Free access
Research Article
1 October 1992

Bovine helper T cell clones recognize five distinct epitopes on Babesia bovis merozoite antigens

Abstract

Helper T cell clones from two Babesia bovis-immune cattle were characterized for use in identification of potentially protective immunogens of B. bovis merozoites. Proliferation assays with 11 CD4+ clones revealed a differential pattern of response to soluble cytosolic antigen, membrane-enriched antigen, detergent extracts of the membrane-enriched antigen, soluble culture supernatant exoantigen, and different geographical isolates of B. bovis as well as Babesia bigemina parasites. When the data were combined, the clones could be grouped according to five different patterns of response. One group recognized only the membrane-enriched fraction of New World and Australian parasites. Four remaining groups recognized antigens found in the cytosolic as well as the membrane-enriched fraction, and clones representative of each group were used to identify cytosolic antigens fractionated by anion-exchange chromatography with the use of fast-performance liquid chromatography. One clone (C97.3C3), which responded to all B. bovis isolates and to B. bigemina, recognized a single peak of activity that eluted with 0.25 M NaCl and contained protein bands of 70 and 75 kDa. The remaining clones were stimulated by a second antigenic peak that eluted between 0.35 and 0.45 M NaCl and contained protein bands of 42, 47, 56, and 84 kDa. The majority of the clones produced interferon, whereas tumor necrosis factor alpha/tumor necrosis factor beta production was less frequent. These studies provide the basis for using helper T cell clones to identify potentially protective immunogens of B. bovis and delineate a minimum of five helper T cell epitopes recognized by two immune cattle.

Formats available

You can view the full content in the following formats:

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Infection and Immunity
Infection and Immunity
Volume 60Number 10October 1992
Pages: 4364 - 4372
PubMed: 1383149

History

Published online: 1 October 1992

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Contributors

Authors

W C Brown
Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843.
S Zhao
Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843.
A C Rice-Ficht
Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843.
K S Logan
Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843.
V M Woods
Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note: There is a 3- to 4-day delay in article usage, so article usage will not appear immediately after publication.

Citation counts come from the Crossref Cited by service.

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Figures and Media

Figures

Media

Tables

Share

Share

Share the article link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share on social media

American Society for Microbiology ("ASM") is committed to maintaining your confidence and trust with respect to the information we collect from you on websites owned and operated by ASM ("ASM Web Sites") and other sources. This Privacy Policy sets forth the information we collect about you, how we use this information and the choices you have about how we use such information.
FIND OUT MORE about the privacy policy