INTRODUCTION
At the onset of cell division, the accurate distribution of genomic material is crucial for cell survival and development (
1). Central to this process are the kinetochores, a centromere macromolecular protein complex that drives chromosome segregation in eukaryotes by connecting chromosomes to microtubules (
2). The kinetochore is a large, highly dynamic machine assembled from multiple pathways that are temporally controlled (
3). Kinetochores gather on opposite sides of a centromere region of each chromosome where spindle microtubules attach (
4). In general, the kinetochore can be thought of as a different set of proteins, assembled by timing blocks. The inner kinetochore, composed of proteins that bind to DNA or centromeric chromatin, is also known as the constitutive centromere-associated network (CCAN) in vertebrates and fungi (
5). As a cell enters mitosis, outer kinetochore proteins are assembled on this platform of inner kinetochore proteins, forming the interaction surface for spindle microtubules and allowing chromosome movement (
6). Several inner kinetochore components associate with kinetochores throughout the cell cycle, while other inner kinetochore proteins are recruited to the outer surface, specifically in mitosis (
7). They provide a landing platform for the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) proteins, ensuring the fidelity of chromosome segregation (
8).
From yeast to humans, the majority of the CCAN assembly can be subdivided into four discrete units, and their stability depends critically on reciprocal interactions (
6). Furthermore, the recruitment of components of the CCAN in these species depends on a specialized centromeric histone H3 variant, the centromere protein A (CENP-A) (
9). The fact that some subunits are missing from certain lineages (
10) highlights that much remains to be understood about the structural and functional contributions of these four CCAN complexes at the kinetochore. Functional studies indicate that the CCAN plays an active role in the efficient incorporation of CENP-A into centromeric nucleosomes (
11), where, afterwards, it is required either for the assembly of further kinetochore components, thereby functioning as a scaffold (
2), or the regulation of kinetochore-microtubule dynamics (
12).
The emergence of eukaryotes from prokaryotic lineages has involved a significant rise in cellular complexity (
13). Research on kinetochores has provided a picture of the essential organization of kinetochores across species. However, the functionality and dynamic organization of the layers that made the kinetochore in some early branch organisms, such as the kinetoplastids, remain unclear (
14). This is the case of
Trypanosoma brucei, the causative agent of human African trypanosomiasis (HAT), whose kinetochore assembles from a repertoire of unique proteins very divergent from other organisms (
15). To date, a trypanosomatid inner kinetochore that contains 24 unique proteins (KKT1 to -23 and KKT25) has been identified (
15,
16). Within this group, two proteins with protein kinase domains (KKT2 and -3) are constitutively localized to centromeres throughout the cell cycle, most likely acting as functional orthologues of the eukaryotic CCAN proteins (
15,
16). In addition, this parasite has a set of KKT-interacting proteins (KKIP1 to -12) that are related to outer kinetochore proteins Ndc80 and Nuf2 (
17) and a cohort of proteins localized to the nucleus during interphase and to the spindle during mitosis (NuSAPs) involved in regulating spindle dynamics and chromosome segregation (
18).
Apart from KKT2 and KKT3, the
T. brucei kinetochore contains two other protein kinases, CLK1 (KKT10) and CLK2 (KKT19) (
15,
19). Previous studies have shown that CLK1 is essential for survival in the bloodstream form of this parasite (
20,
21). As part of a drug discovery campaign, we recently identified the amidobenzimidazole AB1 as a trypanocidal covalent inhibitor of
T. brucei CLK1. Detailed mode-of-action and target validation studies indicate that CLK1 is the main target of AB, which binds specifically to C215 residue at the hinge domain (
22). Treatment of the bloodstream form with AB1 caused nuclear enlargement during metaphase concomitant with a G
2/M cell cycle arrest. Furthermore, we demonstrated that CLK1 inhibition impaired nuclear KKT2 distribution (
22), suggesting that CLK1 has a role in kinetochore assembly or regulation. In the insect procyclic form, KKT4 and KKT7 phosphorylation has been shown to depend on KKT10/19, and the localization of KKT10/19 is tightly controlled to regulate the metaphase-to-anaphase transition (
19). Given the clinical importance of
T. brucei bloodstream forms for drug intervention and the advantage of using a chemical tool to study the kinetochore regulation, here we demonstrate that CLK1 phosphorylates KKT2 at S508 during early metaphase, and its inhibition affects the posterior recruitment of inner kinetochore components affecting chromosome segregation in a pathway that is independent of aurora kinase B.
DISCUSSION
The inner kinetochore complex of
T. brucei is unusual in that none of the 24 identified KKT proteins have any sequence identity with CENP proteins of the constitutive centromere-associated network (CCAN) in yeast or vertebrates (
15,
16). Four of the KKTs contain protein kinase domains, and here we provide the first evidence of a unique protein kinase signaling pathway that regulates inner kinetochore function in bloodstream-form
T. brucei. KKT2 is a multidomain protein, constitutively associated with the centromere during the cell cycle, which contains an N-terminal protein kinase domain, a central domain with a unique zinc finger domain, and a C-terminal divergent polo box domain (PDB) (
15). The PBD and the central domain are sufficient for kinetochore localization (
44), but it is not clear if KKT2 binds directly to DNA or forms a protein complex at nucleosomes with other KKT proteins. In this study, we show that while KKT2 protein kinase activity is required for growth and replication of bloodstream-form trypanosomes (
Fig. 2B), the localization of KKT1 and KKT9 to the kinetochore remained unaffected by the loss of KKT2 protein kinase activity (see
Fig. S4A in the supplemental material). These data suggest that KKT2 protein kinase activity is required for a function of the kinetochore that is independent from assembly of its inner complex.
We also show that phosphorylation of the kinetochore, and specifically KKT2, is crucial for kinetochore assembly in bloodstream-form
T. brucei. Depletion of the kinetochore protein kinase CLK1 (KKT10) by RNAi, or inhibition with the CLK1 inhibitor AB1, is lethal due to disruption of kinetochore assembly (
22). Multiple phosphorylation sites have been identified in KKT2, and a number are cell cycle regulated, including S508 (
31), suggesting a regulatory role. While we cannot discount phosphorylation of S507 or other sites as a requirement for kinetochore assembly, we only identified S508 to be essential, indicating that the other known phosphorylation sites cannot compensate for loss of phosphorylation on S508. S508 is located between the Cys-rich central domain and the C-terminal domain, and phosphorylation might contribute to association of KKT2 with chromatin via its DNA binding domain. Indeed, the finding that KKT2
S507A-S508A is mislocalized supports this hypothesis, and the fact that the mutant protein can localize to the kinetochore in the presence of wild-type KKT2 suggests that KKT2 is an oligomer and that the WT protein can recruit and retain the mutant protein on the kinetochore. As KKT2 protein kinase activity is not required for assembly of the kinetochore, phosphorylation of S508 seems less likely to regulate the kinase activity of KKT2.
By using chemical and molecular approaches, we demonstrate that phosphorylation of KKT2 in the bloodstream form during metaphase allows the spatial recruitment of inner kinetochore components. We provide evidence that KKT2 is phosphorylated by CLK1, but we cannot formally rule out the possibility of an intermediate kinase being involved. Recently, a study showed that in the procyclic form, CLK1 kinase activity is essential for metaphase-to-anaphase transition, although its expression was dispensable for the recruitment of kinetochore components (
19). This difference may be due to cell cycle regulators having different functions in the two developmental stages of
T. brucei (
45,
46) or because there can be protein turnover differences between life cycle stages (
47). Indeed, CLK1 protein expression relative to CLK2 appears higher in the bloodstream trypanosome (
22) than the procyclic form (
19).
In
T. brucei bloodstream forms, we show that KKT2 is a substrate for CLK1. In mammals, CLK protein kinases are found in the cytoplasm and in the nucleus, where they regulate alternative splicing through phosphorylation of serine/arginine-rich domains on splicing factors (
48), as occurs with human CLK1 in association with the serine-arginine protein kinase 1 (SRPK1) (
49). Human CLKs also activate the abscission checkpoint in human cells by phosphorylating aurora kinase B, most likely acting as upstream regulators (
50). The role of CLKs in regulating splicing is conserved across many organisms, including
Plasmodium falciparum, where inhibition of
P. falciparum CLK1-3 (PfCLK1-3) is lethal to the parasite by preventing the splicing of essential genes (
51). In
T. brucei, most genes are constitutively transcribed as polycistronic mRNAs that are resolved through trans-splicing (
52), but it remains unclear if CLK1 also has a role in that process. It has been proposed that the unique domains structure of
T. brucei kinetochore proteins is consistent with the
T. brucei kinetochore having a distinct evolutionary origin (
15,
44), and the finding of a unique CLK1/KKT2-centered regulation for kinetochore assembly supports that hypothesis.
As with most signaling networks, phosphorylation plays an essential role in the regulation of kinetochore functions, and multiple kinases have been found to regulate kinetochores (
53). Key examples are aurora kinase B, MPS1, BUB1, PLK1, and CDK1 (
53,
54). From yeast to humans, most of the functions of aurora kinase B require its incorporation into the CPC (
55) and its dynamic localization during the cell cycle (
54). As a regulator of the kinetochore-microtubule attachment during mitosis, aurora kinase B contributes decisively to two feedback mechanisms, the error correction (EC) and spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) (
56). Furthermore, it promotes the inner and outer kinetochore interactions through phosphorylation of Dsn1 (
39,
57,
58), a subunit of the Mis12 inner kinetochore complex, essential for kinetochore assembly (
59). The
T. brucei aurora kinase B orthologue, TbAUK1, has distinctive roles in metaphase-anaphase transition, ensuring proper spindle assembly, chromosome segregation, and cytokinesis (
37,
40). Alongside the parasite CPC, TbAUK1 associates with chromosomes during G
2/M phase and with kinetochores in metaphase and finally localizes in the spindle midzone in anaphase (
41), suggesting a role coordinating kinetochore recruitment and attachment. However, the potential role of this kinase in promoting kinetochore assembly has not yet been established or well separated from its regulatory function on mitosis.
In the
T. brucei procyclic form, two kinetochore proteins, KKT4 and KKIP4, localize to the spindle during mitosis (
17,
60). Our results suggest that localization/expression of key outer kinetochore proteins remains unaffected after CLK1 inhibition, whereas KKT4, recently described as a microtubule tip-coupling protein (
60), remains in anaphase, suggesting end-on interaction defects of microtubules with kinetochores. The role of aurora kinase B in the inner and outer kinetochore interaction in yeast resembles our findings of TbCLK1 functions in the recruitment of inner kinetochore during metaphase. Conversely, our results indicate that both pathways act independently in
T. brucei or at least not involving inner plate recruitment through KKT2 phosphorylation; the stability of KKT2 localization further support this hypothesis. Interestingly, inhibition of CLK1 affects CPC localization at metaphase and NuSAP2 during anaphase. Understanding that centromeric localization of CPC is required to correct errors in attachment (
61) and NuSAPs stabilize kinetochore microtubules during metaphase (
62), it will be possible that, during anaphase onset, CLK1 and TbAUK1 coordinate different layers of regulation of kinetochore microtubule attachment and spindle stabilization. The fact that CLK1 copurifies with TbMlp2 and NuSAP1 provides further support for this (
18). Interestingly, NuSAP1 to -4 partially colocalize with KKT2 (a CLK1 substrate) during the cell cycle, and knockdown of NuSAP1 destabilizes the expression of KKT1 but also triggers an unequal nuclear division without affecting spindle assembly (
18), similar to our findings with KKT2 phosphomutants. Future experiments are required to determine whether the CLK1-KKT2 axis regulation of inner kinetochore assembly in
T. brucei also requires a specific set of NuSAPs.
Altogether, we propose a model where CLK1 progressively phosphorylates KKT2 during S phase, allowing the timely spatial recruitment of the rest of the kinetochore proteins and posterior attachment to microtubules (
Fig. 5). It is possible that KKT2 is phosphorylated by CLK1 prior to recruitment to the kinetochore, but evidence suggests this would occur during early S phase (
32). Inhibition of CLK1 activity with AB1 leads to impaired inner kinetochore assembly and irreversible arrest in M phase, suggesting that this defect cannot be repaired by the parasite’s checkpoint control and implying a dual function of CLK1 at different points during chromosome segregation. Considering the conservation of CLK1 between
T. brucei,
T. cruzi, and
L. mexicana (
22), the bioactivity of AB1 against the three trypanosomatids, and the conservation of the KKT2 S508 phosphorylation site in
Leishmania and
T. cruzi, it is quite likely that this signaling pathway is conserved across the trypanosomatids.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Parasites.
All transgenic
T. brucei brucei parasites used in this study were derived from monomorphic
T. brucei brucei 2T1 bloodstream forms (
63) and were cultured in HMI-11 (HMI-9 [GIBCO] containing 10%, vol/vol, fetal bovine serum [GIBCO], Pen-Strep solution [penicillin at 20 U ml
−1, streptomycin at 20 mg ml
−1]) at 37°C and 5% CO
2 in vented flasks. Selective antibiotics were used: 5 μg ml
−1 blasticidin or hygromycin and 2.5 μg ml
−1 phleomycin or G418. RNAi was induced
in vitro with tetracycline (Sigma-Aldrich) in 70% ethanol at 1 μg ml
−1. The endogenous Ty, mNeonGreen experiment was performed using the pPOTv6 vector (
64). The generation of inducible TbCLK1 and KKT2 RNAi was done as previously described (
20).
Plasmids.
Recoded
KKT2 was synthesized by Dundee Cell Products. The recoded KKT2 sequence (
KKT2R) codes for the same amino acid sequence as
KKT2 but only shares 94.23% nucleotide identity. All segments of identity between
KKT2 and
KKT2R are less than 20 bp long.
KKT2R was inserted into the plasmid pGL2243 using XbaI and BamHI restriction sites, generating pGL2492. This plasmid is designed to constitutively express KKT2 from the tubulin locus, with the addition of a C-terminal 6× HA tag. To express catalytically inactive KKT2 and phosphomutants, the active-site lysine (K
113) and serine (S
5, S
8, S
25 S
507-S508, and S
828) were changed to alanine by mutating pGL2492, carrying the coding sequence for
KKT2, using site-directed mutagenic PCR. A list of primers is provided in
Text S1 in the supplemental material. To generate individual KKT2 recoded mutants, correspondent KKT2
R plasmids (described above) were transfected into the KKT2 RNAi cell line. Localization of endogenous KKT1 and KKT9 in KKT2
R mutants was assessed by microscopy after transfection of the correspondent mNG-KKT1 or mNG-KKT9 pPOTv6 vector into each recoded cell line.
Immunofluorescence and cell cycle analysis.
Cells treated for 6 h with compounds or dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and were centrifuged at 1,400 × g for 10 min before washing twice with Trypanosoma dilution buffer (TDB)-glucose at room temperature. Suspensions were centrifuged at 1,000 × g for 5 min, pipetted into 6-well microscope slides, and dried at room temperature (RT). Cells were fixed with 25 μl of 2% paraformaldehyde diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and incubated at room temperature for 5 min. Cells were washed in PBS to remove paraformaldehyde prior to washing twice more with PBS and permeabilized with 0.05% NP-40 for 10 min. Cells were washed twice in PBS and dried at RT. Mounting medium with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) was added to each well with a coverslip. Slides were kept at 4°C before viewing using a Zeiss LSM 880 with Airyscan on an Axio Observer.Z1 invert confocal microscope.
Ty-NuSAP1 and Ty-NuSAP2 were detected by indirect immunofluorescence by using a mouse Imprint monoclonal anti-Ty1 antibody (clone BB2). Briefly, cells were harvested by centrifugation at 1,400 × g for 10 min at room temperature, washed, and resuspended in TDB-glucose. A total of 2 × 105 cells were dried on slides, fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 1 h, washed with PBS, blocked with 50% (vol/vol) fetal bovine serum for 30 min, and then incubated with anti-TY (1:800) diluted in 0.5% blocking reagent for 1 h. Alexa-Fluor 488 (anti-mouse) was used as the secondary antibody (Invitrogen). Cells were DAPI stained and visualized using a Zeiss LSM 880 with Airyscan on an Axio Observer.Z1 inverted confocal microscope.
To study spindle formation, wild-type bloodstream forms were treated or not for 6 h with AB1 (5× EC50) or CLK1 RNAi cells were treated or not with tetracycline for 24 h. Parasites were harvested by centrifugation at 1,400 × g for 10 min and then washed twice with TDB-glucose at room temperature. Samples were fixed for 10 min in 2%, wt/vol, formaldehyde in PBS, followed by 5 min incubation with 1 M Tris, pH 8.5, to quench the fixation. The fixed cells were washed with PBS, suspended in PBS, and adhered to SuperFrost Plus adhesion slides for 15 min. Attached parasites were then permeabilized with methanol at –20°C for 15 min and rehydrated with PBS, followed by incubation with blocking buffer (5% bovine serum albumin, 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS) for 1 h at room temperature. Cells were immunostained at room temperature for 1 h with KMX-1 antibody to detect the mitotic spindle. After three washes (0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS), samples were incubated for 1 h with an Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (used at 1:300) secondary antibody. Finally, after three more washes, the slides were mounted in ProLong diamond antifade mountant with DAPI and examined by fluorescence microscopy. For analysis, 2K1N and 2K2N populations (n = 80) were considered, and statistical significance determined using the Holm-Sidak t test, with α = 0.05.
For cell cycle analysis, bloodstream-form T. brucei cell lines were incubated or not for 6 h with AB compounds at a final concentration of 5× the individual EC50 for each compound (averaged from viability assays). Control cultures were treated with 0.5 μl DMSO. Cultures were pelleted and cells were collected and washed once in TDB supplemented with 5 mM EDTA and resuspended in 70% methanol. Cells were centrifuged at 1,400 × g for 10 min to remove methanol and washed once in TDB with 5 mM EDTA. Cells were resuspended in 1 ml 1× TDB with 5 mM EDTA, 10 μg ml−1 propidium iodide, and 10 μl of RNase A. Cell suspensions in 1.5-ml tubes were wrapped in foil to avoid bleaching by light. Cells were incubated for 30 min at 37°C in the dark until fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis. Cells were analyzed for FACS using a Beckman Coulter CyAn ADP flow cytometer (excitation, 535 nm; emission, 617 nm). Cell cycle phase distribution was determined by fluorescence.
Hydroxyurea-induced synchronization of cell lines was obtained by incubating parasites in exponential growth phase with 10 μM hydroxyurea (HU) (Sigma-Aldrich) for 6 h. Removal of HU from the culture medium was achieved by centrifuging cells at 1,400 × g for 10 min, washing twice with fresh (drug-free) medium, and resuspending cells in medium lacking HU. Subsequently, samples were collected each hour for posterior cell cycle analysis by propidium iodide staining.
Protein analysis.
KKT2 and KKT3 phosphorylation profile were analyzed by using a SuperSep Phos-tag precast gel (
29) according to the manufacturing protocol. Briefly, Ty-mNG KKT2 and Ty-mNG KKT3 were incubated with 5× AB1 EC
50 for 18 h and collected for analysis by Western blotting in an EDTA-free radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) lysis buffer. In parallel, the expression of both proteins was analyzed after 24 h for TbCLK1 RNAi. After electrophoresis, the gel was washed 5 times with 10 mM EDTA transfer buffer to improve transference. The membrane then was transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane using a 0.1% SDS Tris-glycine transfer buffer at 90 mA overnight at 4°C. The membrane was blocked for 1 h with 10% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and KKT2 and KKT3 phosphorylation pattern was analyzed by using an anti-Ty1 antibody (see
Text S1 for details).
Anti-phospho KKT2 S508 was raised against a synthetic phosphopeptide antigen C-GTRVGS(pS*)LRPQRE-amide, where pS* represents phosphoserine. The peptide was conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) and used to immunize rabbits. Phosphopeptide-reactive rabbit antiserum was first purified by protein A chromatography. Further purification was carried out using immunodepletion by nonphosphopeptide resin chromatography, after which the resulting eluate was chromatographed on a phosphopeptide resin. Anti-antigen antibodies were detected by indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with unconjugated antigens passively coated on plates, probed with anti-IgG-horseradish peroxidase conjugate, and detected with 2,2′-azinobis(3-ethylbenzthiazolinesulfonic acid) substrate. Posterior antigen specificity was confirmed by Western blotting using KKT2 RNAi and endogenous tagged KKT2 cell lines. Custom antibody was produced by Thermo Fisher Scientific.
For Western blotting, parasites were washed with TDB supplemented with 20 mM glucose. After centrifugation, the samples were resuspended in the RIPA buffer (number 9806S; New England Biolabs) supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitors obtained from Promega and Roche Life Science, respectively. All samples were quantified by Bradford protein assay (Bio-Rad), 25 μg of protein was loaded, resolved in a 4 to 20% NuPAGE Bis‐Tris gel (Invitrogen) in NuPAGE morpholinepropanesulfonic acid running buffer, and transferred onto Hybond‐C nitrocellulose membranes (GE Healthcare) at 350 mA for 2 h or, for high-molecular-weight proteins, overnight at 4°C.
After transfer, membranes were washed once in 1× TBST (Tris-buffered saline [TBS], 0.01% Tween 20 [Sigma-Aldrich]) for 10 min and then incubated for 1 h in blocking solution (1× TBST, 5% BSA) or, if required, overnight at 4°C. Next, the membrane was rinsed for 10 min in 1× TBST and placed in blocking buffer containing the required primary antisera for 1 h at room temperature or overnight at 4°C. The membrane was then washed 3 times with TBST and placed in blocking solution containing the appropriate fluorescent secondary antisera for 1 h. A list of antibodies is provided in
Text S1.