Mycobacteria are the etiological agents of devastating diseases such as tuberculosis (
Mycobacterium tuberculosis), leprosy (
Mycobacterium leprae), and opportunistic infections of human immunodeficiency virus-infected individuals (
Mycobacterium avium).
M. tuberculosis infects around one-third of the entire human population and kills two to three million people each year, mostly in developing countries (
22). Once thought to have been controlled in the developed world, tuberculosis has reemerged in recent years primarily due to the human immunodeficiency virus epidemic and the appearance of drug-resistant strains of
M. tuberculosis (
2). The emergence of such strains is particularly serious since mycobacteria are intrinsically resistant to most antibiotics and disinfectants. The key factor in this generalized resistance and the success of
M. tuberculosis as a human pathogen is its unusual, waxy cell wall, which provides an effective permeability barrier. This structure is of particular interest since the biochemical processes involved in its synthesis are the targets of existing antimycobacterial drugs and are potential targets for the design of new generations of antimycobacterial compounds.
The mycobacterial cell wall comprises a layer of peptidoglycan to which is attached arabinogalactan and long-chain mycolic acids (
3). The mycolic acids form the inner leaflet of an asymmetric lipid bilayer with the outer leaflet comprising a range of noncovalently linked (glyco)lipids. Although the composition of the noncovalently linked (glyco)lipids varies in different species, some are highly conserved in all mycobacteria. The most important of these are the phosphatidylinositol mannosides (PIMs) and their hyperglycosylated derivatives, lipomannan (LM) and lipoarabinomannan (LAM). It is proposed that these mannolipids are important virulence factors in pathogenic mycobacteria, acting as ligands for host cell receptors and having potent immunomodulatory properties (reviewed in reference
12). Considerable progress has been made in delineating the early steps in PIM biosynthesis and the assembly of the mannan and arabinan components of LM and LAM (reviewed in reference
1) (Fig.
1). PIM biosynthesis is initiated by the transfer of two mannose residues and a fatty acyl chain to phosphatidylinositol (
11). The first mannose is transferred from GDP-Man by the enzyme PimA (
10), while the second is added by a recently identified mannosyltransferase Rv2188c, now known as PimB′ (
14). AcPIM2 and its acylated variant Ac
2PIM2 are the most abundant apolar PIMs of the mycobacterial cell wall. A subpopulation of AcPIM2 is elongated with two more mannose residues to form AcPIM4, the proposed branch point intermediate of polar PIM and LM/LAM biosynthesis (
13,
19). AcPIM4 can be processed by the PimE α(1→2) mannosyltransferase (
20) and another uncharacterized enzyme to form the abundant polar PIMs AcPIM6 and Ac
2PIM6. Alternatively, AcPIM4 can be elongated with long chains of α(1→6)-linked mannoses with α(1→2)-linked side chains to form LM (
8,
9,
18). LM is subsequently modified with single arabinose or more complex arabinan oligosaccharides, depending on the species, to form the mature LAM (
26).
Although the essential features of this pathway are established, less is known about the topology of these reactions or mechanisms that regulate flux of intermediates into polar PIM, LM, or LAM biosynthesis and hence the steady-state levels of these mannolipids. Based on the predicted topologies and sugar donors utilized by the respective glycosyltransferases, it is thought that the early PIM species are synthesized on the cytoplasmic leaflet of the plasma membrane, whereas polar PIM species, LMs, and LAMs are assembled by plasma membrane or cell wall-localized glycosyltransferases with extracytoplasmic catalytic sites. We have recently identified a putative lipoprotein, termed LpqW, that is likely to have an extracytoplasmic location and a role in regulating LAM biosynthesis in
M. smegmatis (
15,
16). The gene encoding LpqW was initially isolated when a
M. smegmatis transposon library was screened for mutants with defects in cell wall synthesis (
13). The transposon mutant, designated Myco481, formed small colonies on complex media and synthesized structurally normal LAMs, but at significantly reduced levels relative to the wild type (
13). When grown in complex liquid media such as Luria-Bertani (LB) or pleuropneumonia-like organism media (PPLO), Myco481 was observed to give rise to variants that had normal colony morphology and restored LAM biosynthesis. Analysis of one such variant, designated Myco481.1, indicated that the restoration of LAM synthesis was associated with the loss of polar PIM biosynthesis and the accumulation of the branch point intermediate, AcPIM4. Targeted disruption of
lpqW with a drug resistance cassette also generated a LAM-deficient mutant (Myco721) from which a LAM-restored strain could be derived (Myco721.1). Theses analyses indicate that loss of LpqW function and LAM synthesis has a profound impact on the growth of
M. smegmatis but that this defect can be largely bypassed through inhibition of polar PIM biosynthesis and accumulation of AcPIM4. In the present study we show that this bypass results from the introduction of secondary mutations into
pimE, encoding the mannosyltransferase involved in converting AcPIM4 to polar PIMs (
20). Analysis of independently derived
lpqW pimE mutants has revealed functionally important domains in the polytopic PimE protein. Our data suggest that LpqW might function in chaperoning low-abundance PIM intermediates into the LM/LAM pathway in
M. smegmatis.
DISCUSSION
This study provides new insights into the function and biosynthesis of LAM, the major cell wall lipoglycoconjugate of mycobacteria. Specifically, we provide evidence that, in M. smegmatis, two proteins—LpqW and PimE—can regulate the flux of PIM intermediates into LAM. The functional domains of these proteins are predicted to have an extracytoplasmic orientation, indicating that key pathway branch points in PIM/LM/LAM biosynthesis occur in this compartment. Finally, analysis of lpqW mutants supports the notion that LM/LAM is required for normal growth of M. smegmatis under certain culture conditions.
Homologues of
lpqW have been identified in all species of mycobacteria, although the precise function of the encoded protein is unknown. We showed previously that disruption of
lpqW in
M. smegmatis results in the selective loss of LM/LAM without affecting PIM biosynthesis. This phenotype is stable while
lpqW mutants are grown in minimal defined medium but is unstable when the same mutants are cultured in complex medium. Specifically, growth in complex medium results in the selection of faster-growing bypass mutants that express LM/LAM at levels intermediate between the original mutant and wild type and have altered PIM profiles. Remarkably, we show that in all of the bypass mutants examined to date, the
pimE gene is disrupted by transposon insertion, frameshift, deletion, or point mutation, resulting in partially or completely inactivated PimE, the mannosyltransferase that converts AcPIM4 to AcPIM5 (
20). We propose that LpqW and PimE are therefore likely to be involved in closely related metabolic processes (Fig.
6), providing the strongest evidence to date that LpqW is directly involved in LM/LAM biosynthesis.
How might LpqW and PimE regulate LAM biosynthesis in wild-type cells? LpqW and the functional domains of PimE are predicted to have an extracytoplasmic location (
16,
20; see also below) and are involved indirectly or directly in determining the fate of the branch point intermediate AcPIM4. The capping of AcPIM4 with α(1→2)-linked mannose residues by PimE diverts this intermediate from LM/LAM biosynthesis. Specifically, we have shown that AcPIM5/6 are not utilized as LM precursors, even when the flux through this pathway is reduced and apolar PIM species are depleted (
5). In contrast, LpqW appears to be required for incorporation of AcPIM4 into the LM/LAM pathway when PimE is active. We have recently shown that the reactions in the PIM biosynthetic pathway are compartmentalized in the plasma membrane, with the early steps occurring in domains that are not associated with the cell wall, whereas later steps occur in a tightly bound plasma membrane-cell wall fraction (
21). Both PimE and the α(1→6) mannosyltransferases involved in assembling the mannan backbone of LM are located in the latter fraction (
20,
21). It is possible that LpqW is involved in chaperoning early PIM intermediates between these domains or to the α(1→6) mannosyltransferases within the plasma membrane-cell wall domain. Consistent with this hypothesis, we have recently determined the crystal structure of LpqW and shown that it contains a potential ligand-binding domain that theoretically accommodates the trimannose structure representing the AcPIM4 head group (
16). Alternatively, LpqW could be involved in excluding PimE from this domain or otherwise regulating the activity of this mannosyltransferase. In the absence of LpqW, loss-of-function mutations in PimE result in the accumulation of uncapped AcPIM4, which appears to bypass the need for LpqW. Some correlation was observed between the levels of AcPIM4 in the different
lpqW bypass mutants and the levels of LM/LAM, supporting the notion that in the absence of LpqW, LM/LAM biosynthesis is dependent on high steady-state levels of AcPIM4 (Fig.
5). Similarly, expression of functional PimE in the Myco721.1 bypass mutant depleted this new pool of AcPIM4 and reversed the fast-growth phenotype of the bypass mutant. AcPIM4 accumulates to high levels in the
pimE mutant, although no increase in LM/LAM over wild-type levels was observed in this strain (
20). It is possible that in the presence of LpqW, LM/LAM synthesis is regulated by the activity of the elongating α(1→6) mannosyltransferases. Alternatively, LpqW may both promote and restrict the entry of AcPIM4 into this pathway.
Genes involved in initiating PIM biosynthesis are essential for the viability of mycobacteria, indicating that the PIMs, LMs, and/or LAMs are essential for viability and growth (
1,
10,
14). However, the function of each of these components and the extent to which the roles of one can compensate for the loss of an other has not been clearly defined. Our analyses of
lpqW mutants shows that LM/LAM is required for optimal growth in nutritionally complex medium. This was indicated by the altered colony morphology of the initial mutant and the reproducibility with which this mutant was overgrown by the
pimE bypass mutants. The fact that all of the bypass mutants contained mutated
pimE genes indicates that the growth phenotype of the
lpqW mutant was directly related to its defect in LM/LAM synthesis. In contrast, colony morphology of the
lpqW mutant grown on defined medium was similar to wild-type bacteria during continuous subculture. These data indicate that LM/LAM is not essential for optimal growth in this minimal defined medium. The appearance of bypass mutants occurs within a few subcultures, indicating a strong selective advantage in having restored LM/LAM synthesis. A high rate of LM/LAM synthesis may be required to stabilize the mycobacterial cell wall under the specific (i.e., osmotic) conditions encountered in the complex medium. Regardless, these studies highlight the possibility that LM/LAMs (and other cell wall components) are functionally important under some, but not all, growth conditions. The importance of LM/LAM appears to vary in different members of the mycobacteria and corynebacteria. For example, the
M. tuberculosis lpqW homologue (Rv1166) is essential under standard culture conditions (
23). On the other hand, we recently generated a
Corynebacterium glutamicum mutant that is unable to synthesize AcPIM2 and consequently polar PIMs, LMs, and LAMs, by targeted disruption of the newly identified PimB′ gene (
14). However, this bacterium synthesizes a second family of LM-like molecules that are assembled on a GlcA-diacylglycerol rather than a PI-lipid anchor, and this LM may compensate for the loss of PIM and PI-anchored LM/LAM in this mutant. Interestingly, the genes required for the synthesis of GlcA-diacylglycerol anchor are present in
M. smegmatis, but we found no evidence that this pathway is upregulated in either Myco481 or Myco721 or the corresponding bypass mutants.
The
lpqW mutant provided a unique experimental system for generating
pimE mutants with reduced or abolished mannosyltransferase function. These analyses provided the first evidence that ISMsm1, a putative mobile element identified during the sequencing of the
M. smegmatis genome, is an active transposon capable of driving the evolution of
M. smegmatis. Analysis of the
M. smegmatis genome has revealed several potential new elements, but it is not known whether these are functional for transposition or remnants of ancient elements. Thus, ISMsm1 could be modified and exploited for future mutagenesis studies on
M. smegmatis or related species. These analyses also indicated domains within PimE that are essential for mannosyltransferase function. All of the single-amino-acid mutations in PimE were mapped to hydrophilic loops that are predicted to be extracytoplasmic. Such an orientation for the catalytic residues of PimE is consistent with the fact that this enzyme utilizes the lipid-linked sugar donor, polyprenyl-phospho-mannose (
20), a characteristic feature of glycosyltransferases in the exoplasmic leaflet of the prokaryote plasma membrane or the inner leaflet of the eukaryotic endoplasmic reticulum or Golgi membrane. Intriguingly, none of the identified mutations in
pimE are predicted to result in the complete loss of the protein. Hypothetical translation of the mutated genes shows that all of the deletions are in-frame and should allow most of PimE to be translated normally. Even the two most disruptive mutations, the frameshift affecting all residues from L343 onward (Myco481.12) and the ISMsm1 insertion (Myco481.1), are near the 3′ end of
pimE and should allow most of the gene to be translated. If complete loss of PimE function provided a competitive advantage to the
lpqW mutant, we would anticipate finding frameshifts and/or transposon insertions near the 5′ end of the gene. The absence of such events suggests that mutations that abolish or limit the enzymatic activity of PimE, while still allowing expression of the N-terminal domain of the protein, are being selected. The continued translation of PimE may be required to maintain an enzyme complex in the biosynthetically active plasma membrane-cell wall domain (
20,
21). Alternatively, PimE might have other functions unrelated to PIM biosynthesis that are important for normal growth.
In summary, our analyses of the lpqW bypass mutants suggest that both LpqW and PimE are involved in regulating LM/LAM biosynthesis in M. smegmatis. Whether this is also true for pathogenic species such as M. tuberculosis remains to be determined. Both proteins may indirectly or directly regulate the accessibility of the key branch point intermediate, AcPIM4, to elongating α(1→6) mannosyltransferases. These studies are the first to identify proteins involved in regulating the flux of early PIM intermediates into polar PIMs or LM/LAMs and in balanced cell wall assembly under different growth conditions. Given that LM/LAM synthesis is essential for the infectivity of pathogenic species of mycobacteria, the dissection of these steps may facilitate the identification of new drug targets.