Open access
Announcement
1 October 2020

Complete Genome Sequences of Two Salmonella enterica Lytic Phages, NBSal006 and NBSal007

ABSTRACT

The use of bacteriophages as antimicrobial agents represents a promising alternative for the control of pathogenic bacteria. Here, we present the complete genome sequences of two novel Salmonella enterica lytic bacteriophages, NBSal006 and NBSal007, candidates for Salmonella biocontrol.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Salmonella enterica is a Gram-negative pathogen recognized as one of the most common causal agents of foodborne infections (1, 2). Poultry flocks are one of the main reservoirs of Salmonella and thus are an ideal target for its control using bacteriophage-based antimicrobials. An initial step that is necessary for the development of such phage-based antimicrobials is the rigorous characterization of novel phages with strong lytic activity. Here, we describe the isolation and characterization of two novel Salmonella bacteriophages, NBSal006 and NBSal007.
To isolate bacteriophages, 50 g of waste samples was collected from Peruvian poultry (location, 11°58′22.1ʺS, 77°06′17.0ʺW); these samples were stored at 4°C until their use in phage isolation. For phage isolation, the soft agar overlay method was performed as described by Adams (3), using Salmonella enterica AR-404 (CDC and FDA Antibiotic Resistance Isolate Bank) as the host; 3 passages were required to identify single plaques. Isolated phages were amplified by incubating phage and Salmonella cultures for 18 h at 37°C in tryptic soy broth or agar.
Phage genomic DNA was extracted using a modified phenol-chloroform method, including a DNase step to limit bacterial DNA contamination (4). The QIAseq FX single-cell DNA library kit was used to prepare the genomic library, followed by sequencing on the MiSeq Illumina platform (151-bp paired-end reads). Raw reads were trimmed using Fastp (5) and assembled using Unicycler (6), followed by the SPAdes genome assembler v3.9.0 using the Unicycler contigs as trusted contigs to obtain the complete genome sequence for each phage (7). Phage genome completeness was checked using the PHASTER tool, for which the completeness score is based on the proportion of phage genes in the genome (8); also, it was corroborated by identifying the genome ends and packing strategy using the PhageTerm tool (9). Genomic annotation was performed using the RAST server (10), and the tRNA presence was checked with tRNAscan-SE v2.0, included in the RAST server (11). Default parameters were used for all software unless otherwise specified.
The numbers of sequencing reads generated for NBSal006 and NBSal007 were 5,008,144 and 5,111,521, respectively; phage NBSal006 had a genome of 41,850 bp with 3,915× coverage, and NBSal007 had a genome of 43,747 bp with 4,241× coverage. Both phage genomes had a G+C content of 49.8%. The genomic annotation for the phages presented 56 coding sequences with assigned function out of 66 annotated coding sequences for NBSal006 and 54 out of 57 for NBSal007. Moreover, no tRNA coding sequences were identified in the phages. Both phages presented circularly permutated genomes with redundant ends and a headful packaging mechanism. The genomic relation to other phages was evaluated with a nucleotide BLAST search, which showed notable similarity across the entire phage genome with phages from the Siphoviridae family, particularly NBSal006 with the previously described phage Shelanagig (nucleotide identity, 95.67%) and phage NBSal007 with the phage vB_StyS-sam (nucleotide identity, 92.03%) Table 1.
TABLE 1
TABLE 1 Characteristics of phages NBSal006 and NBSal007
Phage name (GenBank accession no.)No. of paired-end reads (million)Genome length (bp)Coverage (×)Packaging strategyaNo. of genesNo. of genes with predicted functionsG+C content (%)Closest phage (GenBank accession no., % identity)
NBSal006 (MT677933)541,8503,915Headful (Pac)665649.8Shelanagig (MK931446.1, 95.67)
NBSal007 (MT677934)5.143,7474,241Headful (Pac)575449.8vB_StyS-sam (LC507823.1, 92.03)
a
Pac, subtype of the genome packaging mechanism used by the phage (8).
The discovery of new phages with strong lytic activity is an essential step in the development of phage-based antimicrobial products. The study of the new phages’ genomes enables us to have a better understanding of their biology and have a solid foundation to conduct further functional studies on them. Here, we present the complete genome sequences of 2 Salmonella enterica lytic phages with the potential to be used in the development of a phage-based antimicrobial for the biocontrol of Salmonella enterica in poultry.

Data availability.

The genome sequences and raw data have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers MT677933 and SRR12133959 (NBSal006) and MT677934 and SRR12127194 (NBSal007).

REFERENCES

1.
Jajere SM. 2019. A review of Salmonella enterica with particular focus on the pathogenicity and virulence factors, host specificity and antimicrobial resistance including multidrug resistance. Vet World 12:504–521.
2.
Dar MA, Ahmad SM, Bhat SA, Ahmed R, Urwat U, Mumtaz PT, Bhat SA, Dar TA, Shah RA, Ganai NA. 2017. Salmonella typhimurium in poultry: a review. Worlds Poult Sci J 73:345–354.
3.
Adams MH. 1956. Bacteriophages. Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York, NY.
4.
Llanos CD, Ortega J, Bardales JA. 2020. Complete genome sequences of five Salmonella enterica phages, NBSal001, NBSal002, NBSal003, NBSal004, and NBSal005. Microbiol Resour Announc 9:e00301-20.
5.
Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. 2018. Fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34:i884–i890.
6.
Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. 2017. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005595.
7.
Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477.
8.
Arndt D, Grant J, Marcu A, Sajed T, Pon A, Liang Y, Wishart DS. 2016. PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res 44:W16–W21.
9.
Garneau JR, Depardieu F, Fortier LC, Bikard D, Monot M. 2017. PhageTerm: a tool for fast and accurate determination of phage termini and packaging mechanism using next-generation sequencing data. Sci Rep 7:8292.
10.
Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology. BMC Genomics 9:75.
11.
Lowe TM, Chan PP. 2016. tRNAscan-SE on-line: integrating search and context for analysis of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 44:W54–W57.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Microbiology Resource Announcements
Microbiology Resource Announcements
Volume 9Number 401 October 2020
eLocator: 10.1128/mra.00969-20
Editor: Simon Roux, DOE Joint Genome Institute

History

Received: 18 August 2020
Accepted: 9 September 2020
Published online: 1 October 2020

Contributors

Authors

Carlos D. Llanos
Nextbiotics, Inc., Oakland, California, USA
Renzo Punil
Departamento de Microbiología y Parasitología, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru
Enrique Mamani
Departamento de Microbiología y Parasitología, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru
Carlo Mormontoy
Departamento de Microbiología y Parasitología, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru
Nextbiotics, Inc., Oakland, California, USA

Editor

Simon Roux
Editor
DOE Joint Genome Institute

Notes

Address correspondence to Jorge A. Bardales, [email protected].

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note:

  • For recently published articles, the TOTAL download count will appear as zero until a new month starts.
  • There is a 3- to 4-day delay in article usage, so article usage will not appear immediately after publication.
  • Citation counts come from the Crossref Cited by service.

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. For an editable text file, please select Medlars format which will download as a .txt file. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Figures and Media

Figures

Media

Tables

Share

Share

Share the article link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share on social media

American Society for Microbiology ("ASM") is committed to maintaining your confidence and trust with respect to the information we collect from you on websites owned and operated by ASM ("ASM Web Sites") and other sources. This Privacy Policy sets forth the information we collect about you, how we use this information and the choices you have about how we use such information.
FIND OUT MORE about the privacy policy