INTRODUCTION
Chronic infections are caused mainly by drug-susceptible pathogens but are difficult to eradicate (
1). This is particularly true for biofilms, microbial communities that form on indwelling devices or within soft tissues and are protected from the immune system by a layer of exopolymers (
2,
3). An increasing body of evidence points to persister cells as the main culprit of drug tolerance. Produced stochastically by all pathogens studied, persisters are multidrug-tolerant phenotypic variants of the wild type (
4,
5).
In vivo studies have shown that
Escherichia coli bacteria causing urinary tract infections (UTIs) form drug-tolerant biofilms within bladder epithelial cells (
6,
7). Mutants with elevated levels of persisters (high persister mutants) are common among
Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from patients with cystic fibrosis (
8), among
Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from patients with tuberculosis (
9), and among
Candida albicans from patients with oral thrush (
10). Persisters were reported in a chronic
Staphylococcus aureus mouse infection model (
11). These observations link persisters to clinical manifestation of chronic disease.
Most of what we know about the mechanism of persister formation comes from the study of
E. coli, and toxin-antitoxin (TA) modules have been linked to persister formation. It has been shown that stochastic expression of the HipA kinase, a type II toxin which inhibits protein synthesis by phosphorylating Glu-tRNA synthetase (
12,
13), contributes to the formation of persisters (
12,
14). Gain of function mutations in
hipA produce elevated levels of persisters
in vitro, and the same mutants are present in patients with relapsing UTI (
14). Stress-induced toxin expression has also been linked to increases in drug tolerance. Fluoroquinolone antibiotics kill cells by stabilizing toxic reaction intermediates, such as double-stranded breaks in DNA generated by DNA gyrase and topoisomerase (
15). The main function of SOS is to express DNA repair enzymes, but the same regulatory pathway also turns on production of the type I TisB toxin in a subpopulation of
E. coli cells (
16). TisB forms an ion channel in the cytoplasmic membrane, decreasing proton motive force and ATP levels, which leads to drug tolerance (
16,
17).
One important class of toxins that are linked to persisters are the mRNA interferases encoded by type II TA loci (
18). Transcriptome analysis revealed that persisters express high levels of mRNA interferases (
19,
20). Ectopic expression of these toxins causes multidrug tolerance (
19). Stochastic overexpression of the
yoeB toxin in individual cells has been reported to protect from ampicillin as well (
21). Deleting single interferases does not produce a phenotype in
E. coli (
22), but the level of persisters was reported to be drastically decreased in a strain with deletions of 10 mRNA interferases (Δ10TA) (
23). Stress in the form of starvation has also been linked to the expression of mRNA interferases (
24). Specifically, the formation of ppGpp by the stringent response has been reported to cause an increase in persisters in
E. coli and
P. aeruginosa (
25,
26). A recent study showed that ppGpp induces persister formation through the activation of mRNA interferases and linked stress response, toxin-antitoxin systems, and persister formation (
21). The induction of mRNA interferases by stress has become a widely accepted model for persister formation in
E. coli (
27–31).
In this study, we found that most stresses induce mRNA interferase expression, but this leads to an increase in the persister level only in the case of the stringent response. The known persister reporter
rrnB P1, the promoter of rRNA, senses both ppGpp and ATP. We found that
rrnB P1 reports persister levels in Δ10TA and ppGpp
0 backgrounds, indicating that it is the variation in the level of ATP that determines the formation of persisters. These findings are consistent with our recent study in the Gram-positive pathogen
S. aureus (
32) and indicate a universal role of ATP in the drug tolerance of different species. A drop in ATP decreases the activity of antibiotic targets, providing a simple explanation for the mechanism of drug tolerance and persister formation.
DISCUSSION
Persisters are formed through redundant mechanisms; screens of knockout libraries in several species have not produced a strain that does not form persisters (
22,
58–61). TA modules have emerged as a major component responsible for persister formation in
E. coli.
hipA was the first gene to be linked to persisters, identified in a screen for
hip mutants in the 1980s (
62). A deletion in the
hipBA TA locus, however, produced no phenotype, and this line of inquiry was largely abandoned. With a resurgence of interest in drug tolerance, gain-of-function
hipA mutants became a convenient and widely used model to study persisters (
63). We recently reported that
hipA mutants conferring 100- to 1,000-fold increases in persisters are present both in commensals and in clinical isolates from patients with UTI, showing that the HipA toxin in these strains becomes not only biologically relevant but also the main component responsible for persister formation (
14). The ability of ectopically expressed interferase (mRNA endonuclease) toxins to produce a similarly large increase in persisters seemed to provide a satisfactory corollary to HipA. Several lines of additional evidence pointed to a role of mRNA interferases in drug tolerance of
E. coli, including increased expression in isolated persisters, time-lapse microscopy of cells surviving antibiotic treatment (
19–21), and a decrease in the level of persisters in a strain with deletions of 10 TA systems (
23). Additional experiments led to a plausible model of persister formation in
E. coli, as follows: starvation → RelA/SpoT → ppGpp → PPX (inhibition) → polyphosphate → Lon activation → antitoxin degradation → toxin release → inhibition of translation → drug-tolerant persister (
21). This model has been widely accepted (
27–31).
We sought to determine whether various stresses can induce the expression of mRNA interferases and persister formation. Our results were unexpected: at least some of the TAs were expressed under each stress tested (stringent response, osmotic stress, pH stress, and NaCl stress), but only the stringent response led to TA-dependent persister formation, and the phenotype is specific to fluoroquinolones—there was no effect on tolerance to ampicillin. We then decided to reexamine the role of these mRNA interferases in the antibiotic tolerance of persisters formed stochastically in unstressed culture and determine whether bacteria harbor an additional, overlooked mechanism of persister formation.
The
E. coli Δ10TA mutant was reported to have a diminished level of persisters tolerant to unrelated antibiotics under common growth conditions in rich medium (
23), and we confirmed this finding. However, in minimal medium, the Δ10TA mutation affected tolerance of ciprofloxacin but not of ampicillin. Another expectation of the mRNA interferase model of persister formation is the execution mechanism: the toxins degrade mRNA, which should inhibit translation, leading to dormant persisters. Surprisingly, we find that the Δ10TA mutation has the same effect on decreasing persister formation in the presence of chloramphenicol or tetracycline, which completely inhibit protein synthesis. How mRNA interferases are linked to persister formation remains unclear.
It is important to point out that a recent study reported that Δ10TA exhibits decreased resistance to ciprofloxacin (
64). The ciprofloxacin MIC is the same in the wild type and Δ10TA, as determined by the standard broth microdilution method, which registers twofold changes. Using a more detailed range of concentrations, the authors report a 1.5-fold-higher ciprofloxacin MIC for the wild type than for Δ10TA (
64). It is possible that this increased susceptibility accounts for the apparent decrease in tolerance of Δ10TA. The authors also report no difference in the levels of persisters of the wild type and Δ10TA surviving treatment with kanamycin, suggesting that interferase-type toxins may contribute to tolerance to some but not all antibiotics.
We next considered whether elements of a proposed “toxin activation pathway” could affect persister formation irrespective of TAs. It has been reported that ppGpp inhibits the PPX phosphatase and increased levels of polyphosphate activate the Lon protease that degrades the antitoxins. However, we find no phenotype in Δ
lon Δ
sulA, Δ
ppx, Δ
ppk, or Δ
ppx Δ
ppk mutants. This is consistent with similar negative findings from other recent publications (
43–45).
Our study has also provided a serendipitous clue to a missing mechanism of persister formation in
E. coli. One of the experiments that linked ppGpp to persisters was based on observing the antibiotic tolerance of individual cells stochastically expressing RpoS, which reports the levels of ppGpp (
21). The authors argued that an increase in ppGpp will lead to degradation of antitoxin and release of active toxin. The cells expressing RpoS also had low levels of transcription of the ribosomal promoter
rrnB P1, which is repressed by ppGpp. We reexamined this by sorting cells carrying
rrnB P1-
gfp in the Δ10TA and Δ
relA Δ
spoT backgrounds. Dim cells were enriched in persisters in all strain backgrounds, showing that
rrnB P1 can report persisters through an additional mechanism.
Having established that the
rrnB P1 promoter can report persister status independently of ppGpp, we considered its other known effector, ATP. The activity of
rrnB P1 is positively controlled by ATP (
47,
48), and that is apparently why sorting dim cells in an
rrnB P1-
gfp strain enables the isolation of persisters. Interestingly, RpoS is also an ATP reporter (
65). Proteolysis of RpoS by ClpXP is inhibited at lower ATP levels. It appears that both persister reporters are coregulated by ATP and ppGpp. We also find that the fraction of such dim cells increases as the culture progresses from early exponential to stationary state, matching the known phenomenon of persister increase with cell density (
53). It appears that persisters in a growing culture are cells that entered into a stationary-like state.
ATP indeed seems like a good candidate for a general cause of tolerance, since most bactericidal antibiotics kill by corrupting active, energy-dependent targets. Fluoroquinolones act by irreversibly stabilizing gyrase-DNA intermediates that collide with replication forks, releasing lethal double-strand DNA breaks (
52); aminoglycosides cause mistranslation, which produces toxic misfolded peptides damaging the membrane (
51); and β-lactams kill cells by forcing a futile cycle of peptidoglycan synthesis (
66). All of the antibiotic targets require ATP to function, and a drop in ATP will lead to decreased activity, resulting in drug tolerance. One well-known example is tolerance of β-lactams. Once a culture stops growing, peptidoglycan synthesis ceases, and cells become completely tolerant to cell wall-acting antibiotics (
50). Apart from this well-understood mechanism of tolerance, we found that lowering intracellular ATP in a growing population to stationary levels with arsenate treatment strongly increases the level of persisters tolerant to fluoroquinolones. The same treatment dramatically decreases the rate of translation and diminishes DNA fragmentation caused by fluoroquinolones, explaining the mechanism of tolerance (
Fig. 5). Taken together, our results suggest that the variation in the level of ATP serves as a mechanism of persister formation in
E. coli.
It is notable that we recently found that ATP depletion appears to be the main mechanism of persister formation in
S. aureus (
32). Neither the stringent response nor toxin-antitoxin modules play a role in
S. aureus persisters (
32). ATP depletion may be a general mechanism of persister formation in bacteria.
While tolerance by a drop in the energy level explains persister formation, why some cells in a growing culture will have less ATP remains to be established. One possibility is that unavoidable stochastic variations in gene expression prevent rare cells from readjusting their metabolism to deteriorating conditions as the density of the culture rises, leading to a drop in ATP and drug tolerance. From this perspective, there is no specialized mechanism of stochastic persister formation. This random error hypothesis (although without the ATP component) was proposed by Vázquez-Laslop and coauthors (
67). The findings of this study suggest an answer to the long-existing puzzle of stationary-phase populations forming very high levels of persisters. A drop in ATP in stationary-phase explains increased tolerance.
It appears that there are at least two different types of mechanisms that lead to persister formation in
E. coli and probably in other bacteria as well: dedicated persister components, such as mRNA interferases, TisB, or the gain-of-function mutations of HipA, and a decrease in ATP, possibly caused by random errors or a low energy state of the population. It is important to note that one specialized mechanism of persister formation, the induction of the TisB toxin by the SOS response, leads to a drop in proton motive force, ATP, and drug tolerance (
16,
17). The mechanism by which mRNA interferases cause tolerance seemed obvious, since overexpression of this type of toxins inhibits translation (
40). However, we find that a drop in the level of persisters is the same in the presence or absence of protein synthesis inhibitors in a strain with deletions of 10 TAs. Notably, ectopic overexpression of
mazF causes a futile cycle of RNA degradation/synthesis, which leads to a decrease in the energy level and drug tolerance (
68). If stochastic activation of a given mRNA interferase toxin is enough to similarly produce a futile cycle, this would contribute to the general mechanism of persister formation by ATP depletion.