22 December 2020

ACE2 Receptor Expression and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Infection Depend on Differentiation of Human Airway Epithelia

ABSTRACT

Studiesof patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) demonstratethat the respiratory tract is a major site of SARS-coronavirus (CoV)infection and disease morbidity. We studied host-pathogen interactionsusing native lung tissue and a model of well-differentiated cultures ofprimary human airway epithelia. Angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2),the receptor for both the SARS-CoV and the related human respiratorycoronavirus NL63, was expressed in human airway epithelia as well aslung parenchyma. As assessed by immunofluorescence staining andmembrane biotinylation, ACE2 protein was more abundantly expressed onthe apical than the basolateral surface of polarized airway epithelia.Interestingly, ACE2 expression positively correlated with thedifferentiation state of epithelia. Undifferentiated cells expressinglittle ACE2 were poorly infected with SARS-CoV, whilewell-differentiated cells expressing more ACE2 were readily infected.Expression of ACE2 in poorly differentiated epithelia facilitated SARSspike (S) protein-pseudotyped virus entry. Consistent with theexpression pattern of ACE2, the entry of SARS-CoV or a lentiviruspseudotyped with SARS-CoV S protein in differentiated epithelia wasmore efficient when applied to the apical surface. Furthermore,SARS-CoV replicated in polarized epithelia and preferentially exitedvia the apical surface. The results indicate that infection of humanairway epithelia by SARS coronavirus correlates with the state of celldifferentiation and ACE2 expression and localization. These findingshave implications for understanding disease pathogenesis associatedwith SARS-CoV and NL63infections.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) emerged as a regional andglobal health threat in 2002-2003, resulting in approximately800 deaths (5). Anintense, cooperative worldwide effort rapidly led to the identificationof the disease-causing agent as a novel SARS coronavirus (CoV)(18,32) and the subsequentcomplete sequencing of the viral genome(24,37). The SARS-CoV genomeencodes 14 putative open reading frames encoding 28 potential proteins,and the functions of many of these proteins are notknown. While the incidence of new cases of SARS waned in2003-2004, many aspects of SARS disease pathogenesis andhost-pathogen interactions remain unsolved.
Limited humanpathological studies demonstrate that the respiratory tract is a majorsite of SARS-CoV infection and morbidity(8,30). Two previouslyrecognized human coronaviruses (HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-229E) cause∼30% of upper respiratory tract infections(14,28), and, recently, twoadditional human coronaviruses, HCoV-NL63(42) and HKU1(46), were identified inassociation with bronchiolitis and pneumonia, respectively.Epidemiologic data suggest that infection with NL63 is common, as mostadults have neutralizing antibodies to the virus(12). Limited studies ofthese other human coronaviruses indicate that they infect respiratoryepithelia (2,4,44). Little isknown regarding the initial steps of SARS-CoV interaction with the hostcells in the respiratory tract, such as the cell types in which primaryviral infection and replication occur. Viral RNA has been localized tocells of the conducting airways and alveoli by in situ hybridization inSARS postmortem samples(40). Experimentalevidence in several animal models, including nonhuman primates(7,19,27,38), mice(9,13), ferrets(25), and Syrian hamsters(34) indicates thatdirect application of SARS-CoV to the respiratory tract results inpulmonary infection. Furthermore, epidemiologic analysis of a TorontoSARS outbreak supports the hypothesis that the virus is transmitted byrespiratory droplets(49). Thus, it appearslikely that interactions between SARS-CoV and respiratory epitheliaplay an important role in the genesis of SARS.
The cellularreceptors mediating binding and entry have been identified for somecoronaviruses associated with human disease. HCoV-229E uses CD13 as areceptor (48). Thecellular receptors for HCoV-OC43 and HKU1 are currently unknown.Recently, angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) was identified as areceptor for both SARS-CoV(21) and NL63(12). ACE2 is amembrane-associated aminopeptidase expressed in vascular endothelia,renal and cardiovascular tissue, and epithelia of the small intestineand testes (6,10,11). A region of theextracellular portion of ACE2 that includes the first α-helixand lysine 353 and proximal residues of the N terminus ofβ-sheet 5 interacts with high affinity to the receptor bindingdomain of the SARS-CoV S glycoprotein(22).
Severalunanswered questions remain regarding ACE2 expression in humanrespiratory epithelia and its role as a receptor for SARS-CoV. Theseinclude the identification of the specific epithelial cell typesexpressing ACE2, the polarity of ACE2 expression, and whether SARS-CoVinfection of respiratory epithelia is ACE2-dependent. Here weinvestigate interactions between SARS-CoV and human airway epitheliausing native tissue and a primary culture model of polarized,well-differentiated tracheal and bronchial epithelia. Our findingsindicate that the state of cell differentiation and ACE2 expressionlevels are both important determinants of the susceptibility of humanairway epithelia to infection.

MATERIALSAND METHODS

Epithelial cellculture.

Primary culturesof human airway epithelia were prepared from trachea or bronchi cellsand grown at the air-liquid interface (ALI) on collagen-coated porousfilters as described previously(17). In selectexperiments, the apical surface of primary cells was submerged under500 μl of cell culture medium for 7 days to inducededifferentiation or grown in nonpolarized fashion on tissue cultureplastic. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board atthe University of Iowa. A549 cells (ATCC CCL-185) were maintained inDulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/F12 (Gibco) containing10% fetal bovine serum, penicillin (100 U/ml), and streptomycin (100mg/ml).

Immunoblot analysis.

Cells or tissues were lysed in 0.1%Triton X-100 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and total protein wasseparated on a sodium dodecyl sulfate-7.5% polyacrylamide gelelectrophoresis gel and transferred to polyvinylidenedifluoride membrane. Goat anti-ACE2 polyclonal primaryantibody (catalog no. AF933, R & D Systems,Minneapolis, MN), horseradish peroxidase-conjugated donkey anti-goatsecondary antibody, mouse anti-foxj1 monoclonal primary antibody (giftof S. Brody, Washington University), and a horseradishperoxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibody were used.Primary antibody binding was visualized using SuperSignalchemiluminescent substrate (Pierce, Rockford,IL).

Immunofluorescencestaining.

Airway epitheliawere fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 5 min at room temperature andwashed with PBS. Five percent bovine serum albumin in PBS was used toblock nonspecific antibody binding. An anti-ACE2 monoclonal antibody(MAB933; R & D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) was applied to cells (bothapical and basolateral surfaces for air-liquid interface-culturedcells). Epithelia were then incubated at 37°C for 1 hand again washed with PBS. Rabbit anti-mouse fluoresceinisothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibody (F-4143;Sigma, St. Louis, MO) was added to cells and incubated at 4°Covernight. Cells were then washed with PBS, and a Cy3-labeled mouseanti-β-tubulin IV monoclonal antibody (C-4585; Sigma) wasadded. Cells were incubated at 37°C for 1 h, followedby PBS washes, and then mounted with DAPI(4′,6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole) VectaShield (VectorLabs, Burlingame, CA). Nuclei were stained with To-pro-3 (T3605; Sigma,St. Louis, MO). The SARS-CoV nsp1 protein was localized in cells fixedwith 100% methanol using a rabbit polyclonal anti-nsp1 primary antibody(gift of M. Denison) (33)and a mouse anti-rabbit fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated secondaryantibody (catalog no. A11088, Molecular Probes, Eugene,OR).

Surface biotinylation.

The apical or basolateral surfaces ofairway epithelia were treated with 1 mg/mlN-hydroxysulfosuccinimidobiotin (Pierce, Rockford, IL) in PBSfor 30 min at 25°C. The epithelial surface was washed and thenincubated with 100 mM glycine in PBS for 20 min at 25°C toquench unreacted biotin. Epithelial protein lysates were prepared bysonication in lysis buffer, and biotinylated proteins were precipitatedusing neutravidin covalently linked to immobilized diaminodipropylamine(Pierce). Biotinylated proteins were released in 8% sodium dodecylsulfate-containing loading buffer, boiled, and analyzed byimmunoblotting for ACE2. ErB2 was detected as a control basolateralmembrane marker (43)using rabbit polyclonal anti-c-erbB2 antibody (Dako Corporation,Carpinteria, CA).

Scanning electronmicroscopy (SEM).

Epitheliawere fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in Na cacodylate buffer for 30 minand rinsed with 0.1 M Na cacodylate buffer three times. Samples werepostfixed in 1% OsO4 for 1 h and sequentiallyrinsed with 0.1 M Na cacodylate buffer and H2O. Samples werethen serially dehydrated using 25% to 100% ethanol. Aftercritical-point drying, samples were mounted on stubs, sputter coated,and examined using a Hitachi F-4000 electronmicroscope.

Real-time reversetranscription-PCR mRNA analysis.

Total cellular RNA was isolated usingTRI-Reagent (MRC, Cincinnati, OH) or a commercial spin column isolationkit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA), and 1 μg was reversetranscribed using a reverse transcription (RT)-PCR kit (Ambion, Austin,TX). An aliquot of cDNA was subjected to PCR using an iCycler iQfluorescence thermocycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) with SYBR green I DNAdye (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) and Platinum Taq DNApolymerase (iQ SYBR green Supermix kit, Bio-Rad). PCR conditionsincluded denaturation at 95°C for 3 min and then for 35 cyclesof 94°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30 s,and 72°C for 30 s, followed by 5 min at 72°Cfor elongation. The following primers were used: (i) human ACE2 forward5′-GGACCCAGGAAATGTTCAGA-3′ andreverse5′-GGCTGCAGAAAGTGACATGA-3′,(ii) SARS-CoV N gene forward/leader5′-ATATTAGGTTTTTACCCAGG-3′and reverse5′-CTTGCCCCATTGCGTCCTCC-3′, (iii)SARS-CoV S gene forward/leader5′-ATATTAGGTTTTTACCCAGG-3′ andreverse5′-CTCCTGAGGGAACAACCCTG-3′, and(iv) human hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) forward5′-CCTCATGGACTGATTATGGAC-3′and reverse5′-CAGATTCAACTTGCGCTCATC-3′.Fluorescence data was captured during the 10-s dwell to ensure thatprimer dimers were not contributing to the fluorescence signal, andspecificity of the amplification was confirmed using melting curveanalysis. Data was collected and recorded by iCycler iQ software(Bio-Rad) and initially determined as a function of threshold cycle(CT). Levels of mRNA were expressed relative tocontrol HPRT levels, which were calculated as2ΔCT. In some samples, PCR products were visualized on 2% agarose gels withethidium bromide.

Adenoviralvectors.

E1-deleted replicationincompetent adenoviral vectors expressing human ACE2, Escherichiacoli β-galactosidase, and foxj1 under the control of thecytomegalovirus promoter were produced as previouslydescribed(1).

Preparationof SARS S protein-pseudotyped lentivirus and infection of airwayepithelia.

The SARS-CoV Sprotein cDNA (Urbani strain “S-H2,” as describedreference 21) was used topseudotype feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) expressing anuclear-targeted β-galactosidase by using previously describedmethods (45).The virus was concentrated 250-fold by centrifugation, andtiters were determined on HT1080 cells, obtaining titers of ∼2×105 to 4 × 106transducing units/ml. Well-differentiated human airway epithelia weretransduced with the pseudotyped FIV by applying 100 μl ofsolution to the apical surface of airway epithelia. After 1 hof incubation at 37°C, virus was removed and cells wereincubated at 37°C for 2 days. To infect epithelia from thebasolateral side, the Millicell insert was turned over, and virus wasapplied to the basolateral surface for 1 h in100 μl of medium. Following the 1-h infection,virus was removed and the insert was turned upright and incubated at37°C in 5% CO2 for 2days.

β-Galactosidase activityassays.

The Galacto-Lightchemiluminescent reporter assay (Tropix, Bedford, MA) was used toquantify β-galactosidase activity following the manufacturer'sprotocol. Relative light units were quantified using a luminometer(Monolight 3010; Pharmingen, San Diego, CA) and standardized to totalprotein in the sample.

Preparation ofwild-type SARS-CoV and infection of airway epithelia.

SARS-CoV (Urbani strain) was producedin Vero E6 cells under BSL3 containment conditions. Virus titers weredetermined on Vero E6 cells with typical yields of ∼4 ×106 PFU/ml. Epithelia derived from three donors wereinfected in duplicate with SARS-CoV from the apical surface(multiplicity of infection [MOI], 0.8). Following a 30-min incubationat 37°C, virus was removed and 10 washes with PBS wereperformed. A sample was collected by adding and removing500 μl of medium from the apical side of oneepithelium from each donor. A total of 500 μl of medium wasadded to the basolateral side of the remaining epithelia, and24 h later, samples were collected for titerdeterminations.

RESULTS

ACE2expression in human airway epithelia.

ACE2 serves as the SARS-CoV receptor,at least for tissue culture cell entry(21). To determine ifACE2 is also the SARS-CoV receptor in the respiratory tract, we firstlooked for evidence of ACE2 protein expression in human lung tissue byWestern blotting. An immunoreactive band consistent with theglycosylated form of ACE2 was identified in lysates from human airwayand distal lung tissue (Fig.1A). However, the cell type expressing ACE2 could not be identified in thisexperiment, as both endothelial and epithelial cells can express ACE2.Accordingly, we next evaluated ACE2 protein expression inwell-differentiated primary cultures of airway epithelia usingimmunohistochemistry and observed airway epithelial cell expression,with the most abundant signal for ACE2 on the apical rather than thebasolateral surface(Fig. 1B).Furthermore, the signal intensity was strongest on ciliated cells, asdemonstrated by colocalization with the β-tubulin IV marker ofcilia (23), suggestingthat ciliated cells express ACE2 abundantly. To confirm a polardistribution of ACE2 in differentiated epithelia, selective apical orbasolateral surface biotinylation with subsequent precipitation wasperformed (Fig. 1C).Immunoblot analysis of precipitated proteins confirmed that ACE2 isexpressed in greater abundance on the apical surface of conductingairway epithelia, although in some experiments a weak ACE2 signal wasalso detected basolaterally. In contrast, ErbB2, the receptor forheregulin-alpha, was more abundant on the basolateral surface aspreviously reported (43),confirming selective biotinylation.
Results from polarizedepithelia suggested that ACE2 expression might depend on the state ofcellular differentiation. To validate a model to test this hypothesis,we used SEM to compare the apical surface morphology ofwell-differentiated epithelia with that of well-differentiated cellssubsequently grown with medium present on their apical surfaces for 7days. Of note, submersion of the apical surfaces of primary cellscaused loss of cilia (Fig.2A). Loss of this important marker of cell differentiationwith resubmersion was associated with markedly diminished expression ofACE2 mRNA and protein (Fig. 2B andC). In contrast to results in polarized epithelia, poorlydifferentiated primary human tracheobronchial epithelia (hTBE) or A549cells grown on tissue culture plastic expressed little ACE2 mRNA orprotein. Interestingly, foxj1, a transcription factor required for awell-differentiated ciliated epithelia phenotype(3) was also coordinatelyexpressed with ACE2, indicating that ACE2 positively correlates withthe state of epithelial differentiation. We also asked whether foxj1might directly regulate ACE2 expression in airway epithelia. Primarytracheobronchial cells grown in submersion culture were transduced withan adenoviral vector expressing ACE2, a negative-controlβ-galactosidase, or foxj1. Only transduction with the ACE2vector conferred ACE2 expression, suggesting that foxj1 expressionalone does not regulate ACE2 (Fig.2D and data notshown).

SARS-CoV infection of human airwayepithelia.

To evaluate thepolarity of entry of the SARS-CoV in airway epithelia, we prepared FIVvirions pseudotyped with SARS S protein. The ACE2 dependence oftransduction with SARS S protein-pseudotyped FIV virions was firstevaluated on 293 cells with or without cotransfection with human ACE2cDNA. We observed that 293 cell transduction with this vector wasalmost completely ACE2-dependent (Fig.3A). To establish the ACE2 dependence of human airwayepithelia for SARS-CoV, we transduced poorly differentiated A549 cellsand submerged primary hTBE cells that do not express constitutive ACE2with increasing amounts of an adenoviral vector expressing human ACE2.After 48 h, SARS-CoV S protein-pseudotyped-FIV was applied tothe apical surface at an MOI of 0.1 (based on HT1080 titers). There wasan inoculum-dependent increase in the transduction of cells thatexpressed ACE2 (Fig. 3B).S protein-pseudotyped FIV was then used to contrast the efficiency ofentry in A549 cells, poorly differentiated (submerged) human airwayepithelia, and well-differentiated (ALI) epithelia. Onlywell-differentiated epithelial cells showed significantβ-galactosidase expression following transduction (Fig.3C). We next applied thepseudotyped virus to the apical or basolateral surfaces ofwell-differentiated primary cultures of human airway epithelia toinvestigate whether the virus preferentially entered from one cellsurface. After 2 days, the cells were harvested and entry was evaluatedby β-galactosidase activity. Transduction of human airwayepithelia by the S protein-pseudotyped virions occurred moreefficiently when applied from the apical rather than the basolateralsurface(Fig. 3D).This pattern of entry correlates with ACE2 expression on polarizedcells (Fig. 1). Incontrast, FIV pseudotyped with the vesicular stomatitisvirus-G envelope entered polarized cells better from thebasolateral surface.
We went on to perform select experimentsusing wild-type SARS-CoV (Urbani strain). Using protocols similar tothose outlined for Fig. 3,we evaluated the ability of SARS-CoV to infect multiple human airwayepithelial cell culture models. Under BSL3 containment, we applied thevirus to A549 cells, poorly differentiated (submerged) primary culturesof airway epithelia, or well-differentiated (ALI) human airwayepithelia at an MOI of 0.8. A549 and hTBE cells cultured undersubmerged conditions expressed little detectable SARS-CoV N or S genemRNA after infection (Fig.4A). In contrast, in well-differentiated cells infected with SARS-CoV fromthe apical surface, the N and S gene mRNAs were detected at highlevels. We confirmed that the gene products detected in real-timeRT-PCR assays were generated from new SARS-CoV mRNA templates ratherthan viral genome by verifying the appropriate size of the amplifiedproducts (Fig. 4B). Theprimers used included a forward primer in the conserved SARS CoV5′ leader sequence and gene-specific reverse primers. Theseresults suggest that SARS-CoV infects undifferentiated human airwayepithelial cells poorly or not at all, while well-differentiated airwayepithelia are susceptible.
To document that SARS-CoVproductively infects human airway epithelia, we applied the virus tothe apical surface of well-differentiated human airway epithelia at anMOI of ∼0.8 for 30 min and then measured therelease of virus 24 h later. As shown in Table1, these results indicate that, following apical application of SARS-CoV,a productive infection occurred and virus was preferentially releasedapically. We confirmed SARS-CoV infection of polarized epithelia byimmunostaining cells for the SARS-CoV nsp1 protein 24 hfollowing infection. Confocal microscopy revealed viral nsp1 protein inthe cytoplasm, consistent with replication complexes, following apicalapplication of the virus(Fig. 4C).Control, noninfected cells showed no staining. The infection ofpermissive Vero E6 cells showed intense cytoplasmic staining only inthe presence of SARS-CoV infection (data not shown). To better definethe cell types infected by SARS-CoV in this model, we colocalized thensp1 and β-tubulin IV proteins (Fig.4D). Nsp1 staining wasobserved in perinuclear regions and distributed throughout thecytoplasm. In addition, we observed some areas of colocalization ofnsp1 and β-tubulin IV, suggesting that replication complexesmay assemble in the cytoplasm near or within cilia. These findingsindicate that ciliated cells are the predominant cell type infected bySARS-CoV in well-differentiated airwayepithelia.

DISCUSSION

We report thenovel observation that SARS-CoV infection of human airway epithelia isdependent upon the state of epithelial differentiation and ACE2 mRNAand protein expression. ACE2 is more abundantly expressed on the apicalsurface of polarized epithelia, and we show for the first time thatwell-differentiated cells support viral replication with viral entryand egress occurring primarily from the apical surface. Thus, SARS-CoVpreferentially infects well-differentiated ciliated epithelial cellsexpressing ACE2. Since ACE2 is also the receptor for the coronavirusNL63 (12), these findingsare relevant to the biology of infection with this more common humanpathogen.
ACE2 expression in human tissues correlates with knownsites of infection, including lung and intestine(6,10,11). ACE2 is anectoenzyme that converts angiotensin II to angiotensin (1-7)(41), but its physiologicrole in the airways is currently unknown. The predominant apicaldistribution of ACE2 suggests that the enzyme may be available tocleave peptides at the mucosal surface of the airway, but the nativesubstrates in the lung have not yet beenidentified.
Epidemiologic data indicate that SARS-CoV is spreadby respiratory droplets and contact(49). While such findingssuggest that the virus enters the host through the mucosa of therespiratory tract and the eyes, many details of the initial steps ofrespiratory cell infection by SARS-CoV in humans are poorly understood.Limited human pathology data, primarily autopsy studies from SARSpatients with severe disease and secondary complications, includingrespiratory failure, indicate the presence of virus in both proximaland distal pulmonary epithelia(40). Most data fromhuman respiratory tissue from SARS patients was obtained two or moreweeks following disease onset(8,15,20,40). Lung tissue fromsuch patients exhibits changes of diffuse alveolar damage, desquamatedepithelial cells, type II cell hyperplasia, fibrin and collagendeposits in the alveolar space, increased mononuclear infiltrates inthe interstitium, and, in some cases, the presence of multinucleatedsyncytial cells. Such changes reflect the combined effects of primaryinfection, host immune responses, and therapeuticinterventions.
Human ACE2 appears necessary and sufficient toserve as a receptor for SARS-CoV(21). While bothdendritic-cell-specific ICAM3-grabbing nonintegrin (DC-SIGN; CD209) andDC-SIGNR (L-SIGN, CD209L) can enhance SARS-CoV infection ofACE2 expressing cells, these proteins are not sufficient to supportinfection in the absence of ACE2(16,26,47). Several recentreports using SARS-CoV or retroviral vectors pseudotyped with SARS Sprotein (31,39,47)(29) indicated that humanairway epithelial cell lines were poorly transduced, an unexpectedfinding that raised questions regarding the ability of respiratoryepithelia to support SARS-CoV infection. The present studies helpexplain these results. Since SARS-CoV infection of airway epithelia isACE2-dependent, and ACE2 expression is greatest in well-differentiatedcells, the low transduction efficiencies of nonpolarized, poorlydifferentiated cells are not unanticipated.
Our findings suggestthat the epithelium of the conducting airways, the major site ofrespiratory droplet deposition, supports the replication of SARS-CoV.The observation that ACE2 complementation of poorly differentiatedepithelia enhanced transduction with S protein-pseudotyped virions in adose-dependent manner further supports its role as a receptor. In thesetting of a productive infection of conducting airway epithelia, theapically released SARS-CoV might be removed by mucociliary clearanceand gain access to the gastrointestinal tract. SARS-CoV infects cellsin the gastrointestinal tract, and diarrhea is a clinical sign commonlyobserved in patients with SARS(5). Furthermore, thepreferential apical exit pathway of virions would favor the spread ofinfection along the respiratory tract. While not a focus of this study,pathological data indicate that SARS-CoV infects type II pneumocytes(40). The infection andrelease of virus in this compartment with its close proximity to thepulmonary capillary bed might allow systemic spread of virus to distantorgans, especially in the context of inflammation and alveolarcapillary leak. This pattern of apical infection and release of virusin polarized epithelia is reminiscent of transmissible porcinegastroenteritis virus(36) and HCoV-229E(44). In contrast, mousehepatitis virus-A59 enters polarized cells from the apical surfaces andexits from the basolateral side(35).
Insummary, studies in models of human airway epithelial differentiationand polarity reveal that SARS-CoV infects well-differentiated cellsfrom the apical surface and preferentially exits from the apical side.These findings should also apply to the entry of NL63 in human airwayepithelia. ACE2 expression in airway epithelia appears to be bothnecessary and sufficient for SARS-CoV infection. Airwayepithelial expression of ACE2 is dynamic and associated with cellulardifferentiation, a finding that may underlie susceptibility toinfection. The apical expression of ACE2 on epithelia indicates thatthis coronavirus receptor is accessible for topical application ofreceptor antagonists or inhibitors. To date, the factors regulatingACE2 expression have not been identified. Future studies of the ACE2promoter and gene expression associated with cell differentiation mayreveal regulators of ACE2 expression and subsequent SARS-CoV and NL63susceptibility.
FIG. 1.
FIG. 1. ACE2is expressed on human airway epithelia. (A) ACE2 protein levels weredetermined using immunoblot analysis of extracts from human airway andalveolar tissue. The control is recombinant ACE2 released into thesupernatant from A549 cells infected with an adenoviral vectorexpressing human ACE2. The positions of ACE2 and α-tubulin areindicated by arrows. MW, molecular weight in thousands. (B)ACE2 protein location in polarized human airway epithelia wasdetermined using immunofluorescence staining for ACE2 (green),β-tubulin IV (red), and nuclear DAPI (blue). Confocalfluorescence photomicroscopic images are presented en face (top) andfrom vertical sections (bottom). Colocalization is shown by yellow inthe merged images. Bar, 10 μm. (C) ACE2 protein location inpolarized human airway epithelia was determined by selective apical orbasolateral biotinylation, immunoprecipitation of biotinylated surfaceproteins, and immunoblot analysis for ACE2 or control basolateralerbB2. MW, molecular weight in thousands. The positions of ACE2 anderbB2 are indicated byarrows.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2. ACE2 expression is associated with airway epithelial cell differentiation. (A) Ciliated epithelial cell differentiation in cultures of primary airway epithelial cells under air-liquid interface or resubmerged conditions was verified by SEM of the apical epithelial surface. Bar, 10 μm. (B) ACE2 mRNA levels were determined using real-time RT-PCR analysis of samples from A549 cells or primary hTBE cells cultured under undifferentiating submerged (Sub), differentiating ALI, or resubmerged (Resub) conditions. Values are expressed as mean mRNA levels relative to control HPRT mRNA levels plus or minus standard deviations (SD) (n = 3), and the asterisk indicates a significant difference in mRNA levels between air-liquid interface and resubmerged conditions. (C) ACE2 protein levels were determined using immunoblot analysis of extracts from A549 or primary hTBE cells. The positions of ACE2, foxj1 (to verify epithelial cell differentiation status), and β-actin are indicated by arrows. MW, molecular weight in thousands. (D) ACE2 protein levels were determined using immunoblot analysis of extracts from hTBE cells under submerged conditions that were infected with a recombinant adenoviral vector that expressed ACE2, control transgene (β-galactosidase), or foxj1. MW, molecular weight in thousands.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3. SARS-CoV S protein-pseudotyped FIV infects differentiated airway epithelia best from the apical surface. (A) β-galactosidase levels were determined by enzyme activity in 293 cells transfected with a plasmid expressing control (Ctl) transgene or human ACE2 and then infected with SARS-S protein-pseudotyped FIV expressing β-galactosidase. ND, not detected. (B) β-galactosidase levels were determined in A549 cells (black bars) or primary hTBE cultured under submerged conditions (white bars) that were first infected with an adenoviral vector expressing ACE2 at the indicated MOI and then infected with SARS-S protein-pseudotyped FIV expressing β-galactosidase. (C) β-Galactosidase levels determined in extracts from A549 cells or primary hTBE cultured under submerged or ALI conditions that were infected from the apical surface with SARS-S protein-pseudotyped FIV expressing β-galactosidase. (D) β-galactosidase levels determined in primary hTBE cultured under ALI conditions that were infected from the apical or basolateral surface with vesicular stomatitis virus-G or SARS-S protein-pseudotyped FIV. In panels A through D, values are expressed as means plus or minus SD (n = 4 to 6) and a significant difference from levels on uninfected cells (A and B), hTBE cells cultured under submerged conditions (C), or cells infected from the apical surface (D) is indicated by an asterisk. RLU, relative light units.
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4. Infectionof differentiated airway epithelia by SARS-CoV. (A) SARS-CoV N and Sgene mRNA levels were determined using real-time RT-PCR analysis ofA549 cells or primary hTBE cultured under submerged or ALI conditionsand infected with SARS-CoV from the apical surface at an MOI of 0.8 for24 h. Values are expressed as mean mRNA levels relative tocontrol HPRT mRNA levels plus or minus SD (n = 2). ND,not detected. An asterisk indicates a significant difference in mRNAlevels between submerged and ALI conditions. (B) PCR products in panelA for hTBE cells cultured under ALI conditions were visualized byethidium bromide. bp, base pairs. (C) SARS-CoV nsp1 replicase proteinlocation in polarized human airway epithelia that were left uninfectedor infected from the apical or basolateral side with SARS-CoV.Twenty-four hours following infection with SARS-CoV viral replication,complexes were localized using immunofluorescence staining for nsp1(green) and nuclear To-pro-3 (red). Bar, 50 μm. (D)Colocalization of SARS-CoV nsp1 protein and cilia in polarized humanairway epithelia. Airway epithelia were infected as described in thelegend for Fig. 4C andthen fixed and immunostained for nsp1 (green) or β-tubulin IV(red) as a marker for ciliated cells. The merged image showscolocalization of nsp1 and β-tubulin, indicating that thepredominant infected cell types were ciliated epithelia. Bar, 10μm.
TABLE 1.
TABLE 1. Polarrelease of SARS-CoV following apical application to airwayepitheliaa
Virionegress typeEgress value (PFU/ml) forspecimen no.:  
 123
Apical2.5 × 1045 × 1043 × 104
Basolateral15205
a
Urbani strain SARS-CoV at an MOI of 0.8 wasapplied to the apical surface of well-differentiated epithelia fromthree different human donors. Virion egress was assayed 24 hlater by determining the titers for Vero E6cells.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the supportof NIH PO1 AI060699-01.
We thank Jian Shao and Paola Vermeer fortechnical advice and assistance. We thank Steve Brody for supplying theantibodies against foxj1, an adenoviral vector expressing foxj1, andhelpful discussions. We thank Carmen Halabi and Curt Sigmund forproviding the human ACE2 cDNA. We also acknowledge the support of theCell Culture and Gene Transfer Vector Cores, partially supported by theCenter for Gene Therapy for Cystic Fibrosis (NIH P30 DK-54759) and theCystic Fibrosis Foundation, for preparing airway epithelial culturesand adenoviralvectors.

REFERENCES

1.
Anderson,R. D., R. E. Haskell, H. Xia, B. J.Roessler, and B. L. Davidson.2000. A simplemethod for the rapid generation of recombinant adenovirus vectors.Gene Ther.7:1034-1038.
2.
Bradburne,A. F., M. L. Bynoe, and D. A.Tyrrell.1967. Effects of a “new”human respiratory virus in volunteers. Br. Med. J.3:767-769.
3.
Brody,S. L., X. H. Yan, M. K. Wuerffel,S. K. Song, and S. D. Shapiro.2000. Ciliogenesis and left-right axis defects in forkheadfactor HFH-4-null mice. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol.Biol.23:45-51.
4.
Chilvers,M. A., M. McKean, A. Rutman, B. S. Myint, M.Silverman, and C. O'Callaghan.2001. The effects ofcoronavirus on human nasal ciliated respiratory epithelium. Eur.Respir. J.18:965-970.
5.
Donnelly,C. A., A. C. Ghani, G. M. Leung,A. J. Hedley, C. Fraser, S. Riley, L. J.Abu-Raddad, L. M. Ho, T. Q. Thach, P. Chau,K. P. Chan, T. H. Lam, L. Y. Tse, T.Tsang, S. H. Liu, J. H. Kong,E. M. Lau, N. M. Ferguson, andR. M. Anderson.2003. Epidemiologicaldeterminants of spread of causal agent of severe acute respiratorysyndrome in Hong Kong. Lancet361:1761-1766.
6.
Donoghue,M., F. Hsieh, E. Baronas, K. Godbout, M. Gosselin, N. Stagliano, M.Donovan, B. Woolf, K. Robison, R. Jeyaseelan, R. E.Breitbart, and S. Acton.2000. A novelangiotensin-converting enzyme-related carboxypeptidase (ACE2) convertsangiotensin I to angiotensin 1-9. Circ. Res.87:e1-e9.[Online.]
7.
Fouchier,R. A., T. Kuiken, M. Schutten, G. van Amerongen, G. J. van Doornum, B. G. van den Hoogen, M. Peiris, W. Lim, K.Stohr, and A. D. Osterhaus.2003. Aetiology:Koch's postulates fulfilled for SARS virus. Nature423:240.
8.
Franks,T. J., P. Y. Chong, P. Chui, J. R.Galvin, R. M. Lourens, A. H. Reid, E. Selbs,C. P. McEvoy, C. D. Hayden, J. Fukuoka,J. K. Taubenberger, and W. D. Travis.2003. Lung pathology of severe acute respiratory syndrome(SARS): a study of 8 autopsy cases from Singapore.Hum. Pathol.34:743-748.
9.
Glass,W. G., K. Subbarao, B. Murphy, and P. M.Murphy.2004. Mechanisms of host defensefollowing severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus (SARS-CoV)pulmonary infection of mice. J. Immunol.173:4030-4039.
10.
Hamming,I., W. Timens, M. L. Bulthuis, A. T. Lely,G. J. Navis, and H. van Goor.2004. Tissuedistribution of ACE2 protein, the functional receptor for SARScoronavirus. A first step in understanding SARS pathogenesis.J. Pathol.203:631-637.
11.
Harmer,D., M. Gilbert, R. Borman, and K. L. Clark.2002. Quantitative mRNA expression profiling of ACE 2, anovel homologue of angiotensin converting enzyme. FEBSLett.532:107-110.
12.
Hofmann,H., P. Krzysztof, L. van der Hoek, M. Geier, B. Berkhout, and S.Pohlmann.2005. Human coronavirus NL63 employs thesevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus receptor for cellularentry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA102:7988-7993.
13.
Hogan,R. J., G. Gao, T. Rowe, P. Bell, D. Flieder, J. Paragas,G. P. Kobinger, N. A. Wivel, R. G. Crystal, J. Boyer, H. Feldmann, T. G. Voss, andJ. M. Wilson.2004. Resolution ofprimary severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirusinfection requires Stat1. J. Virol.78:11416-11421.
14.
Holmes,K. V., and M. M. C. Lai.1996. Coronaviridae: the viruses and theirreplication, p. 1075-1093. InB. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, and P. M.Howley (ed.), Fields virology, 3rd ed. Lippincott-RavenPublishers, Philadelphia,Pa.
15.
Hwang,D. M., D. W. Chamberlain, S. M. Poutanen,D. E. Low, S. L. Asa, and J. Butany.2004. Pulmonary pathology of severe acute respiratorysyndrome in Toronto. Mod. Pathol.23:23.
16.
Jeffers,S. A., S. M. Tusell, L. Gillim-Ross, E. M. Hemmila, J. E. Achenbach, G. J. Babcock,W. D. Thomas, Jr., L. B. Thackray, M. D.Young, R. J. Mason, D. M. Ambrosino, D. E. Wentworth, J. C. Demartini, and K. V.Holmes.2004. CD209L (L-SIGN) is a receptor for severeacute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.USA101:15748-15753.(First published 20 October 2004;10.1073/pnas.0403812101.)
17.
Karp,P. H., T. O. Moninger, S. P. Weber,T. S. Nesselhauf, J. L. Launspach, J. Zabner, andM. J. Welsh.2002. An in vitro model ofdifferentiated human airway epithelia. Methods for establishing primarycultures. Methods Mol. Biol.188:115-137.
18.
Ksiazek,T. G., D. Erdman, C. S. Goldsmith, S. R.Zaki, T. Peret, S. Emery, S. Tong, C. Urbani, J. A. Comer, W.Lim, P. E. Rollin, S. F. Dowell, A. E.Ling, C. D. Humphrey, W. J. Shieh, J. Guarner,C. D. Paddock, P. Rota, B. Fields, J. DeRisi, J. Y.Yang, N. Cox, J. M. Hughes, J. W. LeDuc,W. J. Bellini, and L. J. Anderson.2003. A novel coronavirus associated with severe acuterespiratory syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med.348:1953-1966.
19.
Kuiken,T., R. A. Fouchier, M. Schutten, G. F. Rimmelzwaan,G. van Amerongen, D. van Riel, J. D. Laman, T. deJong, G. van Doornum, W. Lim, A. E. Ling, P. K.Chan, J. S. Tam, M. C. Zambon, R. Gopal, C.Drosten, S. van der Werf, N. Escriou, J. C. Manuguerra, K.Stohr, J. S. Peiris, and A. D. Osterhaus.2003. Newly discovered coronavirus as the primary cause ofsevere acute respiratory syndrome. Lancet362:263-270.
20.
Lang,Z., L. Zhang, S. Zhang, X. Meng, J. Li, C. Song, L. Sun, and Y.Zhou.2003. Pathological study on severe acuterespiratory syndrome. Chin. Med. J. (Engl.)116:976-980.
21.
Li,W., M. J. Moore, N. Vasilieva, J. Sui, S. K. Wong,M. A. Berne, M. Somasundaran, J. L. Sullivan, K.Luzuriaga, T. C. Greenough, H. Choe, and M. Farzan.2003. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is a functionalreceptor for the SARS coronavirus. Nature426:450-454.
22.
Li,W., C. Zhang, J. Sui, J. H. Kuhn, M. J. Moore, S.Luo, S. K. Wong, I. C. Huang, K. Xu, N. Vasilieva,A. Murakami, Y. He, W. A. Marasco, Y. Guan, H. Choe, and M.Farzan.2005. Receptor and viral determinants ofSARS-coronavirus adaptation to human ACE2. EMBO J.24:1634-1643.
23.
Look,D. C., M. J. Walter, M. R. Williamson, L.Pang, Y. You, J. N. Sreshta, J. E. Johnson,D. S. Zander, and S. L. Brody.2001. Effects of paramyxoviral infection on airwayepithelial cell Foxj1 expression, ciliogenesis, and mucociliaryfunction. Am. J. Pathol.159:2055-2069.
24.
Marra,M. A., S. J. Jones, C. R. Astell,R. A. Holt, A. Brooks-Wilson, Y. S. Butterfield, J.Khattra, J. K. Asano, S. A. Barber, S. Y.Chan, A. Cloutier, S. M. Coughlin, D. Freeman, N. Girn,O. L. Griffith, S. R. Leach, M. Mayo, H. McDonald,S. B. Montgomery, P. K. Pandoh, A. S.Petrescu, A. G. Robertson, J. E. Schein, A.Siddiqui, D. E. Smailus, J. M. Stott, G. S. Yang, F. Plummer, A. Andonov, H. Artsob, N. Bastien, K. Bernard,T. F. Booth, D. Bowness, M. Czub, M. Drebot, L. Fernando, R.Flick, M. Garbutt, M. Gray, A. Grolla, S. Jones, H. Feldmann, A.Meyers, A. Kabani, Y. Li, S. Normand, U. Stroher, G. A.Tipples, S. Tyler, R. Vogrig, D. Ward, B. Watson, R. C.Brunham, M. Krajden, M. Petric, D. M. Skowronski, C. Upton,and R. L. Roper.2003. The genome sequenceof the SARS-associated coronavirus. Science300:1399-1404.
25.
Martina,B. E., B. L. Haagmans, T. Kuiken, R. A.Fouchier, G. F. Rimmelzwaan, G. Van Amerongen, J. S. Peiris, W. Lim, and A. D. Osterhaus.2003. Virology: SARS virus infection of cats and ferrets.Nature425:915.
26.
Marzi,A., T. Gramberg, G. Simmons, P. Moller, A. J. Rennekamp, M.Krumbiegel, M. Geier, J. Eisemann, N. Turza, B. Saunier, A.Steinkasserer, S. Becker, P. Bates, H. Hofmann, and S. Pohlmann.2004. DC-SIGN and DC-SIGNR interact with the glycoproteinof Marburg virus and the S protein of severe acute respiratory syndromecoronavirus. J. Virol.78:12090-12095.
27.
McAuliffe,J., L. Vogel, A. Roberts, G. Fahle, S. Fischer, W. J. Shieh,E. Butler, S. Zaki, M. St Claire, B. Murphy, and K. Subbarao.2004. Replication of SARS coronavirus administered intothe respiratory tract of African Green, rhesus and cynomolgus monkeys.Virology330:8-15.
28.
McIntosh,K., R. K. Chao, H. E. Krause, R. Wasil,H. E. Mocega, and M. A. Mufson.1974. Coronavirus infection in acute lower respiratorytract disease of infants. J. Infect. Dis.130:502-507.
29.
Mossel,E. C., C. Huang, K. Narayanan, S. Makino, R. B.Tesh, and C. J. Peters.2005. Exogenous ACE2expression allows refractory cell lines to support severe acuterespiratory syndrome coronavirus replication. J. Virol.79:3846-3850.
30.
Nicholls,J. M., L. L. Poon, K. C. Lee,W. F. Ng, S. T. Lai, C. Y. Leung,C. M. Chu, P. K. Hui, K. L. Mak, W. Lim,K. W. Yan, K. H. Chan, N. C. Tsang, Y.Guan, K. Y. Yuen, and J. S. Peiris.2003. Lung pathology of fatal severe acute respiratorysyndrome. Lancet361:1773-1778.
31.
Nie,Y., P. Wang, X. Shi, G. Wang, J. Chen, A. Zheng, W. Wang, Z.Wang, X. Qu, M. Luo, L. Tan, X. Song, X. Yin, M. Ding, and H. Deng.2004. Highly infectious SARS-CoV pseudotyped virus revealsthe cell tropism and its correlation with receptor expression.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.321:994-1000.
32.
Poutanen,S. M., D. E. Low, B. Henry, S. Finkelstein, D.Rose, K. Green, R. Tellier, R. Draker, D. Adachi, M. Ayers,A. K. Chan, D. M. Skowronski, I. Salit,A. E. Simor, A. S. Slutsky, P. W. Doyle,M. Krajden, M. Petric, R. C. Brunham, and A. J.McGeer.2003. Identification of severe acuterespiratory syndrome in Canada. N. Engl. J. Med.348:1995-2005.
33.
Prentice,E., J. McAuliffe, X. Lu, K. Subbarao, and M. R. Denison.2004. Identification and characterization of severe acuterespiratory syndrome coronavirus replicase proteins.J. Virol.78:9977-9986.
34.
Roberts,A., L. Vogel, J. Guarner, N. Hayes, B. Murphy, S. Zaki, and K.Subbarao.2005. Severe acute respiratory syndromecoronavirus infection of golden Syrian hamsters. J. Virol.79:503-511.
35.
Rossen,J. W., W. F. Voorhout, M. C. Horzinek, A.van der Ende, G. J. Strous, and P. J. Rottier.1995. MHV-A59 enters polarized murineepithelial cells through the apical surface but is releasedbasolaterally. Virology210:54-66.
36.
Rossen,J. W. A., C. P. J. Bekker,W. F. Voorhout, G. J. A. M.Strous, A. van der Ende, and P. J. M. Rottier.1994. Entry and release of transmissible gastroenteritiscoronavirus are restricted to apical surfaces of polarized epithelialcells. J. Virol.68:7966-7973.
37.
Rota,P. A., M. S. Oberste, S. S. Monroe,W. A. Nix, R. Campagnoli, J. P. Icenogle, S.Penaranda, B. Bankamp, K. Maher, M. H. Chen, S. Tong, A.Tamin, L. Lowe, M. Frace, J. L. DeRisi, Q. Chen, D. Wang,D. D. Erdman, T. C. Peret, C. Burns, T. G. Ksiazek, P. E. Rollin, A. Sanchez, S. Liffick, B.Holloway, J. Limor, K. McCaustland, M. Olsen-Rasmussen, R. Fouchier, S.Gunther, A. D. Osterhaus, C. Drosten, M. A.Pallansch, L. J. Anderson, and W. J. Bellini.2003. Characterization of a novel coronavirus associatedwith severe acute respiratory syndrome. Science300:1394-1399.
38.
Rowe,T., G. Gao, R. J. Hogan, R. G. Crystal,T. G. Voss, R. L. Grant, P. Bell, G. P.Kobinger, N. A. Wivel, and J. M. Wilson.2004. Macaque model for severe acute respiratory syndrome.J. Virol.78:11401-11404.
39.
Simmons,G., J. D. Reeves, A. J. Rennekamp, S. M.Amberg, A. J. Piefer, and P. Bates.2004.Characterization of severe acute respiratory syndrome-associatedcoronavirus (SARS-CoV) spike glycoprotein-mediated viral entry.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA101:4240-4245.
40.
To,K., J. H. Tong, P. K. Chan, F. W. Au,S. S. Chim, K. Allen Chan, J. L. Cheung,E. Y. Liu, G. M. Tse, A. W. Lo, Y. DennisLo, and H. Ng.2004. Tissue and cellular tropism ofthe coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome: anin-situ hybridization study of fatal cases. J. Pathol.202:157-163.
41.
Turner,A. J., J. A. Hiscox, and N. M.Hooper.2004. ACE2: from vasopeptidase to SARS virusreceptor. Trends Pharmacol. Sci.25:291-294.
42.
vander Hoek, L., K. Pyrc, M. F. Jebbink, W. Vermeulen-Oost,R. J. Berkhout, K. C. Wolthers,P. M. Wertheim-van Dillen, J. Kaandorp, J.Spaargaren, and B. Berkhout.2004.Identification of a new human coronavirus. Nat. Med.10:368-373.
43.
Vermeer,P. D., L. A. Einwalter, T. O. Moninger,T. Rokhlina, J. A. Kern, J. Zabner, and M. J.Welsh.2003. Segregation of receptor and ligandregulates activation of epithelial growth factor receptor.Nature422:322-326.
44.
Wang,G., C. Deering, M. Macke, J. Shao, R. Burns, D. M. Blau,K. V. Holmes, B. L. Davidson, S. Perlman, andP. B. McCray, Jr.2000. Human coronavirus229E infects polarized airway epithelia from the apical surface.J. Virol.74:9234-9239.
45.
Wang,G., V. A. Slepushkin, J. Zabner, S. Keshavjee, J. C. Johnston, S. L. Sauter, D. J. Jolly, T.Dubensky, B. L. Davidson, and P. B. McCray, Jr.1999. Feline immunodeficiency virus vectorspersistently transduce nondividing airway epithelia and correct thecystic fibrosis defect. J. Clin. Invest.104:R49-R56.
46.
Woo,P. C., S. K. Lau, C. M. Chu, K. H. Chan, H. W. Tsoi, Y. Huang, B. H. Wong,R. W. Poon, J. J. Cai, W. K. Luk,L. L. Poon, S. S. Wong, Y. Guan, J. S.Peiris, and K. Y. Yuen.2005.Characterization and complete genome sequence of a novel coronavirus,coronavirus HKU1, from patients with pneumonia. J. Virol.79:884-895.
47.
Yang,Z. Y., Y. Huang, L. Ganesh, K. Leung, W. P. Kong,O. Schwartz, K. Subbarao, and G. J. Nabel.2004. pH-dependent entry of severe acuterespiratory syndrome coronavirus is mediated by the spike glycoproteinand enhanced by dendritic cell transfer through DC-SIGN.J. Virol.78:5642-5650.
48.
Yeager,C. L., R. A. Ashmun, R. K. Williams,C. B. Cardellichio, L. H. Shapiro, A. T.Look, and K. V. Holmes.1992. Humanaminopeptidase N is a receptor for human coronavirus 229E.Nature357:420-422.
49.
Yu,I. T., Y. Li, T. W. Wong, W. Tam, A. T.Chan, J. H. Lee, D. Y. Leung, and T. Ho.2004. Evidence of airborne transmission of the severeacute respiratory syndrome virus. N. Engl.J. Med.350:1731-1739.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

Journal of Virology cover image
Journal of Virology
Volume 79Number 2315 December 2005
Pages: 14614 - 14621

History

Received: 16 June 2005
Accepted: 14 September 2005

PubMed: 16282461

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Contributors

Authors

Hong Peng Jia
Departments of Pediatrics
Dwight C. Look
Internal Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242
Lei Shi
Internal Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242
Melissa Hickey
Departments of Pediatrics
Lecia Pewe
Departments of Pediatrics
Jason Netland
Departments of Pediatrics
Michael Farzan
Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138
Christine Wohlford-Lenane
Departments of Pediatrics
Stanley Perlman
Departments of Pediatrics
Paul B. McCray Jr [email protected]
Departments of Pediatrics

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

View Options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Rendering failed! Template not found. c = axel-publication-content,t = collateral-tables,p = asmj,v = maint-210601-7023d2b9

Share

Metrics & Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Share Options
Share the article link

Share on social media
Get Access
Buy Article
Journal of Virology Vol.79 • Issue 23 • ASM Journals Pay Per View, PPV 25
Journal Subscription
Journal of Virology
ASM members can purchase subscriptions to journals.
Join or renew
View Options
Tables
Figures and Media
References

We Recommend

American Society for Microbiology ("ASM") is committed to maintaining your confidence and trust with respect to the information we collect from you on websites owned and operated by ASM ("ASM Web Sites") and other sources. This Privacy Policy sets forth the information we collect about you, how we use this information and the choices you have about how we use such information.
FIND OUT MORE about the privacy policy