Open access
Bacteriology
Announcement
15 September 2023

Genome sequences of key bacterial symbionts of entomopathogenic nematodes: Xenorhabdus cabanillasii DSM17905, Xenorhabdus ehlersii DSM16337, Xenorhabdus japonica DSM16522, Xenorhabdus koppenhoeferii DSM18168, and Xenorhabdus mauleonii DSM17908

ABSTRACT

Xenorhabdus species are bacterial symbionts of entomopathogenic Steinernema nematodes, in which they produce diverse secondary metabolites implicated in pathogenesis. To expand resources for natural product prospecting and exploration of host-symbiont-pathogen relationships, the genomes of Xenorhabdus cabanillasi, Xenorhabdus ehlersii, Xenorhabdus japonica, Xenorhabdus koppenhoeferii, and Xenorhabdus mauleonii were analyzed.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Species of the genus Xenorhabdus (Bacteria, Pseudomonadota, Gammaproteobacteria, Enterobacterales, and Morganellaceae) (1) are Gram-negative bacteria that form symbiotic relationships with entomopathogenic nematodes of the genus Steinernema (2). During the Xenorhabdus–Steinernema life cycle, insect larvae are infected and killed, including species with significant ecological and economic impacts, such that some Steinernema have been employed as biocontrol agents (2). The pathogenicity of the nematode host is dependent on secondary metabolite production by the Xenorhabdus symbiont (3), making these bacteria a target for prospecting for novel bioactive compounds. With 27 validly published species to date (1), there is great genetic diversity in the genus Xenorhabdus (4), and the genomes described here expand resources for bioprospecting and exploration of complex symbiont-host-pathogen relationships.
Xenorhabdus cabanillasii DSM17905 was originally isolated from the nematode Steinernema riobrave in the US (Texas), Xenorhabdus ehlersii DSM16337 was isolated from Steinernema serratum in China, Xenorhabdus japonica DSM16522 from Steinernema serratum kushidai in Japan, Xenorhabdus koppenhoeferii DSM18168 from Steinernema serratum scarabaei in the US (New Jersey), and Xenorhabdus mauleonii DSM17908 from an unidentified Steinernema species in St. Vincent (Caribbean) (5). All isolates were supplied by the Leibniz Institute DSMZ (6). Cultures were grown aerobically at 28°C in DSMZ medium 1 (https://mediadive.dsmz.de/) (7), with the exception of DSM16522, which was grown in DSMZ medium 535. Genomic DNA from X. ehlersii was isolated using MasterPure Gram Positive DNA Purification Kit (Epicentre MGP04100). DNA from other species was isolated using Jetflex Genomic DNA Purification Kit (GENOMED 600100). DNA is available from DSMZ through the DNA Bank Network (7).
Genomes of X. cabanillasii and X. ehlersii were analyzed at JGI using Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) sequencing technology (8). DNA (2 ug) was treated to remove single-stranded ends and repair damage, followed by A-tailing and ligation with PacBio adapters using SMRTbell Template Prep Kit 1.0. Final size selection for 6–10 kb templates used the Sage BluePippin system. PacBio Sequencing primer was annealed to the SMRTbell template library, and Version P6 sequencing polymerase was bound to them. Libraries were sequenced on a PacBio RSII sequencer using Version-C4 chemistry and 1 × 120 sequencing movie run times. Reads were assembled using HGAP (smrtanalysis/2.3.0 p5, HGAP3) (9). Read N50 was 5,289 bp for X. cabanillasii and 5,660 bp for X. ehlersii.
For X. japonica, X. koppenhoeferii, and X. mauleonii, Illumina (10) 300 bp insert shotgun libraries were constructed from 100 ng of DNA that had been sheared using the Covaris LE220, and size was selected using SPRI beads (Beckman Coulter). Library construction used the KAPA Library Preparation Kit (KAPA Biosystems) for the Illumina platform, which includes end-repair, A-tailing, and ligation of Illumina compatible adapters (IDT, Inc) as recommended by the manufacturer. Libraries were quantified using KAPA Biosystem’s Library Quantification Kit for Illumina platforms (Roche) and run on a Roche LightCycler480 real-time PCR instrument. Quantified libraries were multiplexed and prepared for sequencing on the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform utilizing a TruSeq paired-end cluster kit, v4, and Illumina’s cBot instrument to generate a clustered flow cell for sequencing. Sequencing was performed using HiSeq TruSeq SBS sequencing kits, v4, following a 2 × 150 indexed run recipe. Raw reads were filtered using BBDuk (11). Reads with more than one “N,” quality scores averaging <8 (before trimming), or lengths <51 bases (after trimming) were discarded. The remaining reads were mapped to masked versions of human, cat, and dog references using BBMAP and discarded if identity exceeded 95%. Filtered Illumina reads were assembled using SPAdes (version 3.6.2) (12). Parameters for the SPAdes assembly were —cov–cutoff auto —phred–offset 33 –t 8 –m 40 —careful –k 25,55,95 —12. Assembled contigs <1 kb were discarded. Using CheckM2 (13), all genomes were 100% complete. The final assemblies were annotated by the JGI genome annotation pipeline (14).
Final genome statistics and links to NCBI genome and sequencing data archives for the five Xenorhabdus species are summarized in Table 1. Data and detailed reports can also be downloaded from the JGI Genome portal and the JGI Integrated Microbial Genomes with Microbiomes (IMG/M) system (15).
TABLE 1
TABLE 1 Xenorhabdus genome assembly statistics and accessions
 X. cabanillasii DSM17905X. ehlersii DSM16337X. japonica DSM16522X. koppenhoeferii
DSM18168
X. mauleonii DSM17908
Sequencing platformPacific Biosciences RS2Pacific Biosciences RS2Illumina HiSeq 2500Illumina HiSeq 2500Illumina HiSeq 2500
# reads used in assembly148,449130,74210,000,00010,000,0009,878,486
Coverage87.6 ×90.3 ×428 ×477 ×349 ×
# assembled scaffolds(>1 kb)19929295
Total scaffold sequence length4,335,622 bp4,058,264 bp3,561,198 bp(0.01% gaps)3,182,127 bp(0.02% gaps)5,119,810 bp (0.04% gaps)
Contig N504,335,622 bp941,920 bp80,906 bp70,143 bp178,279 bp
Largest Contig4,335,622 bp1,272,290 bp220,581 bp188,443 bp440,959 bp
GC content (%)42.943.842.743.043.9
# predicted CDS3,7543,7013,2282,7944,393
GenBank accession numberNZ_RAQI00000000.1NZ_QTUB00000000.1NZ_FOVO00000000.1NZ_FPBJ00000000.1NZ_NITY00000000.1
NCBI SRA accession numberSRX3886576SRX3785650SRX2156714SRX2156721SRX2156707
JGI IMG/G taxon ID27782609322772190835268462284626846228452684622849
AntiSMASH 7.0 was used to survey genomes for biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) potentially involved in the synthesis of bioactive secondary metabolites (16). At least one non-ribosomal peptidyl synthase (NRPS) BGC most similar to that involved in synthesis of xenoamicins A and B (17) was conserved in all five genomes. Also common were BGCs encoding, for example, NRPS-like systems for assembly of the antibiotics nematophin (18) and safracin (19), a Type II polyketide synthase for the synthesis of aryl polyenes (20), and siderophores of the putrebactin/avaroferrin class (21). Each genome also contained unique BGCs whose products are yet unknown.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The work (proposal DOI: https://doi.org/10.46936/10.25585/60001024) conducted by the US Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute (https://ror.org/04xm1d337), a DOE Office of Science User Facility, is supported by the Office of Science of the US Department of Energy operated under contract no. DE-AC02-05CH11231. This announcement was largely prepared by undergraduate students, and we gratefully acknowledge JGI for initiating and supporting it as an educational project (the “Adopt-a-genome” Project). We gratefully acknowledge the help of Nicole Reimann and Carola Berg (DSMZ) for cell cultivation, and Katrin von Nyssen and Meike Döppner (DSMZ) for DNA extraction and quality control.
We also thank JGI staff who contributed to this project including Marcel Huntemann, Alicia Clum, Krishnaveni Palaniappan, Natalia Mikhailova, Galina Ovchinnikova, I-Min A. Chen, Dimitrios Stamatis, T.B.K. Reddy, Supratim Mukherjee, Chris Daum, Nicole Shapiro, Danielle Graham, Nikos C. Kyrpides, and Tanja Woyke.

REFERENCES

1.
Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. 2022. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 50:D801–D807.
2.
Abd-Elgawad MMM. 2022. Xenorhabdus spp.: an overview of the useful facets of mutualistic bacteria of entomopathogenic nematodes. Life (Basel) 12:1360.
3.
Dreyer J, Malan AP, Dicks LMT. 2018. Bacteria of the genus Xenorhabdus, a novel source of bioactive compounds. Front Microbiol 9:3177.
4.
Tobias NJ, Wolff H, Djahanschiri B, Grundmann F, Kronenwerth M, Shi YM, Simonyi S, Grün P, Shapiro-Ilan D, Pidot SJ, Stinear TP, Ebersberger I, Bode HB. 2017. Natural product diversity associated with the nematode symbionts Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus. Nat Microbiol 2:1676–1685.
5.
Tailliez P, Pagès S, Ginibre N, Boemare N. 2006. New insight into diversity in the genus Xenorhabdus, including the description of ten novel species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56:2805–2818.
6.
Mukherjee S, Seshadri R, Varghese NJ, Eloe-Fadrosh EA, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M, Coates RC, Hadjithomas M, Pavlopoulos GA, Paez-Espino D, Yoshikuni Y, Visel A, Whitman WB, Garrity GM, Eisen JA, Hugenholtz P, Pati A, Ivanova NN, Woyke T, Klenk H-P, Kyrpides NC. 2017. 1,003 reference genomes of bacterial and archaeal isolates expand coverage of the tree of life. Nat Biotechnol 35:676–683.
7.
Gemeinholzer B, Dröge G, Zetzsche H, Haszprunar G, Klenk HP, Güntsch A, Berendsohn WG, Wägele JW. 2011. The DNA bank network: the start from a German initiative. Biopreserv Biobank 9:51–55.
8.
Eid J, Fehr A, Gray J, Luong K, Lyle J, Otto G, Peluso P, Rank D, Baybayan P, Bettman B, Bibillo A, Bjornson K, Chaudhuri B, Christians F, Cicero R, Clark S, Dalal R, Dewinter A, Dixon J, Foquet M, Gaertner A, Hardenbol P, Heiner C, Hester K, Holden D, Kearns G, Kong X, Kuse R, Lacroix Y, Lin S, Lundquist P, Ma C, Marks P, Maxham M, Murphy D, Park I, Pham T, Phillips M, Roy J, Sebra R, Shen G, Sorenson J, Tomaney A, Travers K, Trulson M, Vieceli J, Wegener J, Wu D, Yang A, Zaccarin D, Zhao P, Zhong F, Korlach J, Turner S. 2009. Real-time DNA sequencing from single polymerase molecules. Science 323:133–138.
9.
Chin CS, Alexander DH, Marks P, Klammer AA, Drake J, Heiner C, Clum A, Copeland A, Huddleston J, Eichler EE, Turner SW, Korlach J. 2013. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat Methods 10:563–569.
10.
Bennett S. 2004. Solexa Ltd. Pharmacogenomics 5:433–438.
11.
Bushnell B. 2018. Bbtools: a suite of fast, multithreaded bioinformatics tools designed for analysis of DNA and RNA sequence data. Joint Genome Institute
12.
Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. Spades: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single–cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477.
13.
Chklovski A, Parks DH, Woodcroft BJ, Tyson GW. 2023. CheckM2: a rapid, scalable and accurate tool for assessing microbial genome quality using machine learning. Nat Methods 20:1203–1212.
14.
Huntemann M, Ivanova NN, Mavromatis K, Tripp HJ, Paez-Espino D, Palaniappan K, Szeto E, Pillay M, Chen I-MA, Pati A, Nielsen T, Markowitz VM, Kyrpides NC. 2015. The standard operating procedure of the DOE-JGI microbial genome annotation pipeline (MGAP v.4). Stand in Genomic Sci 10:1–6.
15.
Chen I-M, Chu K, Palaniappan K, Ratner A, Huang J, Huntemann M, Hajek P, Ritter SJ, Webb C, Wu D, Varghese NJ, Reddy TBK, Mukherjee S, Ovchinnikova G, Nolan M, Seshadri R, Roux S, Visel A, Woyke T, Eloe-Fadrosh EA, Kyrpides NC, Ivanova NN. 2023. The IMG/M data management and analysis system v. 7: content updates and new features. Nucleic Acids Res 51:D723–D732.
16.
Blin K, Shaw S, Augustijn HE, Reitz ZL, Biermann F, Alanjary M, Fetter A, Terlouw BR, Metcalf WW, Helfrich EJ, van Wezel GP, Medema MH, Weber T. 2023. antiSMASH 7.0: new and improved predictions for detection, regulation, chemical structures and visualisation. Nucleic Acids Res 51:W46–W50.
17.
Zhou Q, Grundmann F, Kaiser M, Schiell M, Gaudriault S, Batzer A, Kurz M, Bode HB. 2013. Structure and biosynthesis of xenoamicins from entomopathogenic Xenorhabdus. Chemistry 19:16772–16779.
18.
Cai X, Challinor VL, Zhao L, Reimer D, Adihou H, Grün P, Kaiser M, Bode HB. 2017. Biosynthesis of the antibiotic nematophin and its elongated derivatives in entomopathogenic bacteria. Org Lett 19:806–809.
19.
Tang GL, Tang MC, Song LQ, Zhang Y. 2016. Biosynthesis of tetrahydroisoquinoline antibiotics. Curr Top Med Chem 16:1717–1726.
20.
Grammbitter GLC, Schmalhofer M, Karimi K, Shi YM, Schöner TA, Tobias NJ, Morgner N, Groll M, Bode HB. 2019. An uncommon type II PKS catalyzes biosynthesis of aryl polyene pigments. J Am Chem Soc 141:16615–16623.
21.
McRose DL, Seyedsayamdost MR, Morel FMM. 2018. Multiple siderophores: bug or feature J Biol Inorg Chem 23:983–993.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Microbiology Resource Announcements
Microbiology Resource Announcements
Volume 12Number 1019 October 2023
eLocator: e00548-23
Editor: Julie C. Dunning Hotopp, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
PubMed: 37712678

History

Received: 22 June 2023
Accepted: 4 August 2023
Published online: 15 September 2023

Keywords

  1. Xenorhabdus
  2. secondary metabolism
  3. entomopathogen
  4. nematodes

Contributors

Authors

Raegan Robertson
Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, California, USA
Author Contributions: Investigation, Writing – original draft, and Writing – review and editing.
Katie Conrad
Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, California, USA
Author Contributions: Investigation and Writing – original draft.
Baarik Ahuja
Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, California, USA
Author Contributions: Investigation and Writing – original draft.
Markus Göker
Leibniz Institute DSMZ, German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures, Braunschweig, Germany
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, and Writing – review and editing.
Richard L. Hahnke
Leibniz Institute DSMZ, German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures, Braunschweig, Germany
Author Contributions: Investigation and Methodology.
Alex Spunde
DOE Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
Author Contributions: Investigation and Methodology.
Natalia N. Ivanova
DOE Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
Author Contributions: Investigation and Methodology.
Rekha Seshadri [email protected]
DOE Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, and Writing – review and editing.
Department of Biology, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, California, USA
Department of Public Health, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, California, USA
Author Contributions: Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, and Writing – review and editing.

Editor

Julie C. Dunning Hotopp
Editor
University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Notes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note:

  • For recently published articles, the TOTAL download count will appear as zero until a new month starts.
  • There is a 3- to 4-day delay in article usage, so article usage will not appear immediately after publication.
  • Citation counts come from the Crossref Cited by service.

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. For an editable text file, please select Medlars format which will download as a .txt file. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Figures and Media

Figures

Media

Tables

Share

Share

Share the article link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share on social media

American Society for Microbiology ("ASM") is committed to maintaining your confidence and trust with respect to the information we collect from you on websites owned and operated by ASM ("ASM Web Sites") and other sources. This Privacy Policy sets forth the information we collect about you, how we use this information and the choices you have about how we use such information.
FIND OUT MORE about the privacy policy