We already observed that RNAi-mediated depletion of ULK1 impairs virus release into the cell culture supernatant (
Fig. 1A). As a next step, we were interested in the role of ULK1 kinase activity in HCMV replication. Consequently, virus release assays were performed in the absence or presence of either SBI-0206965 or ULK-101, a novel and potent ULK1 inhibitor (
Fig. 6A to
C) (
42). To investigate whether ULK1 kinase activity is important for HCMV replication at the immediate early, early, or late stage of infection, HFFs were infected with AD169 (MOI of 0.1), and the respective inhibitors were added at 1.5, 24, or 48 hpi at different concentrations as indicated (
Fig. 6A). At 96 hpi, viral genomes were quantitated in cell culture supernatants by TaqMan-based qPCR. The addition of both inhibitors resulted in the reduced release of viral genomes into the supernatant irrespective of the time point of addition. SBI-0206965 impaired virus release starting at a concentration of 10 μM, whereas ULK-101 proved to be considerably more potent, with significant impairment starting at a concentration of 0.63 μM (
Fig. 6A). At a concentration of 20 μM, SBI-0206965 decreased the number of viral genomes in the supernatant by 58 to 93%, while ULK-101 impaired the release of viral genomes by 65 to 89% at a concentration of 1.25 μM. The impact of ULK1 kinase inhibition on the release of viral genomes was less pronounced after the addition of the inhibitors at 48 hpi than after an earlier addition at 1.5 or 24 hpi. However, the fact that the addition of ULK1 inhibitors at 48 hpi was still able to induce a significant impairment of virus release implies that ULK1 kinase activity plays an important proviral role in late events of the viral replication cycle. As a next step, we aimed to analyze whether the reduced release of viral genomes that we observed in the absence of ULK1 kinase activity is limited to a specific HCMV strain, MOI, or time point of analysis. Thus, HFFs were infected with either AD169 or TB40/E (MOI of 0.1 or 1), followed by the addition of SBI-0206965 (20 μM) or ULK-101 (1.25 μM) at 48 hpi. Viral genomes in the cell culture supernatants were quantitated by TaqMan-based qPCR at 96 to 168 hpi (
Fig. 6B and
C). In AD169-infected cells, the release of viral genomes was reduced by 72 to 91% (MOI of 0.1) and 65 to 83% (MOI of 1) upon inhibition of ULK1 kinase activity (
Fig. 6B). Similarly, in TB40/E-infected cells, release was reduced by 61 to 80% (MOI of 0.1) and 36 to 87% (MOI of 1) (
Fig. 6C). In conclusion, irrespective of the viral strain, MOI, or time point of analysis, the release of viral genomes into the supernatant was significantly reduced in the absence of ULK1 kinase activity, with one exception. The addition of ULK1 kinase inhibitors did not show a significant impairment after infection with TB40/E at an MOI of 0.1 and analysis at 96 hpi; however, the total number of released viral genomes ranged between 695 and 2,321 on average and was therefore very low (
Fig. 6C). To answer the question of whether inhibition of virus release by SBI-0206965 or ULK-101 is due to negative effects on viral gene expression, we investigated the expression pattern of different viral marker proteins throughout the replication cycle in the presence of ULK1 kinase inhibitors (
Fig. 6D). Expression of the immediate early and early proteins IE1 and pUL44 was not affected by the addition of ULK1 kinase inhibitors up to 96 hpi. Surprisingly, we observed a modest increase in steady-state levels of the late proteins′ major capsid protein (MCP) and pp28 (pUL99) at 96 hpi in the presence of ULK1 kinase inhibitors. Most strikingly, however, ULK-101 elicited a distinct mobility shift of the phosphoprotein pp28 (
Fig. 6D, lanes 14, 15, 19, and 20). In particular, at 96 hpi, a slightly slower-migrating form of pp28 merged with a faster-migrating form in the presence of ULK-101 (
Fig. 6D, lane 20). This suggests that phosphorylation of pp28 depends on ULK1 kinase activity. Taken together, our data demonstrate that two chemically distinct ULK1 kinase inhibitors interfere with the release of viral particles without an obvious negative effect on viral gene expression, indicating that ULK1 kinase activity is required for late events of the viral replication cycle.