DISCUSSION
Although diarrheagenic
E. coli was isolated with similar frequencies in diarrhea and control samples, illnesses were associated with a more inflammatory response. However, these pathogens elicited a mild inflammatory response. Fecal leukocytes as a marker of inflammatory response have different sensitivities and specificities in outpatients and hospitalized children (
25), and also in developed or resource-poor countries (
4). In general, fecal leukocytes have limited value in discriminating between pathogens causing watery diarrhea when the inflammatory response is mild. Patients with presumably noninflammatory diarrheal pathogens, such as rotavirus, ETEC, and cholera, may have a mild inflammatory response with fecal leukocytes (11 to 20 L/hpf), suggesting that the threshold for separating patients with primary inflammatory diarrhea from those with noninflammatory diarrhea may be higher in areas where multiple bacterial and parasitic infections are common (
6,
11,
12). On the other hand, typical invasive pathogens, such as
Shigella and EIEC, have been associated with a higher inflammatory response (>50 L/hpf) (
8,
27), suggesting that these levels may be useful for discriminating invasive bacteria at the emergency room or outpatient consultation.
In this study, EAEC, EPEC, and ETEC were the most prevalent
E. coli pathogens. Fecal leukocytes (>10 L/hpf) were found in 5.6% of EAEC diarrhea cases; this is lower than previously reported (∼28 to 40%) in EAEC traveler's diarrhea (
2,
3,
10). In a study in Brazil, children with malnutrition and persistent diarrhea due to EAEC had elevated levels of fecal lactoferrin and proinflammatory cytokines (interleukin-8 [IL-8] and IL-1β) in their stool samples (
26). Interestingly, patients infected with EAEC and carrying a group of virulence genes (
aggR,
aap,
aatA,
astA, or
set1A) were associated with the presence of fecal leukocytes and increased production of fecal cytokines (IL-8, gamma interferon [IFN-γ], IL-1β, and IL-1 receptor antagonist [IL-1ra]) (
3,
9,
14).
The second most commonly isolated pathogen was EPEC. Fecal leukocytes were found in 8.3% of EPEC infections and were significantly associated with diarrhea cases. Previous studies in children have shown higher frequencies of fecal leukocytes in stool samples (19%) (
15). Although EPEC strains are not invasive pathogens, they induce an inflammatory response in the gut epithelium
in vivo by triggering production of cytokines and chemokines, including IL-8, which recruits polymorphonuclear leukocytes to the infection site (
24).
In vitro studies have shown that intestinal epithelial cells infected with EPEC trigger IL-8 release through Toll-like receptor 5 (TLR-5) and activation of NF-κB, mediated by flagellin, the secreted protein of the EPEC
fliC gene (
16). In addition, NleE, a type 3 secretory system (T3SS) effector, is required for EPEC-induced polymorphonuclear leukocyte migration (
28).
Fecal leukocytes were found in 13.8% of ETEC diarrhea cases; this was similar to other studies in children (10 to 34%) (
15,
18,
27). Interestingly, ETEC isolation in stool samples was highly associated with the presence of fecal leukocytes, and this association increased when we analyzed ETEC isolation as a single pathogen, adjusting for the presence of blood in stools, age, sex, undernutrition, and breastfeeding. Infection with ETEC has traditionally been considered a secretory diarrhea with little or no inflammatory response. However, several studies have shown that tissue culture cells infected with ETEC cause disruption of the membrane barrier plus increase of IL-8 expression, especially with heat-stable enterotoxin strains (ETEC-ST) (
9,
22). Similarly, increased levels of IL-8, IL-1β, and IL-1ra were found in fecal samples from travelers with ETEC infection (
5), although these levels were lower than those in
Shigella infection. Travelers with ETEC diarrhea were found to have markers of enteric inflammation, such as the presence of occult blood in 30%, fecal leukocytes in 27%, and fecal lactoferrin in 27% (
2). However, there are few data on the inflammatory response to ETEC infection in children.
The relatively high presence of fecal leukocytes in this study compared to others is almost certainly due to careful and rapid screening, as opposed to “real-world” situations, where samples sit for too long before being analyzed. However, these pathogens in general elicited a mild inflammatory response, measured by the number of fecal leukocytes per high-power field (most samples had between 11 and 20 L/hpf); the vast majority (95%) of diarrheagenic
E. coli diarrhea samples were positive for fecal lactoferrin. Screening for fecal lactoferrin is a highly sensitive method to detect an inflammatory process. At the screening dilution, the assay detects as little as 15 ng of lactoferrin per μl, or about 3,000 leukocytes/μl, which is equivalent to >1 L/hpf (
6). Further studies are needed to confirm our findings and to compare the prevalences of fecal lactoferrin in control samples (stool samples from children without diarrhea and with and without infection by diarrheagenic
E. coli or other enteric pathogens). It is possible that Peruvian children, like children from developing countries in general, have a chronic mild inflammation in the gut (high rates of fecal lactoferrin), due to frequent and recurrent exposure to enteric pathogens. It is important to clarify this in order to determine the screening value of this test in developing countries.
As far as our partial correlation analyses revealed, it seems that fecal leukocytes are not associated with significant variations in anthropometric indicators. However, particularly in respect to association with the height-for-age metric, further longitudinal studies seem to be warranted before reaching a definitive conclusion as to the effects of inflammatory diarrhea, particularly in the context of multiple inflammatory diarrhea episodes during the period of follow-up.
The presence of blood in stool samples was highly associated with the presence of fecal leukocytes (>10 L/hpf) (P < 0.001), and this association persisted in the multivariate analysis. In addition, children less than 12 months of age had a higher risk of having fecal leukocytes, after adjustment for the presence of blood and breastfeeding (P = 0.001).
There were several limitations in our study. First, we did not search for viral pathogens other than rotavirus (calicivirus, enteric adenovirus, or astrovirus), and therefore, the samples considered “single-pathogen infections” may have included some cases of coinfections with other viral pathogens. Second, we did not evaluate for fecal lactoferrin in all samples. Third, we used a qualitative method to determine the presence of fecal lactoferrin. A quantitative method to correlate the level of lactoferrin with the amount of fecal leukocytes and the clinical information might be more informative. Nevertheless, this study provides important information on fecal leukocytes and lactoferrin in all currently recognized groups of diarrheagenic E. coli pathogens diagnosed by molecular methods. Further studies are needed to confirm the association of ETEC with the presence of fecal leukocytes and to determine the levels of fecal lactoferrin and other inflammatory markers in stool samples of children infected with the pathogen.