INTRODUCTION
Genetic variability is an intrinsic property of all organisms and plays a crucial role in evolution. It has been widely documented that under conditions of nutritional stress, such as those occurring during post-exponential-phase growth, bacteria deploy mutagenic processes to modify their genomes and escape from growth-limiting conditions (
1–5). These cellular processes, commonly known as stress-associated-mutagenesis (SAM) or stationary-phase-associated mutagenesis (SPM), have been demonstrated to occur in distinct organisms, including
Escherichia coli,
Pseudomonas spp., and
Bacillus subtilis (
5–9).
In slow-growing or nondividing bacteria, where DNA replication is dramatically diminished or even absent, the process of transcription remains active and provides the cell with the blueprint for protein synthesis necessary to sustain cell homeostasis (
10,
11). As such, the transcriptional machinery is likely to encounter DNA damage much more frequently than the replication apparatus, and such encounters can lead to deleterious consequences for the cell (
12). It is well known that genetic damage is preferably repaired in actively transcribed genes, more specifically in the template transcribed strand, preventing the cytotoxic effects associated with these lesions. This repair process is conserved among the three domains of life and is known as transcription-coupled repair (TCR) (
13). Previous studies with
E. coli and
B. subtilis have associated the process of transcription with the ability of cells to acquire mutations under conditions of stress (
3,
14,
15). Employing different mutagenesis systems, recent studies have shown that transcriptional derepression of genes under selection potentiates SAM in
B. subtilis (
16–20).
The Mfd factor translocates along DNA in an ATP-dependent manner (
13,
21) and guides the nucleotide excision repair (NER) machinery to DNA lesions that stall the RNA polymerase (RNAP) in actively transcribed genes (
13). In
B. subtilis, Mfd also affects additional processes, including recombination, carbon-catabolite repression, TCR, and tolerance of protein oxidation (
22–24). Other reports have attributed a role to Mfd in novel pathways of mutagenesis in growing
E. coli and
B. subtilis cells, as well as during spore germination/outgrowth (
25–27).
During the elongation phase of transcription, roadblocks posed by DNA-binding proteins or specific DNA sequences induce RNAP to slide backward along the template (backtrack), resulting in the extrusion of the 3′ terminus of the nascent RNA through the RNAP secondary channel (
28). Several reports have shown that the GreA factor increases an endonucleolytic event of the nascent RNA to generate a new 3′-OH terminus that can be extended by RNAP; thus, this factor prevents transcription arrest during elongation and enhances transcription fidelity (
29–31). Interestingly, experiments using a forward mutagenesis system selecting for trimethoprim resistance (Tmp
r) showed that transcriptional derepression promoted mutations in stationary-phase
B. subtilis. This process was dependent on Mfd and GreA (
18). However, the mechanisms underlying these processes remain unclear. Of note, recent reports postulate that error-prone processing of DNA mismatches and oxidized bases leads to mutagenic events in transcriptionally active genes (
32). In this work, we investigated whether the processing of DNA lesions that are substrates of the oxidized guanine (GO) system and the apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonucleases Nfo, ExoA, and Nth modulates the Mfd- and GreA-dependent mutagenic events occurring in growth-limited cells of
B. subtilis strain YB955. Overall, our results support the notion that in growth-limited
B. subtilis cells, spontaneous DNA lesions occurring in transcriptionally active genes initiate mutagenic processes mediated by Mfd and GreA.
DISCUSSION
The results described in this work indicate that Mfd and GreA promote reversions in the mutant genes hisC952, metB5, and leuC425 in amino acid-starved cells of B. subtilis strain YB955 that lack a functional GO system or have the AP endonucleases Nfo, ExoA, and Nth disabled. Overall, our results suggest that under growth-limiting conditions, nonbulky DNA lesions of an oxidative nature drive mutagenic events through Mfd and GreA.
In
B. subtilis, Mfd favors the accumulation of mutations in genes under selection that are highly transcribed (
16–20). In agreement with previous results (
17), we found that Mfd was required to generate reversions in the three mutant amino acid-biosynthetic genes of
B. subtilis strain YB955. It must be pointed that in starved
B. subtilis cells, mutagenic events promoted by MutY, a DNA glycosylase of the GO system, required a functional Mfd protein (
32). On the basis of these results, it was postulated that G-A and C-A mispairs that accumulate in stationary phase are processed in an error-prone manner, employing components of the BER pathway and the Mfd protein (
32,
40). Further results revealed that MutM, another component of the GO system, was involved in growth and SA mutagenesis in
B. subtilis (
44). Taken together, these observations suggested the existence of an active mechanism in which spontaneous lesions initiate the mutagenic pathway dependent on Mfd and components of the BER system. The results of this work (
Fig. 1) and previous studies (
18,
45) revealed that transcriptional factors in addition to Mfd, namely, GreA and NusA, impact stress-associated mutagenic processes in bacteria.
AP sites and single-strand breaks are common lesions resulting from spontaneous base loss and repair events of damaged DNA bases, and such lesions are processed by AP endonucleases (
46). In
B. subtilis,
nfo,
exoA, and
nth encode the main proteins with AP endonuclease activity; accordingly, the simultaneous disruption of these genes was necessary to produce a genetic background susceptible to the oxidizing agent H
2O
2 (
42). It has been shown that genetic inactivation of Nfo, ExoA, and Nth resulted in the accumulation of genomic AP sites during the stationary phase of
B. subtilis strain YB955 (
42). AP sites of spontaneous origin or derived from the processing of damaged DNA bases through DNA glycosylases are mutagenic and cytotoxic (
46). Our assays subjected
B. subtilis cells to starving conditions (see Fig. S1 and S2 in the supplemental material), which led to halted DNA replication but active transcription (
10,
11). Under these conditions, the inactivation of AP endonucleases markedly increased the reversion rates of the
his,
met, and
leu mutant genes. Notably,
mfd and
greA were directly or indirectly involved in these mutagenic processes, as evidenced by the fact that among AP endonuclease-deficient strains, the independent disruption of either of these factors resulted in the production of a significantly lower number of revertants than that for strains proficient in
mfd or
greA (
Fig. 2 and
3). Based on these results, it is feasible to speculate that in growth-limited
B. subtilis cells, Mfd and GreA promote SA mutagenesis in transcriptionally active genes carrying unprocessed AP sites and single-strand breaks.
In addition to AP sites and strand breaks, oxidized guanines (8-OxoG’s) are among the most prominent lesions inflicted by ROS (
34,
35). Organisms in the three domains of life rely on the GO DNA repair system to avoid the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of this type of lesion (
35,
46). As shown here (
Fig. 4 and
5) as well as in a previous report (
39), starved
B. subtilis cells with a disabled GO system dramatically increased the production of His
+ and Met
+ revertants. It has been proposed that genetic lesions of an oxidative nature elicit these amino acid reversions (
39,
40,
44). The biochemical evidence described in this report supported this hypothesis; thus, stationary-phase cells of the ΔGO strain accumulated large amounts of chromosomal 8-OxoG lesions (
Fig. 7). Our results also showed that Mfd and GreA were required to generate a significant proportion of the His
+ and Met
+ revertants produced by the ΔGO strain (
Fig. 4 and
5). Accordingly, in the GO-deficient strain background, disruption of
greA or
mfd resulted in a significant decline in the reversion rates of His
+ and Met
+ colonies. These results strongly suggest that the processing of 8-OxoG’s through Mfd and GreA promotes error-prone repair events in transcriptionally active genes, consequently generating amino acid prototrophic reversions in starved
B. subtilis cells. In support of this notion, the level of 8-OxoG lesions increased significantly after the disruption of
mfd or
greA in the GO-deficient strain (
Fig. 7). Also, our genetic restoration experiments with
mfd and
greA, and our survival assays with the GO- and AP-deficient strains, showed that SAM was restored in the Mfd- or GreA-deficient strains once the genes encoding these factors were expressed in
trans and that survival was not differentially affected in these strains (
Fig. 2 to 5; also see Fig. S1 and S2 in the supplemental material).
Previous reports showed that nonreplicating cells of an
E. coli strain deficient in Nfo and ExoA increased mutagenic events in response to AP sites, single-strand breaks, and oxidized bases such as 8-OxoG (
47). Our results with
B. subtilis agree with the observations for
E. coli; however, this report is novel because it shows that Mfd and GreA are important for these mutational processes. As shown in this work, ROS-promoted DNA lesions, but not mispaired DNA bases, are involved in the GreA-dependent SA mutagenic events in
B. subtilis (see Fig. S4 in the supplemental material). In contrast, oxidative DNA lesions (this work) and DNA mismatches did promote Mfd-dependent mutagenic events under conditions of nutritional stress in this microorganism (Fig. S4) (
32). A previous study with GreA showed that this factor controls transcriptional fidelity and impacts the stability of prokaryotic genomes (
30). Based on these observations, we propose that ROS-promoted DNA lesions in transcriptionally active genes induce incorrect matches in the 3′-terminal end of the growing mRNA chain, trapping the transcriptional machinery in an inactivated state (
30). Following a GreA-dependent backtracking event (
48), the RNAP activates a 3′–5′ exonucleolytic event to eliminate the misaligned mRNA (
30). In growth-compromised bacteria, these events provide an opportunity for error-prone incorporation of nucleotides from a biased nucleoside triphosphate (NTP) pool (
41) and bypass of the DNA lesion, which generates a mutant mRNA pool that promotes SAM through retromutagenesis. It is also possible that the stalled GreA-RNAP complex can signal the recruitment of Mfd to dissociate RNAP and engage components of the BER system to incise/excise the DNA lesion(s) and resynthesize a DNA patch in an error-prone manner. Evidence supporting the notion of transcriptional mutagenic mechanisms has been reported for eukaryotes and prokaryotes (
12,
30,
49–51). The influence of factors associated with the process of transcription has been presented elsewhere; NusA, a transcriptional factor involved in termination/antitermination processes, was found to be necessary for the generation of Lac
+ colonies under starving conditions in
E. coli strain FC40 (
45). Further studies proposed that these mutations could arise from an alternative TCR mechanism in which NusA recruits DinB to fill DNA gaps in the transcribed strand and to restore the template strand for transcription (
49).
One other important observation from our experiments is that unrepaired AP sites, single-strand breaks, and 8-OxoG’s increased the reversion rates of the
hisC,
metB, and
leuC genes in growing cells of the
B. subtilis YB955 ΔGO and Δ
nfo Δ
exoA Δ
nth strains. This observation agrees with previous observations (
39,
42). However, we found that the effects of GreA and Mfd disruption on mutation prevention or promotion are growth phase dependent in
B. subtilis. In rapidly growing cells, both transcriptional factors prevented mutagenesis during logarithmic growth (
Fig. 6). We speculate that the metabolic conditions operating in growing cells of
B. subtilis, including a properly balanced pool of precursors for RNA and DNA synthesis (
41,
52), may elicit GreA- and Mfd-dependent high-fidelity repair in actively transcribed genes (
17,
18,
30). In contrast, in nutritionally stressed bacteria, biased dNTP and NTP pools (
41,
52) and/or the recruitment of low-fidelity DNA polymerases (
32,
49) promotes error-prone repair and genetic variability that increases the likelihood of escaping growth-limiting conditions. Additionally, the production of Mfd-dependent Leu
+ revertants was found to require the PolA and YqjH DNA polymerases in
B. subtilis (
32). Furthermore, SA
his,
met, and
leu reversions in AP endonuclease-deficient
B. subtilis cells required the low-fidelity polymerase PolX (
42). Finally, a perturbed balance in the NTP levels associated with increased expression of ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) has promoted SAM in starved
B. subtilis cells (
41).
In conclusion, the results obtained in this report provide novel evidence suggesting that DNA lesions generated spontaneously by metabolic factors that are substrates of the BER system activate the Mfd and GreA function promoting divergent mutagenic events during the growth and stationary phases of B. subtilis.