ABSTRACT

In undergraduate life sciences education, open educational resources (OERs) increase accessibility and retention for students, reduce costs, and save instructors time and effort. Despite increasing awareness and utilization of these resources, OERs are not centrally located, and many undergraduate instructors describe challenges in locating relevant materials for use in their classes. To address this challenge, we have designed a resource collection (referred to as Open Resources for Biology Education, ORBE) with 89 unique resources that are primarily relevant to undergraduate life sciences education. To identify the resources in ORBE, we asked undergraduate life sciences instructors to list what OERs they use in their teaching and curated their responses. Here, we summarize the contents of the ORBE and describe how educators can use this resource as a tool to identify suitable materials to use in their classroom context. By highlighting the breadth of unique resources openly available for undergraduate biology education, we intend for the ORBE to increase instructors’ awareness and use of OERs.

INTRODUCTION

Educators often seek new ways to enhance student learning outcomes and promote educational accessibility. However, developing new teaching materials can take significant time and effort. Open educational resources (OERs) emerged as one way to facilitate the diffusion of knowledge. UNESCO (1) defines OERs as “teaching, learning and research materials in any medium—digital or otherwise—that reside in the public domain or have been released under an open license that permits no-cost access, use, adaptation, and redistribution by others with no or limited restrictions.”
Within undergraduate life sciences education, OERs have been shown to promote accessibility, reduce costs for students and instructors, increase knowledge retention, and improve student success (24). The significance of OERs in enhancing student-teacher learning has been underscored by Vision and Change (V&C), a framework that describes core concepts and competencies that should be integrated into undergraduate biology programs and advocates for the use of student-centered pedagogical practices (5). The V&C report recommends that instructors create and disseminate student-centered teaching resources to improve undergraduate biology education.
Despite increasing use, availability, and awareness of OERs among higher education instructors (6), these resources are often dispersed across different repositories, journals, and websites. This diffusion can make it difficult for instructors to find OERs that align with their course learning objectives, with many instructors expressing a desire for a peer-reviewed repository of OER materials in their discipline (7).
We address this challenge by developing a resource collection of OERs that are currently being used in undergraduate biology courses, the Open Resources for Biology Education (ORBE; https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25343107). By categorizing each resource based on topic, intended audience, and other relevant criteria, we aim to streamline the process of locating and utilizing OERs in life sciences education.

PROCEDURE

Using the ORBE

The ORBE is a resource collection designed to assist educators in locating new OERs to use in undergraduate biology courses. Containing 89 unique OERs, the ORBE was compiled by surveying undergraduate biology educators in 2020 (8) and 2021 about what OERs they use in their courses. For more details on how the ORBE was compiled, please refer to File S1.
Educators wishing to use the ORBE to identify new OERs can browse within any of the following categories (Table 1): resource name, URL, audience, topic area, resource description, presence of institutional support or institutional affiliation, level of no-cost access, and type of use/adaptation/redistribution policy. To aid in browsing this resource, users can download the spreadsheet and filter or search for key terms within each category using drop-down menus (accessed by clicking the gray triangle enclosed in a square icon to the right of each category name in the ORBE).
TABLE 1
TABLE 1 Open Resources for Biology Education user guide
ORBE categoryDescriptionSub-category
1. Resource nameTitle of website
2. URLLink to the resource website
3. Topic areaDescription of the topic area(s) of education materials hosted on the website, as obtained from the homepage, “about me” page, or frequently asked questions (FAQ) pageAnatomy, Animal Behavior, Animal Science, Biochemistry, Biodiversity, Bioengineering, Bioinformatics, Biostatistics, Biotechnology, Botany, Cell Biology, Climate Science, Conservation, Disease, Ecology, Environmental Science, Evolution, Genetics, Genomics, Health/Healthcare, Human Health, Immunology, Marine Sciences, Medicine, Microbiology, Molecular Biology, Neuroscience, Oceanography, Physiology, Plant Sciences, Public Health, Quantitative Biology, Sustainability, Toxicology, Zoology
4. Resource descriptionWebsite description obtained from the language used on the website homepage, “about me” page, or FAQ page 
5. AudienceThe intended audience of the educational materials provided
Undergraduate (or K-16) = materials designed for teaching undergraduate students only or materials designed for undergraduate students and students in grades K-12
K-12 = materials designed for teaching students in Kindergarten through 12th grade
Public = materials designed for educating all ages or the general public
6. Institutional support/affiliationWebsites with noted past or present support from or affiliation with noncommercial educational or scientific institutions
Present: resource cites affiliation with an educational or scientific institution (defined as one of the following: institution of higher education, governmental organization, scientific funding agency, museum, nonprofit research or educational organization, professional scientific society, or peer-reviewed academic journal)
Absent: resource does not cite affiliation or support from an educational or scientific institution. Resource is either a personal website or a website supported by a commercial entity
7. No-cost accessDetails about the presence or absence of any financial restrictions to access educational materials on the website
Partial: resource contains some educational materials that are freely accessible and others that are only accessible through an institutional or personal paid account
Complete: all educational materials that are freely accessible
8. Use/adaptation/redistribution policyDetails about restrictions on reuse/adaptation/redistribution of the educational materials on the website
Public domain: allows for unlimited reuse without permission
Creative Commons: the public is granted permission through a Creative Commons license to use creative work under copyright law, with certain restrictions (e.g., attribution, noncommercial use)
Custom-use license: the public is granted permission through a custom limited-use license to use creative work under copyright law, with certain restrictions (e.g., attribution, noncommercial use)
Unclear/unspecified: a specific reuse policy is not identifiable on the website

Safety issues

There are no safety issues associated with this study.

CONCLUSION

The final draft of the ORBE is hosted on figshare.com, an open-source online repository for research materials (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25343107). The websites listed in the ORBE serve several audiences, are often provided at completely no cost to users, largely have institutional support, and have a variety of use licenses (Fig. 1). Websites cover a wide range of biology subdisciplines including molecular biology, physiology, ecology, and evolution. The most listed resources are designed for undergraduate/K-16 audiences, indicating that undergraduate instructors are looking for materials designed specifically for their educational level. Institutional support is common; for example, 30 resources cite current or past support from the National Science Foundation and 31 cite a current or previous affiliation with a college or university.
Fig 1
Fig 1 Overview of the intended audience, noncommercial institutional support, no-cost status, and use licensing of the 89 biology education resource websites listed in the ORBE.
The greatest variability is among use license types, which has the potential to be confusing for instructors who may want to use, modify, and share updated versions of materials. As such, we encourage OER authors to ensure that reuse, crediting, and adaptation policies for their materials are stated as clearly as possible. Creative Commons licenses offer one example of a particularly visible and user-friendly way for OER creators to license their work and communicate reuse policies to users (9; creativecommons.org). Creative Commons licenses have transparent language, a straightforward and widely used classification system, recognizable iconography, and useful links to support resources. These qualities benefit OER creators, who can easily apply licenses to their materials and retain the copyright of their work, and OER users, who can confidently understand licensing terms to appropriately use the materials.
Additionally, we encourage OER websites to support users by providing easily accessible information about the content they are hosting alongside costs and relevant details about reuse policies to support instructors using OERs more effectively in their teaching. Similarly, OER authors can support users by sharing as many relevant details as possible about their OER implementation context (e.g., intended audience, specific topic, teaching modality, class size, and learning goals). The more contextual details are specified, the easier it will be for instructors to identify appropriate OERs to adopt into their teaching practice.
Although we present the ORBE as a static document, we recognize that future revisions will be necessary. As the prevalence of OERs in undergraduate biology education increases throughout the next decade, we see valuable opportunities for OER users to periodically compile similar resource collections. In addition to serving the community of biology educators by featuring new OERs, future OER collections can be compared with the ORBE to reflect how resources have changed over time. The ORBE, to our knowledge, is the first resource collection of its kind for undergraduate life sciences instructors to access a variety of OERs suitable for their courses. As the number and variety of OERs increase alongside growing awareness and use of OERs in higher education (6), ORBE represents the beginning of a needed community effort toward the management and dissemination of OERs. We hope that increased awareness and use of the breadth of resources available will result in increased usage and development of OERs in undergraduate life science courses.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors wish to thank the Cornell Discipline Based Education Research group and anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful comments on the manuscript.
This work is supported by National Science Foundation grants DUE-1725130, 1917387, 2044189, 2043996, 2044118, 2125990, 2126110, and 2125998.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

File S1 - jmbe.00203-23-s0001.pdf
Supplemental Materials & Methods (details about the creation of the ORBE, with additional information about how ORBE resources were identified via surveys and how OER status and additional details were ascertained for each resource).
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

1.
United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization [UNESCO]. 2021. Open educational resources (OER). Available from: https:// en.unesco.org/themes/building-knowledge-societies/oer. Retrieved 01 Oct 2023.
2.
Smith MK. 2018. Publishing activities improves undergraduate biology education. FEMS Microbiol Lett 365:fny099.
3.
Diaz Eaton C, Bonner K, Cangialosi K, Dewsbury B, Diamond-Stanic M, Douma J, Smith M, Taylor R, Wojdak J, Wilfong K. 2022. Sustainability and justice: challenges and opportunities for an open STEM education. CBE Life Sci Educ 21:es4.
4.
Colvard NB, Watson CE, Park H. 2018. The impact of open educational resources on various student success metrics. Int J Teach Learn Higher Educ 30:262–276. https://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/pdf/IJTLHE3386.pdf
5.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. 2011. “Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: a call to action”. Washington, DC
6.
Seaman JE, Seaman J. 2023. “Digitally established: educational resources in U.S. higher education, 2023”. Available from: https://www.bayviewanalytics.com/oer.html. Retrieved 13 Oct 2023.
7.
Belikov OM, Bodily R. 2016. Incentives and barriers to OER adoption: a qualitative analysis of faculty perceptions. Open Praxis 8:235.
8.
Senn LG, Heim AB, Vinson E, Smith MK. 2022. How do undergraduate biology instructors engage with the open educational resource life cycle? Front Educ 7.
9.
Kim M. 2007. The creative commons and copyright protection in the digital era: uses of creative commons licenses. J Comput Mediat Commun 13:187–209.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education
Volume 25Number 229 August 2024
eLocator: e00203-23
Editor: Stanley Maloy, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA
PubMed: 38709009

History

Received: 30 November 2023
Accepted: 10 April 2024
Published online: 6 May 2024

Keywords

  1. open educational resources
  2. OER
  3. undergraduate biology education
  4. teaching resources
  5. life sciences

Contributors

Authors

Sanah Ahmed
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, and Writing – review and editing.
Tiffany Adjei-Opong
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
Author Contributions: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, and Writing – review and editing.
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
Author Contributions: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, and Writing – review and editing.
School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, and Writing – review and editing.
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Validation, and Writing – review and editing.
School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Validation, and Writing – review and editing.
Physics and Astronomy, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, USA
Author Contributions: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Validation, and Writing – review and editing.
Office of the Provost and Executive Vice President, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA
Author Contributions: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, and Writing – review and editing.
Codon Learning, Golden, Colorado, USA
Author Contributions: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, and Writing – review and editing.
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, and Writing – review and editing.
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, and Writing – review and editing.

Editor

Stanley Maloy
Editor
San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA

Notes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note:

  • For recently published articles, the TOTAL download count will appear as zero until a new month starts.
  • There is a 3- to 4-day delay in article usage, so article usage will not appear immediately after publication.
  • Citation counts come from the Crossref Cited by service.

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. For an editable text file, please select Medlars format which will download as a .txt file. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share the article link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share on social media

American Society for Microbiology ("ASM") is committed to maintaining your confidence and trust with respect to the information we collect from you on websites owned and operated by ASM ("ASM Web Sites") and other sources. This Privacy Policy sets forth the information we collect about you, how we use this information and the choices you have about how we use such information.
FIND OUT MORE about the privacy policy