Structure of SBPV virion and capsid proteins.
The structure of SBPV was determined from two crystal forms to resolutions of 3.4 Å and 2.6 Å (
Table 1). The two structures are similar, with a Cα-atom root mean square deviation (RMSD) of 0.27 Å; however, they differ in the positions of protruding (P) domains of the VP3 subunits on the virion surface (
Fig. 1A and
B). The maximum outer diameter of the virion is 388 Å. The virion is bigger than those of other picornaviruses because of the P domains. The organization of capsid proteins within the SBPV virion is similar to that of other viruses from the order
Picornavirales (
Fig. 1C). The capsid is built from major capsid proteins VP1 to 3 arranged in pseudo-T3 icosahedral symmetry (
Fig. 1). The major capsid proteins have jellyroll β-sandwich folds with β-strands named according to the picornavirus convention B to I (
37). The two antiparallel β-sheets forming the β-sandwich fold contain the strands BIDG and CHEF, respectively. The structures of the major capsid proteins could be built except for residues 253 to 266 of VP1, 92 to 100 and 261 of VP2, and 418 to 430 of VP3. The electron density corresponding to VP4 could not be identified in either of the two structures.
Structure of the VP3 P domain.
The SBPV virion represents the first atomic structure of a virus from the family
Iflaviridae. Unlike in the previously structurally characterized viruses from the order
Picornavirales, the SBPV capsid protein VP3 contains a C-terminal extension of residues 267 to 430 (
15) that fold into the globular P domain positioned on the capsid surface (
Fig. 1C and
D). The domain consists of a central twisted antiparallel β-sheet formed from strands β4, β5, and β6 surrounded by the 14-residue-long α-helix α1, 3-residue-long 3.10 helix, and two shorter β-sheets containing strands β1 and β2 and β3 to β7 (
Fig. 1D). The β-strands are connected by loops that vary in length between 6 and 23 residues. In both of the crystal forms, the residues of the P domain have higher average B factors (crystal 1 B = 110 Å
2; crystal 2 B = 57 Å
2) than the average B factors of the rest of the capsid (crystal 1 B = 57 Å
2; crystal 2 B = 16 Å
2), indicating a higher mobility of the P domain. The P domains in the two crystal forms are similar, with an RMSD of 0.32 Å for 144 Cα atoms.
The P domains are positioned in different locations on the virion surface in the two crystal forms (
Fig. 1 and
2). It is important to note that the domains are not held in position by crystal contact in either of the crystal forms. In crystal form 1, five P domains related by one icosahedral 5-fold axis form a “crown” on the virion surface (
Fig. 1A and
3A). The crowns have a diameter of 90 Å and protrude 50 Å above the capsid surface, giving the SBPV virion its characteristic shape (
Fig. 1A). Residues from loop β2-β3 as well as the N- and C-terminal loops and β2 of the P domain interact with the BC, CD, and EF loops of VP1, forming an interface with a buried surface area of 850 Å
2 (
Fig. 2A and
B). P domains within the same crown do not interact with each other (
Fig. 1A and
3A). In crystal form 1, the electron density map corresponding to the P domains is less well ordered than that of the rest of the SBPV virion, indicating an increased mobility of the crown.
In crystal form 2, the P domain is positioned approximately equal distances from the icosahedral 5-fold, 3-fold, and 2-fold axes (
Fig. 1B and
3B). Residues from α1, β3, β5, β7, and loops β2-β3, β3-β4, and β4-β5 of the P domain interact with the CD and GH loops of VP3, the C terminus of VP1, and the GH loop of VP2, forming an interface with a buried surface area of 1,150 Å
2 (
Fig. 2C and
D). The density of the P domain is better resolved than in crystal form 1, indicating that the P domain forms more stable interactions with the capsid surface at the interface observed in crystal form 2. The transition between the two alternative positions of the P domain on the virion surface requires a 122° rotation of the domain around the axis, which passes through Lys266 (
Fig. 1C). The center of mass of the P domain in crystal form 2 is shifted 36 Å toward the 3-fold axis relative to its position in crystal form 1 (
Fig. 1). This movement of the domain is possible due to a 23-residue-long flexible linker that connects the P domain to the core of the VP3 subunit.
The crystallization conditions that produced the two crystal forms of SBPV differed in terms of solution components and pH, which was 6.5 for crystal form 1 and 4.5 for crystal form 2 (
Table 1). We speculate that the differences in localization of the P domains might be induced by the differences in the crystallization conditions. Furthermore, it is possible that the two observed locations of the P domain on the virion surface reflect movements of the domain required for SBPV cell entry
in vivo. Similar mobility of the protruding domain was previously reported for capsid proteins of mammalian caliciviruses, where it was speculated to facilitate virus-receptor interactions (
38–40). The cell entry of iflaviruses has not been studied, but it is likely to involve receptor-mediated endocytosis as has been described for mammalian picornaviruses (
41,
42). The endosomal entry involves exposure of the virions to low pH that could trigger movements of the P domain that might be required for cleavage of substrate by the putative catalytic triad within the P domain as described below.
The P domain contains a putative receptor-binding or catalytic site.
Residues Ser284, His283, and Asp300 from the P domain of VP3 are located close to each other, indicating the presence of a putative catalytic triad (
43) that might be involved in the cleavage of an as-yet-unknown substrate. These residues face the interior of the crown in crystal form 1; however, they constitute the apex of the P domain in crystal form 2 (
Fig. 3A and
B). The distances between the side chains of the putative reactive site are larger than ideal for catalyzing the hydrolytic reaction (
Fig. 3C) (
43). Nevertheless, it is possible that the optimal configuration of the active site might be achieved upon binding the unknown substrate to the P domain. This type of catalytic triad has been previously identified in proteases, lipases, and esterases (
43–45). The residues constituting the putative active site are conserved among other iflaviruses that have P domains, including DWV, VDV-1, and Kakugo virus (
20,
46,
47). However, the iflaviruses Sacbrood and
Perina nuda virus lack P domains altogether (
48,
49). Catalytic activity of the putative active site might be required for the virions to escape from endosomes in a manner analogous to the lipase activity present in the N-terminal domain of capsid proteins of parvoviruses (
50). There are five additional conserved residues located in the vicinity of the putative active site in strand β1 and loops connecting strands β1-β2 and β2-β3 (
Fig. 3C). This is in contrast to the overall 12% sequence identity of the P domains. The conservation of the residues reinforces the possibility that they may constitute a receptor or substrate-binding site. Furthermore, a similar conserved patch of residues in P domains of noroviruses was shown to bind glycans (
51,
52). Additional experiments are required to identify the putative receptor of SBPV and to determine whether the catalytic triad cleaves it.
The DALI server was used to identify structures similar to the P domain (
Table 2) (
53). Most of the top hits were domains of virus capsid proteins that are exposed on the virion surface and therefore might be involved in receptor binding or cell entry. A common feature of these domains is a core formed of β-strands that is in some cases complemented by one or more short α-helices located at the periphery of the domain (
Fig. 4). Furthermore, the P domains were also found in plant picorna-like viruses from the family
Tombusviridae (
54). In these species, however, the protrusions exhibit a β-jellyroll fold. Even though the surface domains could be identified in the DALI search, the structures of the domains are quite different and cannot be meaningfully superimposed. The surface domains were identified in viruses from the families
Tombusviridae,
Nodaviridae,
Hepeviridae, and
Astroviridae (
54–57). All these viruses have positive-sense single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) genomes and similar overall virion architectures. It is therefore possible that a common ancestor of these viruses contained the P domain. However, the P domains were retained in the evolution of only some of the viruses.
Putative SBPV integrin receptor binding site.
Currently there is no information about the cell entry of honeybee viruses, and the putative receptors remain to be identified. However, the VP2 subunit of SBPV contains the integrin recognition motif Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) in the GH loop (
Fig. 1C). The GH loop is exposed on the virion surface in crystal form 1 but is partly covered by the P domain in crystal form 2 (
Fig. 2A and
B). Integrins serve as cell entry receptors for numerous viruses, including human picornaviruses such as the foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) and several parechoviruses (
58–60). The RGD motif within FMDV is located in the VP2 subunit, similar to the case with SBPV, although closer to the icosahedral 2-fold axis (
Fig. 1C). The RGD motif is not conserved across different iflaviruses and may confer specific tissue tropism to SBPV. Even though honeybees encode a number of integrins (
61), their involvement in virus cell entry has not been demonstrated so far.
Comparison to virion structures of dicistroviruses.
The most notable difference between SBPV and structurally characterized dicistroviruses, besides the P domain, is in the positioning of the N-terminal arm of the VP2 protein, which contributes to the interpentamer contacts within the capsid (
Fig. 5A to
D). In SBPV, two β-strands from the N-terminal arm of VP2 extend the β-sheet CHEF of a VP3 from the neighboring pentamer (
Fig. 5C). In contrast, in dicistroviruses represented by TrV and cricket paralysis virus (CrPV), the N-terminal arm of the VP2 subunit reaches around an icosahedral 2-fold axis into the neighboring pentamer, approaches a 3-fold axis, and forms two β-strands that extend the β-sheet CHEF of a VP3 subunit from the same pentamer (
Fig. 5D) (
67,
68). Thus, the VP2 N-terminal arms of SBPV and dicistroviruses mediate interactions between VP2 and VP3 subunits in different relative positions within their virions. However, the type of interaction, i.e., extension of the β-sheet CHEF of VP3, is the same for both the viruses, representing domain swapping of the VP2 N-terminal arms. It was speculated previously that the observation of domain swapping among homologous complexes is indicative of hinge movements of structural units connected by the swapped domains. The alternative placements of the N-terminal arms of VP2 subunits therefore indicate that pentamers of capsid proteins could move relative to each other.
Additional differences between SBPV and dicistroviruses can be found on the capsid surface. The RGD containing the GH loop of the SBPV VP2 subunit contains 30 residues, while in TrV and CrPV it is only 17 residues long (
Fig. 5A and
B) (
67,
68). The SBPV loop therefore elevates higher above the surface of the virion, which might be required for binding to the putative integrin receptor (
Fig. 1C). On the other hand, the GH loop of the VP3 subunit is longer in TrV, containing 36 residues in comparison to 24 in SBPV (
Fig. 5A and
B) (
68).
The maturation of capsids of viruses from the order
Picornavirales is connected to a cleavage of capsid protein VP4 from the N terminus of a precursor subunit, called VP0. In picornaviruses, VP0 cleavage generates the proteins VP4 and VP2, while it was suggested that in iflaviruses the precursor cleavage produces VP4 and VP3 (
67,
68). It has been proposed that a conserved Asp-Asp-Phe (DDF) motif, present in parts of capsid proteins that are exposed to the virion cavity, is involved in the VP0 cleavage (
67–69). The dicistroviruses CrPV and TrV contain the DDF sequence in a loop immediately following β-strand I of VP1, while TrV has an additional DDF sequence, in a loop following β-strand I of VP3 (
Fig. 5F) (
67,
68). SBPV also has two DDF sequences. One is in VP1, residues 226 to 228, and the second one is formed by residues 239 to 241 of VP3 (
Fig. 5E). Therefore, the locations of the DDF sequences in SBPV are similar to those in TrV (
Fig. 5E and
F). The DDF site in VP1 subunit of SBPV is located within 4 Å of the N terminus of VP3 subunit from a neighboring protomer, suggesting that it might mediate the VP0 maturation cleavage (
Fig. 5E).