ABSTRACT

JorRay, Blocker23, Nibbles, and OlgasClover are actinobacteriophages belonging to clusters G1, B2, CT, and DJ, respectively. JorRay and Blocker23 were identified in host bacterium Mycobacterium smegmatis mc2155. Nibbles and OlgasClover were identified in host bacterium Gordonia rubripertincta NRRL B-16540.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Actinobacteria is a diverse phylum of Gram-positive bacteria, which includes pathogenic members, such as the Mycobacterium genus, and others that may be useful for environmental remediation like the Gordonia genus (1, 2). Actinobacteriophages are viruses that infect bacterial hosts belonging to the Actinobacteria phylum (1). Four actinobacteriophages, JorRay, Blocker23, Nibbles, and OlgasClover, were studied as part of the Science Education Alliance-Phage Hunters Advancing Genomics and Evolutionary Science (SEA-PHAGES) program (3).
Protocols for isolation of the bacteriophages and DNA extractions are from the SEA-PHAGES Phage Discovery Manual (4). Host bacterial strains were provided by the University of Pittsburgh via SEA-PHAGES. Soil samples were obtained by digging a few centimeters below the surface. Samples were incubated with PYCa (peptone-yeast-calcium) broth for 4 hours at 30°C and allowed to settle, and the supernatant was sterilized with a 0.22-µm filter. For direct isolation, supernatant was used immediately for plaque assays. For enriched isolation, 500 µL of the appropriate host bacteria was incubated with the supernatant at 30°C for 72 hours, 0.22-µm filter sterilized, and used for plaque assays. DNA was extracted from high-titer lysates using the Norgen phage DNA isolation kit with five rounds of freeze/thaw (4-minute freeze in dry ice-ethanol bath and 1-minute thaw).
Bacteriophages were sequenced at the Pittsburgh Bacteriophage Institute using an Illumina MiSeq instrument. Sequencing libraries were generated from extracted genomic DNA using Biolabs (NEB) NEB Ultra II Library Kit, v3, 150-base single-end reads, per the manufacturer’s instructions. The raw reads were uploaded to Newbler v.2.9 with default settings to produce contiguous assemblies of reads (5). The contigs produced from Newbler were analyzed using the default settings of Consed v.29 (http://www.phrap.org/consed/consed.html) to produce a single contig. Quality control included evaluating for completeness by checking genome circularization and accuracy by checking for gaps and low census quality, correcting errors, and determining genomic termini by searching for overrepresented portions of the DNA (5). JorRay was sequenced using the deconvolution of genomes after en masse sequencing (DOGEMS) method (6). For DOGEMS, genomic DNA of four different phages (including JorRay) were pooled into one library. This library was prepared, sequenced, and evaluated for quality in the same manner described earlier, resulting in contigs representing these four phages. JorRay was identified from the list of contigs by PCR using primers specific to G cluster phages (listed in Table 1). Genomic and sequencing information for bacteriophages is listed in Table 1.
TABLE 1
TABLE 1 Actinobacteriophage Genome and Sequencing Information
PhageGenBank accession numberSRA accession numberGPS
coordinates
IsolationClusterGenome lengthGC contentGenome end typeSequencing coverageNumber of readsPrimer sequences for DOGEMS
JorRayON637765SRR2387885933.75 N, 84.41 WEnrichedG141,901 bp66.6%3′ sticky overhang (11 bases)4360,798Forward:
TCGACGTTCCGGGTACCTAT
Reverse:
TGACTCGGCCGATTTCGTAG
Blocker23ON970593SRR2387884633.7488 N, 84.4153 WEnrichedB267,402 bp68.9%Circularly permuted1322626,379N/A
NibblesOR253918SRR2387885236.1789 N, 115.1841 WEnrichedCT45,601 bp61.7%3′ sticky overhang (10 bases)2696865,906N/A
OlgasCloverOR613475SRR2387884936.1253 N, 115.2774 WDirectDJ61,926 bp51.3%3′ sticky overhang (nine bases)823354,055N/A
Annotations were done using the following programs: DNA Master v5.23.2 (http://cobamide2.bio.pitt.edu/computer.htm), Starterator v1.2 (https://github.com/SEA-PHAGES/starterator), Phamerator (phamerator.org) (7), PhagesDB BLAST (phagesdb.org/blast) (8), NCBI BLAST (9), PECAAN (discover.kbrinsgd.org), GeneMark v2.5p (10), Glimmer 3.02 (11), Aragorn (v1.1 and v1.2.38) (12), HHPRED (v3.2.0) (13), tRNAscanSE 2.0 (14), TMHMM (v2.0) (15), and SOSUI (v1.11) (16) using the default parameters listed in the SEA-PHAGES bioinformatic guide (17).
JorRay contains 62 forward-facing genes except for tyrosine integrase and immunity repressor being reverse, a hallmark of the G1 cluster. Blocker23 contains 91 genes, and 31 were assigned putative functions. The genome begins with genes predicted to belong to the PreQ0 pathway of 7-deazaguanine modifications protecting bacteriophage DNA from host restriction enzymes (18), which were not found in the other phages. Nibbles contains 67 genes. Gene 55 is a putative lipoprotein, identified in 4 of 47 cluster members (Azira, Fribs8, and Survivors). OlgasClover contains 93 forward-facing genes, and 25 genes were assigned putative functions. No genes encoding transfer RNAs or transfer-messenger RNAs were found in these phages.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was made possible with the support from the Biological Sciences Department of the College of Southern Nevada. We thank the SEA-PHAGES program and the University of Pittsburgh for providing the opportunity to study bacteriophages and sequencing all phage genomes for annotation. We would like to thank Dan Russell for his help with the DOGEMS methodology. Thanks to Malik McRae at Morehouse College for the discovery of Blocker23. Finally, we would like to thank all the SEA-PHAGES QCers for verifying the annotations of each phage genome described in this work.

REFERENCES

1.
Hatfull GF. 2020. Actinobacteriophages: genomics, dynamics, and applications. Annu Rev Virol 7:37–61.
2.
Arenskötter M, Bröker D, Steinbüchel A. 2004. Biology of the metabolically diverse genus Gordonia. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:3195–3204.
3.
Jordan TC, Burnett SH, Carson S, Caruso SM, Clase K, DeJong RJ, Dennehy JJ, Denver DR, Dunbar D, Elgin SCR, et al. 2014. A broadly implementable research course in phage discovery and genomics for first-year undergraduate students. mBio 5:e01051-13.
4.
Poxleitner M, Pope W, Jacobs-Sera D, Sivanathan V, Hatfull G. 2018. Phage discovery guide. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD.
5.
Russell DA. 2018. Sequencing, assembling, and finishing complete bacteriophage genomes. Methods Mol Biol 1681:109–125.
6.
Jacob C, Alvarez Y, Carney T, Castro C, Alvarez R, Connors BJ. 2020. Genome sequences of mycobacteriophages Joselito, Patt, and Tydolla. Microbiol Resour Announc 9:e00519-20.
7.
Cresawn SG, Bogel M, Day N, Jacobs-Sera D, Hendrix RW, Hatfull GF. 2011. Phamerator: a bioinformatic tool for comparative bacteriophage genomics. BMC Bioinformatics 12:395.
8.
Russell DA, Hatfull GF. 2017. PhagesDB: the actinobacteriophage database. Bioinformatics 33:784–786.
9.
Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410.
10.
Besemer J, Borodovsky M. 2005. GeneMark: web software for gene finding in prokaryotes, eukaryotes and viruses. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W451–W454.
11.
Delcher AL, Bratke KA, Powers EC, Salzberg SL. 2007. Identifying bacterial gene and endosymbiont DNA with glimmer. Bioinformatics 23:673–679.
12.
Laslett D, Canback B. 2004. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 32:11–16.
13.
Remmert M, Biegert A, Hauser A, Söding J. 2011. HHblits: lightning-fast Iterative protein sequence searching by HMM-HMM alignment. Nat Methods 9:173–175.
14.
Lowe TM, Chan PP. 2016. tRNAscan-SE on-line: integrating search and contextual analysis of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 44:W54–W57.
15.
Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL. 2001. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol 305:567–580.
16.
Hirokawa T, Boon-Chieng S, Mitaku S. 1998. SOSUI: classification and secondary structure prediction system for membrane proteins. Bioinformatics 14:378–379.
17.
Pope WH, Jacobs-Sera D, Russell DA, Cresawn SG, Hatfull GF. 2017. SEA-PHAGE bioinformatics guide. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD.
18.
Hutinet G, Kot W, Cui L, Hillebrand R, Balamkundu S, Gnanakalai S, Neelakandan R, Carstens AB, Fa Lui C, Tremblay D, Jacobs-Sera D, Sassanfar M, Lee Y-J, Weigele P, Moineau S, Hatfull GF, Dedon PC, Hansen LH, de Crécy-Lagard V. 2019. 7-deazaguanine modifications protect phage DNA from host restriction systems. Nat Commun 10:5442.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Microbiology Resource Announcements
Microbiology Resource Announcements
Volume 13Number 411 April 2024
eLocator: e01256-23
Editor: J. Cameron Thrash, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
PubMed: 38445868

History

Received: 20 December 2023
Accepted: 26 February 2024
Published online: 6 March 2024

Keywords

  1. bacteriophage
  2. Actinobacteria
  3. genome

Data Availability

The GenBank accession numbers and SRA accession numbers for the four bacteriophages reported here are in Table 1.

Contributors

Authors

Breanna M. Baumgartner
Department of Biological Sciences, College of Southern Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Author Contributions: Formal analysis and Investigation.
Kayla A. Bono
Department of Biological Sciences, College of Southern Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Author Contributions: Formal analysis and Investigation.
Dawn R. McIntosh
Department of Biological Sciences, College of Southern Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Author Contributions: Formal analysis and Investigation.
Anna M. Vu
Department of Biological Sciences, College of Southern Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Author Contributions: Formal analysis and Investigation.
Chanel F. Adams
Department of Biological Sciences, College of Southern Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Author Contributions: Formal analysis and Investigation.
Brooklyn C. Benik
Department of Biological Sciences, College of Southern Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Author Contributions: Formal analysis and Investigation.
Jessica Chavez
Department of Biological Sciences, College of Southern Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Author Contributions: Formal analysis and Investigation.
Samantha J. Gresky
Department of Biological Sciences, College of Southern Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Author Contributions: Formal analysis and Investigation.
Andres Sotelo
Department of Biological Sciences, College of Southern Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Author Contributions: Formal analysis and Investigation.
Jordan I. Ray
Department of Biology, Morehouse College, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Author Contribution: Investigation.
Alexandra Peister
Department of Biology, Morehouse College, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Author Contributions: Investigation, Methodology, and Supervision.
Kendra W. Kimberley
Department of Biological Sciences, College of Southern Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Author Contributions: Methodology and Writing – review and editing.
Chelsey C. McKenna
Department of Biological Sciences, College of Southern Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Author Contributions: Supervision, Validation, and Writing – review and editing.
James R. Theoret
Department of Biological Sciences, College of Southern Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Author Contributions: Supervision, Validation, and Writing – review and editing.
Department of Biological Sciences, College of Southern Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Author Contributions: Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, and Writing – review and editing.
Erin J. Windsor
Department of Biological Sciences, College of Southern Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Author Contributions: Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, and Writing – review and editing.

Editor

J. Cameron Thrash
Editor
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA

Notes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note:

  • For recently published articles, the TOTAL download count will appear as zero until a new month starts.
  • There is a 3- to 4-day delay in article usage, so article usage will not appear immediately after publication.
  • Citation counts come from the Crossref Cited by service.

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. For an editable text file, please select Medlars format which will download as a .txt file. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Figures and Media

Figures

Media

Tables

Share

Share

Share the article link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share on social media

American Society for Microbiology ("ASM") is committed to maintaining your confidence and trust with respect to the information we collect from you on websites owned and operated by ASM ("ASM Web Sites") and other sources. This Privacy Policy sets forth the information we collect about you, how we use this information and the choices you have about how we use such information.
FIND OUT MORE about the privacy policy