INTRODUCTION
The MarR/SlyA family of transcription factors controls an array of biological functions critical to bacterial physiology and survival (
1–5). In the
Enterobacteriaceae family, the DNA binding protein SlyA regulates diverse aspects of virulence (reviewed in reference
6). SlyA originally was identified in
Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium for its ability to induce hemolytic and cytotoxic phenotypes when overexpressed in
Escherichia coli (
7,
8). Since then, in
S. Typhimurium, SlyA has been implicated in facilitating intracellular survival within professional macrophages (
7,
9), contributing to cell envelope modification (
10), and conferring resistance to antimicrobial peptides and oxidative stress (
11,
12). Meanwhile, in
E. coli, SlyA contributes to virulence differently by inducing a hemolytic phenotype (
13), facilitating the synthesis of a virulence antigen (
14,
15), and contributing to type 1 fimbriation (
16). The role of SlyA in the human pathogen
Shigella, however, has not been described despite the identification of a
slyA gene (
8) and the high amino acid identity that SlyA shares with SlyA proteins found in closely related organisms (
Table 1).
Shigella flexneri is closely related to both
Salmonella spp. and
E. coli. It carries a large (∼220-kb) virulence plasmid responsible for the invasive and virulent nature of this organism. Encoded on the large virulence plasmid is VirB, a transcriptional regulator essential to
Shigella virulence. VirB functions to counteract the repression of virulence gene promoters mediated by H-NS (
17–19), a histone-like nucleoid structuring protein that prevents the inappropriate expression of horizontally acquired genes (reviewed in reference
20). As a derepressor, VirB binds to promoters to facilitate the rearrangement of the H-NS–DNA nucleoprotein complex to ultimately upregulate transcription. This regulatory activity is a common feature of an emerging group of proteins that do not behave as traditional transcriptional activators; instead, they function solely to alleviate H-NS-mediated repression by remodeling the nucleoprotein complex (
20). SlyA is included in this group of proteins, because for most SlyA-regulated promoters characterized so far, SlyA binds to target promoters to counteract repression mediated by H-NS to facilitate the transcription of virulence genes (
11,
16,
21–25).
Included in the SlyA regulon is
slyA itself, the promoter of which is positively autoregulated in
E. coli (
14) and negatively autoregulated in
S. Typhimurium (
26). This promoter also has been shown to be positively regulated by the PhoP response regulator of the PhoP/PhoQ two-component system in
S. Typhimurium (
10,
11). Meanwhile, H-NS negatively regulates the orthologous
rovA promoter in
Yersinia pseudotuberculosis (
27) but has no effect on the
slyA promoter in
E. coli (
14). The intricate regulation of
slyA and its downstream targets is critical to many virulence features identified thus far in
E. coli and
S. Typhimurium; however, the regulation of
slyA in
Shigella and its role in virulence remain undetermined.
Here, we provide the first characterization of SlyA in Shigella. We describe three major aspects of slyA: the regulation and activity of the slyA promoter, the effect of exogenous slyA expression on Shigella virulence phenotypes and gene regulation, and a novel SlyA-dependent role in acid resistance. Overall, our study characterizes an important transcriptional regulator in S. flexneri and uncovers a novel role for SlyA in acid resistance, a virulence feature that is essential for the successful pathogenesis of the bacterium.
DISCUSSION
The SlyA transcriptional regulator has been demonstrated to be an important virulence factor in several enteric bacteria (reviewed in reference
6); however, prior to this study it had not been studied in the human pathogen
Shigella. Here, we describe three significant features of
slyA in
S. flexneri: (i) the regulation of the
slyA promoter, (ii)
Shigella virulence phenotypes and promoters regulated by the exogenous expression of
slyA, and (iii) the requirement of SlyA in acid resistance. Overall, our characterization of
slyA and the regulator it encodes uncovers some interesting parallels between
E. coli,
Salmonella, and
Shigella and also reveals a novel and unique role for SlyA in
Shigella virulence.
Our characterization of the
S. flexneri slyA promoter revealed that certain aspects of its regulation were more similar to the less conserved
S. Typhimurium
slyA promoter (68% identical) than the highly conserved
E. coli slyA promoter (99% identical). Specifically, this was demonstrated by our observations that the
S. flexneri slyA promoter activity is (i) maximal during stationary phase (
Fig. 2A), (ii) negatively autoregulated (
Fig. 2A), and (iii) positively regulated by PhoP (
Fig. 3A). Our finding that PhoP regulates the
slyA promoter in
S. flexneri adds another member to the PhoP/Q regulon, which previously had consisted of a single virulence plasmid-carried operon (
shf-wabB-virK-msbB2) that encodes enzymes involved in bacterial cell wall biosynthesis (
33,
57). Interestingly, although the
slyA promoter in both
S. Typhimurium and
S. flexneri has been shown to be regulated by PhoP (
10 and
11 and
Fig. 3A, respectively), the
slyA transcript has not been identified in genomic approaches attempting to characterize the PhoP/Q regulons in
S. Typhimurium (
22,
58,
59). This apparent discrepancy may be explained by the different experimental conditions and approaches used in these studies (i.e., promoter activity versus mRNA levels) or the possibility that posttranscriptional regulation or modification of
slyA mRNA in
S. Typhimurium and possibly
S. flexneri exists. This will be the subject of future investigations in our laboratory. The observation that the regulation of the
slyA promoter in
S. flexneri is similar to that in
S. Typhimurium but different from that in
E. coli is intriguing, since
Shigella species diverged from
E. coli after
E. coli and
Salmonella had diverged from their common ancestor. Pondering this evolutionary paradox, one can posit that the similar regulation of
slyA in
S. flexneri and
S. Typhimurium proves advantageous because of their common intracellular lifestyle. Future examination of the
S. flexneri SlyA regulon will reveal if there is any support for this idea.
SlyA is a well-characterized transcriptional regulator of virulence-associated promoters in closely related organisms (reviewed in reference
6); therefore, the role of SlyA in
Shigella virulence-associated phenotypes was investigated. Surprisingly, our data demonstrated that in the absence of
virB, the exogenous expression of
slyA could restore Congo red binding to
S. flexneri (
Fig. 4). We determined that this phenotype was due, at least in part, to SlyA upregulating genes encoding the type three secretion apparatus (i.e.,
mxiC-lacZ) (
Fig. 5A), a process known to lead to Congo red binding. In addition, the exogenous expression of
slyA could upregulate the
icsP promoter in the absence of
virB (
Fig. 5B) but not the VirB-independent
icsA promoter (data not shown), suggesting SlyA functions to compensate for the lack of VirB when expressed at high levels. The mechanistically intriguing effect of SlyA on VirB-dependent promoters could be caused by (i) SlyA binding to VirB binding sites, (ii) SlyA binding to degenerate SlyA binding sites, (iii) SlyA decreasing intracellular H-NS protein levels, or (iv) some combination thereof. While we acknowledge that high levels of SlyA in these particular assays are responsible for the regulatory effects observed, these findings highlight the relative plasticity of the regulatory networks controlling virulence; if
virB is lost or inactivated, simply increasing SlyA levels through the mutation of its promoter could restore some virulence gene expression and phenotypes. This is especially interesting because
virB has been shown to be deleted or otherwise inactivated at high frequency when serially passaged at 37°C (
60). To our knowledge, our finding that SlyA can compensate for the loss of VirB is the first of its kind to suggest that one derepressor of H-NS-mediated repression compensates for the loss of another. In light of these findings, it is interesting that other derepressors of H-NS-mediated repression have the potential to serve this kind of back-up role when a gene encoding the usual cognate transcriptional regulator is lost or mutated.
Our finding that SlyA is essential for acid resistance in
S. flexneri is the first to demonstrate that SlyA is required for this crucial virulence phenotype in enterics. The acid resistance controlled by SlyA may have remained uncharacterized to this point, because attributes of
Shigella virulence most commonly are studied in nongastrointestinal (GI) tract models: the Sereny test, which is a conjunctivitis model in mouse; the rabbit ileal loop model, where shigellae are artificially introduced into a closed-off segment of the ileum, thereby bypassing migration through the upper GI tract; and/or
in vitro tissue culture assays. None of these assays examine events that lead to the successful passage of shigellae through the stomach, and this may explain why critical factors like SlyA, which promote acid resistance, have not been identified. This is unfortunate, since acid resistance is arguably one of the most critical virulence determinants in
Shigella spp., because it has been correlated (
32,
50,
51) to the extremely low infectious dose of this pathogen (10 to 100 cells) (
61). Therefore, our finding that SlyA is essential for acid resistance in
S. flexneri constitutes a novel and significant finding in
S. flexneri pathogenesis and raises the possibility that SlyA plays an important role in determining the infectious dose of this highly infectious enteric organism.
In summary, we have characterized three major aspects of slyA in S. flexneri. Our study highlights unexpected similarities between the S. flexneri and S. Typhimurium slyA promoters. We describe an unprecedented relationship between two derepressors of H-NS-mediated repression, SlyA and VirB, and discuss possible implications of our findings. Moreover, we emphasize the importance of SlyA in acid resistance. This is a virulence role not previously demonstrated for SlyA but is one that is likely to be essential for the pathogenesis of this pathogen. Clearly, one important future direction of this work will be to identify genes of the S. flexneri SlyA regulon and specifically those that are responsible for the acid resistance phenotype, which has been described for the first time in this work.