawa H. 2017. Friends or foes? Host defense (antimicrobial) peptides and proteins in human skin diseases. Exp Dermatol 26:989–998.
64.
Dinulos JGH, Mentele L, Fredericks LP, Dale BA, Darmstadt GL. 2003. Keratinocyte expression of human beta defensin 2 following bacterial infection: role in cutaneous host defense. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 10:161–166.
65.
Sharma H, Nagaraj R. 2015. Human β-defensin 4 with non-native disulfide bridges exhibit antimicrobial activity. PLoS One 10:e0119525.
66.
Rosshart SP, Herz J, Vassallo BG, Hunter A, Wall MK, Badger JH, McCulloch JA, Anastasakis DG, Sarshad AA, Leonardi I, Collins N, Blatter JA, Han S-J, Tamoutounour S, Potapova S, Foster St Claire MB, Yuan W, Sen SK, Dreier MS, Hild B, Hafner M, Wang D, Iliev ID, Belkaid Y, Trinchieri G, Rehermann B. 2019. Laboratory mice born to wild mice have natural microbiota and model human immune responses. Science 365:eaaw4361.
67.
Rademacher F, Simanski M, Glaser R, Harder J. 2018. Skin microbiota and human 3D skin models. Exp Dermatol 27:489–494.
68.
Wei W, Cao Z, Zhu YL, Wang X, Ding G, Xu H, Jia P, Qu D, Danchin A, Li Y. 2006. Conserved genes in a path from commensalism to pathogenicity: comparative phylogenetic profiles of Staphylococcus epidermidis RP62A and ATCC12228. BMC Genomics 7:112.
69.
MacLea KS, Trachtenberg AM. 2017. Complete genome sequence of Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 12228 chromosome and plasmids, generated by long-read sequencing. Genome Announc 5:e00954-17.
70.
Bose JL, Fey PD, Bayles KW. 2013. Genetic tools to enhance the study of gene function and regulation in Staphylococcus aureus. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:2218–2224.
71.
Yin X, Goudriaan J, Lantinga EA, Vos J, Spiertz HJ. 2003. A flexible sigmoid function of determinate growth. Ann Bot 91:361–371.
72.
CLSI. 2018. Methods for dilution of antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; approved standard, 11th ed. CLSI document M07. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
73.
Mack D, Siemssen N, Laufs R. 1992. Parallel induction by glucose of adherence and a polysaccharide antigen specific for plastic-adherent Staphylococcus epidermidis: evidence for functional relation to intercellular adhesion. Infect Immun 60:2048–2057.
74.
Neopane P, Nepal HP, Shrestha R, Uehara O, Abiko Y. 2018. In vitro biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus isolated from wounds of hospital-admitted patients and their association with antimicrobial resistance. Int J Gen Med 11:25–32.
75.
Galac MR, Stam J, Maybank R, Hinkle M, Mack D, Rohde H, Roth AL, Fey PD. 2017. Complete genome sequence of Staphylococcus epidermidis 1457. Genome Announc 5:e00450-17.
76.
Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−ΔΔCT) Method. Methods 25:402–408.
77.
Pfaffl MW. 2001. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 29:e45.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image mSphere
mSphere
Volume 5Number 324 June 2020
eLocator: 10.1128/msphere.00360-20
Editor: Paul D. Fey, University of Nebraska Medical Center

History

Received: 19 April 2020
Accepted: 22 May 2020
Published online: 10 June 2020

Keywords

  1. microbiome
  2. skin
  3. engineering
  4. genetics
  5. therapeutics
  6. live biotherapeutic products
  7. dermatology
  8. synthetic biology

Contributors

Authors

David Dodds
Azitra Inc., Farmington, Connecticut, USA
Department of Microbiology, Molecular Genetics and Immunology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
Ming-De Deng
Bio-Technical Resources, Manitowoc, Wisconsin, USA
Gilles R. Dubé
Azitra Inc., Farmington, Connecticut, USA
Trudy H. Grossman
Azitra Inc., Farmington, Connecticut, USA
Alaina Kaiser
Azitra Inc., Farmington, Connecticut, USA
Kashmira Kulkarni
Azitra Inc., Farmington, Connecticut, USA
Roger Leger
Azitra Inc., Farmington, Connecticut, USA
Sara Mootien-Boyd
Azitra Inc., Farmington, Connecticut, USA
Azim Munivar
Azitra Inc., Farmington, Connecticut, USA
Department of Psychiatry, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
Matthew Pestrak
Azitra Inc., Farmington, Connecticut, USA
Komal Rajpura
Azitra Inc., Farmington, Connecticut, USA
Alexander P. Tikhonov
Azitra Inc., Farmington, Connecticut, USA
Traci Turecek
Azitra Inc., Farmington, Connecticut, USA
Azitra Inc., Farmington, Connecticut, USA
Department of Pediatrics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA

Editor

Paul D. Fey
Editor
University of Nebraska Medical Center

Notes

Address correspondence to Travis Whitfill, [email protected].

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note:

  • For recently published articles, the TOTAL download count will appear as zero until a new month starts.
  • There is a 3- to 4-day delay in article usage, so article usage will not appear immediately after publication.
  • Citation counts come from the Crossref Cited by service.

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. For an editable text file, please select Medlars format which will download as a .txt file. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Figures and Media

Figures

Media

Tables

Share

Share

Share the article link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share on social media

American Society for Microbiology ("ASM") is committed to maintaining your confidence and trust with respect to the information we collect from you on websites owned and operated by ASM ("ASM Web Sites") and other sources. This Privacy Policy sets forth the information we collect about you, how we use this information and the choices you have about how we use such information.
FIND OUT MORE about the privacy policy