On the basis of 16S rRNA sequence comparisons, members of bacterial species within the family
Anaplasmataceae have recently been reorganized into four main groups, each corresponding to an individualized genus (
12). The genus
Anaplasma comprises agents responsible for zoonotic infections, the granulocytic ehrlichiosis, in both humans (HGE) and animals, mainly horses (
Anaplasma equi) and sheep, goats, and cows (
Anaplasma phagocytophilum). In the upper midwestern United States, the pathogens are transmitted by
Ixodes scapularis (
9,
40), whereas they are transmitted by
Ixodes persulcatus in Asia (
3,
27). Although few human cases have been described (
23,
31,
35,
41),
Anaplasma strains have been detected in
Ixodes ricinus ticks collected in different countries of Western Europe (
5,
7,
14,
17,
22,
32,
34,
38). The genus
Ehrlichia includes the agent of human monocytic ehrlichiosis (
Ehrlichia chaffeensis), mainly transmitted by
Amblyomma americanum in the United States (
11,
15,
43), and other species, mostly involved in animal infections. To our knowledge, just two human cases have been reported in Europe, based only on serologic evidence (
26,
33). However serologic testing cannot consistently distinguish between infections due to distinct species in this group of bacteria. The infection of
I. ricinus by
E. chaffeensis is poorly documented, and most
Ehrlichia DNAs found in this tick were
Ehrlichia-like DNAs related to the agent of human monocytic ehrlichiosis. Therefore, the role of
I. ricinus as a vector of this pathogen is only suspected to date.
Neorickettsia and
Wolbachia are the two additional genera in the family
Anaplasmataceae. However, ticks have never been implicated in the transmission of the former, and no mammalian infection due to
Wolbachia pipientis has ever been documented.
Different targets have been designed to demonstrate the presence of DNAs from these bacteria either in ticks or in the blood of various mammalian hosts, including humans. The principal genes used were the 16S rRNA (rrs) gene, the eubacterial groESL heat shock operon, the gene encoding P44 proteins, a family of surface proteins capable of eliciting an immunologic response in patients with granulocytic ehrlichiosis, and the epank1 gene, encoding a 153-kDa protein antigen restricted to the Anaplasma genus. By these means, different more or less closely related ehrlichiosis agents have been demonstrated in I. ricinus ticks from Europe.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A total of 418 questing I. ricinus ticks, collected from vegetation, were tested for Ehrlichia infection by a PCR assay. One hundred ninety-seven ticks (larvae, nymphs, and adults) collected in Tunisia and 221 adult ticks collected in Morocco between November 2002 and March 2003 were included in the study. PCR products of the expected size were obtained from 53 of 324 (16.3%) adult I. ricinus ticks, from 2 of 59 nymphs, and from 1 of 35 larvae. Additionally, 32 Hyalomma detritum, 6 Hyalomma marginatum marginatum, and 14 Hyalomma anatolicum excavatum ticks collected from bovines in Tunisia, as well as 188 Rhipicephalus sanguineus ticks from dogs, were checked for the presence of Ehrlichia DNA. PCR signals were obtained from 18.8% of H. detritum, 7.1% of H. excavatum, and 2.9% of R. sanguineus ticks. No signal was obtained from H. m. marginatum. Moreover, 36 Haemaphysalis sulcata and 47 Haemaphysalis punctata ticks, collected on the vegetation, were analyzed. All were negative for the presence of Ehrlichia DNA.
Given the broad genetic diversity among the species in the family
Anaplasmataceae, we searched for primer sets able to amplify DNA from all organisms belonging to this family. We chose this strategy in order to draw up an inventory of different species within this family present in ticks collected in Maghrebian countries. The
rrs gene proved to be a useful target. Initially, using sequences available in data banks, we verified that partial
rrs sequences were representative of the whole gene. Indeed, the clustering obtained was similar to that reported by others using the sequence of the whole gene, as well as other genes (
12). Therefore, we used the primer set Ehr521-Ehr747, which was initially designed for the specific amplification of
A. phagocytophilum (
29) but actually allowed the amplification of 247 bp in the
rrs genes from all organisms of this heterogeneous family. Despite a high sensitivity, the specificity was poor, since all members of the family and also some
Rickettsia and
Bartonella spp. were detected (
17,
24,
39). Therefore, in order to provide objective confirmation of the identification, all PCR products whose DNA concentration was ≥50 ng/μl were sequenced. The phylogenetic relationships between partial
rrs sequences of ehrlichiae from North Africa and sequences available in data banks are shown in Fig.
2.
The nucleotide sequences of 36 PCR products from
I. ricinus ticks were determined. All sequences matched with sequences of representatives of the family
Anaplasmataceae (Table
1 and Fig.
2). Therefore, we extrapolated the prevalence of tick infection, although we are aware of the risk of overestimation when no sequence is available to confirm the amplification specificity. The prevalence of infection of adult
I. ricinus ticks in Tunisia (25.2%) was twice as high as the prevalence in Morocco (12.2%). A similar result was noted when the prevalence of infection by
B. lusitaniae was studied in these two countries. Furthermore, the density of ticks was also higher in Tunisia than in Morocco (
1,
2). In the present study, no significant difference in the infection rate of ticks according to sex was observed. As expected, the prevalence of infection of immature tick stages was lower, 3.4% for nymphs and 2.8% for larvae. Different studies conducted in the United States and in Europe revealed high discrepancies between the prevalences of infection in ticks, which may be associated with geographic or seasonal differences or with tick stage or tick status (unfed or fed, either on healthy animals or on animals with ehrlichiosis). In Europe, reported prevalences of
A. phagocytophilum in free-living
I. ricinus ticks range from 0.8 to 24% (
7,
34).
Moreover, 139
I. ricinus ticks were simultaneously studied for infection by
B. lusitaniae and members of the family
Anaplasmataceae. Ten ticks (7.2%) were infected by both organisms (data not shown). This is in the range of the coinfection rate usually reported in the literature (
1,
5).
A huge worldwide genetic diversity has been described among members of the family Anaplasmataceae. It is noteworthy that a similar diversity was demonstrated for ticks collected in North Africa, since the sequences determined in this study fell into three of the four groups constituting the family Anaplasmataceae.
Most
I. ricinus ticks were infected by organisms whose partial
rrs sequences fell into the cluster of
Anaplasma, although some of them constituted separate and highly divergent branches (Fig.
2). Sequences from two
I. ricinus ticks (together with one
H. detritum tick) fell into the cluster of the causative agent of HGE, cospecific with those of the veterinary pathogens
A. phagocytophilum and
A. equi. The partial sequences determined in this study shared 100% identity with the
A. phagocytophilum sequence (accession number UO2521 ) but differed by 2 nucleotides from the sequence determined from an
I. ricinus tick collected in France (accession number AF012528 ) (
30), as shown in Fig.
2.
Sequences of amplicons derived from 19
I. ricinus ticks in Tunisia (3 of which, IR12, IR25, and IR47, are included in Fig.
2) and from 13
I. ricinus ticks in Morocco (3 of which, MTI199, MTI210, and MTI216, are included in Fig.
2) (Table
1) constitute a separate branch in the
Anaplasma cluster. The complete identity of the sequences of organisms from both Tunisian and Moroccan ticks must be underlined. These sequences were 100% identical but differed markedly from
A. phagocytophilum sequences (11 nucleotide differences), the most closely related partial
rrs sequences. Therefore, they clearly represent a distinct new species, and provisionally we designated this species
Anaplasma-like.
Two samples, one from an
I. ricinus tick (44IR) and one from an
H. detritum tick (17HY) in Tunisia, contained sequences that fell into the cluster comprising the agent of monocytic ehrlichiosis,
E. chaffeensis, and a pathogen for domestic ruminants,
Ehrlichia ruminantium. Partial sequences 44IR and 17HY differed from
E. chaffeensis sequences (accession number U86664 ) by 4 and 7 nucleotides, respectively.
Ehrlichia-like organisms related to the monocytic
Ehrlichia have frequently been reported in American studies. However, they have also been found in some European countries (
17,
38), although more rarely than
A. phagocytophilum. Phylogenetic analysis (Fig.
2) showed that sequences from Maghrebian samples clearly differed from those of
Ehrlichia-like organisms found in Dutch
I. ricinus ticks (accession number AF104680 ) (
38). Whether these organisms should be classified as separate species or only strain variants remains an open question.
Surprisingly, one sequence obtained from an
I. ricinus tick collected in Morocco was closely related to that of
W. pipientis (10 nucleotide differences from
W. pipientis [accession number U23709 ]) (Table
1). Sequences related to
Wolbachia have rarely been identified from ticks in European studies (
17). This bacterium, identified for the first time from the mosquito
Culex pipiens, infects a large range of nematodes and arthropods (
18).
W. pipientis is mostly involved in the metabolism of its hosts, causing reproductive alterations, and seems to be devoid of direct pathogenicity for humans or animals (
4). However, as a symbiont of human pathogens,
W. pipientis could be implicated in pathological filariasis (
36).
No sequence homologous to sequences in the
Neorickettsia cluster was found in any tick. This was not surprising, since ticks have never been implicated in the transmission of these agents, which are more specifically associated with helminths (
12).
Four DNAs extracted from
R. sanguineus gave positive PCR signals (Table
1). Three of them were sequenced. They fell into the
Anaplasma cluster and exhibited 100% identity with the sequence of
Anaplasma platys (accession number AF156784 ). Interestingly, these
R. sanguineus ticks were found on dogs; one was a male and two were females, one unfed and the other partially engorged at the time of collection. These results were not surprising, since
A. platys has been reported to parasitize circulating platelets of dogs in Japan and is known to cause infectious cyclic thrombocytopenia, which may be fatal for dogs (
16). No DNA from
E. canis, a species frequently involved in canine infections (
2), was detected in ticks collected on dogs in Tunisia. However several species of
Anaplasmataceae can be transmitted to a variety of hosts in nature, even though
E. canis and
E. ruminantium have been isolated exclusively from dogs and cattle, respectively. For example, in Missouri, the agent of
Ehrlichia infection in dogs is currently
Ehrlichia ewingii (
21). It is not yet known whether
R. sanguineus could be the vector of
A. platys, and the actual role of
Rhipicephalus in the transmission of members of
Ehrlichia species remains to be confirmed. An extended study is needed to clarify these data from North Africa.
Seven DNAs extracted from
Hyalomma ticks led to positive signals in PCR and were sequenced (Table
1). One sequence completely matched that of
A. phagocytophilum, and another fell into the
Ehrlichia cluster (Fig.
2). Three sequences from
Hyalomma ticks branched in the cluster
Anaplasma but resulted in short sequences (139 to 158 nucleotides) and some discrepancies on the two strands. The data inferred from these sequences were too inconclusive to be included in the phylogenetic analysis. Moreover, the two remaining sequences from
Hyalomma ticks did not match any previously known DNA sequence in a FASTA search. Consequently, even though no precise infection rate could be deduced from the analysis of
Hyalomma ticks, evidence of the presence of DNA closely related to
A. phagocytophilum in at least one
H. detritum tick and of DNA closely related to
Ehrlichia in another tick was acquired.
The presence of
A. phagocytophilum in European ticks was reported for the first time in 1997 (
42), although its detection from different animal species had been described earlier (
28). Afterwards, reports came from North and Northwestern Europe (
1,
7,
14,
17,
22,
25,
30,
34,
38), as well as from Central Europe (
5,
32) and even Southeastern Europe (
6). The reported prevalences of infection showed large differences according to country, study, and tick species. Although the presence of members of the family
Anaplasmataceae was reported as early as 1937 in Algeria in bovines, sheep, and dogs (
10), data from North Africa have since been rare. Ghorbel et al. (
13) reported a positive serology against
E. canis for 10% of febrile patients in Tunisia, whereas no sera positive for
E. chaffeensis were found in blood donors in Central Tunisia by Letaief et al. (
20). The present study indicates that the agent of HGE is present on this continent. In Europe as in the United States,
A. phagocytophilum is maintained in a natural cycle between the tick vector,
I. scapularis or
I. ricinus, respectively, and reservoir hosts. It is very likely that similar relationships also occur in North Africa, and this possibility needs to be further investigated by identifying the reservoir hosts.
Our findings prove, for the first time, the presence of members of the family Anaplasmataceae in ticks in North Africa. Additionally, this study demonstrates a high level of genetic diversity among species present on this continent. Moreover, we demonstrate that these pathogens are harbored not only by I. ricinus but also by other tick species, Hyalomma and Rhipicephalus. Some of the Anaplasmataceae species detected in ticks are pathogenic for both humans and livestock. The demonstration of species closely related to the agents of granulocytic and monocytic ehrlichioses suggests that evidence of human and animal infections should be sought. Although people may be bitten by ticks infected by Anaplasmataceae members, the health implications in North Africa remain unknown. Therefore, our findings warrant further investigation in order to clarify the pathogenic potential of diverse Anaplasmataceae species in North Africa and the burden for human and animal populations, as well as the genetic relationships and epidemiology of these species. The respective roles of different tick species in the transmission of the different pathogens remain to be evaluated. Collectively, these data should be considered in medical practice, and ehrlichiosis should be included in the differential diagnosis of febrile illness in North Africa as well as in Europe.