Infection of mice with murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV) is an established model for studying human cytomegalovirus infection. Immune control of MCMV infection is organized in a hierarchical and redundant manner by diverse components of the innate and adaptive immune response (
19,
21,
32,
34). NK cells play an important role in the innate control of cytomegalovirus infection. This has been demonstrated in humans with a rare disorder characterized by complete absence of NK cells and in genetically deficient mice lacking NK cells or being depleted of these cells by treatment with anti-NK cell antibodies (
4). On the basis of their susceptibility to MCMV infection, mouse strains are either susceptible (e.g., BALB/c mice) or resistant (e.g., C57BL/6 mice) (
17,
37). MCMV titers in the spleens of mice inversely correlate with their ability to mount an effective NK cell response, which is controlled by the single dominant locus, named
Cmv1, located in the natural killer gene complex on mouse chromosome 6 (
10,
14,
37-
39). The alleles of the
Cmv1 locus can confer either susceptibility (
Cmv1s, a recessive allele) or resistance (
Cmv1r, a dominant allele) to MCMV (
36,
39).
The
Cmv1r (
Ly49h) gene encodes the Ly49H receptor (
5,
9,
23,
24), which belongs to the Ly49 family of NK cell receptors and is expressed on approximately 50% of NK cells in C57BL/6 mice (
41,
43,
47). Unlike the inhibitory Ly49 receptors, Ly49H lacks the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif and is noncovalently coupled with DAP12 at the cell surface, allowing transduction of an activation signal into the cell via its immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (
16,
43) that is required for resistance to MCMV (
40). However, Ly49H does not define resistance to vaccinia virus and gammaherpesvirus 68 (
2,
12).
Unlike other members of the Ly49 receptor family, which use major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules as their cellular ligands, Ly49H binds to at least one MCMV-encoded protein, the
m157 gene product (
2,
42). The m157 protein has structural homology to MHC class I molecules, similar to several other proteins encoded by MCMV
m145 gene family members (
42). An MCMV deletion mutant restricted Ly49H activation to 15 genes in the HindIII-E region (
2). Isolated open reading frames (ORFs) from this region, with the exception of
m157, failed to activate Ly49H. However, a similar contribution of other genes in this region cannot be excluded since certain cytomegalovirus proteins encoded by different genes can only be expressed as a complex (
27). Therefore, it remained an open question whether
m157 is the only viral gene that contributes to MCMV resistance defined by Ly49H.
To investigate the biological relevance of the
m157 gene, we constructed an
m157 deletion mutant, as well as the corresponding revertant virus. We studied the susceptibility of these recombinant viruses to control by NK cells in vivo in Ly49H
+ and Ly49H
− mouse strains. Loss of the
m157 gene is associated with gain of virulence in Ly49H
+ but not in Ly49H
− mouse strains. Therefore, m157 is the only MCMV-encoded protein that activates Ly49H
+ NK cells. The absence of the gene that encodes this protein in the
m157 deletion mutant gave us the opportunity to reveal the function of viral genes that down-modulate NK cell activity in
Cmv1r mice.
Cmv1 has been defined as a locus of resistance to MCMV, influencing virus control mainly in the spleen (
37). Furthermore, since we could define m157 as the only MCMV-encoded ligand for the Ly49H receptor, we could also address the question of NK cell control of infection at a different site of infection.
DISCUSSION
Viruses affect NK cell control by providing viral ligands that bind NK cell receptors. Depending on whether these receptors are activating or inhibitory, the resulting NK function is modulated (
29). The second type of NK cell modulation affects cellular ligands for NK cell receptors that are regulated by infection or stress (
3,
22,
25). Two MCMV genes are thought to encode ligands for NK cell receptors,
m144 and
m157, but only the cognate NK cell receptor for the m157 protein, Ly49H, has been identified (
2,
42). The interaction between Ly49H and the m157 protein is a unique situation and contributes to MCMV resistance in C57BL/6 mice, which express the Ly49H NK cell activation receptor. In previous studies the ligand-receptor interaction was demonstrated by expressing the isolated viral ligand (
2,
42). By deleting
m157 from the MCMV genome, we show that m157 indeed is the only MCMV ligand for Ly49H. Accordingly, in congenic mice lacking the Ly49H receptor (BXD-8), as well as in mice depleted of Ly49H
+ NK cells, deletion of this gene from the virus has no phenotype. Ly49H
+ mice, after infection with Δ
m157, lose their MCMV-encoded resistance phenotype.
m157 also serves as a ligand for the inhibitory NK receptor Ly49I in the MCMV-susceptible 129/J strain, and it also binds to NK cells of other MCMV-sensitive strains (
1). Therefore, m157 is seen as an inhibitory NK cell ligand and Ly49H
+ mice are considered an exception to the rule. However, no experiments in which NK cell function is blocked through m157-Ly49I have been published. Loss of NK cell activation can be studied in the context of virus infection when the virus either expresses or lacks the gene of interest. However, when we studied the effect of
m157 deletion in the 129/SvJ strain no vigorous phenotype became apparent. A certain degree of virus attenuation was noticed in both BALB/c and 129/SvJ mice. Considering that the m157 protein binds to the Ly49I allelic form of 129/J but not of BALB/c mice (
2), it is not clear whether this effect is related to the m157-Ly49I interaction. A strong signal was not to be expected, since in comparison to NK cells from the C57BL/6 strain only a minority of NK cells from 129/J mice binds m157 but does not lyse m157
+ targets in vitro (
2).
The absence of NK activation in Ly49H
+ mice infected with Δ
m157 provided the opportunity to demonstrate the function of other viral genes inhibiting NK cell function. These genes act by down-modulating NKG2D ligands similarly to the function of
m152 (
22,
25). There is another not yet identified gene(s) in the left end of the genome (
28), and we have evidence of at least one additional gene elsewhere (U.H.K. and S.J., unpublished data). Most NK cells express NKG2D receptors (
18). Therefore, the loss of one silencing signal from a chorus of several is difficult to detect. This situation is similar to that of the genes modulating MHC class I expression, in which identification of the three genes involved (
m04,
m06, and
m152) had to precede the construction of virus mutants that lack or express class I modulating functions in all possible combinations (
49). In addition, deletion of the viral gene that down-modulates a ligand for an activating NK cell receptor has an immediate effect on NK control, since virus infection upregulates stress-induced ligands (
7,
11). On the other hand, deletion of a viral ligand for an inhibitory NK cell receptor should not have a strong phenotype, especially if the stress-induced activating ligands are down-modulated at the same time.
Our study also confirms and extends the known complexity of NK cell control in different organs (
30,
44). The
Cmv1 locus has been described as a host resistance locus that regulates NK cell responses during acute MCMV infection in the spleen (
37). Accordingly, Δ
m157 lacks this type of control. In addition, we show here for the first time that, akin to virus control in the spleen, Ly49H
+ NK cells also mediate MCMV control in the lungs. Additional evidence for this is provided by C57BL/6 mice depleted of Ly49H
+ NK cells, in which the titer of w.t. MCMV in the lungs reached a level comparable to that after depletion of NK1.1
+ NK cells. In contrast, MCMV control in the liver appears to be independent of m157-Ly49H interaction. This finding is in accordance with the minimal effects of anti-Ly49H MAbs on the virus titer in the liver (
5), pointing at a different type of NK control of MCMV in that organ (
30,
44). After MCMV infection, NK cells pass through two different stages of activation. The first, nonspecific phase, during the first 2 days after MCMV infection, is characterized by IFN-γ production and NK cell proliferation, irrespective of Ly49H expression, while in the second, specific phase, there is a selective proliferation of Ly49H
+ NK cells (
12). This early activation of NK cells may be sufficient to control virus infection in the liver but not in the spleen and lungs. The mode by which NK cells mediate their antiviral effector function also differs between the liver and spleen. While in the spleen NK cells act via a cytolytic mechanism, in the liver MCMV is controlled by cytokines including IFN-γ produced by NK and NKT cells (
30,
44). In perforin-deficient C57BL/6 mice, no differences between Δ
m157 and w.t. MCMV titers in the spleen were observed, which suggests that Ly49H-positive cells mediate their effect almost exclusively via a perforin-dependent pathway (I.B., unpublished data).
The MCMV genome harbors genes, in addition to
m152 (
22), whose products down-modulate NKG2D ligands, also in mice expressing
Cmv1r (
Ly49h) (S.J., unpublished). However, this inhibition of NK cell activation is overridden by NK activation through m157, which makes these mice an exception to the rule. It has been proposed that natural isolates from wild mice, depending on the presence or absence of the Ly49H receptor, are expected to be variable in the
m157 gene (
1,
35). Indeed, this has been recently demonstrated by Voigt et al., who reported that most of the MCMV strains they isolated from wild mice possessed a specific mutation of the
m157 gene (
48). Furthermore, this study provides evidence that NK cells can exert sufficient immunological pressure on MCMV that it undergoes rapid and specific mutation in the
m157 gene region. Accordingly, we have been studying immunodeficient C57BL/6 mice that rely on NK functions to survive MCMV infection. Under these selective conditions, virus mutants arise that indeed do not respond to the Ly49H receptor (R. A. French, T. J. Pingel, M. Wagner, I. Bubic, L. Yang, S. Kim, U. H. Koszinowski, S. Jonjic, and W. M. Yokoyama, submitted for publication).