Open access
Bacteriology
Announcement
18 May 2023

Draft Genome Sequence of the Bacterial Endophyte Priestia megaterium B1, Isolated from Roots of Apple (Malus domestica)

ABSTRACT

Over the past years, a number of important traits supporting plant growth have been shown for different strains of Priestia megaterium (formerly known as Bacillus megaterium). Here, we report the draft genome sequence of the endophytic bacterial strain Priestia megaterium B1, which was isolated from surface-sterilized roots of apple plants.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Priestia megaterium (1) is known for its plant-growth-promoting potential (2) and its ability to enhance plant resistance against stress (3, 4). Priestia megaterium strain B1 was isolated from surface-sterilized roots of a single apple plant and grown for 8 weeks in gamma-irradiated soil in Ellerhoop (Germany; latitude, 53.71435; longitude, 9.770143). Roots were surface sterilized by sequential immersion in 70% ethanol, 1.3 M sodium hypochlorite, and 70% ethanol. Crushed roots were plated onto water agar (WA; Difco, NJ) and incubated at 28 ± 2°C for 7 days. Isolates were purified on nutrient agar (HiMedia, Mumbai, India) and preserved in 15% (vol/vol) glycerol at −80°C (5).
Genomic DNA was extracted using the Genomic-tip 20/G kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), after the cultivation of strain B1 from a glycerol stock in LB broth (Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) for 48 h at 30°C. Multiplexed libraries were prepared following the protocol “Procedure & Checklist-Preparing Multiplexed Microbial Libraries Using SMRTbell Express Template Prep kit 2.0.” (Pacific Biosciences, CA). Genomic DNA was sheared to approximately 10 kb using g-TUBEs (Covaris, MA) followed by a cleanup step of the DNA using AMPure beads (Pacific Biosciences). To avoid the possible loss of plasmids, no size selection was included. The library was loaded by diffusion loading on a Sequel system (Pacific Biosciences). The loading concentration on the single-molecule real-time (SMRT) cell 1M v3 was 6 pM. Sequencing run parameters were 10-h movie time, 2-h immobilization time, and 2-h pre-extension time using the continuous long read mode.
Reads were obtained in FASTQ format, applying SAMtools (v1.12) (6). LongQC 1.2.0c (7) revealed an acceptable read quality, and thus, no error correction was performed. Flye v2.9 (https://github.com/fenderglass/Flye) was used for the de novo assembly of reads, using the command flye –pacbio-raw –threads –out-dir –scaffold (8). No circularization or gap closure was performed after the assembly. CheckM v1.0.18 (9) was used to calculate completeness and contamination percentages. Assembly quality was checked by QUAST v4.4 (10). Type (Strain) Genome Server (https://tygs.dsmz.de/) was used to calculate digital DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH) values (11). Average nucleotide identity (ANI) was estimated by FastANI v0.1.3 (12). The genome was annotated using NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) v6.5 (13). Default parameters were used for all software.
Sequencing yielded a total of 426,737 reads (mean read length, 2,747.024 bp; N50, 3,979 bp). The resulting draft genome had a total sequence length of 5,664,514 bp (GC content, 37.93%; contig N50, 5,139,808 bp) comprising 13 contigs. The completeness of the genome was 99.43%, with 0.07% contamination. Both dDDH and ANI confirmed the identity of strain B1 as Priestia megaterium, with a nucleotide sequence homology of 73.3% and ≥95%, respectively. PGAP identified 5,710 coding DNA sequences, which included potential genes for siderophores production, phosphate solubilization, and resistance to heavy metals.

Data availability.

The draft genome sequence was deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession JARQZM000000000, via BioProject PRJNA700828 (with BioSample accession number SAMN30014917, SRA accession number SRX16711599, and GenBank assembly accession GCA_024582855.2).

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We are thankful to the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) for funding this work through the funding initiative BonaRes (ORDIAmur, grant number 031B0512).

REFERENCES

1.
Gupta RS, Patel S, Saini N, Chen S. 2020. Robust demarcation of 17 distinct Bacillus species clades, proposed as novel Bacillaceae genera, by phylogenomics and comparative genomic analyses: description of Robertmurraya kyonggiensis sp. nov. and proposal for an emended genus Bacillus limiting it only to the members of the Subtilis and Cereus clades of species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 70:5753–5798.
2.
Chandra A, Chandra P, Tripathi P. 2021. Whole genome sequence insight of two plant growth-promoting bacteria (B. subtilis BS87 and B. megaterium BM89) isolated and characterized from sugarcane rhizosphere depicting better crop yield potentiality. Microbiol Res 247:126733.
3.
Antil S, Kumar R, Pathak DV, Kumar A, Panwar A, Kumari A. 2022. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria - Bacillus cereus KMT-5 and B. megaterium KMT-8 effectively suppressed Meloidogyne javanica infection. Appl Soil Ecol 174:104419.
4.
Nascimento FX, Hernández AG, Glick BR, Rossi MJ. 2020. Plant growth-promoting activities and genomic analysis of the stress-resistant Bacillus megaterium STB1, a bacterium of agricultural and biotechnological interest. Biotechnol Rep (Amst) 25:e00406.
5.
Kusari S, Lamshöft M, Kusari P, Gottfried S, Zühlke S, Louven K, Hentschel U, Kayser O, Spiteller M. 2014. Endophytes are hidden producers of maytansine in Putterlickia roots. J Nat Prod 77:2577–2584.
6.
Danecek P, Bonfield JK, Liddle J, Marshall J, Ohan V, Pollard MO, Whitwham A, Keane T, McCarthy SA, Davies RM, Li H. 2021. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. GigaScience 10:giab008.
7.
Fukasawa Y, Ermini L, Wang H, Carty K, Cheung M-S. 2020. LongQC: a quality control tool for third generation sequencing long read data. G3 (Bethesda) 10:1193–1196.
8.
Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. 2019. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol 37:540–546.
9.
Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055.
10.
Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075.
11.
Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. 2019. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 10:2182.
12.
Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. 2018. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun 9:5114.
13.
Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Microbiology Resource Announcements
Microbiology Resource Announcements
Volume 12Number 620 June 2023
eLocator: e01172-22
Editor: David Rasko, University of Maryland School of Medicine
PubMed: 37199619

History

Received: 4 November 2022
Accepted: 8 May 2023
Published online: 18 May 2023

Contributors

Authors

Research Unit for Comparative Microbiome Analysis, Helmholtz Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
Souvik Kusari
Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Center for Mass Spectrometry (CMS), TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
Susanne Kublik
Research Unit for Comparative Microbiome Analysis, Helmholtz Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
Sarah Benning
Research Unit for Comparative Microbiome Analysis, Helmholtz Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
Roberto Siani
Research Unit for Comparative Microbiome Analysis, Helmholtz Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
Sebastian Zühlke
Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Center for Mass Spectrometry (CMS), TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
Research Unit for Comparative Microbiome Analysis, Helmholtz Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
Felix Mahnkopp-Dirks
Institute of Horticultural Production Systems, Section Woody Plant and Propagation Physiology, Leibniz University Hannover, Hanover, Germany
Michael Schloter
Research Unit for Comparative Microbiome Analysis, Helmholtz Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
Chair for Soil Science, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany

Editor

David Rasko
Editor
University of Maryland School of Medicine

Notes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note:

  • For recently published articles, the TOTAL download count will appear as zero until a new month starts.
  • There is a 3- to 4-day delay in article usage, so article usage will not appear immediately after publication.
  • Citation counts come from the Crossref Cited by service.

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. For an editable text file, please select Medlars format which will download as a .txt file. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share the article link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share on social media

American Society for Microbiology ("ASM") is committed to maintaining your confidence and trust with respect to the information we collect from you on websites owned and operated by ASM ("ASM Web Sites") and other sources. This Privacy Policy sets forth the information we collect about you, how we use this information and the choices you have about how we use such information.
FIND OUT MORE about the privacy policy