Research Article
1 January 2011

A New Model of Epstein-Barr Virus Infection Reveals an Important Role for Early Lytic Viral Protein Expression in the Development of Lymphomas

ABSTRACT

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infects cells in latent or lytic forms, but the role of lytic infection in EBV-induced lymphomas is unclear. Here, we have used a new humanized mouse model, in which both human fetal CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells and thymus/liver tissue are transplanted, to compare EBV pathogenesis and lymphoma formation following infection with a lytic replication-defective BZLF1-deleted (Z-KO) virus or a lytically active BZLF1+ control. Both the control and Z-KO viruses established long-term viral latency in all infected animals. The infection appeared well controlled in some animals, but others eventually developed CD20+ diffuse large B cell lymphomas (DLBCL). Animals infected with the control virus developed tumors more frequently than Z-KO virus-infected animals. Specific immune responses against EBV-infected B cells were generated in mice infected with either the control virus or the Z-KO virus. In both cases, forms of viral latency (type I and type IIB) were observed that are less immunogenic than the highly transforming form (type III) commonly found in tumors of immunocompromised hosts, suggesting that immune pressure contributed to the outcome of the infection. These results point to an important role for lytic EBV infection in the development of B cell lymphomas in the context of an active host immune response.
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a human herpesvirus that causes infectious mononucleosis and is associated with both B cell and epithelial-cell malignancies (20, 32). EBV-positive B cell lymphomas include endemic Burkitt lymphoma (BL), Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), lymphoproliferative disease (LPD) in immunocompromised hosts (32), and diffuse large B cell lymphomas (DLBCL), particularly in elderly patients and AIDS patients (29, 30). EBV does not infect rodent cells, making it difficult to study EBV pathogenesis and EBV-induced lymphomas by using small-animal models. EBV-positive transformed B cell lines (lymphoblastoid cell lines [LCLs]) can be grown in SCID mice, but these animals do not have a functional immune system and cannot model the different human B cell differentiation states seen in various types of EBV-positive tumors. Recently, mice with partially reconstituted human immune systems from engraftment of human CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) have provided improved models for studying EBV pathogenesis (4, 38, 43, 44).
A critical advantage of these new model systems is the ability to investigate the role of different forms of viral infection (e.g., latent versus lytic) in the context of selective pressure exerted by the host immune system. This is important because multiple viral and host factors likely determine whether EBV-infected B cells eventually proliferate into lymphomas, and the relative contributions of different factors are not well understood. For example, EBV-positive lymphomas primarily contain cells showing latent forms of infection, but the role of lytic infection in their genesis is unclear. Lytic infection kills the host cell; however, it also allows horizontal spread of EBV from cell to cell and may increase the pool of latently infected B cells from which transformed cells arise. Chronic acyclovir therapy in patients treated for herpes simplex virus reactivation also decreases EBV viral loads (14), suggesting that horizontal EBV transmission may be required to replenish the reservoir of latently infected cells. Consistent with a tumorigenic role for lytic infection, prophylactic treatment of transplant patients with antiviral drugs that inhibit lytic replication may reduce EBV-associated lymphomas (6, 10). Moreover, LCLs derived from a lytic replication-defective EBV mutant have an impaired ability to form LPD-like lesions in SCID mice (12). Additionally, lytically infected B cells secrete factors that may promote B cell tumors through a variety of mechanisms, including the B cell growth factor interleukin 6 (IL-6) (18), two different angiogenesis factors (vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF] and IL-8) (13, 15), and immunosuppressive cytokines (cellular IL-10 [23, 37], viral IL-10 [25, 39], and transforming growth factor β [TGF-β] [2]).
The major counterbalancing element to EBV-driven lymphomagenesis is the host immune response. Much of the human T cell response to EBV is directed against lytic viral proteins (36), as well as against latency proteins that are associated with more aggressive B cell proliferation (3), and thus host immune activity probably particularly limits these highly pathogenic forms of viral infection. Several different types of EBV latency have been described, each characterized by different patterns of EBV gene expression and corresponding differences in immunogenicity (20). Type III latency, in which all 9 latent viral proteins are made, is the only type able to transform primary B cells in vitro; however, this type of infection is highly immunogenic, and tumors with type III latency are usually observed only in immunosuppressed patients (5, 11). At the other end of the spectrum are the type 0/type I forms of latency, in which either no viral protein (type 0) or only EBNA1 (type I) is expressed. Cells with this type of latency persist throughout life in the peripheral memory B cell compartment following recovery from primary EBV infection; type I latency is also found in EBV-positive Burkitt lymphomas (40). Cells with type IIA latency (EBNA1+/LMP1+/EBNA2) are found in memory B cells and germinal center cells in the tonsils of healthy EBV carriers, as well as in EBV-positive Hodgkin lymphomas (41). Cells with type IIB latency (EBNA1+/EBNA2+/LMP1) are found in the tonsils of patients with infectious mononucleosis (22, 27) but have not yet been reported to be the predominant form of infection in any type of EBV-positive human tumor. Thus far, animal models of EBV infection have demonstrated a predominance of type III latency, and it has been difficult to model types 0, I, IIA, and IIB, perhaps because the immune responses in these models have not provided sufficient control of cells with type III latency to allow for the outgrowth of the other less aggressive latency forms.
In the current study, we investigate the role of lytic viral infection in EBV pathogenesis and tumorigenesis by testing a lytic replication-defective EBV mutant compared to a lytically active control strain. We use a new humanized NOD/LtSz-scid/IL2Rγnull (hNSG) mouse model, in which both human CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells and human thymus/liver tissue are engrafted. This model allows for the development of human T cells that are restricted by the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules expressed by their autologous B cells, which is critical for efficient immune control of EBV infection. Thus, the analysis presented here provides the first assessment of the impact of lytic viral infection on lymphoma development within the context of a self-educated human immune system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Humanized NOD/LtSz-scid/IL2Rγnull mice.

Immunodeficient nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient (NOD/LtSz-scid/IL2Rγnull [NSG]) mice were purchased from Jackson Labs (catalogue no. 005557) and used at 6 to 10 weeks of age. Human fetal thymus and liver tissues (gestational age, 17 to 20 weeks) were obtained from Advanced Bioscience Resource (Alameda, CA). Mice were humanized by following the procedure described previously (31). In brief, the recipient mice were conditioned with sublethal (2 to 3 Gy) whole-body irradiation and implanted with fetal thymus and liver fragments under the recipient kidney capsule after irradiation. The mice also received an intravenous injection of purified CD34+ cells isolated from the same fetal liver by the magnetically activated cell sorter (MACS) separation system (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA). The purity of the injected CD34+ cells was at least 80 to 90%. At 10 weeks after immune reconstitution, the levels of human hematopoietic cells in mice were determined by multicolor flow cytometric (FCM) analysis using various combinations of the following antibodies: pan-anti-CD45 (clone HI30), -CD4 (clone RPA-T4 or OKT4), -CD8α (clone RPA-T8), -CD19 (HIB19), and -CD3 (SP34-2). Antibodies directly conjugated to fluorescent dyes were purchased from commercial sources. For flow cytometric analysis, blood was collected from mice 10 weeks after implantation of human cells. Samples were subjected to ACK lysis to remove red blood cells and further purified by density gradient centrifugation using Histopaque (Sigma). Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis was performed on a FACSCalibur (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA). Dead cells were excluded from the analysis.
In one experiment, humanized mice were made without cotransplanting fetal thymic tissue. In brief, NSG mice were irradiated with 2 Gy 24 to 48 h after birth, and purified fetal liver CD34+ cells (0.5 million) were injected intrahepatically into each mouse. Immune reconstitution was documented as above.

Viruses and plasmids.

Wild-type (WT) EBV (B95-8 strain), expressing the green fluorescent protein (GFP) and a hygromycin B resistance gene, and the BZLF1-deleted mutant virus (Z-KO) were constructed using bacterial artificial chromosome technology as described previously (7, 8) and were a gift from Henri-Jacques Delecluse. WT and Z-KO 293 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% penicillin-streptomycin, and hygromycin B (100 μg/ml; Roche). Raji, an EBV-positive Burkitt lymphoma cell line, was maintained in RPMI 1640 medium with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. Plasmid DNA was purified through columns as described by the manufacturer (Qiagen). The EBV pSG5-BZLF1 and pSG5-gp110 expression vectors were gifts from Diane Hayward (34) and Henri-Jacques Delecluse (26), respectively.

EBV infection of mice.

293 cells latently infected with the WT or Z-KO viruses were converted to the lytic form of EBV infection by transfecting them with BZLF1 and gp110 expression vectors by using the FuGENE 6 transfection reagent (Roche) as per the manufacturer's protocol. Supernatants were harvested at 72 h posttransfection and filtered through a 0.45-um-pore-size filter. The virus was concentrated by centrifuging at 18,000 rpm for 3 h using an SW27 rotor, resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) overnight at 4°C, and then stored at −80°C. To determine the titer of the EBV stock, Raji cells were infected with serial 10-fold dilutions of virus. After 48 h, cells were treated with 50 ng/ml phorbol-12-myristate-3-acetate (PMA; Sigma) and 3 mM sodium butyrate (Sigma), and the GFP-expressing Raji cells were counted 24 h later by fluorescence microscopy. The amount of virus required to form one GFP-positive Raji cell was defined as one green Raji unit (GRU).
Mice were injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with 2,750 GRUs of WT or Z-KO EBV in 250 μl PBS or mock infected with PBS alone. In most experiments, half of the mice derived from a particular donor (8 to 12 mice per donor) were infected with the WT virus, and the other half were infected with the Z-KO virus. In one experiment, half of the mice reconstituted with a particular donor were infected with the Z-KO virus, and the other half were mock infected (and thus more animals were infected with Z-KO virus than with the control WT virus). One WT EBV-infected animal and one Z-KO virus-infected animal were sacrificed at days 3 and 20 postinfection, and the rest of the animals were sacrificed at 60 to 65 days postinfection unless they exhibited clinical signs, including weight loss, disturbed gait, or hair loss. Organs, including spleen, lymph node, lung, liver, pancreas, kidney, heart, implanted human fetal thymus, head, bone marrow, muscle, stomach, bowel, and salivary gland, were collected and fixed with 10% formalin and then paraffin embedded.

Detection of EBV-encoded RNAs (EBERs) by in situ hybridization.

EBER in situ hybridization studies were performed using the PNA ISH detection kit (DakoCytomation) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, tissues were deparaffinized and rehydrated and then treated with 1:10 diluted proteinase K at room temperature for 20 min. After tissues were washed, EBER probe was added on top of the tissue and covered with a cover slide. Hybridization was performed at 55°C for 90 min. After hybridization, tissues were washed with stringent washing solution at 55°C for 30 min. Anti-fluorescein isothiocyanate (anti-FITC)/AP was added and incubated at room temperature for 30 min, and substrate was then added to develop the color. Tissues were counterstained with nuclear fast red. To compare the number of EBV-infected cells in animals infected with the WT versus that in animals infected with the Z-KO virus, we calculated the number of EBER-positive cells in each mouse by counting the positive cells in slides that included sections containing the kidney, liver, implanted fetal thymus, spleen, and lung from each animal. Although other tissues or organs, such as lymph nodes, also contained some EBER-positive cells, since these tissues were not consistently present on the slides of all animals, they were excluded in the comparison.

Measurement of EBV viral loads.

Plasma samples (approximately 100 μl) were collected from jugular vein bleeds after euthanasia of animals and frozen. DNA was extracted using the QIAamp DNA minikit and eluted in 100 μl nuclease-free water. Five microliters of the DNA was applied in duplicate quantitative PCR (Q-PCR) targeting the EBV BamH1W segment [EBV W1, 5′-GCAGCCGCCCAGTCTCT-3′; EBV W2, 5′-ACAGACAGTGCACAGGAGCCT-3′; and EBVWprobe, 5′-(6-carboxyfluorescein)AAAAGCTGGCGCCCTTGCCTG(6- carboxytetramethylrhodamine)-3′] as previously described (33). Human ApoB DNA was quantitated in a separate well as a marker of the efficacy of extraction and amplification. The EBV PCR assay has a sensitivity of 6 copies per PCR.

Immunohistochemistry.

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections and cells were deparaffinized and hydrated and then treated with 10 mM citrate buffer (0.05% Tween 20, pH 6.0) for 20 min in a water bath at 98°C. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with 0.3% hydrogen peroxidase solution, and nonspecific labeling was blocked in a 5% goat serum blocking solution. Sections were incubated with the first antibody for 1 h at room temperature. The Super Sensitive polymer-horseradish peroxidase immunohistochemistry detection system (BioGenex Inc.) was used by following the manufacturer's instruction. Colors were developed with the diaminobenzidine tetrachloride (DAB) substrate kit (Vector Laboratories Inc.) by following the manufacturer's instruction. In the cases of double staining, a combination of the DAB substrate kit (nickel solution was added to DAB) and the Vector VIP substrate kit (Vector Laboratories Inc.) was used by following the manufacturer's instruction. Antibodies (and dilutions) used were as follows: anti-CD3 (polyclonal; DakoCytomation; 1:200), anti-CD20 (clone H1, BD Pharmingen; 1:600), anti-CD27 (clone M-T271, BD Pharmingen; 1:300), anti-LMP1 (CS.1-4, DakoCytomation; 1:800), anti-EBNA1 (EB14, a gift from Richard Burgess, University of Wisconsin; 1:2,000), anti-EBNA2 (PE2, Abcam; 1:100), anti-BZLF1 (BZ1, Santa Cruz; 1:200), anti-BMRF1 (G3-E31, Vector Laboratories; 1:200), anti-GP350/220 (OT6, gift from Jaap Middeldorp, Vrije Universiteit University Medical Center, Netherlands; 1:2,000), anti-CD4 (BC/1F6, Biocare Medical; 1:25), and anti-CD8 (SP16, Biocare Medical; 1:50). In addition, to confirm type IIB latency status (EBNA2+/LMP1), we repeated LMP1 staining using a different anti-LMP1 antibody (OTC21C, a gift from Jaap Middeldorp; 1:200) in some animals. EBV 293 cells were converted to the lytic form of EBV infection by transfecting them with the SG5-BZLF1 vector and then fixed with 2% agar in 1% formalin and paraffinized for immunohistochemistry detection to serve as a positive control for lytic viral protein immunohistochemical (IHC) assays.

T cell proliferation assays.

hNSG mice were infected with 2,750 GRUs of WT or Z-KO EBV suspended in PBS or mock treated with PBS alone. Twenty to 35 days postinfection, animals were sacrificed and splenocytes were harvested. The splenocytes were depleted of B cells by magnetic sorting using anti-CD19 beads (Miltenyi Biotech) and labeled with 2.5 μM carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). Autologous uninfected B cells, or lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) made by infecting autologous B cells with WT EBV or Z-KO EBV, were γ-irradiated (7,500 rads) and cultured with the CFSE-labeled splenic cells at a ratio of 1:50. After 7 to 8 days of culture, the cells were fluorescently stained for expression of CD3 to identify T cells, treated with DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) to allow for the exclusion of dead cells, and analyzed by flow cytometry. The percentage of T cells that had undergone cell division was determined by gating on DAPI-negative CD3-positive cells and assessing the fraction that showed diminished CFSE fluorescence intensity.

T cell killing assays.

Splenocytes from WT or Z-KO EBV-infected or mock-treated mice were magnetically depleted of B cells and labeled with CFSE as described above. The splenic cells were incubated in culture medium at 37°C at a 3:1 ratio with autologous uninfected B cells or LCLs made by infecting the B cells with WT EBV or Z-KO EBV. In parallel, uninfected B cells or WT or Z-KO LCLs were incubated alone (without splenic effector cells) to assess the amount of spontaneous cell killing. After 4 h, the cultures were stained with DAPI to identify dead or dying cells and analyzed by flow cytometry. Percent target cell killing was assessed for each culture by determining the fraction of the total CFSE-negative population that showed elevated DAPI staining. Specific killing was calculated by subtracting the amount of spontaneous cell death of target cells alone from the amount of cell death observed in the presence of splenic effector cells.

Delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) assay.

WT or Z-KO EBV-infected thymus-engrafted hNSG(thy) mice (four animals each) and two mock-infected hNSG(thy) mice were subcutaneously injected into the right hind footpad with 12.5 μg of commercially available EBV antigens (Meridian Life Science, Inc., Memphis, TN) in a total volume of 25 μl 1 month postinfection. To control for swelling caused by the injection itself, PBS alone was injected into the left hind footpad. The hind footpad thickness was measured 24 h postinjection by using a dial thickness gauge. The preinjection measurement was subtracted from the postinjection measurement to obtain specific swelling values. DTH reactivity is shown as the change in thickness of the hind footpad expressed in units of 10−4 inches.

RESULTS

Successful multilineage human hematopoietic reconstitution and thymic engraftment of NSG mice.

To generate an in vivo model that would allow analysis of EBV pathogenesis and lymphoma formation in the context of a self-educated human immune system, we injected irradiated NSG mice intravenously (i.v.) with human fetal CD34+ cells (purified from fetal liver) and cotransplanted a small piece of the fetal thymus (with liver tissue) under the kidney capsule, as previously described (31). Reconstitution levels of human cells in the NSG mice were determined using multicolor flow cytometric analysis at 10 weeks posttransplantation. At the time point of EBV infection (10 to 12 weeks after engraftment), human-derived CD45 cells comprised around 35% of the total leukocyte population, and both T cells (including CD4- and CD8-positive cells) and B cells were present (Fig. 1). In addition, the engrafted human thymic tissue remained viable under the mouse kidney capsule for the duration of the experiments.

Both the control EBV and a lytic replication-defective mutant establish long-term latency in hNSG(thy) mice and traffic to similar sites.

To directly test the role of lytic infection in the pathogenesis of EBV infection, we compared a lytically active control virus to a deletion mutant strain (Z-KO) lacking BZLF1, a transcription factor required for lytic viral gene expression (20, 32). The Z-KO virus contains a kanamycin resistance cassette (inserted between nucleotides 102389 to 103388 using B95.8 coordinates) that specifically disrupts BZLF1 function, and the phenotype of the mutant virus can be rescued in trans by the expression of the BZLF1 gene product (7, 8). Immune reconstituted mice were infected i.p. with equal titers of the control or Z-KO virus and sacrificed at various time points after infection or sooner if they showed signs of clinical illness. Multiple different organs were examined for the presence of EBV-infected cells using the EBER in situ hybridization assay. EBERs are expressed in all latently EBV-infected cells regardless of their latency type (20). While the number of EBER-positive cells was somewhat variable, every EBV-infected animal, regardless of whether infected by the control or the Z-KO virus, was found to have at least some EBV-infected (EBER-positive) cells at the time of autopsy, except for the animals sacrificed at day 3 postinfection. No EBER-positive cells were found in the tissues from uninfected hNSG(thy) animals (data not shown).
To determine if horizontal viral transmission is required for the ability of EBV to infect certain cell types or to reach certain sites in the body, we compared the sites of EBER-positive cells in tumor-free animals infected with the control or Z-KO virus. EBER-positive cells were most frequently observed in the liver, spleen, kidney, lung, and transplanted human thymic tissue (Table 1). In some animals, EBER-positive cells were found in the bone marrow, nasal lymphoid tissues, mesentery, and muscle tissue (Fig. 2 and data not shown). In the transplanted fetal thymus, EBV-positive cells were most commonly found in the medulla area, often near Hassall's corpuscles (Fig. 3A). In the spleen, EBV-positive cells were usually located within CD20-rich lymphoid zones (Fig. 3B). No clear differences in the sites and numbers of EBER-positive cells were observed in animals infected with the control virus or the Z-KO virus (Table 1). Although Z-KO-infected animals were somewhat more likely than control virus-infected animals to have EBV-infected B cells in the thymus and spleen, the differences were not statistically significant. Since the Z-KO virus is not horizontally transmitted, these results indicate that EBV-infected B cells home to many different organs in this model and that transmission of EBV from cell to cell via the lytic form of viral infection is not required for the establishment of long-term viral latency.

B cells are the predominant host cell type infected by EBV in this model.

Although EBV is primarily found in B cells and epithelial cells in healthy humans, it can infect T cells and monocytes/macrophages in vitro (35) and is found in some T cell and NK cell lymphomas (17). To determine if EBV can infect cell types other than B cells in the hNSG(thy) mouse model, we costained multiple tissues using an anti-EBNA1 antibody and antibodies specific for human B cells (CD20), T cells (CD3), monocytes (CD14 and CD68), hematopoietic stem cells (CD34), and epithelial cells (anticytokeratin). All EBNA1-positive cells costained with CD20 in every organ, including the transplanted human thymus (Fig. 4A). Some EBNA1-positive cells also costained with anti-CD27, a marker for memory B cells (Fig. 4B). Thus, few if any T cells or monocytes are infected with either the control or Z-KO EBV in this model.

EBV establishes type I and type IIB latency in hNSG(thy) mice.

To define the type(s) of viral latency established by the control and Z-KO EBV, we performed an IHC assay in EBER-positive areas from multiple different types of organs in tumor-free animals, using anti-EBNA1, anti-EBNA2, and anti-LMP1 antibodies. As summarized in Table 2, type I and type IIB latency were the most common forms of EBV infection in both the control virus-infected and Z-KO-infected mice. As we were unable to perform EBER in situ hybridization assays on the same cells used to perform EBNA IHC assays (due to loss of EBNA1 IHC staining under the EBER staining conditions and vice versa), we could not determine how many cells had type 0 latency. However, since we generally found more EBER-positive cells than EBNA1-positive cells in the tumor-free animals (data not shown), cells with type 0 latency may have also been present. Some animals had a mixture of various different types of latency depending upon the location. An example of cells with type I latency is shown in Fig. 5A, and examples of cells with type IIB latency are shown in Fig. 5B to D. Latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1)-positive cells were rare and/or nonexistent in most tumor-free hNSG(thy) animals infected with either the control or Z-KO EBV. Rare LMP1+/EBNA2 cells (type IIA latency) were found in the kidney of a control EBV-infected mouse (Fig. 6A). In tumor-free animals, cells with type III latency were observed most frequently at the day 20 time point (Fig. 6B and C). Thus, in animals that successfully limit their EBV infection, type III latency is transient, presumably because the host immune response eliminates cells with type III latency.

Fewer lymphomas develop in Z-KO-infected hNSG(thy) mice.

Although many mice had asymptomatic infection, some EBV-infected mice eventually developed B cell lymphomas in this model. Importantly, the lytic replication-defective Z-KO virus produced significantly fewer lymphomas than the control virus. Six of the 11 mice infected with the control virus developed lymphomas, versus only 2 of the 14 Z-KO virus-infected animals (P < 0.05) (Fig. 7A). All EBV-positive tumors were CD20+ DLBCL-like lymphomas. A number of the EBV-induced lymphomas in this model were small and discovered only after review of a series of slide sections obtained from multiple different organs. Interestingly, in contrast to the EBV-induced lymphomas found in humanized mouse models that do not include engrafted human thymic tissue, which have all been reported to have type III latency (4, 38, 43), we found that some of the lymphomas in this hNSG(thy) model had type I (Fig. 7B) and type IIB (Fig. 7C) latency, although others did have type III latency (Fig. 7D) (summarized in Table 3 ). No uninfected mice developed lymphomas (data not shown). These results suggest that one or more lytic viral proteins enhance the development of B cell lymphomas in the hNSG(thy) mouse model and show that this model provides for the development of EBV-positive lymphomas with type I and type IIB latency.

Lytically infected cells in tumors of mice infected with the control virus.

To examine the effect of lytic viral infection upon the level of EBV DNA in the plasma, we performed viral load assays in a subset of mock- and Z-KO and control virus-infected animals. Somewhat surprisingly, the only animal that had detectable viral DNA in the plasma was a control virus-infected animal with a large type III lymphoma (Table 4). Although it is possible that EBV plasma viral loads might have been higher if measured at earlier time points after control virus infection, these results suggest that the development of an effective anti-EBV T cell response in this model acts to eliminate cells with lytic viral infection.
We also performed an IHC assay using antibodies directed against three different classes of lytic viral proteins (the immediate-early BZLF1 protein, the early BMRF1 protein, and the late gp350/220 protein) in all animals infected with the control EBV strain. Whereas no lytically infected cells were observed by IHC assay in any tissues from tumor-free mice (including the one animal examined at 3 days postinfection), rare cells expressing the BZLF1 and BMRF1 proteins, but not the gp350/220 protein, were found within B cell lymphomas (Fig. 8A); as expected, no BZLF1- or BMRF1-positive cells were found in any of the tumors infected with the Z-KO virus (data not shown). All BZLF1-positive cells costained with CD20 (data not shown), indicating that they were B cells. Notably, the absence of late viral antigen staining in the lymphoma cells suggests that lytic infection is either abortive or that cells expressing late viral proteins are rapidly eliminated. Interestingly, EBV infection of mice that were reconstituted with human CD34+ stem cells in the absence of cotransplanted thymic tissue resulted in the development of tumors showing greater evidence of lytically infected cells (Fig. 8B). Thus, the self-educated T cells of the thymus-engrafted mice may contribute to the elimination of lytically infected cells.

Development of EBV-specific immune responses in hNSG(thy) mice.

EBV-positive cells in tumor-free animals were almost always surrounded by CD3+ T cells (Fig. 9A, suggesting that T cells actively interact with EBV-infected B cells prior to tumor development. To investigate this directly, we assessed the responses of primary T cells from infected and uninfected mice to EBV-infected or uninfected B cells. Splenocytes from the control or Z-KO virus-infected or mock-infected mice were depleted of B cells and then labeled with CFSE and cultured with uninfected B cells or B cells that were infected in vitro with the control or Z-KO EBV (i.e., LCLs). After 7 to 9 days, the cultures were stained with anti-CD3 and DAPI and analyzed by flow cytometry for the percentage of live T cells that showed diminished CFSE fluorescence (indicating that cell division had taken place). As shown in Fig. 9B, T cells obtained from mice infected with either the Z-KO virus or the control virus showed significantly higher proliferation when exposed to EBV-infected B cells than when exposed to uninfected B cells. Additionally, T cells derived from mock-infected animals had minimal proliferative responses to the EBV-infected LCLs (Fig. 9B). Thus, primary T cells from EBV-infected mice proliferated specifically in response to EBV-infected LCLs, whereas T cells from uninfected mice did not.
To further investigate the potential for immune-mediated control of EBV-infected cells in this model, cell killing assays were performed using splenic effector cells (e.g., T cells and NK cells) and uninfected B cells or LCLs infected with the control or Z-KO virus as target cells. As shown in Fig. 9C, in a 4-h assay, splenic effector cells from a mock-infected animal showed no specific killing of EBV-infected B cells (either control virus or Z-KO virus infected). In contrast, splenocytes from each of the two Z-KO virus-infected animals examined showed cytotoxic effector activity to both control virus- and Z-KO virus-infected LCLs, as did splenocytes from one of the two control virus-infected animals examined. There was no specific killing of uninfected B cells by effector cells from any of the animals, confirming that the cytotoxic response was specific to infected LCLs (Fig. 9C). These results suggest that in this model, primary effector cells from EBV-infected animals can produce a functional killing response against EBV-infected B cells.
As another measure of the host immune response against EBV, we examined in vivo delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses to an antigen preparation from EBV-infected cells. DTH responses are localized inflammatory responses initiated by the activation of antigen-specific lymphocytes that result in multicellular infiltration and edema. Mice that were either mock infected or infected with the control or Z-KO virus were inoculated in the footpads with a preparation of protein antigens from a lytically induced EBV-positive cell line or PBS, and the amount of swelling in the footpads was measured 24 h later (Fig. 9D). Both control EBV- and Z-KO virus-infected animals had significantly more swelling in response to the EBV antigen than the mock-infected animal. The DTH responses were not significantly different between control EBV- and Z-KO EBV-infected animals. This assay provides powerful confirmation that mice infected with either the control or ZKO virus strain develop in vivo immune responses against proteins from EBV-infected cells.

EBV-positive tumors of different latency types all attract a vigorous inflammatory response in hNSG(thy) mice.

Finally, we stained tumors with anti-CD3 antibody (which recognizes all T cells), as well as anti-CD8 and anti-CD4 antibodies. All of the EBV-positive lymphomas, including those with type III latency (in which the immune response is obviously inadequate), were infiltrated with both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in this model (Fig. 10A). Interestingly, the CD4 cell infiltration of tumors with type IIB latency appeared particularly robust (Fig. 10B). Levels of T cell infiltration of the tumors containing the control EBV versus the Z-KO virus were not obviously different. These results indicate that host T cells interact with various different types of EBV-positive tumors in this model, even when the tumors are not effectively eliminated.

DISCUSSION

The potential role of lytic viral infection in the development of various types of EBV-positive malignancies has remained unclear, in part due to the lack of suitable animal models to study this question. In addition, it has been difficult to study the role of the more restricted forms of viral latency in EBV-positive cancers using animal models, since EBV cannot infect rodent cells, and in the absence of a highly functional engrafted human immune system, lymphomas with type III latent infection inevitably develop. In this paper, we have used a new humanized mouse model to directly assess the effects of a lytic replication-defective BZLF1-deleted mutant compared to those of an otherwise identical BZLF1+ control strain. We show that the lytic replication-defective mutant develops fewer lymphomas in this model. In addition, we demonstrate that this is the first humanized mouse model able to support the development of EBV-induced B cell lymphomas with restricted forms of viral latency (type I and type IIB), a feature that may be related to the presence of self-educated T cells that are able to efficiently recognize EBV-infected B cells.
We previously showed that early-passage LCLs infected with EBV are more efficient in producing LPD-like lesions in SCID mice than LCLs infected with the Z-KO virus (12). However, the SCID mouse model does not have human immune effector populations, cannot support horizontal viral transmission, and does not contain the various different stages in human B cell differentiation. Thus, there is a critical need for the development of new, more sophisticated models to study the pathogenesis of EBV infection in vivo.
The current study is the first to comprehensively examine EBV pathogenesis in just such a system. A previous study using a similar model system showed the development of EBV-specific MHC class I- and class II-restricted adoptive immune responses (24) following infection with EBV; however, the behavior of EBV, including its ability to establish latency and form tumors, was not described. Our results showing enhanced lymphoma formation after infection by lytically active EBV suggest that horizontal transmission of virus is important for lymphoma formation, which is consistent with the findings of another group showing that the ability of EBV to induce LPD in NOD/Shi-scid/IL2rγnull (NOG) mice following immune reconstitution with human cord blood hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) (but not thymic tissue) is dependent on the dose of virus used to infect the mice (43). Nevertheless, since we found that the lytic replication-defective Z-KO virus efficiently establishes viral latency in this model, another possibility is that lytically infected cells promote EBV-induced lymphomas through paracrine mechanisms and/or immunosuppressive factors.
Similar to another recent study examining EBV infection in hNSG mice (38), we detected few if any cells with lytic EBV infection in tumor-free animals, although we found lytically infected cells within the EBV-induced tumors. In addition, we did not detect EBV DNA in the plasma of any tumor-free animal. Since the previous study found that much of the CD8 T cell response in their model is directed against lytic viral antigens (38), lytic EBV infection must clearly occur at a low level in the tumor-free animals, even if it is difficult to detect by using IHC methods or by measuring viral DNA in the plasma at the time points tested in our study. The finding that lytically infected cells are preferentially found in lymphomas in both this study and a previous study (38) is consistent with the hypothesis that lytically infected cells contribute to tumor growth through paracrine mechanisms and are thus selected for in tumors. The fact that we detected tumor cells with BZLF1 and BMRF1 expression, but not gp350/220 expression, suggests that lytic infection in tumor cells may be abortive. Interestingly, abortively lytic EBV infection which occurs shortly after EBV infection in vitro was recently reported to contribute to EBV-induced cellular proliferation of naïve and memory B cells (but not germinal center B cells) (19). Nevertheless, detectable lytic infection in the humanized mouse model could also simply be a marker for an inadequate immune response to EBV.
Clearly, the hNSG(thy) mouse model does not always fully contain EBV infection, as evidenced by the finding that some EBV-infected mice went on to eventually develop EBV-induced lymphomas. Another technical problem with humanized mouse models in general is the tendency of the mice to develop graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) as they age. While we did not find that EBV infection affected the onset or severity of GVHD (in comparison to the mock-infected mice) in this study, the development of GVHD at late time points after immune reconstitution in this model is currently an impediment for studying EBV pathogenesis for periods longer than 2 months postinfection.
Nevertheless, several findings in the current study suggest that this model will be particularly attractive for the study of EBV-associated diseases. First, the virus is able to establish type I latency (and likely type 0 latency) in memory B cells, closely mimicking the behavior of the virus in healthy humans following recovery from primary EBV infection. Second, similar to healthy humans, tumor-free animals in this model have few if any cells with the most immunogenic (and transforming) form of latent viral infection (type III latency), suggesting that the immune response is successfully recognizing and destroying such cells. We found that primary T cells from infected hNSG(thy) mice showed specific responses to EBV-infected B cells in vitro and developed antigen-dependent DTH responses in vivo. Since the T cell responses were also present in Z-KO virus-infected animals, at least a portion of the anti-EBV immune response in the hNSG(thy) model is directed against latent viral antigens. Finally, although some animals do eventually develop EBV-positive lymphomas, only a portion of these lymphomas have type III latency (similar to EBV-induced LPD in immunosuppressed humans), whereas other lymphomas have forms of viral latency (such as type I) that occur in EBV-positive tumors of immunocompetent humans. Thus, although a variety of different approaches have been recently developed to examine EBV pathogenesis in mice with a reconstituted functional human immune system (4, 24, 38, 43), this is the first human immune-reconstituted mouse model found to support the development of EBV-induced tumors that have type I and type IIB latency.
Interestingly, similar to the results of several other recent studies using human immune reconstituted mice (4, 43), we did not obtain EBV-positive lymphomas with type IIA latency (typical of EBV-positive Hodgkin's disease). The lack of type IIA lymphomas may reflect the fact that cells with this form of latency are very rare in the tumor-free animals (perhaps reflecting an imperfect reconstitution of the normal B cell differentiation in the lymphoid structures) and/or the requirement for multiple different cellular mutations to complement the role of EBV in such tumors. To date, NOD/SCID mice transplanted with human HSCs (and no thymus) is the only mouse model reported to support EBV-positive lymphomas with type IIA latency (16). Since the method used to diagnose type IIA latency in this study was reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) based, the results need to be confirmed by IHC staining of the tumors. In any event, since human T cells do not engraft efficiently in the NOD/SCID mouse model, NOD/SCID mice are not useful for studying EBV pathogenesis in the context of an intact immune system.
Nevertheless, our results here, as well as those of another group (4), suggest that the hNSG(thy) model should prove useful for studying other types of viral latency, particularly the type IIB form. Type IIB latency has been found in EBV-infected B cells within the tonsils of infectious mononucleosis (IM) patients (22, 27), but currently very little is known about this type of latency. While type IIB latency has been proposed to be a marker of newly infected cells (since EBNA2 is expressed prior to LMP1 during B cell infection) (27), our finding that Z-KO virus-infected hNSG(thy) mice have cells with type IIB latency long after the initial infection indicates that type IIB latency is not restricted to newly infected cells. Instead, since type IIB latency preferentially occurs in the follicular region of IM tonsils, whereas type IIA latency primarily occurs in the germinal centers (22), interactions occurring between B cells and T cells within normal lymphoid structures may regulate the EBV latency state.
The development of tumors with predominantly type IIB latency in our model was unexpected and suggests that this type of latency, although nontransforming by itself, must provide some sort of survival advantage for the tumor cells. Although cells with this form of EBV gene expression pattern have been described within AIDS-associated lymphomas and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) (9, 28), they represent only a portion of the cells in such tumors, and it has been generally assumed that the cells with type III latency are driving the growth of such tumors. Type IIB latency also occurs following EBV infection of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) B cells in vitro (1), but such cells are not stably transformed by EBV. Interestingly, CD40 ligand stimulation has been shown to replace the growth stimulation function of LMP1 in LCLs derived with an LMP1-deleted virus (21). Since the CD4 cells are a major source of CD40 ligand (42), the close proximity of CD4 cells with EBV-positive B cells in the tumors with type IIB latency (Fig. 10) may induce CD40 signaling in the EBV-infected cells (reducing the need for LMP1 expression). In the future, it will be important to determine whether type IIB infection is more common than previously recognized during normal EBV infection in humans and what role it plays, if any, in different types of EBV-associated malignancies.
FIG. 1.
FIG. 1. Reconstitution of human hematopoietic cells in NSG mice. Peripheral blood was collected from immune reconstituted hNSG(thy) mice 10 weeks after human fetal CD34 cell transplantation and stained with antibodies specific for human CD45, CD3, and CD19 by flow cytometry. Dead cells were excluded from the analysis. The reconstitution levels in 12 mice that were subsequently infected with control EBV, versus 16 mice that were subsequently infected with Z-KO EBV, are shown. Results are presented as the percentages of positively staining cells with each antibody in comparison to the total leukocyte population.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2. Both control and Z-KO virus-infected animals have EBER-positive cells at multiple different sites. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and EBER in situ hybridization were performed on a variety of different organs in tumor-free animals infected with the control or Z-KO virus. EBER-positive cells were detected at many different sites, including the nasal lymphoid tissue surrounding the vomeronasal organ (VNO; outlined with hatches; 20× magnification) (A) and muscle (20× magnification) (B). Examples of positively staining cells are illustrated with arrows.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3. EBER-positive cells travel to specific regions of the transplanted thymic tissue and reconstituted spleen. H&E, EBER, CD20, and CD3 staining was performed on transplanted thymic tissue (20× magnification) (A) and spleen (40× magnification) (B). Ki67 staining was also performed on the cells shown in panel B. EBV-positive cells were primarily located in the medulla region of the thymic tissue and primarily localized to CD20-rich lymphoid zones (outlined with hatches) of the spleen.
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4. All EBV-positive cells are CD20 positive and some are CD27 positive. Dual color immunohistochemistry was performed using anti-EBNA1 (black) and anti-CD20 (pink) antibodies in transplanted thymic tissue (A) or anti-EBNA1 (black) and anti-CD27 (pink) antibodies in the spleen (B) (both, 100× magnification). EBNA1-positive cells with costaining for CD20 or CD27 are indicated by black arrows, and EBNA1-negative CD20- and CD27-positive cells are indicated by pink arrows.
FIG. 5.
FIG. 5. Control and Z-KO viruses establish long-term type I and type IIB latency. EBER in situ hybridization, as well as anti-EBNA1, anti-EBNA2, and anti-LMP1 staining, was performed as indicated to determine the type(s) of viral latency established in tumor-free animals. Some slides were also stained for CD20 or CD3 as indicated. Arrows show examples of positively staining cells. (A) Type I latency in a lymph node of a Z-KO virus-infected animal (20× magnification in upper panels and 40× magnification in lower panels). (B) Type IIB latency program in the spleen of a control virus-infected animal; cells expressing EBNA2 are shown with arrows (all, 40× magnification, except the upper right panel shows 100× magnification). Hatches indicate CD20+ lymphoid aggregates. (C) Type IIB latency in the transplanted thymic tissue of a Z-KO virus-infected animal; the Hassal's corpuscles (HC) are outlined with hatches. EBER analysis (20× magnification) and EBNA2 and LMP1 IHC assay (both 100× magnification) are shown. (D) Type IIB latency program in the kidney of a Z-KO virus-infected animal (all, 100× magnification).
FIG. 6.
FIG. 6. Latency types IIA and III occur rarely in control and Z-KO virus-infected mice. EBER in situ hybridization, as well as anti-EBNA1, anti-EBNA2, and anti-LMP1 staining, was performed as indicated to determine the type(s) of viral latency established in tumor-free animals. (A) Type IIA latency in the kidney of a control virus-infected animal (H&E staining shown at 40× magnification; EBER, EBNA1, EBNA2, and LMP1 staining all shown at 100× magnification). (B) Type III and type IIB latency in transplanted thymic tissue of a Z-KO virus-infected mouse (day 20 postinfection) (all, 100× magnification). Costaining with anti-EBNA2 and anti-LMP1 antibodies reveals that only a portion of the EBNA2-positive cells also express LMP1 (indicated by pink arrows). (C) Type III latency in the liver of a Z-KO virus-infected mouse (day 20) (all, 100× magnification).
FIG. 7.
FIG. 7. Control EBV infection induces more tumors than Z-KO virus infection in hNSG(thy) mice, and some EBV-positive tumors have restricted latency types. (A) The numbers of EBV-positive tumors in control and Z-KO virus-infected animals are shown (relative to the number of animals infected with each virus). The P value was calculated using a one-tailed Fisher exact test. Animals sacrificed at day 3 and day 20 postinfection were excluded from this analysis. H&E, EBER, EBNA1, EBNA2, and LMP1 staining was performed, as indicated, on a tumor in the liver (type I) of a control virus-infected animal (100× magnification) (B), a tumor in the pancreas of a Z-KO virus-infected animal (type IIB) (100× magnification) (C), and a tumor in the liver of a control virus-infected animal (type III) (100× magnification) (D).
FIG. 8.
FIG. 8. Cells with lytic EBV infection are found within EBV-induced lymphomas. (A) H&E, EBNA1, BZLF1, BMRF1, and gp350/220 staining was performed on a tumor in the liver (type III) of a control virus-infected hNSG(thy) animal (100× magnification). (B) H&E, EBNA1, BZLF1, BMRF1, and gp350/220 staining was performed as indicated on a tumor in the spleen (type III) of a control virus-infected animal reconstituted with no thymus implantation (100× magnification).
FIG. 9.
FIG. 9. Infection with both the control and Z-KO viruses induces a host immune response. (A) EBER in situ hybridization and CD20 and CD3 staining were performed on kidney (upper) and muscle (lower) as indicated in tumor-free animals (100× magnification). (B) Proliferation of T cells in response to EBV-infected B cells. Splenocytes were harvested from 4 animals that were mock infected, 5 animals infected with Z-KO virus, and 6 animals infected with the control virus. The splenocytes were depleted of B cells, labeled with CFSE, and then incubated with autologous uninfected B cells or B cells (LCLs) immortalized with the control or Z-KO virus. The plots show the percentages of the total T cells from each mouse that had diluted CFSE fluorescence intensity (indicating that they had proliferated) after 7 to 8 days of culture with the three B cell types shown on the x axes. P values were calculated using a one-tailed paired t test. (C) Cytotoxic responses to EBV-infected B cells. Splenocytes from the indicated virus- or mock-infected animals were depleted of B cells and tested in a 4-h cytotoxicity assay for the ability to kill autologous uninfected B cells or B cells immortalized with the control or Z-KO viruses. The bars show the specific killing (means and standard deviations of results from 3 replicate samples) by effector cells from the indicated animals against the target cell types shown in the legend. The asterisks indicate the cases where no specific killing was detected. (D) Delayed-type hypersensitivity response of EBV-infected animals in response to EBV antigens. Mock- or virally infected animals were injected in the footpad with an EBV antigen preparation or with PBS. The plot shows the change in the thickness of the footpads after the antigen injection compared to preinjection measurements; the results from two mock-infected animals, four control virus-infected animals, and four Z-KO virus-infected animals are included.
FIG. 10.
FIG. 10. EBV-induced lymphomas are infiltrated with T cells. (A) A type III tumor in the kidney of a Z-KO virus-infected animal was stained for EBER, CD3, CD8, and CD4 as indicated (100× magnification); (B) EBER/CD20/CD3/CD4/CD8 staining of a type IIB tumor surrounding the bile duct in a control virus-infected animal (100× magnification).
TABLE 1.
TABLE 1. The numbers of animals with EBER-positive cells in various organs after infection with control versus Z-KO virus are shown; results are from the tumor-free animals only
Organ/tissueEBVNo. of animals with EBER-positive cells/total no. of animals
SpleenControl2/5
 Z-KO10/12
LungControl5/5
 Z-KO9/12
KidneyControl3/5
 Z-KO12/12
ThymusControl1/5
 Z-KO6/12
LiverControl3/5
 Z-KO10/12
TABLE 2.
TABLE 2. Latency types in tumor-free animalsa
EBVNo. of animals with latency type(s):   
 II and IIAIIBI and IIB
Control1130
Z-KO5052
a
Some animals had different latency types in different organs. Animals harvested at day 3 and day 20 postinfection were excluded from the analysis.
TABLE 3.
TABLE 3. Latency types in EBV-positive lymphomas
EBVNo. of animals with latency type:   
 I (LMP1/EBNA2)IIA (LMP1+/EBNA2)IIB (LMP1/EBNA2+)III (LMP1+/EBNA2+)
Control1023
Z-KO0011
TABLE 4.
TABLE 4. EBV viral loada
AnimalEBVDPITumor presenceNo. of ApoB DNA copies/5 μlViral load (copies/5 μl)
1Mock51No133Undetected
2Mock56No30Undetected
3WT39Yes (type I)114Undetected
4WT51No31Undetected
5WT60Yes (type III)9825
6WT30No16Undetected
7WT32No51Undetected
8Z-KO57No70Undetected
9Z-KO24No4Undetected
10Z-KO3No258Undetected
11Z-KO60Yes (type III)25Undetected
12Z-KO51No68Undetected
13Z-KO32No8Undetected
a
Q-PCR was performed (using primers to detect the BamHI repeat region of the EBV sequence) on purified plasma DNA collected from mock-infected, control virus-infected, or Z-KO EBV-infected animals at the time points indicated. The human ApoB gene DNA was quantitated in a separate well as a marker of the efficacy of extraction and amplification. The presence (or absence) of tumors in each animal is indicated. DPI indicates the day postinfection that plasma was collected.

Acknowledgments

We thank our collaborators, Annette Gendron-Fitzpatrick and Drew Allan Vandenack, for their technical support. Thanks to Henri-Jacques Delecluse for providing valuable reagents. Thanks to Jaap Middeldorp for providing the anti-LMP (OTC21C) and anti-gp350/220 (OT6) antibodies and Richard Burgess for kindly providing the anti-EBNA1 antibody (EB14).
This research was supported by grants R21-CA12643, R01-CA58853, and R01-CA66519 from the National Institutes of Health and University of Wisconsin Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA014520.

REFERENCES

1.
Bandobashi, K., A. Liu, N. Nagy, L. L. Kis, J. Nishikawa, M. Bjorkholm, G. Klein, and E. Klein. 2005. EBV infection induces expression of the transcription factors ATF-2/c-Jun in B lymphocytes but not in B-CLL cells. Virus Genes 30:323-330.
2.
Cayrol, C., and E. K. Flemington. 1995. Identification of cellular target genes of the Epstein-Barr virus transactivator Zta: activation of transforming growth factor βigh3 (TGF-βigh3) and TGF-β1. J. Virol. 69:4206-4212.
3.
Chapman, A. L., and A. B. Rickinson. 1998. Epstein-Barr virus in Hodgkin's disease. Ann. Oncol. 9(Suppl. 5):S5-S16.
4.
Cocco, M., C. Bellan, R. Tussiwand, D. Corti, E. Traggiai, S. Lazzi, S. Mannucci, L. Bronz, N. Palummo, C. Ginanneschi, P. Tosi, A. Lanzavecchia, M. G. Manz, and L. Leoncini. 2008. CD34+ cord blood cell-transplanted Rag2−/− γc−/− mice as a model for Epstein-Barr virus infection. Am. J. Pathol. 173:1369-1378.
5.
Cohen, J. I., C. M. Bollard, R. Khanna, and S. Pittaluga. 2008. Current understanding of the role of Epstein-Barr virus in lymphomagenesis and therapeutic approaches to EBV-associated lymphomas. Leuk. Lymphoma 49(Suppl. 1):27-34.
6.
Darenkov, I. A., M. A. Marcarelli, G. P. Basadonna, A. L. Friedman, K. M. Lorber, J. G. Howe, J. Crouch, M. J. Bia, A. S. Kliger, and M. I. Lorber. 1997. Reduced incidence of Epstein-Barr virus-associated posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder using preemptive antiviral therapy. Transplantation 64:848-852.
7.
Delecluse, H. J., T. Hilsendegen, D. Pich, R. Zeidler, and W. Hammerschmidt. 1998. Propagation and recovery of intact, infectious Epstein-Barr virus from prokaryotic to human cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95:8245-8250.
8.
Feederle, R., M. Kost, M. Baumann, A. Janz, E. Drouet, W. Hammerschmidt, and H. J. Delecluse. 2000. The Epstein-Barr virus lytic program is controlled by the co-operative functions of two transactivators. EMBO J. 19:3080-3089.
9.
Hamilton-Dutoit, S. J., D. Rea, M. Raphael, K. Sandvej, H. J. Delecluse, C. Gisselbrecht, L. Marelle, H. J. van Krieken, and G. Pallesen. 1993. Epstein-Barr virus-latent gene expression and tumor cell phenotype in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Correlation of lymphoma phenotype with three distinct patterns of viral latency. Am. J. Pathol. 143:1072-1085.
10.
Hanto, D. W., G. Frizzera, K. J. Gajl-Peczalska, K. Sakamoto, D. T. Purtilo, H. H. Balfour, Jr., R. L. Simmons, and J. S. Najarian. 1982. Epstein-Barr virus-induced B-cell lymphoma after renal transplantation: acyclovir therapy and transition from polyclonal to monoclonal B-cell proliferation. N. Engl. J. Med. 306:913-918.
11.
Heslop, H. E. 2005. Biology and treatment of Epstein-Barr virus-associated non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Hematology Am. Soc. Hematol. Educ. Program 2005:260-266.
12.
Hong, G. K., M. L. Gulley, W. H. Feng, H. J. Delecluse, E. Holley-Guthrie, and S. C. Kenney. 2005. Epstein-Barr virus lytic infection contributes to lymphoproliferative disease in a SCID mouse model. J. Virol. 79:13993-14003.
13.
Hong, G. K., P. Kumar, L. Wang, B. Damania, M. L. Gulley, H. J. Delecluse, P. J. Polverini, and S. C. Kenney. 2005. Epstein-Barr virus lytic infection is required for efficient production of the angiogenesis factor vascular endothelial growth factor in lymphoblastoid cell lines. J. Virol. 79:13984-13992.
14.
Hoshino, Y., H. Katano, P. Zou, P. Hohman, A. Marques, S. K. Tyring, D. Follmann, and J. I. Cohen. 2009. Long-term administration of valacyclovir reduces the number of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-infected B cells but not the number of EBV DNA copies per B cell in healthy volunteers. J. Virol. 83:11857-11861.
15.
Hsu, M., S. Y. Wu, S. S. Chang, I. J. Su, C. H. Tsai, S. J. Lai, A. L. Shiau, K. Takada, and Y. Chang. 2008. Epstein-Barr virus lytic transactivator Zta enhances chemotactic activity through induction of interleukin-8 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. J. Virol. 82:3679-3688.
16.
Islas-Ohlmayer, M., A. Padgett-Thomas, R. Domiati-Saad, M. W. Melkus, P. D. Cravens, P. Martin Mdel, G. Netto, and J. V. Garcia. 2004. Experimental infection of NOD/SCID mice reconstituted with human CD34+ cells with Epstein-Barr virus. J. Virol. 78:13891-13900.
17.
Jaffe, E. S., L. Krenacs, S. Kumar, D. W. Kingma, and M. Raffeld. 1999. Extranodal peripheral T-cell and NK-cell neoplasms. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 111:S46-S55.
18.
Jones, R. J., W. T. Seaman, W. H. Feng, E. Barlow, S. Dickerson, H. J. Delecluse, and S. C. Kenney. 2007. Roles of lytic viral infection and IL-6 in early versus late passage lymphoblastoid cell lines and EBV-associated lymphoproliferative disease. Int. J. Cancer 121:1274-1281.
19.
Kalla, M., A. Schmeinck, M. Bergbauer, D. Pich, and W. Hammerschmidt. 2010. AP-1 homolog BZLF1 of Epstein-Barr virus has two essential functions dependent on the epigenetic state of the viral genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107:850-855.
20.
Kieff, E. D., and A. B. Rickinson. 2007. Epstein-Barr virus and its replication, p. 2603-2654. In D. M. Knipe and P. M. Howley (ed.), Fields' virology, 5th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA.
21.
Kilger, E., A. Kieser, M. Baumann, and W. Hammerschmidt. 1998. Epstein-Barr virus-mediated B-cell proliferation is dependent upon latent membrane protein 1, which simulates an activated CD40 receptor. EMBO J. 17:1700-1709.
22.
Kurth, J., M. L. Hansmann, K. Rajewsky, and R. Kuppers. 2003. Epstein-Barr virus-infected B cells expanding in germinal centers of infectious mononucleosis patients do not participate in the germinal center reaction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100:4730-4735.
23.
Mahot, S., A. Sergeant, E. Drouet, and H. Gruffat. 2003. A novel function for the Epstein-Barr virus transcription factor EB1/Zta: induction of transcription of the hIL-10 gene. J. Gen. Virol. 84:965-974.
24.
Melkus, M. W., J. D. Estes, A. Padgett-Thomas, J. Gatlin, P. W. Denton, F. A. Othieno, A. K. Wege, A. T. Haase, and J. V. Garcia. 2006. Humanized mice mount specific adaptive and innate immune responses to EBV and TSST-1. Nat. Med. 12:1316-1322.
25.
Miyazaki, I., R. K. Cheung, and H. M. Dosch. 1993. Viral interleukin 10 is critical for the induction of B cell growth transformation by Epstein-Barr virus. J. Exp. Med. 178:439-447.
26.
Neuhierl, B., R. Feederle, W. Hammerschmidt, and H. J. Delecluse. 2002. Glycoprotein gp110 of Epstein-Barr virus determines viral tropism and efficiency of infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:15036-15041.
27.
Niedobitek, G., A. Agathanggelou, H. Herbst, L. Whitehead, D. H. Wright, and L. S. Young. 1997. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection in infectious mononucleosis: virus latency, replication and phenotype of EBV-infected cells. J. Pathol. 182:151-159.
28.
Oudejans, J. J., M. Jiwa, A. J. van den Brule, F. A. Grasser, A. Horstman, W. Vos, P. M. Kluin, P. van der Valk, J. M. Walboomers, and C. J. Meijer. 1995. Detection of heterogeneous Epstein-Barr virus gene expression patterns within individual post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders. Am. J. Pathol. 147:923-933.
29.
Oyama, T., K. Ichimura, R. Suzuki, J. Suzumiya, K. Ohshima, Y. Yatabe, T. Yokoi, M. Kojima, Y. Kamiya, H. Taji, Y. Kagami, M. Ogura, H. Saito, Y. Morishima, and S. Nakamura. 2003. Senile EBV+ B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders: a clinicopathologic study of 22 patients. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 27:16-26.
30.
Oyama, T., K. Yamamoto, N. Asano, A. Oshiro, R. Suzuki, Y. Kagami, Y. Morishima, K. Takeuchi, T. Izumo, S. Mori, K. Ohshima, J. Suzumiya, N. Nakamura, M. Abe, K. Ichimura, Y. Sato, T. Yoshino, T. Naoe, Y. Shimoyama, Y. Kamiya, T. Kinoshita, and S. Nakamura. 2007. Age-related EBV-associated B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders constitute a distinct clinicopathologic group: a study of 96 patients. Clin. Cancer Res. 13:5124-5132.
31.
Rajesh, D., Y. Zhou, E. Jankowska-Gan, D. A. Roenneburg, M. L. Dart, J. Torrealba, and W. J. Burlingham. 2010. Th1 and Th17 immunocompetence in humanized NOD/SCID/IL2rγnull mice. Hum. Immunol. 71:551-559.
32.
Rickinson, A. B., and E. D. Kieff. 2007. Epstein-Barr virus, p. 2655-2700. In D. M. Knipe and P. M. Howley (ed.), Fields' virology, 5th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA.
33.
Ryan, J. L., H. Fan, S. L. Glaser, S. A. Schichman, N. Raab-Traub, and M. L. Gulley. 2004. Epstein-Barr virus quantitation by real-time PCR targeting multiple gene segments: a novel approach to screen for the virus in paraffin-embedded tissue and plasma. J. Mol. Diagn. 6:378-385.
34.
Sarisky, R. T., Z. Gao, P. M. Lieberman, E. D. Fixman, G. S. Hayward, and S. D. Hayward. 1996. A replication function associated with the activation domain of the Epstein-Barr virus Zta transactivator. J. Virol. 70:8340-8347.
35.
Savard, M., C. Belanger, M. Tardif, P. Gourde, L. Flamand, and J. Gosselin. 2000. Infection of primary human monocytes by Epstein-Barr virus. J. Virol. 74:2612-2619.
36.
Steven, N. M., N. E. Annels, A. Kumar, A. M. Leese, M. G. Kurilla, and A. B. Rickinson. 1997. Immediate early and early lytic cycle proteins are frequent targets of the Epstein-Barr virus-induced cytotoxic T cell response. J. Exp. Med. 185:1605-1617.
37.
Stewart, J. P., F. G. Behm, J. R. Arrand, and C. M. Rooney. 1994. Differential expression of viral and human interleukin-10 (IL-10) by primary B cell tumors and B cell lines. Virology 200:724-732.
38.
Strowig, T., C. Gurer, A. Ploss, Y. F. Liu, F. Arrey, J. Sashihara, G. Koo, C. M. Rice, J. W. Young, A. Chadburn, J. I. Cohen, and C. Munz. 2009. Priming of protective T cell responses against virus-induced tumors in mice with human immune system components. J. Exp. Med. 206:1423-1434.
39.
Swaminathan, S., R. Hesselton, J. Sullivan, and E. Kieff. 1993. Epstein-Barr virus recombinants with specifically mutated BCRF1 genes. J. Virol. 67:7406-7413.
40.
Thorley-Lawson, D. A. 2005. EBV the prototypical human tumor virus—just how bad is it? J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 116:251-261.
41.
Thorley-Lawson, D. A., and A. Gross. 2004. Persistence of the Epstein-Barr virus and the origins of associated lymphomas. N. Engl. J. Med. 350:1328-1337.
42.
van Kooten, C., and J. Banchereau. 2000. CD40-CD40 ligand. J. Leukoc. Biol. 67:2-17.
43.
Yajima, M., K. Imadome, A. Nakagawa, S. Watanabe, K. Terashima, H. Nakamura, M. Ito, N. Shimizu, M. Honda, N. Yamamoto, and S. Fujiwara. 2008. A new humanized mouse model of Epstein-Barr virus infection that reproduces persistent infection, lymphoproliferative disorder, and cell-mediated and humoral immune responses. J. Infect. Dis. 198:673-682.
44.
Yajima, M., K. Imadome, A. Nakagawa, S. Watanabe, K. Terashima, H. Nakamura, M. Ito, N. Shimizu, N. Yamamoto, and S. Fujiwara. 2009. T cell-mediated control of Epstein-Barr virus infection in humanized mice. J. Infect. Dis. 200:1611-1615.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Journal of Virology
Journal of Virology
Volume 85Number 11 January 2011
Pages: 165 - 177
PubMed: 20980506

History

Received: 20 July 2010
Accepted: 14 October 2010
Published online: 1 January 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Contributors

Authors

Shi-Dong Ma
Departments of Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
Subramanya Hegde
Department of Medical Microbiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
Ken H. Young
Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
Ruth Sullivan
Research Animal Resources Center and UW Comprehensive Cancer Center, Graduate School and School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
Deepika Rajesh
Department of Surgery, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
Ying Zhou
Department of Surgery, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
Ewa Jankowska-Gan
Department of Surgery, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
William J. Burlingham
Department of Surgery, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
Xiaoping Sun
Departments of Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
Margaret L. Gulley
Department of Pathology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Weihua Tang
Department of Pathology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Jenny E. Gumperz
Department of Medical Microbiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
Shannon C. Kenney [email protected]
Departments of Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
Medicine, McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note:

  • For recently published articles, the TOTAL download count will appear as zero until a new month starts.
  • There is a 3- to 4-day delay in article usage, so article usage will not appear immediately after publication.
  • Citation counts come from the Crossref Cited by service.

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. For an editable text file, please select Medlars format which will download as a .txt file. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share the article link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share on social media

American Society for Microbiology ("ASM") is committed to maintaining your confidence and trust with respect to the information we collect from you on websites owned and operated by ASM ("ASM Web Sites") and other sources. This Privacy Policy sets forth the information we collect about you, how we use this information and the choices you have about how we use such information.
FIND OUT MORE about the privacy policy