Characterization of human iPSC-derived neurons and astrocytes.
To study the viral entry mechanisms in human brain cells, we set up a human iPSC-derived neuron-astrocyte coculture system in a 96-well plate format. The iPSC lines used for neuron and astrocyte differentiation are listed in
Table 1. All lines had the normal karyotypes and they expressed known pluripotency markers podocalyxin (TRA-1-81), stage-specific embryonic antigen 4 (SSEA-4), octamer-binding transcription factor (Oct)-4, and homeobox transcription factor Nanog at the protein level and
POU5F1 (Oct-3/4),
NANOG, and sex determining region Y box 2 (
SOX2) at the mRNA level (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Since the iPSC lines used in this study were reprogrammed using a Sendai virus-based vector, we also determined that residual expression of Sendai virus RNA was below the detection limit.
We used 6 different iPSC lines (
Table 1) to obtain cortical-like neurons using the overexpression of tetracycline-inducible neurogenin 2 (NGN2) in combination with dual SMAD/WNT inhibition. We confirmed the neuronal identity of the iPSC-derived cells by positive staining for the neuronal markers microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2) and class III β-tubulin (TUBB3) (
Fig. 1A). The majority of the neurons displayed nuclear expression of Cut-like homeobox 1 (CUX1), a marker for upper cortical layer neurons (layers II and III) (
Fig. 1A) and lacked COUP-TF-interacting protein 2 (CTIP2), which is a marker for lower cortical layers V and VI (data not shown). In addition, the majority of the neurons showed robust staining with vesicular glutamate transporter 1 (VGLUT1) (
Fig. 1A). Together, these data implied that our cultures contained mainly excitatory glutamatergic neurons of the upper cortical layer (II and III) identity. However, some neurons displayed positive staining for gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) (
Fig. 1A), which suggested that the cultures also contained small subsets of inhibitory GABAergic interneurons.
We also generated astrocytes from 4 different iPSC lines using the sphere-based protocol described in Materials and Methods. The identity of iPSC-derived astrocytes was confirmed by staining with the astrocyte markers glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), S100 calcium binding protein β (S100β), and aquaporin 4 (AQP4) (
Fig. 1B). The expression of
GFAP and
S100β mRNAs in the iPSC-derived human astrocytes was further confirmed by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR), and neither of these was detected in the parental iPSCs (
Fig. 1C).
To create a more complex model for studying SARS-CoV-2 infection, we mixed iPSC-derived neurons and astrocytes at a 1:1 ratio and cultured them together for several weeks. To evaluate the maturity and functionality of the neuron-astrocyte cocultures, we used a 24-well microelectrode array (MEA) system. The ability of neurons to form connected, electrically active networks is an important hallmark of their functionality.
In MEA experiments, bursts are periods of increased electrical activity recorded from a group of neurons connected to a recording electrode (single-electrode bursting). During network bursting, multiple electrodes record increased activity at the same time, which indicates that there is connectivity between different parts of the neuronal network. The cocultures used in this study started developing electric bursting activity after 3 weeks of maturation, as seen by a gradual increase in mean firing rate and the percentage of bursting electrodes (
Fig. 1D). Network maturation in our neuron-astrocyte cocultures reached a plateau by day 31, when most of the recording electrodes (>80%) recorded both single-electrode bursting and network bursting and the network burst duration had reached a duration of 0.7s (
Fig. 1D). Representative images of MEA recordings from all 16 electrodes at days 21, 30, 31, and 35 are shown in
Fig. 1E (10-s interval). Since our neuron-astrocyte cocultures formed a connected, electrically active network as expected of functional neurons by days 30 to 32, we chose this time point for SARS-CoV-2 infection experiments.
Finally, we used qRT-PCR to assess the expression of cell surface molecules known to be important for SARS-CoV-2 infection in the respiratory tract. The level of the main entry receptor ACE2 in iPSC-derived neurons was below immunofluorescence detection (
Fig. 1F). At the mRNA level,
ACE2 expression was detectable in both iPSC-derived neurons and astrocytes. However, the levels were low compared to those for the Caco2-ACE2 cell line, which overexpresses ACE2 receptor (
Fig. 1G and Fig. S2). The level of
TMPRSS2 mRNA expression in iPSC-derived neurons and astrocytes was at the same level with the negative control cell line A549, which does not express this gene (
Fig. 1G and Fig. S2). Both neurons and astrocytes expressed detectable levels of the entry cofactor
neuropilin 1 (
NRP1) mRNA (
Fig. 1G and Fig. S2). Neuropilin is a protein that controls axonal development in neurons and has recently been shown to facilitate SARS-CoV-2 infection in ACE2-expressing cells (
25,
26).
In summary, the neuron-astrocyte coculture model displayed electric activity typical of mature neurons, with correctly expressed cell markers. At the RNA level, both neurons and astrocytes endogenously expressed NRP1 and low amounts of ACE2, but not TMPRSS2.
SARS-CoV-2 selectively infects neurons in an iPSC-derived neuron-astrocyte coculture model, and the infection appears productive.
To assess susceptibility of iPSC-derived human neural cultures to SARS-CoV-2, we infected 30- to 32-day-old neuron-astrocyte cocultures with the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan strain and analyzed samples by immunofluorescence analysis of viral protein expression at various time points. A representative image of an infected well at 48 h postinfection (hpi) stained with DNA dye Hoechst 33342 (nuclear marker), MAP2, and SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (N) is shown in
Fig. 2A, with an enlarged area shown in
Fig. 2B. The viral N protein was detected both in the neuronal cell body and throughout neurites (dendrites) (
Fig. 2B). Additionally, immunolabeling against viral N and double stranded RNA (dsRNA) confirmed the presence of both viral protein synthesis and viral RNA replication in the infected cells (
Fig. 2C).
Following the infection at a virus concentration equivalent to a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1.5 in Vero E6-TMPRSS2 cells, we found a low level of neuronal infection (around 0.05%) at all analyzed time points (24, 48, and 120 hpi) (
Fig. 2D). The level of the neuronal SARS-CoV-2 infection did not differ significantly between the analyzed time points (
Fig. 2D), which was in line with previously published work (
13). Based on the distribution of the viral N staining at 24 hpi, the infection was mostly localized in the neuronal soma, with proximal neurites only beginning to display signs of N-positive staining (
Fig. 2E, arrow). At 48 hpi, it was common to see neurons with both soma and neurites positive for SARS-CoV-2 N (
Fig. 2E, arrow). At 120 hpi, all the neurons that were found positive for N had their neurites retracted (
Fig. 2E).
To assess whether the infected neurons released infectious virions, we carried out qRT-PCR analysis of the conditioned medium collected from the cells at 0, 24, 48, and 120 hpi. We observed that the levels of viral genome released into the medium increased over time, with the maximum load detected at 48 hpi (
Fig. 2F). To assess whether the released viral RNA corresponded to infectious virions, we transferred conditioned medium from infected neuron-astrocyte cocultures to Vero E6 cells, which are highly susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection (
Fig. 2G and
H). As a comparison, we infected Vero E6 cells with different dilutions of the original SARS-CoV-2 stock produced in Vero E6-TMPRSS2 cells (
Fig. 2G and
H). The presence of infectious virions in the medium tended to increase from 0 to 24 hpi but did not reach the level of statistical significance, likely due to a very low number of infected neurons in our coculture model. At 48 hpi, infectious viruses were no longer detected in the media of infected neuron-astrocyte cocultures, probably due to virus-induced neuronal cell death (
Fig. 2G). More studies will be required to accurately determine the extent and kinetics of infectious virus release from infected neurons.
In the neuron-astrocyte cocultures, all of the N-positive cells demonstrated robust staining for the neuron-specific marker MAP2, which suggests that all of the infected cells were neurons. We did not find any infected astrocytes (defined as MAP2-negative cells) in our experiments. Although our data were consistent with previous findings where neurons, but not astrocytes, were susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection in human iPSC-derived cultures (
10,
12,
13,
15), SARS-CoV-2 infection has been previously observed in human primary astrocytes (
27) and iPSC-derived astrocytes (
14,
16) in some studies. Some differences in cell culture protocols, such as the length of differentiation, pH, or the presence or absence of fetal bovine serum in the medium might explain the differences in iPSC-derived astrocyte infectibility by SARS-CoV-2. More studies need to be conducted to understand the effects of different culture conditions on viral entry into astrocytes.
Since previous work by Wang et al. demonstrated that the presence of astrocytes exacerbates neuronal susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection in human iPSC neuronal cells (
14), we challenged iPSC-derived neuronal monocultures with a dose of SARS-CoV-2 similar to what we used to infect neuron-astrocyte cocultures. The level of infection in neuronal monocultures was comparable to the level of infection in neuron-astrocyte cocultures, which suggested that astrocytes did not facilitate neuronal SARS-CoV-2 infection in our cocultures (
Fig. 2I).
SARS-CoV-2 infection of iPSC-derived neurons is ACE2 dependent.
ACE2 is the primary receptor used by SARS-CoV-2 to enter cells (
28). Some of the earliest studies on SARS-CoV-2 challenged the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 could infect brain cells due to the low
ACE2 mRNA levels found in the human brain (
29,
30). Since then, some studies have reported ACE2 protein and RNA expression in some human neurons (
7,
31,
32), with Song and coworkers further reporting that application of anti-ACE2 antibody prior to infection blocked SARS-CoV-2 in human brain organoids (
7). To test whether SARS-CoV-2 infection of human iPSC-derived neurons is dependent on ACE2, we treated the cells with different concentrations of a polyclonal anti-ACE2 antibody (2, 5, or 20 μg/mL) 1 h prior to infection with SARS-CoV-2 (MOI equivalent to 1.5 PFU/cell, as determined in Vero E6-TMPRSS2 cells) (
Fig. 2J). At 24 hpi, the presence of anti-ACE2 antibody significantly blocked the infection in a dose-dependent manner (
Fig. 2J). An antibody against the intracellular protein actinin, which we used as a negative control for potential unspecific antibody-virus interactions, did not significantly inhibit the infection (
Fig. 2J). Overall, these data confirmed previous findings that the neuronal SARS-CoV-2 infection is ACE2 dependent, which is similar to SARS-CoV-2 infection in other cell types (
33,
34).
Virus infection is blocked by inhibition of PIK5K but not serine proteases.
To infect cells, SARS-CoV-2 surface protein spike (S) has to be cleaved by cellular proteases, which is followed by fusion of the virus with the cell membrane or endocytic compartment membranes. Previous studies have reported that SARS-CoV-2 could infect human primary cells through two main pathways: (i) through endocytosis, cathepsin-mediated spike activation, and membrane fusion at late endosomes or lysosomes (
35,
36); or (ii) spike activation by TMPRSS2 and direct viral fusion with the plasma membrane or the membrane of early endosomes (
22,
23,
37). To investigate the route of infection utilized by SARS-CoV-2 in human iPSC-derived neurons, we used small-molecule inhibitors to block these pathways, alone or in combination. Apilimod blocks PIK5K and therefore disrupts early to late endosomal-lysosomal trafficking, which has previously been shown to block viral infections, such as Ebola virus and SARS-CoV-2 infection of TMPRSS2-negative cells (
38–40). When applied 1 h prior to infection at a 0.2 μM concentration, apilimod decreased the number of SARS-CoV-2-infected cells at 24 hpi by more than 80% (
Fig. 3A). At 0.25 μM and 1 μM concentrations, it blocked infection completely (
Fig. 3A). At 48 hpi, the antiviral effect of the drug was reduced, but infection was still blocked by over 70% (
Fig. 3B). Nafamostat, a potent inhibitor of serine proteases, prevents the virus from entering TMPRSS2-expressing cells directly from the plasma membrane or through early endosomes (
33). In accordance with the lack of TMPRSS2 expression in our neuron-astrocyte cocultures, nafamostat applied at the saturating 25 μM concentration did not significantly inhibit SARS-CoV-2 infection at either 24 hpi or 48 hpi time points (
Fig. 3A and
B). A combination of both drug types had an effect similar to that of apilimod alone (
Fig. 3A and
B), which indicated that serine proteases are not necessary for neuronal infection.
Caco2-ACE2 cells express TMPRSS2 endogenously, which allows direct viral fusion at the plasma membrane (
33). Therefore, these cells can serve as a positive control for the inhibitory efficacy of nafamostat. While apilimod had only a small effect on the infection rates in Caco-2-ACE2 cells at 24 hpi, 25 μM nafamostat rendered a >90% decrease in the infection levels (
Fig. 3C and
D), confirming previous findings that cell surface serine protease inhibitors are capable of blocking SARS-CoV-2 entry in cells where this route is available for the virus. The observed inhibition with nafamostat was similar to that of anti-ACE2 antibody at a 20-μg/mL concentration (high) (
Fig. 3C), with both showing almost full inhibition of the infection.
Apilimod inhibited SARS-CoV-2 infection in neurons even when we increased the virus dose 10-fold (
Fig. 3E and
F). In control-treated cells, this 10-fold increase in virus dose increased the percentage of infected neurons from 0.05 to 0.5%, but the treatment with 2 μM apilimod almost completely blocked the infection (
Fig. 3E and
F). Notably, apilimod negatively affected the morphology of neurons by causing neurite retraction at 48 h posttreatment (
Fig. 3D). Astrocytes were not infected despite the increase in virus dose. Furthermore, we assessed the efficacy of camostat, another serine protease inhibitor that efficiently inhibits SARS-CoV-2 infection in TMPRSS2-expressing cells, with a 50% inhibitory concentration of ~2 μM (
41). Camostat did not inhibit SARS-CoV-2 neuron infection, even at a high concentration (50 μM) (
Fig. 3E and
F), which was consistent with the results obtained with nafamostat (
Fig. 3A and
B).
Since apilimod induced a clear morphological change in neurons and to make sure that the observed inhibition of virus entry into neurons by apilimod was not due to a general cytotoxic effect, we assessed the potential cytotoxicity of apilimod in neuron-astrocyte cocultures using a luminescence-based CellTiter-Glo 2.0 cell viability assay. 7-Hydroxystaurosporine (UCN-01), which is neurotoxic at high concentrations due to the inhibition of protein kinase C (
42), served as a positive control. While UCN-01 was significantly cytotoxic already after 24 h of treatment, apilimod did not show significant cytotoxicity at any of the used concentrations and evaluated time points (
Fig. 3G).
Apilimod blocks endosome maturation by inhibiting PIK5K, which prevents endocytic cargoes from being delivered from early to late endosomes and lysosomes. Having established that apilimod blocked SARS-CoV-2 infection in neurons, we tested whether an inhibitor of the lysosomal protease cathepsin L would block neuronal infection. Cathepsin L is known to trigger virus fusion with lysosomal membrane in cells that do not express TMPRSS2. To this end, we treated neuron-astrocyte cocultures with a high concentration (10 μM) of the cathepsin L inhibitor SB412515. Consistent with previous findings (
23), SB412515 efficiently blocked infection in Vero E6 cells, which are known to be infected through the endosomal pathway (positive control) (
Fig. 4A and
B). In contrast, SB412515 was unable to block infection in Caco2-ACE2 and A549-ACE2-TMPRSS2 cells, where the virus enters through a TMPRSS2-mediated pathway (negative controls) (
Fig. 4A and
B). In neuron-astrocyte cocultures, SB412515 moderately reduced the number of infected neurons in some experiments, but the observed difference was not statistically significant (
Fig. 4A and
B). Our results indicated that the virus can utilize other cathepsins or lysosomal proteases to infect neurons when cathepsin L is inhibited. For example, cathepsin B can also be involved in SARS-CoV-2 entry (
35), and this protein is abundantly expressed in human neurons and neuron-like cells (
43).
Since neuronal infection was blocked by an inhibitor of the host factor PIK5K but not by inhibitors of cell surface serine proteases, these data suggested that SARS-CoV-2 infection of iPSC-derived neurons preferentially occurs through the endosomal pathway and not through direct fusion with the plasma membrane following TMPRSS2-mediated cleavage. This could be due to the organ-specific lack of TMPRSS2 and the acidic environment (pH < 6.8) required for direct cell entry at the plasma membrane. For example, the pH of the human nasal mucosa is around 6.6 (
23), whereas the brain extracellular fluids have a pH of >7.2 (
44). The lack of TMPRSS2 is also known to quickly lead to mutations in the viral spike protein (
26), which can select for endosomal-lysosomal cell entry in human neurons that do not endogenously express TMPRSS2.
Drugs aimed at blocking viral infection through the endosomal-lysosomal pathway could potentially be used to prevent or limit neuronal infection by SARS-CoV-2. However, although intravenous administration of apilimod did not show evident adverse effects in human clinical trials, we warn against incautious use of such drugs. In our
in vitro experiments, apilimod negatively affected the morphology of neurons by causing neurite retraction at 48 h posttreatment (
Fig. 3G), even though we did not detect cytotoxicity. Thus, the safety of apilimod should be carefully evaluated in preclinical studies before it can be aimed at treating brain infections.
Conclusions.
The current study has characterized the SARS-CoV-2 infection pathway in human iPSC-derived cortical-like neurons and has provided evidence that neurons but not astrocytes get infected. The infection relies on ACE2 for entry. When entering the neuronal cells, the virus preferentially uses the endosomal-lysosomal pathway, even though inhibition of cathepsin L did not significantly block infection. In future studies, it will be important to define the identity of the protease(s) involved in virus entry. Viral RNA and low levels infectious viruses were released from infected neurons, but more studies are required to characterize this aspect of the infection.
Nonlethal, low-level infection in the brain might be difficult to trace, but it could still lead to long-lasting negative consequences. Although the infection led to neuronal cell death within 48 to 120 hpi in vitro, it is currently unknown how long an infected neuron can survive or release viruses in vivo. A deeper understanding of brain infection by SARS-CoV-2 could help us understand if there is a causal connection between direct viral infection of brain cells and the neurological manifestations associated with long COVID. More detailed molecular characterization of the viral entry pathways, mechanisms of assembly, and viral release are needed to develop treatments against COVID-19-associated neurological complications.