INTRODUCTION
Oysters are filter-feeding bivalve molluscs with great ecological and economic significance. They are considered ecosystem engineers due to their ability to form reefs that serve a variety of beneficial functions, including protecting shorelines from storm-related damage and providing habitat for other marine organisms (
1,
2). Eastern oysters have been shown to play roles in coastal biogeochemical cycles, for example, through promoting denitrification and accumulation of heavy metals (
3–5). For these reasons, efforts have been made to restore oyster populations around the United States. In addition, oysters represent a significant and growing portion of the aquaculture industry. In 2018,
Crassostrea spp. of oysters represented almost one-third of the major species produced in world aquaculture (
6). Given their ecological and economic importance, a more comprehensive understanding of the factors that mediate oyster physiology would have potential implications in coastal management and the aquaculture industry.
Like other invertebrates, oysters are known to harbor a diverse range of microorganisms. Culture-based studies have revealed the presence of
Proteobacteria (e.g.,
Vibrio,
Pseudomonas,
Alteromonas),
Actinobacteria (e.g.,
Micrococcus), and
Bacteroidetes (e.g.,
Flavobacterium) in the oyster-associated microbiome (
7). Some readily culturable members, such as strains of the
Vibrio genus, have been closely studied to profile their abundance (
8), pathogenic potential (
9), evolution and diversity (
10), and inhibitions by probiotics (
11,
12). Other well-known microbes from the eastern oyster include several protozoan pathogens, such as
Perkinsus marinus,
Haplosporidium nelsoni, and
Haplosporidium costale, causative agents of Dermo, Multinucleated Sphere X (MSX), and Seaside Organism (SSO) diseases, respectively, which are major diseases of adult eastern oysters (
13). However, less is known about nonculturable microbes and their potential associations with diverse physiological and ecological functions of eastern oysters (
14,
15).
Culture-independent approaches, such as the profiling of amplicon libraries, have led to the detection of other previously uncultured taxa in the oyster microbiome, such as the
Chloroflexi,
Firmicutes,
Fusobacteria,
Planctomycetes,
Spirochaetes,
Tenericutes, and
Verrucomicrobia (
16,
17). A distinct microbiome is found in multiple oyster tissues (e.g., hemolymph, gill, mantle, and gut) compared with microbial communities of the surrounding seawater, suggesting potential host selection strategies that lead to the enrichment of specific groups (
18). Multiple factors, including changes in environmental conditions (
16,
19–21), diet (
22), infection (
23,
24), and the use of probiotics (
25), have been shown to influence the composition of oyster microbiomes during certain life stages and among different tissue types. All of these studies set the stage for further investigating the taxonomic composition and functional potential of oyster microbiomes across different tissues.
In the absence of microbial isolates, shotgun metagenomics serves as a useful tool for gaining functional insights into uncultured members of a microbiome. Prior applications of metagenomics in marine invertebrates have revealed remarkable bacterial functions, including chemical defense mediated by secondary metabolites produced by the sponge microbiome (
26) and the metabolic interactions between chemosynthetic symbionts and their hosts in deep-sea hydrothermal vents (
27). One potential challenge in the application of metagenomics to host tissues is the high abundance of host DNA that masks the signals from the tissue-associated microbiome (
28). This issue may not be easily resolved by targeting different sample types (e.g., using biodeposit samples to represent the gut microbiota), as a clear distinction is found between the fecal microbiome and the gut microbiome of filter-feeding bivalves, e.g., the blue mussel,
Mytilus edulis (
29). Thus, a successful application of metagenomics in oyster microbiome studies requires the development of customized protocols for the enrichment of microbial DNA from the host tissue.
Here, an integrated microbiome analysis of the eastern oyster was performed by combining 16S rRNA gene-based community profiling, shotgun metagenomics, and genome-scale metabolic reconstruction. Amplicon libraries were analyzed to compare the diversity and distribution of microbiomes across six distinct oyster tissues and between oysters infected and uninfected with the protozoan pathogen P. marinus. Metagenomic-based identification of oyster gut-associated bacteria was enabled with a specialized protocol that enriched microbes from host tissues. Functional characterization was performed through the application of a genome-scale metabolic reconstruction on a metagenome-assembled genome (MAG). Together, these analyses shed light on the diversity of the eastern oyster microbiome across tissue types and provided functional insights into the Mollicutes, a prevalent taxon in the microbiome of the eastern oyster.
DISCUSSION
The microbiome of marine invertebrates has potential significance in mediating the biological and ecological functions of host organisms (
41,
42). A comprehensive understanding of host-microbiome interactions relies on the taxonomic and functional characterization of the microbiome across different tissue types and individuals. Despite potential encounters with the highly diverse microbial communities in the surrounding water column through their filter-feeding lifestyle, eastern oysters have been shown to generally contain low microbial diversity compared to the surrounding water column (
18). While the taxonomic structure of the oyster microbiome has been previously studied, little is known about its functional potential. This study, to the best of our knowledge, represents the first metagenome-derived functional characterization of the
Mollicutes bacteria that is prevalent in the oyster microbiome.
The metagenomic sequencing was complemented with amplicon-based 16S rRNA gene profiling across six distinct tissue types. Analyses of the alpha diversity revealed that the oysters carry a highly diverse microbiome both across different tissue types and when the same tissue type was examined among individual oysters (
Fig. 1 and also
Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Significant distinctions in the microbiome composition were also observed in different oyster tissues, with the gut carrying a distinct microbiome from all other tissues examined and the oyster mantle, gill, and inner shell samples being significantly different from one another (
Data Set S1C). Interestingly, the gill and mantle demonstrated significant differences in the microbiome composition despite their close proximity within the oyster, indicating tissue-specific differences in community structure and potential mechanistic differences in microbiome associations with the mantle and the gill of oysters.
Taxonomic assignments of amplicon sequences across the six profiled tissue types revealed five major taxa at the class level, including
Mollicutes,
Chlamydiae,
Spirochaetia,
Fusobacteriia, and
Gammaproteobacteria. All of these taxa have been observed in other eastern oyster microbiome studies in various relative abundances (
15,
39,
43). The presence of these major taxa was further confirmed with metagenomic sequencing of the oyster gut microbiome, where at least one full-length 16S rRNA gene was reconstructed for each taxon. Tissue-specific enrichment (e.g.,
Mollicutes and
Chlamydiae in the gut and
Spirochaetia in the mantle and gill) was observed for a number of the major taxa (
Fig. 2). Interestingly, the
Mollicutes was significantly enriched in the adult oyster gut, with an 8-fold-higher relative abundance compared to the larvae homogenate (
25) and a 5-fold-higher relative abundance compared to the biodeposits (
40) (
Fig. S5).
The variability and abundance of the oyster microbiome can be affected by a number of biological and environmental factors, such as host genetics, health status, and diet (
10,
19,
22,
23). While we recognize that this study has ultimately surveyed the microbiome of oysters from one site at one point in time, the observed high individual-level and tissue-specific microbiome variability has prompted us to examine the influence of a potential factor, the infection by a parasite,
P. marinus, on the oyster microbiome, within that site. The oysters infected by
P. marinus appear to carry a significantly lower microbiome alpha diversity in the inner shell than the uninfected oysters. This is interesting as the inner shell is a potential site of biofilm formation by some probiotic bacteria in oysters (
11). In contrast, the comparison of other tissue types revealed no significant shifts in alpha diversity between the
P. marinus-infected and uninfected samples. This is in line with other studies that have examined the eastern oyster microbiome during
P. marinus infection (
20,
44). At this point, it is unknown why the
P. marinus infection would impact only microbiome alpha diversity in the inner shell. One possibility is that the inner shell microbiome is particularly impacted by changes in immune responses or metabolic state induced by
P. marinus infection. Although
P. marinus can be distributed through tissues in systemic infections, initial sites of infection were proposed to include the pseudofeces discharge area (
45), so it is not unreasonable to speculate that mucosal immune responses of the mantle to
P. marinus infection may have a secondary effect on some exposed bacteria uniquely present in the inner shell.
The mapping of ASVs onto full-length 16S rRNA genes obtained from metagenomic assembly also provided a unique opportunity for examining the abundance of specific bacteria among
P. marinus-infected and uninfected samples (
Fig. S2). Interestingly, the
Mollicutes appeared to show various responses to the infection across different oyster tissues. Specifically, the
Mollicutes-1 and
Mollicutes-2 showed a 4- to 5-log-fold-higher relative abundance in the gut and the pallial fluid, respectively, of the uninfected than the
P. marinus-infected oysters. Meanwhile, the
Mollicutes-1 had a slightly lower (1.2 log fold change) relative abundance in the inner shell of uninfected compared to infected oysters. This indicates potential complexity underlying the mechanisms of tissue-specific associations by the
Mollicutes with the oyster host, and it is in contrast to the
Chlamydiae, which demonstrated a statistically significant increase in the
P. marinus-infected gill, mantle, and inner shell samples. The higher relative abundance of
Mollicutes-1 in uninfected gut samples is also in line with a prior study of the Sydney rock oyster (a Pacific species) where sequences related to
Mycoplasma were present in the digestive gland of uninfected oysters but absent in oysters infected with the protozoan parasite
Marteilia sydneyi (
23).
Additional insights into the oyster gut microbiome have been achieved with the reconstruction of MAGs. Overall, two MAGs of high completeness and low contamination have been identified for the
Mollicutes and
Chlamydiae, and one partial MAG has been identified from the
Spirochetes. Specifically, phylogenomic assignments and the calculation of pairwise ANI and AAI values with reference genomes suggest the
Mollicutes and
Chlamydiae MAGs are distinct from isolates previously described in other organisms and environmental samples (
Fig. 3A and
Data Set S2B and C). To further elucidate the functional potentials encoded in the oyster
Mollicutes MAG, a genome-scale metabolic network was reconstructed. The metabolic reconstruction has revealed a heavy reliance of the oyster-associated
Mollicutes on host-derived nutrients, with several unique metabolic pathways identified in the
Mollicutes MAG compared to other neighboring strains in the phylogeny. One is a chitin utilization pathway, which supports the degradation of chitin for carbon and energy metabolism; another is a complete ADI pathway that could fuel ATP production through the utilization of arginine, an abundant amino acid in the eastern oyster (
46). Interestingly, despite the presence of a GlcNAc utilization pathway in
M. marinum and
M. todarodis and the presence of an arginine deiminase gene in
M. mobile, the complete ADI and chitin degradation pathways were present only in the oyster
Mollicutes MAG (
Fig. 3B). Arginine has been previously implicated in the infection dynamics of oysters. For example,
P. marinus is speculated to sequester arginine to avoid host immune responses mediated by the production of nitric oxide, for which arginine is a precursor (
47). The potential competition of
P. marinus and
Mollicutes in the utilization of host-derived arginine may provide some insights into the observed decrease of
Mollicutes in the
P. marinus-infected gut samples. However, the variable differential abundance of
Mollicutes in other tissue types (e.g., pallial fluid or inner shell) indicates a potentially complex relationship between
P. marinus,
Mollicutes, and the oyster host that requires further investigations in future studies.
The prevalence of
Mollicutes in the adult oyster gut is commonly observed among other 16S rRNA gene profiling studies (
16,
48). Electron-dense bodies that resemble strains of the genus
Mycoplasma are also demonstrated by transmission electron microscopy in eastern oyster gut goblet cells (
49). Phylogenetic placement of
Mollicutes ASVs among reference 16S rRNA genes of
Mollicutes from laboratory isolates and environmental samples further elucidated a high level of phylogenetic diversity of this oyster-associated taxon (
Fig. 4). The oyster-associated
Mollicutes have been primarily identified from four distinct clades. Clade IV contains the highest number of unique ASVs across different oyster tissues and is taxonomically assigned to the genus
Mycoplasma. Clades I and II similarly contain oyster-associated
Mollicutes from all tissue types, but they formed distant branches from clade IV in the phylogeny and are taxonomically assigned to “
Candidatus Bacilloplasma,” “
Candidatus Lumbricincol,” and uncultured members of the family
Mycoplasmataceae. While clades I, II, and IV all include references from invertebrate hosts, clade III is largely represented by free-living references from water and sediment samples and is taxonomically assigned to the
Izemoplasmatales,
Acholeplasmatales, and RF39 (
Data Set S2E). Distinctions between clade III and other oyster-associated
Mollicutes clades are also reflected in the higher presence of clade III
Mollicutes ASVs in the surrounding seawater. In contrast, the three other clades had little or no presence of
Mollicutes ASVs from the surrounding seawater. Overall, the integrated study of the phylogenetic diversity and functional potential of the eastern oyster-associated
Mollicutes will set the stage for future research on bacterial transmission dynamics, host range, and relative impacts on host health. Further study of the mechanisms of the
Mollicutes acquisition, persistence, and physiology will begin to shed light on the nature of the relationship between the oyster host and
Mollicutes.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Alexa Sterling, Ashley Hamilton, Benjamin Korry, Dina Proestou, Evelyn Takyi, Kathryn Markey Lundgren, Rebecca Stevick, and Samuel Hughes for advice and/or assistance related to the sampling and processing of oysters. Thanks to Janet Atoyan of the Rhode Island Genomics and Sequencing Center for advice and assistance related to sample preparation for sequencing.
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) grant OIA-1929078. Metabolic reconstruction was supported by NSF grant DBI-1553211, and student fellowships were partially supported by grant OIA-1655221. Sample collection, parasite quantification, and community and metagenomic sequencing were supported by a Rhode Island Science and Technology Advisory Council Collaborative Research Grant in 2017. Microbial community sequencing and metagenomic library preparation were conducted at a Rhode Island NSF EPSCoR research facility, the Genomics and Sequencing Center, supported in part by the National Science Foundation EPSCoR Cooperative Agreement OIA-1655221. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding agencies.
Research design & planning: Y.Z., Z.T.P., M.G.-C.; sample collection: Z.T.P., M.G.-C., K.D.-T., Y.Z.; protozoan pathogen quantification: A.K.S., R.M.S.; molecular sequencing: Z.T.P., Y.Z.; data analysis: Z.T.P., Y.Z.; metabolic reconstruction: K.D.-T., K.T.R., Z.T.P., Y.Z.; manuscript writing: Z.T.P., Y.Z.; manuscript editing and approval: all authors.