We used three methods to compare the levels of protection in the different groups. First, an adapted Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that passively transferred b12 offered significantly better protection than the control antibody (
P = 0.0361). However, although there was a clear trend for better protection conferred by NFb12 relative to the control antibody, this did not reach statistical significance (
P = 0.1502) (
Fig. 5B). No statistical difference in protection between wild-type b12 and NFb12 was observed (
P = 0.5152) (
Fig. 5B). Second, using a Cox proportional hazard model, we calculated the relative risk of infection for wild-type b12 and NFb12 compared to the control group and found that wild-type b12 reduced the infection risk per challenge by a factor of 4.7 whereas NFb12 reduced it by a factor of 3.0 (
Table 1). However, although clear trends were apparent, the hazard ratios did not reach statistical significance. The corresponding
P values were as follows: for b12 versus control,
P = 0.0765; NFb12 versus control,
P = 0.1853; and b12 versus NFb12,
P = 0.5154. Interestingly, the hazard ratio for wild-type b12 versus control antibody was notably lower here (4.7) than in a previous study (21.3) (
22). This correlates with the higher challenge dose used here (30 TCID
50) than in previous challenge (10 TCID
50), suggesting that the hazard ratio is highly sensitive to the viral challenge dose, which may be an important consideration in evaluating the potential of antibody in mediating protection under different exposure conditions. Third, the infection susceptibility (
37) was calculated for each treatment group to show that both wild-type b12-treated (
P = 0.0022) and NFb12-treated (
P = 0.0086) animals required a significantly higher number of challenges to become infected than control animals (
Table 2). No difference was observed between wild-type b12- and NFb12-treated animals (
P = 0.7089) (
Table 2). Overall, our analyses strongly suggest that weekly treatment with a low dose of wild-type b12 or NFb12 induces an increase in the level of protection against viral challenge
in vivo. However, there was no indication that NFb12 enhanced protection relative to wild-type b12.