Research Article
12 August 2015

Protection against Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli by Non-Genetically Modified Organism Receptor Mimic Bacterial Ghosts

ABSTRACT

Shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli (STEC) causes severe gastrointestinal infections in humans that may lead to life-threatening systemic sequelae, such as the hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). Rapid diagnosis of STEC infection early in the course of disease opens a window of opportunity for therapeutic intervention, for example, by administration of agents that neutralize Shiga toxin (Stx) in the gut lumen. We previously developed a recombinant bacterium that expresses a mimic of the Stx receptor globotriaosyl ceramide (Gb3) on its surface through modification of the lipopolysaccharide (A. W. Paton, R. Morona, and J. C. Paton, Nat Med 6:265–270, 2000, https://doi.org/10.1038/73111). This construct was highly efficacious in vivo, protecting mice from otherwise fatal STEC disease, but the fact that it is a genetically modified organism (GMO) has been a barrier to clinical development. In the present study, we have overcome this issue by development of Gb3 receptor mimic bacterial ghosts (BGs) that are not classified as GMOs. Gb3-BGs neutralized Stx1 and Stx2 in vitro with high efficiency, whereas alternative Gb3-expressing non-GMO subbacterial particles (minicells and outer membrane blebs) were ineffective. Gb3-BGs were highly efficacious in a murine model of STEC disease. All mice (10/10) treated with Gb3-BGs survived challenge with a highly virulent O113:H21 STEC strain and showed no pathological signs of renal injury. In contrast, 6/10 mice treated with control BGs succumbed to STEC challenge, and survivors exhibited significant weight loss, neutrophilia, and histopathological evidence of renal damage. Thus, Gb3-BGs offer a non-GMO approach to treatment of STEC infection in humans, particularly in an outbreak setting.

INTRODUCTION

Shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli (STEC) causes diarrhea and hemorrhagic colitis in humans, which can be complicated by life-threatening systemic sequelae, such as the hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) (14). Infection is principally food-borne, and modern large-scale food production and distribution practices leave the community vulnerable to massive outbreaks of STEC disease, such as that which occurred in Europe (principally northern Germany) in 2011 (5). Both the severe gastrointestinal symptoms and the systemic complications associated with STEC infections are caused principally by Shiga toxin (Stx), which is a sine qua non of virulence. During infections, STEC colonizes the gut and releases Stx into the gut lumen; the STEC does not invade the gut mucosa to any significant extent, but toxin is absorbed into the circulation and targets tissues, such as the microvasculature of the gut, kidneys, and brain, which display the appropriate glycolipid receptor (4, 6).
Development of rapid and sensitive methods for early diagnosis of STEC infection has created a window of opportunity for therapeutic intervention. Indeed, STEC infection may be detected up to a week before onset of HUS (4, 7). Furthermore, increased awareness during major outbreaks will result in more patients presenting during the prodromal stage. Contacts of persons with proven or suspected STEC infection also could be treated. Unfortunately, antibiotic therapy is contraindicated for STEC infection, because it increases free Stx in the gut lumen, probably by inducing toxin gene expression (4, 8). Thus, adsorption or neutralization of Stx in the gut is a potentially important alternative therapeutic strategy. STEC strains associated with human disease produce one or more of the recognized types of Stx (Stx1, Stx2, Stx2c, and Stx2d). Although they differ in amino acid sequence, all of these Stx types recognize the same receptor, globotriaosyl ceramide (Gb3), which has the structure Galα[1→4]Galβ[1→4]Glc-ceramide (6). We have previously exploited this specificity to develop a recombinant bacterium expressing a mimic of the Gb3 oligosaccharide on its surface (9). This involved insertion of a plasmid carrying two Neisseria galactosyl transferase genes, lgtC and lgtE (10), in a derivative of E. coli R1 (CWG308), which has a waaO mutation in the outer core lipopolysaccharide (LPS) biosynthesis locus such that a truncated LPS core terminating in glucose (Glc) is produced (11). Expression of lgtC and lgtE resulted in the linkage of Galα[1→4]Galβ[1→4] onto the terminal Glc, generating a chimeric LPS terminating in an exact mimic of the Stx receptor Gb3 (9). This presents a high-density array of receptor mimics on the bacterial surface, each capable of lateral diffusion in the fluid outer membrane to optimize docking with the Stx B subunit pentamer. This bacterium adsorbed and neutralized Stx1, Stx2, Stx2c, and Stx2d with very high efficiency in vitro (1 mg dry weight could neutralize over 100 μg of purified toxin). Moreover, oral administration of the bacterium was 100% protective in a mouse model of STEC-induced renal damage (9). Oral administration of this novel agent to individuals diagnosed with, or at risk of, STEC infection has the potential to adsorb and neutralize free Stx in the gut lumen, thereby preventing absorption of toxin and the concomitant life-threatening systemic sequelae associated with STEC disease.
Notwithstanding the therapeutic potential of the live receptor mimic bacterium, the fact that it is a genetically modified organism (GMO) has been a barrier to its use in humans, even though no other effective treatments for STEC infection are available. The present study seeks to overcome this roadblock by using bacterial ghost (BG) technology (12). BGs are empty, nonliving bacterial envelopes of Gram-negative bacteria produced by controlled expression of the cloned bacteriophage PhiX174 gene E. This forms a lysis tunnel structure within the envelope of the bacteria, expelling cytoplasmic contents but leaving the cell envelope, including the inner and outer membrane structure, intact. In the present study, we have constructed BG derivatives of E. coli CWG308 expressing the globotriose epitope and examined their capacity to neutralize Stx and protect mice from otherwise fatal challenge with virulent STEC. We also examined the Stx neutralization capacity of subbacterial particles (minicells and outer membrane blebs), as these might provide an alternative non-GMO therapeutic delivery platform.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and plasmids.

Strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. All E. coli strains were routinely grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium with or without 1.5% Bacto agar.
TABLE 1
TABLE 1 Bacterial strains and plasmids
Strain/plasmidDescriptionSource or reference
Plasmids  
    pK184Cloning vector29
    pGb3pK184 carrying cloned Neisseria lgtC and lgtE genes9
    pAWJCarries lysis gene E from bacteriophage PhiX17417
E. coli strains  
    CWG308waaO mutant of E. coli R111
    97MW1SRStreptomycin-resistant derivative of O113:H21 STEC expressing Stx29
    CB168O111:H− STEC producing Stx118
    C600ΔwaaOBE. coli C600 with waaOB deleted13
    C600ΔwaaOBΔlppC600ΔwaaOB with lpp deletedThis study
    C600ΔwaaOBΔompAC600ΔwaaOB with ompA deletedThis study
    C600ΔwaaOBΔlppΔmsbBC600ΔwaaOB with lpp and msbB deletedThis study
    C600ΔwaaOBΔlppΔmsbB attλ::ParaB-lpp ΔompAC600ΔwaaOB with lpp, msbB, and ompA deleted and lpp under the control of arabinose promoterThis study
    C600ΔwaaOBΔlppΔmsbB attλ::ParaB-lpp ΔaraBADΔompAC600ΔwaaOB with lpp, msbB, araBAD, and ompA deleted and lpp under the control of arabinose promoter (conditional blebbing strain)This study
    C600ΔwaaOBΔlppΔmsbB attλ::ParaB-lpp ΔaraBADΔompA/pGb3Conditional blebbing strain expressing the Stx receptor mimic Gb3This study
    C600ΔwaaOBΔminBΔmsbBC600ΔwaaOB with the minB operon and msbB deleted, minicell-producing strainThis study
    C600ΔwaaOBΔminBΔmsbB/pGb3Minicell-producing strain expressing the Stx receptor mimic Gb3This study

Preparation of Gb3-mimic minicells and blebs.

Minicell- and bleb-shedding host strains were constructed in the E. coli C600ΔwaaOB strain, which, like CWG308, has a truncated LPS core terminating in Glc (13). For the generation of minicells (14), the minB operon (consisting of the minC, minD, and minE genes) and the msbB gene were deleted using the method described by Datsenko and Wanner (15); PCR primers used for mutagenesis are listed in Table 2. The mutations were verified by PCR and DNA sequencing, and the confirmed minicell-producing strain was designated the C600ΔwaaOBΔminBΔmsbB strain.
TABLE 2
TABLE 2 PCR primers used in construction of blebbing and minicell-producing strains
Primer nameSequencea (5′–3′)
lpp-FRTKm-FACTTGTAACGCTACATGGAGATTAACTCAATCTAGAGGGTATTAATAATGTTAACCCTCACTAAAGGGCG
lpp-FRTKm-RGTGCGCCATTTTTCACTTCACAGGTACTATTACTTGCGGTATTTAGTAGCAATACGACTCACTATAGGGC
msbB-FRTKm-FCGCTACACTATCACCAGATTGATTTTTGCCTTATCCGAAACTGGAAAAGCATGTTAACCCTCACTAAAGGGCG
msbB-FRTKm-RGCGAAGGCCTCTCCTCGCGAGAGGCTTTTTTATTTGATGGGATAAAGATCAATACGACTCACTATAGGGC
lppNdeI-FCATATGAAAGCTACTAAACTGGTA
lppXmaI-RCCCGGGTTACTTGCGGTATTTAGT
pLAKm-FRTCm-FCCGCAAAAATTAAAAATGAAGTTTTGACGGTATCGAACCCCAGAGTCCCGGTGTAGGCTGGAGCTGCTTC
pLAKm-FRTCm-RATGCTTCAATAATCTAGTGGATCAAGAGACAGGATGAGGATCGTTTCGCACATATGAATATCCTCCTTAG
araBAD-FRTCm-FGCAACTCTCTACTGTTTCTCCATACCCGTTTTTTTGGATGGAGTGAAACGGTGTAGGCTGGAGCTGCTTC
araBAD-FRTCm-RTTCGTTTGATTGGCTGTGGTTTTATACAGTCATTACTGCCCGTAATATGCCATATGAATATCCTCCTTAG
ompA-FRTCm-FCTCGTTGGAGATATTCATGGCGTATTTTGGATGATAACGAGGCGCAAAAAGTGTAGGCTGGAGCTGCTTC
ompA-FRTCm-RGCAGCGGGGTTTTTCTACCAGACGAGAACTTAAGCCTGCGGCTGAGTTACCATATGAATATCCTCCTTAG
minC-FRTKm-FATCATCGCGCGCTGGCGATGATTAATAGCTAATTGAGTAAGGCCAGGATGTTAACCCTCACTAAAGGGCG
minE-FRTKm-RTTGAAGATAAATGCGCTTTTACAGCGGGCTTATTTCAGCTCTTCTGCTTCAATACGACTCACTATAGGGC
a
Restriction sites are underlined.
A conditional blebbing strain was constructed by first deleting lpp and msbB in the E. coli C600ΔwaaOB strain (15). The lpp gene then was integrated into the chromosome of the C600ΔwaaOBΔlppΔmsbB strain under the control of the arabinose-inducible promoter ParaB using the CRIM plasmid method described by Haldimann and Wanner (16). The genes encoding the enzymes responsible for the utilization of arabinose (araBAD) and ompA subsequently were deleted in this strain. The genotype of the final strain C600ΔwaaOBΔlppΔmsbB attλ::ParaB-lpp ΔaraBADΔompA was verified by PCR and DNA sequencing. The minicell and conditional blebbing host strains then were transformed with pGb3.
Minicells for use in toxin neutralization assays were isolated by diluting an overnight culture of the C600ΔwaaOBΔminBΔmsbB:pGb3 strain 1:50 in LB broth supplemented with 0.1 mM isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and 200 μg/ml kanamycin and incubating at 37°C with shaking for 5 h. Whole cells were removed by sequential centrifugation at 3,900 × g for 15 min at 4°C. Minicells were harvested by centrifugation at 15,000 × g for 1 h at 4°C and purified by sequential sucrose density gradient centrifugation. The minicell phenotype was confirmed by scanning electron microscopy, and the purity of the isolated minicells was determined by fluorescence microscopy.
Blebs were isolated from the C600ΔwaaOBΔlppΔmsbB attλ::ParaB-lppΔompA:pGb3 strain for use in toxin neutralization assays after growth in LB broth supplemented with 0.2% l-arabinose, 0.1 mM IPTG, and 200 μg/ml kanamycin, where appropriate, at 37°C with shaking until an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of ∼0.4 was reached. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 3,900 × g for 15 min and were resuspended in the original volume of prewarmed LB broth supplemented with 0.2% glucose, 0.1 mM IPTG, and 200 μg/ml kanamycin where appropriate, and it was incubated for an additional 6 h at 37°C with shaking. Whole cells were removed by two rounds of centrifugation at 3,900 × g for 15 min. Blebs were isolated from the supernatant by centrifugation at 150,000 × g for 3 h at 4°C. The supernatant was carefully removed, and the pellet containing blebs was washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) before a second centrifugation at 120,000 × g for 30 min at 4°C.

Construction of BGs.

Production of BGs was carried out according to Langemann et al. (12). BGs were prepared from E. coli CWG308:pK184 (for control BG) or CWG308:pGb3 (for Gb3 BG); pGb3 is a pK184 derivative with cloned Neisseria lgtC and lgtE genes, directing expression of the Gb3-mimic LPS on the cell surface (9). Both E. coli strains were transformed with lysis plasmid pAWJ (17) carrying the lysis gene E from bacteriophage PhiX174 under a temperature-inducible promoter/repressor system and a tetracycline resistance cassette. Bacteria were grown in animal-free LB medium supplemented with tetracycline (10 μg/ml) and kanamycin (50 μg/ml) until mid-logarithmic phase, followed by E-lysis induction via temperature upshift from 35°C to 42°C. After inactivation with β-propiolactone (BPL) and washing with deionized water, the BGs were lyophilized, weighed, and stored at room temperature. Prior to use, BGs were resuspended in PBS (for in vitro toxin neutralization) or 10% sucrose, 10% NaHCO3 (for in vivo studies) at the indicated density, using three 30-s pulses at 6,000 rpm in a Precellys 24 homogenizer (Bertin Technologies).

Toxin neutralization assay.

The capacity to neutralize Stx was determined by incubating BG, minicell, bleb, or live bacterial suspensions with various concentrations of purified Stx2 or a crude lysate of the Stx1-producing STEC strain CB168 (18) in a final volume of 700 μl of PBS for 1 h at 37°C with gentle agitation. The mixtures then were centrifuged and the supernatants were filter sterilized. Cytotoxicity of the supernatant fraction then was assayed using Vero (African green monkey kidney) cells, which are highly susceptible to all Stx-related toxins (4). Serial 2-fold dilutions were prepared in tissue culture medium (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 2 mM l-glutamine, 50 IU/ml penicillin, and 50 μg/ml streptomycin). Fifty microliters of each dilution was transferred onto washed Vero cell monolayers in 96-well tissue culture trays, and after 30 min of incubation at 37°C, a further 150 μl of culture medium was added to each well. Cells were examined microscopically after 72 h of incubation at 37°C and scored for cytotoxicity. The endpoint Stx titer (cytotoxic doses [CD] per milliliter) was defined as the reciprocal of the highest dilution resulting in cytotoxicity in at least 10% of the cells in a given monolayer. The percentage of Stx adsorbed/neutralized was calculated using the formula 100 − (100 × CDBG/CDPBS), where CDBG is the Stx titer in the extracts incubated with the BGs (or other subbacterial particles) and CDPBS is the Stx titer in the respective Stx extract treated only with PBS.

In vivo studies.

Animal experimentation was approved by the University of Adelaide Animal Ethics Committee. The streptomycin-treated mouse model of STEC-induced renal injury has been described previously (19, 20). Two groups of 10 BALB/c female mice were given 5 mg/ml streptomycin in drinking water for 24 h before oral challenge with 108 CFU of streptomycin-resistant STEC 97MW1 (9) suspended in 50 μl of 10% sucrose, 10% NaHCO3. Mice then were given oral doses of 10 mg control BG or Gb3 BG suspended in 75 μl of 10% sucrose and 10% NaHCO3, twice daily for up to 12 days, commencing approximately 30 min after STEC challenge. All STEC and BG doses were administered by micropipette into the mouth and swallowed voluntarily. Oral streptomycin (5 mg/ml) in drinking water was continued throughout the experiment. The numbers of 97MW1 were monitored in fecal samples from two representative mice from each group 2 days and 10 days after challenge. These fecal samples were homogenized and serially diluted in PBS and then plated onto LB agar supplemented with 50 μg/ml streptomycin. Mice were weighed daily, and the survival times of mice in each group also were recorded. Animals were euthanized if they became moribund, were exhibiting signs of distress, or had greater than 15% weight loss. The difference in survival rate between groups was analyzed using the Fisher exact test. Kidneys also were removed from mice that succumbed to challenge for histological examination, as well as from surviving mice at the end of the experiment (day 12). Blood samples were collected on day 12 from surviving mice for hematological and biochemical analyses.

RESULTS

In vitro Stx neutralization by BGs.

The capacity of BGs derived from CWG308:pK184 (control BG) and CWG308:pGb3 (Gb3 BG) to neutralize crude Stx1 extracts or purified Stx2 was compared with that of the respective live cell suspensions. In a preliminary experiment, 12 mg BG or live cell suspension was mixed with 100 μl of CB168 lysate in a final volume of 700 μl PBS, and the cytotoxicity of filtered supernatants was assayed as described in Materials and Methods. The undiluted CB168 lysate had an Stx1 cytotoxicity titer of approximately 3.3 × 106 CD/ml. Gb3 BG neutralized 99.6% of this cytotoxicity, compared with 99.9% neutralization for live CWG308:pGb3 cells. No neutralization of Stx1 whatsoever was detected using control BG or CWG308:pK184 cells.
The neutralization capacities of BGs and whole cells then were compared using purified Stx2. Serial dilutions of control BG and Gb3 BG suspensions, as well as the respective live cell suspensions, were incubated with 50 μg purified Stx2 (specific cytotoxicity of 2,300 CD/μg) in a final volume of 700 μl PBS, and the cytotoxicity of filtered supernatants was determined after incubation as before. No neutralization of Stx2 was detected using either control BG or CWG308:pK184 cell suspensions. However, for Gb3 BG, neutralization ranged from 99.6% at 4 μg Stx2 per mg BG to 87.5% at 32 μg Stx2 per mg BG. For live CWG308:pGb3 cells, neutralization ranged from 99.8% at 4 μg Stx2 per mg cells to 98.4% at 32 μg Stx2 per mg cells (Table 3).
TABLE 3
TABLE 3 In vitro Stx2 neutralization by Gb3 BGs
Toxin dose (μg Stx2 per mg BG/cells)Stx2 neutralization (%) for:
Gb3 BGCWG308:pGb3 live cells
499.699.8
899.299.8
1696.899.6
3287.598.4

In vitro Stx neutralization by minicells and blebs.

The capacity of minicells and outer membrane blebs prepared from Gb3 mimic-expressing E. coli strains to neutralize purified Stx2 also was examined (Table 4). Although significant neutralization of Stx2 was observed for the whole-cell suspensions from the respective Gb3-expressing minicell- and bleb-shedding strains, no significant toxin neutralization was observed for the isolated Gb3-minicell or Gb3-bleb preparations.
TABLE 4
TABLE 4 Neutralization of Stx2 by whole cells, minicells, and blebsa
Strain–preparationStx2 titer% Neutralization
C600ΔwaaOBwhole cells16,384 
C600ΔwaaOB/pGb3whole cells51296.9
C600ΔwaaOBΔminBΔmsbBwhole cells16,384 
C600ΔwaaOBΔminBΔmsbB/pGb3whole cells1,02493.75
C600ΔwaaOBΔminBΔmsbBminicells16,384 
C600ΔwaaOΔminBΔmsbB/pGb3minicells16,3840
C600ΔwaaOBΔlppΔompAΔmsbBΔaraBAD attλ::Paralppwhole cells16,384 
C600ΔwaaOBΔlppΔompAΔmsbBΔaraBAD attλ::Paralpp/pGb3whole cells4,09675
C600ΔwaaOBΔlppΔompAΔmsbBΔaraBAD attλ::Paralppblebs16,384 
C600ΔwaaOBΔlppΔompAΔmsbBΔaraBAD attλ::Paralpp/pGb3blebs16,3840
C600ΔwaaOBΔlppΔompAΔmsbBΔaraBAD attλ::ParaompAwhole cells16,384 
C600ΔwaaOBΔlppΔompAΔmsbBΔaraBAD attλ::ParaompA/pGb3whole cells1,02493.75
C600ΔwaaOBΔlppΔompAΔmsbBΔaraBAD attλ::ParaompAblebs16,384 
C600ΔwaaOBΔlppΔompAΔmsbBΔaraBAD attλ::ParaompA/pGb3blebs8,19250
CWG308–fresh whole cells16,384 
CWG308:pGb3–fresh whole cells6499.6
a
Aliquots of whole cell/minicell/bleb suspensions (0.5 mg dry weight equivalent) were incubated with 10 μg purified Stx2 in a final volume of 0.7 ml PBS for 60 min with gentle rocking at room temperature. Suspensions then were centrifuged (at high speed), and filter-sterilized supernatant was serially diluted and assayed for Stx2 activity on Vero cell monolayers. Endpoint Stx2 titers were determined microscopically at 72 h. Freshly prepared CWG308 and CWG308:pGb3 cells also were tested as additional positive and negative controls. Percent Stx2 neutralization was determined by comparing Stx2 titers for a given Gb3-expressing preparation (whole cells, minicells, or blebs) and the respective preparation from control cells.

In vivo protection from lethal STEC challenge.

In view of the inability of Gb3-minicells and Gb3-blebs to neutralize sufficient Stx2 in vitro, animal studies were conducted only with BGs. The streptomycin-treated mouse model was used to assess protective efficacy against lethal challenge with the highly virulent O113:H21 STEC strain 97MW1, which carries three stx2 genes. Groups of 10 mice were challenged with 97MW1 and then treated orally with 10 mg Gb3 BG or control BG twice daily for 12 days (see Materials and Methods). Examination of fecal pellets from two mice from each group on days 3 and 11 confirmed stable gut colonization by 97MW1 at approximately 4 × 108 CFU per g feces for both groups. All 10 mice in the Gb3 BG group were alive and well at the end of the experiment (day 12). However, 6 of the 10 mice treated with control BG succumbed to the STEC challenge (Fig. 1). The difference in overall survival rate between groups is highly significant (P = 0.0059). Moreover, unlike the Gb3 BG group, the four surviving mice in the control BG group were clearly sick, with dull, ruffled fur, hunched appearance, and reluctance to move freely. There also was a significant difference in body weight between the two groups by the end of the experiment (Fig. 2). The mean body weight of the Gb3 BG group increased steadily during the experiment from 15.5 g on day 1 to approximately 17.3 g on day 12. In contrast, the control BG group maintained or slightly increased body weight until day 5 and then steadily lost weight, and by day 12, the mean weight of the four surviving mice had dropped to below 14 g, approaching the threshold for euthanasia. The difference in body weight between the two groups reached statistical significance on days 6, 7, and 8 (P < 0.05), as well as on days 11 and 12 (P < 0.02).
FIG 1
FIG 1 Survival curve showing in vivo protective efficacy of Gb3 BG. Streptomycin-treated mice were challenged with STEC 97MW1 and then treated twice daily with 10 mg control BG or Gb3 BG, as described in Materials and Methods. Mice were weighed daily, and the survival times of mice in each group (n = 10 per group) also were recorded. An asterisk indicates significant difference in survival rates between groups (P = 0.0059) by Fisher exact test.
FIG 2
FIG 2 Treatment with Gb3 BG prevents STEC-induced weight loss. Data are weights of STEC-challenged mice (means ± standard errors of the means) for the groups of mice from Fig. 1 treated with control BG or Gb3 BG. Significant differences between control BG and Gb3 BG groups are indicated: *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.02 (unpaired 2-tailed t test).
Blood films collected on day 12 from all of the surviving mice showed evidence of leukocytosis in three of the four surviving control BG mice, unlike the case for the Gb3 BG group (Fig. 3). Differential cell counts showed that these three control BG mice had marked neutrophilia (Fig. 4), a typical feature of Stx2 intoxication in murine models (21) and human cases of HUS (22). Blood samples also were tested for plasma urea and creatinine as a measure of renal function. Unfortunately, insufficient specimen remained for the three control BG mice that had neutrophilia, but the remaining control BG mouse had higher urea and creatinine levels than any of the 10 Gb3 BG mice (Fig. 4).
FIG 3
FIG 3 Blood films from STEC-challenged mice treated with control BG or Gb3 BG. Blood was collected from surviving mice on day 12, and films were examined microscopically after Giemsa staining. (Upper) Low-power field showing leukocytosis in control BG-treated mice (A) and Gb3 BG-treated mice (B). (Lower) High-power field showing neutrophilia in control BG-treated mice (C) and Gb3 BG-treated mice (D).
FIG 4
FIG 4 Analysis of day 12 blood samples. Blood samples from all 10 Gb3 BG-treated mice and the four surviving control BG mice were examined by differential cell count (A); plasma urea (B) and creatinine (C) also were determined. Data for individual mice are shown; an asterisk denotes insufficient sample for analysis.
Histological examination of kidneys collected at the time of euthanasia from four of the mice in the control BG group that succumbed to STEC challenge (euthanized on day 7 or 8) showed extensive evidence of necrosis in renal tubules and glomeruli. There also was glomerular capillary collapse and formation of microthrombi, as well as interstitial hemorrhage in the renal cortex. A representative example is shown in Fig. 5B. In the four control BG mice that were still alive on day 12, albeit with signs of morbidity, kidney tissue showed blood congestion in the glomeruli, swelling of tubular epithelial cells (some showing nuclear fading, suggesting cell death), and extensive interstitial hemorrhage (Fig. 5C). In contrast, kidney tissue appeared normal in all 10 mice in the Gb3 BG group, which were alive and well at the end of the experiment (Fig. 5A). Kidney slides also were scored for the above-described histopathological damage by a blinded observer using a 12-point scheme (Fig. 6). The 10 surviving Gb3 BG mice had a mean score of 0.25, compared with 6.25 for the 4 surviving control BG mice and 10.5 for the 4 euthanized control BG mice. Scores for both control BG groups were significantly higher than those for the Gb3 BG group (P < 0.01 in both cases).
FIG 5
FIG 5 Histopathological analysis of kidneys from STEC-challenged mice. Fixed kidney sections from all of the mice that had survived the experiment on day 12 (i.e., 10 Gb3 BG- and 4 control BG-treated mice), as well as from four of the six control BG-treated mice that were euthanized on day 7 or 8, were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and examined by light microscopy. Representative high-power fields from one mouse from the Gb3 BG group (A), a control BG survivor (B), and a euthanized control BG mouse (C) are shown. Histopathological features were similar within each group (not shown).
FIG 6
FIG 6 Histopathological scores of kidney sections from STEC-challenged mice. Kidney section slides from the 10 surviving Gb3 BG mice, the 4 surviving control BG mice, and 4 of the control BG mice that were euthanized were scored (out of a possible total of 12) using the following scheme: blood congestion in renal glomeruli (score, 1), renal tubular epithelial swelling (score, 1), interstitial hemorrhage (focus-only score, 1; extensive score, 2), sign of cell death in tubular epithelium (focus-only score, 2; extensive score, 4), glomerular capillary collapse and microthrombus formation (focus-only score, 2; extensive score, 4). **, P < 0.01 by Student's unpaired two-tailed t test.

DISCUSSION

Large outbreaks of STEC disease, such as that which occurred in Europe in 2011, have the potential to overwhelm clinical acute care facilities in even the most advanced economies. A feature of the 2011 outbreak was the high proportion of patients who progressed from gastrointestinal disease to systemic complications, such as HUS, and the higher than usual mortality (5, 23). While the etiological agent had an atypical genetic background (enteroaggregative E. coli O104:H4), it expressed the same phage-encoded toxin (Stx2) as classical O157:H7 enterohemorrhagic and other STEC strains associated with severe human disease. The early administration of agents capable of neutralizing Stx in the gut lumen would very likely have reduced the severity of gastrointestinal disease and prevented progression to HUS in many cases. However, no such agents were approved for human use at the time (23).
We have previously reported that oral administration of recombinant E. coli expressing a molecular mimic of the oligosaccharide receptor for Stx is highly protective against otherwise fatal challenge with virulent STEC in a murine model (9). Subsequent studies demonstrated that protection also could be elicited using formalin-killed receptor mimic bacteria and that treatment was still efficacious when commencement was delayed for up to 48 h after STEC challenge (24). Nevertheless, these killed bacteria still contain genomic DNA and do not satisfactorily quell regulatory concerns regarding exposure of humans to GMOs. The use of BG technology is a potential game changer, as BGs are empty shells devoid of cytoplasmic contents (12). Final treatment of BG preparations with BPL ensures sterility and alkylates any residual traces of DNA, leaving it nonfunctional and nonreplicable (25). Thus, unlike previous nonviable derivatives of the receptor mimic constructs, BGs can be classified as non-GMO. In the present study, we demonstrated that unlike Gb3-mimic minicells and blebs, Gb3 BGs bind significant amounts of Stx1 and Stx2 in vitro and are highly efficacious against STEC challenge. All treated mice survived challenge and steadily gained weight, even though the virulent O113:H21 challenge strain was maintained at high levels in the gut throughout the 12-day experiment. In the Gb3 BG-treated mice, pathological findings at the end of the experiment were unremarkable. In contrast, 6/10 control BG-treated mice succumbed to challenge, with the four survivors exhibiting significant weight loss, as well as pathological features consistent with Stx-induced renal damage.
Antibiotic therapy is contraindicated in cases of human STEC infection, owing to the risk of induction of phage stx gene expression by the bacterial SOS response and/or increased release of Stx into the gut lumen due to antibiotic-induced bacterial lysis (26). Management of patients is principally supportive, and early intravenous blood volume expansion is recommended, as it may provide protection against anuric HUS (26). During the 2011 European outbreak, the anti-C5 monoclonal antibody eculizumab, which has been used for treating atypical (non-Stx-related) HUS, was used empirically in some patients but without clear evidence of benefit (26). More encouragingly, intravenous administration of mouse-human chimeric monoclonal antibodies to Stx1 and Stx2 has been shown to protect mice against intraperitoneal injection of purified Stx or oral challenge with Stx2-producing STEC (27). Such antibodies previously have been shown to be safe in phase I clinical trials (28). Notwithstanding their likely efficacy in humans with STEC disease, monoclonal antibody-based therapeutics are likely to be expensive to manufacture on a large scale, and parenteral administration will mandate close clinical supervision. On the other hand, Gb3 BGs are likely to be extremely cheap to produce on a large scale and have a long shelf life, particularly in dried form. This will permit presumptive oral treatment of persons with suspected STEC disease, pending the results of laboratory analysis of stool samples or those deemed to be at high risk of infection, such as close contacts of confirmed cases. This is an important consideration, since early commencement of therapy will be more likely to prevent progression of STEC disease to life-threatening systemic complications.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by program grant 565526 and project grant 1002792 from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) and discovery grant DP120103178 from the Australian Research Council (ARC). A.W.P. is an ARC DORA Fellow; J.C.P. is an NHMRC Senior Principal Research Fellow.
BGs were produced and provided by BIRD-C (www.bird-c.at).

REFERENCES

1.
Karmali MA. 1989. Infection by verocytotoxin-producing E. coli. Clin Microbiol Rev 2:15–38.
2.
Nataro JP, Kaper JB. 1998. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Clin Microbiol Rev 11:142–201.
3.
O'Brien AD, Holmes RK. 1987. Shiga and shiga-like toxins. Microbiol Rev 51:206–220.
4.
Paton JC, Paton AW. 1998. Pathogenesis and diagnosis of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infections. Clin Microbiol Rev 11:450–479.
5.
Frank C, Werber D, Cramer JP, Askar M, Faber M, an der Heiden M, Bernard H, Fruth A, Prager R, Spode A, Wadl M, Zoufaly A, Jordan S, Kemper MJ, Follin P, Müller L, King LA, Rosner B, Buchholz U, Stark K, Krause G, HUS Investigation Team. 2011. Epidemic profile of Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli O104:H4 outbreak in Germany. N Engl J Med 365:1771–1780.
6.
Lingwood CA. 1996. Role of verotoxin receptors in pathogenesis. Trends Microbiol 4:147–153.
7.
Paton AW, Ratcliff R, Doyle RM, Seymour-Murray J, Davos D, Lanser JA, Paton JC. 1996. Molecular microbiological investigation of an outbreak of hemolytic uremic syndrome caused by dry fermented sausage contaminated with Shiga-like toxin-producing Escherichia coli. J Clin Microbiol 34:1622–1627.
8.
Zhang X, McDaniel AD, Wolf LE, Keusch GT, Waldor MK, Acheson DW. 2000. Quinolone antibiotics induce Shiga toxin-encoding bacteriophages, toxin production, and death in mice. J Infect Dis 181:664–670.
9.
Paton AW, Morona R, Paton JC. 2000. A new biological agent for treatment of Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli infections and dysentery in humans. Nat Med 6:265–270.
10.
Gotschlich EC. 1994. Genetic locus for the biosynthesis of the variable portion of Neisseria gonorrhoeae lipopolysaccharide. J Exp Med 180:2181–2190.
11.
Heinrichs DE, Yethon JA, Amor PA, Whitfield C. 1998. The assembly system for the outer core portion of R1- and R4-type lipopolysaccharides of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 273:29497–29505.
12.
Langemann T, Koller VJ, Muhammad A, Kudela P, Mayr UB, Lubitz W. 2010. The Bacterial Ghost platform system: production and applications. Bioeng Bugs 1:326–336.
13.
Pinyon RA, Paton JC, Paton AW, Botten JA, Morona R. 2004. Refinement of a therapeutic Shiga toxin-binding probiotic for human trials. J Infect Dis 189:1547–1555.
14.
de Boer PA, Crossley RE, Rothfield LI. 1989. A division inhibitor and a topological specificity factor coded for by the minicell locus determine proper placement of the division septum in E. coli. Cell 56:641–649.
15.
Datsenko KA, Wanner BL. 2000. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:6640–6645.
16.
Haldimann A, Wanner BL. 2001. Conditional-replication, integration, excision, and retrieval plasmid-host systems for gene structure-function studies of bacteria. J Bacteriol 183:6384–6393.
17.
Jechlinger W, Szostak MP, Witte A, Lubitz W. 1999. Altered temperature induction sensitivity of the lambda pR/cI857 system for controlled gene E expression in Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol Lett 173:347–352.
18.
Paton AW, Beutin L, Paton JC. 1995. Heterogeneity of the amino-acid sequences of Escherichia coli Shiga-like toxin type-I operons. Gene 153:71–74.
19.
Wadolkowski EA, Burris JA, O'Brien AD. 1990. Mouse model for colonization and disease caused by enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. Infect Immun 58:2438–2445.
20.
Paton AW, Bourne AJ, Manning PA, Paton JC. 1995. Comparative toxicity and virulence of Escherichia coli clones expressing variant and chimeric Shiga-like toxin type II operons. Infect Immun 63:2450–2458.
21.
Fernández GC, Rubel C, Dran G, Gómez S, Isturiz MA, Palermo MS. 2000. Shiga toxin-2 induces neutrophilia and neutrophil activation in a murine model of hemolytic uremic syndrome. Clin Immunol 95:227–234.
22.
Robson WL, Fick GH, Wilson PC. 1988. Prognostic factors in typical postdiarrhea hemolytic-uremic syndrome. Child Nephrol Urol 9:203–207.
23.
Karch H, Denamur E, Dobrindt U, Finlay BB, Hengge R, Johannes L, Ron EZ, Tønjum T, Sansonetti PJ, Vicente M. 2012. The enemy within us: lessons from the 2011 European Escherichia coli O104:H4 outbreak. EMBO Mol Med 4:841–848.
24.
Paton JC, Rogers TJ, Morona R, Paton AW. 2001. Oral administration of formalin-killed recombinant bacteria expressing a mimic of the Shiga toxin receptor protects mice from fatal challenge with Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli. Infect Immun 69:1389–1393.
25.
Perrin P, Morgeaux S. 1995. Inactivation of DNA by beta-propiolactone. Biologicals 23:207–211.
26.
Davis TK, McKee R, Schnadower D, Tarr PI. 2013. Treatment of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am 27:577–597.
27.
Melton-Celsa AR, Carvalho HM, Thuning-Roberson C, O'Brien AD. 2015. Protective efficacy and pharmacokinetics of human/mouse chimeric anti-stx1 and anti-stx2 antibodies in mice. Clin Vaccine Immunol 22:448–455.
28.
Bitzan M, Poole R, Mehran M, Sicard E, Brockus C, Thuning-Roberson C, Riviere M. 2009. Safety and pharmacokinetics of chimeric anti-Shiga toxin 1 and anti-Shiga toxin 2 monoclonal antibodies in healthy volunteers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:3081–3087.
29.
Jobling MG, Holmes RK. 1990. Construction of vectors with the p15a replicon, kanamycin resistance, inducible lacZα and pUC18 or pUC19 multiple cloning sites. Nucleic Acids Res 18:5315–5316.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Infection and Immunity
Infection and Immunity
Volume 83Number 9September 2015
Pages: 3526 - 3533
Editor: A. J. Bäumler
PubMed: 26099582

History

Received: 21 May 2015
Returned for modification: 5 June 2015
Accepted: 16 June 2015
Published online: 12 August 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Contributors

Authors

Adrienne W. Paton
Research Centre for Infectious Diseases, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Austen Y. Chen
Research Centre for Infectious Diseases, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Hui Wang
Research Centre for Infectious Diseases, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Lauren J. McAllister
Research Centre for Infectious Diseases, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Florian Höggerl
BIRD-C GmbH & Co. KG, Vienna, Austria
Ulrike Beate Mayr
BIRD-C GmbH & Co. KG, Vienna, Austria
Lucy K. Shewell
Institute for Glycomics, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Southport, Queensland, Australia
Michael P. Jennings
Institute for Glycomics, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Southport, Queensland, Australia
Renato Morona
Research Centre for Infectious Diseases, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Werner Lubitz
BIRD-C GmbH & Co. KG, Vienna, Austria
James C. Paton
Research Centre for Infectious Diseases, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Editor

A. J. Bäumler
Editor

Notes

Address correspondence to James C. Paton, [email protected].

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note:

  • For recently published articles, the TOTAL download count will appear as zero until a new month starts.
  • There is a 3- to 4-day delay in article usage, so article usage will not appear immediately after publication.
  • Citation counts come from the Crossref Cited by service.

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. For an editable text file, please select Medlars format which will download as a .txt file. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share the article link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share on social media

American Society for Microbiology ("ASM") is committed to maintaining your confidence and trust with respect to the information we collect from you on websites owned and operated by ASM ("ASM Web Sites") and other sources. This Privacy Policy sets forth the information we collect about you, how we use this information and the choices you have about how we use such information.
FIND OUT MORE about the privacy policy