Open access
Host-Microbial Interactions
Research Article
18 April 2024

Gut-associated functions are favored during microbiome assembly across a major part of C. elegans life

ABSTRACT

The microbiome expresses a variety of functions that influence host biology. The range of functions depends on the microbiome’s composition, which can change during the host’s lifetime due to neutral assembly processes, host-mediated selection, and environmental conditions. To date, the exact dynamics of microbiome assembly, the underlying determinants, and the effects on host-associated functions remain poorly understood. Here, we used the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and a defined community of fully sequenced, naturally associated bacteria to study microbiome dynamics and functions across a major part of the worm’s lifetime of hosts under controlled experimental conditions. Bacterial community composition initially shows strongly declining levels of stochasticity, which increases during later time points, suggesting selective effects in younger animals as opposed to more random processes in older animals. The adult microbiome is enriched in genera Ochrobactrum and Enterobacter compared to the direct substrate and a host-free control environment. Using pathway analysis, metabolic, and ecological modeling, we further find that the lifetime assembly dynamics increase competitive strategies and gut-associated functions in the host-associated microbiome, indicating that the colonizing bacteria benefit the worm. Overall, our study introduces a framework for studying microbiome assembly dynamics based on stochastic, ecological, and metabolic models, yielding new insights into the processes that determine host-associated microbiome composition and function.

IMPORTANCE

The microbiome plays a crucial role in host biology. Its functions depend on the microbiome composition that can change during a host’s lifetime. To date, the dynamics of microbiome assembly and the resulting functions still need to be better understood. This study introduces a new approach to characterize the functional consequences of microbiome assembly by modeling both the relevance of stochastic processes and metabolic characteristics of microbial community changes. The approach was applied to experimental time-series data obtained for the microbiome of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans across the major part of its lifetime. Stochastic processes played a minor role, whereas beneficial bacteria as well as gut-associated functions enriched in hosts. This indicates that the host might actively shape the composition of its microbiome. Overall, this study provides a framework for studying microbiome assembly dynamics and yields new insights into C. elegans microbiome functions.

INTRODUCTION

Microorganisms have shaped the evolution of multicellular host organisms since the very beginning (1). As a consequence, they are of particular importance for the biology of their hosts. They can influence host nutrition and metabolism by providing specific enzymes for digestion (e.g., cellulase for digestion of plant material [2]) or certain nutritious compounds (e.g., specific amino acids [3]). They can define host development (4), maturation of the immune system (5), mediate immune protection against pathogens (6), or even influence host behavior through interaction with the host’s nervous system (7). During the lifetime of a host, the composition of its associated microbiome can change. For example, the assembly of the zebrafish gut microbiome is initially driven by neutral processes, while later time points during development are characterized by non-neutral dynamics, most likely due to maturation of the immune system (8). Overall, microbiome changes can be described by Vellend’s four high-level processes: selection, dispersal, drift, and speciation/diversification (9). The four processes help to generalize specific causes underlying microbial assembly, such as priority effects (selection), neutral assembly (drift, dispersal, and speciation), selection by the host, and interaction of microbes with the host or with other microbes (selection) (9, 10). To date, however, it is still poorly understood how these temporal changes affect the microbiome-mediated functions. If the host controls the microbiome assembly process, then functional changes may be expected because the host usually faces different functional challenges during its lifetime (e.g., development and immune protection early in life, sexual reproduction after maturation, etc.). If the bacteria are in control, then later time points should be characterized by bacteria well adapted to the host habitat and/or highly competitive bacteria. A controlled experimental approach may help to better understand the consequences of microbiota assembly changes during host lifetime.
The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans provides a tractable experimental system, for which a large number of associated microorganisms have been isolated together with the nematode from the host’s natural habitat: rotting plant matter (11, 12). Naturally associated microorganisms include members of the genera Pseudomonas, Ochrobactrum, Enterobacter, Comamonas, and others. Previous work highlighted that a representative set of the naturally associated microbes can provide almost all essential nutrients needed by the worm for growth (except cholesterol) and significantly affect C. elegans population growth (13). Naturally associated bacteria can moreover enrich in worms and provide immune protection against pathogens such as the gram-negative Bacillus thuringiensis, the gram-positive Pseudomonas aeruginosa, or the fungus Drechmeria coniospora (11, 1416).
Since changes of microbial composition are dynamic and at least partially dependent on host characteristics during development and adult life, we combined microbial abundance data from the different sampling time points with results from ecological and metabolic modeling to study consequences of these changes at the functional level. Microbiome compositional changes can be studied across time using neutral assembly models, and metabolic network models can be employed to uncover functions. In particular, we found surprisingly little compatibility with a neutral model for the microbial assembly in a former study which we intended to follow on longer time scales (17). In addition, we recently developed a new method for metabolic pathway and model prediction (18) and proposed a classification of ecological strategies for microbes (13).
The aim of the current study was to use C. elegans and 43 bacteria representative of the nematode’s naturally associated microbiome (i.e., CeMbio43) in order to assess microbiome assembly dynamics and resulting functional consequences during the major part of the lifetime of the host. These 43 bacteria are an extension of the set of 12 bacteria that define the previously published CeMbio resource (19). We obtained full-genome sequences and reconstructed metabolic network models for these 43 bacteria. The bacteria were either combined with C. elegans or not (as control). Microbiome composition was characterized with the help of 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing for nematodes and the directly associated environment (labeled “substrate”) or the control environments without worms (labeled “control”) at six time points, covering C. elegans development and a considerable part of its adult lifetime (almost 8 days after egg hatching at 25°C). We assessed diversity and neutrality of microbiome dynamics. We further used the reconstructed metabolic networks to infer changes in the metabolic competences of the microbial communities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An extended version of material and methods can be found in the supplemental material.

Material

We used the C. elegans strain DH26, which has a mutation in the gene rrf-3, encoding a member of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase family. As possible for any mutation in a central gene, the rrf-3 variant may affect microbiome assembly (20). Nevertheless, this mutant comes with the unique advantage that it is spermatogenesis defective and sterile at 25°C. Therefore, using this mutant allows us to avoid overlapping generations in our experiment, thereby enabling us to sample repeatedly across the lifetime of this nematode. We defined a community of 43 natural C. elegans microbiome isolates, the CeMbio43 (Table 1; Tables S1 and S2), which extends the previously described CeMbio resource (consisting of 12 bacterial strains [19]), which is representative of the natural C. elegans microbiome (11, 12), and which includes several strains for the naturally more abundant genera in the worm’s microbiome.
TABLE 1
TABLE 1 Overview of the extended CeMbio community including genome statisticsa
IDSpeciesRefbMbcGenesContigsrRNA
BIGb0170Sphingobacterium multivorum*6.45,391121
BIGb0172Comamonas piscis*5.24,595119
BIGb0393Pantoea nemavictus*5.24,667222
CEent1Enterobacter cloacae*4.84,458126
JUb134Sphingomonas molluscorum*4.13,81649
JUb19Stenotrophomonas indicatrix*4.64,079214
JUb44Chryseobacterium scophthalmum*4.74,199121
JUb66Lelliottia amnigena*4.64,207122
MSPm1Pseudomonas berkeleyensis*5.75,159212
MYb10Acinetobacter guillouiae*4.64,244293
MYb11Pseudomonas lurida*6.15,456116
MYb115Pseudomonas fluorescens(**)6.35,676122
MYb121Erwinia billingiae**5.04,532286
MYb158Acinetobacter johnsonii 3.63,414233
MYb174Enterobacter ludwigii 4.64,293295
MYb176Enterobacter ludwigii 4.64,283373
MYb177Acinetobacter sp. B2070 3.53,311221
MYb181Sphingobacterium faecium**5.54,6192438
MYb186Enterobacter sp. 638 4.84,485263
MYb191Acinetobacter sp. 4D-W-22 3.53,3502111
MYb21Comamonas sp. B-9 5.44,762364
MYb25Chryseobacterium culicis**5.04,504113
MYb264Chryseobacterium sp. 5.24,607121
MYb328Chryseobacterium sp. 5.65,004603
MYb330Pseudomonas sp. 6.15,446654
MYb331Pseudomonas sp. 6.15,447714
MYb371Pseudomonas sp. 6.15,450534
MYb375Erwinia sp. 4.94,5052411
MYb379Ochrobactrum sp. 5.14,780475
MYb382Sphingobacterium sp. 4.74,0022911
MYb388Sphingobacterium sp. 6.25,326293
MYb396Comamonas sp. 5.34,719233
MYb398Pseudomonas sp. 5.54,8951054
MYb416Erwinia sp. 5.85,38044314
MYb49Ochrobactrum anthropi**4.84,553312
MYb535Erwinia sp. 4.94,5992511
MYb541Pseudomonas sp. 6.35,789824
MYb58Ochrobactrum pituitosum**5.04,635315
MYb592Gluconobacter wancherniae 3.23,048406
MYb595Gluconobacter cerinus 3.63,299482
MYb596Gluconobacter albidus 3.33,044513
MYb69Comamonas sp. TK41 5.34,610283
MYb71Ochrobactrum vermis*5.45,191312
a
Illumina short reads were used from reference 13, and additional Pacbio long reads were obtained for this study.
b
Reference studies which previously described the respective genomes: “*” Dirksen et al. (19) and “**” Zimmermann et al. (13).
c
Genome size given in mega base pairs (Mb).

Whole-genome sequence analysis of bacteria

We isolated high-quality genomic DNA using the Nucleo Spin Tissue Kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) for the 26 bacterial strains without previously sequenced genomes (Table 1). Short-read sequencing was performed by NextSeq 500 using the NextSeq 500/550 High Output Kit v2.5 (300 cycles) and long-read sequencing with the Pacbio Sequel II. The genomes were assembled using SPAdes v3.14.1 (21), MaSuRCA 3.4.2 (22), Unicycler v0.4.8 (23), shovill 1.1.0 (24), and SKESA 2.4.0 (25). Genome assembly quality was evaluated using QUAST v5.1.0rc1 (26). The genome-sequencing data were used to annotate genomic functions with gapseq 1.1 (Sequence DB: 1139b8e, bitscore cutoff 150 [18]), including inference of metabolic pathways (27), metabolic network models, growth media suitability, and carbon source and fermentation products. The variation in metabolic reactions between the CeMbio43 strains predicted by gapseq was analyzed by a multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) based on the presence or absence of reactions in metabolic models using the function MCA() of the R package FactoMineR v2.9 using strains as individuals and reactions as categorical variables (28). Virulence, resistance genes, and plasmids were scanned with abricate 1.0.1 (29) using the databases vfdb 2018-Jul-16 (30), plasmidfinder 2022-Mar-8 (31), resfinder 2022-Mar-8 (32), and megares 2022-Mar-8 (33). Gut microbiome-specific gene clusters were identified by gutSMASH 1.0.0-1555cd7 (34). For CAzyme annotation, dbCAN 3.0.2 was used (35). The microbial interactions were simulated by a pairwise comparison of single vs co-growth rate assuming TSB growth medium with BacArena 1.8.2 (36).

Analysis of microbiome changes

Temporal changes in microbiota composition were assessed for nematode populations (labeled “host”), the directly connected nematode growth medium (NGM) environment (labeled “substrate”), and the control NGM plates without worms (labeled “control”) in 8–13 replicates and across 6 time points. The experiment was started with L1 larvae of C. elegans strain DH26. Nematodes and bacterial lawns were sampled after 16 h (t2), 42 h (t3), 66 h (t4), 90 h (t5), 138 h (t6), and 186 h (t7). DNA was extracted with the Nucleo Spin 96 Tissue Kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany). The 16S libraries were prepared using the 341F and 806R primer covering the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene, followed by sequencing on the Miseq platform (Illumina). We processed the obtained 16S amplicon-sequencing data using the standardized amplicon-sequencing pipeline nf-core/ampliseq 2.1.1 (37). Sample sequences were inferred by DADA2 (38), and the microbial composition data (ASV and taxonomic table) were analyzed with phyloseq 1.38.0 (39). DESeq2 1.34.0 was used to find differentially abundant taxa (40) that were visualized by heat trees using the R package metacoder 0.3.5.001 (41). To assess the neutrality of the samples, the expected long-term distribution of a neutral model was fitted to the sample abundance data (17, 42). The impact of stochastic processes on community assembly was evaluated using the normalized stochasticity ratio metric available as R package NST 3.1.10 (function tNST [43]). We combined the microbial 16S data with the functions predicted from genomic analysis and modeling. For each organism, the presence (true/false) of a particular function indicated if the organism’s abundance contributed to the abundance of the function. Finally, by adding up the abundances of all taxa in a sample for which the presence of a function was predicted, the overall abundance of the function was determined. In analogy to the taxon-level analysis, DESeq2 1.34.0 was used to identify differentially abundant functions.

RESULTS

The extended CeMbio43 community, genomes, and metabolic models

In 2020, we introduced a natural Caenorhabditis elegans microbiome resource, CeMbio, consisting of 12 representative members of the nematode’s native microbiome (19). In the current study, we present an extended version of the CeMbio community with 43 bacterial strains, CeMbio43, which incorporates additional taxa chosen by their repeated presence in a long-term field study (11, 12). Newly integrated strains belong to the genera Erwinia, Microbacterium, and Gluconobacter. Besides a more comprehensive coverage of representative taxa of the native microbiome, the CeMbio43 community accounts for the redundancy detected for many microbiomes (44). Additional strains to increase redundancy were added for Acinetobacter (+3), Chryseobacterium (+3), Comamonas (+3), Enterobacter (+3), Ochrobactrum (+3), Sphingobacterium (+3), and Pseudomonas (+6). Overall, the CeMbio43 community augments the existing resources for microbiome research in C. elegans by further improving the representation of a native microbiome and by accounting for species redundancy (Table 1; Tables S1 and S2; Fig. 1).
For the 43 strains of the community, 12 genomes were already assembled for the original CeMbio community (19), and an additional 5 were already characterized for a previous study (13). We now assembled the genomes for the remaining 26 strains. Noteworthy, depending on the organisms, the best assemblies were not obtained from one single but a combination of methods (MaSuRCA, shovill, SPAdes, and Unicycler). SPAdes made more than one-third of the high-performing assemblies (Table S2). The CeMbio43 genomes were used to reconstruct a phylogenetic tree and, importantly, infer metabolic models and thus the metabolic competences of the included strains (Fig. 1).
Fig 1
A rooted phylogenetic tree features the evolutionary relationships between the strains. The MCA shows the variance in the presence of metabolic reactions between strains.
Fig 1 Genomes and inferred metabolic model similarities: (A) Rooted phylogenetic tree in circular format based on assembled genome similarity (alignment by GtdbTk [45] and tree by IQ-TREE [46], midpoint rooting), (B) Multiple correspondence analysis of reactions that were present in the inferred metabolic models. The colors indicate the different genera of the CeMbio43 community. Strain codes are as in Table 1.

Microbial community changes across the major part of nematode life

We studied changes in microbial communities from three environmental sources (control, substrate, and host) for six time points (16, 42, 66, 90, 138, 186 h) with 8–13 replicates, totaling 180 samples. The experiment was started with synchronized L1 larvae (time point t0), whereby the first two (16, 42 h) cover larval development, while the remaining four time points encompass a large part of adult life, including the usual reproductive period of C. elegans at this temperature. Microbial community composition was characterized for nematode hosts, the plate environment from which nematodes were isolated (labeled substrate), and also as controls, plate environments maintained without C. elegans. We measured the within-sample diversity and compared the influence of time and sample source on community dynamics, illustrated for the considered genera in the barplot of Fig. 2A. The diversity increase over time was most robust for host and substrate samples (Spearman R = 0.52; cf. R = 0.32 [controls]; Fig. S5). The Shannon index showed significant temporal variation for substrate and host samples (Fig. 2C). While a similar result was obtained for evenness (Simpson), richness (Chao1) did not vary significantly over time (Fig. S6). Analysis of the variance (ANOVA) of Shannon indices indicated the influence of sample source and time (Table S5). The Tukey honest significant difference test suggested significant differences at the beginning and between 90 and 186 h (Table S6) and for host vs controls and host vs substrate (Table S7).
Fig 2
Illustrations feature the relative abundance of microbes and taxonomic relationships between the species. Graphs present alpha diversity within individual samples, overall community similarity, and beta diversity between different sample types.
Fig 2 Microbial abundances and diversity across sample types and time. (A) Relative mean abundances per sample type and time point. Only taxa with a maximal relative abundance ≥0.05 are shown. Low abundance CeMbio43 taxa [group: “cembio (low)”] and unidentified taxa (group: “other”) are represented jointly. (B) Differential heat tree of species abundances. A taxonomic tree is shown in gray. Differentially abundant species between three conditions were compared: microbial samples from C. elegans (host), from the plate environment directly associated with the worms (substrate), and from plate environments that were always maintained without worms (controls). The colored trees indicate the comparison: substrate vs host (top left), control vs host (top right). Differentially abundant species were colored brown (enriched in substrate or controls) or turquoise (enriched in hosts). Differential abundances were inferred by DESeq2. Taxa with adjusted P-value of ≤0.05 are shown. The thickness of branches corresponds to mean abundance. (C) α-Diversity of filtered and agglomerated microbial samples on taxon level (Shannon diversity) across time. (D) Ordination of microbial samples shown in a PCoA plot using Aitchison distance. Time is indicated by increasing red color intensities. (E and F) Differences in β-diversity (Aitchison, weighted Unifrac distance) compared between sample types and across time. For comparing host-associated samples, pairs from the same replicate were available, whereas for comparing host with control or substrate with control, pairs were randomly associated (100 repetitions).
When comparing differences between samples (β-diversity), we found the influence of time on sample variation to be the most prominent for host-derived samples (Aitchison distance; Fig. 2D). Although we found significant differences between sample sources (PERMANOVA F test P = 0.002, Table S8), variation over time was only identified for host and substrate samples (PERMANOVA F test P < 0.05 for Bray-Curtis, Unifrac, and Aitchison distance; Fig. S7; Table S10). Time points 66 and 186 h showed significant dissimilarities across sample sources (Table S9). For several cases, pairs of host and substrate samples from the same plate existed so that compositional distances could be compared directly between the paired samples. This allowed us to assess the dynamics of community composition between conditions. We observed that differences between host samples and controls increased over time (Fig. 2F; Fig. S8b). For host and substrate samples, Bray-Curtis and Unifrac distances indicated that they initially diverge in composition but, after 90 h, become more similar again (Fig. S8b; Fig. 2E).
We performed a differential abundance analysis using DEseq2 based on a negative binomial generalized linear model with time and source as variables to identify bacterial strains whose growth showed variation. The results were summarized in a “heat tree” that depicts differentially abundant taxa for host vs control and host vs substrate. When comparing control vs substrate samples, we did not find differentially abundant taxa (Fig. 2B). In agreement with previous studies, Ochrobactrum (MYb71/MYb49) and Enterobacter (CEent1) strains were specifically enriched in samples obtained from within the host in all comparisons. Chyseobacterium (MYb328) and Pseudomonas (MYb371/MYb331/MYb330) showed higher abundances in host compared to control samples, whereas Comamonas (MYb396/MYb69/MYb21) and Chryseobacterium (MYb328) were more abundant in host compared to substrate samples. Acinetobacter (MYb10, MYb158, MYb191/MYb177) belonged to the most widely abundant taxon across all samples and was, together with Sphingobacterium (MYb388), significantly enriched in control and substrate samples. In addition, Pseudomonas (MSPm1), Chryseobacterium (JUb44), and Sphingomonas (JUb134) showed higher abundances in controls in contrast to host samples (Fig. 2B; Fig. S4).
In summary, we found differences in diversity between samples obtained from hosts, substrate, and controls. The effect of time was most pronounced for microbial samples obtained from the host, and host samples diverged over time compared to controls. This suggests that specific microbial taxa were enriched in the host-associated community compared to substrate and control samples.

Stochasticity

We next assessed to what extent deterministic and stochastic processes have shaped the assembly of microbial communities across time points and the three sample types (host, the host-associated substrate, and the host-free controls). We first took Hubbell’s neutral model to investigate the effect of stochastic effects. In a previous study, we observed low neutrality for the microbial community assembly of C. elegans compared to other organisms (goodness-of-fit R2 = 0.44). Since the fit of the neutral model is based on the long-term equilibrium state, we hypothesized that the microbial community in the short-lived nematode might still be in a transient state on its way to a more neutral composition, thereby underestimating neutral effects (17). Therefore, in the current study, we characterized the microbial community dynamics over the considered time points of C. elegans lifetime and tested whether neutrality increases across time. Surprisingly, we found that the neutral expectation fitted the observed community abundance data very well (0.8 < R2 < 0.95) regardless of the sample source, indicating that the data can be explained by a neutral model (Fig. S10). Although we did not find a continuous increase in neutrality, the dispersal parameter m of the neutral model decreased over time and differed between sample sources (Fig. 3A). Lower values for the dispersal parameter at later times could indicate less mixing between samples, leading to more variance between communities. However, the neutral model analysis comes with the limitation that it is based on the presence and absence of taxa, while most samples of our study continuously contained nearly all of the CeMbio43 taxa and only their relative abundance varied. Because of this limitation, we further assessed the role of stochastic effects with the taxonomic normalized stochasticity index (tNST). The tNST quantifies the effect of deterministic (tNST<0.5) and stochastic effects (tNST >0.5) based on β-diversity. The tNST changed over time for all conditions, starting with higher values (tNST >0.5) followed by a decrease, most prominently for host samples (tNST <0.2 after 90 h), and a late increase observed only for host samples (tNST ≈ 0.4 after 186 h; Fig. 3C). In general, host samples showed significantly lower stochasticity values when compared to controls (bootstrapping test P < 0.05; Fig. 3B). Taken together, contrary to our original hypothesis, stochasticity rather decreases across time, even if there is a slight reversal at the late time points for the host samples. This suggests that non-stochastic processes may shape the composition of microbial communities in our experiment.
Fig 3
Three graphs illustrate the influence of stochastic effects on microbial community composition over time and across different environments.
Fig 3 Influence of stochastic effects on microbial community dynamics. (A) Best-fit values of the dispersal parameter m of the neutral model across time and the different sample types. (B and C) Taxonomic normalized stochasticity index across time and sample types. Red dashed line (tNST = 0.5) indicates the transition of the influence of stochastic (tNST > 0.5) to deterministic (tNST < 0.5) processes in community assembly. Significant differences in tNST were observed between sample types (B) and across specific adjacent time points (C).

Enrichment of host-specific functions

We identified many potential functional traits that differ between sample types. The microbial communities from C. elegans were significantly enriched for traits relevant to a host environment. In particular, our analyses of diversity and stochasticity already indicated deterministic effects on the microbiome assembly and differences in the dynamics between sample types (control, substrate, and host). Therefore, we wondered whether the non-stochastic effects are explained by selection of specific functions of the microbiome across time. To address this idea, we assessed the temporal changes in characteristics of the microbial community, as inferred from the microbiome abundance data in combination with the corresponding genome sequences and reconstructed metabolic models. We considered distinct types of microbiome characteristics (see Materials and Methods), including those defined by carbohydrate-active enzymes (i.e., cazyme in Fig. 4), metabolic exchange (i.e., exchange), microbiome-related gut functions (i.e., gut), pairwise interactions (i.e., interactions), growth media (i.e., medium), metabolic pathways (i.e., metabolism), adaptive strategies (i.e., universal adaptive strategy theory [uast]), and virulence factors (virulence). The predicted characteristics (presence/absence) were related to the microbial abundance data to obtain temporal information for each potential function and community.
Fig 4
A differential abundance analysis compares the functional capabilities of microbial communities, such as cazyme, exchange, gut, interactions medium, metabolism, UAST, and virulence, across three environments: control, host, and substrate.
Fig 4 Differentially abundant functions in host compared to substrate and control microbiome. Differential abundance was assessed by DESeq2 for different functional subsystems (along vertical axis) and different comparisons of the sample types (the two panels). For example, for the comparison “substrate vs host,” positive values (log2 fold change) indicate that the host-associated microbiome showed an increased presence of the functions of the respective subsystem, while negative values a comparative decrease of the functional subsystem in the host samples. No differentially abundant functions were found for substrate compared to control microbiome. The following subsystems were considered: cazyme, carboydrate-active enzymes; exchange, carbon/energy source and metabolic byproducts; gut, gut-microbiome gene clusters; interactions, prevalence of ecological interactions based on pairwise metabolic predictions; medium, growth medium components; metabolism, MetaCyc pathways; uast, life-history strategies; virulence, virulence and resistance genes.
Our analysis revealed that worm-associated microbial communities had the highest functional diversity, which increased over time (Fig. S11). Using DESeq2, we found significant trait differences for many comparisons between sample types (Fig. 4). In particular, we found glycoside hydrolases and glycosyl transferases to be differentially abundant between sample sources (Fig. S12). In addition, we inferred substrate uptake and metabolic products from metabolic models and discovered enriched capacity for tryptophan uptake and folate production in the host-associated microbiota (Fig. S13). Interestingly, gene clusters responsible for gut microbiota functions were almost exclusively increased in host samples. This result was driven by a raised abundance of genes encoding for short-chain fatty acid production, polyamine metabolism, and anaerobic energy metabolism (Fig. 5). We used the metabolic models to infer pairwise interactions between bacteria and found neutral interactions enriched in non-host samples (Fig. S14). In addition, we predicted the suitability of different growth media or nutrients from metabolic models. Compared to substrate and control samples, we found that host-enriched microbes could more often use sulfoquinovose and, to a lesser extent, N-acetylglucosamine and N-acetyl-neuraminate (Fig. S15). We further studied the presence of metabolic pathways as defined by MetaCyc (Fig. S16). Secondary metabolites degradation and carboxylate degradation were over-represented for host compared to substrate samples, whereas samples from substrates and controls showed higher levels of aromatic compound degradation (Table S11). We next assessed differential abundance of specific pathways known to be relevant for C. elegans. Here, vitamin B12 biosynthesis and salvage pathways were significantly more abundant in the host than in substrate samples (Fig. S20). Moreover, branched chain amino acid (BCAA) degradation pathways were enriched in the host compared to control samples (Fig. S21). In a previous study (13), we proposed to classify bacteria into competitors, stress tolerator, and ruderals, according to the universal adaptive strategy theory (47). We found an enrichment of competitive and mixed strategies in microbial samples from hosts and more stress-tolerance strategies in control and substrate samples (Fig. S17). We also explored the differential abundance of virulence genes. We identified adherence as more prevalent in substrate samples, and immune regulation, antimicrobial activity, and invasion increased for host samples (Fig. S18). Last, we checked two pathways relevant to host colonization and worm fitness as identified in our previous study (13). Consistent with our previous results, we found pyruvate fermentation to acetoin and hydroxyproline degradation almost exclusively to be differentially abundant in the host-associated microbiota (Fig. S19).
Fig 5
An enrichment analysis of gene clusters involved in gut host-microbe interactions. It compares control and host samples and substrate and host samples.
Fig 5 Enrichment of gut microbiome functions. Gene clusters were predicted by gutSMASH and combined with microbial abundance data. We found gut functions dominantly enriched in host samples. No differences were found for controls vs substrate. TPP, thiamine pyrophosphate; AA, amino acids; GR, glycyl radical amino acid metabolism; OD, oxidative decarboxylation; PFOR, pyruvate ferredoxin oxidoreductase; energy-converting ferredoxin, NAD+ reductase complex (Rnf).
For a more complete picture, we tracked the contribution of microbial species to the inferred functions. We summed up the species abundances and performed a regression analysis to account for the impact of low-abundant species on functional abundances. Although some taxa showed a more substantial contribution to some functions (as, for example, seen for the Enterobacteriaceae CEent1 and JUb66), we found that the enrichment of gut functions was supported by a larger variety of microbiota strains (Fig. 6; Fig. S22).
Fig 6
A table features the regression coefficients for all strains indicating the contribution to subsystems like cazyme, exchange, gut, medium, metabolism, UAST, and virulence factors.
Fig 6 Contribution of microbial taxa to functions. The attribution of individual taxa to predicted functions was determined by regression analysis. We used a penalized regression model to estimate how well the taxon abundances can predict functional abundances. For each taxon, all coefficients from regression models summarized by subsystem are shown in boxplots. The subsystem “interactions” is not shown because of low variance. Strain codes are as in Table 1; colors indicate different genera as in Fig. 1.

DISCUSSION

In our study, we analyzed the assembly of a newly defined and fully sequenced microbial community across a substantial part of the lifetime of C. elegans. Our study is one of very few studies to characterize microbial community dynamics in this nematode across time (12). We compared microbiome characteristics across six time points and a total of 186 h for three different sample types: host, the direct substrate environment of the hosts (substrate), and an environment without nematode hosts (controls). We found that time affected α-diversity only for substrate and host samples. The microbial composition of host vs control samples differed with time, indicating the relevance of host factors. Strains from the genera Ochrobactrum and Enterobacter were specifically enriched in host samples. We also found less influence of stochastic effects on microbial assembly across our sample types, most prominently in host samples, possibly suggesting deterministic processes shaping microbiome composition. Finally, we inferred changes in microbial functions from the fully sequenced genomes and community composition and identified several functions, which were previously described for host-microbe interactions, to be specifically enriched in the host-associated microbial communities. By combining microbial abundance data with ecological and metabolic predictions, we addressed the compositional and physiological dynamics of microbiome assembly across a substantial part of the lifetime of the host C. elegans.

Specific beneficial microbes increase in abundance in the host

In our previous study on the 12-member CeMbio community, we found Ochrobactrum (MYb71) and Stenotrophomonas (JUb19) more abundant in worms, while Acinetobacter (MYb10) and Sphingobacterium (BIGb0170) were enriched in lawns (19). The present study confirms a higher abundance of Ochrobactrum (MYb49/MYb71) in worms, and of Acinetobacter (MYb10, MYb191, MYb158) and Sphingobacterium (MYb388) in the host-free controls. In contrast to the earlier results, we now also found Enterobacter (CEent1) to be more abundant in worms but not Stenotrophomonas. The latter differences may be explained by the more diverse CeMbio43 community, the different C. elegans strain used, and/or the higher temperature of the present experiment (which was necessary to ensure worm sterility and thus unconstrained sampling of worms across its lifetime). Especially if other bacterial species of the same genus, as in the case of Sphingobacterium, followed the same enrichment pattern, the extended CeMbio community’s additional redundancy might help to identify the species or strains performing the same role or function. For the host-enriched Ochrobactrum, beneficial effects for C. elegans, such as ROS detoxification and increased growth, were reported before (20, 48). Host transcriptomics revealed that Ochrobactrum influences the nematode’s dietary response, development, fertility, immunity, and energy metabolism via GATA transcription factor (ELT-2) and C-type lectin-like genes and additional genes known to be involved in energy metabolism or fertility (49). In addition, Enterobacter bacteria showed consistently high prevalence in worms and provide protection against the pathogen Enterococcus faecalis (50, 51). The combination of known positive effects and the increased abundance of Ochrobactrum and Enterobacter in the nematode gut may suggest that C. elegans is able to favor presence of beneficial microbes. A dissection of the possible underlying molecular mechanisms warrants further research.
The nematode immune system possibly shapes the composition of the host-associated microbial communities. Indeed, a previous comparison of microbiome composition across a diverse set of natural C. elegans strains identified distinct microbiome types, most likely as a consequence of host filtering, and demonstrated a significant role of worm genetics (20). Interestingly, host filtering favored the presence of Ochrobactrum which was linked to the worm’s insulin-like signaling pathway (20). Although we did not find a specific Ochrobactrum-dominated microbiome type, Ochrobactrum was significantly more abundant in worms compared to controls or substrate samples (Fig. S4). Moreover, our analysis of microbiome-associated functions yielded a possible link between the presence of Ochrobactrum and host insulin signaling. Host samples with high Ochrobactrum abundance were significantly enriched for the microbiome-associated branched chain amino acid degradation pathways (Fig. S21), which were previously reported to contribute to insulin resistance (52), whereby a reduced catabolism of BCAA by the host was shown to increase the lifespan of C. elegans (53). If C. elegans may have a core microbiome is under debate (12, 54). In general, the precise definition and quantification of a core microbiome remain challenging (55). Therefore, Turnbaugh and colleagues argued that a core microbiome exists primarily on the level of shared metabolic functions (44). In our study, we introduced a microbiome community that is representative of the microbial diversity naturally encountered in C. elegans and that is close to what may be considered a core microbiome of this nematode. We still observed variation in microbiome composition across time and sample type. Importantly, we found the presence of host-relevant functions to be enriched in host samples and distributed across numerous microbial taxa (Fig. 6). This finding is consistent with the proposed importance of functions rather than specific taxa in defining the host-associated core microbiome (56).

C. elegans microbiome assembly dynamics are shaped by selective rather than stochastic processes

Stochastic processes have been reported to shape the assembly of microbial communities in diverse contexts and host systems (57). Previously, we used the neutral model to assess stochasticity in the microbiomes of several different hosts and found the lowest neutrality for the microbiome of C. elegans (17). Considering the short lifespan of the nematode, we previously hypothesized that the worm-associated community might be in a transient state that can appear non-neutral temporally. In the current study, we now observed a much higher level of neutrality, even though we considered a longer time-span, with very little change in neutrality over time. However, the α-diversity of samples showed differences only for evenness rather than richness (Fig. 2C; Fig. S6), indicating little variation in the general presence of taxa. This may have even been expected since we used a pre-selected community of microbes known to coexist with C. elegans in nature. Consequently, the classical neutral approach was limited because it is based on differences in presence-absence as a function of mean relative abundances, while our data set shows little variation in presence-absence of the bacteria but instead is rather shaped by changes in relative abundances.
As an alternative to the neutral model (58), we therefore employed a null model approach, which is less influenced by presence/absence of microbes and has shown higher accuracy and precision than the neutral model in certain cases (43). The null model analysis revealed a decrease in stochasticity for all environments initially, followed by increased stochasticity for later time points only for host samples. Initially, the observed stochasticity dynamics could be a consequence of the experimental setup for which abundances were arranged artificially and did not reflect ecological conditions. Therefore, an initial decrease in stochastic effects seems reasonable to establish the more natural strain abundances and may be further influenced by selective processes in the host. The later increase of stochasticity only for host samples is generally consistent with previous reports from other animal hosts (17) and most likely reflects the aging of C. elegans, in which the constant pumping of new material and grinder efficiency declines after around 100 h (59). Consequently, the host is likely to lose its ability to select the presence of microbes so that microbiome composition is more strongly influenced by stochastic processes. Such an age effect has also been reported for the human microbiome, where the microbial community composition becomes less diverse and more unique with aging (60, 61). Although stochasticity was highest for host samples at later time points, the overall stochasticity (i.e., summarized across time) of host-derived samples was significantly lower than that of control and substrate samples. Given the similar starting point of stochasticity for all environmental sources, we conclude that deterministic (i.e., selective) processes may play a particular role in shaping host-associated microbial communities, consistent with the previous demonstration of host genetic influence on microbiome composition in C. elegans (20).

Host-relevant traits become enriched in the C. elegans microbiome

We used our time-series abundance data in combination with the genome sequence-inferred metabolic characteristics to determine which microbial traits predominate in the different sample types. For the host samples, we found significantly higher abundance of many gene clusters and pathways that are known to be produced by anaerobic gut microbes and affect animal hosts (62). The presence of functions usually associated with anaerobic gut microbes further indicates the potential role of anaerobic niches in the gut of C. elegans (63). One example is the enriched production of short-chain fatty acids, which can have many beneficial effects in animals, including protection of C. elegans against neurodegeneration (64, 65). High levels of the microbial-derived short-chain fatty acid propionate can also have a toxic effect in C. elegans, and its degradation is linked to vitamin B12 whereby vitamin deficiency reroutes the fatty acid metabolism (66, 67). Our former study identified several members of the native microbiome of C. elegans to possess pathways for vitamin B12 biosynthesis (13). In agreement with these findings, we found the capacity for propionate production (by Enterobacteriaceae, Comamonas) and vitamin B12 production (by Ochrobactrum, Comamonas, Pseudomonas) in microbial samples from C. elegans enriched over time, indicating a vitamin-rich environment with B12-dependent host breakdown of propionate (67).
Another example is the higher production of polyamine spermidine and folate in the host-associated microbiome. Spermidine is known to extend the lifespan of C. elegans, and folate is an essential vitamin for this nematode, which affects germ cell proliferation and aging (6870) and thus fitness-associated characteristics. In addition, the host-derived microbial samples showed higher potential to degrade N-acetylglucosamine and N-acetyl-neuraminate used for the dense glycosidation of host mucins and thus provide a source for host selection of commensal bacteria (71). However, C. elegans’ glycans seem to lack N-acetylneuraminate (72). Nonetheless, C. elegans contains gangliosides (73) that could provide N-acetylglucosamine because gangliosides are glycosphingolipids that contain N-acetylglucosamine as terminal residue (74). Furthermore, we looked into microbial life histories. We encountered increased competitive strategies and competitive virulence traits in host samples (Fig. S17 and S18), which are in-line with studies emphasizing the dominance of competitive interactions in microbiomes in general (75). Finally, we confirmed pyruvate fermentation to acetoin and hydroxy-proline degradation for the host-associated microbiome, which we previously found to be associated with bacterial load and worm fitness and which could potentially be involved in worm attraction and skin microbiome interactions (13). Taken together, we identified several functions potentially critical for C. elegans physiology to be enriched in the worm. These findings may suggest that this nematode specifically selects bacteria providing these functions. It is an exciting area for future research to assess how exactly C. elegans is capable of selecting specific microbial taxa.

Conclusion

This work introduced an approach for studying changes in microbiota-mediated functions by combining microbial abundance data with genome-inferred traits. We employed metabolic modeling, pathway analysis, and ecological concepts to infer functions potentially relevant to the microbiome of C. elegans. Our time-series data of a defined microbial community revealed that the host microbiome is shaped by selective rather than stochastic processes. These selective processes appear to favor an enrichment of microbiome-mediated functions in C. elegans that are typical for gut microbiomes and that are likely beneficial for the nematode.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the Kaleta, Traulsen, and Schulenburg groups and also Alejandra Zárate-Potes, Alexandre Benedetto, Peter Deines, and Janna Wülbern for valuable advice on our project.
We are grateful for funding by the German Science Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG) within the Collaborative Research Center 1182 (Project-ID 261376515), projects A1.1 (to H.S.), A1.5 (C.K.), A4.1 (A.T.), A4.3 (H.S.), and INF (L.M.-S.). We further acknowledge financial support by the Max-Planck Society (institutional funding to A.T., fellowship to H.S.).

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

Supplemental material - mbio.00012-24-s0001.pdf
Extended material and methods, Figures S1-S22, and Tables S1-S12.
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

1.
McFall-Ngai M, Hadfield MG, Bosch TCG, Carey HV, Domazet-Lošo T, Douglas AE, Dubilier N, Eberl G, Fukami T, Gilbert SF, et al. 2013. Animals in a bacterial world, a new imperative for the life sciences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:3229–3236.
2.
Flint HJ, Karen PS, Sylvia HD, Petra L, Evelyne F. 2012. Microbial degradation of complex carbohydrates in the gut. Gut Microbes 3.
3.
van Ham R, Kamerbeek J, Palacios C, Rausell C, Abascal F, Bastolla U, Fernández JM, Jiménez L, Postigo M, Silva FJ, Tamames J, Viguera E, Latorre A, Valencia A, Morán F, Moya A. 2003. Reductive genome evolution in Buchnera aphidicola. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:581–586.
4.
Dominguez-Bello MG, Godoy-Vitorino F, Knight R, Blaser MJ. 2019. Role of the microbiome in human development. Gut 68:1108–1114.
5.
Muraille E. 2013. Redefining the immune system as a social interface for cooperative processes. PLoS Pathog 9:e1003203.
6.
Litvak Y, Mon KKZ, Nguyen H, Chanthavixay G, Liou M, Velazquez EM, Kutter L, Alcantara MA, Byndloss MX, Tiffany CR, Walker GT, Faber F, Zhu Y, Bronner DN, Byndloss AJ, Tsolis RM, Zhou H, Bäumler AJ. 2019. Commensal enterobacteriaceae protect against salmonella colonization through oxygen competition. Cell Host Microbe 25:128–139.
7.
Needham BD, Funabashi M, Adame MD, Wang Z, Boktor JC, Haney J, Wu W-L, Rabut C, Ladinsky MS, Hwang S-J, Guo Y, Zhu Q, Griffiths JA, Knight R, Bjorkman PJ, Shapiro MG, Geschwind DH, Holschneider DP, Fischbach MA, Mazmanian SK. 2022. A gut-derived metabolite alters brain activity and anxiety behaviour in mice. Nature 602:647–653.
8.
Burns AR, Stephens WZ, Stagaman K, Wong S, Rawls JF, Guillemin K, Bohannan BJ. 2016. Contribution of neutral processes to the assembly of gut microbial communities in the zebrafish over host development. ISME J 10:655–664.
9.
Mark Vellend. 2016. The theory of ecological communities. In Number 57 in monographs in population biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
10.
Nemergut DR, Schmidt SK, Fukami T, O’Neill SP, Bilinski TM, Stanish LF, Knelman JE, Darcy JL, Lynch RC, Wickey P, Ferrenberg S. 2013. Patterns and processes of microbial community assembly. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 77:342–356.
11.
Dirksen P, Marsh SA, Braker I, Heitland N, Wagner S, Nakad R, Mader S, Petersen C, Kowallik V, Rosenstiel P, Félix M-A, Schulenburg H. 2016. The native microbiome of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans: gateway to a new host-microbiome model. BMC Biol 14:38.
12.
Johnke J, Dirksen P, Schulenburg H. 2020. Community assembly of the native C. elegans microbiome is influenced by time, substrate and individual bacterial taxa. Environ Microbiol 22:1265–1279.
13.
Zimmermann J, Obeng N, Yang W, Pees B, Petersen C, Waschina S, Kissoyan KA, Aidley J, Hoeppner MP, Bunk B, Spröer C, Leippe M, Dierking K, Kaleta C, Schulenburg H. 2020. The functional repertoire contained within the native microbiota of the model nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. ISME J 14:26–38.
14.
Kissoyan KAB, Drechsler M, Stange E-L, Zimmermann J, Kaleta C, Bode HB, Dierking K. 2019. Natural C. elegans microbiota protects against infection via production of a cyclic lipopeptide of the viscosin group. Curr Biol 29:1030–1037.
15.
Kissoyan KAB, Peters L, Giez C, Michels J, Pees B, Hamerich IK, Schulenburg H, Dierking K. 2022. Exploring effects of C. elegans protective natural microbiota on host physiology. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 12:775728.
16.
Montalvo-Katz S, Huang H, Appel MD, Berg M, Shapira M. 2013. Association with soil bacteria enhances p38-dependent infection resistance in Caenorhabditis elegans. Infect Immun 81:514–520.
17.
Sieber M, Pita L, Weiland-Bräuer N, Dirksen P, Wang J, Mortzfeld B, Franzenburg S, Schmitz RA, Baines JF, Fraune S, Hentschel U, Schulenburg H, Bosch TCG, Traulsen A. 2019. Neutrality in the metaorganism. PLoS Biol 17:e3000298.
18.
Zimmermann J, Kaleta C, Waschina S. 2021. gapseq: informed prediction of bacterial metabolic pathways and reconstruction of accurate metabolic models. Genome Biol 22:81.
19.
Dirksen P, Adrien A, Johannes Z, Fan Z, Adina-Malin T, Sarah Arnaud M, Marie-Anne F, Michael S, Christoph K, Hinrich S, Buck SS. 2020. CeMbio - the Caenorhabditis elegans microbiome resource. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.
20.
Zhang F, Weckhorst JL, Assié A, Hosea C, Ayoub CA, Khodakova AS, Cabrera ML, Vidal Vilchis D, Félix M-A, Samuel BS. 2021. Natural genetic variation drives microbiome selection in the Caenorhabditis elegans gut. Curr Biol 31:2603–2618.
21.
Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477.
22.
Zimin AV, Marçais G, Puiu D, Roberts M, Salzberg SL, Yorke JA. 2013. The masurca genome assembler. Bioinformatics 29:2669–2677.
23.
Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. 2017. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005595.
24.
Torsten S. 2020. Shovill: assemble bacterial isolate genomes from Illumina paired-end reads. Github. https://github.com/tseemann/shovill.
25.
Souvorov A, Agarwala R, Lipman DJ. 2018. SKESA: strategic k-mer extension for scrupulous assemblies. Genome Biol 19:153.
26.
Mikheenko A, Prjibelski A, Saveliev V, Antipov D, Gurevich A. 2018. Versatile genome assembly evaluation with quast-lg. Bioinformatics 34:i142–i150.
27.
Caspi R, Billington R, Keseler IM, Kothari A, Krummenacker M, Midford PE, Ong WK, Paley S, Subhraveti P, Karp PD. 2020. The metacyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes - a 2019 update. Nucleic Acids Res 48:D445–D453.
28.
Sébastien L, Julie J, François H. 2008. FactoMineR: a package for multivariate analysis. J Stat Softw 25:1–18.
29.
Thorsten S. 2020. Abricate: mass screening of contigs for antimicrobial and virulence genes. Github. https://github.com/tseemann/abricate.
30.
Chen L, Zheng D, Liu B, Yang J, Jin Q. 2016. Vfdb 2016: hierarchical and refined dataset for big data analysis—10 years on. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D694–7.
31.
Carattoli A, Zankari E, García-Fernández A, Voldby Larsen M, Lund O, Villa L, Møller Aarestrup F, Hasman H. 2014. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:3895–3903.
32.
Zankari E, Hasman H, Cosentino S, Vestergaard M, Rasmussen S, Lund O, Aarestrup FM, Larsen MV. 2012. Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:2640–2644.
33.
Doster E, Lakin SM, Dean CJ, Wolfe C, Young JG, Boucher C, Belk KE, Noyes NR, Morley PS. 2020. MEGARes 2.0: a database for classification of antimicrobial drug, biocide and metal resistance determinants in metagenomic sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res 48:D561–D569.
34.
Pascal Andreu V, Roel-Touris J, Dodd D, Fischbach MA, Medema MH. 2021. The gutSMASH web server: automated identification of primary metabolic gene clusters from the gut microbiota. Nucleic Acids Res 49:W263–W270.
35.
Zhang H, Yohe T, Huang L, Entwistle S, Wu P, Yang Z, Busk PK, Xu Y, Yin Y. 2018. dbcan2: a meta server for automated carbohydrate-active enzyme annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 46:W95–W101.
36.
Bauer E, Zimmermann J, Baldini F, Thiele I, Kaleta C. 2017. Bacarena: individual-based metabolic modeling of heterogeneous microbes in complex communities. PLOS Comput Biol 13:e1005544.
37.
Straub D, Blackwell N, Langarica-Fuentes A, Peltzer A, Nahnsen S, Kleindienst S. 2020. Interpretations of environmental microbial community studies are biased by the selected 16S rRNA (gene) amplicon sequencing pipeline. Front Microbiol 11:550420.
38.
Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. 2016. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 13:581–583.
39.
McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. 2013. Phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One 8:e61217.
40.
Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. 2014. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-Seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15:550.
41.
Foster ZSL, Sharpton TJ, Grünwald NJ. 2017. Metacoder: an R package for visualization and manipulation of community taxonomic diversity data. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005404.
42.
Sloan WT, Lunn M, Woodcock S, Head IM, Nee S, Curtis TP. 2006. Quantifying the roles of immigration and chance in shaping prokaryote community structure. Environ Microbiol 8:732–740.
43.
Ning D, Deng Y, Tiedje JM, Zhou J. 2019. A general framework for quantitatively assessing ecological stochasticity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116:16892–16898.
44.
Turnbaugh PJ, Hamady M, Yatsunenko T, Cantarel BL, Duncan A, Ley RE, Sogin ML, Jones WJ, Roe BA, Affourtit JP, Egholm M, Henrissat B, Heath AC, Knight R, Gordon JI. 2009. A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins. Nature 457:480–484.
45.
Chaumeil P-A, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. 2022. GTDB-tk v2: memory friendly classification with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinformatics 38:5315–5316.
46.
Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD, von Haeseler A, Lanfear R. 2020. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol Biol Evol 37:1530–1534.
47.
Grime JP, Pierce S. 2012. The evolutionary strategies that shape ecosystems. In Wiley-Blackwell
48.
Tamburro A, Robuffo I, Heipieper HJ, Allocati N, Rotilio D, Di Ilio C, Favaloro B. 2004. Expression of glutathione s-transferase and peptide methionine sulphoxide reductase in Ochrobactrum anthropi is correlated to the production of reactive oxygen species caused by aromatic substrates. FEMS Microbiol Lett 241:151–156.
49.
Yang W, Petersen C, Pees B, Zimmermann J, Waschina S, Dirksen P, Rosenstiel P, Tholey A, Leippe M, Dierking K, Kaleta C, Schulenburg H. 2019. The inducible response of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans to members of its natural microbiota across development and adult life. Front Microbiol 10:1793.
50.
Berg M, Zhou XY, Shapira M. 2016. Host-specific functional significance of caenorhabditis gut commensals. Front Microbiol 7:1622.
51.
Shapira M. 2017. Host–microbiota interactions in Caenorhabditis elegans and their significance. Curr Opin Microbiol 38:142–147.
52.
Qin J, Li Y, Cai Z, Li S, Zhu J, Zhang F, Liang S, Zhang W, Guan Y, Shen D, et al. 2012. A Metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes. Nature 490:55–60.
53.
Mansfeld J, Urban N, Priebe S, Groth M, Frahm C, Hartmann N, Gebauer J, Ravichandran M, Dommaschk A, Schmeisser S, Kuhlow D, Monajembashi S, Bremer-Streck S, Hemmerich P, Kiehntopf M, Zamboni N, Englert C, Guthke R, Kaleta C, Platzer M, Sühnel J, Witte OW, Zarse K, Ristow M. 2015. Branched-chain amino acid catabolism is a conserved regulator of physiological ageing. Nat Commun 6:10043.
54.
Zhang F, Berg M, Dierking K, Félix M-A, Shapira M, Samuel BS, Schulenburg H. 2017. Caenorhabditis elegans as a model for microbiome research. Front Microbiol 8:485.
55.
Neu AT, Allen EE, Roy K. 2021. Defining and quantifying the core microbiome: challenges and prospects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 118:e2104429118.
56.
Doolittle WF, Inkpen SA. 2018. Processes and patterns of interaction as units of selection: an introduction to ITSNTS thinking. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:4006–4014.
57.
Zhou J, Ning D. 2017. Stochastic community assembly: does it matter in microbial ecology? Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 81:e00002-17.
58.
Gotelli NJ, McGill BJ. 2006. Null versus neutral models: what’s the difference? Ecography 29:793–800.
59.
Chow DK, Glenn CF, Johnston JL, Goldberg IG, Wolkow CA. 2006. Sarcopenia in the Caenorhabditis elegans pharynx correlates with muscle contraction rate over lifespan. Exp Gerontol 41:252–260.
60.
Jackson MA, Jeffery IB, Beaumont M, Bell JT, Clark AG, Ley RE, O’Toole PW, Spector TD, Steves CJ. 2016. Signatures of early frailty in the gut microbiota. Genome Med 8:8.
61.
Wilmanski T, Diener C, Rappaport N, Patwardhan S, Wiedrick J, Lapidus J, Earls JC, Zimmer A, Glusman G, Robinson M, Yurkovich JT, Kado DM, Cauley JA, Zmuda J, Lane NE, Magis AT, Lovejoy JC, Hood L, Gibbons SM, Orwoll ES, Price ND. 2021. Gut microbiome pattern reflects healthy ageing and predicts survival in humans. Nat Metab 3:274–286.
62.
Pascal Andreu V, Augustijn HE, Chen L, Zhernakova A, Fu J, Fischbach MA, Dodd D, Medema MH. 2023. gutSMASH predicts specialized primary metabolic pathways from the human gut microbiota. Nat Biotechnol 41:1416–1423.
63.
Backes C, Martinez-Martinez D, Cabreiro F. 2021. C. elegans: a biosensor for host–microbe interactions. Lab Anim (NY) 50:127–135.
64.
van der Hee B, Wells JM. 2021. Microbial regulation of host physiology by short-chain fatty acids. Trends Microbiol 29:700–712.
65.
Walker AC, Bhargava R, Vaziriyan-Sani AS, Pourciau C, Donahue ET, Dove AS, Gebhardt MJ, Ellward GL, Romeo T, Czyż DM. 2021. Colonization of the Caenorhabditis elegans gut with human enteric bacterial pathogens leads to proteostasis disruption that is rescued by butyrate. PLOS Pathog 17:e1009510.
66.
Watson E, MacNeil LT, Ritter AD, Yilmaz LS, Rosebrock AP, Caudy AA, Walhout AJM. 2014. Interspecies systems biology uncovers metabolites affecting C. elegans gene expression and life history traits. Cell 156:759–770.
67.
Watson E, Olin-Sandoval V, Hoy MJ, Li C-H, Louisse T, Yao V, Mori A, Holdorf AD, Troyanskaya OG, Ralser M, Walhout AJ. 2016. Metabolic network rewiring of propionate flux compensates vitamin B12 deficiency in C. elegans. Elife 5:e17670.
68.
Chaudhari SN, Mukherjee M, Vagasi AS, Bi G, Rahman MM, Nguyen CQ, Paul L, Selhub J, Kipreos ET. 2016. Bacterial folates provide an exogenous signal for C. elegans germline stem cell proliferation. Dev Cell 38:33–46.
69.
Eisenberg T, Knauer H, Schauer A, Büttner S, Ruckenstuhl C, Carmona-Gutierrez D, Ring J, Schroeder S, Magnes C, Antonacci L, et al. 2009. Induction of autophagy by spermidine promotes longevity. Nat Cell Biol 11:1305–1314.
70.
Virk B, Jia J, Maynard CA, Raimundo A, Lefebvre J, Richards SA, Chetina N, Liang Y, Helliwell N, Cipinska M, Weinkove D. 2016. Folate acts in E. coli to accelerate C. elegans aging independently of bacterial biosynthesis. Cell Rep 14:1611–1620.
71.
Hansson GC. 2020. Mucins and the microbiome. Annu Rev Biochem 89:769–793.
72.
Bacic A, Kahane I, Zuckerman BM. 1990. Panagrellus redivivus and Caenorhabditis elegans: evidence for the absence of sialic acids. Experimental Parasitology 71:483–488.
73.
Cutler RG, Thompson KW, Camandola S, Mack KT, Mattson MP. 2014. Sphingolipid metabolism regulates development and lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mech Ageing Dev 143–144:9–18.
74.
Ronald LS. 2019. The biology of gangliosides, Sialic acids, part II: biological and biomedical aspects. In David C Baker (ed), Of advances in carbohydrate chemistry and biochemistry. Vol. volume 76. Academic Press.
75.
Palmer JD, Foster KR. 2022. Bacterial species rarely work together. Science 376:581–582.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image mBio
mBio
Volume 15Number 58 May 2024
eLocator: e00012-24
Editor: Colleen M. Cavanaugh, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
PubMed: 38634692

History

Received: 2 January 2024
Accepted: 22 March 2024
Published online: 18 April 2024

Keywords

  1. microbiome
  2. systems biology
  3. microbial communities
  4. microbial ecology
  5. Caenorhabditis elegans
  6. community dynamics
  7. functional ecology

Data Availability

The raw data from genome sequencing and 16S amplicon sequencing are available at PRJNA743218. The source to reproduce figures and results can be found at Github (https://github.com/jotech/cembio-dynamics).

Contributors

Authors

Research Group Evolutionary Ecology and Genetics, Zoological Institute, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
Max Planck Fellow Group Antibiotic Resistance Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Ploen, Germany
Research Group Medical Systems Biology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
Agnes Piecyk
Research Group Evolutionary Ecology and Genetics, Zoological Institute, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
Michael Sieber
Department for Evolutionary Theory, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Ploen, Germany
Carola Petersen
Research Group Evolutionary Ecology and Genetics, Zoological Institute, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
Julia Johnke
Research Group Evolutionary Ecology and Genetics, Zoological Institute, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
Lucas Moitinho-Silva
5Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts University, Kiel, Germany
Sven Künzel
Department of Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Ploen, Germany
Lena Bluhm
Research Group Evolutionary Ecology and Genetics, Zoological Institute, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
Arne Traulsen
Department for Evolutionary Theory, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Ploen, Germany
Research Group Medical Systems Biology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
Research Group Evolutionary Ecology and Genetics, Zoological Institute, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
Max Planck Fellow Group Antibiotic Resistance Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Ploen, Germany

Editor

Colleen M. Cavanaugh
Editor
Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

Notes

Johannes Zimmermann and Agnes Piecyk contributed equally to this article. Author order was determined by Hinrich Schulenburg.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note:

  • For recently published articles, the TOTAL download count will appear as zero until a new month starts.
  • There is a 3- to 4-day delay in article usage, so article usage will not appear immediately after publication.
  • Citation counts come from the Crossref Cited by service.

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. For an editable text file, please select Medlars format which will download as a .txt file. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share the article link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share on social media

American Society for Microbiology ("ASM") is committed to maintaining your confidence and trust with respect to the information we collect from you on websites owned and operated by ASM ("ASM Web Sites") and other sources. This Privacy Policy sets forth the information we collect about you, how we use this information and the choices you have about how we use such information.
FIND OUT MORE about the privacy policy