Evolutionary adaptation to low- or high-temperature conditions often leads to the commitment to exist only in those conditions (
28). However, eurythermal organisms tolerate and grow at a wide range of temperatures while stenothermal organisms are restricted to a narrow range (
3). Hence, a eurypsychrophilic bacterium would be capable of growing over a wide range of low temperatures, from −10 to 0°C at the lower limit to 20 to 30°C at the upper limit. One such eurypsychrophilic bacterium is
Psychrobacter cryopegella, isolated from a low-temperature (−12°C), saltwater lens in Siberian permafrost (
4). This bacterium displays its maximum growth rate (i.e., has an optimal growth temperature [
Topt]) at 22°C yet is able to reproduce at temperatures as low as −10°C and as high as 30°C.
Of major concern to organisms living over a wide range of temperatures is the fact that reaction rates decrease exponentially as temperature decreases. This also holds for bacterial growth rates (essentially a collection of chemical reactions). However, when bacterial growth rate (μ) is examined on an Arrhenius plot (log μ versus 1/
T), two linear domains often appear below
Topt. The point at which the slope changes is designated the critical temperature (
Tcritical). The existence of
Tcritical has been reported for eurypsychrophiles, mesophiles, and thermophiles (
5,
6,
9,
12,
13,
15,
22,
35). The lack of
Tcritical reports for stenopsychrophiles is probably because their growth rates have not been systematically examined at sufficiently low temperatures. It is hypothesized that
Tcritical exists as a result of increased energy demands, the synthesis of stress proteins, and/or the use of alternate metabolic pathways at low temperatures (
6,
10,
12).
Understanding the basis of
Tcritical is important because much of the earth's surface is permanently at or below 4°C and the microorganisms isolated from permanently cold ecosystems (e.g., sea ice, glacial ice, the deep sea, and permafrost) generally have
Topt values much greater than in situ temperatures (
Tin situ) (
2,
18,
23,
29,
31). Furthermore, eurypsychrophiles are isolated more frequently from low-temperature environments than are stenopsychrophiles (
29,
37). Stenopsychrophiles are more adapted to low temperatures than eurypsychrophiles and subsequently have faster growth rates at 0°C (
13,
29). In addition, stenopsychrophiles compensate for low growth rates at
Tin situ by having growth yields that peak around
Tin situ or remain constant from
Topt to
Tin situ (
13,
15,
19). Unfortunately for eurypsychrophiles, not only is
Topt greater than
Tin situ but
Tcritical is also greater than
Tin situ.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains and growth conditions.
The isolation and characterization of
P. cryopegella (previously referred to as
Psychrobacter sp. 5) from Siberian permafrost has been described (
4).
S. oneidensis MR-1 was provided by K. Nealson.
P. cryopegella was grown in R2A broth (
4) plus 3% NaCl (R3) while
S. oneidensis was grown in Luria-Bertani Medium (LB) at various temperatures in a VWR model 2005 low-temperature incubator with shaking at 100 rpm (
4). To determine growth rate, absorbance at 600 nm was monitored over time using a Spectronic 20D spectrophotometer (Thermo Spectronic, Rochester, N.Y.).
For macromolecular synthesis experiments conducted at temperatures at or above 0°C, P. cryopegella or S. oneidensis was first grown at the experimental temperature for 1 to 7 days, diluted (1:10) into 18 ml of fresh R3 in 30-ml polycarbonate straight-sided jars (Nalgene), and incubated for an additional 1.5 to 24 h prior to the addition of [3H]leucine or [3H]adenine. For experiments conducted at −4 and −7°C, P. cryopegella was grown overnight at 22°C, diluted (1:20) into fresh R3, and incubated for an additional 11 days at −4°C or 6 days at −7°C. Prior to the addition of [3H]leucine or [3H]adenine, 4-ml subsamples were removed to determine optical density at 600 nm and cell numbers by dilution plating. For killed controls, 0.16 g of trichloroacetic acid (TCA) was added.
Growth yield.
Triplicate cultures of P. cryopegella were grown in 50 ml of LB3 (10 g of glucose, 30 g of NaCl, and 5 g of yeast extract [all per liter] [pH 7.0]) in 250-ml flasks at 20, 16, 10, 4, 0, −4, and −10 °C with shaking at 100 rpm. The flasks were inoculated with a loopful of cells, and cultures were collected during exponential phase. Cultures grown at 0, −4, and −10°C were inoculated with 5 ml of an overnight culture grown at 16°C and incubated for 5, 6, and 20 days, respectively. Cell weights and glucose concentrations of inocula were also measured. Cells were collected by centrifugation for 10 min at 10,000 × g and 4°C. Cell pellets were washed with 5 ml of phosphate buffer, recollected by centrifugation, resuspended in 0.5 ml of phosphate buffer, transferred to preweighed Al trays, dried at 65°C for 3 days, and weighed. Supernatants were stored at −20°C and passed through 0.2-μm-pore-size filters prior to analysis using Sigma's glucose (GO) assay kit (GAGO-20).
DNA and RNA synthesis rates.
[
3H]adenine incorporation rates into DNA and RNA were determined by standard procedures with minor modifications (
16). Briefly, [2,8-
3H]adenine (specific activity, 24.2 Ci/mmol; Perkin-Elmer) was added to a final concentration of 30 nM and samples were incubated for at least 10% of the expected doubling time at the experimental temperature. Subsamples were taken in duplicate at six or seven time points within this incubation period. At the time points, 1 ml of culture was filtered through a 25-mm-diameter Whatman GF/F filter in a glass filter tower, placed into a 1.5-ml Eppendorf tube, and stored at −80°C. Filters were removed from the freezer, and 1 ml of ice-cold 5% TCA, 1 mg of reagent RNA (baker's yeast; Sigma), and 1 mg of DNA (calf thymus; Sigma) were added. Samples were mixed thoroughly, incubated on ice for 1 h, and spun at 12,000 ×
g for 1 min, and the supernatant was discarded. Filters were washed three times with 1 ml of ice-cold 5% TCA and three times with 1 ml of ice-cold 95% ethanol. Residual ethanol was evaporated by gentle heating. Filters were mixed with 1 ml of 1 M NaOH, incubated at 37°C for 1 h, incubated on ice for 15 min, mixed with 0.25 ml of 9 M HCl-100% TCA-H
2O (2:1:1), incubated on ice for 15 min, and spun at 12,000 ×
g for 1 min. For [
3H]RNA analysis, 0.625 ml of supernatant was transferred to a clean scintillation vial while the remaining supernatant was discarded. Subsequently, filters were washed two times with 1 ml of ice-cold 5% TCA and two times with ice-cold 95% ethanol. Residual ethanol was evaporated by gentle heating. Filters were mixed with 0.5 ml of 5% TCA, incubated at 95 to 100°C for 30 min, cooled on ice, mixed with 0.5 ml of 1 M NaOH, and spun at 12,000 ×
g for 1 min. For [
3H]DNA analysis, 0.5 ml of supernatant was transferred to a clean scintillation vial containing 0.5 ml of 2 M HCl. Five milliliters of BetaMax Scintillation cocktail (ICN) was added to vials followed by analysis in a Beckman LS6000 scintillation counter for
3H.
Protein synthesis rates.
[
3H]leucine incorporation rates were determined by standard procedures (
17). Briefly, [3,4,5-
3H(N)]leucine (specific activity, 170 Ci/mmol; Perkin-Elmer) was added to a final concentration of 4.2 nM. Samples were incubated and subsampled as above. At time points, 1 ml of culture was filtered through a 25-mm-diameter Whatman GF/F filter in a glass filter tower, rinsed twice with 3 ml of ice-cold 5% TCA, and rinsed twice with 3 ml of ice-cold 80% ethanol. Filters were placed into clean scintillation vials and air dried. Five milliliters of scintillation cocktail was added to the vials, incubated at room temperature for 2 days to maximize dispersion into the cocktail, and analyzed in a Beckman LS6000 scintillation counter as described above.
Calculations and statistical analyses.
Specific growth rates (μ) were calculated by determining the slope of the straight-line portion of exponential growth (on a semilog plot). At least six time points over approximately three doublings were used to determine the slope of the line of best fit. The minimum acceptable r2 value of the lines was 0.8 (average r2 = 0.959). The average growth rate and standard deviation for each temperature were calculated by standard methods. For normalization purposes (see below), the growth rate at −7°C for P. cryopegella was determined from the line of best fit (μ = 0.308 e0.271 T, r2 = 0.987) for data from 4 to −10°C.
Growth yield was calculated as follows: YGlc = (mcells × MWGlc)/[V × ([Glc]initial− [Glc]final)], where mcells is the grams (dry weight) of cells produced, MWGlc is the molecular weight of glucose in grams/mole, [Glc] is the concentration of glucose in grams/liter, and V is the volume of the culture in liters. The average growth yield and standard deviation at each temperature were calculated by standard methods. Standard t tests were performed to verify the significance of differences in YGlc between temperatures.
Synthesis rates (k) were calculated from the linear portion of the 3H uptake versus time curve (duplicate samples minus killed controls). The slope and r2 value for these lines were determined (r2 ranged from 0.56 to 0.99, with an average of 0.86, for 21 slopes). The standard error of each slope (SEb) was calculated as follows: SEb = SEY|X/√SSXX, where SEY|X is the standard error of the regression and SSXX is the sum of squares of X. The standard error of regression, SEY|X, is equal to √[(SSYY − b × SSXY)/(n − 2)], where b is the slope, SSYY is the sum of squares of Y, and SSXY is the sum of the cross-products of X and Y. The sum of squares of X is equal to \({\sum}(\mathit{X}_{\mathit{i}}{-}\mathit{X}_{mean})^{2}\)(analogous calculation for SSYY). The sum of the cross-products of X and Y is equal to \({\sum}(\mathit{X}_{\mathit{i}}{-}\mathit{X}_{mean})(\mathit{Y}_{\mathit{i}}{-}\mathit{Y}_{mean})\).
Normalized rates, kN, were calculated as follows: kN = k/μ, where k is the 3H uptake rate in zeptomoles/cell/day and μ is the specific growth rate in divisions/day. The standard deviation of the normalized rate was calculated as follows: σ = kN × √[(SEb/k)2 + (σμ/μ)2], where SEb is the standard error of k and σμ is the standard deviation of the growth rate. Standard t tests were performed to verify the significance of differences in kN between temperatures.
DISCUSSION
Organisms that live over a wide range of temperatures must compensate for slow reaction rates at low temperatures to remain competitive. Some psychrophiles maximize or maintain their growth yields at low temperatures (below
Topt) to compensate for low growth rates (
13,
15,
19). Our data indicate that, similar to the psychrophilic sulfate-reducing bacterium (SRB) LSv514, growth yield of
P. cryopegella steadily increased as temperature decreased from 16 to 0°C (
19). A variety of responses of growth yield to temperature were seen in psychrophilic SRB isolated from Arctic marine sediments. For example, growth yield first increased and then remained constant as
T decreased from
Topt to 11°C to 0°C, growth yield remained constant from
Topt to −1.8°C, and growth yield peaked at
Topt and decreased with decreasing
T (
15,
19). Currently, there is insufficient data to determine whether or not the decrease in growth yield of
P. cryopegella seen below 0°C and the subsequent maximum growth yield at about
Tcritical is typical of psychrophiles (especially given the variation in trends seen for psychrophilic SRB alone). To date, six of seven psychrophiles examined maximized or maintained growth yield at low temperatures. Whether or not psychrophiles as a class exhibit this behavior is unknown, because the temperature dependence of growth yield in psychrophiles has not been extensively studied nor has the effect of other physical or chemical variables on growth yield. In comparison, the growth yield of mesophiles generally peaks close to the
Topt and can remain constant over parts of the growth temperature range where growth rate is constant (
1,
15,
20).
We examined the temperature dependence of growth rate and DNA, RNA, and protein synthesis rates to elucidate the basis of
Tcritical. In
P. cryopegella, the temperature dependence of both DNA synthesis rate and growth rate changed at
Tcritical. The slopes for both linear domains of
kDNA and growth rate were similar, suggesting that these two processes are tightly coupled. It is not likely that a temperature-dependent change in the DNA replication machinery caused
Tcritical because no such change has ever been reported, nor has the control of growth rate by DNA synthesis. Cell reproduction probably slowed for other reasons, causing the growth rate and DNA synthesis rate to be regulated accordingly. The temperature dependence of protein and RNA synthesis rates in
P. cryopegella did not change at
Tcritical, indicating that its ribosomes and RNA polymerases remained functional at temperatures below
Tcritical, as has been demonstrated for other psychrophiles (
32-
34). (Note: protein and RNA elongation rates are temperature dependent, while the numbers of ribosomes and RNA polymerases remain constant with temperature [
9,
12,
30]). In contrast, when grown at the same temperature but at different growth rates, bacteria alter their protein synthetic capacity by changing the number of ribosomes (
21,
24).) Genotypic adaptation of ribosomes to low temperatures has been demonstrated in cold-tolerant strains of
Bacillus cereus that were shown to substitute A and T for G and C, when compared to mesophilic strains (
26). Conversely, in mesophiles the temperature dependence of protein synthesis rates changes at
Tcritical, reflecting the inability of mesophilic ribosomes to function at low temperatures (
7,
9,
32-
34).
Subsequently, we normalized synthesis rates in order to reveal temperature-dependent processes that were masked by the primary effect of decreasing temperature (exponential decrease in reaction rates). Normalized rates allowed examination of synthesis requirements on a per-cell-division basis rather than time. There was no significant change in
kDNA
N. with temperature in
P. cryopegella, because the same DNA synthesis requirement exists for each cell division. Specifically, one genome must be synthesized per cell division. Both
kRNA
N and
kPN were at a minimum at
Tcritical, indicating that cell reproduction required the least amount of RNA and protein synthesis at this temperature. Conversely, cell reproduction at temperatures above and below
Tcritical required the synthesis of additional RNA and proteins (or higher levels of the same RNA and proteins). Indeed, temperatures of 10°C and below induced the expression of both cold acclimation proteins (CAPs) and cold shock proteins (CSPs) in psychrophilic bacteria (
7,
8,
14,
27,
36). Furthermore, as temperature decreased, more CAPs and CSPs are produced and expressed at higher levels (
14,
27,
36). To date, cold response studies have examined 5°C temperature increments and found that expression of CAPs and CSPs changed at all increments (
14,
27,
36). This study examined 3 to 6°C increments, and statistically significant changes in RNA and protein synthesis rates were seen between most of the increments. However, how these data relate to production of CAPs and CSPs is unclear. Above
Tcritical, the
kRNA
Nand
kPN may increase due to the production of additional proteins and/or increased protein turnover caused by higher rates of denaturation and degradation (
9,
11,
25,
38). It is striking that cell reproduction required the least amount of RNA and protein synthesis at
Tcritical and that growth yield peaked at
Tcritical.
While this study focused on Tcritical in psychrophiles, the synthesis rates, normalized rates, and growth yield were examined in the mesophile S. oneidensis MR-1 for comparison. The growth yield of S. oneidensis MR-1 displayed thermal characteristics typical of mesophiles (yield peaked at high temperatures). Likewise, DNA synthesis rates and growth rates decreased with T according to the Arrhenius relationship. Unlike most mesophiles however, S. oneidensis MR-1 maintained RNA synthesis rates from 18 to 4°C. Regardless of this ability, the normalized RNA synthesis rate of S. oneidensis MR-1 also changed at Tcritical, as seen in P. cryopegella. In addition, minimal normalized RNA synthesis rates corresponded to temperatures with the highest yields. Therefore, S. oneidensis MR-1 grew most efficiently (that is, it minimized RNA synthesis requirements for cell division) at temperatures above Tcritical, while P. cryopegella did so only at Tcritical.
In summary, the most beneficial survival strategy for psychrophiles may be to maximize growth yield, not growth rates, at low temperatures.
P. cryopegella accomplished this by streamlining growth processes (cell reproduction required the synthesis of the least amount of protein and RNA) at a fairly low temperature (4°C,
Tcritical). In addition, we demonstrated that at
Tcritical growth of
P. cryopegella was separated into two domains and, previously, that below
Tcritical the respiration requirement for cell reproduction increased dramatically (
4). Identifying the cell processes that lead to
Tcritical is vital to understanding low-temperature growth. Prior to this study, no basic mechanisms involved in maximizing or maintaining growth yields at low temperatures had been identified. This type of growth strategy may be an essential part of being able to live over a wide range of temperatures. While this study presented one approach to define the basis of
Tcritical, it remains to be determined whether or not
Tcritical is a pivotal temperature in psychrophiles with respect to global stress response.