Retroviral Gag polyproteins have specific regions that facilitate the final separation of assembled virus particles from the cell surface and from each other (
9,
15,
21,
24,
36-
40). These regions, which are known as late assembly (L) domains, harbor short, highly conserved proline-rich motifs that are thought to constitute interaction sites for cellular factors. The first L domain was identified in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), where it is located in p6
gag , the C-terminal domain of the Gag precursor (
9). Within p6
gag , a P(T/S)APP motif near the N terminus of the domain is crucial for virus release, while other regions of p6
gag appear to be largely dispensable, at least in the context of a full-length Gag precursor (
9,
15). Although p6
gag is the most variable of the Gag domains of primate immunodeficiency viruses, the P(T/S)APP motif is absolutely conserved among these viruses and is also found at an equivalent location in other lentiviruses, even though these viruses do not possess a p6
gag domain. The only exception is equine infectious anemia virus (EIAV), which uses a YXXL motif in its unique C-terminal Gag domain for virus release (
24).
While the L domains of lentiviruses occupy a C-terminal position within Gag, those of oncoretroviruses are in the N-terminal half of the Gag polyprotein. The best-studied oncoretroviral L domain, that of Rous sarcoma virus (RSV), maps to the 11-amino-acid p2b region, which is located between the matrix (MA) and capsid (CA) domains of the Gag precursor (
36,
37). More recently, it was shown that Mason-Pfizer monkey virus and Moloney murine leukemia virus (Mo-MuLV) harbor L domains at an equivalent location (
38,
40). In all three viruses, the essential core of the L domain has the sequence PPPY, which is highly conserved among oncoretroviruses but absent from the HIV-1 Gag precursor. Interestingly, conserved PPXY motifs, often in combination with a P(T/S)AP motif, are also found in the matrix proteins of certain enveloped negative-strand RNA viruses (
4,
11,
32). These appear to have a role similar to that of the corresponding retroviral motifs, since mutations in the PPXY motifs of vesicular stomatitis virus and Ebola virus inhibited budding from the plasma membrane (
10,
16).
Retroviruses have long been known to contain small amounts of ubiquitin (
26), a highly conserved 76-amino-acid polypeptide that can be covalently attached to lysine residues in other proteins. In HIV-1 and Mo-MuLV, lysine residues in the vicinity of the L domain are monoubiquitinated in a small fraction of virion-associated Gag molecules (
19,
20). While the enzymatic machinery involved remains unknown, it has recently been reported that the P(T/S)APP motif in HIV-1 p6
gag interacts with the putative ubiquitin regulator Tsg101 (
35). Several studies now indicate that L domains engage the cellular ubiquitination machinery to promote virus release (
22,
27,
32). These studies show that compounds which block proteasomal degradation inhibit the budding of different retroviruses at a late stage. It is thought that proteasome inhibitors interfere with budding solely because they deplete the intracellular levels of free ubiquitin. Consistent with this interpretation, RSV budding could be restored in the presence of a proteasome inhibitor by overexpressing ubiquitin, or by fusing ubiquitin directly to Gag (
22). Independent evidence for a role of ubiquitin in retroviral budding is provided by our recent observation that L domains induce the ubiquitination of a minimal HIV-1 Gag molecule (
32). Importantly, the ubiquitination of Gag was induced by unrelated L domains and was prevented by mutations that blocked L domain function. These results indicated that the recruitment of a component of the cellular ubiquitination machinery plays a crucial role in L domain function.
A peptide from the candidate Ebola virus L domain with combined P(T/S)APP and PPXY motifs was exceptionally active in stimulating virus-like particle (VLP) production by a minimal HIV-1 Gag molecule that lacked most of MA, about two-thirds of CA, and all of nucleocapsid (NC) and p6
gag (
1,
32). In the present study, we find that in this minimal Gag context the PPXY motif is required for the induction of Gag ubiquitination and VLP production, implying that the P(T/S)APP L domain core motif by itself is insufficient. In marked contrast, a mutant peptide which retained only the P(T/S)APP motif was fully active as an L domain when fused to a nearly full-length HIV-1 Gag polyprotein that lacked only p6
gag . Our results reveal a context-dependent activity of the P(T/S)APP motif and indicate that HIV-1 Gag regions outside of p6
gag can cooperate with the conserved L domain core motif to enhance Gag ubiquitination and to promote virus release. To elucidate the role of ubiquitin in L domain function, we also examined whether VLP production in our system is affected by the coexpression of mutant ubiquitins. The results of these experiments suggest a link between the endocytosis function of ubiquitin and its involvement in virus exocytosis.
DISCUSSION
Short peptides from HIV-1 p6
gag that include the P(T/S)APP motif can functionally replace the unrelated L domains of oncoretroviruses (
21,
39), suggesting that only a few conserved Gag residues are involved in HIV-1 L domain function. Nevertheless, the results presented here indicate that the P(T/S)APP motif does not function autonomously. Our results imply that the P(T/S)APP L domain core motif, in contrast to the PPXY core motif present in oncoretroviral L domains, depends on other Gag regions in order to function.
We recently reported that a highly L domain-dependent minimal HIV-1 Gag molecule is efficiently complemented by full-length HIV-1 p6
gag , whereas the first 14 p6
gag residues, which include the P(T/S)APP motif, were insufficient to rescue VLP formation (
1). In contrast, VLP production by the minimal Gag molecule was potently enhanced by peptides which harbored a PPXY motif, and in particular by a peptide from the Ebola virus L domain which contained overlapping P(T/S)APP and PPXY motifs (
1,
32). In spite of the exceptional potency of the Ebola virus L domain in this context, we now find that its ability to rescue the HIV-1 minimal Gag construct is essentially abolished by a single-amino-acid substitution which disrupts the PPXY motif but leaves the P(T/S)APP motif intact. The single-amino-acid substitution also prevented the ubiquitination of the minimal Gag molecule, confirming the relationship between the recruitment of the cellular ubiquitination machinery and L domain function.
In marked contrast to its importance in the minimal Gag construct, the PPXY motif proved to be dispensable when the Ebola virus L domain was appended to the C terminus of an HIV-1 Gag precursor that lacked only p6 gag and thus had the domain organization MA-CA-p2-NC-p1. In the latter context, the mutant Ebola virus peptide was about as efficient as the parental peptide in inducing Gag ubiquitination and in enhancing VLP formation. Thus, in its natural location C-terminal of NC-p1, a P(T/S)APP motif appeared sufficient to provide L domain function, and the presence of a PPXY motif conferred no significant advantage, which may explain why authentic HIV-1 Gag lacks such a motif.
The context-dependent activity of the P(T/S)APP motif suggested a need to cooperate with a Gag region that was present in MA-CA-p2-NC-p1 but absent from the minimal Gag construct. Indeed, our results indicate that the ability of the P(T/S)APP L domain core motif to induce Gag ubiquitination depended on NC-p1. When NC-p1 was replaced by a leucine zipper domain, prominent Gag ubiquitination could still be observed in the presence of combined P(T/S)APP and PPXY motifs, but not if the PPXY motif was disrupted and only the P(T/S)APP motif was left intact.
One explanation for these results is that Gag sequences that participate in the recruitment of the cellular ubiquitination machinery are not exclusively confined to p6
gag but extend across domain boundaries into the adjacent NC-p1 region of the Gag precursor. Alternatively, the P(T/S)APP L domain core motif, in contrast to the PPXY motif, may recruit an ubiquitinating enzyme that exhibits a preference for particular lysine residues in NC-p1. The latter model would require that the ubiquitination of Gag itself is functionally relevant, as suggested by the finding that RSV budding from cells depleted for ubiquitin could be rescued by fusing ubiquitin directly to Gag (
22). In the case of nonprimate lentiviruses, a role of NC in L domain function is strongly suggested by the organization of the Gag precursor. These lentiviruses lack a p6
gag domain but, with the exception of EIAV, instead have a P(T/S)APP motif at the very C terminus of the NC domain. In HIV-1, the conserved L domain core at the N terminus of p6
gag may be assisted both by NC-p1 and by the remainder of p6
gag , because NC-p1 is clearly dispensable for L domain function if the full-length p6
gag domain is present (
1).
The mechanistic basis for the involvement of ubiquitin in L domain-mediated virus budding remains unknown. L domains appear to induce the addition of only a few ubiquitin moieties to Gag (
32), and these are unlikely to constitute strong degradation signals, since a Lys48-linked chain of at least four ubiquitin subunits is required for efficient recognition by the proteasome (
34). The view that the proteasome is not directly involved in L domain function is supported by our finding that the coexpression of K48R ubiquitin, which was expected to cap Lys48-linked chains, had no specific effect on VLP formation. In contrast to K48R ubiquitin, the K63R mutant led to a reduction in VLP formation that was more pronounced than a reduction in Gag expression levels that was observed with all of the mutant ubiquitins tested. Interestingly, the expression of K63R ubiquitin also altered the pattern of cell-associated Gag-ubiquitin conjugates. Such conjugates could be relatively easily detected in the presence of the Ebola virus L domain, which generally induced a more pronounced Gag ubiquitination than did HIV-1 p6
gag . Specifically, K63R ubiquitin caused a selective reduction in the intensity of a band that migrated at the expected position of diubiquitinated Gag. The simplest explanation for this observation is that the affected Gag species harbored a Lys63-linked diubiquitin chain.
Monoubiquitination and Lys63-linked diubiquitin chains have been shown to play a role in endocytosis (
12), a process that involves a budding event from the plasma membrane, as does retrovirus release. A relationship between the endocytosis functon of ubiquitin and its involvement in virus budding is also suggested by our finding that the coexpression of I44A or F4A ubiquitin had a rather pronounced dominant-negative effect on VLP production. Ile44, together with Leu8 and Val70, forms a hydrophobic patch on the surface of ubiquitin that is crucial for monoubiquitin-mediated endocytosis (
28). Ile44 appears to be the primary residue required, because its replacement in a recent comprehensive alanine scan had a more pronounced effect on endocytosis than the substitution of any other ubiquitin surface residue (
29). While the latter studies were performed in a yeast model system, the importance of Ile44 in ubiquitin-mediated endocytosis has also been demonstrated in human cells (
18). Besides its role in endocytosis, Ile44 is required for the targeting of Lys48-linked multiubiquitin chains to the proteasome (
2). However, Phe4 is located in a second hydrophobic patch on the ubiquitin surface that is crucial for endocytosis but not for proteasomal degradation (
29).
Taken together, our results are compatible with a model in which L domain-induced ubiquitination of Gag or of a cellular factor at the site of virus assembly leads to the recruitment of a component of the endocytic machinery to promote the membrane invagination or fission events required for virus budding. An involvement of the endocytic machinery in retrovirus budding has previously been suggested, based on the observation that the L domain of EIAV recruits the clathrin-associated AP2 adaptor complex to the viral assembly site (
25). The L domain of EIAV is unique in that it lacks both a P(T/S)APP and a PPXY motif, and the cellular factor(s) recruited by other L domains are thus likely to be different. Their identification may not only be important to understand the mechanism of enveloped virus release but may also have wider implications for cell biology.