La Crosse virus (LACV) and closely related viruses of the California serogroup of bunyaviruses (family,
Bunyaviridae) infect humans in many countries of the northern hemisphere (
4,
13). LACV is the most important arboviral cause of pediatric encephalitis in the United States. From 1996 to 1997, a total of 252 cases of LACV encephalitis have been reported (
5). It has been estimated that there may be as many as 300,000 LACV infections annually in the midwestern United States alone (
4). However, the vast majority of infections is clinically inapparent or associated with mild symptoms, suggesting that humans have a powerful defense against LACV infections.
It is well known that the interferon (IFN) system plays a pivotal role in the first line of defense against viruses. Many cell types produce and secrete alpha and beta IFN (IFN-α/β) in response to viral infections in a paracrine fashion, thereby signalling the presence of an invading virus to neighboring cells. The binding of IFN-α/β to their specific cell surface receptors triggers the intracellular Jak/STAT pathway, leading to the activation or enhanced expression of more than 50 genes (
34,
37,
38). Their combined activities generate a so-called antiviral state. The proper functioning of the IFN-α/β system is essential for the survival of certain viral infections. Blocking IFN-α/β activity in mice by the injection of antibodies directed against IFN-α and IFN-β leads to a dramatically increased sensitivity to many viruses (
14,
15,
17). Furthermore, genetically targeted (knockout) mice lacking the β subunit of the IFN-α/β receptor (IFNAR-1
−/− mice) are unable to establish an antiviral state and, as a consequence, are highly susceptible to many viral infections, despite the presence of an otherwise intact immune system (
6,
28). However, the contribution of an individual IFN-induced protein to the generation of the antiviral state is difficult to assess, because various effector proteins appear to have overlapping antiviral activities (
38).
Mx proteins are among the few effector proteins of the IFN-α/β system with known antiviral activity. They are highly conserved large GTPases with homology to dynamin and have been found in all vertebrate species investigated so far, including mammals, birds, and fish (reviewed in references
3 and
41). The human MxA protein is a cytoplasmic protein (
1,
40) which is rapidly induced in response to acute viral infections (
33). Transfected cells, expressing MxA under the control of a constitutive promoter, are resistant to infections with viruses of several RNA virus families, namely,
Orthomyxoviridae (
10,
11,
30,
31),
Paramyxoviridae (
35,
36,
44),
Rhabdoviridae (
31),
Bunyaviridae(
9,
25), and
Togaviridae (
27). A first indication for the role of MxA in vivo came from transgenic mice which constitutively express human MxA but lack functional mouse Mx proteins (
29). These MxA-transgenic mice were completely resistant to infections with Thogoto virus (THOV), a tick-borne orthomyxovirus, and they proved to be less sensitive to infections with influenza A virus and vesicular stomatitis virus (
29).
Here, we demonstrate that the function of a single IFN-induced effector protein can be studied in vivo without interference from activities of other IFN-induced proteins. To that end, we crossed MxA-transgenic and IFNAR-1−/− mice resulting in MxA+/+IFNAR-1−/− mice. We show that MxA expression is sufficient to protect IFNAR-1−/− mice against a lethal challenge dose of THOV. Furthermore, enhanced resistance was observed against LACV and Semliki Forest virus (SFV), a neurotropic virus of the family Togaviridae.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Mice.
The generation of the MxA-transgenic mouse lines L and G, as well as the generation of IFNAR-1
−/− knockout mice, was described previously (
28,
29). MxA-expressing IFNAR-1
−/− knockout mice that originated from the MxA-transgenic L line were generated as follows. Mice homozygous for the MxA transgene (MxA
+/+) were mated with IFNAR-1
−/− mice. Resulting F
1 offspring (MxA
+/− IFNAR-1
+/−) were interbred. The IFNAR-1 genotype of the F
2 generation was analyzed by PCR as described previously (
28). To test whether F
2animals were homozygous for the MxA transgene, they were backcrossed with BALB/c mice, and the MxA genotypes of the progeny were analyzed by PCR as described previously (
28). Mice homozygous for both MxA and the IFN-α/β receptor defiency (MxA
+/+IFNAR-1
−/−) were used for further breeding. A second MxA-transgenic IFNAR-1
−/− mouse line was generated with the MxA-transgenic G line. For unknown reasons, breeding of MxA-transgenic mice of line G never yielded homozygous females (
29). Therefore, male mice homozygous for MxA of line G were first crossed with female IFNAR-1
−/− mice. F
1animals thereof were interbred, and the resulting F
2progeny were tested for their MxA and IFNAR-1 genotypes as described above. F
2 males homozygous for the MxA transgene as well as the IFN-α/β receptor deficiency (MxA
+/+IFNAR-1
−/−) were selected and backcrossed with IFNAR-1
−/− mice. The resulting offspring (MxA
+/− IFNAR-1
−/−) were used for virus challenge experiments. All mouse lines described in this paper have mutations in the endogenous mouse Mx genes
Mx1 and
Mx2 (
39,
42). As a consequence, functional Mx1 and Mx2 proteins are not expressed in these mice.
Analysis of MxA expression in transgenic mice.
Animals were anesthetized and exsanguinated, and a variety of organs and tissue samples were removed, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −70°C. The frozen samples were homogenized in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl
2, 1 mM EDTA, and 0.1% Triton X-100. Subsequently, the cells were lysed by sonication. The lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 10 min and mixed with sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-gel sample buffer (
26). Protein samples (20 μg per lane) were separated by SDS–10% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Transfer to nitrocellullose membranes (Millipore, Bedford, Mass.) and Western blot analysis were carried out essentially as previously described (
1), with a monoclonal antibody specific for MxA (
21) and a chemiluminescence detection kit (Pierce, Rockford, Ill.).
Virus stocks.
The Sicilian (SiAr126) isolate of THOV (
2) was grown in BALB/c mice as previously described (
19). Stock virus prepared from liver homogenates contained 7 × 10
6 PFU per ml as titrated on Swiss mouse 3T3 cells. The original strain of LACV (
43) was grown on baby hamster kidney (BHK-21) cells yielding a titer of 1.2 × 10
8 50% tissue culture infective doses (TCID
50) per ml as determined on Vero cells. The SFV prototype strain was grown on Swiss mouse 3T3 cells yielding a titer of 6.8 × 10
9 TCID
50 per ml as determined on the same cell type.
Experimental viral infections.
For each set of experiments mice were age matched. Five- to eight-week-old mice were anesthetized and intraperitoneally infected with 300 PFU of THOV, 105TCID50 of LACV, or 102 TCID50 of SFV. The animals were monitored for clinical symptoms at least once a day.
Detection of virus yields.
Mice were anesthetized and exsanguinated, and organs and tissue samples were removed, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −70°C. The frozen samples were weighed and transferred to a vial containing 9 volumes of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution per weight of tissue sample. The organs were ground with quartz sand, and the resulting suspensions were cleared by centrifugation and again frozen at −70°C. Virus yields were determined by the TCID50 method with Swiss mouse 3T3 cells for THOV and SFV and Vero cells for LACV.
Immunohistochemical analysis.
Mouse brains were fixed in PBS containing 4% formaldehyde for 48 h and subsequently washed in PBS. Coronal and sagital slices of approximately 3 mm were dehydrated through graded alcohols and embedded in paraffin. Sections of 3-μm nominal thickness were stained with hematoxylin and eosin or stained for cellular and viral proteins. Immunostaining for the glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) was carried out with a rabbit antiserum specific for GFAP (DAKO, Copenhagen, Denmark) and a biotinylated swine anti-rabbit immunoglobulin serum (dilution, 1:300 and 1:250, respectively). Visualization was achieved by using avidin-peroxidase and diaminobenzidine. For the immunostaining of MxA a mouse monoclonal antibody specific for MxA and polyclonal rabbit anti-mouse immunoglobulin serum was used (dilution, 1:50 and 1:20, respectively). Visualization was carried out by using calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase complexed with a mouse monoclonal anti-alkaline phosphatase antibody (dilution, 1:50). Immunostaining of viral antigens was performed with a polyclonal rabbit anti-C protein of SFV (dilution, 1:50) and a polyclonal rabbit antiserum specific for the nucleocapsid protein of LACV (dilution, 1:50) (kindly provided by Raju Ramasamy, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, Tenn.). Mouse monoclonal anti-rabbit immunoglobulins (dilution, 1:25) and a rabbit polyclonal anti-mouse immunoglobulin (dilution, 1:25) were used as bridging antibodies. The remaining steps of the procedure were the same as those used for the immunostaining of MxA. The secondary and tertiary antibodies were purchased from DAKO. All immunostained sections were counterstained with hematoxylin.
DISCUSSION
Here, we show that human MxA protein protects MxA-transgenic mice from lethal virus infection independent of other IFN-induced proteins. We generated MxA-transgenic IFNAR-1
−/− mice because they express MxA constitutively in various organs but are unable to mount an endogenous IFN-α/β response. Challenge experiments revealed that these mice were highly resistant to infection with THOV, a tick-borne orthomyxovirus. We have previously shown that THOV is inhibited by MxA in transgenic mice (
29). The previous experiments were performed with inbred mouse strains that lack functional mouse Mx proteins but possess an otherwise intact IFN-α/β system. It was therefore possible that other IFN-induced proteins would act in conjunction with ectopic MxA to yield complete protection. The results presented here clearly demonstrate that this is not the case. MxA alone is able to block the multiplication of THOV without the help of other IFN-induced proteins. Since antibodies against THOV have been detected in the sera of various species including man (
7), one has to assume that human infections can occur but that the virus may be completely inhibited by the action of human MxA protein. Accordingly, only a few clinical cases due to THOV virus infection in humans have been reported.
In cell cultures, MxA has the potential to inhibit a wide range of RNA viruses, including members of the families
Orthomyxoviridae,
Paramyxoviridae,
Rhabdoviridae,
Bunyaviridae, and
Togaviridae (
18). However, the crucial question about the importance of MxA for the antiviral defense in vivo has remained unanswered. LACV and closely related viruses frequently infect humans (
4,
13). In spite of the high number of infections, clinical cases are rare. We and others have shown previously that the multiplication of LACV and other members of the family
Bunyaviridae is inhibited by MxA in stably transfected Vero cells (
9,
25). These results suggested that MxA is part of the antiviral defense mechanism against bunyaviruses in humans. However, experiments elucidating the effect of MxA in vivo were not possible, because a suitable animal model was missing. The laboratory mouse
Mus musculus shows a strong age-dependent susceptibility to experimental LACV infections. Suckling mice die from infection irrespective of the site of virus inoculation, whereas adult mice develop a lethal encephalitis only when infected by the intracerebral route (
22,
23). The known sensitivity of IFNAR-1
−/− knockout mice to many viral infections (
6,
28) prompted us to test these mice for their susceptibility to LACV (
20). Our results demonstrate that adult IFNAR-1
−/− mice indeed represent a suitable animal model for studies on LACV-mediated pathogenesis. Interestingly, the neurological symptoms and the immunohistological findings observed in LACV-infected IFNAR-1
−/− mice resemble those described in rare cases of acute LACV encephalitis in humans (
24).
Here, we show that about 40% of the MxA-transgenic IFNAR-1
−/− mice survived the experimental infections without apparent clinical symptoms while 100% of IFNAR-1
−/− control mice died. Furthermore, MxA-transgenic animals that succumbed to infection showed a delayed onset of disease. It is presently not clear why only a subset of MxA-transgenic animals survived. The extent to which virus growth was blocked by MxA in muscle cells, the major extraneuronal replication site (
16), may be critical to the course of the disease. For unknown reasons, the level of MxA expression in muscle cells is low in both MxA-transgenic founder lines, G and L (
29), as well as in MxA-transgenic IFNAR-1
−/− mice. As shown in Fig.
4E and
6E MxA expression in the brain is not uniform and there are cells expressing higher levels of MxA than others. Most likely, the inhibition of virus replication is not complete in the periphery and, depending on the MxA expression levels at the site of CNS entry, LACV might gradually overcome MxA-mediated inhibition. In humans, most LACV infections follow a subclinical course, which may be the result of the induction of MxA expression, but nevertheless in a few cases acute encephalitis is produced (
4,
5). In view of the present findings it is conceivable that the degree of clinical manifestations may depend on the extent of IFN production and hence MxA expression during infection. In the few cases where acute illness is observed, the inefficient induction of antiviral effector proteins like MxA might allow uncontrolled LACV replication at the site of primary infection followed by virus spread to the brain. Furthermore, humans with genetic defects in IFN signalling or the MxA gene may be predisposed towards LACV encephalitis. It would be interesting to determine the proper function of IFN signalling and MxA in severe cases of acute LACV encephalitis.
SFV, a member of the family
Togaviridae, is so far the only positive-stranded RNA virus which is affected by the antiviral action of MxA (
27). Here, we show that MxA is also able to inhibit the multiplication of SFV in vivo. One hundred percent of IFNAR-1
−/− mice died upon infection, whereas only 60% of MxA-transgenic IFNAR-1
−/− mice succumbed. Furthermore, viral titers were lower in MxA-transgenic IFNAR-1
−/− mice than in IFNAR-1
−/− control mice. It should be emphasized that SFV was detectable in the brains of all MxA-transgenic animals analyzed. Obviously, MxA is not able to prevent initial infection of the CNS. Rather, MxA appears to reduce virus replication within the brain. The reason why some animals became progressively diseased after a few days and finally succumbed remains elusive. The simplest explanation is that SFV replication occurred initially in brain cells expressing low levels of MxA. This may have led to greater virus loads in the CNS, and gradually the MxA-mediated block of virus multiplication may have been overcome in an increasing number of cells.
Our results demonstrate that MxA is able to protect transgenic animals against a number of viruses and conclusively establish this protein as an important intracellular mediator of the antiviral effects of IFN-α/β.
Progress in genetic engineering should allow us in the near future to introduce genes like
MxA into farm animals in order to improve their disease resistance. A weak spot in the live cycle of arthropod-borne pathogens is their transmission by vectors. Therefore, some viruses could be controlled by MxA even before humans or livestock get infected. In an attempt to establish pathogen-derived resistance in arthropod vectors, the multiplication of LACV was shown to be inhibited in mosquitoes that express genetic elements of the LACV genome (
32). An alternative strategy might be to use MxA for the generation of LACV-resistant mosquitoes.