ABSTRACT

Erwinia amylovora is a plant pathogen belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae family, a family containing many plant and animal pathogens. Herein, we announce nine genome sequences of E. amylovora bacteriophages isolated from infected apple trees along the Wasatch Front in Utah.

ANNOUNCEMENT

At an estimated total number of 1031, phages are by far the most abundant biological entity on the planet (17). They dramatically influence the evolution of bacteria by their ability to infect and kill their hosts and to transfer genetic material. Erwinia amylovora is a rod-shaped facultative anaerobic member of the Enterobacteriaceae bacterial family, which includes many well-characterized Gram-negative plant and animal pathogens, such as Salmonella spp., Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella spp. As the causative agent of fire blight, Erwinia amylovora infects members of the Rosaceae plant family, causing diseased areas to appear burnt (810). The isolation and characterization of phages that infect E. amylovora may aid in our understanding of these bacteria and provide potential treatment for this devastating agricultural disease. Herein, we announce the genome sequences of nine E. amylovora bacteriophages, vB_EamM_Asesino, vB_EamM_Alexandra, vB_EamM_Bosolaphorus, vB_EamM_Desertfox, vB_EamM_MadMel, vB_EamM_Mortimer, vB_EamP_Pavtok, vB_EamM_SunLIRen, and vB_EamM_Wellington.
Phages were isolated from apple trees along the Wasatch Front in Utah that appeared to harbor fire blight infection. Phages were plaque purified through a minimum of three passages after amplification via enrichment culture (11). All nine phages reported in this announcement infect the Erwinia amylovora ATCC 29780 strain, as indicated by plaque assays, and their characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Genomic DNA was extracted (Phage DNA isolation kit; Norgen Biotek), a library was made using the Illumina TruSeq DNA Nano kit, and sample genomes were sequenced by Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencing (250-bp paired end) and assembled with Geneious (12) version 8.1 using de novo assembly with medium-low sensitivity and various percentages of data. All phages circularized upon assembly and were annotated using DNA Master (http://cobamide2.bio.pitt.edu/computer.htm), giving preference for calls that gave full coding potential coverage.
TABLE 1
TABLE 1 Properties of nine Erwinia amylovora bacteriophage genomes
NameGenBank accession no.SRA accession no.Total no.
of reads
No. of reads
used
Assembly fold coverage
(range [mean])
Length (bp)No. of
ORFsa
No. of
tRNAs
G+C
content (%)
vB_EamP_PavtokMH426726SRX45976021,301,332386,192492–2,086 (1,069)61,40162036.9
vB_EamM_SunLIRenMH426725SRX45976061,301,332386,1928,249–42,422 (13,566)84,5591412236.3
vB_EamM_WellingtonMH426724SRX4597603626,048372,488133–514 (329.7)244,950295850.3
vB_EamM_AsesinoKX397364SRX45976092,222,0381,022,382512–1,378 (1,037.7)246,2902891251.2
vB_EamM_AlexandraMH248138SRX4597608381,540200,00563–516 (166.3)266,532349049.8
vB_EamM_BosolaphorusMG655267SRX4597604778,168326,34483–555 (248.4)272,228321149.4
vB_EamM_DesertfoxMG655268SRX45976051,930,4701,138,933115–612 (352.9)272,458320049.6
vB_EamM_MortimerMG655270SRX46161092,581,160287,39647–207 (129.4)273,914325149.5
vB_EamM_MadMelMG655269SRX45976071,604,7201,443,568567–1,577 (1,213.9)275,000321049.4
a
ORFs, open reading frames based on current annotation.
The nine phages were grouped into five distinct clusters by genomic dot plot and average nucleotide identity analyses, as previously described (11), with the first three groups containing jumbo Myoviridae. The first jumbo group included four myoviruses, vB_EamM_Bosolaphorus, vB_EamM_Desertfox, vB_EamM_MadMel, and vB_EamM_Mortimer, which are similar to previously published Erwinia phage Ea35-70 (13), as well as other phages we have isolated (14). The second group included two jumbo myoviruses, vB_EamM_Asesino and vB_EamM_Wellington, with similarity to the well-characterized Salmonella SPN3US phage (15) and related phages. The third is a single jumbo myovirus, EamM_Alexandra, which has similarity to previously published Erwinia phages EamM_Yoloswag (14) and EamM_Y3 (16). Podovirus vB_EamP_Pavtok and myovirus vB_EamM_SunLIRen are similar to Erwinia phages PEp14 and phiEa21-4 (17), respectively. The three jumbo myovirus groups package DNA by headful packaging (14) based on homology to phage phiKZ terminase (18), and their bp 1 was chosen by alignment to their phage family. PhageTerm (19) was used to determine the packaging strategy of SunLIRen and Pavtok. SunLIRen appeared to have headful packaging, and its bp 1 was assigned based on homology alignment to Erwinia phage phiEa21-4, while the packaging strategy of Pavtok is unknown, and its bp 1 was assigned due to homology to PEp14.

Data availability.

The GenBank and SRA accession numbers for the nine Erwinia bacteriophages are listed in Table 1.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the Howard Hughes Medical Institute Science Education Alliance–Phage Hunters Advancing Genomics and Evolutionary Science (SEA-PHAGES) for phage analysis training. In addition, we thank Ed Wilcox (BYU DNA Sequencing Center) and Michael Standing (BYU Microscopy Lab).
This work was graciously funded by a USDA grant (to D.A.B., University of Arizona) and the Department of Microbiology and Molecular Biology and the College of Life Sciences at Brigham Young University, as well as a private donor.

REFERENCES

1.
Bergh O, Børsheim KY, Bratbak G, Heldal M. 1989. High abundance of viruses found in aquatic environments. Nature 340:467–468.
2.
Wommack KE, Colwell RR. 2000. Virioplankton: viruses in aquatic ecosystems. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 64:69–114.
3.
Brüssow H, Hendrix RW. 2002. Phage genomics: small is beautiful. Cell 108:13–16.
4.
Wilhelm SW, Jeffrey WH, Suttle CA, Mitchell DL. 2002. Estimation of biologically damaging UV levels in marine surface waters with DNA and viral dosimeters. Photochem Photobiol 76:268–273.
5.
Hendrix RW. 2003. Bacteriophage genomics. Curr Opin Microbiol 6:506–511.
6.
Hambly E, Suttle CA. 2005. The viriosphere, diversity, and genetic exchange within phage communities. Curr Opin Microbiol 8:444–450.
7.
Suttle CA. 2005. Viruses in the sea. Nature 437:356–361.
8.
Khan MA, Zhao Y, Korban SS. 2012. Molecular mechanisms of pathogenesis and resistance to the bacterial pathogen Erwinia amylovora, causal agent of fire blight disease in rosaceae. Plant Mol Biol Rep 30:247–260.
9.
Schroth M, Thomson S, Hildebrand D, Moller W. 1974. Epidemiology and control of fire blight. Annu Rev Phytopathol 12:389–412.
10.
Thomson SV. 2000. Epidemiology of fire blight 2, p 9–36. In Vanneste J (ed), Fire blight: the disease and its causative agent, Erwinia amylovora. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, United Kingdom.
11.
Arens DK, Brady TS, Carter JL, Pape JA, Robinson DM, Russell KA, Staley LA, Stettler JM, Tateoka OB, Townsend MH, Whitley KV, Wienclaw TM, Williamson TL, Johnson SM, Grose JH. 2018. Characterization of two related Erwinia myoviruses that are distant relatives of the PhiKZ-like jumbo phages. PLoS One 13:e0200202.
12.
Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Meintjes P, Drummond A. 2012. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28:1647–1649.
13.
Yagubi AI, Castle AJ, Kropinski AM, Banks TW, Svircev AM. 2014. Complete genome sequence of Erwinia amylovora bacteriophage vB_EamM_Ea35-70. Genome Announc 2:e00413-14.
14.
Esplin IND, Berg JA, Sharma R, Allen RC, Arens DK, Ashcroft CR, Bairett SR, Beatty NJ, Bickmore M, Bloomfield TJ, Brady TS, Bybee RN, Carter JL, Choi MC, Duncan S, Fajardo CP, Foy BB, Fuhriman DA, Gibby PD, Grossarth SE, Harbaugh K, Harris N, Hilton JA, Hurst E, Hyde JR, Ingersoll K, Jacobson CM, James BD, Jarvis TM, Jaen-Anieves D, Jensen GL, Knabe BK, Kruger JL, Merrill BD, Pape JA, Payne Anderson AM, Payne DE, Peck MD, Pollock SV, Putnam MJ, Ransom EK, Ririe DB, Robinson DM, Rogers SL, Russell KA, Schoenhals JE, Shurtleff CA, Simister AR, Smith HG, Stephenson MB, et al. 2017. Genome sequences of 19 novel Erwinia amylovora bacteriophages. Genome Announc 5:e00931-17.
15.
Lee JH, Shin H, Kim H, Ryu S. 2011. Complete genome sequence of Salmonella bacteriophage SPN3US. J Virol 85:13470–13471.
16.
Buttimer C, Born Y, Lucid A, Loessner MJ, Fieseler L, Coffey A. 2018. Erwinia amylovora phage vB_EamM_Y3 represents another lineage of hairy Myoviridae. Res Microbiol 30062–30067.
17.
Lehman SM, Kropinski AM, Castle AJ, Svircev AM. 2009. Complete genome of the broad-host-range Erwinia amylovora phage phiEa21-4 and its relationship to Salmonella phage Felix O1. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:2139–2147.
18.
Mesyanzhinov VV, Robben J, Grymonprez B, Kostyuchenko VA, Bourkaltseva MV, Sykilinda NN, Krylov VN, Volckaert G. 2002. The genome of bacteriophage phiKZ of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Mol Biol 317:1–19.
19.
Garneau JR, Depardieu F, Fortier L-C, Bikard D, Monot M. 2017. PhageTerm: a fast and user-friendly software to determine bacteriophage termini and packaging mode using randomly fragmented NGS data. Sci Rep 7:8292.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Microbiology Resource Announcements
Microbiology Resource Announcements
Volume 7Number 1411 October 2018
eLocator: 10.1128/mra.00944-18
Editor: J. Cameron Thrash, Louisiana State University

History

Received: 18 August 2018
Accepted: 12 September 2018
Published online: 11 October 2018

Contributors

Authors

Ruchira Sharma
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA
Jordan A. Berg
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA
Nolan J. Beatty
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA
Minsey C. Choi
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA
Ashlin E. Cowger
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA
Brooke J. R. Cozzens
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA
Steven G. Duncan
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA
Christopher P. Fajardo
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA
Hannah P. Ferguson
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA
Trevon Galbraith
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA
Jacob A. Herring
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA
Taalin R. Hoj
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA
Jill L. Durrant
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA
Jonathan R. Hyde
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA
Garrett L. Jensen
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA
Si Yang Ke
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA
Shalee Killpack
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA
Jared L. Kruger
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA
Eliza E. K. Lawrence
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA
Ifeanyichukwu O. Nwosu
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA
Tsz Ching Tam
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA
Daniel W. Thompson
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA
Josie A. Tueller
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA
Megan E. H. Ward
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA
Charles J. Webb
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA
Deceased. Charles J. Webb did not see or approve the final version of this paper.
Madison E. Wood
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA
Edward L. Yeates
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA
School of Plant Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tempe, Arizona, USA
Donald P. Breakwell
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA

Editor

J. Cameron Thrash
Editor
Louisiana State University

Notes

Address correspondence to Julianne H. Grose, [email protected].

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note:

  • For recently published articles, the TOTAL download count will appear as zero until a new month starts.
  • There is a 3- to 4-day delay in article usage, so article usage will not appear immediately after publication.
  • Citation counts come from the Crossref Cited by service.

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. For an editable text file, please select Medlars format which will download as a .txt file. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Figures and Media

Figures

Media

Tables

Share

Share

Share the article link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share on social media

American Society for Microbiology ("ASM") is committed to maintaining your confidence and trust with respect to the information we collect from you on websites owned and operated by ASM ("ASM Web Sites") and other sources. This Privacy Policy sets forth the information we collect about you, how we use this information and the choices you have about how we use such information.
FIND OUT MORE about the privacy policy