INTRODUCTION
Neisseria gonorrhoeae (Gc) causes the bacterial sexually transmitted infection gonorrhea. Gc is designated as an urgent threat level pathogen by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, with approximately 82.4 million cases each year globally (
1). Factors contributing to the prevalence of gonorrhea include increasing resistance to antibiotics, resistance to soluble and cellular innate immune components, and the lack of protective immunity elicited by prior infection (
2,
3). Finding new approaches to treat or prevent Gc infection is of utmost importance.
The most abundant surface component on Gc is lipooligosaccharide (LOS). The length and composition of LOS is regulated by
lgt (LOS glycosyltransferase) genes. Phase variation of
lgt genes results in varying oligosaccharide compositions within a Gc population, including during infection (
4–7). Gc isolated from uncomplicated urethral infection predominantly produces LOS that can be sialylated. Sialylation is the incorporation of sialic acid onto the alpha and/or beta chain terminal galactose of LOS, catalyzed by Gc LOS sialyltransferase (Lst) (
8–10). Gc cannot synthesize sialic acid and instead scavenges cytidine-5′-monophosphate-
N-acetylneuraminic acid (CMP-NANA from the host) (
11). Lst is constitutively expressed (
12,
13), is required for optimal genital tract infection (
14–16), and uses diverse forms of CMP-sialic acid (
17).
LOS sialylation is a form of molecular mimicry that is thought to enable Gc to evade immune recognition (
18,
19). Sialylation was originally characterized due to conferring “unstable” serum resistance on Gc recovered from urethral secretions but not after laboratory passage (
11,
20,
21). Sialylation has since been shown to inhibit all three complement activation pathways by decreasing C1 engagement and C4b deposition and increasing recruitment of factor H on Gc (
17,
22,
23). Sialylated glycans enable the immune system to discriminate self from non-self, achieved in part through sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-type lectins (Siglecs) (
24–27). Siglecs are produced by most immune cells, including neutrophils, which are the predominant immune cells recruited in Gc infections and constitute the purulence in gonorrheal secretions (
28). Human neutrophils express Siglec-5, -9, and -14. Siglec-5 and -9 contain cytoplasmic immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motifs (ITIMs) that recruit SH2 domain-containing phosphatases to inhibit cellular activation (
29–34). By contrast, Siglec-14 associates with the adapter protein DAP12, which contains an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activating motif (ITAM) that once phosphorylated, recruits Syk kinase to activate downstream signaling (
35,
36). The genes that encode Siglec-5 and Siglec-14 are adjacent and considered paired receptors since the proteins share almost complete sequence identity in their binding domains and similar glycan binding preferences (
35,
37). 10%–70% of individuals in certain racial/ethnic groups harbor a
SIGLEC14/5 fusion gene where Siglec-14 is not expressed but Siglec-5 is (
38). Thus, on balance, signaling through neutrophil Siglecs dampens inflammatory signaling. Sialylated Gc has been reported to interact with the extracellular domains of these Siglecs as Fc chimeras (
39).
Gc expresses numerous gene products that defend against neutrophil antimicrobial activities (
28). Gc also varies its ability to interact non-opsonically with neutrophils through phase-variable expression of opacity-associated (Opa) proteins (
40). Most Opa proteins bind one or more carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecules (CEACAMs). In particular, binding to the granulocyte-restricted CEACAM3 elicits phagocytosis, reactive oxygen species production, and granule release (
41–47).
In this study, we unexpectedly found that sialylation promotes Gc survival from human neutrophils in a complement-independent manner. Our results implicate Siglecs in dampening the neutrophil activation that is elicited by CEACAM-binding Opa proteins, bringing new insight into the ways that Gc modulates soluble and cellular innate immunity to persist in its obligate human host.
DISCUSSION
Gc sialylation of LOS by Lst is crucial for complement resistance and pathogenesis
in vivo (
10). This study reveals an unexpected, complement-independent role of sialylation: its ability to restrain neutrophil activation in response to Opa+ Gc, improving Gc survival upon neutrophil challenge. Sialylation reduced granule mobilization and release of both oxidative and nonoxidative species in response to Opa+ bacteria. Unexpectedly, sialylation of the LOS did not have a significant effect on Opa-CEACAM binding and engagement. Instead, by blocking the immunoregulatory Siglecs on neutrophils, sialylated Opa+ Gc could no longer suppress neutrophil activation or killing capacity. These data suggest the exploitation of neutrophil self-associated molecular pattern recognition by Gc through LOS sialylation by Lst. Our findings add to the increasing understanding of how pathogens co-opt host factors to impair immune cell activation (
72).
This study focused on Gc interactions with neutrophils, the main cell type found in human infectious secretions. We used human neutrophils that were adherent and treated with IL-8, mimicking post-migration behavior in these terminally differentiated, short-lived primary cells (
59). Work by our group and others has investigated how Gc expression of phase-variable Opa proteins affects their survival from neutrophils (
40–42,
45,
48,
63,
73). Most Opa proteins bind selected human CEACAMs. In particular, neutrophils and other granulocytes express CEACAM3, which contains an ITAM that can recruit the Src family and Syk tyrosine kinases to drive signaling pathways leading to phagocytosis, granule release, and ROS production (
40). Given the negative charge conferred by sialic acids, we hypothesized that LOS sialylation would impair the phagocytic activity of neutrophils toward Gc. However, we found no significant difference in the ability of sialylated Opa+ Gc to bind the soluble N-domain of CEACAM, CEACAM-expressing cells, or primary human neutrophils. While our study only focused on Opa+ Gc that bind CEACAMs 1 and 3, future work can explore how sialylation affects other modes of interaction between Gc and neutrophils, including antibody- and complement-mediated association.
Siglecs help the innate immune system to distinguish between non-self and self-associated molecular patterns (
26). Many immune cell Siglecs contain cytoplasmic ITIM domains that transduce inhibitory signals to dampen inflammation (
24). Other sialylated bacteria, including
N. meningitidis and Group B
Streptococcus, have been shown to manipulate cell activation
via Siglec engagement (
27,
69), and Gc can bind human Siglec-Fc chimera proteins (
39). Consistent with published findings, we detected Siglec-9 and Siglec-5/-14 on the human neutrophil surface (
29,
32,
37). Moreover, blocking Siglecs reversed the inhibitory activity of sialylation on neutrophil responses to Gc, uncovering a new role for Siglecs in thwarting neutrophil anti-gonococcal responses. Interestingly, human Siglec-Fc chimeras have also been reported to bind PorB on the surface of unsialylated Gc, which was enhanced by the production of a shorter, nonsialylatable LOS (
39). Whether non-sialylated Gc interacts with Siglecs on neutrophils and the consequences of such interaction remain to be explored. Unlike Siglec-5 and Siglec-9, Siglec-14 does not have a cytoplasmic domain; instead, it associates with the ITAM-bearing DAP12 (
35,
37). Siglec-5 and Siglec-14 have almost identical ligand binding domains due to ongoing gene conversion and are considered paired receptors, possibly to balance immune responses to pathogens (
24,
35,
38). In a study of genetic variations in Siglecs among a human cohort with a high burden of gonorrhea, uninfected individuals were more likely to produce Siglec-14, though not reaching statistical significance (
39). Future work can examine whether neutrophils from individuals with or without Siglec-14 respond differently to sialylated Gc.
The localization of Lst has recently been updated from an outer membrane protein to the inner face of the cytoplasmic membrane, where the OS is assembled (
74,
75). Unlike the closely related microbe
N. meningitidis, Gc cannot endogenously synthesize CMP-NANA and must scavenge it from the extracellular environment for sialylation. Lst has both α2,3 (alpha chain LNnT) and α2,6 sialyltransferase activity (alpha chain P
k-like OS and beta chain lactose) and has been shown to use different CMP-sialic acids as substrates (
8,
17,
52,
53). This promiscuity suggests that sialic acid availability rather than enzymatic activity drives the dynamics of LOS sialylation. We exploited this feature of Lst to add azido-labeled CMP-NANA in the form of N-acetylneuraminic acid (Neu5Ac) to directly track sialylation on the Gc surface. Other Lst substrates include CMP-Neu5Gc, which is missing in humans due to the evolutionary loss of the responsible hydrolase (
76), and CMP-legionaminic acid and CMP-ketodeoxynonulosonic acid, which do not confer complement resistance and could serve as anti-gonococcal therapeutics (
17).
One key question prompted by this work is how neutrophils affect the dynamics of Gc sialylation. Neutrophils have been proposed as a source of CMP-NANA since lysates from polymorphonuclear phagocytes, including neutrophils, confer “unstable” serum resistance on Gc (
77). How Gc obtains CMP-NANA, which is cytoplasmic, is currently unknown since intracellular Gc resides in phagolysosomes (
65). Phagosomes may contain sialic acid transporters; in addition, neutrophils may release CMP-NANA by lysis or elaboration of neutrophil extracellular traps. It is also tantalizing to speculate that neutrophil sialyltransferases, found in the secretory pathway, could intersect with Gc- and sialic acid-containing compartments to sialylate the bacteria (
78). Conversely, neutrophils have surface-exposed sialidases, which desialylate their glycans during diapedesis (
79,
80) and other cells’ glycans for adhesion (
81). While we did not detect any desialylation of Gc over the first 30 min of neutrophil exposure, the sialylation state of Gc over time with neutrophils remains unknown. Modification of neutrophil-like cells to synthesize azido-labeled CMP-NANA (
82) would allow sialylation of Gc to be tracked over time and in different compartments in an Lst-dependent manner.
Sialylated Gc has reduced infectivity in the experimental challenge of the human male urethra (
14) and the genital tract of female mice (
15,
16). However, Gc isolated from male urethral gonorrheal exudates are sialylated (
8,
11,
21). In addition, Gc isolated from cervicovaginal human secretions are less likely to be sialylated, due to sialidase activity conferred by members of the female genital microbiome (
83). Given these dynamics, we anticipate that balancing the sialylation state allows Gc to resist cellular and humoral immunity—including by engaging Siglecs to thwart neutrophil attack—while maintaining infectivity of target mucosal surfaces. These findings can be exploited for novel therapies for gonorrhea since Lst expression is not a phase variable. For instance, CMP-NANA analogs that do not confer serum resistance aid complement killing of the multidrug-resistant Gc (
17,
84). Similarly, sialic acid analogs that do not engage Siglecs could be developed to render Gc more sensitive to neutrophils. These approaches, in conjunction with antibiotics and vaccines, could enhance neutrophil and soluble host defenses to combat drug-resistant gonorrhea.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Louise Ball and Samuel Clark for preliminary experiments that informed this project, and Asya Smirnov and Linda Columbus for guidance in methods development. We thank Mike Solga of the UVA Flow Cytometry Core Facility (RRid: SCR_017829) and Hazel Ozuna (University of Louisville) for advice, Ann Jerse and Marcia Hobbs for strains and antibodies, and Sanjay Ram for reagents and discussions. We are grateful to the human subjects who made this research possible.
This work was supported by NIH R01AI097312, NIH U19AI144180, and NIH U01AI162457 (A.K.C.). A.J.C. was supported in part by NIH F31AI157528 and NIH 3R01AI097312-07S1. A.J.C. and M.W.B. were supported in part by NIH T32AI007046. M.M.P. and N.J.F. were supported by NIH R35GM124893. G.A.J. and C.M.J. were supported by the Merit Review Award BX000727 and the Research Career Scientist Award from the Research Service of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.
Conceptualization: A.J.C. and A.K.C. Formal analysis: A.J.C, K.S.T., and N.J.F. Funding acquisition: A.K.C. and A.J.C. Project Administrator: A. K.C. Investigation: A.J.C., K.S.T., M.W.B., and N.J.F. Methodology: A.J.C., M.W.B., N.J.F., and M.M.P. Supervision: G.A.J., C.M.J., M.M.P., and A.K.C. Visualization: A.J.C. Writing—original draft: A.J.C. and A.K.C. Writing—review & editing: A.J.C., K.S.T., M.W.B., N.J.F., C.M.J., G.A.J., and A.K.C.