A validated animal model could hasten progress in the development of an effective vaccine for HIV. Here, we demonstrate, in a small pilot study, that immunizations of macaques with vaccines similar to those used in the HIV vaccine RV144 trial in Thailand, which resulted in protection of one-third of the vaccinees from HIV acquisition (
4), also protected few vaccinated macaques from acquisition of the highly pathogenic SIV
mac251 using a dose of challenge virus that transmits few virus variants (
24). However, because the macaque study was not powered sufficiently for scoring protection, further studies will be needed to properly investigate the correlates of protection. Restrictive TRIM5α alleles for SIV
mac251 replication did not account for the lack of SIV
mac251 acquisition in macaques P148, P250, M624, and M927, as demonstrated in previously published work with this virus stock (
30). Interestingly, of the four vaccinated animals that resisted five challenge exposures, two carried the MamuA01 protective allele (animals M624 and M927) (
Table 1). However, because the control group also had animals that carried the same protective allele (
Table 1) and nevertheless acquired SIV
mac251 following mucosal challenge, it is likely that vaccination, in combination with the genotypic status, contributed to the protection from infection, as also observed earlier with these vaccine modalities (
15). In the same conditions, vaccination with gp120 alone did not protect from infection, except a single animal that carried the protective MamuA01 allele and was also able to mount high titers of gp120 antibody with high avidity (
Fig. 4A). Similar to humans vaccinated with an equivalent vaccine regimen (
4), ALVAC-SIV/gp120 immunization did not protect macaques from CD4
+ T-cell loss or high virus plasma levels over time. The ALVAC-SIV/gp120 vaccines in macaques elicited limited CD4
+ T-cell responses and negligible CD8
+ T-cell responses, as in humans (
4). Similarly, all the vaccinated macaques developed binding antibodies to the envelope protein (
4) and neutralizing antibodies to lab-adapted SIV
mac251. Because the study was not powered to assess correlates of protection, we considered the results that follow as exploratory. Vaccine-induced protection from SIV
mac251 acquisition was significantly associated with antibody with high avidity for gp120 but not with neutralizing activity
in vitro, ADCC, or T-cell responses measured by ELISpot, intracellular cytokine staining, and T-cell proliferation. Interestingly, the significant difference in antibody avidity to gp120 was lost when the gp120 protein, used in the assay, had a deletion in V1 and V2. These data suggest that either the V1/V2 could be among target epitopes of antibodies with high avidity or that the V1 and/or V2 may be necessary to maintain the appropriate conformation of the gp120 protein for the optimal binding of high-avidity antibodies, directed to regions other than V1/V2. The results obtained with the cyclic cV2c peptide (
Fig. 5F), although only approaching statistical significance, suggest that V2 may be a target of high-avidity antibodies. In addition, our findings with the virus reduction assay, following retinoic acid stimulation of primary CD4
+ cells, suggest that the ALVAC-SIV priming may be important for the elicitation of antibodies able to reduce viral infectivity under conditions whereby α4β7 is increased by retinoic acid since the sera from animals immunized with gp120 alone did not have this activity (
Fig. 5H and
I).
The similarity of the results obtained in macaques here with those reported in humans using equivalent vaccines, as well as in those by others using different vaccine modalities (
49,
50), is encouraging but needs to be confirmed by properly powered studies since the present study confirms the usefulness of this macaque model despite differences in the immunogens used. The ALVAC-HIV vaccine used in humans expressed the
gag-pro genes, whereas the ALVAC-SIV vaccine used in the present study expressed the
gag-pol genes. The ALVAC-HIV in humans expressed a fused HIV clade E gp120 to the gp41 transmembrane domain of the HIV
LAI strain, whereas the ALVAC-SIV expressed the entire envelope protein. The envelope protein boost in humans consisted of two proteins: HIV clade E and clade B fused to the gD HSV signal peptide and were produced in CHO cells (
4). In macaques, we used only the native monomeric SIV
mac251 gp120 produced in T cells. In addition, the challenge used in the macaque study here was homologous (approximately 1% diversity in the envelope gene of the challenge and the vaccine strain), whereas the vaccinated volunteers in the RV144 trial were likely exposed to more genetically diverse clade E and AE strains (
4). Hopefully, SIV
mac251-based vaccines, constructed as the human vaccines, may be proven, in properly powered animal studies, to confer significant protection from SIV
mac251 as observed within 3 years from vaccination in the Thai volunteers (
4). Animal models have accelerated the development of effective vaccines for human diseases and significantly facilitated the identification of correlates of protection (
51–55), but the models should reflect conditions of the human infection and disease as accurately as possible (
56). Notably, in the present study, the low repeated doses of SIV
mac251 used to challenge the macaques resulted in the transmission of few virus variants, as typically seen in heterosexual transmission of HIV-1 to humans. However, we noticed a significant correlation between time of acquisition and number of variants transmitted in vaccinated but not control animals, suggesting that in animals that are not protected from infection, vaccination may be associated with early transmission of a higher number of virus variants. Further studies will be necessary to confirm these results. Our data demonstrate that the low repeated dose challenge of rhesus macaques with SIV
mac251 may be a relevant model for potentially defining correlates of protection, for demonstrating the effectiveness of other candidate vaccines, and ultimately for the improvement and optimization of vaccines against HIV.