INTRODUCTION
The retroviral structural polyprotein Gag contains three conserved domains, matrix (MA), capsid (CA), and nucleocapsid (NC). Gag plays the primary role in immature particle assembly and viral genomic RNA (vRNA) recruitment and packaging.
Retroviruses assemble via two different morphogenetic pathways; the first, historically referred to as C-type, wherein particle assembly occurs at the cell membrane, and the second, D-type, assembling in perinuclear regions. The pathogenic human viruses, HIV and human T-cell lymphotropic virus assemble via C-type intermediates, whereas M-PMV is the prototypic D-type retrovirus. The Gag polyprotein of M-PMV is first transported to an intracytoplasmic pericentriolar site, where particle assembly occurs (
1–3). This targeting requires a cytoplasmic targeting/retention signal (CTRS) localized in the MA domain that mediates the interaction of Gag with components of dynein to transport cargo molecules toward the minus ends of the microtubules (
4). After assembly, the immature D-type particles are transported to the plasma membrane, where budding occurs.
Gag nucleation and particle assembly is promoted by interactions between CA domains and also by interactions between NC and both cellular and viral RNA. The importance of RNA for assembly is well documented by
in vitro assembly studies with various retroviruses, e.g., Rous sarcoma virus (RSV), HIV, murine leukemia virus (MLV), and M-PMV (
5–11). Although cellular RNA is sufficient to promote Gag assembly (
12), formation of an infectious retrovirus requires specific packaging of the viral genome (vRNA) into the assembling Gag particle. It is likely that the initial recognition of the genomic nucleic acid is mediated by a few Gag molecules that bring the vRNA to the assembly site (
13). It has been well documented both in HIV and in MLV that the selection of vRNA for packaging into retroviral particles is mediated by specific interaction between the highly structured
Psi sequence at the 5′-untranslated region of unspliced vRNA and zinc-finger motifs of the NC protein (
14–17). Nonspecific interactions between RNA and other Gag domains such as MA may also contribute to recognition (
18,
19).
The current understanding is that the site at which the initial Gag-vRNA interaction occurs is different for different retroviruses. For HIV, vRNA is exported from the nucleus by the
trans-activating factor Rev and subsequently interacts with Gag in the cytoplasm (
20). In RSV, it has been proposed that the primary Gag-vRNA interaction may occur in the nucleus. This is supported by several pieces of evidence, including the presence of two nuclear localization signals in NC and MA recognized by different importins (
21) and the detection of a large amount of RSV Gag in the nuclei of cells treated with leptomycin B (LMB) (
22), a specific inhibitor of the karyopherin CRM1 (chromosome region maintenance 1 receptor) nuclear export pathway. An RSV Gag mutant that bypasses the nucleus packages vRNA less efficiently than the wild type (wt), and both nuclear trafficking and vRNA packaging is restored by the insertion of a heterologous nuclear localization signal (
23,
24). It has been suggested that the formation of the RSV Gag-vRNA complex induces a conformational change of Gag, which leads to the exposure of the nuclear export signal, a leucine-rich region within p10 (
25). However, whether nuclear Gag triggers the export of the full-length RSV vRNA remains an open question, since even Gag proteins that do not enter the nucleus generated infectious particles (
22). The feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) Gag protein cycles through the nuclei of both human and feline cells, and it has been proposed that encapsidation of FIV vRNA may also initiate in the nucleus (
26).
In the case of M-PMV Gag, a small proportion of Gag was observed in nuclei of LMB-treated cells (
22), suggesting a possible interaction of Gag with vRNA within the nucleus. However, the M-PMV vRNA contains a stem-loop structural motif, termed the constitutive transport element (CTE), which can mediate nuclear export of incompletely spliced genomic RNA (
27,
28) through recognition by a cellular factor called TAP, which specifically binds the CTE (
29). The mode of nuclear export and the site of Gag-vRNA interaction therefore remain unclear.
We described previously the local and global organization and arrangements of Gag in
in vitro-assembled immature particles of representatives of three retroviral genera, namely, HIV, RSV, and M-PMV, using cryoelectron tomography (
30). N-terminal domains of CA were arranged into hexameric rings around large holes with the CA domains forming dimers beneath this layer. In HIV and RSV, strong rod-like densities formed by the spacer peptide descended toward the particle center along the 6-fold axis. In contrast, M-PMV lacks the extended rod-like densities contributed by the spacer region in other retroviruses, and the disordered NC-RNA region is closer to CA than in other retroviruses (
31–33). The CA domain of M-PMV contains a stretch of three basic residues (RKK) located very close to its C terminus. Two RKK regions provided by two neighboring CA molecules form a basic patch on the underside of the CA layer in immature Gag arrays. We previously proposed that these residues may interact with nucleic acid, explaining the proximity of the nucleic acid layer and CA in M-PMV (
30). Structural studies of
in vitro-assembled M-PMV tubes show the presence of an extended “nucleic acid-like” filament of density in the vicinity of these residues, suggesting that an organized nucleic acid structure interacts with this motif (
31–33). Here, we have explored the effects of mutating the RKK to AAA or GPG on assembly, nucleic acid incorporation, structure, and virus production.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plasmids and viral constructs.
All DNA manipulations were carried out according to standard subcloning techniques, and all plasmids were propagated in
Escherichia coli DH5α. All newly created DNA constructs were verified by DNA sequencing. For
in vitro assembly assays, the RKK mutations were introduced into pSIT ΔProCANC M-PMV plasmid, which carries the gene for an M-PMV capsid and nucleocapsid fusion protein lacking the N-terminal proline (
34) under the T7 promoter. The
201RKK
203 to AAA or GPG mutations in pSIT ΔProCANC M-PMV were made by SLIM mutagenesis (
35). To introduce mutations in the M-PMV proviral vector pSARM4 (
36), we first used a helper vector (MHelppUC19) encoding M-PMV SacI-Eco72I fragment, which was prepared as described previously (
37,
38). Mutations RKK/AAA and RKK/GPG were created by two-step PCR mutagenesis using primers carrying appropriate mutations and suitable NotI and XmaI restriction sites, respectively. The obtained PCR products were digested with SacI-NotI/NotI-Eco72I or SacI-XmaI/XmaI-Eco72I, and both fragments were ligated into the MHelppUC19. After sequence verification, the mutated SacI-Eco72I fragments of the MHelppUC19, carrying the appropriate mutation, were inserted into pSARM4 or pSARM-EGFP. For the single-round infectivity assay, the M-PMV Env expression vector pTMO (
39) and the pSARM-EGFP vector in which EGFP (enhanced green fluorescent protein) replaces the
env gene (
40) were used. Further details of the cloning strategy and the full sequences of all PCR primers can be obtained from the authors upon request.
Cell growth and virus production.
HEK 293T cells were grown in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium (DMEM; Sigma) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco) and 1%
l-glutamine (PAA Laboratories). Transfection of the HEK 293T cells was performed using FuGene HD transfection reagent (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) according to the manufacturer's instructions. At 24 or 48 h posttransfection, virions in the culture media were harvested, filtered through a 0.45-μm-pore-size filter, and centrifuged through a 20% sucrose cushion at 200,000 ×
g for 1 h in a Beckman SW41Ti rotor. M-PMV proteins were detected by Western blotting with a rabbit anti-M-PMV CA polyclonal antibody (
41).
Bacterial expression and purification of ΔProCANC, AAA, and GPG mutants.
Luria-Bertani medium supplemented with ampicillin (100 μg/ml) was inoculated with a 0.1% (vol/vol) overnight culture of E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying pSIT ΔProCANC M-PMV or an AAA or a GPG mutant plasmid. The cells were cultivated at 37°C and 250 rpm until the culture reached the exponential growth phase (i.e., an optical density at 600 nm of 0.4 to 0.6). Protein expression was induced by the addition of 0.4 mM (final concentration) IPTG (isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside). The cells were harvested at 4 h postinduction by centrifugation at 5,000 × g and stored at −20°C.
The purification of the proteins was performed according to previously published protocols (
5,
42). Briefly, a high-salt containing buffer extraction was used to solubilize and release the protein from the cell lysate pellet. The extracted protein was subsequently purified by immobilized metal affinity chromatography on a Zn
2+-charged column, followed by ion-exchange chromatography on a phosphocellulose column, to remove contaminating nucleic acids. Finally, the protein was dialyzed against storage buffer (50 mM phosphate, 500 mM NaCl, 1 μM ZnSO
4, 0.05% mercaptoethanol [pH 7.5]), concentrated using ultrafiltration on Amicon Ultra-15 Ultracel 10K (Millipore, Ireland) concentrators to ∼1 mg/ml, and stored at −20°C. The protein concentration was determined by using a Bradford protein assay.
Analysis of VLP formation in E. coli.
To determine whether the viral protein assembled inside the bacterial cells during the induced expression process, 1 ml of the cell culture at 4 h postinduction was pelleted, and the cells were resuspended in 350 μl of lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, 100 mM NaCl, 1% [wt/vol] octylthioglucoside, 1 mg/ml lysozyme [pH 8.0]). The suspension was incubated on a rotation mixer for 10 min at room temperature. Using this mild lysis process, the intact virus-like particles (VLPs) were released into the lysate and were subsequently analyzed using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) after negative staining.
In vitro assembly of purified ΔProCANC proteins.
The
in vitro assembly of purified wild-type and mutant ΔProCANC M-PMV proteins was performed as previously described (
5). Briefly, 60 μg of purified protein in storage buffer was mixed with either MS2 phage genomic RNA or λ phage genomic DNA at a 10:1 or 5:1 (wt/wt) ratio in 100 μl of total reaction volume. This mixture was dialyzed against the assembly buffer (50 mM Tris, 100 mM NaCl, 1 μM ZnSO
4 [pH 8.0]) for 2 h at room temperature. When the effect of reducing conditions on the assembly process was studied, the assembly mixture contained 60 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), and the concentration of DTT in the dialysis buffer was 20 mM.
Gradient centrifugation.
The
in vitro particle assembly efficiency was determined by gradient centrifugation, followed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The dialyzed assembly mixture was loaded on top of 10 to 55% linear OptiPrep (Axis-Shield, Oslo, Norway) gradient and centrifuged for 40 min at 215,000 ×
g. The gradient was fractionated, and the individual fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (12% gel). The gels were blue silver stained (
43) and digitized using Uvitec Alliance 4.7 (Uvitec, United Kingdom), and the assembly efficiency was assessed by densitometric analysis of the lanes using the Fiji (ImageJ) software package (
44). The protein content in the topmost fraction of the gradient represented the unassembled protein, whereas the protein content in fractions with an OptiPrep density of around 1.15 to 1.27 g/ml (wt/vol), i.e., fractions 6 to 9, represented the assembled VLPs (
5,
6,
45).
EMSA.
For the electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA), 5 or 1.7 μg of studied protein was mixed with 165 ng of 1-kb DNA ladder (Promega, USA) in 10 μl of total volume of buffered environment (25 mM Tris, 250 mM NaCl, 0.5 μM ZnSO4 [pH 8.0]), corresponding to a protein/nucleic acid ratios of 30:1 (wt/wt) and 10:1 (wt/wt), respectively. The EMSAs were performed under reducing conditions, where the sample reaction mixture contained 60 mM DTT. The samples were incubated 45 min at room temperature. To prove that the nucleic acid shift was caused by the protein nucleic acid interaction, an equivalent reaction mixture was treated with proteinase K (5 μg/reaction) for 45 min at 37°C. All of the samples were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis (1% gel) at 8 V/cm. The gels were stained by ethidium bromide and digitized by UVIdoc HD2 (Uvitec).
Protein expression, radioactive labeling, and quantification of particle release.
The HEK 293T cells transfected with the appropriate DNA construct were grown for 48 h posttransfection, starved for 30 min in methionine- and cysteine-deficient DMEM (Sigma), and then pulse-labeled for 30 min with Tran35S-label (M.G.P., Czech Republic) at 125 μCi/ml. The labeled cells were then chased in complete DMEM for 16 h. The cells from pulse and pulse-chase experiments were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), lysed in 1 ml of lysis buffer (1% Triton X-100, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.05 M NaCl, 25 mM Tris [pH 8.0]) on ice for 30 min, and clarified by centrifugation at 14,000 × g for 2 min. The culture medium of the chased cells was filtered through a 0.45-μm-pore-size filter, and SDS was added to a final concentration of 0.1%. Viral proteins were immunoprecipitated from the cell lysates and culture media with a polyclonal rabbit anti-M-PMV CA antibody (1:1,000 dilution) and separated by SDS-PAGE. Radiolabeled proteins were visualized using a Typhoon 9410 phosphorimager (Amersham Biosciences).
To quantify the particle release, the radiolabeled protein bands of 35S-pulse-labeled Gag (Pr78) and pulse-chase-labeled virion-associated CA (p27) were quantified using ImageQuant TL (Amersham Biosciences). The released viral proteins are shown as relative concentrations of CA correlated to the levels of intracellular Gag in individual samples.
Single-round infectivity assay.
Infectivity of M-PMV wt and CA-CTD mutants was determined as described earlier (
37,
46). Briefly, HEK 293T cells were cotransfected with either wt or RKK/AAA mutant pSARM-EGFP expression vector, together with the glycoprotein expression vector pTMO. At 48 h posttransfection, the culture supernatants were collected and filtered through a 0.45-μm-pore-size filter, and each sample was normalized for capsid protein content by quantitative Western blotting (
37). The volume of culture supernatant used to infect HEK 293T cells was adjusted to 4 ml with complete DMEM, and the cells were incubated for an additional 48 h. The cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde, and the number of GFP-positive cells was determined using flow cytometry (BD FACSAria).
Viral RNA isolation and quantitative RT-PCR.
Reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) was performed as described previously (
37). Briefly, the HEK 293T cells were transfected with wt or RKK/AAA mutant proviral construct. At 48 h posttransfection, the virus-containing medium was filtered and centrifuged, and the M-PMV CA content in the viral pellets was normalized by semiquantitative Western blot analysis. Encapsidated RNA was isolated using the QIAamp viral RNA minikit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The amount of isolated RNA was quantified by measuring the
A260. To specifically quantitate the genomic RNA, RT using RevertAid H Minus M-MuLV reverse transcriptase (Fermentas) of isolated total RNA (of the CA-normalized amount) was performed. Subsequently, 2 μl of each RT product was used for real-time PCR using a Light Cycler 480 II Real-Time PCR system (Roche) and DyNAmo Hot Start SYBR green mix (Finnzymes). Three pairs of MPMV-CA derived primers—CA1ss (GTGGAATCTGTAGCGGACAA) and CA1as (ATTACCGGCTTGTTGGTTTC), CA2ss (GAAACCAACAAGCCGGTAAT) and CA2as (GAGCAAACAATCCTGGATCA), and CA3ss (TATTGGGCCCTCTTATCAGC) and CA3as GCAACACCCTCCTTTCTCTT—were used for each wt and RKK/AAA sample. Three control samples containing (i) total RNA isolated from wt and RKK/AAA mutant, (ii) cDNA prepared from mock-infected cells, and (iii) water were used for real-time quantitative PCR. The viral genomic RNA content in individual samples was determined in three independent experiments.
Nucleus isolation.
HEK 293T cells transiently expressing the wild-type or RKK/AAA mutant M-PMV proviral constructs grown in 100-mm plastic dishes were incubated with leptomycin B (LMB; final concentration, 20 nM) at 24 h posttransfection for 30, 60, and 120 min. The cells were then washed with PBS, and nuclear and cytosolic fractions were isolated using a Nuclei EZ Prep Nuclei Isolation kit (Sigma-Aldrich) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Individual samples of total cell lysate, and nuclear and cytosolic fractions were then analyzed by Western blotting with the following antibodies: rabbit anti-M-PMV CA (the present study), rabbit anti-lamin A (L1293; Sigma-Aldrich), rabbit anti-cyclophilin A (sc-20360; Santa Cruz), and monoclonal anti-β-actin (clone AC-74; Sigma-Aldrich).
TEM sample preparation and analysis.
HEK 293T cells transiently expressing the wild-type or mutant M-PMV proviral constructs grown in 100-mm plastic dishes were washed with PBS, scraped into a microtube, and prefixed with freshly prepared 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.5). After a washing step with 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.5), the cells were postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide, dehydrated in an ethanol series (30, 50, 70, 80, 90, and 100%), and embedded in fresh Agar 100 epoxy resin. Ultrathin sections (70 nm) of cells were cut with a diamond knife on a Leica UC6 ultramicrotome (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). The thin sections were collected on Parlodion-coated microscopy grids and contrasted using saturated uranyl acetate and lead citrate. For each sample, we analyzed approximately 30 infected cells.
In vitro-assembled VLPs were deposited on carbon-coated copper grids for 3 to 6 min. The grid was washed twice on a drop of deionized water for 20 s and stained with sodium silicotungstic acid (4%, pH 7.4) for 30 s. The excess stain was wicked off using a filtration paper, and the samples were dried in air and analyzed using a JEM-1010 transmission electron microscope (Jeol, Japan) operated at 80 kV and equipped with a Megaview III CCD (charge-coupled device) camera. The images were processed using the AnalySIS software suit (Olympus, Japan).
Cryoelectron tomography and subtomogram averaging.
In vitro-assembled mutant ΔProCANC M-PMV RKK/AAA was diluted in PBS containing 10-nm colloidal gold and transferred to glow-discharged C-Flat 2/2 Holey carbon grids in a high-humidity chamber. Cryogrid preparation was performed using a manual plunging device (EMBL, Heidelberg, Germany). Grids were blotted from the back, frozen in liquid ethane, and then stored under liquid nitrogen conditions until imaging.
Data acquisition and image processing were performed as previously described (
32). In brief, tilt series were imaged on a FEI Titan Krios electron microscope operated at 200 keV, with a GIF2002 post-column energy filter (using a slit width of 20 eV) and a 2k×2k Gatan Multiscan 795 CCD camera. Low-magnification montages for search and navigation were acquired using SerialEM (
47). Tilt series were then acquired at appropriate positions using FEI tomography software version 4 in automated batch mode. The nominal magnification was 33,000, giving a calibrated pixel size of 2.87 Å. The tilt range was from −45° to +60° in 3° steps, collecting first from 0° to −45° and then from 3° to 60°, with a total dose of ∼40 e Å
−2 being applied to each tilt series. Defoci ranged between −1.5 and −3.5 μm. Tomograms were reconstructed using the IMOD software suite (
48).
Subtomogram averaging was performed as described previously (
32) using MATLAB scripts derived from the TOM (
49) and AV3 (
50) packages. The Dynamo software package was used for generation of masks and for FSC (Fourier shell correlation) calculations (
51). Initial alignment was performed on 3× binned data. Processing was carried out entirely independent for two half data sets. Each half data set contained roughly the same number of tubes and an equal distribution of defoci. To obtain an initial structure, one tomogram with a defocus of −3.5 μm was chosen for each half-data set. Extracted subtomograms from this tomogram were assigned initial angles based only upon the geometry of the tubes and were averaged to generate a smooth starting reference. The subtomograms from this tomogram were then iteratively aligned and averaged in six dimensions against the reference as described previously (
50). After the structure stabilized it was used as starting reference for its respective half-data set. Subsequently, all subtomograms within each half-data set were aligned and averaged against their respective independent starting reference for six iterations. After the first two iterations, a cross-correlation-based cleaning was performed to remove subtomograms that contained no density corresponding to the M-PMV ΔProCANC protein layer. No symmetry was applied in the alignments performed with binned, non-CTF-corrected data.
The defocus of each tomogram was measured by fitting theoretical contrast transfer function (CTF) curves to averaged power spectra from 512 square pixel tiles generated from all images in a tilt series using MATLAB scripts. CTF correction was performed using the program “CTF phase flip” implemented in IMOD (
52).
Subvolumes with a size of 310 Å
3 were extracted from unbinned, CTF-corrected tomograms at the positions determined in the 3× binned alignments. The subtomograms were subjected to two further alignment iterations in which an additional 2-fold symmetry was applied. The two final references were aligned, averaged, and multiplied with a Gaussian filtered mask. Subsequent comparison of the two final references (averaged from 52,566 and 53,038 asymmetric units in each of the half-data sets, respectively) by FSC indicated a resolution of 10.9 Å. The final structure was sharpened applying a negative B-factor of −1,500 Å
2, while filtering to the resolution determined at the 0.143 FSC threshold. The wt M-PMV ΔProCANC tube structure used for comparison was EMD-2089 (
31). Visualization of tomograms or electron microscopy density maps was performed using either IMOD (
48), UCSF chimera (
53), or Amira4 (FEI Visualization Sciences Group) with the electron microscopy toolbox (
54).