Influenza A viruses of the H1 to H16 and N1 to N9 subtypes are maintained in wild waterfowl (
1,
2) but can cause zoonotic events. In 2012 and 2013, the genomes of two novel influenza A virus subtypes (the H17N10 and H18N11 subtypes) were discovered in bats in South America (
3,
4), raising concerns that viruses of these subtypes may infect humans. No infectious viruses were isolated from the original bat samples (
3,
4).
Some of the bat influenza virus proteins are functionally similar to or compatible with their counterparts in canonical influenza A viruses. The ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex (composed of the polymerase and NP proteins) of bat influenza viruses showed polymerase activity
in vitro (
3,
5,
6). The N-terminal domain of the H17N10 PA protein possesses endonuclease activity comparable to that of canonical influenza A viruses (
7). The NS1 proteins of bat influenza viruses bind double-stranded RNA and antagonize host innate immunity, similar to the findings for established influenza A virus NS1 proteins (
8,
9). Moreover, the H17N10 virus M gene is compatible with that of canonical influenza A viruses (
10).
The viral surface glycoproteins, hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA), play critical roles in the life cycle of influenza viruses. For influenza A viruses of the H1 to H16 subtypes, HA is responsible for virus binding to sialic acid-containing receptors on host cells (
11–13), whereas NA cleaves the sialic acid from the receptors to release progeny viruses from infected cells (
14–16). The activities of these two viral proteins must be balanced for efficient virus replication (
17–24). The H17 and H18 bat influenza virus HA proteins bear some structural similarity to H1 to H16 HAs, although the shape of their receptor-binding pockets differs from that of the receptor-binding pockets of the H1 to H16 HAs (
4); moreover, the amino acids in the presumed receptor-binding site of the H17 and H18 HAs are acidic, making an interaction with negatively charged sialic acids unlikely. In line with this finding, the H17 and H18 HA proteins did not interact with >600 sialic acid-containing glycan structures tested in glycan arrays (
4,
25). These data suggest that the cellular receptors of bat influenza viruses differ from those of conventional influenza viruses. In fact, Karakus et al. (
26) recently reported that major histocompatibility complex class II proteins serve as receptors for bat influenza viruses. The N10 and N11 NA-like proteins bear some structural similarity to their N1 to N9 counterparts but lack the putative sialic acid-binding sites and do not possess sialidase activity (
4,
27,
28). Currently, the role of the N10 and N11 NA-like proteins in bat influenza virus replication is not understood.
Moreira et al. (
29) tested more than 30 cell lines with a pseudotyped vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) expressing H17 or H18 HA and found that Madin-Darby canine kidney subclone II (MDCK II) cells, but not the commonly used MDCK cells, were susceptible to the pseudotyped viruses. The identification of cell lines that are sensitive to infection with H17 and H18 viruses opened the door for the generation of H17N10 and H18N11 viruses by reverse genetics (
29) and their further characterization. Here, we generated bat influenza H18N11 virus by reverse genetics and detected mammal-adapting amino acid changes in the NA-like protein that emerged during passages in MDCK II cells; these mutations enhanced the replicative ability of the H18N11 virus in cultured cells and broadened their organ tropism in mice and ferrets.