Open access
Announcement
2 January 2020

Complete Genome Sequence of Serratia marcescens Podophage Pila

ABSTRACT

Multidrug-resistant Serratia marcescens strains cause serious nosocomial infections in humans. Here, we present the annotated genome sequence of S. marcescens podophage Pila. Similar to its closest relative, Enterobacteria phage T7, Pila has a 38,678-bp genome, predicted to encode 51 protein-coding genes, and contains 148-bp direct terminal repeats.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Serratia marcescens, a facultative, Gram-negative bacterium of the family Enterobacteriaceae, causes nosocomial infections in severely immunocompromised or critically ill patients (1, 2). S. marcescens is commonly found in water, soil, animals, insects, and plants, and multidrug-resistant strains have emerged (3). Here, we present the isolation and genome annotation of S. marcescens phage Pila.
Bacteriophage Pila was propagated on host Serratia marcescens strain D1 (no. 8887172; Ward’s Science) aerobically at 30°C and 37°C in LB broth and agar (BD). This phage was plaque purified, via the soft-agar overlay method (4), from filtered (0.2-μm filter) municipal wastewater collected in College Station, Texas. Phage genomic DNA was prepared as described by Summer (5), using a modified Promega Wizard DNA clean-up system shotgun library preparation protocol. The phage DNA library was prepared with an Illumina TruSeq Nano low-throughput kit and then sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq system with paired-end 250-bp reads, using a 500-cycle v2 kit. FastQC (www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc) was used for quality control of the 4,413 total reads in the phage-containing index, and reads were trimmed with the FastX Toolkit v0.0.14 (http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit). SPAdes v3.5.0 was used with default parameters to assemble a single contig at 14.9-fold coverage (6). The contig was confirmed to be accurate at the termini by Sanger sequencing of PCR products amplified from the contig ends (forward, 5′-AAGGCTGTAAGTGACGCTATTG-3′; reverse, 5′-TAGCCTCAGGTGAAGCTGTA-3′). Protein-coding genes were predicted using GLIMMER v3.0 and MetaGeneAnnotator v1.0 (7, 8). Potential tRNA genes were assessed with ARAGORN v2.36 (9). Rho-independent termination sites were annotated using TransTermHP v2.09 (10). Gene function was predicted using InterProScan v5.33-72, TMHMM v2.0, and BLAST v2.2.31 searching the NCBI nonredundant and UniProtKB Swiss-Prot and TrEMBL databases, with a maximum expectation value of 0.001 (1114). Genome-wide DNA sequence similarity was calculated using progressiveMauve v2.4.0 (15). All analyses were conducted using the Center for Phage Technology (CPT) Galaxy and Web Apollo instances (https://cpt.tamu.edu/galaxy-pub), using default parameters unless otherwise stated (16, 17). Phage morphology was determined using negative staining with 2% (wt/vol) uranyl acetate and transmission electron microscopy performed at the Texas A&M University Microscopy and Imaging Center (18).
The 38,678-bp double-stranded DNA genome of podophage Pila has a G+C content of 48.8%. The 51 predicted protein-coding genes correspond to a coding density of 92.5%. Notably, Pila shares 83.7% nucleotide identity with Enterobacteria phage T7 (GenBank accession no. AY264774). PhageTerm analysis predicted the genomic termini to be 148-bp direct terminal repeats, typical for T7-like phages (19), which is where the Pila genome was reopened. More than 40 Pila proteins have significant similarity to those of two Yersinia phages, YpP-R and YpsP-G (GenBank accession no. JQ965701 and JQ965703, respectively).

Data availability.

The genome sequence and associated data for phage Pila were deposited under GenBank accession no. MN098329, BioProject accession no. PRJNA222858, SRA accession no. SRR8892142, and BioSample accession no. SAMN11408657.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by funding from the National Science Foundation (grant DBI-1565146). Additional support came from the CPT, an Initial University Multidisciplinary Research Initiative supported by Texas A&M University and Texas AgriLife, and from the Texas A&M University Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics.
We are grateful for the advice and support of the CPT staff.
This announcement was prepared in partial fulfillment of the requirements for BICH464 Bacteriophage Genomics, an undergraduate course at Texas A&M University.

REFERENCES

1.
Hejazi A, Falkiner FR. 1997. Serratia marcescens. J Med Microbiol 46:903–912.
2.
Cristina ML, Sartini M, Spagnolo AM. 2019. Serratia marcescens infections in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Int J Environ Res Public Health 16:610.
3.
Mahlen SD. 2011. Serratia infections: from military experiments to current practice. Clin Microbiol Rev 24:755–791.
4.
Adams M. 1959. Bacteriophages. Interscience Publishers, New York, NY.
5.
Summer EJ. 2009. Preparation of a phage DNA fragment library for whole genome shotgun sequencing. Methods Mol Biol 502:27–46.
6.
Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477.
7.
Delcher AL, Harmon D, Kasif S, White O, Salzberg SL. 1999. Improved microbial gene identification with GLIMMER. Nucleic Acids Res 27:4636–4641.
8.
Noguchi H, Taniguchi T, Itoh T. 2008. MetaGeneAnnotator: detecting species-specific patterns of ribosomal binding site for precise gene prediction in anonymous prokaryotic and phage genomes. DNA Res 15:387–396.
9.
Laslett D, Canback B. 2004. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 32:11–16.
10.
Kingsford C, Ayanbule K, Salzberg S. 2007. Rapid, accurate, computational discovery of rho-independent transcription terminators illuminates their relationship to DNA uptake. Genome Biol 8:R22.
11.
Jones P, Binns D, Chang HY, Fraser M, Li W, McAnulla C, McWilliam H, Maslen J, Mitchell A, Nuka G, Pesseat S, Quinn AF, Sangrador-Vegas A, Scheremetjew M, Yong SY, Lopez R, Hunter S. 2014. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 30:1236–1240.
12.
Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, Madden TL. 2009. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10:421.
13.
Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL. 2001. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol 305:567–580.
14.
UniProt Consortium. 2019. UniProt: a worldwide hub of protein knowledge. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D506–D515.
15.
Darling AE, Mau B, Perna NT. 2010. progressiveMauve: multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PLoS One 5:e11147.
16.
Afgan E, Baker D, Batut B, van den Beek M, Bouvier D, Cech M, Chilton J, Clements D, Coraor N, Gruning BA, Guerler A, Hillman-Jackson J, Hiltemann S, Jalili V, Rasche H, Soranzo N, Goecks J, Taylor J, Nekrutenko A, Blankenberg D. 2018. The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res 46:W537–W544.
17.
Lee E, Helt GA, Reese JT, Munoz-Torres MC, Childers CP, Buels RM, Stein L, Holmes IH, Elsik CG, Lewis SE. 2013. Web Apollo: a Web-based genomic annotation editing platform. Genome Biol 14:R93.
18.
Valentine RC, Shapiro BM, Stadtman ER. 1968. Regulation of glutamine synthetase. XII. Electron microscopy of the enzyme from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 7:2143–2152.
19.
Garneau JR, Depardieu F, Fortier LC, Bikard D, Monot M. 2017. PhageTerm: a tool for fast and accurate determination of phage termini and packaging mechanism using next-generation sequencing data. Sci Rep 7:8292.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Microbiology Resource Announcements
Microbiology Resource Announcements
Volume 9Number 12 January 2020
eLocator: 10.1128/mra.01420-19
Editor: Simon Roux, DOE Joint Genome Institute
PubMed: 31896656

History

Received: 12 November 2019
Accepted: 26 November 2019
Published online: 2 January 2020

Contributors

Authors

Loraine Melbern
Center for Phage Technology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA
Kathryn Broussard
Center for Phage Technology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA
Russell Moreland
Center for Phage Technology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA
Mei Liu
Center for Phage Technology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA
Center for Phage Technology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA
Justin Leavitt
Center for Phage Technology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA

Editor

Simon Roux
Editor
DOE Joint Genome Institute

Notes

Address correspondence to Justin Leavitt, [email protected].

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note:

  • For recently published articles, the TOTAL download count will appear as zero until a new month starts.
  • There is a 3- to 4-day delay in article usage, so article usage will not appear immediately after publication.
  • Citation counts come from the Crossref Cited by service.

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. For an editable text file, please select Medlars format which will download as a .txt file. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share the article link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share on social media

American Society for Microbiology ("ASM") is committed to maintaining your confidence and trust with respect to the information we collect from you on websites owned and operated by ASM ("ASM Web Sites") and other sources. This Privacy Policy sets forth the information we collect about you, how we use this information and the choices you have about how we use such information.
FIND OUT MORE about the privacy policy