Glycoprotein H (gH) is a type 1 transmembrane protein that is required for virus-cell and cell-cell spread in all herpesviruses studied (
12,
15,
24,
26). gH is an important target of the host immune system. Individuals who have had primary infection with VZV or herpes simplex virus (HSV), the most closely related human alphaherpesvirus, have humoral and cellular immunity against gH (
1,
56). Immunization of mice with a recombinant vaccinia virus expressing VZV gH and its chaperone, glycoprotein L (gL), induced specific antibodies capable of neutralizing VZV in vitro (
28,
37). Immunization of mice with purified HSV gH/gL protein resulted in the production of neutralizing antibodies and protected mice from HSV challenge (
5,
44), and administration of an anti-HSV gH monoclonal antibody (MAb) protected mice from HSV challenge (
16). Antibodies to HSV and Epstein-Barr virus gH effectively neutralize during virus penetration but not during adsorption in vitro, indicating an essential role for gH in the fusion of viral and cellular membranes but not in initial attachment of the virus to the cell (
18,
33).
Anti-gH MAb 206, an immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) antibody which recognizes a conformation-dependent epitope on the mature glycosylated form of gH, neutralizes VZV infection in vitro in the absence of complement (
35). MAb 206 inhibits cell-cell fusion in vitro, based on reductions in the number of infected cells and the number of infected nuclei within syncytia, and appears to inhibit the ability of virus particles to pass from the surface of an infected epithelial cell to a neighboring cell via cell extensions (
8,
35,
43). When infected cells were treated with MAb 206 for 48 h postinfection (hpi), virus egress and syncytium formation were not apparent, but they were evident within 48 h after removal of the antibody, suggesting that the effect of the antibody was reversible and that there was a requirement for new gH synthesis and trafficking to produce cell-cell fusion. Conversely, nonneutralizing antibodies to glycoproteins E (gE) and I (gI), as well as an antibody to immediate-early protein 62 (IE62), had no effect on VZV spread (
46).
Like that of other herpesviruses, VZV entry into cells is presumed to require fusion of the virion envelope with the cell membrane or endocytosis followed by fusion. One of the hallmarks of VZV infection is cell fusion and formation of syncytia (
8). Cell fusion can be detected as early as 9 hpi in vitro, although VZV spread from infected to uninfected cells is evident within 60 min (
45). In vivo, VZV forms syncytia through its capacity to cause fusion of epidermal cells. Syncytia are evident in biopsies of varicella and herpes zoster skin lesions during natural infection and in SCIDhu skin xenografts (
34). VZV gH is produced, processed in the Golgi apparatus, and trafficked to the cell membrane, where it might be involved in cell-cell fusion (
11,
29,
35). gH then undergoes endocytosis and is trafficked back to the
trans-Golgi network (TGN) for incorporation into the virion envelope (
20,
31,
42). Since VZV is highly cell associated in vitro, little is known about the glycoproteins required for entry, but VZV gH is present in abundance in the skin vesicles during human chickenpox and zoster (
55).
Investigating the functions of gH in the pathogenesis of VZV infection in vivo is challenging because it is an essential protein and VZV is species specific for the human host. The objective of this study was to investigate the role of gH in VZV pathogenesis by establishing whether antibody-mediated interference with gH function could prevent or modulate VZV infection of differentiated human tissue in vivo, using the SCIDhu mouse model. The effects of antibody administration at early and later times after infection were determined by comparing infectious virus titers, VZV genome copies, and lesion formation in anti-gH antibody-treated xenografts. In vitro experiments were performed to determine the potential mechanism(s) of MAb 206 interference with gH during VZV replication, virion assembly, and cell-cell spread. The present study has implications for understanding the contributions of gH to VZV replication in vitro and in vivo, the mechanisms by which production of antibodies to gH by the host might restrict VZV infection, and the use of passive antibody prophylaxis in patients at high risk of serious illness caused by VZV.
DISCUSSION
VZV gH is predicted to play an essential role in VZV virulence and is a known target of the humoral immune system during infection (
1). The present study of the SCIDhu mouse model showed for the first time that gH contributes to VZV infection and cell-cell spread of virus in skin xenografts in vivo and confirmed this contribution in vitro. The low levels of persistent VZV replication and spread observed in some VZV-infected xenografts in vivo and in HELF cells in vitro in the presence of anti-gH antibody indicate that passive antibody interference with gH functions has some limitations. This residual spread might have resulted from incomplete binding of antibody to all functional gH. Alternatively, other VZV glycoproteins might be capable of mediating some virion-cell or cell-cell fusion in the absence of functional gH. It has been suggested that VZV gH and gL or gB and gE might induce fusion (
12,
30), although if so, VZV would be the only herpesvirus investigated to date that does not require both gB and gH for this event.
This report also demonstrated for the first time that the administration of anti-gH antibody was effective at preventing or reducing VZV pathogenicity in human skin. Since SCIDhu animals are immunodeficient (
4), this inhibitory effect could be assessed in the absence of a polyclonal B-cell response to multiple viral proteins and without VZV-specific cell-mediated immunity. The prevention of infection might be attributed to a block of virus attachment and entry into cells. The reduced pathogenicity in xenografts that became infected might be attributed to the block in spread of virus from cell to cell, inhibition of canonical gH trafficking, and potential virus particle degradation. MAb 206 binds to a conformation-dependent epitope on mature glycosylated gH, and neutralization of VZV is complement independent (
35). Two potential mechanisms for MAb 206 neutralization of VZV are inhibition of receptor binding and attachment and inhibition of fusion. The antibody might also disrupt postentry events, such as interactions between virus proteins and trafficking of proteins or virion particles (Fig.
9).
Neutralizing antibodies to herpesviruses block attachment by physically blocking interaction and preventing binding of virus proteins to cellular receptors (
38,
41,
57). A VZV gH receptor has not been identified, and the cell-associated nature of VZV prevents study of VZV attachment steps. If gH interaction with a cellular protein is required for attachment, then a neutralizing antibody could disrupt binding and prevent infection (Fig.
9, step 1).
Epstein-Barr virus, human cytomegalovirus, and human herpesvirus 6 and 7 gH/gL form a complex with additional glycoproteins. Some of these complexes appear to determine cell-specific infectivity, receptor specificity, or the route of virus entry into the cell (
36,
48,
53,
54). No interactions with cellular proteins have been identified for VZV gH, but antibody binding to gH could disrupt or prevent formation of a protein complex required for receptor binding, thereby preventing infection (Fig.
9, step 1).
Neutralizing anti-gH MAb might mask functional domains of VZV gH, preventing fusion and entry. VZV gH and gL can mediate fusion between cell membranes when expressed in vitro in a vaccinia virus vector (
12). Many anti-HSV gH neutralizing antibodies block virus penetration and prevent entry (
18). HSV gH is required for hemifusion, and one MAb specifically blocks this fusion step (
49). Deletion or mutation of predicted HSV gH heptad repeats and α-helical coiled coils disrupts virus infectivity and cell-cell fusion (
21,
23). Mimetic peptides of the α-helices interact with lipid membranes (
19,
21). When the HSV α-helix 1 was replaced with the positionally conserved α-helix from VZV, the resulting chimeric gH was capable of promoting cell-cell fusion and rescuing infectivity of an HSV gH-negative virus, indicating that VZV gH contains a functional α-helix capable of mediating fusion (
22). Thus, the reduced number of infected skin xenografts and cell-cell spread during MAb 206 treatment could potentially have resulted from inhibition of virus entry into cells (Fig.
9, steps 1 and 2).
Glycoprotein trafficking from the plasma membrane to the Golgi apparatus can occur via clathrin-coated vesicles (
3). VZV gH endocytosis is antibody independent but clathrin dependent (
42), and this report has demonstrated that anti-gH MAb 206 binds gH and is internalized with gH (Fig.
9, step 2). MAb 206 and gH colocalized with EEA1, a marker for early endosomes, and with Vps4, a marker for MVB, indicating that MAb 206 and gH underwent endocytosis and sorting via the MVB pathway. Vps4 is required for transport of endocytosed proteins between prevacuolar endosomes and vacuoles (
2). Vps4 is also required for autophagy, presumably for autophagosome-endolysosome fusion (
47). Endocytosed proteins can be sorted to the Golgi apparatus via the endocytic recycling pathway or late endosomes. The colocalization between gH and Vps4 might occur during one of the sorting steps, as gH is targeted to the TGN. Alternatively, the association of gH and Vps4 might indicate that VZV uses the MVB pathway for assembly and egress of virus particles, as has been suggested following studies of HSV gB colocalization with Vps4 during envelopment and egress (
6). The MAb 206-gH complexes were not targeted to the TGN. The lack of these complexes in the TGN may have resulted from the experimental system, but they may also demonstrate that the antibody disrupts gH trafficking, although the complexes did travel through endosomes and the MVB pathway. VZV gH interacts with gE on the plasma membrane and in virions, and it has been suggested that this interaction results in the targeting of gH to the TGN for secondary envelopment via the TGN-targeting motif of gE (
31,
43). Binding of MAb 206 to gH particles expressed on the surfaces of infected cells does not disrupt endocytosis of gH, but the resulting MAb-gH complex might not interact with other virion proteins, resulting in the altered trafficking of gH to sites other than the TGN (Fig.
9, step 3). These complexes colocalize with Vps4, similar to gH, but rather than sorting to the TGN, they could be sorted through late endosomes to lysosomes or autophagosomes, which are induced during VZV infection (
50).
MAb 206 might also direct gH complexes to be degraded by interacting with Fc receptors on the surfaces of infected cells. Antigen-antibody complexes bound to Fc receptors on human fibroblasts undergo endocytosis and are targeted for degradation, and these fibroblast Fc receptors mainly interact with monomeric immunoglobulins, especially IgG1 (
9,
17). Skin keratinocytes have also been shown to express functional Fc receptors that interact with IgG (
51). Antibodies against pseudorabies virus gD and gB expressed on monocytes induce antibody-dependent, clathrin-dependent endocytosis of the glycoproteins, mediated by tyrosine-based endocytosis motifs (
13,
14,
52). VZV gH contains a functional tyrosine-based endocytosis motif (
42). Thus, MAb 206 would not have to disrupt gH protein interactions, but instead could interact with cellular Fc receptors in order to alter trafficking of gH and target it for degradation via the Vps4/MVB pathway and sorting to either lysosomes or autophagosomes (Fig.
9, step 3).
Immunogold EM analysis of MAb 206 localization within treated infected cells demonstrated that MAb 206 bound to gH on virus particles on the cell surface, which resulted in neutralization of these particles and prevention of virus spread from cell to cell (Fig.
9, step 4). The MAb 206-labeled virions were found within cells, suggesting that labeled particles on the surfaces of infected cells were internalized. A MAb 206 interaction with Fc receptors could direct the internalization and degradation not only of gH but also of virions containing gH in their envelope (Fig.
9, step 5).
Interferon (IFN) production is activated in human epidermal cells in VZV-infected skin xenografts and modulates the progression of lesion formation (
27). The experiments reported here with anti-gH antibody showed that infection was suppressed during treatment but progressed to complete destruction of the skin tissue when anti-gH antibody was cleared from the circulation. Together, these findings indicate that the combination of the innate IFN response of epidermal cells and passively administered antibody is not sufficient to eliminate VZV when replication has been initiated in skin. This suggests that an effective cell-mediated immune response to VZV is likely to be necessary to resolve primary VZV infection. Herpes zoster as a result of VZV reactivation has been suggested to result in part from a decreased cellular immune response as patients age, even though the humoral immune response remains high (
1). The observations presented here suggest that preexisting anti-gH antibodies might reinforce the innate IFN response and slow the progression of cell-cell spread for an interval that allows for clonal expansion of memory VZV-specific T cells that make IFN-γ and stimulate B cells and cytotoxic T lymphocytes to respond to VZV reactivation.
Anti-gH antibody administration to SCIDhu mice with pOka-infected skin xenografts prevented infection or reduced pathogenicity if infection had been established. This mirrors the prophylaxis of immunocompromised patients, who are administered varicella-zoster immunoglobulin (VZIG) as soon as possible after exposure, up to 96 h postexposure to the virus (
32). Neutralization assays demonstrated that humanized MAb 206 had a biological activity that was 2,400-fold that of the standard VZIG preparation (
10). Administration of VZIG does not consistently prevent varicella following exposure but can ameliorate the severity of the disease, although severe disease and death can still occur. The data presented here demonstrated that administration of anti-gH antibody immediately after inoculation prevented infection, but delaying treatment by 4 days resulted only in suppression of infection, emphasizing the need to give prophylaxis to exposed patients as soon after exposure as possible. This has potential clinical relevance because maintaining the supply of VZIG has been challenging, and an anti-gH MAb might be developed as an alternative for prophylaxis of patients at risk of severe primary VZV infection.