Open access
Bacteriology
Research Article
15 February 2022

Multiple Regulatory Mechanisms Control the Production of CmrRST, an Atypical Signal Transduction System in Clostridioides difficile

ABSTRACT

Clostridioides difficile, an intestinal pathogen and leading cause of nosocomial infection, exhibits extensive phenotypic heterogeneity through phase variation. The signal transduction system CmrRST, which encodes two response regulators (CmrR and CmrT) and a sensor kinase (CmrS), impacts C. difficile cell and colony morphology, surface and swimming motility, biofilm formation, and virulence in an animal model. CmrRST is subject to phase variation through site-specific recombination and reversible inversion of the “cmr switch,” and expression of cmrRST is also regulated by cyclic diguanylate (c-di-GMP) through a riboswitch. The goal of this study was to determine how the cmr switch and c-di-GMP work together to regulate cmrRST expression. We generated “phase-locked” strains by mutating key residues in the right inverted repeat flanking the cmr switch. Phenotypic characterization of these phase-locked cmr-ON and -OFF strains demonstrates that they cannot switch between rough and smooth colony morphologies, respectively, or other CmrRST-associated phenotypes. Manipulation of c-di-GMP levels in these mutants showed that c-di-GMP promotes cmrRST expression and associated phenotypes independently of cmr switch orientation. We identified multiple promoters controlling cmrRST transcription, including one within the ON orientation of the cmr switch and another that is positively autoregulated by CmrR. Overall, this work reveals a complex regulatory network that governs cmrRST expression and a unique intersection of phase variation and c-di-GMP signaling. These findings suggest that multiple environmental signals impact the production of this signaling transduction system.
IMPORTANCE Clostridioides difficile is a leading cause of hospital-acquired intestinal infections in the United States. The CmrRST signal transduction system controls numerous physiological traits and processes in C. difficile, including cell and colony morphology, motility, biofilm formation, and virulence. Here, we define the complex, multilevel regulation of cmrRST expression, including stochastic control through phase variation, modulation by the second messenger c-di-GMP, and positive autoregulation by CmrR. The results of this study suggest that multiple, distinct environmental stimuli and selective pressures must be integrated to appropriately control cmrRST expression.

INTRODUCTION

The ability to adapt to environmental changes is critical to bacterial survival, including that of pathogens, which can face rapidly changing conditions and stresses during infection (14). Sense-and-respond adaptation strategies often involve two-component systems (TCS) that consist of a sensor kinase and a cognate response regulator. In response to an activating signal, such as binding of a ligand or a change in pH, the sensor kinase autophosphorylates and activates the response regulator through transfer of the phosphoryl group (5, 6). Response regulators have a wide range of functions, and many control transcription through direct binding of DNA. The resulting transcriptional changes contribute to adaptation of the bacterium to the environmental stimulus sensed by the sensor kinase. Bacteria can also adapt to stimuli via intracellular small molecules such as cyclic diguanylate (c-di-GMP) (7, 8). The intracellular level of c-di-GMP is modulated by the opposing activities of diguanylate cyclases and phosphodiesterases that synthesize and degrade c-di-GMP, respectively; the production and function of these enzymes is controlled by environmental signals (9, 10). C-di-GMP is then recognized by specific protein or RNA receptors (riboswitches) that mediate the adaptive response (1113).
In contrast, diversification of phenotypes in a bacterial population serves as a bet-hedging strategy to help ensure survival of the population as a whole. The development of phenotypically distinct variants, independent of environmental conditions, improves the odds that a subpopulation survives a sudden stress (2, 14). Phase variation, a mechanism of generating phenotypic heterogeneity, occurs through reversible genetic changes that typically cause an ON/OFF phenotypic “switch” (15, 16). Several mechanisms of phase variation have been described, including conservative site-specific recombination, in which a sequence-specific recombinase binds inverted repeats and mediates inversion of the intervening DNA (15, 17). The invertible DNA element contains regulatory information, such as a promoter, that impacts the expression of adjacent genes. In a well-characterized example in Escherichia coli, phase variation of fimbria production is mediated by the fimS invertible element, which contains a promoter that drives transcription of the fimbrial genes when properly oriented (1820).
Clostridioides difficile is an intestinal pathogen and a leading cause of nosocomial infections in the United States. C. difficile infection (CDI) can result in mild to severe diarrhea and potentially fatal complications such as pseudomembranous colitis, toxic megacolon, and sepsis. Recent work has shown that C. difficile contains multiple invertible DNA elements flanked by inverted repeats, indicating a considerable capacity for phenotypic heterogeneity through phase variation (21, 22). Four of these invertible elements have been demonstrated to regulate downstream genes and related phenotypes in a phase variable manner. The Cdi4 invertible element, also called the flagellar switch, modulates expression of the flgB flagellar operon, resulting in phase variation of flagella (23, 24). This operon encodes the sigma factor SigD, which promotes the transcription of flagellar genes as well as transcription of tcdR, which encodes a direct activator of the C. difficile toxin genes tcdA and tcdB (25, 26). Accordingly, the production of these toxins is also phase variable (23, 24, 27). The Cdi1 invertible element mediates phase variation of CwpV, which contributes to phage resistance (2831). The Cdi2 element, or pdcB switch, modulates the production of a c-di-GMP phosphodiesterase and affects intracellular c-di-GMP and related phenotypes (32, 33).
The Cdi6 invertible element, here called the “cmr switch,” regulates the expression of cmrRST in a phase-variable manner (21, 34). The cmrRST operon encodes a putative noncanonical TCS with two DNA-binding response regulators (CmrR and CmrT) and a sensor kinase (CmrS) (34). Both CmrR and CmrT contain phosphoreceiver and DNA binding domains, suggesting that they function as transcriptional regulators. Phase variation of CmrRST allows C. difficile to switch between rough and smooth colony morphologies that differ in several physiological characteristics. Through unknown mechanisms, CmrRST positively regulates type IV pilus-independent surface motility and cell elongation, and it negatively regulates swimming motility and biofilm formation. Furthermore, a cmrR mutant strain is deficient for colonization and shows attenuated virulence in a hamster model of infection, indicating a role for this regulatory system in CDI.
C-di-GMP riboswitches are widespread in the C. difficile genome and appear to be the primary mechanism of c-di-GMP regulation in this species (11, 12, 35, 36). Upstream of the cmr switch lies a class II c-di-GMP riboswitch that positively regulates cmrRST transcription in response to c-di-GMP (Fig. 1A) (35, 36). Increasing c-di-GMP levels results in the formation of the rough colony morphology, consistent with increased cmrRST expression (34). The relative contributions of the c-di-GMP riboswitch and the cmr switch to controlling expression of cmrRST, and therefore to the phenotypes controlled by this system, are unknown.
FIG 1
FIG 1 Generation of genetically phase-locked strains. (A) Diagram of the cmrRST locus. The previously identified c-di-GMP riboswitch Cdi-2-2 and putative associated promoter are indicated. Black triangles represent the inverted repeats flanking the invertible DNA sequence (cmr switch). The OFF orientation corresponds to the sequence present in the R20291 reference genome (GenBank accession number FN545816); the ON orientation corresponds to the inverse of that sequence. (B) Sequence of the right inverted repeat (RIR) of the cmr switch. Gray shading indicates sequence identity between the imperfect inverted repeats of the RIR in each orientation. Three nucleotides (shown in red) were deleted from the RIR to lock the cmr switch in the ON and OFF orientations. The asterisk (*) indicates the nucleotide at the site of recombination. (C) Orientation-specific PCR to detect each orientation of the cmr switch in WT, cmr-Δ3 OFF, and cmr-Δ3 ON strains. (D) qRT-PCR analysis for the cmrR and cmrT transcripts in WT rough and smooth isolates, cmr-Δ3 OFF, and cmr-Δ3 ON. Data from four biological replicates were analyzed using the ΔΔCT method with rpoC as the reference gene and normalization to the WT smooth samples. Shown are means and standard error. #, P < 0.0001; two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Sidak’s multiple-comparison posttest compared to the WT/smooth condition.
One challenge to the study of phase variation is its stochastic nature, which adds uncontrolled variation into an otherwise controlled experiment. Phase-locked strains in which the invertible element is prevented from inverting can be a useful tool with which to study phase-variable systems (23, 37). Our previous work on CmrRST relied primarily on characterization of wild-type (WT) C. difficile rough and smooth colony isolates, which have a strong bias for the ON and OFF cmr switch orientations, respectively, but remain capable of switch inversion and phenotypic switching (34). We aimed to characterize cmrRST regulation through the interplay of c-di-GMP and the cmr switch by generating phase-locked cmr-OFF and cmr-ON mutants. The results of this study indicate that cmrRST expression is subject to complex regulation by both sense-and-respond mechanisms and phase variation, highlighting the potential importance of this system to C. difficile physiology through the variety of activating signals.

RESULTS

Generation and phenotypic characterization of phase-locked cmr-ON and cmr-OFF strains.

To characterize the dual regulation of the cmrRST system by phase variation and c-di-GMP, we first generated phase-locked strains with the cmr switch fixed in the ON or OFF orientation. Phase locking can be achieved in multiple ways. One strategy is to delete the site-specific recombinase responsible for inversion. In C. difficile R20291, the RecV recombinase is required for inversion of the cmr switch (21). However, RecV mediates the inversion of multiple sequences; thus, a mutation in recV has pleiotropic effects (21, 23, 28). Instead, we chose to phase-lock the cmr switch by mutating an inverted repeat sequence to prevent site-specific recombination from occurring (38). The exact nucleotides at which recombination and inversion of the cmr switch occur were previously identified (21). We used allelic exchange to delete the nucleotide at the site of inversion in the right inverted repeat (RIR) (position 3,736,177) in the R20291 genome, as well as one additional nucleotide on each side (Fig. 1B). Prior work determined that mutating the equivalent residues in the flagellar switch RIR eliminated switch inversion, resulting in phase-locked strains (39). We recovered independent mutants with the cmr switch in either orientation and designated them cmr-Δ3 ON and cmr-Δ3 OFF. These mutants were subjected to orientation-specific PCR to confirm that they are genotypically phase-locked. In contrast to the WT parent that yielded both cmr-ON and cmr-OFF products indicating heterogeneity in cmr switch orientation in that population of cells, cmr-Δ3 ON exclusively yielded a PCR product corresponding to the ON orientation, and cmr-Δ3 OFF only yielded the OFF orientation product (Fig. 1C).
Previous work showed that R20291 rough and smooth colony variants correlate with cmr-ON and cmr-OFF gene expression and phenotypes, respectively (34). Specifically, the cmr-ON, rough colony variant exhibits greater surface growth and reduced swimming motility than the cmr-OFF, smooth colony variant. Furthermore, ectopic expression of cmrR and cmrT individually stimulated rough colony formation and surface motility while inhibiting flagellum-mediated swimming motility, although only cmrT was required for rough colony development and surface motility. To conclusively determine the effect of cmr switch orientation on gene expression, we measured the abundance of the cmrR and cmrT transcripts in the cmr-Δ3 ON and cmr-Δ3 OFF mutants. Nonlocked rough and smooth isolates were included as controls (34). Both cmrR and cmrT transcripts were 7- to 10-fold more abundant in C. difficile with the cmr switch in the ON orientation, whether in the naturally arising rough colony variant or in cmr-Δ3 ON (Fig. 1D). Therefore, the three nucleotides at the site of RecV-mediated recombination are required for cmr switch inversion, and the ON orientation corresponding to the inverse of the published R20291 genome promotes expression of cmrRST.
The cmr-Δ3 phase-locked mutants were then evaluated for the phenotypes previously associated with cmrRST expression. As a control we included WT R20291, which is capable of CmrRST phase variation and generation of both rough and smooth colonies, as well as a ΔcmrR ΔcmrT double mutant that forms only smooth colonies (Fig. 2A). The cmr-Δ3 OFF mutant formed exclusively smooth colonies, similar to ΔcmrR ΔcmrT. cmr-Δ3 ON formed rough colonies that resemble those in the WT, though they appeared to have less defined topology (Fig. 2A). Also consistent with increased cmrRST expression, cmr-Δ3 ON displayed greater surface motility than the WT, while cmr-Δ3 OFF had decreased surface motility more similar to that of ΔcmrR ΔcmrT (Fig. 2B and C). Finally, cmr-Δ3 ON showed decreased swimming motility and biofilm formation compared to all other strains (Fig. 2D and E). Together, these results reinforce the model that the cmr switch orientation modulates expression of cmrRST and the assignment of the respective ON and OFF switch orientations.
FIG 2
FIG 2 Mutating the RIR of the cmr switch results in phenotypically phase-locked strains. (A) Colony morphology of WT rough and smooth isolates, cmr-Δ3 OFF, cmr-Δ3 ON, and ΔcmrRΔcmrT. Shown are representative images after 24 h of growth on BHIS agar. (B) Surface motility of WT, cmr-Δ3 OFF, cmr-Δ3 ON, and ΔcmrRΔcmrT quantified by measuring the diameter of growth after 72 h. (C) Representative images of surface motility after 72 h of growth. (D) Swimming motility of WT, cmr-Δ3 OFF, cmr-Δ3 ON, and the ΔcmrRΔcmrT mutant quantified by measuring the diameter of growth in 0.5× BHIS 0.3% agar after 48 h. (E) Biofilm formation after 24 h in BHIS-1% glucose-50 mM sodium phosphate, quantified by crystal violet staining. (B, D, and E) Shown are means and standard error, with symbols representing independent samples from at least 2 independent experiments. *, P < 0.05; ****, P < 0.0001; one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple-comparison posttest compared to the WT.

C-di-GMP regulates cmrRST expression independently of the cmr switch.

Upstream of the cmr switch is a c-di-GMP riboswitch sequence, adding another regulatory layer to the transcription of cmrRST (35, 36). The two regulatory features could act independently with one regulatory element dominant over the other, or they might act coordinately such that both the riboswitch and cmr switch must be in the “on” state to allow cmrRST transcription. To distinguish between these possibilities, we modulated c-di-GMP levels in the phase-locked cmr-Δ3 ON and OFF strains by overexpressing the diguanylate cyclase dccA (pPtet::dccA) to increase intracellular c-di-GMP or the catalytic EAL domain of the phosphodiesterase pdcA, which hydrolyzes c-di-GMP, to reduce c-di-GMP (pPtet::EAL) (10, 40, 41). Increasing c-di-GMP through overexpression of dccA resulted in rough colony formation in cmr-Δ3 OFF, which normally forms smooth colonies (Fig. 3A). Additionally, increasing c-di-GMP enhanced the rough colony appearance of cmr-Δ3 ON. In contrast, reduction of c-di-GMP through overexpression of the EAL domain did not visibly affect the morphology of cmr-Δ3 ON or OFF, suggesting that the impact of EAL overexpression on c-di-GMP levels was insufficient to alter expression of cmrRST compared to the WT with vector under these conditions. Overexpression of dccA led to a significant 2- to 3-fold increase in the abundance of the cmrS transcript, which served as a marker for cmrRST expression, in both cmr-Δ3 ON and OFF, consistent with the colony morphology phenotypes observed (Fig. 3B).
FIG 3
FIG 3 Regulation of cmrRST by c-di-GMP occurs independently of cmr switch orientation. (A) Colony morphology of cmr-Δ3 OFF and cmr-Δ3 ON containing either vector, pPtet::dccA, or pPtet::EAL. Strains were grown on BHIS-agar with 20 ng/mL ATc to induce DGC and EAL gene expression. (B) qRT-PCR analysis of cmrS transcript abundance in cmr-Δ3 OFF and cmr-Δ3 ON strains carrying pPtet::dccA or vector control grown in BHIS broth with 20 ng/mL ATc. Data were analyzed using the ΔΔCT method with rpoC as the reference gene and normalization to cmr-Δ3 OFF with vector. Shown are means with standard error of six biological replicates from two independent experiments. *, P < 0.05; ****, P < 0.0001; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison posttest. (C) Representative images of ΔcmrR::SNAP carrying pPtet::dccA or vector control grown in BHIS broth with 20 ng/mL ATc. Samples were imaged at ×60 magnification by light and fluorescence microscopy following staining with SNAP-Cell TMR-Star substrate. Percentages of total cells that were fluorescence-positive were determined from at least three fields each from two biological replicates. Shown are means and standard deviations.
These methods assess changes in cmrRST expression as a population average. To determine the effects of the c-di-GMP riboswitch and the cmr switch on the heterogeneity of cmrRST expression among individual bacteria, we used a strain in which cmrR was replaced by a codon-optimized SNAP-tag gene reporter, ΔcmrR::SNAP (21). The pPtet::dccA plasmid and vector control were introduced into this strain. In ΔcmrR::SNAP with vector and in the uninduced control, approximately 1% of the population fluoresced (Fig. 3C). This result is similar to those of prior analyses showing that a minority of WT cells express cmrRST (21). Induction of dccA increased fluorescence-positive cells to >95%. This result was not due to a shift in cmr switch orientation; by quantitative PCR (qPCR), the orientation of the cmr switch was not significantly different between WT overexpressing dccA and the vector control (Fig. S1). Therefore, the higher percentage of fluorescent cells reflects cmrRST expression in response to c-di-GMP. Together, these data indicate that expression of cmrRST from the upstream promoter and c-di-GMP riboswitch is not dependent on the orientation of the cmr switch. Rather, high c-di-GMP levels increase cmrRST expression regardless of cmr switch orientation.

The cmr switch contains a promoter in the ON orientation.

The best-characterized phase variation regulatory mechanisms involve a promoter encoded within the invertible element that drives expression of adjacent genes when in the proper orientation (20). Our data suggest that cmrRST transcription originates from multiple sites in a manner dependent on internal c-di-GMP concentrations and the orientation of the cmr switch. Therefore, we sought to map the transcriptional start sites (TSS) in strains reflecting these different states. Instead of using cmr-Δ3 phase-locked strains, which are missing three nucleotides of unknown significance to transcription, we used strains in which the cmr switch is locked by a mutation in recV, designated recV cmr-ON and recV cmr-OFF (Fig. S2). Additionally, dccA was overexpressed in recV cmr-OFF to identify any TSS associated with increased c-di-GMP and transcriptional readthrough via the riboswitch. Using 5′ rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE), four total TSS were identified in recV cmr-ON, recV cmr-OFF, and recV cmr-OFF pDccA. In all strains, a TSS designated TSS1 was identified 699 nucleotides (nt) upstream of the cmrR start codon and located upstream of the c-di-GMP riboswitch (Fig. 4A, Fig. S3). Another TSS, designated TSS2, was found in recV cmr-ON, located 336 nt upstream of cmrR and mapping within the cmr switch in the ON orientation. A third TSS, designated TSS3, was identified 342 nt upstream of the cmrR start codon in both recV cmr-OFF strains. This position maps TSS3 to within the cmr switch, appearing only in transcripts from the cmr-OFF strains. In all three strains, a fourth TSS (TSS4) was identified 90 nt upstream from the cmrR start codon.
The 5′ RACE results confirm an expected TSS upstream of the c-di-GMP riboswitch and suggest that expression of cmrRST can originate from multiple additional sites. TSS2 within the cmr switch in the ON orientation was identified; however, we unexpectedly identified TSS3 within the cmr switch in the OFF orientation. To elucidate how phase-variable cmrRST expression is mediated, we examined the functionality of the newly identified TSS. We created a series of transcriptional reporter fusions of the alkaline phosphatase (AP) gene phoZ to regions immediately upstream of cmrRST (Fig. 4B) (42). Two of the fusions contain the upstream region from the left inverted repeat (LIR) to the start of the cmrR coding sequence. These fusions differ in the orientation of the invertible element; ON (pMC123::cmrON/TSS4-phoZ) encompasses TSS2, and OFF (pMC123::cmrOFF/TSS4-phoZ) encompasses TSS3. Both constructs also include TSS4. Additionally, we included a reporter with the region from the 3′ end of the RIR to the start of the cmrR coding sequence (pMC123::TSS4-phoZ), which contains TSS4, as well as a promoterless control (vector). To prevent inversion of the cmr switch present in the reporters once in C. difficile, we assayed AP activity in a recV mutant lacking the recombinase necessary for inversion (21). C. difficile with pMC123::TSS4-phoZ (Fig. 4B, construct 1) or pMC123::cmrOFF/TSS4-phoZ (construct 2) showed no significant difference in activity compared to the promoterless control (Fig. 4C). In contrast, C. difficile with pMC123::cmrON/TSS4-phoZ (construct 3) exhibited 20-fold higher AP activity (Fig. 4C). These results indicate the presence of a functional promoter when the cmr switch is in the ON orientation but not the OFF orientation.
FIG 4
FIG 4 Mapping of transcriptional start sites (TSS) upstream of cmrRST. (A) Diagram of TSS identified by 5′ RACE using RNA derived from cmr-ON and cmr-OFF templates. (B) Alkaline phosphatase reporters used to detect promoter activity. Brackets indicate the regions from the native cmr locus that were used to make transcriptional reporters. Construct 1 contains the region between the 3′ end of the right inverted repeat and the 5′ end of cmrR coding sequence (pMC123::TSS4-phoZ). Construct 2 includes the region in construct 1 plus the cmr switch in the OFF orientation (pMC123::cmrOFF/TSS4-phoZ). Construct 3 is identical to construct 2 but with the cmr switch in the ON orientation (pMC123::cmrON/TSS4-phoZ). (C) Alkaline phosphatase (AP) activity of C. difficile with reporters in panel B. Shown are the means and standard deviations from 12 biological replicates from 4 independent experiments. ****, P < 0.0001; one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test.

CmrR positively autoregulates expression of cmrRST.

Response regulators often have the property of autoregulating their expression (43). To determine whether CmrR and/or CmrT have the ability to transcriptionally regulate cmrRST, we overexpressed cmrR (pCmrR) and cmrT (pCmrT) in C. difficile and analyzed cmrRST expression by quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR). Overexpression of cmrR resulted in a significant 7-fold increase in transcript abundance of cmrS and cmrT compared to the vector control (Fig. 5A). In contrast, overexpression of cmrT had no effect on cmrR or cmrS transcript abundance. These results indicate that CmrR, but not CmrT, transcriptionally regulates the cmrRST operon.
FIG 5
FIG 5 CmrR positively regulates cmrRST expression. qRT-PCR measurement of cmrRST transcript abundance. Strains were grown with ATc induction (10 ng/mL for vector and pCmrR, 2 ng/mL for pCmrT) prior to RNA isolation. (A) WT with pCmrR, pCmrT, and vector control. n.d., not determined; cmrR and cmrT were not measured in strains overexpressing those genes. #, P < 0.0001; unpaired t test. (B) qRT-PCR analysis of cmrS transcript abundance of recV cmr-OFF and cmr-ON, each with pCmrR or vector control. The recV cmr-OFF with vector strain serves as the reference condition for ΔΔCT analysis. Shown are means and standard deviations of 4 biological replicates. (C) Diagram showing regions of transcript measured in panel D. (D) qRT-PCR analysis of cmrRST transcripts with values normalized to rpoC. (B and D) Shown are means and standard error from independent replicates. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test.
To assess whether CmrR-mediated regulation is dependent on the orientation of the invertible element, we overexpressed cmrR from a plasmid in the phase-locked recV cmr-ON and cmr-OFF mutants. We then used qRT-PCR measuring cmrS to assess expression. Overexpression of cmrR significantly increased cmrS transcript abundance compared to the respective vector control in both recV cmr-OFF and cmr-ON mutants (Fig. 5B). While overexpression of cmrR in recV cmr-OFF resulted in over a 20-fold increase in cmrS transcript abundance relative to vector control, the cmrS transcript increased only about 2-fold in recV cmr-ON pCmrR relative to the vector control.
We considered the possibility that CmrR regulates cmrRST expression from one of the previously identified TSS. To address this possibility, we used qRT-PCR to measure the transcript abundance by probing sequences immediately downstream of TSS1, the cmr switch containing TSS2 or TSS3, and TSS4, as well as within cmrS (Fig. 5C). Because transcript abundance differed substantially depending on the region measured, we expressed the data normalized to rpoC transcript abundance rather than the ΔΔCT method. Overexpression of cmrR did not alter transcript abundance when probing immediately downstream of TSS1, regardless of cmr switch orientation, indicating that CmrR-mediated autoregulation occurs downstream of the TSS1 promoter (Fig. 5D). In contrast, when probing immediately downstream of the cmr switch (TSS2/TSS3), cmrR overexpression resulted in 11-fold higher transcript abundance in recV cmr-OFF relative to the vector control, though the difference did not reach statistical significance (Fig. 5D). Transcript abundance was 23-fold higher in recV cmr-ON than in recV cmr-OFF (vector controls, P < 0.01), and cmrR overexpression in the cmr-ON background led to a further 3-fold increase. Similar changes were observed when probing downstream of TSS4; cmrR overexpression increased transcript abundance 31-fold in recV cmr-OFF and 60-fold in recV cmr-ON compared to the recV cmr-OFF vector control (Fig. 5D). These results suggest that CmrR autoregulates cmrRST expression from the promoter corresponding to TSS2, TSS4, or both. Notably, transcript abundance was 29- and 36-fold higher when measuring downstream of TSS4 compared to TSS3 (cmr-OFF) and TSS2 (cmr-ON), respectively, indicating that the TSS2 promoter is weaker than the TSS4 promoter under these conditions.

CmrR autoregulation of cmrRST expression requires the TSS4 promoter.

To further define the promoter autoregulated by CmrR, we generated reporter strains in which different portions of the cmrRST regulatory region were transcriptionally fused to a phoZ (alkaline phosphatase, AP) reporter gene (42). We first constructed a strain in which cmrR, under the control of the Ptet promoter, was inserted at an ectopic site on the RT1693 (recV cmr-OFF) chromosome. This strain allowed anhydrotetracycline (ATc)-inducible expression of cmrR (Fig. S4), prevented unintended inversion of the cmr switch (Fig. S2), and permitted the use of plasmid-borne phoZ reporters. Figure 6 shows the combinations of the TSS1/c-di-GMP riboswitch, the cmr switch orientation (TSS2/ON or TSS3/OFF), and the region encompassing TSS4.
FIG 6
FIG 6 CmrR autoregulation occurs at the TSS4 promoter and is enhanced by the cmr-ON switch sequence. Alkaline phosphatase reporter activity for regions of the cmr 5′ untranslated region (UTR) containing one or more putative promoters in C. difficile with ATc-inducible Ptet::cmrR at an ectopic site. (Left) Diagrams of the plasmid-borne reporter fusions carried by the strain. (Right) AP reporter activity after growth with or without 10 ng/mL ATc to induce cmrR expression (Fig. S4). Shown are means and standard deviations from three independent experiments. ****, P < 0.0001; two-way ANOVA and Sidak’s posttest.
The promoter corresponding to TSS1, located upstream the c-di-GMP riboswitch, displayed similar transcriptional activity regardless of ATc (pRT2566), indicating that CmrR does not autoregulate expression at this site. This result is consistent with the qRT-PCR analysis of the native cmrRST site (Fig. 5), and it further suggests that cmrR overexpression does not impact global intracellular c-di-GMP levels. The promoter corresponding to TSS3 (pRT2567), present in the cmr-OFF switch orientation, yielded no detectable AP activity when isolated from upstream (TSS1) and downstream (TSS4) sequences and was not affected by overexpression of cmrR. Adding the downstream sequence to the cmr-OFF switch region (TSS3 + TSS4, pRT2514) resulted in no AP activity in the absence of ATc but led to 10-fold increased AP activity when cmrR was overexpressed.
The construct containing only the cmr-ON switch sequence (TSS2, pRT2568) displayed comparable levels of transcriptional activity with and without cmrR overexpression. The addition of the downstream sequence (TSS2 + TSS4, pRT2515) yielded baseline AP activity 3-fold higher than the TSS2-only reporter and also conferred CmrR-mediated autoactivation. Finally, the reporter containing the region downstream of the cmr switch alone (TSS4, pRT2497) did not show AP activity in the absence of ATc but did exhibit 20-fold activation by cmrR overexpression. The baseline AP activity and degree of activation by CmrR was comparable to that from pRT2514 (TSS3 + TSS4), confirming that there is no active promoter in the cmr switch when in the OFF orientation under these conditions. Overall, only the constructs with the TSS4 region resulted in increased activity upon cmrR overexpression, indicating that the TSS4 promoter is required for CmrR-mediated autoregulation of cmrRST. Further, the highest transcriptional activity in the absence of cmrR overexpression was seen in the cmr-ON construct in which TSS2 and TSS4 are both present, suggesting additive effects of the promoters or the disruption of an important sequence in the constructs separating the two elements.

cmrRST and its upstream regulatory elements are well conserved in C. difficile.

C. difficile strains from multiple ribotypes form rough and smooth colonies associated with phase-variable cmrRST expression (34). To examine the potential scope of CmrRST phase variation and function in C. difficile, we used NCBI BLAST to determine the extent of conservation of cmrRST and its upstream regulatory region using R20291 as the reference sequence. The analysis examined the 895 bases 5′ of cmrR, which contains a c-di-GMP riboswitch and the cmr switch (Fig. 1A), and the cmrRST coding sequences. Among 71 C. difficile whole-genome sequences available in NCBI (taxonomic ID 1496), C. difficile strains shared high sequence identity to the reference for both the riboswitch (98.9% ± 1.2) and the cmr invertible element (98.1% ± 1.4) (Fig. S5). This similarity is comparable to the average percent sequence identity for the cmrRST operon (98.7% ± 1.1). These results indicate that the c-di-GMP riboswitch and invertible element upstream of cmrRST are highly conserved across many C. difficile strains from divergent ribotypes and underscores the importance of this operon and its regulation to C. difficile physiology.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we demonstrate that multiple regulatory mechanisms control the transcription of cmrRST. Our results support a model in which, under basal c-di-GMP conditions, the orientation of the cmr switch determines the expression level of cmrRST. This phase variation mechanism involves the reversible inversion of a promoter within the cmr switch sequence. Increasing intracellular c-di-GMP augments cmrRST expression independent of cmr switch orientation. Our data also show that expression of cmrRST is also subject to autoregulation by CmrR, which occurs at an additional promoter downstream of the cmr switch and is enhanced by the orientation of the cmr switch. Therefore, multiple environmental signals may impact cmrRST expression through c-di-GMP signaling, phase variation, and the activation of the response regulator CmrR. CmrRST has important roles in C. difficile cell and colony morphology, motility, biofilm formation, and virulence, suggesting multiple contexts in which distinct environmental stimuli and selective pressures must be integrated to appropriately control cmrRST expression at the single-cell and population levels. This work represents the first account of a unique intersection of regulatory mechanisms controlling the expression of a signal transduction system that broadly impacts C. difficile physiology and disease development.
Phenotypic analysis of phase-locked R20291 mutants (cmr-Δ3 ON and cmr-Δ3 OFF) showed that they behave similarly to WT rough and smooth populations, respectively. Expression of cmrRST in the locked-ON mutant was equivalent to that of WT rough isolates, while expression in the cmr-Δ3 OFF mutant was similar to that of WT smooth isolates. Consistent with these results, cmr-Δ3 ON yielded rough colonies, increased surface motility, and decreased swimming motility and biofilm formation compared to WT smooth isolates, the cmr-OFF mutant, and the ΔcmrR ΔcmrT mutant. Interestingly, while cmr-Δ3 ON forms rough colonies, they are not identical to those formed in WT populations, and there is still some heterogeneity of colony morphology. This observation may reflect differences in activity of CmrR or CmrT or that other factors contribute to colony morphology. Other work has suggested heterogeneity in c-di-GMP levels among individual C. difficile cells (23, 44), so c-di-GMP may also result in colony morphology differences via modulation of cmrRST expression.
By artificially manipulating intracellular c-di-GMP levels in the cmr locked mutants, we found that c-di-GMP promotes cmrRST expression regardless of the orientation of the cmr switch. These findings are consistent with observed phenotypes; the cmr-Δ3 OFF mutant exhibited surface motility intermediate between that of the WT and the ΔcmrR ΔcmrT mutant. In the cmr-Δ3 OFF mutant, cmrRST could still be expressed from the TSS1 promoter upstream of the invertible element if c-di-GMP levels are sufficiently high. Intracellular c-di-GMP levels have been shown to increase in C. difficile with growth on a surface (41), which is consistent with c-di-GMP serving as a signal to enhance CmrRST-mediated surface motility regardless of cmr switch orientation.
Multiple TSS were identified upstream of cmrRST using 5′ RACE (Fig. S3). TSS1 mapped upstream of the c-di-GMP riboswitch sequence and is preceded by –10 and –35 sites. TSS2 was identified within the cmr switch in cmr-ON C. difficile. The TSS2 region showed transcriptional activity using the alkaline phosphatase reporter, and TSS2 is preceded by potential –10 and –35 sites. TSS3 was detected within the cmr switch in cmr-OFF bacteria; while qRT-PCR analysis suggested low-level transcription and potential responsiveness to cmrR overexpression, the TSS3 region lacked detectable transcriptional activity using the phoZ reporter assay, and no –10/–35 sites were identifiable. TSS4 was found between the cmr switch and the translational start of cmrR in both cmr-ON and cmr-OFF strains; the TSS4 region showed transcriptional activity when cmrR was overexpressed. A longer region containing both TSS2 and TSS4 showed maximal reporter activity, and the contributions of the TSS2 and TSS4 promoters to transcription appeared additive. Furthermore, only the reporters containing TSS4 exhibited CmrR-mediated autoactivation. Together, these results support a model (Fig. 7) in which the TSS1 promoter (P1) acts independently of the downstream promoters and yields an mRNA with a c-di-GMP riboswitch that enhances transcription readthrough when the c-di-GMP ligand is bound. The cmr switch in the ON state contains a promoter (P2) corresponding to TSS2, while the inverse orientation of the cmr switch lacks an active promoter. An additional promoter (P4) downstream of the cmr switch is activated by CmrR and autoactivates cmrRST. These regulatory elements are poised to modulate cmrRST expression in response to distinct environmental stimuli. Interestingly, CmrT does not regulate the expression of cmrRST, suggesting that CmrR and CmrT have different DNA specificities and, accordingly, distinct regulons. Future work will identify the genes directly and indirectly regulated by CmrR, CmrT, or both as well as determine their consensus DNA binding sites, which will elucidate the functions of these coexpressed response regulators.
FIG 7
FIG 7 Model of multilevel regulation of cmrRST transcription. Three promoters control the expression of cmrRST. Promoter P1, corresponding to TSS1, generates an mRNA with a c-di-GMP riboswitch that is permissive for transcriptional readthrough when c-di-GMP is bound. The cmr switch contains a promoter (P2) corresponding the TSS2 when in the ON orientation. An additional promoter, P4, lies between the cmr switch and the cmrRST coding sequences. Transcription from P4 is positively regulated by CmrR. P1 and P2 independently regulate cmrRST transcription, while P4 activity is enhanced when the cmr switch is in the ON orientation.
In other bacteria, the reversible inversion of a promoter via site-specific DNA recombination is a common mechanism of phase-variable expression of adjacent genes (15, 45). Two additional mechanisms have been described in C. difficile. Phase variation of the cell wall protein CwpV in C. difficile occurs as a result of site-specific recombination of a sequence mapping to the 5′ untranslated region of cwpV. In one orientation, the invertible DNA sequence results in the formation of an intrinsic terminator in the mRNA, preventing expression of the downstream gene cwpV; the intrinsic terminator does not form in the mRNA with the sequence in the inverse orientation, allowing cwpV transcription to occur (28). Flagellar phase variation in C. difficile also occurs through an mRNA-mediated mechanism, where one orientation of the invertible sequence yields an mRNA permissive for transcriptional readthrough, while the other orientation results in Rho-mediated transcription termination (23, 24, 27, 44). Notably, the region upstream of the flgB operon has a similar arrangement to that of cmrRST, with a c-di-GMP riboswitch preceding the switch that undergoes site-specific recombination (23, 25, 36). However, the riboswitch upstream of flgB negatively regulates transcriptional readthrough, so binding of c-di-GMP by the riboswitch leads to transcription termination precluding synthesis of longer transcripts containing the flagellar switch regardless of its orientation. Thus, phase variation and c-di-GMP regulation of flagellar gene expression are linked, in contrast to the cmrRST system in which c-di-GMP and the cmr switch independently modulate expression.
In summary, this work demonstrates that cmrRST expression is subject to multilayered regulation with multiple potential inputs from environmental signals. The complexity of this regulatory network suggests that cmrRST expression, and therefore its transcriptional targets, requires careful control. Further work that defines the signals which promote cmrRST expression will provide important insights into the role of this TCS in C. difficile physiology and pathogenesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Growth and maintenance of bacterial strains.

Table S1 lists the strains and plasmids used in this study. C. difficile R20291 and derivative strains were maintained in an anaerobic environment of 90% N2, 5% CO2, and 5% H2. C. difficile strains were grown statically at 37°C in brain heart infusion (BHI), BHIS (37 g/L Bacto brain heart infusion, 5 g/L yeast extract), or tryptone yeast (TY; 30 g/L Bacto tryptone, 20 g/L yeast extract, 1 g/L thioglycolate) medium as indicated. E. coli strains were grown in Luria Bertani medium at 37°C with aeration. Antibiotics were used where indicated at the following concentrations: chloramphenicol (Cm), 10 μg/mL; thiamphenicol (Tm), 10 μg/mL; kanamycin (Kan), 100 μg/mL; ampicillin (Amp), 100 μg/mL.

Construction of bacterial strains and plasmids.

Table S2 lists the primers used in this study. Detailed methods for the generation of plasmids and strains used in this study are provided in Text S1. Strain and plasmid information is listed in Table S1.

Quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR.

For analysis of cmrR and cmrT expression in C. difficile R20291 (WT), cmr-Δ3 ON, and cmr-Δ3 OFF, these strains were grown overnight (16 h) in TY medium, and 5 μL was spotted on BHIS-agar. After 24 h, growth was collected, suspended in 1:1 ethanol:acetone, and stored at −80°C for subsequent RNA isolation. For analysis of transcript abundance in R20291 strains carrying pCmrR, pCmrT, or vector, these strains were grown overnight in TY-Tm medium. Cultures were diluted 1:30 in BHIS-Tm broth. After 2 h of growth, ATc was added to induce gene expression (WT with vector or pCmrR, 10 ng/mL; WT with pCmrT, 2 ng/mL). Samples were collected at the mid-exponential phase and saved in 1:1 ethanol:acetone at −80°C.
RNA was extracted as described previously (46) and treated with a TURBO DNA-free kit (Life Technologies) to remove contaminating genomic DNA. cDNA was synthesized using the high-capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit (Applied Biosystems) using the manufacturer’s protocols (24, 40). Real-time PCR was performed using the SensiFAST SYBR and fluorescein kit (Bioline) as previously described (21, 34). Data were analyzed using rpoC as the reference gene. Primers are as follows: rpoC, R850/R851; cmrR, R2298/R2299; cmrT, R2537/R2538; cmrS, R2539/R2540; TSS1, R2745/R2746; TSS2/3, R2751/R2804; TSS4, R2803/R2716.

Orientation-specific PCR.

Orientation-specific PCR was done as previously described (23, 34). Colonies grown on BHIS-agar were boiled to produce lysate for PCR using primers R2270/R2271 to detect the ON orientation (241- bp product) and R2271/R2272 to detect the OFF orientation (140-bp product). PCR products were separated on a tris-acetate-EDTA (TAE)-1.5% agarose gel.

Quantification of switch orientation by quantitative PCR.

R20291 cmrR::SNAP pPtet::dccA (RT2500) and vector control (RT2501) were grown overnight in TY-Tm broth and then diluted 1:30 in BHIS-Tm containing 20 ng/mL ATc to induce dccA expression. After growth to the mid-exponential phase, genomic DNA was purified by phenol:chloroform:isopropanol extraction and ethanol precipitation. qPCR was performed as previously described with 100 ng of DNA per 20-μL reaction and 100 nM primers (34). Data were analyzed using the ΔΔCT method, with rpoA as the reference gene and the indicated control conditions. The primers are as follows: ON orientation, R2270/R2271; OFF orientation, R2271/R2272; and rpoA, R2273/R2274.

Microscopy.

To image whole colonies, strains were grown on BHIS-Tm agar for 24 h. For cmr-Δ3 ON/OFF with pPtet::dccA, pPtet::EAL, or vector, ATc (20 ng/mL) was included in the agar. Colonies were imaged using a Keyence BZ-X810 microscope or Zeiss Stereo Discovery V8 dissecting microscope with a glass stage.
Fluorescence microscopy of SNAP-labeled strains was performed as previously described (21). R20291 cmrR::SNAP pPtet::dccA or vector control was grown overnight in TY-Tm broth. Cultures were diluted 1:30 in BHIS-Tm. After 2 h of growth, ATc (20 ng/mL) was added for induction. Mid-exponential-phase samples were pelleted, washed, and incubated with SNAP-Cell TMR-Star (New England Biolabs) at 37°C for 30 min. Samples were further washed and mounted on 1% agarose pads. Imaging was done using a Keyence BZ-X810 microscope with an Olympus 100× PlanFluor objective. Bright-field and visualization of red fluorescence with a Chroma filter (ET545/30x, EM620/60m) was done using the same image capture settings for all samples. Cells were counted on at least three fields from two biological replicates for each strain and condition.

Phenotype assays.

Motility and biofilm assays were done as previously described (34, 40); further details are provided in Text S1.

Alkaline phosphatase assays.

Strains carrying phoZ reporters were grown in BHIS medium to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of ∼1.0, and then 1.5 mL of culture was collected, pelleted, and frozen at −20°C. Samples were thawed, and AP activity using the substrate p-nitrophenyl phosphate was measured as previously described (23, 42).

5′ rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE).

R20291 recV cmr-OFF (RT1693), recV cmr-OFF pDccA (RT2184), and recV cmr-ON (RT2520) were grown in BHIS to the mid-exponential phase. RT2184 was grown with Tm and induced with 1 μg/mL nisin (induces dccA expression from the Pcpr promoter). Samples were collected and frozen in 1:1 ethanol:acetone. RNA was extracted and purified using the RNeasy minikit (Qiagen). cDNA was synthesized with the 5′ RACE system for rapid amplification of cDNA ends kit (Thermo Fisher) using the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, cDNA was synthesized using primer R2792 (for all strains) or R3171 (in cmr-ON only) and SuperScript II reverse transcriptase. The samples were treated with RNase mix and then column purified and treated with terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT). The products were then PCR amplified with the provided anchor primer and primer R2793 (for all strains) or R3172 (in cmr-ON only) and then subjected to Sanger sequencing.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by NIH awards R01-AI107029 and R01-AI143638 to R.T. O.S. was supported by a postdoctoral training fellowship from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Supplemental Material

File (mbio.02969-21-sf001.pdf)
File (mbio.02969-21-sf002.pdf)
File (mbio.02969-21-sf003.pdf)
File (mbio.02969-21-sf004.pdf)
File (mbio.02969-21-sf005.pdf)
File (mbio.02969-21-st001.pdf)
File (mbio.02969-21-st002.pdf)
File (mbio.02969-21-t0001.pdf)
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

1.
Trastoy R, Manso T, Fernandez-Garcia L, Blasco L, Ambroa A, Perez Del Molino ML, Bou G, Garcia-Contreras R, Wood TK, Tomas M. 2018. Mechanisms of bacterial tolerance and persistence in the gastrointestinal and respiratory environments. Clin Microbiol Rev 31:e00023-18.
2.
Magdanova LA, Golyasnaya NV. 2013. Heterogeneity as an adaptive trait of microbial populations. Microbiology 82:1–10.
3.
Casadesus J, Low DA. 2013. Programmed heterogeneity: epigenetic mechanisms in bacteria. J Biol Chem 288:13929–13935.
4.
Fang FC, Frawley ER, Tapscott T, Vazquez-Torres A. 2016. Discrimination and integration of stress signals by pathogenic bacteria. Cell Host Microbe 20:144–153.
5.
Bourret RB, Silversmith RE. 2010. Two-component signal transduction. Curr Opin Microbiol 13:113–115.
6.
Krell T, Lacal J, Busch A, Silva-Jimenez H, Guazzaroni ME, Ramos JL. 2010. Bacterial sensor kinases: diversity in the recognition of environmental signals. Annu Rev Microbiol 64:539–559.
7.
Hengge R, Grundling A, Jenal U, Ryan R, Yildiz F. 2016. Bacterial signal transduction by cyclic Di-GMP and other nucleotide second messengers. J Bacteriol 198:15–26.
8.
Purcell EB, Tamayo R. 2016. Cyclic diguanylate signaling in Gram-positive bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 40:753–773.
9.
Hengge R. 2009. Principles of c-di-GMP signalling in bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol 7:263–273.
10.
Purcell EB, McKee RW, Courson DS, Garrett EM, McBride SM, Cheney RE, Tamayo R. 2017. A nutrient-regulated cyclic diguanylate phosphodiesterase controls Clostridium difficile biofilm and toxin production during stationary phase. Infect Immun 85:e00347-17.
11.
Sudarsan N, Lee ER, Weinberg Z, Moy RH, Kim JN, Link KH, Breaker RR. 2008. Riboswitches in eubacteria sense the second messenger cyclic di-GMP. Science 321:411–413.
12.
Smith KD, Lipchock SV, Ames TD, Wang J, Breaker RR, Strobel SA. 2009. Structural basis of ligand binding by a c-di-GMP riboswitch. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16:1218–1223.
13.
Chou SH, Galperin MY. 2016. Diversity of cyclic di-GMP-binding proteins and mechanisms. J Bacteriol 198:32–46.
14.
Ryall B, Eydallin G, Ferenci T. 2012. Culture history and population heterogeneity as determinants of bacterial adaptation: the adaptomics of a single environmental transition. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 76:597–625.
15.
van der Woude MW, Baumler AJ. 2004. Phase and antigenic variation in bacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev 17:581–611.
16.
van der Woude MW. 2011. Phase variation: how to create and coordinate population diversity. Curr Opin Microbiol 14:205–211.
17.
Trzilova D, Tamayo R. 2021. Site-specific recombination: how simple DNA inversions produce complex phenotypic heterogeneity in bacterial populations. Trends Genet 37:59–72.
18.
Abraham JM, Freitag CS, Clements JR, Eisenstein BI. 1985. An invertible element of DNA controls phase variation of type 1 fimbriae of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:5724–5727.
19.
Klemm P. 1986. Two regulatory fim genes, fimB and fimE, control the phase variation of type 1 fimbriae in Escherichia coli. EMBO J 5:1389–1393.
20.
Blomfield I, van der Woude M. 2007. Regulation of fimbrial expression. EcoSal Plus 2.
21.
Sekulovic O, Mathias Garrett E, Bourgeois J, Tamayo R, Shen A, Camilli A. 2018. Genome-wide detection of conservative site-specific recombination in bacteria. PLoS Genet 14:e1007332.
22.
Sekulovic O, Bourgeois J, Shen A, Camilli A. 2019. Expanding the repertoire of conservative site-specific recombination in Clostridioides difficile. Anaerobe 60:102073.
23.
Anjuwon-Foster BR, Tamayo R. 2017. A genetic switch controls the production of flagella and toxins in Clostridium difficile. PLoS Genet 13:e1006701.
24.
Anjuwon-Foster BR, Maldonado-Vazquez N, Tamayo R. 2018. Characterization of flagellum and toxin phase variation in Clostridioides difficile ribotype 012 isolates. J Bacteriol 200:e00056-18.
25.
McKee RW, Mangalea MR, Purcell EB, Borchardt EK, Tamayo R. 2013. The second messenger cyclic di-GMP regulates Clostridium difficile toxin production by controlling expression of sigD. J Bacteriol 195:5174–5185.
26.
El Meouche I, Peltier J, Monot M, Soutourina O, Pestel-Caron M, Dupuy B, Pons JL. 2013. Characterization of the SigD regulon of C. difficile and its positive control of toxin production through the regulation of tcdR. PLoS One 8:e83748.
27.
Anjuwon-Foster BR, Tamayo R. 2018. Phase variation of Clostridium difficile virulence factors. Gut Microbes 9:76–83.
28.
Emerson JE, Reynolds CB, Fagan RP, Shaw HA, Goulding D, Fairweather NF. 2009. A novel genetic switch controls phase variable expression of CwpV, a Clostridium difficile cell wall protein. Mol Microbiol 74:541–556.
29.
Reynolds CB, Emerson JE, de la Riva L, Fagan RP, Fairweather NF. 2011. The Clostridium difficile cell wall protein CwpV is antigenically variable between strains, but exhibits conserved aggregation-promoting function. PLoS Pathog 7:e1002024.
30.
Sekulovic O, Ospina Bedoya M, Fivian-Hughes AS, Fairweather NF, Fortier LC. 2015. The Clostridium difficile cell wall protein CwpV confers phase-variable phage resistance. Mol Microbiol 98:329–342.
31.
Sekulovic O, Fortier LC. 2015. Global transcriptional response of Clostridium difficile carrying the CD38 prophage. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:1364–1374.
32.
Dhungel BA, Govind R. 2021. Phase-variable expression of pdcB, a phosphodiesterase, influences sporulation in Clostridioides difficile. Mol Microbiol 116:1347–1360.
33.
Reyes Ruiz LM, King KA, Garrett EM, Tamayo R. 2021. Coordinated modulation of multiple processes through phase variation of a c-di-GMP phosphodiesterase in Clostridioides difficile. bioRxiv.
34.
Garrett EM, Sekulovic O, Wetzel D, Jones JB, Edwards AN, Vargas-Cuebas G, McBride SM, Tamayo R. 2019. Phase variation of a signal transduction system controls Clostridioides difficile colony morphology, motility, and virulence. PLoS Biol 17:e3000379.
35.
Soutourina OA, Monot M, Boudry P, Saujet L, Pichon C, Sismeiro O, Semenova E, Severinov K, Le Bouguenec C, Coppee JY, Dupuy B, Martin-Verstraete I. 2013. Genome-wide identification of regulatory RNAs in the human pathogen Clostridium difficile. PLoS Genet 9:e1003493.
36.
McKee RW, Harvest CK, Tamayo R. 2018. Cyclic diguanylate regulates virulence factor genes via multiple riboswitches in Clostridium difficile. mSphere 3:e00423-18.
37.
Snyder JA, Lloyd AL, Lockatell CV, Johnson DE, Mobley HL. 2006. Role of phase variation of type 1 fimbriae in a uropathogenic Escherichia coli cystitis isolate during urinary tract infection. Infect Immun 74:1387–1393.
38.
Grindley NDF, Whiteson KL, Rice PA. 2006. Mechanisms of site-specific recombination. Annu Rev Biochem 75:567–605.
39.
Trzilova D, Warren MAH, Gadda NC, Williams CL, Tamayo R. 2021. Flagellum and toxin phase variation impacts colonization and disease development in a mouse model of Clostridioides difficile infection. bioRxiv.
40.
Purcell EB, McKee RW, McBride SM, Waters CM, Tamayo R. 2012. Cyclic diguanylate inversely regulates motility and aggregation in Clostridium difficile. J Bacteriol 194:3307–3316.
41.
Purcell EB, McKee RW, Bordeleau E, Burrus V, Tamayo R. 2016. Regulation of type IV pili contributes to surface behaviors of historical and epidemic strains of Clostridium difficile. J Bacteriol 198:565–577.
42.
Edwards AN, Pascual RA, Childress KO, Nawrocki KL, Woods EC, McBride SM. 2015. An alkaline phosphatase reporter for use in Clostridium difficile. Anaerobe 32:98–104.
43.
Groisman EA. 2016. Feedback control of two-component regulatory systems. Annu Rev Microbiol 70:103–124.
44.
Trzilova D, Anjuwon-Foster BR, Rivera DT, Tamayo R. 2020. Rho factor mediates flagellum and toxin phase variation and impacts virulence in Clostridioides difficile. PLoS Pathog 16:e1008708.
45.
Jiang X, Hall AB, Arthur TD, Plichta DR, Covington CT, Poyet M, Crothers J, Moses PL, Tolonen AC, Vlamakis H, Alm EJ, Xavier RJ. 2019. Invertible promoters mediate bacterial phase variation, antibiotic resistance, and host adaptation in the gut. Science 363:181–187.
46.
Bouillaut L, McBride SM, Sorg JA. 2011. Genetic manipulation of Clostridium difficile. Curr Protoc Microbiol Unit 9A.2:1–17.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image mBio
mBio
Volume 13Number 122 February 2022
eLocator: e02969-21
Editor: Jimmy D. Ballard, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center

History

Received: 4 October 2021
Accepted: 20 January 2022
Published online: 15 February 2022

Keywords

  1. phase variation
  2. phenotypic heterogeneity
  3. bet-hedging
  4. cyclic diguanylate
  5. c-di-GMP
  6. motility
  7. biofilm
  8. population heterogeneity

Contributors

Authors

Elizabeth M. Garrett
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
Anchal Mehra
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
Ognjen Sekulovic
Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA

Editor

Jimmy D. Ballard
Editor
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center

Notes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note: There is a 3- to 4-day delay in article usage, so article usage will not appear immediately after publication.

Citation counts come from the Crossref Cited by service.

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. For an editable text file, please select Medlars format which will download as a .txt file. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Figures and Media

Figures

Media

Tables

Share

Share

Share the article link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share on social media

American Society for Microbiology ("ASM") is committed to maintaining your confidence and trust with respect to the information we collect from you on websites owned and operated by ASM ("ASM Web Sites") and other sources. This Privacy Policy sets forth the information we collect about you, how we use this information and the choices you have about how we use such information.
FIND OUT MORE about the privacy policy